TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

bbeard Archive

View 27 posts and 247 comments by bbeard on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
424

bbeard/r/MensRights26/04/12 12:28 PM
243

bbeard/r/MensRights13/07/12 12:14 PM
207

bbeard/r/MensRights23/02/11 12:13 PM
154

bbeard/r/MensRights19/05/12 08:32 AM
114

[Eastern Culture]bbeard/r/MensRights27/12/13 10:22 AM
113

bbeard/r/MensRights26/12/13 06:08 AM
92

bbeard/r/MensRights24/12/13 06:23 AM
36

bbeard/r/MensRights08/07/11 10:13 AM
21

bbeard/r/MensRights02/03/11 04:58 AM
20

bbeard/r/MensRights03/03/11 06:15 AM
18

bbeard/r/MensRights26/04/12 07:11 AM
14

Discriminationbbeard/r/MensRights15/04/15 05:39 AM
13

bbeard/r/MensRights23/12/13 01:23 PM
13

bbeard/r/MensRights15/12/11 09:48 AM
7

bbeard/r/MensRights04/01/12 08:49 AM
6

bbeard/r/MensRights03/10/12 08:38 AM
5

bbeard/r/MensRights24/02/12 01:41 PM
3

bbeard/r/MensRights14/03/12 01:30 PM
2

bbeard/r/MensRights27/06/11 07:33 PM
1

bbeard/r/MensRights09/09/11 05:35 AM
1

bbeard/r/MensRights14/03/12 01:59 PM
1

bbeard/r/MensRights02/03/12 05:47 AM
1

bbeard/r/MensRights20/07/11 01:39 PM
0

bbeard/r/MensRights29/11/11 07:27 AM
0

bbeard/r/MensRights02/08/11 11:20 AM
0

bbeard/r/MensRights24/07/12 01:12 PM
0

bbeard/r/MensRights24/12/10 05:55 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It's not my primary language either, which is why it is even harder to find the closest correct interpretation of your posts. Nevertheless, I am not trying to criticize you personally - this is just something that I mentioned because it was affecting me. It would be a big help if you use some kind of auto-correct.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 08:12 PM
-2

Your posts have a high rate of spelling errors. I find this to be distracting.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 06:15 PM
2

Good joke, wrong place.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 01:58 AM
19

They were not fired, instead they got away with a slap on the wrists. The women, meanwhile, have been handed warning letters for "giving misleading information" but will face no further action.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 03:36 PM
3

Agreed that there are other factors, but it just seems silly to say that the right way to correct for possible subtle bias is by being overtly biased. We can see this even in other fields, for instance scientists are human beings with their own biases which can creep into their theories - but the solution is clearly not to reject science in favor of things like religion or postmodernism that celebrate being biased without even try to be/appear to be objective in any way.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 05:09 PM
16

You would think this shows that boys are discriminated against in grading, but some people are actually biased enough to think that the bias lies in standardized tests: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/education/news/JEE-test-format-may-engineer-gender-divide/articleshow/27765989.cms This is despite the fact that universally, it is accepted that the standardized test format is not suited to women. It is this realization that had made colleges in US opt for a more broad-based selection pro…
/r/MensRights24/12/13 12:31 PM
1

You are being deliberately obtuse here.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 08:16 AM
16

In his defense, he is a complete idiot. He has shown that again and again in the past.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 04:05 AM
2

I honestly don't understand the exaggerated outrage shown by internet feminists about this episode. They have no hesitation straight up lying about the intention of the accusations, as if the point was was to falsely implicate feminist figures instead of to show the brokenness of the system. Yes feminists, that is why we made it so obvious for you.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 04:20 PM
1

You may be blinded by your hatred of men, but the unreliability of wikipedia on controversial issues can be seen even outside of gender issues, for example where wars are concerned you often have nationalists of both sides fighting it out on the talk page.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 02:32 PM
-1

Still waiting to see SRS banned.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 09:26 PM
-1

The bottom left is empty. You should put 'misanthrope' or 'Islamist' in there somewhere.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 12:54 PM
4

I would also like to thank the community for this same reason.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 11:33 AM
1

No, feminism is not the way.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 12:59 PM
4

Well, now you know that feminism is not just about dealing with that. It is also about half-baked concepts of patriarchy theory. You can and should fight oppression against women without becoming a feminist.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 12:57 PM
1

My theory is that these women are blind to the guy who did not have sex here, to the extent that they forget to account for him while trying to take averages.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 09:19 AM
1

The averages are different to the extent that the population is not closed w.r.t this relationship, and also to the extent that the numbers of men and women are different. I realize that these do not change the numbers by much in practice, but the averages are probably not *exactly *the same.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 09:17 AM
2

Fair enough, but I was making a joke in the sense that they could actually become convinced that hiring male forecasters worsens the weather.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 03:14 PM
20

This could backfire.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 02:47 PM
2

I think it is funny how in this instance misandrist feminists and misogynist islamists think alike.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 11:19 AM
1

This is the real issue here, thanks for pointing it out.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 10:25 AM
1

Seriously? I don't. Think of the people exposed by agent orange. They are far more despicable than this violentacrez guy. Were they fired? Were they shamed on many kinds of media like this? Face it, some of them may even benefit from broadcasting their bigotry.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 09:51 AM
5

MRAs practice the same SRS ban model--remove all dissenters who don't follow the MRA religion. lolwut? CRY HARDER YOU HYPOCRITICAL FAGGOT MANGINA I see, manhood101 troll.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 06:07 AM
2

As an Atheist, I hate it when people try to blame something that essentially refers to just a sane approach to theological questions for the excesses of movements like communism. However, this atheism plus movement does demonstrate just easily how the name 'Atheism' can be co-opted by such fanatics when people try to make this from a personal tendency into a social movement.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 04:57 PM
4

They don't instantly ban all MRAs. That is all the proof some feminists need.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 03:18 AM
9

I don't like the business of people getting banned - but it is manboobz after all. Also, these people have no qualms about getting people/sites they dislike banned, so find it hard to care.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 06:37 AM
9

I have made a request for mens_rights here: http://www.reddit.com/r/redditrequest/comments/106n49/requesting_mens_rights_to_make_it_actually_about/
/r/MensRights20/09/12 08:53 AM
1

TIL.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 06:49 AM
2

More than the eye? Possible, but hard to believe. On the other hand, can't think of any other part that trumps over it.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 06:45 AM
4

I like to think that I am not a real man - I am more complex than that because I have an imagination.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 07:41 AM
5

WTF is wrong with the women who laugh at stuff like this?
/r/MensRights22/08/12 12:04 PM
4

First rule of feminism: never accept that misandry could exist. If something screams 'misandry', pretend it is actually misogyny,
/r/MensRights21/08/12 09:47 AM
8

As an Indian, I am beginning to think I should have voted! :)
/r/MensRights09/08/12 05:06 AM
2

I don't have a problem with what claims to have done then, although calling you a rape apologist for disagreeing with her here seems a bit harsh.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 01:04 PM
1

I don't see where we know for sure that she was not hurt. Still, I do see now that he claimed that she hit him first, and given that his story was more coherent at least that part makes sense. Still, I am a bit put off that the argument did not revolve around the violence itself but rather with the judge randomly deciding to believe one party or the other and then just repeatedly making judgements about the characters of the people involved.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 09:31 AM
2

But the real question is whether her dumbness has anything at all to do with being blonde. Why not 'stupid tall person', for instance?
/r/MensRights31/07/12 09:13 AM
2

But seriously though, the show is stupid. So is this episode. Although it feels good to see those manipulative teen girls getting called out, the accusation was that she was physically hurt and that is what needed to be addressed. Even if she started the whole affair 'because they were loserds', that would not justify her getting beaten up if that indeed had happened.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 09:11 AM
0

Degree of certainty that there was no real 'femitheist divine' to begin with: 90%
/r/MensRights25/07/12 10:51 AM
2

Well the original link links to feministe and feministing in the sidebar and the following seem to be even more clearly feminst: http://chd.ihollaback.org/2012/07/the-power-of-sharing-stories-the-delhi-metro-incident/ http://delhi.ihollaback.org/2012/07/03/new-submission-from-crochet/ I find it a bit misleading to say that simply because someone promotes some aspects of traditional gender roles, they cannot be feminist. After all, the feminist movement thrives on chivalry and male disposability …
/r/MensRights25/07/12 09:56 AM
2

Sure there are WR abuses in India, and there are also MR abuses. I am talking about this specific case. The protagonist here is not the blogger. People praising her: bloggers, commentators. (many bloggers wrote about this, see http://doiwrite.blogspot.in/2012/07/thank-you-real-heartfelt-thank-you.html).
/r/MensRights25/07/12 09:42 AM
1

I am an Indian, you are the one lacking cultural context. If you had known how crowded India can be, you would also know that there is no such thing as being too close to another person in Indian public transport . Anyway, talking back to women can get you beaten up. His ignoring her was even more pacifist than saying 'I like it here' would have been. I would call her a cunt, but I realize that would be considered more inappropriate than calling men 'dicks' for some reason. Let's just say that s…
/r/MensRights25/07/12 09:28 AM
3

She felt that she had the right to tell the first man where he could stand. Now, while some women may feel threatened by the mere presence of men near them, there are special women's compartments to make them feel safe. Men are beaten up, even, if they enter those by intention or mistake. Now, there is no reason why she should not be able to travel in the other compartments, but if she does then she should travel as an equal to the men there and not as someone who can arrogate to herself the rig…
/r/MensRights25/07/12 06:36 AM
-2

r/atheism is frankly a great sub reddit, so I will take this as a compliment.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 02:28 PM
2

Well I did log in there that time for that purpose, but in hindsight you are right. Fuck I'm scared now.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 12:00 PM
3

I suggest we go there and try to undo the vandalism as far as we can. As much as we disagree with feminism, this sort of thing is not acceptable.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 08:26 AM
2

/r/MensRights is not smart stupid enough to pull this one off. There, FTFY.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 08:12 AM
1

Interesting fact: For some reason the thread was sorted by 'controversial' instead of 'best' for me to begin with. Many of the top comments were along the lines of 'why are all the top stories about women?' However, in that setting I could not see any such comment at the top. I admit it spooked me out a bit. More to the point, this may just be a result of selective upvoting of stories about women by men who have had bad experiences with women. Of course it could also be that women are just more …
/r/MensRights16/07/12 09:46 AM
0

Not to mention that the thread was removed from the mr queue for referring to srs so there was practically no positive input, just trolls trolling you. In context there was nothing particularly deplorable in what you wrote. Shame on the ones who tried to make it a witch hunt.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 04:46 AM
1

Sorry, as Demonspawn pointed out I meant TwoXChromosomes.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 03:50 PM
4

The 'view comments on reddit' link was not working on imgur so I thought that the initial submission may have been removed, seems that it is still there on /r/TwoXChromosomes EDIT: didn't realize /r/2xc was ever a thing. Paid the price for laziness.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 12:16 PM
1

It's because Cosmopolitan may still be reasoned with, but SRS are lunatics. We all know that they are insane, and don't want to waste time on them.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 09:21 AM
1

Squirrels are cute, so I approve of this.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 02:36 PM
5

And then the women will whine about how the school is being sexist due to more female dropouts, resulting in their changing the grading to equalize that. Finally, when more women are being admitted and more are graduating, this will be seen as proof of female superiority and the fact that this did not always happen will be seen as proof of the historical oppression of women, to correct for which they will make the process even more discriminatory against men. You can just see it happening.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 07:40 AM
5

Four? That is too high a number.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 11:55 AM
1

One of the ways. There is also stuff like male disposability.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 09:47 AM
3

Google+ :P
/r/MensRights29/06/12 09:45 AM
1

Lucky guy.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 11:37 AM
1

Okay, while I don't completely agree with you, I don't see why you should just be downvoted into oblivion. So I will bite: why do you think that capital is the major cause of human misery? I can accept that the urge to obtain social dominance by putting others down is the major cause of human misery, and capital is a form it often takes. But of the forms it can take, I find capital to be most benign compared to other forms such as politics.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 11:10 AM
2

It is tempting to think of women as bumbling fools who can't even kill themselves after reading such whines about how 'women try to kill themselves more but men succeed more often', but I suspect the facts are much more mundane with men's attempts at suicide going unnoticed as accidents more often and also with men receiving less support in general from society being much less likely to make 'pleas for help', knowing that such a thing would not get them any sympathy and only make life more miser…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 07:15 AM
2

The tests for IITs/IIMs are different from the school leaving exams (SSLC).
/r/MensRights21/05/12 04:00 AM
5

The props are because the basic decency here is unexpected. Also for actually speaking out instead of just passively disagreeing. I do agree that simple decency like this should not be rare enough to deserve props.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 09:20 AM
1

http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/25832.html
/r/MensRights14/05/12 10:25 AM
8

No it isn't. They don't want equal results in terms of say workplace deaths or life expectancy.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 06:01 AM
-1

No, what I said was that if this study showed that women were more charitable we would never hear the end of it. FYI, I am well aware of how women's organizations try to spin the issue. There is nothing 'under reported' about claims that women are more charitable. I am not sure why I am trying to explain this so patiently to an SRS troll, guess I am just in a good mood at the moment.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 04:35 PM
1

Well, my point was this that if the findings of the study was the other way around, we would never hear the end of it. Sorry if I was not clear enough, but then again thank you for proving my point.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 03:46 PM
3

I really don't like turning charity into a pissing contest. That being said, if it was the other way round, we would never hear the end of it. So I can live with it.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 01:59 PM
3

Not many people on this subreddit, thankfully.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 11:01 AM
37

Honestly, those would make much more sense than this. Reason: many people think of those as acceptable behaviors. Few men think that raping is ok.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 07:25 AM
7

Yes those comments are ridiculous, as are the sandwich jokes. Very few reasonable comments in that thread.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 12:21 PM
5

Scumbag Doga: Too busy to screencap a comment. Not too busy to ban someone for the comment and refer to that comment in multiple comments of his own.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 09:55 AM
2

Just to let you know, I upvoted you because you do have a point. Agreed that in practice you need some sort of social skills to get your arguments heard. However it is lazy to pursue social skills to the exclusion of arguments, and to pretend that social skills are a substitute for arguments. There is a difference between accepting that social factors play a role in getting your argument heard and regarding that as desirable, or to go even further to say that social factors should grant not just…
/r/MensRights27/04/12 07:58 AM
2

Yes, indeed we are all about downvoting feminist trolls like viperz. However the comment seems to have been in askreddit. Don't think she/he/it would have dared to post something like that here. Pretty pathetic that the feminists have been reduced to false flag operations like this.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 06:10 AM
0

Not All Women Are Like That. (Just Most Of Them).
/r/MensRights23/04/12 06:39 AM
2

I got it too, looks like the feminists are doing what they can to ensure that people are not exposed to men's rights.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 06:21 AM
1

As far as I remember, this was created by kloo to 'take back' the meaning of feminism as a genuine movement for equal treatment of genders or something. Unfortunately, he was apparently not careful enough in his choice of mods. Cliffor, for instance, is clearly known around here as being a troll and definitely not an MRA. 'kulgha' is also clearly a feminist. This is just another example of how trying to find reconciliation with feminists in the false belief that they too really just want equalit…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 12:33 PM
2

Although it is hard to believe, we keep getting people posting stories to troll even about sensitive issues like this - so I can't have full confidence about the genuineness of your post. That being said, if this is not a troll post, and you really are the sister of black visions, I am sorry for your loss.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 09:17 AM
1

Obvious troll is obvious.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 05:58 AM
1

Amazing.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 11:36 AM
3

While I agree that simply saying that rape accusations are sometimes concocted may not be grounds to call someone a 'misogynist', etc., the bigger issue seems to be the reasons why the police have made those claims. You can see the clips here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7uBBbFpm8U Even I (Indian living in North India) have difficulty making out the exact words, but subtitles are your friend. See eg. from 2:25 onwards: 'If a girl asks for a birthday party and is alone with 2-3 boys and sees …
/r/MensRights09/04/12 10:58 AM
1

His point seems to be that he does not care what people think of him as long as they are thinking of him.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 10:12 AM
1

I thought it was common knowledge. Anyway I found this blog: http://margaretsanger.blogspot.in/ Obviously it's a blog but you can follow links etc. as given.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 09:48 AM
2

Yeah, at least I found the first few seasons to be good. It went downhill after that. Of course, there is no guarantee that you will like them simply because I liked them.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 03:40 PM
2

First few seasons were good.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 03:03 PM
2

troll
/r/MensRights03/04/12 07:11 AM
3

I agree that the article is bullshit, the very assumption that any field where women are 'under-represented' has a problem is bullshit. However, They all dropped out because they had very low scores, not being able to pass exams on computational mathematics and control theory. I don't know how much one anecdote is worth. I know some very smart women, does not mean all women are necessarily smart. An interesting thing I've noticed is that these girls rarely communicated with the rest of the group…
/r/MensRights02/04/12 03:24 PM
2

Sorry, but what is TMI?
/r/MensRights30/03/12 01:39 PM
3

Indonesia's powerful religious affairs minister believes that mini-skirts are pornographic and should be banned under the country’s tough new anti-porn laws. There are multiple levels of WTF involved here.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 02:33 PM
2

From the title it's not clear this has anything to do with men's rights, but after going through the article I can see the relevance. Example: Women are not the source of their oppression; oppressive policies and the as-yet unaddressed white patriarchy which still dominates the global stage are. Because women–and particularly women of color–are forced to bear the brunt of the Black male response to the Black male plight, the international community and those nations who have benefitted from the …
/r/MensRights29/03/12 06:15 AM
8

From the comments: Ok, women win. I confess. You proved you don't need us men more than we don't need you. Now go away and don't need us somewhere else. Pure gold.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 06:02 AM
3

Considering that the amount of time one can sleep is not that flexible, she seems to be saying here that women have more free time than men. Looks legit.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 06:44 AM
6

Too many people behave the opposite of this (skeptic towards allegation by men, blindly believe allegation by women). So I am okay with the people who do this to balance things out.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 07:07 AM
6

I am libertarian myself, I dislike christianity.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 08:56 AM
3

I don't like VoxDay but this article is good.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 08:16 AM
33

As an Indian, let me tell you how these laws work: India can broadly be divided into conservative versus leftist parts which in turn corresponds largely to a rural-urban divide. To be sure, this is a simplified view of a complex situation with some urban people being more conservative and vice-versa... but India is a large and complicated country. The important thing here is that there is a section that favors men and another section that favors women. The first section may be more in number but…
/r/MensRights19/03/12 07:03 AM
2

The connection to men's rights is a bit flimsy, but the story is one of the best short stories I have read.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 06:33 AM
1

oh, didn't notice that. resubmitting
/r/MensRights14/03/12 01:59 PM
1

That's part of what makes it so interesting... you can't tell that from the expression of suffering - but for a lot of people, any judgement regarding the barbarity of the practice would require you know not just the pain and suffering of the child but also if it is a boy or a girl.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 01:42 PM
3

The link seems to change by date. Try this one: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304537904577277223750295642.html?mod=WSJ_article_comments#articleTabs%3Darticle
/r/MensRights13/03/12 09:29 AM
1

Video by feminist. Let's not give it views.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 06:57 AM
2

Yes.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 06:30 AM
1

Manhood Academy. Downvote and ignore.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 06:19 AM
2

Appeasement is not going to work, especially towards feminists, when our very existence threatens them. If your main reason to oppose distasteful posts here is because 'what will feminists think', I would say that feminists would think badly of us as long as we don't subscribe to feminist conspiracy theories and double standards. That being said, of course it is desirable not to take the concept of 'enemy' so seriously that we endorse even views we find to be distasteful simply because feminists…
/r/MensRights12/03/12 06:05 AM
6

It is not inappropriate because of what feminists think (it is foolish to think that feminists will be satisfied if we simply pander to them a bit when our very existence threatens them) - it is inappropriate because we MRA's find it to be distasteful.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 02:00 PM
6

Manhood Academy. Downvote and ignore.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 01:58 PM
0

Yes she did.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 08:17 AM
6

"come on"? that's your argument? Honestly, I am just confused here. What makes you think that 'come on' was my argument there? Do you think 'honestly' is my argument here? you're trying to trap me with angry language. Once again, I am confused here. Are you saying that I am using angry language here, or do you think I am trying to trap you into using angry language? In any case, I apologize for any such misunderstanding. Like I said, it matters a lot whether it was in fact his TV. Not sure where…
/r/MensRights06/03/12 01:35 PM
-1

Agree with you completely, that post had been written on the basis of just the post title without looking carefully at the actual video. Still think that she was justified if it was her TV, though.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 12:55 PM
7

Come on, she was not 'trapped', she had actively placed herself there in her bid to demonstrate ownership over the TV. eg. see at 0:26. Now, the man is clearly a violent guy and I too don't want to defend him. But the woman did attack him first, and if it turns out that the TV did in fact belong to the man, her actions suddenly look a lot less acceptable.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 12:46 PM
4

While I am familiar with such sentiments among those opposed to post-conception choice for fathers, you should at least post a screenshot, or at least quote the originals also before changing genders.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 11:58 AM
7

Ok, on reading this I went ahead and watched the video. Frankly, it is hard to make out stuff like instigation in just this short video. All we can actually see here is the husband being violent. EDIT: Noticed that she actually swung at him first after she threatened to call the cops on him and before he hit her back. Going by his actions such as kicking the TV, I would not call him blameless - but her threats and her obviously setting him up complete with her putting on a show for the camera do…
/r/MensRights06/03/12 11:41 AM
6

This is certainly sad, I just don't see how this belongs to this particular subreddit.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 11:00 AM
2

So both then.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 12:07 PM
2

Not sure if troll or just stupid.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 06:12 AM
1

Text: I have given it some thought and I honestly think that it is such a gross betrayal that I would have lost all faith in life. I think that I would contemplate suicide. Just as it is a her choice what she does with her body, it is my choice what I do with mine and I will very likely choose not to live anymore. Suicide is the ultimate protest and would be a clear message that no you are not having your way with me. If a woman knew that was the end of the road when it came to getting pregnant …
/r/MensRights27/02/12 01:52 PM
11

Oh, I didn't even notice that since it was yellow on white. Yes, that subreddit is pretty shit. I remember getting preemptively banned from there for believing in the rights of gay men. To be fair I asked for it: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ij5wi/can_you_be_banned_from_a_subreddit_without_even/c24b35q
/r/MensRights25/02/12 06:44 PM
10

Did you reply to the wrong post by mistake? EDIT: /r/Rights4Men sucks.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 06:28 PM
2

I think it's important to realize that it is not your fault that you don't feel comfortable crying in front of other people. Very often, the same people who try to ridicule men for being afraid to show weakness are also the first to ridicule them when they do show weakness. I feel it is important to accept the fact that neither your tendency to cry alone nor your unwillingness to do so in front of others is some fault that requires you to 'man up' or 'get over it'. The fault lies squarely on the…
/r/MensRights25/02/12 05:29 PM
3

Original: Women have it so easy. They usually always have someone looking out for them. Theyre allowed to show weakness. Its accepted. Every night I cry alone, depressed and suicidal as fuck, snd Im scared to tell anyone. I'm scared to cry in front of people because I'm a man.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 05:20 PM
5

I always find it amusing to see srs try to defnd their trolls.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 07:12 AM
20

You should also point out how the term "Schrodinger's Rapist" shows a profound misunderstanding of the Schrodinger's Cat thought experiment: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/q411e/how_i_feel_whenever_i_see_people_use_the_phrase/c3uoqx4
/r/MensRights25/02/12 04:13 AM
2

Precisely. I don't care much if those feminists are not interested in what Schrodinger's cat actually is, but at least they should not try to misuse something they misunderstand so thoroughly just to sound intellectual.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 04:04 AM
1

Yeah I too stopped following him on facebook after this post: http://www.facebook.com/YoutubeTAA/posts/267118606687782 in spite of some of the great vids he has made. I just don't see how trolling back srs trolls is such an awful thing to do.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 03:14 PM
2

It's okay, I too don't know how anyone can be ok with stuff like 'ICumWhenIKillMen', regardless of context.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 02:43 PM
-3

Sorry, but trolling back SRS trolls in a thread they invaded is just fine by me.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 06:28 AM
8

Why do mods from other communities bother having such a conversation with SRS'ers when SRS itself bans people for any or no reason without giving any justification?
/r/seduction23/02/12 08:42 AM
3

Well, obviously, if they can be killed by something like heart disease, then they are not real men [/s] On a more serious note, one example I know of a disease where women are indeed over-represented is in primary biliary cirrhosis.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 12:58 PM
1

Replying to save.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 08:38 AM
2

It's better to join one of those that has alredy been made for this purpose. I recommend http://www.reddit.com/r/MaleStudies/ and http://www.reddit.com/r/masculism/ . Personally, I still find the level of trolling here to be tolerable, so I tend to mostly lurk/comment here (although I am also subscribed to these and some other smaller mr subreddits). If you want there to be other active subreddits on MR, best bet would seem to be to try to make these more active.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 02:55 PM
1

saving this
/r/MensRights17/02/12 10:53 AM
3

Not showing up in 'new' for me, may have got stuck in spam filter. Am messaging mods.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 07:49 AM
-2

I don't like the use of the olympics as a tool of politics, but there is nothing especially bad about this use as compared to any other.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 11:35 AM
7

once women are given rights, they expand them Even if this is true, the question is whether we actually desire a world where women do not have rights - I, for one, certainly do not. Why cannot we support women when they ask for equal rights and then oppose them when they seek to further expand them? I feel that our actions should be guided by our own desires rather than by whatever caricature our opponents make of them. It is a fact that I want equal rights for men and to oppose women's attempts…
/r/MensRights16/02/12 11:28 AM
0

A classless society in which he was a fascist oligarch. Just like Stalin's vision of Russia, right?
/r/MensRights16/02/12 06:23 AM
2

Bravo, this needed to be said and you said it quite nicely.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 02:34 PM
5

Don't think this is relevant to this subreddit, but if anyone is interested, here is the content so you don't have to give her views: Apparently I'm A Bad Feminist MRA's are hilarious. I mean where do these men get their brains from? Why do you think feminists are man hating sadists who love to see them get raped, abused by their partner, etc.? I don't want that to happen to anyone at all. Wait, I just stated I don't want men to be raped, abused by their partner, etc. Is Gloria Steinem going to …
/r/MensRights14/02/12 02:14 PM
9

That's it, basically.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 07:41 AM
27

it just looks like a gigantic circlejerk of nonsense Looks like you already understand the concept.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 07:22 AM
5

Could be.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 07:20 AM
2

This is somewhat interesting in regards to this issue at hand: http://www.cohnitz.net/Frege/Stich2010/presio3/index.html Also interesting may be the excuses Carol Gilligan came up with when Kohlberg's work failed to show the moral superiority of women (I know, I am extrapolating a bit here). A little about Gilligan here: http://www.webster.edu/~woolflm/gilligan.html I find this part to be interesting: There has been criticism of Gilligan's work and much of it has come from Christina Hoff Sommers…
/r/MensRights09/02/12 02:49 PM
3

If she thinks that Plato, Aristotle, Descartes put in their ideas simply for praise without putting in deep thought behind those ideas then that thought says more about her than about them. However, although she is clearly sexist, it is not clear that the professor in her class also put forth the point from a sexist point of view (other than if the prof. really used the term 'male ego', which is mostly used by misandrists I find). It takes some courage/confidence to believe that you can find som…
/r/MensRights09/02/12 02:29 PM
3

Because everybody knows, equality should mean EXACTLY half of every job position should be male and the other half should be female False. Equality should mean that AT LEAST half of every DESIRABLE job position should be female. /feminism
/r/MensRights09/02/12 02:08 PM
4

Saving as example of why SRS is not a downvote brigade.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 09:43 AM
1

Replying to save.
/r/MensRights02/02/12 07:22 AM
5

It's like waltzing into /r/niggers and seeing a rule "no racism allowed". This comment made my day.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 10:11 AM
1

This is quite well written. Especially liked the part about pulling the plug on the media's cool aid.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 09:06 AM
-4

not a men's rights site, but against dogmatism, and against stupid logic. Sorry but against dogmatism and against stupid logic tends to lead to belief in men's rights. So this is not much of a disclaimer. I am not interested in helping out the bigots at r/2xc if they cannot help themselves.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 11:11 AM
2

Just a little heads up, 'manboobz' has views that are bad enough as they are without being parodied by your low grade trolling. You may believe that what you are writing is more a true expression of how he would write if he was really honest about his feelings, but even if that is right (it may well be), your acts merely end up painting him as a victim.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 06:54 AM
1

In fact, this makes me somewhat happy because his behavior as a teacher seems to have shown discrimination against boys. Why not offer emotional support to boys too?
/r/MensRights02/01/12 09:18 AM
4

I found this: http://www.avoiceformen.com/misandry/we-are-all-being-watched/
/r/MensRights22/12/11 09:04 AM
1

Original link seems to be down, here is a mirror: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6c73DUuiCE
/r/MensRights15/12/11 06:23 PM
1

found a mirror: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6c73DUuiCE
/r/MensRights15/12/11 06:22 PM
6

They are accusing him of spreading rumors about them behind their backs. Even if true (which is not a given), such physical assault would surely not be acceptable the other way around.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 02:39 PM
0

Society will come up with even harsher penalties to "punish" the cads who are not "owning up to their responsibilities" for taking care of the children they sired. This is the point where the cost becomes too high. Men cannot be held responsible for the desires of women. Thankfully, coming up with ever harsher penalties can hardly be sustainable. If it turns out that society destroys itself trying to come up with harsher and harsher punishments on men because women chase alphas, then maybe socie…
/r/MensRights13/12/11 03:57 PM
2

I realize that the feminist notion of 'equality' tends to refer to a society where men are second class citizens, but the article seems to say that really equal status of men and women is bad because it will stop women from satisfying their erotic needs. I for one am okay with genuine equality of status even if it comes at the cost of the erotic fulfillment of women.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 01:48 PM
3

That's a good analogy: just as atheists tend to know more about christianity than christians, MRAs tend to understand feminism better than feminists.
/r/MensRights12/12/11 08:36 AM
6

I get the sense from the girls that they think the boys should act like gentlemen and just slow down if they are approaching the finishing line and let the girls win. Of course, if they did that, they would still be jeered for losing to the girls.
/r/MensRights24/11/11 06:48 AM
2

At first I was like, 'the fuck?' Then I realized it was a parody of this article: http://lifestyle.msn.com/relationships/article.aspx?cp-documentid=8319151
/r/MensRights30/09/11 03:44 AM
0

I think your description is fine for fat people with stable weights or gradually increasing weight. For someone to almost double her weight in 2 years, there probably has to be another reason IMHO.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 03:26 AM
3

What's with the 'Ghandi' thing? I never got it: it's Gandhi!
/r/MensRights27/09/11 03:03 PM
2

What, you dare oppose feminist stereotypes? That's misogynist!
/r/MensRights22/09/11 02:34 PM
2

Not much imagination is required here, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 02:46 PM
1

On that note, I guess you agree with those who say that men should be given education and other opportunities in preference to women.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 04:20 AM
11

What is stunning is that a consequence of women being made managers with less experience can be used to cry 'discrimination against women', when the fact that women are being made managers with less experience is more of an indicator of discrimination against men.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 04:14 AM
1

Starting at 7, but she kept at it till he was 11.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 04:11 AM
5

Because no women commit crimes. Ever.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 04:11 AM
1

It probably is. I think they have a list of sites which they target - yours, avfm and the spearhead are probably in it. Probably some others too.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 04:03 AM
2

This is a great site.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 05:21 PM
-2

The other subreddits you mentioned do not violate reddiquette like /r/SRS does. If those stayed while /r/SRS got removed, it would be entirely just.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 10:41 AM
17

Feminist logic: MensRights sometimes referring to misandry in other subreddits: downvote brigade. 3-4 subreddits dedicated primarily to downvoting MensRights: not a downvote brigade.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 10:03 AM
1

That's around the point where you realize they shouldn't be your friends, it makes more sense once you realize that.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 09:51 AM
8

I posted it here: http://www.reddit.com/r/redditrequest/comments/klfxv/request_to_ban_members_of_the_voting_clique/ Should I also message reddit admins?
/r/MensRights20/09/11 09:47 AM
-3

More likely that they know each other in real life and littlegirlbrew took the screenshot when she saw this on 'wutabouttehmenz' 's screen. I did something similar with one of my college friends (full disclosure: he is no longer my friend) who used to love behaving unethically online.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 09:46 AM
0

Thanks, a trial run looks reasonable.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 04:34 AM
1

Sorry, I should have taken that into account. This kind of tagging is common in subreddits like anarchism and the outcome seems to be regularly that it descends into a sort of unaccountable name-calling. Although I realize that you two are far more fair-minded than the 'anarchism' mods, I suspect that part of the problem with such tags is in the structure of the tagging idea itself and we are better off avoiding it as it is anyway not really essential.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 03:54 AM
17

Fun though experiment: imagine if the representation of the genders was the other way around. Would it still have been presented in such a negative light? Or would it instead have been accompanied by feminist gloating?
/r/MensRights19/09/11 05:29 PM
4

I don't like this development. The community is good at downvoting trolls and moving on as it is. There is no need for the mods to take on the extra work where the subjective nature of such judgements are likely to lead to conflict of opinions. We don't need this kind of 'anarchist' solution to our troll problem.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 05:22 PM
4

Let's excuse all sociopaths on past history - no wait, make that just female sociopaths - says sexist hack AlyoshaV
/r/MensRights19/09/11 01:59 PM
-1

That's because you yourself want to protect female abusers.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 01:56 PM
1

Vigilante justice served to a sociopath who has destroyed the lives of many men and endangers the lives of her grandparents but will not be punished by the legal system - it is not just moderate, it is the bare minimum we need until laws start taking care of such people.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 01:51 PM
1

Yes, yes it is.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 12:59 PM
-1

AnnArchist is a good choice.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 11:43 AM
5

Fuck off obvious troll.
/r/MensRights11/09/11 02:36 PM
1

I nominate thetrollking. He seems to have lots of time. I like pssvr too.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 10:31 AM
3

best of luck, you will be missed.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 10:29 AM
0

It's just you.
/r/MensRights04/08/11 07:05 PM
2

It has been happening all around the world for a while now. Maybe you just started noticing it since the danish cartoonist threats.
/r/MensRights04/08/11 06:36 PM
3

Many feminist men are nasty pieces of work, and assume that all men must be like them.
/r/MensRights04/08/11 06:32 PM
6

I recognized the name, otherwise for all I knew it could have been a feminist. Poe's law at work, I guess.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 05:44 PM
2

If they are interested only in the problems of women they should reflect that in their name or in their motto or just somewhere in their front page: http://www.uhc.com/home.htm Basically they should be upfront about their intentions. The problem is that they pretend to be interested in the problems of health in general while they have a considerable bias towards considering only the health of women in particular.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 05:26 PM
5

There is no legal reason they cannot, but we as individuals are free to point out the bias of other individuals.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 04:01 PM
2

Your trolling is too obvious and by now your modus operandi has also become boring. Try something new for a change.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 07:42 AM
8

Oh, so your point is what? That it has not yet been posted to /r/libertarian? I can fix that.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 05:46 PM
2

Power hungry assholes are drawn towards ideologies like feminism, I find.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 06:16 AM
3

Truth, presented to feminists, goes through three stages: first they ignore it, then they ridicule it, then they regard it as self evident proof either of the oppression or the superiority of women. The wage gap of unmarried women earning more is now being ignored, but I am sure that in time they will cite it as evidence of how women are really superior to men.
/r/MensRights31/07/11 05:47 AM
11

Whenever I have brought this up with any feminist, I have come up against neither complaint about the situation nor even indifference towards it - but rather pride in these statistics, and attempts to show that these prove some sort of innate superiority in women. Let's forget that the increase in female participation in higher ed is something many governments have explicitly tried for - if there are too few men, it must be because of some failing on the part of men or greatness of women. Seriou…
/r/MensRights30/07/11 03:47 PM
12

While this is not much different from the far less controversial belief that women should be able to force men into paternity, I find it much more humane to support the right of both parents to absolve themselves of parenthood at any time.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 08:03 AM
14

Before all billionaires are women: 'wage gap'. After all billionaires are women: 'look how awesome women are. this is proof of our inherent superiority'.
/r/MensRights25/07/11 05:53 AM
1

proof?
/r/MensRights21/07/11 12:32 PM
5

Well then /r/rights4men should be the ones banning them right? Too bad /r/rights4men was too busy banning people who believe in LGBT rights.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 12:26 PM
7

/r/whiterights members should not be banned just for their opinions, just as random members of /r/feminisms are not banned. Maybe we should have banned their mods if they had persisted in putting /r/mensrights in their sidebar, but they seem to have rectified this.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 11:00 AM
16

Such laws are absurd. Has there ever been a law requiring 40% of both genders to be represented in jails?
/r/MensRights20/07/11 03:51 PM
3

About time.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 03:43 PM
2

I cannot see it.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 03:02 PM
-1

Is this behaviour representative of the members of /r/anarchism? Yes, yes it is. Anarchism is a flawed ideology, entirely useless to anyone who has a genuine interest in freedom and in fighting oppression. Libertarianism, in in all its flavors, does much better.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 02:57 PM
1

How feminists sound to me
/r/MensRights20/07/11 01:45 PM
7

I am not even in the top 200 - but this setback has not dampened my spirits, will try harder!
/r/MensRights20/07/11 01:43 PM
5

[deleted] without the [deleted], I am guessing.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 01:42 PM
4

uhhh... she rants about 'man hating bitches', not men EDIT: and to be honest, I don't think the OP there represents twoxchromosomes fairly.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 06:17 PM
2

I entirely agree with that. It almost feels like he felt the need to prove that he wasn't opposed to feminism, by pointing to areas where he agreed with feminists. However, this idea of 'if I try to say anything about this that does not toe the feminist line, I will be castigated as a misogynist' seems to have turned into a self-fulfilling prophecy.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 04:15 PM
1

Which of his books? He has written many books, you know.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 03:44 PM
2

On the contrary, you are absolutely right that men being coerced into genocidal conflict all over the world is a far bigger concern for men's rights than the particular concerns of men in western society, because men are the primary victims in all these conflicts and this fact is often not properly understood. However, other things like FRAs and unjust alimony/child support settlements are also a real issue, far larger than you may realize because they are not enforced by isolated individuals bu…
/r/MensRights08/07/11 03:44 PM
1

Somehow such quotas are never applied in jail... first make sure that 30% of all prisoners in any locality are women.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 03:24 PM
7

He was comparing a non-issue to an issue to show what an issue really looks like. A better comparison is with theists getting offended at atheists not taking enough care about their feelings.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 03:02 PM
0

I agree about the limits of the scientific method (eg. how while individual scientific theories can be falsified, you cannot falsify the notion that scientific laws exist that underlie the observable world), and that we don't have much of a handle on things like the nature of consciousness. People may reject theism for various reasons, but the realization that there are other people who also reject theism often helps people come to terms with the negative social consequences of revealing their a…
/r/MensRights08/07/11 12:11 PM
-13

Feminist laws do actually harm people, and cannot really be countered without challenging the feminist framework that leads to them. Anyway, we basically seem to agree with each other. Mostly, the disagreement seems to be about the extent of the problem - anyone's judgments about such a thing probably should not change with such a discussion but only from the cumulative effect of various stats/anecdotes.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 11:52 AM
8

This is gold.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 11:48 AM
-22

Sadly, their views are too popular to be simply ignored. To say that feminists should just be ignored is a bit like saying that Islamists should just be ignored (tbh Islamism is probably far worse than feminism, but the difference is one of degree).
/r/MensRights08/07/11 11:47 AM
3

That is a nice way of doing things, buying his books only makes sense to the extent of counteracting the feminist attempt to boycott him. If it was only a question of people badmouthing him (without the boycott) there would be no question of supporting him in this way. Basically, what I find is that due to their disproportionate influence, feminists have become this entity that cannot be criticized without severe repercussions for one's career. This is because anytime anyone makes a honest state…
/r/MensRights08/07/11 11:34 AM
2

http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/david-allen-green/2011/07/richard-dawkins-chewing-gum
/r/MensRights08/07/11 10:51 AM
10

It probably doesn't make sense if you are religious, but I figured out that among those who have rejected the religion of feminism there would also be plenty of others who would have rejected other religions.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 10:27 AM
6

It's not a matter of life and death, but it is one chance to do your bit against misandry.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 10:23 AM
1

Hey, I believe in rights of gay men as of other men. Ban me too from your subreddit. EDIT: Thanks for the fast response!
/r/MensRights08/07/11 05:11 AM
16

Do we really need to give this retard more hits?
/r/MensRights08/07/11 04:55 AM
0

Congratulations, I guess...
/r/MensRights06/07/11 12:46 PM
3

The sarcasm seemed pretty obvious to me, somehow it seems that most people missed it.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 04:33 AM
1

Nice one, but now that I replied fewer people should fall for it.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 04:02 AM
1

It seems to be because many of them either have been raped or know someone who was, and there are few things worse than being not believed when you tell people you were raped (unfortunately, having your life destroyed by a FRA is probably one of those things). This leads to hatred towards those who don't believe in rape accusations. All of this is understandable really, it's just that as someone who knows many stories of men whose lives have been destroyed due to false accusations I would hesita…
/r/MensRights06/07/11 04:01 AM
1

I was confused at first on reading the submission headline (as in, who can really want women to spend life in prison for a miscarriage?), but on reading the article I got more context: Welcome to Pandora's Playground, ladies and gentlemen. Thirty-eight states have some form of "fetal homicide" law on the books. They were drawn up primarily as a means to prosecute men whose violent assaults on women resulted in loss of a fetus. Unfortunately, under the law, what's good for the gander is also good…
/r/MensRights06/07/11 03:33 AM
1

Oh no! Yoo aar wraang! Indian womens is oppressed! V INVANTED ZERO!!!
/r/MensRights30/06/11 11:49 AM
3

'Taking a knife to baby's genitals before they have the ability to say no' has everything to do with genital mutilation. It's pretty hypocritical to oppose it when done on females but support it as parental rights when little boys are involved.
/r/MensRights25/06/11 08:41 AM
2

Ok, so I assume you are fine with genital mutilation even when it is done on females. Correct?
/r/MensRights25/06/11 08:21 AM
1

But does it really? Do women support equal outcomes in things like life expectancy and incarceration rates?
/r/MensRights24/06/11 06:51 PM
1

Oh no... it keeps ugly people happy? We can't have that! Only the beautiful [TM] people deserve happiness!
/r/MensRights19/06/11 07:46 AM
1

So you are saying that men are responsible for overpopulation? I blame the patriarchy!
/r/MensRights13/06/11 08:03 AM
1

brilliant
/r/MensRights12/06/11 10:23 AM
1

You finally figured that out? Congratulations!!!
/r/MensRights10/05/11 08:39 AM
5

But doesn't that mean that there is in fact a wage gap? Only that it is against men?
/r/MensRights15/04/11 07:46 AM
3

I second that.
/r/MensRights12/03/11 03:55 AM
3

True, and the article does a good job elaborating on that. So maybe I should have pointed that out too. I just put in the part about men so that it does not seem irrelevant to this subreddit.
/r/MensRights02/03/11 02:42 PM
1

Honestly, that probably makes more sense than this one.
/r/MensRights28/02/11 05:04 AM
2

Hiding behind goo.gl links won't make you any less of a manhood101 troll.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 04:17 AM
3

No dude you are behind the times. Currently the PC smear is to call it 'islamophobic'.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 04:14 AM
1

wtf?
/r/MensRights12/01/11 06:51 PM
23

Next time feminists claim that extremist feminists are some kind of fringe element in feminism, we should ask: where is the 'feminaziwatch' website by feminists vilifying extremist feminists and pointing out that an extremist feminist 'does not speak for us'?
/r/MensRights11/01/11 02:51 PM
4

I don't get this post and what this has to do with mensrights.
/r/MensRights07/01/11 04:59 PM
1

I don't there are any different subreddits specifically for black men's rights, and really this place seems to be the right place to discuss those issues. Don't know of many stats on these issues, though. Perhaps someone can help out on those?
/r/MensRights21/12/10 04:31 AM
2

In the sphere of thought, absurdity and perversity remain the masters of the world, and their dominion is suspended only for brief periods. Arthur Schopenhauer
/r/MensRights20/12/10 01:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter