TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Street_Pop6248 Archive

View 15 posts and 67 comments by Street_Pop6248 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

I don't agree with this notion. I'd say help people, even if they don't like you.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 04:55 PM
3

So somehow expecting hugs, smooches and basic touch is being mothered.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 04:43 PM
1

Yeah, true. I'm not even going to deny it. I am spiteful about what happened.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 05:15 AM
1

I already messaged them. If they don't respond, I'm messaging them again. I know exactly which mod took it down. So I know who to confront.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 04:48 AM
-1

No, I won't take it down. Let it stay, so other people know about this mod behavior. I'll use modmail later.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 04:16 AM
3

I wasn't degrading women though. I merely said this: I am not sugar coating this. This isn't about minimizing abuse, it is real, it is serious. But it is not as widespread as the feminist narrative will have anyone believe. Feminism exaggerates and sometimes overexaggerates abuse to gain leverage. Whether that leverage be social or political, it has happened, too much. Men have been painted as monsters because of inflated and negative abuse narratives. There I said it.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 04:12 AM
1

How though? Doesn't exaggeration of abuse narratives undermine men? That actually fits rule 1 from what I've read.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 04:01 AM
2

No, I don't think I will. Because none of what I said was bad or even false. Feminism does exaggerate abuse to undermine men. I will feel free to not post this with evidence.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 06:31 PM
4

Women get abused, men get abused. But honestly, not as many women get abused as feminism claims. Also, it isn't that hard to spot red flags. Many women tend to be attracted to red flags.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 02:38 PM
8

I could've gone harder, I just didn't want to be sent to the reddit shadow realm.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 01:51 PM
2

Honestly, I've seen some nasty lies and manipulations from feminist articles. Especially when it comes to statistics. I won't outright shun feminists. But I wouldn't trust everything they say either.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 01:23 PM
2

I won't ignore it. I did say women, but that doesn't stop anyone else from commenting.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 06:50 PM
4

I never identified as feminist. Okay, maybe in elementary and middle school. But as I grew older. I learned it was outright garbage.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 06:46 PM
16

Cause some of them, sound serious.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 06:34 PM
3

W reply. 😭😭😭👍👍
/r/MensRights24/01/26 03:15 PM
1

Rape and beatings that did not happen to all women. Yes they happened, they were not always happening.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 11:30 AM
1

Okay, bye, bye. Have a nice day. Sorry if I frustrated you.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 11:29 AM
4

We're derailing here. The larger point I am making. Is women were not oppressed for centuries.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 11:09 AM
1

Hot peppers are actually something I haven't tried in a while. But women did have legal protections, in fact self defense laws were not gender specific. No matter how badly you try and convince me otherwise. I am not going to validate the claim that women had no legal protections.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 11:07 AM
20

Alot of the oppression narrative arguments and historical sources have been influenced by propaganda in the last few decades. So I generally tend to tune out anything suggesting women or pretty much any other claim of centuries oppression. History isn't that simple.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 10:31 AM
6

I don't think little of women. I'm just an extremely blunt person. I don't beat around the bush. So alot of my opinions come off harsher than necessary
/r/MensRights24/01/26 10:29 AM
7

Check my other response. Because historically everyone was enslaved at some point in time. Men, women, children. I don't see the point you're trying to make.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 10:19 AM
2

Women did have legal protections. And women as a class were not oppressed. I will admit women and men, boys and girls had it hard. Everyone had it hard in ancient times.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 10:17 AM
8

And before I hear a slave argument. Yes slavery is oppression, but the notion that wives were abused universally is false.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:39 AM
6

That does not mean tobacco wives or any wife for that matter was ever abused. Also, on the notion of being sold. Alot of men were sold as slaves and such too in the past. That doesn't automatically equate to any kind of oppression, even gender oppression.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:38 AM
6

Pretty much yes, or to go more in depth. Masses can be gullible when it comes to voting. And that can cause immoral policies to be implemented. It doesn't even have to be women specific. If a politician manages to get the backing of the majority, they get in power. Being in power means they can implement policies that could be immoral.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:36 AM
8

I sincerely doubt not having the right to vote, automatically means any persons life involves abuse, neglect or oppression. Just because you lack political influence doesn't automatically equate to oppression. Even in ancient eras where monarchy was the main form of government. People who did note vote for political influence did not have gender oppression. They still had it hard though, regardless of whether they were man or woman.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:34 AM
6

200 million is absurd and untrue. That's a hefty populational chunk. And why would the man have to care for a child in ancient times. If he had to protect and provide for the entire family. Protecting and providing in those eras. Meant fending off physical danger, working in the hot sun and facing injury or death. I think the roles even out.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:24 AM
3

I will admit openly and honestly that I do not have sources. Because all the sources I once used were either lost or got political influenced. And I'm not going to spend hours scrolling just to find one source to contest you with. So I come clean, I have no sources. But I do know what sources decades ago point to. And they are not the same as what your provided sources claim. If we assume marital rape was a law at some point. That does not automatically mean every woman was raped in her marriage…
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:20 AM
6

What are the validity of these sources? Because not every source is historically accurate.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:00 AM
25

This, this is the best take I have seen thus far.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 08:59 AM
1

Okay, then by that same logic. Giving immoral people voting rights also causes those policies.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 08:58 AM
4

Also, bringing historians into the argument is genuinely flawed to be honest. Most historical sources, digital or not. Were influenced by politics in the last few decades. Your sources don't match up to raw documentation of ancient livelihoods. Peasant classes lived hands on lives, every winter was a harder struggle compared to everyday. And every day was also a struggle depending on how competent the man or woman was in the family. Upper classes, usually called nobles. Had higher education beca…
/r/MensRights24/01/26 08:54 AM
4

An ancient society is not going to waste treasury or tax coin on educating men and boys regardless of status. There were class differences back then. Peasants, regardless of gender were largely illiterate. Nobles or better off families had higher levels of literacy than the peasant class. To argue that men regardless of social status got education. Completely ignores the hierarchial reality of those eras.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 08:51 AM
5

The last thing I'd trust is the world history website. That thing was heavily politics influenced back in 2020-2023. I've read books dating back 30 years ago. The information on them and this source is not the same.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 08:42 AM
7

This is genuinely asinine at this point. Peasant men did not get higher education. Education wasn't free back then, it certainly isn't now.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 08:28 AM
9

Okay, so by that logic boys and men who were not elite. Also lacked higher education.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 08:18 AM
6

Women in Rome were allowed higher education, if they could afford it.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 08:15 AM
8

Voting rights do not really prove anything, that's a point I see getting unused alot. Having voting rights doesn't equate to oppression or lack of oppression.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 08:13 AM
5

Sources, seriously where is this "legally raped and beaten" coming from?
/r/MensRights24/01/26 08:12 AM
15

They did not.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 06:39 AM
13

There is no reality where a group of women are defeating a likely armed group of invading men in ancient times. Even if the women are armed.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 06:39 AM
13

Not true. Women did have conditional voting rights in Rome, less conditional in Egypt, etc etc. Women had property rights as widows and so forth and could participate in politics. Things just had very specific conditions that needed to be met.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 06:31 AM
21

Women did not fight in Sparta or defend the land. Sparta had strict military laws.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 06:20 AM
3

And I'll make it again. After breakfast.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 05:44 AM
7

That was my post.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 05:43 AM
1

I absolutely can make a sweeping statement like that. I did make a sweeping statement like that. I did not say "all women" I said women.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 07:22 PM
15

Not sure whether to believe you or not. As I have had arguments with you in past posts and from what I've seen. You aren't really supportive of many other, also important things concerning men. Also, yeah proclaiming yourself as a feminist, even one allegedly supporting men raises suspicion.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 07:20 PM
0

I very much disagree with that. To assume the vast majority, would just be an assumption of almost everyone. If taken literally.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 06:48 PM
62

I'm a men's rights lurker. I tend to lurk around feminist spaces. Or used to, because alot of their posts became outright garbage, violent or too extreme.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 06:22 PM
8

I don't agree with that. If you have hormonal psychosis, or frankly any psychosis, then seek help. And it absolutely isn't their fault for having hormones. It is absolutely their fault for getting violent.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 05:21 PM
5

Tell that to wives outright verbally mauling their husband's when on their periods, but submitting fully to their bosses.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 05:17 PM
4

Women are irrational on their periods. I've seen wives and girlfriends alike smack and yell and be outright disrespectful on their periods. Stress or no stress, you shouldn't dish out that kind of disrespect. Hormones or no hormones, your internal chaos shouldn't be someone else's chaos.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 04:48 AM
15

No, this isn't about understanding or binary accountability for both genders. The conversation specifically surrounds feminism, weaponization of pain with no perpetrator. Also, to be frank, how women will socially weaponize their own hormones.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 03:22 AM
1

I never said even specifically, that they are the emotionally nurturing parent. I was talking about something very different. You're both twisting words and taking words out of context. Which ironically, is how many bad wives and mother's tend to escalate over time. I did say she bears the responsibility of doing so. But no mother or woman is automatically nurturing by default. And so far, throughout this post. You've only argued from a mother's point of view. Which leaves me suspicious about yo…
/r/MensRights23/01/26 02:56 AM
1

Or mayhaps mother's tend to actually be bad.
/r/MensRights22/01/26 05:08 AM
2

If the mother is proven to be bad, why on earth would she get custody?
/r/MensRights21/01/26 10:13 AM
3

Utterly ludicrous. The parent best suited or more competent must be granted primary custody. I know there's this "men are abusive" narrative nonsense. But I've seen way more mother's hurt kids than father's.
/r/MensRights21/01/26 04:33 AM
2

Well what you don't want to happen is already happening. It is already a hierarchy of pain, with men at the bitty bottom.
/r/MensRights07/01/26 06:43 AM
3

I can actually get behind this as support it. Because that is the actual truth of history as we know it. Not what feminism claims it is.
/r/MensRights07/01/26 06:12 AM
3

My personal opinion, is that abuse exists in every era. But it doesn't occur in collectives of people. Media portrayals of abuse almost exclusively favor male abusers. There is rarely ever talk about male hardship or male victims.
/r/MensRights07/01/26 06:11 AM
1

Well, I don't know why I need to keep explaining this. The human body derives pain from pressure in the muscles and musculoskeletal system. Any internal pain can be significantly decreased if you simply relax on all levels. I've seen three women undergo home births. Two were friends of the family, one was a family member. It took some time to really get them to relax. But once they were calm and didn't fear the incoming pain. They felt significantly less pain and even bragged later about how the…
/r/MensRights03/01/26 06:23 AM
1

Speaking of sources. This stuff used to be common knowledge twenty years ago. I can provide sources. I just don't wanna, nor should I really.
/r/MensRights02/01/26 05:27 AM
1

Except, it's not just endorphins that are being released, you also release oxytocin and even dopamine once the base hormones settle. And no, your Vajaje isn't torn open. The cervix expands dramatically.
/r/MensRights02/01/26 05:26 AM
2

Yes! This, this what you said. I absolutely agree. Pain is not a competition or virtue. Everyone goes through it.
/r/MensRights29/12/25 01:11 PM
1

It's biology, specifically female hormonal biology during labor. There are probably hundreds of sources for this, pick one or better yet, search them yourself.
/r/MensRights29/12/25 04:13 AM
2

Why do you need pain meds? During birth, under relaxation a woman's body releases the bonding hormone oxytocin and a myriad of other hormones that make it less painful or even enjoyable. If stressed, loads of cortisol and pain inducing biochemicals. How do you not know this?
/r/MensRights28/12/25 07:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter