TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

accidental_me Archive

View 230 posts and 1,642 comments by accidental_me on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1912

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights26/01/20 11:41 AM
1817

Progressaccidental_me/r/MensRights13/11/20 03:52 PM
1641

Intactivismaccidental_me/r/MensRights30/09/20 11:52 AM
1196

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights22/01/21 11:13 AM
1149

Generalaccidental_me/r/MensRights16/01/21 09:23 AM
807

Discriminationaccidental_me/r/MensRights03/06/22 07:21 AM
549

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights03/03/20 02:59 PM
461

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights12/02/22 10:28 AM
435

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights14/09/21 11:27 AM
415

Legal Rightsaccidental_me/r/MensRights01/08/21 09:42 AM
398

Generalaccidental_me/r/MensRights30/10/20 02:09 PM
379

Edu./Occu.accidental_me/r/MensRights28/08/20 04:01 PM
358

re: Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights25/07/14 09:20 AM
354

accidental_me/r/MensRights06/02/20 11:01 AM
311

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights01/07/22 11:22 AM
304

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights13/02/22 07:33 AM
303

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights09/02/22 10:43 AM
269

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights29/11/20 09:33 AM
266

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights16/01/22 02:04 PM
258

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights28/01/21 08:28 AM
230

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights21/01/22 04:54 PM
226

accidental_me/r/MensRights08/01/14 08:48 AM
217

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights16/10/20 11:32 AM
213

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights05/03/20 08:01 PM
212

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights25/08/22 03:37 PM
194

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights26/07/20 05:25 AM
192

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights17/11/20 03:00 PM
189

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights25/12/20 01:41 PM
166

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights09/09/22 05:51 PM
162

Generalaccidental_me/r/MensRights20/07/20 07:25 PM
150

Generalaccidental_me/r/MensRights26/11/20 03:33 PM
144

Discriminationaccidental_me/r/MensRights10/02/22 06:14 AM
142

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights17/01/22 06:57 PM
142

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights05/11/20 12:44 PM
135

Discriminationaccidental_me/r/MensRights08/02/22 10:29 AM
134

Fathers/Custodyaccidental_me/r/MensRights19/04/16 11:36 AM
132

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights18/08/21 02:13 PM
123

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights30/12/21 07:20 AM
115

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights08/12/20 10:04 AM
111

Humouraccidental_me/r/MensRights05/11/20 06:01 AM
110

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights12/01/21 08:08 AM
108

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights09/12/20 03:30 PM
108

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights14/09/22 10:46 AM
105

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights09/07/20 07:38 AM
102

Discriminationaccidental_me/r/MensRights29/10/20 01:26 PM
102

Legal Rightsaccidental_me/r/MensRights08/02/20 12:14 PM
101

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights12/05/20 07:38 AM
98

Generalaccidental_me/r/MensRights12/12/20 10:27 PM
90

accidental_me/r/MensRights11/12/13 09:53 AM
89

Humouraccidental_me/r/MensRights06/12/20 02:55 PM
86

Discriminationaccidental_me/r/MensRights13/10/20 06:03 AM
84

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights20/11/20 06:23 PM
82

accidental_me/r/MensRights22/01/14 01:25 PM
81

Healthaccidental_me/r/MensRights22/12/20 09:02 AM
80

Discriminationaccidental_me/r/MensRights22/04/20 05:32 AM
77

Generalaccidental_me/r/MensRights02/01/22 12:31 PM
73

accidental_me/r/MensRights21/01/14 08:58 PM
73

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights31/08/21 06:40 PM
71

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights21/07/20 07:21 AM
69

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights26/05/20 09:26 AM
68

accidental_me/r/MensRights09/12/13 12:04 PM
68

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights22/01/22 04:56 PM
67

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights28/10/23 06:13 AM
62

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights24/02/20 11:39 AM
57

Legal Rightsaccidental_me/r/MensRights06/03/20 05:37 AM
56

accidental_me/r/MensRights06/01/14 02:30 PM
56

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights25/01/20 12:04 PM
56

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights23/11/20 05:08 PM
55

Discriminationaccidental_me/r/MensRights01/04/20 11:56 AM
52

False Accusationaccidental_me/r/MensRights12/09/20 02:13 PM
51

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights02/11/20 01:42 PM
51

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights14/08/20 07:20 PM
50

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights31/01/20 04:11 PM
49

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights01/11/20 06:22 AM
47

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights04/01/21 10:39 AM
46

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights15/12/20 02:06 PM
45

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights18/08/20 12:18 PM
45

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights14/09/20 03:13 PM
45

Generalaccidental_me/r/MensRights31/03/20 07:46 AM
43

Discriminationaccidental_me/r/MensRights30/10/21 05:05 AM
42

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights25/11/20 08:30 PM
42

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights30/01/20 09:09 AM
40

accidental_me/r/MensRights08/01/14 06:38 AM
40

Legal Rightsaccidental_me/r/MensRights19/11/22 07:22 AM
40

accidental_me/r/MensRights11/01/14 04:59 PM
39

Generalaccidental_me/r/MensRights14/02/21 04:42 PM
38

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights15/07/20 07:15 AM
37

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights14/07/20 10:03 AM
36

accidental_me/r/MensRights09/01/14 08:56 AM
36

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights02/06/23 05:00 AM
36

Discriminationaccidental_me/r/MensRights02/06/20 05:39 AM
35

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights11/12/20 06:08 AM
35

Generalaccidental_me/r/MensRights26/11/21 06:08 PM
35

accidental_me/r/MensRights28/08/20 01:09 PM
34

Marriage/Childrenaccidental_me/r/MensRights26/10/20 09:05 AM
34

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights07/11/20 10:51 AM
34

False Accusationaccidental_me/r/MensRights14/07/20 01:39 PM
33

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights26/07/20 08:12 PM
33

Discriminationaccidental_me/r/MensRights04/11/20 03:24 PM
33

accidental_me/r/MensRights21/12/13 05:39 PM
32

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights09/09/20 05:15 AM
32

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights26/07/20 08:15 AM
32

Discriminationaccidental_me/r/MensRights09/10/20 12:16 PM
31

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights25/09/22 10:08 AM
31

Generalaccidental_me/r/MensRights12/12/20 07:22 AM
30

Edu./Occu.accidental_me/r/MensRights27/08/20 05:32 PM
30

Progressaccidental_me/r/MensRights23/01/21 08:27 PM
30

Discriminationaccidental_me/r/MensRights22/03/22 10:39 AM
29

Generalaccidental_me/r/MensRights31/01/21 09:42 PM
28

Anti-MRMaccidental_me/r/MensRights22/11/20 09:53 AM
27

Humouraccidental_me/r/MensRights06/06/21 08:10 AM
26

Generalaccidental_me/r/MensRights04/07/20 08:24 AM
26

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights26/02/20 01:17 PM
25

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights13/01/21 09:53 AM
25

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights06/12/20 09:53 AM
25

Activism/Supportaccidental_me/r/MensRights30/06/20 08:26 AM
25

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights10/02/20 12:51 PM
25

accidental_me/r/MensRights13/01/14 05:44 PM
25

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights25/06/20 08:24 PM
24

accidental_me/r/MensRights05/01/14 09:27 AM
23

accidental_me/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/20 08:08 AM
23

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights16/10/21 02:27 PM
23

Generalaccidental_me/r/MensRights06/07/20 12:27 PM
23

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights08/02/20 07:22 PM
22

accidental_me/r/MensRights07/12/20 08:42 AM
22

accidental_me/r/MensRights05/03/14 08:05 PM
22

Generalaccidental_me/r/MensRights10/07/20 02:00 PM
22

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights20/09/21 12:29 PM
21

Discriminationaccidental_me/r/MensRights31/07/20 05:29 PM
21

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights28/07/20 07:56 AM
21

Discriminationaccidental_me/r/MensRights30/06/20 09:09 AM
21

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights01/12/20 01:12 PM
21

Discriminationaccidental_me/r/MensRights09/02/22 05:35 PM
20

Generalaccidental_me/r/MensRights28/07/20 05:40 AM
20

Generalaccidental_me/r/MensRights18/11/20 12:12 PM
20

Legal Rightsaccidental_me/r/MensRights25/07/20 04:22 PM
20

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights23/12/20 02:29 PM
19

accidental_me/r/MensRights27/11/13 08:50 AM
19

Generalaccidental_me/r/MensRights15/01/21 11:34 AM
19

Edu./Occu.accidental_me/r/MensRights28/02/20 08:08 AM
19

accidental_me/r/MensRights15/01/14 12:23 PM
18

Edu./Occu.accidental_me/r/MensRights19/06/21 04:17 PM
18

Discriminationaccidental_me/r/MensRights14/11/20 07:55 AM
18

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights19/10/20 12:39 PM
18

accidental_me/r/MensRights22/04/16 03:11 PM
18

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights12/01/21 07:58 AM
18

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights07/12/20 04:39 PM
17

Generalaccidental_me/r/MensRights25/09/20 08:45 AM
16

Humouraccidental_me/r/MensRights22/09/20 12:30 PM
16

Healthaccidental_me/r/MensRights16/05/20 09:29 AM
16

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights15/05/20 02:25 PM
15

accidental_me/r/MensRights27/11/13 07:46 AM
15

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights02/02/21 07:19 AM
15

Generalaccidental_me/r/MensRights04/03/20 12:48 PM
15

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights16/08/20 07:39 PM
15

Discriminationaccidental_me/r/MensRights03/11/20 09:04 AM
15

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights01/12/20 09:28 AM
14

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights02/01/23 07:02 PM
14

False Accusationaccidental_me/r/MensRights20/04/16 08:33 AM
14

Generalaccidental_me/r/MensRights27/10/20 10:47 AM
14

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights05/02/21 03:23 PM
14

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights15/07/20 04:11 PM
11

Generalaccidental_me/r/MensRights30/09/22 01:05 PM
11

accidental_me/r/MensRights07/01/14 05:54 PM
11

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights16/06/20 01:10 PM
11

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights15/01/21 12:13 PM
11

Generalaccidental_me/r/MensRights22/07/20 11:14 AM
10

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights29/05/20 02:44 PM
10

Generalaccidental_me/r/MensRights31/03/20 04:26 PM
10

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights30/10/20 07:41 AM
10

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights09/11/20 02:24 PM
10

Storyaccidental_me/r/MensRights26/07/14 05:15 PM
9

accidental_me/r/MensRights10/01/14 01:45 PM
9

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights15/02/21 07:17 PM
9

Generalaccidental_me/r/MensRights21/10/20 10:20 AM
9

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights06/03/20 06:12 PM
9

accidental_me/r/MensRights10/12/13 04:35 PM
9

Questionsaccidental_me/r/MensRights28/04/16 05:03 AM
9

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights14/12/20 03:23 PM
8

Discriminationaccidental_me/r/MensRights07/06/20 06:25 AM
7

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights03/12/20 08:00 AM
7

Legal Rightsaccidental_me/r/MensRights03/08/20 01:20 PM
7

Generalaccidental_me/r/MensRights11/07/20 11:17 AM
7

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights21/01/22 06:02 AM
6

Humouraccidental_me/r/MensRights03/12/20 06:39 PM
6

Discriminationaccidental_me/r/MensRights03/09/21 04:39 PM
6

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights02/10/21 07:24 AM
6

accidental_me/r/MensRights17/11/13 11:35 AM
5

Discriminationaccidental_me/r/MensRights18/08/21 03:09 PM
5

accidental_me/r/MensRights05/01/14 08:02 PM
5

Discriminationaccidental_me/r/MensRights13/05/20 07:31 AM
5

Raising Awarenessaccidental_me/r/MensRights26/07/14 11:18 AM
4

accidental_me/r/MensRights27/11/13 10:02 AM
4

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights23/09/21 08:45 AM
4

Generalaccidental_me/r/MensRights30/08/20 07:18 AM
4

accidental_me/r/MensRights10/12/13 09:17 PM
4

Discriminationaccidental_me/r/MensRights03/06/20 09:23 AM
4

Discriminationaccidental_me/r/MensRights20/12/20 09:04 AM
3

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights06/10/20 11:54 AM
3

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights14/10/21 07:12 AM
3

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights29/02/20 06:50 AM
2

accidental_me/r/MensRights23/01/14 08:51 AM
2

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights11/07/20 06:00 AM
2

Generalaccidental_me/r/MensRights08/09/22 09:02 AM
2

accidental_me/r/MensRights21/12/13 07:48 PM
2

Discriminationaccidental_me/r/MensRights01/04/20 11:43 AM
2

Generalaccidental_me/r/MensRights21/10/20 03:58 PM
1

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights28/07/20 07:50 AM
1

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights24/09/20 10:30 AM
1

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights24/09/20 10:27 AM
1

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights06/02/24 08:53 AM
1

Generalaccidental_me/r/MensRights12/12/20 10:22 PM
1

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights15/12/20 07:55 PM
1

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights23/01/22 07:32 PM
1

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights09/11/20 02:17 PM
1

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights09/11/20 02:09 PM
1

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights08/12/20 01:11 PM
1

Discriminationaccidental_me/r/MensRights13/10/20 05:53 AM
1

Edu./Occu.accidental_me/r/MensRights03/09/20 07:01 AM
1

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights16/10/20 11:26 AM
0

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights28/01/22 10:00 AM
0

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights26/12/20 02:23 PM
0

Generalaccidental_me/r/MensRights15/12/20 06:01 PM
0

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights22/09/22 05:22 AM
0

Generalaccidental_me/r/MensRights11/07/20 11:28 AM
0

accidental_me/r/MensRights27/08/20 05:46 PM
0

Social Issuesaccidental_me/r/MensRights16/03/20 04:56 PM
0

Feminismaccidental_me/r/MensRights02/09/20 05:19 PM
0

accidental_me/r/MensRights01/02/20 07:29 PM
0

accidental_me/r/MensRights24/01/14 07:33 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,642 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

This was about the UK, I suppose, with a few references to some US states? Anyway, bad history writing because there are no sources. Could be true or could be not.
/r/MensRights01/02/24 02:17 PM
28

Boys and men having wrong feelings, attitudes and opinions about theri lives can't be tolerated.
/r/MensRights01/02/24 01:43 PM
3

Sometimes it's because the feminist narrative can't be talked about openly because it's mostly wrong factually and morally. Of course, the feminist narrative isn't the sae as the female narrative, but they do have many similarities.
/r/MensRights29/10/23 06:49 AM
1

These AI are reflection of society by the way! Yes, that's what the last line was referring to. We won't be able to trust any AI as long as it just reflects the biased text masses and finds the sentences that are the most likely based on those texts. In a way, it reflects the attitude of a such "average" person whose texts end up on "reliable" platforms, like governments, universities, and established media. (I'm just beginning to understand this strange creature and probably haven't found the r…
/r/MensRights29/10/23 05:28 AM
3

Sorry to say, but you don't understand how it works very well if you think that's all it does. In addition to being a probability algorithm, AI is told which texts it should prefer, and actual people also tell it what is "right" and "wrong". I suggest you have a chat with an AI and ask how it's trained.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 12:26 PM
5

Yes, that was my point. Perhaps I didn't spell it out very well.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 12:21 PM
11

Come to think of it, the answers reflect the general view of the mainstream media, probably not so much what the public thinks. Anyway, it's totally biased in a very hostile, feminist way. We can't know if it's taught to be biased in this way, but it seems likely because some kind of political correctness is what the developers started aiming at after the first catastrophic failures. Google: kevin roose bing ai. To be more precise, I think it's taught to favor "women's views" and feminism along …
/r/MensRights02/06/23 05:19 AM
5

Misandry is real and institutional. If it wasn't why would we hear decade after decade lies about men hating women and beating them up ans other typical hate-movement kind of propaganda. And it's not only propaganda but something that has turned into laws. What can I say? They hate us the same way the Nazis hated Jews or the KK hated "the negroes" in the 1930s.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 11:22 AM
7

Patriarchy is a device women started using after the agricultural revolution to ensure the survival of their offspring. Having children with the wealthiest Big Man was the way to go. This suited the Big Men, too, particularly because marriages with powerful families increased their power. Polygamy, more or less, broke down in the west during the Middle Ages and so did patriarchy, although it took several centuries before the individual person, instead of the family led by a man, became the unque…
/r/MensRights24/05/23 07:22 AM
2

Is this fake? Sounds like it.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 07:11 AM
1

Luckily, I figured the whole thing out. Institutionalizing such ideas like being woman or, say, black causes you to behave in a certain negative way should not be encouraged. And as hard it is to accept, this goes for men, too. It is true, though, that men are on average somewhat different from women. This is not because "patriarchal culture" has instructed men to oppress, discriminate, and wield draconian power in general. It's because evolution is a bitch, as the saying goes (I think). The uni…
/r/MensRights24/05/23 06:38 AM
8

Back in the day, I wrote articles on higher-end restaurants and interviewed and watched hundreds of restaurant workers and owners. This was in the 00s. One thing was clear: kitchens tend to be pretty intense places. It didn't matter which sex the chef was. For kitchen workers, it meant that either you handled the heat or else you quit. Most people who stayed were men. The female workers, in my opinion, were all "good guys" and thus able to take the heat and give back. I liked the vibe and the me…
/r/MensRights24/05/23 05:49 AM
-1

But then again, weddings are something that last only for a few hours. The attractive guys don't have the time to fuck with more than one or two women. EDIT: I failed to read the title of the post. My bad.
/r/MensRights23/05/23 04:52 PM
4

I don't think that is ritualistc but a hbit, a way of life.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 08:10 PM
7

Yeah, it's like things we do without thinking because they're a part of the culture, not necessarily because there is any obvious rationale behind it.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 07:13 PM
6

Perhaps the biggest problem is that for them there are no constants, everything is fluid, everything can be defined ad hoc. If there is a social problem, they can and will mold the "explanation" so that it'll fit their sacred dogma, usually the patriarchy theory.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 05:41 AM
117

It's often frustrating but also kind of funny how stupid ideologues these moderators are pretty much everywhere in the mainstream media. And they are supposed to make fair and intelligent decisions on what gets published, LOL!
/r/MensRights30/09/22 01:02 PM
11

Yeah, but feminists have their own statistics saying that vast amounts of men harass or are violent towards women. There seems to be no amount of evidence that can make them stop believing in that propaganda. Some time ago on a n Amnesty's forum, I tried to refer to academic studies and meta-analysis, and the moderator said I was being violent myself and banned me.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 07:57 PM
5

And feminism i snot some marginal, let alone oppressed ideology. Instead, they have become very much part of the establishment. Now they can change laws and practices so that they favor women, discriminate against men, and slowly destroy the trust between people.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 08:28 AM
1

Satre and Simone de Beauvoir had an open relationship lasting decades. And she was a feminist.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 08:19 AM
-1

I didn't read what you wrote so I don't pretend I can answer to you but seem to think you know something about me LOL. I'm a grandfather of several granddaughters among other things.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 05:27 PM
2

You are living in Hell.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 05:26 PM
2

You're trying to discuss with a strawman. I didn't say what you suggest I said.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 05:25 PM
6

I think women used to be more respectful. And don't get me wrong, I know that men have "always" been more respectful towards women than vice versa. But somehow it was more mutual back then. No? When I think about many popular books back then or even movies, men had "honor", they had a place in the society which they honorably filled. TV was full of honorable men.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 10:45 AM
1

It explained some hormonal differences between men and women, which contribute to different behaviors, if you have to know.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 10:35 AM
24

You can't argue with toxic people, they just want to insult you. I think women tend to be often pretty toxic karens. But still I don't want to generalize by saying it's part of their sex.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 10:28 AM
6

Yeah, I don't know why saying a few facts gets me downvoted. Not that I care but it is always fascinating when it happens. People are often, I don't know, perhaps it's better that I don't say what I think. :--)
/r/MensRights25/09/22 06:38 AM
25

Almost anybody, at least women, can get paid for domestic work by becoming a housemaid.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 04:36 AM
1

There is a lot of research finding that women are very emphatic towards their family, children, in particular. And very unemphatic towards those who threaten their family. It's a biological mechanism that works through hormones. Male hormones, on the other hand, are "designed" to make co-operation possible with people men don't know. For example, men's stoic behavior exits not only to attract women but also to make it possible to not lose your calm in a tight spot with possibly hostile people. S…
/r/MensRights25/09/22 04:23 AM
1

AS expected, this is not getting upvotes, lol, but why?
/r/MensRights22/09/22 07:48 AM
1

I'm probably going to be downvoted but what if young men started taking actual pills that decrease the sex drive? Instead of becoming frustrated, they could focus on something else than chasing women. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/treatments/22402-chemical-castration I'm not saying that I'm pro "chemical castration", decreasing your testosterone levels with medication, just wondering if it could help millions of boys and young men.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 04:27 AM
1

Sure, but I was thinking about what premises would make anti-feminism sound rational and righteous. Arguing that it's toxic is futile because most people just think it's crazy talk.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 06:06 AM
3

All that is solid melts into air, wrote Marx. And he was right - although in a way that he never could have imagined. It was actually the Marxist tradition, ironically, that brought us this world where everything is fluid. And it serves power-hungry feminists. But not women. For men it's a catastrophe.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 06:47 PM
1

I thought about my answer afterwards, and perhaps men tend to be more predictable. Then again, women tend to be more, hmm, delightful? There is a slight difference that is hard to explain. Anyway, I'm talking about family and long-term friends. The world is different for young men, I get that.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 05:47 PM
6

LOL
/r/MensRights20/09/22 04:04 PM
1

All women in my life have shortcomings - who doesn't - but they are decent people, normal, predictable, pretty much the way the men in my life are.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 04:01 PM
51

[–]nighthawk_something 16 points 7 days ago "Here's how men are oppressed, let's shoot up a grocery store to make sure that nothing changes" Basically the entire ethos of MRAs Their hatred is often so much harsher than here. Yeah, I hate that Feminists have managed to rise to the establishment and that they use their power to spread hatred and lies. But I would never take a marginal incident to trash the whole movement. Rather, I talk about what the powerful do not what some mentally disturbed f…
/r/MensRights20/09/22 03:29 PM
-11

I think they are trying to widen their audience base. Besides, women are better customers by any metrics, probably in movie business, too.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 03:18 PM
38

What is the askfeminist like? Usually feminists can't survive in an open discussion because most of it is either lies, half-truths, or immoral. Surely they are not having open discussions there?
/r/MensRights20/09/22 03:16 PM
1

atrocities What atrocities exactly has the Swedish government funded? Is there any other government that has declared itself feminist?
/r/MensRights20/09/22 03:12 PM
1

This is going to be or , actually, is already a huge problem in Europe, too. That's because nobody will talk about it as a problem, well, nobody who matters. Female MDs just aren't on average as productive as male MDs.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 12:10 PM
5

Make-up is used also to look different from men. Without it, many women would look too much male. It also makes you look healthy or healthier than what you really are. And younger.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 07:22 AM
22

Then again Swedish governmets tend to declare themselves Feminist. Or is it just the leftist governments?
/r/MensRights20/09/22 07:10 AM
2

What feminism boils down to - perhaps - is the need to undermine and finally destroy "patriarchal institutions and norms". In this sense it's a typical new-left movement, "progressive" and "liberal", although many followers don't know this. An anti-feminist is thus a person who doesn't think that we should undermine such institutions as traditional families. That, by the way, doesn't necessarily make an anti-feminist a conservative because a rational person can advocate for progressive ideas wit…
/r/MensRights20/09/22 07:07 AM
2

Psychologists have long told us that there are two independent “always-on” sides of our brain. One is the emotional side, the other the rational side. NYU psychologist Jonathan Haidt uses a lovely analogy to explain both: the emotional side is the elephant, the rational side is the rider. The rider of the elephant looks like he or she is in charge, but when there’s a disagreement between the elephant and the rider, the elephant usually wins. Irrational ideologues like Feminists are like elephant…
/r/MensRights20/09/22 06:44 AM
1

Toxic masculinity, as a feminist concept, means those behaviors that have a negative effect on oneself and others and is caused by patriarchy. So, if men, for example, are stoic and don't express their feelings the same way women do, it's considered toxic and caused by patriarchy. Actually, men probably tend to be stoic because of innate things and because women like stoic men. Nevertheless, being stoic may harm men and thus be toxic, if it's not natural but an act. So, there might be something …
/r/MensRights18/09/22 07:14 PM
2

Intersectional femininism, in particular.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 04:28 AM
1

Well, writing here is just a bi-product of what I'm really up to. Or, rather, it sometimes, when I feel fed up, gives me to boost to write down certain things I have been thinking. That's about it.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 07:40 PM
1

LOL, "fake feminists"! My advice, in turn, is that you stop now looking into feminism, when you still have your naive beliefs. Because if you dig as deep as I have dug, there is no turning back. You see, feminism has almost hegemony when it comes to many things, particularly so called equality issues. And it's frightening that an ideology that has been lying about so many things and spread so many hostile lies is in power Tehy have even managed to turn their hatred into laws, like the Istanbul c…
/r/MensRights15/09/22 05:30 PM
1

I'm doing this for myself - and in the prcess to do public service bt fighting a hate movement called feminism.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 02:25 PM
1

I read the book, as I already wrote in the original post. I also know - after writing books myself - that titles are supposed to do something positive to the sales. I wrote something about it in a post above.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 12:46 PM
4

She thought is a people's issue, though.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 12:36 PM
9

And feminist move goal posts freely as the need arises. Many of them have been taught that objective reality is not fixed but changes all the time. That seems to develop into a state of mind that steers thoughts so that you don't really have to follow "traditional rules" of argumentation. Along with goal posts, strawmen are particularly common: "so, you are saying..." Furthermore their "facts" are often myths that live within their own circles. I don't think they themselves necessarily believe i…
/r/MensRights15/09/22 09:24 AM
13

Just bring a sign with #killallmen Abd the book I Hate men, which has been received pretty well and translated into over 17 languages.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 09:02 AM
4

It’s an edgy title. Whatever. They only do it because they know people like you will get upset. No, you are wrong. Those feminists did it because that's their conviction that hating men is a good thing.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 04:42 AM
2

it’s probably disingenuous to judge a book solely based on reviews, mainly reviews that confirm your biases. That's not the way I did it. I even described my "method" so that it would become obvious even to a fool that I didn't. But if somebody is foolish enough, there's nothing you can do. Authors of books use titles like this to grab attention. You didn't get that right either. Yeah, most authors do that but not this one. The book was not supposed to sell more than perhaps a few hundred copies…
/r/MensRights15/09/22 04:36 AM
8

Exactly.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 04:26 PM
12

"Hates like a man"? What are you talking aboua? She obviously hates like a feminist.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 11:28 AM
4

Do the US men have the right to vote if they don't register? Because if not, men still don't have the same political rights as women.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 07:05 AM
3

As do all social animals. The stress hormones of male chimps were measured and it turned out that the further up or down the social hierarchy an individual chimp was, the higher the stress level was. The boss chimp had the most extreme levels. And for a good reason because they don't live long. One day a group of lower chimps will go at him together and bite him and eat his testicles until he's dead. And before that happens, each day they must act as if this day could be the one. The number of s…
/r/MensRights14/09/22 06:41 AM
8

A fun fact: In Finland (which is often hailed as one of the most equal countries in the world, LOL), men got the same political rights as women in 1945, 40 years after women. Anyway, it's true that some women didn't often have the same rights as as their male peers in the past - or today in traditional societies. That was (is) because societies consisted of families, often extended families or clans. Certain men were the heads of those families. And they had to carry a heavy burden. That burden …
/r/MensRights13/09/22 06:49 PM
9

Here's a similar study from Finland with nationalities.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 06:29 PM
1

Here's a meta-analysis. There are other sources on YouTube and in scholarly papers. I seem to remember there is another meta-analysis, too. But you have to find them for yourself. It's bit tricky because for some reason they don't easily appear in Google searches. One trick is to write reddit as one of the search terms because over the years there must have been dozens or probably hundreds of posts about the discrepancy between the academic findings and the "official truth". EDIT: I realized tha…
/r/MensRights13/09/22 06:10 PM
1

Companies try to pay according to productivity. They have to in a competitive market. If they pay women less, it's because women are less productive or women are satisfied with a lower salary (meaning they won't negotiate or quit to find an employer who pays them more).
/r/MensRights13/09/22 06:01 PM
1

She first said that all women, including herself, face sexual harassment. Then she was asked to state an example. And that was what she came up with, sitting in a room with men. A police officer!
/r/MensRights12/09/22 03:09 PM
1

It could be, but because most violence is reciprocal and men naturally don't want to use full force against, say, their wives, I doubt that's not true. In the rare cases when a man is a psychopath or totally loses his control, it's true, of course. But if the woman loses it, she often uses "weapons", and that can be more destructive.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 02:57 PM
6

Both women and men don't want to see women being hit anymore they want to see children being hit. Evolution made women's face look child-like so that the much stronger sex wouldn't hit them. Crying has the same effect. Women hitting men is more usual than the other way around because nobody really cares when that happens. Men are or don't feel like child, instead they have these quite scary features so that men can commit violence and receive it (I'm talking more about the men of the past when y…
/r/MensRights12/09/22 02:44 PM
-1

Sweden and Norway have Finland in between. And Finlad drafts only men and let the most eager women join, too.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 02:39 PM
-7

Small countries right next to Russia don't have the luxury of thinking about things like equality in military issues. Women on average are not as good soldiers as men, not even close. Everybody knows this, although we often pretend we don't.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 07:25 AM
1

Yeah, and there are good sources, even meta-analysis, saying that women are more violent in IPV.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 06:21 AM
7

We've been told that in the police force women don't have to fight, because there is that calming-down effect when a woman is present. Even the most obnoxious bastard doesn't want to attack a woman. Fair enough. But then there are the situations where the female magic doesn't work, when you really must fight or have the physical competence. Unfortunately, you rarely can tell in advance what kind of a situation is in question. "Should we send men or women?"
/r/MensRights31/08/22 05:14 PM
1

Kanerva, an unmarried man, was ousted partly because he flirted with women, and partly because he couldn't keep his promise to stop flirting. Terms that are used in connection with drugs were used two or three times on the video, or so it sounds. Marin herself didn't take a proper hair drug test. Why, if she was clean and no drugs were used? Why didn't Alma or anybody else? It is hard to say about all the security concerns because the police and other security officials won't talk about them, na…
/r/MensRights26/08/22 10:28 AM
4

She acts in a way that would not be allowed to male PM. That's why a male PM would have apologized already. We shouldn't lower the standards for women, and particularly not in these times of crises.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 07:55 AM
3

A test taken from your hair is supposed to tell about your drug use for a much longer period. But she didn't take that test. I wonder why? Furthermore, there have been claims that the doctor who decided what test to take is her friend but I don't know if that's true , even after googling.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 07:49 AM
5

Just want to clarify that she did not take an aprroriate drug test, a I already explained. Don't make things up.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 07:40 AM
6

You are just standing up for her and got almost nothing right, not the drugs part, not the security concerns, not the drug test, not that male ministers have not been forced to resign (Kanerva and others), and particularly not the Russian angle. A true white knight!
/r/MensRights26/08/22 07:36 AM
6

In many ways a typical hate movement.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 04:00 PM
39

I was just talking about her the other day when somebody claimed that men don't understand how hard it is to be a woman and how privileged men are. Yeah, in some ways it might be true, in some other ways not. But she really did a favor to all men in the end.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 02:42 PM
2

Onion but not.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 02:38 PM
1

It's insanity to think that a movement that aims at helping a certain group would actually help other groups as well. Why on earth would tehy do so. But even more insane is that in the west, at least, the establishment insists that feminist want to help other people as much as women. Crazy!
/r/MensRights22/08/22 02:35 PM
5

What is on my mind? Women? Nope. What's on my mind is equality and the widening gap between men and women and how that affects us and our future.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 08:51 AM
5

Whaaaat!? I was obsessed with women? Where did that come from? Ok, I get it. You're one of those...
/r/MensRights17/08/22 08:31 AM
7

What?! That people here are osessed with women? You haven't been reading this sub enough, if that's what you think. Almost no posts ever are obsessed with women. If you think otherwise, list here below posts that are. Perhaps you'ew right but you have to prove your case.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 07:23 AM
15

Why are these women so obsessed with men? Honestly. What is it in certain women that make them think about men so much? And if the result is that men are shit, why not just stop thinking about men? I know a couple of men who at some point just decided that they don't want to spend their life chasing after women because it never turned out well. In my opinion, that's the way to go. Not spending your days on social media complaining. Besides, I've been told that many women can quite easily become …
/r/MensRights17/08/22 06:33 AM
16

It's disturbing. I rememberr how people wished decades ago that women would be somehow better than men. But then it turned out that what they would come up with is Feminism! A movement that is in many ways as bad as anything men have come up with.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 02:35 PM
263

Because our culture - and Reddit - lets girls and women express their feelings by hatred, there will always be individuals who do. It was pretty much the same thing, say, 100 years ago when different cultures let immoral people hate jews, blacks, gypsies and so forth. If Reddit had existed back then, there would have been subreddits like "LetsHateTheNegroes". One of the most ironic things in our modern vulture culture is that misogyny is supposed to be a thing, and wide-spread at that, but hatin…
/r/MensRights16/08/22 02:27 PM
3

Women are extremely important for the movement because men are really not allowed to talk about the injustices men face without big risks. Surely women, too, can face social consequences but perhaps not so "fatal"?
/r/MensRights16/08/22 09:10 AM
12

Social studies on the sex differences can be divided into three genres: "We were surprised that it wasn't women but men who were discriminated against." "We were surprised that it wasn't women but men who were discriminated against, so, we decided to ignore the data that didn't fit." And then tere are the real feminist academics who know exactly what they are doing from the beginning.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 08:41 AM
3

It's an old idea: "Why are women always complaining about men being this or that when men are actually a picture of the female desire". And it's true to some extent. Two things come to mind, though. During the eons of evolution, we lived in a very different kill-or-get-killed environment. What was good in a men back then isn't necessarily attractive nowadays - although certain general characteristics, like strong, stoic, and humorous, won't go anywhere. If you read about hunter gatherers or noma…
/r/MensRights12/08/22 12:38 PM
4

Perhaps evolution has favored strictly straight guys but has not cared particularly much whether women like women sexually so long as they let men have an intercourse with them every now and then? That would make the male sexuality rigid and female sexuality fluid. Edit: The reason being that men who are obsessed with having sex with women compared to men who really don't know whether to play with each other or go hunting women are evolutionary two very different groups.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 10:25 AM
14

Many feminists would say that Feminism is called out for misandry all the time. And it sure is - somewhere in the comment section far down below or on marginal forums like this. But the institutions and people who matter, the establishment, keep silent or are feminists themselves. People in general seem to think that women are the eternal underdogs. Or perhaps they just feel that protecting women is what we should do, like protecting children. An unknown man, on the other hand, has been a threat…
/r/MensRights12/08/22 09:02 AM
18

Same for male homosexuality. I once discussed with a gay academic who was doing research on homosexuality. He said that it's quite clear that it's much harder ( or perhaps rarer, can't remember) for men to choose their sexual orientation that it's for women.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 08:45 AM
4

There was this forum some ten years ago in Sweden that was like this forum but about Sweden mostly. It was fascinating and disturbing how much feminist hatred and lies there were in the Swedish media and elsewhere. Much more than in Finland at the time. Unfortunately, the owner of the forum got overwhelmed and shut it down, if I remember correctly. My guess is that it's gotten worse ever since. At least in Finland it has.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 08:38 AM
14

LOL, Sweden is perhaps the most Feminist country on earth. And it's not good but very propagandist and hateful. Or perhaps it's even worse in Finland.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 08:22 AM
2

Yeah, it's appealing because it's self-evident and still it's not because we can't know the difference.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 08:01 AM
1

Serenity prayer: God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, courage to change the things I can, and wisdom to know the difference.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 07:56 AM
2

Bunching up is pretty hard for women as a group because they are celarly the better-off sex. According to almost all central well-being statistics.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 07:32 AM
2

feminists & just like any lobbying group Feminist are a very special kind of a lobbying group: their strategy is to spread hatred towards a group into which people are born. Furthermore, they are very much in power in the west, sos, calling them a lobbying group is not perhaps accurate.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 07:30 AM
5

It just isn't that Feminists don't care, they also actively spread hate propaganda by, for example, lying about the domestic violence. And these are not some marginal nazis but people in the very center of the establishment.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 07:23 AM
3

According to the article, that's because men are in a fierce competition between each other, even fiercer than earlier. So, what should you do, give up or become better? As it says int the article, you can be happy without a woman. So, everybody can really decide what to do: compete for women or do something else.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 07:18 AM
2

It might seem that love is reserved to only perhaps ten, twnty percent of men. And, yet, I made it, having several lovely grand kids already. My own kids being much more sucessfult that I ever was. Somehow it all turned out almost too good to be true.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 09:21 AM
1

It's in women's culture to be "anti-men". Ask a honest female friend and she'll tell you how women talk about men when there are no men present. It's the same with many primates. Males are a nuisance, always wanting sex, ready to rape, even. Then again huMEN are different. We want our women to like us. And yet huWOMEN see the ape in us. And most women like men in the end - or, at least, don't hate men.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 09:33 AM
2

I'm pretty sure it's misogyny /s
/r/MensRights29/07/22 07:28 AM
4

Isn't "cat calling" something only certain groups are in to? Isn't it alien to the arch enemy of feminism, the well-to-do white men?
/r/MensRights29/07/22 07:21 AM
2

It'll make demonizing men official, like, if the KKK's views on the black would become a law.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 07:56 PM
15

This is how it went in all likelihood. A group of feminists set out to prove how the world is against women. At first, they thought it was a simple job. Then to their surprise, reality set in. Women were actually dong better than men in. The only thing they could do was to corrupt the data - and change it into porpganda. This is how feminism works and how they change the world. It's so sad.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 04:51 PM
1

These results are supported by actual academic studies, though, at least in Norway and Finalnd.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 07:07 AM
1

Immoral or just stupid. We never know. This is the same problem we have with all hate-movements.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 07:20 PM
1

There is no significant differende in the DV between the sexes, alhough women start violence more often. This is what the non-Feminist academia has found out. You can have your own feminist facts. Who cares? So do most of the humanity, and what's more important, the establishment that decides what people know.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 04:48 PM
1

There is no significant difference between the sexes although women star violence more often than men. Lesbian relationships tend to be the most abusive, then heterosexual relationships and then gay relationships. I tend to think, right or wrong, that if somebody is ignorant about the facts and/or promotes hateful propaganda, it's not my job to educate them. Google yourself and the process perhaps leaves a small sing into your brain.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 04:19 PM
1

Well said, once again. The HUGE problem with intersectionalism is that it's not something that rationla people would put together. At least, I don't see how that could happen. Instead it's our subconscious attitudes helped by activist who don't really appriciate fairness the way the enlightenment tradition sees it. As every person having the same human rights as individuals. I understand that there ar narratives about our past that righfully emphasize the past wrongdoings and their presence even…
/r/MensRights02/07/22 04:11 PM
2

Racism and sexism are so kindered that often there is no point in talking about then as different pehenomena. I'm afraid that intersetionalism is trying to bring them together under one political umbrella: let's all be intersectionalsit and put people in an hiearchy the way it was in the good ol' days.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 03:24 PM
2

Well said.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 03:01 PM
0

Psychopathy is much more common among men and it's usally psycopaths that radically abuse women - or men. Almost everything, good and bad, is more common among men. Like murdering your spouse - or saving her. That's basic evolutionary biology. But I'm talking about people who are more in the middle of the bell curve, where alost all of us exist. Academic research tells that among these people there is no big difference between the sexes although women tend to ignate violence much more often than…
/r/MensRights02/07/22 02:37 PM
1

" an overwhelming majority of abusers are male" An overwhelming majority of protectors are men. Men are an overwhelming majority in almost everyhin we notice. But the most abusive ralationships are lesbain and the least are gay. Women start violence much more often than men in straight relationships. A big surprise! So, why is that? Why are men so little abusive and why feminist have to lie about it so loudly? The reason is simple. all hate movements need the bad guy they can blame. But I'm not …
/r/MensRights02/07/22 02:07 PM
1

Can I still comment on reddit? Let's try.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 01:56 PM
1

For example, the Istanbul Convention and it's resolution becoming law is very real. That's what real feminists do.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 01:12 PM
1

Academic meta-analyses. AFAIK there are two. Plus other academic litterature alhtoufh it sometimes hard to find becasue certain facts don't shod up easily on Google But sorry if I offended you. You are obviously a troubled person and it's not civilized to use strong arguments when speaking to people like you. So, pelease accpet my apolgy.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 08:04 AM
1

Academic research disagrees. You are a victim of hateful propaganda. But so are most people. But haters hate. That's what you folks do.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 07:43 AM
1

Yes I did. And it was obvious that you didn't read the text I posted. But never mind, it seems that few did.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 07:35 AM
1

19 % of women said that feminist describes them "very well". 47 % somewhat well. My theory is that most women are feminists because it's fashionable. But they don't know much about it because they don't face discrimination but are, rather, favored by "everybody". Teachers, employers favor them, they are treated more nicely, there are always people who want to help them and so forth. Something men can only dream of. When things are realtively fine, you don't feel any need to look deeper into femi…
/r/MensRights02/07/22 07:33 AM
1

"A National Geographic/Ipsos survey of more than 1,000 American women found that only 29% of respondents identified as feminists, while another 69% did not." But the share is crazy, anyway, knowing what Feminism is.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 07:01 AM
0

No offense, but did you read what I wrote? I seems you didn't.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 06:57 AM
1

I can't discuss with people who think that men generally beat up their wives to keep them under control. I hate you, sexists, too much. Go to a Feminist sub to spew your insane hatred. There you are welcome.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 06:41 AM
1

They loved too much on the other side and hated on the other. But that's not the point. The point is how we use words.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 05:57 AM
2

The problem is that when you alk to feminists you'll find way too often hatred. Ignorance or hatred.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 05:53 AM
0

Don't disrespect the Nazis, but only the Nazis that disrespect you.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 09:33 PM
1

Women decide, for example, more often the place where the family moves to. I have no idea why you started talking about makeup. Very weak, nevertheless. Women decide what we consume, where we live, where the roads go to. They demand politicians also, to do things they want.. Most of the reality is decided by women. And why not? Women are the more peacful sex. Man have for centuries aimed at making the world something the sex whose accetance we look for wants. Well, it didn't turn out too bad. Wh…
/r/MensRights01/07/22 08:42 PM
1

But politically there is still just the reality that is constructed by words. What we have to do is to fight over their meanings.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 08:27 PM
1

My point is that western societies are a systen where people have two fundmental rights: they can vote and they can consume (or get elected and start a business), People often forget the right to consume alhough it's in some sense a more important right because it made us wealthy. Because we have the right to vote and consume , we need people to run those institutions that guaranteen these rights. They are our servants in some sense - although they have also power over us and are not just servan…
/r/MensRights01/07/22 07:44 PM
2

Thanks.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 07:26 PM
3

Women have more rights than men in many western socities and they are statistically better-off. Nowhere thay have less rights in the west. Nevertheless they are able to sell a story that is propaganda, contrary to what facts tell. They can do this becasue they are part of the establishment. I'm almost ok with that. Every activist group uses the means they have in theri disposal. But I'm not ok with the hate-movement tactics. Portrayin men as demon-like creatures. That's why I thing Feminism has …
/r/MensRights01/07/22 07:25 PM
1

which against commone belief doesn't mean a society in which men are privileged, it means a society in which the ones who hold the most power are men Thanks for the thoughtful answer. I don't believe, though, that men have more power in our western socities. Sure, there are many men serving the markets and voters, but the have little power. Instead, who have the power are tha ones who elect them and that's women.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 07:12 PM
2

No. Scientific facts are rarely considered to be true as you must know. It would be foolish to claim that I know something with absolute certainty. What we do is we quantify things. Then somebody quantifies in a different way. And then comes along more. Then, one day somebody consideres all these studies and makes a meta-analysis. That starts to sound like somethin we can consider to be close to a fact. Perhaps we could make sotemthing out of it? Make it work. But then, after ten or twenty years…
/r/MensRights01/07/22 07:05 PM
3

Where I live the feminist insanity is mainstream within the establishment. It became a law. How much more mainstream you can be? MRAs, who cares, so marginal group that most people don't even know they exist.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 06:53 PM
1

I mean no one is essentially right or wrong we’re just all sort of making up our own opinions. Our socities in the west are grounded in the idea of the enlightenment which basically said that we should aim at facts instead of opinions or other imaginary things like religion. I hate to see how the younger generations don't anymore believe in this great idea. Instead we have propaganda and people saying that there are no facts.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 06:38 PM
4

I wasn't trying to be hostile. Perhaps I say things bluntly becuse of the language barrier? As for what can count as facts, if not scietific meta-analyses don't, I don't know what can.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 06:09 PM
3

Your idea of feminism may be all feminists are trying to actively hurt men No, it's not, and I said so much already in the OP. I live in a countrey where Feminism along with its misandrism is an integral part of the government. Apparenlty you live somewhere else. Or perhaps you live here but don't see the problem because it benefits you.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 06:01 PM
5

I…guess you and I don’t agree about western civilization being the pinnacle of human society. So what's you pinnacle? Anyway, I'ver been studying history for 40 years now, part of the time professionally. I'm pretty sure I know what I'm talking about. I'm pretty sure that you just want to make a political satement by saying that somewhere sometime things were better than what they are in the EU right now. And that's OK insofar you know that what you say is not true. EDIT: And yeah classical Gree…
/r/MensRights01/07/22 05:54 PM
6

the obvious existence of domestic violence which does disproportionately effect women. It's just not exclusively true There is a lot of academic reseach, even metanalyses that don't agree. I think that you are a victim of Feminist propaganda spread by the establishment - as are almost everybody else.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 05:49 PM
5

Yeah, it often looks like that.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 05:03 PM
1

If "Feminism" is a word without real meaning, this discussion is over. In a sense, human history is an never-ending battle over words and their meanings. I don't claim that I know the truth. But, nevertheless, I tried to explain what I meant with the question. If this then that.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 05:03 PM
1

Rarely but sometimes.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 04:35 PM
3

Yeah, you're right, I'm wrong. But still, I was thinkin about more rebutable forums. Misogyny is, after all, something that penetrates throught the whole patrarchial society. (Of course it doesn't but that the establisment wants to tell us.)
/r/MensRights01/07/22 04:33 PM
5

My question went somethig like this: If you don't belive in the mainstream propaganda by feminists, like the crazy idea that men want to beat up their wives to keep them under control, are you really a Feminists? The mainstream seems to hate men, after all. How else they could come up with so hateful narratives decades after decades?
/r/MensRights01/07/22 04:30 PM
13

But feminism, at the same time is not a "small world" but a key component of the establisement. We are ruled by these crazy ideas of men being evil and women victims.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 04:08 PM
1

Yeah, but most people who call themselves Feminist aren't like that. They can be perfectly rational and moral - and still think that men want to beat up their wives. They belive in somtehing tha is obviously not true. Why? Because deep down they hate men?
/r/MensRights01/07/22 04:04 PM
3

Could you direct me to these infamous misogynists, where do they discuss their hatred? I've heard so much about them but haven't found them. Hating men is common and easy to find, but hating women, elusive.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 04:00 PM
2

I think you are fundamentaally wrong. Fighting Nazis was fightin Nazis, not fightin some obscure grou who happened to believe in something like perhaps killing Jews. There is a reason why we have words.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 03:55 PM
5

Yeah, I adressed that. Women are cabable of loving their dads, for example. What I then tried was to rise on a more abstract level: do you have to believe such feminist core ideas that men, for example, tend to violently opress their wives and children. That's laughable, but it's aslo something the feminist movement have successfully been advocating for decades. It's not something aheppining in the marginal, the hatres is right there in the middle.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 03:40 PM
11

the patriarchy hurts socioeconomically disadvantaged men just as much as it does women and children. What! are you saying that the western society that is superior to anything the humanity has seen or has been able to develop, is hurting women? Or Children of all people! Where do this crazy ideas come from? Yes, lets spend our time on Reddit on our couches and imagien how much better everything would be without "patriarchy" or whatever you want to call this world of unseen wealth, safety, and hu…
/r/MensRights01/07/22 03:21 PM
6

Typically feminists just feel not think. There was notihin anti-women in what you wrote, but it still felt like there was. I suppose.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 02:29 PM
7

Some of the most misandrist feminists are men themselves. Let's not forget that.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 02:25 PM
3

"Ideology" is perhaps not the right word here. "Civilization"? Beiing part and promoting a civilization that doesn't attck neighboring countries and try to treat everybody nice. That's what I want to be part of.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 01:01 PM
4

On the otehr hand, men are the result of millions of years of women's desires. Men are not only that but to a large part exactly that. Evolution: Men desperately want to fuck and women choose who can. What can you do when you can't revert millions of years of evolution? Well, what most men do, try to be nice to women and show them I'm a good guy, let's have children together. And often somthing pretty awesome can come out of that formula.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 08:26 AM
2

On average, this sub is superior to any Feminist sub, site, or media. In my opinion.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 08:18 AM
1

You did have good points there, not tyring to be condensending.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 08:13 AM
2

The crucial idea of the western world comes from the enlihgtenment and thus facts opposed to imaginary things. Whatever we do, we should not give up this ideal. If we do, we'll become jew-hating nazis, men-hating feminists.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 08:07 AM
5

Here's an idea: Try rationality instead of feelings. Yeah, it's harder but in the end it's much more rewarding.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 09:50 AM
3

"Actual men's rights organization". LOL. There is no other actual men's right's organizations than this here and elsewhere where men and women try the change the feminist narrative. And, believe it or not, the projects has been successful. The establishmen can't argue for feminism on open forums. In other words, they have suppress the freedom of speech. And that, my friend, is the seed of change. Ha always been.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 09:33 AM
5

For the privileged, equal rights look like oppression
/r/MensRights30/06/22 09:28 AM
13

Men are by far more likely to become marginalized, for example suffer from mental disorders or abuse alcohol or drugs. The mainstream media tells us otherwise, but they are just sexist. The mainstream media would never forget that, say, black people are at a grater risk of becoming marginalized and face other societal ills. And that's fine. But the story they are telling about men is toatlly feminist. We don't like men much, do we, unless somthing terribla happens and we need them.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 09:18 AM
4

The US legal system is crazy. No? It's hard to understand, anyway. Ruining people economically seems to be rather the rule than an exception. No? (Heard was probably a metoo-opportunist, but that's not what I'm talking about.)
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:48 PM
24

I'm starting to think that feminism is a complete and total lie, from start to finish. It's a political movement grounded in victimhood and women can't be considered victims without lying. But victimhood normal stuff within many political movements. Sadly, feminism needs an enemy, too. That's where it gets ugly.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 05:50 AM
13

Some women think that having children is a wonderful thing. But of course you are entitled to your opinion that it's awful. Anyway on average, men are worse off. It's a fact you can't deny although you probably think you can. Society is geared towards helping women to stay safe and get ahead even when it's men who face much greater social risks.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 05:41 AM
5

What classifies as privileged to you? Women are happier and their quality of life is higher. Women are treated better by both men and women. The "privilege gap" is wide and visible. At some level we all know how things are. And still people think that men are better off - and would probably think so even without feminst lying about everything. Our minds are strange creatures...
/r/MensRights23/06/22 05:27 AM
11

Furthermore, feminist propaganda is often grounded in ideas and lies that are hard to explain in any other terms than as hatred. The best example is probably the way they lie about domestic violence. This is also the most dangerous form of hatred because it's systematic and they have been able to make it mainstream, even so mainstream that it has become part of legislation in many countries (the Istanbul convention, the Duluth model).
/r/MensRights23/06/22 05:14 AM
1

Testosterone makes men dominant, not violent.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 05:14 PM
1

If patriarchy describes a system where a society is divided into (extended) families or clans that are under the almost absolute power of a male head of the family or clan, such systems still exist and did exist in the west until quite lately. Now, the definition I gave above was rude but, nevertheless, I think patriarchy could describe that tradition, legislation, and social system, quite fairly - had it not become Feminist propaganda and thus pretty much meaningless or even derogatory.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 07:50 AM
3

Thanks for making me laugh,
/r/MensRights03/06/22 06:34 PM
1

"Hidden" in the sense that it's hard to find with google. I explained it but you didn't read.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 05:26 PM
8

Women are the more privileged sex because, among other things, people like them more and want to be their friends, help them and what not. It's in all likelihood a biological machanism.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 05:24 PM
-6

Google for "subconscious mind controls 95" and you'll get about 2 million links. Some things are so easy to find with Google or even well-known that it's a bit too much to demand that the person saying something pretty much common knowledge has to provide links.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 05:08 PM
-5

It's a well-known fact. Most of what we do we do without consciously making any decisions. I think you'll find a lengthy discussion about it in Thinking fast and slow, for example. But you can deduce it without any books by thinking, say your day. You made some conscious decisions but most things, like, say moving your position, opening Reddit,, not to mention things like breathing, you did without deciding to do it. To make things even more interesting, it's a well-known and tested theory that,…
/r/MensRights03/06/22 03:54 PM
-15

The IAT is not a meaningful test because it's only measures the quick unconscious emotional responses that you have that can change once you have enough time to think rationally.This is why it can't be linked to any sort of real world behavior. The average guy thinks rationally perhaps about 5 % of his decisions, the rest is automatic and based often on unconscious associations. That's what the test tries to test. The name of the test already gives away what it is trying to do.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 12:07 PM
2

It's against the feminist mentality to be pro-men in any issue (although they sometimes pretend that they are not like that, I've seen enough to know that it's just opportunism, not real, long-lasting feelings).
/r/MensRights03/06/22 12:01 PM
7

Someone here was trying to give an impression that the test is somehow debunked and only ignorant people think it's not. That's not true. The main concern probably is that we can't know by exactly what bias the systematic results are caused. My point in this post was not to argue about that. I simply noticed that women are systematically seen in a more positive light (in that one study) and that this was a result that was hard to find.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 11:51 AM
8

Wikipedia: The IAT is now widely used in social psychology research and, to some extent, in clinical, cognitive, and developmental psychology research. Hmm, why are these people widely using it when they think it worthless? A mystery indeed.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 11:15 AM
15

Of course, your opinion is not the opinion of professional psychologists in general. Although the test has its critics, few claim that is worthless. That's, pretty much, what you can say about any psychological test. You just can't see inside anybody's head, so everything you measure is indirect and as such interpreted through a theoretical framework. If the IAT just measures feelings of the moment and not permanent biases, you can still ask where the feeling came from and why they show up syste…
/r/MensRights03/06/22 08:09 AM
1

Saved. Thanks.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 04:47 PM
1

Any links?
/r/MensRights12/05/22 09:21 AM
14

Patriarchy at work. /s
/r/MensRights31/03/22 01:34 PM
2

It would be nice if women more often stared to stand up for equality and harmful stereotypes. Nowadays most of them don't. But neither do men. Most people are either too traditional or too ideological.
/r/MensRights27/03/22 08:14 AM
1

Name a claim you don't believe and I'll provide sources and arguments. But first you have to show that you understand that I'm talking about Feminist claims, not bashing women. Two totally different things, like, say, Stalinism and workers are two different things.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 07:40 AM
1

Feminists are establishment, MRAs are marginal. You can't compare the two. What you're saying is like trying to deny the poor the right to be critical of the lies and half-truths the rich tell.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 07:25 AM
2

That's unfortunately impossible until people turn into angles.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 07:55 AM
1

Women are more violent in general in relatiohips and families.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 12:54 PM
1

You met a sociopath, LOL
/r/MensRights21/02/22 05:16 PM
11

¨The cannon so likes that fodder.
/r/MensRights19/02/22 08:44 PM
3

In the west most if not all governments are more or less anti-MRA, as are many international organizations, like the UN. Media and academia are the same This may sound like hyperbole but it's not. If they weren't, we wouldn't have institutions and even laws that discriminate against men's rights. Instead we'd have at least attempts to correct the worst cases of discrimination like conscription, harsher punishments, widening equality gap in education, the marginalization of boys, homelessness and…
/r/MensRights16/02/22 10:21 AM
1

You sound very frustrated, lol.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 10:45 AM
2

Then again, most young women are attractive, about 70-80 %. The bell curve is very steep for women, particularly with makeup.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 05:08 AM
-7

In democratic free-market societies, it's impossible to dominate people. For that you need a totlitarian society.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 09:25 AM
35

It was an example. I once had a discussion on a feminist forum (which didn't kick me out for some reason) about which sex is better off. Several feminists joined in. After several hours the last message, I seem to remember, form their side said something like: "yeah, but feminism is not about who's better off but who is in power". I think that was the first and last time I, kind of, won an argument with feminists so that they agreed. As I wrote, it's hard to argue that men are better off, if you…
/r/MensRights13/02/22 09:16 AM
121

Women are in general better off compared to men. It's very hard to argue otherwise. And the equality gap has been widening between the sexes. I have often wondered how big, for example, the education gap can become before people start to realize that something needs to be done in favor of men and boys. Another possibility is that the wider the gap becomes the less satisfied women will be and the more they want to be favored. Now it seems that this is exactly what's going to happen. The propagand…
/r/MensRights13/02/22 07:53 AM
7

I'm not sure about that. In some parts of Africa, so I've heard, if somebody, usually he, is suspected of sorcery - like shrinking somebody's penis while haking hands - a mob can gather around the poor fellow and beat him to death.
/r/MensRights12/02/22 05:11 PM
2

Martin van creed Martin van Creveld. He indeed has a chapter called The Great Witch Hunt. I don't remember if I have read it but now I must.
/r/MensRights12/02/22 04:25 PM
20

Here's an example: https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/35037
/r/MensRights12/02/22 01:19 PM
61

Let me explain. Perhaps the biggest problem all men face is the negative stereotype people tend to have about men. Feminists strengthen and build that stereotype by anti-male propaganda. The lie about witch crazes being about misogyny, men hating women is one of the pet lies of these kinds of Feminists. "Can you imagine, those pigs hated women so much that they burnt millions of us," is what they want people to think. Perhaps world would be a better palace if people knew the truth instead.
/r/MensRights12/02/22 11:45 AM
25

Women are often portrayed as a minority when they in fact are a majority by about two percentile points in the west (51-49).
/r/MensRights11/02/22 09:13 AM
23

Women are a majority,
/r/MensRights11/02/22 06:01 AM
2

There are several reasons behind the decision. Naturallly gender has to do with it because firms usually want to do what customers like. An in this case they want a female voice. But, sure, there are a couple of technical reasons as well.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 05:11 PM
8

That's a good point. And perhaps it's the future of politics, if women manage to stay in power now that they have managed to take over many top positions in parties - at least where I live.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 04:51 PM
21

Men, so it seems, don't care whether the voice is male or female while women do. So, commercial enterprises gravitate towards female voices.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 06:49 AM
4

Lighter sentences because of “lighter” crimes. Context is everything Men get hashers sentences nowadays for similar crimes. Why would it have been different earlier?
/r/MensRights10/02/22 04:11 AM
5

Don't forget the pink flying cows who shot women for fun.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 04:09 AM
5

I guess. But why have so many left the organization (if the two thirds number is correct)?
/r/MensRights09/02/22 11:51 AM
9

Yeah, there is still the Girls Scouts for girls and then there is the Boys Scouts for girls. Well, if that's the future all the Good People want, who am I to question it? But seriously, the first idea that comes to mind is probably bot the best possible idea and probably not even worth writing down. Good ideas don't come from adopting the lates fad. INstead they come from being critical of the latest fad.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 11:47 AM
31

In case you can't read the article, it says that the number of members have dropped by two thirds since 2019 and blames "WOKE"-culture. It's not particularly interesting article anyway, beside the point that it was the first result when I Googled "boys scouts decline". I'm thinking about the problem in a more general way. For example, there is a trend to unite boys and girls into the same sports clubs before the age of 12 or 14 or whatever. The same is happening in schools. I wonder if this tren…
/r/MensRights09/02/22 11:02 AM
2

It's an interesting study. Then again, the researcher makes a feminist comment in the article, which makes her research dubious. Did she really get the results she claims she did? She also admits that there are studies that have found women more emotional but no studies finding the opposite. The study says it proves that there is no correlation between fluctuating hormones in women and their emotions. The test subjects apparently lived their normal everyday lives without any particularly emotion…
/r/MensRights08/02/22 05:28 PM
1

Yeah, but in the scenario I described you wouldn't know. That's the point. In fact, it's the point in every scenario because you can't know anybody's exact qualifications regarding any exact scenario, you always have to rely on classifications and stereotypes in addition to what you think you know about individual qualifications. That's the essence of reasoning in general. Reasoning is probabilistic. And that's why we classify people, or anything for that matter, when we start thinking about the…
/r/MensRights08/02/22 01:37 PM
30

"the results were skewed by a mistake in the data" Hmm, any feminists in the team?
/r/MensRights08/02/22 01:16 PM
4

People tend to be weary of male strangers, much more than of female strangers. Just saying that we don't want "men" to lead us. We want people we know and trust to lead us. The development in Europe during the last couple of decades have shown that the leader can be a woman as well, if not more so.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 12:52 PM
11

Women are emotionally more expressive. And because expressing emotions leads to deeper emotions, my guess is that women are, for that reason alone, more emotional. Men have feelings, too, but we tend to hide and control them better. Evolutionary psychologists have argued that there are good biological reasons for this stoicism considering the role of the role males and females have had for millions of years.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 12:47 PM
8

Sure, but I'm talking about men and women as classes. Every discussion on social issues starts with some kind of classifications. One reason to divide people into men and women is that stereotypes are quite remarkably different. If I called the fire department and they asked if I wanted a man or a woman, I, based on the stereotype, would say "man".
/r/MensRights08/02/22 12:37 PM
2

What is it like, I wonder, to belong to a group like feminists? To be about the worst sexist on earth and pretend to fight against sexism. Does it hurt in the brain?
/r/MensRights06/02/22 05:36 PM
119

I skimmed it through, and the narrative goes something like this: Women want to fit the job description perfectly before they apply while men don't. Nevertheless, recruiters respond less often to female applicants. But when they do, they are more likely to recruit women than men. The goal of the article is to help women by telling them and recruiters how to apply for jobs more efficiently. So, it feels very much like a feminist article. That, of course, is a warning sign: are the figures they ar…
/r/MensRights28/01/22 05:30 AM
0

Always glad to favor women, we're here to serve.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 06:20 PM
2

Don't worry, if you're female, you won't be discriminated against but favored. Just move to one of the Nordic countries. In fact, most of the EU is firmly in the favoring corner. You don't believe me? Hell, most of the countries here have laws that force the state to favor women!
/r/MensRights24/01/22 06:05 PM
1

I don't want that to be fixed. It doesn't fit the stroy I'm telling. Men led families and thus everybody on the "ground level"and are still leading in some parts of the world. Some men and women led states and the like and were often enemies of progress. I'm not talking about them. But somehow even them were won over.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 08:49 PM
2

One strong feminist idea is to blur all lines - except the one between good and evil, men and everybody else. This is probably the main reason why it often impossible - and unbearable - to read or listen to feminists.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 08:59 AM
5

Half the comments on that post were about how she probably didn’t get the job for her skills. Hard to believe. Perhaps there were a couple, am I right?
/r/MensRights22/01/22 07:08 AM
17

It does seem like a lot of women get very bitter and resentful when they don't find a guy like that who wants them back There is a theory: when sex is liberated -> women, as gatekeepers -> decide who fucks whom -> and end up wanting the same men as other women -> which leads to the most attractive men -> getting the upper hand, after all -> and most -non-alpha - women getting betrayed eventually -> which leads to most women "hating" men.
/r/MensRights21/01/22 07:10 PM
10

One of the key concepts of the book (The right to sex) is fuckability. Patriarchy, so we are told, has made some bodies fucakble and others not. So, for example "women with dicks" are not fuckable within the lesbian community, because patriarchy. Another key idea is that white men (who are the evil ones in all possible respects) think that they are entitled to women's bodies. And patriarchy has convinced many women to think so too. Can an Oxford professor really be this far removed from reality?…
/r/MensRights21/01/22 06:37 AM
1

It's about incentives, not who has how much time.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 02:02 PM
10

The article didn't mention perhaps the biggest problem of them all, though: Women are less productive and so are unmarried men compared the traditional economic backbone, fathers. And less fathers, and fathers living with their own kids, we will have and already do. It's a big trend almost nobody talks about. Then again, perhaps unmarried and divorced men will find other and more fulfilling lifestyles. If so, the trend that now looks very worrying will turn out a blessing.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 05:49 AM
-6

If culture evolution is true, then we all, men and women, are used by our culture. All, cultures have used women to give birth and raise children. All cultures have used men to protect and feed women and children. Any culture without these basic roles could not have lasted longer than a generation or two. Of course cultures have other aspects and roles as well, but they can change from one culture to another. The basic ones couldn't until modernity slowly freed women from their role and men, alt…
/r/MensRights19/01/22 12:20 PM
17

If a study has thes faults it's probably Feminist: internal inconsistencies, the replacement of truth criteria by appropriateness criteria, inability or unwillingness to perceive the difference between explaining and explaining away, deliberate contempt and disregard for international empirical research, active attacks on empirical sciences, the narrowness of the knowledge base, and the invisibility of existing large-scale research data.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 08:03 PM
13

One point is that the results Feminists get and publish are not factually true but they don't care. Objectivity just doesn't matter to Feminists. Another point is that the author is not just some guy on internet but a scholar whose h-index is 32 and who is a professor in criminology in the Finland's best university.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 07:54 PM
17

Only Feminist "researchers" claim that majority of DV is perpetrated by men. They "know" this because they manipulate data so that the results are what they want. Other Feminists then use these "studies" as sources in their Feminist textbooks and other texts so that soon all feminist "know" it. Proper researchers know, on the other hand, that this is not true and DV is not gendered the way Feminist researchers lie. And this is no conspiracy theory either but a well-documented fact. Quite a few p…
/r/MensRights17/01/22 02:50 PM
-3

https://unstats.un.org/unsd/gender/timeuse/ There seldom seems to be big differences between how much men and women work in total (unpaid and paid) at least in the first world countries. But it's important to remember that women's work is more often voluntary. Women often want, for example, that their home looks nice and tidy even more so than what's necessary.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 02:34 PM
5

Women tend to use weapons because they are often weaker. "Often" because it's not always men, or men in their prime they are fighting with. Using knives, broken bottles etc. leads to pretty unintuitive results, women being more dangerous and lethal in DV. Anyway, we people live by all kinds of stereotypical notions of the world. For example, it's been a good idea to protect women particularly from (unknown) men for millions of years. For most of us, women always are potential, innocent victims n…
/r/MensRights17/01/22 08:33 AM
16

The differences are rather small, though, percentage wise. Then again regarding the Gallup survey: "it’s actually a big difference: its equivalent to the increase in life satisfaction that comes from moving up their country’s income distribution by about 5 percentage points. In the U.S, that’s equivalent to making $2,000 to $4,000 extra per year. " The linked World Bank article furthermore claims that women have different anchor points from men for happiness, which would explain the difference. …
/r/MensRights16/01/22 06:19 PM
9

Work can be great but most of the time it isn't, perhaps particularly for women. They weren't "designed by evolution" to work in strictly goal-oriented, hierarchical groups. Like men were. Though I can't say I'm sure this is true it somehow rings true.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 05:48 PM
34

Furthermore, the marginalized people (prisoners, homeless, addicts etc) are far more often men. But they don't answer to this kind of surveys. A well-known problem. So, if they did answer, the gap would be bigger. Becoming a mother or having that possibility saves many women from dropping out - and makes them happier, too. That's the silver bullet for many women, I guess.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 05:42 PM
8

I think that most of us see partner violence when we are in our teens and it's almost always girls acting out against boys, slapping or yelling at them out of control or something along those lines. Perhaps it's just where I live but I never saw a boy acting violently or really out of control against girls. Anyway, I have this theory that because of this we tend to know what's goin on. And yet we somehow deceive ourselves into believing that reality is something else, that it's boys and men who …
/r/MensRights16/01/22 04:56 PM
2

Usually, what is more common is less newsworthy. What we are dealing here is something different. Partly this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missing_white_woman_syndrome
/r/MensRights16/01/22 04:12 PM
-7

I'm pretty sure boys are more trouble. Or to be more precise, all kinds of troubles are more common among boys.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 03:48 PM
2

Your brain needes some some grease to make the gears rotate. You should try to make a coherent argument and the see where it leads instead of making incoherants singular statements that don't have any real connection.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 06:34 PM
1

Read what I wrote and stop being silly.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 05:23 PM
3

Most of them are in their teens and many 16-17 years old.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 05:20 PM
3

Yes, there are girls, too, but most of them are boys, more than 90 %. Which was my guess - produced by my brain which knows that boys make much better soldiers and guerilla soldiers in particular. It's not an accident that almost all soldiers we know of during the past 150 000 years or so have been boys and men. Guerilla soldiers need units whose peak performance level is high. And that means that every member of the unit is top notch. Those who are not will become a burden sooner or later. For …
/r/MensRights02/01/22 02:37 PM
1

Take a look at these pictures if your brain can't produce even the most obvious truths by reasoning.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 12:48 PM
2

From an early age, we drum into children the idea that if they’re lost or scared they should seek help from a police officer first and, failing that, a woman. What? Do they in Britain really teach children to be sexists? Are all Britts feminists? Fortunately, things haven't gone that far where I live.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 12:40 PM
5

Hey, thanks. It's nice that somebody has given it a name and analyzed it. I also agree with you on pretty much everything you wrote. Though I don't think these progressives running amok are really Marxists but, rather, children of postmodernist anti-rationalism. Yeah, they are waging a class struggle (the classes being men and often white men and everybody else) but they don't really understand it as a class struggle. It's more like a war between the righteous and the evil.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 04:13 PM
15

Women are probably more violent, At least, that's what science seems to be saying. But even if men were more violent, what's the point, morality, to vilify those who say that women, too, are violent according to every non-feminist study there is
/r/MensRights30/12/21 09:45 AM
12

Yes, there is a case to be made for that. But that's not my point. The public, at least the mainstream media and so forth seems to think that even talking about women's violence is somehow wrong. They seem to think that spreading hate (only men are perpetrators and only women are victims) is morally more fair than speaking about facts (DV is not a gendered issue unless you frame it in a way hate-movements usually describe their "enemies"). MRAs often frame their case with facts and think that th…
/r/MensRights30/12/21 09:42 AM
6

Both male and female judges give men harsher sentences but I seem to remember that male judges are even worse.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 08:24 PM
11

It's childish to refer to feminist "studies" as if they were objective. Anyway, "women and children fisrt to safety" is probaly the most all-encompassing and universal moral maxim of the humankind. You must be very ignorant if you think that studying 18 shipwrecks (in a feminist study) could somehow discredit it.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 08:13 PM
1

Women tend to pick customer service jobs, like health care. Service jobs always lack behind non-service jobs because the latter can use technology more and more efficiently.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 03:21 PM
3

Two X chromosomes prevent copying errors for one. Males also have to try much harder to get their genes passed on. Ordinariness isn't optimal: how do you stand out if you're ordinary? So, evolution favors variation in males because that way the "winner-takes-it-all" guy will pop up from the gene pool much more often. For women, average is good, because it tells about good - average - genes. The most beautiful women are the most average, at least facially. I'm no expert, though, be warned.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 07:14 AM
7

But so much hate has been spewed in the name of Feminist mainstream that it's a lost cause and should be buried.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 07:20 PM
11

Men are more likely to be everything that is out of the ordinary, in good and bad. It doesn't have to be more complicated. Women are the "ordinary sex". The reason is biological. To make men, as a class, as ordinary as women is pretty much impossible. But they are trying.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 07:15 PM
10

Here's, by the way, a post that reached the "frontpage" despite it being "MRA". https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/comments/r2hgpn/norah_vincent_a_lesbian_feminist_writer_once/
/r/MensRights26/11/21 06:13 PM
9

Women must hate it that they sometimes must pay tens of thousands to get pregant and then, my god, carry the liitle vermin around and push it out. And it even doesn't stop there. There are going to be years upon years of constant agony wathing him grow up.
/r/MensRights11/11/21 04:56 PM
7

I won't happen because it would just emphasize how a wrong and unequal the system is, forcing men to serve while just giving women a free medical check-up and perhaps career advice.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 09:39 AM
1

For the longest time women had little power, if any, about when or who they married. That's not true, as far as we can know. Prehistoric people didn't have arranged marriages until farming. Then marriages were often arranged for both women and men. But that went on / has been going on for less than 10 000 years while the humankind is about 200 000 years old
/r/MensRights06/11/21 05:53 PM
1

¡Yes!
/r/MensRights03/11/21 04:20 PM
0

I care about their free speech.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 05:23 AM
-1

I'm very much anti-feminist but also very much pro free speech. So, I can't answer to your question.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 07:22 PM
5

If every man she's interacted with has been a piece of shit, it tells a lot about her, not men. Certain women always go after "alpha males" and end up feeling used and betrayed.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 10:43 AM
3

Feminism is a typical class-struggle ideology and those alway need to construct an enemy. For Feminism, the enemy is men, as a class.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 06:42 AM
12

Finnish. When I was a memeber it was quite liberal and even pro-market. Nowadays it's totally Feminist and pretty far to the left. Voters are something like 75% women, almost all MPs are women. That's what Feminism does best, sidelines and drives men away.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 05:46 PM
70

I was a member of the Green party back then and was once reading the party paper. There was this article on a serial killer. Don't ask me why, can't remember. The author described the psychological traits of the killer and then wrote "so, exactly as a typical man". It took over a decade before I could say I became an anti-feminist (by understanding the crucial importance of equality between the sexes). But for some reason that was a watershed because I started doubting. I still tried to see the …
/r/MensRights31/10/21 02:44 PM
7

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/40167523-the-feminism-book But let me warn you, if you know the facts, it's exhausting, so much hate and lies. And if you don't know, you might start believing it and fall into a deep rabbit hole.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 02:15 PM
1

It's a common practice everywhere, though. There are even studies on it even though it doesn't hurt women but men. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5576692/ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0094119008000181
/r/MensRights30/10/21 07:26 AM
13

It seems that blind auditioning can hurt women. It would be interesting to know if American orchestras still held on to it. Or is that part of the story - that the share of women in orchestras rose after blind auditioning became the standard - a myth, too. Here's a demand from NYT to stop blind auditions in the name of diversity, racial diversity, that is.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 06:22 AM
3

Insurance is business and their goal is to make money. They don't make decisions based on political correctness or stereotypes but statistics - unless laws forbid them as they do in many places in this particular issue.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 05:30 AM
4

Women had to stay home because they "always" had small kids to breastfeed or were pregnant or - more likely - both. You don't send that kind of people to work the fields, let alone to hunt. That's the natural, biological foundation of the labor division between the sexes. Anthropologists think that we humans are unique among the apes and perhaps even mammals in that sense. That natural division of labor became obsolete only after birth control and home appliances. After that women were seldom pr…
/r/MensRights29/10/21 05:06 AM
3

If you have kids - and give birth to a new baby every two years or so - and have to take care of them and the home cook, do laundry etc, how many hours it takes a day without any appliances, what do you think? Two? 16?
/r/MensRights29/10/21 04:09 AM
13

If you read the Wikipedia article on patriarchy, you'll notice that even feminists don't know what it is. None of the examples apply to the modern (western) societies. Earlier, decades ago, there were social norms and even laws that forced women and men in distinct roles. For example, until quite recently a husband could end up incarcerated if he couldn't provide for his wife. Then again, women, wives in particular, seldom got the chance to educate themselves or have a decent profession (so that…
/r/MensRights28/10/21 02:35 PM
8

Trying to get such a paper published would be incredibly difficult. Furthermore, people censor themselves because it's definitely not good for your career even to suggest that you research something so politically incorrect as masculinity unless you do it from a feminist perspective. Been there, seen that.
/r/MensRights28/10/21 02:13 PM
3

Masculinity is rooted in biology and particularly in the female desire, female biology. You can deconstruct it all you like but it's not going anywhere. Besides, masculinity is a positive force in this hostile universe, without it we wouldn't exist. But, yeah, it should change as the times change. We should try to do it by telling women about their unhealthy expectations, among other things. Deconstruct the idea in their heads. Perhaps it's hopeless - women want what they want - but it's telling…
/r/MensRights28/10/21 02:03 PM
2

But don't forget to support the Guardian while you're there. No?!
/r/MensRights19/10/21 09:35 AM
1

Men have to work hard to become something. That often looks like a curse but it's also an opportunity for something great.
/r/MensRights17/10/21 08:15 AM
3

Violence is what men do more than women. Sometimes it's bad but without it we humans wouldn't exist. I mean, how could we have survived the jungle out there, if there had just been women protecting us and hunting for food?
/r/MensRights17/10/21 08:10 AM
2

Those girls who regard appearances as very important do it for several reasons. One of the more important is to look attractive in the eyes of attractive boys, the ones "every girl" is interested in. Other boys, the large majority doesn't count. But, yeah, it's also a "fad", something some girls get excited about while some other girls might get excited about horses or whatever. Then the "main audience" is probably other girls who are into the same thing. And then there are the cultural pressure…
/r/MensRights17/10/21 08:00 AM
2

Perhaps the biggest mistake she makes is right there in the beginning. Sex doesn't happen between boys and girls but, as a trend, between certain girls and certain boys. Anyone who's been a boy knows this. It's a fundamental category error and everything afterwards is at best confused and at worst misandric. Women are designed to look for good genes and they do it by looking for boys and men who somehow rise above the average. That's why girls who, in the eyes of most boys, seem to have all the …
/r/MensRights17/10/21 07:29 AM
1

Because human children depend on both mother and father to survive, women, too, try to be attractive in the eyes of men. For many birds this is not the case. But when it is, like in swans, there is no big difference in courtship between the sexes. Let's see if I get downvoted for saying this...
/r/MensRights16/10/21 06:22 AM
30

Feminism lies about men portraying us in a very negative, hostile way. Feminism also is one of the core ideologies, having power over political agendas and narratives, in most western countries. Of course, there is no corresponding ideology portraying women negatively, on the contrary. If this doesn't prove that misandry is systematic while misogyny marginal, I wonder what does.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 06:09 AM
3

Of course they should exist. Of course no study or statistics is perfectly accurate. Of course both men and women fill parts of days with things that are not necessary. Women do them more often at home. But that's not the whole problem. Let's take cleaning as an example. Many women want their homes to look much tidier than men do. So, they end up cleaning more. Is this "extra cleaning" an equality problem as "studies" claim or imply? There is no way of telling unless you know how oderly and neat…
/r/MensRights13/10/21 04:42 PM
1

I don't think that's the way social sciences should work. But they do, they have become political weapons especially on the "equality issues".
/r/MensRights13/10/21 02:40 PM
20

It's common sense that people all over the world expect men to be bread winners. Anyway, it very hard to make reliable statistics about a thing like this. Where is, for example, the line between something you have to do at home and what you want to do. And is what you want to do really necessary? It's impossible to know.
/r/MensRights13/10/21 01:58 PM
0

Yeah, mothers had naturally a lot of power in homes, but the final say was granted to the person on whom the survival depended more and who had to make crucial decisions (like fight or flee). And that usually was the father, pater. That's not the case anymore for those who live in places that are safe and regulated, turned into large-scale homes, which goes without saying. The rationale is the same as with any commercial or, or say, military enterprise: there must be somebody at the top who must…
/r/MensRights02/10/21 08:15 AM
1

What you say makes littel sense becasue you rely on ancdotes and biased "convential wisdom". Yeah, that's what we do when we face something unfamiliar. But for somebody like me, who knows almost too much about all this, there is no idea carry on this discussion.
/r/MensRights29/09/21 04:38 PM
5

Men don't get paid more, that's propaganda. If they were, why would any business hire men if they got women to do the same job cheaper? It's part of the hateful Feminist narrative aimed at destroying trust in men. And as for the rest, sigh ... Nobody's defending serial killers or rapists. That would be insane. It's the feminist rape narrative, the one that dehumanizes men, that's hateful propaganda and should not be promoted. We should get rid of FEminist hatred towards men before it does more d…
/r/MensRights29/09/21 06:27 AM
2

I'm talking about the mainstream feminists in places like govenrments in the west and international organizations (the UN and EU for example). Check out the Istanbul convention, for example. You can consider the most powerful institutions on earth marginal only if you keep you eyes very firmly shut. And are you implying that I'm defending rape because I don't belive the Feminist lunacy and hate speech!? What are you? A mainstream Feminist?
/r/MensRights29/09/21 04:35 AM
1

You're not sure!?
/r/MensRights29/09/21 04:11 AM
22

The feminist narrative often portrays men in a way that, if applied to any other demographic, would be considered hateful. Probably the best - or worst - example of dehumanizing men is the "violence narrative", men being violent towards women to gain benefits and keep them subjugated. The "rape narrative" is even crazier - and even more misandric.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 07:57 PM
1

All big social phenomena are extremely complex when you start to chop them into smaller pieces. That's the way reality, and the social reality in particular, is in relation to words. And yet we can talk about them, at least we can argue about definitions. You shouldn't go through your life by saying to yourself and others: "I can't talk about this beause I can't define it in its totality". And, now, unfortunatley, i have to start working. Try epistemology and argumentation theory. Have a nice li…
/r/MensRights27/09/21 04:55 AM
1

Every definition is reductive. When I wrote that, I relized that I used words that can't be defined without being reductive. I relized that I can't say anything ... unless I accept that the objective univers can't be captured into words. :D Anyway, using the " we can't talk about this or that because we can't agree on definitions" tactics is tiresome and evasive.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 04:21 AM
3

She did what many women do in courts: blamed a man or men. Women do it because they are told that it's a strategy worth trying. Apperantly it pays off at least every now and then. But not this time, too amy billions agains her.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 02:27 PM
1

The things Feminists have brought to the political agenda are pretty much the same all over the world: violence, harrassment, pay gap, class ceilings, STEM, stereotyping men negatively, patriarchy as a force that must be brought down, women as the eternal victims, women's powerlessness and a few more. Feminsim very much has a core.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 12:06 PM
3

He's pretty much right and this is something that should be discussed much more.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 05:43 AM
3

People mostly want to be good but by which standards? Your good is probably different from what a Femnist or Nazi thinks is good.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 05:37 AM
10

Actually, Feminists are bot sexist and racist, no question about that. Their enemy is not only men in general but white men in particular. Sometimes straight middle-aged white men which make them ageists and heterophobes.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 05:34 AM
1

Then again, I didn't ask for a definition but an example.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 04:45 PM
6

Don't be. It's not your fault. You've been fooled. :D
/r/MensRights23/09/21 04:33 PM
6

I understand that it's difficult to defend an ideology that must invent its problems to justify its existence. It's so much easier for ideologies that rise from real-world problems.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 04:16 PM
6

First of all, you didn't answer my question. Not a single example. Why is that? What would you say? It doesn't matter what I think about it. We know from numerous studies that - lets call them - "anti-social " people live in anti-social relationships. It's no big surprise that in such relationships wives beat their husbands and vice versa. Psychopaths are often violent, too. So, it's a problem of marginal people. Very few people are afraid of violence at home even "sometimes" (as they ask in sur…
/r/MensRights23/09/21 03:41 PM
6

Why don't you give an example of some feminist core claim that is factual and balanced. I mean, it was a honest question. There must be things that are not lies or opportunistic half-truths. I just can't come up with a single example.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 12:13 PM
2

Right about what, answer to what question?
/r/MensRights23/09/21 10:17 AM
10

The difference between male and female victims is that female victims are way more likely to feel physically threatened. That's one opinion. On the other hand, many women are violent because they don't feel threathened. Instead they think that hitting without retaliation is their female privilege. And even if you were right, Feminists tell us that the reasons are different, namely violent men and patriarchy. So, this is not in any way an answer to my question. Nice try but sorry. As for your oth…
/r/MensRights23/09/21 09:39 AM
5

I'm not sure we know about the women who kill because they hate men. How could we. Would media report something like "A Feminist killed his boyfriend. She was part of a Feminist online group spreading misandry"? Or mutilated or robbed. Besides, women almost always say that they became violent, even killed in self-defense or because they had been victims of violence. To get a pussy pass. So, a misandrist woman killing a man might end up in statistics as a victim of misogyny. Anyway, it would be v…
/r/MensRights22/09/21 06:08 PM
1

Many protitutes are men (selling sex to men, mostly).
/r/MensRights22/09/21 09:47 AM
4

The newest fad is to make only buying illegal.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 09:46 AM
4

Hunter/gatherer was the oldest profession because you can't sell sex for a fruit unless somebody gathers it first.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 09:44 AM
37

I've been listening to Who stole Feminism. In the 90s she was still hopeful that the change will come and the hostility - as well as lunancy - will turn out to be impossible in the long run. I wonder what she thinks now, almost 30 year later.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 07:35 PM
7

And what all this to do with Hay's lies and hostility? Nothing.
/r/MensRights14/09/21 04:24 PM
0

Yeah, that would be stupid.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 04:50 PM
0

Ok, they could have explained it. But I'm OK with it otherwise. It's a bit hard for a non-native to know where the line is drawn, though. Can you use the language the people you despise use to show how you despise them? Apperantly not.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 04:48 PM
2

Morbidly obese women are not being raped in large numbers. Young, healthy, attractive women are. They are? Where?
/r/MensRights02/09/21 07:46 PM
0

Yeah, but treating everyone as an individual is actually impossible - and, sorry to say, stupid. I'm going to get downvoted but anyone knows after a few minutes of thinking why we have to think about people as groups and why it's stupid not to do it in most cases. What you can do is to try to see your loved ones as individuals (and fail) but that's about it.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 07:13 PM
1

The male stereotype is very negative unless you're fulfilling a certain accepted or admired role. A single unknow man out of nowhere is can't even rent a decent apartment. Getting a job is much harder for him than for a woman, particularly if belong to a minority.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 07:01 PM
2

InFinland women got full voting rights in 1906 and men in 1945. That's because voting was tied to military service. I wonder if that was the case i many other countries where they believe that men got the the right before women.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 06:50 PM
3

Women want somebody to have kids with. After that, man is optional.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 05:38 PM
1

What, what, WHAT???
/r/MensRights25/08/21 05:27 PM
1

I asked my wife about sexual harassment, don't get me wrong, a good-looking woman in her times. I've been sexually harassed three time, once by a man and twice by a woman. And, yes, once by several women, when I was 16 and they decided that talking dirty to me was sexy. My wife had one story to tell - and even that didn't sound like the stories I had to tell.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 04:34 PM
2

I don't think this is a Finnish thing, neither it has anything - or much - to do with Feminism. The idea behind the conscription is to have a strong enough army, in the eyes of Kreml, in particular, so that in case of a European conflict they don't feel the urge to try to invade the country. That's why Finland hasn't joined the NATO either. And that's why, I suppose, they don't want to conscript "the weaker sex" but let women serve if they want to.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 05:01 PM
45

Playing victim to gain benefits, yeah, that's Feminism.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 04:48 PM
2

Great, thanks!
/r/MensRights18/08/21 04:16 PM
3

It's commonly known that single men are discriminated against when it comes to renting an apartment. But it's hard to find studies on it (wrong sex, I guess). So, here's one I happened to stumble upon. It's interesting, not only because it once again shows how much of a privilege being female is. But it also shows how being male can be even a bigger handicap than being a woman of an ethnic group that undoubtedly faces prejudice - but not as much as men.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 03:18 PM
10

Because the title didn't have any fact in it.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 12:37 PM
2

Knowing the name of the book would help you to get it.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 12:28 PM
2

We can only guess how many people get inspired by this kind of hate speech and actually kill somebody.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 05:24 AM
4

Not all men here are white and there are women here, too. But, yeah, my son did have some tough time because he couldn't find a room to rent when he started studying. All of them went to girls, as he told me after a while. At last he found one, but it was in a bad neighborhood and far away from the university. I had the break him the sorry news that this is the way the world is, but he said that he had understood it already in high school. That being male is often a handicap.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 11:23 AM
11

KillAllMen, for example.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 11:17 AM
17

Men are treated worse than women by most standards. Women are the privileged sex by most standards. If not, why would the marginalized people be mostly men, why would it be OK to force men to die to protect women, to mention a few examples. The reason you can't see this is twofold: 1) you've been lied to, constantly since your childhood and 2) your innate subconscious attitudes make you feel uncomfortable if the eggs-producing sex is not treated better than the disposable sex.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 11:13 AM
10

Yeah, alcohol plus hormonal fluctuations is a particularly dangerous combination. No wonder, the share of men receiving medical help because of DV is many time s higher than that of women. You should educate yourself with real facts and not just repeat what the establishment have been telling you. Don't trust the power elite!
/r/MensRights01/08/21 11:40 AM
10

The law is about five years old. Are saying that women were worse off back then? That's just stupid. And furthermore, many people think that laws that discrimate against groups defined by innate traits are immoral.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 11:36 AM
9

The "most dangerous countries are Denmark, Finland, And Sweden. By far the most common form of "violence" is pushing. Feminist factoids are not well recieved among people who think that lying and half-truths are immoral.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 11:33 AM
15

Yeah, you're right (though I don't know if "incel" is the right word here). But there still is a problem that has to do with how "equality" is defined by the establisment. We know, for example,that many popular indicators of equality don't recognize situations where men are worse off. We know from studies that people tend to see an equal situation as sexist and discriminating against women. So, where is "equality"? When will people start seeing that men are disciminated against? The chairman of …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/21 05:27 PM
2

No political movement looks for equality, freedom or whatever actually. They look for power and economic interest Nope, in a democracy they look for votes and can't get them without doing favors. Thar's democracy 101.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 07:33 PM
11

When women have sex only with that small share of men who look good enough and get a lot of sex, women will think that that small share is what men are like. Scumbags that can't commit and will betray you rather sooner than later. Then they'll start hating men and become feminists. It's an old story but on steroids this time.
/r/MensRights01/07/21 05:43 PM
12

Those people just hate. Period. Two steps: Remove them from any power Therapy
/r/MensRights25/06/21 05:13 PM
5

Raping women has been illegal for about 300 000 years. What's your point?
/r/MensRights06/06/21 06:14 PM
2

Just kidding. I like Germans. My son lives in Berlin.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 04:18 PM
2

Are you German! Sounds like it. Where I live rape is the worst crime. But, hey, Gemans...
/r/MensRights06/06/21 04:16 PM
2

I mean, if you call an argument and a person toxic, you, bro, must be able to tell why you did it. To a bro.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 04:14 PM
2

Yeah, but which part was wrong? Just asking-
/r/MensRights06/06/21 04:09 PM
7

Which part? Just asking.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 08:16 AM
48

Out of curiosity, what's your point? Do you think that killing men is alright because they are not an etnicity?
/r/MensRights06/06/21 08:15 AM
1

The unequal education system is, hands down, the biggest problem. Perhaps not in all countries but in the most feminist ones. We should have an education system that levels the playing field. Now we have a system that does the opposite and almost nobody among the power elite sees any problem in that. But it's a huge problem - even for women who find it harder and harder to find male partners to make babies with. And for national economies which try to cope with the diminishing productivity.
/r/MensRights05/06/21 08:32 AM
1

What clothes? Where? Like in Arab countries? Men, too, are under strict dress codes there. Regulating people's behavior by all kinds of arbitrary rules is the hallmark of most civilizations.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 05:05 AM
1

No, it's a subconscious. Courts don't think that they should favor women, they just do it without thinking. Everyday sexism tends to be that way: we want to make things better for women, it's in our genes and culture. Feminism is, by the way, founded on this tendency. But so is the rest of the world, most of the time we just don't see it.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 04:57 AM
3

The title is wrong, I'm afraid.
/r/MensRights16/03/21 08:29 PM
2

Markets exist to respond to the needs and wants of people. Are you living in a world where there are no free markets?
/r/MensRights07/03/21 08:04 AM
1

Women don't, by and large, like to watch pictures of naked men. Markets tell what people like. If there is demand there si suply. You're being dishones, if you don't get this very, very basic idea.
/r/MensRights06/03/21 07:03 PM
1

Everything has to do with EP. But here the mechanism is very simple and applies to all similar ideologies. You just can't have an open discussion about even non-political lies like flat earth, let alone politically charged issues where different groups get hated. You can't have an open discussion about things like patriarchy because sooner or later such people who see the theory for what it really is will show up. And that's the end of the open forum. I've seen many feminist forums go through th…
/r/MensRights24/02/21 01:18 PM
5

Feminists can't have open discussions because what they say is not true. Wage gap is not true, so, they can't talk about it openly. It's very simple and it's the same with all movement and ideologies that are based on lies and ahlf-truths. You can't have an open discussion about Nazism. I don't think it has anything to do with sexes.
/r/MensRights24/02/21 12:03 PM
2

There is this netflix movie "Project Power" where the male protagonist, Jamie Foxx, says to the teen female protagonist something like: "you're both black and a woman so the world is stacked against you". What?! And this movie was supposed to be less woke than Netflix movies usually are. Why would I watch a movie that thinks black women are worse off than black men?
/r/MensRights13/02/21 04:27 AM
0

On the other hand, if you feel empathy, you can't be truly evil. This is like metaphysics, though. You can't really argue about terms like "evil" because their meaning comes from religion or is otherwise out of this world.
/r/MensRights10/02/21 08:37 PM
1

Jolie, please don't take my man just because you can.
/r/MensRights10/02/21 08:09 PM
2

Didn't pass the peer review though it was close.
/r/MensRights10/02/21 08:05 PM
-2

If the truly evil people tend to be psychopaths, then there is probably more evil among men than women.
/r/MensRights10/02/21 08:01 PM
4

Never trust anything that feminists may be interested in. But if it's not just feminist propaganda, it would be interesting to read how they back up the allegation. The the arguments and links in the article seem to be pretty vague circumstantial evidence. Then again, I didn't read them properly, just skimmed. But perhaps you did read?
/r/MensRights10/02/21 03:02 PM
1

"Individualist Feminist" attacks SJWs with this fine thought: "People now associate social justice with street-gang activism or shrill accusations of racism and sexual abuse. But many cultural changes that arrive on campus and flow inevitably into society do so quietly.
/r/MensRights08/02/21 04:20 PM
1

It's not as radical as I thought it could be. Most of the stuff is "standard social science", so to speak. But it does smuggle along strange, harmful, and even hateful ideas, too.
/r/MensRights06/02/21 07:40 AM
5

Here's a TLDR: "Science" tries to "explain" how "nature" works and claims that "sex" is "natural" while we know that it's a social construct because some doctors didn't know 100 years ago about chromosomes and used an approximation that isn't 100% correct.
/r/MensRights05/02/21 03:45 PM
-9

Which one: sperm or tears? Actually neither unless you link a sexist context to it. If you think it's a gross sex "joke" or poetry about men's tears, there's nothing sexist about it.
/r/MensRights02/02/21 06:41 AM
-9

Well, male tears also mean male tears, so what's the big deal.
/r/MensRights02/02/21 05:59 AM
1

Trump lied a lot and acted in erratic ways. He was a populist and and demagogue. Surely he was depicted worse than what he really was, but he wasn't a reasonable guy by any standards.
/r/MensRights02/02/21 05:27 AM
16

one of the most important things we can do to protect women is teach them “don’t hit first.”
/r/MensRights01/02/21 08:11 PM
3

I was taught to treat girls and women with special respect and kindness. Then, at some point, I realized that some women saw it as sexist. Had to stop becasue you could never tell which ones.
/r/MensRights01/02/21 08:25 AM
5

In fact, as far back as you go in mainstream media, “idealized” masculinity revolves around sacrificing ones own life or health to protect the life or health of women. Well said. This is the goal of our modern societies. We teach boys to accept the exploitation, putting your own interests aside.
/r/MensRights01/02/21 08:23 AM
6

Denying the Findings Probably underlying much of the controversy is the fact that the phenomenon of the battered wife has been intricately linked to feminist theory regarding patriarchy. Unwilling to recognize the problem of battered husbands and concerned that attention would be drawn away from the problem of battered wives, some radical feminists attempted to punish those who brought attention to this problem. For example, researchers who had written on battered husbands were verbally harassed…
/r/MensRights31/01/21 09:53 PM
1

Hard to follow. But women are treated better, though sometimes not. Men are treated worse, though sometimes not. It's hard to be a man if you're not among the uppermost 20% or so. It sucks to be a human being if you're not particularly good at anything. It sucks even more if you're a man who is not particularly good at anything. It's a paradox to claim that being treated better is being treated worse. But I fail to see what this has to do with the crazy hating of men. Feminism.
/r/MensRights31/01/21 08:34 PM
3

And in what country only girls are taught to be polite?
/r/MensRights29/01/21 12:01 PM
2

A woman's world is ruled by her and loathing; a man's world is ruled by him and pride?
/r/MensRights29/01/21 11:55 AM
17

I've been skimming through some "feminist classics" and, well, there is no denying it: feminism is founded on hate, not totally but to a significant degree.
/r/MensRights28/01/21 09:02 AM
2

It's hard to understand because there is no United Elites Association that would conspire behind our backs to divide us.
/r/MensRights28/01/21 06:03 AM
10

The disposable are hard to see over the empathy gap.
/r/MensRights27/01/21 06:39 AM
55

In India, 98% of primary school-age girls were actually enrolled, as opposed to 97% boys, according to figures adjusted for 2009-18. Soon, when the enrollment is 100% for girls, feminists have to start preventing boys to from attending to "advance equality" even further.
/r/MensRights27/01/21 06:36 AM
2

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/sex-murder-and-the-meaning-life/201206/the-7-best-things-about-being-male
/r/MensRights26/01/21 08:26 PM
1

It's an excellent source, not conforming to feminist allegations but challenging them - albeit wit caution, understandably.
/r/MensRights25/01/21 12:03 PM
1

You can remove it from the article, as you probably know.
/r/MensRights25/01/21 11:10 AM
2

Weinstein was an unscrupulous individual. It seems that some "art institutions" like Hollywood generated, enticed, and enabled such individuals. But I don't think it has anything to do with this patriarchy thingy. An unscrupulous individual has power and meets other individuals who are willing to do almost anything to benefit from that power. That's what happened and it has nothing to do wit any "patriarchy".
/r/MensRights25/01/21 11:06 AM
93

The next logical step is to forbid men from going anywhere without a female escort.
/r/MensRights25/01/21 06:32 AM
0

If you ask common people about society, how it works and things like that, they don't bring up patriarchy unless they are young and in college. Some do, sure, but the vast majority doesn't. And if you ask academics what they truly think is important to know about society, in the end very few think that patriarchy should be included. If it was popular, politicians would be saying things like: "vote for me and let's crash patriarchy together". But very, very few popular ones are, because they know…
/r/MensRights24/01/21 04:18 PM
10

It's an observation that only conservatives know how the job markets function. Alright...
/r/MensRights24/01/21 07:49 AM
5

Yes, you are seeing the stats the establishment, like the mainstream media wants you to see. Then there are the actual statistics, which tell that women's wages are pretty much the same as men's wages for similar jobs. Anything else would be impossible according to the economic theory.
/r/MensRights24/01/21 07:47 AM
10

That's an insult to everyone who's not conservative to say that they can't have honest, critical and factual opinions.
/r/MensRights24/01/21 07:42 AM
1

"The better people" won't like this because their cause is noble and sacred while the MRA cause is unethical and foul. Conflating them like that is like mixing together cake and shit.
/r/MensRights24/01/21 07:23 AM
-11

Feminists are saying pretty much the opposite: patriarchy and men are not the same thing. Thus, blaming patriarchy can't be the same as blaming men. Thus, it can't be victim blaming. IMO, blaming men or patriarchy depending on the strategical advantage is just confused logic or opportunism. Besides, patriarchy is a fringe theory. There is no reason to believe it says anything fundamental about society.
/r/MensRights24/01/21 06:28 AM
1

I'm no expert but I know that the stereotypical view we have on the third world is not right. We tend to have these sexist attitudes toward "brown men", racist and sexist attitudes. The information we get often have a pro girls/women tendency. We are worried about the honor violence when women face it, not when men face it tough it's much more common. We are worried about the girls forced to marry and don't even know about the boys who are forced, too. We have huge charities concentrating on hel…
/r/MensRights23/01/21 02:03 PM
3

I think the OP was about the statistics and the way they are talked about. It's propagandist to claim we know when we don't.
/r/MensRights23/01/21 01:08 PM
1

LOL, where?
/r/MensRights23/01/21 12:51 PM
1

It's pretty much impossible to prove it. How do you quantify it, what are the indicators? My worldview is founded loosely on Bayesian probabilities: I'm absolutely sure of nothing but some things are more likely than others. ¨ That said, there are all kinds of examples of sexism against men, like harsher sentences, mistrust towards young and single men, education systems that discriminate against boys, the fact that women are treated and are expected to be treated more kindly, and so forth. But …
/r/MensRights23/01/21 12:47 PM
1

LOL, that's what you got from what I wrote? You're a comedian or...
/r/MensRights23/01/21 12:13 PM
1

So, feminism is the general equality ideology by advocating only for women's issues and ignoring men's issues. And you see no paradox there? I don't think this conversation is going anywhere. But let me give you an example to help you forwards. The Gender Gap Index is the most influential equality index there is. Governments, academia, "everyone" is using it to justify their equality facts, goals and politics . So it's naturally feminist, too. The index tells us that the equality in health is pe…
/r/MensRights23/01/21 11:38 AM
3

Sexism is an act that is based on negative stereotypes of one sex. Or as the first definition on Google got it almost right: "prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination, typically against women, on the basis of sex".
/r/MensRights23/01/21 11:11 AM
2

It may be common knowledge within the establishment and the underlings but might doesn't make right. There are much more negative stereotypes about men than there are about women. People just don't care about them the way the care about the negative stereotypes of women. That's why it's OK to put men in harm's way or to not rent an apartment to them, to mention a few examples of sexism - that really are harmful, not just something that causes you to feel bad. Edit: and every time this is brought…
/r/MensRights23/01/21 09:50 AM
1

Didn't Russia quit being a member?
/r/MensRights23/01/21 07:28 AM
1

You're having hard time seeing the big picture. Feminism is not in the eyes of the public and these big organizations a women's movement but a general equality ideology. And feminists exploit this ignorance by spreading telling just one side of the story and thus lies and even hatred. It's not something that that just happened by accident that they don't talk about the sexism women face here and everywhere. Instead they predent to talk about sexism in general. And this by no means the only issue…
/r/MensRights23/01/21 07:25 AM
2

What makes you think women face more sexism? And even if they did, that's besides the point.
/r/MensRights23/01/21 06:42 AM
3

Feminism is an enemy. There's no doubt about it.
/r/MensRights22/01/21 07:43 PM
2

It's propaganda because it pretends to be about something good and fair and human but is actually the view of one ideology. That's basic propaganda. All nasty ideologies have done it. Council of Europe has been dragged through the mud because they are supporting an ideological view instead of facts and common good. When I see this happening I wonder if these people know what the feminists they have given their name and integrity are up to.
/r/MensRights22/01/21 07:27 PM
3

"The continent's leading human rights organization" has almost nothing to say about the sexism men face. And what it does say is from the Feminism 101. It isn't right. There's something troubling about these international organizations that have become mouthpieces of feminist propaganda - even if people like you don't see it. The EU is the same and the UN and many, if not most first-world governments. Many big NGOs have surrendered; Amnesty International has, in this sense, become similar to the…
/r/MensRights22/01/21 06:31 PM
9

Feminists have supported him, so he has to give them something, which will probably mean weakening men's legal rights. No? It most certainly will not mean strengthening them. Hell, he is a feminist himself: "Joe Biden Advocates For Men To Become Feminists". Here you'll find some points where they (feminists like biden and Harris) are going to start favoring women and discriminating against men: https://msmagazine.com/2021/01/20/biden-harris-feminist/
/r/MensRights21/01/21 07:04 AM
9

I don't think this could happen in the civil law countries (France, Germany, the Nordic countries, etc) because hard childhood and similar "mitigating factors" are not in the law.
/r/MensRights21/01/21 06:36 AM
3

Evolution wise, men are better suited for certain tasks and women for other tasks. Men, on average, are better with large groups and the outside world. Women are better with intimate relationships and groups. Evolution "decided" that you can't be both. If you are good with the outside world, you must have certain traits that are not optimal with what's going on "at home". Stoicism is good when dealing with large groups and the outside world, You shouldn't cry before a battle or an onslaught on a…
/r/MensRights20/01/21 09:12 AM
2

Businesses get women cheaper because they are less productive, work less, for example. this is no rocket science. What the political establishment and "female trade unions" want in many countries is a bonus for women for being female. But that's not possible in this globalized world of ours. So, what they reaklly want is beyond me. Or perhaps they just don't understand how economy works.
/r/MensRights20/01/21 08:35 AM
2

Dehumanizing men is the name of their game, nothing new here.
/r/MensRights20/01/21 08:28 AM
5

What about the lizard people? Did these guys know whether they are toxic or not? I mean, they seem to be very intelligent and morally superior people who should know the answer to this question, a question which may determine our destiny as a species. .
/r/MensRights19/01/21 11:51 AM
6

1970s new evidence was invented all the time, so those were happy times. By 2016 most of the feminist evidence was dead, so they, understandably, don't want to think about that sad year.
/r/MensRights18/01/21 11:42 AM
4

You have to dehumanize your enemy because you can't efficiently wage war against humans like you yourself. The oldest trick in the book. (But not all feminists are like that. Most people who call themselves feminists just don't understand - or don't care all that much - what the hard-core academics and other influencers are doing. They think that feminism is this feel-good project that every decent human being should support. They are not evil, just stupid and ignorant.)
/r/MensRights17/01/21 06:38 PM
3

I don't think it's productive to try to discuss this with you, so, I just cite the article you linked to: From a scientific perspective, in nearly every discussion of toxic femininity (and toxic masculinity), the causal link between gendered behavior and the hypothesized negative effects are unspecified, meshed, or ignored because they are purported to be “self-evident,” at least to the author. Unsubstantiated generalizations are not uncommon, with claims that such behavior is injurious to the i…
/r/MensRights17/01/21 02:52 PM
1

Most of what you notice is done´or made by men. So, you can pick most things in this world and argue that they somehow depict masculinity. Behind all this is a bias in our thinking. I'll explain it to you if you ask nicely.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 12:30 PM
9

LOL what!? Actually you think that toxic masculinity is OK because you've been taught that normal decency don't apply to men. But it's as bad to call men toxic as it is to call, say, Jews toxic. You're just brainwashed not to see it. Linking a fundamental identity to toxicity is not productive and should be abolished. I would never send, for example, my son to a psychologist who saw masculinity as a problem. The seeds of disaster would be too evident. (Actually my both sons are doing fine and do…
/r/MensRights17/01/21 12:09 PM
6

What about toxic femininity, toxic Jewishness, toxic "negroidity"? Are they OK, too?
/r/MensRights17/01/21 11:55 AM
1

I seem to remember that I agreed that people have every right to as scared as they want to. But I thought that it was a bit paranoid, too, to be afraid of murderers. Serial killers surely have "better" ways to find their victims than using Tinder. Talking about being afraid of getting murdered is hyperbole and sounds something she has learned from feminist propaganda. Reasonable would be something like: There are always potential dangers when you hook up with strangers regardless of gender. That…
/r/MensRights17/01/21 10:06 AM
1

The women worked for the bar and they were told to order something that costs a lot. I don't remember if the guy asked about the price - it's a bit impolite, after all - but even if he did, they could lie because it's a scam, I suppose. The bill came only after a few rounds. Anyway, it's a common scam, I'm sure you'll find more about the specifics by googling.
/r/MensRights16/01/21 05:09 PM
20

The thing is that I was never told while girls, I think, are told too many times. Then again this was long ago. Perhaps the times are different and boys are nowadays told to be wary of women who show interest. Particularly abroad. Another precaution is to not look like a tourist. And not to be too drunk.
/r/MensRights16/01/21 03:50 PM
1

On the other hand, employers have to pay employees according to how much money they make for the firm. If they don't and the competition does, they'll go bankrupt. That will always happen in the long run. In other words, free markets force companies to pay fair wages. "Fair" meaning something that is not arbitrary or evil but is based on merit (employee's productivity). What merits people have is more arbitrary - you can have merits because of, for example, your genes or family background or pur…
/r/MensRights16/01/21 07:27 AM
4

I don't think so. Men are supposed to make more money than women everywhere. It's a social role expectation. Women tens to want providers for the children and themselves.
/r/MensRights13/01/21 12:13 PM
9

For those who don't know about this major feminist hoax, the index measures the gap only if women are worse off. If men are worse off, the situation is interpreted to be equal (and it's even worse than that for some indicators). Nevertheless, the index is used by "everybody" - governments, academia, NGOs - as if it measured the gender gap. Why? Some conspiracies seem to be true, after all.
/r/MensRights13/01/21 10:04 AM
8

Good. I just wanted to defend the title of my post. I wasn't talking about my worldview. Neither were you talking about yours until you decided to justify your error by pretending that we were talking about something else, something more profound. We weren't.
/r/MensRights12/01/21 09:04 PM
9

Please read what the discussion here is about. What you're saying has nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights12/01/21 07:55 PM
12

For two months they hated women? If so, why don't you prove it? Why didn't the magazine prove it?
/r/MensRights12/01/21 07:47 PM
11

It doesn't work like that. When you make a claim you have to be able to prove it. This is so basic that I won't argue about this either. Even you would agree, if you just thought about it.
/r/MensRights12/01/21 07:45 PM
2

Most of the world does just fine without all the problems that executions bring about.
/r/MensRights12/01/21 05:10 PM
17

I find it very hard to have a rational discussion about your opinion. I can argue about moral opinions but not about unsubstantiated claims.
/r/MensRights12/01/21 04:56 PM
21

Pelosi is the main enemy of Trump (in their opinion). How do you know that they were after her also because she's female? Do you have any evidence? The Ms. Magazine didn't, so they linked to general feminist hate speech.
/r/MensRights12/01/21 03:50 PM
10

This is a business that builds on the goodwill of the users. Some are sympathetic and some hostile towards r/MensRights. They don't want to make either group angry. So, they have come up with ways to "hide" controversial subs. Banning is not the only option. Earlier quite a few posts here got to r/all but not anymore. Now the "better people" don't have to think about the unpleasant issues that are discussed here. They don't even have to know this sub exists. They also don't put any ads here, so,…
/r/MensRights12/01/21 01:59 PM
4

Yeah, that's a problem. If you google anything with a "genderish" perspective, there are almost always feminist hits first. That's, I suppose, because it's usually feminists who study and publish these things and they tend to link to each other's research. It's an academic circle jerk. And google basically thinks that more links mean more important and meaningful. I haven't come up with any good solution. Usually I just spend a bit more time looking for unbiased sources trying to refine my searc…
/r/MensRights12/01/21 10:31 AM
4

The most succesful hoax of our times.
/r/MensRights11/01/21 06:15 PM
2

No big deal but: mi·nor Lesser in importance, seriousness, or significance. When I double-click any word in Chrome definitions like that pop up. I think it's an extension I've installed.
/r/MensRights11/01/21 12:49 PM
9

What I had in mind is more like a general cultural attitude. If you run an all-male something, you probably feel pressured to change it so that women can join, too. If you don't, there is this nagging feeling that what you do is somehow wrong. That's your feminist superego talking. And even if you don't have that kind of superego, it's likely that there are people around you who have. And they either try to change the system or they just stop coming. But it's not the whole story and you can look…
/r/MensRights11/01/21 08:05 AM
12

There are such clubs, choirs etc that were earlier male only and then were opened for women. This unfortunately sometimes leads to men leaving mainly because many men feel at leas a little awkward when women are present compared to the openness when they are in a male company. It's all those - sexist - expectations telling that men should heavily censor themselves when in presence of women. Furthermore, the competition dynamics change. If you earlier tried to be the best now you try to be (also)…
/r/MensRights11/01/21 07:29 AM
3

It would be surprising if there weren't at least some sort of MRA sites and FB pages in every European country - even in the "minor" ones. BTW, if you use Chrome, you can translate between many languages. Just right click and choose "Translate".
/r/MensRights11/01/21 06:53 AM
1

So why?
/r/MensRights09/01/21 08:59 AM
1

The link between pater and father still remains in many expressions: Pater noster = our father. Patronymic = father's name. Pro patria = for fatherland. Etc.
/r/MensRights09/01/21 08:45 AM
2

Aggression is good if you know how to handle it. It's bad if youi don't. It's possible that you think about criminals and I think about people who can't handle their aggression and end up committing a crime, like assault. In addition to criminals.
/r/MensRights08/01/21 04:12 PM
1

Heh, but, yeah, if they wanted to kill themselves.
/r/MensRights08/01/21 11:10 AM
3

At the moment those who got the joke without an explanation are losing by seven to ten.
/r/MensRights08/01/21 10:53 AM
2

One suicidal female is recorded more times because she will attempt to kill herself many times while a suicidal male is recorded fewer times because of his better success rate. By the way, usually you can't get a social research or psychology paper published unless you can show causation (unless you are not trying to, which is totally legit in some cases). As for aggression, it surely causes crime. Many crimes are, after all, just stupid aggression escalating. A criminal lifestyle must increase …
/r/MensRights08/01/21 07:16 AM
50

It's funny how these feminist-minded people always are surprised by the real world.
/r/MensRights08/01/21 06:32 AM
8

What does the manual on political correct language say?
/r/MensRights08/01/21 06:24 AM
2

Try again. This time read what I wrote.
/r/MensRights07/01/21 04:30 PM
6

It's from the Washington Post and by a university professor ... so ...surely it can't be bigotry? But it is. This world is a strange place. Bigotry is against everything we believe in - unless it's against men. Yeah, you migh argue, it's only white men that we are allowed to hate and that surely must be OK. But did you notice that the two first men she mentions are actually JEWS! So, apparentluy you can also hate Jewish men! What's next? Jewish women? All this sounds too much like a slippery slo…
/r/MensRights07/01/21 11:15 AM
3

Here the bigot defends her hate speech (and frowns upon the hate she's received). But do I have the right to hate feminists? More so than she has the right to hate men. You can't choose your sex but you can choose what kind of ideas you support and spread. Particularly if you are a middle-aged professor and not a vulnerable teenager. (I think you have to hit esc right after the page has loaded, otherwise you can't read it.)
/r/MensRights07/01/21 10:39 AM
6

I've thought that patriarchy is a feminist myth, not existing in real life. Where can I join?
/r/MensRights07/01/21 10:29 AM
3

Women have a strong incentive to make husbands part of the family, to make them engaged as deeply as possible with them and the kids. If the family had the woman's family name, it would be emotionally much easier for a man to not care and even leave the family. This is no rocket science but the feminists in the article don't have a clue, it seems.
/r/MensRights07/01/21 07:29 AM
14

As I said, men work more than women. If there are children involved, we can assume that women spend more hours at home. If there are no children, then she may be shopping or in a bar and not at home. So, in that sense you might be onto something.
/r/MensRights05/01/21 02:43 PM
115

Yeah, but it feels better to think that women are important and men are not. So, stop mansplaining. /s
/r/MensRights05/01/21 02:35 PM
25

Isnt that one of the reasonable complaints feminists have? Sure, if you are allowed to complain about the paid working hours, too. Men, after all, work more than women, and they do it because of certain role expectations (like providing for their wives). And naturally you should at the same time talk about the combined working hours (paid+unpaid) because then, according to certain statistics, men work more than women. It's complicated. But that's not what feminists think. For them it's the typic…
/r/MensRights05/01/21 02:17 PM
0

He meant to say: Aw, women, who let them in?
/r/MensRights05/01/21 01:01 PM
1

They want HIM to protect the nation. Monotheists have female gods, too, and you can't have that, I suppose.
/r/MensRights05/01/21 12:56 PM
1

Rather than feminists alone, it's the "gendered violence industry" in general that endorses the power struggle narrative and other feminist follies. A government official, for example, can't say that the Istanbul Convention is factually and morally wrong. She just has to act as if everything was OK to keep her job. The Gendered Violence Industry is, in its turn, part of the even bigger Women's Grievances Industry. If your livelihood is dependent on it, you have to believe in such things the wage…
/r/MensRights05/01/21 12:51 PM
2

And nowhere is the data more tragic than our prison system. Ninety-three percent of our prison population is male. And that disparity can't be explained by police discrimination. Or systemic bias against boys. What!
/r/MensRights05/01/21 10:29 AM
9

Women have so few gendered problems nowadays that feminists turn general problems into gendered ones and invent new problems where there aren't any. If they didn't do this, the whole grievance movement would vanish into thin air.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 03:08 PM
-11

Why don't you just check things that are important and you want or need to have an opinion about?
/r/MensRights04/01/21 03:03 PM
5

It's true that men and women are quite similar, more similar than different statistically. But it seems that there are things were men and women are very different and this seems to be one of those. If it wasn't, we should have at least something similar going on in the women's magazines as (there used to be) in men's magazines.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 11:22 AM
114

I think that most people know that women have the upper hand in relationships and homes more often than men. But then there is the other "reality" which says that women are oppressed everywhere by men. This mythical reality is so powerful that it easily surpasses the real reality in weak minds. Like in the mainstream media.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 11:15 AM
28

And soon we got another one.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 11:09 AM
44

Some say men are inherently violent, some say men use violence to have power over women - which makes them more like inherently power hungry than violent. Violence is a by-product. Feminist favor the power narrative. It's crucial to their whole worldview. Then again, if women were in power, many feminists think, there would be little violence. So, they must think that women are not inherently violent but men are.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 05:29 PM
37

It's very hard to find out about these things because feminist-minded researchers have polluted most of the field. The most important thing is to keep the "men are pigs" narrative alive, not the truth or what happens to be people whoa re in violent relationships.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 04:33 PM
4

Finland is doing fine, not great but just fine. And Finland is also a remote, big place with a population the size of Berlin's. Finland's prime minister has been applauded in many international outlets for her great job. But I'm pretty sure it's because she's pretty and young. And a woman. Because her impact, as far as I can see, hasn't been remarkable in any way. Slow reaction times, bad decisions, blatant lies and what not. My theory is that she's isn't at her best because she's a young and pr…
/r/MensRights02/01/21 06:37 PM
6

Google Translate PDF Files for Free I'm sure you are aware of Google Translate, but did you know that they take in files too? Follow the steps below to translate PDF files. Access the Translate a Document tool. Choose the language to translate from and to. If you are lazy or unsure, you can also leave the default language to 'Detect language'. Click 'Choose File' and then click the blue 'Translate' button. Let Google work its magic. You will get a pop-up with the PDF file translated.
/r/MensRights01/01/21 04:35 PM
1

She said nothing of the kind. You're reading your own peculiar thoughts into what she really said. A great article. She has chosen her perspective and knows how to defend it.
/r/MensRights01/01/21 01:24 PM
1

maximal freedom like Sweden Sweden isn't particularly free but feminists there are particularly obnoxious.
/r/MensRights29/12/20 07:06 AM
1

That's true. But it's changing. This is not going to end well. I hope it would but I don't see how weak men bossed around by women could en dwell in the world that is basically the same it was 100 000 years ago. It just seems that it's different, safe witihout riski because some men managed to make it that way in some isolated parts of the planet.
/r/MensRights28/12/20 07:08 PM
1

There are all kinds of shitty experiments that have been done to just men. Like the Stanford prison experiment. Perhaps I'll look into it one of these days.
/r/MensRights26/12/20 02:31 PM
7

LOL
/r/MensRights26/12/20 11:23 AM
2

Men are on average more prone to do anything that is out of the ordinary, also violence. Some people think it's a huge problem and some people think it's huge benefit that there are such people who do things that are out of the ordinary. It's common that people have both of these beliefs at the same time though they contradict each other. No problem.
/r/MensRights26/12/20 11:11 AM
1

Happy Christmas, you typical hater! :D
/r/MensRights25/12/20 09:26 PM
3

Oh wow. This place is a straight up toxic shit hole. Cheers you poor miserable people I was hoping that you wouldn't be that angry anymore. But it takes time. One day, perhaps...
/r/MensRights25/12/20 08:44 PM
1

OK. That sounds like a reasonable argument, Something reasonable people could argue about. It's not hatred anymore. Thanks for that.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 07:30 PM
2

There are haters everywhere. But fewer here than on many other political forums. Hate an anger fuels minds the same way as virtues. Perhaps more so.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 06:55 PM
2

What presents did you get from you loved ones? Stop hating.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 06:31 PM
12

reflexively I doubt that very much. There is a ton of evidence that feminists are often wrong factually and morally. Yeah, who wouldn't? But they are in power, so, it's our duty to be critical towards them. MRAs are sometimes as stupid as feminists. And the attitudes, well, sometimes I feel I wouldn't want to spend a night in a pub with some of these guys. But they are not in power. Give them some leeway.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 06:18 PM
5

My son and his girlfriend - who are living abroad and can't come home because of the pandemic - just gave me and my wife a Christmas present. It was a picture of our family with all our children with their mates and kids made by an artist from a third-world country. Misery? Nah, rather, one of the nicest things I can imagine.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 05:43 PM
22

Yes, projection: https://medium.com/@andywilson457/feminism-psychological-projection-on-a-macro-and-gendered-scale-eb8694e0efcc This obsession with rape, seeing all men as potential rapists, even young boys (which adds a particular Freudian twist) would seem more simply explained by women’s own well documented propensity for rape fantasies. 62% of women admit to fantasizing about being raped. (Critelli, 2009) “Human females have a particular proclivity for using indirect aggression, which is typ…
/r/MensRights25/12/20 05:09 PM
21

Yeah, I know it makes little sense, a feminist definition par excellence. But if I decided to define feminism based on my prejudices - hmm - "a movement of women that tries to make hating men mainstream". Fair? Probably more than what Ms. does. And they, their ideology is part of the establishment.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 01:47 PM
5

The premise of the post was the Britannica's definition. Apparently you think you have a better one. Let's hear it. I have seen many and they just don't make sense. Why? Because the phenomenon didn't exist, so, it's impossible to define rationally. Sure, society used to be very different and still is in many parts. People had different rights and responsibilities according to their position in the great chain in of being. Women were below men in some ways but, on the other hand, all successful s…
/r/MensRights23/12/20 07:49 PM
-1

And it's pretty hard to "enjoy" having children the same way as with a woman (though not totally impossible). Men want children, that's the call of the evolution. The researchers are not from this world. Were they women?
/r/MensRights23/12/20 07:28 PM
1

So, Encyclopedia Britannica got it wrong, is that what you're saying? I wonder what would be a better definition. Something like: "Patriarchy is a system in which the leader of a clan is trying to hold absolute power but often can't and then fucks up like Michael Corleone". Or perhaps: "Patriarchy is a system in which fathers try to rule their families without pissing off the leaders".
/r/MensRights23/12/20 05:42 PM
1

With sex so freely available without emotional attachments, through social media for example, and because bromances occupy such a privileged spot in young men’s lives, “the bromance could increasingly become recognized as a genuine lifestyle relationship; whereby two heterosexual men can live together and experience all the benefits of a traditional heterosexual relationship,” 'There are two gaping holes in that argument.
/r/MensRights23/12/20 05:18 PM
19

‘Most American women hope to marry,’ lead author Daniel T. Lichter said in a press release, ‘but current shortages of marriageable men – men with a stable job and a good income – make this increasingly difficult, especially in the current gig economy of unstable low-paying service jobs.’ That opening sentence seems like a preposterous assumption to base an entire study on. Researchers are telling about the results they got and speculating about possible reasons. It's not an assumption "based on"…
/r/MensRights23/12/20 03:14 PM
1

Women's reproduction-related health problems were by far the biggest reason why working-age people died. So, it's no wonder that researchers and doctors concentrated on doing something about it din those early years. Those damned "patriarchal doctors" that is. Perhaps it's just a tradition nowadays, too much money in all kinds of institutions and foundations that must be targeted to studying it.
/r/MensRights23/12/20 11:11 AM
1

I'm under the impression that they controlled for the age. That's what the article seems to be saying.
/r/MensRights23/12/20 04:58 AM
10

Why should this possible takeaway evoke outrage? A recent study8 found that people evaluate scientific studies reporting a male-favoring advantage less favorably, compared to those reporting a female-favoring one. Papers demonstrating a male (versus female) advantage were viewed as less credible, less valuable, more offensive, and more harmful. These findings suggest merely highlighting a disparity disfavoring women is likely to evoke public outcry. I wonder if these people think that it's just …
/r/MensRights22/12/20 04:36 PM
13

I wonder if the same would work for an East-End school.
/r/MensRights21/12/20 04:59 PM
3

I don't know if you're trolling but let my clarify. I didn't say he's ignorant but sounds like one. The reason is that if you know something about social psychology and such things, you know that it's common that people have wrong ideas about society and people - and about women and men, in particular. Hell, most people probably believe that what feminists say is by and large true. If you as a researcher don't know this about people, you're ignorant.
/r/MensRights21/12/20 04:43 PM
14

overall only 6 percent of total philanthropic dollars in this country are going to women and girls. As a philanthropic entity, we are encouraging people to give their dollars in the places that affect women and girls; so that we can make sure that their voices are heard. Why is it “only”? What share would be enough? What is the share "men get". 1%? 0,1%? It must be below what "women get", otherwise they would make a big fuss about it.
/r/MensRights21/12/20 03:08 PM
1

That's what "Google said", I didn't look into it any further. I should really read the methodology section but I have other plans.
/r/MensRights21/12/20 02:30 PM
11

This is maybe not too surprising ... given research in social psychology suggesting that people often hold more positive stereotypes of women, are more concerned about harms to women, and are more protective of women than men. That's one of the more robust findings about the sexes and it's probably one of the reasons behind the phenomenon. We think women are worth more and want to hear it. But it also feels wrong to say that men could be better at something. We don't like men all that much?
/r/MensRights21/12/20 02:02 PM
5

I realized that a lot of people think it’s the other way around: that people are more likely to accept male-favoring differences – or that everyone prefers differences that favor their own sex. So, it looked to me like the world was one way, but a lot of people were adamant it was another. This guy sounds ignorant. Was he really surprised about that!?
/r/MensRights21/12/20 01:55 PM
2

Life expectancy gender gap As such, parity is considered as achieved if, on average, women live five years longer than men. Truncating the data at the equality benchmarks for each assigns the same score to a country that has reached parity between women and men and one where women have surpassed men. Appendix B: The Global Gender Gap Index: Methodology and ...reports.weforum.org › global-gender-gap-report-2020 › a.
/r/MensRights21/12/20 11:20 AM
2

We have control over our lives. Here's a great book about it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man%27s_Search_for_Meaning
/r/MensRights20/12/20 07:10 PM
1

Okay, thanks. I was sure that the methodology section I read years go used an absolute figure. Perhaps they did earlier. Or perhaps it was another indicator, like healthy years, though I doubt it.
/r/MensRights20/12/20 06:15 PM
1

They are always surprised when the world isn't the way they feel it should and what feminists say it is. Comical.
/r/MensRights20/12/20 04:36 PM
0

They even consider equal life expectancy as unfair to women Nope, they consider less than 2 years' difference as unequal.
/r/MensRights20/12/20 04:33 PM
9

Hard to say if the is true that there is a lot of hatred towards those groups if the hate gets censored. But it does sound like a feminist or SJW factoid. So, my guess is that it is not true. What we DO know is that Twitter allows hate speech against men. And so do other platforms. It's unfair - but it's OK, too, because that way the craziness and evilness will come out in the open. It's going to play an important role in their downfall, hopefully.
/r/MensRights20/12/20 10:30 AM
7

Yes
/r/MensRights20/12/20 10:09 AM
21

We recognise that if people experience abuse on Twitter, it can jeopardize their ability to express themselves. Research has shown that some groups of people are disproportionately targeted with abuse online. This includes; women, people of color, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual individuals, marginalized and historically underrepresented communities. For those who identity with multiple underrepresented groups, abuse may be more common, more severe in nature and hav…
/r/MensRights20/12/20 09:45 AM
14

What the reaction of media and the film industry, feminists, if he gets a fair trial and Heard is deemed to have lied? "Ooops, we did it again."
/r/MensRights20/12/20 09:42 AM
30

Exactly. You can't help but think it's been left out in order to make Twitter a more welcoming service to women and feminists in particular.
/r/MensRights20/12/20 09:33 AM
12

Most employers must think that hiring a feminist is an unnecessary risk. Unless they are stupid. Back in the day when I was asked about these things I learned to pay attention to possible feminist inclinations. That happened after we hired a young woman - we actually hired just women to diversify - who turned out to be a real pain in the ass. One of the reasons was that she really despised and looked down on older male co-workers (like me).
/r/MensRights20/12/20 09:30 AM
70

What the fuck, Twitter? Twitter: While we encourage people to express themselves freely on Twitter, abuse, harassment and hateful conduct continue to have no place on our service. In July 2019, we expanded our rules against hateful conduct to include language that dehumanizes others on the basis of religion or caste. In March 2020, we expanded the rule to include language that dehumanizes on the basis of age, disability, or disease. Today, we are further expanding our hateful conduct policy to p…
/r/MensRights20/12/20 09:13 AM
33

The WEF is perhaps the biggest disinformation machine int the world. Their Gender Gap Index is a) among the most important feminist tools for favoring women and b) a hoax.
/r/MensRights19/12/20 01:54 PM
2

Thanks for the nice words. The Lord of the Rings was one of my favorites, too. And Mika Waltari's historical novels. Here in Finland they used to be a big thing. They and LOTR are, probably one of the main reasons why I decided to study history. The past seemed like this mysterious and fascinating foreign land. Anyways, good luck with your doctoral thesis!
/r/MensRights19/12/20 01:42 PM
2

When I was studying history at the university eons ago, I was overwhelmed by all that new information I was supposed to learn. "How on earth am I going to make any sense of all this and know what is true and what relates to what and ... aargh!" I was a bit childish back then. Then, and I remember exactly how it happened, I realized that I had been lied to. There is no truth. There are just perspectives. Your task is to choose one perspective at a time, try to be as fair as you can, and then argu…
/r/MensRights19/12/20 10:07 AM
-2

Or learn to use it.
/r/MensRights18/12/20 06:53 PM
3

But if you are talking about women “lashing out” their insecurities in men, then I answer you a resounding YES. Yeah, I mean that feminists - perhaps - try to transfer their subconscious negative thoughts into an enemy. That's not unheard of. There are all kinds of psychological theories why feminism, in particular, is such a essential part of the modern-day discourse with its -occasional or frequent - hatred and demonizing, though. I'm not saying projection is the best one. (I haven't actually …
/r/MensRights18/12/20 06:15 PM
3

To be honest, I didn't read everything. So, I'm sorry if I misunderstood. Anyway, you shouldn't make generalizations about men that are based on monks or therapy groups. Most men are just fine with their identity. In fact, men seem to handle identity related problems better than women - at least if you believe the references in the article above. Do feminists project their own insecurities onto men? But it is also true that young men face really difficult problems in this day and age when there …
/r/MensRights18/12/20 04:36 PM
51

I think that there is a fundamental difference between feminists and MRAs: Feminists feel so entitled that they have no problem writing books and articles about 'what men are and what they should be'. MRAs - and men in general - feel that the opposite. Even thinking about it feels creepy and dangerous. No?
/r/MensRights18/12/20 10:32 AM
3

It reminds me of the problems Nazis had when they tried to decide who were real Jews and who were not. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Laws#Classifications_under_the_laws
/r/MensRights18/12/20 10:00 AM
1

He's saying that women are more docile.
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/20 06:41 PM
7

It's a feminist hoax to maintain that partner violence is a gendered issue, something men do to women. Perhaps their most successful hoax. And among the most important, too: "See how dangerous the enemy is, you have to give us more power to fight it!" So, according to meta-analysis both sexes do it but there are small differences here and there. For example, among young couples females tend to be more prone to violence. That said, it's understandable, in my opinion, that we tend to worry more ab…
/r/MensRights17/12/20 10:49 AM
3

It's angry, not angy. Couldn't resist...
/r/MensRights17/12/20 10:40 AM
1

Sentences should be shorter. Be shorter, sentences! Even shorter.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 05:29 PM
3

You could attack their core beliefs: patriarchy, violence against women, historical oppression, power relations, rape culture, economic injustices. That's not easy because a) people tend to believe in the feminist narrative and feel automatically sympathy for women and b) it's hard to attack them without rather deep knowledge of the subjects (and googling produces mostly feminist results because feminism is such a big business, not because Google necessarily favors feminism in its search results…
/r/MensRights16/12/20 10:47 AM
10

Think what that did to those girls, going through their hateful lines many times and adult women cheering. Beyond repair, possibly.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 08:25 AM
3

Perhaps the touching part was that she expected him to make her uncomfortable - being a brute and all - but all of a sudden he didn't and was somehow the opposite in the 19th century romantic way. But don't try this yourself, the risks are so obvious and likely to happen.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 08:19 AM
14

The obvious follow-up question she should have asked is " what is toxic femininity?" Why didn't she? Is it too loaded? Too insignificant? My guess is that most people would refuse to answer and think silently that it's improper to imply that women could be toxic.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 07:53 AM
2

Crying certainly helps but it's not a signal we see straight away like faces are. Women also tend to smile a lot but not always.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 05:41 AM
1

That women objectively look better comes from the theory that claims that average is beautiful, the most beautiful is the most average. I don't think it has been proven beyond reasonable doubt but, as far as I know, it's the best theory there is. What is considered good looks vary between cultures and there seems to be a strong correlation between the average looks and beauty standards in different places (though studying it has become hard because western beauty nroms have infiltrated almost ev…
/r/MensRights16/12/20 05:39 AM
3

Almost all people think that children's faces are cute, I believe. Evolution made us that way. It's also a fact that those features remain in women much more than in men whose faces change during puberty. Evolution made us that way, too. Luckily, stating facts isn't a crime, otherwise there would be many criminals like these. EDIT: There was a test on the Uni-Regensburg's site that lets you test how much you like "baby-faceness" as they call it.
/r/MensRights15/12/20 08:46 PM
0

Isn't there this theory that two X chromosomes are better than one because there is some sort of double-checking possibility decreasing the number of copying errors?
/r/MensRights15/12/20 06:52 PM
10

I read the article but couldn't really follow the plot. I even googled both the author and the magazine to find context but that didn't help. Many men are doomed to celibacy but should be thankful that they are not killed.They don't understand what's going on and oppose to people like feminists who could help them and support people who want to make the world a patriarchal hellhole where they will be much worse off. No, that could not have been the plot ... could it? Anyway, what's scary is that…
/r/MensRights15/12/20 03:21 PM
10

The article discussed a totally different issue, different but similarly crazy. The idea is that because women are "secondary workers" they respond to higher tax rates more strongly than men by working less or quitting altogether. With lower taxes women would work more, which is good for the economy. True. But it's nonsense to claim that we should consider taxes from this single perspective. For example, not all women are "secondary workers" (within families), but they would get the same tax cut…
/r/MensRights14/12/20 09:15 PM
8

Without the kind of marriage we have, there would be harems and even more single mothers. We were lucky that the norm in the west became the kind of nuclear family we have. That was part of the "winning formula" that made the west the champion of so many good things. It makes me nervous when I see these "good institutions" being challenged and even losing without any plan on what's going to replace them.
/r/MensRights14/12/20 11:16 AM
-13

It's a trend internationally. https://ourworldindata.org/marriages-and-divorces#marriages-are-becoming-less-common The main biological reason is women's pickiness. Women's pickiness is getting stronger and men look less marriageable - partly because they are.
/r/MensRights14/12/20 11:00 AM
1

Chimpanzees. Male sexuality have had this predatory side for millions of years and even longer. It feels threatening especially for women.
/r/MensRights13/12/20 05:32 PM
3

Europes only genoise after WWI was Sebrencia You might want to fix that to WWII and genocide. It seems that genocides can be divided into those that target everybody (what Nazis did) and those that target mostly men. The Soviet Union targeted mostly men because the aim was to get rid of potentially dangerous people in certain, crucial areas close to the Soviet border, in particular. Before Stalin there were, for example, a lot of Ingrian Finns living in the St Petersburg (Petrograd, Leningrad) a…
/r/MensRights13/12/20 09:05 AM
14

That was a drama. But tell my about the numerous attacks where boys have been kidnapped - and killed - that have been going on in the Near East and Africa for decades. Without googling. Almost nobody cares. I remember checking how the kidnapping and killing of boys that Boko Haram had been doing for years had been in the news after an idiot columnist wrote how nobody cares because they was girls whom Boko Haram kidnapped. It was disturbing how little anybody had paid attention before the girls g…
/r/MensRights12/12/20 10:39 PM
5

It's self-evident that it's not a good idea to let others know if you are against an ideology that the establishment favors. I, for example, would never tell anybody publicly because it would hurt my business. Perhaps my friendships, too.
/r/MensRights12/12/20 09:58 PM
17

random people on the internet? LOL. The UN, the EU, governments etc, etc, are not random people on Internet but they have the same lies.
/r/MensRights12/12/20 09:44 PM
3

A good question. It seems to be impossible to do anything that favors men nowadays even if there's solid reasoning behind it. There are some vague ideas floating around about things like narrowing the education gap or helping homeless men, but when something should be done the momentum just isn't there. "Yeah, it's not the way it should be, I guess, but you know, helping men/boys, is that really necessary, I mean, aren't there all kinds of other things we should be doing, and, anyways, what othe…
/r/MensRights12/12/20 05:58 PM
1

Did they control for the fact that most really old and thus vulnerable people are women?
/r/MensRights12/12/20 05:37 PM
13

Feminist do that often. Are you saying they are not sexist?
/r/MensRights12/12/20 05:34 PM
31

It's disgusting how patriarchy makes women have attitudes like that. And this time I won't forget: /s
/r/MensRights12/12/20 05:30 PM
1

If there is a thought that keeps coming back and there really seems to be no reason to ruminate about it, you don't have to. Every time the thought starts rising its ugly head, just decide to think about something else to push it away. For example, you can start telling yourself a story about something else. Over time the unnecessary an unpleasant thought will start coming back more rarely. We are - or should be - masters of our own thoughts and there are "tricks" that we can help you to be exac…
/r/MensRights12/12/20 01:22 PM
5

I forgot to put /s there. The money is meant for the US mothers.
/r/MensRights12/12/20 09:31 AM
11

Melinda is fabricating a narrative telling that women's charities are getting far too little money compared to other charities. Here is an example of the lates feminist insanity.
/r/MensRights12/12/20 07:49 AM
0

Think what $ 2,400 means to a poor African mother. It's like the earnings of several years and you get it once a month! The Gates are really trying to solve the most pressing problems of the planet and humanity (though 2 400 a month sounds almost like too much; can even they afford that much money?)
/r/MensRights12/12/20 07:46 AM
1

But if they are debunking it has to stop, in my opinion.
/r/MensRights12/12/20 06:39 AM
1

People have tried to debunk women and children as a myth That has to stop.
/r/MensRights12/12/20 06:01 AM
-2

This so-called study is a single instance of a woman buried with hunting tools. No it's not. it's about almost as many women as men buried with a hunting gear. EDIT: Yes it is, read the article.
/r/MensRights12/12/20 05:59 AM
3

Then again you would have to consider the much greater risks women have hunting mammoths and their value for reproductions. Evolution didn't make women physically weaker and more fragile without a reason. Women also had either young children to look after or they were pregnant. But who knows, there are so many unknowns involved.
/r/MensRights12/12/20 05:56 AM
2

They weren't sedentary which makes accumulating wealth very unlikely.
/r/MensRights12/12/20 05:49 AM
1

So, women are violent but only against other women?
/r/MensRights12/12/20 05:35 AM
2

When it becomes apparent that feminism harms society and economy in particular then we will see changes. Feminism does that already but it's not apparent. That's why it's important to talk about the lies and immoralities.
/r/MensRights11/12/20 08:24 PM
1

If you bought all, others would go bankrupt, I believe.
/r/MensRights11/12/20 01:00 PM
1

If that was true, we wouldn't have governments, the EU, the UN implementing feminist policies based on lies and black-and-white half-truths. If that was true, we wouldn't have academic feminism teaching exactly the kind of things I mentioned to begin with. If that was true, we wouldn't see huge international charities, like Amnesty and Plan, raising money with feminist themes - based on lies or cherry-picking. "Splinter groups" my ass, as an American would say. I see all this in a tragic light, …
/r/MensRights11/12/20 09:05 AM
1

If only it was a fringe idea. The problem is that most people don't understand the evil premises, so to speak. They think they are one of the good people when they actually are supporting very harmful ideas. In this case about men. 100 years ago it was the Jews in many countries. My son, by the way, lives in Berlin. A nice city.
/r/MensRights11/12/20 08:30 AM
1

I mean that dehumanizing a group has never ended well and dehumanizing men is probably not going to end well either. What else could it mean? And this sociopath thing is not the only example of the ways feminist dehumanize men. And the establishment either joining in or keeping silent. Hunger leads, by the way, to apathy not aggression. People don't kill daughters during famines. People tend to protect girls more than boys and there is a good biological, reproduction-related reason for it. And p…
/r/MensRights11/12/20 07:36 AM
8

Yeah, the girls have to reconsider their future career. Perhaps house wife is, after all, the way to go.
/r/MensRights11/12/20 06:44 AM
1

It's #79 in Amazon's board games with 4.6 stars. There are over 20 000 board games in total on Amazon (I don't know if there is any way to find out how many different games there are, but whatever the figure is #79 means it's selling well).
/r/MensRights11/12/20 06:42 AM
9

But it's also true that "white men" is a special group among men, the only one that can be attacked freely. And the attackers are not a fringe group but belong to the establishment and hold power. The enemy is either men in general or white men, never Asian or Jewish men, let alone men that belong to some disadvantaged ethnic group. That said, I don't think it's wise to talk about whiteness at all these days. The word is too loaded. Negative talk is destructive, positive talk is "WRONG".
/r/MensRights11/12/20 06:25 AM
1

Most of the successful states have been until quite recently pretty tyrannical. Think about China, Japan, Many native American empires. In Europe things started to change but it happened slowly and recently.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 07:15 PM
1

This is not complicated. Feminists claim that men treated women - like daughters - as if they were property or slaves. Only people like sociopaths do such things. Thus, men must be sociopaths or something similar. I don't know what's hard to understand. It's like logic. Or are you denying that feminists say such things? Or perhaps you think that men were like that but not anymore. But no, there is a universal human nature that is not sociopathic. We shouldn't be here if it was. A "feminist" movi…
/r/MensRights10/12/20 06:47 PM
1

LOL. You are paranoid. I never even hinted that I was saying anything about you personally. But I'm sure this gives you that lovely hate feeling that you have found another man monster.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 05:10 PM
1

Stop implying that men are sociopathic monsters who treated theri daughters as property and slaves etc.. Even Nazis weren't saying so bad things about the Jews. If you don't this is not going end well.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 03:47 PM
1

Read what I wrote and try again. I'm a historian by education and have written a couple of books and dozens of articles. By the way. So, being critical of sources is something I know about probably a lot more than you do. Actually, the big difference between me and you seems to be that I can be critical but you can't. Feminism is not all bullshit, of course. And it can be even useful. But it's often a movement that lies and spreads hate. Unfortunately. And that part undermines everything that is…
/r/MensRights10/12/20 09:11 AM
4

What happened in western Europe is almost like a miracle considering that tyranny is the default, so to speak. Nevertheless, Europe managed to incorporate such ideas as abolition, enlightenment, science, (relative) freedom of expression, free enterprise, and finally democracy into its societies and institutions. Church played its part - for and against - but there were other forces at work as well, like the competition between different principalities and kingdoms and the "Renaissance" of certai…
/r/MensRights10/12/20 08:37 AM
32

Here are Amazon's Content Guidelines for Books: These guidelines apply to book content, including title, cover art, and product description. Illegal or Infringing Content We take violations of laws and proprietary rights very seriously. It is your responsibility to ensure that your content doesn't violate laws or copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity, or other rights. Just because content is freely available does not mean you are free to copy and sell it. Poor Customer Experience Books for sa…
/r/MensRights10/12/20 08:23 AM
9

There is an interview with Cassie Jaye (The Red Pill maker) where she talks about how she first set out to make a documentary about the misogynist manosphere and trash like Paul Elam. But that's impossible for a honest person. That the great tragedy of feminism. They teach people things that don't exist. But over time something starts happening even with lies. Some of them start to come even true when there is enough of bitterness and hatred.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 07:41 AM
6

The weapons the white knights were given by the SJ Warriors are useless. But the white knights don't realize it until they have to use them in battle. Then they, after a few weak blows, turn to run shouting "bye, you whining misogynist!" The strange thing is that this can happen time and again and they still believe their weapons are of the finest quality. I believe it's a spell that has been cast upon them by SJMs (Social Justice Magicians).
/r/MensRights10/12/20 07:32 AM
1

I've talked about sexual harassment with my wife. She said that she remembers two cases of sexual harassment, neither of them threatening but inconvenient nevertheless. I, on the other hand, remember three, by three different women/girl, that is, so I won. I can reveal anonymously that I used to be very cute. In this light it would be totally futile to even try to discuss "rape culture" with her. She'd think I'm nuts. That said, I admit that there are rape-culture places in this world, like cert…
/r/MensRights10/12/20 06:58 AM
2

It's typical for sociopaths to see other people as objects rather than human beings worth sympathy and kindness. A sociopath could, among other things, try to treat another person as property or a slave, even if that other person was his mother, wife or daughter. For more than 95% of us people that's impossible (if less than 5% are sociopaths, psychopaths narcissists on other people with no or weak empathy and other relevant feelings). These feelings are universal and can, thus, be found in anci…
/r/MensRights10/12/20 06:39 AM
3

The idea of universal human rights started to form during the late antiquity, though. It was weak and vague but for example in Christianity and granting full Roman citizenship to most free men there were clear signs of the idea. Slowly even slavery started to get a bad rap within the western Christendom. I'm no expert but I once read an essay and was impressed.
/r/MensRights09/12/20 08:50 PM
1

Google for example: "Gender is the most significant factor for being a perpetrator or victim of domestic violence in particular" with quotes.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 03:54 PM
5

A less radical question: would you rather have a daughter or son considering the risks?
/r/MensRights08/12/20 05:22 AM
1

Yeah, slaves were oppressed or Jews.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 05:17 AM
6

Straight white men are pretty much the only group everybody, including the establishment, is allowed to slander. Sometimes feminists slander men in general but they are very careful not to mention any particular male group except the straight white men. That's one way to look at it. You are free to choose another way.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 09:03 PM
1

I think it's feminists and not women who do it. Most women probably don't even know what mansplaining is - or don't use it if they do.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 08:56 AM
7

People have the strangest ideas of the history of women and equality. No wonder these kinds of people don't have nay problems with discriminating against men the way society nowadays does. They think that it's just after all those millennia of oppression.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 08:45 AM
3

They are illusionists.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 05:58 AM
1

The blog is awesome.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 05:53 AM
1

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_5
/r/MensRights07/12/20 05:50 AM
-4

Men are systemically opressed into doing all the work. I've always thought that men "do all the work" because they a) want sex more and b) and women tend to be very picky. If so, it's not oppression but more like biology. Then again, perhaps biology can be oppressive. Edit: Unbelievably, there seems to be people who don't know this: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_5
/r/MensRights06/12/20 05:48 PM
8

I wonder why somebody would want a white man's sentence. Perhaps she'll turn out to be one of those who wants to live in prison. But if so, why didn't she want to be punished like a black man? Strange. Well, I think she wanted to join a white gang in the prison. She had been in black and Hispanic gangs and now wanted to try the only one that was left. Perhaps that would bring her happiness. Finally. Perhaps in the next episode all this will be explained. Sorry for the spoiler.
/r/MensRights06/12/20 03:33 PM
2

Suit or wealth doesn't equal privilege either.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 06:58 PM
3

Yeah, it's not optimal if "the world" doesn't know about all those people who think #killallmen is cool.
/r/MensRights04/12/20 11:27 AM
1

Sounds like an endgame but only for the civilization. For the people who survive it will be the beginning of the biggest shoot'em up ever.
/r/MensRights04/12/20 11:19 AM
27

You should have added your credibility with a couple of feminist slogans like "men are trash, killallmen".
/r/MensRights04/12/20 11:14 AM
1

There are many ways to talk about prices. If you read what I wrote, I first told how companies in reality end up charging what they do. then I said that I really don't know what the psychology behind the pink tax is i.e the fact that women "demand pink stuff". If you do, please tell. Otherwise this is futile - as tend to be, by the way, oh so many economics discussions because people often have strong feelings and little knowledge.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 08:22 PM
1

Prices usually have little to do with production costs. Ask Apple if you don't believe me. And the conspiracy ... I don't know what you are talking about. Clearly you didn't understand what I wrote, sorry about that. Competition - if there is any - is naturally one component in the "optimal price point equation". In commodities and mass-market goods it's the most important one.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 07:43 PM
1

In an individual company somebody decides the price and changes it until it's optimal in relation to profit or other strategic goals. This is very basic business economics. It's not the same as the price mechanism you find in economics books because an individual company can't know what the demand or the supply are and can't really even much influence them.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 07:27 PM
1

Well, the demand depends on the price. And the price is the mystery. So...
/r/MensRights03/12/20 06:59 PM
1

It would be strange if they didn't teach about the "placebo effect" caused by the relation between a doctor and patient. It makes a huge difference, after all. But I don't doubt that there are med schools that are outdated in this sense.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 09:09 AM
3

To be clear, I wasn't talking about this single anecdote but the possibility and propability of a bias.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 09:04 AM
4

Putting family before the career is the main reason.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 08:55 AM
4

Perhaps this is different in different countries depending on what they emphasize in the med school. I have visited many doctors with my mother during the past couple of years and doctors have always been pleasant or very pleasant. But it could be that older doctors weren't told that the results depend a lot on your positive behavior. If I have understood correctly, a couple of decades a go they thought that medicine is mostly science and only just a little customer service.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 08:53 AM
7

Yeah, that's a good metaphor.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 08:46 AM
1

Most doctors are pleasant. That's part of their education to learn to be pleasant. They are taught that if they are not, the results will be worse, which is true. And a general practitioner hardly ever sees a dying person. Well, we all are dying persons but you know what I mean.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 08:44 AM
1

Of course. It's strange if people don't smile when they meet each other the first time. It's in our genes. Unless there's tension between. Then we don't smile and that's a signal, too.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 08:35 AM
1

It would be nice to be able to read the Washington Post article.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 07:21 AM
6

I had an argumentation like this once. The person I was arguing with just wasn't a nameless feminist on Internet but a permanent lay member of the jury (yes, there are such judicial systems). I tried to explain that men get harsher sentences. She became totally bewildered and just refused to talk about the subject in a rational manner. "But there are no women doing these things, should we put innocent women to prison, is that what you want." She probably thought that punishing every group the sa…
/r/MensRights03/12/20 07:15 AM
40

There are a lot of people who don't really think but just let the words flow out of their brains in the order they have been put there, so to speak. Because they think they are good persons and have been listening to other good people speaking good causes, they believe that the words that flow out will produce rational and moral sentences. When you listen to a person like that, it's like listening to a preprogrammed automaton, nothing individual, just hollow words pouring out. They might sometim…
/r/MensRights03/12/20 07:02 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Kobdb37Cwc
/r/MensRights03/12/20 06:43 AM
1

It's a biological manifestation of the men's and their forefathers' (and foremothers') answers to the challenges universe offered them during the last 3.5 billion years. But it's also a social role that is strongly influence by evolution but not totally determined by it.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 05:18 PM
2

They use such terms as "mansplaning" to silence their political enemies and men in general and to put fear and self-censorship into their hearts by using a negative stereotypes. That's mildly irritating and even unfair - men can't do it to women, after all - but above all it's something that should get shot down much more effeciently than the man managed to do. I hate when politicians don't even pretend they are discussing real issues but turn to these "social-media tactics".
/r/MensRights02/12/20 03:02 PM
2

She isn't dutch, tho.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 02:48 PM
2

It must be frustrating perhaps even frightening to realize that the war you thought you had already won is actually just beginning.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 02:45 PM
50

This shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone. Men have dealt with the outside world for millions of years much more than women. It's no wonder that men's tribalism is weaker. There are all kind of studies suggesting that men have been "build" to co-operate across tribal lines, not anly wage war.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 02:38 PM
4

In this context, violence is frequently normalised. I was shocked when a 12-year-old boy generally known as a nice kid sent my daughter a series of messages on Instagram saying he wanted to come around to her house and choke her to death. Twelve. Where does this come from? I'm sure that happened exactly as you descibed it. Anyways, I think that feminists are "scoundrels". So, are we even? Perhaps not, because I think they're not only that but a huge threat to the whole western civilization, figt…
/r/MensRights02/12/20 09:41 AM
3

Do you happen to know if there is any big organization saying that DV is not gendered. All kinds EUs and UNs seem to buy into the feminist bullsihit. It would be nice if there was a reputable source you could refer to by saying: "I just told you what the scientific consensus is, are you anti-sicence or what?"
/r/MensRights01/12/20 02:03 PM
2

The book that is used as a source is found in Goole books
/r/MensRights01/12/20 01:14 PM
5

I'm sorry I hurt your feelings. Try a feminist discussion forum if you like safe facts and opinions.
/r/MensRights01/12/20 12:45 PM
5

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/jngphh/finnish_man_ordered_by_court_to_pay_alimony_for_a/
/r/MensRights30/11/20 03:49 PM
22

Men who don't want women in their lives are misogynist losers. But when it's the other way around you get 5-star reviews and sympathetic articles praising for nuanced discussion.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 01:53 PM
1

I agree it's mostly noise. But I still think they removed the question because people answered wrongly. The hole thing is a feminist exercise and you can't have DV being such smallish a problem and men being more afraid. They can't have that kind of narrative spreading among the subjects.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 01:42 PM
1

It's just what it looks like when a group of haters is told that it's OK to hate. We've seen it elsewhere over and over again, Nazis and Jews being the most notorious example.
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/20 07:39 AM
1

During their lifetime. It's rare compared to what ignorant people think, particularly the kind of violence you need to be afraid of.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 05:07 AM
5

There is a lot of political research going on and it's very popular, feminists linking to each other because violence needs to exist in a certain way to keep the ideology running. My opinion is that Google can't distinguish between bad and good research in certain political issues. There are (at least) two meta-analyses on the subject. https://web.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm?fbclid=IwAR2ZaxaQZ5E3kk_QIG8gkA_VuLKCeQJQIhQpl8mvgJuWy6DpJpz-qnzO0_w http://www.domesticviolenceresearch.org/pages/12_…
/r/MensRights29/11/20 06:20 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpm3cleCy5w&t=4492s https://www.bitchute.com/video/KLxkkYypXjU/
/r/MensRights29/11/20 05:22 PM
1

It means that ECCO shoes are on sale. 30% off for ladies, gentlemen, and children.
/r/MensRights29/11/20 05:17 PM
4

I often end up writing a somewhat vague titles because of the 300-characters limit. What "violence researchers" agree on is that DV is rare and women tend to be perpetrators somewhat more often. And that's what this survey found once again. Feminist, on the other hand want DV to be common and perpetrated mostly by men. So, what can you do when it's not so? Either you rig the methodology so that it "proves" your point (what for example the Gender Gap Index does) or you just drop the inconvenient …
/r/MensRights29/11/20 05:06 PM
13

One woman can attempt to kill herself ten time and each attempt is recorded as an individual case. A man who kills himself the first time is recorded only once.
/r/MensRights29/11/20 10:17 AM
46

So the bottom part is from the 2012 barometer and the upper part from the newest 2017 barometer. The newest one has omitted the question regarding DV. The share of people who are often or at least sometimes afraid of violence at home is so small that the difference between men and women can't be distinguished. In the text it says, though, that men are a bit more afraid. I wonder if they are going to publish these anymore. Facts tend to be a nuisance. For these kinds of people.
/r/MensRights29/11/20 09:38 AM
1

The hero's journey was cut short, but he still managed to keep chaos at bay at least for one person but also for other's who know about his heroism and learn from it.
/r/MensRights29/11/20 06:29 AM
-1

I think it was Jordan Peterson who said that women have been in power for only a short while and we really can't know what "they" want. Perhaps their feelings are dramatically different from men's feelings. Perhaps they, for example, feel unsafe and want to build societies around that feeling. Feelings vs. rationality seems to be one of the key fault lines of our age. Governance can't be founded on feelings, that much should be clear. Then again, aren't the great ideas like equality o democracy,…
/r/MensRights28/11/20 07:48 AM
1

In this sense the US is better than Finland, I think.
/r/MensRights28/11/20 07:06 AM
1

666 years to go. That doesn't sound good.
/r/MensRights27/11/20 06:48 PM
1

First-time offenders always - unless they somehow fuck up - serve just half of their sentence. I understand perfectly well why people have been angry as hell. Prisons are tough places for these kind of people, though, so at least they are not going to enjoy their time there. Accidents can happen. The longest sentence was 4 years 2 months, so, Abdo Ibrahim Ahmed will be a free man in a year if he serves just half. I wonder if he's then going to get the residence permit he wanted when he came here…
/r/MensRights27/11/20 04:47 PM
1

It was heinous but perhaps not as heinous as "continious gang rape " makes it sound because the girls were there more or less voluntarily. Now I sounded heinous, I know, but just wanted to say that the sentences would have been longer if there had been violence. That's my impression and googling didn't produce any conflicting evidence. Anyway, the government will make the penalties harsher next year because of, among other things, what happened in those cases.
/r/MensRights27/11/20 11:12 AM
5

That would explain it, wouldn't it
/r/MensRights27/11/20 10:37 AM
12

"Feminist gets to front page using "I'm a feminist and i care about (insert men's concern and insecurities here )" but still considers masculinity to be toxic!" After a title like that there should be something about toxic masculinity but I can't find it. I just first see the response which is clever but not by a feminist. The second screen capture is by a feminist but there's nothing about toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights27/11/20 10:17 AM
2

For me it boils down to this: Feminism is part of the establishment and thus it should be under strict scrutiny like any part of the establishment. But it's not. It is allowed to lie and spread hate. I could probably live with that if they weren't trying to do things that are extremely dangerous to our civilization (anti-science, anti-equality, anti-individualism) and our social life by creating tension and resentment between the sexes. When feminists are in power boys and men fall behind faster…
/r/MensRights27/11/20 10:06 AM
30

Hardcore feminists can't see clearly but only through a filter of resentment and hate. But sometimes they seem to get a glimpse of men's condition but only when it's about individual or intimate and biological problems. Men don't, you know, have social problems. They rule the world like lizard aliens. But you failed to publish the part where she(?) talks about toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights27/11/20 09:34 AM
10

Or it goes like this: A feminist group decides to tell the truth to the world They publish their first posts about women's oppression, rape culture, male violence, toxic masculinity and other pet subjects A couple of critical minds appear on the forum asking for evidence Feminists proudly present the evidence they've learned at the university, in media, from politicians The critical minds show that their evidence is at best black-and-white half-truths and often blatant lies Feminist start defend…
/r/MensRights27/11/20 08:05 AM
67

"Mr Knowland will be replaced with Ms Feelland." (No, not really, just joking.)
/r/MensRights27/11/20 07:27 AM
1

repairs, and household management Repairs hardly is a traditional women's job. I'm not sure what the other one includes but it doesn't sound totally "female". Anyway, two variables should be taken into account: how much is the total workload when all work is added up (paid and unpaid) how much more household work women want to do (meaning, what's the difference between single men and women in this regard). Feminist organizations, like the UN, will never talk about that. Unless a miracle happens …
/r/MensRights27/11/20 06:27 AM
0

Google what present-day farmers in third-world countreis do and be less clueless. But what do I care what ignorant people believe? I mean, what's wrong with me? I have to stop correcting you guys. It means absolutely nothing if somebody doesn't know how some peasants used to spend their time! Stupid me.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 09:24 PM
1

I'm no expert but it doesn't work like that but is based on a complicated formula. I don't think anybody can get a 26 years sentence. If you murder someone, you can ge life but even that in practice means about 14-16 years unless you fuck up bad in prison or on your leave.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 06:39 PM
1

Nope, they worked during the growing season to get enough food to live through the time of the year there wasn't much they could do. It's all about allocating your resources to maximize your chances to survive (not that they thought in such terms but in the long run those farms that did the right thing survived). For some people it meant working all through the year while some other people couldn't do much during winters, so they saved their energy. If you google, you'll find that the same patte…
/r/MensRights26/11/20 06:29 PM
8

Thanks, I'll leave the non-existing mystery man there because it's not essential information.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 06:02 PM
11

Sentences tend to be very short in Finland in general. But the bias in courts against men exists here, too, so I guess a man would have served longer.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 05:52 PM
-1

That's way too categorical. World doesn't work like that. But enough of this..
/r/MensRights26/11/20 05:49 PM
-1

I'm very serious because I have read about the subject, long ago but I still remeber some points. Yes, there were places where you were allowed to hunt or fish and then men, naturally hunted or fished. But in Europe, for example, they were often forbidden activities - particularly hunting in the few forests that were left. And it's surprising how fast only a few hunters with rifles can deplete big areas of pretty much all game. If there was forest around you that you were allowed to utilize, pro…
/r/MensRights26/11/20 04:11 PM
1

It seems to be a pretty universal experience that if you ever seen partner violence, it's the female partner who's the perpetrator. That's not true in all possible societies but among regular middle-class westerners it seems to be pretty common.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 12:51 PM
5

During the Cold War, the story goes, all foreign ambassadors and the like coming to Washington or the UN headquarters saw on their way from the airport several bars and restaurants that had "No Negroes" signs. Then Kennedy realized that it was pretty hard to sell the "US worldview" to Africans when they saw those signs. I think he managed to ban them, right?
/r/MensRights26/11/20 12:12 PM
1

Decent men wore always hats when outside. If you wore a top hat, people knew that you were pretty rich and perhaps important because they were expensive and important men usually wore them. If you wore a flat hat, that meant in Europe that you belonged to the lower classes, a working man, probably. In American movies working-class men use often cowboy hats but that was probably a frontier thing? If you were somewhere in between, not a working man but not all that important or rich either, you wo…
/r/MensRights26/11/20 11:44 AM
-4

Actually, there wasn't much to do outside the growing season, that is, most of the year in the northern parts.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 11:21 AM
6

I don't see how Hitler would have been particularly right-wing. He was reich-wing, though. And a collectivist with a leader cult, exactly like in the Soviet Union.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 10:17 AM
1

LOL, they are not. But I'm through with this, have a nice day.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 06:25 AM
0

What's the problem then? It's about a survey asking about violence, not legally punishable assaults. Among violence is pushing and shoving which are, clearly and without any doubt, not necessarily violence at all. This can't be too hard to understand. And yet there's something that makes you change the subject and make strange statements on how most cases of pushing and shoving are violence and punishable under law or something like that. I just don't get it and I'm not drunk either.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 05:19 AM
0

Are you drunk? No offense, but it sounds like you were, not understanding a simple thing even after the second time I explained it. If that's the case, lets return to this tomorrow or whenever you're sober again.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 04:38 AM
2

Here's the question: Physical violence Since you were 15 years old until now/in the past 12 months, how often has someone: • Pushed you or shoved you? • Slapped you? • Thrown a hard object at you? • Grabbed you or pulled your hair? • Beaten you with a fist or a hard object, or kicked you? • Burned you? • Tried to suffocate you or strangle you? • Cut or stabbed you, or shot at you? • Beaten your head against something? It's almost comical how they fail to make any distinction between, say, pullin…
/r/MensRights26/11/20 04:30 AM
1

Yeah, the only way you can defend your original, strange claim is, indeed, by moving the goalposts and start talking about assaults. You are either not thinking clearly or you're being dishonest.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 04:01 AM
2

A typical case is something like that you go into a crowded train or bar or whatever and you happen to push somebody because you are going somewhere. You are not thinking clearly. The next time this happens to you, try to call the police and listen carefully when they explain why you just wasted their time and why pushing in a crowded place is not a crime.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 03:31 AM
0

I don't know if you are being sarcastic. In case you're not: They can be violence never rarely, often, always. Even the feminists who conducted the survey don't claim that pushing is always violence. That would be too absurd even by their standards. The same goes for the rest as well.
/r/MensRights25/11/20 09:39 PM
8

Men and women are not equal. Women fare better in almost everything that is important in life, like happiness, freedom, safety, social safety nets, friends...
/r/MensRights24/11/20 06:03 PM
7

Men consume more energy and need more food. Food should cost less for men - or why not be free? It's silly manifestation of the gynocentric world we live in.
/r/MensRights24/11/20 05:57 PM
491

It's harder to favor women if we don't know who women are
/r/MensRights24/11/20 03:16 PM
2

It's owned by a Russian oligarch and a former KGB agent. Hatred between people, chaos in the west.
/r/MensRights24/11/20 05:14 AM
4

They don't only keep silent but also lie: Having smaller incomes and less leisure time than men due to care-giving responsibilities, women generally consume less in comparison to men in the same geographical and social location. But that's feminism, I guess. The EU spins the issue this way and (Equality-and-Climate-Change-Report.pdf from p.22) and finds out that it's men who spend more and are less willing to change their consumption habits. They mention that according to the OECD women make 80%…
/r/MensRights23/11/20 07:52 PM
11

Fellas, don't trust this man.
/r/MensRights23/11/20 04:05 PM
3

Are you saying that bashing feminists and bashing women is the same thing?
/r/MensRights23/11/20 08:30 AM
1

It's some combination of the three variables.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 10:56 PM
3

I'm assuming she does it to become better known and make more money. Sounds wrong.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 07:36 PM
-2

Yeah, it depends. There are usually three factors: the ages of the parties, the age difference, and the age of the older one.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 06:31 PM
-35

So that they can show what kind of a stupid cow she is. /s /s
/r/MensRights22/11/20 05:55 PM
2

I agree that sometimes oppression is so unfair and extreme that anger is understandable and even productive because it creates solidarity and momentum. But I honestly don't think that in the rich countries any group would be in that situation.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 03:13 PM
4

Fight sexims within.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 02:26 PM
2

I watched is without sound. So, my guess is that she has something wrong with her eyes (she squints but still can't see clearly) and he with his ears - or perhaps with the vocal organs - but luckily a helicopter comes to take them to a hospital.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 10:30 AM
2

We know that certain surveys said so. Likewise, certain surveys "prove" that 2% of rape accusations are false and then there are surveys that "prove" it's 70%. I don't say they are totally useless but it's very hard and often impossible to get meaningful results.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 10:13 AM
3

There should be a better, more clever way because asking people about these things is almost useless.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 10:01 AM
4

Yeah, a lot of stupid feminist arguments.
/r/MensRights21/11/20 08:46 PM
1

Yes, but not on the 11.19.
/r/MensRights21/11/20 04:44 AM
13

There is an interesting comment below the article adding two more "symptoms": projection and something that sounds like a spiced-up projection in my ears: The other major amplifier of the tendency towards cognitive distortion is that it has positive emotional rewards. The (female) feminist indulges in self-justifying claims of moral purity: all negative motives, blame and shame are exported to the “other”. Victim status inevitably results and confers an authenticity and promotes an aura of moral…
/r/MensRights20/11/20 07:26 PM
3

Yeah, that's partly because of the bias in academia. I guess. But it's also biology and the gynocentric culture.
/r/MensRights20/11/20 04:54 PM
56

Thank you for trying to steal Men's day to feminists? No thanks.
/r/MensRights20/11/20 03:17 PM
26

World toilet day was BTW, before International men's day. November 19th got selected, not because of the toilet day but because Jerome Teelucksingh, who revived the event, chose 19 November to honour his father's birthday and also to celebrate how on that date in 1989 Trinidad and Tobago's football team had united the country with their endeavours to qualify for the World Cup. Well the day got started small and in the marginal the same way the MRA movement in general.
/r/MensRights20/11/20 02:23 PM
8

Google has become so feminist that it must be against the very soul of their culture to advocate anything that has to do with men's rights. Being Google's customer is like supporting directly the feminist cause and downplaying the problems of the worse-off sex. I changed to – don't laugh – Microsoft. Unfortunately Google search is so superior that you just have to use it ... and the only sensible mobile OS is that Linux thing that is made by Goo, too. But other than that ... oh, just forget what…
/r/MensRights20/11/20 02:10 PM
28

Women have a lot to say through different channels, like markets (they spend more), families (they tend to rule them), schools (teachers are women who favor girls), politics (women are the majority of voters), organizations (of which many have adopted feminism)... If this wasn't the case, why would ignorant people like in teh OP's discussion believe in all that craziness?
/r/MensRights20/11/20 11:26 AM
31

There have been all kinds of more or less simplistic theories trying to explain why the social world is the way it is. The oldest ones explain with gods, the Marxist theory explain with production modes, functionalists with challenges and so forth. There are people who believe it's alien lizards who are in power. Feminists have come up with men as the ultimate cause for everything.They call it the patriarchy theory and, thank god, it's not wide-spread outside feminist ans certain leftist circles…
/r/MensRights20/11/20 11:11 AM
2

But what would it mean in the bigger scheme of things?
/r/MensRights19/11/20 02:38 PM
1

Because women are more interested in success than looks humankind is not gonna get dived into the fair and ugly.
/r/MensRights19/11/20 02:12 PM
1

You can't prove that something did not happen by following these rules. Unfortunately. If a student accuses you of looking at her in a certain way it's pretty much impossible to prove you didn't. Furthermore, you can't prove you that you didn't touch inappropriately by saying that your policy is to be in a public place when you're with a female studen.
/r/MensRights19/11/20 05:48 AM
3

It's not necessarily just projection because many women really feel awkward around men who show "too much" weakness.
/r/MensRights19/11/20 05:28 AM
6

If you live in a labyrinth or a small island middle of nowhere.
/r/MensRights18/11/20 09:42 PM
8

And that's the way you can explain it to yourself, as well, and after a while you start believing it. It's a handy narrative our cultures hands out to all abusive and violent women.
/r/MensRights18/11/20 09:40 PM
1

Yeah, males getting killed is not news. It's almost nothing, the normal state of affairs. Carry on, nothing to see here. Women getting killed is not only news, it's also a huge social problem which politicians should deal with. Now. As the article clearly shows.
/r/MensRights18/11/20 09:33 PM
2

Do you have any source? I've always wondered if there is any truth behind these stories because they sound implausible. Why would you kidnap anybody when there are, after all, plenty of volunteers who certainly do the job better? And why would they want to kill them after a while? I'm not saying that nothing like that ever happens but it being a way to do business sounds far-fetched. Unless there is a total anarchy and no fear of any retributions, like convictions or revenges. Or if it's a Holly…
/r/MensRights18/11/20 09:24 PM
1

In humans, women have more pronounced secondary sexual characters. Men are interested in (healthy) looks, women in (protection and providing) capabilities.
/r/MensRights18/11/20 05:10 AM
12

Often the most mentally fucked-up feminists are men. Sometimes the most fucked-up men are feminists.
/r/MensRights18/11/20 04:38 AM
2

There's no way in hell Finland could be moving towards a 6-hour workday. That's a utopian goal of the left. What Finland needs is longer working hours because the economy has been doing so badly since 2008. Sweden has been doing better but even there it's not a realistic goal. In the Netherlands and Switzerland, on the other hand, the average working day is already six hours. And for women even less.
/r/MensRights18/11/20 04:30 AM
1

I have no idea what you're trying to achieve with these strawmen. Stress relief maybe? Dominance, status? Whatever it is, it's not worth the trouble. Nobody's gonna remember what you wrote after an hour or so.
/r/MensRights17/11/20 06:20 PM
2

Furthermore, there are "male traits" that can get you in trouble. Like if you're seen as strong, it can get you murdered for being a threat or an obstacle. That's probably the main reason why male apes kill other male apes, by the way.
/r/MensRights17/11/20 05:47 PM
4

the motivation isn’t ‘I’ll kill this dude because he’s a man’ but ‘I’ll kill this dude to show I’m a man’, which are different motivations. You seem to be an expert on motives. Just a moment ago you implied that we can't know about them unless the police investigates and soleve the murder - or something like that.
/r/MensRights17/11/20 05:41 PM
1

You do know they investigate murders right? If the Guardian or the people they interviewed can prove that they were killed because they were women, why don't they tell about the evidence? I mean, doesn't that sounds a bit suspicious? If you wrote about how alien lizards rule the world, surely you would try to prove it somehow, right? The sad fact is that SOLVING A MURDER IN MEXICO IS THE EXCEPTION, NOT THE RULE (a title I copy-pasted, I'm not yelling at you). But what I wrote was not as clear as…
/r/MensRights17/11/20 05:34 PM
2

For what it's worth, I have used it every now and then with my sons. But only jokingly: "Be a man, eat your lettuce", or something along those lines. But I tried to keep in mind that it's not just a joke. That boys must learn that they are expected to have something masculine about them, at least some confidence, fearlessness, humor, righteousness, trustworthiness. You don't have to say "man up" to tell or show them that, though. I would never say anything like that to boys that are not mine, my…
/r/MensRights17/11/20 05:17 PM
33

What is femicide, anyway? Apparently it could mean that a woman is killed because she's a woman. How are these people - or the Guardian - supposed to know the motives of the murderers when they are never caught? How are they supposed to know that the murders are not connected to the drug business or other crimes? Do they even care when they have decided to paint a picture of women's eternal victimhood in hands of men?
/r/MensRights17/11/20 03:06 PM
2

Pretty much all societies want to ensure that men learn to be willing to make sacrifices for their family, clan, gang, country or what have you. Men must learn to become honorable, which often means being disposable if needed. Thus, men must be forced inside a strict role. In many societies, particularly the historical ones, there were institutionalized initiation rites that were painful or scary or both. The aim was to turn boys into men, honorable men. You had to learn that being a man means s…
/r/MensRights17/11/20 09:14 AM
21

The feeling I get is very Orwellian. The amount of doublespeak is bewildering - and extremely worrisome. And it's not only this Australian establishment that is douplespeaking. One of the more respected media outlets doesn't notice - or care - it's douplespeak but treats it as if what they're saying was normal and rational.
/r/MensRights17/11/20 08:06 AM
1

Feminism played only a little role in the overall "human rights development". Had it played a bigger role there would have been a period of only rich women having the right to vote the way the early feminist movement wanted. Naturally, there isn't one path all nations followed. There are even countries s where men got full political rights later than women. But all that is history. Now we have to fight an ideology that is in many ways a hate movement. We have to deal with it, make people see the…
/r/MensRights16/11/20 07:23 PM
0

Out of curiosity, where do you live? The idea that women are not considered worth as much as men sounds so alien to me. Or shouldn't be equal. Anyway, some feminists seem to think that women should be more like men, If they are not, they are condemned not to rise the career ladder as well as men do. Then there are feminists who think that the whole game of meritocracy is constructed on male "virtues" and should be reconstructed so that women's virtues would play a more important role. Bot approa…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 08:11 AM
6

What you had in mind is the earnings gap. There is no gender wage gap - which is mostly a moral and political argument backed up with some poor science. Basically feminists want to say: see, that's how patriarchy works, men pay us less money for the same job just because we are women. Rape is the second most despised crime in the world right after murder. And, yes, murders and rapes get sometimes normalized. That's usually called war or some other total collapse of the civilian culture. But what…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 07:41 AM
7

Well, you seem to think that feminism is OK and opposing it useless, perhaps immoral. You use terms like "rape culture" as if they weren't anti-male propaganda, harmful, disastrous anti-male propaganda. You think that the wage gap is true which proves that you're not on the map. To fight feminists you have to know what they are about.
/r/MensRights15/11/20 06:51 AM
5

You could do yourself a favor by trying to answer these kinds of questions: why has the feminist movement been lying about the intimate partner violence for decades? why don't the popular equality indexes, like the Gender Gap Index, measure eaquality but women's position? Why does the feminist movement come up the terms like mansplaining, matterrupting, manspreading, male tears and make them popular? why do they think that we live in a patriarchy, which is actually a silly fringe theory based on…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 06:26 AM
2

Obviously any ideology that is founded on hateful lies can't have open discussions. But it's not true that feminism thrives only in echo chambers. Take something like the EU, the UN, most western governments... They can't be total echo chambers and still they often embrace feminism. That's because being against feminism is extremely strongly against what is politically correct. In other words, people who understand what's going on, that it's about lies and hatred, can't speak up because they are…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 05:40 AM
1

You sound so angry that I hope I won't meet you, dark or light. ButI feel sorry for you having to live in a violent place like that. Try to survive, move to a safer part of the world and get rid of your anger! Then everything will look lighter.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 05:45 PM
3

This must be what they teach in genders studies: how to spin facts so that they in the end don't mean anything. Then you can say whatever you want. It's like magic.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 11:27 AM
3

https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=AVE_HRS Here's a historical overview of women's working hours.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 08:00 AM
1

To be able to embrace the cut-throat competition you have to have a certain combination of personality traits that are even less common among women than men. You have to be able to handle the stress, you have to know how to remain cool-headed in all situations, you have to be able to push your emotions away, you have to be intelligent and so on. The top performers in these traits are more often men than women because there are more men than women "in the tail". To have the combination of all the…
/r/MensRights14/11/20 06:06 AM
-8

I wasn't talking about your problems but women's problems when asked.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 07:07 PM
-5

But it still is a problem. You can't argue that something is not a problem because the motive behind is not totally reasonable. Besides, women face less violence because they don't walk alone. And men face more violence because many of them don't shy away from it. Some men even go looking for it. Women do have problems and hardships though not so many as men.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 06:41 PM
-7

Pretty much all women avoid walking alone in the dark in cities which makes life harder. Women tend to be in general more scared because of millions of years of less agency in dangerous situations, is my theory. Sexual harassment and assaults are a bigger problem for women also in practice not only as a possibility and a reason to be scared.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 05:01 PM
38

his should be the standard, she's the 'expert' and it should absolutely take more than her tale of an encounter on a bus to convince anyone that she has any sort of point! Well said. I wouldn't believe even myself if I tried to reconstruct some traumatic experience afterwards. She's just trying to femipulate her audience to feel her pain.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 04:34 PM
38

I don't think there is any scientific way to measure the difference. That said, women tend to be happier and more content with their lives women commit fewer suicides women die older which probably reflects to some degree the harder lives men live (like harder work, much more marginalization etc) women's quality of life tends to be higher in most countries, particularly in the west if you remove the feminist bias from the equality indexes they seem to show that there is a gender gap in favor of …
/r/MensRights13/11/20 04:14 PM
4

A Swedish history book claimed that Swedish is something like 80% medieval German because of Hansa and other German influences in Swedish towns. I don't know if that's true, though. Somewhat hard to believe when you think how different they now are. (I mostly answered to this post because I wanted to test if I get the 500 error that is preventing me from posting.)
/r/MensRights13/11/20 02:10 PM
1

I'm all for women's rights, why do you think I'm not. everybody is. But even more I'm for the rights of the sex which is falling behind fast in western countries. That's why I'm against Feminism. Feminism is a destructive ideology founded on lies.
/r/MensRights12/11/20 08:19 PM
1

Who's stopping you? Patriarchy?
/r/MensRights12/11/20 07:34 PM
6

Where? Compared to women? Laws told men (but not women) not to rape. A man was not allowed to stop supporting wife and children.
/r/MensRights11/11/20 06:27 PM
3

Men drive, instead of women, not because they are indifferent pigs but because they need to. Women tend to work in the service sector much more than men and those jobs are often where people move and public traffic goes where people go. So women's jobs are "by definition" where you can get without a car and where it's counter-productive to drive with your own car (think city centers, for example). Where men work there are often no busses going there and even if there are you often need a car to …
/r/MensRights11/11/20 02:07 PM
1

Also, some women trey committing suicide many times, most suicidal men don't - because they are dead.
/r/MensRights10/11/20 06:17 PM
1

To my view the role of goverment is to protect life, property and freendom, not to engineer anything thats the liberal goverment. We all have our views and then there is the empirical reality.
/r/MensRights10/11/20 05:55 PM
1

The Soviet Union was a gloomy, gloomy place. You could almost smell the rotting corpses. There were tens of millions of them after all. I live in Finland and visited the place several times. Dark, dirty, poor, and - hopeless in some sense. Corruption was everywhere. The police were to be afraid of, even for a western tourist. I don't really understand why you brought up Finland. There's nothing special about this country compared to other North-European countries, at least other Nordic countries…
/r/MensRights10/11/20 05:50 PM
2

Social engineering is what governments do, it's one of their main tasks in every country. The results are sometimes good and sometimes bad and most often mixed. If you have an open society with loyal citizens and a strong legal tradition, the results are probably more often good than bad. Even a semi-socialist country like China can have successes, probably because the people are so loyal in the best Confucian tradition.
/r/MensRights10/11/20 06:01 AM
0

Here are three reasons why socialism doesn't work: Economy has no price signals, nobody knows what really should be produced nor which companies or bosses are good at what they are doing and which are bad. China is trying to resolve that by giving up socialist principles in economy but only after tens of millions of people had died. And still China has many big but inefficient public sector companies. The system must be based on the "holy scriptures" (Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin, Mao etc.) and t…
/r/MensRights10/11/20 05:35 AM
2

1) Women feel afraid in the streets alone. Surely men do too? It's not that simple. Men face more violence but are less afraid on average. 2) Let’s close the wage gap? Women drop out of the workforce to raise children: it’s there choice to choose a career or choose family? Well, Make it socially and legally normal for men to choose to raise a family, to win custody, to take equal paternity leave. It's not that simple. In countries where women are better off than men, and where women are encourag…
/r/MensRights10/11/20 04:54 AM
1

Feminist core beliefs are very anti-male, thought understanding it isn't totally straight forward. You can, for example, think that patriarchy is a objective description of the society we live in while, in fact, it's an ideological fantasy that paints a very strange and hostile picture of men. Another thing they have been lying about for decades is violence men supposedly perpetrate against women, Yet another is rape culture and so on. If you don't understand what feminist core beliefs are sayin…
/r/MensRights10/11/20 03:45 AM
4

It's useful from my perspective in two ways: Drawing these kind of four-field matrices help me to organize things in my mind. You should try drawing a few. It forces you to think about what is important and how things relate to each other. Of course you are totally entitled to think that the result is bullshit. But for me and in the light of what I have learned it's not. The second reason is that I'm learning to use a new paint/vector software. Learning by doing, you know. (the background color …
/r/MensRights09/11/20 06:12 PM
5

I don’t think MRA even believe this kind of feminist exists. Heh, anybody who knows anybody knows level-headed feminists. Hell, my sister thinks she's a feminist. She's very nice - but doesn't know anything about feminism. And that's, I think the key. If you start reading about feminism it's pretty impossible to stay feminist, if you are a nice, intelligent person. That's because the ideology is founded on very destructive and hateful ideas. If you start reading about feminism and stay feminist …
/r/MensRights09/11/20 02:58 PM
1

Boogie man
/r/MensRights09/11/20 12:10 PM
2

Feminism is a movement that emerges from a human cognitive bias which disproportionately perceives womens disadvantages and disporportionately sees men as perpetrators and women as victims. I agree that it really is something like that. But I don't know if it has been ever operationalized tested rigorously. I don't know how that shoudl be done either. But it would be very valuable to have this bias proven. (I know about the trolley experiment, and vaguely remember a test where boys and girls act…
/r/MensRights09/11/20 11:59 AM
17

More men but very little pr-men activity, that's the way governments tend to be everywhere.
/r/MensRights09/11/20 11:46 AM
1

Men have two kinds of problems: those that affect all or, at least, most of us (like negative stereotypes) and then those that affect marginalized people (who are mostly men like the prison inmates). There is a link between these two groups, though: in a probabilistic sense all men are in a group that has a higher likelihood to become marginalized. So, being a man increases, for example, you chances of ending up in prison because the negative stereotypes people consciously or subconsciously atta…
/r/MensRights09/11/20 09:02 AM
1

Where is prostitution illegal? Certain US states and counties, certain East-European countries that are not members of the EU (though there may one or two exceptions), most of Africa, Muslim countries and Asia? Most people live in countries where it's totally or partly legal. In some European countries (Scandinavia, Ireland, France) buying is illegal but selling is not.
/r/MensRights09/11/20 08:29 AM
5

If you serve a life sentence it's quite likely that you're a violent psychopath. And psychopaths almost never get better until they are old, over 60 or so. My guess it that they just decided to let a few dozens very dangerous people loose.
/r/MensRights09/11/20 07:54 AM
1

I don't understand anything you're saying but fortunately I don't have to. :D thinking isn't apparently your thing, try something else.
/r/MensRights08/11/20 09:06 AM
1

I don't want to get into the psychology of individuals, that should be clear enough. I outlined certain general, low-resolution explanations in three categories: discrimination (1), statistical differences in psychological traits (2 and 3), statistical difference in social roles (4 and 5), and the last one which is about a statistical difference in a medical condition. It's pretty hard to follow your argumentation because I know what I was doing but you obviously don't. The first one is not a pr…
/r/MensRights07/11/20 07:17 PM
1

Well, only one the reasons I outlined use discrimination as an explanation. Strange tha you didn't notice it, hmm, perhaps you didn't read what I wrote?. Anyway, it's true that men, for example, murder more than women, but if you read my post, you would find an explanation for it, a low-resolution explanation. Of course you could easily go deeper and construct higher-resolution explanations, testosterone for example, but I decided not to write about them. Saying that there are more men in prison…
/r/MensRights07/11/20 03:41 PM
3

It seems that you are arguing with a bot?
/r/MensRights07/11/20 11:45 AM
3

Yeah, thanks.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 11:42 AM
7

Actually just Feminazis are like nazis. The unfortunate state of affairs is that, well, you can't tell who is a Feminazi and who isn't. Typically, you'd expect that the powerful Feminists in our civilized societies would be civilized, as well. But don't make that assumption if you don't want to get disillusioned. Sure, there are, must be civilized Feminists, right? But they seem to be rare when you think about the average Feminist urge to demonize men when speaking about such things as intimate …
/r/MensRights07/11/20 11:40 AM
7

Finland has a tradition of passing gender neutral laws - but the feminist pressure to give up this tradition has been strong. There is already the Equality law that demands that special attention should be paid to women (it seems that the law is pretty much the same in Sweden, by the way, perhaps in other Nordic countries as well). The utterly sexist/feminist Istanbul convention got ratified and became, thus, part of the legislation. It's utterly ridiculous to demand that we should have a law th…
/r/MensRights07/11/20 11:20 AM
4

Porn is shameful here where I live. Nobody I know talks about it or watches it openly.
/r/MensRights05/11/20 06:27 PM
6

Here's something about the original meta-analysis: https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/humor-sapiens/201910/are-men-really-funnier-women
/r/MensRights05/11/20 06:03 AM
1

International comparisons would have helped the experts on the right track. Even in countries where marriage isn't the kind of risk it is in the US, men are not getting married.
/r/MensRights04/11/20 05:41 PM
6

Actually they write about the implicit prejudice research in general, not just the well-known Implicit Attitude Test. The article that linked to that page was about the IAT so ... my bad.
/r/MensRights04/11/20 03:42 PM
2

15 days ago to a sub that's now banned. This community has been banned This subreddit was banned due to being unmoderated.
/r/MensRights04/11/20 08:23 AM
3

Certain women might feel good if they are taught by a male teacher, the same way certain women are happy to glorify a male god, like Yahveh, Zeus etc.
/r/MensRights04/11/20 08:20 AM
1

If you don't know what something means, write the relevant words up there where it now says "https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/jn30ck/feeling_emasculated_after_being_raped_is/" Press entenr and wacht the magic happen. It's called Googling.
/r/MensRights03/11/20 09:41 AM
1

i think its mostly causing it something like 90% at least Feminism is a cult, ideology that exploits the subconscious feelings we have. Even if there wasn't a single feminist in the world, we would have thses feelings and the resulting laws, institutions etc. They would be less powerful and hateful but still there. We would, for example, be afraid of unknown men and try to do something about it, like what the police and courts do. We would feel emphaty towards women and try to protect them.
/r/MensRights03/11/20 09:38 AM
2

The intention behind this is to essentially destroy your adversaries identity, and therefore ability to fight. Wouldn't it be more efficient to just kill them? Compared to castration and slavery. I wonder if there is another intention. The first thing that comes to mind is a sexual motive but then again that sounds far fetched, too abnormal to become common. A deterrent? Hate and contempt? I don't know but it's tragic, GOT in real life.
/r/MensRights03/11/20 09:30 AM
1

This is "funny" (in the meme sense) in the USA but does it happen elsewhere? Not within the EU, I think, and not in the Nordic countries for sure. It'd be interesting to know.
/r/MensRights03/11/20 09:08 AM
4

That's great news. It seems likely that two trends are taking place: the police are treating people more equally and women's role also in this field (crime) is increasing. So, they are pretty much the same trends that are applauded by everybody in other fields like, say, management. Women are treated more equally by employers and owners, and more women are getting involved with managing and leading. I'm sure feminists are happy. No?
/r/MensRights03/11/20 08:37 AM
14

It's what they say, how they talk, that's unacceptable or, at least reprehensible - or would be if they were talking about the Jews and not men. Read what, for example, Valerie Solanas, a Feminist icon, has to say about men and then replace men with Jews. Perhaps you get it then.
/r/MensRights02/11/20 03:39 PM
3

PS youth The youth organization of the Finnish version of a populist national party. They advocate it because it's a Muslim custom but there seems to be also MRA advocacy rising through its ranks. You may disagree but I thik they are a bit racist but also anti-sexist (particularly when sexism hurts men). If you tend to think that racism and sexism are close relatives, it is a paradox.
/r/MensRights01/11/20 10:10 AM
3

Orwell would be proud of that language.
/r/MensRights30/10/20 03:00 PM
1

A contributing factor could be that in the past women have talked about it more. The feminist movement made violence towards women something we talk about. Now there is more support for men and more of them are feeling comfortable coming forward." LOL, this was said in 2104. Dr Bates pointed out that Prof Johnson's original research looked at men in prisons and women in refuges, rather than typical members of the public. LOL, the original study, that is debunked in the article, seems to have bee…
/r/MensRights30/10/20 05:19 AM
2

Yeah, women don't pay any net taxes on average.
/r/MensRights29/10/20 03:16 PM
7

The offence seems to be called officially "coercive OR controlling behaviour" though it's called "coercive control" by media and advocates.
/r/MensRights29/10/20 01:29 PM
1

We think women should be taken care of. Women themselves, naturally, have adopted this attitude. "Everything" is geared towards "protecting" women.
/r/MensRights29/10/20 06:22 AM
3

I doubt that you can buy a shotgun just like that anywhere in Europe.
/r/MensRights27/10/20 01:20 PM
10

women just lack a general sense of fondness for men Many do, particularly if they are not particularly bright (not seeing flaws, biases in their thinking) or have been treated badly (going after the same attractive guys as other girls and ending up feeling betrayed) or have bought into the feminist narrative (believing that bad things in their lives tend to be caused by men).
/r/MensRights27/10/20 06:10 AM
17

And when you say "feminism" people will think of more equality for women. And if you criticize feminism, you are seen as somebody who is against equality. A Nazi or something like that. Anybody who has pointed out how feminists are unethical or nonfactual has heard this "comeback": "Why is it that men can't accept equality?"
/r/MensRights27/10/20 06:02 AM
2

It's one of the great ethical principles of humankind to put women's and children's welfare before men's when something bad happens or is expected to happen. When I say "great" I mean important and universal, perhaps not so much wonderful. For an individual man the deal is seldom wonderful when he stands in the battlefield waiting to be slaughtered. The moral principle is so common and common sense that it doesn't even have a name. If it had, feminist would have harder time blaming men for being…
/r/MensRights26/10/20 09:42 PM
-3

The guy, Jani, should have denied his paternity within two year after the child was born. He was seven weeks late though he had known about the real father after 1.5 years. The law is unfair but the idea is to protect the child. Sometimes you can deny your paternity even many years after the child is born but then you have to have particularly strong reasons why you are so much late.
/r/MensRights26/10/20 09:28 PM
5

At least in some countries the "equality law" aims at helping women. Here's an example from Sweden. The second paragraph tells that the law aims to help foremost women's position in the workforce. There are laws favoring women in such fields as drafts and violence but perhaps the most numerous are the laws that give women benefits in reproduction. Men have very few rights, women have many. Also marriage laws sometimes favor women not only in courts but also in actual, written laws.
/r/MensRights26/10/20 09:39 AM
2

Out of curiosity, was this something the Trump administration achieved? Is there a big risk that a democratic president will encourage univerities to start discriminating against men again more blatantly?
/r/MensRights25/10/20 06:49 AM
3

a woman in on average far less productive than a man in such early society fully dependent on heavy manual labor There are studies that indicate that women can be more productive than men in "primitive" societies. Hayden (3) stated that hunter-gatherers such as the !Kung might live in conditions close to the “ideal” hunting and gathering environment. What do the !Kung eat? Animal foods are estimated to contribute 33% and plant foods 67% of their daily energy intakes If men hunt, that can be favo…
/r/MensRights24/10/20 07:09 AM
3

It's easy to produce twenty 5-star reviews on Amazon. The author can do it by herself if she doesn't have money or (similarly crazy) friends. But that's not enough to impress Amazon's algorithms. I actually welcome all Feminists who say what they think and don't pretend to be normal. The more they openly speak their minds, the more people get it. The beauty of free speech. Then again it's possible that she's just trying to make a few euros. I wonder if Amazon really would ban anti-women or even …
/r/MensRights24/10/20 05:03 AM
6

I'm writing a book and want to include examples outside North-America and Europe. This is great stuff.
/r/MensRights23/10/20 02:45 PM
3

It's the End of the Men as We Know Them (And I Feel Alarmed)
/r/MensRights23/10/20 02:37 PM
3

Sounds like a hoax. https://www.skeptic.com/downloads/conceptual-penis/23311886.2017.1330439.pdf
/r/MensRights22/10/20 08:47 AM
1

A lot of gangs rape women and so do male terrorist groups. From there you jumped to something completely different. Why? Do you have something to say or do just write what comes to mind?
/r/MensRights22/10/20 05:11 AM
1

Gang rapes are so rare that they don't only become news but get even their own Wikipedia articles. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Hathras_gang_rape_and_murder The fact is that common, everyday things get no publicity but really rare do.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 05:27 PM
1

"A lot of" is so few that it makes news, sometimes international news when gangs rape women during normal times.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 05:20 PM
1

Yeah, if you don't have it.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 05:18 PM
1

I don't think men watch much women's sports either.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 11:37 AM
3

I said nothing of the kind. Actually I specifically said that the piece of news was accurate (though with arbitrary comments which could have been written by Moscow trolls for all we know). What I tried to do has to do with the war we all should be waging against all kinds of trolls. You should get real if you think this is unimportant.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 06:15 AM
2

By the way, Sputnik is a Russian state-owned propaganda outlet. It's purpose it to weaken the perceived potential enemies like western Europe. Wikipedia: Sputnik is frequently described as a Russian propaganda outlet.[4][5][6] In 2016, Neil MacFarquhar of The New York Times wrote: "The fundamental purpose of dezinformatsiya, or Russian disinformation, experts said, is to undermine the official version of events — even the very idea that there is a true version of events — and foster a kind of po…
/r/MensRights20/10/20 05:35 AM
65

Equality between the sexes = female privileges. It's more or less written in the Equality law which demands that women in particular have to be protected in the workforce or something like that. According to the law the state has to subsidy certain women's NGOs, as well. Unofficially, the whole equality business is in the hands of femnists. No wonder Finland's educations system, for example, is one of the most unequal in the world between the sexes.
/r/MensRights19/10/20 12:53 PM
5

I hate feminism the same way I hate racism. They close relatives. But I don't want a more male-centered society but a less female-centered one.
/r/MensRights18/10/20 07:22 PM
10

Women lust for money, status, height, stability, wits, and often dominance. Did I leave something essential out?
/r/MensRights18/10/20 07:43 AM
3

In short: Gender gap index is a hoax but they admit it albeit in language that is not totally honest. Gender inequality index is not a hoax like the GGI above but its implicit policy recommendations are not what people want. Furthermore, many of its indicators are feminist and thus not measure equality but "women's issues". Basic indicator of inequality is transparent and fair and shows that in the West women are better off than men. Personally I think the article was unnecessarily hard to read …
/r/MensRights18/10/20 07:23 AM
2

It depends on where you live. In the Nordic countries it's not OK. Then again the government publishes almost everybody's tax information. Strange places...
/r/MensRights18/10/20 06:45 AM
5

Society pressures women to study and work in STEM. But in the countries where women are even more better off than on average, women tend to choose jobs that they like, jobs where they can work with people, not things and systems. So, the more feminist a country becomes (AKA the more privileged women get), the more the division of labor between the sexes seems to increase. You've been duped to believe a narrative that is not true. But never mind, so are a vast majority of other people and the pow…
/r/MensRights18/10/20 06:38 AM
1

In the EU that's forbidden.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 01:52 PM
2

The code of conduct among many violent (gang) criminals is not to assault women and children. This reflects the general attitude among men - and even women. That's one of the foundations of our ethics, though seldom talked about nowadays. Except when teaching boys: "Never hit a girl or a woman". To claim that the opposite is true is a typical feminist lie. They lie about almost everything and ignorant people believe. The sensible approach to feminist arguments is to turn them up-side-down becaus…
/r/MensRights17/10/20 01:46 PM
5

The history of the judicial system (in Europe from the middle ages onwards)) goes pretty much like this: no strong central power -> vendettas kings and strong monpoly of power -> few vendettas but often arbitrary convictions democracy and strong monopoly of power -> even fewer vendettas, strong legality thus less arbitrariness The key question is: how can we ensure that most people feel that they will be treated right when bad things happen? What these feminists et. al. are doing is, as you said…
/r/MensRights17/10/20 08:11 AM
2

Probably somewhere around 50 if you count all allegations the law enforcement hears about. Most of them don't lead anywhere but are more like drunken slurs or confused recollections the next morning waking up in a strange apartment. Two policemen in the Helsinki police department estimated that these allegations were about 70% on the department's official FB page.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 07:57 AM
5

It is almost impossible to know the true numbers of both genuine rape and false allegation crimes It's not "almost impossible" but just impossible. What we can hope for is rough estimates in different circumstances. Rape is, after all, more common among, say, the male prison population than among monks.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 07:49 AM
2

Yeah, a well known occupational hazard. And there's nothing you can do about it. They pay your salary and women don't take it well if you complain.
/r/MensRights16/10/20 06:15 PM
8

At least 40 years old.
/r/MensRights16/10/20 02:06 PM
27

I feel sorry for these young kids who are taught this "men and society hate women, men are bad" nonsense as a legitimate worldview. It might take even decades before they realize how wrong and harmful those confused and hateful thoughts are - for society and themselves.
/r/MensRights16/10/20 01:41 PM
29

I think we should call this the Great Domestic Violence Hoax. The purpose has been to keep the DV industry running and demonize men because, you know, men are dangerous and women, the fragile, lovely women shouldn't trust them, let alone live with them.
/r/MensRights16/10/20 12:19 PM
21

The name of the research paper is in the title. Here's the link if googling is not your thing: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233717660_Thirty_Years_of_Denying_the_Evidence_on_Gender_Symmetry_in_Partner_Violence_Implications_for_Prevention_and_Treatment
/r/MensRights16/10/20 12:16 PM
5

Well, it's pretty much impossible to prove that women would be worse off or that they would face more violence. The facts just don't support such views. In general the world we live in resembles very little the world feminists insist we live in. So, feminists end up lying to make things look then way "they are supposed to be" according to their theories. The great domestic violence hoax is a prime example and it has been going on at least 40 years. I just posted about it. And feminist don't only…
/r/MensRights16/10/20 11:51 AM
1

She has written a book, it seems, about the subject and is now monetizing.
/r/MensRights16/10/20 05:26 AM
5

Can someone tell me where this idea comes from? Political movements tend to have their enemies. No big surprise there. But the feminist worldview and the actual world are so far apart that they touch each other mostly accidentally. So they have to reinvent the actual world and make it look like what the theory says it should look like and then claim that the narrative they then start telling is the actual world. The most surprising thing probably is that so many people buy into that reinvented w…
/r/MensRights16/10/20 05:21 AM
3

Legally, men and women are equal Nope, they are not. There laws that are unfavorable to men (consription, reproduction rights) and in courts men get much harsher sentences. The fact that women on average earn less than men can be explained almost completely by the difference in the working hours. Anyways, politics in a democracy is about "victim points". The people who are believed to be victims by voters get all kinds of benefits, like money. Women are much better victims than men and that's wh…
/r/MensRights15/10/20 10:39 AM
3

Yeah, I'm pretty sure an abused lesbian can go to one of the women's sehlters without problems or stigma. For men there is usually nothing.
/r/MensRights15/10/20 08:11 AM
1

Could it be that she, as an entitled woman, didn't think about it through because she kind of expected to be treated well. No man would have made a movie like that. (Then again I haven't seen the movies so ... I'm just guessing.)
/r/MensRights14/10/20 11:31 AM
0

If you're not dirt poor, world is full of opportunities. Don't try to change things you can't change but concentrate on things you can change. Think you world different.
/r/MensRights14/10/20 11:24 AM
2

If you have anger issues that's a legit reason to see a professional.
/r/MensRights14/10/20 11:15 AM
6

Because it's th UN Women, I suppose they saw the facts in dreams or read in Vogue. In other words, they are not known for vigorous fact checking, to put it mildly. Another thing is that for thes people equality means the wellbeing of girls and women. They don't even try to hide it. They are so sure of their privilege to speak nonsense without anybody daring to correct them. Well, on Twitter they do get corrected but they just ignore it.
/r/MensRights14/10/20 11:11 AM
3

Yeah, the whole post-structuralism thing started heading almost immediately towards really strange worlds, feminism being the prime example. But perhaps the basic principles are worth considering when we are baffled by all the crazy things feminists can say. Why doesn't anyone see that what they say is nonsense and totally unfair? Because their arguments are part of the general discourse of the powerful, which is very gynocentric. The language which we tend to see as natural actually reflects ce…
/r/MensRights14/10/20 10:59 AM
2

Finland has a long tradition of passing gender-neutral laws. So, I'm pretty sure it's gonna be written so that women can be found guilty, too. Then again we a have a strongly Feminist government which can mean almost anything. They just trippled the money they hand out to women's organizations.
/r/MensRights14/10/20 10:15 AM
2

It's ducks. Donald Duck has no trousers: Nor do any ducks in Finland, come to think of it.
/r/MensRights14/10/20 10:12 AM
-2

Narratives (or discourses) are more important than facts. Why would feminism be so powerful if they weren't? That's what people like Foucault were actually saying and they weren't wrong - except that they thought that feminists were on the losing side. That they got wrong. Foucault thought that it's almot impossible to turn the dominant narrative (discourse) into something else because of power realtions that are always embedded in the langauge. The method he suggested was the "deconstruction" o…
/r/MensRights14/10/20 09:56 AM
8

now feminists have so little evidence for their claims That "now" has lasted several decades already.
/r/MensRights14/10/20 09:38 AM
5

Evolution designed women to look and even behave (crying, in particular) quite a lot like children. That way men - and women - were willing to protect them and put women's welfare or, at least, safety before their own. And what kind of an evil person would want to be mean to children?! Women are always potential victims who should be protected. Treating them like we treat men feels wrong. And that's what they can use in almost every situation. In certain situations this is a disadvantage: who wo…
/r/MensRights14/10/20 05:39 AM
1

The typical service time is six months, not two years, if that's what you think.
/r/MensRights14/10/20 05:20 AM
7

There should be a name for this phenomenon when researchers or somebody else set out to prove that something is what their confused worldview predicts and then are surprised when the opposite turns out to be true. It's so common. More precisely the word could try capturing the exact moment when the first results come out, and they prove something completely different from what they had expected. Something like: "The person went totally sikinsokin when she realized that it was men who had been di…
/r/MensRights13/10/20 02:49 PM
10

The confused researcher tries to understand why women are preferred. The article by the "Finnish BBC" is also at loss claiming that women were only slightly preferred.
/r/MensRights13/10/20 06:11 AM
2

I'm not a native speaker but doesn't the problem arise when you address women? For some reason it's not OK to say "Hey, women, come here" (but you can say "hey, men, come here"). Instead, you say either ladies or girls. And here the problem is that it's weird to address young women, teenagers as ladies or a bit older women as girls. If so, i think we just have to stop addressing women.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 09:02 AM
1

I've decided to be an outsider. I have no strong leanings this way or that. It's important that there are many views present when decisions are made and that the best arguments win. So I'm for democracy, though it's not the best system. But the best we can have right now. Voting is futile, anyway, from an individual's perspective.
/r/MensRights09/10/20 01:38 PM
3

Minors attracted person, apparently.
/r/MensRights09/10/20 12:29 PM
6

This has been talked for about 20 years now and not much has changed. The momentum just isn't there. But I'm pretty sure the times are gonna change at some point when the economic consequences start impacting in their full force.
/r/MensRights09/10/20 12:23 PM
13

Yeah, but you, /u/marcopoloman, lived in the 13th century. Back then boys were favored. Here in our time it the other way around.
/r/MensRights09/10/20 12:21 PM
1

You don't know what you are talking about. Educate yourself. There are a lot of resources critical to "official truths" you are repeating. If you have been told one side of a story, it doesn't make you an expert about the reality.
/r/MensRights09/10/20 10:52 AM
2

No it's not.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 05:08 AM
8

Why the capital letters?
/r/MensRights07/10/20 03:15 PM
2

I read the article and a lot has changed since I read about them the last time. There has been progress, huge progress, because of tourism. The modern world has entered their culture. And traditional cultures don't go together well with the modern world. But how did they become what they were, this strange rarity? Well, I've understood that in remote places cultures can take surprising turns perhaps without any particular or, at least, obvious reason.
/r/MensRights07/10/20 08:23 AM
5

It could be - and this is pure speculation - that at some point men thought that they want more freedom from work and other duties, but didn't realize what it really would mean.
/r/MensRights07/10/20 08:05 AM
1

People search for thing that they don't know about. So, I assume that strong women are something that has to be searched for because they aren't obvious everyday knowledge.
/r/MensRights07/10/20 05:02 AM
3

In the article, an uneducated person tries to make huge generalizations based on superficial knowledge of a fringe culture. But this whole Mosuo thing is interesting. How has the culture has managed to survive? They don't seem to have many things going for them in the contest between cultures: no military strenght, no progress. Why aren't people leaving for wealthier areas where they can have more opportunities as individuals or families? Perhaps they are. As another uneducated person my guess i…
/r/MensRights07/10/20 04:43 AM
2

I wonder how they calculated that in France. I mean, even the French must have hard time knowing what the world is like in ten years, let alone in 1 000. Anyway, there is no inevitable trend that will lead to equal earnings between men and women, no more than between old and young, short and tall, city dwellers and rural folk, left-handed and right-handed, or any other two groups that aren't perfectly identical or identically perfect.
/r/MensRights06/10/20 12:13 PM
1

Their beacon is hate and the feminist money-making machine, not what people think.
/r/MensRights06/10/20 11:11 AM
21

"Neighborhood bake sale for a shelter for men." LOL, that's the craziest idea I've heard today.
/r/MensRights06/10/20 11:05 AM
1

I'm an anti-feminist but that has nothing to do qith what I think about women. What the hell are you talking about it?
/r/MensRights04/10/20 05:06 PM
3

She must be a feminist.
/r/MensRights04/10/20 05:03 PM
0

If stating something obvious is deep in your world, why not try to become less dumb. :D
/r/MensRights01/10/20 04:29 PM
1

Because the flair is Feminism; thought it was obvious.
/r/MensRights01/10/20 04:28 PM
3

Finland is a nonsecular country as are all Nordic countries. But it has nothing to do with the issue at hand. Finland has a secular constitution which it abides to fairly well unless Feminists have other interests. And this is not a joke.
/r/MensRights01/10/20 07:49 AM
3

You think you know something that's true when you actually know just a feminist narrative. You don't have to be that way, believing what the power elite tells you.
/r/MensRights01/10/20 07:42 AM
4

If you don't get the circumcision part what about the double standard?
/r/MensRights01/10/20 07:40 AM
4

Ask your parents.
/r/MensRights01/10/20 07:37 AM
2

In the Nordic countries people love the underdogs - not always knowing who the underdogs are. "We" love to help women thought women are much off than men. Muslims? There is a pro-west, anti-islam movement exactly because the power elite is so pro-immigration. I'm neither. I think we should help Muslims who are discriminated against and who are here already, But I'm also a big fan of the western values and achievements.
/r/MensRights01/10/20 07:26 AM
7

Boys aren't circumcised that often? What? What is the share of Muslim infants who get circumcised routinely compared to Finnish male infants? In then Helsinki area and Turku it's probably over 50%- No?
/r/MensRights30/09/20 06:11 PM
19

Is it like impossible to make laws that are gender neutral? Finland, being the backwaters of equality, says no.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 05:39 PM
8

In places like Denmark there are much more Muslims than Jews.And in places like Denmark one of the main problems they have is the poor integration of the Muslims population. Andsome of my best friends are Muslims and so forth. :D
/r/MensRights30/09/20 04:38 PM
7

By the way, I was circumcised. I have no idea why. Perhaps it was "a thing" back then?
/r/MensRights30/09/20 04:30 PM
4

Muslims?
/r/MensRights30/09/20 04:20 PM
9

Kansalasialoite meni juuri läpi. Tyttöjen ympärileikkaus oli kielletty tietty, on ollut aina. And the same in English: the circumcision of girls has been forbidden always. Now they are going to forbid again And Finnish doctors have never circumcides girls.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 04:06 PM
34

Tell me where you live and I'll come and chop part of penis off. :D
/r/MensRights30/09/20 03:31 PM
1

They love the idea of killing men. It's, not, you know killing us really but just enjoying the idea.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 01:12 PM
6

Dead people don't suffer. Well, dead women probably do suffer, at least according to these karens, but men don't.
/r/MensRights28/09/20 05:52 AM
27

I'd like to the break-down, too. How do youg et rape the second most common violent crimes? There are, after all, such things as robbery, gang violence, bar brawls etc. etc.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 09:59 AM
3

Oh, Dolores!
/r/MensRights26/09/20 05:41 AM
1

I was referring to something totally different from what you write here, namely your previous post.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 06:12 PM
2

You see it as a psychological problem, which it is, but it also a social problem. Men who don't get love from women and children are at a vastly greater risk at becoming marginalize in some way.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 05:55 PM
1

That's NOT the right answer to anything unless you're a Buddhist monk. And even then you would be expected to say it in a clever way.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 05:52 PM
9

This is reverse misogyny. And thar was sarcasm. Anyway, what do they think they'll achieve by telling to some of their employees that they not worth much, that they are working in the firm because the firm is a patriarchal shithole, not knowing what it does and favoring men and oppressing everybody else than white men?
/r/MensRights24/09/20 05:13 PM
3

Do you know what it takes for a woman to get ready for a date?! I know it depends on how high you aim. Average Joe wouldn't care, perhaps even notice, if you spent much less.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 08:24 AM
1

The main reason for the earnings gap is that men, on average, work more.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 05:40 AM
12

One of the main points of the human evolution is that we have two sexes, and one sex is primarily for reproduction and the other for protection against the "outside world". That's because human babies are so helpless for so long. The one that is geared more towards protection, on average, takes more readily risks and can control his emotions better particularly when push comes to shove. But that's not enough, men have to have strict role expectations as well. Taking risks is more natural for men…
/r/MensRights24/09/20 05:34 AM
3

That might be true somewhere, American universities perhaps? What I've seen elsewhere, very few people advertise Feminism. The real problem are the powerful people who don't advocate feminism publicly but make societies more unequal and worse for men . These "invisible feminists" within the government are a huge danger.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 05:10 AM
-15

Ouch, clever you! Of course I knew you intentions. But you ignorant stance got me a chance to explain how things really are by pretending to agree with you. But enoug is enough Bye, I'll block you so we don't have to carry on with this meaningless game.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 09:49 AM
-23

Exactly. People are really ignorant when it comes to economical laws and facts. Employers buy productivity and try to guess who is more productive. They can't know it but make educated guesses. If you are offered a lower starting salary than somebody else, the employer guesses, right or wrong, that you are less productive. Of course there are trade unions and laws that try to fight this but without them, the decision is made by an employer whose main goal is to make more profit or at least not t…
/r/MensRights23/09/20 09:34 AM
-49

Is it possible that the employer knows from experience that women are on average worth more in that particular job?
/r/MensRights23/09/20 06:19 AM
1

Gone Girl. Then there is Mika Waltari who was popular in the 50s and 60s. His long historical novels always have the protagonist falling in love with women who - sometimes love him back but more often - treat him truly like shit. Nowadays he would be considered a misogynist but back then one of his books (The Egyptian) ended up a big Hollywood production.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 06:09 AM
102

Harassing women online can mean almost anything. There is a strong attempt to make laws that favor women all over the world or at least the western world. There were even efforts in the EU to make criticizing Feminism illegal. Is that the next step? I can't help but think that there are two groups that advocate this: those nutcases who think we live in patriarchy and those nutcases who think that women's psych is so fragile that they should be protected against harsh talk. And now the nutcases h…
/r/MensRights23/09/20 05:56 AM
23

Unfortunately, I can't tell whether I would have enjoyed it or not because I had to stop at this silly claim. It is worth stating at the outset that feminism, throughout its long and rich history, neither equals nor endorses misandry Hating men is, after all, one of the main themes of feminism, men are the good enemy. And though not all feminists spend their days hating men, I'm pretty sure that even the "nice ones" hold some sort of grudge against us. Why would they otherwise advocate an ideolo…
/r/MensRights23/09/20 05:40 AM
5

The point to take home is that women have an incentive to lie in court about domestic abuse because that way they can get benefits. And the - feminist - British authorities are fighting for these women by, among other things, downplaying the number of false accusations. The situation is pretty ugly for married men. There's nothing they can do when the whole system is rigged against them. How do you prove to the system that you didn't abuse your wife particularly when the system insists that wome…
/r/MensRights23/09/20 05:14 AM
4

I once listened to an interview with an MRA. Close to the end the MRA told that men should organize themselves into men-only groups to find brotherhood or something along those lines. The female interviewer said: "Up to this point I was surprised how reasonable you sounded. But now I'm scared." People and women in particular don't like the idea of men-only groups aiming at benefits for themselves. Who know what will follow? Nazism? War?
/r/MensRights22/09/20 03:43 PM
2

If you talk about boys instead of men or males they'll find it harder to punish you for arguing for unpopular opinions and facts.
/r/MensRights18/09/20 01:56 PM
3

Yeah, I have my doubts about the narrative regarding Ancient Greece, too. How was it common knowledge what the wife of Socrates was like if they never saw her, for example? But then again there is contrary evidence from the Near East and from certain Islam customs that strictly seem to have restricted women's freedom and punished wrong-doers. Here'e a site that looks interesting: http://www.womenintheancientworld.com/ The section on Hammurabi's law has this to say: At marriage a woman’s sexualit…
/r/MensRights17/09/20 01:47 PM
4

Thanks for an interesting post. There have been all kinds of societies and cultures in history. For example, before farming and herding the rules were often very different because people, men, didn't usually have anything to pass down to their children. Later on they did, and after that the successful cultures laid down rules that tired to make sure that a man knew who his children were. That way men were willing to make much greater sacrifices and work harder. Women might not know who the fathe…
/r/MensRights17/09/20 08:10 AM
2

Who are the men who tell women what to wear ans who the women who let men tell them? Not in this universe.
/r/MensRights16/09/20 04:09 PM
50

Studies have quite literally shown that there are more female pedos Which studies?
/r/MensRights16/09/20 05:33 AM
8

But it's not women primarily. It 's our culture. A male has to become a man to be worth something. Most men put a lot of effort into that. Then again it's possible, even likely, that sex - and thus women - is indirectly behind that cultural trait.
/r/MensRights13/09/20 04:53 PM
3

I think it was the fifth of Genesis. Peter Gabriel was still the lead singer. Yeah, a poor joke.
/r/MensRights12/09/20 04:32 PM
1

My favorite is Selling England by the Pound.
/r/MensRights12/09/20 04:26 PM
30

She quit her job ... Latner gave Climans thousands of dollars every month, a credit card, paid off her mortgage and showered her with expensive gifts. He provided her and her children with a “lavish lifestyle,” the court found. Don't do that or you'll be punished! I have to say that, though the "British" common law makes sense sometimes, it can lead to things that I find incomprehensible. No parliament would ever pass a law making this possible. "If you give your girlfriend lots of money and val…
/r/MensRights11/09/20 06:18 AM
6

In line with the knowledge and political principles, the power of language principle states that all concepts of reality, including power and oppression, can only exist and be transmitted via language. Therefore, whoever controls the language controls all of reality. Whatever language is dominant must be so because it was designed by those in power to entrench their power. We must all revolt against language as it exists. In fact, post-modernists don't think that language is designed by the powe…
/r/MensRights11/09/20 06:05 AM
2

men are always and only the benefactors of oppression, and if there is ever a situation where a man is discriminated against it is just a consequence of his overwhelming privilege backfiring on him. I think you could use a bit more precise language here because the two statements contradict each other. Feminists — if they can think, which is rare — don't make that mistake. Instead, they say that we live in a patriarchy, which often discriminates also against (white middle-aged, straight) men, no…
/r/MensRights11/09/20 05:38 AM
-2

That was silly, thanks!
/r/MensRights05/09/20 03:27 PM
-5

I enjoy reading what silly people have to say.
/r/MensRights05/09/20 02:51 PM
-39

If a young woman hits you once, deal with it. I mean, that happens to most young men several times and you really shouldn't get traumatized by something like that. Sure, there are exceptions to the rule, but for most men dealing with minor , almost everyday problems shouldn't be a problem
/r/MensRights05/09/20 06:51 AM
1

You sound like a typical entitled woman and feminist who doesn't know anything about the discrimination and hardships men face. The little you know you see through the feminist theory that distorts the picture beyond recognition. Harsher punishments? Discrimination in schools? There are more strict dress codes. I'm talking about harsher convictions, even death penalties, and the fact that boys are falling behind in schools and you ... you are talking dress codes! I'd laugh if this wasn't so trag…
/r/MensRights04/09/20 01:26 PM
0

I tend to believe good science. You?
/r/MensRights03/09/20 07:56 PM
1

What is the goal of the Men’s Rights Movement? Men should have the same rights as women, that's probably sums it up. You don't know that men don't have the same rights as women but that's OK because almost nobody does, feminists probably the least. That's the way the people who hold power want it for some reason. Some of the denied rights are legal (conscription, reproduction rights), some institutional (harsher punishments, discrimination in schools), and some cultural (much stricter role expec…
/r/MensRights03/09/20 07:31 AM
1

we are addressing issues such as men’s responsibility to care for oneself, care for others and care for the well-being and sustainability of societies, including the promotion of gender equality. Both the challenges and the promising practices covering these topics will be discussed in both panel and workshop formats, involving a range of stakeholders, among them policymakers, researchers and activists.
/r/MensRights02/09/20 05:41 PM
6

More generally, we shouldn't assume that any cultural behavior is linked to something so vaguely defined as "masculinity". Think about a social worker who faces a violent boy. If she's a feminist she thinks: "ah, we must change something in his masculinity". A non-feminist social worker would take another approach: "hmm, I have to find out what's the background he comes form and then decide what to do". Obviously the feminist would not only inefficient but also harmful and morally wrong. If we k…
/r/MensRights02/09/20 07:46 AM
1

If I had something to say, wouldn't it be against her commands?
/r/MensRights02/09/20 07:23 AM
3

Praising men is OK because we need a counter-narrative to fight the killallmen and men-are-trash folks. But it should be done in a humble way, not bragging but just humbly noticing all the good things men are responsible for.
/r/MensRights02/09/20 05:27 AM
5

Less time in the sun, is my advice.
/r/MensRights02/09/20 05:16 AM
-3

Women on average don't prefer the most masculine men but those who have also "feminine", less masculine features. It's been speculated that "too" masculine features might signal too much aggressiveness, which is something women don't necessarily want because it might mean danger for the woman, too, not just for other men.
/r/MensRights02/09/20 05:15 AM
2

The irony is that she's doing exactly what she blames men for. What's more, she's part of a movement that is among the most harmful in recent decades, a sexist ideology spitting on men. And she doesn't have any idea of what she's doing and how harmful it is.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 06:11 AM
2

For example the Wikipedia article on patriarchy proves that it doesn't exist the way feminist in their hatred want it to exist. They haven't been able to come up with a single example in the article that would even hint towards the existence of the conspiracy you guys think is the driving force of the humankind. It's a fringe theory within academia - outside the crazy faction that apparently wants to destroy the benefits of the scientific revolution and enlightenment.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 06:04 AM
3

Beeristheanswer
/r/MensRights01/09/20 04:42 AM
1

Feminists have to come up with these demon stories. If they didn't, they'd look silly with their hysterical demands to wipe out the demons.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 08:06 PM
1

It's not a joke, it's a meme. Memes catch on if people find them worth spreading. They don't have to funny, though, and this one surely isn't. So, what's the reason behind its success?
/r/MensRights31/08/20 08:32 AM
1

Only in the USA?
/r/MensRights31/08/20 08:29 AM
2

Probably Islamophobic, too, and racist in general.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 08:27 AM
6

Perhaps Saudi-Arabia and even there just a few of the restrictions apply.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 08:26 AM
4

LOL, they are not. Well, perhaps in feminist fantasies.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 08:25 AM
1

Believers aren't conservatives. Conservatives can be believers but not necessarly. i didn't group leftists nad feminists together.
/r/MensRights30/08/20 11:30 AM
7

We all know Yes, you have been taught well by the people in power.
/r/MensRights30/08/20 08:23 AM
1

Isn't that what you just did? I tried not to. But I used "conservative in two different meanings (as a political leaning and as an ideology) and wasn't clear enough which one I had in mind there. What I meant: It's not fair to say that all those people we like to call conservative are against equality though the hard-core old-time conservatives often are. The same goes for the people we like to call left-wing. Though the hard-core "liberals" are often feminists and thus against equality, it'd be…
/r/MensRights30/08/20 08:10 AM
2

That's so disgusting that why we just don't #KillAllMen?
/r/MensRights29/08/20 01:53 PM
2

You seem to live in a world of feminist lies but never mind, so do most of people. So, it's very hard to find fact about these issues. Google searches produce mainly feminist propaganda. But we know from studies that it's mostly women who send other women these nasty messages. Also: Contrary to popular expectations, we find that more men than women have experienced online harassment. The main reason is that men receive more comments directed at their opinions and attitudes; women and men are equ…
/r/MensRights29/08/20 01:51 PM
3

Next you should prove that the difference is based on sex. If you asked Tinder, they wouldn't admit it because their pricing strategies are a trade secret. That's the way it is with almost all companies. In the EU there is this directive that tries to make sure that there are no big differences in online prices depending on where within the EU you sell. The problem is that it virtually impossible to monitor if that is really happening because firms have these different pricing stragies based on …
/r/MensRights29/08/20 06:20 AM
1

The similarities are often striking. They don't have holy scriptures, the word of God, though, but then again not all religions have.
/r/MensRights29/08/20 06:12 AM
1

Tell that to Plato and pretty much every philosopher after him.
/r/MensRights29/08/20 06:10 AM
1

No, it's something pretty much everybody who knows even something about these things, even many feminists agree on.
/r/MensRights29/08/20 06:09 AM
0

That's how science really works though you probably have been told a different story. Evolutionary psychology is not just-so stories as anyone who had even the thinnest knowledge about the subject knows. It looks for evidence broadly in medicine, biology, anthropology, anthropological comparisons, and zoology to mention the most important ones. People who are against it usually sound incredibly ignorant when they try to argue about these things because they just don't know what they are tlaking …
/r/MensRights28/08/20 06:44 PM
6

Well, any scientific article should state the premises it's based on. Arguments, studies are always true only relatively (plus logically). In this case we could argue that if we think that people who have more freedom of choice can choose more freely what they desire, then girls choose what they desire more often than boys. It's by no means clear that many people share this premise but talk instead about social conditioning, for example, that more or less forces girls to choose what they don't d…
/r/MensRights28/08/20 06:30 PM
0

Evolution made women have childlike features so that other people would have an urge to protect them. People who are fighting evolution psychology are going to lose the war. There is absolutely no doubt about it, better explanations will win in the end. Ignorant people will lose.
/r/MensRights28/08/20 06:09 PM
2

feminism is the most powerful anti-equality movement today No doubt about that in most western countries, perhaps all. Religions tend to have some pretty unequal ideas, but they are much, much weaker than feminism. At least in Europe. Feminism is not only against equality, it's also a very powerful movement and it speards hatred.
/r/MensRights28/08/20 06:01 PM
29

Many people believe that feminists just talk and don't act so it's not dangerous. But I'm sure that thousands men have been harmed and even killed for feminist reasons. Hatred normalizes violence. If you tell somebody that Jews are the root cause of all that is evil, it won't end well.
/r/MensRights28/08/20 05:41 PM
34

Here's a more comprehensive article: https://quillette.com/2018/06/19/why-women-dont-code/ In 2018, another paper explored the same question from a different perspective using international data from the PISA survey (the Programme for International Student Assessment). Olga Khazan summarized the paper well in an article for the Atlantic: The issue doesn’t appear to be girls’ aptitude for STEM professions. In looking at test scores across 67 countries and regions, Stoet and Geary found that girls…
/r/MensRights28/08/20 04:56 PM
4

Hatred and censorship instead of discussion. The lost generation?
/r/MensRights28/08/20 04:08 PM
8

The idea that men run almost 100% all countries is ridiculous. First, it's not men in general but a few men. Second, countries are not really run by anybody, even the most totalitarian dictators can have only a modest influence on what goes on in his country. If Trump could run the USA, the country would look very diferent, I assume. IMHO it would be closer to the truth to say that (wealthy western democratic) societies are run by those people who raise our children, run our families, consume th…
/r/MensRights28/08/20 01:46 PM
1

It's possible that these words linger on in Finland because the country got industrialized so late. Until 1950s most people worked on farms without much of social security. Men had to do what men had to do or the whole family could perish. And what men had to do is not nice but dangerous and wearing, protecting and providing. Women, on the other hand, did more things that come naturally to people and women in particular, raising kids, in particular.
/r/MensRights28/08/20 12:28 PM
1

Foucault was a clever guy though he did make grave mistakes, too. But even if you dismiss all postmodern crap, the fact remains that the connections between language and reality is one of the oldest philosophical questions, not something somen Frenchmen came up with a few decades ago. I don't think there is a single philospher who thinks that our language doesn't affect the way we see and can see the world.
/r/MensRights28/08/20 12:23 PM
1

Men are forced into a much stricter role than women. That's why there should logically be words that penalize men more harshly for not behaving properly. If that's not the case there must be other means society uses to force men do things that don't come naturally to them, like risking their lives to protect and work long hours in unpleasant jobs (particularly before the very recent times). Laughing at men who don't comply is another way. Not getting laid yet another.
/r/MensRights28/08/20 12:18 PM
3

I think that originally circumcision was group identity thing. If you claimed to be a Muslim but were not circumcised you weren't a real Muslim, perhaps even spy or something. Grown men usually don't to get their penises cut.
/r/MensRights28/08/20 08:46 AM
1

It is impossible that our hormones would not have an effect on how we behave, talk for example. The differences are statistical, of course, but when they become part of the role expectations, it's pretty hard to escape them. For example, men can stop flirting with women, but if they do so, it's very unlikely they'll ever have sex and children.
/r/MensRights28/08/20 07:20 AM
2

Here' are a few examples of words that describe negative physical traits: many words describe men's length and sort of laziness or other traits that are supposed to be linked with the physical size or age psychological traits: like änkyrä or huru-ukko of men who talk stupid things and can't act in a decent manner behaviors, juntti, for example, means about the same as redneck but is more general, any man can act like a juntti wearing clothes that are wrong somehow, too fancy or too worn all kind…
/r/MensRights28/08/20 07:08 AM
1

My point was that these negative words steer men towards being what society wants them to be, as I already wrote.
/r/MensRights28/08/20 06:38 AM
4

To be more precise, I'm a historian. Or used to be. Language is always changing, naturally. It is always arbitrary, the way Foucault envisioned. It reflects biology, power relations, reality, but not directly. You can't "escape" it because even if you don't believe in the moral judgements it contains, you can't make other people think the same way.
/r/MensRights27/08/20 08:01 PM
6

I'm a humanist by education and just can't understand how we could see the world the way we see it without language. Every word we learn defines reality by imposing a difference on it. Some differences are practical or aesthetic and some moral.
/r/MensRights27/08/20 07:51 PM
5

Fin is a thin vertical part sticking out of the body of especially a fish or an aircraft that helps balance and movement. :D But, yeah, we probably talk less and can enjoy silence more - but it's probably something that is vanishing. Nevertheless, some foreigners are astounded by the silence. I find it hard to understand why some people feel that they have to talk all the time and so loudly.
/r/MensRights27/08/20 07:33 PM
1

As a side note, a history book came to mind. It discussed whether it was possible for a medieval person not to believe in God. I think the conclusion was that it wasn't possible. Without God language just didn't make sense.
/r/MensRights27/08/20 07:23 PM
5

It doesn't dictate, it steers in a subtle way.
/r/MensRights27/08/20 07:06 PM
1

Employers are either good at paying people what they are worth or they are bankrupt. Your dad seems to believe employers don't know what they are doing. And that's impossible. It's economics, stupid. :D As a side note: I do think that women pay a penalty for their ability to make children and then wanting to take care of them. Clever employers know that it makes women riskier and want to pay women less.
/r/MensRights26/08/20 09:28 AM
-1

In my opinion the message is: "women are animals". Why would any civilized human being believe in shit like that? Yeah, I know, women aren't like that. Most of them know that men are decent folks who probably would endanger their life to protect women. But, come on, in the corridors of power there is a movement which has no problem spreading hatred like this!
/r/MensRights26/08/20 09:03 AM
1

Obviously I meant physically weaker.
/r/MensRights19/08/20 11:03 AM
4

I don't think evolution is sexist. It's amoral. Evolution has given the weaker sex certain "tricks" to compensate for their weakness. Crying is one.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 07:03 PM
1

which route to take and how fast to drive
/r/MensRights18/08/20 06:59 PM
2

He's not likely marry either and have kids. But that's oK, too, of course. You just should know about the consequences.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 03:28 PM
3

Most of the time crying is not a reasonable reaction to anything. Think of a parent for example. Parenting is often stressful. The last thing a parent should learn is to start crying when feeling stressed, though. The hormones you get out of crying you can get out of solving stressful situation. That is the norm, or should be, even if many women seem to think differently. But for women crying is also communication. The weaker sex has been taught by evolution a few tricks.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 03:24 PM
2

I'm sure you can read crap like that in feminist books. But what does that prove? Nothing else than that you can read it in feminist books. Masculinity is viewed pretty negatively, and among young women very negatively. It can't be a norm.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 03:14 PM
2

I get what you're saying.My perspective was this (as you probably already realized): if we look at apes (primates alone aren't a great example here) it's common that males give females benefits to get sex. The same goes for people if dating isn't forbidden or there isn't a surplus of women. That would remain true even if there were no governments. Hmm, perhaps we should add one more premise: the group should be reasonably affluent and equal. If it's not, the men with resources would get almost a…
/r/MensRights16/08/20 06:02 AM
1

The system where men do most of the work in dating - if there is any - is universal regardless of the government. But I suppose you use the word in a different sense?
/r/MensRights16/08/20 05:22 AM
6

The reasons behind this dating inequality are biological in nature. It's not going anywhere anytime soon. But, if all goes well, in a couple of centuries we'll be shiny metal objects or perhaps we live within computers. Then we can have no dating at all - or exactly the kind of dating we want: men having orgiews and women strong silen funny guys who adore them.
/r/MensRights15/08/20 05:43 PM
2

It's totally arbitrary to demand that women should have 50 per cent of the political power. What about other genders, ethnic minorities, disabled people... The list is endless. You think that women should have 50% but are not advocating the same for other groups is because that's what you have been taught. Why? By whom? Do you have any idea? Demanding sources is pointless because it's your task to find the truth., not mine. Start by reading the links on the right.
/r/MensRights14/08/20 08:36 PM
1

It's true that women often get the pussy pass in the court and that certainly explains part of the original question about the DP. I'm pretty sure you have never heard that women get far lighter sentences in courts. That has been proved over and over again but people like you, who just believe what is taught, don't still know about it. You probably think women get harsher convictions because that's what they want us to believe.
/r/MensRights14/08/20 08:08 PM
1

Honor killings are not a privilege. Men, and sometimes women, too, get killed in traditional societies because of honor related causes but nobody in her right mind would think that is a privilege. And Even in Saudi Arabia - which you seem to think represents the World while it's actually a strange exception - women have many important privileges, like the right to be supported and not having to work. The fact that you don't believe the facts I told you about, that you haven't heard about these f…
/r/MensRights14/08/20 07:59 PM
3

I have never understood where this idea comes form that men have more privileges than women. Everywhere I look I see female privileges: marginalized people tend to be men not women, women are happier almost everywhere, their lives are safer, they commit less suicides, live longer, they get better education, have amore lax role expectations, can drop their career to stay at hom, the list could go on and on. And still we are told that the opposite is true, that it's the men who have all the privil…
/r/MensRights14/08/20 07:08 PM
2

Women have more rights than men in this universe. Reproduction rights for example, rights to be supported, less civic duties. This is true even in most third world countries. Either you live in a different universe or you have been tricked by somebody to believe i na narrative that's not true.
/r/MensRights14/08/20 06:58 PM
2

There are many, many countries where men don't get to vote unless they serve in the military. Women, in those countries, get to vote without any responsibilities. You are being delusional, tricked by the narrative of the power elite.
/r/MensRights14/08/20 06:51 PM
13

There is a category of studies where researchers, who are surprised that the world doesn't correspond with their stupid feminist views, are surprised. The researchers who found this out were very surprised.
/r/MensRights13/08/20 07:19 PM
30

Why can women, but not men, use shortcomings as an excuse? Perhaps that's the question.
/r/MensRights13/08/20 04:31 PM
5

An article debunking serial killer myths debunks your myth: Myth #2: All Serial Killers Are Caucasian. Reality: Contrary to popular mythology, not all serial killers are white. Serial killers span all racial and ethnic groups in the U.S. The racial diversity of serial killers generally mirrors that of the overall U.S. population. There are well documented cases of African-American, Latino and Asian-American serial killers. African-Americans comprise the largest racial minority group among serial…
/r/MensRights11/08/20 11:35 AM
3

Who wants to have anything to do with a media outlet that thinks genocide is a good thing? Crazy people, feminists are running the world and this is what it looks like.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 02:09 PM
10

Valerie Solanas is best known as a feminist icon who wanted to kill all men.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 07:43 AM
1

Yeah, me too. but being cynic isn't healthy in the long run.
/r/MensRights03/08/20 06:46 PM
2

Here in Finland the constitution claims that everybody should be equal and blah, blah, the same as "everywhere". Then the law that deals with defense says that you every citizen must take part in defense and men by military means. Women are not mentioned at all. IT IS NOT EQUAL AND IT IS AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION. But what about courts and schools and what have we? They are different and still the same in some sense.
/r/MensRights03/08/20 06:14 PM
15

Women don't have the same rights, they have more.
/r/MensRights02/08/20 06:27 PM
3

They do.
/r/MensRights01/08/20 05:43 AM
6

In my opinion, to be more aggressive is fine, nothing to be ashamed of - if you meet injustice. Unfortunately, good guys are often less aggressive than bad guys. That's the problem.
/r/MensRights31/07/20 08:38 PM
3

I sometimes post to other subs without changing the account and sometimes my post won't appear or appear only after a while. I'm just not sure why-
/r/MensRights31/07/20 05:46 PM
37

Becoming a man means that you have to learn to live with your hormones. Men, in general, are pretty good with their anger management because that's what they learn to do, that's their expertise. Women, well, not so much.
/r/MensRights31/07/20 05:39 PM
27

Google seems to suggest that those places should be avoided. Those racists and sexists!
/r/MensRights31/07/20 01:27 PM
2

Perhaps still about ten years ago the washing room areas at the swimming halls were cleaned by women - usually young women - here where I live. I don't know if that's still true because I stopped visiting them.
/r/MensRights31/07/20 12:35 PM
2

That's because you're a shitty-dude magnet. Or to be more precise, it's because the men you choose tend to be psychopaths looking for women like you, shallow and dumb, easy victims.
/r/MensRights31/07/20 11:57 AM
0

Some people, some economists even, claim that it's unfair that women earn less than men. It's an opinion, as is to claim that it's not unfair, so it's going to be controversial unless the earnings, pay gap disappears by some sorcery.
/r/MensRights31/07/20 07:11 AM
1

For feminists misogyny is not just hatred, it's a tool, as the Wikipedia article explains.
/r/MensRights30/07/20 04:43 PM
2

‘If you’re not a liberal when you’re 25, you have no heart. If you’re not a conservative by the time you’re 35, you have no brain.’
/r/MensRights30/07/20 09:36 AM
2

Toxic masculinity is by definition, well, toxic. So is toxic femininity. That said, it's an unfortunate term when it's associated with a certain group. Nobody outside the extremist circles would say "toxic Jewishness". But "toxic masculinity" seems to be OK. Tells a lot about the current culture - and the deep sexist undercurrents people live by. But when the term is used like this, it's pretty normal psychological language. Edit: Reading what you wrote more carefully, you I perhaps don't disagr…
/r/MensRights30/07/20 09:24 AM
4

One of the Feminist icons was a mentally unstable killer. Hmm, was there another feminist icon who was a violent criminal?
/r/MensRights29/07/20 01:58 PM
7

1233 people thought that is a fact. LOL, tells a lot about these people - and their families. What kind of fathers these women had?!
/r/MensRights29/07/20 12:02 PM
1

Yeah, you're right. I said it wrong. In postmodernism there are no innate traits. Still, language and thus society and culture is structured around power. Power is everywhere because what we say, what can be said without soundin foolish, is rooted in the way language has evolved among the people who hold power. So, reality - which is pretty much the same as language - benefits the powerful and they can keep it that way. Or to be more precise, it stays that way "automatically" because language is…
/r/MensRights28/07/20 05:24 AM
3

Actually, it's a trend, either that women self-report about these feelings more or that they feel them more. And it's no minor trend either. It's increased something like five times bigger in a couple of decades.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 01:07 PM
11

Yeah, that's Wikipedia for you. Never trust it if there is a possibility of activists editing the articles, particularly the left-leaning ones (because the right-leaning ones a far less active on Internet).
/r/MensRights27/07/20 09:30 AM
10

The feminists who have power over us base their politics on the idea that only women can be worse off. So, even when women are far better off, there still is no equality problem. The UN, EU, WEF they all gather information in indexes that are based on that principle. No wonder men are slowly but surely falling behind.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 09:27 AM
3

What are the truths and facts? Hard to say, but we know with absolute certainty that many, many more things than just fatherlessness have a strong correlation with the sad things the figures above describe.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 07:11 AM
1

I don’t think this topic really has anything to do with making a man less employable Except that it's main reason why feminists advocate it. I honestly don't understand why this is so hard to grasp when it is so obvious.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 06:14 AM
-1

It's a fact that it's a risk for an employer to hire a woman or give a woman a key position in her fertile years because it's likely that she'll absent from the job for quite a long time taking care of the baby. So, what can you do to change it? Women are going to make babies, so, that's hard to change (though you could make women less likely to make babies which is happening). You can't force employers to hire employees whose productivity is likely to be negative if she decides to become pregna…
/r/MensRights27/07/20 06:11 AM
4

Correlation doesn't mean causation here. Sure, fatherlessness can have negative effects on some children but it's misleading and immoral to claim that fatherlessness alone causes all the depressing figures above.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 05:53 AM
0

It depends. If women are already better off on the jobs market and if a lot of (young) men need good jobs to become good citizens, then this could be another step towards a catastrophe. Unfortunately. Feminists won't stop until women are better off in every respect - if even then.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 05:42 AM
2

Feminists are advocating this because it makes men less employable and women more. That's one of their main causes.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 04:54 AM
2

I think that most ideologies trying to explain "everything" are wrong but perhaps not as wrong as feminists who seem to get pretty much everything wrong. It's hard to come up with a single feminist explanation of society that is backed up by solid evidence.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 04:32 AM
3

Exactly.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 04:20 AM
-3

Humanists want parents to be able to spend more time with their infants. Yeah, and feminists want it because...?
/r/MensRights27/07/20 04:19 AM
-5

Yeah, and feminists.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 04:19 AM
1

I tried to explain it. All humans want power (and privileges) to begin with. But oppressed people can overcome this tendency because being treated wrong makes you wiser and more moral.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 04:17 AM
2

You pretty much misunderstood everything. Congratulations! :D
/r/MensRights27/07/20 04:16 AM
-14

I'll be downvoted but it's true anyway that paternity leaves for men are something feminists want. Why? Because anything that makes men less employable make women more employable. Edit: Certain facts are evil and get downvoted. Remember to say just nice facts! :D
/r/MensRights26/07/20 08:26 PM
10

Yeah, it's like they were following a script. Perhaps it was taught at the women's study class.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 03:44 PM
1

Google was accused of a similar thing but there was a logical explanation. Unfortunately I don't remember what. But I guess you can find it with a search engine.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 03:13 PM
1

They wanted straight women and the participants self-reported that they are straight.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 03:11 PM
3

Every feminist I’ve met has been perfectly open to discussion and men’s rights. LOL, that must be the reason why feminist forums are moderated so liberally! Anyway, there once were feminists who decided to discuss matters freely. It lasted for a couple of months. First they started censoring and banning and then finished it altogether. This is what happened to me: There was a discussion on sexual abuse. I brought up a blog post by a prominent feminist. She advised feminist to "seduce" 13-year-ol…
/r/MensRights26/07/20 03:01 PM
5

I have talked to numerous feminists over the years. It never ends well never mind how cautiously you try to choose your words. Feminism, as you must know, can't be discussed openly, it's far too dishonest and unfair for it. I wonder if you know haw bad the feminist reputation has become outside the corridors of power, among the men and particularly amonfg the marginalized men? I assume you do know and it makes you nervous.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 09:33 AM
8

My guess is that they come here or elsewhere and see how feminism is attacked. That must hurt because it's part of their core identity. "I'm a good person because I'm a feminist and the other way around." And it must hurt even more than they know that they can't engage in an open discussion because they don't have arguments outside their own echo chamber. (This is true for all ideologies and cults and isn't, unfortunately, totally foreign to MRAs either.)
/r/MensRights26/07/20 09:07 AM
11

MRA has very bad connotations pretty much everywhere. Yes, but fairness is winning. The progress is slow but the fact that feminists like you are getting nervous tells that a change is gonna come.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 09:01 AM
6

*corresponding figure As if you didn't know.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 08:33 AM
1

You don't. It still is.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 07:35 AM
4

The Goof Men Project.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 05:38 AM
9

"Fragile masculinity" refers to the fact that men can lose their status as men if they don't behave manly, in case you didn't know. But feminist have basically started using it as a slur against men. Here's an article discussing the pretty universal nature of it (though the Freudian part at the end is pure speculation). Actually it's a section out of David Gilmore's book Manhood in the making - Cultural concepts of masculinity.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 05:36 AM
8

There is a meta-analysis that says it's about 50-50, despite the large number of ideological studies.
/r/MensRights25/07/20 04:51 PM
5

When a public sector is run by women it slowly starts to favor girls and women. Well, men tend to favor women, too, but not so much. That's because women have this strong ingroup bias which is strengthened by the narrative of discrimination of girls and women which they are taught from early on. The women who favor women don't necessarily know what they are doing - though many do. It's often more like subconscious tendency: "sure, we should do something to help boys but let's first discuss somet…
/r/MensRights25/07/20 04:41 PM
7

I just happened to watch a documentary about Finnish soldiers during the WWII, their mental problems, fear, death and so forth. In one of the letters a soldier wrote: "for the first time in my life I have experienced the love of fellow human beings here in the korsu (a wooden underground bunker where many soldiers lived for years)". I'm not sure why that moved me.
/r/MensRights25/07/20 06:44 AM
6

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Coalition_for_Men_v._Selective_Service_System
/r/MensRights25/07/20 05:14 AM
0

This isn't really an MRA issue. Or if it is then everything, when there is a man doing something, is.
/r/MensRights25/07/20 05:09 AM
3

That's not necessarily manipulation. i don't think DuckDuckGo would sabotage their selling point by manipulating search results. II don't know if Google manipulates search results. There have been allegations but you'll find rebuttals as well. Algorithms behave sometimes in strange ways.
/r/MensRights24/07/20 07:05 PM
11

Feminist facts. They are different from normal facts. They are not true.
/r/MensRights24/07/20 07:00 PM
3

Ms Heard replied: "No. What woman has ever benefited from being the victim of domestic violence?" Sounds a bit, hmm, dishonest. Surely Ms Heard must know that women almost routinely benefit from domestic violence allegations as a strategy in nasty divorces.
/r/MensRights24/07/20 06:08 PM
13

All modern societies tell girls and women to overvalue themselves ad nauseam. They do it directly: "you are at least as good as boys and probably better". And indirectly: "if you don't succeed, don't look for the problem in yourself but in the (alleged) discrimination you face". Fortunately, most women don't fall into this trap, not totally at least. But for a weak personality, it's a very tempting - and toxic - path to take. A feminist path.
/r/MensRights24/07/20 08:14 AM
3

I thought about that but didn't want to change the original titles. Put the word in quotes instead.
/r/MensRights24/07/20 07:36 AM
3

Empathy gap. Any other misspelled words?
/r/MensRights24/07/20 07:31 AM
1

It's the UN it's referring to.
/r/MensRights24/07/20 06:17 AM
23

Their basic problem is that most of what they say is not true or fair. I mean, how else are you supposed to "run" an ideology based on lies and immoral statements but by disregarding the outside world? Unless that outside world agrees with you as governments, for example, tend to do.
/r/MensRights24/07/20 05:52 AM
-5

How are those two things the same? To man up is to find strength and resilience in yourself. To get back to kitchen i never said and it's just a stupid slur.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 06:16 PM
2

Even if you include subcultures? Being born into a favela kind of place is shit for everybody. Hard to say which sex suffers more because I've never lived in such a place. But not knowing makes me cautious of making sweeping generalizations or claiming to know with absolute certainty.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 06:48 AM
1

Sure, but there have been cultures where being a woman is even worse than being a man.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 05:54 PM
0

Perhaps so but then again: And of the approximately 6,720,000 adult males that are in prison, jail, parole, or probation,3 16%, or 1,075,000, are psychopaths. Thus, approximately 93% of adult male psychopaths in the United States are in prison, jail, parole, or probation.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 05:52 PM
3

Yeah, sure. Though it's clear that most tribes wouldn't survive without men either. I just tried to analyze the matter a bit further. We do "love" certain successful men. And most of us remember a few boys back at school whom "everybody" liked, no empathy gap there. And we don't feel empathy toward ugly women. And form the evolutionary perspective this makes sense. I'd like to see a study on how, for example, sulky boys are treated by their parents. Teachers, at least, discriminate against them.…
/r/MensRights22/07/20 12:06 PM
8

It's far form certain that there are many more psychopaths among men. The difference between male and female psychopaths is that the male ones tend to end up in prison. And it's among the prison population where the whole phenomenon has been studied. Anyway, the earnings gap can be explained almost entirely by the difference inthe hours worked.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 11:40 AM
9

Dishonest garbage. Or perhaps the author isn't dishonest, just stupid. You can never really know whether these feminist experts lack in the ethics or thinking department — or both.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 11:34 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter