TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

babno Archive

View 27 posts and 1,072 comments by babno on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
964

Discriminationbabno/r/MensRights21/04/23 02:15 AM
525

babno/r/PussyPass10/06/15 10:25 AM
397

babno/r/PussyPass16/04/15 09:01 PM
254

babno/r/PussyPass09/07/14 02:03 AM
226

babno/r/PussyPass09/01/16 03:41 AM
214

babno/r/PussyPass11/02/15 01:18 PM
184

babno/r/PussyPass30/01/17 11:39 PM
178

babno/r/PussyPass18/02/15 12:22 AM
138

babno/r/PussyPass02/01/18 03:36 AM
103

babno/r/PussyPass17/02/17 11:45 PM
77

babno/r/PussyPass16/05/17 02:26 PM
52

babno/r/PussyPass13/01/15 01:49 AM
44

babno/r/PussyPass16/06/15 09:41 PM
36

babno/r/MensRights06/03/12 01:55 PM
31

babno/r/MensRights17/02/16 10:13 PM
29

Fathers/Custodybabno/r/MensRights10/05/17 09:37 PM
29

Generalbabno/r/MensRights26/01/20 03:57 AM
19

babno/r/MensRights08/02/20 05:27 PM
18

babno/r/MensRights30/08/12 01:40 AM
16

babno/r/MensRights25/01/13 05:23 PM
9

babno/r/MensRights21/01/13 03:23 PM
8

babno/r/MensRights27/11/12 06:30 PM
6

babno/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:22 AM
5

babno/r/MensRights18/09/14 05:06 PM
1

babno/r/MensRights01/03/17 12:16 AM
0

babno/r/MensRights14/02/13 06:32 PM
0

babno/r/MensRights15/02/13 09:27 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,072 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

Women are the primary supporters of consumerism, being responsible for the vast majority of purchases.
/r/MensRights11/05/25 01:51 AM
15

Damn. And worth noting that that doesn't mean the 75% were guilty, just that they did indeed have sex with the woman. There is still the possibility that they consented at the time.
/r/MensRights10/05/25 02:34 AM
2

In truth, both are right to an extent. On the one hand, ~90% of alleged rapes do not end in a conviction, and obviously there is a mix with significant numbers of both innocent and guilty accused in there. On the other hand, of the ~10%, some of them are convicted on word alone. And even if you're part of "lucky" group of innocent people not convicted, you're still out thousands in lawyers fees, probably fired from your job and unemployable for 6 months-2 years while your case in ongoing, you we…
/r/MensRights10/05/25 02:32 AM
9

TBF, smart phones (particularly social media which they enable) IS terrible for young people (and everyone else too, though not quite as much). It would be better if they didn't have access to them IMO. However that decision should be with parents, not any sort of legislation or government.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 11:08 AM
12

It was more the obama dear colleague letter which required colleges to handle investigating SA accusations without any regard for due process or commitment to the truth. Were it not for that then title IX is fairly innocuous.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 06:05 PM
3

Ok. FYI, "homicide", "murder", and "manslaughter" are used at least 90% of the time in a legal context and are rarely used outside of that. In normal conversation we would also just use one word for all of them, "kill", though that can obviously refer to non humans as well.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 12:56 PM
1

Do you not have a word you can use to differentiate between intentional, unintentional, or even justified killing?
/r/MensRights22/10/24 12:26 PM
4

Homicide, not self defense FYI, homicide just means a human killing another human. Self defense killings are justified intentional homicides. Murder is the unjustified intentional homicide, while manslaughter is an unjustified unintentional homicide.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 02:07 AM
4

In theory it's easy, in practice often not so much. Admin will force push kids forward that really ought to have stayed back to get better numbers. As a result a 6th grade teacher can have a class ranging from 2nd-6th grade ability. There are also places in the country where significant portions of the class do not speak the same language as their teacher.
/r/MensRights03/09/24 12:51 AM
5

After months with few sightings, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police announced in June the group was spotted multiple times, and the mother was arrested but later released. The whole thing boils my blood.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 08:49 PM
23

I agreed to split time 50/50. Too late, I realized that time equals money. The more time he had with the kids, the less he was obligated to pay for child support. Literally admitting her highest priority is to use the kids to get more money. Kids spending time with their father is entirely pointless in her eyes.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 12:52 AM
26

so even if he's a minor he has to pay child support? Yep, such as this 13 year old rape victim
/r/MensRights03/02/24 03:47 AM
7

Also worth noting, even if such laws appear gender neutral, many places don't allow for the possibility of a female being legally defined as a rapist (as you already mentioned) so that would need to be changed as well.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 03:45 AM
7

From the article she will put forward a law that offers fathers the option to renounce their parental rights and the obligation to pay child support. “The woman, when she finds out that she is pregnant, has 15 days to notify the father and the father can decide if he is going to be responsible for the child or not.”
/r/MensRights19/01/24 01:47 AM
5

Makes sense, it's basically a form of propensity evidence which is usually not permitted.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 11:58 PM
3

My GF has explicitly said she'd welcome it if I woke her up with certain acts. I imagine quite a few partners out there would also say as much.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 09:06 PM
-70

This story has been reposted dozens if not hundreds of times. As one might expect for a case that's over a quarter of a century old. Not to say this wasn't a travesty of justice, it was. But unless it's still happening and you can bring up more recent examples, it's about as relevant as feminists bringing up women being unable to vote to support the idea of current sexism against women.
/r/MensRights19/07/23 12:31 AM
62

The so-called party of ‘family values’ has just contributed to erosion of the institution of marriage in Florida,” Pretty sure she did a lot more to erode her marriage by divorcing her husband.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 08:29 PM
1

Whether we have a selective service signup or not has absolutely nothing to do with if a draft will happen or is needed. It only makes it more organized if it does happen. So people arguing "Hur just get rid of SS" are stupid. Given that, it should be gender neutral. I also understand women are on average less physically capable than men, and that's relevant for many combat roles. But there are also plenty of other essential roles in the military that they could fill without their lack of physic…
/r/MensRights03/07/23 02:13 PM
1

When you plea you're still convicted, but typically it's to a lesser charge (otherwise why plea). So instead of going to trial and maybe being convicted of rape and 20 years in prison, they'll plea and take a conviction for sexual assault and 10 years in prison. And since a sexual assault conviction is not a rape conviction, they join the "99% of rapists" who were "not" convicted.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 01:03 PM
2

Typically they start with the assumption that 80% of rapes are unreported, and of the remaining 20% that are reported, 10% go nowhere because woman doesn't name anyone, lack of evidence, or recanting. Of the remaining 10% many will take a plea deal avoiding conviction on the specific charge of rape, and others will be found not guilty (but they totally were), and 1% will be found guilty and convicted of rape.
/r/MensRights27/05/23 02:50 PM
22

My wife had said that the woman started grabbing her to show her what I was doing to her and my wife had asked her to stop multiple times and she wouldn’t. Sounds like there was indeed an assault, but not by you.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 02:05 PM
1

Unfortunately, yes. A very diverse set of people with a diverse level of basic competency.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 09:22 PM
4

Said transgender activist is a mockery and caricature of a woman. They excitedly share news of their "period" and joyously randomly offer people, including teen and preteen girls, tampons.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 09:17 PM
54

I think I see who you're talking about, but with only eyes and a forehead I can't really say conclusively if they're a man or woman.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 02:50 AM
-2

Published 8:09 a.m. ET Sept 2, 2014. Nearly 9 years ago. They could stand to be a bit more current.
/r/MensRights06/04/23 10:18 PM
4

There is a world where someone invades us and we need to justifiably enact the draft. In such a world it is vastly preferable to have it organized ahead of time, and ideally in a gender neutral manner (though also with a mind towards physical requirements for various roles).
/r/MensRights21/02/23 03:22 AM
3

Side note, when dealing with sites like buzzfiend, link to an archive of the article. They often stealth edit once they receive backlash for their bigotry Don't want to direct extra traffic their way.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 03:59 PM
2

is telling that now that women can be forced to have babies, men can be up in arms about their own bodies being invaded in that way We've been up in arms and talking about this for over a decade. Most MRM are pro choice and wish that the same ability to choose to be a parent would be extended to men, as men have never had any sort of reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 06:15 PM
0

misscariages alredy are prosecuted That's a bit of a mischaracterization. The one example I've seen involved the mother smoking meth which caused the miscarriage.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 05:59 PM
-6

My issue is doing it in secret does precisely the opposite of normalizing it. And we don't know the likely outcome, this is a marriage, there should be a great deal of trust and understanding which should allow this. I've been open about my desires with my romantic partners and it's been received well enough from all of them. Though in fairness I did bring it up early in the relationship before any pregnancy occurred.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 12:32 PM
-2

That's part of the issue, we need to change the general cultural attitude around dna testing so it's no more accusatory to a woman's faithfulness as wearing a seatbelt is not insulting someone's driving ability.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 12:22 PM
-16

I'm fine with testing to be sure, men should enjoy the same certainty that women do. But it is concerning that you had to do it in secret. I would hope your wife, your life partner, would understand. I've told my GF that if we ever had a kid I would want them tested, and she's ok with it.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 11:25 AM
3

Yes and no. Reversals have a ~90% success rate if done within a few years of the procedure, and it starts going down with more time. 10% isn't all that rare, and any doctor will tell you to treat the decision as if it is permanent, because there is a good chance it will be.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 02:06 AM
1

I can't help but laugh at anyone proposing a sex strike, regardless of where they are. Any pro life man would obviously want the child raised in a stable home with two parents, aka marriage. Any pro life man in such a situation has a ~0% chance of being affected by any sex strike. How effective do they imagine threatening no sex is to a crowd that says no sex before marriage?
/r/MensRights27/06/22 05:58 PM
10

Being wrongly accused of rape is astonishingly rare. In fact, it rarely ever happens. The majority of sexual assault is not reported most of the time. Literally next to each other, right after the other. The double think is astounding.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 02:00 AM
3

Please use an archive site to avoid giving them traffic btw.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 12:30 PM
18

Rude, sure, but sexual harassment? Come on.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 01:45 PM
1

Restraining orders are granted like sugar. A restraining order is no proof of wrongdoing by a male Lied in your very first point. It wasn't just a restraining order, it was a FELONY ARREST WARRANT. Not gonna bother reading the rest, go stalk someone else.
/r/MensRights27/11/21 01:10 AM
1

Seems I have a stalker. You failed to address any of my points btw.
/r/MensRights27/11/21 01:01 AM
1

Why tf are they even hired then 😂 solely out of wokeism? They underbid the shit out of the competition. Recruiters help them cheat to get past the interview process (get questions and answers ahead of time, give them a script to go off of) And as far as speech goes, it's not just the accent, it's that they tend to talk SUPER fast. They'll talk faster than I normally do as a native english speaker. If they slow down it's no worse than any other non native speaker.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 03:52 AM
1

In many STEM fields there are actually a LOT of them. I (white male) have been outnumbered by Indians at some jobs while in the US, and even when not they're hardly a rare sight. And in my anecdotal experience which is not an excuse to discriminate against anyone, 90% of them are entirely incompetent and their speech unintelligible.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 10:17 PM
9

Yeah there's a big push for women is STEM fields and it's become acceptable sexism to denigrate men. I'm an engineer as well, and I was the only man on a development team at the health insurance company, which I will call Signa to keep things "anonymous". Manager would constantly make sexist remarks of "stupid men" and such, and wish she had a 100% female team. I kept religious notes and proof, but I was also a contractor, so when I was fired they acted as intermediaries and I could never show t…
/r/MensRights21/11/21 10:01 PM
1

A whole year and no fact checking? It's actually worse than I wrote above. There was an active restraining order because he assaulted her, and he was kidnapping the kids. Also we know he was going for a knife. Also the arrest warrant typically isn't granted with no evidence as OP's title claimed. And frankly his past is irrelevant to the police response anyways. He ignored orders to stop and went for something concealed. What if they didn't shoot and he turned around with his own gun? 100% justi…
/r/MensRights21/11/21 02:42 PM
27

whne the real reason your alive is cos of a women Women are the sole reason? They do it all on their own? I guess if your understanding of biology matches your spelling ability you may believe that.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 10:47 PM
14

Ah yes, not real feminism, real feminists are for equality.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 10:45 PM
6

Can I interest you in some Russia? Both sides are thoroughly inundated with fake news, though it's typically concentrated in different areas.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/21 03:03 AM
50

Something I saw elsewhere 5 Billion goes to the UN 999 Million gets lost mysteriously 1 Million for starving people but it's stolen by warlords and used for weapons
/r/MensRights02/11/21 11:31 PM
11

Hadn't heard of the yoga shooting, though looking it up now everything is saying he was a male supremacist/incel, nothing about men's right's even when included in the search. I wouldn't qualify Elliot as one either given he never mentions mens rights in that manifesto as you claim, he was simply an incel. Paul Elam, I direct you to lookup the definition of satire, though sure he's not the friendliest face of the movement. That all said I acknowledge there are extremists and denounce them. I do …
/r/MensRights21/10/21 05:25 PM
16

Extremists like the national organization of women who spend millions lobbying to directly support most of the things I listed?
/r/MensRights21/10/21 04:57 PM
21

Feminists? The people who protest and shut down suicide awareness talks via illegally pulling fire alarms? The people who fight against men getting equal custody? The ones who support lifetime alimony because they think women are incapable of supporting themselves? Who burn books they disagree with? The people that want to get rid of due process for rape trials while protecting false accusers? Are willing to out and out lie to try and get higher wages and more powerful positions? Fighting desper…
/r/MensRights21/10/21 02:56 PM
1

If stealthing is then so should this. The issue is it's very easy for the woman to say she "forgot" to take her BC pill that day, and it would be excessive to charge someone with something as serious as rape for something so small as forgetting a pill (which does legitimately happen, even if it's a bullshit excuse sometimes too). The real answer to this is to give men an opt out of parenthood just as women do. Search for financial abortion if you're unaware of what that is.
/r/MensRights18/10/21 04:44 PM
2

Well if you're dropping enough dough for a 4+ month long vacation right before intending to buy a house...
/r/MensRights14/10/21 09:36 PM
1

Article says she was traveling and vacationing for the entire summer.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 06:39 PM
1

Didn't notice that, but it's not really an appropriate analogy like that though as in your example she was present and undeniably a witness to the crime, where as in our actual story according to everyone involved the man paid with a declined card and promised to pay later (quite possibly out of earshot of her), and never did (and it's quite plausible she never realized he never went later to repay, assuming she knew in the first place, she didn't need to go with him to do so). In our actual sce…
/r/MensRights28/08/21 07:58 PM
0

She'd likely have to return the items as it's tantamount to receiving stolen goods, but no she'd face no legal punishment for her actions.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 03:56 PM
1

Eating is not a crime. Not paying for it is. The guy accepted that he was responsible for paying it, and she was not.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 03:54 PM
0

Again, it doesn't matter if she knew or not. She was not participating in the crime. He accepted responsibility to pay and did not, she did not.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 11:39 AM
0

Knowing about it != doing it. He was the one who accepted the responsibility to pay. He was the one who gave a declined card. He was the one who lied about coming back to pay.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 02:28 AM
3

Here is a few memes from my collection While not feminism specifically, this one is fun, showing that women abuse children roughly twice as often as men do
/r/MensRights18/08/21 06:37 PM
6

I have this bookmarked as a list of examples of feminism in action
/r/MensRights18/08/21 06:13 PM
6

Someone came out and accused David Bowie the day he died.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 02:24 AM
-1

I feel like some context is important here. Afghanistan isn't the US, and unlike here I'd say it's indisputable women are mistreated severely under Islam and are looking forward to quite a special hell. Not at all saying men are going to have a picnic either, but in the vast majority of cases women will have it worse. Also while it isn't an obligation of all men to fight and die to protect women, it was an obligation of the ANA, who were literally being paid to defend their country against the T…
/r/MensRights18/08/21 12:08 AM
2

Devils advocate here, and just going off of known facts from post and not speculation (like statistically she is more likely to have started the divorce, but we don't know so not considering it). 150/week is 7800/year, which isn't obscene, certainly not by the standard of many posts here, assuming there is no child support (22 years means kids are likely grown or almost). They've also been divorced for ~3.5 years, so the total which has been ordered to be paid is 27,300. He's over 20,000 behind.…
/r/MensRights16/08/21 01:13 PM
14

They're not too open with it, but it's what's been shared by automod and some sub mods
/r/MensRights07/08/21 11:40 AM
39

He's just following official reddit sitewide policy.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 09:43 PM
1

Reddit policy states that women/minorities are protected and can't be attacked or generalized, but specifically leaves out such protections for men/white people.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 01:15 AM
11

People keep saying FDS isn't banned despite their clear hatred against men, but fail to realize that reddit policy specifically allows hatred against men and white people, only being against hatred against women and minorities.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 01:02 AM
6

If it ends up affecting the boy for an extended amount of time, I'll file a complaint on his behalf and see how it shakes out. The longer you wait the weaker your case and the less chance of anything happening. Except perhaps causing an officer to target you, and without a meaningful complaint about them there is nothing to protect you from that.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 10:24 PM
9

Ad hominems are easier than addressing the argument. Most everyone does it, including MRAs at times. Just be careful to not fall into the trap yourself and be willing to call it out whenever you see it, ESPECIALLY amongst your own. It helps strengthen us to weed out reliance on fallacies.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 01:34 PM
2

Original video from nearly a decade ago which was edited and re-uploaded without accreditation from OP. Also just to be clear OP is indisputably peddling a false narrative here, just can't say for sure if it's ignorance or malicious lying, though given the circumstantial evidence I detailed elsewhere I'm fairly confident it is the latter.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 11:19 AM
17

“Over the last 18 years Kerry has had the chance to get a DNA test but as myself and Child Support could never get in contact with him, it never happened, and now he is coming out with accusations that are unfounded and untrue,” she said. They couldn't get in contact with him but they could charge him and suspend his passport? I call bullshit.
/r/MensRights28/07/21 06:17 PM
15

TLDR: It's their fault for believing women. Damn, talk about victim blaming.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 03:30 AM
1

Nice ad hominem. Come back in a few years It's already almost a decade old smart guy.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 02:28 AM
-1

Lol, I'm gonna be a villain of history for accusing OP of lying? An accusation which I am quite confident in the truthfulness of, and you have not actually disputed.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 01:50 AM
1

At least I'm an honest one.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 12:50 AM
0

When you abuse those who have a different opinion to yours, you lose the argument. Agreed, your needless condescension and baseless accusations in your initial response was evidence you had no argument. Nice meaningless fancy word salad. Just because you're willing to accept faulty arguments based on lies that weaken the MR position doesn't make it a good idea.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 01:32 PM
-2

My name isn't 'bucko'... Would dipshit be more accurate then? How so? "Feminists shut down a suicide awareness event meeting because it was male" Relevance? Because this sort of post isn't one that would be done by someone who actually was knowledgeable and sympathetic to MR. Any opposition could easily point to this sort of thing and say "Look at this highly upvoted post which is a provable lie, they deal in fantasy and propaganda" What 'movement'? Mens Rights isn't a 'movement'. Sure thing the…
/r/MensRights25/07/21 04:43 AM
-1

Slow down there bucko. We're on the same side here, though likely not the same as OP. OP is a throwaway account with zero activity until yesterday, lied about the reasoning, linked to a recently re-uploaded video, and failed to mention the true origin of the video. I refuse to accept such content just to try and further MR, and believe having such overall weakens the movement. Them why did feminists shut it down? Because it wasn't preaching the feminist approved narrative of "men did it to thems…
/r/MensRights25/07/21 01:10 AM
-2

This was like 10 years ago, it was a talk on why men commit suicide. It wasn't male only.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 07:19 PM
0

The church has come out and said except when performed for strictly therapeutic medical reasons, directly intended amputations, mutilations, and sterilizations performed on innocent persons are against the moral law. Which seems pretty clear to me.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 12:01 AM
2

a religious Christian Galatians 5:2, Mark my words! I, Paul, tell you that if you let yourselves be circumcised, Christ will be of no value to you at all.
/r/MensRights20/07/21 06:39 PM
7

It's from the administration for children and families, a government source. Here is a 2019 version showing the same thing on page 52
/r/MensRights16/07/21 03:33 PM
14

Feel free to show them this as well
/r/MensRights16/07/21 03:30 AM
3

He was guilty, but the only way we know that is because they violated his 5th amendment rights to not self incriminate.
/r/MensRights02/07/21 11:11 PM
-3

To play devils advocate, I know it's been shown that minorities are more likely smoke weed in public, thus making them more likely to be caught and arrested. Seems possible that there is a similar tendency for men to exhibit that same behavior.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 11:25 PM
9

Pretty much this. I wonder why boys with extraordinarily shitty parents are the only ones who deserve bodily autonomy.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 01:49 PM
1

Non reciprocal domestic violence is more commonly woman on man. But women are more likely to be killed from domestic violence. Regardless of numbers it can affect a man just as severely as it affects women and all cases should be treated equally regardless of gender of victim/perpetrator.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 05:10 PM
2

Quizzed on the proposed amendments, Women Against Rape (WAR) coordinator, Peggy Ramaphane welcomed the proposals stating that they are a good move for the government to increase sexual offence penalties since rape remains the country’s nightmare. However, Ramaphane advised that when investigating such matters, the police should make sure that they prove such false allegations beyond reasonable doubt. “I hope that this amendment would not make matters worse because the country is faced with a big…
/r/MensRights15/06/21 04:51 PM
3

Initially flustered and taken aback that someone challenged her, she tried to excuse it because she spends time dressing up and looking nice.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 11:28 AM
26

I ditches a female friend after she told me this I feel like eating out. I'm gonna flirt with some guy to get him to take me out. I told her I was disgusted with how she'd use someone like that and play with someone's feelings to get a free dinner out of it.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 10:15 PM
7

Women are more likely to be slut shamed or harassed by women. Therefor not an issue right?
/r/MensRights13/06/21 10:01 PM
7

I have it bookmarked for such occasions
/r/MensRights12/06/21 08:05 PM
1

A bit unrelated but Aflac is also a pyramid scheme. I was granted an interview, surprise surprise it was a group interview, where you have to pay a few hundred dollars to get an insurance salesman’s license before being sent door to door to sell insurance (or recruit other salesmen)
/r/MensRights11/06/21 11:01 PM
9

They also asked feminist subs, so shows a good cross section of communities they're polling.
/r/MensRights11/06/21 09:24 PM
10

Please do report back with how things go.
/r/MensRights11/06/21 09:23 PM
32

My understanding is while women are in more accidents men are in more serious (and therefor more expensive) accidents. And men driving more is irrelevant, it only matters the number of crashes during a coverage period. If men are a bigger drain on drivers insurance I’m ok with paying more. What I’m not ok with is the double standard with health insurance where ever since Obama they can’t charge women more despite them using more.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 03:15 AM
1

​Are we really going to let children starve just so you can stick it to those feminists? If the child is starving then it has an unfit parent and should be taken away and put up for adoption. Your "solution" would only further push women into having abortions, you know...that thing you say is murder. I never said it was murder. As I said in OP we're largely fine with abortion. And it wouldn't necessarily increase abortions either if it makes women more careful with contraception realizing she do…
/r/MensRights04/06/21 10:09 PM
1

Pay garnishments, tax refund seizes, property seizures, drivers licenses revoked, prison. Child support isn't unpaid because of lazy deadbeats, it's because women choose to keep a child knowing they can't pay for it themselves, knowing the man doesn't want to be a father but forcing him to finance her decisions regardless, are unwilling to share custody with men who do want to be fathers, and are often deadbeats themselves because if they worked then CS/alimony would be reduced. You know what wo…
/r/MensRights04/06/21 09:51 PM
0

Did you know that women ordered to pay support are far less likely to pay it than men? And despite that women are far less likely to actually be punished for it. There'd certainly be less support as well if there was more shared custody (not to mention children do better when they have time with both parents). Unfortunately feminists fight hard against this and have successfully gotten quite a few equal custody bills veto'd despite public support. As to the "suffering" of children, that would be…
/r/MensRights04/06/21 08:24 PM
1

I've accepted that women have the right to kill the child if decided early enough, and with that in mind feel it's fair for men to have the right to not have to pay for the child if decided early enough.
/r/MensRights04/06/21 07:44 PM
1

Doesn't hurt them as much as killing them.
/r/MensRights04/06/21 07:20 PM
10

That still has the issue of the mother having to go through a procedure she may not want. The general consensus amongst most (not all) MRAs is that womens rights to abortion are largely fine, and men should get a "financial abortion" option, where they are notified of the pregnancy (or child if birth has already happened) and then have a period of time in which they can decide to sign away all parental rights and responsibilities, including any obligation to pay child support.
/r/MensRights04/06/21 01:39 AM
-2

TBF all of the YTA judgements are because he kept this information from his fiance, which OP conveniently left out of his title.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 06:00 PM
2

Just because he wasn't charged doesn't mean it wasn't a crime. "The NRL has determined the player did not breach any other NRL rule nor is there any complaint about the conduct of the player." So he only broke one rule. That's still more than 0. The 'evidence' however was acquired by means of criminal activity meant to blackmail and/or defame therefore not admissible. Even if the evidence wasn't obtained legally (fruit of the poison tree therefor inadmissible) that doesn't mean a crime didn't oc…
/r/MensRights20/05/21 11:47 PM
1

After 2 seconds of googling If you are caught having sexual intercourse (or are caught with your genitalia exposed) in or within a public space or school, you are liable to punishment under section 5 of the Summary Offences Act 1988 (the Act) which can result in The maximum penalty for obscene exposure is a $1,100 fine or imprisonment for six months.
/r/MensRights20/05/21 09:39 PM
2

I did. Guy committed crime by having sex in public toilet, someone filmed it, sports commission is fining him because committing crimes violates the agreement he signed with them. What part of that is incorrect?
/r/MensRights20/05/21 08:59 PM
2

I don't know about Australia but in the US at least it's illegal to have sex in a public toilet. He's not being fined for being a victim, he's being fined because he broke the law and someone caught his illegal acts on video (assuming they have similar laws which seems likely)
/r/MensRights20/05/21 08:39 PM
6

Typically the loudest voices against outlawing it are those screaming religious freedom/anti semitism. Personally I feel religious freedom is a reason which supports the outlawing of it. Every person should have the religious freedom to decide for themselves if they partake in a religious ritual, especially one that permanently alters their body.
/r/MensRights13/05/21 12:16 AM
5

Coming to cases where even the mother didn't find out until late - Sorry hun, if she couldn't back off, neither can you. What if she did fine out, but didn't tell him, and lies? For that reason the deadline for men shouldn't be dependent on how far along the pregnancy but when he is informed of the pregnancy. Personally I'd say within 2 weeks is reasonable.
/r/MensRights12/05/21 01:42 AM
2

These are feminists. Do they sound like they're trying to achieve equality for women AND men?
/r/MensRights07/05/21 10:46 PM
2

They're here because we aren't as ban happy and looking to censor as they are. I'm happy about that, I'm ok facing some opposition.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 12:15 PM
54

TBF, two wrong don't make a right, and both of your actions are very obviously not appropriate for the work place.
/r/MensRights18/04/21 08:08 PM
1

Pick some examples from this. Personally I'd go for mentioning NOW blocking equal custody laws in Florida.
/r/MensRights10/03/21 01:28 PM
1

No response eh? Did you finally get someone else to read/explain your "source" to you and how you're a smooth brained retarded monkey? Worthless fucks like you are huge reason why the MRM isn't taken more seriously.
/r/MensRights03/03/21 01:04 PM
1

You literally don’t know how to read do you? As you still cannot reply with any link to any source. So I'll have to speculate. You mean the linkedin in your OP that you're taking issue with and calling hogwash? BTW I did see this harvard link in one of your posts that was not replying to me. Is that the "Harvard business review survey" you purport debunks the HP report? Please say yes.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 10:22 PM
1

Just because you say something is a fact doesn't make it so. Maybe the fact that you drink bleach has made you incapable of understanding that (see what I did there?). LinkedIn report and Harvard business review survey linked. Where did you link to these in your OP or in one of your replies to me?
/r/MensRights01/03/21 09:49 PM
6

IIRC is was bullshit questioning, just like the 5 in 1 women get raped stats they pull out of their ass. Questions they asked were things like "Would you have sex with a woman who had a glass of wine" and counted everyone who said yes as a potential rapist.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 09:33 PM
1

1 & 2 are pretty much the same thing, violence against men is more acceptable. I don't think that is in any way unique to anime. It's a common theme in all genres of media and has been for decades. RE. 3. Harem animes. Don't really need to say more, but I will. This sort of thing does cater to certain audiences, as does harems, and so long as there is variety and the trope isn't directly harmful (like permissive violence against men is) I don't take much issue with it. Women don’t even like thes…
/r/MensRights01/03/21 09:01 PM
0

You are clearly set in your view and no amount of evidence will change it Well I mean the amount of evidence and sources you've offered is zero, so yeah I don't find it all that persuasive. But ok sure.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 08:34 PM
0

What “conflicting” studies are you talking about? The Hewlett Packard study you already mentioned but dismissed because it conflicted with the harvard study (which you claimed was cited in the original link but wasn't). Here is an analysis of the HP report along with linkedin analytics I used it to mean a candidate deciding to apply or not based on whether they meet qualifications. Is that what the author also meant? That's why I noted the lack of definition in the article. The only thing here b…
/r/MensRights01/03/21 06:46 PM
0

No it doesn't. My point is vetting a position and applying without meeting the requirements are not mutually exclusive. It's entirely possible men do both things at higher rates than women. You gotta watch your bias. For example you have 2 conflicting studies and decided the one you agree with is sufficient to totally debunk the one you don't agree with.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 12:50 PM
1

I don't know if vetting is actually defined in there, but in my experience vetting has very little to do with the requirements. Taking myself as an example, I'll absolutely apply to something where I'm only matching 60-70% of the requirements. But should I get an interview, I will then research the company history and function, study for likely scenarios they might question or exam me on, look up the background of my interviewers, etc. That is vetting, and far more than most of my collogues do.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 12:23 PM
1

I recall a study a while back which showed that on average women won't apply to a job unless they meet 90%+ of the listed requirements, where as men will apply if they have 70%+ of the requirements. This explains everything in a sexism free way.
/r/MensRights28/02/21 10:53 PM
9

Underlying truth: Women makes roughly 77% as much as men make. Myth: Women make 77% as much as men make for the same work Reality: Women make 77% as much as men make while working different lower paying jobs with less hours The 77% number is achieved by comparing surgeons to teachers.
/r/MensRights26/02/21 04:24 AM
14

She's actually technically correct, it was originally coined by the Mythopoetic men's movement. BUUUUTTTTT the definition they had for it bares no resemblance what so ever to how it's used today. Toxic masculinity to them was masculinity that had been mutated into either overly feminized or overly aggressive destructive forms. This mutation occurred due to things like constant accusations of sexism, loss of male only spaces, female issues monopolizing all discussion and muting/shutting out male …
/r/MensRights23/02/21 12:10 PM
3

What is the precise context for this? Are these legal categorizations that someone could be charged with? Are these psychiatric categorizations for therapists? Are these from some random women's studies class for idiots? Given one of the examples of abuse is "Pouting" I have trouble believing these are actually applied anywhere meaningful.
/r/MensRights19/01/21 08:03 PM
3

There are some actions and positions of Biden and the left that we would absolutely oppose. For example Biden making being a minority woman a requirement to be his running mate will definitely get a lot of flak from most people here. But just because you’re a Biden supporter doesn’t mean you endorse everything he’s ever done, and so long as you can see the nuance and criticize him when he deserves it on sexist behavior like my example, then you’re perfectly welcome here. Also worth noting that t…
/r/MensRights13/01/21 11:07 PM
27

Women live longer, so if we were to base it off that (not saying that we should) then men should get to retire earlier than women so they each have the same average percentage of their lives working and retired.
/r/MensRights31/12/20 04:28 AM
0

Fled the country? How could a police find him from the pizza delivery fiasco if he fled the country? Because there are police in more than 1 country, and extradition treaties are a thing. He fled from the UK to the US, did you bother to read the article? And why are you using a word like 'fled' to describe the father? Because he was ordered to hand over the child to the child's grandparents by a judge, and instead he defied the court order to flee the country.
/r/MensRights31/10/20 01:50 PM
0

Back in June, Yvette was staying with her father, Virgil Henley, but a court would rule that she was in danger, and guardianship was granted to her grandparents, Gary and Kim Forester in Hesperia. Any more details on this? If he fled the country there may be some truth to that.
/r/MensRights31/10/20 03:38 AM
3

I think there isn't even any part of masculinity you can definitely say is toxic, life has too many variables. For example blind rage one might instinctively say is toxic and negative. But what if it's rage at a grave injustice and drives you to solve that injustice? There are scenarios where any aspect of masculinity is the proper and ideal response.
/r/MensRights28/10/20 02:19 AM
2

Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, brothers, and sons in combat. Hillary Clinton.
/r/MensRights24/10/20 02:53 PM
3

There is relatively little room for opinion on the matter. We have the facts.
/r/MensRights14/10/20 12:24 AM
5

It's a quote from Hillary Clinton
/r/MensRights18/09/20 02:59 AM
12

You're thinking about it wrong. Just as women have been the primary victims of war, women have lost husbands, fathers, brothers, to covid.
/r/MensRights17/09/20 08:15 PM
0

Nice red herring. We're talking about Jacob Blake, not Breonna Taylor. Stop being so quick to use a gun and shoot others. Stop repeating bullshit talking points that I've debunked multiple times for you. I'm done, no point talking to a willfully blind zealot.
/r/MensRights27/08/20 02:31 AM
1

This is not a case where they gunned him down the instant he failed to obey their first order. vs Are you seriously still trying to justify police shooting people because they don't immediately fall at the officers feet? Reading is hard. Shooting a suspect should be done rarely, It is rare. There's over 50 million police interactions per year. Roughly 1000 of them aka 0.00002% of them result in a fatal encounter for the suspect. Also fun fact according to the FBI’s Uniform Crime Report 2018 LEOK…
/r/MensRights27/08/20 02:13 AM
1

Let him go and follow him to arrest him later? He had a felony warrant out for his arrest BEFORE his trespassing. You really want police to just let that kind of person go to try and arrest him later using either the same means that failed or allowing him to present a deadly threat to them? What if later was 3 seconds later when he pulled a gun on them? Or if he just got in the car and tried to run them/one of the bystanders down? But hey, good to know if you ever get your way I can commit whate…
/r/MensRights27/08/20 01:56 AM
0

What would you suggest they had done at that point?
/r/MensRights27/08/20 01:22 AM
1

They had tried grappling him, he broke away. They tried tasing him, and it had no effect. They were actively trying to hold him back until he was seconds away from potentially aquiring a gun and killing them. What would you suggest they had done at that point? Also keep in mind Blake has admitted to having a knife in his possession at the time, and the officers were told of his violent history (which included assaulting officers) by dispatch so grappling/holding him is already a big risk for the…
/r/MensRights27/08/20 01:04 AM
2

I wouldn't celebrate anyone getting shot, but I also believe, barring some pretty extreme unknown information, this is 100% justified. Police were called because he was called in by someone saying he was trespassing and had stolen their car keys. He wrestled with police and while ignoring (and allegedly threatening) the police he dove into a car where he could easily either 1. Retrieve a weapon or 2. Turn the car into a weapon.
/r/MensRights26/08/20 08:48 PM
1

Ah yes, the true feminists
/r/MensRights24/08/20 01:50 PM
1

Yer a bit late there mate
/r/MensRights16/08/20 11:45 PM
9

Was a single digit pixel count really all you could spring for?
/r/MensRights08/08/20 03:05 PM
3

Anything and everything. 9/11, holocaust, the great leap forward, etc. Yes, all were utterly horrific acts of unspeakable evil, but humor Helps us deal and cope with it Makes it easier to share these topics, which is good because it keeps them in our recent memory. This is a big one. An alarming number of people don't even know about male suicide being such a big issue, and posts like the tiktok this thread is about helps inform people. Similarly while the depravity of nazism is well known and t…
/r/MensRights30/07/20 12:06 AM
9

Personally I think it should be ok to joke about anything and everything. Suicide, rape, pandemics, murder, etc. The biggest issue is is it actually a joke made in humor, or a veiled threat/hope for harm.
/r/MensRights29/07/20 11:07 PM
2

Misogyny/hatred of women aren't tenants of mgtow, though if we're being honest they do probably attract a higher than average number of men who do hold those beliefs. Aside from the "misogynist" part that is actually a fairly decent definition. I'd probably also replace "destroyed by feminism" to be "setup to benefit women at the expense of men". And I personally don't see feminists as having started most of the aspects of that society, though they have started some and others they work to maint…
/r/MensRights27/07/20 02:27 PM
1

Being ignored is bullying? Wow I wish my bullies went that route instead.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 11:56 AM
7

Exactly. The man still pays even though it's the woman who cheated and lied.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 11:56 AM
30

Unlikely. He was also suing CPS for corruption and endangerment of children. If it was a wack job seems more likely it'd come from that direction.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 12:17 AM
6

He didn't say far right, he said right wing, which it is. It's funny as well, but no need to deny it certainly focuses more on taking (well deserved) shots at the left.
/r/MensRights09/06/20 02:11 PM
6

Wouldn't surprise me either, but I'd rather not assume things.
/r/MensRights04/06/20 08:06 PM
20

It reads Conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud vs Conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud and honest services wire and mail fraud Not a lawyer, not familiar with this case, and I'm not aware of what "honest services" means but it seems like he pleaded guilty to two seperate things while she only pleaded guilty to one. Can anyone with more knowledge on the subject explain where/if I'm wrong?
/r/MensRights04/06/20 05:14 PM
8

Might we get some context? What was the reported content?
/r/MensRights29/05/20 11:27 AM
2

As they say, any publicity is good publicity. Plus I'm not one to get my panties in a bunch over some comedy. Everyone and everything should be the subject of ridicule some times.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 01:14 PM
3

sub with 1k subs Don't need to wonder, read the comments. Yes. Both ways around yes Yes and if a woman falsely accused a man she should go to jail to
/r/MensRights10/04/20 03:45 AM
-12

Seems like most of the YTA voting people did so because they think it's fake.
/r/MensRights18/03/20 01:56 PM
3

Its r/adultery. By definition it is a sub for garbage humans.
/r/MensRights02/03/20 10:47 AM
3

People here will complain about this exact thing being said on Father’s Day for single moms. Let’s keep the hypocrisy down eh.
/r/MensRights02/03/20 10:19 AM
1

Or we could be embroiled in ww3 with the next hitler. It’s stupid to operate on hypotheticals.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 05:44 PM
0

It's how it should be. Sucks for the father but it's the lesser of two evils. We should raise men up to have equal rights to opt out of parenthood, not try to bring women down to have equal lack of rights to opt out.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 02:38 PM
2

So if a woman forgets to take the pill that’s a mans fault? So women are incapable of something so simple as taking a pill without a man holding her hand?
/r/MensRights14/02/20 10:31 PM
3

It has been removed because it's allegedly fake.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 08:14 PM
5

The thing is they're not really the extremists. If anything, you're the radical that is outside the feminist norm. I'll offer you this quote for Karen Straughan aka Girl Writes What Listen, if you want to call yourself a feminist, I don't care. I've been investigating feminism for more than 9 years now, and people like you used to piss me off, because to my mind all you were doing was providing cover and ballast for the powerful political and academic feminists you claim are just jerks. And beli…
/r/MensRights10/02/20 09:08 PM
5

I think the biggest difference between the MRM and feminism is actually definitions. Feminism seems to see equality as things like equality of outcome and women favored legislation to "make up" for past wrongs against women. The MRM would rather have equality of opportunity and just ending sexism in legislation. One of the other critiques of feminism is frankly a lack of empathy and cherry picking. As an example, domestic violence. Feminism portrays it as an entirely or primarily gendered proble…
/r/MensRights10/02/20 08:53 PM
3

Politicians shape actual laws and policy. Feminists ideas aren't satirical and reflect common realities for many men. Both of those are substantially more impactful than some rando saying how they get guys to pay for a meal. Really one of my main gripes about it is how much it's clogging up the sub because it is such low hanging fruit.
/r/MensRights08/02/20 11:17 PM
3

I read it as, to win custody the woman has to be a fire breathing monster and turning the child into one as well.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 01:33 PM
1

Because if you look at the title of the post we’re looking at the gender of the perpetrator rather than the victim.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 03:32 PM
2

Why can't they see that excluding an entire gender is equal representation of men and women?
/r/MensRights30/01/20 10:21 PM
3

The child rape stats come from the Administration for Children & Families.. The sources for the first pic are listed in the pic itself.
/r/MensRights26/01/20 03:20 PM
2

Assuming you mean the in reddit preview. That can happen with albums with multiple images.
/r/MensRights26/01/20 01:40 PM
7

The rapist and pedophile statistics are especially madeup
/r/MensRights25/01/20 09:57 PM
3

Dr Kellog actually, at least for non jews in the US. He suggested it as an anti masturbation measure. He also suggested sulfuric acid on the clit for girls for the same reason. A shame the former wasn't rejected as the latter was.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 03:09 AM
1

The description is at odds with the title, saying the father's family called the police due to the mother and her family threatening violence and refusing to comply with a court order. "New York--- On January 1, 2020, 10-year-old #MinaiiHenry lost her battle with #Osteoscarcoma She had only been diagnosed in early August 2019. While friends and family began to mourn, Minaii's father had no idea his daughter was gone. Much like her sudden diagnosis, #LeonHenry was left out of his daughter's last …
/r/MensRights16/01/20 06:30 PM
2

Seems like a troll to me.
/r/MensRights13/01/20 07:12 PM
3

You got downvoted for spamming the thread. 6/16 of the replies were you. Being obnoxious about it doesn't help the cause.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 09:58 PM
1

And it's still too harsh for the feminists.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 05:03 PM
3

It would actually make the patriarchal "wage gap" worse. Woman can do these jobs, but not in enough numbers at current wage levels. Meanwhile if we're doubling the number of women there would be massive overflow of things like teachers. So current female dominated jobs would plummet in wages while male jobs would soar.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 07:03 PM
1

They can occasionally, but typically if I debate someone I’m not trying to convince my adversary, I’m convincing any undecided people watching.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 02:52 AM
2

Dismissing someone has never changed anyone’s mind. Listen to and counter their points.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 08:46 PM
-14

So delete
/r/MensRights26/12/19 02:16 PM
-4

If you don’t know who she is how can you know enough to say she didn’t deserve it? My take on the situation is idgaf.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 07:26 AM
7

It can be wrong for multiple reasons. While consent is certainly a major (and arguably the primary) reason to oppose it, the fact that it’s an irreversible change away from the natural body is also very relevant. As an example to showcase the difference, deaf people. Many choose not to get cochlear implants because they prefer to be deaf and parts of the deaf community. However I wouldn’t fault any parent for getting them for their deaf child when they’re too young to consent, because being able…
/r/MensRights29/10/19 09:25 PM
4

NOW says that while spending millions to oppose shared parenting laws. It’s a standard pairing for them.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 09:51 AM
27

Imposition of equal time, joint custody presumptions or equal shared parental responsibility Feminists are saying including parental alienation would lead to the above quoted section, and that's a reason to not do it. They're literally point blank saying they're against equality and shared parental responsibility.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 02:22 AM
1

This is such a terribly sad story. It says they tried to move the children to the father but failed, which I’m guessing means they ran away and/or physically protested to an extreme degree.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 11:46 AM
2

I don’t deny that they’re sexist and a shit sub, but dismissing false accusations as rare/not a serious problem is very different from actively promoting them. They can still be shitty sexist people and not promote false accusations. But yeah 1 minute old post that’s been deleted pretty sure it’s fake.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 11:34 AM
1

How does them saying it’s obviously fake lend credence to it being real? Can you see the post or was it deleted?
/r/MensRights23/10/19 11:27 PM
3

Interesting that you managed to catch that within 1 minute of posting.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 10:11 PM
12

Others have given a fairly good rundown. I’d like to add a bit about why we’re anti-feminist when “it’s just about equality”. Go to r/feminism, and make a post titled “I’m an MRA but I’d like to learn more about feminism”, and then same body with MRA and feminist switched. Compare the responses you get here vs there. Disclaimer: you may want to use a throwaway account. There’s a million reasons and examples I could tell you, but I think the exercise above will be more effective as it’s first han…
/r/MensRights22/10/19 12:28 PM
2

I don’t see how that’s fair at all. Even if criminalizing drugs is stupid (and it often is), it’s publicly known and agreed to by users that if they do drugs and caught they’ll potentially go to prison for up to Y time. The issue with Kamala is she violated that agreement by surpassing Y.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 05:54 PM
2

Prosecutors and politicians like to make a name for themselves. So they want to propose and prosecute people for sex crimes and dui, but there’s already laws against those and there aren’t that many happening, so they throw in public urination in their “stop sex crimes act” that no one will read more than the title and then boast about how they successfully prosecuted thousands of sex offenders (obviously leaving out that all they did was public urination). That’s the why and how of it. It’s pre…
/r/MensRights18/10/19 05:16 PM
3

They can be, but frequently aren’t due to women’s groups claiming it would dissuade victims from coming forward. And you should look into how they got 75% (or 20% or 50% or 90%, all numbers I have seen plus many more). They’re often limited sample size, leading questions, and misinterpreted answers. As an example here is some wording/questions I’ve personally seen on some of the rape surveys that I looked into. Here is our sexual assault survey for you to fill out. The more people who say they w…
/r/MensRights18/10/19 04:12 PM
2

It would make no sense to work like that. Once the accused is shown as not guilty, they could then choose to go after the accuser and themselves prove that they made a malicious false accusation. It’s entirely possible (and most likely) that there wouldn’t be enough evidence to meet the burden of “beyond a reasonable doubt” and that both would be not guilty and walk free.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 03:15 PM
4

You got me. Makes about as much sense as giving someone a dui because they chose to sleep and not drive while drunk. But both happen.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 03:13 PM
5

Shh, don’t point out how they conflate the two to increase numbers. Also don’t point out that these “studies” that determine unreported rapes count rapes where the “victim” doesn’t consider themselves raped just because they had a sip of beer in the same week.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 03:09 PM
3

That 10% determined to be faked is what was proved beyond a doubt in court or via confession. Care to guess how many are proved to be real? Why, it’s 10% (which btw is very similar to the conviction rate of most other crimes). That leaves 80% of cases where we don’t know one way or the other, though if it follows the trend of the cases where we do know then it’s around 50/50.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 03:05 PM
1

I had a similarly abusive mother, though I don’t think I ever blamed/classified all women as that, and was never scared of women. I am however quiet aware that women can be like that, and I’m vigilant in looking for signs of it. I believe that is the healthier and proper takeaway from growing up as we did, but I know it’s certainly not as easy as it may sound. What may help is to try and “study” and “profile” certain women you casually know (coworkers would work best probably) and that’ll help y…
/r/MensRights13/10/19 12:59 AM
4

With the wonder of no-fault divorce things like cheating are not taking into consideration at all when filing for child support, alimony, or custody.
/r/MensRights12/10/19 02:48 AM
3

Wow, at 80k a year they’re expecting you to work 66 hours a week.
/r/MensRights12/10/19 02:44 AM
8

The percentage of homeless men and the percentage of women only homeless shelters. Also the number of deaths caused by prostate and breast cancer versus the amount of funding given to each.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 08:03 PM
3

He said there is a female version.
/r/MensRights09/10/19 01:34 PM
10

A lawsuit over an app name?
/r/MensRights09/10/19 01:31 PM
8

LMAO, there is SO much projection in that post it's amazing.
/r/MensRights02/10/19 02:46 PM
8

Got a source for that? That's my first time hearing that.
/r/MensRights27/09/19 03:43 AM
1

She's (partially) correct though, women do care more about who finds them which is one of several reasons they choose pills. There's also vanity in there as they want a "pretty corpse". Men and women are different and make different choices for different reasons, and depending on the situation those reasons aren't always flattering for men or women. Hormones effect how each behaves and feels, that's science. We don't want to be a mirror of feminists who think women are perfect and do no wrong. W…
/r/MensRights27/09/19 03:42 AM
0

100% agree. Banning words is stupid.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 05:27 PM
1

Worst is subjective. For me the worst part of bullying was a cracked skull and concussion (which ironically was inflicted by a girl throwing rocks at me).
/r/MensRights17/09/19 04:44 PM
-1

So you're just going to assume that half of all depressed men are never diagnosed (or more if you don't assume all depressed women are diagnosed)? Do you also believe that rapes are actually 10x higher because "90% of rape victims never report it"? Sorry, I'll stick to actual known numbers and not shit randomly pulled out of your ass.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 03:57 PM
-1

Women have a greater fear of pain. They also want to leave a "pretty corpse" and also want to avoid overly traumatizing whoever finds them. This all leads them to choose pills over a gun/knife.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 02:45 PM
0

Well I wouldn't know that because OP cherry picked two sentences and didn't provide a source. I see he says "the 2nd result in google" which means he's either stupid or intentionally hiding the source given that results change depending on the persons search history, location, if they have Alexa recording every word they say, etc. So since I haven't seen the source I won't comment on it. I will however note that while it's true men successfully commit suicide more, women attempt it more, which i…
/r/MensRights17/09/19 02:14 PM
0

People whining about "bossy" were stupid. People whining about "aggressive" are equally stupid. They're words, they describe things, so long as it's an accurate usage it's fine. Scratch that, whining about aggressive is worse, because it doesn't even carry a negative connotation much of the time. "He aggressively pursued his studies". I can't really think of bossy being used in a positive light.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 02:06 PM
1

That's one specific and narrow area of violence. Overall men are more violent, that's the facts. As to why it flips in relationships, I'd say it's likely because of cultural influences where woman on man violence in relationships is portrayed not as violence but as humor.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 02:02 PM
1

That's one specific and narrow area of violence. Overall men are more violent, that's the facts. As to why it flips in relationships, I'd agree with you that it's likely because of cultural influences where woman on man violence in relationships is portrayed not as violence but as humor. relationships between girls are notoriously passive-aggressive That is BECAUSE women are less violent. When you have a disagreement or distaste for someone you'll have to solve that by some means. Because women …
/r/MensRights17/09/19 02:01 PM
1

Because women choose less effective/recoverable means. Women attempt suicide far more than men, but due to fear of pain, wanting to leave a "pretty corpse", not wanting to traumatize whoever finds them, they're more likely to use something like pills over a gun.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 01:57 PM
-2

the idea that women are more likely to have depression and anxiety, which simply isn't true. Yes it is true, you're wrong
/r/MensRights17/09/19 01:48 PM
655

They are, because testosterone is a thing. On the flip side women typically are higher in neuroticism which leads to the depression and anxiety. The sexes are different and hormones effect how each behaves and feels, that's science. We don't want to be a mirror of feminists who think women are perfect and do no wrong.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 03:31 AM
1

There’s the possibility that a doctor could offer medical services in exchange for sex. This is exploitative and could be sexual abuse. To prevent this there is a blanket rule that doctors may not have sexual relations with patients. There is no exemption for spouses, and there’s generally not much will to make any because for most medical procedures it’s a terrible idea to treat a close relation because that can compromise your judgement.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 08:59 PM
12

The suspension is likely a result of zero tolerance policies (it says she was punished as well) and not outright sexism. There is of course a (imo strong) argument to be made that zero tolerance is sexist in its nature though. How everyone ignored the bully and did nothing until he was forced to defend himself is certainly disgusting.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 10:12 PM
1

I might have an unpopular opinion here, but I think there's situations where it's warranted, and this (depending on the nature of the company) could easily be one. As a receptionist you are a face of the company put out there to represent the company, and I think it's obvious that they would want that person to look a certain way. Like you wouldn't want an obese person as a gym receptionist. By a similar token you probably don't want a guy as a receptionist (or waiter) for hooters. And you might…
/r/MensRights31/08/19 11:46 PM
5

Even if you accept that made up BS definition, she literally says she took that power, fulfilling the requirements.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 07:22 PM
4

I’d suggest they have a march in a full business suit in the hot summer.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 01:35 AM
4

Tbf it appears that he didn’t mention having to share a room in his OP but updated it later. Most of the posts accusing him of being the asshole were from before the update.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 04:20 AM
2

Good on razer for dropping her. She certainly deserves that at least. I would like to note and add though that she did not deserve the dox, harassment, or threats. That is not at all what we are about.
/r/MensRights27/06/19 10:18 AM
0

Did you miss the part where their PM was pressured into resigning over brexit? Or how except for Londonistan every region voted in favor of brexit.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 02:43 PM
3

Especially with family the only way to win is not to play. Neither of you will convince the other, save yourself the shouting matches.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 05:25 AM
12

Will he remain after brexit though? Makes sense to me that he’d have to leave since Britain will no longer be a part of European Union.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 04:43 AM
1

That is entirely irrelevant to wether circumcision makes ulcers more likely (not guaranteed) or not.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 05:22 AM
5

Is there still any causal correlation between circumcision and ulcer infection though? Could it be circumcision causes ulcer which causes hiv vulnerability?
/r/MensRights25/05/19 05:34 PM
1

Large sample sizes are a bad thing now? Holy fuck are you stupid. Speaking of which, let's do some simple math. So 67,000 females were sexually assaulted in 2013. Let's be generous and take the most extreme radical claim that only 1 in 5 are reported to police, so the number we're working with is 268,000. This is also assuming that 100% of those crimes listed as sexual assault are rape. At a 5% rate, assuming no birth control was used by either party, no plan b, all rapists finishing inside, and…
/r/PussyPass19/05/19 01:54 PM
1

Wrong. The lowest estimate for adult women starts at 5% and goes up to over 30% in some areas Nice sources you have there. I see different numbers. But sure, just assume that 200% of rapes are unreported to justify your "thinking". Are you willing to accept abortion being illegal if the law makes exceptions for cases of rape/incest/life of the mother No. So rape/incest/life of the mother is therefor irrelevant to your argument as to why abortion should be legal. Why are you focusing so much on i…
/r/PussyPass19/05/19 04:55 AM
1

I'm not dismissing it, I'm saying it doesn't warrant the irrational paranoia that you are promoting which probably results in more deaths than medical malpractice. How about you though? Aside from trying to scare black people away from the doctor so they die, why bring this up? Are you willing to accept abortion being illegal if the law makes exceptions for cases of rape/incest/life of the mother (which combined account for less than 1% of abortions)? Because if you're not then it's entirely irr…
/r/PussyPass18/05/19 09:45 PM
2

You're the one saying that it's extremely dangerous when it is more likely you'd die from a lawn mower or a falling tree.
/r/PussyPass18/05/19 07:47 PM
1

Of course they are, that's why I encourage them to get medical help when it's needed and don't fear monger and tell them to avoid medical professionals.
/r/PussyPass17/05/19 11:01 PM
2

TIL .017% chance of death is "extremely dangerous". If 700 deaths a year is so terrifying I'm guessing you don't ride in any automobiles, which causes 40k deaths a year, or sleep in a bed since between accidental falls and suffocation cause over 20k, or go near farms as agricultural machinery causes 4k, or stand between two large objects as being squished is nearly 2k, or be near a tree which could fall on you as it does for 1.4k, or go near a lawn mower which is nearly 1k. You ever think that t…
/r/PussyPass17/05/19 10:12 PM
1

Generally the support is taken evenly from each paycheck. His next paycheck will be similarly pathetic.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 10:45 PM
21

“Name calling of women online has risen over 21% over previous levels, compared to just 11% for men. We must fight this sexist injustice” -feminists who like to mangle statistics for their own gain.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 12:50 PM
1

It’s a joke. Obviously. You don’t need to find it funny but you shouldn’t sink to their level and waste energy getting all butthurt over a joke.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 11:20 PM
1

You're the one who brought up UBI as a defining marker of marxism. I merely corrected your assertion that milton freedman supported UBI and clarified the difference between that and NIT. Personally I'd say much more telling is his support of the green new deal. Andrew Wang is the only candidate I've ever seen that actually took any men's rights position This specific mens rights position maybe. Plenty of other issues have some support, such as Trump and Devos being against campus kangaroo courts…
/r/MensRights21/03/19 06:33 PM
2

NIT is basically just removing the government restrictions on how people spend their assistance which they get under certain circumstances. It represents a reduction in government. UBI is universal regardless of circumstances, and with the price tag being hundreds of times higher represents a massive increase in government. Yeah it's massively different.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 03:03 AM
1

He never said nothing else matters, or that even circumcision is his only deciding factor. Personally I'd say that's the most important position for me from an MRA standpoint, but not big enough to be worth a single issue vote. Even if he said he was committed to outlawing it, which he didn't, it wouldn't be enough to get me to vote for him with his numerous other stances I oppose.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 02:17 AM
2

Except he didn't. He proposed a negative income tax for only people below the poverty line as basically a replacement for food stamps, housing assistance, etc. Not remotely close to UBI.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 02:13 AM
8

I don't like trying to do the oppression olympics of who has it worse, especially with the many types of both FGM and MGM. It doesn't matter if murder is worse than breaking someones legs, they're both causing harm and illegal. Similarly it doesn't matter if FGM is worse than MGM, they're both causing harm and should be illegal.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 04:23 PM
7

Can't bear to be in the same room as son is getting tortured and cut on, asks why more people aren't getting their sons tortured and cut on...
/r/MensRights14/02/19 06:15 AM
1

It was also posted to r/relationship_advice, and the story was inconsistent between the two and in the comments. One of those discrepancies for example was in one he claimed she merely threatened to cry rape, in the other he claims she actually went through with it and screamed rape.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 04:16 AM
-1

As the person you replied to explained but apparently you are incapable of remembering or figuring out yourself, the poster is satirizing people who argue they don't want insurance to cover birth control for women. The issue with only issuing it to people with PMS/bad periods is it's easily abusable as they can just claim to their doctor they have them. Also arguing whether or not it's a disease is pointless/disingenuous. They can be just as or more debilitating as many diseases and have a cure …
/r/MensRights01/02/19 01:41 AM
-1

absolutely no man wants erectile dysfunction. PMS is an actual disease, which is alleviated by some birth controls (as well as helping normal period issues). Absolutely no woman wants PMS or super bad periods.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 11:19 PM
1

when Kevin Spacey was accused, plenty of conservatives ate it up Sure, because 1. he admitted it 2. his hilarious deflection of "but i'm gay". I'm pretty sure a bunch of conservatives jumped on the "James Gunn is a pedo!" Pretty sure but likely wrong. Personally I recall hearing so much as a peep about it. I actually had to look it up right now as I had never heard of it. Pizzagate. Really? Now you're bringing memes into this? Conservatives are obsessed with trying to prove people are pedos. Exa…
/r/MensRights12/01/19 03:39 AM
2

you were trying to paint the left as against due process Was I? Well with the power of reading we can go back and see that I said "opposing due process in alleged sexual misconduct cases" Because those jobs suck? So you only want equality when it suits you. Got it. Glad you admit you're cherry picking. Notable exception though, pharmaceuticals doesn't suck at all, its not physically strenuous, high paying, and dominated by women. Imagine thinking this disproves sexism against women in the workpl…
/r/MensRights12/01/19 12:57 AM
1

Also, a poll found 82% of republicans support torturing terrorist suspects, significantly more than democrats: And I would disagree with that, an opinion not shared by the majority of either party. However this is not a gender issue and there's no overlap with MRAs on the issue. Gauntanamo Bay Same answer as above. I'll also add though that Obama had both the house and the senate, if he actually wanted to get it closed he could have. To me affirmative action is just a temporary placeholder that …
/r/MensRights11/01/19 11:40 PM
2

Making men's rights a partisan issue That is unfortunate, but in a world where the only thing needed to decide that kavanaugh is guilty is a (D), that's what we are. as if conservatives never push harmful stereotypes against men I never said that was the case. What comes to mind right away is conservatives being by and large the ones against women in combat roles or a gender neutral draft, both of which I (and I'm sure the vast majority of his sub) am for and am opposed to the conservative view …
/r/MensRights11/01/19 09:57 PM
3

Do you disagree with anything that I said?
/r/MensRights11/01/19 09:11 PM
6

It's men's rights obviously. However, many of the lefts current central tenants are directly opposed to mens rights. Things like discriminatory hiring practices, opposing due process in alleged sexual misconduct cases, etc. The right/conservatives also oppose there therefore there is a lot of overlap, and I'm sure there's some people who wouldn't identify as MRAs who still want to defend due process who join with MRAs in that common goal.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 08:05 PM
1

I can't find anyone convicted or charged for too much birth control. Only for not using it when saying they are. I'll copy paste what I said. Generally it's the other way around but the principal is the same, consent to one is not consent to the other. The original argument was about rape by deception. We're talking about something else. So lying is something else from deception? STDs STDs and trans are both biologically and physically linked to sex and whether someone is STD positive or trans b…
/r/MensRights12/10/18 04:16 AM
2

'I'm married to someone else' is a huge one and we don't require that be disclosed to avoid rape by deception. Everything you bring up is in the same category. Marriage is not biologically or physically linked to sex at all, it's a social construct. And even within that construct some people have open marriages. Procreation, homosexual sex, and stds, are all obviously directly linked to sex.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 04:07 AM
5

Which would imply that you need to disclose if you're on hormone birth control Yes, you should. People have been convicted of rape for being untruthful about their birth control status. Generally it's the other way around but the principal is the same, consent to one is not consent to the other. It doesn't even need to be religious reasons, it could be a personal moral code. It doesn't matter why they came to those beliefs, only that they not be casually tossed aside. Choose your partners wisely…
/r/MensRights12/10/18 03:53 AM
2

Some people believe that sex is purely for procreation. Or similarly they only want to have sex with a long term partner and the ability to procreate is a dealbreaker in that. Others think that gender is purely biological and it's a sin to sleep with those biologically male. I know homosexual sex has a higher risk for STDs, I don't know if that carriers over into people who got SRS and then has homosexual sex but it's possible. Those are all pretty major and for some one could make an argument t…
/r/MensRights12/10/18 03:20 AM
2

The audio is in english.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 12:02 AM
5

Given how many posts we've JUST had complaining about people trying to co opt fathers day, this seems super hypocritical.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 01:58 PM
10

Both, and both agree. In the name of religious freedom people, including babies, should not have to endure others forcing religious rituals on them.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 06:15 PM
3

From what I gather it’s really inconsistent and depends a lot on the troop leaders. BSA has pretty strict guidelines on what each troop should be doing and have a process in place to ensure the troop leaders are capable of providing a true scouting experience. GSA not so much.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 01:16 PM
1

Why not? Women do it, and it's probably better than unwanted pregnancy. Your article even mentions that it doesn't cause any serious side effects. There's obviously a lack of specific information here, but it's certainly better to have an option than to not.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 04:21 AM
-11

He got 3 months for the disturbing the peace with a toy gun plus 18 for the meth. Both were worthy of prison time to the judge.
/r/PussyPass02/01/18 04:54 AM
-4

He got 3 months for the disturbing the peace with a toy gun plus 18 for the meth. Both were worthy of prison time to the judge.
/r/PussyPass02/01/18 04:52 AM
3

https://i.redd.it/fw3nwc8f2q301.jpg
/r/MensRights14/12/17 12:02 AM
3

Consider contacting F.I.R.E. seems right up their alley. Also, on what grounds did they claim you were suspended?
/r/MensRights05/12/17 03:18 AM
8

BSA is specifically tailored to the needs of boys, which is good and vital to be as effective as possible. What I worry about here are the inevitable complaints that it doesn't accommodate girls enough and with the following force changes the boys lose what makes BSA such a precious experience for them.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 09:18 PM
3

I support banning infant circumcision to promote religious freedom (among other reasons). It is not religious freedom to have a religious surgery forced upon you. One should be able to choose for themselves.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 02:49 PM
5

This. Also something to speak to the character of the father. While incompetent mothers are certainly often chosen over competent fathers, that's not every case and this particular one the father could have been as bad or worse.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 10:30 PM
1

I'll add an example
/r/MensRights11/06/17 03:30 AM
2

Precisely. All we know of these women is that they are cunts.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 04:26 AM
3

Very true. In a way they're playing off our sexism where we value female life over males, so inflicting greatest harm means inflicting greatest value loss means targeting females.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 04:12 PM
6

They didn't attack because sexism, they attacked because they're barbarous savages, but to be fair it's possible they attacked there because sexism and they chose this target because how "impure and immoral" it is in their backwards society.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 02:20 PM
11

I recently got banned from there too. I asked the mod if I had ever posted there before and they confirmed that I hadn't, but they didn't like what I might say if I ever decided too.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 05:39 PM
15

It was with health insurance, but obama made sure to correct that horrid injustice...
/r/MensRights17/05/17 12:19 PM
1

You have a house and a car but you can't afford paternity tests or 70 pounds a week?
/r/MensRights16/05/17 11:11 PM
8

Well she's to be a surgeon, so cutting into people... :P
/r/PussyPass16/05/17 02:32 PM
4

Both are tasteless.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 11:24 PM
2

That's very different from your original assertion that men don't deserve water/are completely ignored and excluded.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 07:40 PM
2

Because it does disproportionately affect women because they are the ones who have to get the water and then everyone equally uses it. Just like workplace deaths disproportionately affect men, it's ok to place emphasis in both scenarios.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 07:21 PM
3

provide access to clean water for women and their families That's not excluding men. Yes it puts emphasis on women, but given U/AlexanderSupersloth point that's not uncalled for. Would you be up in arms if a group like OSHA said they want to improve workplace safety for men and their families?
/r/MensRights08/05/17 07:13 PM
6

And broke up in 2020. Definitely fishy to me.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 02:04 PM
1

Devils advocate/to be fair, the vast majority of people in both fields are men, and they can be assumed as the default. Take a similar example from the other side. If one says nurse most people would assume a female to the extent where we will specifically say male nurse if they're a male, but we won't bother saying female nurse because female is the default.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 02:01 AM
1

It sure isn't the point, in fact it's negative 91 points :P FYI apparently mods agree with me though, OP was removed.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 01:56 PM
2

"Most people" have been wrong plenty of times in the past, I'll hold my ground that racism is not cool.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 10:26 PM
3

Doesn't mean we should make it easy for them or that we shouldn't strive to be better.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 08:24 PM
-41

I figure we don't need any more negative light.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 03:18 PM
-86

Racism not cool.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 12:44 PM
16

Go to this GP, show him tiny prescription, ask if he thinks that's appropriate given his injury and pain level, get a new pain doctor.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 01:39 PM
1

You could follow others leads, try to get a screening of the red pill, or organize a blood stained men protest.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 03:48 AM
23

IMO contact local media. May be the best bet. Here's a headline for you "A military father served his country and now his son, but when CPS screwed up they forced him to clean up their mess to the tune of $46,000".
/r/MensRights07/04/17 07:39 PM
29

Warren Farrell at Toronto?
/r/MensRights05/04/17 10:28 PM
58

Be still my beating heart, a silent protest? No air horns, no fire alarms, no blocking of entrances? I applaud their unfortunately rare decency. That is a proper exercise of their right to protest that doesn't infringe on our right to free speech.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 09:23 PM
3

but correct me if I'm wrong, cutting off the foreskin usually does result in (A) lower sensitivity and (B) as a result of A, higher stamina due to less capacity for pleasure. Assuming it doesn't result in erectile dysfunction then it can.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 03:59 AM
-2

I figured I'd just smash it with a hammer. Break bones but it'll heal eventually type mangle.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 11:08 PM
-2

Oh ok, so I can break your hand then? Because it's clearly not as destructive as cutting it off.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 10:26 PM
0

She's talking about a relatively mild form of female circumcision. Regardless it's all bad and which is worse is a stupid argument. Is it worse to have your arm or leg chopped off? It doesn't matter and both are bad and if one is worse it doesn't justify doing the other.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 08:15 PM
2

A video of the procedure being done.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 08:00 PM
2

Lol, you have no basis in reality, did I strike a nerve? Here's some more "lies" that you know are true. Your prophet was a pedophile who had sex with a 9 year old, muslims are largely inbred because Muslim neanderthals such as yourself can only bare to stop fucking their goats long enough to go inside and rape their little sister before returning to their true loves the farm animals. The Qurans only useful purpose is to be burned in a fire.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 04:59 AM
2

Yeah you're either illiterate or a troll, quite possibly both. Btw did you realize it was me in both chains? No use continuing this Muhammad. Your prophet is a piece of shit.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 04:18 AM
2

You asked me to define consent, that's what I did. Consent as a legal topic is fairly well defined, and not what feminists want of it. That's why they're fighting to change it with BS like affirmative consent laws. I think you got confused. Is english your first language? I'm arguing for change to prevent further occurrences of injustice in both cases like Brian Banks and this rapist. You're advocating for change only for the former as a hypocrite would. I recognize injustices happen and therefo…
/r/MensRights25/03/17 02:14 AM
1

So they're both problems with the same cause, but you're arguing for the rapists acquittal verdict but against the false accusers acquittal verdict. Still a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 02:07 AM
1

Consent: to permit, approve, or agree. You cannot do that while unconscious. You can not say or indicate "I approve of sex" while unconscious. And consent should not need to be proven. Proof is the burden of the prosecution, and they need to prove lack of consent. My personal ideal process would work thusly. An accusation is made to police, and an initial investigation is performed (rape kit, any communications, witness interviews, etc). If there is enough evidence from above, they would then ch…
/r/MensRights25/03/17 01:10 AM
1

No, I'm just demonstrating your hypocrisy. You berate me for calling out a failing in the legal process that you think is fine, but will then call out a failing in the legal process that you think is wrong. I'd say it's more the women are wonderful effect and the preferential treatment of women in courts, which have both been present long before feminism, though they certainly don't do anything to challenge it.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 12:46 AM
1

Well the law says she walks free, and as someone once said. What the Law says counts. Your opinion is worth the paper its written on....no offense.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 12:24 AM
1

It is in the law. Sex without consent is rape. The issue here is the interpretation of the law, and this judge, wrongly, interpreted consent as something an unconscious person can give. And some cases have to be subjective. If someone had a single sip of beer, obviously they can consent. If someone is unconscious, obviously (well it's obvious to everyone except you and rapists) they can not consent. The line falls somewhere in the middle, and that line is fuzzy and shifts with each person and th…
/r/MensRights25/03/17 12:21 AM
5

"Guys are the worst" in reference to someone who just dumped you.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 07:26 PM
1

Yeah, I'm sure you mean no offense as you insult me as a liar and a feminist in your 18 day late reply. Injustices happen, innocent people are pronounced guilty and guilty walk free. A quick example would be wanetfa Gibson falsely accusing Brian banks of rape, having him locked up for years, and during the school for a million bucks. When it was revealed it was a all a lie, it was too late as Brian had already lost years, and Gibson walked away with zero consequences and didn't have to repay a d…
/r/MensRights24/03/17 06:28 AM
1

SHE! WAS! UNCONSCIOUS!!! Get that through your god damn skull!!! Alcohol had varying levels of effects on different people. Has every girl who's had 6 drinks and had sex been raped? No, of course not. But I'll sure as shit say that anyone, man or women, who is so drunk they are passed out and unconscious and pissing themselves while someone has sex with them in that state was raped.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 05:44 AM
88

Cosmo is basically the onion. Silly to get mad about it.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 06:25 PM
0

There was never a time for Nigel when this was public knowledge and he didn't have a statement from police saying he was completely innocent.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 12:17 PM
-1

I'm guessing English isn't your native language then? "It just doesn't happen." Is a common phrase to say something is exceedingly rare, and the fact that it happened in this case in incredible. Because I've been slandered as a sexual predator and mud sticks. That indicates to me that you were publicly outed by another person/party when you were accused. Nigel was never revealed until he himself chose to. Do you really think he didn't ask earlier? Given that the article point blank says he didn'…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 04:25 AM
0

He was not "loudly proclaimed 100% percent innocent". After three weeks, police returned Nigel's computers to him, and he had been found completely innocent. People are not found innocent, it just doesn't happen. You're found not guilty because they couldn't prove beyond a reasonable doubt you did it, and there's no point proving you're innocent. He was found without a doubt innocent, that's huge, and certainly much louder than the non existent press about his arrest. Literally every story is a …
/r/MensRights23/03/17 04:03 AM
0

Yes, I do realize how bad it has to be, and that is light years away from what happened here. He was detained for a few hours, with no physical force, he had no social campaign against him, and the investigation was concluded in only 3 weeks where I've seen some take years. There are people with heart conditions, and if you suddenly appear around a corner the sudden shock could give them a heart attack and kill them. Should you be charged with manslaughter? No, because the vast majority of the p…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 01:10 AM
1

If the pictures had the perp in it, wouldn't they know it was not him? Never seen amateur porn? If the guy's holding the camera all you see is his dick and brief shots of his gut/thighs. When they stop a car with drugs in it, they assume it belongs to everyone in the car This would be more like they found drugs in one of the persons pockets. That doesn't rule out the possibility that the others had drugs, or even that they planted it in the persons pockets, but it does provide sufficient reasoni…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 01:00 AM
1

Because the owner of the IP is irrelevant. What matters is who had access to/was using it at the time of the crime, which in absence of the evidence has an equal chance of being either of them, and there is boundless potential evidence that could point to one over the other.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 12:51 AM
1

It wasn't an acceptable mistake, that's why they paid 60k for it. But it wasn't as bad as he initially charged, which is why he got so much less than he sought. What about how they conducted the operation would be unacceptable to you had the guy actually been distributing CP?
/r/MensRights22/03/17 11:15 PM
1

Your experience is entirely different and incomparable with the one in the story. Yours lasted years, his lasted a few weeks. You were publicly shamed, he was not and loudly proclaimed 100% innocent once concluded. He was only detained a few hours as they seized the computers. He was never publicly portrayed as a sexual abuser. They made a mistake, which was preventable, but they rectified it as best they could with a short investigation, declaration of innocence, apology, and the 60k. I don't s…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 11:10 PM
0

In May 2011, officers at South Yorkshire Police were informed by colleagues in Hertfordshire that they had identified an IP address from which more than 100 indecent images of children had been shared in April that year. If the perp was producing the pics, it could be quite obvious that it was a male. If he was just sharing previously made stuff, likely with other pedos (not the victims), it's quite possible the perp said while sharing them "Damn I would like to stick my dick in this one." or so…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 05:24 PM
3

Nigel spent the following weeks living away from home, with his mother. After three weeks, police returned Nigel's computers to him, and he had been found completely innocent. Because of what happened I felt unable to go back into the field of work I was working in Unpopular opinion. Mistakes happen, and it seems as though he in reality suffered minimally. Him not working is entirely his choice, he quit. I don't see anything about his name being slandered across the country, and 3 weeks later he…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 01:11 PM
3

Here's what I read Where he crossed, barrier in the center but not baring entrance to highway and there's no way that is 55mph limit with those turnoffs Re her drug use, not proven but seems pretty likely considering she admitted to daily use of cocaine. Daniel Peshkin, Hyland's public defender, said the sentence would give Hyland the opportunity to turn her life around. He said the woman had used crack cocaine daily for 13 years and regularly consumed alcohol, PCP, prescription painkillers and …
/r/MensRights17/03/17 01:11 AM
0

So look elsewhere
/r/MensRights16/03/17 06:48 PM
1

Here's what I read Where he crossed, barrier in the center but not baring entrance to highway and there's no way that is 55mph limit with those turnoffs Re her drug use, not proven but seems pretty likely considering she admitted to daily use of cocaine. Daniel Peshkin, Hyland's public defender, said the sentence would give Hyland the opportunity to turn her life around. He said the woman had used crack cocaine daily for 13 years and regularly consumed alcohol, PCP, prescription painkillers and …
/r/MensRights16/03/17 06:37 PM
12

Feminine hygiene is definitely a significant problem afflicting female homeless people, and I'm good offering help to any in need. The appeal of "oh noes it's horrible almost 40% of the homeless are women" is definitely retarded and sexist, though also effective given the women are wonderful affliction of our society.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 04:22 AM
30

It looks like it'll be on youtube, so everyone should be able to access that.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 07:07 PM
0

Where's your proof that it's an unproven assumption?
/r/MensRights06/03/17 01:27 PM
7

Well they live longer and are less likely to be killed in other ways, so yeah.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 02:44 AM
1

It's specifically stated in the article she was unconscious, and given ~.25 BAC it's entirely likely it's true.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 01:00 AM
-1

We also know to deny our inner self for our own good too. I like sex, and would love to have sex with many a fine looking woman, but I do not (even though I've had some pretty giant opportunities) because I have a girlfriend and also stds are a thing. If I got super drunk it's possible that I'd try to act on my I want sex inner self, and I'd call it rape if someone took advantage of me of not being in my proper head.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 08:33 PM
2

If she did that to a guy who was unconscious level of drunk I would absolutely call it rape. Even if it's not considered that by most people including the police. Men are held to an unreasonably high standard while women are at an unreasonably low standard (in most cases). The proper place is a middle.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 02:31 PM
1

Crazies like her say if they've had a drop in the last week she's too drunk. There's a difference between that and 3x legal limit and passing out unconscious.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 02:27 PM
1

He had taken her cloths off as well as his. That by itself is sexual assault, and even if nothing more had yet occurred, it's pretty clear what the intentions were.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 04:08 AM
4

Everyone reacts differently to various levels of alcohol, and that should be taken into consideration. In this case, the girl pissed herself and passed out.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 04:05 AM
3

Police discovered Mr al-Rawi, 40, with an unconscious naked female passenger in his taxi in Halifax on 23 May 2015. The unnamed 26-year-old's blood-alcohol level was three times the legal limit, and she had urinated on herself. Yeah, this is not cool. Just because someone has been drinking doesn't mean they can't consent, but if they've had enough to the point of pissing themselves and passing out, they obviously cannot consent.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 04:03 AM
2

The unnamed 26-year-old's blood-alcohol level was three times the legal limit, and she had urinated on herself. And urinated herself. Asleep referred to unconscious because the article literally says Police discovered Mr al-Rawi, 40, with an unconscious naked female passenger in his taxi in Halifax on 23 May 2015.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 04:00 AM
2

And why is it here?
/r/MensRights04/03/17 03:16 PM
7

They say it's not a big deal for a guy to have someone elses kid, but lawsuits happen when it happens for 20 minutes to a woman
/r/MensRights03/03/17 07:12 PM
1

It was likely a combination of multiple things, including both the mental illness and ex wives and other factors as well. But it's something we can't say for sure.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 03:45 PM
9

Twice. She did this to her kids twice. You would think nearly killing the first one was enough, but she had to go back for more.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 04:34 AM
3

These same sorts of actions in different circumstances in the past have sometimes been called warcrimes and merited execution. 78 years for each seems much more appropriate.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 04:32 AM
39

So rape is OK as long as I roofie her first? She will have no recollection of the event.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 03:24 PM
3

I am a liberal, Sanders voter, who's been around here pretty much since I came to reddit 5 years ago. I don't see all that much regarding trans period, and when I do it's usually responded to as "unrelated to MR". RE anti liberal agenda, this sub definitely does lean conservative, but I wouldn't say it's strictly anti liberal. The issue is some of our biggest roadblocks are PC culture, SJWS, feminists, anti free speech, anti due process, etc. which are all examples of extreme liberalism gone amo…
/r/MensRights23/02/17 01:23 AM
3

I misread. All the same, is a stupid (lack of) sentence.
/r/PussyPass19/02/17 03:56 AM
12

Wow, that should be 6 counts each of assault and sexual assault which should mean decades. I wonder if this is why DV is sky high in lesbian relationships. They know they can get away with it re the law, and there's no risk of their stronger male partner snapping and hitting back.
/r/PussyPass19/02/17 12:31 AM
0

He didn't even say that. It was an example of things groupies let celebrities do with them. Bloody idiots, that is their biggest problems.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 08:48 PM
2

My understanding of English has been brought into question. it was a complete dog's dinner and someone has to stand up and say the emperor has no cloths on here.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 05:20 PM
10

Powerful people are protected because they are powerful and command protection.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 01:22 AM
1

One of our big fights is a default of equal custody unless valid reason is proven. Such a law would have stopped this mother from losing her child, as well as fathers. While it really sucks, there's a large number of people who would be much more convinced by this story that the plight of a father (such as the people who responded to fathers pain by writing "the agony of being a 50/50 mum" article)
/r/MensRights12/02/17 10:15 PM
2

If she were 15+ then sure, it's reasonable to believe they are 18. But 12? No. Especially after she already admitted she lied (she changed 18 to 16).
/r/MensRights11/02/17 04:24 PM
1

Return of kings is generally not a good source. Neither of our communities wish to associate with each other.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 08:48 PM
6

Not pretty much, straight up more than any other. And if we fix that that'll greatly help with the deaths as well.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 09:35 PM
8

It's also reality, men make up the vast majority of the victims of violence, black men even more so. I want to work towards helping men live longer by addressing both violence and heart disease as well as other ailments men needlessly suffer.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 08:40 PM
2

It would be even higher if so many weren't gunned down first.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 04:07 PM
10

I think he's saying if she's mentally ill enough to not be able to keep herself from murdering an infant (and therefor unable to stop herself from doing it again if given the opportunity) then there's not much good she can do alive. Not saying I agree, but that's the gist of it I think.
/r/PussyPass31/01/17 01:26 AM
1

I like how comments and ratings are disabled, unlike other TED talks. EDIT: 8:50 OMFG. She went south park IRL, she pays someone to edit out the mean comments on her social media.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 10:49 PM
6

Please update after you've spoken with an attorney.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 05:15 PM
2

This video is 5% about PC gone amok and 95% dribble.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 04:27 AM
2

What the exact truth behind this case is is irrelevant. I'm not saying ditch the whole thing, I'm saying if you're seeking more than real damages for a criminal act then you should go to criminal court which a sufficient burden of proof to warrant that. 100k for pain and suffering isn't making her whole, it's purely punitive, which I see as the exact same as prison time, which requires a criminal proceedings.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 02:09 PM
2

For civil courts with a low burden of proof, yes. General damages enable and encourage what we suspect may be the case here, false accusations for monetary gain.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 04:05 AM
2

Welcome to mens rights activism, or literally any activism. We see things about the current state of the world that we believe unjust and seek to change them.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 02:57 AM
2

I don't view money for pain and suffering as being made whole, it's punitive. Money doesn't make any pain she allegedly had suddenly better, pain and money are not interchangeable. Money and medical bills are.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 02:09 AM
2

That's not a quantifiable real damage.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 01:43 AM
2

The comments bring up many interesting points for both sides. IMO the issue is civil courts issuing punitive damages. Civil suits should only be seeking to be made whole, in this ladies case that might be any resulting medical bills, therapy, lost wages, etc.
/r/MensRights17/01/17 09:24 PM
5

He admitted himself he likely looked suspicious, it's entirely reasonable for the woman to call 911. Your title made it seem like she knowingly did it for vengeance or something. The only issue here is how quick and needlessly the officers resorted to violence. If you want to make the case that that wouldn't have happened if it was a female suspect, sure. But the 911 caller is blameless.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 03:21 PM
1

Why is this here?
/r/MensRights15/01/17 11:26 PM
6

You should probably drop by askfeminists sometime. I was banned for asking why NOW lobbies against shared parenting.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 04:01 AM
7

As a female, right now, living my ordinary life, what can I do right now that shows how valued I am? Commit a crime, get a lighter sentence (or none). Go to a bar and don't pay a door fee and get free drinks. Hit a guy and either he will do nothing, or he will defend himself in which case others will likely jump him and he is more likely to be arrested than you. Have more opportunities like gym hours and scholarships purely for being a woman. Need I go on?
/r/MensRights14/01/17 02:56 AM
6

Another word for them would be kafka. They're largely for show as the outcome is determined before the court takes place. Common attributes of these college courts include but are not limited to, you aren't told the charges, you aren't told your accuser, you aren't allowed legal counsel (while the prosecution is), you aren't allowed to question your accuser, you aren't allowed to provide evidence (prosecution can), you aren't allowed to have witnesses (prosecution can), and if you're exonerated …
/r/MensRights14/01/17 02:47 AM
5

I have no idea why males aren't doing well in school and neither does anyone know (for certain). It's a recent development, and we do know a lot as to why. Studies with changing the names on tests have shown bias against boys by female teachers (male teachers do not have any meaningfully significant bias). We also know that boys and girls learn best in different environments, with boys thriving better off competition and suffering far more without some physical activity. And what's been happenin…
/r/MensRights14/01/17 02:24 AM
4

Your entire argument is based on the premise of you idyllic view of feminism that simply does not reflect reality. Even if, and that's a big if, most feminists do subscribe to your view, they're not the active ones with power to do anything. The active ones are groups like NOW which actively lobby against shared parenting, or campus feminism that attacks free speech and due process at every turn.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 01:08 AM
3

Allegedly, nothing has yet been proven in court. If we're sticklers about this in cases where men are the accused we should be so in all cases.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 12:15 AM
11

Disabled comments and dislikes, probably a smart move on their part. They must realize how full of bullcrap they are.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 11:02 PM
1

The death penalty is pretty eternal if you don't believe in an afterlife. And they're not exactly temporary crimes. If you repent you are forgiven, if not then not. So even though you committed the crime a long time ago, you do not regret it and would do it again, and for that you are punished.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 05:01 AM
1

Remind me again, one person ate the apple. Therefore why is everyone ever born punished for it? Sins of your fathers be damned. Not original sin, just normal sin. Theft, murder, cheating, etc were rampant, Gods teachings were forgotten and ignored, etc. merciful and vengeful are two opposite sides. And do we not have multiple sides? Have you never shown mercy and at another time shown vengeance? Gods mercy is total forgiveness if you truly repent, and his vengeance is the opposite. There will be…
/r/MensRights07/01/17 07:11 PM
1

The old testament is still the word of god, no? Yes, and humanity was failing at it, giving themselves to sin and dooming their fate. I don't think a timeless, all knowing, all powerful being would change their mind very often and one day decide mercy was a cool thing. God is always merciful (and also vengeful, just as we have multiple sides of ourselves because we were made in his image). It was becoming clear humanity, his greatest creation and love, was doomed without his intervention, and th…
/r/MensRights07/01/17 03:45 PM
1

Virgin birth of god somewhat trumps that first bit. And it would surely be an honor more than a breach. Re wars I covered that, in most cases God was a convenient excuse to motivate people. Like how the Iraq war was because 9/11/WMDs, but those reasons obviously don't hold up to scrutiny and we know it was really for oil/finishing daddies job. Similarly the crusades were because god but that doesn't hold up either and it was for land/riches. If Christianity wasn't a thing they would have picked …
/r/MensRights07/01/17 03:32 PM
5

99% of your grievance material is the old testament before Jesus (or non existent, pretty sure the whole thing took a dim view of adultery). Overall Christianity has been a positive force in the world, binding communities and offering charity. Yeah some shitty things have been done in the name of Christ, but IMO most of those would have happened regardless and that was just their excuse to pin it on.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 04:55 AM
1

Been done :( but it's more to do with not wanting to be racist + the victim was just a boy.
/r/PussyPass07/01/17 02:23 AM
2

If PMS can cause women to be dangerously violent for which they have no control (and thus would get off on PMS defense) then PMS should be classified as a mental illness and women who have it should be institutionalized for their and others safety.
/r/PussyPass07/01/17 02:22 AM
1

There are a few notable differences. While it restricts your job choices you do still have options, you still have free time (probably) and privacy, and it is temporary. I'd say it depends a lot on an individual basis. If it's a reasonable order of a few hundred bucks a month which the person could comfortably spare out of the paycheck they'd get anyways, that's a lot different from the guy working 3 jobs and 16 hours a day while still falling further behind and becomes homeless and the threat o…
/r/MensRights05/01/17 07:50 PM
11

Looking at the average of cases where women have primary custody vs men have primary custody, men are less likely to be granted any child support from the women, will get less when they do, women are less likely to pay, and deadbeat moms are less likely to face consequences. Prison time for contempt of court for not paying CS is essentially debtors prison, which is seen as abhorrent in all other forms except this one. Based on pre-tax income rather than post expense/the actual cost of child rear…
/r/MensRights05/01/17 02:52 PM
2

It won't.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 02:41 PM
6

There are many different forms of both female and male circumcision. On the milder side there is a pin prick to the clit, they collect a few drops of blood which they burn in a brazier, which causes zero long term effects (except in rare case infection from dirty needle). On the more severe side they can completely remove the clit and sew the vagina shut. These two are both equally illegal. On the male side there's what you're thinking of, and then there's this (NSFL). Both are equally legal, th…
/r/MensRights28/12/16 04:50 AM
5

Yes, it is 4chan. You feed the trolls and they will continue their trolling.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 05:13 AM
6

4chan? You got baited son.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 04:41 AM
3

Premiums cover cost of claims+profit. How does saying don't take gender into account increase the cost of claims at all, let alone to the point where both genders would have to pay more? The point of this is instead of Jack paying $100 and Jill paying $80, both pay $90, which ends up being the exact same total premium for the company.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 11:30 PM
1

These seem low. Napkin math the us is ~320 million to the worlds 7 billion, so ~4%. Last I heard the majority of males in US are circumcised, around 60%. So the US alone should cause 2.4% of the world to be circumcised.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 02:06 PM
5

They were elected to vote on them by large numbers of women.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 05:21 PM
1

Perhaps you should learn your history and not just assume people are making assumptions I wasn't assuming, you outright stated you didn't know what equity feminism is. I quoted you saying that. Feminism as it relates to men has largely been antagonistic. Quoting myself >For most varieties(of feminism) and certainly the currently most popular ones I agree with you(that they shouldn't be trusted with MR advocacy). There are some neglected ones such as equity feminism (which chs subscribes to) whic…
/r/MensRights06/12/16 08:25 PM
1

I agree that it isn't the place for the law. The laws place would be in legal inequalities which there are none for women (and plenty for men). Social issues are preconceptions and how society views and interacts with women, and there are ways to go about fixing that without laws. For example men and women can be looked down on, thought incompetent or suspicious in certain careers (male preschool teacher, female mechanic). The law has no place in such an issue, but that doesn't mean it can't be …
/r/MensRights06/12/16 01:39 PM
1

Equity feminism whatever it is Perhaps you should learn what something is before making assumptions and accusations about it. The MRM is absolutely needed and of course feminism will never primarily advocate for men. However flavors such as equity feminism is never opposed or works against MR, and there are plenty of potential joint ventures that they'd take part in, such as helping level the family court field as they place importance on equity and allowing a mother time without her kid.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 01:32 PM
2

There are different flavors of feminism. For most varieties and certainly the currently most popular ones I agree with you. There are some neglected ones such as equity feminism (which chs subscribes to) which have no conflict with the mrm.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 05:51 AM
-3

If equality had been achieved then we wouldn't be here :) and to be fair there are still gains for women to be made and legitimate goals feminism could pursue, but they are almost entirely social or in other countries and there's very little money to be made in either.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 04:56 AM
1

Fuck I didn't even notice the leg.
/r/MensRights22/11/16 12:31 AM
1

physically assaulted by my girlfriend There's your problem. Need to add an ex in there asap.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 01:18 AM
4

Ah you saw sargons this week in stupid too eh
/r/MensRights01/11/16 01:58 AM
1

Beware returnofkings, iirc they are legit male supremacy/pickup artist website.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 12:46 PM
5

Underage girl, his DNA was found, and a jury convicted. He can rot.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 07:22 PM
3

I don't know if this is possible, but could there be an automated forced flair for posts and comments? Next to the username have "new account" if the account is less than a week old, or have "new poster" if the account has posted/commented less than 10 times here. That could label and separate the new comers vs the consistent community. Yes they could pose around for a week pretending to be legit, but 90% of trolls are too lazy for that.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 03:28 PM
5

You should be incredibly proud of yourself. It may seem somewhat unfair that he's in his own house and your with your parents, but the disparity would be so much worse if you went the child support route, which would hurt not only your ex but your daughter as well. You will be so much more satisfied in life and your daughter has a fantastic role model in both of her parents.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 08:14 PM
5

I don't want blm. Keep them the fuck away from us. We don't want to associated with the violent riots that keep popping up like the one in Charlotte nc.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 11:15 PM
3

Don't believe me, ask random women only look at anecdotal evidence please oh please don't look at actual research.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 06:32 PM
6

I think she's more commenting on american culture, and yes a majority of people would think something is up in that situation despite reality being vastly different.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 10:20 PM
2

Your position so far as I can tell thus far, is that religion grants you rights over another person as they are worth less than you, in a relationship reminiscing slavery. And you would compromise numerous ideals and break the law rather than recognizing others as having equal value to you.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 04:42 AM
2

So says the person who believes their right to force their ideology on others trumps all other people's rights and laws for no reason beyond arrogance.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 04:20 AM
2

'Body modification' is part and parcel with the religion. As is female circumcision with Islam, as is arm amputation in my fictional religion. Do you support those as well? The child didn't choose the parents value system. So because they couldn't choose their parents value system they shouldn't be able to choose their own? You drop this one small idea, you get more people to agree with you. Why end there? If we drop the draft we will get yet more. If we drop equal parenting even more. We are a …
/r/MensRights07/09/16 12:16 AM
2

So being against male circumcision is anti islamic, but being against female circumcision isn't?
/r/MensRights06/09/16 08:32 PM
1

Galatians 5:2 the only Christians who think they need to circumcise are ignorant of their own faith.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 08:31 PM
1

Had to check, because, and no offense, many people would view what you wrote as a trolly level of stupid. My religion is very important to me, and I am not interested in listening to arguments against it. Openly saying you stick your fingers in your ears when faced with opposing view points isn't gonna win you a lot of support here. But your child is your child, and you need to raise them as a proper member of your religion. You can absolutely share the ideas and ideals of your religion, but phy…
/r/MensRights06/09/16 08:14 PM
1

Is this sarcasm or no?
/r/MensRights06/09/16 11:43 AM
1

I take that phrase less literally. It's more a cautionary statement, that in working towards equal rights you also get equal responsibilities with it, and having those equal responsibilities means it's not the rosy paradise you thought it'd be as you realize the value of the privileges you gave up.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 11:22 AM
1

I oppose infant circumcision because I support religious rights. Of individuals. And your religious rights end when they impact other people, your child is not your property. If your child at a reasonable age decides for himself for whatever reason to get circumcised, great. You making religious decisions for others against their will is the antithesis of religious freedom.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 11:17 AM
10

A "friend" posted a link about it (vox thing complaining about why we don't teach men not to rape) and I commented saying yeah it's such a lenient sentence it's like he's a women who raped a child. De-friended within 15 minutes no reply.
/r/MensRights03/09/16 06:52 PM
1

She's obviously a sexist and those comments are obviously sexist, however I doubt they would qualify for creating a hostile environment even if the genders were switched.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 12:45 AM
1

Obviously they don't believe it's mutilation, just like feminists don't believe affirmative action is sexist or BLM doesn't believe segregation based on race is racist. However if you take away their group bias and look dispassionately and objectively at the definitions and the acts, you can only conclude that they are mutilation/sexism/racism.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 03:23 PM
8

Being in a position of power invalidates consent. Similar to how a therapist can't sleep with their patients.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 01:55 PM
3

If you don't treat the penis after removing part of it it is more likely than not that the baby would die of either blood loss or infection. If it's not damaged by the circumcision why would they need to do anything afterwards? I don't see how my definition is subjective, I copy pasted it from a dictionary, which is a collective agreement of the meaning of words in language. Link
/r/MensRights23/08/16 02:28 AM
4

Looking on dictionary.com Ritualistic : the study of ritual practices or religious rites. genital : of or relating to the sexual organs. Mutilation : to injure, disfigure, or make imperfect by removing or irreparably damaging parts: A Bris is obviously a religious rite, penis is obviously a sexual organ, and you are removing a part of the penis which causes injury.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 09:02 PM
1

On the bright side it looks like an investigation was done and discipline should be forthcoming to the offending officers, as well as new safeguards to prevent this sort of thing in the future.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 11:30 PM
1

So she acknowledges that the video proves violence against women is protected, and then says that proof is a lie. Sounds like a feminist to me.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 03:40 PM
3

I just got an email saying that male employees can come in at 10:00am while the girls can come in at 11:00am. So nice of them to give you hard evidence of sexual discrimination.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 01:34 PM
1

It's not a demand men want, it's a demand underage boys want as that is the majority of the audience. Granted they don't make up the majority of the donations but they still give in the form of ad revenue.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 12:57 PM
5

That only 2-8% of rapes are false. Except what they mean are 2-8% of theoretical rape claims are proven beyond a reasonable doubt to be false, and a similar number are proven true.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 12:02 AM
7

The article didn't even touch what IMO is the biggest argument againsts "boobie streamers" and that is integrity and fairness. Gaming is still becoming established, and I and many others of the gaming community wish that it would become a respected sport like chess, and even become popular enough to be shown on tv. But if you lookup a popular "gaming athlete" and assume this is one of the best, and you happen to choose legendary lea, you'd right it off as a gimmick for the viewing pleasure of pe…
/r/MensRights12/08/16 10:13 PM
7

I like how in all their insults towards intactivists they fail to provide a single example. Not even that they don't even make a specific accusation. It's only vague general attacks such as toxic angry mob that routinely engages in terrorist and oppressive and abusive tactics What actions are abusive or oppressive? Not one example is given.
/r/MensRights07/08/16 04:38 AM
1

I like it when she questioned the credibility of the source for the video, when the entire video is Hillary talking.
/r/MensRights07/08/16 03:49 AM
-1

Marriage counseling is your only hope ad it's a slim hope, she is controlling and manipulative. If she refuses document her behavior and when you have enough file for divorce.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 07:19 PM
22

That last sentence. "Having a lounge for women promotes gender equality"
/r/MensRights01/08/16 07:09 PM
1

The higher earner will be paying child support, and the state gets a piece of that, so it's in their interest to make sure the higher earner doesn't have equal custody so they have to pay more, and they have more time to spend at work.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 04:22 AM
1

Moronic beyond belief.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 01:35 PM
30

Women have exactly zero agency.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 03:42 PM
0

Oko is a crazy talentless attention whore. She is the shining idol of all sjws.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 04:35 PM
2

She explains why in the article. She tries to look like she's open and above board, but it's all deceit.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 09:43 PM
1

I just googled what I typed above.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 08:34 PM
4

How is going with the will of 90% of the people undemocratic? I really want someone to explain what mental gymnastics make that possible.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 07:26 PM
3

How is this related?
/r/MensRights12/07/16 12:00 PM
2

A shame, that was my favorite class in college (ours was called "algorithms and data structures" and used a lot of OOP)
/r/MensRights10/07/16 01:51 AM
3

It might have been mentioned because the army is a profession involving violence and the training to use it (all enlistees go through basic training)
/r/MensRights10/07/16 01:47 AM
3

Re why males in power choose to benefit women. As a scientist you should be able to appreciate evolutionary responses, and through much of human history women were much more valuable to the survival of the both the species and the kingdom. If there's a war then you send the men to die and next generation your back to normal, if you send the women then the loss of reproduction means you might never recover. While the need to shield women from death isn't so common any longer, the urge to protect …
/r/MensRights06/07/16 02:39 PM
3

Seems like they're complaining that they're not referred to the police, which imho I think is the way it should be. Police should handle criminal conduct, not universities.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 02:11 PM
3

some of his ideas are quite radical, such as having more male teachers. Paraphrasing cause mobile. But that seems very sad to me, that such a basic and obvious thing to me can be seen as radical by someone else.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 06:14 PM
1

You could always print out a poster sign and stand around a busy area for a while informing people. I might suggest anti circumcision.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 03:50 PM
1

I'd say it's more conservatives disliking sending the money to other countries, against over regulation, and being isolationist/anti immigration, with liberals being fine spreading the money around for stuff like research grants and in favor of free travel. I do not consider feminism/mra as related to brexit, and personally I would have said they would be better off remaining. Thunderfoot and Sargon of Akkad actually had a fascinating 2 hour discussion on it.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 01:51 AM
1

Discussing your wages is protected at the federal level. Your employer CAN NOT prohibit you from doing so. The stigma against sharing your wages as too personal was made and is encouraged by corporations, not to discriminate but to keep people ignorant of how well others negotiated.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 01:35 AM
4

The latter. And honestly I see no problem with this. Getting them interested early and having them work hard to be a dev is the right way to do it, not affirmative action handing it out.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 12:32 PM
1

There's a bunch of definitions written down of feminism, and even more if you define feminism by the actions of self described feminists. Whenever feminists do retarded shit and are shown as bigots, they deny it while pointing to the definition of feminism as simply the belief that women and men should be equal. Those bigots and most feminists do not conform to that definition, but CHS does.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 02:34 PM
9

Attacking a gay night club is an act of misogyny (hatred of women)!?! Now that is some god like mental gymnastics that I cannot begin to comprehend.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 02:20 PM
5

I don't think we ought to defend the guy or the sentence. Their might have been mitigating factors, but we don't know and that is speculation. Based on public information about the event and case it is a travesty of justice he got off so light. False rape accusations happen and they're terrible and need to be taken more seriously. We can't achieve that by minimizing and making excuses for actual rapists.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 02:32 PM
1

If anything it's proof that there isn't a rape culture. This event is absolutely something that would be welcome and common place in a rape culture, and what are we as a culture doing? Blasting it, raising all alarms, etc and it would shock me if the judge wasn't recalled. That is the last thing that would happen in a rape culture.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 11:32 AM
3

To be fair, "cleaning the dirty black off a guy" is way way way more racist than sexist.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 12:53 PM
2

IDGAF.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 08:20 PM
1

Very much agreed. However I don't think we can shackle a person to an area. If they want/need to leave, wether for personal or professional reasons, they should accept the responsibility of putting in extra effort to see their children or accept they don't get to see them as often.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 11:48 PM
2

Honestly, you're the one moving to start a new family, barring any mental issues I highly doubt your wife will get anything less than primary custody.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 08:14 PM
2

That is amazing and hilarious. Thanks for bringing some cheer, too often all the posts are doom and gloom oriented.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 04:22 AM
2

Why else do you think I was pleasantly surprised.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 11:27 PM
2

I was pleasantly surprised by the article. No insults beyond the quotes of the interviewees, mentioned specific pain points of the mrm, and I feel it's entirely fair and accurate views of both trump and Clinton. Honestly I support trump over Clinton only because congress will let him do absolutely nothing but his election will have drastic changes on future elections for the better. If it weren't for that I'd absolutely go Clinton. Trumps tax proposal alone would bankrupt us.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 08:17 PM
3

That's a pretty shitty endorsement. Pro tip, if you're trying to talk someone up, avoid saying things like "I recoil at her rhetoric"
/r/MensRights20/05/16 01:41 PM
2

I did it by getting a mexican girlfriend :) more relevant though it was a long and painful process involving everything from stalkers to stand ups, but I eventually found an awesome women who hates marriage as much as I and we get along swell. There are good American women I'm sure, but you'll have to put in a lot of effort to find one that's also compatible with you.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 04:49 PM
1

As others said from an evolutionary standpoint birthing is the primary purpose of women. Risks are weighed against that primary purpose. Yes birthing carries a risk, but to avoid that risk stops your primary purpose so the risk is dealt with. Hunting, building, etc also carry risks, but ignoring those risks offers little to no benefit in fulfilling the primary purpose, and thus they are avoided so they can better carry out their purpose.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 02:33 PM
3

Giving birth and propagating our species isn't a risk. It's what we're designed to do. It's a much greater risk to the species to avoid giving birth as opposed to giving birth. The ability to give birth is the greatest asset to a species with survival and growth as the central goals, and those with that ability should be protected and take as little risks as possible. Re pain tolerance, pregnancy and birthing releases natural pain killers. You can't claim a high pain tolerance if you're on morph…
/r/MensRights16/05/16 03:21 PM
3

Aside from birthing, no they wouldn't, because of birthing. A population can rebound much better if a large portion of the males die vs a large portion of the females.
/r/MensRights16/05/16 02:46 PM
2

Yes. The vast majority of businesses are started by men is the most evident effect of that today.
/r/MensRights16/05/16 02:22 PM
1

This isn't feminism it's just corrupt politics fighting to keep corrupt establishment politicians in power. Same reason there was so much denouncing of trump from the GOP despite him being front runner or did basically the same thing to Ron Paul last election.
/r/MensRights16/05/16 03:00 AM
2

Once Y date occurs the accused will either be released as not guilty, or pronounced guilty along with their crime. A record of the trial could also be released at that time.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 02:52 PM
2

It doesn't need to be a secret arrest. If they are released with bail nothing need be said. If they are held they can just say "X is arrested for an undisclosed reason and will have a trial at Y date"
/r/MensRights14/05/16 01:21 PM
2

Usually r/feminism is more careful, being very liberal with the bans and censorships before it gets to this level. But the unopposed response to this joke from everyone is sue them. Sure, that will really help the stereotype that women are to fragile and easily offended for work place environments (especially male dominated fields)
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:24 AM
1

Also why manspreading is infinitely more important than honor killings in the Middle East.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 02:17 PM
1

They weren't a mgtow at the time of fucking. Men going their own way want as little to do with women as possible.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 01:27 PM
9

Name calling not helpful. But the whole point of this is guilt by association regardless of if any took place.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 08:41 PM
7

I like how she thinks there's overlap of mgtow and pua. Does she even know what they stand for? They are polar opposites, they contradict each other to the very core. One cannot be a pua and a mgtow any more than they could be both that women and remotely intelligent.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 08:40 PM
3

It's absolutely understandable for you to feel the way you do, and there is zero excuse for him to be vial and make you feel guilty. Do try and approach it objectively and calmly. Email (assuming he has access to internet) is a good way to avoid the screaming and interruptions and allows you to structure your side. Do try to convey that if you go to court, you are basically guaranteed to get that $380, but he'll have to pay his court costs, likely your costs, and they charge a fee ontop of the $…
/r/MensRights03/05/16 10:01 PM
7

Arguments for him. 25k (~20k after taxes) is not much. That's $1700/month, half of which can easily be taken up just by rent and utilities, ignoring food/transportation/etc. I don't know how much his GF is bringing in, but it's entirely possible that he's truly not able to give much more. You've also essentially remarried with a supportive husband, and it doesn't sound like you actually rely on his child support (though it undoubtedly helps, if nothing else put it into a college fund). He also h…
/r/MensRights03/05/16 09:31 PM
4

You made a post about a post on the same subreddit and was only made 8 hours before yours?
/r/MensRights01/05/16 11:07 PM
1

Hence my careful use of the word alleged. We don't need to rely on just her word though, there may be physical evidence or records or third party witnesses. But we don't know if any of those were brought before the court.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 08:04 PM
1

The beating thing I mentioned because OP claimed people think he deserved it cause meth. Never said ptsd is an excuse, only a mitigating factor. Tldr: we must weigh all components and not put up outrageous false titles. She probably should have gotten a longer sentence, but there are far greater miscarriages of justice out there and this maybe rates a 3 out of 10 on that scale.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 05:00 PM
-4

Read the article. She had served 1.5 years already, and the boyfriend was allegedly abusive. Allegedly he beat/kicked her to the ground, turned around, and she got up and stabbed him causing him to die. PTSD from her son dying is also a valid mitigating factor.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 12:57 PM
1

It's a show, it's entertainment, it's fake and not real. So long as it's not actively encouraging hatred or degrading any group/s of people it's irrelevant. It's unfortunate that joss is a white knight feminist, but the value if the final product should have no relation to its creator.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 06:25 PM
1

I responded to your points with actual data in a calm manner. Rather than refute the argument with anything of meaning you attack me with personal attacks. Is that not the very definition of ad hominem?
/r/MensRights25/04/16 01:21 PM
1

True enough. Always amusing to watch the desperate with nothing valid behind their argument result to attacking the person. It's early but I want to say that's the ad hominem logical phalacy which makes your third.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 11:36 AM
1

The cultural difference between men and women is nuanced, not vastly different. I think the vast majority of people, but here and the general population, would disagree strongly with you. We treat women vastly different, so much so that it bleeds into our supposedly just unbias justice system to the tune of 50% shorter sentences. And that's after steps are taken to eliminate differences, the general population and day to day interactions are even more different. there is absolutely no reason why…
/r/MensRights24/04/16 10:47 PM
1

what makes you think that any single individual woman would be any better at “theoriz[ing] about what goes on inside a womens head …” than any other human being men? Men and women are different, biologically and culturally. Read some testimonials of trans people. Emotions are much more powerful for women, they are less inclined to take risks, and there's a vast difference in how other people treat you as well. They have a different viewpoint that will contribute to such a discussion. That knowle…
/r/MensRights24/04/16 09:34 PM
0

There's a difference between capable and ideal. Yes men could theorize about what goes on inside a womens head that dissuades her from working more, and they could get it completely right and we can throw a big parade. But much more likely they will get some things wrong or miss some reasons. Yes there are male obstetricians with a great deal of knowledge, but the source of all of that knowledge was women, and that knowledge has been vetted, edited, updated, and standardized over decades, which …
/r/MensRights24/04/16 01:07 PM
9

"You swore to tell the whole truth" "Yeah but it was an omission" Holy fucking idiot.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 04:07 AM
18

Now fellows, we ourselves have gotten butthurt over when men are completely lacking from various diversity and equality events. And given there are 3 women on the executive board there's no reason at least one of them shouldn't have been included. Two way street, and if we're to be better than the feminists we shouldn't dismiss things like this. And yes, pay gap not real and all that, but there is an earnings gap and a discussion on encouraging women to work harder and allowing men to take more …
/r/MensRights24/04/16 03:56 AM
4

That's a bold strategy Cotton, let's see if it pays off for him.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 01:27 AM
1

That's actually better than I expected. How sad is that?
/r/MensRights21/04/16 01:39 PM
1

Too much words, and it sounds radical. More likely to push people away from Bernie than pull them in.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 01:46 AM
1

I liked the tape swastika that was both the wrong way and the exact same tape as was used for the swastika is sitting on the persons table.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 12:54 PM
1

You inherit half from the mother and half from the father. So if men were yy then all offspring would be xy, a new gender.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 07:02 PM
2

They were higher and have been plummeting recently. Are they trying to argue that they only recent have learned she is a women and based on that fact are changing their views?
/r/MensRights18/04/16 11:57 PM
0

Alas, it's from my personal folder of "points" filled with screen shots of such useful studies found both recently and in this case years ago. You may be able to google the title of the table and get lucky.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 10:50 PM
2

Depends where you are, many if not most are probably 1-3. I was working on the same theory with 21-16=5.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 07:48 PM
0

Romeo and Juliet laws. Depends on state but they allow for anywhere between 1-5 year difference. And there are plenty where it just doesn't matter so long as they're above age of consent. 18 primarily refers to porn. As stated before the bigger issue is the power dynamic between them as teacher and student.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 07:10 PM
1

Do you?
/r/MensRights18/04/16 07:00 PM
1

On the federal level, but most if not all states set it lower.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 06:54 PM
0

Most places the age of consent is 15 or 16 so he was probably not under age.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 04:51 PM
2

17 is almost certainly not underage. The issue is that as a teacher she is in a position of power above him and has the ability to manipulate and exploit him. Same issue as quid quo pro sexual encounters between a boss and subordinate In the professional world.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 03:41 PM
2

I don't believe so, but even still while divorces are widespread and common, most children do still grow up with parents who are together. Including married and single parents, I'd be shocked if women have more than 60% of the time with the children (assuming married is 50/50). That certainly doesn't account for the over double offense rate of women.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 12:35 PM
30

From the US DOJ
/r/MensRights17/04/16 02:44 AM
54

Not only is it hateful, it is outright lies. Women make up the VAST VAST majority of child abusers, including sexual.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 08:45 PM
8

Only if his wife demands permanent alimony exceeding his income and he never sees his kids again.
/r/MensRights15/04/16 09:09 PM
2

Can always sort by new or controversial.
/r/MensRights15/04/16 03:58 PM
1

Note I specifically said if that's all they say. If they engage at all then they're usually not banned. But if the last 20 comments of there's are copy pasted then they add nothing.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 11:18 PM
5

Such views won't get you banned (unless literally all you do is say "cis men must die"), but they will get you shit on and down voted. That's imo the best free speech.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 04:02 AM
3

So she isn't even claiming you raped her, she is claiming to be a mind reader and that you want to rape her?
/r/MensRights12/04/16 02:40 PM
0

This video is a year and a half old.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 04:28 AM
6

Should do an archive link. Here it is.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 01:31 AM
2

They did this. The result was 80%+ bankruptcy rate, regardless of major. They could have paid it back, but just out of college you have no credit and no significant assets so there was no reason not to declare bankruptcy.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 11:52 PM
47

women's superiority and privilege groups Ftfy
/r/MensRights08/04/16 03:17 PM
2

women's superiority and privledge groups Ftfy
/r/MensRights08/04/16 02:20 AM
0

Random thought. I've seen quite a few of these. We should do one, same pricing scheme. However in addition to different prices, the cupcakes for women will be special made at 70% the size.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 08:51 PM
1

Sexists using made up excuses, but all the same death threats aren't cool.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 08:48 PM
5

If the mother files for state support or tries to go after the man for support, then assuming he can be found his wages can be forcefully garnished, his possessions can be repossessed, his drivers license/passport/Etc can be revoked, and if after that he is unable to pay he is put in debtors prison.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 08:30 PM
5

For reproductive rights, you'll hear the term "financial abortion" or "legal abortion". Basically it's the idea that men should have x (often 4-6 weeks) of time after being informed of pregnancy to file a form and inform the mother of their intention to not be a father, thus barring them from any legal rights or financial responsibilities to the child. Assuming he was told in a reasonable period of time the mother then can choose to abort or bring to term with the knowledge she will be doing so …
/r/MensRights07/04/16 07:53 PM
23

Here's my fantasy ruling. "You are indeed not paid at the same proportion of wages as the male soccer league. You are in fact paid a much higher sum comparing to the profits earned by the women's league vs the men's league, and are hereby ordered to pay back pay to the league and all future wages shall be reduced to match the men's leagues profit to wage ratio"
/r/MensRights31/03/16 03:21 PM
0

A small part of me homes something goes wrong (though nothing too bad) so their can be a national spotlight on the issue. It's not often you get a "celebrity baby" that's getting a likely public circumcision.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 03:18 PM
1

Better than that even, they're currently building up supply for trials and selecting sites, though it will be under the agreement that it may be permanent.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 03:40 AM
15

Only feminists can complain that trying to have both parents involved with their kids is anti family.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 06:49 PM
1

It also makes for more interesting games. Men have more strength and control, and a heavy felt ball enables more spin. The normal felt may not even be "faster" because if you do go faster and you have less downspin you may miss the court, especially on the serve.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 02:40 PM
1

Cause some people like the red pill blue pill scene and use it as an analogy occasionally and they're desperate to grasp any straw in sight.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 07:06 PM
1

She seems more respectful of other ideologies than many, though still openly admits to not researching anything that doesn't support her world view.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 01:40 AM
4

Are Indian MRAs actually opposed to martial rape, or are they just being reported as if they do because they want to ensure due process for all parties?
/r/MensRights13/03/16 12:23 PM
2

If she's incapable of defending her position with facts, then she has none, and is assuming her stance due to her own sexism.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 12:45 PM
6

Except she's the strongest (physically) and smartest character in the show...
/r/MensRights11/03/16 04:40 PM
2

I think he has a gun. I know I'll rudely demand be leave, try to steal his camera, and then threaten him and get a gang together to follow through!
/r/MensRights26/02/16 06:28 PM
1

Don't attack feminism, just focus on the issues and the lack of proportional attention they receive. I.E. men make up equal DV victims and the vast majority of homeless, but there are next to no shelters for them vs the countless for women.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 04:53 AM
5

I love these because they're so quick to run to the dictionary to prove feminism is just for equality, but for things like sexism/racism then their own made up definitions are law.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 01:26 PM
1

Most of their ideals I agree with. The problem is they only apply those to half of the population. They're against violence against women. Considering men are the primary victims of violence I'm against violence against anyone. Circumcision sexual and reproductive freedom equal employment opportunities etc, just change female to everyone and I'm on board.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 03:33 PM
2

r/titlegore
/r/MensRights17/02/16 12:33 PM
1

I'm very left leaning. If Sanders wouldn't repeat the wage gap and didn't dislike nuclear power he's be 100% perfect for me (he's still miles ahead of other candidates and has my support). My main dissent from liberals is their toting of the war on women as they wage war on due process in universities.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 02:42 AM
6

I don't give a fuck. Just don't make every post "look at me I'm gay". Same reason as the rule "there are no women on the Internet".
/r/MensRights04/02/16 01:47 PM
3

IMO bigger things to worry about than googles daily front page which 90% of users never see because they just type it in their search bar.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 03:54 AM
3

There shouldn't be by law. That person was either ignorant or intentionally breaking procedure. By ratio mothers are much more likely to be deadbeats under paying or paying nothing, but much less likely to have anything done about it.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 08:33 PM
14

Not sure if it counts as one, but children in general as a whole process. A woman could drug and rape me, get pregnant, sue for child support, never let me have contact with the child, drag me through the mud, and even have me sent to prison if I can't make support payments. I can end up in prison if I am raped. It's beyond insanity.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 08:21 PM
2

Well I know a lot of militant sufferagates (sp?) started fired and set off bombs and such. Decent chance some death happened.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 04:25 PM
8

I just sent an email of support to him, and I hope many of you do as well.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 11:34 PM
4

It's currently unavailable. I presume the ddos attacks have begun again?
/r/MensRights25/01/16 10:48 PM
6

I am quoting her here. Connie St. Louis ... Had... To assassinate another... for... Reporting... The facts of the story..."
/r/MensRights25/01/16 05:23 AM
7

There's other big differences too. For example, in this case a rape actually occurred.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 12:30 PM
3

Except she was waiting for him. It's guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and that imo is not reasonable. Just like you can't disprove alien mind control.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 03:08 PM
10

I imagine at least one would volunteer to switch classes so long as there is another one made available to them. Who wants to sit in the same class with their rapist/accuser when just taking the class an hour or two later/earlier is an option?
/r/MensRights12/01/16 02:25 PM
2

This seems more environmentalist type issues than men's rights.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 08:38 PM
8

Nice victim blaming there. Firstly, we must assume we believe her account that she did not intentionally murder him (and that's all we have to support that situation, her word). What evidence would have been different between she sneaks up to play and give him a spook vs she sneaks up to kill him? Second, we don't know what or how this 'playing' happened. Maybe it was equal, maybe she snuck up to give him a quick fright. What we do know is that SHE had the gun, SHE didn't make sure it was unload…
/r/PussyPass09/01/16 04:09 PM
10

That resulted from negligence. And where do you think they concluded that it was an accident? Could it possibly be from the interview of the only witness, aka the murderer? Regardless, your stupid actions which you knew were stupid ended someones life, which can result in life in prison unless of course you have a vagina.
/r/PussyPass09/01/16 02:58 PM
0

This is a non issue. It's a bloody name. They're stupid for caring so much about it, let us not be stupid and ignore this zero importance issue.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 02:39 PM
1

There is a safety pin and there's a decent chance you could feel/hear the click. It's a hard metal object in an area without much hard things.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 08:55 PM
3

IMO leave it. 1. We don't want to turn to censorship or mirror their tactics (like #banbossy) and 2. It's idiotic and 98% of people see that, it does them more harm than good.
/r/MensRights03/01/16 11:49 PM
2

They were obviously pushing their ideological lies. Look closely, the figures on the right are smaller than the figures on the left.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 03:39 PM
2

She already isn't arguing points 2 and 4. Point 1 offer "Women outnumber men 2 to 1 in college and are given 2 to 1 hiring preference in STEM fields, and you say they don't have as many opportunities as men? And when was the last time a women was made to feel like a pedophile for wanting a profession that has anything to do with children?" Point 3 I'd give her a link on NOW opposing shared parenting and say "So you'd consider the national organization a misandrist organization and not a feminist…
/r/MensRights27/12/15 02:16 AM
4

Surprisingly well balanced article. Present both sides fairly without stating anything as fact unless it is 100% known fact.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 10:50 PM
9

Because iirc Colvin was a pregnant unmarried teen and the NAACP thought they couldn't use her for those reasons. It would make a better public image to use rosa parks, as she would have more power behind it. While people could easily say Colvin was just some sinful idiot young person making noise, they could not say the same about parks.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 06:02 PM
7

Regardless of if they do better or worse vs traditional families, I am 1000% certain they do better in same sex families vs state home/adoption agency/foster homes/etc.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 04:06 PM
7

Rosa parks that shit!
/r/MensRights16/12/15 04:01 PM
1

Iirc it was to show support for rape victims who pee themselves during the assault and this experience additional shame and embarrassment.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 05:00 PM
1

Course he also allegedly kicked her out and is holding the passports hostage. We need to wait on additional details.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 09:26 PM
1

Hopefully she gets to enjoy a nice acid scar face the rest of her life.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 01:20 PM
1

Wasn't this done before and they got flooded with names?
/r/MensRights21/11/15 02:46 PM
3

I assumed it was a ceramic cup thrown impacting his eye and shattering.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 09:34 PM
1

It's an unfortunate byproduct of any movement, and we can't really help that there are extremists or the stupid things they do or say. But there is something we can do that will distinguish us. We need to speak out against them, strongly unified and loud. The instant death threats are issued or an attempt on free speech is made, we need to shout back this is not ok, this is not how we want to do things. It's all too easy to sit back and not care about bad things happening to people we dislike, w…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 01:24 PM
1

Not nearly from day one. She only got attention after she had already done videos, did her kickstarter, and then started getting flack for doing fuck all with 10x the money she asked for. On this side we have someone who has done 2 unrelated independent films and is currently working on a 3rd.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 07:22 PM
0

In all reality, it's an independent film. When was the last time you heard about a small time film from a major news source before it's even done production.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 06:25 PM
1

Your first link requires a login to view, and your second link has a video of Bernie explaining a variety of ways in which to pay for his programs. Did you just notice the horribly biased writing and didn't bother to watch the video?
/r/MensRights19/10/15 02:19 AM
2

The average effective tax rate is 12.6% aka half of my tax rate my first year out of college. According to that very link only 10 out of 27 wealthy nations collect less of the GDP from corperations than the US, however the US has BY FAR more large corporations which BY FAR make more money per capita than any other nation, so if all countries were the same tax we would make BY FAR much more of our GDP than any other nation. And you keep screaming OMG they're going to move and we will get nothing.…
/r/MensRights18/10/15 11:36 PM
2

Tell that to these corporations, who made millions in profit, and paid 0 taxes. Tax rates don't matter when you hide tens of billions of dollars overseas. Just like me with health insurance only paying 30% of what is billed to us, corporations find ways to avoid paying part of even all of the taxes due, sometimes even getting a rebate when they paid nothing such as Mattel. And while I love you assuming we're all cumming our pants over Sanders (and indeed reddit as a whole is largely liberal) MR …
/r/MensRights18/10/15 11:00 PM
1

you statists your statistics or you statisticians? What the fuck don't you guys get about corporations being to move overseas. Financially they already are the corporate tax rate is the second highest in the world. Which doesn't matter if profits are overseas so they don't pay any of it. You obviously have no idea what you're talking about, and quickly falling into mindless emotional rage rants, hence the sudden downvotes.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 10:37 PM
2

Measuring our poorest to other countries poorest is not a relevant comparison. What is something to go off of is the relation and gap between the poor and rich for each country, and according to your forbes link the US gap is the largest at roughly .23, with the next highest being France at roughly .19 and the average at around .13. Tax rates don't matter when they already hide profits overseas or claim ridiculous exemptions to avoid them all together. Re health insurance, I actually work at a h…
/r/MensRights18/10/15 09:11 PM
3

Most people here (I may be wrong) think of SJW issues on crazy non issues people bring up to make a movement and get others to follow them and thus feel all self important. Things so out there that SJW will fall for #pissforequality. When 90% of the world has less income inequality, more regulations, etc for their wealthiest citizens (and a much more stable economy than ours as a result), that disqualifies it from being a crazy non issue that are SJW issues. I'll also note you complain about bei…
/r/MensRights18/10/15 05:32 PM
8

What's even more amazing is when they banned the other women they said. "This is not about shutting down conversations or denying free speech; this is about keeping our students safe. If this were about silencing people we happen to disagree with or avoiding uncomfortable conversations, we would be denying the application for Milo Yiannopoulos to speak."
/r/MensRights08/10/15 09:42 PM
1

No question the ideal lesson we can teach people is not all men are pedos. But this is an alternate route that could benefit us. And in general more knowledge would be helpful to the public. Every day I see actual abusing convicted female pedos treated infinitely better than accused non confirmed non offending male pedos.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 09:32 PM
1

It's a two birds one stone type of deal. It no secret that men are often viewed and scrutinized as potential pedophiles on the verge of abusing any child they interact with. If the general public understood that most pedophiles do not act on their feelings and they should not be reviled for thoughts they have no control over, it is likely to follow that cops won't be called on dads playing with their children in the park or men are allowed to sit next to unaccompanied minors on planes.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 07:35 PM
1

Any official comment from the college? I tried to ask on their facebook but they don't allow others to make posts.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 02:19 AM
9

What the boyfriend said supports that video 100%. People who don't have as much/aren't as smart=people in poor neighborhoods.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 08:25 PM
1

This was a year ago. Any update?
/r/MensRights17/09/15 11:34 AM
3

Was this last nights episode? I'm generally not up late enough to watch but I may start watching online.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 11:34 AM
4

That's likely what the author wants you to think. In general you should not think ill of people who want to document when they are victims of illegal discrimination.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 02:46 PM
5

I like how they bring up ray rice victim blaming when that is exactly what this article is. Blaming victims of discrimination for trying to right a wrong. I also like this They took a photo, left the premises, then promptly initiated legal action, turning to a 1959 California law written to prevent discrimination against minorities and women. They're openly admitting they don't care about discrimination against people if they don't fit their preconceived notion of what a victim is. Oh but its ab…
/r/MensRights03/09/15 11:33 AM
2

Same experience at my job. The one female working in IT is making 40k, she didn't ask for more because she was scared doing so would make them no longer interested. They offered me 40k, and I came back with 55k, they instantly said sure.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 12:41 AM
32

Come now we all know those things like mansplaining are made up things by sjw and the like. No need to manipulate anyone into a manic state. It'll be an annoying manual process to remove it, so just ignore it, otherwise the pain will be worse than a manowar sting.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 02:40 PM
5

Fuckin onions. It's the deaf mute dad all over again.
/r/MensRights22/08/15 10:09 PM
0

This isn't about being paid, it's about putting a value on the time and work put in. And in a way they are paid to clean their own home, because the alternative is to get another cleaner to do it and be paid negative $25-$35/hr.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 02:34 PM
1

I am well aware, as should everyone involved. But OP comes off as overly generous in awarding her extra beyond what she puts in, so when it's revealed that she contributes half of what OP does to the household, she can't go "well you didn't give me full credit/marginalized my contribution" because EVERYONE KNOWS that she actually contributes much less than that already embarrassing half. So she needs to accept it or fight to be revealed as an even lazier self centered bitch.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 02:24 AM
2

At least part of the issue is the wife is complaining that he doesn't contribute to the house enough. What I strongly suspect will happen if they do itemize everything is op is contributing 10 more hours of work and a financial value $60000 greater than wife
/r/MensRights19/08/15 09:28 PM
0

I mean the act itself (speaking harshly) is minor. Refer to my other reply please.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 05:20 PM
1

I meant her acts (speaking harshly) were themselves minor. They are of course causing a much greater impact on OP and might indicate a toxic relationship. But the act itself is relatively minor, and a first step is communication, not jump straight to divorce. It's entirely possible she is a self conceited lazy bitch, and divorce is the eventual outcome, but having only a partial one sided story isn't enough to determine that, and there are steps to take to potentially salvage the situation befor…
/r/MensRights19/08/15 03:16 PM
2

women even less so Yep, there it is. I'm sorry you have a poor view of women that has caused your sexism, but I'm not interested in that and I would hope most people here are similar.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 03:13 PM
2

I'm not excusing her, I'm giving op advice to communicate her issues to her so the situation can have a chance to improve.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 03:00 PM
0

They're married. People can change when it's something minor like this. Not all women are evil horrible monsters, many are reasonable. It's entirely possible she's stressed and hasn't fully thought out how hard OP works for the family, and hasn't realized the damaging effect of voicing that stress in front of the kids. Regardless it's worth a try.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 02:54 PM
12

Talk to your wife. Explain it's not ok to disparage you and air her grievances in front of your children. Then sit down with her and work out how much each of you contribute to the family, both time wise and financially. Professional cleaners make $25-$35/hr so use that for the home work time. Ask her how much time she spends each day doing what (30 min to take kids to school, hour of cleaning, etc). This is so you can be on the same page.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 11:49 AM
1

... That's the definition of quotas in this context. You normally wouldn't get in but due to quota requiring us to have more x you get in.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 03:25 PM
1

Now this is a good reply. Explaining a point of view without insults. His goals are very possible, it's been done in many other countries. But you are correct it's not going to be just taxing the rich (or rich will take on another meaning, such as myself making 55k/year). I think the bigger cutback will be costs though. Many areas are bloated and cost excessive amounts, such as private prisons, schools, and healthcare. A company will sell a pill for 50c over seas, and then turn around and sell t…
/r/MensRights14/08/15 11:50 AM
4

It's one thing to disagree with policies and show examples, it's another to mindlessly call him (or anyone) a "socialist nutjob" with no backing.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 02:38 AM
1

Correlation != causation. Sanguifier's explanation that people believing they are protected being circumcised does seem like a much more likely reason.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 05:58 PM
4

...Duh? If the mother objects to a fathers claim, get a DNA test and then put the father on the BC. Ideally this should be a lot more streamlined but the other scenario is some random guy can claim to be the father and be put on the BC no objections.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 02:48 AM
9

I don't see anything suggesting mother has more rights (though she was able to keep him off the BC). It says if either parent doesn't consent then there should be no procedure. What we have here is a negligent doctor who ignored proper protocol and laws.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 02:36 AM
15

...Umm? It was posted because it's not fine. Every post here is against circumcision. Did you miss the whole saving chase thing, which is a very similar case to this?
/r/MensRights02/08/15 02:35 AM
12

I would like to reassure my patients that I always strive to provide the best possible care. Now let me chop off infant penises within hours of the request of some random guy who claims to be the father but isn't on the birth certificate and make 0 attempt to return the calls of the mother who is on the birth certificate.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 02:32 AM
1

Assuming you mean can't. Studies have shown roughly 4% of fathers are unknowing raising someone else's kid. You obviously know nothing about the voter id law fiasco going on here. To give you a quick overview, there have been a few dozen cases of voter fraud for the last hundred years in all elections combined. Billions of votes, dozens of attempts at voter fraud. It's not a real problem. And yet people bring it up as a problem, using it to require special photo id for voting. This law is NOT pu…
/r/MensRights28/07/15 11:47 PM
1

You're actually french and living there so you'd know better. My understanding however is that their stated reasoning is to preserve the family, i.e. if they don't know they are being cuckolded then men are less likely to initiate divorce. What I and many here believe is that there are further reasons they can't actually say, specifically that a woman's desire to deceive her husband is more important than his right to the truth, and that more divorces=more welfare moms which is worse than mens m…
/r/MensRights28/07/15 10:33 PM
1

Didn't France make paternity tests illegal so men couldn't find out their wife cheated on them and divorce? That speaks a lot about the mentality of the French government.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 05:20 PM
1

I'm in usa. Be careful about what you see. Most people here believe violence is on the rise because news loves to talk about murders and shootings constantly, but when you actually look at the numbers of murders, rapes, assaults, etc every single one of them has been going down for decades.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 02:55 PM
2

I'm not classifying all single mothers or welfare recipients in one category. Most (I hope) welfare recipients have gotten injured or don't have a car and nothing in walking distance etc which are 100% valid reasons and we should help those brought low by unfortunate circumstances outside of their control. And single mothers can either be in that same category of unfortunate circumstances, or in the birth control sabotaging divorcing fighting tooth and nail for sole custody category. Unfortunate…
/r/MensRights28/07/15 02:24 PM
1

There are many who legitimately need it, yet we should still deny it. They entered into the system knowing that they would rely on it and it would be given to them, despite other self sufficient(and harder) options available to them. Much like welfare queens, they knowingly avoid working so that they get money. Without that money they would not have the income to survive, but if they chose that and could choose to work then should we really be enabling them to be lazy?
/r/MensRights28/07/15 11:22 AM
1

I especially like the claim that medical costs would be free, when we already give far more medical insurance payouts to women (for the same premiums no less)
/r/MensRights20/07/15 11:01 AM
21

She actually chose the 30 days, but afterwards was told that it would really be water. She was then allowed to go back and say "No actually I'd like a spritz of water please." and avoid the 30 days.
/r/PussyPass19/07/15 12:46 PM
1

Not a MR issue. Some PEOPLE are lying cheating assholes, and it sucks that you must deal with one. But not all women are like this, it's not an equality issue.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 11:05 AM
2

Why are you accusing him of being on the same shit liar level as sulkowitz?
/r/MensRights11/07/15 02:09 PM
116

the woman was trying to quit her job much earlier when the woman was thrown out of the restaurant Defending the vaginas at any cost.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 11:23 AM
1

Womens gets a lot less viewers and brings in less capital so they should get less, but is it 17.5 times less? It does seem excessively low.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 10:45 AM
1

A lot of people have already given up on hopes of successful lawsuit, and that kind of apathy is a large reason why sexism against men is so rampant. We don't complain because it would be unmanly because it's not a real problem because no men are complaining. I do recall a story fairly recently a group of male university teachers successfully sued for wage discrimination based on gender. I'd say this is at least worth a quick consultation with a lawyer.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 10:24 PM
3

Did you have many unexpected and unforeseen experiences during or after your transition? Notable examples?
/r/MensRights23/06/15 08:47 PM
1

I thought so too. Intriguing and mysterious. Otherwise I wouldn't have used it. It's the only possible reason I can think of though why it has so few views. Ah well.
/r/PussyPass18/06/15 12:22 PM
5

IKR. And I'd say this is far worse than my other submissions which were much more successful. I guess I should have put the boy being the one found guilty in the title.
/r/PussyPass18/06/15 11:42 AM
2

The women got 1 month in jail and a $1600 fine.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 11:21 AM
2

That I fully agree with you. It's rather a vicious cycle. People don't think men can be raped in part because they never hear of it happening. Men don't come forward about their rape because people (including themselves often) don't think they can be raped. We absolutely need to work against the stigma.
/r/PussyPass11/06/15 08:04 PM
2

Yes I said it was dv. As far as rape stats I don't have them, I'm not op and I didn't make the claim or am aware of any. Male rape in general is hard to get stats on since it is not officially recognized as rape. Child male rape is even harder. There are isolated incidents that one can look at though. Like the raped boy who ended up having to pay child support.
/r/PussyPass11/06/15 06:22 PM
4

http://i.imgur.com/yYvNmlL.jpg
/r/PussyPass11/06/15 11:30 AM
6

It's domestic violence, not sexual violence, but men who call to report abuse are more likely to be arrested themselves than have the abuser arrested, 33.3% vs. 26.5%
/r/PussyPass11/06/15 11:26 AM
14

It was the first 2 that said she didn't. Only the last that said she did. So my suspicion is that by the 3rd one she had learned how to lie and fake it well enough.
/r/PussyPass10/06/15 04:48 PM
8

So basically they are backing their claims with patriarchy when they can't find any facts, which is basically all of them.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 02:30 AM
0

Is this actually referring to the median rather than the average? Because medians are stupid and worthless. 99, 99, 10, 10, 10 the median is 10. 15, 15, 15, 1, 1 the median is 15. As for explanations, I'd venture a guess that lots of boards are being pressured to introduce quotas. The more visible IE richer companies get a lot more publicity, and a lot more pressure to introduce such quotas, and thus women ceos are disproportionately pushed towards the higher echelons of pay.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 07:49 PM
2

I'd say its more public backlash than the legal side of things. Somehow Sulkowicz still has supporters, and you know the story they would spin. I can see it now. Columbia sabotages own students anti rape project at rapists request.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 12:10 PM
3

So she's saying some people are incapable of doing certain things based purely on their race and gender. Good borg quote though.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 01:50 AM
1

RE hatred of feminism, it's pretty much forced on us. Feminists as a group work directly and indirectly through lies and misrepresentation. They minimize mens problems or make it seem like doing something to fix them is an attack on women. We hear every day from feminists how false rapes are virtually non existent and thus we can deny accused of their rights and presumption of innocence, or how creating mens abuse shelters is taking away from women, regardless of evidence. And that's the indirec…
/r/MensRights05/05/15 10:18 PM
1

The way it's phrased it's putting you being a guy as a problem. If she said "It's great that you're a guy, FYI all our staff are women" then it's informative. But with the "But" it's entirely different, it's saying your great for the job BUT WAIT there is a problem. It's possible your benefit of the doubt is correct, but I have trouble believing that statement is anything good for you. If you're interested in exposing them I might record further conversations with her on your phone or something,…
/r/MensRights01/05/15 12:56 AM
9

These are seriously some of, if not the most idiotic mind numbing blither I've ever conceived of. Can we actually confirm these to be quotes from her, rather than some anonymous twitter person attributing it to her? No offense to OP, but I don't want to believe someone can be this retarded. Though if anyone is, it's an art student who believes slander is artistic expression.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 11:33 AM
15

Isn't this both years old and proven fake?
/r/MensRights26/04/15 12:51 PM
2

When someone breaks the law, the obviously correct thing to do is to pursue it in a legal route, i.e. going to the police, filing a suit, etc. Now what was the difference between these 2 stories again?
/r/MensRights25/04/15 03:34 AM
1

It's 30 years and then a chance of parole. It's likely a life sentence with possibility of parole.
/r/PussyPass24/04/15 04:32 AM
1

It doesn't say anything about her intending to claim she was abused, and there is nothing substantive telling us she'll walk, and even if there was that is meaningless until an actual ruling.
/r/PussyPass23/04/15 03:48 PM
2

Second degree could have been aiding the guy, she may not have actually killed the person. Plus there has been no sentence yet. First gets 25+, second gets 10-25, we don't actually know how long either will serve. Everything about OPs title is wrong.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 03:45 PM
3

Murder is worse than assault, and therefor having assault as a crime trivializes murder, so they won't mind at all if I beat the crap out of them.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 01:00 AM
5

eating disorder.
/r/PussyPass22/04/15 02:45 PM
3

Not according to the family law and the justice system.
/r/PussyPass17/04/15 09:34 PM
2

I went through half a dozen other articles on the subject and couldn't find anything on it. You'd think at least one of them would mention it. Even if a random person on the internet with no source is correct, the difference is obscene and I doubt their rap sheet justifies 7.5 times more bail.
/r/PussyPass17/04/15 11:35 AM
-7

I and I'm sure many others don't follow sports politics as closely as you. If you want to compare and contrast that is fine, but OP didn't do that. And honestly, I think the punishment for Britt is fine. It's just an over sensitive overly PC centered society that would make whatever you're referring to happen.
/r/PussyPass17/04/15 01:59 AM
-7

She was rude, she got scolded. Not a pass, and not serious enough to even consider.
/r/PussyPass17/04/15 01:05 AM
2

Well said good sir. When speculating non gendered reasons for the disparity, do consider the total circumstances needed. Both men got the same bail, and both women got the same bail. Assuming it is not gender based, that means both men had very similar history and/or were out of state, and both women were also same but substantially lesser histories and in state. That also means that 2 much more experienced criminals who may have decided to drive hundreds of miles decided to team up with local n…
/r/PussyPass17/04/15 12:54 AM
6

So she had a "momentary abnormality of mental functioning" which lasted for 9 months as she denied she's pregnant, while also planning to murder the baby (that she denied existed) as well as it's disposal and hiding of evidence and is now magically better so she doesn't have to be committed. What a load of horse shit.
/r/PussyPass16/04/15 10:53 PM
25

It's also to make it harder or easier to get out of jail depending on how dangerous you are. Generally this is determined by severity of crime, but here the presence of pussy is also a factor.
/r/PussyPass16/04/15 10:04 PM
9

I like her continued logic here. "I'm going to ask people a favor. I know, lets insult them in the same sentence, calling them maniacs aka unreasonable crazy people who would never follow my request."
/r/MensRights16/04/15 08:50 PM
114

Not sure why she's apologizing. That's a perfect example of the wage gap. A difference in pay that may appear to be the result of gender, but if you look at it for more than .072 seconds can see it's entirely the result of choices they made.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 01:56 PM
5

So only in situations where the person is a proven liar will she refer to them as an alleged victim.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 06:46 PM
4

I like how she calls MRA/GG/Ayy people animals, scumbags, and swine, who need to be locked up/killed, and then says oh I treated them as adults and they were mean to me oh poor me.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 12:41 PM
6

the issues brought up in the failed lawsuit What issue? You mean frivolous lawsuits by terrible toxic former employees?
/r/MensRights06/04/15 03:48 PM
27

Manufacture and distribution of CP is good for probation. Got it.
/r/PussyPass03/04/15 04:15 AM
1

2) "The outcome would have been different for a man" is not strong enough to stand on its own. The offender must have used (or been granted) a pass based on their gender; e.g. motherhood, PMS, perceived 'weaknesses'. Posts made on flimsy grounds will be removed.
/r/PussyPass02/04/15 01:31 AM
20

It's not terribly relevant. But attorney Therese Lawless REALLY!?!
/r/MensRights28/03/15 12:36 AM
2

You are underestimating mental hospitals. If she was found to be faking, they'll label her a sociopath and keep her there forever. If they find it to be a more serious disorder they'll keep her there forever. Of curable criminal crazies, the time they spend in mental hospitals is probably an average of 5-10 years.
/r/PussyPass27/03/15 07:30 PM
17

She told the court there was "no merit" in the damages claim, saying she had always believed her former husband was aware he was "not necessarily" the boy's father. I'll take obvious bullshit for 800 Alex.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 06:03 PM
2

They refuse to look at the big picture. They have blinders on. They only see the hundreds of extra male CEOs, and don't consider the millions extra male min wage, worker deaths, or unemployed.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 01:54 PM
28

So basically "Look at all these poor victims of FGM, give us money to fight it"
/r/MensRights18/03/15 12:44 AM
0

Welcome to /r/pussypass, where female privilege is documented. We showcase how pedophiles, abusers and other human garbage are given special treatment as if being female were some sort of mental handicap. Someone freaked because their SO got hurt. If someone right near me appears to have sustained serious head trauma or worse, I'd be concerned too, even if I didn't know them. In absolutely 0 way is this a pussy pass. Even if it were, she is not choosing to cash it in, and all she gets an some sy…
/r/PussyPass17/03/15 11:12 PM
2

OP, you're an idiot. A number of people, including the girl, were trying to get between them and stop the fight/defuse the situation. She obviously wasn't joining in the fight. Given everyone was trying to stop the fight, I'd say they already cared. Someone said call an ambulance after she got knocked out, which is basic common sense. Getting knocked out is serious business, and often causes brain damage. Not to mention given that they aren't trained and it was a new situation, it could have pot…
/r/PussyPass17/03/15 09:20 PM
11

She also fled the scene.
/r/PussyPass17/03/15 04:19 AM
4

In a disaster, women ought not necessarily to be rescued before men That's sexism? Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but that is saying that rescue should not be gender based. That is the only non sexist way to view such a situation.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 07:52 PM
1

Bad idea to have a face as background. Just makes it unpleasant to read.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 06:40 PM
9

"A modest proposal" That's the instant keyword for satire. How do people not see that? Personally I'm a fan of the modest proposal for the irish to sell/eat babies to help solve the famine.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 02:50 AM
5

"These cases are very difficult to prosecute." You mean bullshit made-up cased with concrete evidence to that effect that you hide? Yeah, I think they should be hard to prosecute.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 02:30 AM
3

She also has virtually 0 chance. Studies have shown that even among the strongest women, which she is undoubtedly, strength is comparable to you random average guy. Now she also has great fighting skills and techniques, which would surely allow her to beat nearly anyone of the general populace, but the instant you get even a mediocrely skilled guy, if he can land 1 punch for every 5 she deals, he will win because of greater endurance and strength.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 04:02 AM
8

You can't be too hard on the guy. You need to consider the reality of the world. The judge reduced sentencing on the girls because they felt they were "victims of unreasonable force from Mr Moore as he tried to defend his girlfriend". Any more force means he would actually be the one on trial and the thug girls would walk away as the 100% innocent victims.
/r/PussyPass04/03/15 03:45 AM
9

I agree he could have done more, but "stands by and watches" and not a remotely accurate description.
/r/PussyPass04/03/15 03:25 AM
15

Boyfriend stands by and watches. Granted he took a few short breathers but most of the fight he was absolutely in there throwing punches and trying to be in-between his GF and the assailants.
/r/PussyPass03/03/15 11:24 PM
3

It's not just the officer. She also had it attack her landlord and his daughter who had to have surgery. 3x felony assault all of which resulted in major injuries should absolutely be more than 6 months. Depending on the state each charge should result in 1-25 years depending on severity.
/r/PussyPass03/03/15 03:42 AM
1

They're kids. Kids are assholes. I got plenty worse as a white guy from girls and boys and rarely was anything done because, again, fucking kids.
/r/PussyPass02/03/15 11:30 PM
0

Ok yeah I'd call that cp.
/r/PussyPass02/03/15 02:29 AM
1

I've never seen it but a possible explanation is part of the requirement for something to be CP is it needs to be sexual in nature. If you for example made a video showing how to change a diaper, it would not be CP.
/r/PussyPass02/03/15 12:31 AM
1

Or I just click on various subs to look at them? You are so thankful to OP for "allowing" you to hear of this, and yet it's too hard for you to click once and wait half a second of load time?
/r/PussyPass28/02/15 02:01 PM
-2

Are you blind? Because as of right now this story is post number 1, 5, and 6 of this sub, and it is clear from the title they are all referencing the same story.
/r/PussyPass28/02/15 02:47 AM
6

3 posts in 1 day on the same story, all viewable on the front page without even having to scroll.
/r/PussyPass27/02/15 05:30 PM
3

Is it really that hard to look at the top 3 posts before posting something?
/r/PussyPass27/02/15 02:12 AM
7

who is not a “gold digger” Miss Mead’s list of demands...a diamond-encrusted bass guitar worth $250,000...$10,000 a year to spend on fashion accessories, and a $US1.2 million limited edition, crystal-studded Kuhn Bosendorfer grand piano. Of course, she's a diamond/gemstone digger. And here's one final quote from the judge. Master Sanderson said it was important to note that his decision was not about “fairness”
/r/MensRights26/02/15 11:03 PM
9

I like that it's within the realm of possibility that they want to file an appeal for this. They think they can do better. And their reasoning? Because testimony for her breaking the law should not have come out. He basically confirms that she broke the law, just argues that we shouldn't know about it and therefor she is innocent.
/r/PussyPass26/02/15 03:08 PM
22

Assuming they don't have a house and literally spend every single day in a hotel, that's over 5k every single day. There are exactly 2 hotels in the world that are that expensive.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 11:39 PM
9

She narrowly missed the jugular.
/r/PussyPass24/02/15 02:11 AM
49

The jurors explain their decision"At no point did she try to stab him or cut him". So what do you describe putting the knife to his throat, resulting in him having a cut throat? For the second piece of "evidence" I'm assuming he is countering her claim that she didn't intend to kill him. I guess the most bias motivated hersey possible is now evidence when it comes to women.
/r/PussyPass23/02/15 11:50 PM
3

Out of curiosity, why would they go for murder 2 rather than murder 1 here?
/r/PussyPass23/02/15 11:38 PM
15

She was also acquitted of attempted aggravated assault with serious bodily injury, so there was a lesser charge as well.
/r/PussyPass23/02/15 11:37 PM
5

So according to her logic assault should be legal because murder is worse. Got it, I'll make sure to beat her senseless should I see her as a show of support.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 01:14 AM
36

Not a pussy pass, just discrimination and targeting of a male student. Pretty much the exact polar opposite. Instead of a women not getting punished for committing a crime, its a guy getting punished for not committing a crime.
/r/PussyPass19/02/15 09:42 PM
1

According to the link you posted, 10% is exactly $82,765.95 to each of 10 charities.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 04:25 PM
7

"Hate fueled votes" isn't exactly accurate in regards to planned parenthood. They do a lot of good work, including STD testing for me. Granted they also support circumcision, but all things considered I'd say they're a good distance from public enemy #1. That said, I'd really like a prostate cancer charity given it's potential funding cut from the CDC.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 03:15 PM
86

It shouldn't even be relevant that she was texting. She was making a left turn, so he had the right of way. Despite this she didn't use signals or make any indication she was turning. That's textbook case of reckless driving resulting in death, and should be an open shut case to convict her of manslaughter. The texting is an additional violation ontop of all that. I'd say her attempt to destroy evidence (deleting recent texts before surrendering phone) should warrant a bigger punishment as well.
/r/PussyPass16/02/15 03:58 AM
8

She had only a skirt on, which since they were banging was likely hiked up anyways and about as effective as having socks on.
/r/PussyPass15/02/15 05:52 AM
2

Here's hoping it's not because she seriously hurts someone.
/r/PussyPass13/02/15 04:42 PM
4

as long as these people stay clean 99% of the time they won't repeat their offense 37 convictions. She had skipped out on court ordered rehab/checkins/etc multiple times before.
/r/PussyPass12/02/15 05:07 PM
3

Still works for me (though it may just be cached). Maybe try accessing it through a proxy such a vtunnel?
/r/PussyPass12/02/15 03:36 AM
12

Given it was cited as fact in court, I'd say possession and use at the very least, with intent to distribute as a possibility.
/r/PussyPass11/02/15 07:17 PM
14

They make a good point. Brain damage certainly fucks peoples lives up.
/r/PussyPass11/02/15 01:29 PM
1

There's actually nothing in the article saying they'll be able to sue for support/inheritance. It may be part of the law, but nothing I see says so.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 04:48 AM
8

I don't think it is sexist in itself. As humans we're biologically programmed to notice certain traits. They're not doing it cause you're a guy, they're doing it cause your ass. What is sexist though is people telling you it's no big deal/ignore it/hahahahaha, and then turning around and saying people cat calling girls is akin to rape and should be out lawed.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 04:13 PM
6

Attack the person not the argument.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 04:55 AM
41

So women initiate the majority of divorces because they love commitment so much?
/r/MensRights03/02/15 10:43 PM
2

I was quoting the article that seemed relevant to OPs title. I fully agree with you, unfortunately no fault divorces are a thing. It must also be within reason.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 04:52 AM
5

I was quoting the article because of OPs title/claim.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 12:23 AM
25

It is always a mystery to me why ex-wives — and husbands! — feel entitled to be provided with the grand lifestyle they once enjoyed and live high on the hog for ever more. All of it funded by their former spouse. Why?
/r/MensRights01/02/15 11:24 PM
3

Course you could not have sex with a lady and they just accuse you. Can still be difficult to prove otherwise, especially if they refuse to submit to a rape kit or allow any proof that they were raped (or not) to be collected.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 01:08 PM
17

Note that they based it off of the median, not the mean/average. 1, 2, 3, 88, 99 the median is 3.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 04:05 PM
1

She plead guilty to resisting arrest.
/r/PussyPass13/01/15 06:52 PM
11

Resisting arrest, attempting to flee, and assaulting an officer enables you to get an officer fired and sue? Fuck this world.
/r/PussyPass13/01/15 03:58 PM
1

I'll bet you anything they asked shit like "You and your long term steady girlfriend whom you have sex with all the time go to dinner for your anniversary. You both shared a lovely meal and a glass of wine. When you get home she drags you into the bedroom. Do you have sex with her?". If you answered yes then you're a rapist because she had alcohol and was unable to consent.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 06:30 PM
2

They're campaigning and suing against informed consent laws. I think that about says it all.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 06:06 PM
10

So she killed him, desecrated his corpse, lied to friends and family by texting with his phone, then lied pretending she was a grieving widow, then lied trying to say she was of not sound mind, and now she claims he was abusive. Yep lets report that he was abusive as iron clad solid fact.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 01:57 AM
43

And yet the fact that men get most nobel prizes and have contributed most major inventions and take up most stem fields is somehow sexist and not at all indicative of most woman's ability.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 12:07 AM
3

The primary issue I see is it's nearly impossible to prove. Either side can post it and delete their browser history. So either you assume innocent until proven guilty in which case 99.9% of cases will end with no conviction. Or you give special weight to the accusers testimony which does away with the rights of the accused.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 04:11 PM
2

"Shit, I can't defend my position. Well I guess that means you're a rape apologist/misogynist"
/r/MensRights18/11/14 01:49 PM
6

"Shit, I can't defend my position. Well I guess that means you're a rape apologist/misogynist"
/r/MensRights18/11/14 01:45 PM
9

Support him with this petition He doesn't deserve to be remembered for this when he dedicated a decade to one of mankind's most momentous feats of the modern era.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 10:10 PM
126

You know what else would make it easier to punish offenders? If we assumed literally everyone ever accused of any crime is guilty. And as they often say crimes are under reported, so we should randomly pick people off the street and convict them of some random crime to account for the under reported crimes. It's a bullshit point really. It should be hard to take away years of someones life.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 02:30 AM
24

I doubt that they'd put in "have a nice day" type comments while leaving out actually vulgar mean comments. And given how much of the former there was, I doubt they really narrowed down much at all (unless there were a bunch of white guys being ultra douchebags but they were too racist to consider including them),
/r/MensRights30/10/14 09:37 PM
-5

So she canceled it herself then. "Shit, they didn't cancel it. I guess I have to since I didn't prepare anything. I'll say it's because I want to censor a group of people. I know, how bout people with legal conceal permits." Seriously though, if she put in hard work preparing to do a talk, it only makes sense that she'd record it and put it up on youtube so people don't miss out on a "valuable thought provoking talk". If she doesn't, well that speaks volumes about her and the "threat"
/r/MensRights15/10/14 01:34 PM
2

That looks SUPER hygienic!!!
/r/MensRights13/10/14 08:12 PM
0

I'd say that her not getting the nobel prize was less to do with anti women sentiment and more to do with anti nazi sentiment.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 01:17 AM
12

His argument might hold water if he could name a single female who should have gotten a nobel prize but didn't.
/r/MensRights11/10/14 03:45 AM
2

Not a twitter user but I'd guess she gets hundreds of tweets per day. I HIGHLY doubt that she would have an app to notify her for every single one.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 04:11 PM
1

Even if they were doing that, it's still only a 3 minute window. I'm not saying it proves she faked it, it just strongly suggests it and makes it the most likely explanation.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 03:38 PM
1

Which is why I said she may have issued the threats herself.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 03:34 PM
3

Not the latest, the last. That was the last tweet that account ever made, and they got the SS when it was only 12 seconds old.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 02:05 PM
1

Someone saw the tweets, sent the link to anita, and she opened it, all within 3 minutes? And happened to get the last tweet made as well.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 01:00 PM
1

It's still only a 12 second window though because that was the last threat made.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 12:57 PM
6

At one point the police said she didn't contact them. Guess I didn't get the update. The evidence was just extremely fishy behavior and proof from her. The screen shot she took of the threats was 12 seconds after the posts were made, she had just logged out of her twitter account, and there was no search. That leaves 2 possibilities. She made the threats herself, and immediately logged out and took a screen shot of them. She was logged out of her account, she searched her own account, happened t…
/r/MensRights07/10/14 05:18 AM
27

Could certainly do with some fact checking. Anita did not contact the police and there is evidence she may have issued the threats herself, and there isn't any claim Quinn slept with a journalist, there's rock solid proof.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 10:25 PM
2

Pressure to get the guy to marry her.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 09:49 PM
2

may or may not have!!! Exactly. You can easily make an argument against circumcision based on what is. You don't need to resort to what might be.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 07:33 PM
2

IMO we actually have the better deal on the surgery front. We can store semen for later use. If a condom breaks and the mom is forced to get an abortion I'm inclined to say that's much worse than a vesectomy.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 12:06 AM
2

If you intended to show them to a judge that means you also intended to be accused of rape so you would have the opportunity to show them to the judge. That's a bit harder for the prosecution to sell.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 01:05 PM
5

The law says it is “disorderly conduct” for a defendant to take intimate and confidential recordings, such as photos or videos, and then distribute them to intentionally cause serious emotional So only show it to the judge and not Facebook and you're good.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 12:35 AM
33

It does say he was on probation which often times means you're not allowed to have weapons.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 03:26 AM
2

I would say sexually assaulted.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 08:01 PM
3

My story is basically the same exact thing as you. The main differences are I'm only 25, I found him last year, and I have made sure to keep that tidbit from my mother because she would likely have a very similar reaction to your mother if she found out.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 04:13 PM
7

Feminism, tackling the big important issues of the day.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 02:02 AM
13

Anyone else reminded of "How can she slap?" The way a guy instantly mobs him and everyone else slowly converges on him.
/r/PussyPass22/07/14 01:45 PM
33

I like how the woman had 2 previous counts of child cruelty beforehand to. Who could have possibly seen this coming.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 01:35 PM
8

We also lack context. OP assumes the only reason for the lack of belief is the fact that a guy was raped. For all we know the post could have started out "So the aliens were playing with a virtual boy and having a blast." and that's why the poster didn't believe the post.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 01:35 PM
16

They said they were equal, and then they charged the boy and not the girl.
/r/PussyPass09/07/14 01:47 PM
12

You can absolutely make a point for bringing no charges. What happened was indeed relatively harmless. The point of this is that they decided charges would be brought and they would be brought against the eight year old boy and not the babysitter. They decided the eight year old was the person with the most responsibility compared to a fourteen year old babysitter.
/r/PussyPass09/07/14 01:22 PM
1

I considered sarcasm but given the length of your post and how it touched on several different subjects I found that highly unlikely. Stick to one subject and/or keep it short, or the sure fire way of just adding /s
/r/PussyPass09/07/14 01:15 PM
38

She is nearly twice his age and in a position of power which should demand some level of responsibility and she initiated it. When 2 people are drunk and unable to consent, the person responsible is the person who initiates it. Despite all this, they charge the 8 year old and not the girl. You can make a case for not charging either, but to go after the boy and not the girl is a textbook case of pussy pass.
/r/PussyPass09/07/14 04:45 AM
3

Even if you can somehow rationalize an 8 year old being equal to a 14 year old (a babysitter in a position of power no less), how do you then go from being equal to only charging the 8 year old?
/r/MensRights09/07/14 02:07 AM
35

It's not banning all men, just reporters from the sun (and maybe other news outlets she disagrees with). It is still ridiculous that this is publicly funded under the guise of art when it's obviously just promoting a political agenda.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 01:26 PM
11

He's not saying they should, but by punishing the guys and not the girl the school is being hypocritical.
/r/PussyPass21/06/14 12:32 AM
6

OP put the wrong link, the story has had developments, http://www.tucsonnewsnow.com/story/25818959/father-accused-of-leaving-child-in-car-charged-with-murder I do however support that we need to wait for what does happen rather than on what might happen.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 10:28 PM
1

He's not saying that they don't reduce output, he's saying that their effect is far less than you claim to be. You seem to be saying you're half 50% effectiveness for a full week, while Karissa36 is saying it's more like 80-90% for 2 days. As to your experience with the 30 women, they were all experiencing the same hardship (period) and therefor agreed to slack of more than needed, because there wasn't anyone there who didn't have a period that would make them look bad. IE they milked it for all…
/r/MensRights13/06/14 06:57 PM
2

You've posted in MR before, and I'd guess they went through your history, saw that, boom insta MRA that's banned.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 11:05 PM
10

First replies must be made by feminists is my guess. A stupid and anti-discussion rule, but it's there.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 06:44 PM
13

I've heard from an unreliable source that his manifesto also mentioned a burning hatred for any man he deemed more successful than him, which likely means if they were not a virgin. I'm not sure where one might find his manifesto as it's been taken down most places, but it seems something someone could fact check.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 12:29 AM
14

for an official court and not a college hearing, a 0 evidence claim from an event that happened months ago, with evidence against the event in the form of texts, I don't see a conviction. And if he was convicted then there's no way he'd only get 6 months.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 05:06 PM
48

agreed, very fishy. Sorry to OP if this is true, but yeah I'm not so sure.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 02:20 PM
0

I vote for telling the bosses wife. Then we can hope the 19 year old berates the wife for being sexist for disapproving of her actions.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 02:14 PM
3

This was before it got so intense and spread though so that's not a given. However I can see this from the cops side as well.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 12:08 AM
0

I would say it does make sense, however it's not in the basic human rights of individuals interest.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 10:24 PM
-7

Just fyi, she did NOT say he had a psychological problem. She stated the symptoms of one which included delusions, and said "that's just like you miss except the delusions are real". As in if it weren't real I think you, the mother, is having a problem. Considering that, plus the mothers current emotional (and imo overreacting) state, she recommended counseling which I think is quite apt for this situation.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 04:26 AM
13

Also freedom of inquiry apparently means if you make an inquiry I try to get you fired.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 03:01 PM
-4

Anyone else notice how badly this is written? "There's times of the month" Aside from the grammar error a professional study shouldn't be too squeamish to say period
/r/MensRights09/04/14 12:25 AM
5

Make sure you record the next conversation so when she goes into court saying "His daughter is starving and he just doesn't care!!!" you can say "No, she's actually doing this just to pay off her bills play recording"
/r/MensRights24/03/14 04:09 PM
9

This was posted before and found to be bullshit. They included a picture of the girl which google image search revealed to be a porn star.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 01:54 PM
1

May have been just the one but I've had only bad experiences there. I was kept waiting over an hour past my appointment time, and it was shockingly expensive (~$120 for basic std test i believe). And then they messed something up giving me a false positive which was hell until I got a 2nd test.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 02:41 PM
11

They're encouraging more women to apply, not necessarily saying they'll only accept women.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 03:11 PM
4

As coach always said, "Another word for almost is CAN'T"
/r/MensRights07/02/14 03:47 PM
11

My reply which is currently awaiting moderation…lol. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/mar/19/myths-about-rape-conviction-rates It's people like you who perpetuate the myth and as you said, discourage victims from coming forward. I'd also like to add regarding this quote "More screams of ‘liar’ against the victims (although to be entirely fair to those who hate women so very much, they scream liar whether the defendant is found guilty, or is acquitted." Kind of like you screaming lia…
/r/MensRights07/02/14 03:45 PM
8

We can always hope for another light rain.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 03:04 PM
2

Eirick's girlfriend, 31-year-old Leah Hutchinson, died in December from a heroin overdose. Investigators say she died after being injected by Eirick.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 02:51 AM
1

We and I are discussing the video linked in the head, not everything he's ever done. And most included him in other speeches.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 01:12 PM
2

I'm saying she was normal for her. It is normal for serial killers to kill people, its what they do.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 01:11 PM
1

so she wasn't normal when she did the same thing again and again.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 05:26 AM
1

No personal experience, but I've seen a fair number of cases with friends/family and random ones in the news. So long as there is no reason (abuse, alcoholism, etc) even if you lose I don't see you getting less time than the offer. You may even get more time if you lose like half the summer rather than a month (probably won't get suspending support though). Their offer really is just insulting and a hope to rattle you or play off ignorance.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 02:54 AM
2

Aside from that quote he was much more even handed than most are these days.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 02:36 AM
-1

So long as women have at least 51% of the say in having an abortion or not, you're say is rather irrelevant weather it be 49% or 0%. And that is as it should be. Ideally you would both discuss it together and reach a mutually agreeable solution, but in the end legally a women needs to have the ability to abort regardless of anyone else. Echoing what TheCameraLady said, we just need to give men equal options in other respects.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 06:11 PM
3

Just FYI, if you actually go through the article, she didn't actually send any nudes to his boss. She just said it to give him a moment of panic.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 03:58 AM
6

I like how she says girls who choose to partake in pornos aren't people.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 08:00 AM
6

Some feminists of influence, possibly their womens studies professors, didn't like the idea of a speaker on mens issues. Thus they dug through his work and pulled some out of context quotes to distort and discredit him and whip everyone into an ill-informed frenzy.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 11:58 PM
2

If she's the sole guardian of the child (and most likely is) then they need her consent to do the test. The court may also require her to take part in the test as well.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 06:02 AM
10

And then they'll complain that the standard unfairly discriminates against women.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 10:45 PM
8

Circuit Judge Scott Shore told the 19-year-old Toulon woman that he would have given her a longer sentence if the law allowed it
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:13 PM
2

$90,000 too. And she was a minor and heavily coached by her mother it seems and done out of fear rather than malice.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 05:44 PM
2

I also like how she instantly went to "The babysitter is a female" never even entertaining the possibility it could be a guy.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 06:29 AM
7

She was suspected of 45 but only convicted of 2 it looks like.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 01:43 AM
7

This is what I was thinking. She's proven on paper that she alleges she is fully and singly capable of taking care of the child. However I do see hypocrisy when you look at the lesbian couple who broke up and child support went after the donor. I think it was in Tennessee.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 07:52 PM
30

Ski mask? The same ski mask wearers who illegally pulled a fire alarm?
/r/MensRights10/08/13 10:59 PM
9

Aside from being posted several times in the last 2 days, it's also never stated she is a feminist. We can't make false statements and dramatize things past facts. I believe she got a year suspended sentence, 30 hours community service, and had to pay the guy 80$
/r/MensRights08/08/13 08:01 PM
6

I thought the point was even after assaulting/attempting to kill someone with a knife (forgetfulness != killer) she was not only not imprisoned, but continues to live with her victim because "oh she's a harmless old lady" which has now been proven bullshit at the near cost of the mans life.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 04:47 AM
-4

So being a cheating asshole and a repeat liar (never gonna do it again, i promise) makes you look better than telling people you have an open relationship?
/r/MensRights06/08/13 02:56 AM
2

Well one of them is. I feel really bad for his wife.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 08:31 PM
5

The amusing part is his statement isn't disagreeing with the non-sexist feminism they constantly claim to represent.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 07:52 PM
0

I'd wager things like smoking and leaving without paying are much larger and more common reasons of why cabbies have recording devices. They're also useful if the patron is violent or sick and damages the vehicle. They also protect against all false allegations beyond rape. Here is a precise parallel of what you said: Putting windows in will stop eagles and hawks from entering your house and attacking your pet and you. Therefor since people all started putting windows in large bird attacks must …
/r/MensRights05/07/13 03:19 PM
2

well 2 cases (that I know of) that made it to news within 5 years in 2 countries. Not sure that's quite enough of a basis to call it often.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 02:50 PM
8

Without knowledge/consent of the other party it often is.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 09:47 PM
34

She closed the comments after the person posted the rules of the park.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 10:02 PM
4

Well if you have then she can't claim ignorance.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 02:01 AM
17

Before asking her to leave maybe you should have a conversation with her. By the sounds of it she has no idea what a big problem this is to you. Sit her down and tell her this can not go on, and you will take steps to make sure it stops, up to and including asking her to leave.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 11:52 PM
1

I imagine she had made up her mind already, and felt telling you was best because the only purpose you knowing would have would be to make you feel bad (as far as she thinks). Personally that'd be a pretty big breach of trust for me.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 03:00 PM
1

Do you wear a seat belt? Are you planning on crashing?
/r/MensRights15/05/13 05:27 AM
0

The median is the middle value, not the average.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 03:55 PM
-2

Well to be fair that is an idiotic question. It's a mid-evil society in which it's only proper for men to fight. Brienne Tarth, the biggest female who is in the military, experiences plenty of violence. Being stuck with a bear this weeks episode, a rape attempt a few back, etc. There are plenty of non-military instances, where there is violence against women (these are probably more common than non-military male violence) which renders your initial assertion 100% false. Or is sticking someone fu…
/r/MensRights13/05/13 01:46 PM
2

Medians are worthless, you want averages. If you have 2 people with incomes of 0, and one with an income of 9 trillion, then the median is 0.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 01:38 PM
0

Rape is most definitely a form of violence. Violence generally makes committing serious crimes easier, and even if they didn't use violence the first time, they may well use it should the re-offend (as many felons do).
/r/MensRights08/05/13 02:43 AM
2

Yes, they do need guns more than others. In fact most felons need them more than others. After all they did something foul enough to get a large number of people willing to label them felons, they've probably got a large deal more people looking for vengeance than the average fellow. However, society has a greater need to keep guns away from them than it has needs to keep guns away from others. Societies needs trump personal needs in these cases.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 12:53 AM
1

Your title is misleading. It is framed as such that the fundraisers in her honor were in response to her being exposed as a fraud. In reality they were previous to this, for her alleged cancer.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:30 PM
5

It's as relevant as discussing why it was mostly males who held jobs requiring them to be in the towers. You can connect literally anything to sexism. The computer I'm typing on, made by a computer science major, field largely dominated by men. That doesn't mean I should consider that every time I use it. This event is far enough removed that we shouldn't focus on it. Yes, men make up the majority population of prison, and that's an issue we can and should focus on today and any other day. But p…
/r/MensRights06/05/13 05:13 PM
10

This isn't a sexism issue. We can't take some random thing and just post it while adding "Most victims were probably maybe I don't know men, and therefor it's sexist". This judge is scum and a dirtbag and deserves the full wrath of justice, and as it turns out most victims were boys. But it's not due to sexism, it's due to corruption, bribery, and scumbags. This belongs here just as much as if I posted "9/11 most victims in the tower were men!"
/r/MensRights06/05/13 05:49 AM
3

The page literally says "deserves not to be held accountable for her actions"... I don't even...
/r/MensRights02/05/13 04:33 PM
3

I agree that the child should have remained with his adopters. 4 years is a long time. However barring the father from ever seeing his kid is pointless.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 03:31 PM
51

Feminism is easily the biggest promoter and supporter of rape culture. Without it, what would they complain about?
/r/MensRights26/04/13 03:24 PM
0

No problem my good sir/miss.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 02:22 PM
1

Well from all accounts I've heard it's been falling or staying the same for the last few decades (which makes sense, not much reason for intact to circumcise). Even if it were rising, this seems like an awfully steep rise.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 01:49 PM
3

Source? That seems quite high from my anecdotal evidence from the locker room, plus the rather random numbers used on the scale.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 01:31 PM
2

Character witness is unlikely then, as we don't really recognize online relationships much yet. Though if you knew about the affair previously you may still be able to help (got any texts/FB messages about it? Did he tell you over the game? You might be able to get those)
/r/MensRights19/04/13 10:03 PM
2

Did you know each other in RL for a significant period of time?
/r/MensRights19/04/13 09:20 PM
3

Did you know about the affair previously? If so you could testify saying this was an ongoing affair that she willingly partook in. If not, then you could potentially be a character witness.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 08:35 PM
-4

It just takes 2 seconds to look at the front page to see if literally the exact same title (minus xpost part) is there.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 03:48 AM
-3

2nd post of this link within 5 hours, ~10th over all time.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 03:23 AM
1

I see your point, though I think it rests on the fact that as a culture we are completely insensitive to gender as a reason, and extremely oversensitive to religion (especially Islam) as a reason.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 09:35 PM
1

So if instead of saying "You aren't allowed because there are Muslim women in there" they said "You aren't allowed because there are Muslim women in there and it is a women only time slot" then you would be happy? While I agree it's better, it's not an issue I would get more than mildly annoyed at, if I could even call it an issue. More like a gentle suggestion.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 09:12 PM
1

The first sentence is the historical reason for female only swim time that was brought about decades ago. He is saying "While this was created for Muslims, we are not excluding based on culture. As Muslims have no issue with it, we open their swim time to all females of any faith". Also, since when is it impossible to have more than 1 reason to do something?
/r/MensRights10/04/13 09:02 PM
1

here you go.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 08:48 PM
3

It was made for Muslim women, but while their faith disallows men from being present, it doesn't disallow women of other faiths. If the Muslims are happy with it why not allow more customers. Even if it weren't, I'd be fine with having female only time for those uncomfortable in front of men so long as the same opportunity is extended to men, which it is.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 08:31 PM
4

There are also male only spaces. It's also a YMCA pool. This isn't news, it's just a guy going off on a tirade omitting things he doesn't feel like mentioning.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 08:26 PM
2

He appealed already, and in reaction they offered the settlement to avoid it going to court because the judge and the wife are guilty of numerous crimes. His problem the judge says he will sign the settlement only if he abandons his appeal, and he fears given the judges disregard for ethics that once abandoned the judge will still not sign the settlement.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 11:27 PM
5

Certainly not when they don't announce themselves or their purposes. They did not and had the same standing as random muggers when they attacked him.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 05:02 AM
5

Seniority is always an issue, in any field, in any job, it's always been like that. It might not matter when it's 27 vs 29 years, but that's only because at that time the big promotions are in blocks of 5 or something. It may not make sense, it may not be fair, but that's the reality.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 03:50 PM
8

Seniority doesn't work that way. Younger teachers are almost universally more liked and more effective, but they'll still be paid half of what the older teachers are. This is likely something you do not know. It's quite possible they heard she was looking for another job, and they came to her pre-emptively to keep her rather than she jump ship/get in a price war.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 02:52 PM
10

You are entirely discounting her seniority, plus I doubt you have hard evidence on everything you posted here and much of it is actually heard through the grape vine. There is also the possibility of things you may not know. Just be wary and don't always jump straight to the discrimination button (much like feminists are doing these days).
/r/MensRights03/04/13 02:24 PM
70

Example that happens to me nearly a year ago. I was walking to work (an office job with proper office attire and briefcase) one morning. A little girl (~3-4) was playing with a ball in the front yard as her mother sat on the porch watching. As kids won't to do, she kicked the ball to hard, and it was heading toward the street. Not wanting her to run into the street, I took a few quick steps, stopped the ball, knelt down, picked up the ball, and outstretched my hand to offer it to the girl. The g…
/r/MensRights28/03/13 10:40 PM
2

You did comments for formatting reasons, but you still put in 0 formatting?
/r/MensRights27/03/13 02:34 PM
0

I took the attempted point as "these are all the things women go through but no men and therefor misandry isn't real and stop bitching about how men have problems too"
/r/MensRights27/03/13 03:55 AM
0

This is incredibly dismissive and patronizing that men are victims and we have issues. Now add a "wo" in there and that is what 5 posts on the front page of r/feminism is about right now. Seriously, I counted. And we can literally change this around to do the exact same thing. Women, are you worried about your future because of misogyny? You need to accept that it happens even if no one acknowledges it or offers help for it. Just woman up and take it. Just woman up and pay for all your dates or …
/r/MensRights27/03/13 12:12 AM
13

Prediction. A competent lawyer will advise her that the case is 100% hopeless, and she will tweet she is deciding to be the bigger person and not sue to obviously guilty sendgrid in a suit that would be a sure win.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 03:48 PM
3

The word you are looking for is suspect.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 03:37 PM
1

Well kindergarten was nearly 20 years ago, so I'm not sure about still, but it's certainly still fresh.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 02:49 AM
2

Aside from bullying, my kindergarten teacher beat me and other boys. She was finally fired for it ~7 years after I left, so she had been doing it atleast a decade, and up to 4 decades before people cared enough.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 01:26 AM
1

Good point. Maybe he could fake being really sick and nauseous in the morning to give an excuse for the unavoidable.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 02:53 PM
3

Try this as an explanation. It's my kid too, and you're the most important person in my life. It's personal for me too, and I need to be there with you. I'd be a terrible person if I wasn't. The trick is to not vomit while saying it.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 02:23 PM
35

Not going to the police means a lifetime of abuse. You seem to have everything you need (though if you can, get a recording of her threatening to tell them you beat her or pretending she is after she hung up, the later is slightly better). If you can, tape her/yourself as you "leave for work" and leave it on as you go directly to the police station. This will show she was in perfect condition as you left and any wounds found later are self inflicted.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 07:35 PM
1

If you can try to record her attempting to extort you.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 07:06 PM
2

Here you are fine sir/miss
/r/MensRights24/02/13 06:54 PM
10

Actually men are more likely to be raped (is us)
/r/MensRights24/02/13 04:17 PM
2

I do rather dislike how much of this sub is "woman does bad thing" though.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 04:44 PM
0

I was banned without even making a post there. Seriously one day I woke up, saw a red mail icon, clicked it,"You have been banned from posting in SRS: Reason " And I was like I've never heard of this sub before, how am I banned?
/r/MensRights20/02/13 02:33 PM
1

The person didn't even argue a point, they just presented the actual meaning. As such I wasn't sure they would want to be tied to us at all. Basically the quote blogged about was "if a key opens every lock in the world it's awesome, if a lock is opened by every key in the world it's bad". The blog asserted lock/key referred to vagina/penis, and the response/correction simply stated it is actually about power, and that women hold the power in the dating world and the standard should be compared t…
/r/MensRights15/02/13 11:58 PM
2

I got banned after being provoked by one of the big posters there (tytyger or something like that). I tried to remain calm, but when they are an 11 on the rudeness scale I could only keep it down to ~4. She then deleted all her responses and reported me. I took and SS of comments and showed it, of course no action against the greater offender.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:46 PM
2

Thought you were, but I put that there on the off chance you weren't plus to supply reference to any christians who never got around to reading the bible.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 06:07 AM
5

(1 Corinthians 7:18). To do so would be a bad testimony to others, as it tends to indicate that the person believes that circumcision is a requirement of Christianity. It is not. To claim that any work of man is required for salvation is heresy. Salvation is by grace, not by works (Ephesians 2:8-9). Circumcision means nothing to God, since Christ’s death (see Acts 6:15; 1 Corinthians 7:19). 1 Cor. 7:17 "As God has called each man, in this manner let him walk. And thus I command in all the church…
/r/MensRights10/02/13 05:56 AM
10

Christian parents - many who had no idea the simple procedure is available on the NHS. Or that Christianity doesn't ask that you circumcise your son.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 01:56 AM
1

Aisde from police and lawyer, try to figure out which place P is scheduled for and CANCLE the appointment. Make sure to prove that you are the father and you do not consent to it and they will deny (or atleast notify you) if she tries to re-schedule it. Then do the same with all other nearby hospitals. Once you have both your children safe, go to the media!!! I know this situation sucks beyond belief, but this is something that can get huge attention and bring about good change, both for how mot…
/r/MensRights09/02/13 02:38 PM
22

Smoking was opposed by the nazi's. If you dislike smoking, then you support nazi's.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 01:53 PM
0

To be fair, many of the patches are a placebo and pulling out has never been effective. I'd also attribute reddits reaction due mostly to how pro-choice everyone here is.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 07:05 PM
2

I recently moved so I don't know about my local area, but I know common law marriages have happened in the US before. Thanks for reminding me of the terminology, I'll look it up for my area.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 06:36 PM
2

While the author themselves misunderstands MRAs and grossly oversimplifies many things, I think it does make a valid point and we could stand to focus more on issues by themselves. I'm especially not a fan of the "if a man did this" posts that make up a sizable share here.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 05:04 PM
6

He was hoping a redditor here would happen to be/know a doctor in the LA area.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 08:40 PM
2

Assange intentionally went to sweden because of that fact. Sweden wants him so they can not kill him (as opposed to most other places).
/r/MensRights21/01/13 05:53 PM
11

Feminism and rape has just about nothing to do with it. The government wants him beyond reason (understandably so), and they're using whatever they have to make it appear like a warranted attack against him. If this weren't there he'd be in the same spot but for charges of jay walking.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 03:27 PM
2

What about it? There are no direct legal consequences for adultery.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 04:39 PM
2

The reason I've been told is you can commit a crime while drunk but you can't give consent while drunk.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 02:11 PM
7

It says the company and plan isn't liable. It doesn't say anything about the ex. He should go after her and I see no reason why he shouldn't win.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 05:27 PM
2

We don't. ~10% of accused are convicted. 2-8% are investigated by police who then come to a conclusion that the status of the case is somewhere between "not remotely possible that the alledged rapist could be convicted" and "the accuser is lying". This leaves us with a 65-80% grey area (depending on the study) where we just don't know. Since we don't know, we can use statistics to paint us a general picture and give us a rough idea of what we're dealing with. When we put the numbers on a properl…
/r/MensRights09/01/13 07:28 AM
2

Make sure the clinic knows that they'll have to get your consent to fertilize and you should be fine. There is another similar case going on, but it's only a case because of 1 major difference. That difference is the wife is 100% sterile now, and the frozen eggs are literally her only chance of ever having babies. If that weren't the case then the eggs would be destroyed. Currently the case is discussing to destroy them or not, afterwards assuming they aren't destroyed there will be another case…
/r/MensRights04/01/13 06:15 PM
1

I may be showing my ignorance and talking out my ass, but in this case, is a lawyer absolutely needed? I'm just saying this because the situation is so extreme plus it sounds like she would not have a lawyer as well. Get pictures of your ex's house, your daughter when she arrives, a list of witnesses with short details about what they've offered to say in court (gun within reach, drug use, daughter), show evidence of ex's complete non-interest, perhaps a copy of that evaluation that says the ex …
/r/MensRights16/12/12 03:24 PM
5

the children had been unlawfully killed As opposed to lawfully killing children?
/r/MensRights11/12/12 02:31 AM
-2

He said he liked doing it. If he had expressed distaste or some trauma from the event I (at least hope) people would express their sympathies.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 01:51 AM
4

I only read the first half, but your title is very misleading/wrong. It seems her main argument is the lack of care for females. While I don't agree with everything I read, I can certainly see how females have some medical needs men don't, and the fact that 25% of detention centers have 0 pregnancy support/care does seem like a problem.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 11:37 PM
3

That is freaking amazing. +1000 points to his bosses.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 05:31 PM
3

First, that is one of the stupidest, most idiotic laws I have ever heard of. I think personally, for you, getting the charges expunged would be best. It's likely quicker, and as we all know even having the charges can make getting a new job difficult (I imagine you were fired?). However, looking at the bigger picture, these scum piles need to learn their lesson. I also imagine this is one of the few times the state might be on your side. I mean in addition to locking you up, she also wasted stat…
/r/MensRights17/11/12 03:32 PM
2

according to the mans story there was no woman. And if you read my first sentence, I said "Assuming the mother is telling the truth" as in my judgement is contingent on that fact.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 05:01 PM
5

Assuming the mother is telling the truth (seems less likely compared to mans story) the outrage is entirely valid. All he had to do was open the door and let them in. That poses hardly any danger to himself, and saves the life of 3 people. I think if it were a women there would be at least near equal community feelings.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 02:18 PM
5

sexist discrimination of any kind So you believe sexist discrimination only applies to women...? Nowhere did I see (or in the original release) did I see "towards women". Only sexist, which as I understand it, MRAs believe goes both ways. So until they actually say something, or when implemented shows itself to be one sided, kindly read what you post.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 02:25 AM
6

One of the biggest things we knock the feminist movement for is wanting it both ways. This is exactly what this thread is doing. We can't go "OMG huggies what terrible sexist ads." and then go "Sony, meh it's all in good fun."
/r/MensRights02/11/12 01:11 PM
-4

The financial impact of divorce can be crushing for both men and women
/r/MensRights30/10/12 05:01 PM
17

the creators of Jersey Shore Well that explains a fair bit...
/r/MensRights26/10/12 04:18 PM
3

That seems almost like a hidden insult to women. "women tend to have a higher tolerance for ambiguity" is the same as saying "men are more likely to perfect something" or "women are more likely to accept errors".
/r/MensRights29/09/12 05:26 PM
1

But I think there's a big difference between men's rights within feminism and MRAs who aren't really fighting FOR men as much as they are AGAINST feminism. seems like she is separating them into at least 2 groups. And I do see your point, yes it would be better if did say "let's discuss with them", and I in no way hold her to be perfect or ideal. I am wary of the fact she seemed to word most of her responses in a manner that could be interpreted many different ways. However I do think she is pro…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 05:26 PM
1

I think she had a very poor choice of words. She did say her belief in feminism is closer towards the original definition which is simply economical, social, and political equality among both genders, which I hope is something we can all get behind. I believe/hope she was saying/separating between MRAs who believe in that and those who just want to fight womens rights (which DO exist, just as there are feminist who are fighting mens rights, which, interesting fact, Jessica recognizes and condemn…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 02:07 PM
1

All those links would be very strong proof, if she ever said any of them. I guess you didn't actually read any of her ama, let alone the comment this post linked to. While I do not proclaim her to be perfect, in this ama I have learned that she is aware of and against problems in the feminist party such as transphobia and man hate. If you read the context of the very comment that was linked, you would know she prefers the definition of feminism which is simply economic, social, and political equ…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 02:02 PM
0

This is very amusing. She isn't saying all MRA's are bad, just the ones who fight feminism more than fight for mens rights (you know, like how we complain about the feminists who fight mens rights more than fight for womens rights). And by making this post, you have proven yourself to be in the former category. Congratulations!
/r/MensRights11/09/12 03:12 AM
2

video said 90% of teachers who sexually assault kids are men. Is there any truth to that?
/r/MensRights03/09/12 04:39 AM
1

I guess this is just where we differ on opinion. You obviously see nothing wrong with adults sexually assaulting kids/toddlers/infants, and don't see it as something worth condemning, however me voicing my disapproval of said sexual assaults is very worth demonizing in your eyes.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 02:08 PM
2

I would say no on both counts. He is a rapist, a felon, a violent criminal, and by all accounts most likely a very reprehensible person. I would not feel safe with that person visiting me or having partial custody of my child. He should have to pay. He forced himself on someone, likely without a condom. The mother is surely conflicted on weather to keep the baby or not, and worrying about raising a kid on 1 salary shouldn't have to be in consideration. However, child support laws still need chan…
/r/MensRights23/08/12 05:27 AM
2

it's a direct result of the answers to our questions of "why don't men have options regarding pregnancy" and that answer will be "You consented to a child and (and child support) when you stuck your dick in her. Alimony you consented to when you married her as divorce and alimony is a possible outcome which you are aware of as a possible result." A sucky reason, but there it is.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 07:58 AM
-10

I was mistaken on the owner, however my 2nd point remains (most likely) true. While she can not legally own the pet, that doesn't mean she wasn't the primary caregiver and it sounds as if she was indeed the one who fed, walked, played with, and had the strongest bond with the pet.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 08:42 AM
-20

there was no conviction. His lawyer (wrongfully) convinced him to plead no contest (basically a guilty plea but you feel better about it. You are saying you have no testimony or evidence to give on your behalf). BRING ON THE DOWNVOTES!!! He was intending to kill a dog against the owners wishes. While not rape, that is at the very least destruction of property. You also must understand how much peoples dogs mean to them, even if it isn't logical. My dog is my brother, and while I wouldn't play th…
/r/MensRights02/08/12 07:29 AM
4

he was just saying he doubted all that blood was from equal retaliation (ie a slap). herp de derp.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 07:36 AM
3

was there any action against the babysitter? Did yer dad get his job back?
/r/MensRights23/07/12 09:46 AM
1

exactly. This is the same reason doctors can't have relationships with patients. It breaches basic ethics. Being only unethical is rarely against the law, but it is certainly something you can be legit fired for.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 07:27 AM
1

It's more they are laughing at the irony. person goes to commit crime, has crime committed upon them. A local story, a women tried to rob a convenience store, the clerk disarmed her and sat on her to subdue her as cops came. She died. Most people ended up laughing and everyone patted the clerk on the back.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 09:41 AM
0

if anyone was wondering, as I was, here is a post explaining what and why from their perspective.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 12:00 PM
0

And what happens when one of the countless contradictions happens? What happens when someone who identifies as a feminist does something reasonable that you agree with, or do you defacto disagree with everything they say regardless purely because she identifies as a feminist? There are stories of people who call themselves christians in the south assaulting muslim people. At that same time there are others who call themselves christians forming a protective circle around muslims so they can pray…
/r/MensRights12/07/12 01:33 PM
0

I know beatingwomen is a troll, it was just an example because THERE ARE people with those kinds of ideals that associate themselves as mens rights. And however many people act like that while associating themselves with mens rights, the definition of the mens rights ideal will never change or stand for that and will be egalitarian. Just like feminism. You are letting the actions of individuals change the meaning of words, and it does not work that way.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 10:59 AM
-4

Technically it is. Feminism by definition is egalitarian. However when people say they are anti-feminst, they usually aren't talking about the definition, they are talking about the extremists who call themselves feminists, like someone who is anti mens rights might be talking about r/beatingwomen.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 10:14 AM
3

you really expect them to go through each and every one? There are dozens, maybe more, and half the article would be just names.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 12:43 AM
2

the ones they specifically name, such as beatingcripples and rapingwomen, I can sort of get behind.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 10:17 AM
5

The issue was is it constitutional to force you to pay a non-government entity, and the answer is no. However, they could have done the exact same thing with a tax that says "pay x, but if you have healthcare then you are exempt" which is why it passed, and that's why it was upheld. It wasn't done as a tax because of several reasons. stigma against socialization obama didn't want another tax under his name it doesn't fit the standard of what most people view as taxes (in that some people would b…
/r/MensRights28/06/12 03:13 PM
9

I saw on some stories of it that they openly said they are against it because it means male circumcision would be comparable to female circumcision.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 11:27 AM
0

as long as they abuse caps lock I'm all for it.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 09:39 PM
1

As I said, to judge a single case as in the mans interests is very bad. I am simply saying, statistically, if 1000 men are forced to have sex with women and 1000 women are forced to have sex with men, then the numbers of reality say that a lot more women will be unhappy compared to the men, mainly because society teaches men the sex you get the more awesome/manly/cool you are, and the more a women has sex the more she is a slut/whore/etc. Ideally that should not be the case, but it is an imperfe…
/r/MensRights26/06/12 09:25 PM
-7

"you can't rape the willing." While you cannot assume that on a person by person basis, statistically many men would welcome sexual advances by women while the reverse is not true. This, while the product of a sexist upbringing, is the world we live in.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 02:37 PM
-7

while murder is worse than rape in real life, he makes some valid points about the subject being portrayed in fake mediums. We can all relate to killing and death, but as he said in most cases women can't just go out and rape, and the primary perpetrators of rape are male.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 01:19 PM
2

It's not exclusive to the opposite statement of "a home isn't a home without a dad", and a mom is just as important as a dad to a healthy family. While it may have been worded differently, I think you're reading too much into this.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 12:58 AM
2

GUYS!!! I figured out the answer. Patriarchy still exists and it completely rampant in their goal of promoting feminism and discriminating against men.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 02:40 PM
5

a quick google showed me about a dozen people who asked this question copy paste. it's a troll.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 10:12 AM
67

Birth is the number one cause of death, so if we make abortions mandatory for everyone that will greatly decrease the death rate.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 01:58 PM
4

not much to do with MR, more just asshole cops.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 07:37 AM
10

be careful of generalizing. That is a large part of what this subreddit is against, (all men are rapists, all american women are horrible, etc)
/r/MensRights07/06/12 06:56 PM
2

josh was actually smart, just clumsy and socially awkward, while drake was basically the opposite (common setting for any comedy, place 2 opposites together) with a lot of street smarts and smoothness while not being book smart. mom never really did all that much, and megan wasn't smart so much as an excuse to throw a random pie into the show now and then.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 07:04 AM
2

welcome to srs.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 07:08 PM
2

If it went differently the fire could have consumed the house and spread to other houses, thus causing a danger to the community.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 03:15 PM
8

How about if we impose something like if you falsely accuse someone then you receive the punishment you were seeking to impose on the person you falsely accused (or 1/2, 3/4, w/e is fair). That way if you falsely accuse someone of stealing a candy bar, you must give them a candy bar, and if you falsely accuse someone of rape you get years in prison. I would also like to add that it will have to be proven that it was false accusation. If there is reasonable doubt that a person is not guilty of th…
/r/MensRights31/05/12 09:03 AM
4

this is a much nicer yogurt commercial
/r/MensRights31/05/12 08:58 AM
8

If you actually watched the show it's not what you think. Aside from being a comedy show, it's also not saying men are idiots as it is saying like parent like son, so while josh and his folks are bumbling boobs, drake and his folks are freaking awesome at everything. The only one who breaks this rule is Megan, who is an evil manipulative demon spawn.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 08:28 AM
1

you can custom order shirts with anything on them. They even provide sparkly designs you can put words over.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 10:36 PM
0

Right, I didn't see the people cheering on the person in that shirt in the pic. For all we know there could be 8 people behind the camera person giving that girl the finger. I was getting the vibe from the OP that "omg we should burn all of these shirts and no-one should ever be able to say this kind of thing"
/r/MensRights25/05/12 09:01 PM
-9

Because free speech.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 08:11 PM
6

In which case I say they can go to hell.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 09:02 PM
3

Women police officers/firefighters were complaining the standards were too high and it was being sexist as not many women could meet them (they were the same standards for men) so they lowered the standards needed for women to get those jobs. I was saying so long as that doesn't happen here then I'm all for it.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 08:14 PM
5

If she was vocal about not wanting a big wedding (which I doubt) then I don't think she owes him for the wedding costs. The apartment costs are up in the air, as non-married/intending to be married people can share an apartment (compared to engagement ring, which is pretty much for intending to be married), but I think that largely depends on the money she withdrew from the account. If she did indeed take 20k that she has no claim to, then that sends a message of malicious intent.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 07:20 PM
7

So long as they don't lower the physical standards for women, I think this is a very good thing that they allow them full access.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 07:01 PM
1

Atleast she admits it exists.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 07:45 AM
2

What is happening with the suit? Is there hope that you explain the situation and maybe get partial custody of the child?
/r/MensRights23/05/12 07:43 AM
4

For those that can't read, they aren't upset that men are entering the careers, but because they receive faster promotions than women, as shown by statistics like while in the medical field, 5% of the nurses are men, while 25% of hospital administrators are men. They claim this is due to sexism, which may or may not play a role (some of the disparity is due to the tendencies of the choices of women like child birth and time off for the family, but it's unclear how much).
/r/MensRights23/05/12 07:38 AM
2

I haven't personally researched it myself, but I've heard many stories online and friends who have done both and abroad has sounded much easier in 90% of the cases. Of what I have heard, you contact an adoption agency, submit various bits of information, information processing, ~3-4 months after initial contact you fly over there for 2-4 weeks, have a few in person meetings including the child, sometimes with the child staying with you in the hotel and checkups to make sure you can care for them…
/r/MensRights22/05/12 03:45 PM
5

I know it's often cheaper and quicker to go overseas to china/india and adopt a child there. Assuming you are in US, it could be years and 10's of thousands before you get through the bureaucracy and actually get your kid.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 09:58 AM
-5

Surprisingly reasonable and well supported statements from 4-chan.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 09:01 AM
1

pic aside from the mini-skirt, there is also a leather jacket, a lot of pieces of cheap jewelry, heals, and a wig. I know at my school a girl (and several were over the years) would be suspended for wearing that.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 07:46 AM
1

I have the same problem with both scenarios, and that is intent. This isn't a case of birth control failure or something. 30 kids, by woman or man, a lot of those have to be intentional. He intentionally created kids, and is now regretting the results of his intentional actions, and too fucking bad. Also, all the mothers and the father are idiots as several others have pointed out.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 08:31 PM
0

which exist because they just spontaneously, with no outside influence said, "Hey, lets implement a bunch of new offices for women even though we have received no requests to do so."
/r/MensRights21/05/12 08:16 PM
2

This is the last time I'm going to repeat something. Women of the feminist movement (and many others, good and bad, nazi's and humanitarians) influence the government to fulfill their agenda. That government needs to put in place the safeguards so no single group has too much power while also taking into account the wishes of the people they represent.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 08:02 PM
0

institutional as in the institution that is making changes, ie society and government.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 04:59 PM
2

That is correct. I'd rather not type out a 3rd time why that isn't an issue. Feel free to respond to those rather than just repeating yourself.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 04:18 PM
2

feel free to read any time now. I stated right at the start I would be writing this from the view of a reasonable feminist as defined by websters and dictionary.com (not your feminazi sites that you are trying to use to put down the entire group) As defined by accepted non-biased dictionaries, the goals of feminism are nothing any non-sexist person would fight against.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 03:02 PM
1

Then those ones don't. Don't generalize though, as some (these days likely a minority) do.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 02:55 PM
4

And those facts enable their misinformation and prejudice to be more effective. Technically speaking, the largely male government would be able to all but enslave women. But then they wouldn't get re-elected (if they weren't impeached). It's direct power vs indirect power.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 02:54 PM
3

So long as they work along the lines I have stated here.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 02:49 PM
4

None, but that is an institutional problem. girl writes what.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 02:28 PM
5

While personally I don't buy that definition of sexism, they do have a point, but they also don't fully explore the current state, which I shall do so now. Fact: Government is primarily dominated by men. However, the actions and opinions of these men have influences. These influences include misinformation and prejudice from women, which the men then act on to be sexist towards other men.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 02:26 PM
4

Ideally yes, but as I say in my OP re. 4, Specialization, groups can work much better towards their goals if they have fewer goals to work on. So long as the progress of women stops once it reaches equal levels of men (or if it continues then men's rise with them) then it is working towards a better world. There is full opportunity for other groups to address the issues for men, and while I wouldn't expect Feminism to actively take part, I would expect their full support and recognition that the…
/r/MensRights21/05/12 02:17 PM
3

yes, though I'm not sure where that came from.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 02:08 PM
2

the doctrine advocating social, political, and all other rights of women equal to those of men.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 11:10 AM
6

I shall again play devils advocate again despite the risk of downvotes. I will be writing this from the view of a reasonable feminist who bases their opinion on confirmed facts. re 1. Feminism is based on the assumption that society and government law have gender based inequalities in them, some of which damage women. Society includes everyone, men and women, so those inequalities are perpetuated because the society allows it to, which requires a majority population, so that includes men and wom…
/r/MensRights21/05/12 07:38 AM
2

I believe the hardest part of a tattoo artist is simply the art, and you can get practice with a simple pen & paper. After that they get to ink up a piece of pig skin a few times before onto the customers.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 07:14 AM
1

Oh yes, because I forgot where the students said in the report that the girls were proportionally the same size skirt as the male student did. As I said, the primary issue here isn't that he was wearing a skirt, but that he violated the dress code, in this manner as a $10 whore, which could cause significant distraction in the school classrooms. And if you've ever been to school, you know it's already hard enough to get the students to pay attention. The only reason this is even a story is becau…
/r/MensRights21/05/12 07:09 AM
-2

On the other hand, women are limited to only 10 items, because they place much more value on appearance and are more likely to steal items (or so the false stereotypes say).
/r/MensRights20/05/12 06:42 PM
1

So, you are saying this outfit is exactly as acceptable school clothing as this outfit based purely on the fact that the skirts are about the same length?
/r/MensRights20/05/12 06:39 PM
1

And as I said in my OP, I would condemn that if it happened, but it hasn't. You can't judge someone on what they maybe could have done in a different situation, because they didn't actually do it.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 06:08 AM
1

Did you see what he was wearing? He was dressed like a $10 whore. Ideally he would be written up for that, but the school had enough faith in people to think "We don't really need a rule that states don't dress like a $10 whore, people are smart right!" Given that they don't have that rule they can't say he violated the don't dress like whores policy, so they chose the closest thing to it that was in the rule book.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 08:29 PM
8

In hopes that I won't have to agree with fox, I think it's simply a poor choice of words on Michelles part. I believe her message was more intended to say "If you want to marry a druggie who dropped out of high school and lives in his parents basement, you're gonna have a bad time"
/r/MensRights19/05/12 07:46 PM
8

I'm not sure about their idea for soy burgers. Personally, a large reason I don't eat soy is because people try to pass it off as meat. I respect some people don't eat meat, and they need to respect that I don't eat fake meat. Also soy tastes like shit. Disclaimer, I do eat other veggies, just not soy.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 12:16 PM
17

I'm glad the movement still has some people who are critical of themselves and will speak out when a "member" of their group says terrible things.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 12:12 PM
-16

If they had a legit dress code as part of the rules (as many many schools do) then they didn't go out of their way to target him, he went out of the way to violate school rules. Until I see something that says a girl went around school in a bikini and wasn't punished, there is nothing wrong with this.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 05:53 AM
1

While not homeless/poor, I have certainly lived the frugal life of a college student. And I must say, would those immediate concerns not take priority over a tatoo in most logical reasonable people? btw in the video it is said she has been very poor off for all of her life and homeless for most of it.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 04:52 PM
1

She'd be able to save by not spending money on tatoos. Keep them with you. Alot of cleaners offer free service to unemployed people looking to get job interviews.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 04:36 PM
1

I'm not saying 2k is the difference between home and homeless itself, but there is definitely a better use for that. As far as how much, $50 is pretty much bottom of the barrel for prices, and she had atleast 20 tatoos on her. If I were in her position, that would probably be put towards good cloths and preparing for job interviews.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 04:12 PM
-1

What is that, like $2000 worth of tatoos? Homeless people sure got their priorities straight...
/r/MensRights18/05/12 02:25 PM
3

The court may terminate the parental rights may, as in optional, as in it's entirely the courts decision. Given that the state gets a portion of the child support you pay, it's highly unlikely a court would wish to terminate the parental rights.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 11:20 AM
7

"They'll say they are pissed and why they are pissed, but they don't talk about their feelings." ...wat?
/r/MensRights18/05/12 07:12 AM
8

Not a fan of victim blaming.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 10:37 AM
11

I find it ironic that she wanted to study genetics, and then throws the results of a genetic test away.
/r/MensRights12/05/12 08:03 PM
3

Both cases should be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted. It is entirely possible for a rape case to have no convictions of either side. If the judge/jury only feel 50/50 or even 60/40, then I would not call that a reasonable doubt and would convict no one.
/r/MensRights12/05/12 09:01 AM
7

While I do think she should go to jail, there are some things about this story that I really really like. She is named, and the accused man is not. 150 hours of CS plus the year of supervision is at least in the ballpark of a decent punishment, compared to the cases where the person was given some $200 fine or some shit.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 04:27 PM
1

It sounds as if the women didn't intend to hit him and it was out of her control (other than giving up her right to vote). She was trying to go around him to vote, and he jumped in front of her getting hit before she could stop.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 11:39 AM
1

the 6th amendment I believe.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 04:06 PM
1

It says it is the crime which women FEAR the most, not the most common or harmful one. This statement is most likely true, given the medias portrayal of rape and men. Sociology is studying the state of the society which is much more about the peoples perception of that society rather than the actual state of the society.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 07:13 AM
1

TIL of Godwin's law. Thank you kindly.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 07:00 AM
4

I think it's good news. KKK references are pretty much only saved for the threatening groups. Now if they just start throwing in some Hitler/Nazi/Manson in there then we'll be a perfect mirror of the relationship between fox news and democrats.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 06:36 AM
82

As a lifeguard, if I had to interact with any kid and their mother was present, there was about a 1 in 3 chance I would get yelled at. Twice I was called a pedo as I helped kids regain the use of their lungs (We don't do mouth to mouth, we use these). I just remember that it's the moms who are shits, not the kids, and having a less than exemplary mother at times, I would never want to punish the kid because of the mother. Please understand that the kid knows you helped and will remember it. The …
/r/MensRights06/05/12 06:58 AM
7

I must be seeing things, because I swear that I see a link entitled "Why?" that sends you to the information that explains why.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 09:01 PM
1

I'm more shocked that there is a website dedicated to helping people cheat on their SO.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 11:49 AM
1

I didn't say it was bad at all, but the good and proper thing is often not the first thing to come to someones mind in high stress situations. If I come home to my house being robbed, the proper thing to do is lock the door and call the police. Can you honestly say that is the first thing that would come to your mind? Because if I'm honest I believe my first thought would be to go into the house, shoot the robber, and make sure my dogs are ok.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 05:30 AM
38

I think the bizarre may be more referring to the line of thinking "My wife just assaulted me in front of my kids, so I had to have her arrested and now I need to fill out police reports. Better make sure twitter is updated." All and all I would say it's fairly unbiased, sticking to as many facts as possible with very little opinion. That said, I've seen all too many reports where a man allegedly assaulted a women, and the media have no problem using plenty of opinion on those stories.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 03:43 PM
1

Even if the female only things aren't covered in the health plan (that is an option) then females still pay more (though the difference is less), because of number 2. Not all women complain about every headache, but all of them are charged as if they do. While I'm sure the insurance companies could easily absorb the loss and bring both situations to even, that's not how the "free" market works, and I doubt they'd be willing, so that would mean men would pay more for health and women would pay mo…
/r/MensRights24/04/12 09:47 AM
1

more google top results Before you throw it in my face, yes men can end up paying more for medical later in life due to lower life expectancy, but for most of our lives we pay much less. Women face higher health care costs for two main reasons that I've heard of, one biological and one a (real world) result of a sexist society (or so they say). Maternity, pap smears, mammograms, and other various tests related to being a female which outweigh the tests purely for men. Women make more claims, esp…
/r/MensRights24/04/12 09:03 AM
1

it is a fact guessed to be stemming from another fact. The facts are blacks have less (insurance dropping them perhaps) and blacks pay more for life insurance. The only guess is that the 2 facts are related, and they may not be, but that is irrelevant. I know about life insurance because I as a white male have purchased life insurance for myself and informed myself on the subject as it pertained to me. I was unaware of any difference before a purchased it, just as I am more a less unaware of man…
/r/MensRights24/04/12 07:54 AM
1

"... blacks to own more expensive types of coverage..." I didn't read all the way through it, and that was just the first google result, but it seems that not only do blacks pay more, but not as many even seek it in the first place. I'd also like to add that it goes both ways, as women pay higher medical insurance.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 07:35 AM
2

I never said men and women were the only groups with differences. If it's based on the stereotype that blacks get into gang shootouts and men are horribly reckless drivers then it is racist/sexist, but if it's based in statistical data of thousands/millions of cases, then I don't see an issue with it (as is the case with black peoples deaths/men in crashes). That is a real world fact and they should have the right to make logical choices, just as you have the right to not get life insurance. Wha…
/r/MensRights24/04/12 07:16 AM
5

Life insurance does not work that way. When you die, you get $x where x is your policy. Let's say you are a life insurance company and you cover an equal number of women and men. On average more men will die each day than women, which means most of your payouts are too men, so ideally they should make a larger portion of your profits, or it makes more sense to drop them entirely and only insure women. It may sound bad, but it's really not sexist, it's basic common sense for any business, the sam…
/r/MensRights24/04/12 06:42 AM
3

Slavery in the bible was more like being a servant. It was willfully entered into by the person, usually to pay a debt or in return for a crime, and it was not for a period of more than 7 years. It also isn't a required aspect of life, just like circumcision. The problem I was trying to point out is while people know (or maybe like you they don't know but rather accept it despite what they think the bible says) people don't practice slavery, but they practice circumcision stating the bible deman…
/r/MensRights23/04/12 10:04 PM
7

Well that goes without saying, though what perhaps doesn't is Jesus basically abolished circumcision as being gods will. So all those Christians/Catholics who circumcise in the name of god would do well to read the bible.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 01:38 PM
40

God wants females to be circumcised too in the faiths where it happens.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 11:00 AM
1

to get it from a credited DNA testing facility, it should take 2 business days and 400-2k. I have also heard of do it yourself kits you buy from a pharmacy and it has the results in an hour or 2. Personally I think this whole situation is a good thing. Most situations have the roles reversed, with the man begging not to be named father until the tests come back and the mother doing it anyways, and then forcing child support despite lack of dna relation.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 07:15 AM
30

I was riding the tram from work (business suit, suitcase, etc) and a large group of children (~5y/o) got on plus some adults, I assume teachers. There were of course not enough seats so many had to stand. I made room by moving my suitcase and moving over, but no one came. Soon I noticed one of the kids got tired and ended up sitting down on the dirty, cigarette strewn floor. I then offered "Hey you want a seat?" He appeared grateful and moved to take the seat. The teacher then leaped, took him b…
/r/MensRights19/04/12 10:59 AM
3

Personally I thank god it was only 3 days. I can't help but feel it would be much much longer if it happened in the US.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 07:35 AM
1

We won't kill them out of some misplaced sense of free speech and they won't kill us because we're just too much fun.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 07:09 AM
7

SRS wants an equal but opposite entity to oppose, so they are trying to frame us at the level they are at.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 09:42 AM
1

the quest of equality.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 02:27 PM
8

The claim here is a doctor knowingly mislead the parent to give consent for an unneeded surgery, likely to pad their own pockets, and he is having negative side effects of that surgery. The fact that it is about circumcision is coincidental, and likely only there because it was easiest/the most conveniently explained surgery.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 01:36 PM
1

Well as I said there is also the part of saving years of time plus mountains of paperwork. Just saying you should consider it and spent a bit of time researching it as an option.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 01:22 PM
2

Adoption in the US is painful as well, taking years and the process is more expensive than if you actually had the child and were paying food/clothing/medical/etc. for it (even if you are married). Look into overseas adoption. I'm not entirely versed on it so I don't know the importance of marriage, but I know it's a heck of a lot cheaper and I remember plenty of stories of people getting their kids in 3-6 months as opposed to 2-4 years in US.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 07:30 AM
2

25% is a big improvement from 70% (plus the other side effect). I give it a thumbs up.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 07:16 AM
2

Mothers get 6 weeks off of work to stay with their kid after birth. In US it is standard and most common that you will have 10 days of vacation time. Not being a parent myself I haven't shopped around, but I know for my sister ~10 years ago my parents paid about 700 a month for day care (M-F 8am-5:30)
/r/MensRights16/04/12 09:55 AM
4

The trolls only really hurt us if we let them. We give the same advice as if it were real, and 99% of the responses are correct and given we record everything, the only people who believe the trolls that "we are a hate filled group" were already set in that belief and it's highly unlikely they'd ever be for equality.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 10:04 AM
21

Women are being hired to do the same job which has physical requirements. If anyone wants to do that job, then they need to meet those requirements, and that is not sexist. If you call it sexist then you are also saying that an unconscious person trapped in a burning building who must be carried out must instantly drop 30lb if the rescuer is a women, and if they don't then that inconsiderate unconscious person who obeyed they laws of physics is sexist and deserves to burn.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 08:21 PM
1

quite often those cases which are refuted involve just the mother and father in a room, possibly with a lawyer who is either bad or in favor of the mother, and a quick signing of a contract. In this case, the mother is stating in front of the court under oath that she will not pursue child support, and even then the judge is making a special case (ie skirting around the law some) to make it enforceable.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 04:24 PM
2

It should be, but being the devils advocate here, the argument against it is probably as follows. It should be the choice of the woman to get pregnant. If a man takes off a condom, then he is taking away that choice. If a woman stops taking the pill, she is making a choice for herself that she get pregnant, and it isn't causing any change or violation of rights to the man (if you assume the women takes full responsibility of the child, HA)
/r/MensRights13/04/12 12:10 PM
1

But the court can. Most agreements which end up being unenforceable are between the father and the mother. This one would be between the courts and the mother.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 07:19 AM
0

Those past cases are generally made between the father and the mother, while in this case it would be between the courts and the mother.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 08:15 PM
37

I'm not entirely sure where I stand on this one. As many of you didn't read the article, I will put forth the highlights. 1) The women had breast cancer, and the treatment would leave her sterile. Both partners agreed to IVF and put the fertilized eggs on ice until such a time as they wanted kids. 2) Man filed for divorce and began a new relationship that quickly resulted in a child 3) Woman stated under oath she wouldn't pursue child support, and judge would make special case for which it would…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 03:20 PM
3

Tell him to focus on not that. Try, as hard as I'm sure it is, to think of the positive things in his life. His job, his parents/siblings/cousins etc are doing well, etc. Be there for him to talk to. Of course my and all of us here have our hearts go out to him, and if he is a redditor let him know he has a group of people who will support/console him here.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 09:54 AM
4

I think the OP might be referring to the comments of the redditors.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 05:12 PM
1

Mr Ferguson had spent 15 hours in custody and Thames Valley Police had spent nearly £1,500 pounds investigating the claim. here's hoping he can get that back.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 06:32 AM
1

I know that was said, I believe I said a similar thing. However there were others who did not (others who I don't believe are either srs people trying to make us look bad or actually sexist males who mistake this subreddits purpose)
/r/MensRights06/04/12 08:15 PM
3

While it was quite low, underhanded, and dirty of her to do this, I see a point in the article that we might benefit from. If that were a real situation, then I whole heartily agree with the general message we conveyed, I think we could have been gentler about it. There were some comments of "knock the bitch out, she deserved it" type nature. I think a better response would be "It was wrong of you to hit her and should not have happened, though her wrong was greater and if completely necessary t…
/r/MensRights06/04/12 03:56 PM
2

I would suggest staying home one day changing the locks on the doors and breaking up with her. Have a friend present when you let her in to get her things (should she start flipping out and trying to break everything). Thanks for sharing and best of luck to you.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 09:34 AM
1

That's basically what I'd do. I know it sucks but no means no, and you should stop. I'm more a less talking about protecting self from the drunk hookup guilty in the morning call the cops type situation.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 07:17 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter