TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

WhatIsYourLegacy Archive

View 17 posts and 245 comments by WhatIsYourLegacy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
965

FeminismWhatIsYourLegacy/r/MensRights18/01/21 05:14 PM
258

DiscriminationWhatIsYourLegacy/r/MensRights21/03/21 07:24 AM
104

misandryWhatIsYourLegacy/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/20 12:40 PM
80

misandryWhatIsYourLegacy/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/21 07:35 AM
48

Social IssuesWhatIsYourLegacy/r/MensRights22/04/21 08:23 AM
46

Activism/SupportWhatIsYourLegacy/r/MensRights06/03/21 05:34 PM
41

GeneralWhatIsYourLegacy/r/MensRights15/03/21 08:57 AM
38

Social IssuesWhatIsYourLegacy/r/MensRights10/09/20 07:43 AM
24

Activism/SupportWhatIsYourLegacy/r/MensRights12/05/21 04:32 PM
20

GeneralWhatIsYourLegacy/r/MensRights28/11/20 12:19 AM
17

discussionWhatIsYourLegacy/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/21 04:43 PM
14

IntactivismWhatIsYourLegacy/r/MensRights26/09/20 01:14 AM
6

resourceWhatIsYourLegacy/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/20 04:45 PM
6

GeneralWhatIsYourLegacy/r/MensRights07/09/20 05:16 PM
6

resourceWhatIsYourLegacy/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/21 04:54 PM
1

Social IssuesWhatIsYourLegacy/r/MensRights26/01/21 07:05 PM
1

Social IssuesWhatIsYourLegacy/r/MensRights20/02/21 06:49 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Because "cis-het white male" is their favourite insult, and their newest target of censure is gay males
/r/MensRights27/01/21 03:20 PM
1

I don't agree with the intersectionalist-aspect of it all, especially considering that studies have shown that white males are equally likely to be killed by cops as other groups. Also the trans-lobby really shouldn't be referred to, even if the gay rights-movement is.
/r/MensRights25/01/21 07:42 AM
2

Oh wake up... Scrape the surface, you don't have to look far
/r/MensRights19/01/21 12:26 PM
2

I think the worst part was the mod telling me I was "deriding the op" by addressing feminism (and of course locking it to not allow a reply). Gaslighting indeed, odious lot
/r/MensRights19/01/21 12:23 PM
1

It's only destructive, that's not how you instil proper morality or character. It's brainwashing and suppression, nothing more, nothing less.
/r/MensRights19/01/21 12:21 PM
2

Brilliant site
/r/MensRights19/01/21 12:20 PM
2

There's the added matter of tacit value sets, promoted ideology, cultural repercussions etc. They are not unrelated in this case
/r/MensRights19/01/21 12:12 PM
2

I never was much of a conformist anyways
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/21 10:18 AM
4

Fantastic 😁 See you on the discord!
/r/MensRights19/01/21 03:22 AM
3

Saying that males can only appear one way is still not acceptable. Sure people can still look good in penguin-suites, bost most expressions of male beauty are suppressed these days
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/21 03:21 AM
1

This is actually the main reason for why we have an art channel in our males' rights discord. It combats toxic ideas on the male form and sows a healthy body image. I have literally had members tell me that they had never seen the beauty in males before and thanking me. It's beyond tragic, males were heavily featured for their beauty in fine arts until the industrialism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/21 03:20 AM
1

All it takes is having the wrong political opinion and getting reported. I've lost an account bco a (civil and clean) debate in a private chat (dms). "Breach against ToS" without further specification means that you have the wrong opinion.
/r/MensRights19/01/21 03:17 AM
3

I messaged him but he didn't reply... Hello again btw 😄
/r/MensRights19/01/21 03:11 AM
9

The suffragettes were nasty anyways, what with the white feathers and so on...
/r/MensRights19/01/21 03:10 AM
23

Eh, they didn't only mute anyone who commented on the feminism - which undeniably is a crucial element to what he was saying - but in my case they even made me out to be an offender against the op, saying I was "deriding" him. The idiots don't know the meaning of the word
/r/MensRights19/01/21 03:05 AM
8

I know, but the words have inherent meaning, and the satire might as well be turned into irony
/r/MensRights19/01/21 01:07 AM
1

It's a suppression technique I'd say. "Who hurt you?" is meant to belittle you for taking offence, silence you (because if you object you admit to it), it's meant to disqualify your opinion by making you seem biased (and petty/weak/vindictive/butthurt etc), to ridicule you for the purported domination you've been subjected to etc. Utter scum.
/r/MensRights18/01/21 08:49 PM
2

Obviously? I mean everyone keeps saying it, people are too afraid to give public support though, so secret donations is likely the only way to get funding
/r/MensRights18/01/21 08:41 PM
1

Oh instead you have the "get into the factory" type of research that has kept guys expendable since the 1800's
/r/MensRights18/01/21 08:21 PM
2

He doesn't really, he hates the way people treat boys. He even deleted his account bco the abuse, the nastiness out there is unbelievable
/r/MensRights18/01/21 08:11 PM
1

Seems more like a massive server that tries to cater to a hundred interests to gain members if you ask me
/r/MensRights18/01/21 08:03 PM
30

Yeah, same here...
/r/MensRights18/01/21 07:45 PM
29

Yeah I guess it should reasonable to expect that they have mods to match it
/r/MensRights18/01/21 07:43 PM
20

Reclaim the term I mean, justice is something good and they're not for it
/r/MensRights18/01/21 07:42 PM
26

Hypocrisy, lack of historical knowledge, amorality, scorn, schadenfreude, gleeful malice
/r/MensRights18/01/21 05:35 PM
25

I'd like to reclaim the JW-title. They are not for justice by any means.
/r/MensRights18/01/21 05:31 PM
74

My personal comments were muted and accompanied by the sickening decrepit modding that thread. He or she told me I was "deriding the op" by mentioning feminism "instead of supporting him", only showing that he/she doesn't know the meaning of the word. Excellent gaslighting though.
/r/MensRights18/01/21 05:21 PM
1

The worst part is that he's an academic and really ought to know better, but I'm guessing he's up to his ears in indoctrination and can't be bothered to scrutinise the facts
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/21 07:56 PM
2

Graphities What's that?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/21 04:34 PM
2

There are more than five atm
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/21 04:19 PM
1

Oh okay, I just posted the link in any place I thought might be interested in males rights, I don't really know anything about the subs
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/21 10:44 AM
1

Really? Which subs? We foster a positive and constructive spirit
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/21 10:40 AM
3

If they're silent, then they aren't of very much use anyways... If they're a minority I have no idea why you defend feminism on the basis of them either
/r/MensRights14/01/21 09:38 AM
11

Yes I heard you the first time. Once again, who are these people? What are they doing exactly to change politics in a way that favours equally?
/r/MensRights14/01/21 05:07 AM
13

It's not in the past, it's happening right now, all the time, continuously. You're biased, and that's understandable considering the groupthink in that movement. Go on though, which are the good feminists? Where are they? What are they doing?
/r/MensRights14/01/21 04:53 AM
15

Oh ok, so prominent feminists don't count, governmental experts, politicians and lobbyists don't count - who is it you are looking at exactly, and why should those be the focus if they are a tiny tiny speck of a minority?
/r/MensRights14/01/21 04:42 AM
22

No, they are not. They are forcing males out of sexual abuse legislation all over the planet (often at the hands of those that actually dehumanise males), they are singlehandedly responsible for shutting down numerous men's shelters and support programs, they are pushing legislations to free women from judicial consequences and much much more. You're naïve if you don't see that. Look around.
/r/MensRights14/01/21 04:30 AM
41

That's a myth though. Even the most benevolent of feminist phalanxes advocate for "equality as long as it's not at the cost of females", which has led them to block several initiatives aimed toward helping males "because it would lead to less resources available for females". One example: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/2018/11/16/boys-left-fail-school-attempts-help-earn-wrath-feminists-says/
/r/MensRights13/01/21 05:13 PM
3

What methods have they used to gain their success? Also do they have any centralised site?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/21 05:07 PM
1

Intellectual honesty, no misrepresentation, nuanced debate, no angling of news to sell points instead of giving accurate circumstances, no mockery or uncivility etc
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/21 05:06 PM
1

Well, at least it makes it easy to avoid the unacceptable then.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/21 04:54 PM
1

You can join our males' rights-discord, we try to keep it a constructive place and have a number of shared activities, information shares and other things going on: https://discord.gg/V4yjsVPDQ4
/r/MensRights12/01/21 07:41 PM
1

That's terrible, you shouldn't have to feel that way
/r/MensRights12/01/21 07:30 PM
1

😡
/r/MensRights12/01/21 07:10 PM
1

Do you mind if I ask if there's anything in particular weighing you down?
/r/MensRights12/01/21 06:20 PM
1

What are the points made? Don't have time to watch that
/r/MensRights12/01/21 06:16 PM
1

There isn't one for the sub, but there are several males' rights-discords. Here's one: https://discord.gg/V4yjsVPDQ4
/r/MensRights12/01/21 06:14 PM
1

Is it on the decline? I hear it's on the rise, especially the closer types (which of course leads to mockery of bromance or "get a room" etc)
/r/MensRights12/01/21 06:07 PM
5

Here's another one.
/r/MensRights12/01/21 05:40 PM
1

How is it unfriendly toward females?
/r/MensRights12/01/21 05:05 PM
1

Absolutely repugnant
/r/MensRights12/01/21 05:04 PM
2

Odious
/r/MensRights12/01/21 04:55 PM
1

Idk if this belongs on this forum, but I think that it's good that they're treating it as undramatically as they are. The repressed become obsessed, and in Denmark a sound attitude toward your body is fortunately still prevalent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/21 04:27 PM
3

They more often than not have contradictory stances designed to be mediasoundbites that always paints them out as victims
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/21 04:21 PM
1

An excerpt on the method used: The online goal-setting intervention The intervention reported here, an elaborated goal-setting programme (see http://www.selfauthoring.com; future authoring), was designed with all due scientific and practical considerations in mind. It is a package intervention, with elements derived from goal-setting theory, as detailed above, and from the extensive published work on the salutary effects of expressive writing (Pennebaker and Chung, 2011; for reviews see Smyth, 1…
/r/MensRights12/01/21 03:37 PM
1

What kinds do you think would be good?
/r/MensRights05/01/21 08:16 PM
1

Anecdotal and far too simplistic. I reject the notions you put forth.
/r/MensRights05/01/21 08:15 PM
3

Brilliant post. Gj guys 💛
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/21 07:33 PM
1

You know, not reacting to the bad things in the world or not calling them out for what they are is equally unhealthy as well. Also there's the matter of structural issues vs random occurrences.
/r/MensRights31/12/20 01:58 AM
3

That odious monster needs to be shown for what she is for sure... For anyone not familiar, have a listen to one of the radio interviews with her: https://soundcloud.com/889-wers/male-rape
/r/MensRights31/12/20 01:56 AM
3

80% of the victims pinned as having been raped by her way of measuring disagreed with that characterisation
/r/MensRights31/12/20 01:53 AM
1

You forgot to throw in a "[whatever]-tard" in there
/r/MensRights31/12/20 01:52 AM
3

I hope you gave her a piece of your mind. My sincere condolences.
/r/MensRights31/12/20 01:37 AM
1

I posted something similar on unpopularopinion (and reposted on mensrights) before: https://www.reddit.com/r/unpopularopinion/comments/ipytxv/people_who_use_the_term_small_dick_as_an_insult/ The comment-section is disgusting
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/12/20 01:19 AM
2

You don't have to be a puritan to have a sense of self-worth.
/r/MensRights28/12/20 04:40 AM
1

Yeah and if they do, you don't let them get away with it. Your feelings matter every bit as much as hers, which is where most guys fold
/r/MensRights27/12/20 11:31 AM
1

Out of curiosity, what had the hospital posted?
/r/MensRights26/12/20 01:10 PM
5

Gay men are more disliked/scorned/hated than lesbian women, gay teens are more likely to commit suicide and end up homeless, and there are other issues. I guess normally you could draw the line quite easily at what's a gay rights-issue and mrm-issue, but these issues sometimes coincide as disproportionately large issues for both, in which case they should reasonably be addressed through the appropriate channels and from the angle of the particular group. There are lots of gay guys in the males' …
/r/MensRights26/12/20 01:09 PM
1

Honestly, as long as you don't concede any points, but address responses point blank and make sure to keep a stringent line of discussion, she can't evade it. There are facts out there and they are not exempt. You can join our males' rights-discord here if you want to, lots of sources and info there, as well as lots of supportive people: https://discord.gg/V4yjsVPDQ4
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/12/20 01:04 PM
2

Utterly repulsive
/r/MensRights26/12/20 01:03 PM
1

They should if both are working equal amounts of time. Also chores should be shared, and everything that's related to maintenance (e.g. shovelling snow) counts as chores, not only cleaning/cooking etc.
/r/MensRights26/12/20 12:58 PM
3

You'd be shortselling your dignity, exposing your most private for money, and making a profit on something that shouldn't be related to money at all. Guys are worth far better than that. I hope you can manage to choose something else, everything about it is terrible.
/r/MensRights26/12/20 12:55 PM
2

Obviously. You lose sensitivity, sensuality, you get emotional instability, and tons of other difficulties
/r/MensRights26/12/20 12:43 PM
1

Ridiculously annoying article since they fail to mention what a "FIR" even is
/r/MensRights26/12/20 12:29 PM
3

Disagree on point 7, they are simply more skilled at manipulation and get away with having their concerns outweigh yours on principle rather than measured issue for issue. You can learn to see through it, stand your ground and guard your sanctity.
/r/MensRights26/12/20 12:25 PM
1

Feminists (most prominently, Mary Koss) made sure to exclude males from the definitions of rape. There's a lot of number juggling going on, or use of bad statistics. The "1 in 5" is long since disqualified.
/r/MensRights26/12/20 12:17 PM
1

Of course it's sickening. I hope you're getting help. Spouting that depravity is quite likely a maneouvre to keep males livid, because that keeps us less focused and efficient.
/r/MensRights26/12/20 12:14 PM
3

Yes of course, women are very important and appreciated, if for no other reason that you will be far better at convincing other females once you yourself have learned the facts.
/r/MensRights26/12/20 12:13 PM
1

There are political, commercial, industrial and militaristic interests in keeping males suppressed and/or disposable. Thus uncle sam will align with feminists when it's convenient, e.g. allowing the likes of Mary Koss to remove males from rape definitions and hiding statistics etc. It's simple. The aforementioned groups either have something to gain by males losing power (e.g, feminists, because they gain power by that), by males having less control and agency in their life which makes them disp…
/r/MensRights26/12/20 12:10 PM
2

Stick to facts, argue with calmness and reason, and you'll be able to convince your brother. It will help you keep a calm as well. Try to bear in mind that many many females out there want good things for males, the noxious and toxic cliques aren't the majority. Hang in there, you'll get through it. 🙂
/r/MensRights26/12/20 12:02 PM
3

You can try mirroring what they're saying, e.g. "Do you realise that you are dehumanising males, calling them inferior, and taking pleasure in the idea of their mass-scale demise?" I.e. behaving like a nazi
/r/MensRights26/12/20 11:58 AM
1

Well, social constructionism has no ground to stand on whatsoever - epistemologically, scientifically, philosophically etc, so the transconcept falls together with that. Masculinity as we see it is a culturally and temporally (ca 300 years) "local" culture, it says nothing about the innate nature of males. As far as being male, and innate maleness goes, anyone who is a biological male qualifies. The fact that you have gone through things others haven't (and vice versa) doesn't make you or them a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/12/20 10:42 AM
1

Paul Young and Zucchero's "Senza una donna" has some pretty sweet lyrics too. Here's my heart, feel the power Look at me, I'm a flower You can laugh, you're forgiven, but I'm no longer frightened, to be living, yeah Senza una donna No more pain and no sorrow Senza una donna I'll make it through tomorrow Senza una donna Giving my torture and bliss Oooh, Oooh... I stay here and, watch the ocean Don't know why, don't know why, I keep on talking You may laugh, you're forgiven, but I'm no longer frig…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/12/20 10:34 AM
1

Disgusting
/r/MensRights24/12/20 06:52 PM
1

Using the energy and anger that results from it having happened to fight the causes for it
/r/MensRights23/12/20 07:49 AM
1

They are pocketed for sure these days. When Mary Koss wikipedia article was updated with criticism, there was a Psychology Today article sourced. The next day, the changes were rolled back by some feminist vigilante and the article mysteriously disappeared after having been laying online for ages.
/r/MensRights22/12/20 05:43 PM
1

Utter idiot
/r/MensRights22/12/20 05:41 PM
1

No, acceptance is pointless, fighting against it gives energy
/r/MensRights22/12/20 05:41 PM
2

It's barbaric for sure
/r/MensRights22/12/20 05:40 PM
1

Honestly their tone of voice disgusts me
/r/MensRights22/12/20 05:40 PM
5

They're nefarious. As for intersectionalists, they are a scourge in general, trying to usurp other movements' traction for their own. Keep issues rightfully separated!
/r/MensRights22/12/20 05:39 PM
2

Utter idiot. Are you trying to be an apologist or not using your head?
/r/MensRights22/12/20 05:38 PM
5

Well they are pocketed. The AAP has been branded unscientific by every medical agency in Europe - an organisation headed by Jewish urologists, go figure...
/r/MensRights22/12/20 05:37 PM
2

Well, if they try that angle, how about looking at the millions of male calves who are killed after mere days or the male chickens that are tossed into grinders alive. Sure, there's a link between eating meat and machismo - which is quite disgusting. Killing innocent beings and eating them has absolutely nothing to do with being male and it shouldn't be portrayed as such, but as far as any form of sexism goes, even if you imagine it being that way, males have it worse.
/r/MensRights22/12/20 05:36 PM
2

No problem, there are tons more. This is another one that is often an eyeopener: https://web.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm (”This bibliography examines 286 scholarly investigations: 221 empirical studies and 65 reviews and/or analyses, which demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners. The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 371,600.”)
/r/MensRights20/12/20 05:36 AM
-1

Oh yeah, a seven-year-old is very likely to profess his masculinity facepalm
/r/MensRights20/12/20 05:33 AM
3

Well, one of these days you'll follow the rabbithole and have a look at what it really amounts to. Besides, even the most benign forms of feminism do not advocate for equality, but for "equality as long as it isn't at the cost of females", a term which is being used for denying males equal treatment because "it would come from the same resource pool which means less money for females". One example here: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/2018/11/16/boys-left-fail-school-attempts-help-earn-wra…
/r/MensRights19/12/20 09:17 PM
2

Also, the female suicide-attempt myth has been debunked:https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-017-1398-8 ‘Serious Suicide Attempts’ (SSA) were rated significantly more frequently in males than females (p < .001). Anyways, good of you to see reason, don't let anyone push you down.
/r/MensRights19/12/20 09:12 PM
2

I'd award you if I could. Kudos on posting this. 💛
/r/MensRights19/12/20 09:02 PM
2

You really should put scholar in quotation-marks next time as well...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/20 08:28 PM
-21

Are you seriously using a 7-year-old boy saving his sister as an argument for there being no toxic gender norms out there? Are you saying a 7-year-old is masculine? Anyone with more than a braincell can see that there are gender norms in relation to both genders that are anything but healthy. Grow up and stop using good things to defend the unacceptable
/r/MensRights19/12/20 07:07 PM
5

I mean, a mod even said they wouldn't
/r/MensRights17/12/20 05:34 PM
3

Why did they end up removing your post on r/unpopularfacts after all?
/r/MensRights17/12/20 04:35 PM
1

She's a monster for sure. She is also of the opinion that all sexual activity involving males older than 12 is automatically consensual, and that males are not capable of the same levels of being violated as females. Nasty beast. A Wikipedia refused additions to Koss' page "because it would be used to attack feminism" (a male, disgracefully enough), so they're bought. I made a post about it before: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/k2n0ff/wikimedia_administrator_admits_bias…
/r/MensRights17/12/20 03:43 PM
1

Nudity is in itself not a problem imo. You can see that he was bothered by it though, which makes it not ok. It's not uncommon to see nudity featured here in Scandinavia anyway.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 02:59 PM
1

It's very damaging in general and an unacceptable, barbaric, practice.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 02:52 PM
2

In Ireland they still provided basic gender data even if it was anonymous at an individual level, to maintain that the unbalance was maintained ("or it would be unfair to the girls" 🤮) https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/education/girls-to-do-better-than-boys-in-calculated-grade-leaving-cert-exams-as-gender-trends-will-be-built-into-results-39454619.html https://www.irishexaminer.com/opinion/commentanalysis/arid-40045100.html
/r/MensRights17/12/20 02:44 PM
1

Yes, well, the translobby's favourite insult is "cis white heterosexual male". They try to be as bigoted as possible it seems.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 02:38 PM
1

Pay them no heed. You're not alone, I hope you can find support 💛
/r/MensRights17/12/20 02:31 PM
3

I agree that it's a problem, but more so in general life than on this sub I have to say. The "man up"-mentality is noxious for sure though, and I agree that we can't pretend that their aren't toxic gender ideals out there
/r/MensRights17/12/20 02:27 PM
2

Yes it is abuse.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 02:05 PM
2

Your argument is weird. The fact that males could potentially inflict a lot more damage is not a viable reason or justification for females getting to hit males. Also violence is not only physical, and even if it were, they are capable of more than people admit.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 02:03 PM
1

As always, thanks for the additional sources ⭐
/r/MensRights13/12/20 03:13 PM
6

No https://digest.bps.org.uk/2017/07/11/sexual-offending-by-women-is-surprisingly-common-claims-us-study/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4062022/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sexual-victimization-by-women-is-more-common-than-previously-known/
/r/MensRights13/12/20 03:13 PM
2

Why don't you go lobby someone less well-read. Kind of sick, walking around lying to defend that, ngl, despicable.
/r/MensRights12/12/20 11:17 PM
1

🙂
/r/MensRights12/12/20 11:15 PM
3

Imagine going into a males' rights-sub and promoting mutilation of their most intimate at their most vulnerable and saying that iT hAs BeNeFiTs
/r/MensRights12/12/20 08:00 PM
4

Obviously doesn't encompass girls
/r/MensRights12/12/20 06:19 PM
1

Sorry to hear it. People are incredibly resistant to even accept the notion... What kind of platform are you using?
/r/MensRights12/12/20 05:21 PM
2

https://web.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm (”This bibliography examines 286 scholarly investigations: 221 empirical studies and 65 reviews and/or analyses, which demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners. The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 371,600.”)
/r/MensRights12/12/20 05:07 PM
1

Humans in general lack integrity far too often imo
/r/MensRights12/12/20 05:03 PM
6

Girl does not describe older females. Females is the only encompassing term for them.
/r/MensRights12/12/20 05:01 PM
30

Disgusting. https://web.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm (”This bibliography examines 286 scholarly investigations: 221 empirical studies and 65 reviews and/or analyses, which demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners. The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 371,600.”)
/r/MensRights12/12/20 04:59 PM
1

So terribly sorry for your loss, my sincerest condolences... I don't know in what context you're asking. The idea of "the man of the house" is a different thing from what people refer to as "the man" in society, for example. Regardless, neither are something worth aspiring to, as the former denotes a sort of authoritarian perspective on family life where the father decides everything and also has some form of innate duty to do any number of tasks, and the second is a term used for the figurative…
/r/MensRights12/12/20 04:58 PM
0

Honestly all of their "charity" is despicable, considering tons of their own are dying or killing themselves right next to them down the street.
/r/MensRights12/12/20 04:50 PM
3

Legally, no idea. Outside of the law, there is the tendency of trusting males more, professionally, e.g. asking males instead of females if presented with the option between two clerks.
/r/MensRights12/12/20 04:44 PM
5

Most victims of random violence are males, so - no.
/r/MensRights12/12/20 04:44 PM
2

No kidding 😔
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/20 03:39 PM
7

This is the biggest problem with intersectionalists - trying to usurp any movement that even vaguely pertains to whatever point they are driving.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/20 03:39 PM
7

Jeff Bezos is afaik male
/r/MensRights10/12/20 10:45 AM
3

Because it's far more dangerous and complicated to make such a pill for males, the risks are greater
/r/MensRights08/12/20 12:37 PM
5

Disgusting
/r/MensRights08/12/20 12:33 PM
1

Most definitely not
/r/MensRights08/12/20 12:30 PM
5

The mrm is a real eyeopener. I had no idea the UN was so horribly biased.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/20 04:40 PM
0

Too much misrepresentation of fact and circumstance in your message to even bother responding to it. Your attitude is disgusting.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/11/20 10:23 AM
5

Well, mr "far more familiar", let me point you to the real problem here, which is - that guy. Not me. Don't shoot the messenger. That guy, the machineries he defends, and the monster that the machinery serves, are the problem. As far as not fighting a hoard of equally offensive people goes, I might have, but I have no idea how that works, and believe it or not, the inner workings on wikipedia not something people can be expected to know. Another person who does know however was supposed to repor…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/11/20 09:29 AM
5

Try to get this through your skull - a commenter linked to that, not me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/11/20 09:19 AM
7

You're discrediting an article based on a commenters link? Really? At least read the piece, and perhaps look at the linked source-material in the post itself, coming from a wiki-admin. You're either biased or wilfully obtuse to argue as you do, not to mention bashing mrm's.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/20 06:46 PM
3

Yeah, it should be included bco it being a "significant minority interest", and there are sources disqualified by him that should not be.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/20 06:44 PM
7

Yeah it's sick. She wouldn't have been able to though if it wasn't for commercial, industrial and militarist interests in keeping males subjugated/expendable.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/20 06:43 PM
14

That post has 4 upvotes and two comments in defense in a membercount of 70k. They are not distancing themselves, in fact most of the rapelaws were put into place with her help because of her being a feminist, and working with feminists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/20 06:42 PM
6

The timeframe is entirely irrelevant. This two months ago, not two years. You presume quite a few things of what I have and haven't done. Your tone is insulting regardless. This is not a flamefest, this is an article pointing out that a major information platform claiming to have neutral bias has openly feminist administrators. Either you're an apologist or trying very hard to find fault with this post.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/20 06:37 PM
14

Yeah. There are other information eschewments as well of course, but I don't think a wikipedia official has ever admitted it publically like this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/20 01:19 PM
6

In Eton of all places... I suppose this is the change that the new head wanted to bring about
/r/MensRights27/11/20 02:59 PM
1

Well, it doesn't exactly take much, it's still a hollow claim.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 01:49 PM
3

Honestly it's disgusting. I mean I have no idea what kind of person his father is, but the things this judge says to the boy is revolting. Here are a few excerpts: I see someone who is troubled, not happy. He has not achieved his goals in life – apart of course from having you. Because of his personality style, and the love you feel for him, he has a lot of influence over you. All fathers influence their sons, but your father goes a lot further than that. I'm quite clear that if he was happy wit…
/r/MensRights26/11/20 01:19 PM
1

Circumcision is not a preventative measure. The USA where 60% of males are mutilated has a higher rate of penile cancer than Europe, where boys are not harmed. Also the argument is akin to preventatively chopping off your nose to avoid nose cancer.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 12:54 PM
1

Even if they are acting in an official capacity? Do I need to remove Koss' name as well or only Eppstein's?
/r/MensRights26/11/20 11:56 AM
1

Yeah of course. Boycotting is the only option. We're not asking for a cartoon, it's the reasons for the absence of one that are upsetting.
/r/MensRights25/11/20 03:04 PM
50

They are misandrist. It's far from nice.
/r/MensRights25/11/20 01:49 PM
1

they are intentionally slighting men, of course they are. My point was that by complaining about the doodle we are wasting our attention on something that is meaningless at best A major corporation that controls information taking an official and intentionally scornful stance against males is meaningless?
/r/MensRights25/11/20 01:46 PM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/k0s8lj/wikipedia_editor_admits_to_refusing_entries_on/
/r/MensRights25/11/20 01:33 PM
1

Disgusting, you are.
/r/MensRights24/11/20 09:55 PM
1

Well if you are unable to stand up for yourself, at least don't get in the way of others who do. They are intentionally slighting males, whether you want to see it or not.
/r/MensRights24/11/20 09:55 PM
3

Go troll somewhere else, filth
/r/MensRights21/11/20 03:32 PM
1

Nope. Still not... Boycott.
/r/MensRights21/11/20 03:18 PM
1

One doesn't preclude the other. You're either bought or an apologist.
/r/MensRights21/11/20 03:10 PM
1

It's a pleasant sub, leave it at that and direct the censure toward the group you claim is boosting it for their own shortcomings instead
/r/MensRights21/11/20 02:12 PM
1

Post hoc ergo propter hoc?
/r/MensRights21/11/20 02:12 PM
1

One doesn't preclude the other. Don't be an apologist.
/r/MensRights21/11/20 01:59 PM
1

Coop in Sweden recognised Movember, not sure about the IMD though
/r/MensRights21/11/20 01:58 PM
1

They're scum. Boycott them.
/r/MensRights21/11/20 01:58 PM
1

Well, they'll keep gaslighting their way ahead if people let them
/r/MensRights21/11/20 01:55 PM
2

No, they don't pretend to science, they reject it entirely, through their embracing of social constructivism.
/r/MensRights21/11/20 01:48 PM
1

They are a disgrace. Boycott.
/r/MensRights19/11/20 04:23 PM
1

Thanks for the references! Not sure women were any less abusive historically at all. Did you post this comment in the right place though? Seems a bit unrelated
/r/MensRights18/11/20 07:13 PM
6

They really are repugnant. They are implying that being vulnerable, or having emotions is a pejorative Guys are bashed for not being able to express emotion They're constantly pulling every single victim-card they have, constantly contradicting themselves - and suddenly males are the weak ones? It's a suppression technique, double-bind. Speak out and get pinned, as with "small dick"-accusations etc. They are illogical, anti-scientific, profiteering, kindness-exploiting SCUM
/r/MensRights18/11/20 07:08 PM
1

The last resort these days is a dorsal slit
/r/MensRights18/11/20 06:57 PM
1

No, there is no medical need for circumcision for phimosis anymore. A vasectomy is not a mutilation.
/r/MensRights18/11/20 11:54 AM
2

It has been clear for very long. 6 hour days are not only more productive, profitable and beneficial to health (with retained salaries), but better for society.
/r/MensRights18/11/20 10:58 AM
4

Well, most of the perpetrators are also blacks. Criminal vendettas lead to that sort of thing. The knife-epidemic is tied to black assaulters as well, but the victims are there overwhelmingly white.
/r/MensRights18/11/20 10:57 AM
1

The premise is invalid, the roles are both temporally, geographically and culturally localised, even if over larger spans than people normally wrap their heads around
/r/MensRights18/11/20 10:46 AM
2

Well, I always thought so.
/r/MensRights18/11/20 10:45 AM
3

Your premise is invalid
/r/MensRights18/11/20 10:43 AM
2

We do have the discussion of women touching guys inappropriately here in Sweden, where both males and females have their own respective disgusting epithet for that sort of behaviour ("tantslem/slemkärring" and "gubbslem")
/r/MensRights18/11/20 10:40 AM
4

For a moment I thought you were serious...
/r/MensRights17/11/20 12:38 PM
1

Look - I am for a healthy discussion here. There are healthy norms, and unhealthy norms. At the same time, pretending like certain things aren't unattractive is - let's face it - utter tripe. Many boys are indeed beautiful, oftentimes entirely unbeknownst to them because they're never told so, but be honest with yourselves in both directions - both good and bad.
/r/MensRights17/11/20 08:34 AM
2

For sure. The insane state of society is becoming more and more apparent
/r/MensRights17/11/20 08:31 AM
17

Wikipedia is blatantly biased. The editors even admit to refusing additions to Mary Koss' article because "it would be used to attack feminism"
/r/MensRights17/11/20 08:25 AM
3

It's not only sexist, but a suppression technique called victim-blaming. On top of that, you're belittling someone likely in need of help, essentially kicking someone when they're down. Saying "man up" is despicable.
/r/MensRights17/11/20 07:55 AM
1

No, fortunately not. I'm merely saying that on a moral level, her defence does not hold up.
/r/MensRights17/11/20 06:11 AM
1

What forum were you banned from?
/r/MensRights16/11/20 12:31 PM
3

Not familiar with Shapiro. Jordan Peterson is often misrepresented, and even if I don't agree with everything he says or his cognitive dissonance in regards to capitalism, a lot of what he does say and promote is good. He is most often specific, thought-through and clear. Even if he is a bit heavyhanded sometimes, he wants good things for guys, and you can see the passion in his eyes, he genuinely cares. He's often misunderstood and said to propone "man up"-values, which isn't at all the case, h…
/r/MensRights16/11/20 12:28 PM
2

It's disqualifying, belittling, scornful and utterly contemptible. They are disgusting in saying that, and they disqualify themselves from any claims of justice, compassion, empathy, egalitarianism etc. Not only that, but they're trying to shame guys for speaking out as if it were a political statement, tainted by their intersectionalism nonetheless. Scum is what they are, as are their manifestos.
/r/MensRights16/11/20 12:22 PM
0

She failed in her duty as a parent, that's all there's to it. In a matter that directly affects one of the most important aspects of your life, she chose not to protect you, not to investigate the matter herself, and to merely accept the opinion of someone else. Intents aside, she didn't act on your behalf, which is the duty of a guardian or parent.
/r/MensRights16/11/20 12:10 PM
1

Wikipedia is outrightly biased. One of their editors even stated that they're preventing rightful additions to Mary Koss' page because of it being used to attack feminism.
/r/MensRights16/11/20 11:57 AM
2

There's also our males' rights-discord (The Brotherhood) which you can find here: https://discord.gg/V4yjsVPDQ4
/r/MensRights16/11/20 11:54 AM
4

I think the main issue there is that feminist groups get away with simply blaming it on "the patriarchy" even if there are clear numbers of there being a larger female constituency
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/20 09:33 AM
2

There are different phalanxes within the males' rights-movement, as you will find in any movement. Some are less desirable and even out to make the movement look bad, others are more balanced and have good aims. There are other mrm-subs though, e.g. r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
/r/MensRights15/11/20 09:18 AM
2

What do you think would be the best strategy to involve normal non-feminist women and girls in the struggle for males' rights?
/r/MensRights15/11/20 09:09 AM
1

Well it's not a scientific branch, it's good that they recognise that. Stringency is still alive in Germany fortunately.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 09:59 AM
1

The article is removed, which makes me wonder why.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 09:58 AM
7

Well, they only reported about it, don't shoot the messenger. The real problem is that sentencing. Sveriges Radio also highlighted on the contrast between the crime and the sentence in the headlight.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/20 09:27 AM
1

🙄
/r/MensRights13/11/20 12:51 PM
1

Thanks!
/r/MensRights12/11/20 01:37 PM
1

Little Lord Fauntleroy, The Little Prince by St. Exupery, and Oscar Wilde's fairytales. What's "dear boy" about?
/r/MensRights12/11/20 01:27 PM
3

Where did you find those stats? Are they sourced?
/r/MensRights12/11/20 01:16 PM
18

No kidding. Smart, independent, leader-type guys - suddenly hunched. Guys shouldn't let themselves be held hostage under their sexdrive
/r/MensRights12/11/20 01:15 PM
1

If it was a popstar that the girl idolised and she asked for a kiss, and he gave her one in response, if done correctly it could be sort of cute I think
/r/MensRights11/11/20 06:55 PM
5

Are people attacking it on social media already?
/r/MensRights11/11/20 05:46 PM
1

Ah, yeah that's exempt for sure.
/r/MensRights11/11/20 03:24 PM
5

It's a three year old article, but yeah, still idiotic. A national embarrassment...
/r/MensRights11/11/20 03:23 PM
14

Indeed. It's not only the UN though. Google, for example, that make those special animations of their logo for nearly anything (even tiny local significances) made a point out of keeping their logo normal. I've started to boycott them in every respect that I can.
/r/MensRights11/11/20 03:19 PM
11

Fight back. It's unacceptable, that's all there's to it
/r/MensRights11/11/20 03:18 PM
1

A 15-year-old can still be considered a paedophile if the target is prepubescent (which is what paedophilia amounts to)
/r/MensRights11/11/20 03:14 PM
-1

Oh come off it, sexual consent laws are about sex, not giving a kiss...
/r/MensRights11/11/20 03:11 PM
7

Pretty cool, it's the first time I've seen feminists stand up against sexism directed toward men
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/20 03:04 PM
1

No, intersectionalism is a scourge for many reasons. Trying to usurp other movements to use as a bat for your own cause is what those do. Not only is intersectionalism as such only a pitycontest, but trying to usurp other movements hollow them out. For example, there are within the males' rights-movement likely a large number of people with various disabilities, varying political interests, vegans, religious groups etc - and catering to all of those is not only impossible but counter-productive.…
/r/MensRights10/11/20 04:02 PM
2

Several fallacies. 1. Assuming that our group is males, and that males' exclusively work for males - which is a projected notion that stems from feminists only working for females. It's an open confession of bias right there. Since we are expected to have a in-group bias, because they do, they think that we condone and support all actions of other males. Insane stupidity basically. Protesting in itself, saying that males' issues are not their business, is an open declaration of them NOT being fo…
/r/MensRights07/11/20 02:10 PM
1

I guess it has historically been used as a joke, to belittle etc, but under the veil of the comedy there's an intent that's still there. Being able to call it that as a joke enables the behaviour, but I agree that it really shouldn't be referred to as a bromance primarily.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/20 11:21 AM
1

A life sentence would be too harsh, but a term that stands in relation to what you are accusing someone of for sure - if you can be proven to be a liar, which shouldn't be too hard if you pose demands for technical evidence and specifics. One major problem is that other guys underpin this. This would not be able to happen if you didn't have the nauseating simps a la David Eppstein out there plowing the way for misandry and outrageous policies (not to mention defend monsters like Mary Koss on the…
/r/MensRights14/10/20 11:14 AM
2

Yeah the trans-mafia is way out of line... Worst of all is that they've hijacked most of the lgbt-movement. You can't even try to politely have a critical discussion here on r/lgbt without getting instantly permabanned
/r/MensRights13/10/20 08:32 PM
2

Some of those are far worse than others, e.g. the trans movement, which really shouldn't have been measured together with the generally open-minded gaymovement
/r/MensRights13/10/20 04:15 PM
1

They really shouldn't clump the gay movement together with the trans movement in this issue. The translobby is a notorious echochamber with no tolerance for anything outside their groupthink, whereas the gay movement is generally openminded
/r/MensRights13/10/20 04:13 PM
2

Gay guys have higher testosterone levels, not lower
/r/MensRights07/10/20 09:18 PM
1

Disgusting
/r/MensRights04/10/20 03:43 PM
3

You really are nauseating. As long as it's a small child they will get to accompany the parent into whatever locker room they go into - no matter what any Karen might think about it.
/r/MensRights28/09/20 02:32 PM
2

Ah lol, gotcha
/r/MensRights27/09/20 03:16 PM
2

Would you mind telling me why?
/r/MensRights26/09/20 01:54 PM
4

👍
/r/MensRights18/09/20 03:10 PM
4

Wow, major kudos on digging that up, fantastic
/r/MensRights18/09/20 02:03 PM
1

I suggest that you address the arguments instead of reducing to a matter of association. Even Hitler is likely to have said things that make sense
/r/MensRights16/09/20 10:57 AM
0

Not at all. Everyone is different.
/r/MensRights15/09/20 03:27 PM
4

lol I honestly do think they angled the article to shame people, a lot of people disapprove of age differences. I mean if it had said that it was about a 17-year-old I don't think anyone would have batted an eyelash
/r/MensRights14/09/20 11:08 AM
18

In this case, they had an ongoing affair when it started: https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/nursery-worker-17-groomed-baby-21620216 Don't get me wrong though, that rotten monster is utterly nasty, ugly as cancer, even tried pinning the pregnancy on the boy raping her. The age difference, 17 to 13/14, makes a difference though.
/r/MensRights14/09/20 06:13 AM
3

On an individual level, yes, but on a societal level, accepting the narrative means enforcing that stereotype, and accepting people's use of it means condoning the idea that guys that have smaller ones are inferior. Thus it matters. It's not a mere insult
/r/MensRights11/09/20 03:48 AM
3

Well, not only did you miss that I was referring to the acts of the insulter, but you seem to be clueless as to what an attack is
/r/MensRights11/09/20 03:30 AM
5

You think violence is an appropriate reaction to someone saying you a small dick I've never said that
/r/MensRights10/09/20 06:13 PM
2

Wow, you're disgusting, lol
/r/MensRights10/09/20 03:19 PM
3

Thanks 😄
/r/MensRights10/09/20 02:09 PM
13

Minuscule huh? Denigrating someone by attacking their most vulnerable, insulting their dignity, and then attacking them for reacting? You're clueless.
/r/MensRights10/09/20 10:02 AM
0

Yeah it's quite common knowledge among historians, the industrialism wasn't only a result of the technological progress, but also an era that turned against the ideals of the romantic era that preceded it (where e.g. men would gain such good repute if they cried in public in France that they carried around things to fake tears). The idea that you can somehow tell biology apart from culture from inside that culture, is a bit naive. One interesting statistic in this context is for example that les…
/r/MensRights09/09/20 02:08 PM
2

Ok
/r/MensRights09/09/20 03:34 AM
6

Excerpts: "Girls typically do better than boys overall in the Leaving Certificate and this difference has been increasing over time for a *variety of reasons.**"* Yes - blatant discrimination of boys, acknowledged by the OECD. "Teachers’ assessments, with their focus on effort and performance appeared to increase recognition of girls’ work, countering gender-stereotyping which international evidence shows typically does not favour girls" It's almost nauseating. Not only speculatively attributing…
/r/MensRights09/09/20 02:51 AM
0

Well, send a link to the paper and I'll have a look. The Ancient Greek also held masculine love to be highest, especially between males. I think I'm being more sober than you are, the sex-study for example looked at MRI's, not soft science-studies. Sure there are differences, but the fact that a baby (purportedly) makes him more interested in the abstract doesn't necessarily affect his emotional life. Stringently speaking, I wouldn't be surprised if males felt more in many ways, as being disprop…
/r/MensRights09/09/20 12:05 AM
1

I think part of the problem is that the idea that it applies on a demographic level is mistaken. Also, the idea of it being classical is faulty in that it doesn't really stretch back beyond the industrialism (in the west). It's a construct lived up to, by the Pygmalion-effect if nothing else. I disagree with the characterisation, and claim that the notion is purposely upheld by the stakeholders I mentioned. Biology is an implement. If we were to look at a biological level only, even there you'll…
/r/MensRights08/09/20 10:13 PM
1

I can't take responsibility for someone's interpretation. What I'm commenting on is the intentional eschewment of/claim to the masculinity-epithet by the groups I mentioned - something which is a real problem. I do not deny anyone the right to be as they are. On a systemic level, the opposite does not happen very often, which plays right into the hands of those stakeholders.
/r/MensRights08/09/20 10:03 PM
1

It's terribly sad, fortunately people are waking up
/r/MensRights08/09/20 06:58 AM
1

I'm not saying you have to be any specific way at all, quite the opposite. I'm saying the idea that masculinity is something set and fixed, that the idea that masculinity is something specific is a bad thing. I wouldn't deny your nature. Would you deny others theirs, call them unmasculine?
/r/MensRights08/09/20 06:57 AM
1

If you are telling men that how they feel is wrong you're not advocating for their rights, you're advocating against their right to feel their own feelings. I said no such thing. On the contrary, I said that the idea that males are a certain and specific way is a problem, an idea that the aforementioned espouse. I wouldn't deny your nature. Would you deny others theirs, call them unmasculine?
/r/MensRights08/09/20 06:55 AM
1

It would have been so easy to make that gender-neutral, but no...
/r/MensRights07/09/20 08:59 PM
3

Definition of modesty to include protection for men What does that mean?
/r/MensRights07/09/20 07:17 PM
3

It was more about the whole picture - behaviour etc
/r/MensRights07/09/20 07:15 PM
3

So damn ugly
/r/MensRights07/09/20 04:55 PM
1

Does anyone have the link he is citing (@ "report")? On a side-note, the idea that people should blindly consider themselves attractive seems more than a little narcissistic.
/r/MensRights07/09/20 04:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter