TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

iongantas Archive

View 11 posts and 2,615 comments by iongantas on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,615 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Everything after "these findings suggest..." is garbage.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 11:19 PM
3

Emotions should be considered, but they should be considered as facts of the situation, not something you just give into and assign disproportionate importance.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 07:19 PM
3

You know, that's fine, so long as men also get their safe spaces where they can discuss things without some woman interjecting her irrelevant feelings into the discussion.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 07:18 PM
7

This is kind of a wonderful example of the Streisand effect.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 06:50 PM
2

"compassion-driven"
/r/MensRights12/06/18 06:36 PM
1

All good points. Also happy cake day!
/r/MensRights12/06/18 01:55 AM
1

Your first full paragraph is nonsense. A girl is generally going to have a short list of guys she's had sex with in the applicable time frame. Ultimately, if a pregnancy occurs, there should be a suspected father named and paternity routinely determined. If it isn't the first guy, check the rest. That would pretty much cut out all the other bullshit.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 09:20 PM
2

In the case that the adoption occurred without his knowledge or approval, it is a violation of his parental rights.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 07:44 PM
1

First I'm going to disagree with your "only a woman can create a child" statement, and there is generally legal precedent to back that up. This generally throws a wrench in the remainder of your argument. However, if we concede that as being so, and also: "If its the woman's sole decision to create the life, then it's the woman's sole responsibility." This also means no man can ever be held responsible for child support or any other contribution, even if the parents are married, as it is "the wo…
/r/MensRights11/06/18 05:21 AM
2

I would only add that, in your second to last paragraph, once paternity has been determined, the father also has the immediate... right to claim all rights and responsibilities on the child as well. If the mother has given up the child, and he accepts those rights, he immediately gains sole custody, regardless of whether the child has been adopted, fostered, or anything else. I can find no other fault with the general outline you have laid out.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 05:17 AM
8

"So you think denying people involvement in their own government based on their sex will make the world a better place?"
/r/MensRights09/06/18 10:23 PM
2

OTOH, depressive realism is useful.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 04:53 AM
8

There are already lots of people who aren't sex offenders on sex offenders registries. These are more appropriate than some.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 09:26 PM
3

The concept and use of a sex offender registry is completely blinkered already, and shouldn't be used, period. But if we're going to have one, then people who lie about sex offense to get someone sent to jail should absolutely be on it.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 09:25 PM
0

I might believe that if any such thing ever happened here.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 09:14 PM
13

Good summation.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 08:36 PM
3

Which is why that method of calculation of unemployment is complete hogwash. In the last five years I have never not needed a job, but by that metric, there was some period in which I was "not in the workforce".
/r/MensRights07/06/18 03:20 AM
1

The graphic you have after your first sentence looks like a sigil for one of the outer gods.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 03:07 AM
9

Much more survivable these days.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 09:26 PM
2

The state of things 25 or 30 years ago is not particular relevant to today. While I generally agree, and would like to see more contemporary stats, this is pretty the time period for most feminist sources as well. I mean, most of the literature from which their ideology is based is from the 70's or 80's.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 05:49 PM
1

Except that it is more similar to the period a man would serve if convicted of rape.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 09:47 PM
2

So, with the beating oneself up argument, you would still need to provide proof that some particular person did it, which you can't, since they didn't. For the latter, yeah, there could be some cases where there isn't any medical evidence of anything happening, and more likely that it simply wasn't captured in a timely fashion, but if the person was conscious, there should almost certainly be some kind of sign of struggle, and if they were unconscious, something had to have made them unconscious…
/r/MensRights03/06/18 09:28 PM
51

Well, in addition to insuring bodily autonomy, it would also insure religious freedom of the individual. Your freedom doesn't extend to other people's bodies.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 05:32 PM
2

Hey should totally sue them in civic court for damages if they don't get charged with reckless endangerment or something.
/r/MensRights31/05/18 04:19 AM
1

Ah, Terfs.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 02:25 AM
1

While I agree with your general sentiment, I think we should avoid diluting the meaning of bigot in this way. Bigot means, someone who is attached to their opinion and won't consider other views, whereas it seems you're using it to mean generally prejudiced. While in some technical sense these mean the same thing, prejudice generally implies judgement about some demographic, whereas that may only incidentally be true of a bigot.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 02:01 AM
1

Why not both?
/r/MensRights29/05/18 09:06 PM
0

So, three decades?
/r/MensRights29/05/18 09:05 PM
2

I'm inclined to think that if evidence cannot be provided that a crime happened, there's a reasonable likelihood it didn't happen. If no one and nothing was harmed in a demonstrable way, why are we convicting someone of a crime?
/r/MensRights29/05/18 09:02 PM
1

I'd say it depends on the circumstances.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 12:24 AM
1

Let's do one better and have decent primary and secondary school and intensive aptitude and interest testing starting at least 3 years out from graduating high school to help people figure out what they will most likely be successful with.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 09:15 AM
-1

The main problem everyone in this thread isn't getting is that you're making this decision when you're 17, don't know jack shit, and have no perspective on anything. Then you're expecting these same people to forecast what will be needed or reasonable 5 or so years in the future, and you have a lot of people telling them all kind of lies that pertain very closely to this decision making process. People who right now have experience and "know what's going on in the world" can't reasonably predict…
/r/MensRights24/05/18 09:14 AM
4

I'd like to refer you to /r/lostgeneration It's affecting women more because more women than men are going to college.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 09:02 AM
9

And now she should be jailed and fined.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 12:50 AM
1

Mountain Dew?
/r/MensRights24/05/18 12:39 AM
6

"Do you consent?" "yes, what about you?" "yes." A single thrust occurs. Repeat.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 12:16 AM
3

Unless that nation is some nation other than the one they presently reside in.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 12:14 AM
4

I feel like 30 years should be the bare minimum; a decade for each.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 12:01 AM
12

He should now sue her for defamation.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 05:47 PM
1

I didn't vote for either of them, but when I have brought up this point, it is met with scoffing and dismissal.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 08:35 PM
2

Elections would be much more entertaining if politicians went full on kabuki garb and posing.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 08:33 PM
17

They have vaginas, what else do they need? /s
/r/MensRights12/05/18 12:07 AM
10

Generally it produces old bitter cat ladies and makes it harder for anyone to take women seriously on their own merits. Those are both harms to women.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 07:06 PM
3

Welcome back Victoria.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 07:41 PM
11

I have a notion that this is how they were tricked into believing feminism in the first place. Basically, feminist post their feminist "facts" and people come to believe them and thus side with feminists, because there is no competing information.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 06:25 PM
6

Obvious who the "true believer" in feminism is. Though unrelated to this sub, the following one on illegal immigration was also interesting.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 06:07 PM
1

What is "family conflict"? I can construe that to mean at least two or three relatively different things, which is not explained by the abstract.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 10:43 PM
2

This is true.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:48 PM
2

That sort of proves it's a religion.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 10:20 PM
2

It is completely ok for things to be anti-feminist. It is unfortunate that most people aren't sufficiently perspicacious to distinguish that from misogyny.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 10:06 PM
1

There was a study that showed that most people (I don't recall the percent, but I think it was around 70%) perceive equality as misogyny, and only perceive positive (e.g. favorable) sexism towards women as acceptable.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 03:17 AM
2

did you mean your second to last point to say men, rather than women?
/r/MensRights03/05/18 03:15 AM
2

Feminism is the Patriarchy.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 06:52 PM
3

I honestly haven't had any direct interactions with them (that I know of or in that respect), and only know what other people say about them, which on average I am disinclined to trust, because it's usually stated by someone who is incapable of distinguishing different groups.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 07:32 PM
3

All women are suddenly exiled to poorly constructed mud huts in the middle of nowhere...
/r/MensRights30/04/18 06:43 PM
4

No.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 06:23 PM
1

Ok, now that I've interpreted this, he didn't actually answer the question, but that isn't "mansplaining" either.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 05:54 PM
2

You have a way with words. Today's lucky numbers are 58462387
/r/MensRights30/04/18 05:50 PM
3

The second bombed point implies that someone could simultaneously be common law married to multiple people at once. Actually, it necessitates it.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 03:27 PM
3

Shouldn't student loan debt already be cancelled for anyone who is permanently disabled?
/r/MensRights28/04/18 09:13 PM
18

Eh, it can be the "manager". It's dependent on the organizational structure itself.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 04:52 PM
1

Ah, there was a scroll-bar interior to the page, way at the bottom.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 09:44 PM
2

That's not what sexism means.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 07:46 PM
2

First, she is wrong. In fact, if you are a feminist, you're probably a sexist. Second, she is obviously sexist, and you should probably report her through some official channel.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 07:44 PM
1

Formatting makes it unreadable in that archive.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 11:20 PM
1

true LOL.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 02:03 AM
1

Yes. Though I know of no evidence to suggest this has occurred.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 02:01 AM
15

I would like to point out that both of them are culturally appropriating their outfits from American culture that was made by white people. The Asian girl in particular is appropriating goth culture, which is by really really white people.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 05:04 AM
9

"Shut the FUCK Up." Quoteth Big Red.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 11:11 PM
1

o.O
/r/MensRights18/04/18 06:14 PM
1

Not sure who Bailey Jay is, but, as a gay man, I'd do Buck Angel.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 04:37 PM
1

That site has cancer.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 06:55 AM
5

Given the weird way in which feminists cozy up to islamists, I wouldn't be too surprised.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 06:53 AM
3

I'm thinking that if they didn't allow it for men, then those men could point at this women only thing and sue on account of it, which would result in either the men only thing allowed, or the women only thing abolished, win-win either way.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 06:52 AM
2

Are you arguing that the judiciary is not part of the state?
/r/MensRights12/04/18 06:51 AM
5

They won't feel safe ever, even if all men were to disappear. They would then feel unsafe because there were no men to protect them.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 06:49 AM
1

A similar things seems to have happened with /r/mensrights.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 11:48 PM
0

This tells me that France and Germany have more standardized jobs between companies.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 09:16 PM
3

I DU SAD
/r/MensRights11/04/18 06:32 AM
1

What are the links based on? Also, what is KotakuInAction? I've heard this name before, but I have no idea what the sub is about.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 07:02 AM
8

There is now. Maybe they shouldn't lie so much if they want to be believed. To be fair, obviously the ones telling the truth can't help that so many others lied, but really, feminism encouraged them to lie, so feminists can't scream bloody murder when it undercuts the actual helping of women.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 06:30 AM
6

Marriage is basically an agreement to have children and care for them. This seems to have been tossed out the window some time ago, but society hasn't really dealt with that very well yet.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 06:22 AM
5

I assume there was a /s invisibly there.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 08:14 PM
2

I guess the use of the word "cuck-boy" dramatically lowers how seriously I'm likely to take this video instantaneously. I'm not saying he doesn't have perfectly good and valid points, but my desire to sit through the video basically flies out the window. Evidently, this is some kind of terminology that is used by people on the right, and I'd rather it not be specifically associated with the MRM. As a liberal, I'm frequently baffled when SJW's of various stripes speak in such a way that they assu…
/r/MensRights02/04/18 05:44 AM
17

Right, so we're making up for their lack of math by letting them do things that require math, without it. Yeah.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 03:12 AM
120

I feel like this basically says "math is too hard for women". I thought we were trying to get away from that.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 01:44 AM
1

It is amazing how many times her quote was brushed off as nothing when I mentioned it.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 12:59 AM
2

I like how you said "woking more hours". Too much woke.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 03:08 AM
2

In a country of 300+ million people, there aren't enough people that engage in school shootings to be statistically significant with regard to any demographic, nor to note any pattern between the specific shooters. Obviously, they all got issues, but those tend to be variable.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 11:54 PM
1

Like, because the woman randomly decided it, for instance.
/r/MensRights21/03/18 11:28 PM
3

Wasn't that the premise of Bosom Buddies?
/r/MensRights18/03/18 02:20 AM
3

In fact, they do.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 01:00 AM
1

First thing "inappropriately" is an entirely arbitrary thing. It's also highly situational. Almost anything that is "inappropriate" in one situation might be totally acceptable or appropriate in other situations (different actors and or setting, different established relationships between parties). It might also be perceived as appropriate or inappropriate by different parties that are involved in the same event, and without explicit and previously defined and agreed upon categories of what acti…
/r/MensRights13/03/18 05:23 AM
2

That actually defeats the point of diversity.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 04:18 AM
5

I am now this as well.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 07:01 PM
3

You should have said "see, it is actually you who are sexist."
/r/MensRights09/03/18 01:55 PM
1

Your point is actually irrelevant.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 01:16 AM
1

It isn't the emotional labor that is lacking there.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 02:00 AM
5

In the US, multiculturalism and diversity are just leftist doghwhistles for "give stuff to black people and/or women".
/r/MensRights05/03/18 01:44 PM
8

Yeah, that was a paradoxical windfall. I gather she's probably horrid for education generally, but she has done that one rather crucial thing correctly.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 01:39 PM
2

Is Smurfweight the one that got offended?
/r/MensRights02/03/18 01:08 AM
3

They only get more raises in aggregate simply because there are way more men working for the BBC. Clearly the work of the Patriarchy! /s
/r/MensRights02/03/18 12:46 AM
2

The actual colors are neither black and blue, nor white and gold, they are blue and gold. It may be argued that they are some other set of colors that appear that way due to lighting, but the colors in the photograph itself are blue (specifically several light tints of blue) and gold (being a brownish yellow). Interestingly, if you consider this in terms of additive color mixing, it is black and blue and white and gold.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 01:37 AM
1

TBH, most of the Bill of Rights are based on principles, whereas the second amendment is more of an historical artifact of how our country was won.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 03:07 AM
4

To paraphrase "it has been arguably wrong this one way, I can't wait for it to be arguably wrong in this opposite way." Feminism in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 03:02 AM
2

Gee, how magnanimous of her.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 03:00 AM
1

Feminism is inherently antithetical to men's rights. Consequently, it is entirely necessary to criticize feminism in pursuit of men's rights. As long as it exists, nothing remotely resembling equality can come about.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 01:35 AM
2

Number six should probably randomly include islamophobic, just cuz.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 01:25 AM
5

This is why we should do away with capital punishment.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 02:05 PM
11

Wow, that is a huge pile of SJW nonsense.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 02:23 AM
1

I'm looking at those and it's all "I'm not x level quality of body, but I like looking at x level quality". Isn't that just true for everyone? Thing is, if you have X-1 quality of body, you're going to have to settle for partners at the same level.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 06:49 PM
2

I played with MOTU and Transformers, and made clothing out of socks for my Sectaur characters. Full disclosure, am gay.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 09:12 PM
1

"Only an ocean away."
/r/MensRights16/02/18 03:49 AM
5

And if it is not, this will give them a chance to reconsider.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 03:47 AM
1

Well, duh, but try telling them that.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 03:34 AM
1

Whoa, I didn't catch that part. Yeah, that's silly. Assuming functional equality, you would expect even numbers of differing groups, which would mathematically reduce the number from 59%.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 02:19 PM
1

Maybe, just maybe, people hired under gender quotas in the first place aren't as competent as people hired for merit. I don't know if it will "even the field" but for a true test, they'll probably have to enact that hiring mode at all levels of an organization (or maybe all related organizations) for long enough to dissipate the effect of diversity hires. From the other side of this equation, even meritorious women and minorities have probably already been consciously or unconsciously leaning on…
/r/MensRights15/02/18 02:13 PM
1

Especially as it is is a grotesque conjunction of a Latin derived and Germanic derived word.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 01:18 AM
1

Etymology Smackdown!
/r/MensRights14/02/18 01:16 AM
2

That's basically what happened.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 01:06 AM
2

Well, if you look at Tolkien, he uses men to mean humans, in contrast to elves and dwarves and so forth.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 02:38 PM
3

Sounds like the Patriarchy is in your head.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 02:37 PM
1

We come from the land of the ice and snow?
/r/MensRights13/02/18 02:35 PM
3

And also prevent you from producing grandchildren.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 03:24 AM
4

Unfortunately, he probably wouldn't stay alive very long after you cut his legs off.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 03:23 AM
2

Granting prudishness about children and nudity for the moment, why the fuck would it matter if elderly people were around? Just to prevent them clucking?
/r/MensRights13/02/18 01:04 AM
14

I just really don't get in what concept of the world this seems like a good idea.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 06:38 PM
2

She reminds me of Betty Bowers, who basically does the same thing, but about religion.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 03:55 AM
1

"Man" is variably gender neutral, and specifically so in the use of "Mankind".
/r/MensRights06/02/18 01:23 AM
3

Ok, she can die now.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 02:03 AM
5

It's weird how feminists are quite steadily denying women the power of their sexuality.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 04:57 AM
3

Yes, people who deny facts do not understand evolution.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 04:34 AM
2

Clearly this is rape, and we should start a movement about it with a catchy hashtag.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 02:17 AM
7

"I could have said no, but because I didn't, it's rape." WTF?!?
/r/MensRights30/01/18 02:05 AM
2

One supposes they have not perused the Supreme Law of the Land.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 02:13 AM
-1

Much like religion generally.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 01:45 AM
5

And this seems to apply for the majority of the recent public metoo complaints.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 01:46 PM
3

Wow, I'm finally watching the whole interview, and she is a complete cunt. She continually interrupts him, puts words in his mouth, and dishonestly misconstrues pretty much every thing he says. They reference "radical feminism" as if it is some thing off over there, but she's basically a perfect example of it. She has no interest in actually learning anything from the conversation at all.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 09:19 PM
3

Assuming there are people in the future.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 08:31 PM
1

This is ridiculous. Science isn't "cultural" and Bill Nye is more or less wrong. The legal question, however, is pointed. It is hilarious that at one point he says "how do we determine who is more victimized", which is of course the central issue of SJWism.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 01:40 PM
3

Not Victorian: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agatha_Christie
/r/MensRights14/01/18 12:17 AM
2

Actually, insofar as the MRM is, in principle, a fact based movement with the aim of changing the status quo to improve society by promoting rights, it is a liberal movement. Don't confuse this with being tribally leftist.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 10:01 PM
1

At the point where "this guy groped me" is a career ending pronouncement, you've already gone an order of magnitude overboard.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 12:48 AM
1

And perhaps because the environment we work in requires quite a bit of diplomatic skills; scores of people that you cannot rub the wrong way. This leaped out to me. The funny thing is, the people that you "cannot rub the wrong way" are way more likely to be women to begin with. So adding more women just statistically exacerbates this particular problem. Similarly, women are a lot sneakier when they "cause problems". This falls under the rubric of diplomacy, but it doesn't mean they don't cause p…
/r/MensRights09/01/18 01:52 PM
5

"Objectivity is oppressing women!"
/r/MensRights06/01/18 03:06 AM
1

Well, no I didn't, and in fact, I was more commenting on how Hocks is probably going to kill Kylo later. I guess given the context of the thread I did, and I read your invisible /s.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 10:32 PM
7

Or, you know, looking at someone funny.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 08:19 PM
0

I'm gonna have to say that feminists do not value responsibilities.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 01:31 AM
2

Wow, that's disgusting, but kind of what I've come to expect from Sweden. Hopefully they'll get over it.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 02:56 AM
2

Wow, that's disgusting, but kind of what I've come to expect from Sweden. Hopefully they'll get over it.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 02:56 AM
1

I liked about half the movie.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 02:45 AM
5

I am ambivalent about Leia's Force maneuver. Somehow it could have been done more subtly, like her calling someone mentally instead of TKing herself through space.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 02:45 AM
2

Well, there is a subtext between Kylo and Admiral Constipation.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 02:42 AM
11

Well, if this was any example, you aren't going to see any good scifi about women either.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 02:40 AM
4

I mean, if we're judging it on how good it shows female leaders to be, it's pretty terrible, because they virtually obliterated the remains of the Resistance, especially the purple haired twat that only almost made up for it with her final maneuver.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 02:37 AM
2

You aren't mathing correctly. That would require killing 48 in a hundred female customers.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 03:18 AM
10

Yeah, it would be funny if a dude got explicit consent from a gal, had sex with her, and then sued her for rape because he didn't provide said explicit consent.
/r/MensRights24/12/17 03:10 AM
0

Because most of them are heterosexual, which I am not.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 04:50 AM
1

Yes, actually they kind of do. (I don't know who Jyn is).
/r/MensRights21/12/17 04:24 AM
4

I don't disagree. It's obstruction of justice, which is just as severe, if not more than misusing law enforcement to hurt someone else. I mean, if I were supreme legislator, I wouldn't have much problem making a generic law requiring equivalent penalties for any bad faith effort to put legal penalties on another person. I'm actually understanding why they had that law on Litigara on Farscape, except that I would pretty much only apply it to contributions to the prosecution of a case.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 07:27 PM
2

As far as I can tell, Feminism is the only thing perpetuating "simplified definitions of [masculinity]", much in the way Feminism generally kind of does all the things attributed to "Patriarchy".
/r/MensRights14/12/17 12:51 AM
3

Which unfortunately does not speak well for them.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 01:47 PM
2

TBH, Star Wars is also completely infected with SJWism at this point as well.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 01:46 PM
1

I'm going to have to disagree with that. Bosoms are almost completely uninteresting.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 04:49 AM
1

Are you asserting that the woman in the comic is hot?
/r/MensRights11/12/17 02:39 PM
3

I especially appreciate the evil lighting in the second to last cell.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 01:12 AM
1

Like rather a lot of words, it depends on context.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 03:35 AM
3

That is entirely un-American.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 03:05 AM
1

Geez, what happened in January of 2016? I don't recall.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 02:27 AM
3

The world is just insane. But if feminists are going to turn up the volume of ridiculousness to 20, women should be held to the same standard. Only when they are subject to equal treatment will they understand how ridiculous the whole thing is.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 12:50 AM
6

It is a derivation of whore, and could mean either a literal whore (prostitute) or someone who has as much sex as a whore (e.g. a slut).
/r/MensRights21/11/17 05:40 AM
2

Wow, that's straight up misandry and sexism.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 01:35 AM
1

won, not one.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 01:24 AM
1

She essentially destroyed his life. That is murder.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 04:41 AM
45

Wow, she just gets worse all the time.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 03:54 AM
9

Michelle Obama has no sons, and thus cannot speak.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 02:30 AM
1

If you recall the song Welcome Back Victoria, that time has now arrived.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 08:15 PM
1

I found the poster in some other thread on reddit.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 01:22 AM
2

We are witnessing this era's McCarthyism.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 01:27 AM
1

That just makes it prostitution.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 01:03 AM
1

It's just prostitution, in a very literal sense.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 12:49 AM
13

Can't it just say "Restroom"?
/r/MensRights02/11/17 03:55 AM
8

By all evidence, yes. Most of the things that actually exist (as opposed to the Wage Gap, for example) that are blamed on "The Patriarchy" were implemented by feminism.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 01:22 AM
3

Enlighten us.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 02:04 AM
11

Actually, this is a particular standard cognitive bias, well almost fundamental attribution error.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 02:55 AM
11

Probably because it's kind of a mixed message.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 12:45 PM
3

I have literally never witnessed cat-calling in my life outside of a movie or television show.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 08:21 PM
12

That phrase no longer means anything other than "You don't drink my brand of koolaid."
/r/MensRights22/10/17 07:49 PM
1

That's a really good way to dissuade someone from doing a project.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 01:40 AM
3

Was she a Nigerian Princess?
/r/MensRights16/10/17 11:56 PM
1

OMFG, what a spoiled cunt.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 04:45 AM
2

This is just spin, and isn't particularly more intellectually honest than most of the crap that flies around about this sort of thing.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 05:19 PM
1

I think part of the issue is that there isn't necessarily a lot of agreement about what sexual assault is, and I partly think this is a generational thing. I've specifically noticed that just in the past twenty years (though it was probably an ongoing trend before that), there has been an increasing push to label all sexual behaviours at all as sexual assault, which is completely nonsensical. We live in a weird leftist victorian age.
/r/MensRights14/10/17 03:16 AM
1

Calling yourself an X, where X have established behaviours and beliefs, is implicit support of the behaviours and beliefs of X. Morality is based on actions, and supporting a horribly thing is morally horrible.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:35 AM
14

While I think boy scouts should remain boys only (and girl scouts girls only), my personal experience is that they were assholes, including the scout leader.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 01:07 PM
15

Well, realistically, I would encourage him to leave the relationship.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 01:04 PM
0

If you self identify as a feminist, then you support a lot of horrible things, and are ipso facto a horrible person.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 12:05 AM
27

What's sick is the concept that the Dad should let his child run around in a dirty diaper because he's male.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 03:13 AM
1

A person that believes any of the foundations of feminism doesn't value truth, reason and facts, ipso facto, disqualified.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 12:51 PM
15

Wow. That is completely ridiculous.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 05:42 AM
8

If she fucking stabbed someone, it fucking well should.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 12:26 AM
33

As a child that was forced into this arrangement, fuck you.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 01:02 PM
1

OMG, could she possibly be more petty.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 04:23 AM
1

Wow.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 01:22 AM
2

I mean, all of her claims are false.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 03:46 AM
1

Yeah, I was thinking she did most of the talking and we didn't hear so much about his views or situation.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 11:49 PM
8

There are so many movies that unless you're boycotting all of the top 50 actors, there's always something to watch. However, the DC movies aren't doing great to begin with, so they really don't need to be associated with a rabid sexist, and I don't really need to watch them.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 03:48 AM
5

Well, I don't ever need to see any movie with her in it.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 01:30 AM
1

Good bot
/r/MensRights08/09/17 12:32 AM
1

No, sperm and ova can be elicited from skin cells of either sex.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 02:39 AM
1

I'm not sure who the MSM is, but the analogy is useful in some situations.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 12:22 AM
1

Here is a bowl of M&Ms. 5% of them are poisoned. How many do you eat?
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:57 AM
1

Here is a bowl of M&Ms. 5% of them are poisoned. How many do you eat?
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:57 AM
1

I personally did not ever love this term.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:43 AM
1

good bot
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:40 AM
1

That technology already exists.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 03:46 AM
2

His legs are straight forward. HTF can you call that "spreading" of any kind.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 12:22 AM
1

I did not ever love this term; I have very little opinion about Comey, and I was very disappointed in Obama's continued use of drones.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 12:05 AM
1

But the term fake news is also applied to real news that the speaker doesn't like.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 11:55 PM
71

Can we please never use the term "fake news". "Propaganda" will suffice.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 12:43 PM
0

You clearly have no idea what I'm talking about, and hence none about what you're talking about either.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 02:29 AM
1

My statement about conservatism isn't how they align, it is about how they approach and implement their ideology.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 02:29 AM
0

This is yet another indicator that feminism is both conservative and a supremacy movement.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 12:36 PM
1

Thank you, I've added Intro to Algorithms (3rd ed) to my Amazon wishlist.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 09:45 PM
1

Well, they're not European in culture, but insofar as cultures can be said to be "caucasian" (what you're looking for here is Indo-European), they definitely are. Much moreso than they are Asian.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 09:41 PM
2

But Feminism is about equality.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 09:17 PM
3

A somewhat aside. I've got logic down, and I'm learning to code. Do you have a suggestion of a book on "computational and computer science theory"?
/r/MensRights27/08/17 07:38 PM
1

Eh, basically, she's wanting to push the "diversity" impetus back a step. As a guy, I was never pushed, suggested, or expected to enter a STEM major, and I wish I had been, because I'd probably be better off. Now I see that she's wanting to push women into this field, who may not be better off (in the sense of life satisfaction), and this makes my blood boil just as much as diversity hires. I agree that it is a more reasonable tactic than diversity hires, becase I think that giving everyone all …
/r/MensRights27/08/17 07:34 PM
8

I'm pretty sure Asians means east-asians, previously refered to as "mongoloid". Indians are largely Caucasian in origin.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 07:20 PM
4

It is a little freaky how white basically fits a bell curve there, and the other racial profiles completely don't, or else they're radically shifted.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 07:19 PM
2

As a gay man, I can assure you that being fucked in the ass isn't anywhere near as bad as having the entire world turn against you and being thrown unjustly into prison.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 11:38 PM
2

She looks like she hasn't gotten over the fact that she isn't 20 any more.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 03:43 AM
3

If that lying enacts the ruination of someone's life, it is at least as bad as sexual violence.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 12:50 PM
1

I really hope you just forgot this: /s
/r/MensRights20/08/17 08:38 PM
1

Broken clocks are right twice a day.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 08:16 PM
1

The green text is super hard to read. This whole graphic needs more and better design consideration.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 05:26 PM
15

I think it's some of both. The vocal and leader types are deliberately deceiving, or making dishonest assumptions based on feminist theory. Then there are a whole bunch of other people who just believe them just because.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 02:34 AM
2

Translation: That's just like, your opinion, man.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 03:22 AM
8

Propaganda.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 03:05 AM
12

Tell Muslim men not to rape and you're an Islamophobe.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 02:23 AM
1

That's the joke.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 07:02 PM
54

Well, as you know, ISIS is muslim, and therefore sacrosanct to SJWs.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 03:24 AM
1

I agree that he is pandering and that he is less SJW than Hillary. However, when it comes to dealing with situations, the actual number of people in a situation is considerably more relevant than the percentage of them compared to some arbitrary category is. I mean, those are actual people, not a statistic.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 12:37 AM
7

Yeah, they've only had the right to vote without being drafted for like a hundred years or so.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 05:50 PM
9

Clearly the author didn't actually read the memo.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 06:00 AM
5

That's still ridiculous and you should sue the fuck out of them.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 02:04 AM
1

Except, you know, reddit.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 12:44 PM
1

Since women were given suffrage without any corresponding responsibility (like men have), it really was more of a supremacist position.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 12:42 PM
1

Well, yeah.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 03:31 AM
3

In the western world most families have one bread winner that works excessively and one person who concentrates on the family and works very little. That's just utter bullshit and isn't remotely true.
/r/MensRights06/08/17 11:17 PM
1

Define "inappropriate".
/r/MensRights03/08/17 12:07 AM
7

Everyone has these problems. Why would they consider this gendered?
/r/MensRights31/07/17 04:13 AM
2

My question was actually a question, as I've never watched the show.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 09:26 PM
1

They did. It was called Ghostbusters.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 05:34 PM
3

It is interesting and cool to see such a wide variety of women saying this.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 10:14 PM
43

Perhaps he should turn around and sue the mother for fraud for that same amount, plus lawyer's fees, pain and suffering, of course.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 01:03 PM
1

That's the joke?
/r/MensRights27/07/17 12:49 PM
11

I'm bored of feminists projecting.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 04:19 AM
1

You know which of those qualities is legit? Economically privileged. You know that thing that most feminists have.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 12:56 AM
1

Which does not include children.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 12:27 AM
3

This makes me wonder how those stats they cited have changed in the last 4 years.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 12:11 AM
3

That might be a little too TLDR'd.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 07:04 PM
2

Well, the thing you bolded in the quote is actually hugely relevant, its just that that itself is a symptom of wonky policies and poorly thought out social movements.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 05:44 PM
4

yeesh, a feminist review that is more than half the length of the movie? Can we get a TLDR?
/r/MensRights22/07/17 05:35 PM
1

No, the defining factor it that it is only available to an explicit and exclusive group. Privilege means Private Law, where it comes from is entirely variable.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 03:55 AM
1

Actually, what characterizes privileges isn't so much how they are obtained, but that they apply to some exclusive and explicitly determined set of people. For example, everyone who is a member of a country club has the privileges offered by the club. It would be hard to say they were earned or granted, so much as purchased.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 01:47 AM
1

Actually, I wound up looking at several thematically related subs, and it looked like all of them dipped at that point, so I'm guessing it was eithe a reddit-wide things, or like you say some kind of gap, or perhaps re-adjustment of metrics.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 01:44 AM
2

That title is terrible.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 10:18 PM
2

What happened at the beginning of 2016?
/r/MensRights16/07/17 12:05 AM
5

I am from the south, and you are full of shit.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 11:00 PM
1

That's when you don't pay.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 10:56 PM
1

Shocking.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 08:40 PM
1

You seem to be implying that all privileges are earned and that this is a characteristic feature of privileges, and I just want to be clear that that is not so.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:31 PM
3

Not at all racist. Nope.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 02:09 AM
1

Biology for one.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 01:28 AM
1

Nah, easier to drastically change your diet.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 01:26 AM
1

And even those only circumstantially and with large assumptions support her conclusions.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 01:22 AM
1

Well, it's full of crap, for starters.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 01:19 AM
3

I though PUA's were yet another different thing? Also, the information seems relevant to them as well, regardless.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 07:38 PM
1

find some friends This is the hard part.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 04:36 PM
2

In well-to-do egalitarian countries, people tend to do what they prefer to do, which causes a split in choices of occupation along gender lines for a lot of occupations, because men and women, on average, like to do different things.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 04:31 PM
1

I don't disagree with you, and am hugely aware of how one circumstances hold one back or hold one up. However, that isn't culture, and it certainly isn't patriarchy. I has a lot more to do with socio-economic class, but even then, a lot of it just comes down to particulars, and society doesn't really give a shit about those particulars.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 04:26 PM
1

Obviously the culture is making them go against those cultural norms, because people do not have individual agency.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 04:19 PM
2

Having never really had a support network, I do not.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 04:18 PM
2

Yeah, I randomly had a semi-religious discussion with a Jewish lesbian while I was over at her place for passover (I think that was it), and eventually she said that, and I lost all respect for Judaism forever in that moment.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 05:05 AM
1

Same.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 05:02 AM
24

You know, if one of the basic tenets of your religion is to commit a crime against humanity on half its members, maybe it isn't worth anything, and should be abandoned.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 04:38 PM
3

"progressive"
/r/MensRights30/06/17 11:02 PM
1

I now have brain cancer.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 12:51 PM
-2

This is basically how the religious right got where it is.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 12:33 AM
3

You mean that they are two-faced?
/r/MensRights27/06/17 01:32 AM
4

At least partially due to portrayals in film and television, the secretary was seen as a perky female helper to the male boss. This is particularly weird, as secretaries "keepers of secrets" was originally primarily a male occupation. Then it sort of got merged with typist for a while, and now the thing that was originally called secretary is called Executive Assistant.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 03:27 PM
1

"Hollywood is run by Jews is obviously anti semetic" How so? It may be true or it may be false, but how does that make it ANTI semitic?
/r/MensRights25/06/17 03:15 PM
1

You mean completely not required to fight, entirely taken care of, and also allowed to have and manage their own property separately from all of that? Bring it on. But that's not what they want.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 01:25 AM
2

There are three ways you can conceive of what the phrase "people of color" means, all of which are racist. using it to mean "everyone who is not white" weirdly categorizes everyone who is not white as having more similar and comparable experiences to each other than with white people. This is racist because you're attributing a huge variety of people as being the same based on being "not-white". it's just at restatement of "colored people", which is regarded as at least a little bit racist, even…
/r/MensRights22/06/17 02:36 AM
3

I am extremely tempted to email this to my mother, but that would involve making contact with her, so no.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 12:06 AM
1

The problem with "person of color" is that it is inherently racist.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 11:40 PM
2

Also women are more likely to get help with it, and depression in men can manifest rather differently than for women.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 07:34 PM
4

OMG, that's attack helicopterphobic!
/r/MensRights16/06/17 11:46 PM
4

Gynocentrism is a statement about evolution, both physical and social. Patriarchy is a conspiracy theory.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 11:44 PM
14

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, Then they fight you, then you win." Mahatma Gandhi.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 12:49 PM
1

The first part of that just isn't true, so the latter part also doesn't follow.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 12:48 PM
2

That doesn't make it incorrect, as you claimed, it just makes it logically invalid.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 12:45 PM
7

Making it easier for X class of people to do a thing anywhere generally undermines the respectability of X people with that thing everywhere.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 04:53 PM
1

No on should call a woman a white? I guess not, as that is pretty much the worst insult ever, aside from man.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 10:17 PM
2

I think it would be perfectly appropriate to also go around berating and complaining about women who are "manspreading".
/r/MensRights10/06/17 03:09 AM
2

And if all of them refuse, sue them for discrimination.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 03:30 AM
3

I feel somehow this should be related to the "Women control 80% of spending" thing.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 03:30 AM
15

Oh look, hypocritical feminists. Who'd'a thunk?
/r/MensRights09/06/17 12:03 AM
1

No, she's made of clay. Like Adam from Kung-Fu.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:43 AM
2

I hear they monologue.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:43 AM
1

she is practically at the level of a God Much like Superman.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:42 AM
1

You have stated nothing in this post that leads me to believe you were subject to misogyny. Unless of course you're using the feminist definition of misogyny, i.e. being disagreed with while a woman.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 12:28 AM
0

That's some grade A willful ignorance.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 12:55 PM
13

My only regret is that I have but one upvote to give.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 03:31 AM
1

Or not. We really don't have adequate information.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 08:15 PM
1

If she is a feminist, you should break up with her immediately, for your own safety.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 08:14 PM
6

That cost the money, so u coff it up!
/r/MensRights04/06/17 07:39 PM
4

Per Wikipedia: Wonder Woman's origin story relates that she was sculpted from clay by her mother Queen Hippolyta and given life by Aphrodite.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 06:41 PM
10

Oh, this is about Wonder Woman? Funny thing is, she's technically not even human and also therefore not actually a woman. And when I say 'not human', I don't mean, 'an alien species' like Superman. I mean, she is basically a Golem.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 08:14 AM
0

Men should learn to sex their best bros instead.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 08:03 AM
3

Well, she has a vagina of course.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 08:01 AM
1

As a gay man, I'm unconvinced that they can make something that will be more interesting/useful than a slightly mechanized fleshlight and/or dildo, which already exist. It would have to be enormously realistic not to fall into the boner killing uncanny valley, and it would probably be more expensive and more trouble to maintain than a much simpler device.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 09:13 PM
12

They started this shit by demanding the vote without having to register for the fucking draft.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:47 PM
5

I know some people have complained that this course of action is petty, but really, not a single thing should be let by without a fight. That's how we got where we are to begin with.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:46 PM
2

Sort of but really it's more complex than that. Really? Do tell. They think patriarchy harms men as well. Oh. That was completely unexpected. I've never heard that. Is that the extent of "more complex"?
/r/MensRights03/06/17 03:12 AM
1

No, just about the nature of the statements.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 01:34 AM
2

Yeah, it sounds dumb that way too.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 12:52 PM
1

Islamaphobe I would point out that islamaphobia isn't something that really exists, as it implies an irrational fear of something. Islam is, in fact, quite dangerous.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 12:41 PM
15

Sonia Gupta sounds like a self-entitled twat. Also, she doesn't seem to know what "avowed" means.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 12:52 PM
2

I got to about 6 minutes and I couldn't stand any more of her insubstantial drivel. I've never seen anything she's done before, but just from this, I can tell she's a twat, a bit of an idiot, and all around overly emotional. If she still calls herself a feminist and an SJW after being bullied by those very people for slightly saying something that someone misconstrued, there isn't any hope that she's not completely stupid.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 02:04 AM
2

I was hoping Wonder Woman would be a tolerable movie, but now I have doubts.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 05:45 PM
2

Yeah, it's funny that you can always tell they're full of shit when they accuse us of complaining of "reverse" sexism, because that isn't really a term we use over here.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 08:32 PM
1

Actually, it depends on which language you are sourcing. Homo in Latin does mean man, in the sense of person/human. Homo- in Greek means "the same". This gives us hilarious classic language puns such as: Deus homo factus est! Which is Latin for God is made man, and is part of a Christmas song, but can humorously be taken to mean God is made gay.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 08:26 PM
1

I don't think you know what "define" means.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 08:24 PM
-2

So then he makes an assumptive and very narrow claim about socialism, and basically relieves himself of any credibility, destroying his entire narrative.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 06:05 PM
2

You are the hero the galaxy needs right now.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 05:07 PM
2

No, your second paragraph says it happened later. It was already the case before feminists came along.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 05:01 PM
5

Men used to have complete control of their wifes finances Actually, they did not. They had no right to their wives finances, but were responsible to pay for everything for their wives, including taxes on that money that they didn't have a right to have information about.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 07:31 AM
5

Shockingly, they are also about 2/3 of the current college population.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 11:52 PM
1

No, that's like saying "The KKK cares about black people, too!"
/r/MensRights24/05/17 01:55 AM
2

It does if the word "feminism" is attached to it.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 05:12 PM
2

Yet you're tacitly endorsing misandry by calling yourself a feminist.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 05:12 PM
26

Old concept... Matrix. SMH. 'Twas only last year (so it seems).
/r/MensRights21/05/17 05:10 PM
1

Uh, actually there's a more valid scientific name for this, which I can unfortunately not recall, but I think it pertains to body dysmorphia.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 07:14 AM
7

"When everything is misogynist, Nothing is."
/r/MensRights21/05/17 07:08 AM
1

To be sure, it is disproportionately affecting them. They are affected way less than they should be.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 03:43 AM
3

Upvote for clever euphemism.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 03:04 AM
1

JackieChanMeme
/r/MensRights21/05/17 03:00 AM
33

"Men notoriously don't seek help" Because they don't get it when they do. "The American Association of Suicidology is also trying to push for more education requirements that would ensure mental health clinicians are trained to recognize warning signs." This is not a bad thing. But what is a bad thing is that no one cares about the problems men (or really any demographic) face that lead up to that point. If you're only treating something when it becomes a crisis, you're just slapping a band-aid …
/r/MensRights20/05/17 05:11 PM
1

Progressivism (social collectivism So, really, this thread is the first time I've encountered that specific association. Is there historical use of it that way, or is it just being called that now due to SJWs and such?
/r/MensRights20/05/17 04:59 PM
1

I'm not actually discussing a claim, I'm discussing logic.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 02:45 AM
2

You cannot be a feminist without also being a sexist. Or completely deluded.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 01:58 AM
1

But Womyn are strong and independent and don't need no man?
/r/MensRights17/05/17 02:24 AM
1

Feminism and sexism are different. Correct. Feminism is merely a subset of sexism.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 12:11 AM
1

oooooh. Also Okrent's law and argument to moderation.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 03:39 AM
1

Hyperbole, assumption, speculation, baseless assertion, lie. In that order.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 03:36 AM
0

No. I have a similar level of experience in those subjects, excepting Marxism. But my original point is that western religions tend to devalue the importance and dignity of individuals, whether they directly say so or not. Frankly your blatherings about philosophy and Marxism are irrelevant to the subject at hand.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 03:32 AM
1

NOOOO, you must be a victim if we say you were! </every feminist everywhere>
/r/MensRights16/05/17 03:01 AM
6

The MRM is not inherently anti-women, but feminism is pretty much and has pretty much always been anti-man.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 02:49 AM
1

You are correct, I am mis-using equivocation. Now I need to find out what word means this situation that already exists. However, equivocation would be great.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 02:47 AM
8

There is no "actual feminism of equality".
/r/MensRights16/05/17 12:29 AM
9

Feminism is inherently anti-men. You can't simultaneously be pro- and anti- something.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 12:28 AM
1

The word that she does not know is equivocation.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 12:26 AM
3

Wow, what a cunt!
/r/MensRights16/05/17 12:25 AM
3

Personally, I also hate "both sidesism" too. We already have a word for that, equivocation. Feminism is far and away more terrible than the MRM could ever aspire to be.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 12:21 AM
16

Switch genders and you have Milo being accused of supporting pedophilia because he was ok with being fucked by a priest as a teenager.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 11:19 PM
1

Ugh, I just read an article from the Guardian. It's irritating how they start out reporting "just the facts" and then half-way through start editorializing about what the film presented and how.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 05:04 PM
5

"Feminism helps men, too!"
/r/MensRights13/05/17 09:34 PM
-5

Pretty much all of what you said was true a hundred years ago, but is not now.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 09:21 PM
1

I don't think it is proper or useful to cast moral issues as contractual issues.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 09:15 PM
-1

Indeed, it is fundamentally inconsistent with most religious ideologies because it devalues the importance and dignity of individuals. So you are unfamiliar with any world religions? Because they pretty much all devalue the importance and dignity of individuals.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 08:38 PM
1

Let me be clear. I don't think the "Alt-Right" is a thing that anyone calls themselves. I think it is a slur that regressive leftists devised. Similarly, I think the things you mention, and the association of "red-pill" with "alt-right" is also just a regressive left slur tactic.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 08:31 PM
10

It is easy to lose sight of the fact that basis of the feminist mindset is fundamentally different than the standard mindset in the western world It actually isn't. This is pretty standard modality for religionists of all stripes.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 06:05 PM
1

Apart from which, you can tell it doesn't say such a thing, because, while feminist messages tend to be couched in such language, MRA statements generally are not.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 07:02 AM
3

The funny thing is, after hearing them throw these accusations against the MRM, and me knowing first hand they are false, they kinda rang/ring really hollow when thrown against pretty much anyone else, and I'm inclined to disregard them. Essentially the lesson of the boy who cried wolf, and they're crying an awful lot of wolf.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 07:00 AM
3

Yeah, I constantly find it weird that feminists and SJWs try to paint it as a left vs. right sort of thing. Feminism may be associated with the left, but they aren't remotely liberal. And on the opposite side, while I won't claim it is a liberal movement, the MRM at least respects actual liberal values like free speech.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 06:57 AM
5

"If Cassie Jaye and Paul Elam have the right to make a bad film that glorifies elements of the men’s rights movement, then protestors have the right to explain why their arguments are wrong." Well, it is incumbent on them to first know what those arguments are, which they are hide bound and determined not to do.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 06:53 AM
14

I wouldn't say it is accurate to say that 'red pill' has been co-opted by the "alt-right".
/r/MensRights12/05/17 05:11 AM
1

No.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 01:20 AM
3

And these are the same symptoms of leaving any cult/religion.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 12:36 AM
1

"I think mutilation is horrible! Now I will redefine mutilation as not mutilation."
/r/MensRights09/05/17 11:56 PM
32

No. They shouldn't get any kind of choice. They should be sent to an adult prison for sexual assault and have their lives ruined. That is what would happen to a boy that was merely accused of doing this.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 11:48 PM
1

I actually didn't even realize I was posting on a Men's Right subreddit until after I saw all the women hate stuff Please point out this "women hate stuff". That is a very common accusation leveled at the MRM, but not one I, a frequent reader, have actually observed. The rest of your post becomes increasingly garbage-like as it advances.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 01:41 AM
1

Eh maybe. I'm not really sure that responsibilities can precede rights in an ontological sense.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 12:37 AM
2

biology.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 03:56 AM
2

I love that the google usage example of misandry is "her brand of feminism is just poorly disguised misandry".
/r/MensRights08/05/17 03:54 AM
14

“first they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win”
/r/MensRights06/05/17 04:30 PM
14

While still demonizing them.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 04:27 PM
7

Let's use the word 'responsibilities'.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 04:03 PM
3

I don't have 1.5 hours of my life to waste watching this. Can you TLDR?
/r/MensRights06/05/17 04:00 PM
3

Sounds like some kind of HAES propaganda.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 03:55 PM
178

How is that different from saying you're a sinner because Jeebus said "don't be gay, m'kay".
/r/MensRights04/05/17 04:07 AM
1

I'm gathering at this point that you are probably a troll, but I'll attempt an answer for the benefit of other readers. 1) women aren't required to register for selective service. 2) women are largely the beneficiary of systems, particularly welfare, alimony and child support, that are largely paid for by men. 3) A woman can ruin a man's life by claiming he raped her without providing a shred of evidence and suffer zero consequences. 4) women aren't expected to be providers in a relationship.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 12:42 AM
1

It is literally impossible (by which I do not mean figuratively) to care a lot about thousands of causes.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 12:36 AM
9

"You're literally raping me by saying this."
/r/MensRights02/05/17 01:02 PM
5

So what you're saying is, feminism isn't important enough for real feminists to do anything about, but it is important enough for radical not-real feminists to do something about. But they're not the "real" feminists, even though they're out there calling themselves feminists and doing things in the name of feminism and saying what feminism is, but you're too busy going to your bake sale or whatever? Uh-huh.
/r/MensRights01/05/17 04:42 AM
5

Women presently have more rights than men (in the US, at least), and fewer responsibilities. The mere fact that their responsibilities aren't equal to their rights is oppressive to everyone who is not a woman, who consequently have more responsibilities than rights, and may in some sense be deemed a slave class.
/r/MensRights01/05/17 04:37 AM
12

Plus everyone knows that North Korea lies and just because they say it and got it printed doesn't mean it's true because we know the true definition of democrat. This is also true of feminists.
/r/MensRights01/05/17 04:34 AM
2

Trying to run someone over with a car is assault with a deadly weapon.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 11:30 PM
17

A fist generally is not a deadly weapon without lots of specific training. A mobile car always is.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 04:01 PM
14

She basically just said all men in college are rapists.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 01:05 AM
8

and was unsure how to go about grading the paper in an objective and fair way. Then she shouldn't be a teacher.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 01:01 AM
1

Yes, and no.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 01:00 AM
7

I already bought it, but I haven't watched it, because I probably know 95% of what's on it, and it will just make me angry.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 11:53 PM
2

Uh, Welcome Back Victoria?
/r/MensRights24/04/17 12:56 PM
1

I've pretty much only ever seen people referring to other people using this term. I can't recall that I've actually seen it used.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 12:33 PM
8

That's because it is a religion.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 06:48 PM
1

I thought only the Patriarchy(TM) insisted that women are nurturing.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 12:32 PM
1

I'm not going to praise Kipling or anything, but saying he has written a recipe for mediocrity and that he is mediocre aren't the same thing.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 01:52 AM
1

Er. That's what families are for. If you don't want to start a family, don't start a family. Your argument seems to rest on women lacking agency, which is misogynist.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 01:41 AM
9

This is an enormous amount of projecting.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 02:50 AM
1

Believing in male privilege is not moderate.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 06:32 PM
30

Well, he's probably a feminist and that is a thing with them.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 06:14 PM
3

I don't think you're using the term 'gaslights' correctly.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 06:12 PM
5

Do you honestly believe that women can't work while pregnant? I have a cat. Many moons ago, he had an infection on his rear paw. The first vet I saw was a pregnant woman, who of course wouldn't even touch the cat, because pregnant women shouldn't come in contact with cats for medical reasons. So her performance was sub-par, and it wound up costing me, who is a poor schmo, hundreds of dollars more than if she had done her fucking job in the first place. Which she couldn't do, because she was preg…
/r/MensRights16/04/17 04:06 PM
5

Insofar as feminism is inherently anti-men's rights, which it is, Men's rights are indeed anti-feminist rights.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 04:00 PM
1

Yeah they do. My stepmother stopped working to have a kid. 1. Kid. Didn't work for at least five years, and never completely rejoined the workforce after that.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 03:59 PM
14

Insofar as it screams "I am a social justice nutball and will sue the first person that looks at me funny", yes. It is perfectly permissible to judge people for their actions, which you are suggesting it is not.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 03:56 PM
2

Well, if you look at the history of feminist statements, they are.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 03:55 PM
6

uh, Matriarchy hurts women too?
/r/MensRights16/04/17 03:52 PM
8

Society in industrialized nations is implicitly feminist in this day and age. It can no longer be complained that "Society" is pressuring women to do shit. What is pressuring women to make these choices is their own biological urges and desire for "life/work balance".
/r/MensRights16/04/17 03:46 PM
1

sounds like a recipe for mediocrity
/r/MensRights12/04/17 12:36 PM
2

That's slander and extortion right there. Clerk should be in jail.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 04:27 PM
30

I hope he sues the fuck out of them for millions of dollars for defamation of character and slander.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 04:23 PM
5

Threatening false rape accusations IS threatening violence.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 07:58 AM
1

Seriously, that would exclude us attack-helicopter-kin.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 01:02 AM
1

Women consider mansplaining as a condescending or patronizing way of a man explaining something to women. This requires a huge and unfounded assumption on their part if the content of the explanation doesn't explicitly express it.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 04:20 AM
5

Which is why there was a huge separation of spheres between men and women as little as a hundred years ago. Feminists, you are the conservatives.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 06:10 PM
1

You dropped this "/s"
/r/MensRights02/04/17 05:49 PM
3

Can someone summarize? I don't have a random hour available to watch this.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 05:47 PM
6

"Women have always been the primary victims of war!"
/r/MensRights31/03/17 12:29 PM
5

Well, no, that's evolution, because it is necessary for men to orgasm (or at least ejaculate, which are most often simultaneous) to reproduce. It does not require women to do so.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 03:15 AM
2

How very ironic for them to label us as reactionary.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 01:15 AM
1

A step father is not a father.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 12:23 AM
6

Actually, transgenderism is a biological phenomenon that kind of proves the rule by being the exception.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 01:05 PM
1

I think you're discounting the very important qualifier "relatively". Naturally there is certain variation among humans and you would expect outcomes differing accordingly even if each and every one were provided the same resources and opportunities. Maybe there would be a variation and inequality of 20% of whatever metric. That would be "relative" equality of outcome. What we presently have is inequality of 100, 000% or more. This is not due to individual differences or any kind of fair system.…
/r/MensRights05/03/17 05:52 PM
12

Woperson.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 08:20 AM
5

How is this "at the expense of women's rights"? Women do not have the right to get men to fraudulently pay for the upkeep of other men's children.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 02:05 AM
4

This post makes me exceptionally glad to be gay.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 04:51 AM
3

So while I applaud Milo for speaking out against the current SJW madness, portraying it as a purely "left wing" phenomenon is inaccurate.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 07:20 PM
2

:D
/r/MensRights18/02/17 03:48 AM
1

Most hair cutters I've been to, and especially the two closest to me now, cater to women, and are populated by haircutters that barely speak English. This makes salons pretty nerve-wracking.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 03:36 AM
1

One of the fundamental facts about humans is that we are social animals. Another fundamental fact about humans is that we are helpless when born and for a rather longer relative period than is usual among, oh, all animals, but even among just mammals.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 03:29 AM
3

Well, I wouldn't call it a philosophy. I would call it the first step in the journey of a thousand miles to get from feminism to reality.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 02:53 AM
1

That is the most untrue thing about the human life cycle that could possibly be said.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 01:09 AM
1

Yeah, as soon as my bodily autonomy is given a fuck about, I'll care about theirs.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 01:08 AM
7

WHOOOOSH!
/r/MensRights15/02/17 02:03 PM
1

This is certainly true, but there is somewhat more of a chance that they won't be.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 12:41 AM
1

a barber is someone almost every man talks to I don't live in the UK, but this sounds like a suspicious statement to me. I know no one personally who has ever gone to a barber.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 12:40 AM
1

That would be perfectly acceptable if all the other factors established when that "right" was established were also still in place, but none of them are.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 02:01 PM
2

No, it absolutely does not. If you are divorced from someone, you do not owe them a goddamned thing. This is particularly so if the other party initiated the divorce or did anything dishonest during it. Child support I'll allow, but really if one party can't afford to raise the children, the other one should, or else custody should be shared.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 01:58 PM
1

As a gay dude that also didn't really receive much fatherly input, I didn't know to do this until I heard it was a thing. I think spreading this information would not only decrease the earnings gap, but would probably help people in general as everyone demands more of what their time is worth.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 06:20 AM
20

As long as he recognizes that this is something that more affects men, that is awesome, and my respect for him has increased 100%.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 03:32 AM
3

That's what Sally Struthers says.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 03:03 AM
1

Evidently this occurs when they become sixty. But mostly because they lose a third of their height.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 03:01 AM
0

Or pencils that need to eat a sandwich.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 03:00 AM
2

Ehh, that's just dumb.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 03:00 AM
1

This is true of theology, but the part where you're an idiot is that you lump philosophy in with this, and it's obvious you have no idea what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 06:22 PM
1

That is an appeal to authority, which, if you were not an idiot, and knew anything about philosophy, or even visited the internet casually, you would know is a fallacy, and not at all persuasive.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 05:57 PM
1

Or just one. Women.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 05:48 PM
6

"Generally used to denote how some aspects of masculinity — such as entitlement, homophobia and sexual aggressiveness" What if I told you, these aren't aspects of masculinity, nor specific to it.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 07:55 AM
-27

You are clearly an idiot if you lump theology and philosophy together in the same sentence.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 07:50 AM
4

You are asserting a number of propositions, which you have just now called your "points". That is arguing. You don't have to say you are doing it in order to be doing it.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 06:55 PM
2

Very indirectly. Larry got close to a mens rights issue when he talked about fatherless homes being a cause of a bunch of bad stuff, but then he turned around and blamed the dads for it as well. I think the guy have a few good points, but he also spewed a lot of nonsense. Mostly this video is not exactly relevant to this sub.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 10:46 PM
22

It's feminism, it doesn't have to make sense. Feels before reels.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 05:50 PM
1

as we see fewer children among high intelligence parents Which is also not an inherent detriment.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 05:44 PM
1

Just about everything on that video was ridiculous.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 07:23 AM
2

Maybe she shouldn't have gone to the doctor that day.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 04:39 PM
1

Stop oppressing women with your logic. :)
/r/MensRights19/01/17 06:46 AM
1

I don't think anyone is suggesting that the civil standard be lowered. I see no reason why it shouldn't be just as high as the criminal standard.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 12:38 AM
2

How are you defining shitpost?
/r/MensRights17/01/17 04:25 AM
1

Ok, what do you mean they are reaching /all/? I'm not sure what that is.
/r/MensRights17/01/17 04:24 AM
7

And everyone who doesn't agree with us is in that other tribe.
/r/MensRights17/01/17 04:11 AM
16

Don't forget the Dutch!
/r/MensRights17/01/17 04:09 AM
5

Well, their definition of privilege is wrong and their definition of Oppression is suspect. It sort of begs the question of what "keeping people down" means.
/r/MensRights17/01/17 04:09 AM
2

Episke!
/r/MensRights16/01/17 07:16 PM
1

After a brief internet search, would not turn down Tom Hardy based on any physical feature.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 07:14 PM
1

And really, his response was pretty reasonable and well explained.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 07:10 PM
2

The attitude you're talking about is why we have Trump as president now.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 02:57 AM
2

Well, actually, that is a tribe.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 02:51 AM
1

Ok.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 03:47 AM
8

It's probably ok to give traffic for this one.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 06:23 AM
1

You are being obnoxious and impertinent.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 07:31 PM
1

Well, no, I literally wondered that upon reading the headline and noting the sub, but OP's explanation more or less connects it, vaguely.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 03:37 PM
2

Wow, that is ridiculous and also self contradictory at several points.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 06:13 AM
6

For this article, we can give them traffic.
/r/MensRights02/01/17 08:58 PM
11

Taking all criticism personally, reacting emotionally and reflexively rejecting it as if it were an attack, then lashing out at the person giving the criticism blocks any chance for growth, and injures your relationships with others. This may be a reasonable reaction if you've come from a situation where you never received honest criticism and it always was an attack of some sort.
/r/MensRights02/01/17 08:15 PM
11

nobody owes them honest criticism to be sure, everyone should be given honest criticism, particularly if there is an established relationship, which there is between employer and employee.
/r/MensRights02/01/17 08:12 PM
2

Technically, that would be discrimination.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 09:32 AM
5

Yeah, the main problem is that when we "stand up" to these things, we get called alt-right fascist nazi Trump supporting misogynist racist rape apologists.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 02:02 PM
2

Sounds like a divorcin'. Arguably, extended refusal to have sex is infidelity.
/r/MensRights24/12/16 07:28 PM
0

So I've never seen the last group of things and mostly not any of the first group of things.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 03:39 AM
3

How would they be getting visitors from /r/MensRights? do they not more or less proactively ban?
/r/MensRights15/12/16 02:02 AM
7

Please do tell us about the positive extremes of feminism.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 01:40 PM
1

They are no longer custodians of the English language. edit. ok, someone posted that it is fake news. Oxford may continue custoding.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 02:12 AM
12

Uh, yeah, the MRM hasn't "earned" that reputation. They've been smeared with it by feminists.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:44 AM
7

Like Chimpanzees. Or Bonobos. I forget which.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 08:01 AM
3

I really can't think of any "top" or even modestly popular male performers that haven't been doing it at least as long as Madonna. I could probably list a dozen female performers, and I haven't really followed music for the past decade or so.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 06:52 AM
4

I will try to not vomit through the first few episodes.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 04:28 AM
2

Oh good. Maybe I'll actually check it out. Supergirl, that is. I was pretty concerned that it would be chock full of grrl power.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 02:13 AM
2

I've really never noticed "low key sexism" on any subs I frequent. I have occasionally noted over the top sexism by feminists and SJWs.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 02:01 AM
1

Please go and inform all the feminists of this and tell me what their responses are. I'll wait.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 03:41 AM
1

What a cunt. I hope you are no longer saddled with her.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 03:23 AM
2

The woman with the green laniard is completely dishonest from start to finish.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 05:33 AM
2

Eh, Force Awakens had one black character. The trailer for Rogue one is practically a tour of the world's ethnicities.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 06:25 AM
2

Is that an amazed I can't believe you cried or a contemptuous one?
/r/MensRights02/12/16 03:16 PM
1

Can't read the article. Who is the guy?
/r/MensRights02/12/16 02:47 PM
2

Slightly surprised there are no comments here.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 02:21 AM
2

We're, uh, taking it back?
/r/MensRights01/12/16 02:51 AM
1

Hooray. Sense and Logic win a point!
/r/MensRights30/11/16 02:44 PM
3

You can't be an egalitarian and a feminist at the same time as feminism is a female supremacy movement. You can't be for equality for one half of an equation.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 05:52 PM
1

He is letting that stupid blond dye-job grow out.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 04:13 AM
1

Thank you. I've maintained this for a decade, give or take, and very few people have appreciated this notion. I see JakeDC mentions horseshoe theory, but I'm not quite sure if this is the same thing. Really it amounts to tribalism.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 03:17 AM
1

Huzzah, keep us posted.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 03:14 AM
1

How so?
/r/MensRights23/11/16 03:05 AM
1

Good to know. Thanks.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 02:57 AM
1

Insofar as feminism is against the rights of men, it's pretty much a default position that we are against feminism.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 02:21 AM
2

I want pie. Am I a feminist or a misogynist?
/r/MensRights23/11/16 02:19 AM
2

No, I do not believe in equality "for women". I believe in equality for everyone.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 02:17 AM
2

I was totally expecting her rape claim to turn out to be false.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 01:52 AM
1

I don't think he "destroyed" her, but I also didn't particularly see him as being any more of an arrogant asshole than her. She just continually ignored what he was saying.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 06:34 PM
2

I think they are both very British, and they have a different sensibility about when it is ok to interrupt.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 06:33 PM
1

I could have sworn Milo had previously claimed to be Catholic.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 06:33 PM
1

Unfortunately, there would be so much protesting.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 03:08 AM
7

people telling me what I can and cannot say, do, or most importantly think. Yeah, those people aren't actually liberal. They're just conservative about a different narrative.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 02:50 AM
3

I think there is generally far too much use of the word toxic.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 02:39 PM
1

To be sure "non-binary" and "attack helicopter" are made up imaginary "genders" that rather undermine the case for transsexuals. Much in the way calling everything rape and misogyny makes it difficult to deal with actual rape and misogyny.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 02:38 PM
1

That's because if you tell someone, they will freak out, tell your school, who will then kick you out, assuring that you have no other option than suicide. For example.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 02:01 AM
2

So before you get on your high horse about not stooping to their level, let me point out that "us" is just the set of biological men. There isn't any unifying feature other than that set of inherent qualities. "Them" is feminists, who are entirely composed of people with a particular set of ideology, which entails a particular set of behaviours, aims and goals. Ethically, the latter group must be judged (as ethics pertains to actions and mindsets that lead to those actions), while the former mus…
/r/MensRights14/11/16 02:39 PM
7

That was a really good summary of all the particular things that add up to Hillary being a horrible candidate.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 07:05 AM
6

Divorce.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 06:49 AM
2

One feels badly for Canada.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 10:19 AM
-1

A-may-zing!
/r/MensRights11/11/16 02:02 AM
1

Except they didn't really. :-/
/r/MensRights10/11/16 03:34 AM
1

Somehow, from the transposition of luck and future, my flash read of that final sentence was "fuck your future meme posting."
/r/MensRights10/11/16 02:37 AM
5

People get protection from hate speech, Ideologies do not.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 01:55 AM
2

The kind of man that stands up for himself and his rights not to be the target of violence.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 02:52 AM
1

Don't pay for it. She is not your girlfriend.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 02:50 AM
0

Like all religions.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 05:07 AM
7

Absolutely no on deserves the white house, and to say so is an abomination.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 04:56 AM
1

Where can one see this film?
/r/MensRights03/11/16 01:37 AM
6

I really can't wait until we can take childbirth away from women. Then they won't have a thing to stand on but reason, facts and actual work.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 01:19 AM
2

Much in the way religious zealots claim birth control is a slut enabler. Hmmm...
/r/MensRights03/11/16 01:18 AM
3

Actually, racism doesn't actually denote hatred (but may include it), and also is not particularly pertinent solely to black people.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 01:40 AM
1

Author is a douche.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 12:36 AM
1

I'm pretty sure that is unconstitutional.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 12:44 AM
2

And they should be fucking hanged.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 01:44 PM
4

Seriously, when men had those things, it was patriarchy, now that women do, they must just be better. It couldn't possibly be because society treats them more favorably.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 04:43 AM
1

Well, it feels like fascism because it is fascism.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 01:32 AM
2

So, they're not making life hell for their partners, because those women are no longer their partners, and by their own choice, statistically speaking.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 12:58 AM
2

Ever.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 01:44 PM
5

I would cut off all contact with this person yesterday.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 01:31 PM
1

List the top three or four standard feminist claims. If they agree with any of those, they're a feminazi. Off the top of my head, patriarchy, wage gap, that women (in first world countries) are oppressed, check their definition of misogyny and misandry, general points of hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 02:51 AM
1

Most black deaths are at the hands of other black people?
/r/MensRights18/10/16 01:37 AM
25

True question: wtf is misogyny? The term has been so watered down as to be meaningless. I'm not really sure how the words bitch, slut, whore, or cow are misogynistic when applied to a specific person for a specific reason. Misogyny means "hatred of women", not "hatred of some particular woman". If it means the latter, then everyone is a misogynist, and it doesn't mean anything.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 01:32 AM
3

I hear you. I don't think I'm as bad off as you, quite, at the moment, but I've pretty much got jack-all for assistance, even when I've managed to see a counselor regularly. Both of my parents have depression, but my mother had it to a huge berserk level, to where she's been in hospitals a few times and has gone through all kinds of medical regimens. I fall into a depressive episode and I get (from her) "tough love".
/r/MensRights18/10/16 12:50 AM
1

If the systems that they presently service are made leaner, more efficient and more automated, there will be less need for that kind of maintenance, and what there is will change in nature.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 12:46 AM
11

That's really disgusting. The funniest part is that two of the kids said something true, which was not focused on. One said they should be paid according to how hard they work, and another said, equal pay for equal work. Which is totally what should happen, but that requires comparing apples to apples, which the general argument is not doing.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 01:45 PM
2

I don't think they have considered the consequences of doing this.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 08:19 AM
0

That's funny, I knew what video that was going to be.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 08:12 AM
10

It's amusing how the figure keeps inching up.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 01:19 AM
26

Why should women care if men get together? Because they assume that when men get together we act like women. We don't. This is the entire basis of feminism in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 06:13 AM
2

Figure out how you can use it against feminists.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 02:02 AM
1

I don't disagree with your conclusion. However, this is a shitty election with shitty choices.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 03:54 AM
1

Thanks, I think I caught it on a separate thread.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 03:45 AM
2

is there not a recording of the debate? I only see the ad for the debate.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 03:11 AM
1

First. I had to laugh at "third weave" as it conjured some kind of elaborate hair styling process into my head. Second, he's not talking about Spanish people, he's talking about Mexican nationals that are illegally entering another nation. Third. Yeah, Trump isn't going to do the MRM any good. Hillary, however is basically the MRMs number one enemy, as she will work to further institutionalize feminism and the oppression of men and boys.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 05:05 PM
1

I feel like "Expecto Patronum" would be an appropriate counter statement to use of feminist jargon, both for the above mentioned comparison, and ironic value.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 04:43 PM
3

People who complain of "mansplaining" are not keeping that in mind, and consequently you should not kow-tow to their intimidation tactics, which it seems you have done.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 04:39 PM
1

Contrariwise, women can be emotional and not have people thing there's something wrong with them.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 06:02 PM
1

I am wondering what you mean by "mentally strong" and how you measure that.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 04:22 PM
1

I don't actually think people get what they're worth, but that doesn't have anything to do with a gender pay gap.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 01:30 AM
1

Eh, there was a lot of shit in them to begin with.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 02:40 AM
1

Which will inevitably result in her being triggered.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 02:28 AM
1

Wouldn't apply to age of majority.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 10:37 PM
2

Yep, better just kill oneself instead.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 01:14 AM
6

Shockingly, nature rewards systems of persistence with persistence.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 03:39 AM
2

Right, it was one of those all-at-once takes.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 08:10 PM
4

Someone is chopping onions, I swear.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 08:09 PM
3

I think we need to make the 1/2 + 7 rule into law or something.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 01:50 PM
9

I'm sure it is entirely a passive aggressive display.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 03:41 AM
3

Except that most of the people doing this complaining have asses wider than your average man spreads his legs.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 03:40 AM
1

Never heard of that.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 09:28 PM
2

She's "evolved". This isn't even her final form.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 06:03 AM
1

The video is private, and the website interrupted me while I was reading to complain about ad blockers. So I guess I'll never know.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 02:55 AM
1

Insofar as Hillary represents feminism, which is undoubtedly true, it behooves men to regard her in the same way that hispanics, blacks and muslims might regard Trump. Obviously people are more complex than that, but this makes it unsurprising for there to be such a large margin.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 05:20 PM
1

Also, assumes you have friends.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 10:28 PM
6

Unrespectable views do not deserve respect.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 06:24 AM
5

Well that's trash.
/r/MensRights01/09/16 09:51 PM
-7

I didn't read the article, so I'm not sure how intensely this "molestation" was, so I don't know if that is too much or not. At the high end, it is probably right, at the low end, probably too much. What disturbs me is the unevenness with which such punishments are meted. This would have been way more appropriate for the woman that ripped her son's testicles off, generally speaking, but she only got two years.
/r/MensRights01/09/16 03:42 AM
1

Every sociologist I've heard speak has cited studies and statistics and facts and then drawn unsupportable conclusions from them.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 04:37 PM
1

O.M.G. Were they somehow able to reattach them?
/r/MensRights31/08/16 05:13 AM
2

I'm not going to watch that without a little more information.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 06:32 PM
2

Pshaw! Sociology is neither Academic, nor a Discipline, despite its presence in colleges and universities.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 05:38 PM
1

It's gotten to the point where any time some article feels it necessary to specifically point out that someone who achieved something is a woman, I just completely shut off and no longer care about the article.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 06:54 PM
1

I didn't say that.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 04:09 AM
1

I kinda doubt you're "crazy drunk" if you're also "completely in control". People get drunk in different ways, but generally it lowers inhibitions, so you tend to do what you would want to do if you weren't drunk, but restrained yourself from.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 04:07 AM
-19

And you seem to be one of those idiots who doesn't understand that being drunk shuts off parts of your brain, particularly those concerned with inhibitions, which is what the quoted text is all about.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 02:52 AM
1

This is offensive to cats.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 02:02 AM
11

That's entirely crap.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 01:50 AM
-26

The sense of entitlement displayed by drunk women is nothing short of staggering. ANY behavior at all is justified as far as they're concerned, repercussions are simply unthinkable, and being asked to curtail their drunken bullshit is almost always met with an explosion of screaming and/or violence. What is the part about drunk that you didn't understand?
/r/MensRights22/08/16 09:53 PM
34

Well, it did say last year. However, I'm highly suspicious that "sexual assault" includes being looked at by someone you find unattractive.
/r/MensRights21/08/16 04:27 PM
3

They've stopped even pretending it is about equality.
/r/MensRights21/08/16 06:14 AM
1

The first thing that jumps out as absurd is the use of "to man" which actually refers to manipulate, as in handle, as in hands. Latin manus = hand. This reminds me of stupid complaints about the word history. They're too dumb to know where words come from and treat them purely associatively.
/r/MensRights20/08/16 07:50 PM
1

Privilege is just not the word that should be used at all, because that's not really applicable to the situation.
/r/MensRights20/08/16 07:26 PM
1

I would just warn you that you'll be banned from /r/feminism in about two minutes.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 01:40 AM
1

Objects to Ad blocker.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 12:32 AM
1

I have no idea what that means.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 02:37 AM
1

oops, I accidentally selected one without seeing what the scenario was.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 07:57 AM
3

"Sentence First! Verdict Aftewards!"
/r/MensRights14/08/16 07:26 AM
3

Both words are just Greek-isms. Misogyny has a long and glorious history of use, so other languages have come up with more comfortable variants. Misandry is still a Greek-ism, and still means the same thing regardless of what language you use it in, particularly if you're mostly just considering European languages.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 11:20 PM
13

I can't help but think, as I look at her "It's not a phase mom, this is who I really am!"
/r/MensRights31/07/16 04:34 PM
44

What an intelligent and well articulated argument of their opponent's points and why they are wrong.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 07:45 AM
1

Watch her get probation.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 07:38 AM
15

biology. The groupishness is more prevalent, but just like more general kinds of tribalism the details still get filtered through thought processes.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 07:31 AM
5

Other than being vaguely anti-feminist, this appears to have zilch to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 05:57 PM
11

big·ot ˈbiɡət/ noun a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions. "don't let a few small-minded bigots destroy the good image of the city" synonyms: chauvinist, partisan, sectarian; More
/r/MensRights24/07/16 05:47 PM
10

Eh, no. It blew up because Peck turned it off.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 01:05 PM
5

every possible thing is a bold feminist statement. or oppression by the patriarchy
/r/MensRights13/07/16 01:08 PM
2

a lot of these are redundant, and consequently lessen the impact
/r/MensRights13/07/16 12:57 AM
0

Yes, of course we should all pronounce rough, through, thorough, and enough the same way.
/r/MensRights10/07/16 08:47 PM
0

It is a transitional sound. Some languages have transitional sounds between sounds that would be otherwise somewhat awkward to pronounce, and some of them includes this in their writing. Evidently this relationship is not true of British English.
/r/MensRights10/07/16 08:45 PM
8

I guess they're just conveniently forgetting Margaret Thatcher?
/r/MensRights08/07/16 02:22 AM
1

Where do you find these jobs that allow us to afford a house, I'd like to know.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 01:08 AM
-8

Sorry, the first paragraph was entirely sexist and a lie, couldn't really get past that.
/r/MensRights02/07/16 03:36 PM
2

That's just the height of religious entitlement.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 12:58 PM
1

Yeah, I usually associate that with the term Liberal.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 11:40 PM
11

Not at all sexist pandering.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 01:26 PM
1

So the first part I'm noticing he's being a little illogical about is equality of opportunity. He claims that because people have differing "starting conditions" that giving them the same opportunities will result in different outcomes. Well, that's true, because "starting conditions" are where opportunities begin. In giving everyone a chance at a decent life, it is super important that the differences in those starting conditions be minimized as much as possible, such that actual individual mer…
/r/MensRights09/06/16 01:19 AM
1

I think there's a flip flop there in your evaluation of Progressive vs. Liberal. Liberal seems more like a camp, whereas progressive is more of an attitude. Some day we'll get it all sorted out.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 01:30 PM
1

Wow, that sums up current culture entirely.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 04:55 PM
1

So Bill Mahar is just as big of douche as Trump. I don't think he gets to have an opinion about that.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 04:54 PM
2

"muted"?
/r/MensRights27/05/16 02:20 AM
1

Is the sequel series really worth watching?
/r/MensRights26/05/16 04:28 AM
1

Why would you say that. I just said quite the opposite.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 03:29 AM
1

Except "The Golden Rule" in reference to how people interact means a very particular related set of things. Using words to mean what they mean isn't "Idea Highlanderism".
/r/MensRights19/05/16 03:20 AM
2

'UUUUGE!
/r/MensRights19/05/16 02:58 AM
1

Yes. They are fraud, libel/slander, and misuse of the legal and police systems.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 05:44 AM
30

If you get 50/50 time, there is no logic in there being child support in either direction.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 01:02 PM
2

That's a divorcin'.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 09:49 PM
5

I respect him less and less every time he tries to comment on something outside his field of expertise. First atheism, now identity politics.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 01:13 PM
1

That has exactly zilch to do with the golden rule.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 04:22 AM
1

If he only gets to see them 20% of the time, he should only have to pay for 20% of raising them.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 02:17 AM
-7

Also, it is a terrible organization.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 01:00 AM
1

Can we get a tldr?
/r/MensRights02/05/16 03:54 AM
2

TBH, this kind of depends on what "sophisticated" means.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 03:53 AM
1

I will accept those also.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 03:25 AM
1

Please do not lump "feminism" and "the left" together like that.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 03:11 AM
2

Yes, because that's what "attractive" means.
/r/MensRights01/05/16 07:09 PM
10

You could legitimately sue her for slander.
/r/MensRights01/05/16 04:39 PM
0

Feminists are not progressives. They are part of the regressive left. This distinction needs to be maintained.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 05:25 PM
3

This would be a more convincing argument to vote for Catwoman, especially the Michelle Pfeifer version.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 04:00 AM
1

In the west, this is true.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 01:12 AM
2

Yep, no longer allowed cushy office jobs. Just hard manual labor.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 01:12 AM
43

Can we also ban women with enormously fat asses? As this is much more common of a problem.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 05:42 AM
3

I was enraged until I saw the /s.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 02:25 AM
16

"You do not have my consent to hand me this survey."
/r/MensRights14/04/16 03:45 AM
1

Apparently 50% is everything if you're a man and nothing if you're a woman.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 03:42 AM
19

I like how the "anti-racist" part showcases someone more notable for religion than race, and specifically a religion that is everything that feminism claims to be against.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 01:58 AM
2

Hopefully this will be a trend.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 01:33 AM
1

Our politics have generally drifted to the left over the last few decades at least. That is not true at all, and you seem to contradict it in the very next paragraph.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 03:14 PM
2

Well spoke.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 03:12 PM
0

I am wondering if there are still arranged marriages going along with this.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 01:47 PM
5

It is insofar as class war is a huge problem just now and feminism is a distraction from this, with the fallout happening to men.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 03:03 AM
7

Which is being PC. What it is really about is being clear in your references.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 05:22 PM
16

So prostitution is legal in the UK?
/r/MensRights26/03/16 07:37 PM
6

How unfortunate that feminism has caused a decline in the percentage of college educated men.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 02:43 AM
3

I am reminded of this experiment.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 04:22 AM
20

Why did you make me go to hillaryclinton.com?
/r/MensRights23/03/16 02:43 AM
1

This is not satisfying at all, because "leftist" feminist smear tactics are already regressive (like the right) and only differ by their particular identity of focus.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 06:53 PM
2

Intersectionality is the retarded bastard infant child of feminism and reality.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 02:33 PM
6

Yeah, I think one of the hugest problems with feminist "theory" is its inability to be updated according to the march of history.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 02:30 PM
1

Then they would call you ableist.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 02:27 PM
1

I think you are attributing a moral sentiment where it generally does not exist.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 06:39 PM
8

This video makes me realize that they have basically done with Ghostbusters what they did with the Scooby Doo movies.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 06:05 PM
1

I also predict that the sun will rise tomorrow.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 05:51 PM
3

Are you saying that men are responsible for exhibiting control where women are not? Because that's what it sounds like you said, and that's the sexist bullshit that we are fighting against.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 05:44 PM
2

I generally thing Milo has valid things to say, but he does often come off as a twat. My boyfriend won't consider anything coming from Milo because he is associated with Breitbart.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 04:00 PM
2

I'm actually more concerned that he is too tan. Skin cancer is a thing, you know.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 10:19 PM
2

She spent the first minute of 8 not talking about the topic at hand. Did not watch longer.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 09:26 PM
2

Rejecting those notions doesn't automatically mean one accepts egalitarian notions instead
/r/MensRights20/02/16 05:50 AM
1

One contributing factor is probably the way girls act in grade school and high school.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 02:33 AM
2

This sounds remarkably like "every sperm is sacred".
/r/MensRights18/02/16 01:53 AM
1

Those are not "liberals", they'r religious nutjobs.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 05:42 PM
5

So is Theology.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 10:04 AM
1

Because feminists are actively opposing solutions to those problems.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 03:53 AM
1

Three of those are semi-perpetrated, or at least supported by feminists and the fourth is actively ignored with no small help from them.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 03:42 AM
1

So you're saying equality has been achieved?
/r/MensRights12/02/16 03:07 AM
33

Obviously she wasn't really your friend.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 05:27 AM
-3

That guy is a douche and I couldn't really make it through the video.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 03:47 AM
1

Any day now, I'm expecting to see someone saying "Feminism is submission to Allah" with all seriousness.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 07:29 PM
7

Actually, it isn't even about safety. It is about perceived safety.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 02:33 PM
1

As a guy, every time I've tried to haggle, it hasn't really got me anywhere, so I don't know how this contributes to the issue.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 06:17 AM
3

I support them doing this, for two reasons. First is that companies regularly screw over people for all sorts of reason that have nothing to do with gender equality. Second, it will reveal the wage gap for the fraud it is.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 06:15 AM
4

The correct answer to this phrase is "that is a lie".
/r/MensRights29/01/16 06:13 AM
0

Sorry, you don't get to appropriate the fight for gay marriage. Of course all feminists are unique snowflakes with entirely distinct views, just ask any feminist and they'll tell you.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 02:35 PM
1

Feminsm is an ideology, not an inherent human feature. As such it has zero rights to be held sacred and above criticism, which is what you're suggesting by claiming prejudice against it is unreasonable.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 02:33 PM
3

No, we cannot. Because feminism is one of the leading detriments to men's rights.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 02:27 PM
2

You cannot reason someone out of a position they did not reason themselves into.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 02:26 PM
1

Wish that had been around when I was in college.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 07:53 PM
173

Then they should all be kicked out for engaging in harassment.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 05:05 PM
1

I am mildly offended that philosophy is lumped in there.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 03:13 AM
2

I just have to say, his beard is quite nice.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 01:46 AM
9

Shocking if you've been hiding under the rock of feminism.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 01:10 AM
6

She was doing so well and then she said "reverse-sexism". :-/
/r/MensRights15/01/16 02:05 AM
3

Well, no, we would just show them facts and reason and they would melt into puddles of offendedness.
/r/MensRights03/01/16 09:02 AM
3

Wow, I couldn't really get past "examining white identity". This is a nonsensical phrase.
/r/MensRights03/01/16 06:15 AM
11

Since feminism is against men's rights.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 09:20 PM
1

While I do think there are problems with the MRM, most notably its adoption of "privilege" speak, I don't think it has the problems you mention, and that you mention those makes me think you don't actually read here.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 07:50 AM
3

"It is a necessary consequence of everything you just said. Either you really meant that, or you're really stupid."
/r/MensRights12/12/15 09:08 PM
0

An instance is not a class.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 08:44 PM
1

Like ten of them at least have been posted in the past few days.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 03:31 AM
3

Vaginal Visa, even. Just to keep up with the alliteration.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 03:11 AM
2

I agree with everything you just said, and quite frankly, I think accomplishing economic justice would pretty much make everything else pale in comparison, but his pandering is still annoying.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 06:36 AM
3

While I still prefer Bernie for his various economic stances, he is increasingly pandering to various SJW crowds of late. And this is disturbing.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 02:31 AM
1

Conservatism is no less gynocentric than feminism. It just expresses it in a different way.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 02:56 PM
1

non-mentos-compos.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 02:23 PM
7

Unfortunately, you have just convinced me to be even more skeptical of such claims in the future, and likely less compassionate.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 02:51 PM
1

Any time you compare a genetic condition to a cultural complex, you are on the losing side of the argument.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 06:13 PM
1

4pt. font? Moving on.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 06:02 PM
1

I agree with that, but that's not what solipsistic means. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/solipsistic
/r/MensRights13/11/15 03:22 AM
1

You don't saaayy?!
/r/MensRights13/11/15 03:12 AM
1

Basically "I do" covered consent for lifetime.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 02:34 PM
1

Yes, but that is still completely biological and not a social construct.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 05:56 AM
13

One may always assume a feminist speaking about privilege is wrong.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 06:08 AM
1

But you know, Islam is ok, because "that's their culture".
/r/MensRights05/11/15 02:38 AM
1

I love how any protest about treating only radical feminism is immediately followed up by a radical feminist claim.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 03:31 AM
4

Because, like Nazi's, feminists are fascists.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 03:03 AM
4

"The police wouldn't consider what your ex did to you rape because you let him do it" Uh, isn't that what consent means...?
/r/MensRights28/10/15 01:45 PM
2

Because it is the internet, I am sure this exists somewhere.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 01:43 PM
6

Enh, those all just mean "disagree with feminists".
/r/MensRights27/10/15 01:33 PM
-3

solipsistic That word you keep using. I do not think it means what you think it means.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 01:28 PM
1

I like how the article is mostly about redditors discussing the issue.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 11:25 PM
-2

This video is garbage. Why is it being posted here?
/r/MensRights14/10/15 01:27 AM
2

Oops. I meant, my dad may have cried at other times.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 02:34 AM
1

Seriously, what is college age? I was attending college in my early 30's and I went grey by 25.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 12:46 AM
2

I recall my Dad crying when his dog died. He may have died at other times, but I remember that.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 05:59 PM
3

When people talk in generalities of x kind of person "deserving" something, they are almost axiomatically wrong, and may be dismissed as a moron.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 05:58 PM
11

But equally barbaric!
/r/MensRights01/10/15 01:48 PM
22

I dislike both the original picture blurb and the response to it.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 01:44 PM
1

Surely this well somehow turn out better than /r/FeMRAdebates.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 04:32 AM
1

That's some Harrison Bergeron shit right there.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 12:38 AM
1

re: "well, now you know how it feels" The poor white guys always knew how it feels, and the powerful white guys are still powerful white guys, so no one gets their "comeuppance".
/r/MensRights22/09/15 01:35 PM
1

I think we should determine what reasonable sentences are, and hold everyone to those.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 07:01 PM
2

I like her use of contemporary culture in mocking feminism.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 02:08 AM
5

Ugh, I wish actresses I like would stop saying stupid shit.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 01:39 AM
-1

I am marginally scandalized to be somewhat in agreement with Ayn Rand.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 04:53 AM
3

That article is a crock of shit.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 06:15 PM
5

I know you are being sarcastic, but I can't bring myself to upvote this statement.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 12:05 AM
2

Once upon a time, staying home and taking care of the kids, house-keeping and cooking was actually a full time job. In the age of instant microwave dinners, cheap retail clothing and a wide array of timesaving appliances, not so much.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 01:38 PM
2

To be accurate is to be fair.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 01:34 PM
2

Without reading the article "sex offender" is an enormously indefinite term that can include people that mooned someone or urinated in public, thus the title is lame.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 02:32 AM
4

I'm glad he survived.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 02:25 AM
3

Now give us special privileges! Waaaah! <every feminist ever>
/r/MensRights07/08/15 02:38 AM
3

Do you have a link to the thread, or at least its title?
/r/MensRights07/08/15 02:38 AM
2

Well, except that all its issues are already gendered, which is part of why they're issues.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 02:36 AM
2

Big Red: "I say the world is flat so shut the fUCk! up" ftfy
/r/MensRights07/08/15 02:35 AM
3

Send an article to the school newspaper quoting the professor.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 02:34 AM
2

Those are all much too specific.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 02:14 AM
6

It's crazy that this is even a discussion. Due process is constitutionally mandated.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 03:00 AM
1

It's like feminists don't understand English.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 01:55 AM
9

She's actually doing what we ask "good feminists" to do about "radical" feminists.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 12:28 AM
8

Hey now, as a white, gay male, I want equality too.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 01:09 AM
-1

I feel slightly dirty that Republicans are trying to protect actual constitutional rights.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 12:39 AM
4

My particular link is terribly ironic wrt this. I would go a little further than this even. Women, by and large, are much more groupish than men, and inclined to engage in secretive collective action. Projecting this mindset onto the population of men as a whole is where patriarchy theory comes from.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 12:36 AM
1

For the articles, man.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 05:51 PM
24

I would go a little further than this even. Women, by and large, are much more groupish than men, and inclined to engage in secretive collective action. Projecting this mindset onto the population of men as a whole is where patriarchy theory comes from.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 05:31 PM
7

side question, does /v/ have subs? I haven't really looked at it much and am unfamiliar with its operation.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 11:50 PM
28

OMG, you've never seen a women's bathroom.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 07:52 AM
1

I think it's perfectly ok to be in principle for equal pay, as long as you actually look at the facts to determine whether or not it is a real issue.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 10:28 PM
3

So you don't actually read this sub then.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 05:14 PM
1

It is presently at the top, what more do you want? ;)
/r/MensRights06/07/15 05:06 PM
1

In what areas are women worse off than men?
/r/MensRights29/06/15 07:04 PM
0

Please elaborate.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 07:00 PM
8

It's notable to point out that there are also provisions for women to give up their children after birth without the consent of the child's father.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 06:59 PM
1

That still isn't sexism. Sexism is just prejudice wrt sex, which is different from treating things as they are. Prejudice is inherently about treating things not as they are.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 08:11 PM
10

Respect for John Oliver plummets.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 05:11 PM
2

Face. Palm.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 09:45 AM
1

That's not sexism though.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 06:06 AM
1

That's funny because the opposite is likely true.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 06:03 AM
1

Eh, your last claim is pretty specious. A six year old might not know what a lie is, and there isn't any standard of parenting.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 04:34 PM
1

TIL I'm not prebanned from that sub.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 06:09 AM
5

Fighting a bad idea with another bad idea isn't the way to go. Men need to be able to express their problems and have them taken seriously. That's pretty much at the core of everything.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 03:38 AM
5

It does need to be more acceptable for men to have their problems taken seriously.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 03:37 AM
3

Of low value, even.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 11:38 PM
3

I love the way you stated this. It caused me lulz.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 11:37 PM
5

As a gay man, I disagree.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 11:36 PM
3

He often has good points, but almost always takes too long to get to them.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 08:59 AM
1

Which is indeed what it was about. I am astonished (but not really) that someone would construe it as being about gender.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 07:16 PM
1

She even had the balls to call back to the Renaissance and a myth about ovaries shrinking as though it still had some form of influence today. Seriously, that's only separated by several hundred cultural shifts.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 07:03 PM
2

No. We do not. Though if you stop adding things at a certain point, you can spell QUILTBAG, which is slightly amusing.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 07:38 AM
15

This is why we need Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 07:10 AM
2

Feminist propoganda mostly.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 09:45 PM
3

While it is laudable to attempt to redirect the efforts of feminists to where there are actual issues for women, this really has little to do with Mens Rights.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 02:52 PM
6

I would totally be cool with an MRA section in a Pride parade. edit: as a gay man, I should mention.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 07:52 AM
2

Yeah, we call those institutionalized racism/sexism. Somewhere along the line, people forgot that to have an adjectivally modified noun, the noun has to exist independently first.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 07:46 AM
1

facepalm
/r/MensRights09/06/15 07:44 AM
14

Unfortunately, science shows that mutilating a baby boy's penis will more likely make him less compassionate.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 02:25 AM
1

Let me just say "horse shoe theory".
/r/MensRights05/06/15 12:57 AM
1

Well, the thing is, feminism and identity politics aren't at all inherent to the notion of socialism, they just happen to be a prevailing infection. I'm descriptively a socialist because I got a degree in philosophy and then studied physics, not because I've read socialist materials or glommed on to socialist identity politics.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 12:45 AM
1

socialismbeta does not appear to exist. I am mildly hesitant to trust anything that labels itself "true", but I'll watch that for a while and see.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 12:36 AM
4

Pepperidge Farm Remembers!
/r/MensRights02/06/15 06:06 PM
22

Socialist here. I am banned from /r/socialism for questioning feminism.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 05:15 AM
1

That is a huge and incorrect assumption.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 08:57 PM
1

Most of the benefits and debits you just described are irrelevant to me.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 06:32 PM
18

This seems like an accurate description of the insane situation surrounding this issue.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 06:16 PM
10

Neat. You know what. The fact that the concept of slavery is in the bible is sufficient to demonstrate that white Europeans did not invent slavery, so stop being pedantic.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 07:43 AM
1

I agree in principle, but the issue is more about equal application of the law. Ultimately, adolescents need a separate legal designation of some kind.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 07:16 AM
0

Please die.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 07:06 PM
3

Pets and Friends are arguably family.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 08:53 PM
7

Checking in. Yes, feminism is fundamentally illiberal.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 08:06 PM
1

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/LadiesAndGerms
/r/MensRights23/05/15 08:05 PM
12

She would be a saint if she agreed to remain in jail indefinitely. As it is, she is merely heroic.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 08:24 AM
0

First, I did not say that just an hour ago in this same thread. That was said by /u/number357, and is in fact the opposite of my position. Apart from this egregious error on your part, I'm not sure what you are trying to say with your ramblings in the rest of the above response.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 12:01 AM
5

I seem to recall having literally seen someone respond with something like "misogyny isn't just hatred of women". edit: and apparently one of those is in this thread. To expand, while misogyny (and misandry) may be part of sexist attitudes, this doesn't mean that all sexist attitudes are miso -gynist or -andrist. They should be conflated with sexism (institutional or otherwise) and distinction should be maintained.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 05:02 PM
1

I think I really like that her antics and the like have been labelled as 'hipster racism'.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 09:57 AM
2

It would be amazing and hilarious if a museum that accepted it were also subsequently successfully sued for defamation by the victim of this ridiculous stunt.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 09:48 AM
3

It was difficult to tell from this analysis what an accurate graph might look like. Obviously the situation is very complicated and there are several confounding factors even for that.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 08:08 AM
3

Since when were boyscouts concerned about being kind? Source: I was in boy scouts, they were not kind.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 07:30 AM
1

It actually matters what your message is. If your message is white nationalist, that is divisive and only going to appeal to a vanishing group of people. If your message is egalitarian and potentially appeals to more than half of everyone, well, there's more potential.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 12:49 AM
3

As a guy that was never particularly into competition, or at least not usual kinds, I think all students need to be given the opportunity to shine in their preferred way.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 10:04 PM
7

So, a distinction needs to be made here between "feminists lie about rape" and "women lie about being raped", because those are two different statements and you seem to be conflating them.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 09:57 PM
0

I can't help but laugh about A+ performance by Charlize Theron. I haven't seen the movie, but she pretty much overacts in everything I've seen her in.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 09:44 AM
2

Frankly the core of contemporary feminism is illiberal, because it is insular, tribalistic, ideological and anti-scientific, which is about as illiberal as you can get.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 11:49 PM
2

Because they're Truly Outrageous!
/r/MensRights15/05/15 09:03 PM
1

Hopefully she will be indelicately fired.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 08:54 AM
0

She should be fucking fired and thrown out of academia forever.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 02:58 AM
5

That was actually the one part that was kinda true. "Common sense" is a kind of made up thing. It ultimately just references a common understanding of common experiences, but there isn't really any such thing outside of very small closed communities, so it doesn't really mean anything.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 05:35 AM
21

Unfortunately, there are occasional feminists that post things like that in all seriousness.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 05:32 AM
19

An apology is an admission of guilt to the law. Sue the fuck out of her. “It was never done with the intention of splashing it all over these social media pages,” she said. YOU PUT A GODDAMN PICTURE ON GODDAMN FACEBOOK YOU LYING CUNT!
/r/MensRights11/05/15 11:24 PM
1

I think technically it would be libel.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 07:45 PM
1

Two words: punitive damages.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 07:45 PM
1

did you only read the top of the article?
/r/MensRights11/05/15 03:12 AM
-1

If you don't count the rapes and murders that happen in prison.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 05:16 AM
12

The Streisand effect is irrelevant here. He would not be suing for the picture not to be circulated, he would be suing to clear his name and seek punitive damages from the guilty parties. Actually, you would want this lawsuit very public both to radically demonstrate his own innocence, shame the offenders and make other people think twice before doing stupid shit like this.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 05:04 AM
12

He should sue the fuck out of that woman for defamation.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 05:02 AM
3

I don't think it can be blamed entirely on those things, but they are large contributors.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 06:08 AM
2

Do they also not understand that their own asses are usually already that wide without any kind of motion at all.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 10:36 PM
1

Given that ignoring what financial support is given or not given to college students is probably at least two orders of magnitude larger than issues of ignoring pre-nuptual agreements, I think your complaint about pre-nuptual agreements is like complaining about a paper cut when your body is 50% covered in 3rd degree burns.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 12:15 AM
4

In regards to "deconstructing gender roles", present day feminist is as much responsible for enforcing gender roles as any conservative movement.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 10:46 PM
3

I view this more as a problem with how college financial aid is handled than anything else. This definitely isn't a gender issue. Essentially, once a person achieves majority age, the government really shouldn't be looking at anything other than what the student has and is being given, in terms of how they qualify for aid, since parents aren't actually required to contribute to the student's education, regardless of their income.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 10:28 PM
2

So feminist == terrorist?
/r/MensRights05/05/15 04:44 AM
4

Eh, that's just feminists not understanding comics. Le Shock.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 04:35 AM
-4

I already didn't want to see it because it is starring miss Melodrama. Now I really don't want to see it.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 04:33 AM
3

"ME ME ME ME ME!"
/r/MensRights04/05/15 10:32 PM
4

OTOH, if you destroy most of the men, the physical state of their infrastructure is going to fall into shit for a long time.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 08:23 PM
1

But Karen is hilarious.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 08:20 PM
1

Actually, bigotry, in its most basic description, is just the belief that x group is better than y group.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 08:18 PM
6

Yeah, this is the one "problematic" thing he has said. However, I think his overall vision is good and proper, and this one statement/notion doesn't really receive much emphasis. Despite the fact that he appears to (and probably in reality does) have actual integrity, I think he's a pretty shrewd politician. I'm not hugely concerned about this one statement.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 11:55 PM
2

Eh, no, killing with kindness is doubly douchey.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 06:04 PM
2

You did not. However, that is all feminists talk about. Trivial problems in first world countries.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 06:10 AM
5

So just on the Elizabeth Cady Stanton quote. Who the fuck cares if it wasn't intended for public consumption. Clearly she thought it, and it was part of her make-up and motivation. And that makes her a horrible person.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 02:16 AM
4

What non-trivial issues do women in first world countries have?
/r/MensRights29/04/15 01:45 AM
2

I consider myself an MRA and an Egalitarian. While I feel that it is important for women to have equal rights, I can't think of any serious way in which women are lacking in rights, compared to men, in first world countries, and many ways in which they are advantaged over men. Feminism is a female supremacy anti male hate movement disguised as an equal rights movement, and is incompatible with egalitarianism. Their complaints are trivial and/or trivializing, and they don't really want solutions,…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 01:43 AM
3

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 03:28 PM
2

Wow, what a load of post-modernistic tripe.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 03:25 PM
1

First, authoritarian arguments hold zero weight. Second, if you wish to assert that "patriarchy" exists, you will need to define what you mean as it is a vague concept that has been warped out of having any casual meaning, primarily by feminists. The classical meaning of patriarchy is something that does an has existed, but has practically zero resemblance to patriarchy as used by feminists. MRAs are completely right in dismissing the usual feminist formulations of patriarchy as they amount to c…
/r/MensRights27/04/15 08:40 PM
1

Being Caucasian has nothing to do with skin tone.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 08:03 PM
-1

Still just a bit too much sexism there.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 03:30 AM
5

I would find a new job ASAP.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 02:36 AM
0

those are the only feminists we hear from thanks to tumblr reddit. ftfy
/r/MensRights24/04/15 05:52 PM
7

Well, they're Caucasian anyway. As are Indians.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 09:49 PM
2

So you wouldn't be committing perjury by answering no, since jury nullification is in accordance with the law.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 05:36 AM
1

Well, the rape victims bar is way off. I don't know what "sex trafficking" is supposed to mean, so I can't comment on that. The pink part for homeless also seems somewhat large.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 07:46 PM
5

At the current accelerating rate of cultural change, I would expect no more than decades. The internet has a huge role in this.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 07:13 PM
1

Well cultural marxism differs from patriarchy in that patriarchy is sort of a conspiracy theory that is not demonstrably true or usually even falsifiable, while cultural marxism is just a meme, which does exist, and for which there is ample evidence. SJWism for the most part, just is cultural marxism. I am personally unconcerned with the ins and outs of marxism, and I generally like to keep it out of my socialism, which I do regard as an economic model. I am not really concerned with whether or …
/r/MensRights21/04/15 06:30 PM
9

much the treatment negatively impacts one's quality of life and doesn't change life expectancy very much <Morpheus> What if I told you, that's because they haven't researched it as much </Morpheus>
/r/MensRights20/04/15 05:09 AM
1

Warren Farrell in The Myth of Male Power clearly states that patriarchy and male privilege are a thing. Oh, well obviously since Warren Farrell says so, it must be true.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 04:18 AM
1

Ultimately, it is irrelevant what feminists think. What is relevant is what everyone else thinks.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 04:29 AM
1

So, in a great number, possibly a majority, of posted situations that are clear abrogations of men's rights, feminists are there pushing that. How do you want to talk about that without talking about feminism is a mystery. I do agree that "women behaving badly" posts could be cut back on.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 04:27 AM
1

The MHRM should not be defining itself with respect to - or as an opposition to - any other movement. The MRM is opposed to sexism. It just so happens that feminism is a very well defined form of sexism.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 04:24 AM
1

Bingo. When facts and rationality fly out the window, you're dealing with a cult.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 04:22 AM
0

I'll go so far as to say that I am fucking sick and tired of anything that is particularly aimed at helping women or trying to pull heartstrings for them. Do I think they have problems. Eh, maybe. Every time I ask someone to mention some legitimate problems women face, I get crickets. I have an increasingly difficult time believing in real misogyny (caveat - in first world countries), because of the growing number of things that are not misogyny that are being consistently labelled as such, and …
/r/MensRights17/04/15 04:19 AM
1

What is more hilarious is when you're talking to someone who is espousing various extremist feminist ideas, while simultaneously saying that "those feminists aren't real feminists". Huge lack of self awareness.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 04:14 AM
1

Yay. Someone here on /r/mensrights claiming there are "extremists" in the men's rights movement, where we can actually confront them. So who are these "extremists" and where are they hiding?
/r/MensRights17/04/15 04:13 AM
2

Quite frankly, aside from being a completely misandrist movement, feminism isn't really particularly helpful to women either, because it is run on a particular ideology that doesn't square with reality. That means they turn their shoulder on women who disagree (even though women are strong and independent and should be free), but also promotes things that aren't particularly helpful, healthy or useful for women. For example, women in STEM. While there are some women who do have interest in those…
/r/MensRights17/04/15 04:12 AM
2

At this moment in history, in western industrialized nations, women have far more advantages than men. Women, generally, do not need their "societal value" raised. And, generally, there aren't any ways to do this other than by throwing men under the bus.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 04:01 AM
1

The ideological divide is quite huge. The pillars of feminism are patriarchy theory, belief in male privilege and belief in a general rape culture. All of these are completely misandrist. If you don't believe in these, you aren't really a feminist. At best you are a coffee-shop feminist or a naive feminist, but that's not who runs feminism. That's who enables feminism, much in the way that "moderate" christians enable the Westboro Baptist Church.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 03:56 AM
0

The plain and simple fact is that feminism is against the rights of men. If you are promoting/protecting/advocating for the rights of men, you are necessarily against feminism.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 03:54 AM
1

I personally get pretty outraged about some stuff that gets posted here. I really don't want to subscribe to a list that is just all outrage.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 03:52 AM
28

There are no men's shelters.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 01:39 PM
1

None of those words are sexist and they all describe her personality.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 03:09 AM
1

There is no infographic.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 01:49 AM
2

Multitasking is a myth. Please stop using that word.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 06:41 PM
6

see Poe's Law.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 06:13 PM
7

Seriously, it should be a cover story.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 06:11 PM
2

I found this difficult to read due to persistent grammar errors.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 01:23 AM
1

Yeah, for some reason I didn't realize Yale was private when I made the statement. However, that being the case, they are probably doing something illegal in attempting to be a court of law when they are not.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 09:52 PM
3

I think you're looking at the past with rose tinted glasses.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 06:02 PM
3

Everything you mentioned in that middle paragraph isn't communication, it is manipulation, which is the opposite of communication.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 05:43 PM
3

What really infuriates me is "at least he didn't have a wife and kids" because it's better if he was alone and didn't get a chance to reproduce? WTF.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 05:38 PM
20

So first, those things don't make you misogynist. Second, SJWs, who are definitionally also feminists, think disagreeing with them is misogynist, so their opinion in that regard isn't really worth listening to. Third, SJWs are hypocrites.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 09:31 AM
5

That's unconstitutional.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 09:15 AM
8

Slander is verbal. You meant libel. Saying something true but unpleasant about someone isn't libel or slander.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 05:06 AM
2

She was clearly lying, according to the article.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 04:54 AM
1

Oh, he needs to sue her for false accusation now.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 04:54 AM
1

The spelling and grammar made me wince.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 01:25 AM
3

I don't know that this is particularly a Men's Rights issue. However, I do think that it is crucially important that everyone be made super aware that multi-tasking doesn't exist. Mostly because so many jobs list it as a requirement, when it is just ridiculous hogwash.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 01:11 AM
1

It takes a very particular kind of person to do those kinds of work.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 04:52 AM
33

"cultural morays"
/r/MensRights30/03/15 04:27 AM
1

That is unclear. However, she definitely did by miles.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 05:33 AM
1

Yeah, it is difficult to splice apart "Jews" as a race, culture, and religion. Obviously one cannot morally criticize another's genetic provenance. But one can totally criticize culture and religion (which is just another kind of culture), as those are actions people choose to do.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 05:22 AM
0

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 05:18 AM
1

This is, in fact true.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 05:17 AM
6

Gee, you think philosophy might be mostly men because mostly men are interested in it? One suspect it is the same with STEM.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 05:55 AM
1

This pretty much sounds like the 19th century in the west. Minus no fault divorce.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 11:57 PM
0

I object to this comparison, because 'Jews' is a largely religious and cultural group that do, say, and assert a number of objectionable things that are based on a chosen context, and not some innate feature like gender.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 11:43 PM
0

You have heard feminist propaganda.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 11:38 PM
0

They have levels of banning, so you may become unbanned after some time.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 11:37 PM
0

You're comfortable with saying "somewhat" are you?
/r/MensRights23/03/15 11:33 PM
2

I have to say, I've gotten really sick of ads and campaigns and stuff pandering specifically to women on issues that are just human rights issues to the point that I immediately turn off if anything is "for women".
/r/MensRights21/03/15 10:34 PM
23

While our hypersensitive society may call it such, teenagers aren't children.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 10:11 PM
3

Well, it's not just about "fixing" things. You also don't have opportunity to improve things or do other nifty projects.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 10:08 PM
2

I think it is way more likely that people are socially conditioned to think that there is a wage gap, than that they are conditioned in a way such as to create a wage gap.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 07:22 AM
3

Girl be out of touch.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 05:36 AM
7

Good try, trying to spin lack of responsibility as a negative, but nope, "benevolent sexism" doesn't fly.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 01:33 AM
1

In what sense are you still a feminist?
/r/MensRights17/03/15 01:17 AM
10

Placing a feather on your person is technically assault also.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 12:06 AM
2

There are a few things that people can suffer that are so bad that death is better. Losing a loved one and having to raise children on your own are not among these.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 12:02 AM
2

TBH, that was the thing that makes me refuse to vote for her as well. All the other stuff are good reasons as well, but that one, alone, is sufficient.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 12:01 AM
1

Actually the huge dark cycles under his eyes make him look ill.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 05:08 PM
1

Well, good, for the US. I didn't know that.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 07:06 AM
2

Er, how about we just vaccinate everyone against HPV.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 05:40 AM
4

Because men are victimized more we expect them to fear more This just means, assuming everyone were rational, you would expect this. There are actually a number of factors that go into this. Off the top of my head, people tend to remember bad things more than good things. Also, old people will have experienced more bad things in their life, so they will expect more bad things in the future, whereas young people will not have experienced as many bad things, so won't have yet ramped up their expec…
/r/MensRights13/03/15 06:16 PM
4

Definitely buzzword-tastic.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 07:36 AM
1

I don't deny women have problems, but no one who points that out seems to be able to list any. What I do dislike about some "egalitarians" is that they equivocate about the MRM and Feminism as if they are equal and opposite things, which they aren't.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 07:34 AM
3

That's what I always ask. Haven't received an answer yet.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 07:33 AM
1

Erm, how about just Male Helpline.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 07:25 AM
3

This is what happens when half of society is the boy who cried wolf.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 12:58 AM
2

And with same sex marriage available, the men could just marry each other anyway, for convenience if they happen not to be gay.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 12:39 AM
1

Total failure by one subsection will negatively reverberate through to us all. Then the politicians need to get in fucking order and create a sensible society instead of spewing garbage.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 12:35 AM
5

The language in the article is terribly scathing. However a few gems were nice: "While feminism is a spent force..." Just a casual off the cuff taken for granted statement. “Feminism was supposed to bring women happiness,” Crouse said. “But the research shows that women today are much more unhappy then they have been in the past. They’ve ended up with far more opportunities, but their personal happiness is way down.” Welcome to the life of men ladies. You got what you asked for.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 12:33 AM
2

B.b.but, isn't that complaint racist!?
/r/MensRights09/03/15 07:40 AM
1

Sue for discrimination.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 09:00 PM
-5

While I'll agree that feminism is a conservative movement, as it is authoritarian and seeks to enforce and preserve a specific ideology, it isn't politically aligned with republicans, and neither are liberals or "neo-liberalism". This is a huge conflationary statement that one should avoid making.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 08:40 PM
9

Unfortunately, libertarian is a bad word to used to describe that distinction. It is descriptively true, but libertarian refers to a number of different things that are easily conflated, one of which is a political orientation.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 08:36 PM
1

Yeah, but as a society, this kind of contract needs to be somewhat standardized.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 08:30 PM
1

lol. good summary.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 08:00 PM
0

Feminism doesn't not mean women's rights. Feminism doesn't not mean women's rights. Ftfy.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 07:56 PM
2

Among its many issues, MRM generally holds that people shouldn't be held to gender norms and that men are often hurt by those. Feminism, while theoretically seeking to free women from gender norms, realistically enforces gender norms on men just as much as traditionalism, and in a certain sense is creating new gender norms for women, in the form of perpetual victimhood.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 07:55 PM
0

I think if men are going to ask to not be responsible financially for a child they didn't want, access to abortions for women should be easier to obtain. I would point out that abortions, relative to financial abortions, are infinitely more available, as financial abortions don't legally exist. So I don't think that's really a valid stance to take if you claim to be for equality.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 07:49 PM
11

So, it isn't hypocrisy, because the MRM and Feminism aren't just the same thing with the genders flipped. They are fundamentally different kinds of philosophies with fundamentally different aims. If you took the MRM's platform, scratched out "men" an put in "women" I don't think your average MRA would at all be opposed to it, provided it was otherwise adjusted for factual accuracy. Feminism otoh is based on a number of unfalsifiable and otherwise unfactual "theories" and other assertions.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 10:17 PM
5

Well women are one of the two major sexual phenotypes of the human species. Feminism is a religious ideology that people follow of their own decision. I'm not sure how you could confuse the two.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 10:03 PM
14

If she urged him to do it, it is not.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 05:01 AM
15

I agree. They've either committed murder or other heinous crimes or they are complicit in a culture that supports such crimes, as well as subverting justice.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 06:33 PM
8

This is just too horrifying to read.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 12:52 AM
4

Damn, I can't like Meryl Streep any more. :(
/r/MensRights24/02/15 01:48 AM
8

According to some feminists, not believing women are oppressed is misogyny. Kind of a catch 22 there.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 11:07 PM
2

Which interview is that?
/r/MensRights22/02/15 09:15 AM
2

intuitions you mean inhibitions.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 06:27 PM
5

Well, at least she acknowledges that she is terrible.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 05:43 PM
3

Personally, I blame a certain amount of crap for my father not sticking around, however, it was my mother's fault, and I don't blame my dad for that specifically.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 05:39 PM
0

Well, you've been making that attack on me for the entire thread, so what does that say about you?
/r/MensRights21/02/15 04:53 AM
0

Please take your vapid equivocation elsewhere.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 01:59 AM
1

Thanks for putting that on an archive link.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 01:40 AM
0

Now you're just being an idiot. I obviously meant that I distrust you because you are religious about it. Also, it is not sufficient.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 12:16 AM
0

Now your ad-hominem is arguing that being in a position to understand the mathematic, economic, and technological concepts makes me blind to the reality which, I take it, you've accepted on some sort of religious basis. In fact, I do take it on a religious basis, specifically that people indoctrinated into academic economics are incapable of framing the world outside of their religious economic views. Luddites were completely married to the idea that productivity gains create permanent unemploym…
/r/MensRights20/02/15 11:04 PM
-1

I have never heard of this person.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 05:57 AM
6

Except Laurie's piece was really just a series of assertions, while Karen's was a list of particular events, people and actions.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 11:15 PM
1

On problem is that you keep calling this the Luddite position. It is really just a factual position and there is nothing specifically Luddite in character about it. What makes something Luddite in character is not the acknowledgment that technology causes unemployment (a concept which also has only been around a few hundred years), but that technology should therefore be shunned. The fact that you mistakenly use this term, repeatedly, is a mark against any evidence of competence you may have. Th…
/r/MensRights18/02/15 09:25 PM
0

Yes, and feminists call it "critical theory". Both are just so much bullshit.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 08:43 PM
1

You are one of those people that doesn't understand the exponential curve. It's also inexplicable why you keep referring to this as a Luddite position.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 07:19 PM
3

TIL 27 is "older".
/r/MensRights18/02/15 06:37 PM
11

Religion X refuses to debate religion R.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 02:18 AM
1

The point you're missing here is that all of society is geared towards giving things to women, regardless of the gender of who is making the actual decision.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 01:32 AM
7

Cool. I hope he gets several million dollars in remuneration for lost wages, pain and suffering, and generally having his rights trampled on.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 12:56 AM
-1

I'm sorry, but IMHO, that merits the death penalty. Also, what is the difference between incarceration and prison?
/r/MensRights13/02/15 12:40 AM
2

This would be easier to read if you hadn't frozen the format. Since you did not, I'm not going to bother with side scrolling.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 08:28 PM
3

It's hard to say. I guess strictly for moral purposes I'd have to put infant circumcision first, because that happens relatively in an instant, scars you for life, and is happening all the time. Most other things have a little more time to be afforded. Pretty much none of them are going to affect me directly, other than maybe getting rid of the general concept of male disposibility which makes it hard for me to get help or empathy for anything, but that's a weird socially pervasive thing that ca…
/r/MensRights11/02/15 07:10 AM
3

I consider them to be just another form of tribalist conservatism.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 04:00 AM
4

Women own only 1% of farm land and make up just 22% of parliament. How does that have anything to do with whether or not it is a tyrannical female dominated society? Women don't have to exercise power officially to be in control. Just look at western feminism.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 03:58 AM
0

No, putting your bags on a seat is not aggressive.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 10:53 PM
0

No, just responding in kind.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 10:05 PM
2

Which is a meaningless statement if they are forgoing that interaction for the sake of self-righteous bitching.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 10:04 PM
2

That's awesome. I don't really meet people irl in situations where such a discussion could happen, and I'm unfortunately a rather non-confrontational kind of person.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 09:44 PM
1

You are saying that you are ok with logical contradictions, thus demonstrating everything that is wrong with feminism.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 09:40 PM
0

I frequently travel with a lot of baggage, which I am not going to hold in my lap if there is available space. If someone wants to sit there, they move as if to sit there and I move my stuff out of the way. It is very uncomplicated. People who wish to passively agressively whisper to each other and throw dirty looks instead of engaging the situation can fuck off and stand.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 09:30 PM
2

You should expect them to make room when you politely ask to sit there.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 09:29 PM
2

Meanwhile, the jobs women don't want will go undone.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 02:34 AM
2

Also, denying that women in first world countries are oppressed makes you sexist, according to /r/socialism.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 01:58 AM
4

Voat sounds like Vote.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 01:50 AM
1

I think we're generally aware of that. But then you have the post modernist complaint that feminism is whatever you want it to be (as long as you conform to xyz).
/r/MensRights08/02/15 07:22 AM
2

There are a number of stances commonly stated by feminists that are objectionable. Many feminists think that they are being reasonable while holding to these stances, when those stances are in fact radical, and lacking any basis in fact. I pretty much object to any feminist who holds those stances, and to anyone who protests that they are not feminist stances, when obviously they are. I also object to dipshits who try to throw up a post modernist objection and proclaim the unassailable plurality…
/r/MensRights08/02/15 07:18 AM
1

I have to say, that guy is an idiot.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 07:06 AM
0

Whoosh!
/r/MensRights07/02/15 08:14 PM
0

People who engage in passive aggressive behaviour instead of, you know, asking to sit, deserve to stand.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 06:02 AM
6

Interesting how women have a better quality of life or it is even in every country on the list except Chile, Greece, Hungary and the Netherlands.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 02:45 AM
1

That explains why it sounds "made up". Of course the people denouncing it are probably the same ones who would want to stop women's suffrage, because they don't know the meaning of words.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 11:34 PM
1

Sure there's a difference between those, but that is irrelevant to this discussion, because it was the first one.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 11:27 PM
0

Who are the people doing the counting? What is typically feminist? These are irrelevant questions. What matters is the action itself. If you aren't representing feminism, you aren't representing feminism.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 11:25 PM
1

I'm not trying to "police your words" but organically means some very specific ways and using it for everything and its brother in unrelated contexts is a very pseudo-sciencey fluffy buzzword thing to do, and makes it hard to take you seriously. For that particular sentence, the word can be completely omitted without losing meaning. All the more reason not to use it.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 11:24 PM
0

That's not how things work.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 11:20 PM
1

Unfortunately, that's not true when accomplishing absolutely anything in life is dependent on the agreement of other people.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 11:14 PM
1

So, dictionaries refer to common usage. The definition I gave you is a philosophically based definition used in ethics. Which is to say it is more precise and sophisticated.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 10:58 PM
6

And if they are hysterical, but a man, well then they're just a violent rage filled man. /s
/r/MensRights06/02/15 07:53 PM
5

To be sure, you're kind of conflating statements about events with statements about perpetrators. It's fairly trivial to be sure if someone was mugged or their car was stolen. It's the who part that is alleged.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 07:47 PM
2

What is 'meninist' supposed to be. That is a very clunky and not particularly well used word.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 07:22 PM
2

Your analogy is incorrect. Identifying as a feminist is a specific conscious act of communication labeling oneself as belonging to a rather stupid ideology. Being a man entails nothing more than a particular combination of chromosomes and having reached physical maturity. Culture and ideas are always open to criticism, whereas innate qualities pretty much never legitimately are.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 08:38 PM
3

then they can transfer that information to their other feminist friends and suddenly ...they are banned from all feminist subs.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 08:34 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter