~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Women's issues outside of feminist perspective?Feminism is not a monolith. There is standard ideology taught in the name of this ideology, which at least 99% of people who use the term support. Such as "men are privileged over women" and "gender is a social construct invented out-of-nothing by woman-hating men in ancient times in order to help all men and hurt all women - damn the science". | /r/MensRights | 07/07/20 05:18 PM |
| 1 | Women's issues outside of feminist perspective?Women feel less safe (instinctually and due to social conditioning) arising from the fact that they have much less physical strength than men. However, men feel bad about physically harming women (instinctually and due to social conditioning going back millenia at least). Men are each other's competition, and we don't feel anywhere near as bad about physically harming another man if we're convinced he deserved it and it was necessary. | /r/MensRights | 07/07/20 05:12 PM |
| 1 | Who to vote for this Novemeber?Yeah that was pretty great how Kanye West was able to do that. | /r/MensRights | 13/04/20 06:28 PM |
| 1 | Who to vote for this Novemeber?Laura Ingraham ... is against gay marriage That was 2009. So was Obama in 2009. Most elected Democrats were, in 2009. I don't get why conservatives would frequent Men's Rights subreddits The only reason I became a conservative (former moderate Democrat), and the main reason I remain strongly for conservatism, is to fight against feminist ideology, after I learned about it in late 2012 / early 2013. Sure, I've warmed up to most of their other ideas since, and I've always been against Socialism/Co… | /r/MensRights | 10/04/20 04:05 PM |
| 1 | Who to vote for this Novemeber?Ben Shapiro ... said men shouldn't be allowed not to get married. Source? That sounds like an over-simplified paraphrasing. I could give you an infinite supply of sources showing you that they are, in fact, strongly against radical feminism. Care to see a few? Yes please. Alright, here's a start to the "infinite list". I could find countless more if you want. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrhHkQhglig (Fox News doing an entire pro-MRA weekly segment) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHlNfpni6oM … | /r/MensRights | 07/04/20 07:32 AM |
| 1 | Who to vote for this Novemeber?It's definitely easy to be frustrated with common negative behaviors and attitudes of women, especially in recent years. I sure am. It's normal to hate "negative femininity", as with any anti-social behavior, especially when it's directed against you or negatively affects you. But as a straight man, it's hard not to like "positive femininity", as rare as it's becoming. | /r/MensRights | 07/04/20 07:27 AM |
| 1 | Who to vote for this Novemeber?I would be interested in seeing sources for those claims. what you're calling "Traditional, natural, pre-modern society" Karen Straughan (one of the most popular MRA figures) did a great video explaining what I'm talking about: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqEeCCuFFO8&feature=youtu.be&t=4m59s | /r/MensRights | 07/04/20 07:26 AM |
| 1 | Who to vote for this Novemeber?Nevertheless, it's what we have. There's no escaping its results, especially with an incumbent election. One of the two main parties is 100% guaranteed to win. Best to support the least-bad, rather than chase the impossible. | /r/MensRights | 03/04/20 02:24 AM |
| 2 | Who to vote for this Novemeber?Haha, I think with that comment he was just speaking "off-the-cuff", and trying to emphasize that he likes women. It was a stupid comment. If he said it multiple times and/or expounded upon it in that direction, that would be cause for alarm. Look at the overall track record, and especially at the party that he gives power to by holding the executive branch (and the radicals he holds out of power). I'm not saying he's perfect. I voted against him in the primary, for Kasich. But he's what we've g… | /r/MensRights | 02/04/20 04:28 AM |
| 1 | Who to vote for this Novemeber?Simply by opposing the Democrats and trying to remove them from power with his influence, he's stopping them from doing what they're actively in the process of doing, and actively planning to do. | /r/MensRights | 02/04/20 04:20 AM |
| 2 | Who to vote for this Novemeber?pro first & second amendment That alone is all you need to be strongly against the left. Because the left has become strongly against both of those amendments. Show me your evidence how he's antifeminist, and I'll show you evidence he's gynocentric. Being against feminist ideology and being gynocentric are not mutually exclusive. Feminism is "gynosupremacy". Traditional, natural, pre-modern society works out being gynocentric out of necessity and inevitability. Of course, it's not necessary anym… | /r/MensRights | 02/04/20 04:17 AM |
| 3 | Who to vote for this Novemeber?If you're implying the GOP is not in support of radical feminism...I'm not so sure. I could give you an infinite supply of sources showing you that they are, in fact, strongly against radical feminism. Care to see a few? First that comes immediately to mind: Ben Shapiro recently released a video intellectually tearing Feminism apart. And even in the hypothetical (and untrue) case that they were neutral on the subject: neutral would be a hell of a lot better than "rabidly and unchangeably for it,… | /r/MensRights | 02/04/20 04:08 AM |
| 1 | NASA **Continues** to Continue to go Full SJW - "Pay Gap" and "Transgender Day of Visibility"I'm mainly complaining about the "Pay Gap" dishonesty (and indirect promotion of radical feminism). But a lot of the ideology relating to trans people is also anti-scientific bullshit, and based on radical feminism (social constructionism, etc). | /r/MensRights | 02/04/20 02:32 AM |
| 3 | Who to vote for this Novemeber?that kind of change is more effective on a social/local scale You underestimate just how much power the Executive Branch has to influence society. I realized recently: every major outbreak of radical feminist ideology in American society has happened when a Democrat was president. This time it started immediately after Obama's re-election - and this time they got so entrenched that the outbreak is still getting worse 3 years after Obama's term ended. The Executive Branch becomes exponentially mo… | /r/MensRights | 02/04/20 02:27 AM |
| 2 | Who to vote for this Novemeber?And won't you feel terrible when Trump loses your state by 1 vote, and radical feminism because a required daily curriculum for K-12 and all college students? | /r/MensRights | 02/04/20 02:13 AM |
| 1 | Who to vote for this Novemeber?You're on the MRA sub, so I'm assuming you support MRA ideas. One party wants to shove radical feminism in everyone's faces 24/7, and make it literally illegal to disagree with it. They've had a great deal of success in this in the past several years. The other party does not have this goal, and is largely opposed to it. Which party should you vote for? It's important to support the lesser of two evils (if that's how you see it). | /r/MensRights | 01/04/20 11:42 PM |
| 1 | Who to vote for this Novemeber?Why not? You're on the MRA sub, so I'm assuming you support MRA ideas. One party wants to shove radical feminism in everyone's faces 24/7, and make it literally illegal to disagree with it. They've had a great deal of success in this in the past several years. The other party does not have this goal, and is largely opposed to it. Which party should you vote for? | /r/MensRights | 01/04/20 11:40 PM |
| 1 | Who to vote for this Novemeber?Always vote for the lesser evil. You're on the MRA sub, so I'm assuming you support MRA ideas. One party wants to shove radical feminism in everyone's faces 24/7, and make it literally illegal to disagree with it. They've had a great deal of success in this in the past several years. The other party does not have this goal, and is largely opposed to it. Which party should you vote for? | /r/MensRights | 01/04/20 11:40 PM |
| 1 | NASA Continues to go Full SJWI could have sworn I saw a study directly showing this, but I can't find it anymore. But it definitely can be inferred based on other characteristics that have been shown through science, and it's definitely a tendency I've noticed throughout life. https://www.medicaldaily.com/study-womens-brains-are-more-sensitive-negative-emotions-react-differently-mens-354226 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroticism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroticism#Age,_sex_and_geographic_patterns https://www.scient… | /r/MensRights | 28/03/20 09:55 PM |
| 2 | If the patriarchy exists, it is for the sole benefit of women inside of a gynocentric society. Any secondary privileges enjoyed by men, or disadvantages seen by women, are simply side-effects of a system primarily engineered for the benefit of women.Yeah I know. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/20 05:19 PM |
| 3 | If the patriarchy exists, it is for the sole benefit of women inside of a gynocentric society. Any secondary privileges enjoyed by men, or disadvantages seen by women, are simply side-effects of a system primarily engineered for the benefit of women.Right, I meant "different at all", rather than "completely different". You can't argue that society is structured exactly the same as 200 years ago. Most women today go to college and have careers, and a large percentage (probably a large majority) of them keep their careers rather than becoming full-time mothers. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/20 05:13 PM |
| 1 | NASA Continues to go Full SJWI thought I was alone to feel that way Nah, it's very obvious. And I've definitely seen this expressed at least a few times in popular posts/comments on r/The_Donald (and thedonald.win). | /r/MensRights | 28/03/20 04:56 PM |
| 3 | NASA Continues to go Full SJWWe still do all that (minus the USSR). But now we also do this other crap. If they keep it up, the good stuff will likely decline. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/20 04:50 PM |
| 1 | NASA Continues to go Full SJWWell that's really just common sense. Men and women are physically much different. All the talk about "equality meaning women need to be enlisted" is really about pointing out flaws in the "logic" of feminists. Pre-modern society was the way it was because it was impossible for it to be any other way on a wide scale without modern technology - especially birth control, fast food, domestic appliances, desk jobs, and firearms. Karen Straughan has a great video explaining all of this. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/20 04:48 PM |
| 3 | NASA Continues to go Full SJWYou're talking about when there are one or two "diversity hire" women. But when they get so much "diversity" that it's 100% "diversity hire" women, there's nobody there to pick up the pieces. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/20 04:15 PM |
| 5 | NASA Continues to go Full SJWOh, yeah, I thought I had mentioned to you: search doesn't work right directly on DropBox. You had to download. But that won't work anymore, because I just replaced the PDF with a re-created version that's image-based, because some people were being paranoid and saying that the original document might be somehow tracked. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/20 07:26 AM |
| 5 | NASA Continues to go Full SJWI think the political landscape has changed drastically since just a few years ago. More and more republicans in congress appear to have realized the stakes and realized they need to be more aggressive against the newly-(openly)radicalized left. Look at Ted Cruz for example. He used to seem like the typical establishment republican, not doing much. Now he's very Trump-like. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/20 05:28 AM |
| 4 | NASA Continues to go Full SJWHmm, not sure what's going on with your computer. I just searched again: "woke" shows up 1 time, "privilege" 2 times, "implicit bias" 10 times. Yes, gender bias is a real thing - but mostly in favor of women, according to science: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15491274 https://www.bipartisanalliance.com/2018/07/men-women-more-strongly-blamed-men-for.html Going "full sjw" sounds like hyperbole. Skim the whole thing. It's full of both direct and indirect radical feminist ideology. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/20 05:19 AM |
| 4 | NASA Continues to go Full SJWThere was not a majority of non-leftist judges in the Supreme Court, and the Senate majority wasn't big enough. Also, think of all the bad things that didn't happen during that time that would have happened if the Democrats had those majorities - just look at 2018 and on - and that's just when they have the House. Also, the fact that it only held 2 years limited how much of a long-term effect could be had. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/20 04:39 AM |
| 5 | NASA Continues to go Full SJWBut what about a total Republican majority takeover of elected government? What if the house, senate, presidency, and supreme court all end up Republican or majority-Republican this November, and stays that way for a decade? What if like 40% of the population refuses to give any money to media and companies that promote SJW? | /r/MensRights | 28/03/20 02:37 AM |
| 6 | NASA Continues to go Full SJWI need to watch that movie / read the book. I've seen Animal Farm. Well it makes sense, given that 1984 was based on real-life Communist totalitarian society, and leftists are Communists/Marxists. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/20 01:59 AM |
| 2 | NASA Continues to go Full SJWYep. But I'm powerless to change it, other than things like posting here, or sending anonymous messages to specific people. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/20 12:37 AM |
| 7 | NASA Continues to go Full SJWSeems like a bad idea. This stuff is all very hypocritical - we have laws saying the government isn't allowed to impose political ideas on us - yet somehow, they seem to make an exception for far-left SJW ideology in the past several years. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/20 12:06 AM |
| 4 | If the patriarchy exists, it is for the sole benefit of women inside of a gynocentric society. Any secondary privileges enjoyed by men, or disadvantages seen by women, are simply side-effects of a system primarily engineered for the benefit of women.Except pre-modern society wasn't "engineered". It developed naturally out of necessity and inevitability. The only reason it can be at all different today is because of modern technology: birth control, fast food, domestic appliances, desk jobs, firearm defense rather than brute strength. Karen Straughan has a good talk on this. | /r/MensRights | 27/03/20 10:04 PM |
| 25 | NASA Continues to go Full SJWWhat you're leaving out of this equation: women gain the same level of deference and respect as a likable man who's a good leader by being attractive and a good leader / demonstrating competency. At least in the modern era, it has nothing to do with being male or female - rather, it has to do with looking good for your gender + being likable and a good leader and demonstrating competency/expertise. | /r/MensRights | 27/03/20 09:46 PM |
| 25 | NASA Continues to go Full SJWThat's true. I skimmed this document, and it says at several parts that professors must avoid encouraging a poorly-performing female engineering student from switching majors. It's saying to encourage people who do not have the proper mind and skills for engineering to become engineers. That's a potent recipe for things like the Challenger/Columbia shuttle explosions and the Tacoma Narrows bridge collapse. Or, if I were to hop into a time machine: "The Orion Capsule Explosion Disaster" of 2039. … | /r/MensRights | 27/03/20 09:41 PM |
| 9 | NASA Continues to go Full SJWOnly if we don't reverse this trend before the late 2030's. Doesn't matter if the first person happens to be, but what would matter is the reason. At this point, all we can do is vote out leftists, boycott woke companies, make tactful arguments, and do everything possible to tactfully let people know that woke beliefs are not normal and not logical/scientific. | /r/MensRights | 27/03/20 09:29 PM |
| 20 | NASA Continues to go Full SJWI avoid these subjects with other people in the organization, for fear of it adversely affecting my employment. But I've gotten hints dropped that my team leader finds this stuff silly and is probably a conservative, and I know another coworker is a conservative. And I know a few other people who are probably conservatives. On the other hand, I also know a a few other people that I've worked with who are at the very least just fine with it, and a few who definitely believe it. | /r/MensRights | 27/03/20 09:24 PM |
| 1 | History.com is Promoting Radical FeminismI didn't read it - didn't wanna give them clicks. How bad is it? | /r/MensRights | 21/03/20 03:32 PM |
| 2 | History.com is Promoting Radical FeminismScroll down a little past the first item. Big logo, hard to miss. You can see part of it in the lower-right corner of the preview that Reddit saved at the top of this post. | /r/MensRights | 20/03/20 08:24 PM |
| 1 | Recent Emmerson Poll Shows Hard Evidence of How Badly Modern Feminists have DESTROYED male/female relations (scroll down to last graph)Based on my life experience as a 34 year old, I do think this is mostly a new thing in the past few years. Before 2012 I had no idea that Feminism still even existed outside of history books, and I had never heard any of their buzzwords like "misogyny", "sexism", "patriarchy", etc. Now this is constantly thrown in our faces by the mainstream media and random other mainstream organizations, I often run into women who are into this ideology, and I rarely encounter a women who expresses any particu… | /r/MensRights | 13/03/20 03:53 AM |
| 1 | Recent Emmerson Poll Shows Hard Evidence of How Badly Modern Feminists have DESTROYED male/female relations (scroll down to last graph)Good point - didn't notice that. Still a dramatic gender difference, just based on the numbers. Also I didn't make the graphs - I don't work for Emmerson or reportablenews.com. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/20 03:48 AM |
| 1 | Recent Emmerson Poll Shows Hard Evidence of How Badly Modern Feminists have DESTROYED male/female relations (scroll down to last graph)I'm pretty sure this level of gender polarization is unprecedented - never this extreme before the current "SJW era". | /r/MensRights | 13/03/20 03:42 AM |
| 1 | Recent Emmerson Poll Shows Hard Evidence of How Badly Modern Feminists have DESTROYED male/female relations (scroll down to last graph)Because it shows that males and females have become extremely polarized in terms of which political party they support. And I'm sure you've experienced how absolutely horrible feminist women act towards any man who doesn't completely agree with the ideology. It didn't used to be like this. And the only logical explanation for this polarization is feminism pushing men away and taking advantage of women's in-group gender bias. | /r/MensRights | 12/03/20 03:39 AM |
| 1 | The new ad Apple posted yesterday on YouTube is blatant and direct illogical feminist propaganda. Boycotting Apple from now on.The problems are the (likely willful) misconceptions and one-sidedness, how it encourages promiscuity and therefore the destruction of the family (which in turn increases crime and mental issues, and causes the gradual devolution of the human gene pool) (and encourages STDs), and how at the end it lies about what Feminism means to make it look good to uninformed people. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/20 05:38 PM |
| 1 | The new ad Apple posted yesterday on YouTube is blatant and direct illogical feminist propaganda. Boycotting Apple from now on.People who care enough to visit this subreddit and who know about this subreddit are marginal. But the percentage of men who are bothered by SJWs and modern feminists is huge. Just look at the 'like' counts on comments on articles on these subjects. If you want firmer evidence, take a look at the graph showing the male/female discrepancy in party support in this recent poll: https://emersonpolling.reportablenews.com/pr/february-national-poll-sanders-takes-the-lead-for-democratic-nomination-bloom… | /r/MensRights | 11/03/20 05:33 PM |
| 2 | The new ad Apple posted yesterday on YouTube is blatant and direct illogical feminist propaganda. Boycotting Apple from now on.I don't think it's a business so much as obscenely rich leftists and leftist organizations paying big bucks to companies to shoot themselves in the foot and spread far-left ideology. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/20 05:08 PM |
| 2 | The new ad Apple posted yesterday on YouTube is blatant and direct illogical feminist propaganda. Boycotting Apple from now on.It's a new level of suck. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/20 05:06 PM |
| 1 | The new ad Apple posted yesterday on YouTube is blatant and direct illogical feminist propaganda. Boycotting Apple from now on.But most women are not feminists, and especially not actual feminist ideologues. The most recent poll I saw on the subject from a few years ago said only around 20% in the USA. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/20 05:06 PM |
| -4 | New Apple Ad: Feminist PropagandaDidn't wanna give them views, but you can find it easily on YouTube. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/20 01:52 AM |
| -1 | New Apple Ad: Feminist PropagandaDidn't wanna give them views, but you can find it easily on YouTube. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/20 01:51 AM |
| 5 | Feminist propaganda has successfully created several new concepts (wage gap, #metoo, mansplaining etc). MRAs, although they often have the truth on their side, haven't managed to create one single "buzzword"?How society cares about women more than men. Science backs this up: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15491274 https://www.bipartisanalliance.com/2018/07/men-women-more-strongly-blamed-men-for.html | /r/MensRights | 08/03/20 06:45 PM |
| 1 | Women evaluate their relationships more negatively and their partners as less physically attractive on days in which they have higher levels of estradiol, a hormone that peaks just prior to ovulation, new study shows. Men also perceived their partners to be less satisfied when estradiol was high.All of this is common knowledge among people who study "game". Here's a talk primarily focused on this topic: https://youtu.be/D9BQ-_33RGg?t=1471 | /r/MensRights | 17/02/20 03:42 PM |
| 2 | Women evaluate their relationships more negatively and their partners as less physically attractive on days in which they have higher levels of estradiol, a hormone that peaks just prior to ovulation, new study shows. Men also perceived their partners to be less satisfied when estradiol was high.Here's a talk primarily focused on this topic: https://youtu.be/D9BQ-_33RGg?t=1471 | /r/MensRights | 17/02/20 03:36 PM |
| 2 | Ex-Femenists what made you turn?Right, the "pay gap" is a step removed from being anti-common-sense. It's only once you get to thinking about "why would this be the case" that common sense comes into play. | /r/MensRights | 17/02/20 04:20 AM |
| 8 | Ex-Femenists what made you turn?I mean, a lot of what Feminism teaches is the opposite of common sense, as in "things that every single person generally learns through experience early in life, and which is constantly reinforced throughout life experiences". Common sense includes things like "if you drop something it goes down" and "if you jump in water you'll get wet". Common sense also includes things like "post-pubescent males can exert a lot more physical force than females of any age" and "men are biologically attracted t… | /r/MensRights | 16/02/20 10:10 PM |
| 27 | Ex-Femenists what made you turn?I don't think she meant that she worked at Buzzfeed. I think she meant she "grew out of reading Buzzfeed". | /r/MensRights | 16/02/20 10:02 PM |
| 1 | Boycott DC Fray / JAX Fray / NOLA Fray / PHX Fray - They are blatantly and frequently pushing Radical FeminismLol, nah, those wouldn't really make any sense. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/20 03:10 PM |
| 2 | Boycott DC Fray / JAX Fray / NOLA Fray / PHX Fray - They are blatantly and frequently pushing Radical FeminismHaha, nope. I actually didn't link to them - only screenshots of emails, and a magazine they partnered with. I also mentioned their competitors, which I highly recommend as alternatives. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/20 03:29 AM |
| 6 | Boycott DC Fray / JAX Fray / NOLA Fray / PHX Fray - They are blatantly and frequently pushing Radical FeminismI've seen it happen. More often, it's "get woke, lose a lot of business and become much worse off relative to your competitors". | /r/MensRights | 22/01/20 09:14 PM |
| 8 | Saw a girl at my school wearing a shirt that said ‘The future is female’.Exactly. To the OP: please inform that girl about this fact (tactfully). | /r/MensRights | 22/01/20 09:08 PM |
| 1 | New Scientist has been infiltrated by far-left SJW extremist journalistsOh. Hmm. I didn't check the date of the article or issue. I just randomly ended up on that page when looking at another article and assumed it was recent. So that means they were in there over 2 years ago. Hope it hasn't gotten worse. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/20 04:46 AM |
| 1 | PSA: Avoid Clicking Articles on the New-ish Sidebar on RealClearPolitics called "InsideHook" - it's an external site full of SJW Far-Left Extremist / Feminist propaganda clickbait.Hmm, are you sure that's how it works? Also, this post wasn't about ads, but articles. The articles have ads on the InsideHook site, which benefits them. | /r/MensRights | 23/12/19 05:33 AM |
| 1 | PSA: Avoid Clicking Articles on the New-ish Sidebar on RealClearPolitics called "InsideHook" - it's an external site full of SJW Far-Left Extremist / Feminist propaganda clickbait.Advertising for airports? I'm confused. I did a search and saw nothing like that. But that's irrelevant. My post was about how they promote feminist ideology, and are trying to gain a foothold on a popular news website. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/19 09:18 PM |
| 4 | PSA: Avoid Clicking Articles on the New-ish Sidebar on RealClearPolitics called "InsideHook" - it's an external site full of SJW Far-Left Extremist / Feminist propaganda clickbait.Exactly. But RCP itself has been very good. And their email newsletter with "dueling headlines" between conservative and leftist articles from various sources seems to slightly prioritize the anti-leftist links, and the anti-leftist links are very good. And the articles they write on their own page are usually conservative / anti-leftist. They just need to be strongly dissuaded from continuing to give InsideHook its own sidebar. And InsideHook needs to be left to die off. | /r/MensRights | 21/12/19 07:51 PM |
| 1 | Thoughts on why society is in arms against men: it's power/controlI think it's a lot simpler than this. Leftists / Progressives promote this stuff for two reasons: 1.) With the younger women who promote it, it comes down to trying to maximize female societal power at the expense of men, because they want to "tame" the 10/10 males they're all chasing but unable to get commitment from. Essentially, they're trying to actually artificially oppress men to get what they want from them (commitment from the top 20%, left alone or served by the other 80%). Many of them… | /r/MensRights | 24/11/19 03:18 AM |
| 1 | I am a feminist. At least I thought so.But that's not true though. It's defined by what's universally taught in Gender Studies / Women's Studies departments. Yes there are a few different "sects", but they're all much more similar that different. The biggest difference is between modern "Third Wave Feminism" (what it is today) vs "Second Wave Feminism" / "First Wave (Suffragettes)". But the waves prior to the third do not exist anymore - they were replaced. There are no organizations today that go by the name "feminism" but reject th… | /r/MensRights | 02/10/19 04:58 AM |
| 1 | More Than 50% Of Korean Men In Their 20's Are ANTI FEMINISTOh. Haha, never mind then. Guess it was someone else. | /r/MensRights | 01/10/19 04:30 AM |
| 6 | More Than 50% Of Korean Men In Their 20's Are ANTI FEMINISTHow about instead of downvoting, make a rational argument for why I'm wrong? Karen Straughan has a couple good videos explaining in-depth what's wrong about the modern Feminist ideology: https://youtu.be/PqEeCCuFFO8?t=4m59s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ut2VVAW0MwM | /r/MensRights | 01/10/19 04:27 AM |
| 1 | I am a feminist. At least I thought so.Thank you for your open-mindedness. My main issue with modern feminism as an ideology is that it directly contradicts basic science, basic common sense, basic understanding of history (especially the development of technology and its impact on society), and vilifies, misrepresents, and negatively stereotypes all men, while painting all women as infallible (unless they disagree with Feminist ideology). All variations of Feminism that have any power or influence today are like this - they're all c… | /r/MensRights | 01/10/19 04:13 AM |
| 2 | I am a feminist. At least I thought so.Sure, one can be a casual "pop feminist" and be as you described. But this can only happen as a result of having very limited knowledge of what "feminism" actually means today as an ideology. What it means as an ideology today directly contradicts basic science, basic common sense, basic understanding of history (especially the development of technology and its impact on society), and vilifies, misrepresents, and stereotypes all men. All "strains" of feminism that have any power or influence tod… | /r/MensRights | 01/10/19 03:43 AM |
| 6 | More Than 50% Of Korean Men In Their 20's Are ANTI FEMINISTModern feminism is half about encroaching on the basic human rights of men. The other half is about insane anti-scientific ideology. | /r/MensRights | 01/10/19 03:33 AM |
| 1 | NYT runs editorial putting a spotlight on how men face body image problems and that there is no male equivalent of feminist body positivity for them in society.Compare the first two of these to the last: https://d20vtoeqbf8y6m.cloudfront.net/d/dc/dckmntrthjitkwllpmfu.jpg https://d20vtoeqbf8y6m.cloudfront.net/t/ti/tigyygbjabttdvisqsje.jpg https://imgur.com/a/QZ7HwB3 Same bodyfat, drastically different neckfat. And this is far from the worst I've ever seen. Can't you see the difference? Obese people are still seen as ugly Right, I never said they aren't. What I said is "that which is seen as ugly is being unintentionally strongly selected for, while that… | /r/MensRights | 15/09/19 06:16 PM |
| 1 | NYT runs editorial putting a spotlight on how men face body image problems and that there is no male equivalent of feminist body positivity for them in society.None of those people had abnormally large chin fat Interesting... so it's become so common that it's been normalized to you - you don't even realize there's anything wrong with it. You're immersed in it, so it's all you see, so it seems normal. But it didn't used to be normal. Even 10-to-15 years ago, a thin young adult with hanging neck fat was very rare. Now - as you said - it's common. Which technically means it IS "normal", meaning "similar to how the average person is" - but it's NOT normal… | /r/MensRights | 07/09/19 09:51 PM |
| 1 | NYT runs editorial putting a spotlight on how men face body image problems and that there is no male equivalent of feminist body positivity for them in society.Weight and double-chin size are connected, yet partially independent. If you have the genetics for any fat under your chin at all, then the more weight you gain the more double chin you'll have. But, everyone has a different starting point and propensity. There are two factors that determine one's starting point and propensity for it to grow: 1.) Amount of fat cells under chin, 2.) Skin elasticity. Some people start out with a lot of fat cells underneath their chin, just waiting to expand when t… | /r/MensRights | 31/08/19 05:32 PM |
| 1 | NYT runs editorial putting a spotlight on how men face body image problems and that there is no male equivalent of feminist body positivity for them in society.Sorry, I should have been more specific. I'm talking about people who have thin bodies, yet have big double chins like you would normally only expect a morbidly-obese person to have. I find this much more worrying, because a person who's obese can become a normal weight through diet and exercise (even if it may be very difficult for some), but if you're thin with a double chin there's nothing you can do about it (short of plastic surgery) - it's genetic. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/19 02:53 PM |
| 1 | NYT runs editorial putting a spotlight on how men face body image problems and that there is no male equivalent of feminist body positivity for them in society.I agree, but I've realized that the obesity epidemic is a red herring - the real question we need to address is: Why is the rate of double chins rapidly increasing, independent of obesity level? It's become common to see 20-year-olds with double-chins that make them appear morbidly obese despite being thin. A decade ago this was extremely rare. The "double chin epidemic" is much more worrying to me than the obesity epidemic, yet nobody seems to be talking about it. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/19 02:04 PM |
| 6 | It’s not men who express feeling powerful by being violent — it’s womenI think the reality is that men and women are equal here. Naturally equal, but men are strongly discouraged by society from acting this way, while in recent years women are encouraged to act this way. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/19 01:58 PM |
| 1 | "Objectification" is not gender-specific: women objectify men, both sexually and financiallyYeah if he's like 3 feet taller than her then she might rule him out as a matter of practicality. Also I was exaggerating a bit and simplifying a bit. It's more like "at least 4 inches taller bare minimum (but who prioritizes the bare minimum?), and at least above the average male height (5' 10"), and the taller the better". And height isn't the only physical factor women care about - it's just the one that has the strongest effect. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/19 06:10 AM |
| 4 | "Objectification" is not gender-specific: women objectify men, both sexually and financiallyAnd when they say "just taller than me", they're doing an "iron man" / "motte and bailey" tactic. Because they really mean "at least 6 inches taller, and the more the better". | /r/MensRights | 14/06/19 07:09 PM |
| 4 | Teenage boys are flooded with unrealistic beauty standards as wellVery true. And this has been going on for decades, getting steadily worse. And I believe this (in part) is having a permanent negative impact on the quality of the human gene pool - the obesity epidemic is likely largely due to this. And people are getting uglier in general on average every year it seems - specifically in ways that women tend to not care much about. Feminism is literally causing the devolution of the species. | /r/MensRights | 12/06/19 04:29 AM |
| 7 | Men are suing women who accused them of harassment. Will it stop others from speaking out?You forgot to use an archived version of the link. As-is, you're giving the article clicks and giving CNN ad revenue. Try http://archive.is. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/19 03:38 AM |
| 1 | Feminist Teacher Tells Boys That Women Will ‘Cut Off Your Dicks’ Once They Take Overthe anti-feminist leader of Spain’s Vox political party Well that's an ironic name for it. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/19 03:37 AM |
| 1 | Was Shakespeare a woman ? And it begins. More deluded theories from the cult that is trying to convince you that you have little value as a man. Not surprised that it’s from the Atlantic.But it only existed as a depression in the fabric of spacetime - like a black hole. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/19 03:27 AM |
| 5 | Was Shakespeare a woman ? And it begins. More deluded theories from the cult that is trying to convince you that you have little value as a man. Not surprised that it’s from the Atlantic.Was he X? XY | /r/MensRights | 10/06/19 03:22 AM |
| 2 | Spain's new vice-president is a radical feminist. Very dark times expected aheadThere are not "many kinds of feminism". There are a few subgroups with VERY MINOR DIFFERENCES on opinion on very small details. They all believe in the same high-level belief system centered around "The Patriarchy" and "misogyny" - divisive anti-science that flies in the face of basic common sense. | /r/MensRights | 05/05/19 05:11 AM |
| 2 | NASA Pledges To Send First Woman to the Moon in 2024 using tax payer money, to politically correct the mission to the moon. (It doesn't matter if there are more qualified male astronauts than her because female required.)Exactly. The current administration and NASA administrator are very much NOT leftist SJWs. This was clealy done 1.) To appease SJWs and make it harder for them to attack them, and 2.) Because it's not a big deal to be sure to pick one female from the list of qualified astronauts that currently exist. I actually work for NASA. There is definitely a lot of leftist SJW embedded in the management. I think some NASA centers more than others. But it does not currently go all the way to the top. Under … | /r/MensRights | 11/04/19 06:13 PM |
| 1 | Youtube deleting comments and dislikes on Gillette’s youtube video is the equivalent to a child pushing all of their shit under their bed when they tidy their roomBut now we have Brawny and their parent company Georgia Pacific doing even worse things. | /r/MensRights | 11/04/19 06:08 PM |
| 8 | Women have stronger gender bias (source in comments)Given the leftist bias of the source, and given that the chart shows the most "liberal" women having the LEAST gender bias, this is clearly only showing "bias against women". What real studies (from the NIH) have shown is that women have drastically more in-group gender bias than men do, while men have an out-group bias in favor of women. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15491274 https://www.bipartisanalliance.com/2018/07/men-women-more-strongly-blamed-men-for.html | /r/MensRights | 11/04/19 06:05 PM |
| 1 | "Strength Has No Gender" - Anti-Science: Brawny Paper Towels (and Giant Food) Brazenly Promoting Extreme-Left Feminist Anti-ScienceHmm, how does being against exactly what Anita Sarkesian does make me Anita Sarkrsian? | /r/MensRights | 11/04/19 05:59 PM |
| 0 | "Strength Has No Gender" - Anti-Science: Brawny Paper Towels (and Giant Food) Brazenly Promoting Extreme-Left Feminist Anti-ScienceAbuse of corporate power to promote divisive, anti-scientific, extremist political ideology is a big deal. | /r/MensRights | 09/04/19 03:32 AM |
| 1 | "Strength Has No Gender" - Anti-Science: Brawny Paper Towels (and Giant Food) Brazenly Promoting Extreme-Left Feminist Anti-ScienceThey literally replaced an axe-wielding symbol of brute strength who chops down trees with just an axe, with three women. The Brawny Man symbolizes brute strength. There's no way they were referring to the Brawny Man's "mental fortitude". And this is far from the first time that feminists have insisted that physical strength difference between the sexes is all a "social construct" arising from boys being encouraged to lift and girls being discouraged from it. They say this kind of stuff all the … | /r/MensRights | 08/04/19 04:08 PM |
| 1 | "Strength Has No Gender" - Anti-Science: Brawny Paper Towels (and Giant Food) Brazenly Promoting Extreme-Left Feminist Anti-ScienceThey literally replaced an axe-wielding symbol of brute strength who chops down trees with just an axe, with three women. The Brawny Man symbolizes brute strength. There's no way they were referring to the Brawny Man's "mental fortitude". And this is far from the first time that feminists have insisted that physical strength difference between the sexes is all a "social construct" arising from boys being encouraged to lift and girls being discouraged from it. They say this kind of stuff all the … | /r/MensRights | 08/04/19 04:14 AM |
| 4 | "Strength Has No Gender" - Anti-Science: Brawny Paper Towels (and Giant Food) Brazenly Promoting Extreme-Left Feminist Anti-ScienceHaha. But really, even a weak man if he doesn't have a legitimate hormone disorder, even if he doesn't lift, will have more brute strength than basically any woman who has never done steroids and doesn't have a rare intersex hormone condition. | /r/MensRights | 06/04/19 06:07 PM |
| 4 | This Women's Day, let's help women liberate themselves from toxic femininity.Though it's a useful tool to point out hypocrisy. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/19 05:25 AM |
| 1 | Women's empowerment shouldn't come at cost to men, says Australian PM ... on International Women's DayYou should have posted an archived version of the article. As is, you've given CNN advertising revenue from at least 1000 clicks. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/19 05:25 AM |
| 1 | Women's empowerment shouldn't come at cost to men, says Australian PM ... on International Women's Daysnf > snl | /r/MensRights | 09/03/19 05:22 AM |
| 1 | PSA: If you're a moderate / conservative / non-feminist and use OKCupid... be aware that THIS is what you're supporting.I agree. But how long will it take? The media and powerful organizations like these have been at it full-steam since 2014, and it seems to get worse every year. It's been 5 years already. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/19 12:22 AM |
| 1 | PSA: If you're a moderate / conservative / non-feminist and use OKCupid... be aware that THIS is what you're supporting.We didn’t put politics into dating. Women did. No, feminists in power positions did. The women you're referring to are victims of peer-pressure and propaganda pandering to their in-group bias. Feminists need to be removed from their power positions, somehow. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/19 12:19 AM |
| 3 | PSA: If you're a moderate / conservative / non-feminist and use OKCupid... be aware that THIS is what you're supporting.Hmm. I don't understand what that has to do with this post. | /r/MensRights | 22/01/19 11:39 PM |
| 2 | PSA: Here's an Effective Method I Have for Getting a Feminist to Reconsider Her Views, Based on Female In-Group Bias. Please spread this around.not sure if I agree that Feminism is built around man-bashing The people who formalized the ideological belief system around 1970 were lesbians who objectively did hate men. And core beliefs around which the belief system is built are negative over-generalizations about all men, and a conspiracy about all men that clearly comes from a place of hatred. http://gos.sbc.edu/s/solanas.html http://www.findingdulcinea.com/news/on-this-day/May-June-08/On-this-Day--Valerie-Solanas-Shoots-Andy-Warhol.html… | /r/MensRights | 20/01/19 11:40 PM |
| 1 | PSA: Here's an Effective Method I Have for Getting a Feminist to Reconsider Her Views, Based on Female In-Group Bias. Please spread this around.True - the list is already a bit long. I put them in order of importance, but it might be a good idea to put a divider after the top few most important. That's true that some people prefer written information - BUT, that doesn't work as well for catering to female bias. It's easy to not be thinking about the gender of the author of an article as you're reading it. Many times, you only know their gender by looking at the name listed in tiny print at the top. | /r/MensRights | 19/01/19 07:19 PM |
| 3 | PSA: Here's an Effective Method I Have for Getting a Feminist to Reconsider Her Views, Based on Female In-Group Bias. Please spread this around.Hmm. I definitely wouldn't include Emma Watson in that list. Her argument boils down to "people think Feminism is about man-hating, but it's not - it's WONDERFUL and TRUE and DEFINITELY NOT ABOUT MAN-HATING", even though it's literally centered around false, negative stereotypes about men. Aside from that, I think it's best to avoid going overboard with the list to share. The point of my list is to have a relatively-short list of women speakers that would efficiently tear down the core principle… | /r/MensRights | 19/01/19 05:48 PM |
| 2 | PSA: Here's an Effective Method I Have for Getting a Feminist to Reconsider Her Views, Based on Female In-Group Bias. Please spread this around.I get what your saying, and I agree to some extent, but I have a few disagreements: 1.) I don't think that it would cause the MRM to become "Feminism 2.0". Feminism is an ideology - a set of beliefs - and it's centered around man-bashing. The MRM is nothing like this. The one related concern I would have is to watch out for fakes who are actually radical feminists lying about their beliefs in order to get into power and then destroy the movement from within. This is exactly something radical fem… | /r/MensRights | 19/01/19 05:29 PM |
| 1 | PSA: Here's an Effective Method I Have for Getting a Feminist to Reconsider Her Views, Based on Female In-Group Bias. Please spread this around.Don't start with a video hosting Jordan Peterson That's a good point. But on the other hand, I think most feminists who know his name only know him from hit pieces against him, rather than having heard him speak. And I think that as long as the link is kept generic without a title, once they click it they're likely to get drawn in to listening. I actually just changed the link to start at the beginning of the actual conversation (which fortunately starts with the woman), so they won't get turned… | /r/MensRights | 19/01/19 05:07 PM |
| 3 | PSA: Here's an Effective Method I Have for Getting a Feminist to Reconsider Her Views, Based on Female In-Group Bias. Please spread this around.Generally true. But if the reason they don't use facts, reason, and logic is because those have been overridden by in-group bias, then the best shot at getting them to align with facts, reason, and logic is to use that same in-group bias. "Fight fire with fire", as the saying goes. Some people are more far gone than others. There are definitely many it won't work on. But I think there are many that it would. I've gotten it to work for sure in at least one case with a lady who called herself a fe… | /r/MensRights | 19/01/19 04:58 PM |
| 8 | PSA: Here's an Effective Method I Have for Getting a Feminist to Reconsider Her Views, Based on Female In-Group Bias. Please spread this around.Thanks, I'll take a look. Could be good to add to the list. Though it could be counterproductive to make the list too long, rather than focused and relatively short. Also I'd say it's best not to put the title in the link - if the title is something they already disagree with or sounds like something they would disagree with, they might have the emotional knee-jerk reaction to not click it and end the conversation. | /r/MensRights | 19/01/19 04:35 AM |
| 5 | PSA: Here's an Effective Method I Have for Getting a Feminist to Reconsider Her Views, Based on Female In-Group Bias. Please spread this around.Thanks. | /r/MensRights | 19/01/19 04:31 AM |
| 2 | People in this thread were talking about how men's rights subreddits are nothing but woman hate.We're just arguing semantics - this depends on your definition of hate. When a student is struggling in a math class and declares "I hate math!", does that mean that he wishes math had never been formulated and that he opposes all the science and technology that was developed from math? | /r/MensRights | 13/01/19 08:21 PM |
| 2 | People in this thread were talking about how men's rights subreddits are nothing but woman hate.Yep. Dating someone who you are repelled by rather than attracted to is definitely worse than imagining that you're dating someone you're actually attracted to. | /r/MensRights | 13/01/19 08:16 PM |
| 4 | People in this thread were talking about how men's rights subreddits are nothing but woman hate.Yeah I realized the answer to my own question before reading your comment, when I woke up this morning and saw all the downvotes and replies to my one lighthearted comment I made on one of their posts: https://www.reddit.com/r/TrollXChromosomes/comments/af8or5/if_men_flirted_like_birds_vs_if_birds_flirted/edyh9dq/ So it looks like they're completely misusing the word "troll". Apparently it's a feminist thing to completely misuse the word "troll" - they're the only ones I've ever seen misuse it. … | /r/MensRights | 13/01/19 05:51 PM |
| 1 | People in this thread were talking about how men's rights subreddits are nothing but woman hate.hatred of women I think it's very important to distinguish between "hatred of X" and "frustration with X". It's entirely possible to love X yet be extremely frustrated with X. To say that you hate something is to say that you dislike what it is at its core - that you'd rather it didn't exist. That's very different from having strong frustrations about something that you nevertheless love what it is at its core. | /r/MensRights | 13/01/19 07:07 AM |
| 3 | People in this thread were talking about how men's rights subreddits are nothing but woman hate.Hmm. I'm having a hard time figuring out out if TrollXChromosomes and the other "troll subreddits" I just found out about are actually people trolling, as in trolling and making fun of the original subreddit by parodying them and trying to get a reaction, or if they're actually serious and misusing the term "troll" in some way. Do you have a good explanation of it? | /r/MensRights | 13/01/19 07:05 AM |
| 1 | People in this thread were talking about how men's rights subreddits are nothing but woman hate.Except that feminism is the militant wing of itself. Feminists who aren't militant don't remain feminists for very long, because they actually listen to and consider arguments against their logically flimsy ideology. | /r/MensRights | 13/01/19 06:46 AM |
| 1 | People in this thread were talking about how men's rights subreddits are nothing but woman hate.But even if they are "hate subs", it's not hate in the way that feminists believe men hate women - it's frustration. It's not "men hate women for what they are as their very essence", but "men who have had women treat them badly and thus are angry at women about it". It's the same kind of "hate" that (straight) feminists have for men, resulting from some men treating them badly and them extending it to all men as a group. | /r/MensRights | 13/01/19 06:44 AM |
| 6 | People in this thread were talking about how men's rights subreddits are nothing but woman hate.Anyone can get a girl if they put in effort. Yeah... but some guys can only get a 1/10 even when they put in effort. Getting a 1/10 is really not better than just sticking to porn. | /r/MensRights | 13/01/19 06:38 AM |
| 2 | Men arrested for “chatting up members of the opposite sex”I wish that were an "unpopular opinion" in my area... I live in the "belly of the beast" of SJW territory :( | /r/MensRights | 13/01/19 04:04 AM |
| 4 | Men arrested for “chatting up members of the opposite sex”It would be great if all single men could coordinate all at once to stop making any moves to try to start anything at all with ladies, for like a month, just to prove a point and end this nonsense once and for all. Unfortunately, this will not happen, ever, no matter how much anyone tries to organize it. | /r/MensRights | 13/01/19 04:03 AM |
| 3 | Men arrested for “chatting up members of the opposite sex”It's actually already happening. I just got banned from Tinder with no explanation, and I've read it's happening at a huge rate to other guys. Seems that if a woman or two clicks the "report" button for whatever reason, that's all they need to ban you with no recourse. I've read that women on Tinder are extremely report-trigger-happy, and often will report someone just because they're not attracted to them and they try to talk to her. Moral of this story: Boycott Tinder (and the other services o… | /r/MensRights | 13/01/19 04:00 AM |
| 1 | Comparing the APA guidelines for women and the guidelines for menIronically, the other Kimmel (Jimmy) is pretty bad on this subject too. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/19 06:28 PM |
| 7 | APA labels masculinity as a mental disorderSo they're contradicting their studies they did last decade: https://www.apa.org/monitor/dec04/women.aspx?fbclid=IwAR3-ChiKQWnTZ6nwWzVHNY-3OiRBTaANn-B3qMePiHJ2vzNEf7NY8wQm5QY This is the fault of their new president that just took over days ago. (S)he's clearly a radical feminist, and it's strange that (s)he hates masculinity so much given how masculine (s)he looks. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/19 06:06 AM |
| 1 | Male country singers talk about how good they are to women, while female country singers talk about how terrible the men are.Haha, good point. Maybe if I were a rocket scientist that looked like Brad Pitt but 6 inches taller and had just as much money and fame as he does. | /r/MensRights | 11/01/19 12:11 AM |
| 1 | Male country singers talk about how good they are to women, while female country singers talk about how terrible the men are.Basically. I'm a NASA engineer. I don't work directly with rockets, but close enough. | /r/MensRights | 11/01/19 12:10 AM |
| 2 | American Psychological Association, for the first time in its 127 year history, declares half the population of the planet to be "patients" that must be treated as they define 'masculinity' as a psychological problem (with an absurdly pseudoscientific paper).Hadn't heard about that. Well there's a big difference between some young ideologue they hired to run their Twitter account posting shit like that, vs the organization officially adopting anti-scientific ideology as guidelines. I imagine what happened is some hardcore ideologues got into management positions and forced this. It couldn't be long until actual scientists object enough and other management rescinds it / has this management replaced. | /r/MensRights | 11/01/19 12:08 AM |
| 12 | American Psychological Association, for the first time in its 127 year history, declares half the population of the planet to be "patients" that must be treated as they define 'masculinity' as a psychological problem (with an absurdly pseudoscientific paper).This is the same APA that did this study: https://www.apa.org/monitor/dec04/women.aspx Completely contradictory. This study is real science - the OP-linked guidelines are not studies, but ideology. | /r/MensRights | 10/01/19 03:15 AM |
| 3 | Male country singers talk about how good they are to women, while female country singers talk about how terrible the men are.a man being pathetically devoted to a woman is seen as romantic Only in a song or a movie. In real life, it's seen as "creepy" and repulsive, unless maybe if they're already married or something. Conversely, if a woman has a big crush on a man, it's seen as cute and harmless, even if the man is completely uninterested. | /r/MensRights | 10/01/19 02:19 AM |
| 12 | Male country singers talk about how good they are to women, while female country singers talk about how terrible the men are."Okay, so you're a rocket scientist... that don't impress me much" That line literally describes my entire post-college adult life so far. People like Shania Twain are the bane of my existence. | /r/MensRights | 10/01/19 02:17 AM |
| 76 | American Psychological Association, for the first time in its 127 year history, declares half the population of the planet to be "patients" that must be treated as they define 'masculinity' as a psychological problem (with an absurdly pseudoscientific paper).This can't last long in a place of science. It will be overturned shortly. | /r/MensRights | 10/01/19 02:15 AM |
| 8 | Being “creepy” is an inevitable part of young men learning to speak to women they’re interested in. Young men shouldn’t allow women who’ve never had to be the pursuer shame them for trying and not being perfect at it on their first tries.Nobody literally thinks that women aren't people. Come on. | /r/MensRights | 05/01/19 04:24 AM |
| 1 | Found this on an feminist website.. Highest rated comment :don't let anyone objectify you gurl, even if he tier 10Yeah, they would generally pick a 6'4" guy over a 6'2" guy. But if a guy who's 6'2" is having that much trouble, it's probably because of something other than height - it's not the only thing that ladies care about, though it's what they care about most. The other things they really care about with looks: shoulder width, jaw masculinity, and eye masculinity (which I just learned about recently). | /r/MensRights | 05/01/19 03:58 AM |
| 1 | Found this on an feminist website.. Highest rated comment :don't let anyone objectify you gurl, even if he tier 10Haha, exactly. Double-standards. Personally, I wear concealed lifts / extra insoles to compensate for this, but you can only get an inch or two before it becomes obvious. | /r/MensRights | 04/01/19 06:47 PM |
| 2 | Found this on an feminist website.. Highest rated comment :don't let anyone objectify you gurl, even if he tier 10Haha, basically. "Wanting to wear heels" is just an excuse for only considering guys who tower over her. | /r/MensRights | 03/01/19 04:45 AM |
| 2 | Found this on an feminist website.. Highest rated comment :don't let anyone objectify you gurl, even if he tier 10Of course looks is never even mentioned once on this chart... brilliant. | /r/MensRights | 01/01/19 07:46 PM |
| 6 | Karen Straughan Hits Nail on Head: "Men in power do not act in the interests of men as a class. They are more likely to act in the interests of women at the expense of men."The studies proving the "Women Are Wonderful" effect are the #1 most important tool in arguing against the modern feminist ideology. Though I think it's better to use these two links, since they're from universally-respected, prestigious scientific authorities: http://www.apa.org/monitor/dec04/women.aspx https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15491274 | /r/MensRights | 04/12/18 03:35 AM |
| 1 | Viewers are left outraged as Sir Cliff Richard tells Loose Women he'd rather 10 guilty people go free than one innocent person suffer after he was wrongly accused of historical sex offencesOh, how did I miss that? Nice. | /r/MensRights | 30/11/18 06:44 AM |
| 1 | Viewers are left outraged as Sir Cliff Richard tells Loose Women he'd rather 10 guilty people go free than one innocent person suffer after he was wrongly accused of historical sex offencesI'd like to see that clip. Do you have a link? | /r/MensRights | 29/11/18 06:32 AM |
| 0 | 'I was angry, and I sent it out': Woman admits she fabricated a claim about writing an anonymous letter that accused Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault, congressional investigators sayI haven't read about that, but if it's true: it's important to remember which party habitually supports these things. | /r/MensRights | 04/11/18 05:31 AM |
| 1 | Slate.com review of Sabrina the Teenage Witch. Basically we have a mainstream entertainment website saying "whoo, Satanists against the patriarchy! We want it darker!". Laugh if you dare.Oh. Interesting. | /r/MensRights | 30/10/18 05:46 AM |
| 1 | Slate.com review of Sabrina the Teenage Witch. Basically we have a mainstream entertainment website saying "whoo, Satanists against the patriarchy! We want it darker!". Laugh if you dare.You forgot to archive. You're giving them money and encouraging them to keep promoting this kind of junk. | /r/MensRights | 30/10/18 02:16 AM |
| 1 | This Quora answer thread could use some non-radical-feminist replies... complete mess right now.I didn't see that particular one, but if was there it was one of a tiny percentage that are legitimate and don't go both ways. But if that's on there, it's off-topic - nobody would call that a "microaggression". Also, I'm 99.9999% sure the thread had already been brigaded by feminists - otherwise, how do you explain some of the answers by hardcore extreme feminists having thousands of upvotes, while the one or two dissenters had maybe 3 or 4? That wouldn't happen by chance on a random thing like… | /r/MensRights | 25/10/18 02:09 AM |
| 1 | This Quora answer thread could use some non-radical-feminist replies... complete mess right now.I can't see replies-to-replies directly from the question Hmm, I can. At least the first reply is listed right under each answer, and if you click it it shows the full reply, and the beginning of any reply to that reply. Also, I've gotten notifications for replies to my replies. | /r/MensRights | 24/10/18 08:24 PM |
| 1 | New Rule: men shall no longer date feministsRight, so in context that was about teaching religious matters. And yeah, this would be bad in the context of modern society. But remember, everything was completely different before birth control and modern technology. A woman back then would not have the time, experience, or education to be a good leader outside the home. A woman back then would indeed be one who would not be a good source of insight on matters outside the home. I don't believe oppression is the right word unless it was artifi… | /r/MensRights | 24/10/18 05:13 PM |
| 1 | Not Sure if this Fits But Here's Terry Crews' on #MeTooCould be. I haven't heard him make any statements about his motivations. But it was definitely not mainly about feeling powerful, because that would make no sense. | /r/MensRights | 24/10/18 04:51 PM |
| 1 | This Quora answer thread could use some non-radical-feminist replies... complete mess right now.But Quora suggests and emails threads to its users based on previous activity, so random casual people are likely to see it, so the idea of Microaggressions, and these in particular, need to be argued against for their sake. Actually Quora does encourage replies - it sends notifications when you get a reply. Did that person you quoted claim to be a feminist? I didn't notice if they did. | /r/MensRights | 24/10/18 04:49 PM |
| 1 | This Quora answer thread could use some non-radical-feminist replies... complete mess right now.They're mostly not though. Most of them are negative misinterpretations and/or things that happen equally to both sexes. Most of it is "man said X, therefore man believes Y, even though man never said anything about believing Y and other men are saying that's not something men would think". Insecurities, yes, are apparently something stronger in more women than men, as evidenced by this kind of thing. The right solution is not to reinforce these insecurities - especially since believing them cau… | /r/MensRights | 24/10/18 03:38 PM |
| 8 | This Quora answer thread could use some non-radical-feminist replies... complete mess right now.To present the alternate, non-divisive interpretations to the undecided fence-sitters reading. Obviously you're not gonna convince any of the hardcore feminist posters. It's about the audience. | /r/MensRights | 24/10/18 02:24 AM |
| 2 | Not Sure if this Fits But Here's Terry Crews' on #MeTooIt's possible that having power over the person made it extra arousing to him, but nobody ever does anything sexual predominantly just to feel powerful - that's pretty much the least efficient way to exert power over someone. Power can sometimes be an ingredient as a fetish, but its never "not about sexual desire" as feminists illogically insist. | /r/MensRights | 22/10/18 03:26 AM |
| 5 | New Rule: men shall no longer date feministsIn the times that the Bible was written, traditional gender roles were inevitable and the only feasible way that societies could function. It wasn't until the Industrial Revolution, modern technology, and especially reliable mass-produced birth control that it became possible for it to be otherwise. | /r/MensRights | 22/10/18 01:52 AM |
| 1 | Not Sure if this Fits But Here's Terry Crews' on #MeTooWeinstein's actions weren't about power. They were abuse of power for the sake of sexual favors. Power was a means, not an end. | /r/MensRights | 22/10/18 01:34 AM |
| 1 | So I just found out my girlfriend of a year is a radical feminist...By the way, just to add to my earlier comment: when I asked about your rhetorical skills, I was mainly referring to you ability to use "emotional judo". It's especially important when dealing with an emotionally-thinking person on a topic they're emotional about. https://www.inc.com/minda-zetlin/how-emotional-judo-lets-you-take-control-of-every-conflict.html https://louismentalrolladex.blogspot.com/2011/12/emotional-judo-power-of-empathy.html http://sfs.jondon.com/11509/resources/quicktips/what-… | /r/MensRights | 21/10/18 04:22 AM |
| 4 | So I just found out my girlfriend of a year is a radical feminist...Probably. It comes down to how much she likes him - how emotionally attached she is to him. Clearly she also has an emotional attachment to this political ideology. The big question is: which emotional attachment is stronger? | /r/MensRights | 17/10/18 03:47 PM |
| 2 | So I just found out my girlfriend of a year is a radical feminist...I say don't dump her - instead, try your hardest to tactfully convince her that the things she's come to believe are not true. If she really likes you, she'll try to listen. If she doesn't like you enough to entertain your arguments, it probably wasn't gonna work out anyway, and she'll probably dump you. How good are your rhetorical skills? How good is your collection of counter-points, sources, etc? I have a collection of good links in case you need any. I've found that it's best to start by cu… | /r/MensRights | 17/10/18 01:38 AM |
| 1 | Formerly a World-Renowned Place of Science, Johns Hopkins University Falls to SJW Feminist EntryismI've seen 2 bad things from them, and I'll take your word about the circumcision thing you mentioned. The thing I saw other than this post was a couple years ago they sent out a draft of a new diversity roadmap. It had mostly non-ideological, reasonable things, but there were a few blatently SJW / feminist things. They asked for feedback, and I wrote to them to explain why those things were wrong. Not sure if they listened. What else have they done? | /r/MensRights | 22/09/18 04:53 AM |
| 1 | Formerly a World-Renowned Place of Science, Johns Hopkins University Falls to SJW Feminist EntryismI just now got "mansplained" to by a woman working a cash register. She asked me "cash or card?" I said card. I handed her my debit card, and she said "yes, this is debit. See?" And she held up the card and pointed to the word "debit" on it. Obviously I knew that my debit card is a debit card. Did I freak out and blame "the matriarchy"? No. I'm an adult. I just smiled and went on my way. I understood she was trying to be helpful. The problem is not that men think all women are stupid and that me… | /r/MensRights | 18/09/18 06:48 PM |
| 1 | Formerly a World-Renowned Place of Science, Johns Hopkins University Falls to SJW Feminist EntryismI don't know, I was there almost a decade ago, and they were definitely one of the best. I haven't been keeping up much, but it seems hard to believe all that could go out the window in a decade, unless they got infested completely all the way through with SJW pseudoscience right after I graduated and kept quiet about it until now. I can believe that if they have a sociology departnent or a gender studies department (obviously) that they would be garbage, but engineering, medicine, computer scie… | /r/MensRights | 18/09/18 06:34 PM |
| 2 | Formerly a World-Renowned Place of Science, Johns Hopkins University Falls to SJW Feminist EntryismI attended JHU for grad school. I think I know a thing or two about it. I'm sure they've made some mistakes, like the MGM thing you mentioned. That doesn't mean they don't also do a lot of sound science. But that could change if they keep going down the path they've started with this article. | /r/MensRights | 18/09/18 05:38 AM |
| 1 | Formerly a World-Renowned Place of Science, Johns Hopkins University Falls to SJW Feminist EntryismLet's all calm down here. This is not how anyone convinces anyone of anything. I think this is a bit much. In general, they're still a good school that does good research and has good teachers (medical and other fields). I was only pointing out with my post that they've taken a big step down a very bad path. I wouldn't throw out all their scientific work yet. This is like the first stage of cancer - still all-around healthy, but the cancer is a ticking time bomb if it isn't treated promptly. | /r/MensRights | 18/09/18 02:56 AM |
| 2 | Formerly a World-Renowned Place of Science, Johns Hopkins University Falls to SJW Feminist EntryismI think this is a bit much. In general, they're still a good school that does good research and has good teachers (medical and other fields). I was only pointing out with my post that they've taken a big step down a very bad path. I wouldn't throw out all their scientific work yet. This is like the first stage of cancer - still all-around healthy, but the cancer is a ticking time bomb if it isn't treated promptly. | /r/MensRights | 18/09/18 02:54 AM |
| 1 | Formerly a World-Renowned Place of Science, Johns Hopkins University Falls to SJW Feminist Entryismtype of man who tends to distrust women's competence in a surprising variety of fields This is hearsay based on an interpretation - where's the scientific study proving that it's specifically because of their gender? Have you asked the man if it was specifically because of her gender? If a person portrays themselves to not know what they're talking about, they're gonna be treated like it. If there are more women who don't know what they're talking about in a particular field, then it follows tha… | /r/MensRights | 18/09/18 02:48 AM |
| 2 | Formerly a World-Renowned Place of Science, Johns Hopkins University Falls to SJW Feminist EntryismManspreading Can't believe I have to explain this, but men have sensitive reproductive organs between our legs that when compressed get very uncomfortable and can be damaged. Also we have narrower hips, which also make a wider position more comfortable. And it's just as common for women to put their bag on the seat next to them - same issue. But neither is an issue - just politely ask or motion for the person to move over, and they will. mansplaining This idea is sexist. Women explain things to … | /r/MensRights | 18/09/18 02:30 AM |
| 1 | Formerly a World-Renowned Place of Science, Johns Hopkins University Falls to SJW Feminist EntryismIsn't insisting that one's behavior and perspective is absolutely the truth and that the other person's is absolutely wrong itself condescending? The fact is, we as humans have the remarkable ability to interpret literally anything anyone ever does or says as condescending. That doesn't mean that we should. Logic is the great equalizer. When we put subjective emotions aside and analyze things in a logical manner, that's the only way we can come close to absolute truth. Yes that may sound condesc… | /r/MensRights | 15/09/18 06:28 PM |
| 1 | Formerly a World-Renowned Place of Science, Johns Hopkins University Falls to SJW Feminist EntryismI hear this and picture the gajillionth straight person explaining to me how their religious belief that I'm going to hell isn't "homophobic." I don't follow - how does what I said correlate to that? men being socialized to step more on women's toes or double-check their work in general Nobody has socialized me to do that - in fact, no, this is opposite to reality - have you never heard of Chivalry? Men are socialized to go out of their way to be nicer and kinder to women. Who has told me to "st… | /r/MensRights | 15/09/18 06:03 PM |
| 2 | Formerly a World-Renowned Place of Science, Johns Hopkins University Falls to SJW Feminist EntryismI agree that men and women can miss things that aggravate each other, and they shouldn't be dismissed without consideration. However, if it's only a small vocal minority claiming to be aggravated, and if that thing after being analyzed is clearly not the fault of the supposed transgressor, then yes it should be dismissed. At most, a clear explanation should be given to the aggrieved, and and attempt should be made to help them change their attitude so they don't keep misinterpreting things. What… | /r/MensRights | 15/09/18 05:40 PM |
| 1 | Formerly a World-Renowned Place of Science, Johns Hopkins University Falls to SJW Feminist EntryismFYI, here's the online version of the article: https://hub.jhu.edu/magazine/2018/fall/new-erotica-feminists-caitlin-kunkel It has a comments section. | /r/MensRights | 15/09/18 04:01 PM |
| 1 | Formerly a World-Renowned Place of Science, Johns Hopkins University Falls to SJW Feminist EntryismIt happens to men and women because 1.) Habit of pressing the button, and/or 2.) The light on the button doesn't stand out enough to make it immediately clear it's already been pressed. It's not something men do more, unless men are more likely to do things out of habit or to not thoroughly evaluate the status of a button before pressing it (which with this kind of button is entirely unnecessary and a waste of time and mental energy). There's no reason to believe men would do that more. This is … | /r/MensRights | 15/09/18 03:26 PM |
| 15 | Formerly a World-Renowned Place of Science, Johns Hopkins University Falls to SJW Feminist EntryismSeriously, reading this shit makes my head hurt. This is Tumblr-level bullshit. That part about the elevator button is so completely illogical - "Hey, you know that thing that happens to literally every person by accident? That happens to you BECAUSE YOU'RE A WOMAN AND MEN THINK ALL WOMEN ARE STUPID!". Holy fucking shit, when is the giant meteor getting here? | /r/MensRights | 15/09/18 06:32 AM |
| 2 | Popular and Trusted Website HowStuffWorks Article Sneaks in Blatant (and clearly false) Feminist TheoryWell, individual sections are written as if it were fact, then there are a few disclaimers like that mixed in. It seems likely to me that those disclaimers were added after the article was written, at the insistence of her bosses who were probably not full-SJW and were worried about the company's reputation. | /r/MensRights | 18/08/18 01:22 AM |
| 6 | Neuroscientist Says Sex Differences Are Biological, Not A Social ConstructYou may save the planet, but will you even Want To Live On This Planet Anymore? Joking aside, the longer the Democrats stay off-the-deep-end, and the further off-the-deep-end they go with all this man-hating anti-scientific divisiveness, the more moderates will walk away, and that will make the party less able to do anything for the future of the planet. A party that cares about the environment can't do anything for the environment if they've pushed away half their supporters and made themselves… | /r/MensRights | 08/08/18 01:49 AM |
| 1 | PSA: These two links to studies are all you need to completely and concisely disprove the entire modern feminist ideologySorry, I realized after sending it that the message was a lot longer than I meant it to be. Would you like me to pare it down and rephrase it to just a few short points and topics we can discuss? | /r/MensRights | 07/08/18 07:09 PM |
| 17 | Neuroscientist Says Sex Differences Are Biological, Not A Social ConstructIf you care about the future of your party, you need to lambast them just as hard for this. | /r/MensRights | 07/08/18 05:57 PM |
| 1 | PSA: These two links to studies are all you need to completely and concisely disprove the entire modern feminist ideologyHmm, I took a look through that. Pretty interesting. Can you tell me what you mean by "more chances in life"? Do you mean "in the workplace" or "in all facets of life ambitions"? If you mean "in the workplace", I completely agree with you that this was the case historically. But in today's society, I don't believe so, especially in light of affirmative action and diversity programs. In fact, there are studies that show that this historical trend has been reversed - women now have the advantage i… | /r/MensRights | 07/08/18 02:47 PM |
| 1 | PSA: These two links to studies are all you need to completely and concisely disprove the entire modern feminist ideologyPretty good links. Just found a link for the last study you posted an excerpt from: https://www.bipartisanalliance.com/2018/07/men-women-more-strongly-blamed-men-for.html That one seems particularly useful. I think I'll start using that one. | /r/MensRights | 07/08/18 07:49 AM |
| 2 | PSA: These two links to studies are all you need to completely and concisely disprove the entire modern feminist ideologyYep, no problem. Spread them around - I think it'll make a big difference. There are other studies, but these cut directly to the core of modern feminism like no other studies I've seen. I'd suggest this one too: https://www.bipartisanalliance.com/2018/07/men-women-more-strongly-blamed-men-for.html | /r/MensRights | 07/08/18 07:45 AM |
| 2 | PSA: These two links to studies are all you need to completely and concisely disprove the entire modern feminist ideologyWe don't need to appeal to emotion when we have facts I wish that were true, but sadly human nature dictates that that will NEVER be the case, ever, with any generation. And, call me a sexist, but women in particular often seem more likely to be in need of the use of emotional tactics. Especially the feminist ones, since they tend to have deep emotional issues. I'm not saying using a logical fallacy type of appeal to emotion - rather, it's about the angle you come in at with the facts. I've been… | /r/MensRights | 07/08/18 07:19 AM |
| 1 | PSA: These two links to studies are all you need to completely and concisely disprove the entire modern feminist ideologyYep. So I think that people like us who try to undo the societal chaos being done by feminist extremists in power positions tend to do a very sub-optimal job at convincing enough people thoroughly enough. I think we all need to work on our tactics. We need to keep our arguments concise and directly to-the-central-points. And we need to use more "emotional judo" so people who are emotionally invested won't stop listening before considering the points. I think we need a coordinated effort to impro… | /r/MensRights | 07/08/18 06:51 AM |
| 2 | PSA: These two links to studies are all you need to completely and concisely disprove the entire modern feminist ideologyYep. What I was trying to say is that these two things are the "central pillars" of every idea that comes from feminism (also a third central pillar: denial of biological sex differences). "The Patriarchy", "Rape Culture", "Gender-Based Violence", "Female Oppression", etc, are all ideas built on top of the central pillars I mentioned. Pull out those pillars, and the whole house crumbles apart. | /r/MensRights | 07/08/18 06:43 AM |
| 11 | High-flying career women are refusing to 'marry down' despite struggling to find a Mr Right with similar earning power and intelligence. Whose fault is this?So you admit that it's possible for a man to not be socially "privileged". Do you have anything to say relevant to the article? | /r/MensRights | 29/07/18 07:12 PM |
| 1 | Burger King's "pink tax fries" is another example of how one-sided the narrative of gender equality is.Subway can be healthy, depending on what you pick. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/18 01:42 AM |
| 2 | 75 years ago, men and only men were conscripted to die in WW2. Today, game developers shoehorn female soldiers in WW2 games, unabashedly erasing men's coerced sacrifice from popular culture, all for money.Well yeah, that makes no sense. | /r/MensRights | 18/07/18 01:07 PM |
| 2 | 75 years ago, men and only men were conscripted to die in WW2. Today, game developers shoehorn female soldiers in WW2 games, unabashedly erasing men's coerced sacrifice from popular culture, all for money.Well, to be fair, there were samurai swords in WWII. In Japan. Which was a major part of WWII. | /r/MensRights | 14/07/18 10:00 PM |
| 2 | Female Navy Officer cries at court martial and gets 3 months of half pay after killing 7 men.literal tons of money wasted Is a ton of money equal to 2000 British pounds? | /r/MensRights | 12/05/18 02:46 PM |
| 4 | The UK has a major gender pay gap problem. New data "proves" itHow in the world can CNN pass up this BS It's CNN. They have an agenda to push. They've been pushing this kind of dishonesty since 2014. | /r/MensRights | 04/04/18 04:43 AM |
| 1 | SNL for such a "progressive" show the sure hate men.Progressive is not an adjective in the political context, other than meaning "aligning with progressivism". Progressivism is set of political ideologies, which includes what we would call "SJW-ism". | /r/MensRights | 14/03/18 04:23 AM |
| 2 | SNL for such a "progressive" show the sure hate men.You can't have one without the other. | /r/MensRights | 14/03/18 04:19 AM |
| 33 | SNL for such a "progressive" show the sure hate men.You say "progressive" and "hate men" as if they don't go together... | /r/MensRights | 13/03/18 05:13 AM |
| 3 | Is it better to support Democrats or Republicans as a supporter of Men's Rights?Sure, Republicans will try to push things as far to the right as possible, but it'll take 8 years just to undo all the leftward movement done during the Obama administration. 8 years of Trump and maybe we'll be back to about how we were in 2008. Also, Republicans don't explicitly try to force anyone into any roles. One of their mantras is "personal freedom / individualism". And traditional gender roles weren't something that was forced anyway - it was the natural state of things in the pre-indus… | /r/MensRights | 13/03/18 03:10 AM |
| 1 | Is it better to support Democrats or Republicans as a supporter of Men's Rights?Politicians who do not push SJW radical feminist ideology and policy are a hell of a lot better to have in power than politicians who zealously do so. Also, Republican politicians have at times supported major causes of men's rights, such as due process in college sexual assault trails. | /r/MensRights | 12/03/18 06:25 AM |
| 2 | Is it better to support Democrats or Republicans as a supporter of Men's Rights?Also, if you read about his history, he used to be a huge campaigner for literal Socialism and full-blown Communism: https://nypost.com/2016/01/16/dont-be-fooled-by-bernie-sanders-hes-a-diehard-communist/ | /r/MensRights | 12/03/18 06:23 AM |
| 2 | Is it better to support Democrats or Republicans as a supporter of Men's Rights?In Britain there is one conservative Parliament member that I know of that actively speaks out for men's rights and against modern feminism - Philip Davies. And I definitely have seen republican congressional support for some of the big things that MRAs talk about, such as "innocent until proven guilty" with college sexual assault trials. But regardless of how many of the party's actual politicians campaign for men's rights / against modern feminism, the fact is that 1.) It's part what their bas… | /r/MensRights | 12/03/18 06:19 AM |
| 3 | Is it better to support Democrats or Republicans as a supporter of Men's Rights?Until the left stops pushing SJW Feminist bullshit, they are not the party for people who strongly oppose SJW Feminist bullshit. Unfortunately, I've learned in recent years that SJW Feminist bullshit has actually been at the core of the Democratic party for decades - they just used to keep it very well hidden, wisely. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/18 08:07 PM |
| 7 | Is it better to support Democrats or Republicans as a supporter of Men's Rights?As a moderate, former democrat, who switched mainly due to modern feminist SJW bullshit: We have one major party actively working hard against the rights of men, and one party with a small but growing part dedicated to opposing modern feminism and SJW extremism. Opposition to the extremes of modern feminism has become a large part of Republican culture in recent years. Many prominent republican-affiliated figures are constantly speaking out against third-wave feminist extremism. For example, Mil… | /r/MensRights | 11/03/18 08:00 PM |
| 3 | Is it better to support Democrats or Republicans as a supporter of Men's Rights?Actually, opposition to the extremes of modern feminism has become a large part of Republican culture in recent years. Many prominent republican-affiliated figures are constantly speaking out against third-wave feminist extremism. For example, Milo, Ben Shapiro, Christina Hoff Sommers, Stephen Crowder, etc, etc, etc. Even President Trump recently was brave enough to go on record with the media saying that no, he would not call himself a feminist. Talk to almost any republican today, ask them if … | /r/MensRights | 11/03/18 07:57 PM |
| 1 | Damore, Diversity, and Disruption at PSU: “James argues, accurately, that there are differences between men and women,” evolutionary biologist Heather Heying "..something that is so universally and widely accepted in biology"I had a very similar in-person experience like 4 years ago in a group conversation. But worse. After I pointed out that men are physically stronger, she claimed I said that men are superior. I said "just in physical strength". From then on, she kept ignoring me, and even stuck her hand in my face once when I tried to say something. She later took over this geek-focused Meetup group and made it explicitly an SJW-only group. Moral of the story: "this is why we need Gamergate". | /r/MensRights | 27/02/18 11:06 PM |
| 6 | Almost 30 years later Lewinsky now thinks she might have been raped, maybe.Oh yeahhh... I forgot. My super-hot female boss had no power, while average-looks grunt-level employee me had all the power. Thank you for reminding me. | /r/MensRights | 27/02/18 06:38 AM |
| 2 | Damore, Diversity, and Disruption at PSU: “James argues, accurately, that there are differences between men and women,” evolutionary biologist Heather Heying "..something that is so universally and widely accepted in biology"Sounds like it could have been a lot worse. How bad that was also depends on what his definition of "basically" is. | /r/MensRights | 27/02/18 06:36 AM |
| 3 | Damore, Diversity, and Disruption at PSU: “James argues, accurately, that there are differences between men and women,” evolutionary biologist Heather Heying "..something that is so universally and widely accepted in biology"Actually, CAT scans have shown that trans people have brain structures more similar to the opposite sex than non-trans people. Don't say this to a feminist though. I unintentionally went on a Tinder date with a hardcore, SJW, radical feminist recently. I tried to tell her about the well-proven scientific evidence that men and women have different brain structures, and that gay people and trans people have unusually similar structures to the opposite sex, and she literally walked out on me. Becau… | /r/MensRights | 27/02/18 06:30 AM |
| 3 | Almost 30 years later Lewinsky now thinks she might have been raped, maybe.Not sure if you're being serious or not (since you said shitlord), but are you saying that if I tried to sleep with my hot female boss and she allowed it, she would have raped me? | /r/MensRights | 27/02/18 06:14 AM |
| 2 | Daniel Vavra, the lead developer of RPG Kingdom Come: Deliverance, explains why trying to please feminists is a fool's errand (applies to the last 50+ years in places like work, schools, government, social clubs,... not just gaming)Sure, no problem. | /r/MensRights | 27/02/18 06:11 AM |
| 4 | Almost 30 years later Lewinsky now thinks she might have been raped, maybe.Where is the evidence that he coerced her? That he made her job dependent on their relationship? Please provide this evidence. I had a super-attractive female boss for years. If she had offered to have sex with me and I accepted, would that have been rape? No, of course not! | /r/MensRights | 27/02/18 05:53 AM |
| 25 | SJW's change mission of The Men’s Center at the University of Oregon. The Men's Center is now dedicated to 'reconstructing masculinity' by ending male violence and dismantling systems of oppression. Ms. Maya Auld, Program Director, said men need social justice to become better allies to womenThis is exactly like that parasite that infests an ant's brain and makes it do what's best for spreading the parasite rather than for the ant. | /r/MensRights | 27/02/18 05:38 AM |
| 2 | Daniel Vavra, the lead developer of RPG Kingdom Come: Deliverance, explains why trying to please feminists is a fool's errand (applies to the last 50+ years in places like work, schools, government, social clubs,... not just gaming)Legitimate question. https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/ Look at the section on the sidebar, "WHAT IS GAMERGATE?" How it relates here: a large part of it is opposition to authoritarian feminists trying to take over gaming. | /r/MensRights | 27/02/18 05:28 AM |
| 2 | Daniel Vavra, the lead developer of RPG Kingdom Come: Deliverance, explains why trying to please feminists is a fool's errand (applies to the last 50+ years in places like work, schools, government, social clubs,... not just gaming)The Simpsons nailed this 12 years ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aL0MuT0v6ds | /r/MensRights | 27/02/18 05:04 AM |
| 1 | “After pillaging the Earth, the Patriarchy looks to colonize Mars” | How Musk, Bezos, etc. space programs are examples of men’s entitlement to power, control, and ownershipGood point. But even if they don't get ad revenue, they still see the number of page hits. If they get a lot of page hits, that will encourage them to continue. | /r/MensRights | 23/02/18 04:32 AM |
| 2 | “After pillaging the Earth, the Patriarchy looks to colonize Mars” | How Musk, Bezos, etc. space programs are examples of men’s entitlement to power, control, and ownershipYou forgot to archive. You're giving them money, thereby encouraging them to continue publishing this shit. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/18 06:22 AM |
| 2 | 'Monstrous sexual abuse': Hawaii's famous Kamehameha school settles suit for $80 million after school therapist abused boys for 27 years. Sure it's only about 20 hours old. Must have missed the coverage on msn and cnn.the rapist therapist | /r/MensRights | 18/02/18 04:57 AM |
| 4 | Can't wait for Men's Rights Monday from SpotifyWhat catratdog said. Feminist ideology and its inevitably resulting behavior and policies infringe upon the rights of others, and sow social disharmony. In addition, do you think that it would be okay for Scientologists to have significant power over society, and to be frequently evangelizing their religion through major media outlets? No? | /r/MensRights | 17/02/18 03:41 PM |
| 9 | Can't wait for Men's Rights Monday from SpotifyNothing wrong with feminist ideologies? Have you read the things central to their belief system? It's clinically insane. | /r/MensRights | 17/02/18 05:42 AM |
| 6 | Vancouver swing-dancer banned from club for ‘mansplaining’My first encounter with an SJW-controlled social scene was swing dancing. It makes perfect sense to me. | /r/MensRights | 14/02/18 06:44 AM |
| 3 | Does Google Demote Men's Rights WebsitesTry duckduckgo.com. It's usually pretty similar to Google quality. If you really can't find something, then you can resort to Google. | /r/MensRights | 14/02/18 06:43 AM |
| 1 | Who The Hell Would Say "Thank You For Your Feminism"?Yeah he was definitely the better of those two candidates. | /r/MensRights | 03/02/18 03:00 PM |
| 1 | Suzanne Venker: How utterly refreshing to have a president who not only rejects the feminist label but who implies that feminism is a divisive movement that has little regard for menThanks. I wasn't aware of that. Well, even in this video he did dabble a bit in endorsing some unnecessary identity politics, but I agree that the general theme is against it. Good to know. | /r/MensRights | 01/02/18 05:58 AM |
| 1 | Suzanne Venker: How utterly refreshing to have a president who not only rejects the feminist label but who implies that feminism is a divisive movement that has little regard for menNot to mention all the queen monarchs they've had. | /r/MensRights | 30/01/18 06:54 PM |
| 1 | Suzanne Venker: How utterly refreshing to have a president who not only rejects the feminist label but who implies that feminism is a divisive movement that has little regard for menCan you point me to where Bernie distanced himself from idpol? I remember that at least during his campaign he was very much in support of it. | /r/MensRights | 30/01/18 06:52 PM |
| 1 | Who The Hell Would Say "Thank You For Your Feminism"?That would have been a much more natural thing to say. Looks like she said that afterwards. But it's still a weird thing to say, even if she made it less weird with a subsequent sentence. | /r/MensRights | 30/01/18 01:57 PM |
| 1 | Who The Hell Would Say "Thank You For Your Feminism"?If it was meant as a clever joke, she completely bombed at the delivery. | /r/MensRights | 30/01/18 05:48 AM |
| 1 | Trump Declares He Is Not a FeministOkay, so where's your evidence that Trump is less likely to hire a woman with an equal resume? Also - explain these: http://news.cornell.edu/stories/2015/04/women-preferred-21-over-men-stem-faculty-positions https://www.pmc.gov.au/domestic-policy/behavioural-economics/going-blind-see-more-clearly-unconscious-bias-australian-public-service-aps-shortlisting-processes http://www.breitbart.com/milo/2016/07/01/not-sexism-women-just-suck-interviews/ http://www.apa.org/monitor/dec04/women.aspx https://… | /r/MensRights | 29/01/18 03:53 AM |
| 1 | Trump Declares He Is Not a FeministWell that was just one example. Generally "anti-woman" is stated or implied to be about a particular issue or set of issues. Can you think of a specific issue that 99% of women agree on that Trump opposes? If you mean "anti-woman" in the literal sense, as in wishing that all women would cease to exist: finding a straight man that feels that way would be harder than finding a unicorn. Many people who are "anti-gay" do in fact wish all gay people would cease to exist. You'd have to be clinically i… | /r/MensRights | 28/01/18 06:52 PM |
| 1 | Trump Declares He Is Not a FeministGood point - never thought of that. | /r/MensRights | 28/01/18 05:50 PM |
| 1 | Trump Declares He Is Not a FeministA person can be anti-gay - it's very common to feel negative feelings towards the idea of homosexuality and to believe that homosexuality is wrong. And many people believe that gay people shouldn't be allowed to marry, which the vast majority of gay people disagree with and which interferes with their personal lives. Saying someone is "anti-woman" for opposing abortion implies that all women support abortion. Studies show that over half of women believe abortion is wrong (61% acorrding to a rece… | /r/MensRights | 28/01/18 05:47 PM |
| 1 | Trump Declares He Is Not a FeministThe term "anti woman" is sexist. It implies that all women are identical, have the exact same minds, have the exact same opinions, simply because of their sex. The majority of white women voted for Trump. The No. 1 stigma of MRAs is strawman sexism - calling things sexism that are nothing of the sort. | /r/MensRights | 28/01/18 03:41 PM |
| 2 | Trump Declares He Is Not a FeministActually, one is a shit sandwich and the other is a douche. At least according to South Park. | /r/MensRights | 28/01/18 03:06 PM |
| 2 | Trump Declares He Is Not a FeministHmm... when did Sanders speak out against idpol? I've only heard him speak in support of it. For example, I remember at some point during the primaries, he said "I am a strong feminist". | /r/MensRights | 28/01/18 03:04 PM |
| 10 | Trump Declares He Is Not a FeministA lot of what you said applies to both parties. A few years ago I called myself a moderate democrat and only voted for democrats. Then I learned about and experienced modern feminism. Now I only vote republican. The fact is, the left is completely dominated and controlled by feminists right now. The best thing you can do voting-wise to fight modern feminist extremism is to vote republican, whether or not you like the rest of their platform. | /r/MensRights | 28/01/18 04:59 AM |
| 8 | Trump Declares He Is Not a FeministSadly, you're probably right. And there will probably be another sermon on SNL about why everyone should be a feminist (I heard SNL used to be a sketch comedy show...) | /r/MensRights | 28/01/18 04:54 AM |
| 12 | Trump Declares He Is Not a FeministAnd like 5% of the media... | /r/MensRights | 28/01/18 04:16 AM |
| 1 | Civil rights groups are to sue Betsy DeVos over sexual assault policy. They want the courts to rule that the move by her department to give more rights to the accused as illegal.Yes it is. | /r/MensRights | 26/01/18 09:32 PM |
| 1 | Civil rights groups are to sue Betsy DeVos over sexual assault policy. They want the courts to rule that the move by her department to give more rights to the accused as illegal.Not true anymore. I recently got a letter from them trying to get me to join them. It had a huge banner across the top of a picture of the "Women's March". The entire letter was far-left spin - attacking the president using the standard misrepresentations of the left, pushing third-wave feminist propaganda, etc, etc, etc. | /r/MensRights | 26/01/18 02:47 PM |
| 2 | Reporter tries to bait Bill Burr with 'Can women be funny?' + Jimmy Fallon getting uncomfortable during Bill’s men's rights speech (funny!)I've met many funny women. I've seen very few funny female comedians. Seems the funny ones don't become comedians, for whatever reason. | /r/MensRights | 26/01/18 06:17 AM |
| 1 | White men must be stopped: The very future of mankind depends on itYeah seriously... don't fund this crap with page views. | /r/MensRights | 26/01/18 05:52 AM |
| 1 | Civil rights groups are to sue Betsy DeVos over sexual assault policy. They want the courts to rule that the move by her department to give more rights to the accused as illegal.ACLU The ACLU, at least recently, is simply a mouthpiece of the extreme far-left. They're anything but just for civil rights. | /r/MensRights | 26/01/18 05:50 AM |
| 1 | The necessity for the WRA.The thing is, there's a small a handful of legitimate, real-world problems that primarily affect women that could be reduced, such as reducing (actual) sexual assault. Currently, when a woman is bothered by sexual assault and wants to find some outlet for fighting it, she ends up turning to feminism and all its batshit crazy ideology and extremism. It's perfectly analogous to if it were the case that whenever a white person feels uncomfortable with the non-stop white-bashing recently coming from… | /r/MensRights | 26/01/18 05:40 AM |
| 1 | NASA openly pushing full-on SJW Feminism to entire workforceThere actually wasn't a budget cut. Only a redistribution of funds within NASA. Hoping that when the new administrator takes over things will change. | /r/MensRights | 24/01/18 06:06 PM |
| 2 | NASA openly pushing full-on SJW Feminism to entire workforceProbably, but it's being endorsed by NASA. And NASA is directly pushing the same kinds of things: https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/6jvxxb/nasa_goes_full_sjw_pushing_privilege_theory_and/ https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/6r1xj3/nasa_continuing_to_go_full_sjw_integrating_power/ https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/6rilf4/nasa_going_full_sjw_part_3_indoctrinating_its/ So, both NASA and Lockheed are fucked. | /r/MensRights | 24/01/18 04:48 AM |
| 8 | NASA openly pushing full-on SJW Feminism to entire workforceHoly shit - missed that 2nd part. NASA is fucked - unless they hurry up and bring in the new administrator and he fixes it. | /r/MensRights | 24/01/18 01:58 AM |
| 2 | Aziz Ansari Skips 2018 SAG Awards, Receives No Applause When MentionedI was being facetious. Blame should be given everywhere that it exists. And yes, it's extremely ironic. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/18 06:34 AM |
| -1 | The necessity for the WRA.Men's rights are primarily infringed upon by feminism. Preventing women from "falling to the dark side" reduces infringement upon the rights of men. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/18 06:31 AM |
| 6 | Aziz Ansari Skips 2018 SAG Awards, Receives No Applause When Mentionedhe really was asking for this. STOP VICTIM BLAMING! | /r/MensRights | 23/01/18 06:10 AM |
| 0 | The necessity for the WRA.This just may be exactly the cure to the madness of the past few years. Good thinking! | /r/MensRights | 23/01/18 05:07 AM |
| 2 | Found this gem at the women's march. Pure EVIL.I wasn't trying to say that the original, historical Feminist movement was anywhere near perfect. Just that it had some reasonable requests, and it wasn't centered around a batshit-crazy ideological belief system. | /r/MensRights | 22/01/18 08:15 AM |
| 2 | Found this gem at the women's march. Pure EVIL.As the modern ideology, yes. As the historical, non-ideological, now-defunct political movement, not really. | /r/MensRights | 22/01/18 07:42 AM |
| 3 | Liberal identity politics has ruined Star Wars for the fansIronic, because modern feminism IS a conspiracy theory. | /r/MensRights | 13/01/18 12:42 AM |
| 1 | Should we organize a Men's March this year?Better idea: work with conservative groups to organize a "Rational Women's Countermarch" at the same time as the "Women's" March. I know not everyone here is conservative, but that's where you'll find the largest number of women who disagree with much of what modern feminism says. Especially on abortion - you can really get conservative women riled up against abortion, which the "women's" march is in support of. In fact, the date of the "March for Life" is shortly before the date of the "Women's… | /r/MensRights | 11/01/18 06:37 AM |
| 1 | Should we organize a Men's March this year?Better idea: work with conservative groups to organize a "Rational Women's Countermarch" at the same time as the "Women's" March. I know not everyone here is conservative, but that's where you'll find the largest number of women who disagree with much of what modern feminism says. Especially on abortion - you can really get conservative women riled up against abortion, which the "women's" march is in support of. In fact, the date of the "March for Life" is shortly before the date of the "Women's… | /r/MensRights | 11/01/18 06:26 AM |
| 2 | Popular Webpage "Goodreads" Once Again Pushing Feminist-Indoctrination Books, Including One Blatantly Indoctrinating CHILDRENIf you're equating a book about a woman's struggles in life with SJW/feminist doctrine No, but inaccurate generalizations and divisive, negative misinterpretations of women's experiences and unfair negative portrayal of what men as a group think and believe in regards to women. The picture book "Yet She Persisted": Senator Elizabeth Warren’s refusal to be silenced in the Senate inspired a spontaneous celebration of women who persevered in the face of adversity Implying that she was being "silenc… | /r/MensRights | 16/11/17 03:14 AM |
| 1 | Popular Webpage "Goodreads" Once Again Pushing Feminist-Indoctrination Books, Including One Blatantly Indoctrinating CHILDRENRead the descriptions and reviews. Mostly the descriptions. Almost every category has at least one book pushing SJW feminist beliefs. Some categories have several. One book in the Picture Book section is extremely blatant (and is written by Chelsea Clinton). | /r/MensRights | 15/11/17 08:58 PM |
| 1 | Popular Webpage "Goodreads" Once Again Pushing Feminist-Indoctrination Books, Including One Blatantly Indoctrinating CHILDRENNote: It's almost EVERY category. Some are blatant. Some you have to read the summary to catch it. A few, you have to read the reviews on the page to see what it's pushing. But almost EVERY category is full of books with feminist ideology. But most horribly and blatantly: the Picture Book section. Indoctrinating CHILDREN into an extremely divisive, anti-scientific, hate-inducing political ideology. It's sick. | /r/MensRights | 15/11/17 02:47 PM |
| 2 | Only violence stops mansplaining! - Wonder Woman comic #30Sounds like they're asking for trouble saying something like that, but it sounds like it may be that these ladies are not as experienced as the guys working there. In this case, while it's true that these guys are being rude, it wouldn't be "simply because they're women". There's just no conceivable case I can think of where these ladies would be getting things done just as competently and yet the guys would keep on making jokes/comments about "needing to talk to a man" - that sounds like the ki… | /r/MensRights | 07/11/17 06:31 AM |
| 2 | Only violence stops mansplaining! - Wonder Woman comic #30Yes, my male counterparts treat women differently: they're more careful not to offend, more friendly, and yes there's often the undercurrent of one person being attracted to the other but trying not to show it too much for fear of damaging the work relationship or getting in trouble. Other than that, no. Not based simply on their sex. Based on their job responsibilities, experience level, personality, and quality of work, yes. | /r/MensRights | 07/11/17 06:18 AM |
| 2 | Only violence stops mansplaining! - Wonder Woman comic #30Being condescending just means talking down to someone from a perceived higher intellectual or moral authority. So are teachers being condescending every time they teach something to a student? If someone genuinely believes that someone doesn't know something, and they want to help them by teaching them that thing, why is that bad? Should we fire all the teachers because all they do is mansplain all day? I would say that actual, uncalled-for condescension is when someone is clearly not justified… | /r/MensRights | 07/11/17 06:09 AM |
| 3 | Only violence stops mansplaining! - Wonder Woman comic #30If that were true, it would be called "oversplaining" It's called "mansplaining" because feminists only notice when men do it, because feminists have deep-seated negative feelings towards men (often due to bad experiences they had with individual men, which they unfairly generalize to all men and build up negative feelings towards men as a group), and thus are constantly looking for things to criticize about men as a group, while completely missing when women do the exact same things. | /r/MensRights | 07/11/17 05:48 AM |
| 2 | Only violence stops mansplaining! - Wonder Woman comic #30You're being unclear with your wording. Of course some men and some women think they're better than some other individual men and some other individual women. This is assuming the definition of "better" as "a more valuable person". Some people think they're a better person than some other individual people. If you mean "better at a particular task", then yes, most men believe they're better than most women at lifting heavy weights, for example - because biologically they almost always are. In re… | /r/MensRights | 07/11/17 05:40 AM |
| 2 | Only violence stops mansplaining! - Wonder Woman comic #30I didn't mean that nobody is ever condescending. I meant that nobody is ever condescending to someone "simply because they're a woman". It's never that simple. Also, whether something was intended to be condescending is highly open to interpretation, and pretty much every time someone is accused of "mansplaining", it's a misinterpretation. | /r/MensRights | 07/11/17 05:11 AM |
| 5 | Only violence stops mansplaining! - Wonder Woman comic #30But nobody does that. Reminder in case you slept through life: men do not hate women - we are hard-wired to be ATTRACTED to them and PREFER them. | /r/MensRights | 06/11/17 01:04 PM |
| 1 | Wendy Williams destroys audience of entitled man-haters in 5 secondsFact: at some point in their lives, 1 in 6 children will be abducted by the Dutch. https://youtu.be/-iAUwamHTM4?t=5m33s | /r/MensRights | 26/10/17 12:58 PM |
| 270 | Huff Post writer Savannah Seymour on Harry Styles being sexually assaultedI (as a man) have had people I barely knew smack my ass many times. Therefore I've been sexually assaulted. #metoo But I also didn't give a fuck about it. | /r/MensRights | 23/10/17 04:20 AM |
| 1 | Google Is Blatantly Promoting Feminism on its Main Search PageMe too, and I'm planning on trying to further "de-Google" myself as much as possible, from all their services. But - I'm just one person. My de-Googling alone, no matter how thorough, has essentially zero effect. Billions of people use their services. I need people to join me in my effort. I need masses of people to join my efforts. Yet, there seem to be very few people who care enough to do anything at all. | /r/MensRights | 29/09/17 03:52 PM |
| 3 | Silicon Valley's men are embracing 'men's rights' as pushback against gender equality movementAnd now Google is blatantly pushing feminism on its main search page today: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/72k6jo/google_is_blatantly_promoting_feminism_on_its/ | /r/MensRights | 26/09/17 01:09 PM |
| 2 | SJWs Using "Selfie" Wikipedia Page to spread extreme feminist ideology to the unsuspecting masses - They're Watching Edits Like Hawks and Reverting All ChangesAnd if we're gonna call "male gaze" a thing, it's only fair to also talk about "female gaze". It's been shown that women on average judge 80% of men as physically unattractive. | /r/MensRights | 15/09/17 05:33 AM |
| 1 | Why Aren't We Trying to Fix Wikipedia?Jesus, like half the things on that page are clearly false. And the page is locked. While reading it I kind of feel like I'm reading Encyclopedia Dramatica or Uncyclopedia. Except it's a page that people actually trust as fact. | /r/MensRights | 15/09/17 05:26 AM |
| 1 | Why Aren't We Trying to Fix Wikipedia?Sounds likely, but do you have a source? | /r/MensRights | 15/09/17 01:28 AM |
| 1 | SJWs Using "Selfie" Wikipedia Page to spread extreme feminist ideology to the unsuspecting masses - They're Watching Edits Like Hawks and Reverting All ChangesI thoroughly got the impression that if I tried to discuss it they wouldn't be reasonable about it. I didn't just keep deleting it over and over again - I tried modifying it, and I tried only deleting some parts, in ways that were more compromise-like. I included thorough explanations in the change comment. But they kept reverting the changes. | /r/MensRights | 15/09/17 01:26 AM |
| 4 | Why Aren't We Trying to Fix Wikipedia?Infogalactic will not succeed, because: 1.) That's a terrible name that in no way suggests that it's an encyclopedia. 2.) Wikipedia is already firmly established as the online encyclopedia. Everyone knows what it is. If a Wikipedia article has something misleading, millions of people will start to believe it. | /r/MensRights | 03/09/17 05:01 AM |
| 1 | Why Aren't We Trying to Fix Wikipedia?Infogalactic will not succeed, because: 1.) That's a terrible name that in no way suggests that it's an encyclopedia. 2.) Wikipedia is already firmly established as the online encyclopedia. Everyone knows what it is. If a Wikipedia article has something misleading, millions of people will start to believe it. | /r/MensRights | 03/09/17 05:00 AM |
| 30 | SJWs Using "Selfie" Wikipedia Page to spread extreme feminist ideology to the unsuspecting masses - They're Watching Edits Like Hawks and Reverting All ChangesExactly. Please fix it. They keep reverting it when I do. And then I got threatened by a mod. They're completely ignoring the fact that women judge men's looks just as much, and that men also post selfies to try to impress potential mates. | /r/MensRights | 02/09/17 10:00 PM |
| 1 | Campus sexual assault policies are unfair to the accused. This case shows how.Oh. I didn't actually read the article - just the headline. I didn't wanna give them revenue by clicking, and I didn't wanna bother looking for a cached version. | /r/MensRights | 17/08/17 01:11 PM |
| 1 | 'Google Moves Into the Business of Thought Control' Bloomberg ViewDoes a mostly male environment intimidate women from applying/considering the field? Didn't stop them from going into Business. Used to be all males, now over half of business degrees go to women. What's the difference? | /r/MensRights | 17/08/17 04:59 AM |
| 5 | Campus sexual assault policies are unfair to the accused. This case shows how.Don't let this isolated moment of clarity fool you into thinking Washington Post is no longer extreme SJW left. I see the print edition once every week or two, and it's always full of front-page SJW feminist extremism treated as fact. The other day they had a front page article about the "feminist theater pointing out the absurdity of patriarchy". Another day recently, a front page article about how "men don't like to hear women's voices, simply because they're women". Another day recently, fron… | /r/MensRights | 17/08/17 04:53 AM |
| 12 | In TwoXchromosomes science and facts are forbiddenExactly. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/17 05:07 AM |
| 1 | In TwoXchromosomes science and facts are forbiddengoogle google DuckDuckGo Google. Or just "do a websearch for Google". | /r/MensRights | 11/08/17 05:05 AM |
| 3 | In Case You Weren't Sure Whether or not AAUW was an Extremist SJW Organization, Check Out This Post from 2 Days Ago on LinkedInSorry, I thought that was common knowledge. "American Association of University Women". They have a lot of influence. | /r/MensRights | 06/08/17 08:49 PM |
| 7 | Why do feminist justify the use of "mansplaining" when it is a form of sexism.Which is false - women tend to have much more social power than men in social interactions. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/17 04:09 AM |
| 2 | Online dating leaves middle-aged women in 'single wilderness': "Single women in their 40s and 50s are increasingly feeling that their love lives are over as men their own age use online dating to cherry-pick younger models. ""Average" is misleading though - it's likely to happen as early as 40. There's a wide range. Anything over 35 is not considered premature. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/17 03:58 AM |
| 2 | Mozilla (Firefox) is at it Again - Openly Pushing Modern Feminism on their Start PageYou're not paying, but you're paying them through ad revenue and through giving their browser higher usage statistics. Google has been worse more often. I try to minimize my Google use as much as possible. It's not easy though - they have their hands in everything. I switched to Opera yesterday, and I'm shocked at how much faster it is. I had gotten used to the frequent sluggishness of Firefox and (less consistently) Chrome, and started to feel like it was normal or because of a weak WiFi signal… | /r/MensRights | 19/07/17 06:55 AM |
| 1 | Mozilla (Firefox) is at it Again - Openly Pushing Modern Feminism on their Start Pagehttps://mozilla.github.io/womenandweb/ http://mozilla.github.io/learning-networks/clubs/events-women-girls-guide/#introduction Yep. | /r/MensRights | 19/07/17 06:31 AM |
| 1 | Mozilla (Firefox) is at it Again - Openly Pushing Modern Feminism on their Start PageYep. | /r/MensRights | 19/07/17 03:40 AM |
| 1 | Mozilla (Firefox) is at it Again - Openly Pushing Modern Feminism on their Start PageThat's exactly the problem - this kind of thing is ALWAYS pushing the idea that it's all men's fault. That's the core of modern feminism. And this ad has a picture of the FEMINIST MASCOT. | /r/MensRights | 19/07/17 01:27 AM |
| 2 | Mozilla (Firefox) is at it Again - Openly Pushing Modern Feminism on their Start PageFor one thing, it would only reduce it, because field choice is only one of many factors. But that aside, this ad wasn't talking about encouraging women to major in STEM. The things it was actually talking about seem very likely to be all about things like "men as a group are trying to harass all women off the internet" and pushing modern feminist ideology. I've seen things like this so many times, even from this very organization, and it's ALWAYS pushing SJW feminist ideology. Not to mention, t… | /r/MensRights | 19/07/17 01:24 AM |
| 2 | Mozilla (Firefox) is at it Again - Openly Pushing Modern Feminism on their Start PageOpera's pretty good. Though you have to do an intentionally-obscure trick to disable the Google search bar on the start page. | /r/MensRights | 19/07/17 01:20 AM |
| 1 | Mozilla (Firefox) is at it Again - Openly Pushing Modern Feminism on their Start PageOh, you just reminded me of a major problem with Firefox that I had gotten used to and been ignoring: It has some kind of memory leak, where the longer you use it, the slower it gets, and you eventually have to restart the program for your computer to be usable. | /r/MensRights | 19/07/17 01:18 AM |
| 1 | Mozilla (Firefox) is at it Again - Openly Pushing Modern Feminism on their Start PageIt includes "Android". Also there's Chrome and Firefox for mobile. Also, stop using Firefox. | /r/MensRights | 19/07/17 12:32 AM |
| 4 | Mozilla (Firefox) is at it Again - Openly Pushing Modern Feminism on their Start PageInteresting - the stats have changed dramatically over the past few years. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_web_browsers#/media/File:Browser_usage_share,_2009%E2%80%932016,_StatCounter.svg | /r/MensRights | 18/07/17 03:59 AM |
| 5 | Mozilla (Firefox) is at it Again - Openly Pushing Modern Feminism on their Start PageThat would be funny if it weren't for the fact that Mozilla Firefox is either the #1 or #2 most popular desktop web browser. | /r/MensRights | 18/07/17 02:09 AM |
| 12 | I Shit You Not: "Feminist scientists say citing research by straight, white men promotes 'a system of oppression'"What in the actual fuck - I knew that Washington Post had been getting bad lately, but most of this article looks like something straight out of tumblr. I thought they had already hit rock bottom - apparently not. "heteromasculinist body"??? And the list of links at the bottom is extremely cringeworthy too. | /r/MensRights | 17/07/17 03:24 AM |
| 11 | Cards Against Humanity - always the best marketingThis was funny and initially gave me a high opinion of the company, but then I noticed that it says that profits from buying this product are donated to "Emily's List" "Emily's List" pushes SJW feminist identity politics. | /r/MensRights | 13/07/17 04:48 AM |
| 8 | Top Civil-Rights Official Says 90% of Campus Rape Cases Stem From RegretThere has to be lack of capacity to consent (black out or unconscious) The standard feminist line today is that drunk = unable to consent. Not just "black out or unconscious". | /r/MensRights | 13/07/17 04:37 AM |
| 8 | Sweden is finally realizing how toxic feminism has become. Good going.But was her crying supposed to be funny or serious? Was it intended to make her look ridiculous, or was it written in a way sympathetic to that reaction? | /r/MensRights | 13/07/17 04:33 AM |
| 1 | Cracked tries to silence the Men's Rights Movement by calling us "insecure", "sad" and "depressed guys".It boggles my mind how every time I get into a big argument with feminists, they start out calling me "privileged", then say I'm a loser who can't get a girlfriend, and socially privileged. "Loser status" is the opposite of social privilege. I've probably permanently lost some of my hair as a result of trying to wrap my mind around how these people can reconcile so many contradictory beliefs. | /r/MensRights | 07/07/17 02:42 PM |
| 1 | Clementine Ford spewing more hate. Feminists are genuinely arguing that men should pay for their dates.Oh, okay. | /r/MensRights | 07/07/17 02:38 PM |
| 1 | A general critique of modern feminism - designed to change minds of feminist-sympathisersWell, probably less unlikely. But even then, ladies' videos would work much better. Any video of a man will be attacked based on identity by any feminist in the conversation, and someone who's sympathizing with the ideology will likely have already accepted the identity-based mindset to some degree or another. A male feminist sympathizer likely believes that modern feminism is "what all ladies believe" and will help him gain ladies' favor romantically. It's important to destroy this belief with … | /r/MensRights | 07/07/17 02:31 PM |
| 4 | A general critique of modern feminism - designed to change minds of feminist-sympathisersHonestly, as soon as a feminist lady sees a man speaking to a webcam she'll stop listening. Doesn't matter how good his argument is - these people are identity-obsessed. It's much better to use videos of ladies criticizing modern feminism. I have a list I can share. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/17 08:49 PM |
| 15 | WTF is going on with Yahoo finance news?Everyone, please do not click the links at the top - use these archive links. Do not reward Yahoo monitarily for this. Do not fund them. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/17 08:45 PM |
| 3 | WTF is going on with Yahoo finance news?It started getting bad in 2013. It needs to end. Now. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/17 08:43 PM |
| 2 | Clementine Ford spewing more hate. Feminists are genuinely arguing that men should pay for their dates.MRA philosophy I don't think there is such a thing - just common sense and knowledge of facts that many are unaware of. Disagreement with an outragous ideology is not an ideology itself. At least not one that's specific to MRAs. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/17 08:38 PM |
| 7 | Cracked tries to silence the Men's Rights Movement by calling us "insecure", "sad" and "depressed guys".Insecure, sad, depressed, and... privileged, with society designed for our benefit? The cognative dissonance is mind-blowing. Logic 101 should be a required course in school. | /r/MensRights | 05/07/17 10:15 PM |
| 1 | "The Red Pill" is the #1 best selling movie on YouTube in Sweden!"Feminism" is not defined as "wanting equality". It's defined by the ideological beliefs taught by its proponents in gender studies departments and feminist organizations. If you don't accept these ideological beliefs, you are not a feminist in the modern meaning. | /r/MensRights | 25/06/17 09:36 PM |
| 3 | Canada Goes Full Retard: Passes Law Criminalizing Denial of “Gender Theory”Exactly what she said. The things I said are all either directly said by feminist professors, organizations, and politicians, or are direct logical implications of what they say. This isn't "piecing together random statements from a few fringe feminists on the internet" - it's official doctrine coming from the highest levels. And it's things said by pretty much all people that claim to be feminists these days. There is no "MRA ideology" - only "I disagree with many things that feminists say" and… | /r/MensRights | 21/06/17 02:24 AM |
| 3 | Feminism is vastly against nature, yet it appeals to so many women. Why? A female point of view.Don't worry about this guy - he's being hard-headed. I get what you're saying. I agree that it's good to have women speak up to say "what feminists say about my life as a woman is not my life experience", just as I always say that "what feminists say about my life experiences as a man is not my life experience". | /r/MensRights | 20/06/17 09:39 PM |
| 5 | "Scarlett Johansson Female Comedy ‘Rough Night’ Flops. Was It Too Anti-Male?"Yes and history books don't show that women were considered blanket statement less important. Only in terms of the WORKPLACE, etc, which made 100% sense before birth control and modern technology. Their lives and feelings have always been prioritized over men's. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/17 09:19 PM |
| 6 | Canada Goes Full Retard: Passes Law Criminalizing Denial of “Gender Theory”Alright. So you don't believe most of those things? Then you're not a feminist in the modern sense of the word. To be accurate, you'd have to either give the caveat "only in the historical sense", or use a different word such as "egalitarian". | /r/MensRights | 20/06/17 01:08 PM |
| 5 | Canada Goes Full Retard: Passes Law Criminalizing Denial of “Gender Theory”I believe in equal rights for women But women have had equal rights as men since the 1910's (without equal responsibility under the law), and extra protection under the law since the early 1960's. What rights do men have that women do not have? I don't feel the need to distinguish "what kind" I am ... I am a feminist. So you believe in the Patriarchy Theory that was made standard feminist cannon at the beginning of the 1970's? You believe that traditional gender roles weren't inevitable without … | /r/MensRights | 20/06/17 02:00 AM |
| 5 | Canada Goes Full Retard: Passes Law Criminalizing Denial of “Gender Theory”Given the current state of feminism (its ideas, attitudes, and behaviors), publicly supporting feminism without at least a caveat that they mean the original movement or that they disown any extremists is extremely bad. And one does not have to support that ideology in order to support reducing real-world, fact-based problems. | /r/MensRights | 19/06/17 08:57 PM |
| 1 | Canada Goes Full Retard: Passes Law Criminalizing Denial of “Gender Theory”Oh hey Karen. Big fan. Interesting point about the HRC - didn't know that. Looks like it's something to worry about after all. | /r/MensRights | 19/06/17 08:47 PM |
| 2 | Canada Goes Full Retard: Passes Law Criminalizing Denial of “Gender Theory”I'm only speaking in reference to modern Feminism. For example, Trudeau publicly declaring that he's a feminist and that he will keep on declaring it until it's not considered controversial. | /r/MensRights | 19/06/17 08:41 PM |
| 2 | Canada Goes Full Retard: Passes Law Criminalizing Denial of “Gender Theory”Well that's good. Still, Canadian government has done and said some ridiculous things since Trudeau took office. | /r/MensRights | 19/06/17 05:44 PM |
| 3 | Canada Goes Full Retard: Passes Law Criminalizing Denial of “Gender Theory”I hope it's fake. Source? | /r/MensRights | 19/06/17 05:22 PM |
| 1 | The Red Pill continues to be popular, including #1 documentary on YouTube for more than a monthBut what you're describing is just about why women are into it. Far from all women are radical SJW feminists. In fact, a very small percentage, even with the current fad and media blitz. I already had my own guess at why roller derbyers are like that: because there are a lot of lesbians in it, and lesbians invented modern feminist theory, and are the biggest pushers / supporters of it. Now as to why there are so many lesbians in roller derby... not so sure. Maybe at least partially some of the t… | /r/MensRights | 04/06/17 11:49 PM |
| 2 | The Red Pill continues to be popular, including #1 documentary on YouTube for more than a monthSeriously, what is it about Roller Derby? Everyone I've ever met who was into Roller Derby is an extreme SJW feminist. In fact, my first encounter with someone being an extreme SJW feminist was with someone who was into Roller Derby. | /r/MensRights | 03/06/17 04:07 AM |
| 1 | Huffpost is pure feminist cancer.They had like one or two, years ago. | /r/MensRights | 03/06/17 04:03 AM |
| 2 | Kathy Griffin blames a "...bunch of old white guys" for getting her fired from CNN. [She was the "comic" in a photo holding-up a man's severed head, ISIS style].It would be a different story if it was funny. Comedians are supposed to understand humor, right? This one doesn't. South Park could have done something similar in an actually funny way. This person is just a political extremist who thinks she's ISIS. | /r/MensRights | 03/06/17 04:01 AM |
| 1 | This feminist says misogyny was behind the Ariana concert bombing.I agree, and that's pretty crazy about the article. But all I was saying is that "hate" as the word is defined in the English language is a poor word choice. Call it "pigeonholing", "disrespect", or "limitation", but to say they hate women is to say that they do not like them, wish they didn't exist, try to avoid them at all costs, etc. Clearly that's not the case. I'm pretty sure the thing about charging the woman for rape is actually that they charge both the woman and the man for adultery. Ob… | /r/MensRights | 24/05/17 03:57 AM |
| 1 | This feminist says misogyny was behind the Ariana concert bombing.I mean it depends on what you're trying to do. If you're trying to stir up emotions to get people on your side, sure. If you want to be accurate and thus able to look at realistic solutions to the problem, that's different. But I don't think it's good to give any legitimacy to the idea of men hating all women, even if in a different culture. It makes feminists seem less insane and thus more likely to be given power to spread their beliefs. | /r/MensRights | 23/05/17 09:19 PM |
| 1 | This feminist says misogyny was behind the Ariana concert bombing.In the actual meaning of "hating all women but not all men", 99.999% percent of claims are false. Straight men are attracted to women, remember. | /r/MensRights | 23/05/17 09:14 PM |
| 1 | This feminist says misogyny was behind the Ariana concert bombing."Hate" is the wrong word, and some of the things you listed aren't quite accurate. What they are is "socially stuck in the pre-industrial world". | /r/MensRights | 23/05/17 09:12 PM |
| 1 | What is the most important issue facing men right now?I agree mostly, though you're oversimplifying a bit. That's still not the same as "not being considered a full member of the human race". | /r/MensRights | 23/05/17 09:04 PM |
| 4 | What is the most important issue facing men right now?Saying "not considered full humans" is a stretch that borders on the type of shit that modern feminists say. I get where you're coming from, but that's not a good way to phrase it. | /r/MensRights | 22/05/17 10:18 PM |
| 2 | Makes my blood boil. This is what feminism looks like.At least Washington Post now has a slogan that describes what they're causing. It's a very accurate mission statement for them. | /r/MensRights | 21/05/17 06:44 AM |
| 1 | Makes my blood boil. This is what feminism looks like.My reaction to that quote: http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ku1iV9Us5FQ/TyqvcDetFwI/AAAAAAAAAv4/K85ceG4mHtQ/s1600/jackie-chan-meme_thumb%5B7%5D.png I can't even figure out what point they're trying to make with that statement. I thought I had seen the lowest of the low of feminist illogic - but apparently I hadn't. | /r/MensRights | 21/05/17 06:43 AM |
| 2 | I'm glad more people agreed with me than with the replies.Yep, I agree with you on all that. Pretty ridiculous. Good for you for thinking for yourself and not letting these ideologues pressure you into their mindset. Unfortunately, it looks like it's gonna get worse before it gets better - since the US election, it seems like the ideologues in power positions are pushing harder than ever to force everyone to accept their beliefs, and it's working to a large extent. | /r/MensRights | 21/05/17 06:28 AM |
| 2 | I'm glad more people agreed with me than with the replies.Thanks. In my experience, most feminists won't admit that men are naturally stronger. But in that case you can concede that unarmed assault is more serious when done by a man, but if anything is used as a weapon then it should be taken just as seriously from a woman. If a feminist admits that there's a natural strength difference between the sexes, the entire "Patriarchy Theory" begins to fall apart - lack of a natural strength difference is a prerequisite for pre-industrial gender roles being e… | /r/MensRights | 20/05/17 03:12 PM |
| 1 | Men's right of cross-examination being removed under conservative manifesto when accused with a sexual crime aka crimes against women. And some other lowlights...What is this? Source? This seems 100% like a far-left manifesto. | /r/MensRights | 19/05/17 07:38 PM |
| 1 | I'm glad more people agreed with me than with the replies.Exactly the same experience as mine. We must be the same person. That, or SJWs are all the same. Still, it seems like the approach that works best is to stay polite and try to guide them through some questions, starting with the ones about birth control and the inevitability of gender roles without modern technology. | /r/MensRights | 19/05/17 06:18 PM |
| 1 | I'm glad more people agreed with me than with the replies.Haha it's not unrelated. It's a template/example of how to occasionally get past the automatic "warrior mode" that was mentioned, and possibly even change the person's mind a little. | /r/MensRights | 19/05/17 03:39 PM |
| 2 | I'm glad more people agreed with me than with the replies.My latest technique for trying to get past their "insta-block" reaction: first, politely get them to agree to answer a few questions about their beliefs, and ask whether they prefer one question at a time, or all the questions at once to think about. Then send these questions: Just curious: do you actually believe in the central tenet that modern feminism since ~1970 is based on and centered around (The Patriarchy Theory)? Do you believe what it says about how all men as a group hate all women a… | /r/MensRights | 19/05/17 02:26 PM |
| 1 | I'm glad more people agreed with me than with the replies.To be fair, as wrong as their ideas are, that seems like a valid way of trying to make a point over text without seeming pushy or hostile. I recently started using this exact same form against SJW feminists in an attempt to find some way to make my arguments to them without being blocked. It seems to have worked at least once. My latest technique: first, politely get them to agree to answer a few questions about their beliefs, and ask whether they prefer one question at a time, or all the questi… | /r/MensRights | 19/05/17 02:24 PM |
| 2 | I'm glad more people agreed with me than with the replies.To be fair, as wrong as their ideas are, that seems like a valid way of trying to make a point over text without seeming pushy or hostile. I recently started using this exact same form against SJW feminists in an attempt to find some way to make my arguments to them without being blocked. It seems to have worked at least once. My latest technique: first, politely get them to agree to answer a few questions about their beliefs, and ask whether they prefer one question at a time, or all the questi… | /r/MensRights | 19/05/17 06:37 AM |
| 3 | The Red Pill documentary continues to soar in sales, thanks to Feminists trying to censor itThat is a position of power - to mass-indoctrinate the youth. Also there was a senior person at Miss Magazine. | /r/MensRights | 08/05/17 11:52 PM |
| 4 | Because Men don't deserve water??If society could keep its inevitable gynocentrism focused on real-world and fair points such as this, that would be fine by me, and would keep the SJWism away. | /r/MensRights | 08/05/17 06:16 PM |
| 9 | The Red Pill documentary continues to soar in sales, thanks to Feminists trying to censor itThey also interviewed feminists in official positions of power, such as higher-ups at universities and magazines. | /r/MensRights | 08/05/17 06:02 PM |
| 1 | Do you think the MRM is gaining traction?Worse than that - I believe the "women's march" has peer-pressured, in-group-sisterhood-bias'd, and "iron man fallacy"d a whole new generation of SJW radical extreme feminists. | /r/MensRights | 08/05/17 05:53 PM |
| 3 | Do you think the MRM is gaining traction?It looks to me that society is just getting more divided. Yes there's a large increase in MRA activity in the past few years, but this is only in response to a much larger increase in SJW feminist activity. I'm not optimistic. Things seem to be getting worse every day. | /r/MensRights | 08/05/17 05:49 PM |
| 2 | Do you think the MRM is gaining traction?The number of people identifying as "Feminist" is reducing globally If true, then the ones remaining are moving to my area (Washington DC). It's getting worse every day. | /r/MensRights | 08/05/17 05:46 PM |
| 0 | Do you think the MRM is gaining traction?The number of people identifying as "Feminist" is reducing globally If true, then the ones remaining are moving to my area (Washington DC). It's getting worse every day. | /r/MensRights | 08/05/17 05:46 PM |
| 1 | Do you think the MRM is gaining traction?It looks to me that society is just getting more divided. Yes there's a large increase in MRA activity in the past few years, but this is only in response to a much larger increase in SJW feminist activity. I'm not optimistic. Things seem to be getting worse every day. | /r/MensRights | 08/05/17 05:44 PM |
| 3 | Visa launches sexist new card. (Men BTFO!)Makes sense - modern feminism is all about lesbians imposing their worldview onto straight women. Nothing against non-SJW-feminist lesbians, of course, but a lesbian-centered, lesbian-derived worldview is not the best fit for straight women. | /r/MensRights | 08/05/17 01:22 AM |
| 2 | Ads weren't annoying enough, so Microsoft has decided to start pushing feminist propaganda on their lock screen.I completely missed that they were saying "percent of all women". Not sure if that was intentional "weasel wording" or just sheer incompetence. | /r/MensRights | 08/05/17 01:20 AM |
| 1 | Gavin McInnes: "By every metric, men have it worse"True. But she still inspired them, even if it was misguided inspiration. My point is that she wasn't a warrior. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/17 03:53 AM |
| 6 | "William Shatner firmly believes in misandry, a concept favored by men's rights activists"You forgot to archive. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/17 07:22 PM |
| 3 | Gavin McInnes: "By every metric, men have it worse"She was real, but she didn't fight (as feminists like to revise history to)(even though they would consider fighting to be "toxic masculinity"). She was an inspirational figure who stood next to battles. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/17 07:20 PM |
| 21 | Girls-only Coding Class at NYC community centerThe real question: is this "girls code" thing actually a front for SJW feminist indoctrination, with "coding" as the vessel for it? Because that's what "Women Who Code" is. | /r/MensRights | 30/04/17 04:06 AM |
| 6 | Girls-only Coding Class at NYC community centerToo much fur. | /r/MensRights | 30/04/17 04:04 AM |
| 45 | Professor says she felt raped by white male student's paper touting men's rights** I put on my robe and wizard hat ** | /r/MensRights | 27/04/17 06:03 PM |
| 1 | Boys Punching Girls: Feminism's Big Wina decent (say, 30%+) chunk of women, if not a majority, would support total gender equality Only when phrased that way. When practiced as "men can now hit you back" and "men can now say anything to you he would say to other men", and "men will no longer protect you from physical harm", no. I'm also of the opinion that military fitness tests should not be compromised solely on the grounds of gender equality Good. I agree. I agree with your opposition to the notion that [catcalling] represents hat… | /r/MensRights | 25/04/17 04:09 AM |
| 2 | Rights That Men Have That Women Dont1.) I'm talking about isolated areas, such as Washington DC. 2.) "Sexualized" is the wrong word, because it implies that there's no innate biological reaction to a man seeing a woman's breasts. In places where women are always topless, breasts have been desexualized through excessive exposure. Similarly, I love eating Twix candy bars, but if I eat them all day I lose all interest in them. | /r/MensRights | 23/04/17 04:15 PM |
| 2 | Men use sexist and homophobic jokes due to insecurity over their masculinity, study claims: Also, Women use sexist jokes because men are dumb. Also, psychology is dominated by women graduates.does their agreeing with this statement make them sexist against men? Yes. | /r/MensRights | 23/04/17 07:15 AM |
| 10 | Rights That Men Have That Women DontIn many places women are technically allowed to also. But most of them know better than to do that, because they wouldn't like all the sexual attention they would get. | /r/MensRights | 23/04/17 07:13 AM |
| 2 | Feminism As Pseudoscience - A Check List.Well, 17 out of 18 - I've seen nothing from feminism that "relies on the wisdom of the ancients" - in fact, their entire ideology comes from selectively ignoring and misinterpreting history, and maligning the ancients. | /r/MensRights | 22/04/17 05:07 PM |
| 1 | So this actually happened. And they wonder why people think feminism is failing.Today I learned: that homeless man that always asks me for a dollar outside the 7-11 is actually a member of an elite class. | /r/MensRights | 21/04/17 09:53 PM |
| 2 | Boys Punching Girls: Feminism's Big Winwilling to be cordial with me Cordial is good. "no women would..." Obviously I didn't mean that literally - there are exceptions to every rule. For example, there are some women who like being whipped. But they're outliers in the data set. I also know plenty of women who insist on paying for themselves on dates I actually didn't mention that one, because I know that a lot of ladies are okay with that. ones who agree women should have to sign up for the draft if men do They probably don't think i… | /r/MensRights | 21/04/17 05:02 AM |
| 2 | Boys Punching Girls: Feminism's Big WinOkay I believe you about not being a shill. But I disagree that most women would be willing to give up their special treatment. In fact, there was some kind of study posted here a while back (can't find it now) showing that when women are treated exactly the same as a man, most ladies perceive it as extremely sexist. Here's something similar showing the same thing: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/63jpg2/british_soccer_manager_treated_a_female_news/ Some more examples to think about:… | /r/MensRights | 20/04/17 12:40 PM |
| 1 | Boys Punching Girls: Feminism's Big WinI think that if given the choice between either A.) being open to punches from people many times stronger than them, or B.) living as people have lived for the entirety of human existence except for the past ~70 years after technology / birth control changed what was possible, I think most ladies would chose option A. Not that that should have to be a choice, but if it were, there's a clear winner. Contrary to what feminists have told you, there were lots of happy women in the old world. Just as… | /r/MensRights | 20/04/17 04:22 AM |
| 8 | Boys Punching Girls: Feminism's Big WinSure. His point was that women have a lot of societal advantages that many take for granted (especially feminists), and that if there were to be actual equality / identicality between how the sexes are treated, that would require taking away those advantages, which they would be very unhappy about (such as the advantage of not being allowed to be punched). | /r/MensRights | 20/04/17 03:26 AM |
| 5 | Boys Punching Girls: Feminism's Big WinI think you missed his point. | /r/MensRights | 20/04/17 03:11 AM |
| 1 | Purse Spreading. All other seats taken.Hey, purses are pursons too. | /r/MensRights | 20/04/17 03:07 AM |
| 8 | CNN takes crack at why women are starting to outearn men, and how degree choice explains much of the wage gap. It's like they're almost starting to get it.That's great that they included that list of fields where ladies on-average make more than men. But of course they also included an unsubstantiated line claiming that "stereotypes and bias" are definitively part of it. Well, CNN is gonna be CNN. | /r/MensRights | 20/04/17 01:06 AM |
| 3 | The phrase 'innocent women and children' is sexist, racist, and inaccurate - CBCI see nothing about race in that phrase... | /r/MensRights | 20/04/17 12:58 AM |
| 2 | Kindergarten teacher finds Legos are good for cognitive development in young children and bans boys from playing with them in order to "close the gender gap"Interesting about your experience. Well there's a difference between having emotional issues and dealing with emotional issues properly in a social setting. I have plenty of emotions, but I control how I openly react to them. Probably biased studies that don't properly adhere to the scientific method. But there's very clear and obvious evidence that women tend to be bad at recognizing men's emotions and men's intentions - it's called "modern feminism". For example (as if you needed one), I recen… | /r/MensRights | 19/04/17 03:08 PM |
| 2 | Blatant sexism on my local paper's front pageWell you're lucky your local paper isn't my local paper - I live in Washington DC, so my "local paper" is The Washington Post, which is saturated in blatant anti-male sexism every day. For example, just the other day I glanced at it and the first paragraph of an article claimed (paraphrasing) "only women have to try to be likable, and that's sexism". What? Well, thanks Washington Post for informing me that I no longer have to try to be likable - huge load off my back. | /r/MensRights | 19/04/17 12:48 PM |
| 2 | Kindergarten teacher finds Legos are good for cognitive development in young children and bans boys from playing with them in order to "close the gender gap"male-dominated engineering toy People need to stop incorrectly using the word "dominate". "Dominate" implies intentionally controlling / intentionally excluding others. If boys gravitate to Legos more often than girls but are willing to share with girls if they show interest, that's not dominating. | /r/MensRights | 19/04/17 12:43 PM |
| 1 | Kindergarten teacher finds Legos are good for cognitive development in young children and bans boys from playing with them in order to "close the gender gap"women have better emotional intelligence than men (abilities to recognize other people's emotions, deal with your own) Based on my 31 years of experience, that's not quite right. It's more that they tend to have better ability to recognize and prioritize women's emotions and to put greater importance on emotions. But they're often absolutely terrible at correctly recognizing men's emotions / intentions, and often terrible at dealing with their own emotions in a rational manner (not all, just a t… | /r/MensRights | 19/04/17 12:35 PM |
| 1 | Someone Gets It!Two things: 1.) Before modern technology, particularly birth control, this was the only way that was possible on a wide scale, due to biological differences. Modern feminists would get much less dissent if they would stop insisting that "men hate women and have been oppressing them forever and randomly created gender roles out of nothing in order to oppress women" and instead acknowledge that flexible gender roles are a new social experiment of modern society that was enabled by birth control an… | /r/MensRights | 17/04/17 01:41 PM |
| 2 | Someone Gets It!Of course comments are disabled on the video you posted ("Check out this vid"). I had it muted, but I knew exactly what they were saying based on the video. They trotted out the tired old logically fallacious argument that "since pink used to be a boy's color, that means that all ideas about sex differences were randomly created out of nothing". First of all, that doesn't follow logically. Second, it seems much more likely to me that pink became a girl's color because little girls kept showing a… | /r/MensRights | 17/04/17 01:08 PM |
| 2 | Someone Gets It!no mother/father has ever told their daughter they wanted grandkids Right, because no mother/father has ever told their son they wanted grandkids. Except that they do - all the time. This is not a gender discrimination issue. | /r/MensRights | 17/04/17 01:00 PM |
| 1 | Wage Gap Myth in the GraveJust was watching TV and saw a commercial mentioning it. Why are people so gullible? | /r/MensRights | 16/04/17 04:23 AM |
| 5 | A Feminist Biologist Discusses Gender Differences In The Animal Kingdom "So, from the perspective of biology, it would be very surprising if human males and females did not have distinct, hardwired behavioral tendencies..this puts me at odds with much of traditional feminist theory."There are a lot of intelligent points in this article, but there's also a lot of stupid. For example: "the worst victims of patriarchy are the low-status, unmarriageable men who do the most dirty, dangerous jobs in society for peanuts" ...so, men being in charge is responsible for women finding some men unattractive and not wanting to marry them? What? | /r/MensRights | 15/04/17 01:36 AM |
| 1 | Her teen son called her an “intolerant” liberal. So she launched a national project to hear from the other side: How many sons live with intolerant liberal mothers or boys have to cope with intolerant liberal teachers?Tomi Lahren Well that may have been more of a business decision, since her comments clash with the official stance of her organization, but I get what you're saying. | /r/MensRights | 11/04/17 03:15 AM |
| 1 | Her teen son called her an “intolerant” liberal. So she launched a national project to hear from the other side: How many sons live with intolerant liberal mothers or boys have to cope with intolerant liberal teachers?Hmm. I haven't seen that or heard of it, but I'll take your word for it. Good point about the substance of the intolerance. | /r/MensRights | 11/04/17 03:14 AM |
| 1 | Her teen son called her an “intolerant” liberal. So she launched a national project to hear from the other side: How many sons live with intolerant liberal mothers or boys have to cope with intolerant liberal teachers?Interesting. Still, it seems to me that it's much less common on the right than on the left in recent years, even if it does happen on both sides. | /r/MensRights | 11/04/17 02:32 AM |
| 2 | Google Accused of 'Extreme' Gender Pay Discrimination By US Labor DepartmentMaybe the Trump administration orchestrated this as a way to force Google to admit that the "wage gap" is not due to discrimination, in response to their stupid pushing of the discrimination myth a week ago. | /r/MensRights | 10/04/17 04:35 AM |
| 3 | Her teen son called her an “intolerant” liberal. So she launched a national project to hear from the other side: How many sons live with intolerant liberal mothers or boys have to cope with intolerant liberal teachers?I think what he means is that lately leftists have been more intolerant of people who disagree with them and more unwilling to even discuss a disagreement with their beliefs. People on the hard-right at least tend to want to argue for their views, and I've never heard of anyone on the hard-right excommunicating anyone from their lives simply due to a political disagreement (which is something leftists do constantly). | /r/MensRights | 10/04/17 04:28 AM |
| 1 | So why do they act like they can't?Or size of Moose? Right, Boris? | /r/MensRights | 02/04/17 03:25 PM |
| 1 | So why do they act like they can't?Isn't Hope Solo from Star Wars? | /r/MensRights | 02/04/17 03:23 PM |
| 1 | "Men, if you really think you’re a feminist here’s what to do when a woman says you’re being sexist" Any MRA's who defend feminism care comment on this arrogant article?Haha thanks. | /r/MensRights | 02/04/17 03:08 PM |
| 1 | "Men, if you really think you’re a feminist here’s what to do when a woman says you’re being sexist" Any MRA's who defend feminism care comment on this arrogant article?Why take the risk? Because you might not have enough options to be that picky. Feminists are a diminishing minority of women and non-feminists are more attractive I think that depends on what area you live in. In my area (Washington DC), I run into feminists all the time, and ladies who show support for divisive and false feminist beliefs, and ladies who I already knew who are starting to be peer-pressured down the slippery slope of 3rd wave feminism. A large percentage of these ladies are attra… | /r/MensRights | 02/04/17 02:59 PM |
| 13 | It's the pay gap again!You forgot to archive. | /r/MensRights | 02/04/17 02:49 PM |
| 2 | "Men, if you really think you’re a feminist here’s what to do when a woman says you’re being sexist" Any MRA's who defend feminism care comment on this arrogant article?beta-mates beta-males | /r/MensRights | 02/04/17 02:34 PM |
| 1 | "Men, if you really think you’re a feminist here’s what to do when a woman says you’re being sexist" Any MRA's who defend feminism care comment on this arrogant article?I would include the caveat that you can date a feminist if you think she's not too-far-gone, that she might be salvageable by someone she's emotionally invested in, and if you're willing to leave if she turns out not to be. | /r/MensRights | 02/04/17 02:31 PM |
| 1 | "Men, if you really think you’re a feminist here’s what to do when a woman says you’re being sexist" Any MRA's who defend feminism care comment on this arrogant article?Yeah... in retrospect, it's kind of like how bombing terrorists doesn't convince them to abandon their extreme beliefs, but instead gives them more desire to get revenge on those who bombed them. We can only hope that the funding for the underlying organizations will dry up now that Obama is out (whom I voted for both times, but I now realize that he and his administration had been acting behind the scenes to start and propagate this mess). | /r/MensRights | 02/04/17 02:16 PM |
| 3 | "Men, if you really think you’re a feminist here’s what to do when a woman says you’re being sexist" Any MRA's who defend feminism care comment on this arrogant article?"Sexual congress"? Brings up weird mental imagery. | /r/MensRights | 02/04/17 03:56 AM |
| 2 | "Men, if you really think you’re a feminist here’s what to do when a woman says you’re being sexist" Any MRA's who defend feminism care comment on this arrogant article?You forgot to archive. | /r/MensRights | 02/04/17 03:52 AM |
| 8 | "Men, if you really think you’re a feminist here’s what to do when a woman says you’re being sexist" Any MRA's who defend feminism care comment on this arrogant article?Can we please go back to 2011 when no major publication routinely published overtly-feminist articles? Edit: just realized this BS has been going on for 5 years now. Will it never end? I thought Trump's victory would send a clear enough message... | /r/MensRights | 02/04/17 03:51 AM |
| 3 | Canada: Not in my name, Prime Minister: Trudeau has taken his favourite gimmick — wow, he’s a male feminist! — and used it as an excuse to ram through his big government agenda./r/nottheonion ? This guy is literally insane. | /r/MensRights | 24/03/17 01:59 AM |
| 2 | It's bad if men don't care, and now it's also bad if men do care. WTF, feminists? | Why Guys Get Turned on When You Orgasm, and Why That's a Bad ThingPlease edit this post to link to an archive, in order to avoid encouraging this kind of thing by giving them click revenue. https://archive.is/01LQP | /r/MensRights | 24/03/17 01:48 AM |
| 3 | Boycott: Popular Washington DC area Radio Station 93.9 running ad openly pushing the core ideology of SJWs (Intersectional Feminism)the threat may be enough to make the ad go away Not if they're not aware of the threat. Remember, SJWs form safe spaces around themselves by excommunicating anyone who disagrees with them. It's part of why they were so sure Hillary would win. Nobody around them was voting for Trump. But that was because they had already pushed those people out of their lives. If SJWs are running the station now, they may be severely underestimating how many people are upset by the ad, and/or may not even care un… | /r/MensRights | 15/03/17 04:59 AM |
| 2 | Boycott: Popular Washington DC area Radio Station 93.9 running ad openly pushing the core ideology of SJWs (Intersectional Feminism)DC is after all a stronghold of regressive ideology. Yep. boycotting the advertiser vs. the station is the better solution I didn't catch the name of the advertiser. Not sure if they even said. It may have been from the station itself. I remember they ended it with something like "this has be a reality moment" or "moment of reality" or something (ironically). At some point they mentioned a webpage where you could read about women who succeeded "in spite of racism AND sexism", but I don't remembe… | /r/MensRights | 15/03/17 04:51 AM |
| 1 | Boycott: Popular Washington DC area Radio Station 93.9 running ad openly pushing the core ideology of SJWs (Intersectional Feminism)I don't know much about how radio advertising works, but I'm under the impression that they have some level of screening on which ads get played. For example, I'm pretty sure the KKK could never get an ad on the station, no matter how much money they threw at them. Also this is a station that's been popular for decades, so I don't think they're strapped for cash. | /r/MensRights | 15/03/17 03:34 AM |
| 2 | Female politician proposes law to fine men $100 for masturbating as 'act against an unborn child'Right, it's actually slightly lower than that. But you were more incorrect than I was. I was rounding. https://archive.is/CwJjy Unless you have another, more reliable source? | /r/MensRights | 13/03/17 11:40 PM |
| 6 | Female politician proposes law to fine men $100 for masturbating as 'act against an unborn child'Closer to 80%, but otherwise good point. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/17 01:06 PM |
| 1 | I see men around me under 6'1" are basically less than human in today's matriarchy. It's too late for any of you, but we need to teach future generations to not shame those of you who are shortThey wear them often when they go out to clubs etc. But 4 inch is probably much more common. 6' 0" isn't much taller than the average man (average is 5' 10.5"). That's probably why they call it the bare minimum. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/17 04:26 PM |
| 5 | Express your support for a 'Google Doodle' for International Men's day by emailing [email protected]Edit: I stand corrected - Mozilla just went full SJW feminist for "Women's Day". You have no idea how many times I've switched all my open browser tabs back and forth from Chrome to Firefox and back, every time one or the other does something SJW. I recently switched back to Firefox after Google tweeted about "achieving gender equality by using computer vision to count the number of females in movies" (pandering to the SJW belief that movies on average don't have just as many female characters, … | /r/MensRights | 09/03/17 01:17 AM |
| 1 | I see men around me under 6'1" are basically less than human in today's matriarchy. It's too late for any of you, but we need to teach future generations to not shame those of you who are shortFew if any women are looking to date the tallest man possible Never said "tallest man possible" - obviously they're not all holding out for guys who are 6' 7". But I've observed over many years, and heard it said (or written) by countless ladies that 6' 0" or 6' 1" is the bare minimum to be acceptable. When they want to sound like they're not shallow, they try to justify it by saying "I just want him to be taller than me when I'm wearing heels". But the completely open version of that is "I want… | /r/MensRights | 09/03/17 01:13 AM |
| 1 | NYSE posted this on their Snap-story earlier today. I guess Equality through Denigration is okay...Exactly. If there is legitimate data, it surely doesn't control for reversal of cause and effect. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/17 09:46 PM |
| 19 | Express your support for a 'Google Doodle' for International Men's day by emailing [email protected]Yeah, good luck with that - Google is run by SJWs. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/17 09:33 PM |
| 10 | Interesting: To Prove Gender Bias, a University Had a Male Actor Read Hillary's Debate Lines, and a Female Actor Read Trump's. The Results Were...UnexpectedReally interesting, though I wonder how much people's opinions were affected by knowing which person was supposed to represent which real-life candidate. I wonder if they had any kind of control for that. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/17 04:11 AM |
| 1 | I see men around me under 6'1" are basically less than human in today's matriarchy. It's too late for any of you, but we need to teach future generations to not shame those of you who are shortPretty sure that's over 90% of all men That's the point - ladies have unrealistic "beauty standards" for men. Meanwhile, feminists insist it's only men that have unrealistic beauty standards, and a large part of the not-explicitly-feminist female population has come to believe the same thing. And the saddest part of this is that the only reason men's beauty standards are "unrealistic" is because of the modern obesity epidemic. There is not, and has never been, a "shortness epidemic". 40 years ag… | /r/MensRights | 07/03/17 11:18 PM |
| 1 | I see men around me under 6'1" are basically less than human in today's matriarchy. It's too late for any of you, but we need to teach future generations to not shame those of you who are shortMost guys like dating women who they are taller than [them] I don't think that's true. It's something that ladies commonly assume, based on the inverse of ladies' strong preferences, but in reality it seems only the extremely tall guys care about it, and "just because I'm used to everyone being shorter than me". I've never met an average-height guy who cared. Which may actually be part of why ladies have this assumption - because when ladies complain about men, they actually mean "real men" - av… | /r/MensRights | 07/03/17 11:12 PM |
| 2 | "You can be healthy at any weight, your weight does not define your health"...says the 400 pounds lady.It's ammo against modern feminism, which is the enemy of men's rights. It shows a clear example of the kind of destructive anti-science the ideology pushes - an example that most people easily understand. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/17 04:31 PM |
| 1 | I see men around me under 6'1" are basically less than human in today's matriarchy. It's too late for any of you, but we need to teach future generations to not shame those of you who are short"Must be over 5' 10"??? Well, that was 11 years ago - I guess inflation also applies to men's height? Cause the standard is definitely 6' 0" or 6' 1" these days, depending on who you ask. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/17 03:31 AM |
| 2 | A good friend of mine shared this, I can't help but think it just spreads hate. As a white man who went to a school with majority of students were of eastern decent, I can tell you who bullied me more. Hint, it wasn't white men.Having formally studied logic in school, I immediately recognized the logical fallacy here: http://www.fallacyfiles.org/biassamp.html The person who wrote this like likely knows 1000 times more white men than muslims (who may actually be white, but that's a different issue of conflating race with religion). | /r/MensRights | 07/03/17 02:51 AM |
| 1 | To the people saying the MRM should focus less on anti-feminism and more on men's issues directly, you're naive.feminists didn't demand equal obligations To be fair to the original suffragettes: the equal obligation of fighting in war has never been a great thing to expect of women, due to biological differences. Nowadays we're (sort of) doing it anyway, and a few ladies are decent at it, but it's really much more suited to males. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/17 02:45 AM |
| 1 | I see men around me under 6'1" are basically less than human in today's matriarchy. It's too late for any of you, but we need to teach future generations to not shame those of you who are shortAnd then they'll blame it on The Patriarchy. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/17 02:36 AM |
| 1 | Why Modern Feminism is Trash: Sarah Silverman's Rant Against Men |Especially modern feminism. Feminism since the end of the 60's. | /r/MensRights | 03/03/17 06:15 AM |
| 1 | Girls if you hit, slap, belittle, kick, punch, choke, throw things at, or control your boyfriends, you are the abuser.It probably wasn't a big deal in that case, but the fact remains that there's a double standard here: if a man were to kick you, even at minimal-force, any witnesses would immediately jump on him and condemn him for it, and if police were around he might get arrested. And yet modern feminists insist we live in a "woman-hating patriarchy". In fact, this reminds me of two blatant real-world examples: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4akMaeZ0-k https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlFAd4YdQks | /r/MensRights | 26/02/17 01:11 AM |
| 3 | Girls if you hit, slap, belittle, kick, punch, choke, throw things at, or control your boyfriends, you are the abuser.You have every right to be mad at him for that. But this doesn't pass the "flip the genders and it's still okay" test. Especially since you didn't say where you kicked him. For all we know, he could now be infertile. | /r/MensRights | 25/02/17 06:07 AM |
| 1 | Girls if you hit, slap, belittle, kick, punch, choke, throw things at, or control your boyfriends, you are the abuser.I've also known many feminists in real life, starting in 2011. I actually hung out a lot with different groups of them frequently at different times (not realizing at first that it was something that they had in common, or even what it was initially). oppressive gender dynamics were engineered/enforced to benefit men And that's the anti-scientific belief where the seeds of hatred are planted. Gender dynamics / differences / roles were not "engineered" by anybody, much less exclusively by men. Th… | /r/MensRights | 25/02/17 02:49 AM |
| 2 | Girls if you hit, slap, belittle, kick, punch, choke, throw things at, or control your boyfriends, you are the abuser.When did you go to college? I think the serious misandric mindset really started to become common in 2012. Though misandry is the natural outcome of believing the core feminist ideology that it's been centered on since the 1970's. Blaming all your problems on men as a group and having a general preference against them is misandry, just as blaming every little problem on women as a group and having a general preference against women could reasonably be called misogyny. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/17 08:12 PM |
| 5 | Girls if you hit, slap, belittle, kick, punch, choke, throw things at, or control your boyfriends, you are the abuser.Feminism makes them believe that they are not (at least) equal under the law / (at least) equally respected. That's why it needs to go. It points to difficult sitiuations that both sexes get (or have similar difficult situations) and says "this is simply because you're a woman and men hate you". An inverse ideology (let's call it Masculism) could easily be constructed and spread throughout society, if it weren't for the well-documented "women are wonderful effect" and men's constant desire to im… | /r/MensRights | 24/02/17 08:09 PM |
| 1 | Twelve days left to sell the remaining tickets for the Red Pill Event in Washington D.C. Contact your Senators and Reps in Congress to have them send staff there!Nice | /r/MensRights | 22/02/17 11:04 PM |
| 2 | Refugees welcome in Canada, but only women and girlsWell at least they're bringing their male family members. Seems like they're really bringing whole families, even if the official wording was discriminatory. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/17 07:07 PM |
| 11 | Pamela Anderson will campaign for men falsely accused of rapeTrue, but ideally everyone should be taught to be aware of these tendencies, so they're not blind to it and can make more rational decisions. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/17 06:44 PM |
| 1 | Twelve days left to sell the remaining tickets for the Red Pill Event in Washington D.C. Contact your Senators and Reps in Congress to have them send staff there!Do you know if we would get a full refund if not enough tickets are sold? | /r/MensRights | 22/02/17 06:39 PM |
| 3 | Every man should be aware of how much unearned hate is directed at his gender.You're ignoring the fact that before modern technology, gender roles were the only way that was POSSIBLE on a wide scale. Especially before mass produced and reliable birth control, which wasn't possible until the early 1900's and wasn't widely available until after WW2. There was no "institutional discrimination/oppression" - rather, what was possible recently changed, and society as a whole did not immediately adapt to the new possibilities. And you're forgetting that there have always been se… | /r/MensRights | 16/02/17 09:47 PM |
| 7 | Feminists Are Planning a One-Day Women’s Strike – I Say Bring It OnWhat they fail to realize is that "women" does not mean "feminists", and therefore only maybe 20% of women would actually agree to do this strike, at the most, even if they thought it wouldn't be too risky for their job. So maybe 10% would actually do it. Hardly effective. | /r/MensRights | 14/02/17 06:12 PM |
| 2 | When I Became A Mother, Feminism Let Me DownEven if they were true, those are not rights that they do not have. | /r/MensRights | 14/02/17 06:09 PM |
| 3 | Benetton has created#UnitedByHalf a Valentine day campaign that promotes the myth that men oppress women, etc. Even after all this they want MEN to be stupid enough to go to Benetton stores and spend their hard earned money. Don't be fooled by them. Think before you buy anything from Benetton.Agreed, except you should be more specific and say "doesn't mean it's okay to falsely generalize. This generalization was false, but scientifically-established generalizations such as "women are almost always much less physically strong than men" are completely fine to point out. | /r/MensRights | 13/02/17 10:46 PM |
| 1 | It's OK to objectify men but not women?!? Hypocritical feminist :/A "reverse strawman" is exactly what it is, and those are modern feminist's main tool. Otherwise known as an "Iron Man Fallacy". The use of iron man fallacies for defense while pushing the actual beliefs / acting on the actual beliefs the rest of the time is called "motte and bailey tactics". | /r/MensRights | 10/02/17 10:25 PM |
| 2 | Pay Gap Studies Disprove Myth that Sexism Is ResponsibleTell that to Audi. Every other ad I get on YouTube is their ridiculous pay gap propaganda pushing commercial. Can't tell them on their YouTube comments though - comments seem to be locked. But their Facebook posts about it are in serious need of some sanity posts. | /r/MensRights | 07/02/17 09:21 PM |
| 6 | Hillary Clinton: The Future Is FemaleJesus. We really dodged a bullet having her lose. Such a crazy bigot. | /r/MensRights | 07/02/17 09:18 PM |
| 1 | Texas teacher, Alexandria Vera, who had sex with 13-year-old male student almost daily, gets 10 years in prisonYou are making up genes Nope. Guess you haven't been keeping up with the scientific research on this subject: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10342496 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15284410 http://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/news-articles/0713/15072013-How-obesity-gene-triggers-weight-gain-Batterham https://academic.oup.com/hmg/article/15/suppl_2/R124/626082/Genetics-of-obesity-and-the-prediction-of-risk-for http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2013/07/obesity-gene-linked-hunger-hormone http://www.nh… | /r/MensRights | 04/02/17 06:18 AM |
| 1 | In light of recent women's rights protests, is there a concise list of issues that men face?Yeah... they're getting into exclusive relationships with them and marrying them, but not sleeping with them. Makes perfect sense... I see it all the time. Most recent example: a girl I was friends with growing up is about to marry an obese guy with a huge double chin. This girl has always had guys lining up to date her - in fact, she's who I think of when I hear the phrase "friend zone", because the friend zone she's created over the years is ginormous. She could have almost anyone, and yet she… | /r/MensRights | 02/02/17 02:53 AM |
| 0 | Texas teacher, Alexandria Vera, who had sex with 13-year-old male student almost daily, gets 10 years in prisonGenetics is a thing. Just because the Nazis went to a crazy extreme with their genetics programs and did some terrible things, that doesn't mean that society has to now jump to the opposite extreme and say "there's no such thing as bad genes". If someone has genes that guarantee that they and any offspring will be 400 pounds and unable to walk, have a huge array of extremely serious health problems and increased mortality risk from all causes, and extremely unattractive to everyone of every race… | /r/MensRights | 01/02/17 05:20 AM |
| 1 | Texas teacher, Alexandria Vera, who had sex with 13-year-old male student almost daily, gets 10 years in prisonSimilar root cause, similar phenomenon. Idiocracy was about what you said. | /r/MensRights | 01/02/17 05:14 AM |
| 0 | In light of recent women's rights protests, is there a concise list of issues that men face?What is regarded as sexy in the female body department has been anything but Absolutely false. I've heard feminists make this claim a million times, but they never have any solid evidence. Show me your solid evidence. Yes, there were times when everyone was starving and it was talked about as positive to have some thickness (not obesity). Honestly, looking like you're literally starving doesn't look good to most guys - never has, never will. A healthy weight has always been the most attractive. … | /r/MensRights | 01/02/17 05:09 AM |
| 1 | In light of recent women's rights protests, is there a concise list of issues that men face?I dunno, based on my observations over the years, you may be underestimating just how much most guys are repulsed by obesity. I see the hottest of the hot ladies dating and even marrying obese guys with multiple chins - but the thing is the guy is always really tall and broad shouldered. You might be trying to say "I do find morbid obesity to be repulsive". But a guy would tend to find a lady of that same level of obesity much more repulsive. In general, it seems like the repulsion of a guy for … | /r/MensRights | 01/02/17 05:05 AM |
| 2 | Judge Judy agrees with us, for Men's Rights.Yep. Didn't mean anything else by it - just a play on words (that I thought of years ago). | /r/MensRights | 31/01/17 04:37 AM |
| 84 | Judge Judy agrees with us, for Men's Rights.I think I've just been converted to Judyism. | /r/MensRights | 30/01/17 08:23 PM |
| 7 | Not sure if this has been posted in here yet, but this picture just shows what feminism has become.I sure wish I could sleep with whomever I want. Or even somebody I want... | /r/MensRights | 26/01/17 09:00 PM |
| 3 | Texas teacher, Alexandria Vera, who had sex with 13-year-old male student almost daily, gets 10 years in prisonThe double standard is terrible and wrong and should be done away with. That being said, I think statutory rape should be a misdemeanor at most, if both people were fully willing. I know when I was 13 there were teachers I badly wished I could have had a relationship with. I don't think it's the state's place to enforce morality, especially when it's just about arbitrary age numbers. Before modern times, you were considered an adult and got married shortly after you reached puberty. Also, "statu… | /r/MensRights | 26/01/17 08:56 PM |
| -1 | Texas teacher, Alexandria Vera, who had sex with 13-year-old male student almost daily, gets 10 years in prisonSlightly off topic, but: Problem is, since birth control became widespread, it seems the healthiest and most attractive people are the main ones who decided to stop reproducing, while the unhealthiest and ugliest feel the need to validate their existence by reproducing rapidly. Seems to be a large reason for the continuing rise in obesity rates. It's similar to that movie "Idiocracy". | /r/MensRights | 26/01/17 08:49 PM |
| 0 | Saturday Night Live Pushing Strawman Definition of Feminism in Lecture to AudienceNever thought about it that way. You win the debate - congratulations. | /r/MensRights | 25/01/17 04:31 AM |
| 0 | Saturday Night Live Pushing Strawman Definition of Feminism in Lecture to AudienceExplain to me how I'm wrong. FYI, I took a formal logic course in college, and it was an easy A for me. How about you? Have you studied formal logic in school? If so, how did you do? Also FYI, I'm a rocket scientist at NASA. Tell me again how I'm stupid. Or better yet, explain to me how I'm wrong - using logical reasoning. | /r/MensRights | 25/01/17 03:29 AM |
| 2 | I'm taking a stand against the wage gapVery laconic. | /r/MensRights | 25/01/17 01:03 AM |
| 3 | In light of recent women's rights protests, is there a concise list of issues that men face?The biological fact is, straight men are attracted to youth, while straight women are not. And men are much more repulsed by obesity (which often comes with age) than women are. Feminism has sadly caused the left to steal the title of "the anti-science party" from the right. | /r/MensRights | 25/01/17 12:56 AM |
| 1 | Saturday Night Live Pushing Strawman Definition of Feminism in Lecture to AudienceYes. Like I said: SNL's (inexplicably non-comedy) argument was that feminism is X, therefore you should support it. But it's not X - it's Y. | /r/MensRights | 24/01/17 09:23 PM |
| 1 | Milo Yiannopoulos VS Emma Watson (Feminism Debate) 2017 - YouTubeDepending on your personal prefeferences, I'd guess most guys would find her between an 8 and a 10. Which is more than enough so that even if she weren't famous, guys would have positive emotions towards her by default, along with (consciously or subconsciously) hoping they have a chance with her. | /r/MensRights | 24/01/17 09:20 PM |
| 7 | Forget about wanting the same rights as menRight, because nobody ever debates about gun rights. /s | /r/MensRights | 24/01/17 08:23 PM |
| 1 | Milo Yiannopoulos VS Emma Watson (Feminism Debate) 2017 - YouTubeSure she would, because she's extremely physically attractive. | /r/MensRights | 24/01/17 08:22 PM |
| 1 | Am I missing something? Do women not have the exact same rights as men legally? Has the wage gap not been closed? At this point any protesting is just complaining about having a vagina.And women who are properly trained in logic and who don't hate all men collectively. Modern feminists are directly standing in the way, because they do not want to give up any power or privileges that women have (even though they insist that women have no power or privileges over men). | /r/MensRights | 24/01/17 03:29 PM |
| 1 | Saturday Night Live Pushing Strawman Definition of Feminism in Lecture to AudienceHow? They made an argument based on a false premise. They were attacking the idea of being against modern feminism by claiming that feminism is something which it is not. That's what a strawman argument is. Did you watch the episode in question? The claim was: "A is simply B. B is obviously good. Therefore, being against A is obviously bad". But premise #1 is a greatly distorted version of the truth - intentionally distorted to make anyone who disagrees easier to attack. That's what a straw man … | /r/MensRights | 24/01/17 03:20 PM |
| 1 | "Feminism just means equality for men and women"It means an entire complex ideology. Saying it "just means equal treatment" is a blatant lie if said by an experienced feminist. | /r/MensRights | 24/01/17 12:39 AM |
| 12 | Am I missing something? Do women not have the exact same rights as men legally? Has the wage gap not been closed? At this point any protesting is just complaining about having a vagina.Neither men nor women can simply terminate the financial obligation, there is no inequality here. Women can terminate the financial obligation by killing the developing embryo. Men have no such power. | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 05:31 AM |
| 20 | Am I missing something? Do women not have the exact same rights as men legally? Has the wage gap not been closed? At this point any protesting is just complaining about having a vagina.Feminists have always opposed the idea when it has come up. They don't want women to lose any of the power they have over men. | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 03:38 AM |
| 25 | Am I missing something? Do women not have the exact same rights as men legally? Has the wage gap not been closed? At this point any protesting is just complaining about having a vagina.Why is there no "financial abortion"? Women have the right to end a pregnancy, but men have no right to end responsibility for a pregnancy. | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 02:23 AM |
| 18 | Am I missing something? Do women not have the exact same rights as men legally? Has the wage gap not been closed? At this point any protesting is just complaining about having a vagina.They don't have genuine, serious issues Oh feminists have got issues alright... | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 02:21 AM |
| 7 | Don't know where they were going with this one..Gaming laptops are generally more expensive because of their high-end graphics cards, while maintaining a large enough battery to power it for a decent amount of time. Also many of them have much higher display resolutions. | /r/MensRights | 22/01/17 02:18 AM |
| 1 | Children as young as 9 months-old prefer to play with toys specific to their own gender, according to a new study. Stop telling boys they can't like boy things!Evolutionary biology is a legitimate field of study, but even evolutionary biologists don't claim that a person's mind is 0% shaped by their environment - they just claim (and show evidence for) it being in large part shaped by evolved biology. I haven't actually seen many feminists who believe in "blank slate" I'm not sure if I believe you on this, because that's the current meme in pop-feminism - it's one of the big things that's been being pushed by popular feminist organizations since at lea… | /r/MensRights | 24/12/16 04:19 PM |
| 1 | Children as young as 9 months-old prefer to play with toys specific to their own gender, according to a new study. Stop telling boys they can't like boy things!True, but does anyone actually believe that society has 0% influence on people's personalities? I don't believe anyone does. | /r/MensRights | 24/12/16 08:08 AM |
| 1 | Feminists attack no-shave NovemberThe surveys I've seen said just over 20%. Likely higher in my area in the past few years, unfortunately. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/16 04:36 AM |
| 1 | I think I've found an effective way of being able to deal with the Wage Gap MythI knew what that was gonna be before I even clicked it. | /r/MensRights | 07/12/16 02:59 PM |
| 0 | Feminists attack no-shave NovemberThe problem is that a lot of feminists I've met are actually very physically healthy and attractive. I wouldn't want them to be "pushed out of the gene pool" just because they've been peer-pressured into a cult. | /r/MensRights | 07/12/16 02:54 PM |
| 1 | Apparently fake rape for a movie is now actual rape. Women are now accusing fictional movie characters of sexual assault. We have reached a point of Idiocracy.Just wanted to point out the irony of the headline saying "Idiocracy" about something involving someone named Brawndo Brando. | /r/MensRights | 07/12/16 02:52 PM |
| 1 | Is Homophobia a Type of Androphobia?As to why somebody might be A&B, motivations don't really enter into the logic involved. I was talking about reasons for believing things or feeling certain ways. That's what this conversation is about. your original hypothesis was that homophobia arises because male homosexuality implies anal sex which to most people is seen as gross. ie that anal sex is the determining factor (alone) that motivates dislike for gay men and thus homophobia. Not quite - it was that the reason male homosexuals are… | /r/MensRights | 06/12/16 06:55 AM |
| 1 | Is Homophobia a Type of Androphobia?You have a few good points points, but have you actually met anyone who is (A & B)? I haven't. And I haven't heard of any either. If they do exist, they could just be very susceptible to peer pressure and all their friends are B, or they could be very religious and believe that the Bible prohibits homosexuality but not anal sex. But in these 2 cases, D would probably also be true (has a problem with lesbians), which negates the entire point of the discussion. informal language includes implicit … | /r/MensRights | 03/12/16 04:03 PM |
| 2 | Is Homophobia a Type of Androphobia?I'm also fine with LGBT people and I also find anal sex gross. But I'm fine with it out of maturity - I wasn't always fine with it. Beoming fine with it came from learning that they have no control over their orientation, and reflecting on the fact that it doesn't hurt anyone else so it's their own business. There may be other factors too, but I don't think it can be argued that this is not a major factor. Also, conversely, lesbians most likely have an increase in positive emotions towards them … | /r/MensRights | 29/11/16 04:51 PM |
| 3 | Is Homophobia a Type of Androphobia?In my experience, people I've heard speak positively about anal sex were also people who didn't have a problem with gay people. | /r/MensRights | 29/11/16 04:25 PM |
| 3 | Is Homophobia a Type of Androphobia?Depends on the person - some hetero people find it "adventurous", but certainly not all. And either way, it involves subjects that are considered gross by almost everyone, such as buttholes and poop, even if some hetero people look past that. That in itself is enough to make people treat it as worse than "rubbing vaginas together". Also, before condoms were invented / mass produced, it was a good way to get dysentery. | /r/MensRights | 29/11/16 04:19 PM |
| 3 | How The Discrimination Against Short Men Is Perpetuated By WomenGreat article. Not perfect, but I'd give it an A-minus. | /r/MensRights | 28/11/16 08:01 PM |
| 1 | Is Homophobia a Type of Androphobia?I think it's a lot simpler than that: male homosexuality implies anal sex, which to most people is seen as gross, for obvious reasons. | /r/MensRights | 28/11/16 07:51 PM |
| 1 | Goodreads Choice Awards Has Just Nominated At Least Two Books that Push SJW Feminism, and a book by Amy Schumer,extremists who classify all anti-female sentiment as hatred Anti-female? If someone is literally anti-female, it's safe to say that they hate women. But I've yet to meet anyone who is "anti-female". That would be a silly thing to be. hatred of, contempt for Those both mean the same thing. or prejudice against women or girls Assuming that you're implying that this one doesn't also mean "hatred of / contempt for", but just misguided generalization, then it's a terrible idea to try to shoehorn that… | /r/MensRights | 22/11/16 05:33 AM |
| 1 | Goodreads Choice Awards Has Just Nominated At Least Two Books that Push SJW Feminism, and a book by Amy Schumer,I'm talking about 2nd and 3rd wave feminism. Mainly 3rd wave, but 2nd wave is when "The Patriachy Theory" was invented, which boils down to what I described. If not, explain to me how not. I've seen plenty of official feminist sources talking about it, and those descriptions boil down to what I said. "Misogyny" ... simply untrue to translate it as "hatred of women" Since feminists are so big on going by "the dictionary definition", here's the dictionary definition of "misogyny": http://www.merri… | /r/MensRights | 20/11/16 05:06 AM |
| 1 | Goodreads Choice Awards Has Just Nominated At Least Two Books that Push SJW Feminism, and a book by Amy Schumer,Yep | /r/MensRights | 17/11/16 06:51 PM |
| 1 | Clinton lost because the left wasn't interested in debate but in reducing opponents to vile caricatureAlso it's important to remember that Trump was a registered Democrat until a few years ago. | /r/MensRights | 17/11/16 05:27 PM |
| 1 | Goodreads Choice Awards Has Just Nominated At Least Two Books that Push SJW Feminism, and a book by Amy Schumer,Right, a lot of the ideas that derive from those basic beliefs are packaged up nicely into seeming like fairness, justice, etc. But just because a lot of people go along with the nicely-packaged derivative ideas, that doesn't mean they believe the core tenets. It really takes a special kind of stupid (or willful blindness) to believe that there's no innate strength difference between the sexes when counterexamples are literally everywhere and science firmly says the opposite, or to be a woman wh… | /r/MensRights | 17/11/16 04:06 PM |
| 1 | Clinton lost because the left wasn't interested in debate but in reducing opponents to vile caricatureI'll need to see sources for your claims. I did a websearch trying to find what you're talking about, but nothing relevant came up. keeping non-whites and women from having the same rights as white men What are you even talking about? There are literally 0 rights that men or white people have that women or minorities do not have. And in fact there are some rights that women have that men do not have. And there are actually "positive discrimination" programs to benefit women and non-whites. | /r/MensRights | 17/11/16 03:18 PM |
| 1 | Goodreads Choice Awards Has Just Nominated At Least Two Books that Push SJW Feminism, and a book by Amy Schumer,True, in the sense that Germany in the 1930's was a prime location to peddle antisemitism. | /r/MensRights | 17/11/16 03:15 PM |
| 0 | Goodreads Choice Awards Has Just Nominated At Least Two Books that Push SJW Feminism, and a book by Amy Schumer,I refuse to believe that more than ~20% of women believe that there's a grand conspiracy of all men to hurt all women out of hatred, that strength differences between the sexes are just social brainwashing, that physical attraction is a "social construct". That men as a group hate all women, when common sense says the exact opposite. I give women as a group more credit than that - the average woman is a lot smarter than that. | /r/MensRights | 17/11/16 03:09 PM |
| 1 | Goodreads Choice Awards Has Just Nominated At Least Two Books that Push SJW Feminism, and a book by Amy Schumer,I've been reading about modern feminism and interacting with modern feminists in real life and online since 2012. Heck, my sister started sliding down the slope recently by repeating some of the insane modern feminist talking points. Luckily she has two brothers who strongly disagree with that shit and who she cares about. I know modern feminism very well. Even on a personal level. | /r/MensRights | 17/11/16 02:59 PM |
| 3 | Goodreads Choice Awards Has Just Nominated At Least Two Books that Push SJW Feminism, and a book by Amy Schumer,Feminist books are read by people who do not call themselves feminist And they either reject what's said as insane, hateful, divisive, anti-science, going-too-far, etc, or they believe the core tenets of feminism, which means that they're a feminist. I read half a dozen explicitly feminist books without identifying as feminist Based on our past conversations, I don't believe you. You've clearly indicated that you firmly believe the dogma and won't be convinced that there's anything wrong with it… | /r/MensRights | 17/11/16 02:57 PM |
| 1 | Clinton lost because the left wasn't interested in debate but in reducing opponents to vile caricatureAlso, there's no evidence that the current Republican party is trying to disenfranchise minorities. In fact, Trump has repeatedly stated that he wants to help minorities (as long as they're not terrorists or criminals). And I say this as someone who is part-minority. | /r/MensRights | 17/11/16 02:43 PM |
| 3 | Goodreads Choice Awards Has Just Nominated At Least Two Books that Push SJW Feminism, and a book by Amy Schumer,That's true. I was just pointing out that "literature is a mostly female industry" doesn't mean that pushing feminist propaganda is catering to their audience, which is what I interpreted your first comment to mean. | /r/MensRights | 17/11/16 06:40 AM |
| 2 | Goodreads Choice Awards Has Just Nominated At Least Two Books that Push SJW Feminism, and a book by Amy Schumer,Unlikely. It's much more common for it to happen the other way around - to believe that all feminism means is to treat women with respect, right to vote, etc, without any knowledge about the modern ideological core tenets such as "men as a group hate all women as a group and want to dominate them and discriminate against them out of hatred" and "sex differences are all a social construct invented by men as a group in order to hurt all women because they hate them all". It's pretty unlikely that … | /r/MensRights | 17/11/16 06:16 AM |
| -2 | Goodreads Choice Awards Has Just Nominated At Least Two Books that Push SJW Feminism, and a book by Amy Schumer,So? Only ~20% of women even nominally call themselves feminists. | /r/MensRights | 17/11/16 05:56 AM |
| 1 | Goodreads Choice Awards Has Just Nominated At Least Two Books that Push SJW Feminism, and a book by Amy Schumer,So? Only ~20% of women even nominally call themselves feminists. | /r/MensRights | 17/11/16 05:56 AM |
| 0 | Clinton lost because the left wasn't interested in debate but in reducing opponents to vile caricatureSorry, but the fact is that this sub is largely about pushing back against the spread of extreme modern feminist ideology. The democrats are the ones who have been pushing it hard, while the republicans do not subscribe to it. I have always been an independent and until lately I have always sided with the democrats. But looking purely at the issues this sub is about, the current democratic party is our enemy and the republican party is the enemy-of-our-enemy and therefore our friend (at least fo… | /r/MensRights | 16/11/16 05:31 PM |
| 3 | Apparently female is now a protected status?That actually seems like something feminists would agree with, without realizing the consequences. | /r/MensRights | 14/11/16 10:45 PM |
| 3 | The woman who almost became president just tweeted "Girls are valuable". What about boys?trying to empower little girls Giving little girls power is a terrible idea. Or little boys, for that matter. They'll be adults soon enough. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/16 08:00 PM |
| 1 | Consent every step of the way will not work...Cat calls and "unsolicited greetings" are seen as sexual assault and harassment http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3691284/Wolf-whistling-hate-crime-insult-real-victims-abuse.html | /r/MensRights | 10/11/16 05:35 AM |
| 3 | False accusations of rape are okay apparently.It was a long time ago and he didn't know the mic was on. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/16 05:23 AM |
| 1 | Goodreads Choice Awards Has Nominated a Book that Pushes Extreme SJW Feminism and Rants About How Evil Men Are - Please Vote Against It5.4 is the average score ... rose up to 7 where it stabilized Your sentence is self-contradictory. If the current average score is 5.4, logically it cannot also be stabilized at 7. And how do you know which votes are genuine and which ones are not? There's no way to prove who has seen it and who has not. "defense against an aggression" is "they did it first" Not quite - that would be if you punched back. Blocking is a reasonable response to being punched at. If Paul Feig admitted he messed up an… | /r/MensRights | 10/11/16 04:39 AM |
| 1 | Goodreads Choice Awards Has Nominated a Book that Pushes Extreme SJW Feminism and Rants About How Evil Men Are - Please Vote Against Ituse dirty tricks to destroy democratic processes It's not the "democratic process" when the choices are not chosen democratically but by what is essentially an oligarchy (the people running Goodreads). | /r/MensRights | 10/11/16 04:28 AM |
| 1 | I think this election reflected the public's growing awareness of the ever-intensifying gender politics war. ThThe left was 90% reasonable last decade, at least publicly. Here's hoping they can revert to how they were back then. | /r/MensRights | 09/11/16 03:41 PM |
| 5 | Everyday Feminism goes full-blown science denial with pro-creationism article. Is being anti-science an inevitable consequence after years of feminists lying about facts like the wage gap myth etc? | This History Reveals That Science Isn’t Nearly As Objective As You ThinkThey've been science deniers ever since they started denying that there's an inherent strength difference between the sexes, and that there are brain structure differences between the sexes. And since they started denying that there's a biological basis to sexual attraction. And since they started denying that obesity is unhealthy. Etc, etc, etc. | /r/MensRights | 09/11/16 07:26 AM |
| 1 | Goodreads Choice Awards Has Nominated a Book that Pushes Extreme SJW Feminism and Rants About How Evil Men Are - Please Vote Against ItThis is the playground they did it first defense No, because this is a defense against an aggression. If a schoolyard bully punches at you, you're justified in blocking their punch. If a radical SJW feminist group is trying to force their ideology into everyone's mind (after having it unfairly propped by up a mega corporation), people who oppose the ideology are justified in trying to nullify their attempts as much as possible. Ghostbusters ... eventually 7 It's actually at 5.4. | /r/MensRights | 08/11/16 05:09 AM |
| 1 | Goodreads Choice Awards Has Nominated a Book that Pushes Extreme SJW Feminism and Rants About How Evil Men Are - Please Vote Against ItNo, I'm advocating against mega corporations abusing their power to indoctrinate unsuspecting impressionable people into their ideology of choice - especially when that ideology is anti-science, historically illiterate, and sows hatred and distrust. I would be advocating censorship if I were petitioning for Goodreads to remove a book from the running that had been voted into the running on its own merits. Clearly this is not the case. | /r/MensRights | 08/11/16 05:02 AM |
| 1 | Goodreads Choice Awards Has Nominated a Book that Pushes Extreme SJW Feminism and Rants About How Evil Men Are - Please Vote Against ItOne can be supportive of what the historical feminist movement achieved while being completely against the ideology and beliefs that it has been replaced by in modern times. They are two different things. | /r/MensRights | 03/11/16 07:13 PM |
| 0 | Goodreads Choice Awards Has Nominated a Book that Pushes Extreme SJW Feminism and Rants About How Evil Men Are - Please Vote Against ItIf you saw a book titled "The Case For Killing the Jews" and it had a summary describing a line of reasoning justifying rounding up all the Jews and putting them in gas chambers, and the author summary described the author as an avid proponent of neo-naziism, would you need to purchase the book and read it through before deciding that you should vote against it? | /r/MensRights | 03/11/16 03:51 PM |
| 1 | Goodreads Choice Awards Has Nominated a Book that Pushes Extreme SJW Feminism and Rants About How Evil Men Are - Please Vote Against ItThe summary is almost copy-paste from standard SJW feminist lines. The reviews are extolling the SJW-ism using ideological terms and ideological statements. Even just the fact that the summary and the reviews say "feminsim" all over it without the caveat of "historical feminism" is enough to label it as SJW feminism, since there is no reason for feminism to exist in the modern era, and since historical feminism was replaced sometime around 1970 by "the patricarchy conspiracy theory". | /r/MensRights | 03/11/16 07:55 AM |
| 2 | Goodreads Choice Awards Has Nominated a Book that Pushes Extreme SJW Feminism and Rants About How Evil Men Are - Please Vote Against Ithypocritical to advocate a similar campaign It's not that similar - they were trying to prevent a group from doing a showing that they were paying to do. I'm trying to prevent something from being voted into winning an award, which would never have been nominated for the award in the first place if it hadn't been hand-selected by the people running the contest due to their ideological biases. Besides, it's pretty much a guarantee that feminists will be telling all their feminist friends to vote … | /r/MensRights | 03/11/16 07:34 AM |
| 2 | Goodreads Choice Awards Has Nominated a Book that Pushes Extreme SJW Feminism and Rants About How Evil Men Are - Please Vote Against ItAre you serious? You don't think at least the first link is extreme? a culture that demands women be as small, quiet, and compliant as possible Total misrepresentation of culture, along with mistaking biology for culture. Variants of this line are frequently repeated by radical feminists. war with stand-up comedians over rape jokes Radical feminists' obsession with the rare "rape joke" - insisting that guys make them all the time, and that making a joke about rape is somehow worse than all the o… | /r/MensRights | 03/11/16 07:26 AM |
| 0 | Goodreads Choice Awards Has Nominated a Book that Pushes Extreme SJW Feminism and Rants About How Evil Men Are - Please Vote Against ItIsn't that what the summary is for? If the summary (and the reviews) paint a clear picture of it being extremist ideological bullshit, then that's certainly what it is. | /r/MensRights | 03/11/16 06:01 AM |
| 1 | US Government Agency-Wide Newsletter Pushing Extreme SJW IdeologyTrump would not actively support anything like that. Especially knowing his history of being a little too open about his sexual feelings towards ladies. The current Republican majority house and senate would not support these kinds of laws. But with an SJW president backed by an ever-increasingly-SJW media, and if the Republicans lose their majorities, and if an SJW president appoints another SJW supreme court judge (current judge Ginsburg has been quoted spouting feminist ideological hatred tow… | /r/MensRights | 12/10/16 07:45 PM |
| 1 | US Government Agency-Wide Newsletter Pushing Extreme SJW IdeologyWhy not? The more appropriate question is, would he actively do what the current SJW administration actively does? Doing these things takes effort, but not doing things you're not enthusiastic about is easy. Especially if your base is against those things. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/16 07:38 PM |
| 1 | US Government Agency-Wide Newsletter Pushing Extreme SJW IdeologyHe implied that most Mexican illegal immigrants are criminals, drug pushers, or rapists. I'm sure that's a huge exaggeration, but "illegal immigrant" is not a race. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/16 07:36 PM |
| 1 | US Government Agency-Wide Newsletter Pushing Extreme SJW IdeologyLook at it this way: if Hillary and her party (in its current state) win, this is what's next for the USA: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3691284/Wolf-whistling-hate-crime-insult-real-victims-abuse.html Yes, this is real, in England. Yes, this is 100% based on the ideas firmly entrenched in and being pushed by the current leftist parties. Yes this will happen in the USA if we allow it. In fact, I personally know many people (in person) who would think this is the greatest idea in the wo… | /r/MensRights | 12/10/16 03:07 AM |
| 1 | US Government Agency-Wide Newsletter Pushing Extreme SJW IdeologyHe'll take away much of the funding from SJW organizations, he'll push for laws to reform the press, he'll stop the presidency from publicly spreading SJW propaganda (such as the wage gap), and most directly affecting me he'll stop pushing SJW propaganda and re-education to government employees. Back in 2008, I voted for Obama, thinking "great, this will be the final nail in the coffin for overt racism and the belief that black people are held back today primarily by current racism - I'm all for… | /r/MensRights | 12/10/16 02:49 AM |
| 1 | US Government Agency-Wide Newsletter Pushing Extreme SJW IdeologyLook, I'm not a big fan of Trump overall, but I'm getting tired of explaining the obvious about this particular media smear. He said many illegal immigrants are rapists. He did not say "Mexicans in general are rapists". He said "They're [Mexico] not sending their best ... they're bringing drugs, they're bringing crime, they're [the ones being sent] rapists. And some are good people". How can you logically draw the conclusion that he said "all Mexicans are rapists" rather than "some Mexicans are … | /r/MensRights | 12/10/16 02:46 AM |
| 1 | Washington Post Says Debate "Mansplaining"Only near the eastern border. The rest of the country is fine. | /r/MensRights | 11/10/16 10:17 PM |
| 1 | US Government Agency-Wide Newsletter Pushing Extreme SJW IdeologyBoth candidates suck. No, Trump is not racist. Who to vote for comes down to your priorities. If you want to permanently enshrine SJW feminist identity politics "patriarchy theory" in every facet of society, government, grade school, college, the media, laws, etc, by all means vote for Hillary. But this cycle I'm a one-issue voter, and that issue is to stop this SJW horseshit from getting any worse - maybe even reverse it. The SJW fad went full-steam immediately after Obama's reelection. I do no… | /r/MensRights | 11/10/16 10:16 PM |
| 1 | US Government Agency-Wide Newsletter Pushing Extreme SJW IdeologyBoth candidates suck. No, Trump is not racist. Who to vote for comes down to your priorities. If you want to permanently enshrine SJW feminist identity politics "patriarchy theory" in every facet of society, government, grade school, college, the media, laws, etc, by all means vote for Hillary. But this cycle I'm a one-issue voter, and that issue is to stop this SJW horseshit from getting any worse - maybe even reverse it. The SJW fad went full-steam immediately after Obama's reelection. I do no… | /r/MensRights | 11/10/16 10:14 PM |
| 1 | Shower Thought: If feminism is cancer, is that why ladies afflicted with it often lose their hair?Personally I've encountered more buzzcutted and near-buzzcutted feminists than brightly-colored-hair ones. | /r/MensRights | 09/10/16 05:05 PM |
| 1 | Shower Thought: If feminism is cancer, is that why ladies afflicted with it often lose their hair?Mental disorders count as medical reasons. I've noticed before that the central ideology of modern feminism could be described as "collective paranoid schizophrenia". In fact, one of its architects actually was diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia (Valerie Solanas). | /r/MensRights | 09/10/16 07:05 AM |
| 0 | Shower Thought: If feminism is cancer, is that why ladies afflicted with it often lose their hair?True. That's why I was careful to phrase the joke as "two things that coincide", rather than cause and effect. | /r/MensRights | 09/10/16 07:05 AM |
| 1 | Milo Yiannopoulos' review of Cassie Jaye's The Red Pill: The Movie Striking Fear Into The Hearts Of FeministsShower Thought: If feminism is cancer, is that why ladies afflicted with it often lose their hair? | /r/MensRights | 09/10/16 05:42 AM |
| 1 | If a court says he didn't rape her, he didn't rape her. Innocent men do not owe the female population their blood, no matter how much they bay for it.Doesn't this subreddit have a rule about archiving? | /r/MensRights | 09/10/16 05:41 AM |
| 1 | Washington Post Says Debate "Mansplaining"Regardless of whether or not I agree with anything you said - you seem like a very angry person. If you're having a lot of problems with finding a good lady to be with, you should try looking abroad - I recently discovered that the worst traits and hyper-selectiveness of women are mostly specific to ladies from the USA and other western nations. Specifically, try Ukraine. | /r/MensRights | 08/10/16 05:45 PM |
| 3 | Ex-Yahoo employee sues Marisa Mayer claiming she led an illegal purge of male employeesI had been reading it as an alternative to Google News after Google started pushing SJW stuff. | /r/MensRights | 08/10/16 05:41 PM |
| 1 | Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer led illegal purge of male employees, lawsuit chargesI believe it - Yahoo News in recent months has been pushing tons of feminazi propaganda. | /r/MensRights | 07/10/16 10:55 PM |
| 59 | Ex-Yahoo employee sues Marisa Mayer claiming she led an illegal purge of male employeesI believe it - Yahoo News in recent months has been pushing tons of feminazi propaganda. | /r/MensRights | 07/10/16 10:54 PM |
| 1 | Washington Post Says Debate "Mansplaining"If women were truly being 'held back' I never said I believed that. That's what the feminists believe, but I am not a feminist. What I said is that before the industrialization of society, it was impossible for roles to be different than the default for almost every woman, as a matter of common sense, but in post-industrialization society, it is not impossible. | /r/MensRights | 07/10/16 10:51 PM |
| 1 | One word: unfuckingbelievable!Yeah I know you have to be wary of scammers. I wasn't aware of Dream Connections - seems interesting. But it seems a little too artificial for me. Maybe I'll look into it more, but I was just finding ladies who can speak some English on other dating sites and setting up potential dates. I've been using Mamba.ru, Fdating.com, and OKCupid. Also I've been learning some basic Russian, so I can get around better / deal with gaps in a lady's English knowledge / have a better understanding of their cul… | /r/MensRights | 05/10/16 11:08 PM |
| 2 | One word: unfuckingbelievable!Partly culture, partly "supply and demand". In the west, we have an obesity epidemic, which makes about half the female population completely undesirable, which then diverts absurd levels of interest to all healthy ladies, making them extremely picky. Eastern Europe has very little obesity. I believe that the obesity epidemic is the root of a huge percentage of problems in the modern world - even problems that feminists complain about like cat calling and rape are at least partially due to a def… | /r/MensRights | 05/10/16 07:56 PM |
| 2 | One word: unfuckingbelievable!There's a way to avoid completely tossing in the towel that I recently learned - look abroad. Especially eastern Europe and Russia. Their situation is apparently the opposite as the west - they have a surplus of healthy and beautiful ladies, and the guys there are apparently mostly noncommittal and not very nice. Since I started looking, I've met tons of healthy ladies (many much younger than me) who want to go on dates when I get around to visiting. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/16 07:40 PM |
| 1 | One word: unfuckingbelievable!This headline is literally something that would be an Onion article. It follows their frequently-used comedy headline recipe of "breaking news: local person does thing that everyone does every day". | /r/MensRights | 05/10/16 07:35 PM |
| 1 | US Government Agency-Wide Newsletter Pushing Extreme SJW IdeologyWe don't personally have to pay for them, but the government does - our hours on our timesheets come directly from project budgets. For this particular case with the book, it's one session, but it directly takes time away from projects, which translates to cost. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/16 07:26 PM |
| 1 | US Government Agency-Wide Newsletter Pushing Extreme SJW IdeologyYes I'm well aware of how disagreeing with this kind of stuff can get you fired or negatively impact your standing at work. In fact, a few weeks ago my team leader "nominated" me to attend an "Intro to Diversity" course, which the description clearly showed to be about pushing SJW ideology (though they tried to be sneaky about it with wording like "listen and be listened to", which I'm sure was a revision from "listen and believe". I had to put on my best poker face act to make it seem like I ju… | /r/MensRights | 05/10/16 07:20 PM |
| 1 | US Government Agency-Wide Newsletter Pushing Extreme SJW IdeologyExactly. I sent the newsletter contact person an anonymous email yesterday complaining and mentioning that it probably violates some kind of law. Hopefully they'll take it as a warning to back off with that kind of stuff. And by the way, this is just the newsletter we're talking about. We also get occasional mass emails from the president and his administration pushing SJW ideology, and the management here is currently pushing it hard too, with "training courses" they're pushing which are clearl… | /r/MensRights | 05/10/16 07:02 PM |
| 1 | Elon Musk accused of Twitter Misogyny by Feminist techoidiots peddling outrage bait - he questions the stats and asks "What's up with the phoney PC police axe-grinding?"Reminder: show your support for Elon's response by following him on Twitter or liking his Facebook. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/16 02:37 AM |
| 26 | Elon Musk accused of Twitter Misogyny by Feminist techoidiots peddling outrage bait - he questions the stats and asks "What's up with the phoney PC police axe-grinding?"You forgot to archive. You're giving them money for pushing divisive ideological bullshit. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/16 12:50 AM |
| 1 | Washington Post Says Debate "Mansplaining"But some do. Historically they have not, due to biological differences giving them higher priorities. But in the modern era, post Industrial Revolution, birth control, etc, the importance of biological difference has been greatly reduced, and so they CAN, and some do. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/16 12:27 AM |
| 1 | A realization as a womanfuck, the feminist waves keep coming "Safe Space Invaders"? | /r/MensRights | 04/10/16 04:51 AM |
| 1 | Washington Post Says Debate "Mansplaining"One of the main reason I think you're intentionally stirring up trouble and not 100% sincere in everything you say is because you're mixing "women" and "black people" together into the same category, when they're entirely different subjects, and you're painting yourself as precisely the hypothetical "racist sexist homophobe" that SJWs are always strawmanning against and which I've never actually met. Do you also believe that all black people are lazy simply because they're black? Everyone is dif… | /r/MensRights | 03/10/16 03:14 AM |
| 1 | I was reported for gender misconduct for calling myself handsome in classTo be fair, it's not the school itself - it's group of people who go to the school writing these articles and publishing them to a non-affiliated website. | /r/MensRights | 03/10/16 02:58 AM |
| 1 | Washington Post Says Debate "Mansplaining"Okay I'm pretty sure you're a troll now. Or more likely you're a feminist trying to manufacture evidence about how horrible Men's Rights Activists are. When I said "I know this from first-hand experience" I meant that I've worked with women in my engineering job and they do all the same kinds of jobs as the guys and several have been my bosses, and they all do quality work. | /r/MensRights | 03/10/16 01:07 AM |
| 1 | I was reported for gender misconduct for calling myself handsome in classGod, the majority of articles on this site are full-on SJW. I looked at the sub-sites of various colleges on there, and every single one was full of SJW articles. Even the college I went to, which is even more aggravating. | /r/MensRights | 03/10/16 01:04 AM |
| 1 | Student officially changes his personal pronoun to ‘His Majesty’ on campus roster - The College FixI though of another good way to use comedy to discourage this: any obese woman you know, refer to her as "ze". "Fat Positive" feminists will go crazy. | /r/MensRights | 30/09/16 11:47 PM |
| 1 | Washington Post Says Debate "Mansplaining"Assuming you're not trolling, and assuming there aren't actually any significant things single-handedly invented by a women or a black person, that's irrelevant because single-handed invention of useful things is rare in modern society. Women and black people are often integral parts of teams that invent useful things - and I know this from first-hand experience. Whether you're trolling or not, you're making this subreddit look bad. Don't do that. | /r/MensRights | 30/09/16 03:25 PM |
| 1 | Washington Post Says Debate "Mansplaining"OK last response from me because I doubt we'll convince each other of anything Fair enough. Well I have replies, so I'm gonna reply. Here is his ad, here is background on the case it's about. Interesting. But in context, it doesn't seem like his reaction was a big deal. He was rightfully outraged over what had happened and wanted to rant / vent about it. Our prisons aren't filled with people convicted of rape and people who complimented a woman or something I was talking about how it would be if… | /r/MensRights | 29/09/16 04:35 AM |
| 2 | Washington Post Says Debate "Mansplaining"called for the death penalty for children accused of rape Source? I can't find one for this. stop & frisk I just read up on "stop & frisk". The officer has to have solid reasons to be suspicious of the person, and it does not include race. If it reduces violent crime and gang activity in low-income black communities, this greatly helps to solve the problems they have as the unfortunate result of historical racism. he wants more mass incarceration What do you mean by that? But I know that under H… | /r/MensRights | 28/09/16 03:48 PM |
| 3 | Washington Post Says Debate "Mansplaining"I'm only 31, but since I reached voting age, every presidential election I've voted for the democrat, and until last year I had only voted for democrats to other offices. I was a solid moderate democrat - totally for the democrats, but with some appeals to moderation on a few things. Then 2012 came and the SJWs started taking over, and I learned about the insanity of modern feminism (I had thought that feminism had finished and been relegated to the history books already). Since then they've bee… | /r/MensRights | 28/09/16 07:04 AM |
| 1 | Washington Post Says Debate "Mansplaining"They're probably a troll. | /r/MensRights | 28/09/16 02:00 AM |
| 3 | Washington Post Says Debate "Mansplaining"Without reservation? How? What you just described is a "YUGE" reservation. Enough by itself for me to vote for a Republican after voting only Democrat in past elections. Besides, some of your reasons for voting against Trump are probably media lies and misrepresentations. | /r/MensRights | 28/09/16 01:57 AM |
| 6 | Hillary just started the debate with the wage gap mythThankfully Breitbart has pointed out this lie from the debate: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/09/26/fact-wreck-fact-checking-fact-checkers-first-debate/ | /r/MensRights | 27/09/16 04:47 AM |
| 12 | Debate: Hillary just made plain feminist hypocrisy on the "wage gap"Thankfully Breitbart has pointed out this lie from the debate: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/09/26/fact-wreck-fact-checking-fact-checkers-first-debate/ | /r/MensRights | 27/09/16 04:47 AM |
| 2 | Because facts or reality don't matter anymore. All that matters is how she feels someday in the future...When will a steroid hit Earth? | /r/MensRights | 15/09/16 08:35 PM |
| 6 | Obama's female staffers banded together and repeated what other female staffers said to make sure it was heard. So this is how some of the most important decisions in our country were madeIf "gotten much better for female staffers" means "became much more controlled by feminists", this explains EVERYTHING about the insanity of the past 4 years. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/16 08:45 PM |
| 2 | Feminists don't understand cakeHaha yeah, that's why I made the reference. Also, I once had a cake that was designed after the cake from Portal. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/16 08:43 PM |
| 4 | Obama's female staffers banded together and repeated what other female staffers said to make sure it was heard. So this is how some of the most important decisions in our country were madewere women being heard in american politics 100 years ago? 50? If you're refering to women occupying political positions, 100 years ago there was not yet any reliable and mass-produced birth control, and there were no safe modern abortion procedures, and so any lady with a sex drive would by necessity have many children to look after. 50 years ago, birth control was just beginning to become socially acceptable, so same issue. What have any of you been doing to make sure women's voice are heard m… | /r/MensRights | 14/09/16 08:10 PM |
| 8 | Feminists don't understand cakeTo feminists, the cake is a lie. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/16 05:01 PM |
| 4 | it's time to end the gender education gap once and for allSincerely believing that feminism is about equality is what I call "pop feminism". It's what the media has been pushing lately. They cherry-pick, skew, and lie to make it seem like men have all the advantages, and gullible people buy into it. That's why its true nature must be constantly exposed by people who know better. | /r/MensRights | 06/09/16 10:38 PM |
| 6 | Feminist gets challenged, can't find any answer so she resorts to name calling and insultsIn other news, water has just been discovered to be wet. | /r/MensRights | 06/09/16 10:31 PM |
| 0 | I have noticed that anyone who complains about white male privelidge is not white or male and generally seem the type that desperately crave control over someone. Where do they get the idea that all white men sit in board meetings?I said "the general connotation". Most people don't have full and comprehensive dictionary definitions loaded into their brains that they can recall at will. The connotation is the first thing that comes to mind - the default immediate thought reaction. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/connotation In the singular sense of "a privilege", the connotation does match up with "a special right". But in the collective form "privilege", the connotation is "wealth". | /r/MensRights | 31/08/16 02:12 AM |
| 1 | I have noticed that anyone who complains about white male privelidge is not white or male and generally seem the type that desperately crave control over someone. Where do they get the idea that all white men sit in board meetings?Whites have generational wealth Many do. This is not a matter of "you're white therefore you're privileged", as the ideology goes. It's "if your parents were white, you are more likely to have privilege passed on to you". And this is purely from a financial perspective. A middle-class white guy who's 5 feet tall probably hates his life. better funded schools This is a problem that should be solved by encouraging segregated communities to integrate. Inner-city black gang culture combined with bad… | /r/MensRights | 31/08/16 02:07 AM |
| 1 | I have noticed that anyone who complains about white male privelidge is not white or male and generally seem the type that desperately crave control over someone. Where do they get the idea that all white men sit in board meetings?does not negate the fact that most white people in America are more privileged then minorities Nobody's arguing against the statistic that a higher percentage of white people are upper or middle class than black people. But this is not something intrinsic to being a particular race (anymore). It's logically sound to say "a lot of white people are privileged", but it's not logically sound to say "white people are privileged simply because they're white". Also, Asians and Indians (from India) are … | /r/MensRights | 31/08/16 01:51 AM |
| 1 | I have noticed that anyone who complains about white male privelidge is not white or male and generally seem the type that desperately crave control over someone. Where do they get the idea that all white men sit in board meetings?Privilege implies being better off, not being excessively well off I'm talking about the general connotation of the word, which is "being rich". It's a bad choice of word for what the ideological version is trying to say. Are women privileged compared to men? Yes, they are. Are they all "excessively well off"? Even as a frequenter of this subreddit, I disagree with your generalization here. I would say the average woman is privileged compared to the average man, but a morbidly obese lady on welf… | /r/MensRights | 31/08/16 01:31 AM |
| 3 | I have noticed that anyone who complains about white male privelidge is not white or male and generally seem the type that desperately crave control over someone. Where do they get the idea that all white men sit in board meetings?Will Smith is 1000000 times more privileged than the homeless white guy down the street from me. The entire concept of an entire race or sex being "privileged" is stupid because it implies all of them being excessively well-off, which is clearly false. It was definitely true that many decades ago that you would be socially DISADVANTAGED to be black. That's a much better term to use, and it's mostly not true anymore, unless you wander into a KKK meeting or something. There are much better predict… | /r/MensRights | 29/08/16 05:32 AM |
| 3 | "Laci Green is Oblivious to Female Privilege"She's on MTV. MTV has been getting consistently dumber and dumber since the late 90's, and has taken a nosedive into pure insanity recently. | /r/MensRights | 28/08/16 02:02 PM |
| 2 | Should disparaging and condescending remarks about men made my women be considered hate crime? Constant oppressions such as these infringe on a males right to lead a happy and confident life with out being prejudged by social stereotypes.There are two trends in the comments on this post. Half the comments are saying what you're saying. The other half are saying "if they're gonna do it for to men, they better also do it to women, regardless of whether it's good either way". | /r/MensRights | 28/08/16 01:49 PM |
| 1 | Should disparaging and condescending remarks about men made my women be considered hate crime? Constant oppressions such as these infringe on a males right to lead a happy and confident life with out being prejudged by social stereotypes.Maybe Robin Hood will save them. | /r/MensRights | 28/08/16 01:46 PM |
| 1 | Gary Johnson Will Fight for Fathers’ RightsSo, because he has a few concerns about 100% non-regulation of gun sales, he's anti-gun? That's an extreme position. There's such a thing as a "moderate libertarian". Better that a few people unfairly get banned from buying a new gun than for a terrorist to buy guns. This isn't the same thing as putting someone in jail unfairly - it's just not letting them buy a particular item. | /r/MensRights | 20/08/16 08:09 PM |
| 2 | PC culture is getting out of hand. Princeton orders staff to stop using the term 'man' as part of a ban on 'gendered words'mankind -> huMANkind Oops. | /r/MensRights | 19/08/16 06:58 PM |
| 2 | Gary Johnson Will Fight for Fathers’ RightsAnti-gun? Libertarians are typically very pro-2nd-amendment. Where did you get that from? | /r/MensRights | 19/08/16 06:50 PM |
| 7 | Basic Freedoms get curtailed when feminists take over government. In Canada jokes are banned! The West is rotting from the inside.The point is that modern feminists push for this kind of censorship. | /r/MensRights | 19/08/16 06:44 PM |
| 1 | Ivanka Trump Declares Herself a Feminist, Donald Posts About It Stating How Proud He Is. There Is No Hope in this Election.Well, Canada is the nearest country to the USA, not counting Mexico. I guess nobody says "I'm gonna move to Mexico" because they know that's not a good idea with all their economic and crime problems. And they don't speak English. So, Canada is the default. | /r/MensRights | 15/08/16 05:04 PM |
| 1 | Ivanka Trump Declares Herself a Feminist, Donald Posts About It Stating How Proud He Is. There Is No Hope in this Election.Not if you assume Donald vs Hillary is a near-tie. Assuming Donald vs Hillary is a near-tie, if Gary gets 34% then the most either of the others get is 33%. Of course this doesn't hold if Donald vs Hillary isn't a near-tie. But it could still be close to that - for example, if they were 35% vs 31% then Gary would need 36%. | /r/MensRights | 13/08/16 04:30 PM |
| 1 | Ivanka Trump Declares Herself a Feminist, Donald Posts About It Stating How Proud He Is. There Is No Hope in this Election.Not all Bernie supporters supported him specifically because of Socialism - people supported him for a variety of reasons. If you go on r/libertarian and seach "bernie" you'll find a bunch of posts from Bernie supporters switching or considering switching to Johnson. | /r/MensRights | 12/08/16 09:58 PM |
| 1 | Ivanka Trump Declares Herself a Feminist, Donald Posts About It Stating How Proud He Is. There Is No Hope in this Election.https://www.reddit.com/r/Libertarian/comments/4nbnmx/why_bernie_sanders_supporters_are_switching_to/?ref=search_posts | /r/MensRights | 11/08/16 08:17 PM |
| 1 | Ivanka Trump Declares Herself a Feminist, Donald Posts About It Stating How Proud He Is. There Is No Hope in this Election.It's kind of become a long-running joke. I meant it as a joke. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/16 08:13 PM |
| 1 | Ivanka Trump Declares Herself a Feminist, Donald Posts About It Stating How Proud He Is. There Is No Hope in this Election.It's not that simple. Johnson supports many of the things supported by each party and rejects the more embarassing beliefs of each party. Many people support tolerance for gays and are more moderate on immigration but find Hillary to be untrustworthy. In particular I think a lot of Bernie supporters would vote for Johnson - and that's a huge group. Strong dislike of both main candidates, coupled with positions that most people can agree with, is a strong combination. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/16 08:02 PM |
| 1 | Ivanka Trump Declares Herself a Feminist, Donald Posts About It Stating How Proud He Is. There Is No Hope in this Election.She does imply it, by saying that she will "fight for equal pay for equal work". | /r/MensRights | 11/08/16 07:57 PM |
| 1 | Ivanka Trump Declares Herself a Feminist, Donald Posts About It Stating How Proud He Is. There Is No Hope in this Election.There was plenty of hope for people against modern feminism. The Republican Party is generally against modern feminism. Statistically, it's extrememly rare that one party keeps the presidency more than 2 consecutive terms. The left has been shitting all over men and white people for the past 4 years. This should have been an easy win for the party that opposes modern feminism. Instead, they picked the worst possible candidate, who's unlikely to win and if he does will not oppose modern feminism.… | /r/MensRights | 11/08/16 07:14 PM |
| 1 | Ivanka Trump Declares Herself a Feminist, Donald Posts About It Stating How Proud He Is. There Is No Hope in this Election.Sure, but they also try to avoid saying things that will turn a lot of people away. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/16 07:05 PM |
| 1 | Ivanka Trump Declares Herself a Feminist, Donald Posts About It Stating How Proud He Is. There Is No Hope in this Election.He's already pushed it. Twice recently. I don't doubt that him being in power will cause it to be pushed less than Hillary being in power. But now I really don't want him to win either. This is the last straw in a string of disappointing things coming from him. I was willing to forgive the other things (his ultra-conservative runningmate pick, his denial of global warming, his tendency to not think before he speaks), but this is the final nail in his coffin for me. I am now all-in for Gary Johns… | /r/MensRights | 11/08/16 02:11 PM |
| 1 | Ivanka Trump Declares Herself a Feminist, Donald Posts About It Stating How Proud He Is. There Is No Hope in this Election.Donald is celebrating a feminism that you dont even have a concept of its so far back in history False - in fact, it's the only feminism I knew ever existed until 2012. Until 2012 I thought it was something only in the history books. And Ivanka made no qualifications on her statement that she's a feminist - she didn't say "in the original sense" or "but I don't agree with some of the stuff going around these days" or "I believe in fairness for everyone regardless of sex". No - she just said "I a… | /r/MensRights | 11/08/16 02:04 PM |
| 1 | Ivanka Trump Declares Herself a Feminist, Donald Posts About It Stating How Proud He Is. There Is No Hope in this Election.There is no wage gap for men & women doing the same work. But I think Ivanka knows this. https://youtu.be/Er5bE6eYf7k?t=536 And yet right after she says it's about motherhood, she directly implies that they're getting unequal pay for equal work. Which does she believe? The two are mutually exclusive. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/16 01:58 PM |
| 1 | Ivanka Trump Declares Herself a Feminist, Donald Posts About It Stating How Proud He Is. There Is No Hope in this Election.Any other election year I would agree with that. But this year is unique - never in history have the two main candidates been so strongly disliked by so many people. People want another option. Read about it. The only reasons a lot of people wouldn't vote for him are a.) They don't think he can win, and b.) They don't know about him. If he gets into the debates, everyone will know about him, and as his poll numbers rise, people will start to believe that he can actually win, which would have a f… | /r/MensRights | 11/08/16 01:52 PM |
| 1 | Ivanka Trump Declares Herself a Feminist, Donald Posts About It Stating How Proud He Is. There Is No Hope in this Election.And now both major parties are pushing this lie, and the conspiracy theory ideology behind it. Thankfully I did some research today and Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson is clean on this subject (and actually has a good shot at winning if he makes it to the debate). | /r/MensRights | 11/08/16 05:38 AM |
| 1 | Ivanka Trump Declares Herself a Feminist, Donald Posts About It Stating How Proud He Is. There Is No Hope in this Election.Explain. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/16 05:36 AM |
| 2 | Ivanka Trump Declares Herself a Feminist, Donald Posts About It Stating How Proud He Is. There Is No Hope in this Election.Celebrating feminine beauty has nothing to do with feminism - of any era. In fact, feminists from the 70's to today would call "celebrating feminine beauty" "objectification". The problem is that since the 70's, being a feminist has meant believing in "The Patriarchy Theory", which is pure insanity. The feminism before that had particular goals, and those goals were achieved. To call yourself a feminist today and to mean the historical movement is like calling yourself a member of the Tea Party … | /r/MensRights | 11/08/16 05:34 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter