TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

justtenofusinhere Archive

View 13 posts and 645 comments by justtenofusinhere on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
818

Metajusttenofusinhere/r/TheRedPill31/03/22 12:31 AM
397

Red Pill Examplejusttenofusinhere/r/TheRedPill26/06/20 04:02 PM
208

Red Pill Theoryjusttenofusinhere/r/TheRedPill16/08/18 09:35 PM
130

Blue Pill Examplejusttenofusinhere/r/TheRedPill12/07/23 04:26 PM
121

Red Pill Theoryjusttenofusinhere/r/TheRedPill07/09/18 06:27 PM
82

justtenofusinhere/r/TheRedPill04/01/24 07:10 PM
49

Red Pill Theoryjusttenofusinhere/r/TheRedPill05/07/18 06:49 PM
11

DISCUSSIONjusttenofusinhere/r/RedPillWomen14/04/19 08:38 PM
8

Metajusttenofusinhere/r/TheRedPill31/01/19 06:09 PM
5

justtenofusinhere/r/MGTOW31/01/19 06:11 PM
4

justtenofusinhere/r/MGTOW13/01/19 09:05 PM
1

justtenofusinhere/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/18 09:01 PM
0

Men's Rightsjusttenofusinhere/r/TheRedPill21/10/18 07:29 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

Sheep bleat. Don't bother getting mad about it.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/26 04:27 AM
1

It's confusing, because correlation is not causation. You're seeing a trend and it's components, but not the source of the trend. First, for a lot of men, it's not accurate to say they do not care about your education/career/job, etc. What is almost universally true is that your education/career/job, etc. does not make you any more attractive to men. However, NOT having an education/career/job, etc. can make you less attractive to a lot of men because of the risk it imposes on them if they enter…
/r/RedPillWomen23/02/26 07:46 PM
1

NO! And the women are making a bet with the devil. They are building lives and families on top of a bomb. If the wrong wires get crossed at the wrong time, BOOOM. Everything gets blown up. The good news, for women living in the west, is that the the legal system and society are there to pick her up, dust her off and punish the guy for unknowingly detonating the bombs she chose to build on. Sure, that means he 's the only one who really gets destroyed from it, but at least she gets lots of cash, …
/r/RedPillWomen17/11/25 01:32 AM
1

That you can't do other people a favor, you can only establish your new level of obligation. The result, people adopt the "F-you" attitude.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/09/25 07:58 PM
33

You should read about the Canadian millionaire. He dated a woman for a decade or so, a lot of that was on-off. But he NEVER lived with her. However, the Court said that since they often did hold themselves out publicly as a "couple," not even man and wife, just a couple, she was owed 5 figures (just over $53,000) per month for the rest of her life. Climans v. Latner
/r/PussyPassDenied28/09/25 04:04 PM
2

The captain with a leaky ship that can't leave dock. I don't care how well they can spout all of the sailing lingo--if you don't trust their ship to a waive, let alone a storm, that's a direct reflection on their capacity to be a captain.
/r/RedPillWomen25/06/25 05:24 PM
5

You have to take these types of "programs" with a massive pile of salt. These shows are 100% catering to an already existing desire--lonely men who want to believe/feel that their condition is in no way their own fault. Ask yourself, if you were a woman would you want to go on this show knowing it was an ambush meant to make you look bad/depraved/foolish. stupid/etc.? These podcasts, by and large, have to take whatever "guests" they can get. So, why would anyone go onto a show like that? Most of…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/09/24 01:13 AM
1

I'm glad I could help. When you say, "I recently exited a relationship in which I did all this and I feel awful about it on both sides" what do you mean? Did you make it all about sex at first and then try to lock that box afterwards and make him prove his devotion? Or, did you utilize your social network to find suitable and trustworthy prospect? If the latter, how did that work out? Also, your name is curious for someone on this sub.
/r/RedPillWomen14/05/24 08:14 PM
10

"I am endevouring to stay celibate now until I am in a committed relationship" "I need to learn how to date to find a relationship." It sounds to me like you're heading yourself into more troubled waters. Obviously, I don't think you should be jumping into bed with anyone. But, it also sounds like you're gearing up to make future men pay for your past mistakes and the actions of past men. That's not fair and will turn any sensible men off. One of the things I notice is that a number of women who…
/r/RedPillWomen14/05/24 05:00 PM
1

I think a better tact is for you to find such a man and commit to him.
/r/RedPillWomen29/01/24 06:36 PM
2

I am 30, with a college degree and a good job. I am self sufficient and would like to think I have good self confidence and self love (when I’m not getting my heart ripped out by some shmoe). What gives? I had always been told growing up by family and strangers alike that I am very pretty, and I don’t think that has changed. I have many hobbies and friends and am a fairly chill person. What more do I have to do? These are all things YOU want from a MAN. See the problem when that's the only way y…
/r/RedPillWomen29/01/24 11:56 AM
6

Passive, yes, innocent no. I agree they are fully aware, at least by their mid twenties, it still doesn't mean they can control themselves sufficiently. I firmly believe that biology puts in instinctual overrides into all organisms. I'm not sure I agree women are responsible "misportraying her own sexual nature." That's the very nature of the war. They have more options, including options for benefit, by mis-portraying than they would ever get from being honest. The mis-portraying isn't causing …
/r/TheRedPill04/01/24 09:09 PM
12

You are correct. I went back to review something I wrote and decided the post was too long to even bother finding it. I may just add a tl:dr to it. Damaged woman are wounded; if you poke their wounds it hurts them.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/24 09:02 PM
35

You're looking at this all wrong. Things have not gone awry. This is EXACTLY what is supposed to happen. Things grow or die. Really, things grow and then die. And the dead and the waste become the fertilizer for the new growth. Our society grew as much as the foundations would allow. Once they reached those limits, there were only 3 options: 1) stagnate, 2) die, 3) break the foundations and undergo radical transformation. The study of history, is very much the study of this process. Women act as…
/r/TheRedPill22/12/23 06:17 PM
0

Sex is a spectrum, muck like food. Food can take on many different roles. You can painstakingly plan, cook and then slowly enjoy, or you can grab something of the rack. Food can be nutritious and filling, or it can be empty calories. Sometimes you just need a good meal which nourishes and sustains you and which you share with your loved ones or it can be a quick something to just get you through. Sometimes you regret eating something immediately afterwards. Other time you reminisce about a great…
/r/RedPillWomen17/10/23 01:11 AM
1

Why does it matter? If he wants a relationship where he can sleep around, let him try to find that with a woman he actually wants to have a relationship with. Nothing he does has anything to do with what you want, or can have, in a relationship.
/r/RedPillWomen17/10/23 01:06 AM
1

If Rebecca's subterfuge was "clearly detested by God," then prove it with quotes from the text. Now Esau hated Jacob because of the blessing with which his father had blessed him, and Esau said to himself, "The days of mourning for my father are approaching; then I will kill my brother Jacob." If God is the God of peace, and the above is the results of Rebecca's choices, how then can it be said that Rebecca's choices, in any way, had any harmony with God when the results are the complete absence…
/r/TheRedPill29/09/23 03:21 PM
2

As I said, i didn't bother to read your garbled post. But it's clear you misunderstood Genesis. Rebecca's betrayal was clearly detested by God. And while God did love Jacob, Jacob didn't receive God's blessing until late in life because he constantly lived a life in defiance of God. God loves Jacob, because unlike Esau, Jacob was capable of change. But, it wasn't until Jacob actually changed, late in life, that he received the benefit of God's love. None of that was relevant to Rebecca's choices…
/r/TheRedPill29/09/23 02:07 PM
4

Rebecca chose incorrectly, she should have chosen to stay loyal to her husband. She didn't choose Jacob, she chose herself and in doing so turned her sons against each other and one son and father against each other.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/23 04:11 AM
14

I didn't bother to read your post. But there is a very important element to the story that has to be remembered. Rebecca was a good wife--ONLY SO LONG AS ISAAC WAS A STRONG MAN. The first time that Isaac was no longer capable of leading his wife and his family--immediately Rebecca turned on him and betrayed him, rebelled against him and destroyed her family all in pursuit of finding new safety now that she no longer felt safe with Isaac. As soon as Isaac was weak, Rebecca didn't just abandon him…
/r/TheRedPill28/09/23 08:49 PM
5

I knew you weren’t going to do anything half cocked, it’s just that given it’s this sub I just wanted to be clear that by “do something” I wasn’t advocating for anything nefarious. Maybe shame is sufficient. Sit her down, tell her what you saw and that given how inappropriate that was maybe there was some aspect of the interaction you couldn’t see. Ask her to explain. If she can’t then make it clear how disappointed in her you are and how you had thought her to be a much better person/you had th…
/r/TheRedPill13/09/23 12:59 AM
11

She invited him and the kids jn (my kids are home btw)...She knows this is unacceptable to me. I'm assuming by this you mean you've drawn a bright line on this and made her aware of it. And, now she's broken that boundary. Without agreeing that you should have this as a boundary, you nonetheless have to address it head on. Three's two aspects to that. One is should you have drawn it as a boundary? It seems from your post you now regret setting that boundary or are afraid of enforcing it. If you …
/r/TheRedPill13/09/23 12:32 AM
6

You didn't necessarily fail, but you didn't ace that jealousy test. A better response would have been along the lines of, "If that sounds like something you want to do, go for it, just know I'm not into sharing, so...." and leave the ball in her court. If she goes, black her on everything.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/23 03:35 PM
6

Originally posted in reply to a comment, but I want to make it more visible. This isn't a situation where she met some guy, the vibes were off the charts so she grabbed him by the arm and led him to a secluded corner. This was a situation where she already had everyone's eyes on her and, being the center of attention, she was hamming and eating it up, and decided to ratchet it up to a whole other level and publicly display her sexuality and sexual prowess. So, she cast about, found the immediate…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/07/23 01:16 AM
17

I think you've got it wrong. This isn't a situation where she met some guy, the vibes were off the charts so she grabbed him by the arm and led him to a secluded corner. This was a situation where she already had everyone's eyes on her and, being the center of attention, she was hamming and eating it up, and decided to ratchet it up to a whole other level and publicly display her sexuality and sexual prowess. So, she cast about, found the immediately available hot or taboo guy and started suckin…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/07/23 03:04 PM
3

I think he meant that if her BF marries her, she'll be cheating on him shortly, if she isn't already.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/01/23 06:12 PM
20

I come from a Christian background and routinely get into arguments about the state of young men in the U.S. The church is terrified of these young men who have no job, no spouse and no family. It wants nothing to do with them, castigates them at every turn, and DEMANDS that they chain themselves to those institutions BEFORE it will have anything to do with them. And that is how I know the Church is dead. Jesus was a carpenter. But he walked away from it--at no point in any of the Gospels does h…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/09/22 07:01 PM
0

Here's a simple test as to whether or not you should settle. Tell him you're settling and see what he says/does. If he dumps you, then the answer is clearly no. If you're not willing to do that because you think he'll dump you or anything like that, then understand you're considering building a relationship on a big lie--and that's always a disaster in the making. On the other hand, if he's good with it then you two can discuss what it might look like. However that is, how does that look to you?
/r/RedPillWomen16/05/22 05:39 PM
22

No, I don’t believe I have ever seen your ig account.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/22 02:25 AM
8

Yes, I believe it was Willow who wrote the letter.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/22 01:11 AM
88

She may have been with him and lots of other men. She absolutely would rather be with lots of other men.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/22 12:40 AM
28

I actually have a great appreciation for how Rebecca Hardy (the author of this piece) handled both the subject and the story. She pulled an absolute Francisco Goya here. She knows good and well that April is a train wreck of insecurities, victim wallowing and loathing of her "lessers" (i.e. men) who refuse to know their place and do her bidding. Ms. Hardy doesn't do anything except allow April to clearly broadcast who and what she is. Mr. Hardy doesn't try to smooth any frayed edges (and April i…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/03/22 10:11 PM
109

And I've seen 50 year old men, who have at least half a dozen a dozen kids, all by different women, show up to court over failing to pay child support with a 25 y.o. women, heavily pregnant with his child. They don't think about the future long enough to even begin to plan.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 12:38 PM
2

Why should it be on men to have this concern? Why should a man elevate a woman's (not his wife's) concerns over his own? Many men would counter women, as a whole, aren't acting on concern for men. Is some woman bleeding him dry financially? Sucks to be him. There's also the issue of sexual responsibility. If a man wants to have women, he must develop the right skill set, or he'll be out on his backside. The same is for women. It is up to men to become high value, it is up to women to properly ve…
/r/RedPillWomen17/08/21 12:18 AM
1

Depends on what you mean by "sexy." VS does not care what men want. It does not care what men find sexy. Men do not make up VS's target demographic. VS wants women to buy their products. They will sell to women whatever women will buy. This may be what men find sex, but only because women buy it. If women start buying something else, VS will change what they sell. If VS believes that putting out an ad campaign will increase sales, they will do so. VS will not care what messages or ideas are expr…
/r/RedPillWomen11/08/21 12:19 AM
2

None of what follows is an assertion that you should try to fix things with your BF, it's just things you probably need to understand if you decide to go that rout. First, remember how most men and women approach relationships. For most women the relationship is priority number 1. The other person is important to the type and quality of the relationship, but it's the relationship that ultimately matters. This means that quite often is a woman will leave something casual with a great guy for a gr…
/r/RedPillWomen11/08/21 12:06 AM
1

Don’t know. That’s just what he is reported to have said.
/r/Divorce_Men10/07/21 12:57 AM
1

A take on that is how we got Play Boy and the Hugh Hefner we all know. He had his sweetheart. And like good people they abstained from sex prior to marriage and they planned to get married and soon as his deployment in WWII ended. When he got back he was excited to marry his one and only. The wedding was great. Then he found out, while he was putting his life on the line for all of society, his good girl was getting railed by one of the jackasses who was smart enough to avoid getting sent. As he…
/r/Divorce_Men10/07/21 12:10 AM
9

You will never find a more perfect example of what it means to be "alpha widowed."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/01/21 09:17 PM
3

They are not getting how world shatteringly different the truth is from what they believe it to be. Again and again, I run into Christians who fully believe that since they say the words, they are Christians and that's it. When I try to get them to dig into what the Bible truly wants people to know, they are hard core resistant. I have largely moved away from Church and participating in Church groups and have now begun to look for men in crisis. It's often men who have already lost everything wh…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/11/20 07:10 PM
4

My typical response to people asking why God doesn't answer prayer is to point out that it appears the point of prayer is to align you with God, not to get God to align with you.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/11/20 06:48 PM
0

Not even a little. But, when I teach Christians, I can rarely make it out the the first couple of chapters of Genesis before they have a break down. Edit: The "Not even a little" was in answer to, "Did we get the message yet?"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/11/20 06:43 PM
3

I can't argue with any of that. But, I can point out the Solomon was also born from David and Bathsheba. Solomon was blessed by God. He represents the pinnacle of God's people and the Jewish religion. It was Solomon, and Solomon alone who was deemed worthy by God to build the Temple/House of God. Solomon was the outcome of a Godly Man's marital union with a lying, plotting, cheating, fornicating, voyeur-ing, adulterating, un-loyal woman. David's later problems were not the result of Bathsheba's …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/11/20 06:42 PM
2

Thank you. It's been a thought provoking discussion with good insights all around.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/11/20 06:25 PM
1

Please read my later reply to u/where_my_good_mens. I really think the disagreement we are having is not about sluts and forgiveness but about marriage. I will address that, but first I want to look at some of what you just said. My refusal to wife up the former slut does not mean I have not "forgiven" her. It means only that I will not have a relationship with her. I hope you meant that "I will not have a ROMANTIC relationship with her." If not, then we are very far apart. But I believe that is…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/11/20 06:18 PM
2

I think at this point we are largely arguing semantics, but I think it's an important line of thought to explore so I will continue--not to contest but hopefully both of us can learn. I don't think Paul was beaten and executed by way of some cosmic karma for his prior actions. He was beaten and executed because of his devotion to God. I fully believed had he renounced God, he'd have been left a lone and the prior actions left unpunished. That is a big difference. Does it always work that way? No…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/11/20 05:15 PM
8

Not that I will get into it here with you, I promise if we compared our background in studying the Bible and Christianity I'd blow you out of the water unless you have multiple graduate degrees on the subjects. That said, you are just flat wrong. Yes, only God has the capacity to forgive--but what he does is immutable. We can deny it or acknowledge it, but our denials do not change it in the slightest. If you hold against a person that which God has forgiven, you are denying God and his power an…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/11/20 06:09 AM
12

I have to disagree with you--at least as far as Christians go. I agree fully that forgiveness doesn't mean God will spare you from your consequences as far as the world is concerned. But, I think it means Christians have to forgive you, even to the point that it is as if you had never committed those sins in the first place. You break the law, you go to jail. However, if you, as a Christian, are the victim of a crime, and that other person-as far as you can tell-truly repents and turns or return…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/11/20 11:38 PM
1

Not shaming any man for having a problem with it. What I am doing is pointing out how many women are getting around that particular issue by making their expected partner pay instead of the men fucking then, and pointing out how many men don’t realize this.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/11/20 07:53 PM
-4

And I’m saying they are no more fucked up than normal woman (I.e. not that hooking isn’t that bad, but that the CC IS). The ONLY difference I can see between the CC and prostitution is who is paying when other men fuck her. (I know what the hooker is doing and that’s why I merely replied with ALWALT).
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/11/20 04:17 PM
-3

We are all familiar with women not wanting to accept accountability. The point of my post was to point out that actual hookers are more honest and a better deal than what most men are accepting. I was pointing out that the man in the OP who was having a hard time accepting that he might wife up a professional hooker, would have no problems if she'd fucked just as many men but did so on credit that she now expected him to pay--hell, he'd think he won the jackpot. Women are ALWAT, but men are fuck…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/11/20 04:08 PM
-10

I'm going to break with the group on this issue, and say, I have ZERO problem with hookers, sugar babies, cam-models, strippers, and the like--provided they are coming to you with ZERO debt. I'm even more OK With it if they are coming to you with assets and a revenue stream they share. In my opinion, this is SO, SO much more preferable to what most men are doing. Most men in the west are still against dating a hooker. I would not degrade myself to the point that I'd commit to what others could r…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/11/20 03:42 PM
8

The thing is, I agree with everything she said. She just needs to understand it goes both ways. So what if he made a commitment to yo in the past--that was then and this is now. It was right to do that then, but it isn't now and you need to understand I should not be held to that old standard. And, it doesn't make me a bad person when I leave you high and dry because you relied on my promises. Just because I will willing to do it then, does not mean I have to do it with you now.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/10/20 12:54 PM
5

First, things like family falling apart for no reason don't just happen. There is a reason. If you cannot or will not see and identify the reason, you are likely the reason. What you are doing is arguing helplessness. Oh well, there's absolutely nothing he/she cold have done so why even analyze the situation to see if he/she can learn from it. That's the attitude which gets ripped on around here. Second, as for the difference and apparent hypocrisy in my statement, the difference is between word…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/09/20 04:41 PM
0

What if he cheated on her That's a good point. That's not on her and not a reflection on her as a mother or spouse. What if he had a secret drug addiction That's on her. It's not the worst failing, but it's still on her. Each person has the responsibility to fully vet his/her potential partner. If dude can have that bad of a drug issue and she not know, that's on her. What if he cheated on her So what if he did? The fact that he hurt her pride and her feelings doesn't mean he's a bad father--jus…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/09/20 01:00 AM
9

Do you think that that is not correct, or do you think its funny that there are still that many dumb ass guys around?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/09/20 05:19 PM
68

Which proves my point. They are legitimately pissed. They had the children because they believed they could use them to obligate others to their benefit. It isn't happening, at least not to their unreasonably high standards, and they are crying about it. It's like people who go to college. Hey, I went to college, I have all this debt and no fucking job. This system sucks. While those who went to college for an education and skill and networked and got a good job, just go to work and live their l…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/09/20 04:25 PM
365

Honestly, I don't have the slightest problem with, "My children are my world," or "My children come first--always," or "we are a package deal," or anything along those lines. The truth be told, that's exactly what a good mother should do, think and feel. And that's why women say this shit, because they are trying to virtue signal that they are good women. The problem is their actions show it to be absolute bullshit or that they have no idea what their children need--despite being a mother. Child…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/09/20 04:15 PM
28

Her post reeks of privilege and ignorance. "I would also like to know if men would invest communicating for 3 months just to have sex" After all, everyone know all that it takes is spreading your legs to get a sexual partner, right? I mean, who has to put effort into getting laid?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/07/20 10:34 PM
1

Gloves. I wear gloves when working.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/20 03:16 PM
8

Yes sperg. A hallmark of Asperger's syndrome is a lack of social awareness; what is and is not socially appropriate given the context. That's exactly what you did. There was a conversation going. You wanted to participate. Great, everyone is welcome here, though we aren't welcome much anywhere else. You made a comment. Great. I didn't agree fully. You go off on some attempted erudite tear about "true" strength and discipline, etc. We were talking about making women wet. Wholesale lack of social …
/r/TheRedPill26/06/20 06:39 PM
16

Dude, you've totally missed the point with your, "Well, ACTUALLY, Vader is WAAAYYY more powerful than the emperor because..." I don't give a smelly shit what you think is a better determiner of strength. I'm talking about what makes women's holes wet. I can see that that is not your area of expertise, but lets at least try to keep this on point. Your first comment exploring that different women might find different exhibitions of power exciting, was legit effort to contribute to the conversation…
/r/TheRedPill26/06/20 06:17 PM
23

I disagree. The princess of the later story very much had a highly educated, thinker not a feeler, always proper father. I would say you are confusing desire with appreciation. A woman who has never witnesses, up close, the power of stoicism might not understand it or the strength it requires. But everyone understands brute force. And women get turned on by seeing it. All of them.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/20 06:02 PM
6

Depends. I farm strictly as a hobby (i'm a professional 50-60 hours a week), but I'm not a butcher. If all I want are large cuts and roasts, yes I'll do it all myself just as I would a deer. But, If I want all the fancy cuts, then I take it to someone else who's trained to do that. Rabbits are simple, so I do them, plus it wouldn't be cost effective to pay someone to do 30 rabbits.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/20 05:51 PM
28

Depending on the size of the rabbit, roughly the same amount as you'd get from a medium sized chicken. If you paid attention to what I wrote, you'd see I do raise larger animals as well. Clearly I have a farm. The best thing about rabbits are they produce copious amounts of manure--that doesn't have to be composted for several months before applying. But, I don't want a bunch of old, disease-ridden rabbits either, and rabbits truly reproduce at a prodigious rate (females have two uteruses and ca…
/r/TheRedPill26/06/20 05:11 PM
19

Where is he? I skinned and ate him!
/r/TheRedPill26/06/20 04:41 PM
29

Jesus said two things: Forgive them, yes event the harlots and prostitutes, and Don't marry them.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/06/20 07:18 PM
2

I'll assume that you're being sincere. First, let's remember I'm responding to a response from you, not your original post. Your words, " id probably say 3 partners as thats who i officially dated. If I am clean and it would never leak that I had more ( they are blocked on social media and I basically have no friends rn ) then how would he ever know?" That's lying. If you do not understand why lying to your partner about a significant issue is problematic you are not ready for a relationship. Yo…
/r/RedPillWomen20/05/20 01:22 AM
3

Wait, let's look at this. You believe it is perfectly OK to lie to your intended life long partner and thereby deprive him of the opportunity to make a fully informed decision and you intend to do so for the sole purpose of securing your own benefit without regard to the effects it will have on him? That is what makes you a poor relationship prospect. Just as importantly, I strongly suspect it is that attitude regarding your entitlement and your opinion of men that lead you to quick six dicks. Y…
/r/RedPillWomen20/05/20 12:45 AM
1

That's me, Mr. NIBC himself. I just have to know who my dick-brothers are.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/20 12:06 AM
17

Shit. Total shit. Saying, "This is alpha or that is beta" is beta. Don't be an ignorant dipshit. Know yourself and know what is going on around you. If you're worried, "Oh my God, is MY girl CHEATING on me?" Understand your over investment and take appropriate steps-and the steps are not to figure out if she's actually cheating, it's to figure out why the hell you care so much and what you need to do to put everything back into proper perspective and priority. But, information to help you act is…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/20 10:14 PM
49

Reminds me of when I was working in a restaurant. A cute co-worker had flowers delivered to her and she was so excited. All the other girls were jealous, she was walking taller than anyone else so sure that is was her crush who sent them. It clearly made her year. near the end of the evening her doofy ass neighbor came in and asked if she'd received the flowers she was sent. She was immediately crushed. Instant tears. She ran to the back and broke down sobbing. He just stood there confused as he…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/03/20 03:11 PM
49

"I send a strong message to young girls--don't do porn." Not "Don't be a whore" but "Make sure people don't know the ways in which you are whoring it up." The best part is at the end where she admits she enjoyed it. She enjoyed being used as a cheap fuck hole, she's just pissed she failed in securing herself a beta bux to whom she's have sworn under oath "I hated every second of it, I was forced into, that was not me, I am not like that and I will never do those things with you."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/03/20 10:59 PM
34

They don't have to like me. They just have to leave my money alone. They also have to understand that I have no intention of allowing them to dictate what's important to me (not them). The problem is that the system is set up to ensure they can take from each and everyone of us all that they need and there is virtually nothing we can do about it. That's not nature--that's just fucked.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/02/20 12:39 AM
5

Like a spider that saw a weaker male and consumed him after being impregnated for the "benefit" of HER kids.
/r/MGTOW16/02/20 05:25 PM
66

What were you? You were her emotional tampon.
/r/MGTOW15/02/20 02:41 AM
13

Just as you all know they are no "good" women only those raised in patriarchal cultures and those who aren't you've found out and those you haven't FTFY
/r/MGTOW13/02/20 08:50 PM
14

She'a a female.
/r/MGTOW13/02/20 03:26 AM
3

Candide by Voltaire. It was all about the Red Pill but written in the 1500's (maybe 1600's).
/r/MGTOW12/02/20 08:23 PM
2

No take backs!
/r/MGTOW12/02/20 07:12 PM
9

Now this is the type of feminism men NEED! I am so down with this. Let's look at it: He doesn't have to work He doesn't even have to put on shoes She does all the work She pays all the bills She takes on all the stress She spends all day doing what he doesn't want to He gets to indulge in his hobbies all day He gets to have his alone time He gets to go run around with the milk lady, or UPS lady, or meter maid, or whoever it is that's keeping herself hot for the house husbands--but then he gets t…
/r/MGTOW12/02/20 06:42 PM
1

In fairness, if she was shot in the head, there's a good chance it's just TBI.
/r/MGTOW12/02/20 03:02 AM
1

No. It's been a long, long time since I was reading on them. Can't recall where I came across it.
/r/MGTOW12/02/20 02:52 AM
33

All food is a god send when he's starving to death.
/r/MGTOW11/02/20 05:11 PM
17

Lots and lots and lots. Many societies, most notably the Romans, passed laws such as bachelor taxes to try to coerce men to marry. The Assyrians--the original bad guys (and bad asses) of history ran head long into egalitarianism. These people could be brutal. Still, once they became established, stable and prosperous they passed a whole host of laws enfranchising women, allowing them to hold property and have rights, etc. A generation later they repealed them all.
/r/MGTOW11/02/20 05:08 PM
4

I think it's about options. Once, a hard man typically worked hard and had assets and resources. being hard, he wasn't prone to waste or just giving away his hard earned product--you had to earn it the same way he did. Since women couldn't out compete or bully him to share, they had to become differential and become the things he otherwise hadn't provided for his life--softness, rest, etc. Now, a woman can look at any man and say, "go fuck yourself." There is so much money and opportunity and re…
/r/MGTOW11/02/20 01:36 PM
2

Keep in mind, as a portion of his fortune that's very small. It's like a $50 gift from someone making $50,000.
/r/MGTOW07/02/20 06:43 PM
28

How much do you want to bet that after he was dragged to jail by the police she staid and got railed by one, or even both, of the single guys? The lesson to learn here is when she wants to stay instead of leaving with you, go without her. He should have went home, packed his shit and been no where to be found the next morning when she got home. His scarcity mentality sunk him. The idea of having to go through the trouble of securing more pussy caused him to way over invest in his current source,…
/r/MGTOW03/02/20 01:34 AM
1

WOW! what a straw man. On the slim chance your not a troll, though...You asked about a suffragette movement compared to a men's suffragette movement. While I'm not a world history expert, I think I'm fairly safe to say that suffragette movements began exclusively in western countries as none of the non-western countries had any for of wide spread democratic or republican expectations. Prior to any of the suffragette movements obtaining any real success in the aforementioned western countries, th…
/r/MGTOW31/01/20 11:43 PM
5

Absolutely, they were called, "revolutions." Men had to fight and die to take what was denied them, women only ever had to march and cry to be gifted what they wanted. And remember, "white men" as a group did not have the right to vote until late in the 1800's. Prior to that only the very rich and well born could vote. Yes, that was mostly white men, but only about 2% of them. The remaining 98% of white men could not vote any more than the women or minorities.
/r/MGTOW31/01/20 07:28 PM
5

Colin was the QB for the 49ers. His NFL career was basically tanked due to his starting the protest of taking the knee during the national anthem. Perhaps if he'd not done that it would be him going to the Superbowl and not Tannehill.
/r/MGTOW20/01/20 04:13 PM
38

That was my thoughts exactly. There is no way this is for real.
/r/MGTOW16/01/20 03:45 PM
3

It is a metaphor, but not the one you describe. Before getting into it, I want to cite to one of my favorite Dave Chapell jokes where he points out that if men could get laid in card board boxes, that's all men would live in. The Garden represents the natural abundance of what ever (God, Gia, the universe, what ever your higher power is, I'm going to go with nature). Nature has provided all that mankind needs, just as it provides all that billions of other living organisms need. Man is happy, so…
/r/MGTOW15/01/20 11:59 PM
4

Then he created spellcheck!
/r/MGTOW15/01/20 11:43 PM
2

This seems off. I'm fairly sure all of the European Countries participate in the Hague Convention and the convention provides extradition for child support warrants. I may be wrong, if someone know correct me.
/r/MGTOW12/01/20 10:40 PM
50

The entirety of her post is, "I dont think I should have to change to make sure I'm a good fit and productive worker so that I can earn a promotion. How do I force everyone else to accommodate me so that I can force them to give me what I want." And, intertwined through the whole cry baby act is, "why dont they like and trust me?"
/r/MGTOW11/01/20 03:06 PM
2

Isn't that the kid from Stranger Things?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/01/20 01:19 PM
12

Male, there are certainly male pigs.
/r/MGTOW08/01/20 05:06 PM
18

I get that he's male. But he never once has the audacity to call himself a man.
/r/MGTOW08/01/20 04:51 PM
30

To be fair, no where in that post do I see him refer to himself as a "man." He repeatedly admits he's a pig. He's correct and being honest. What's the problem?
/r/MGTOW08/01/20 04:46 PM
6

How do you figure? We went to war over a decade ago in Iraq, which beat Iran in a war in the 80's and we are still there. We also went to war with Afghanistan over a decade ago, another no tech pushover and guess what? We are still there, too.
/r/MGTOW03/01/20 10:35 PM
2

I think there is a strong, but not necessarily exact, connection between the implications for societies. To make a very long discussion short, there are some recent articles analyzing religious tenants to societal factors. The big one seems to be that as a society becomes larger, urban and more crowded, their god(s) become increasingly portrayed as more angry and vengeful. Less crowded, rural societies have more benign gods. This is to be distinguished from the presence of an evil/villain god su…
/r/MGTOW03/01/20 03:47 AM
52

It places all the responsibility on the men so as to maximize the opportunity of women. From a woman's perspective, how is that anything short of amazing?
/r/MGTOW28/12/19 08:25 PM
13

They will blame it on men, but they absolutely know that it's the natural result of kicking fathers out. What won't be considered-by most men-is that the women fully understand, but they just don't care.
/r/MGTOW27/12/19 09:15 PM
5

Women want more, but complain when it means they have to do more.
/r/MGTOW27/12/19 06:38 PM
2

"The meek shall inherit the earth." This saying is at least 2,000 years old. Notice "inherit" as in those who previously had it are now dead.
/r/MGTOW25/12/19 06:06 AM
1

I said it doesn't care about what you've chosen for your self. Every individual is very important to nature. Think about what has had to happen throughout all of history for anything to be in existence. Nothing just poofs into being. Everything is the result of a long, laborious process. Everything has a role. It is all vital (maybe not mosquitoes--they are the freaks of nature with no legitimate purpose). The drama occurs when what you want is different than what nature is trying to force on yo…
/r/MGTOW23/12/19 09:32 PM
1

But only because I care enough to do so.
/r/MGTOW23/12/19 09:28 PM
2

No, they just become food for other organisms in the food chain.
/r/MGTOW23/12/19 09:27 PM
0

But it does care. It cares that there's food for the crocodile.
/r/MGTOW23/12/19 09:00 PM
-1

I replied to your assertion that nature doesn't care bout you. It most certainly does. It just doesn't care about what you choose when what you choose is different from what it's chosen for you.
/r/MGTOW23/12/19 08:53 PM
2

You're having a hard time accepting that you aren't the center of the universe. Nature, as with all things in nature, only cares about itself. The process is hard. The reward is fleeting. The results are timeless. Nature is hard on all the individuals; males and females, winners and losers. All are necessary and so all are important. You seems to struggle with accepting that the role nature has selected for you is not the role you have accepted for yourself. Of course it's easier not to compete.…
/r/MGTOW23/12/19 08:41 PM
10

> Nature doesn't give a fuck about the individual male That's just not true at all. It cares very much about males, collectively and individually. In fact, nature is wholly dependent upon males. It needs the males to compete with each other to push the best to the very limits of their ability to ensure that the health of each species and by extension the whole ecosystem not just continues, but thrives. It doesn't give a shit about your happiness, though. In fact, happiness is just a carrot devis…
/r/MGTOW23/12/19 08:03 PM
7

This isn't accurate. DISCLAIMER: check with an attorney about how the laws work where you live. Generally speaking, when a person dies without a will (intestate), the state already has laws about who will inherit the estate. Assuming your aren't married, the order of inheritance when intestate is something like what follows: 1) children; 2) parents; 3) siblings; 4) nieces/nephews; 5) aunts/uncles/grandparents; 6) extended family.
/r/MGTOW23/12/19 06:25 PM
1

I meant that I knew the relationship with them had"expiration dates." I was not dating them because I was looking for my forever partner. I dated them because they seemed like fun and interesting people, but I knew that what they wanted and what I wanted were too incompatible for anything permanent to develop.
/r/MGTOW23/12/19 05:32 PM
18

The article is limited, but interesting. Sexual history in a vacuum doesn't matter. In context, it's very important. If I'm just looking for NSA, one off, I'll be wasting my time with the virginal Mormon girls. It's all about what you want. I've had LTR with girls who had fairly high numbers. It wasn't an issue because of my expectations. I was never going to marry them. They were fun. I didn't invest in them and knew they had expiration dates, even if I didn't know exactly when that would be. W…
/r/MGTOW19/12/19 09:52 PM
4

To be clear, this is considered a "biased" sample, meaning that the factors leading up to the testing group will, more likely than on an unbiased sample, have more of the sought out disposition. This should not be taken to mean that 1/3 of all births involve an instance of paternity fraud. It means, that out of all the cases where men are contesting paternity, or at least have enough doubt to demand a test, 1/3 are proving not to the the father. For example, if you wanted to know how many women …
/r/MGTOW16/12/19 08:47 PM
24

Dude is still delusional. He know wife #1 cheated on him at the beginning of the relationship and at the end, but never bothers to extrapolate that she was out fucking the whole way through.
/r/MGTOW15/12/19 02:23 PM
6

In the immortal words of Pink Floyd, "You better run!"
/r/MGTOW11/12/19 01:52 AM
5

Again, women see men the way men see jobs and careers. Most men don't want to spend their lives working, but given the society we live in, we spend most of our lives angling to get one. We have to first angle to get a job, then we angle to get a better one. Women are no different. They have to have a relationship in order to monkey branch up. And, the economics of it are the same. It's very important to get into the job market at the highest pay and position possible. It takes a lot less time an…
/r/MGTOW07/12/19 05:45 PM
1

Nope. The fact that the results of their actions do not lead to the result YOU want, does not mean shit to anyone other than yourself. You worry about you. If you eel you cannot reach your goals without someone else somehow helping you or playing wingwoman to you, that's your problem and no one else's. Scientists don't propagate scientific information through their children, but by educating. You go live a great life. See how many people are drawn to it and try to emulate it. There you go, there…
/r/MGTOW06/12/19 11:06 PM
27

Dude, you dated her for a couple of weeks 10 years ago. Move the fuck on.
/r/MGTOW06/12/19 12:59 PM
5

I think you are making something very complicated out of something very simple. Men and women do not want the same things. Women want benefits. Men want purity. These aren't ideological, but pragmatical requirements of evolution. Women need the resources--genes, food, shelter, protection and parental investment to raise children who can survive and reproduce themselves. Men need to make sure the child for which they are providing all of the foregoing are in fact his. The problem is that a woman …
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre04/12/19 09:48 PM
8

Couples counseling is rarely a good idea, and here's why. Most counselors prioritize feelings over anything and everything else. And by feelings, I mean your wife's feelings, because she'll have the most feelings and the strongest feelings and the most to say about those feelings. If you buy into this, you're fucked. If you refuse to buy into this then that automatically makes you the bad guy because you don't care about her feelings. On the off chance you do find a counselor who understands tha…
/r/MGTOW02/12/19 10:29 PM
14

TL/DR: Women will not be happy until they are given that which men have created and earned.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/12/19 05:58 PM
8

Another woman who is all about her, her, her and about all the things she should be getting while never, for even a second, considering what someone else might want. I'll bet you anything that her ex didn't walk away, he was driven away by a financial and emotional vampire who was determined to suck every last bit of his soul from him and leave him an empty husk.
/r/MGTOW01/12/19 05:01 PM
5

Having been married for 30 years and making much more than her? That's a very good recipe for lifetime alimony.
/r/MGTOW28/11/19 04:19 AM
1

This only works if they both have assets. In this scenario, there's no incentive for her to not burn money on lawyers as she won't get it anyway.
/r/MGTOW28/11/19 03:47 AM
2

There is no such thing as, "that type of woman." There is only "the type of man or circumstances, for which she will be that type of woman."
/r/MGTOW26/11/19 11:09 PM
46

I love how the excuse so often is, "she's emotionally committed to me" and "she can separate sex and emotions." This is where the fatal flaw in reasoning occurs. For women, sex is either transactional or emotional. If she's having sex with him, you have to ask, "what is she getting?" If the answer is nothing, then the answer really is "emotions." Poly girls want to be poly because they aren't getting the full pallet of emotions from their SO. She is NOT being emotionally monogamous--she is speci…
/r/MGTOW26/11/19 09:34 PM
1

Yes. Most of those tests look at centimorgans, among other things. Centimorgans are inherited from parents. Comparing the centimorgans of two people can tell you how closely related they are.
/r/MGTOW15/11/19 03:50 PM
13

What's almost lost in OP's humble brag is the fact that her social group is shaming her for her out of bounds sexual activity. She doesn't say, but I strongly suspect her social group is somewhat female, if not entirely female. Slowly people are beginning to wake up and realize actions have consequences.
/r/MGTOW08/11/19 06:29 PM
1

I had a girlfriend who would say she had a pass for certain [celebrity/athlete], she'd usually list 2 or 3 such people. This was usually in a group conversation with others. My go to response was to say I also had a pass and then list 2 or 3 of the cutest neighbors. She'd reply with something like, "that's not how it works." To which I'd reply, "Oops, too late!" She didn't appreciate me responses and quickly stopped that whole line of thought.
/r/MGTOW02/11/19 01:03 PM
115

That he should be paying/doing more for her.
/r/MGTOW02/11/19 12:52 PM
6

What's genetically ingrained into both is how to set up situations giving them power. He goes to force and weapons, she goes to relational obligations and manipulations.
/r/MGTOW26/10/19 01:44 PM
10

Shame is the go to weapon of women everywhere. They will try to shame you into anything and everything.
/r/MGTOW24/10/19 10:39 PM
5

I think it's more fundamental than that. It's not that he's at peace or happy so she has to mess with it, it's that he's got something she doesn't and rather than build it for herself, she can solve the problem by taking it away. After all, how dare he have something without first making sure she has it as well--the selfish bastard. He's asleep while she has to be awake? That lazy bastard. He's happy watching the game while she's sweeping the floors? That lazy inconsiderate bastard. He's happy b…
/r/MGTOW22/10/19 03:44 PM
7

How about you volunteer.
/r/MGTOW21/10/19 07:39 PM
1

For the first thousand years or so, the catholic church didn't require priests to be celibate and unmarried. However, the church also had a problem with priests leaving property to their heirs instead of leaving it with the Church. that's the most likely reason the change was instituted. From a theological standpoint, though, it isn't a huge inconsistency. Though marriage is a Catholic sacrament, love, as the church would define it, is about sacrifice. So, marriage was about. theologically, base…
/r/MGTOW15/10/19 11:04 PM
2

Will?
/r/MGTOW04/10/19 12:23 AM
28

"I'll take SHIT THAT NEVER HAPPENED for $200, Alex."
/r/MGTOW01/10/19 06:04 PM
14

Solipsism at its finest. First, there's her delusion that the world was, innately, a bountiful utopia until men fucked it up with their greed. Not the slightest hint of awareness that we were living in trees to stay out of reach of the lions until men started working. Second, how dare men not spend all their time and effort making the world a better place for women? Men want all their hard effort to benefit them? What fucktards they must be. But, since they won't change, then women will go out a…
/r/MGTOW29/09/19 02:24 AM
5

The NT makes fairly clear that, if you can, don't get married. It further clarifies that if you can't control your sex drive then marry rather than be corrupted by promiscuity. However, having gotten married, denial of sex is wrong and defeats the whole purpose of marriage. So in short, I'd say, if you can move beyond women, do so. If you cant find a women to be monogamous with for the sexual relief. Make sure she wants sex with you as well, or its a bad situation. Having committed, but not marr…
/r/MGTOW28/09/19 04:55 AM
7

Lt's be clear about this, though. This was NOT about her being a slut. It was all about her being in CONTROL. She had her bf under her thumb. She got what she wanted and had to invest minimally in him to maintain it. Who wouldn't love that. However, the longer he accepted that dynamic, the more he solidified in her mind that that is what he deserved because that is who he is--her servant. Imagine now, how pissed off she is when he tries to pull a power play and says "I can walk away from you com…
/r/MGTOW19/09/19 03:41 PM
14

That's not what the study showed, and it wasn't even studying that. Some studies of deceased persons have found traces of male DNA in female cells. Exactly how those traces became present or what effect, if any they had, was NOT studied or even determined. Some of the raw data about the people did appear to find a correlation between the amount and degree of male DNA present positively correlating with women who we would assume to have more promiscuous behaviors. But, there could be several expl…
/r/MGTOW16/09/19 05:30 PM
87

Her past for your future. This is especially relevant given the recent study, that's been posted here at least 1,000 times, about the lack of "economically attractive" partners for women. If women expect men to spend their 20's doing the hard work of making themselves attractive mates, there's no reason men can't expect women to do the same.
/r/MGTOW16/09/19 11:34 AM
16

Exactly. Another man has so turned her on, that she has to turn to her husband to fuck off the excess energy.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/19 10:27 PM
12

Her "look" changes to fit the lie, but she always tells the truth. Compare the photos. In the photo on the left, her bad boy stand up straight, while her upper body ever-so-slightly leans into him. In the photo on the left, her good boy leans into her, while she ever-so-slightly leans away from him.
/r/MGTOW15/09/19 08:36 PM
9

Rollo has written on this multiple times--start there. My take on it is that the subtext of "when old" really means, "at the end." At the end I'm going to die. I do NOT want to eek out a few more days, weeks, months or even years, if I'm more dead than alive. That is why this type of discussion or mentality, to me, misses the mark wholly. WE ARE ALL GOING TO DIE--FULL STOP. Are you going to live: that's the only question. Are you going to live your life the best you can for as long as you can? W…
/r/MGTOW15/09/19 08:32 PM
2

Divorce will not solve your problems, you will solve your problems. Married or not married, you will either do what you need to do or you will not. The good thing about where you are at is that the marriage need not hold you back any longer. What do you care if she stays or goes? Either way, you are dedicated to doing what you need to do. You should act the same regardless of whether you: 1) live alone; 2) live with a roommate; 3) live with a friends with benefits; or 4) live with a LTR.
/r/MGTOW15/09/19 08:29 PM
3

"I have a secret, that I don't tell anyone." I have an STI that I won't reveal until I believe I have you hooked.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/09/19 05:55 PM
1

He also jettisoned large parts, like the whole Law.
/r/MGTOW12/09/19 01:58 AM
5

You do realize these radio "set ups" are fake, right? First, you have to balance ALL of the eves dropping laws which are the laws about when you can and cannot record a person's conversation. Some jurisdictions allow one party consent, many require all parties to consent. Almost all jurisdictions make it a felony to record without the proper consent. Next, you have liability issues, such as if any false representations are made, or if it constitutes an invasion of privacy. Even if true, if you b…
/r/MGTOW11/09/19 10:01 PM
1

Citing to your traditional Christian beliefs, remember: You follow a man who, as far as we can tell, refused to marry, had no kids, and in his 30's stopped working in his profession--for which he was known--to live an itinerant life with about a dozen of his closest male-only- buds. What exactly are you having trouble with?
/r/MGTOW11/09/19 09:49 PM
3

Nope. Court's can use your past income to determine your potential future income and then set your obligation according to that "imputed" income. Losing a professional license, say for being convicted of assaulting your ex, doesn't matter. The court can say you voluntarily acted bad (can't say you didn't do it if you've been convicted for having done it) and therefore you are voluntarily underemployed, so the Court is free to inpute your income on those grounds. You got yourself into the profess…
/r/MGTOW11/09/19 09:39 PM
1

I don't think Paul ever gave an unqualified "marriage is good." He consistently says marriage is better than a lot of other alternatives. But, it is best to not be married.
/r/MGTOW11/09/19 09:29 PM
2

The New Testament repeatedly states that it is best not to marry.
/r/MGTOW11/09/19 11:46 AM
1

For those who aren't just looking for any reason to grab torches and pitch forks, I'll give you an unbiased run down of what happened. The female family court judge made a custody determination in which she made the mother the primary custodian. She did so despite the fact that there was some evidence mom may not have been wholly fit. Child ends up dying. It isn't 100% clear why, but some early evidence points at mom. Dad goes ballistic, starts posting on social media about how bad the judge is.…
/r/MGTOW09/09/19 03:30 PM
1

That's not the correct hand.
/r/MGTOW06/09/19 09:08 PM
3

The key part of the story is: "For four years, Mike had known that the girl...was not...his." That's the issue here. If he had contested paternity as soon as he found out about the paternity fraud, he almost certainly could have repudiated all obligations without issue. But he didn't. As with almost every legal claim, yo must assert it within a reasonable (or statutorily prescribed) time or risk waiving it. He waited four years to say he was not the father. During that time he acted as the fathe…
/r/MGTOW05/09/19 08:46 PM
4

The key part of the story is: "For four years, Mike had known that the girl...was not...his." That's the issue here. If he had contested paternity as soon as he found out about the paternity fraud, he almost certainly could have repudiated all obligations without issue. But he didn't. As with almost every legal claim, yo must assert it within a reasonable (or statutorily prescribed) time or risk waiving it. He waited four years to say he was not the father. During that time he acted as the fathe…
/r/MensRights05/09/19 08:46 PM
8

For the same reason women do all of the following: put on fake nails, put on fake lip color, put on fake eye color and liner, color their hair, use product to make their hair do things it otherwise never would, wear make up to look unlike anything they can actually look like naturally, wear shape wear to force their bodies to have contours that are not real...
/r/MGTOW05/09/19 07:40 PM
10

I think you misunderstood the ending. They broke up, he pulled the implant to help him forget about her.
/r/MGTOW03/09/19 05:10 PM
4

He doesn't understand: ignore what is said as only actions speak the truth.
/r/MGTOW30/08/19 08:35 PM
12

She was just generating an issue to help bring attention to her movie, which was about a high powered woman finding a partner. It's just spin.
/r/MGTOW30/08/19 03:59 PM
84

So how is it you can see the confused look on his face when he called you?
/r/MGTOW27/08/19 02:34 PM
42

They aren't gender neutral, they are written with gender neutral language. You have to ask why the law is being written in the first place. For example, if I wrote a law saying all person's with long hair should be fined $100, that is a gender neutral statute, but it would have an extremely disproportionate effect upon women.
/r/MGTOW25/08/19 09:06 PM
60

No free sex and no free commitment. Also, I agree the past doesn't matter: I promised you forever yesterday? In the past, we're talking about today. I took vows with you last week? Doesn't matter, we're talking about today and I like her more. I promised I'd help you raise the kids? I don't feel like it today, stop bringing up my past.
/r/MGTOW25/08/19 07:10 PM
8

Guarantee you he confronted her about information he saw on her FB account which contradicted information he had been told by her or led to believe by her. Notice, they've been together for 4 years and the FB account was from 5 ago. 5 years prior would have been right before they became a thing and would have made her 24/25; right in the middle of her epiphany stage. She deleted the account when she decided it was time to settle down "and become a new person." She spins that into, he dumped my b…
/r/MGTOW23/08/19 05:05 PM
2

Teach them the holy trinity for men: No marriage No cohabitation No impregnation
/r/MGTOW21/08/19 10:28 PM
23

Just go straight to the source, the book was based off the book Candide by Voltaire.
/r/MGTOW20/08/19 09:33 PM
3

The crux of what she is saying is: I already have more than anyone else I know, but I am extremely upset that I don't have even more!" This is the epitome of entitlement.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/08/19 06:52 PM
5

Well, most think that during their careers they should only have to make lateral moves, at worst, and that all their past experience should be recognized in their current placement and that, yes, when they finally cash out they should be entitled to a comfortable retirement for the rest if their lives.
/r/MGTOW20/08/19 01:48 AM
37

Women view men the way men view jobs.
/r/MGTOW20/08/19 12:37 AM
123

Isn't that the exact same reason men beat their wives? because they love them?
/r/MGTOW19/08/19 09:28 PM
1

We ALL wear clothes, we don't all wear the SAME clothes. All women are like that, they aren't all like that in the same way.
/r/MGTOW16/08/19 08:14 PM
2

As soon as you condone the control of others, you likewise condone the control of you by others. Leave women to themselves and you go your own way. If you ever think to yourself something along the lines of, "I want to do/build/invest in this thing, but I'm afraid of the unrestrained women." That's just a good indication that the thing/activity isn't worth your time or effort in the first place.
/r/MGTOW16/08/19 07:58 PM
2

Oh la la is very good. Not sure it's MGTOW but it is certainly very RP. Rich Girl was originally Rich Boy, about a boy who relies on family money instead of self development, was changed simply because it sounded catchier as Girl.
/r/MGTOW14/08/19 07:00 PM
22

Read the stories. Jesus absolutely forgave everyone of those women: AFTER she publicly confessed her wrongdoing or after her wrongdoing was made known by other means. Never before.
/r/MGTOW13/08/19 04:34 PM
35

Well I'm convinced. None of it is her fault. She's wholly helpless and wholly unable to change her situation.
/r/MGTOW08/08/19 03:11 AM
3

Not intentionally, or towards some nefarious end. The powerful are almost always powerful because they are exploiters. They don't really care what avenue they take to achieve exploitation, the ability to exploit and consolidate is all that matters. In the the age of mass media, which began with radio, then tv and movies and now the internet, the M.O. is to simply give people what they want. As people indulge, then, surprise surprise, they become more indulgent. The cycle repeats. For example, Li…
/r/MGTOW07/08/19 10:36 PM
5

This. At no point does this writer ask why men are drawn in to TRP. The entirety of her position is that she isn't getting what she wants. Its as if the possibility that there's another perspective has NEVER occurred to her. There is just her and what she can get, nothing else.
/r/MGTOW03/08/19 02:26 PM
2

Never attribute to malice what can be explained by ignorance. I don't think it's a conspiracy, I think it's laziness. It takes time, energy, resources and commitment to build and maintain. The choice isn't hard when the clear alternative is almost certain calamity. But, when a society reaches the point that it has no real (apparent) threats and an overabundance of necessities and then luxuries, it's hard to maintain a large population willing to endure continued hardship when they could otherwis…
/r/MGTOW31/07/19 10:55 PM
99

And that's a prime example of why you ignore what they say and only watch what they do. The child MUST have the money so they give it to mom and then make sure she can not be held responsible for how she spends it.
/r/MGTOW31/07/19 01:42 AM
5

Women just want more. When a relationship represents more, then that's what she wants. When a different relationship represents more, then that's what she wants. When no relationship represents more then that's what she wants. More: it's what women crave!
/r/TheRedPill25/07/19 04:24 PM
45

AWALT
/r/MGTOW22/07/19 08:59 PM
1

Which religions are you talking about? Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Zoorastrianism, Buhdism? The texts are all pretty red pill. Maybe you're talking about Helenistic based religions, the ones that typically have women being created for the sole purpose of vexing men? ​ Many of the far eastern (India, China, Japanese) religious traditions teach a civic duty as the ultimate moral virtue stance that caters heavil to female inclussion. Just don't read those.
/r/MGTOW07/07/19 05:41 PM
8

Not saying this isn't legit, but I'm saying there's no way this was taken recently. This is a height of fall photo, just look at the reds, oranges and yellows on the trees.
/r/MGTOW02/07/19 05:21 PM
1

Either way, just turn off the damn lights.
/r/MGTOW30/06/19 02:21 AM
2

Well, that is a stellar example of considering one's self the prize. At no point does she even attempt to explain what a guy would get from being nice, other than the girl. It's clear the girl, at that point is wholly selfish, wants the nice guy because, as a nice guy, he will let he do nothing but prioritize herself and he'll prioritize her as well. BUT, since she is the prize, having her in his home means he's won! ​ Every guy should feel that way about himself.
/r/MGTOW28/06/19 07:37 PM
3

I think there's more complexity to it than that. We certainly have biological instincts. We also have biological necessities and tendencies. All of those but up against environmental realities and stimuli (even the absence of). For example, humans, lacking hair, have a universal need to protect against the elements. I'm not aware of any culture, anywhere, that does nothing skin wise. But, what is done varies greatly depending on the environment. Those and far north or high elevations, invest hea…
/r/MGTOW26/06/19 05:50 PM
3

A lot of people feel a need to create a legacy. Having a wife and children seems like a win/win situation: you get a companion and kids to carry on after you are gone. You can achieve both, without a relation or family. There are many people in this world who need. Maybe they need help, a hand, an ear or just friendship. Find these people and forge real, meaningful relationships. Work with charities or other contributing organizations. If you don't need sex, that should remove all the complicati…
/r/MGTOW24/06/19 11:35 PM
5

You can't get strong without resistance. We have an easy society with an over abundance of everything, including sexualization. We've destroyed all bastions of masculinity which could create/recreate struggle for men. What do you expect.
/r/MGTOW24/06/19 11:19 PM
18

Notice how when she found a man she stopped trying and started dressing down.
/r/MGTOW24/06/19 04:07 AM
6

We are at the point where straight forward, non-embellished writing is indistinguishable from over the top sarcasm.
/r/MGTOW24/06/19 03:12 AM
2

No jurisdiction in the US allows double collection of child support. If it's happening, it's because the two jurisdictions aren't taking. Read the compact.
/r/MGTOW24/06/19 12:29 AM
3

In the U.S. the states most participate in an interstate compact on how to handle child support collection. Just make sure the states are talking to each other, shouldn't be a problem.
/r/MGTOW24/06/19 12:24 AM
2

"The NAWALT argument fails because the focus is wrong, it puts too much agency on the woman" Exactly how much agency should a woman have for her choices and actions? How much should a man have?
/r/MGTOW24/06/19 12:16 AM
14

So...she's...admitting...men should understand implicit communication and expectation of entitlement based on what a woman wears. That should be very interesting.
/r/MGTOW20/06/19 04:36 PM
3

A LOT of that is intentional misinformation not with the intent to deceive, but with the intent to make a dollar. People are drawn to the fringe, novel and extreme. So, that is what our mass media supplies. The more that is provided, the more that is required to continue the fringe, novel and extreme reaction. Fairly soon we find our information receptors inundated with with these representations to the exclusion of everything else. What is actually fringe now appears the norm. ​ Think about it,…
/r/MGTOW19/06/19 12:00 AM
2

Consuming
/r/MGTOW18/06/19 04:42 PM
-6

Dude, you're a douche. You have ni social skills. She may leave something to be desired, but at least she knows how to be around people without being a total cunt.
/r/MGTOW18/06/19 01:08 AM
5

Why would they write an article that long and not once state who iniated the divorce or seperation.
/r/MGTOW12/06/19 05:38 PM
8

At least she's taking responsibility for covering her own bills. She spends her money on clothes, I spend mine in super chargers.
/r/MGTOW12/06/19 03:22 PM
2

It was an observation: the fluidity of "truth" that seemed to be inherent, or at least present, to a very large degree, in virtually every woman I could observe or remember having really observed. Truth is the truth, but not for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/19 04:46 AM
2

Well, you're the sucker for thinking it had anything to do with rights. It's all about privileges and entitlements. But, making those arguments directly would go over like a lead zeppelin (yes, that's really where the band got its name). Instead, they scream about rights and therefore make themselves aggrieved parties. Which rights? which ever are on the other side of the line as it's currently drawn. That's why no matter how much you give them, they must have more.
/r/MGTOW10/06/19 08:13 PM
19

"Because I believed everyone has a past they want to forget and leave behind." ​ And this attitude is one of the main culprits of the degradation of the West. One of the hallmark's of the West, and one of the ideas that I think lead to its ascendancy, is the idea of forgiveness. People can have significant future value, even if they've made mistakes in the past. The notion has found homes in multiple religions, it's so important and functional. However, all of the approaches to forgiveness that …
/r/MGTOW10/06/19 06:03 PM
1

Why would we "take" it back? If we just wait long enough, they'll demand the right to force it on us. Enjoy the decline.
/r/MGTOW09/06/19 02:24 PM
3

STDs aren't new. They've been a huge part of civilization since the beginning. But, prior to the 1900s, virtually untreatable. European court fashions, were often set by those trying to hide symptoms, usually of syphilis.
/r/MGTOW07/06/19 01:32 PM
10

It's all different cuts of the same old dress. Humans are higly adaptable, flexible and resilient. People have been kvetching about "the instability" of everything for thousands of years. The ONLY difference is we have a delivery system capable if keeping things in our face 24/7, an industry built on doing just that, and copious amounts of free time with no idea how to productively use it. If you feel like sheep being lead to the slaughter, its not the world, but that you're a sheep.
/r/MGTOW07/06/19 01:01 PM
1

Not even the slightest hesitancy on their part to admit that "endorsed" media are censoring unapproved voices. Also, no attempt to explain how the men "running" the company made the construction flawed as opposed to those flaws being in the design and/or workmanship.
/r/MGTOW06/06/19 01:54 AM
4

It's a corollary to: "women don;t want to help you train for the race, they just want to wait at the finish lone for the winner."
/r/MGTOW06/06/19 01:51 AM
3

Clearly a troll post. She has the summary line right in the middle (not going to be there when she's done partying) and no woman is going to have that level of magnanimous insight that she does at the very end.
/r/MGTOW02/06/19 01:53 PM
23

No, they'll continue to be play to the system and be coddled for it until the grave.
/r/MGTOW02/06/19 01:45 AM
1

Do you have any idea how much money you could make if you were willing to give blow jobs to dudes? Seriously, you could have dudes paying all your bills, with a much, much better lifestyle, if only you'd get on your knees and swallow some dick. So why don't you do that? Because the thought of swallowing some guy's cock is so repulsive, you'd rather bust your ass providing for yourself than stoop that low. It's the same for women. They'd rather risk being out on their own than suck the dicks of m…
/r/MGTOW01/06/19 08:34 PM
96

She never stopped lying. She saw the post, saw that he was going to hack into her accounts and she rushed home to assure him that it was just one man and in his fixation on that revelation he'd forget about hacking into her accounts--and it worked. My guess is she's an escort. Better to lose him by admitting an affair than have her side hustle get spread to the public and lose her whole life.
/r/MGTOW31/05/19 10:17 PM
6

At what age are children old enough to begin to learn that there are consequences to actions? Of course, the lessons should be age appropriate, she doesn't need to hear that her parents divorced because her mother is a cock gobbler, but she can hear that her mother lied and mistreated her father so they could no longer be together.
/r/MGTOW28/05/19 05:49 PM
15

The only thing Roosh believes is that he needs more dollars in his pocket. The hegemonious left media has frozen him out of his PUA grandstand and he can no longer make any money shilling that snake oil. He needs something else to sell to the gullibles. Religion has a long and esteemed history of silver tongued liars. Just watch him, fairly soon he'll be publishing Real Men of God type media publications in an attempt to keep his business afloat.
/r/MGTOW24/05/19 06:31 PM
2

Nope, just the following: Get a trade skill, electrical, plumbing, welding, something of the like. Don't put yourself in the position to be charged with a felony. That's it. Anywhere you go in the civilized world will have a need for a trade. Work and live cheap. When you have about a year's worth of salary earned-should take you 4-6 months if you're truly living cheap--quit and travel. When you have about a months worth of savings left, start over.
/r/MGTOW23/05/19 04:46 PM
8

Or you could just ignore her and cut her off.
/r/MGTOW21/05/19 11:34 PM
33

Fake, fake, fake fake. Did I mention that it's clearly fake?
/r/MGTOW19/05/19 05:49 PM
0

It's used by them as a universal justification for whatever it was she did/didn't do. She didn't do it because she was bad, or selfish, or a slut, or a whore, or whatever, she did it because, "she just wanted to be loved." Now of course, when she says, "love" what she means is "receive." She did whatever she did so that she could have more it the correct understanding of that phrase.
/r/MGTOW18/05/19 12:46 PM
9

Notice how there's no support for ANY of the claims? Without a doubt, the only people suffering from this growing trend is women and children. The men are doing fine, any attempt to support their claims would make that drastically clear. It would also make clear the only solution: WOMEN MUST CHANGE. ​ This is just another call back to the plantation.
/r/MGTOW14/05/19 10:00 PM
1

Just that the out of Africa theory stemmed from finding certain fossils only in Africa, except now they've been found elsewhere.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/05/19 03:47 AM
12

Not necessarily. There is some emerging evidence of very early human outside of Africa.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/05/19 09:35 PM
19

Nope. Women believe they are entitled from all men, even men they've never met. Men should give them everything they have, but be so great at being men they always have more to give.
/r/MGTOW11/05/19 04:32 PM
47

Women hate men for two reasons: He's given her everything he has and she can take no more He refuses to give her everything he has
/r/MGTOW11/05/19 04:24 PM
9

Even 5 year olds understand there is a natural order to things.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/19 01:09 PM
7

The difference between IDGAF and being mean/jerk is very simple--it's all about the other person. If the other person doesn't factor into it, then it's because you DGAF. If the other person is the reason, then you're being mean. "I don't care this makes your feel, I need to do this now" is very different from "I'm going to do this because of how it will make you feel." The trip up for many, is when you do something without regard to others, but also without any regard for yourself. If you do som…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/19 09:06 PM
198

A woman is jealous of everyone.
/r/MGTOW03/05/19 10:08 PM
9

So what? Let women take care of themselves, you take care of yourself. If you want more/better pussy, go get it. If you loyalty without question, get a dog.
/r/MGTOW03/05/19 04:31 PM
2

Totally fake. That is not remotely how court works.
/r/MGTOW02/05/19 07:21 PM
1

You should be your mission. Developing yourself should be your mission. Turn yourself from a rough, dim unpolished rock into a hard edged, multifaceted gem so that any light from your environment is reflected back to greater degree. Develop your skills, including productive and social skills, learn to plan, explore, be gregarious and brooding in turn. Be fun then be serious. Enjoy the now develop a plan for your legacy. But at all times build your self. Give to yourself freely, but invest only i…
/r/TheRedPill01/05/19 10:04 PM
119

I love how he minimizes the situation. In his mind he's trying to decide if she's a cheater. He's completely ignoring the fact that she's also a liar and a manipulator/gas-lighter
/r/MGTOW30/04/19 06:42 PM
1

HAHAHAHAHAHA! No, your testes and ovaries DO NOT secrete hormones which literally determine your anatomy, your neurological structuring, and your neuro-chemical make up. OH, wait...
/r/MGTOW30/04/19 02:26 PM
10

Latitude.
/r/MGTOW30/04/19 12:15 PM
11

Social and Mass media create a metal over crowding even worse than physical over crowding.
/r/MGTOW29/04/19 12:46 AM
22

>we have twin daughters (5f&5f) Right from the start we see this guy is NOT the brightest bulb. He tells us he has TWIN DAUGHTERS, then needs to spell out for BOTH that they're 5f and 5f as if they might be different ages, despite being twins or one might not be a female despite both being daughters. Although, in clown world they might be different in either or both respects.
/r/MGTOW28/04/19 08:27 PM
2

That's right, half of the population doesn't all have the same genitalia, oh wait. Yes, but not all fish swim... OK, but not all birds have feathers... OK, but not all lizards are cold blooded... OK, but not all insects have exoskeletons... OK, but not all invertebrates are spineless...
/r/MGTOW28/04/19 08:10 PM
1

Women have spent 3 generations trying to raise boys against their nature, it is now falling apart. The same will happen if you try to raise girls against theirs.
/r/MGTOW28/04/19 01:19 PM
1

The problem here is her man is a weak ass man. It's his house. No one, not women, men, friends, girl friends, parents, ministers, no one should walk into your house and act like it is his/her house. It was either Alex doing the things or it wasn't. If it was Alex, B.F. needs to tell him how it's going to be. If it wasn't Alex, B.F. needs to tell g.f. to deal.
/r/MGTOW26/04/19 10:14 PM
17

Tears for all the women who have to cook dinner, but no mention of all the men dying on the battle field. Sobs for all the soccer moms stuck in carpools, but no sound of all the men mangled in dangerous jobs to provide the money that allows them to be soccer moms. Cries for the women who can't be all that they believe they are entitled to be, cries of oppression towards all the men who gave up their dreams to pay their wives, ex wifes, baby mommies or fraudulent baby mommies because failure to d…
/r/MGTOW23/04/19 01:34 AM
11

And when she said "she was thinking about sleeping with him" what she meant was "she was thinking about how mad OP would be if he knew she was sleeping with him."
/r/MGTOW22/04/19 09:55 PM
11

That's not hypergamy, that's the pussypass.
/r/MGTOW22/04/19 01:37 AM
7

I think uts quite likely good women rarely end up single mothers for very long, so they are not counted. Bad men rarely stay as fathers very long, so they are not counted. So the majority of single pare krs are comprised of bad women and good men.
/r/MGTOW21/04/19 06:05 PM
17

He was correct on that as well, it was just the last of them to be pushed.
/r/MGTOW19/04/19 09:54 PM
11

No she won't. She'll take double the step to make sure it's well hidden.
/r/MGTOW18/04/19 03:59 PM
7

Nothing you said made your boss sound miserable. I understand you'd be miserable in his shoes, that doesn't mean he is. He sounds safe in his little box. Most people do not want freedom, they just want fair masters.
/r/MGTOW18/04/19 03:53 PM
10

She "kissed" his dick with her uterus.
/r/MGTOW18/04/19 11:28 AM
3

Men tend to be far more concerned with loyalty than with accomplishment in their partner.
/r/MGTOW14/04/19 08:51 PM
1

First, I'm very sorry about what happened to you in your childhood. Second ,I'm sorry about how things played out when with your boyfriend; I can understand how hard it can be to be rejected when we reach out to others for help. That said, I can't hold it against your boyfriend and offer this advice solely with the intent to help you decide how to move forward and, hopefully, not become bitter from your experience. I'll start by acknowledging what a number of other responders have suggested; tha…
/r/RedPillWomen14/04/19 07:10 PM
4

You should read up on the current conflict within China regarding their native Muslim populations.
/r/MGTOW09/04/19 03:28 AM
24

No, there will then be Pax China, all who are not peaceful shall be dissapeared.
/r/MGTOW09/04/19 12:45 AM
5

The road to Hell is paved with good intentions.
/r/MGTOW07/04/19 07:22 PM
8

Your responses show you dont understand the subtext of her communications. She's well aware of her options to fix the problems, that's why she coming to you--so you will take them from her or, alternately, absolve her of any and all personal responsibility. That's why when your first response was to put it back on her as a choice, she pulled out the rape card. If she was raped then a) she was placed in a situation NOT of her choice, and b) is a victim and should get special privileges as such. W…
/r/MGTOW07/04/19 04:56 PM
20

He's self promoting his "snake diet."
/r/MGTOW06/04/19 02:54 PM
0

Then you must have your head under a rock. Look at OP, he's trying to ignore the clear sign of damage specifically because of how he feels. He sees the truth, but resists it due to his feelings. I know why he's there: because he's been set up to be there. However, that's also very likely how that girl ended up in her situation. Also, the thread doesn't have any instances of her hamstering, remember its written by a male about his thought process.
/r/MGTOW05/04/19 06:41 PM
0

Yes, because all men everywhere have everything figured out. ​
/r/MGTOW05/04/19 06:35 PM
6

You mean experience. Our experiences help shape who we are. Our experiences are, to a significant degree, determined by that with which we interact. So, who we interact with determines, at least in part, who we become. As those people were also similarly shaped by others, it spreads much like a chain reaction or infection. Swim in sewage, get a sickness; eat clean/live clean, become healthy.
/r/MGTOW05/04/19 05:53 PM
2

>you share ... mental entities ​ What the hell does that even mean? Is that like the "toxins" diets are always trying to cure you of?
/r/MGTOW05/04/19 05:36 PM
-7

I have no issues with this girl and I actually have a lot of sympathy. That's not to say I'd date her or that the OP should either, but I see her as a product of the problem not a contributor. First, I'm making a few assumptions. 1) that neither OP nor his GF left anything important out such as her cheating during one of her relationships. 2) That is really went down similar to how OP related the story. 3) That her "assaults" really are assaults. These assumptions are important. GF was abused, b…
/r/MGTOW05/04/19 05:29 PM
1

There's differences between various Greek cities. Some did have outright homosexuality. However, the homosexuality of the Athenians, which is type most people associate with Helenism, wasn't just homosexuality, it was homo-pedophilia. The prominent men of Athens were expected to form close, mentoring, relationships with the teen, and sometimes pre-teen boys, of other citizen families. It was not uncommon for these relationships to become sexualized; and when they did, it was ignored. However, I …
/r/MGTOW05/04/19 05:07 PM
1

Yes, but they aren't all transacting for money and property. You want to be friends with benefits, not the simp establishing his permanent financial obligation.
/r/MGTOW05/04/19 03:30 PM
7

Going through public school we were taught aspects of Greek mythology twice. Both times my teacher was female. Both times we studied the story of Pandora. Neither time was it taught that Pandora was made specifically to vex males and sow discord. I specifically recall asking why the Gods would have given Pandora all the plagues in the first place. Both women feigned ignorance and claimed it was unknown.
/r/MGTOW05/04/19 03:27 PM
5

The logic is super simple. She is a person so cannot be property or treated like such, i.e. he cannot own her or tell her what to do, or even expect anything from her other than that she be true to herself, i.e. do what ever the fuck she feels. Now, his money and resources ARE property and so can be treated like such; they are owned. And, since they are in a relationship, they share their property equally. The fact that she has no property of her own with which to reciprocate is not relevant. He…
/r/MGTOW05/04/19 04:46 AM
5

I'm sure that will work just as well as denying having raped her.
/r/MGTOW03/04/19 01:25 PM
8

Uh, you heard what she said but not what she meant. What she was conveying was, "If I have to spend MY money, I try to spend as little of MY MONEY as possible." And that's why she needs a man, so she can spend ALL of HIS money.
/r/MGTOW03/04/19 04:45 AM
6

Why should any of us care enough? I'm getting mine. The current situation makes that easier than it has ever been to do so. It's only going to get easier. Make yourself better rather than asking me or anyone else do the work to make it better for you.
/r/MGTOW03/04/19 02:37 AM
5

That's patently not true on one hand and possibly not true on the other. First, all accounts make clear that Joseph had a number of children with Mary. At least three of the Gospels recount when Mary and several of Jesus' brothers confront him about his teaching. So, Joseph had numerous sons with Mary. Given the Jews, of the time, tendency to not include women, it's likely he had a number of sons and daughters. ​ Second, there's an argument to be made that Jesus was Joseph's son but that the the…
/r/MGTOW02/04/19 12:46 PM
3

There is no such thing as "that kind of woman" there is only "the type of man for which she will be that kind of woman."
/r/MGTOW01/04/19 06:06 PM
6

I've known that for years; keep several mid-level guys around so she can keep fucking without raising her count.
/r/MGTOW01/04/19 06:01 PM
1

Did it occur to you that he wasn't free to say this, but was compelled? China has a very clear social program which depends, in large part on traditional gender roles. The Communist party is also the only way to really succeed in that country. This may well have been a party decree about who the party would and would not invest in within the Country?
/r/TheRedPill01/04/19 02:41 PM
5

Well, I don't think any teens should be marrying. So, finding out that 50% will get get married before adult hood is quite disturbing.
/r/MGTOW31/03/19 07:38 PM
7

You don't understand AWALT. It isn't that every person will eat cake, it's that every person will get hungry. How a person chooses to deal with that drive, chocolate or salad, doesn't negate the hunger.
/r/MGTOW31/03/19 02:38 PM
11

You've got it wrong. Shane is the one dropping all the "truths." This is how they establish early on how despicable a creep he is. You know from the get go he's the bad guy.
/r/MGTOW31/03/19 12:23 AM
61

Not to knit-pick, but she's about 250 lbs too light in the second panel.
/r/MGTOW26/03/19 04:34 PM
65

Why do these men continue engaging in these long, drawn out conversations? He ended the relationship, she understands full well what "no" means, there is nothing left to say. The fact that he will continue to "debate" the issues, and that is exactly how she sees it, is just reinforcing for her that he's a simp that can be pushed/bullied/manipulated into doing what she wants.
/r/MGTOW26/03/19 04:29 PM
1

Nice! You start off by criticizing a girl for being too sensitive about a joke and then follow that up with how you got your panties in a twist over a girl's joke.
/r/MGTOW25/03/19 11:51 AM
2

Dude, it's a reality show. 80%, minimum, is scripted.
/r/MGTOW22/03/19 05:48 PM
3

Typical female solipsism: since I don't feel like what he did benefited me as much as I feel it should have, I'm going to either ignore or tear down everything he did.
/r/MGTOW19/03/19 12:10 AM
4

deception
/r/MGTOW18/03/19 06:31 PM
4

It's not the whoring around that I mind so much, it's the deciet and the manipulation. They are never truthful and always angling. I've known a lot of men who hit women (it just comes with my occupation). I can count on 1 hand the number if women who didn't start the fights. The above said, never, NEVER hit a woman. It hurts her much, much more to just cut her off and tell EVERYONE why.
/r/MGTOW18/03/19 04:07 AM
1

You don't offer an addict a single hit. A lot of these guys have been so conditioned and lack the mental forging that used to be standard issue in society that no, they'c an't just have some pussy and then walk away.
/r/MGTOW18/03/19 01:49 AM
17

Stop trying to have everything, you'll end up with nothing. ​ It sounds like what you have right now is working for you. Good, keep on keeping on. Just don't become complacent. Understand what she can do in the right situation and enjoy her until that situation arises, if it never does, it's because you beat the odds through sheer luck not because you are special or because she is a unicorn. It does happen.
/r/MGTOW17/03/19 10:39 PM
3

Go to the TRP subreddit. Look on the sidebar for the lightswitch effect.
/r/MGTOW16/03/19 12:53 PM
5

That's probably not as bad as it sounds. The laws of jurisdictions vary from place to place, but most, in the U.S. at least, now limit marital assets to assets acquired during marriage. So this guy's pension is likely safe from divorce. The first 20 years will be the bulk of the value and it belongs to him alone. She can only get it so long as she's with him, if she leaves she has to leave it behind (she may get half of any portion acquired during marriage, but it will always be the minority). H…
/r/MGTOW16/03/19 12:52 AM
3

And this is a HUGE part of the blue pill that much of the manosphere either ignores or just can't see. First, he wasn't neglecting the child. Crying will not hurt the child. Screaming will not hurt the child. There was nothing in the OP's version of events to warrant her attitude or lead anyone to think the child was in a bad position. What OP wanted was for him to suddenly stop being a male and become mother number 2. Many mothers do have an attachment parenting style of child raising. It is a …
/r/MGTOW11/03/19 12:25 AM
12

IUDs for all girls, reversible vasectomies for all boys--NO unplanned, get trapped, locked into child support for 18+ years, pregnancies.
/r/MGTOW10/03/19 01:54 PM
2

Where to begin? First, you're anthropomorphising God. You have to decide, is God just a really super powerful human or something so completely different as to be practically, if nitnactually, beyond our scope of understanding? If just really super, then are there correlations we can attribute to to God? Don't most animals, and most especially people, love their own kids for no other reason than that they are theirs? This is true even when they are barely functional babies. They will hold these c…
/r/MGTOW08/03/19 03:12 AM
2

I disagree. Men care very much and will unquestionably nix a potential partner based solely on sexual past. But, just as not all men are equal in outcome, not all men judge equally. What is extreme to one man may not be extreme to another. And where one man may have an abundance of options another may have none. But any man who has options will nix a potential partner based on her past if that past violates his values. A big part of any woman's challenge is finding men whose values line up with …
/r/RedPillWomen06/03/19 07:35 PM
2

"Guys dont want to hear about the past men you’ve slept with, be it 3 or 30." ​ I don't think that's completely accurate. I think it's more accurate to say, men just want to know if your past is within the bounds of what they can accept. If so, that's all they really need to know. Moderate your information truthfully but accordingly.
/r/RedPillWomen06/03/19 04:56 PM
3

You are only responsible fore yourself. If you let yourself become a soy boy that is your fault. When she leaves that is 100% on her. You are no more responsible for her leaving that she is for you becoming a pussy.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/19 04:10 PM
19

You're in full control over your situation in the beginning. And if you stick to your values and hold frame, you can expect a woman of substance to follow your lead. ​ Well, that's just a crock of shit. ​ There are many, many examples of that simply not being true. There are many, many examples of traditional teachings emphasizing that that is not true. ​ Lets take an easy and widely known example of just such a story--the Garden of Eden story from the Bible. (Disclaimer: I am treating this sole…
/r/TheRedPill06/03/19 03:50 PM
10

This is an advertisement.
/r/MGTOW04/03/19 12:04 PM
3

Just remember, a lot of the societies that imposed harsh adultery laws also castrated boys to make eunuchs so that they could have males watch the women to ensure they were following the rules--and that isn't remotely funny. On second though, that's pretty much an apt description of modern day white knights.
/r/MGTOW01/03/19 04:49 PM
5

How about you stop worrying about women and just see to yourself. Now that you know what they are about, they are very easy to avoid.
/r/MGTOW01/03/19 04:31 PM
-1

Again. You aren't reading what I'm writing. Video is Ok, if there is no sound and not designed to obtain nude or intimate pics/video. Camera on the yard-OK. Camera pointed on outside doors-OK. Cameras in the home placed so as not to capture intimate images, probably ok. He intentionally used the camera to catch her having sex-it was not accidental/incidental-and he recorded conversations without permission of any if the participants. Major felonies. He then distributed the sex video for revenge-…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/19 04:02 PM
-8

No. Even with single consent, at least one participant must be aware and approve. He recorded his fiance and her fuck buddie. He didn't tell either party-and he recorded them. That is no consent and a felony even in single consent jurisdictions.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/19 03:54 PM
1

Generally, not for the purposes he used. Think about it, would it be legal to hide a camera in your toilet or shower and record guests?
/r/TheRedPill27/02/19 03:51 PM
22

I strongly suspect this is nothing more than a masturbatory fantasy. Almost every jurisdiction makes it a significant crime to secretly record conversations you are not a part of (that why most/all CCTV cameras are video only). Most/all places make it a serious crime to secretly record a person to obtain naked/sexual pictures of that person. Many, not all, places make it a crime to distribute images of sexual activity without permission of those on camera/for revenge. If the person writing reall…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/19 03:35 PM
22

Guy is a dumb ass for not having a vasectomy.
/r/MGTOW26/02/19 08:28 PM
4

I don't know where you are, but I think most of the U.S. is due for a market correction in real estate. ​ As a minimalist, if in the U.S., find a lot in the most rural area you can find which is still practicable for your own needs. Act as your own contractor to build your own house, if the coding laws allow, and hire your own subcontractors directly and purchase your own building supplies directly (can be done once you've obtained a building loan). Acting as your own contractor could save you f…
/r/MGTOW26/02/19 08:26 PM
5

Document everything immediately--keep a journal at home which you update every night. ​ Place your own personal safety over and above everything else. ​ Go ahead and find a employment law attorney. Bonus points if said attorney is familiar with whistle-blower laws.
/r/MGTOW26/02/19 08:22 PM
4

OP is exactly right. What all men everywhere need to do is...is that pussy? PUSSY! Everyone! Hey guys! It's PUSSY! Come one, let's go chase it.
/r/MGTOW25/02/19 08:01 PM
6

It's not a good idea for the same reason the rancher doesn't want his beef cattle to understand their situation.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/19 08:12 PM
3

>Why is this a thing society doesn't want to talk about? ​ You answered your own question. ​ >These concepts would actually help men to make better informed decisions about theyr lifes. ​
/r/TheRedPill22/02/19 05:05 PM
3

She is avoiding having any true intimacy with you.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/19 04:49 PM
5

How much things have changed in the last 100 years. You literally have women who are happy to come forward-without a trace of shame-in a national media format and admit they are prostitutes and the magazine then tries to shame the John for not paying. Being a hooker is perfectly fine; not paying the hooker--that's national news.
/r/MGTOW14/02/19 01:20 PM
2

You choose: A) Being with you--she doesn't have to do anything OR B) She'd do anything to be with you.
/r/MGTOW12/02/19 09:22 PM
11

Do not raise your son to not be you, but to be who he is. Remember, your ex didn't do what she did because she was evil (though she may well be evil), but because you didn't establish and maintain boundaries. Most people, men and women will use up anyone who lets them. Teach your son to figure out who he is and to not comprise that for any reason. Boundaries are literally the demarcations of his identity. And before anyone asks, marriage is the ultimate annihilation of boundaries (two become one…
/r/MGTOW08/02/19 08:34 PM
3

Anger is a protective emotion. There is also a reason it is often described as burning. You are angry because she wounded you and the anger is a protective emotion, she is dangerous so you are gearing up to fight. ​ Us the burning aspect of your anger. Let it cauterize your wounds and burn out your weakness. Anything impure dropped into the fire will burn off, leaving only the strong behind. ​ Embrace the anger, use it, burn off all thing unnecessary and become leaner and stronger .
/r/MGTOW04/02/19 05:16 PM
0

That's exactly what I was saying, I just didn't think it was necessary to place "the rules" in quotation marks.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/01/19 06:06 PM
7

It's textbook gas lighting. I agree with everything you said, but think it's worth it look at it in a different light. People are social creatures. Despite the ethos of MGTOW, the vast majority of people, including men, want to live in a society. We wants jobs that give us decent and fair pay so we can have common things such as homes, and cars, and necessities such as food and clothes. We also want friends and spouses. Finally, we want personal fulfillment such as personal growth and achievemen…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/01/19 03:03 PM
1

Scripture says very clearly that "experts" and holders of the "one true interpretation" do not know God.
/r/MGTOW30/01/19 04:27 AM
1

Then how did God expect Hosea to marry a prostitute?
/r/MGTOW30/01/19 04:10 AM
1

There are many errors in your reply. "He asked a question about Christianity (sic) views on sex." No, he asked whether Christianity was founded on abstinence. Of course, that raises the preliminary questions of what constitutes "Christianity" and "Founding" so that we can then more accurately identify who the Christians were and when they were and what they believed. ​ Of course, your basing your whole position on the "no true Scottsman" fallacy--if they don't believe what you believe then they …
/r/MGTOW30/01/19 03:29 AM
1

Well, there was and is plenty of debate, but I suspect that that was because you weren't available to provide a direct pipeline for God's voice.
/r/MGTOW30/01/19 02:47 AM
11

That's not necessarily correct. There is quite a bit of argument/debate on what exactly the earliest christian's views on sex, sexuality, gender role and marriage were. For example, were the earliest christian anti-sex or anti-institutions, including the institution of marriage? That said, some early Christian (but early as in after 100 A.D., but before the 4th century Nicean Counsel) writers and leaders were anti sex. Interestingly enough, though these people agreed sex was wrong, they usually …
/r/MGTOW30/01/19 12:37 AM
7

>I'm going to work so damn hard that my income will dwarf those monthly payments. ​ Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! I want to see this guy's post when he realizes that as he earns more, his child support payments will increase to stay in line with his higher earnings, BUT, they won't decrease when his earnings fall--especialy not if he voluntarily becomes "under employed!" Dude is literally building his own prison by permanently shackling himself to the rat race.
/r/MGTOW25/01/19 07:16 PM
1

You're confusing what a girl is with what she's pretending to be. Will all girls pretend to be something they aren't if they think they'll benefit? Absolutley. Will almost all girls be debauched if they think they can without consequences? Absolutely. Does that mean every girl has the foundation to have the courage to act without fear if repercussion? No. He was asking about numbers, not nature. My answer was: not every girl has sky high numbers, but most girls will have more than you.
/r/MGTOW23/01/19 03:16 AM
8

Ignoring the extremes, it likely work out something like this for most of the population. The very top of men, maybe 10%, have the most partners. Collectively they sleep with about 80% of women before those women exit the dating scene. These men tend to have very high partner counts. ​ Those 80% of women identified above comprise the next group with the highest counts. These can be more readily broken down into three groups: party/highly social girls; serial monogamousts; cute but shy. Those als…
/r/MGTOW22/01/19 09:29 PM
1

The same difference as between an election and a coup.
/r/MGTOW19/01/19 02:16 AM
2

Depends: how well is the competition doing? ​ Societies rarely die via internal decay, they are either replaced by competing societies or are destroyed by external calamities. For example, the Hopi Indians disappeared due to extreme and pervasive drought. The Mayans also likely died out due to environmental factors but those factors were also likely caused, or significantly exacerbated by internal internal "industrialization" (They cut down all their forests thereby destroying their resources an…
/r/MGTOW18/01/19 08:32 PM
6

This reads more as the final stages of her delusion dying than a zealot preaching the gospel. ​ Her primary audience is herself. This is straight cliche, school girl tripe. There is no logic, no reason. It is pure desperation. She sees the pit of despair at the end of her false beliefs and is screeching to herself it can't be true. It is the equivalent of a 3 year old sticking her fingers in her ears and yelling in denial that it is bed time. ​ She knows what's coming and is praying to any God t…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/01/19 05:02 PM
3

Women bashing!
/r/MGTOW16/01/19 11:26 PM
3

"But the fact that you assume that EVERY woman on earth is crazy because of some social media post you’ve seen is irrational and quite pessimistic." More strawmen--are you a farmer? I never said "EVERY," I didn't even say "every." I made very clear in every point of assertion that I was not saying all women. In my points of caution, though, I did imply to use caution EVERY time. What I was encouraging was freedom so the truth could been more readily ascertained. I was then encouraging men to use…
/r/MGTOW13/01/19 10:14 PM
2

"Finally, why does everyone in this subbreddit see women as crazy emotionless golddiggers, yes this kind of women exists but what makes you think they are all like that?" If a mentally deranged man was inflicting injuries on those around him, within seconds the other men would do whatever it took to stop him. It's just inherent in the nature of men. When women show them selves to be deranged and dangerous, other women either A) support them or B) do nothing, refusing to even acknowledge there mi…
/r/MGTOW13/01/19 09:52 PM
0

Well that's a nice straw man argument: focus on tragedy that's not part of the issue raised. That said, again and again, history shows that knowledge saves more lives than laws. Outlaw abortions and women will still seek them, just in allies and back rooms, lying about them and their reasons the whole time--again the truth is hidden. Educate men, embolden women, and men will take greater precautions when they truly understand the danger they are in.
/r/MGTOW13/01/19 09:31 PM
7

To be accurate, Agamemnon's wife was enraged at him because he sacrificed their daughter to the God's to get favorable winds to sail to Troy in the first place. Also, Ag was required to offer that sacrifice because his party, in traveling to the army encampment, accidentally killed a rabbit and that pissed off some God or another who demanded justice. So in all, for the Greeks, everybody was shit---from the Gods down.
/r/MGTOW13/01/19 09:20 PM
2

Some societies do manage a system that continues to value traditional masculinity even when not in need. They do it by being highly traditional. There is a problem with this approach however. They lose the ability to adapt. They become relics and entrench only parts of the necessary masculinity--such as strength and perseverance at the cost of flexibility and creativity. Those societies tend to die slow, painful, rotting deaths. .
/r/MGTOW11/01/19 03:32 PM
6

There are while branches of biology dedicated to studying how organism have no self determination. For example, take ants. Highly structured and population dense. Most of all every ant just seems to know what it needs to do and when. Ant do not organize schools to educate or indoctrinate their young. Hiw can a million ants just know what to do? Chemical reflex. The colony produces chemicals which cause reflexive responses in all the individuals. Isolate an ant long enough and it will stop ALL mo…
/r/MGTOW10/01/19 01:48 PM
1

Another failure to understand. He's worried about their future and can't understand why she doesn't prioritize that. It's because she has no idea if his future will involve her. How does his having money down the road help her if she's dropped his ass? BUT know what? She can benefit from his money NOW. Hence now is the only consideration she has. And besides, where do you think she'll have more chances to monkey branch up the financial tree: hobo town or the neighborhood of all the other young, …
/r/MGTOW08/01/19 10:34 PM
1

You need to learn to let go of the "mine" mentality. You're heart broken about all the things "YOU" will never "HAVE." ​ Look everything worthwhile existed before you were born. They will continue after you die. At most you will temporarily get to avail yourself of their use. That's the best you can get. Plan your life accordingly. ​ There's tremendous freedom and opportunity when you can truly wrap your head around that and embrace it. The world is all opportunity for growth and little else. Yo…
/r/MGTOW06/01/19 05:39 PM
2

To which my response would be: and who gave those men reading and writing? That's right, men gave it to themselves after creating it themselves. Women have had at least ten thousand years to develop their own language, they all still use language developed by men.
/r/MGTOW06/01/19 04:35 PM
96

Throughout most of history men most certainly did know how women felt, that is why all those societies only let men have power.
/r/MGTOW05/01/19 08:54 PM
3

You came all the way to Reddit because a *female* co-worker changed your music selection, something you say you always advise your coworkers they are free to do?
/r/MGTOW03/01/19 10:37 PM
2

You're looking at relationships from a one sided perspective--your side. Would you still be OK doing all of that, exclusively, with a women you described but with the added condition that there be NOTHING sexual between your two, EVER? Nor could you be sexual with anyone else while you two are together? Of course not. It would be such a bad deal for you. Why give all of that if you don't get something in return. It's the same for women, why would she want to give up all of her options if she isn…
/r/MGTOW03/01/19 12:02 AM
2

Women would just change the nature of their lies.
/r/MGTOW24/12/18 02:26 PM
13

The first few years of the Simpsons were truly subversive in this regard. The underlying narrative for Homer wasn't just that he couldn't pull off what he was trying to do, but that what he was trying to do, could never succeed in meeting his expectations. Homer wasn't just failing to meet his own ideas, he has no idea and no direction. You are exactly right in that he was just trying to meet expectations he took from earlier tv tropes. But the reason it was never enough was because even if comp…
/r/TheRedPill23/12/18 04:53 AM
3

"For now"
/r/MGTOW22/12/18 05:21 AM
1

You think the hunter cannot become the hunted?
/r/TheRedPill21/12/18 07:21 PM
12

I think Jesus was the ultimate redpill man. Let's take a look: He meets a woman drawing water, she says it's for her husband, he calls her out for having five husbands, then. He knew what she was and shut her lies down. He allows a woman to crawl, through a crowd, on her hands and knees just so she could touch the hem of his robe. He doesn't stop to help her or go to her, he never stopped what he was doing and let her crawl to him. When a gentile woman asks him to heal her children, he calls her…
/r/MGTOW21/12/18 07:08 PM
13

She wasn't conservative, she just knew what to say to draw in the men who most readily fall for this scam. You think broke ass, tatted up, drealocked, homeless men could or would take her ass out for a meal? No, only the wage slaves stuck in the 50's who can and will.
/r/MGTOW21/12/18 04:54 PM
39

That's all good advice, but it overlooks one thing, camouflage. The viper usually blends into it environment so it's prey can't see it until it strikes. The leopard hides so it can ambush. Women aren't passive or simple creatures who hurt men only through men's carelessness. They are evolved creatures who have natural skill sets designed to let them prey on men.
/r/TheRedPill20/12/18 10:48 PM
4

Yes, that's been the predominant interpretation, maybe not for the last 50 years, but it was for all of the 3,000 prior to that.
/r/MGTOW20/12/18 02:29 PM
1

Yes. I think that was the traditional understanding of that story.within Christianity.
/r/MGTOW20/12/18 02:28 PM
8

Certainly there would have been a power imbalance that would have made it unwise for her to reject David. However, I thinks it's been traditionally understood that Bathsheba intentionally acted so as to draw David's attention. Sure, a roof top bath would have been out of the line of sight of street rabble, but she also knew she was in the direct line of sight of David (a known womanizer) in his palace. If she were truly concerned about her modesty and her vows, she absolutely would have known th…
/r/MGTOW20/12/18 01:10 PM
115

You can see the gina tingles in her eyes.
/r/MGTOW19/12/18 10:23 PM
8

Your dad is spot on. Society very much uses children as leashes and chains to bind men. He needs to walk away and build himself. They will follow or not. That's the way of nature, women and children follow the men, only weak, reject males follow women and children Saying he's the father does not make him so. Treating him like the father makes it real. Are they demanding the kids be with him or that he be with the kids. It may not sound different, but there us a world if difference between the tw…
/r/MGTOW18/12/18 04:58 PM
10

She went full demon possessed contortionist at the end!
/r/MGTOW18/12/18 04:41 PM
4

I wouldn't say they have less behavioral issues, but more that they have more definite extreme boundaries. Young girls are just as apt, if not more so, to act like a spoiled princess. However, if she's never engaged in casual sex, that is it's own boundary with it's own threat point. Add to that the additional threat of losing a guy she's invested in, and cheating because a much larger issue with her. On the other hand, marry a woman who had multiple men in 24 hours, lied to bf of the time with …
/r/TheRedPill18/12/18 12:17 AM
25

Two things: it's never enough, they will always want more The first utterance from the women that sex obligates men to whatever the woman says it does, even after the fact and even when there is no reason to believe it should. Look for this to quickly gather steam and become the new #metoo. #youoweme
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/12/18 12:10 AM
4

I think there is very little questioning that Paul's teaching was: You can be dedicated to your mission or you can be married; you cannot be both.
/r/MGTOW17/12/18 11:34 PM
1

And that's why the solution is to not have LTRs. If you know she's just temporary to begin with, it doesn't matter, enjoy it for what it is and don't worry about what it isn't. If you don't mess with her at all, it matters even less.
/r/MGTOW17/12/18 06:50 PM
1

For argument's sake, I'll assume your assumptions regarding pair bonding are accurate. Girl #1: Has a very strong pair bond with her ex. Still has the capacity to pair bond, the only issue being how strong is your bond with her compared to the ex's? Girl #2: Doesn't have as strong, maybe no, pair bond with priors. Has damaged her capacity to pair bond. Can she pair bond with you at all? If not, what does that mean for you? What does it mean if she can't but has bonded to some degree with her ex(…
/r/MGTOW17/12/18 06:25 PM
5

Uh, that fails to account for a number of crucial factors, such as: 1) Men are more aware of their situation and are inherently problem solvers 2) People do not exist in a vacuum. Some parts of the world might, arguably, be similar to the mouse utopia, but not all, not even most. Traditionally, a society does in fact begin to reflect the same inherent problems and then collapses and is replaced by or is conquered by other healthy societies. Life continues.
/r/MGTOW17/12/18 06:18 PM
71

Very old fashion means she should also be a virgin.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/12/18 02:43 PM
3

Eat less, move more. Eat whole foods over processed foods, eat high fiber and lean meats over other foods. I did well by having a couple plain eggs in the morning with as much fruit as I wanted for breakfast, chicken breasts with as much fruit as I wanted for lunch, and then a reasonable dinner with light snacking. 5x5 lift program.
/r/MGTOW15/12/18 05:06 AM
2

It's because they've been systematically isolated while simultaneously deprived of the opportunity to learn to be solitary. They have to hold on to something, anything.
/r/MGTOW14/12/18 10:31 PM
3

that it basically should never happen except in cases of adultery So, you want to give her even more incentive to ride other dick?
/r/MGTOW14/12/18 06:40 PM
54

"This is the way of an adulterous woman: She eats and wipes her mouth and says, 'I've done nothing wrong.' Proverbs 30:20
/r/MGTOW13/12/18 09:25 PM
2

Find your mission. I said find your mission, I did not say, pick, guess, create, receive from someone/something/some deity else, your mission. FIND it. Number 2 requires you to get out there and do so you can learn, grow and develop. You will know your mission, when in retrospect, you realize the satisfaction, provision and opportunity you are receiving from what you are already doing. If you don't have all the things listed in number 4, keep changing up what you are doing Small changes are chan…
/r/MGTOW13/12/18 07:29 PM
5

No, he's your AFC (average frustrated chump) with a bit more than normal self awareness. He's doing everything right: he works full time, gives everything to his family, won't cheat on his useless, nagging wife, and makes times for his kids despite their clear contempt for him. Despite having followed all the rules, he's poor, a joke, and shit on by all. Unlike the neighbor, Jefferson, who is good looking, personable, lazy, won't work and mooches off his wife, and is loved by all.
/r/MGTOW13/12/18 07:20 PM
2

Their definition and your definition of "decent" is NOT the same.
/r/MGTOW13/12/18 01:48 AM
4

Lying is lying.
/r/MGTOW12/12/18 11:05 PM
1

For most (all?) of recorded history, societies have tried various forms of egalitarian and/or women's lib reforms. Once of two things always happens: a) they learn their lesson and roll the reforms back, or 2) sustain significant and prolonged, usually mortal, damage.
/r/MGTOW12/12/18 10:26 PM
9

She's withholding the truth from him--period. That is the VERY definition of AWALT.
/r/MGTOW12/12/18 08:59 PM
16

I love how women ALWAYS have some justification to participate in lies, "she didn't want to do that to her dad."
/r/MGTOW12/12/18 08:03 PM
1

By getting it.
/r/MGTOW11/12/18 11:19 PM
3

It would be like you marrying in to an endless supply of young, hot pussy. Women can't understand the high value that men place of somethings so cheap and abundant, but there you go.
/r/MGTOW11/12/18 09:32 PM
2

SO, she has a different strategy to play the game. She's still playing the game. She isn't employing RP for your benefit, but for hers.
/r/MGTOW10/12/18 05:37 PM
1

It does in many places.
/r/MGTOW10/12/18 11:23 AM
1

: )
/r/MGTOW10/12/18 03:59 AM
2

Fear. It is often men with little or no self esteem. They also have little real experience with women. That's a dangerous combination. They find women to "save" because A) surely those women have no better options so the man doesn't have to compete (like really, is there any chance she'd pick the asshole over him?), and B) she will show eternal gratitude for being saved, because she was surely aware of the clusterfuck she made of her life and will happily spend the rest of it looking up to a los…
/r/MGTOW10/12/18 03:25 AM
9

First things first, get a test to prove paternity. If it isn't yours, run. If it is, start paying. Then start looking for well paid simp with an aversion to to drama to hook her up with. Once he's duped, I mean hooked, I mean in love, start drama--make him threaten to walk so she wants you gone so she doesn't lose her meal ticket. Then offer to walk, but only if she agrees that you can terminate your parental rights.
/r/MGTOW10/12/18 03:13 AM
1

I see, you're trying to shame and scare me into adhering to your vision of how I can be a useful in your ideal. Not interested. I'm going my way, not yours. Cheers, mate.
/r/MGTOW10/12/18 02:53 AM
3

For the same reason men always go for young attractive faces, perky tits and gravity defying asses.
/r/MGTOW10/12/18 01:58 AM
3

I can show you many versus where Jesus commanded you to forgive those women their sins. You need to learn each and every one. But ask anyone to show you just one verse where he commanded anyone to marry those women.
/r/MGTOW10/12/18 01:53 AM
1

Why should they be any of those thing? How does it benefit a man to be such?
/r/MGTOW10/12/18 01:49 AM
1

I don't think the Gospels were trying to convey that he was.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/18 08:36 PM
3

That's right, it's not your fault, just place all the blame for you life on something else!
/r/TheRedPill08/12/18 01:38 PM
6

Paternity uncertainty and offspring investment. Children with 2 invested parents do better than children with only one. Which means it makes sens to invest in your child--so long as you can be sure it's your child. That's never an issue with women--it was always an issue with men until the advent of the DNA test. So women who where known to sleep around, aka sluts, had harder time getting commitment from quality men, because those men could never be sure if the child was theirs. This placed slut…
/r/MGTOW08/12/18 12:17 AM
5

Here's the thing, don't think either will likely give you a big reward without a lot of hard work. Trade schools are good, they can get you real world skills that are very much in demand, get you the experience you need by the time you graduate and can get you quickly into a very livable wage shortly after finishing. But, they are hard work, usually year around outside and often involve some form of danger. Put 20 years into something, come out a master and not just a journeyman, you might well …
/r/MGTOW07/12/18 09:27 PM
3

Humm, nope.
/r/MGTOW07/12/18 02:32 PM
31

Uh, excuse me? You really believed her when she said she hadn't slept with anyone else?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/12/18 11:16 PM
3

Here's my sperg/literal reaction to your post. It's more likely that the intro stories contained in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke (the virgin birth stories--there is no virgin birth in either Mark or John) were addressing allegations of illegitimacy level against Christians due to Jesus's anti-patriarchy stance. A short analysis: Jesus was a populist and he felt the temple complex (through it's monopoly on the forgiveness of sin) was mercilessly exploiting the Jews. Notice that all 4 canonical…
/r/TheRedPill06/12/18 04:35 PM
3

The thing about 7th graders is that their capacity to critically analyse information is not very developed. Have some of the kids in her school experimented sexually, most likely, have half had sex? No.
/r/MGTOW04/12/18 04:39 AM
2

She wants to compete, since you're the only available opponent, this is what you get. You need to give her a new person to compete against. Get some cute 20 y.o. sniffing around you, slip away with her a few times and see what she does.
/r/MGTOW02/12/18 10:56 PM
1

Assuming the facts as reported are accurate, I don't see the issue. He was fired, plain and simple. The fact that he was given many, many chances not to be fired after failing to meet basic performance standards, doesn't now mean he can't be fired. There was a deal, he failed to live up to his end, the agreement was therefore terminated.
/r/MGTOW28/11/18 05:31 PM
2

This should be required reading for all men. It perfectly illustrates the thought process of farrel women and illustrates their three main axioms: Women are absolutely entitled to a relationship--full stop. If women did not create the situation, or believe they did not create it, they cannot be held accountable for their subsequent choices and/or actions--full stop. If having integrity conflicts with her getting what she wants, she is fully entitled to act without integrity without any loss of t…
/r/MGTOW28/11/18 05:04 PM
20

No, only five relationships with boys unwilling to commit, through no fault of her own, and few assholes who wouldn't accept "no" from her.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/11/18 06:59 PM
53

If you were looking carefully, there was a nice trick of self deception by the hamster. Of course she'll tell guys, because who cares if they go away? They aren't special and that's why she isn't into a LTR. EXCEPT, unless she meets a truly great guy, then of course ALL the rules are different in that case, all of them, including the one where she has no reason to hide her past.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/11/18 06:43 PM
3

She doesn't believe you'll do anything. And if a few days of silent treatment from you is all it costs for her not to have sex with you, that's a win win for her.
/r/TheRedPill27/11/18 12:15 AM
12

The answer wasn't directed specifically at you. The reason they give that line is because it helps weed out the betas who will ignore what women are clearly doing and swallow 100% what they say. (Women already know the double speak so fully support it to ensure the outcome). The alphas will let the women say what ever they want but treat them based on how they dress. Beta's will immediately back off and start "earning" the sex they hope to receive. Creeps will awkwardly try to alpha the girl and…
/r/MGTOW26/11/18 09:59 PM
39

They don't want to be objectified by you!
/r/MGTOW26/11/18 09:52 PM
124

Women chase resources and men chase youth. Neither wants to compromise.
/r/TheRedPill21/11/18 02:37 PM
7

They don't have to, all they have to do is revoke your passport. Without a valid passport, most countries won't let you in, which means you're stuck in which ever country you happen to be located in when the passport is revoked. Since you're a non-citizen you don't have rights and likely have a deadline to get out or risk being labled a criminal who overstayed his visa, except you can't get out because you don't have a passport. The only solution to not being charged as an illegal immigrant is t…
/r/MGTOW19/11/18 03:56 PM
2

I study the prey not because I am the prey or want to be the prey, but because I want to hunt, capture and kill the prey.
/r/MGTOW19/11/18 12:26 AM
2

You are correct in noticing the rise and falls in societies over time. But, do not confuse correlation with causation. Those societies went through extreme and wide ranging changes over the course of their rise and fall. Usually this included moving from a strict patriarchal society to a more gynocentric society. However, many other changes also occurred, such as loosening religious believes, civic duties and changing moral codes, not to mention radical institutional degradation, such as monetar…
/r/MGTOW18/11/18 10:53 PM
6

Cool your tits drama queen. This is NOT a species ending event. It's not even a species effecting event. A culture effecting event? Sure, but humanity has seen thousands, if not tens of thousands, of cultures over the past 20 thousand years or so. Look, what men are just now collectively remembering, yes remembering not discovering for the first time, was widely known across cultures for thousands of years. In fact, irony of ironies, it was the basis of the original liberal education. When one r…
/r/MGTOW18/11/18 05:52 AM
14

This is true, but it isn't the only reason women hide their sexuality and their past. Sometimes, it's because they had to cash out from the CC with whomever they could still snag. This person is literally the floor they intend to stand on. They aren't giving him anything more than they have to because he can only give her so little in return. He simply isn't worth the effort, he's lucky if she doesn't fuck her bf in front of him and then make him eat her cream pie. So, how do you tell which it i…
/r/TheRedPill16/11/18 05:56 PM
0

No. Women are NEVER that honest. They don't use betas, they use men. All of them.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/11/18 03:43 PM
0

This is from smack in the middle of blue pill country. The entirety of your perspective is centered on "intimacy." There is no intimacy in that type of sex, that's why it's so wild: neither person cares about the other. She didn't give herself to Chad in amazing ways, Chad took it because he didn't care about anything other than what he wanted. Did he care if she'd never had anal or had had it a dozen times before? No. He only cared that he wanted it. He was either going to get it from her or fr…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/11/18 02:31 PM
34

You're looking at it incorrectly. You think freedom is not having obligations, that's not freedom, that's death because only the dead have no obligations. Everything is interconnected. You must have things to live: food, water, air, shelter, etc. Imagine if you had to provide everything for your self, and had to provide every aspect of everything you need. As long as you have need, you have an obligation to provide that need. You can do it all yourself, or you can contract others to help you in …
/r/MGTOW14/11/18 06:55 PM
1

No one should have to pay child support at all, it isn't for the child and it isn't support. It is your child--you should be responsible for caring for the child directly. Go get the food, fix it, set the child at you r table and feed him/her. Bath him/her, take him/her to school and pick up. Tuck into bed. DO your fucking job--do not pay someone else to do it for you. Now, if the parents are split, then each does it 50% of the time. Each has met his/her burden to the child. End of story. Nothin…
/r/MGTOW09/11/18 10:27 PM
105

That authoress can go fuck herself. She's no different. She hasn't the slightest concern for boys or men. The whole of her article can be summed up as: There is a very real danger that men are no longer going to be extremely useful tools for women's happiness. We must do something about that now. Men exist for women, men are forgetting that and being raised so that that doesn't happen, and that is intolerable.
/r/MGTOW09/11/18 09:33 PM
18

You are over investing in a single girl. Where are the other girls you're sleeping with or pursuing?
/r/TheRedPill06/11/18 06:24 PM
3

Because women love men based on the man's capacity to meet her needs. What a woman needs prior to child birth is not the same as afterwards. She still needs a man to fill her needs, but as her needs have changed, there is little chance the fool man will change so now her reason to love him is gone. Few men are great enough to be able to meet her needs before and after without changing, and men who will cave to their women and change fail the basic leadership requirement all women need, What real…
/r/MGTOW06/11/18 04:53 PM
3

GLO, why do you hate sheep and cross dressing wolves? TRP has already been quarantined due to intolerant speech, then you have to come here and shit on sheep and cross dressing wolves and risk a full on ban. It's OK to be a sheep. It's OK to be a wolf in sheep's clothing--it shows the wolf is trying to understand the sheep's perspective. And how dare you assume and/or judge people's masturbatory habits come December. How someone chooses to welcome the celebration of our lord and savior is NOT a …
/r/TheRedPill05/11/18 11:11 PM
12

There are two dynamics in play here: 1) She talks about her children all the time, because they are literally her identity. She has failed to develop any other aspect of herself other than her children (she may once have also had girlfriend/fiance/wife as part of her ID at one point, but being single thats gone). If she did not speak about her kids, she'd have nothing to speak about, also, there's bleed over from issue 2. 2) Girls are all about covert contracts. By having some dude's crotch spaw…
/r/MGTOW05/11/18 02:15 AM
3

A parasite, by definition, cannot be greater than its host, no matter how much it might manipulate it.
/r/MGTOW04/11/18 11:45 PM
7

Why do men want everything but to work on themselves and be an asset? Because we've raised them this way. The west has systematically destroyed the social and interpersonal institutions which guide boys into becoming health men. Without knowing him, other than knowing he's 30 so I know the time frame involved, I can promise you, when he was growing up, every time his natural male inclinations came out, he was figuratively smacked in the face and told he was wrong. Now as an adult who was intenti…
/r/RedPillWomen04/11/18 06:53 PM
1

The key take away is that she would leave him if she was certain she could other wise find a man to marry her. She does not want him, she just want to marry.
/r/MGTOW01/11/18 06:34 PM
1

It will all work out to the worse for women. The men who do out compete will have so many options they will refuse to commit. The men who cannot/will not out compete will not have the option to commit. Women wills till not be getting what they want and have to bare the burden solely for what they have.
/r/MGTOW31/10/18 04:29 PM
8

The differences between men and women are on clear display: The "hottest/most popular" man has three women. The hottest girl has one man, of upper but not top value, all to herself and he's wrapping her up in super protective, he's all in, arm wrap. The women with insufficient value all share the top guy with nothing in return---it's clear he's returning no investment for their attention. The man with insufficient value is by himself. That's all anyone needs to know.
/r/MGTOW30/10/18 09:34 PM
4

The level of stupidity in her (lack of) understanding is off the chart. She believes that her menstrual blood is "live giving???" Uh no, that is literally the dead mineral bath being discharged before it rots in the body specifically because she didn't create a life this month.
/r/MGTOW30/10/18 08:22 PM
34

She has to be trolling THOTs. She knows exactly what she's saying; she's saying explicitly what the smokeshow 10's only imply to dumb ass beta's.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/18 12:14 AM
1

As far as I can tell from what OP related, she wants a relation ship with that guy. He has everything she wants to make the relationship worth it. That is different from women just complaining about not being able to get a relationship period, or a relationship with any "good" guy. This woman is talking about one man, not any or every men.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/18 06:58 PM
2

Yes and no. She's pining over a guy not necessarily over a relationship. When a woman is complaining she's alone and can't find a guy anywhere, it usually means she needs to lower her standards if a relationship is that important to her. But that isn't the case, although OP seems to be assigning to her that mentality. What the woman here is doing, is getting pissed that she can't get the guy she wants because he's out of her league. OP is taking that to mean she needs to lower her standards as i…
/r/TheRedPill28/10/18 06:38 PM
24

The most disturbing thing about that photo is that the photo isn't about him. It's just his back, he might as well be a silhouette. The entirety of the photo is what the kids and woman feels, he is wholly irrelevant.
/r/MGTOW28/10/18 03:55 PM
3

Girl get's offended when she discovery that acting like a man: A) means she gets treated like a man, and B) doesn't stop her from wanting all the benefits of being a girly girl.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/10/18 03:38 PM
3

The first step to fixing herself is admitting all of her mistakes leading to this situation. She won't do that. This post is really about how she can't be at fault. That's why it's OK her son doesn't have a father despite all the harm it will cause him, because if it's OK that he doesn't have a father, then she isn't at fault for choosing as she did. Instead, you can literally see her hamster spin, "It's OK I didn't secure you a father, because look at all the other people I secured for you!" Se…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/10/18 03:05 PM
34

Water is wet and people want the best. She is no more wrong for wanting top men then men are for wanting attractive women. I would not, even for a second, consider some 500 lb ham beast. Why should a woman consider a man below her? Before you say, "But she won't even consider men 1 or 2 points above her," so what? If those men aren't worth the effort of a relationship, then she's making the correct decision. After all, TRP says no matter how hot, no matter how great, even if she appears, totally…
/r/TheRedPill28/10/18 02:22 PM
7

That sounds kinda rapey to me. That sounds kinda rapey to me. FTFY
/r/MGTOW24/10/18 09:37 PM
1

Spend it counting your money.
/r/MGTOW21/10/18 11:44 PM
10

Here's the real question: are you going to hold your mother accountable? Will you cut her off and out of your life for what she did?
/r/MGTOW21/10/18 11:44 PM
9

They just want more.
/r/MGTOW21/10/18 07:02 PM
19

Read the accounts, there are absolutely parties where large groups of gorgeous women show up to be used by a small cadre of rich, famous and powerful men in the hopes it might somehow benefit them. So yes, all women will do this, no not all women will do this for any men. As for your friend, if he's getting better strange than he thought possible, good for him. If you're on a higher plane, good for you, don't shit on his progress just because you're ahead.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/18 07:33 PM
2

Only is support of bro-science, (I like your idea, I'm not remotely convinced): That would also explain why the mutation occurs on the X of the XY pair; so that it can be passed down and safely stored in the female DNA which can then be passed on by her to any of her children, regardless of gender and thereby be widely distributed into the future group of descendants. Whereas if the mutation occurred on the Y portion, it could only ever be passed along to sons, thereby excluding, off the top, 50…
/r/MGTOW18/10/18 08:27 PM
34

Notice how quickly women will fuck, but they won't go out and actually do physical manual labor? They all say to themselves, there's no way in hell I'd degrade myself by working that hard for only that in return. Fucking is to women what manual labor is to men--a means to an end.
/r/MGTOW18/10/18 08:09 PM
2

I agree that the fact that she isn't his bio kids shouldn't matter. I also believe he should not be selfish. So, he should be willing to be her father, but not until several other men have first step forward to act as her father as well, maybe one to pay all her livings costs, another to feed her, a third to buy her car when she turns 16, two more to pay for her college. A 7th to cover her marriage costs, etc. He can be the father who takes her fishing. Do you think there will be any takers for …
/r/MGTOW14/10/18 12:10 AM
26

someone cross post this to units
/r/MGTOW13/10/18 11:12 PM
19

A HUGE part of the BP conditioning is being indoctrinated into seeking, above all else, external validation, with female validation being the very pinnacle of that. What you are going through is the dopamine withdraw of receiving/chasing that validation. It will pass, When it does, learn to replace it by seeking and achieving self validation.
/r/MGTOW13/10/18 11:12 PM
7

Uh, that is NOT what happened. His wife named her son after his father.
/r/MGTOW13/10/18 03:59 PM
1

Not agonizing over things that will never happen is exactly why they call me simpius maximus!
/r/MGTOW13/10/18 03:45 PM
0

I don't think you need to worry about. You're personality will make certain that the women are avoiding you. Good luck.
/r/MGTOW13/10/18 01:21 PM
1

He got the better end of that trade
/r/MGTOW13/10/18 01:10 AM
17

If you have a girlfriend, you already have a child.
/r/MGTOW11/10/18 12:49 PM
1

Did you read what I said? That's exactly what the program in my example couldn't do. In the example, the program couldn't distinguish between the choice education program and a choice of educational provider. That's a very important distinction.
/r/MGTOW10/10/18 10:00 PM
1

Technically it can't be considered biased as it doesn't have an opinion. However, the algorithm driving the process could be flawed in as much as it's coding allows analysis of matters inconsistent with the intent of the coding. For example, let's say it has a number of applications from applicants who went to College A, which is a well known all female college. Now College A may have an excellent, maybe even number 1 in the world, engineering program, but given that it's an all female college y…
/r/MGTOW10/10/18 09:35 PM
9

Dude what iss wrong with with someone doing something they can do? There is no need to keep women out of the "man" zone. There is a need to not tone down the "man" zone just because women insist on participating. DO your thing. If she can keep up, great for her, if she can't that's not your problem.
/r/MGTOW10/10/18 05:10 PM
23

I have a boyfriend "I have the cure for that condition" "You call him, I'll call my girl and it'll be a foursome kinda night." Buy me a drink "Bar keep! One water over here." "Wow! Looks AND a sense of humor!" I bet you say that to all the girls "Just the ones I sleep with." "No, just the ones I don't want to sleep with." How many girls have you slept with? "Today?" Will you watch my drink while I dance / bathroom / etc? "Sure, just leave it where I can see it from next to that woman over there.…
/r/TheRedPill10/10/18 04:36 PM
7

You do understand that she sees herself as the man and you as the women in this scenario, correct?
/r/MGTOW09/10/18 01:59 PM
9

1,000 cock stare.
/r/MGTOW08/10/18 05:22 PM
2

When I was 4 I wanted to be a ninja, you know, an assassin. I guess that just goes to prove all men are inherently violent killers. She's a 4 year old. Get over it. When a 24 year old does it, then you just laugh and shake your head and be gratefull you're out of the matrix, but still able to safely enjoy watching the fall out of the shitshow.
/r/MGTOW08/10/18 05:12 PM
4

If they'll do that to their own flesh and blood, just imagine what they'll do to you.
/r/MGTOW04/10/18 08:56 PM
12

No, just no. You are trying to bargain with them and making the first concession which is the only one they need TRP to make to ensure they win. In a nut shell, your argument reads as, "But TRP IS extremely beneficial to women. Look at all the ways what happens here makes it better for women." And that is the entirety of your argument. You are conceeding that they are right if what happens here doesn't benefit their priorities. You are admitting that TRP cannot exist for it's own sake. This is a…
/r/TheRedPill28/09/18 04:16 PM
3

He was disbarred; he is no longer an attorney.
/r/MGTOW28/09/18 02:06 AM
7

They are probably already making a lot more than you so the "raise" that comes with that position likely isn't as much for them as it is for you.
/r/MGTOW24/09/18 11:50 AM
2

Those 1,000 cock stares!
/r/MGTOW23/09/18 06:09 PM
2

Yes, to get what you want. Why does she go there? That's work and she goes to get what she wants. She isn't talking to you because she likes you, she's talking to you because she wants something. OP is all "hur dur, she's too stupid to understand I don't care about what she wants. Why can't she be more concerned about what I want? Wymyn are STUPID." Add to it that he's too damn pussy to just tell her to go away. Add to THAT, he's in MGTOW talking about hows he's wasting his time, money, and ener…
/r/MGTOW23/09/18 03:28 PM
0

Let me make sure I understand your position: You can't understand why she has no concern for your wholesale lack of any concern for what she wants? Gee, it's almost like neither one of you gives a shit about what the other wants, only what you want and how to get it from the other person...
/r/MGTOW23/09/18 01:56 PM
8

She's skirting the issue at the heartof the matter, whether intentionally or because she's in denial, I can't tell. Here's the issue, she has to make sure lots of people like her, especially men because it's so much easier to make it when everyone else is working to make it easier for you. Because she can't stand the idea of actually doing it on her own, so she's trapped by her fear and refusal to carry her own weight by herself. That means she, to some degree, has to cater to men to keep them h…
/r/MGTOW22/09/18 12:12 AM
1

Pre selection is real.
/r/MGTOW21/09/18 05:36 PM
2

That just isn't possible, how would anyone in a position to controll know that that model of operation would work? It's not like we have a book that is thousands of years of old and read by billions of people that litterally opens with a story of a man and woman in a paradise that cannot be improved upon and where all things are in perfect harmony, including the people and God and which then goes on to assert that despite it being perfect in all ways, the woman is convinced to leave it all behin…
/r/MGTOW21/09/18 05:25 PM
6

I especially loved where he stressed A) how important it was to have excellent communication, and then B) point out how he;s fairly sure his wife isn't being comepletely honest about her emotions (being in love with Kyle).
/r/MGTOW20/09/18 09:25 PM
2

It's more accurate to say women reach their peak maturity quicker than men; women at around 18 y.o., men in their 30's (usually early to mid). That does NOT mean women are more mature than men, it doesn't even mean they are as mature as men. It means that they quit acquiring experience based maturity before they are even out of their parent's home. WHy do they ride the CC so long? Because they ltterally can't mature from the experience. They have to be hit over the head by imminent events to mak…
/r/MGTOW20/09/18 09:20 PM
1

Except, under the new order, a woman can control her body and his wallet--if she can just get him to sign the marriage or the birth cirtificate.
/r/RedPillWomen17/09/18 01:12 AM
1

I think the consensus here is that a man should not be a woman. Just because you wouldn't act or speak a certain way, doesn't mean he can't.
/r/RedPillWomen15/09/18 02:47 PM
3

RPW isn't about truth, it's about more. Those gals follow RPW because they think itll give them the edge to outcompete other women and thereby get more. The moment what you say appears to conflict with their expectation of them getting "more," they'll attack you the same as any other woman will.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/18 07:05 PM
4

Uh, this is clearly an advertisement written up and released by the website.
/r/MGTOW13/09/18 10:18 PM
8

The issue is one of two things: 1) you are paranoid about your weight. If so, fix your paranoia. That might be by losing weight, maybe it needs to be by fixing something else. 2) You aren't paranoid and he really has made clear you are not acceptible enough to him at your current weight. Decide which is more important-him or the weight. You ARE going to lose one. You can choose either, he can only chose the one? Your capacity to chose ends once he makes his.
/r/RedPillWomen07/09/18 08:23 PM
4

Preselection is a very real phenomenon.
/r/RedPillWomen07/09/18 08:16 PM
1

Exactly, no matter what the "reason" it's all really just a shit test. Some men just have an easier time passing than others. Some men just get a pass.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/18 08:13 PM
3

Sex is always transactional for a woman. The only issues are what does she want and how blantant is she about pursuing it? Even if the only thing she wants is you, it's still transactional. She's giving you what she has in exchange for what she wants.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/18 08:12 PM
6

First, is it your religion? If so, what does it require of YOU. That's the only consideration you need. Leave her beliefs to her and you follow your beliefs and don't let anyone interfere with that, for any reason. Second, if she says no sex before marriage and you feel the need to honor that, that doesn't change anything for you. SHe's not your wife until she's your wife. That means you aren't married until you are and you do not need to treat her as such until she is. She is not anything to yo…
/r/TheRedPill07/09/18 08:07 PM
2

Via the bare minimum investment of time/energy/resources. Your interest in her should never exceed her clear interest in you. Ideally, your interest in her is clearly less than hers in yours; your 2 to every one of her 3. I'm not saying don't text, I'm saying only text for logistics. If she flakes, she reinitiates. If she says she's waiting, tell her she can catch up with you when she'd done waiting and ready to move.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/18 07:53 PM
5

It's a shit test. Tell me a single religion that says a man should be married to someone other than his wife. A wife, by definition of all the religions I'm aware of, is sexually active with her husband. So, per religion, she's either your wife who you can sleep with or she isn't your wife and you have no responsibility towards her (unless she's your kinswoman). NO RESPONSIBILITY TO HER. That means nothing; she has no claim to your time, money, energy, or attention. Those are the things a man ne…
/r/TheRedPill07/09/18 07:49 PM
14

There is no negotiating, that's what I'm saying. There is sex or there is nothing. Negotiating is a shit test. If she needs time, fine, she can have as much time as she wants, on her own dime and at her own cost. Your time and attention will be elsewhere doing what you need to do while she's doing whatever it is she needs to do.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/18 07:45 PM
2

You're addressing women who are in between the two stages I explored. There is usually a period where women have pushed through their virginal hesitancy but have yet to learn the benefit of restraint. You are also assuming women can only be emotional and impulsive.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/18 06:56 PM
175

Two things: 1) Don't put so much stock into what these girls are saying. They are on the spot with televised attention, they'll say anything they think will get them validation. Watch what they do, ignore all else. 2) Be grateful we live in a society where women are free to act as they wish. There is no reason for any man, anywhere, to not understand in full what women are. This is a level of knowledge and understanding men have never had previously. As a result, men have an unprecedented capaci…
/r/TheRedPill04/09/18 03:48 PM
42

In all seriousness, is he gay? My first impulse was that something is keeping him in his head instead of in the moment. He is NOT being overcome with lust. There comes a point, not too far along, where the only sensation is need for release and the pain in not doing so. There is no hip pain, or uncomfortable, or any of that. I was thinking he has a serious fetish, the type that is a must each and evry time. Or, he is so hung up on his religious veiws of sex, he can't be sexual. However, I don't …
/r/RedPillWomen31/08/18 09:59 PM
4

I want to highjack your post a bit to make it meta and comment a bit on the state of society. Your post makes it clear that being a creator and influencer of society is very important to you. You're a woman. You can literally create, house, carry and shape life itself. There will be no society without children. Yet, it's clear that's a footnote at best for you. You could be the creator of generations of people, people that are literally you, but that doesn't seem nearly as important as creating …
/r/RedPillWomen31/08/18 12:51 PM
2

I'm not saying it has to be an either or. In the future, watch what happens if someone jokingly suggests a girl sleep with a truly repulsive man. Her reaction will be physical and visceral. She can't help it. She'll react to the thought much as she would thinking about anything clearly highly infectious. Her body language will be clearly recoiling and protective.
/r/TheRedPill29/08/18 11:21 PM
4

You've got a whiff of the scent, but your barking down the wrong trail. Here's the basis of the limited scientific data on this (no I'm not looking it up to include the links, GOOGLE it yourself). Impregnation works just like an infection. A smaller, more mobile, DNA capsule seeks out a larger cell and penetrates that cell to inject it's own DNA into it thereby highjacking that cell's DNA info to get it to replicate the new DNA (of course this is mutually beneifical given that it's a 50-50 joint…
/r/TheRedPill29/08/18 11:04 PM
20

Your view of dating realities is very BP warped. You clearly approach it from the women are wonderful, men not so much, perspective. 1)The fact he hasn't settled yet means he's either not looking to settle or a part of his character is stopping him from settling (eg promiscuity, poor communication skills, abusive tendencies etc) Maybe the issue isn't with him but with the women he's encountering? Maybe he is holding out for someone worth what he brings to the table. It will not serve you well to…
/r/RedPillWomen26/08/18 07:25 PM
2

Assuming you're in the U.S., most jurisdictions recognize the concept of non-marital property which is to be restored to the owner, in full, upon a divorce. Talk to an attorney in the state you live to make sure you take the steps to ensure the investment portfolio is non-marital upon marriage and how to clearly maitain it as a seperate non-marital item throughout the marriage. If you move states, you'll need to consult with an attorney in any new state to make sure you keep it as a seperate non…
/r/RedPillWomen26/08/18 07:19 PM
1

No, no, no. If she cheats she will recieve no spousal support. This acknowledges that the default is that she will recieve these things, provided she doesn't cheat. [She] must waive the right to child support and alimony Uh, what, you've already specifically guarenteed the will get those things (provided she doesn't cheat). Which is it? It can't be both, and if she's waived it, then there's no penalty for her if she does cheat. Gergana will provide emotional, physical and sexual comfort as neede…
/r/TheRedPill22/08/18 08:51 PM
5

I don't think he is being callous. I think he's genuinely happy. Most men would be very happy having all their necessities met with a steady supply of sex and no real responsibilities.
/r/RedPillWomen21/08/18 07:59 PM
3

And how to understand what he's really been thinking this whole time That's very easy to answer. He is certain he's hit the jackpot. This whole time he's been reletively secure in the sex you two have been having. He gets sex even though he has nothing to offer and far from being rejected, it seems you aren't going anywhere no matter how much of a screw up he is or how little he has to offer. Sex is the primary drive for men. He's getting sex on the regular (maybe not as much as he'd like, but h…
/r/RedPillWomen21/08/18 07:09 PM
4

Women heavily invest in the use of covert contracts. For example, women will love to use sex as indicating that they are owed or were promised something in return, watch how quick a woman will say something like "Were you just using me for sex?" The implications in that statement are at least two fold: 1) surely you aren't that type of guy, and 2) the sex had to have meant something other than sex or yuo are that type of guy. Once you buy into that, you're stuck because that something is wholly …
/r/askTRP20/08/18 04:53 PM
1

You should go back to the shadows. You entirely absolved her of anywrong doing. No, it couldn't have been her because he was male and older so all of the responsibility lies with himand none on her. She didn't do wrong, she was exploited. She isn't to blame, she's the victim. Complete B.S.
/r/RedPillWomen17/08/18 08:36 PM
11

Hamstering, hamstering, hamstering.
/r/RedPillWomen17/08/18 04:31 PM
7

You are riddled with entitlement and insecurity. You believe you are entitled to a strong, sound relationship and that you don't have to work for it. You feel you deserve it, you certainly want it, so you should have it. That's not how it works. You are in your situation, and the one before that, precisely because you don't know how to be in a strong, secure relationship. You are also riddled with insecurity. From you rpost it is clear the only thing you are bringing to the table for men is sex.…
/r/RedPillWomen16/08/18 11:56 PM
9

I understand why she is sad. There is no reason for me to be sad. Sex isn't empty for me, it is wholly life affirming. SHe's sad because she has never had the life affirmation of commitment, hence why she's a slut. That doesn't bother me, because as a male, I have more people wanting to forge relationships with me due to my value than I know what to do with.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/18 10:36 PM
8

Not at all. It doesn't hold us back, it frees us. It's part of the process. We only reject the process because we don't understand it. Your reasoning is the same one that has so many people dumping on TRP due to the anger phase. Sure, it's unpleasant, but it's necessary. It's a critical part of the process. Sluts are critical parts of the process.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/18 10:34 PM
12

At no point should any man believe any woman is actually interested in him but only in what she (thinks she) can get from him.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/18 09:59 PM
10

They genuinely think men just suck. They don’t know it yet, but that attitude will stay with them to they part No. This is sour grapes. Like with Aesop's fox, that thought will persist so long as they can't get the grapes but that's only because of how much they want those damn grapes. It's having to make do with raisins that is so damn infuriating for them. Let some super fine, wealthy, famous man come scoop her up and I promise she'll drop that line faster than Tom Brady drops any pass thrown …
/r/TheRedPill16/08/18 09:52 PM
21

But most sluts are just lost little girls who want to be loved and cared for. And it’s a little sad that no guy (that they respect) will love or care for them the way they’d like, and instead they spend their time trying to feel less lonely and less unloved through casual sex. Why is that sad? There's a reason safety rules require a person to secure himself before assisting anyone else. She's not your problem until you've gotten yourself where you need to be. It is ironic, though, that once you'…
/r/TheRedPill16/08/18 09:45 PM
9

It also underlies just how unaware of the nature of their own shit tests women are, for all those new to TRP that don't believe women are usually unaware of their own motives. What part of that disclaimer was unclear? Though "advertising" might be a better word.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/18 09:39 PM
248

More proof women veiw men the way men view careers. A man doesn't mind slaving away in his early 20's to get the skills, experience and connections he'll need to apply for the rest of his life. Once he has those, he can, ideally, use them anywhere and everywhere to command high positions and salaries. Can you image how frustrating it would be to start off in the mail room and work your way up to executive vice president just to find out that if you went anywhere else you'd have to start there in…
/r/TheRedPill16/08/18 04:52 PM
5

I think it does. The whole "widow" part implies an actual relationship, not just desire. More pernicous is that having had some sort of sexual activity with the alpha is what convinces her she in fact can/should have relationships with that level of men and makes it so hard for any guy who isn't, or at least isn't seen to be, at that level.
/r/RedPillWomen11/08/18 08:39 PM
2

The old "why buy the cow addage" is a bit inaccurate, because it emphasizes sex and really, sex is a premarital perk for most people. Uh, no. It is the reason men have relationships at all. The way that most women think about sex, "It's nice, it can be really, really enjoyable, but I don't have to have it." Is how most men think about relationships. You know the way most women look at the prospect of being alone? That's how most men look at the prospect of being celebate. He was getting everythi…
/r/RedPillWomen08/08/18 11:24 PM
1

Brent was a foolish 21 year old for getting together with a 27 year old single mother. Not necessarily. How did he come out of this poorly? At an age when most men struggle financially, independently and sexually, he obtained a steady live in girlfriend/mom, who could provide him with maturity and sex. He got 5 years of practice when most men are just trying to get laid and figure out girls. Now he's older, likely higher in SMV and RMV than he was at 21 and smart enough to upgrade from a post 30…
/r/RedPillWomen08/08/18 11:20 PM
3

Second
/r/TheRedPill08/08/18 11:08 PM
7

In very broad strokes... Men tend to be happy because they find ways to be happy with themselves which gives them the strength to do all they have always done no matter how gruling. Denying men self knowledge has been extremely destructive to them. Women are so unhappy because they simply want more but never consider what it means to be more. No matter how much they have their lack of introspection and responsibility means they are always going to be unhappy, which creates a dynamic where much o…
/r/TheRedPill08/08/18 10:59 PM
28

Women saw how happy men were and decided they couldn't be happy unless they had the same opportunities to pursue the same goals, for surely it was the opportunity that made men so happy. Women obtained the freedom of opportunity and saw that men were still happier, so they demanded the same outcomes as men, because surely it was the outcomes that were making men so happy. Women obtained those outcomes and saw that men were still happier so they demanded to have the larger share of those outcomes…
/r/TheRedPill08/08/18 10:33 PM
1

Let's see, she has you bothered anout to take the time to write this post to AskTRP and monitor the replies, but you can't be bothered enough to ask her for her number? The male hamster in action, everyone.
/r/askTRP07/08/18 09:39 PM
1

she starts talking about how Im such a fuck boy. She tells me that she doesn't want me to kiss other women, and I'm just lost at this point. You failed her shit test. I tell her that we do this same routine every week, and that she's a tease. She laughs it off. She leaves She passed your shit test with flying colors
/r/askTRP07/08/18 09:01 PM
1

Marriage, as Christians use it, is an appeal to God's authority without faith in his ability. God created marriage in the Garden when Adam took Eve for his wife. There were no rules, no requirements, no prerequisits, no ceremonies, no promises, nothing but Adam and Eve coming together. Of course, there was no sin then to combat with either. Men realized that marriage was a good thing. However, as with everything else, no matter haw good God made it, men were convinced they could make it just a l…
/r/RPChristians07/08/18 07:49 PM
1

You raise some interesting considerations, but ground work needs to be laid before digging into those questions. Does your church actively voice/teach the position that wives can be in the wrong without that necessitating some wrong by the husband? To state it another way, does your church teach that women can and do sin all by themselves? If not, you have two dangers to the husband trying to utlize chruch discipline. The first is the shame he may recieve in being unable to control his wife, i.e…
/r/RPChristians07/08/18 07:34 PM
5

Nope, it was a solid post.
/r/RedPillWomen06/08/18 07:37 PM
3

Yes, he was up to exactly the same thing, without regrets, It's not the same thing. Durring the party period, he was doing the things necessary to make him attractive to women, while during the party period party girls are not. They are engaged in the same activity, they are not doing the same thing.
/r/RedPillWomen06/08/18 07:33 PM
4

Because for a woman a talented and attractive man with a high N count is still an attactive potential partner. A talented and attractive woman with a high N count is an attractive roll in the hay. Men very much want low N counts, whereas that isn't a priority for women. Men and women want different things.
/r/RedPillWomen06/08/18 07:26 PM
1

Yes.
/r/askTRP06/08/18 07:21 PM
0

It's not the same because women want different things. If women could be satisfied by a man whose only attribute was not sleeping around incels would be king.
/r/RedPillWomen06/08/18 07:19 PM
2

He also told her a lot of other stuff about how “he can’t read me, and doesn’t know what I’m thinking ever” Men must do the chasing, but it's OK for a woman to indicate she can be caught. He's interested in you, he's just nervous, afraid and inexperienced. Those issues aren't nearly so bad when he can hide behind the pretext of friendship and hanging out in the larger social circle. However, when it's just you and him, he's fully exposed and he freezes up. You have to decide if you're OK giving …
/r/RedPillWomen05/08/18 10:07 PM
3

I didn't miss his point at all, his ultimate point was not "be fun" it was "if she cheats, it's your fault." Yes, he makes other points as well, but that was the crux and selling point of his post. That is why he starts his post off with: Too often I head over to TRP and read something along the lines of - GF of 4 years cheated on me, and the peanut gallery shouts Hypergamy! OK great,time to replace the AWALT cheating GF, problem solved right? Wrong. Yeah sure hypergamy plays it's role. But with…
/r/TheRedPill02/08/18 04:05 PM
109

I disagree with the tone. This is too close to, "Be the best dancing monkey for her and she'll be so entertained she won't notice any of the other dancing monkeys." Rollo literally just did a post about recasting TRP for the feminine perspective. Be the best you that you can be because it's what's best for you without regard to others. IDGAF. She cheats because she isn't yours it's just your turn.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/18 01:44 PM
1

How it is used has nothing to do with what it is.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/18 08:23 PM
1

I understand what you are saying. I don't understand how it applies to what I said. Nothing in my reply showed the slightest concern for women. I did mention empathy and sympathy, but only to the degree that having those skills gives a game practitioner more information and more options. It was not meant to suggest that we should elevate other's positions/emotions but that by being aware of them we can better utilize them.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/18 06:58 PM
2

Good post, but something you said, I think, should be expanded: Game isn't a parlor trick where a woman's panties drop and she's none the wiser. Game is a set of strategies and explicit behaviors that help complete god-dammed social retards from getting in their own way. While game certainly includes strategies, it is much more than that. Game, as the name can imply, is much closer to a sport. It is an entire discipline which requires work and skill sets. Much like many early sports encapsulated…
/r/TheRedPill30/07/18 02:22 PM
1

And now you know why most of TRP is anti-marriage.
/r/askTRP30/07/18 12:47 AM
1

Let's break down your reply: 1) you tried to pick a long term partner; 2) he gave you herpes; and 3) my then husband so you two aren't even together any more. Everything you said supports my proposition. As a woman, your role is to vet. You selected a man who either would not stay with you or who ultimately wasn't worth staying with and who gave you a life long disease. Good job, good job. P.S. I never said herpes made you a slut, it just means you failed one of your basic roles.
/r/askTRP29/07/18 03:36 PM
0

The reason you feel the need to break up with her is because you've given her too much importance. You now feel the need to remove her and make space for something else to take that high high level priority. 100 to 1 if you break up with her you'll simply replace her with another girl and be right back here after a while. Don't break up with her, just stop making her a priority. DOn't make people the prioiryt--this includes getting laid. Make yourself your priority. If you fuck other girls, fine…
/r/askTRP27/07/18 09:29 PM
3

Understand that discipline is your foundation.
/r/askTRP27/07/18 09:26 PM
1

This represents a biological fuck up on both sides. Herpes represents her biological fuck up. As a woman it is her burden of performance to adequately vet men for appropriate relational value; i.e. are they high value, resource rich and likely to commit. Also, are there iny detractions with being with him? She failed that job wholly, thus indicating her low reproductive value. There isn't much she can do to fix this except significantly lower her expectations in a mate. Your reaction to finding …
/r/askTRP27/07/18 07:13 PM
10

That's typical for the female mindset. They want to be minimally invested so they can claim a full share. "I'll carry the trowell, you carry the ten 50lb bags of cement, and together we'll get everything set up!"
/r/TheRedPill27/07/18 05:23 PM
7

What's in it for him? Are you truly dressing up for him; or for yourself, or for others? If it truly is for him, are the things you think he should get from it really things he cares about? Does he care what others think about his gf? Is it possible that when you get into "going out mode" you assume behaviors/aspects he isn't thrilled (for example are you mimicking what you did to get him? If so, it might look like you're still on the hunt. He can't be thrilled with that). You say you're dressin…
/r/RedPillWomen25/07/18 02:05 PM
6

He doesn't want to be intimate with you; he'll be physicall, just not intimate. He's in full withdrawl mode emotionally. The reason why is because you've chainsawed him with your relentless demands (just as attraction can't be negotiated, genuine concern cannot be demanded). Re-read what you wrote. You've made very clear to him, in no un-certain terms, that he is not good enough. You're entire relationship is in powerplay mode and he's losing. Being close to you is like snuggling up with a runni…
/r/RedPillWomen25/07/18 01:57 PM
1

"Sex has to be fun...you're fun, right?"
/r/askTRP21/07/18 02:02 PM
3

You've been nexted.
/r/askTRP21/07/18 01:58 PM
1

She's keeping all her options open
/r/askTRP20/07/18 08:11 PM
105

100% it's because you flipped the script on her. Remember, she won't do anything she can't hamster first. That includes leaving you. In her mind, you were no good and were absolutely holder her back while she was holding you up. The proof that when seperated you took off and got things together while she floundered blasts her hamster. She was the dead weight hitching a ride on your back.
/r/askTRP20/07/18 08:08 PM
2

I was right there with you, I really was until the last real paragraph....then TROLLL. Good job, good job.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/18 10:39 PM
2

Institute child support reform so that support is based on actual costs used to support child(ren) and not based on percentages of the payee's income No, eliminate child support. Start off with a 50-50 split time share status between the parents. Each is bearing the cost of the child(ren) 50% of the time, nothing can be more equal. If you can't afford even that, then shift the time-share split until you can. You can only afford to cover the costs of the chil(ren) 25% of the time? Then that's all…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/07/18 11:50 PM
3

Stay out of his way. That doesn't mean he'll find the way to rebuild it, he has to find it on his own. But "helping" will absolutely ensure his failure.
/r/RedPillWomen10/07/18 10:33 PM
5

She tells me she doesnt wanna do stuff anymore that I use her for sex. I tried explaining how i dont That was her shit test and your failing. She was talking emotions and you turned it into a rational analysis...sploosh killer.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/18 01:32 PM
11

You're running into his need to love something higher. Part of the whole BP whitenight aspect is tht by being that white night a man is serving omething higher than himself and therefore being something greater than he could otherwise. Psychologically, speaking men love their high ideas. The more pure the idea the more he can devote himself to that idea. A lot of men intertwine this with romatic love. Sounds like that's what going on. His emotions are invested in you being the one but his knowle…
/r/RedPillWomen10/07/18 12:53 AM
2

because I have a big heart, I've now lost my job and am still facing potential assault charges or legal bullshit over this. Here we have an excellent view of the male hamster in the wild. He has a "a big heart," a.k.a. he's a good person and she/they are not so he had bad things happen to him, whaaaaaa. The organ in question is pussy, your statement should read, "because I have a big pussy I fucking crumpled like a weak bitch" and as a result I was shunned as was appropriate for a weak ass man."
/r/TheRedPill07/07/18 04:06 PM
3

Sperg much? Think about what you just did. You just stated I was wrong because my choice to reduce the various and subtle nuances to one, simple, encapselating word for the sake of quick and easy application fails because it isn't a 500 word nuanced exegesis on the matter. Nice
/r/TheRedPill07/07/18 03:56 PM
8

Your statements "I...forced her...to lose the weight" and the one in another response you stated "I screamed at my wife," are all anyone needs to know. People only scream when they lose frame. She is not in your frame. More likley, she was right were she was when she knew you'd be there walking the dog. She shit tested you massively and you failed it. Your bitch fears welled up and took over and now she knows how much control she has over you through your fear of her riding cock. If she was all …
/r/TheRedPill30/06/18 05:12 AM
19

You cannot plate a LTR/wife. That statement has two meanings. 1) If she is your LTR/wife she is NOT your plate. You cannot treat her as a plate. By definitions, LTR/Marriage and plate are mutually exclusive terms. If she is your wife then you must treat her like your wife (this does not mean treat her per the BP definition of wife). This means you cannot just drop her or not give a fuck if she's going to drop (which is not to say that you don't act like you don't give a fuck, always dread) you h…
/r/TheRedPill30/06/18 04:58 AM
18

Hypergamy. Read on it, undertand it, come to terms with it.
/r/RedPillWomen29/06/18 01:06 PM
2

You and your friend need to read up on the "apex fallacy."
/r/TheRedPill29/06/18 02:27 AM
7

A key fact to understsand about domestic violence actions is that every action covered under the domestic violence label can be prosecuted criminally. So, if all those actions can be criminally prosecuted and result in criminal convictions on people's records and result in jail time why does the country need domestic violence laws in the first place? Because criminal convictions require proof beyond a reasonable doubt and all persons accused are afforded the highest standards of due process. Gue…
/r/TheRedPill29/06/18 02:22 AM
1

Not likely anything to due with eating her pussy (those are viruses and they tend to take a while) unless she had a yeast, thrush, bacterial infection or UTI. If her ass was nasty, well, that's like licking a public toilet. You can catch anything and some of those bacterial issues can manifest rather quickly. As long as no high fever, no dehydration, improvement within 72 hours ,no worries.
/r/askTRP22/06/18 09:49 PM
12

at the end of her bio she says I'm not going to have sex with you. That means she's been pumped and dumped enough times to learn offering sex up on the first/second date increases the chance she won't get a relationship. So, she's telling you straight off the bat she's looking for someone who doesn't turn her on so much that she again can't stop herself. instead, she's looking for a greater beta who will orbit her and give her all the benefits of a relationship with minimal sexual return. It doe…
/r/askTRP22/06/18 09:45 PM
2

Go full beta on her. Be the most over the top cloying, needy, weak bitch you can be. She'll break up with you yesterday. Plus, as a bonus, word will get around and you won't be able to date any of the other girls there either saving you from repeating this mistake in the future!
/r/askTRP22/06/18 04:14 PM
1

It is NOT your money that is the problem.
/r/RedPillWomen22/06/18 12:56 PM
1

Move to the midwest. money isn't a concern It will be once you have children. Place ALL your assets into a trust. Your job is to now administer that trust and draw a modest salary doing so. That should reduce, or even elliminate, the chance that you'll be raped via child support. You'll need to discuss how to set up such a trust with an attorney and then discuss with other attorneys which midwest states are most likley to preserve the trust as oppossed to bust them to hand over to momma, you kno…
/r/askTRP22/06/18 04:40 AM
1

I just covered this yesterday. Read my posts. Don't wait for birth to get started.
/r/askTRP22/06/18 04:35 AM
2

This is trickle truth. You must veiw trickle truth just like you view an iceburg--only a small portion of the whole is being revealed. She said "Another guy kissed me." That's true, but the whole statement is "Another guy [french] kissed me in my cervix while a choked his cock down my throat right before he railed me." Do you see how that works? Good!
/r/askTRP22/06/18 04:28 AM
28

First part of TRP is understanding no one gives a shit what you want. You're a man, the question is ALWAYS what are you going to DO?
/r/askTRP20/06/18 04:58 PM
1

It's stocism that allows you to fully implement amused mastery and agree and amplify, or any other appropriate response/actions. Stoicism should be seen more as a mind set that an action. You try and keep the plate spinning, but stoicism helps you to see when that isn't possible and it helps you accept that it's broken. Stocisim doesn't mean you don't care enought to strive, it means your striving is directed and maintained by calm assurance instead of desperation. You have hopes for more, but t…
/r/askTRP20/06/18 04:54 PM
4

She needs him to be a captain. She also cannot overtly hold the reigns of his leadership. So, insteadd of confronting him with his being a problem he needs to fix, she needs to go to him with a problem she has and ask for his guidance. She needs to read TRP. She needs to find the most readily available posts/sidebar materials that he needs to learn. She then needs to create some plausible excuse about how she was directed there or innocently stumbled upon it. She should further explain that out …
/r/RedPillWomen20/06/18 04:18 PM
3

True. Let me think about it.
/r/RedPillWomen20/06/18 03:58 PM
52

Then ask everyday when you're spending time with your son. If she's being in the least shady or ellusive it's because 1) she doesn't know yet who the father is, and/or 2) she's setting you up to be her bank through child support. If you get any static or evasiveness, I'd go talk to an attorney and have the ppw drawn up immediately and threaten to nuke her if she doesn't put it all on the line immediately and grant you daily access to your child. DO NOT LET HER GET CONTROL OF THIS SITUATION. If t…
/r/askTRP20/06/18 03:54 PM
3

Plausible deniability through ammused mastery and agree and amplify. Her: "Are you sleeping with another woman?" You: "What, right now?" Her: "Are you sleeping with another woman?" you: "Are you asking to join in next time?" Her: "Are we exclusive?" You: "We are tonight!" Her: "Are we exclusive?" You: "Sweetie, you never have to ask permission to bring over another girl." But you have to sell these. THese have to be over the top, but sold straightforward, but with a shit eating arrogant smirk. T…
/r/askTRP20/06/18 03:51 PM
0

Valid points. As a counter points, though, sending him to TRP is something she can do, making him swallow it is not. Experience indicates that it is always a Man's SO that send him to TRP, just usually after she's destroyed and left him. Understanding that, may give OP insight into what she needs to do to avoid undesired outcomes.
/r/RedPillWomen20/06/18 03:41 PM
69

Here's the two issues at play-obviously: He's yours He isn't You MUST plan for both until you know which it is. OUTCOME 2. Let's start with he isn't yours becuase it's the easiest and simplest. Assuming you don't live in France where it's illegal to obtain your own DNA test of your possible child, get the DNA test immediately and get it back to the lab. Do this YESTERDAY. Then forget about this until the result come back. If she prevents you getting a DNA test, assume the child is NOT yours and …
/r/askTRP20/06/18 03:31 PM
1

DH doesn't want to as he has problems seeing blood and pain... My DH does not back me up at all... he will not lift one finger He is not a captain. Sit him down in front of TRP immediately.
/r/RedPillWomen20/06/18 03:15 PM
2

Side bar is to the right. Start reading. Have fun.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/18 02:21 AM
2

Do not leave to be with another woman. Which ever new woman you enter a relationship will also try to dominate and beta-fy you--it is their nature. You might get a year or two of her being submissive, but her desires will take over and you're back to the battle. You cannot escape the battle if you live with a woman. If you want to leave to be by yourself, that's different. But, try that attitude now. Stop thinking of yourself as married. Instead, think of yourself as a single man, who lives with…
/r/TheRedPill16/06/18 01:43 PM
12

The ol' "Imma piece of shit who's still better than you" attitude. Self loathing with delusions of superiority do create a vicious feedback loop. You sabotage everything, including yourself, so you can't fail.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/18 03:05 AM
1

The one instant where a girl liked me was a chubby band girl with braces. I dated her for a week but everyone laughed at me so i broke up with her. That is the key statement. You sabotage yourself. When you do catch a break, you discard it out of fear of others and their thoughts. That is why you are fat. That is why you are awkward. That is why you are a loser. That is, probably, why you are ugly. Being Short is just genetics, suck it up, but keep in mind, your a good 5 inches taller than a fiv…
/r/RedPillWomen15/06/18 06:31 PM
1

One should not engage in behavoir one would be embarassed to have exposed. One should not be embarrased by most of the things they are told they should be.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/18 05:16 PM
36

Your anecdotes explained perfectly how TRP came about. Let's shift the perspective and see why what your fiend and sister are doing is so horrible. They are in essence saying, "You love me so much you will give me everything and I love me so much I'm willing to take it all." Does that describe the type of relationship you want? It is inherently exploitative. Moreover what happens when those men realize what is going on? Do you think the relationships will continue? Or at least continue in the sa…
/r/RedPillWomen15/06/18 01:04 PM
6

Got it. You may not have oneitis, but you don't have sufficient dependable sex to have the abundance necessary to view her correctly. Tighten, or obtain, new plates to establish more reliable source(s).
/r/askTRP15/06/18 03:59 AM
2

You say she's a plate but to be clear; how many other women are fucking and how often?
/r/askTRP15/06/18 01:55 AM
9

High chance she is lying Dude, what are you smoking? There is no chance she is not lying.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/18 07:25 PM
128

2x is very much of the Duluth power model mindset. Per the duluth power model, power=oppressor and victim =virtuous. So, among its adherents there is a very real and very intense contest to be the most victimised person. Think of it like boys being in the scouts. They train for merit badges which shows their ability. The more ability and effort equals rank and the ultimate rank equall eagle scout which is (was) universally respected and a great reflection on a person's character. The victim cult…
/r/askTRP14/06/18 05:59 PM
8

It's being downvoted because it's fantasy. He's saying the way he believes it should be. He is ignoring, though, how it really its.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/18 10:57 PM
2

So was I, so was I...
/r/askTRP13/06/18 10:31 PM
2

Nah, he was waiting in purity for the wedding to her, but he was banging any number of his thousand concubines-which was holy, because he was king and they were concubines.
/r/RPChristians13/06/18 10:29 PM
2

Isn't that what I said? Testosterone=hairy and muscular.
/r/askTRP13/06/18 10:27 PM
1

Or...it could be to make sure kids are well provisioned. If women were as concerned about men and concerned in the same ways as men are for women, it would be nothing but sex, sex, sex all the time. Lots and lots of babies, but who would care for them?
/r/RPChristians13/06/18 10:24 PM
1

Just as you problably didn't know your own purpose previously, you likely are beggining to realize that you don't know the purpose of a wife. Why does God want you to have a wife?
/r/RPChristians13/06/18 10:22 PM
2

The best source of testasterone is to get it directly from the source. You should be guzzling semen by the gallon! Six months of dedicated time on your knees throating the knobs of the built and hairy should make you the alpha-est alpha of them all! Just don't forget to lift!
/r/askTRP13/06/18 10:13 PM
1

A girl will do what ever a girl wants to do. The point of shit tests is for her to decide if it's you she wants to do.
/r/askTRP13/06/18 10:10 PM
13

In a sense, yes, but it is addressed to men more generally, because she expects men to solve her problems. If men would just get with the program, then we could change this culture and shame Chad into wifing me up! It is a lymbic driven cry to someone, read men, to fix her problem. It's just like when a child throws a tantrum expecting someone, read parents, to solve things.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/18 10:04 PM
1

Men want to progress sexually; women want to progress relationally. She's back because she's at the point where you represent her best chance to maintain some sort of relationship status, she'll be gone when that changes. You need to look solely at her from a sexual perspective. Is she your best bet? Meaning, can you get it elsewhere and what will it cost you to get it from her?
/r/askTRP13/06/18 10:03 PM
3

If your ex had died, who would watch the kids all day while you worked? Day care would, and they'd charge you a shit-ton to do it. But you'd pay because it's worth it to have good care for your kids. Would you care what the providers did with their take home? No. This is no different. Your kids have full time care which you pay for while you build your life. Moroer, once your ex realizes she can;t use the kids to control or bother you, I bet you'll begin to see them a lot more than 25%.
/r/askTRP13/06/18 09:56 PM
1

Not in a reprimanding way. Make a joke about it like "why would you even hide that?" Lull her into telling you everything or she'll hide all. Once you know, then you can decide.
/r/askTRP13/06/18 09:51 PM
1

Bodies develop, peak, plateau, and then break down. Not always at the same rate due to genetics, environment, care, etc. An unused 18 y.o. pussy will NOT be like that of a 50 y.o., 40 year veteran prostitute.
/r/askTRP13/06/18 09:48 PM
5

You absolutely missed the covert communication in that exchange. Let me translate it for you. You: "Hey, what's up?" Her brain: "SEX, SEX, SEX." As soon as you reached out to her, her mind began thinking about having sex with you. She associates you with sex. She didn't say she wouldn't meet with you, so...
/r/askTRP13/06/18 09:44 PM
166

Single mothers, you are not in the position to be making demands. Men want childless women with no baggage. Your bastard children are victims of your poor life choices. We don’t want to join in their misery. Fantasy Overweight women, you are not in the position to be making demands. Men want healthy, fit women. No one is forcing you to eat garbage and sit on the sofa. Fantasy Older women, you are not in the position to be making demands. Men want youthful women that can bear children for them. E…
/r/TheRedPill13/06/18 09:37 PM
1

Step: Delete this post Read the sidebar Post any questions you have after you've complied with #2 in AskTRP.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/18 09:28 PM
4

It's all about the dick size. You see, his dick is big enough to reach her from where he's at, yours is not!
/r/TheRedPill11/06/18 03:08 AM
8

You're asking for help in understanding her actions. This really needs to be directed to AskTRP. Go ahead an delete this before you get banned and ask over there if you really want answers. PS: It was an all around shit test. You failed doubly, first because you stopped escalating after she gave you repeated clearance to go forward. You then failed by refusing to follow through with your stated decision until after you complied with your demands. No contact her for a month minimum.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/18 07:56 PM
42

No. The answer to that particulary, but intentionally, misleading question is simple: any one, male or female, who sleeps around IS a hoe. If a woman is still willing to sleep with a man hoe, that's on her, not on men. This question isn't about double standards, it's about women, once again, trying to place all the responsibility on men. WHy can't he be responsible for her choices and actions.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/18 02:37 PM
4

Women want the best man and they want him to commit as much as possible to her. Men want to be the best so that he has as much choice as possible.
/r/RedPillWomen06/06/18 05:22 PM
2

Here's what you need to know about religion. There are two types, good types and bad types. The bad types are stupid people believing stupid things because they are too stupid to know better. The good type(s) types help you understand the world and exert self control. Both are to better enable you to navigate the world. However, anytime something good comes along, there are those looking to buy, and sell, the outcome at half the cost. "Why do all the hard work, when I can just tell you what you …
/r/TheRedPill06/06/18 05:10 PM
5

She's not a plate if she's your only one. If she's a true plate, why would you lie to her about her being your only one? If she's pissed, it's because she thought you two had exclusivity which means either she wasn't a plate, or you were doing it wrong.
/r/askTRP04/06/18 01:23 AM
1

Ah, shaming; always a winning strategy.
/r/RedPillWomen02/06/18 02:20 PM
-2

The one where he can be the captain. Not taken him back.
/r/RedPillWomen02/06/18 01:20 AM
-4

The short of it is you've irrevocable destroyed the power balance. The slightly longer version is you've placed him in crisis. He likely can't articulate the following, but it is very likely that he is intuiting it. You've proven that what you want most is not him. You might very much want him along to share with what it is you want, but he isn't that top priority. That's why you walked away, you wanted more with or without him. Now, he has to figure out how much of himself he can do without in …
/r/RedPillWomen01/06/18 05:53 PM
1

Because you won't die the moment you stop taking food, protien, and/or water. But taking those items will not stop death and ensuring eternal life. So what is the truth you were trying to assert? Eat them and you will live? Not necessarily. Don't eat them and you will die because you didn't eat them? Again, not necessarily.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/18 04:19 PM
1

I agree with every thing you are saying. I wonder, though, could this be applied to those who self promote to obtain profitablility by selling life coaching skills to people who are seeking knowledge? Could it be presented to the fringe and disenfranchised, in the form of paradigm shifting snippets of "truth" that encourage the reader to like they have been presented a glimps of the "truth" thus converting their fringe staus as outsiders into a "the select few" who are positioned to recieve? No,…
/r/TheRedPill31/05/18 03:14 PM
5

Per your post, civilation requires the forceful subjucation of others. But, forceful subjucation inevitably results in resistance. So, civilization equates to eternal struggle. Civilization, therefore, is NOT a panacea. It is, at best, exchanging one set of struggles with another. More practicaly, it is a group of empowered people making the choice of struggles to ensure they have the fewest while the out group has the most while the benefits are inversely correlated. I prefer the current situat…
/r/TheRedPill31/05/18 03:08 PM
1

So what you're saying is that Black Jesus is the only real Jesus. And since we should be more Jesus like, and since Jesus is black, we need to be more black! Black is the new alpha!
/r/TheRedPill31/05/18 02:42 PM
2

I think there are large differences between losing it at 13, 23, or 33.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 01:42 AM
4

To what degree does the age at which you lost your virginity count towards sluttiness/prudishness?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 12:09 AM
0

What part of "bro-science" made you think I was speaking exclusively from a text book definition of the psychoanalytical stance? I used the term because most people are familiar with it, byond that, nothing in my post borrowed from the Fruedian usage.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 12:05 AM
1

How many of those are not both A) heavily monogomous, and B) don't have some sort of societal pressure to ensure paternity?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 12:02 AM
1

You're confusing issues. Noone is saying sex has to be with a virgin to be enjoyable. No one is saying commitment can only be made to a virgin, either. The argument is that the m/w complex is about ensuring paternity. When paternity isn't the issue, then the m/w shouldn't be either. Also,the m/w doesn't ensure the mother is good/capable/loyal to the child. It's meant to ensure authenicity with the father so the father can be assured of paternity so he knows to heavily invest and be a good parent…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 12:02 AM
8

She's not your gf, she's your warden. You need to permanently cut off all contact with her.
/r/RedPillWomen27/05/18 07:37 PM
5

Yes. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. TRP is is the opposite of 3rd waive feminism. It didn't preceed 3WF. It began shortly after 3WF began.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 09:00 PM
1

Addressing your take on the issue, I'd counter with a defense that often works as a defense of taxes. No one like paying taxes. No one likes committing to a low value man. We all pay taxes because the alternative is even more undesirable (if noone pays society breaksdown and choas ensues, if only you stop paying society punishes you to deter others from thinking it's a good idea). Paying taxes isn't so bad if you're rich. Taxes aren't horrible if you're poor and positioned to benefit greatly fro…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 08:31 PM
1

You've got to read the person. This girl was very ambitious and always wanted the best. I was, frankly, way out of her league (she was likley drawn to my status more than she was drawn to me) and not inhibited around women. A big part of her drive was her belief she was out competing the other women who were interested in me (think very extended social circle) and the status being with me would bring. She should have known better. On the other hand, women need to understand that if it's the guy'…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 07:50 PM
1

Technically, no. Monogamy means "one" it does not mean "one at a time." Can people be committed and uncommitted? Depends on your definitions for those terms.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 07:22 PM
1

I dated a place holder for while (year plus). The reasons were two fold. First, I had a lot going on and while I like women, I simply didn't have the time and energy to devote to meeting them and then building and maintain a relationship, or alternatively, ride the waves in the whole hookup scene. Second, she was very in to me and pursued me. She made it super easy. As to why it never became more...she simply wasn't what I wanted. I would never have pursued her. (To be fair, in the beginning I w…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 07:17 PM
3

I'm going to take a big chance here and make an armchair analysis/diagnosis. I think you are very high maintenance because you are very idealistic, and I do not mean idealistic in a god way. I suspect you have a very clear and vivid picture of how your relationships should be, and that they are primarily defined by how great and wonderful each and every day is. You are dedicated to achieving this outcome. You will sacrafice just about anything, including yourself, to this out come. You wil not a…
/r/RedPillWomen21/05/18 10:23 PM
3

Five years ago, I was an insecure mess and deeply unhappy. Now I’m much more confident and content. But a big reason for my confidence and contentment is this marriage You know the above, but all of your actions indicate the opposite. You're about to run face first into a very old dynamic; she was not able to build herself up; I saw the potential in her and invested years of my time, energy, love and resources; now that she feels confident, she's forgotten how she got there and thinks she's too …
/r/RedPillWomen19/05/18 06:32 PM
1

Sweetie, who dumped and alpha widoewed you?
/r/TheRedPill18/05/18 02:58 PM
0

I get that she's your friend, but why would you ever want todo that to some man? Do you really hate men that much?
/r/RedPillWomen18/05/18 12:04 PM
2

WOW, what a collassal shit pile of gatekeeping and "man up." I don't give a shit about your hill. I strive to be the best possible me I can be. How can I be better today than I was yesterday? That's it. Life isn't about being "happy, having fun, putting positivity into the world," life is about living, in all it's aspects. I can't be happy without hard work. I need the struggle to keep me strong and sharp, you're preaching rebranded BP. That said, I understand I have part of me that looks for co…
/r/TheRedPill11/05/18 01:51 PM
12

Believe it or not, a lot of girls do it so you won't "count." If you two aren't serious then what you two did together isn't serious and since sex is serious but what you two did was not serious, then you couldn''t have had sex because sex is seroius, but you two weren't. Common, it's that simple.
/r/askTRP10/05/18 03:26 AM
42

That's likely only a small part, the larger part is the contextual alpha. The professor is king of his class. He stands up in front and commands all attention, and grants all grades based on his perception of worth. So, he has status, power and ability and all the girls have to cowtow to him giving him instant social proof.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/18 09:21 PM
1

Because I'm not arguing against the gist of the post just some of the use of facts in support of it.
/r/RPChristians06/05/18 07:04 PM
1

No, I personally reject the arguments that marriage is a sacrement. I understand its benefits, but I don't raise it that high. I just wanted to point out those two issues, though, because they really jumped out at me.
/r/RPChristians06/05/18 06:05 PM
1

Except, that marriage was instituted by God prior to the advent of sin.
/r/RPChristians06/05/18 05:48 PM
1

I'll admit, I didn't read all of this anthology. But, skiming through, it appears to be chocked full of errors. For example, near the end it says, "When did marriage begin? When man sinned..." However, Genesis 2 clearly establishes marriage and this was before Adam and Eve's sinning. Also, near the beginning it asserts that those who remain single have no real impact on the world, unlike those tho marry and have children. Do you believe Jesus was married? Did he have children? He had an unrivale…
/r/RPChristians06/05/18 05:32 PM
1

Just a note on translating, especially ancient Hebrew. There was a huge gap between society's capacity to conceptuallize and then express those conceptions orally and it's ability to record them in writing. Both speach and thought are numerous millennia older than writing. This is often not accounted for. For example, people often fail to recognise that thought could be significantly more complex than speach and writing. It also leads to to people forgetting that writing tools we have today were…
/r/RPChristians06/05/18 05:05 PM
1

It sounds like you are trying to follow rules, given that christians pulled down the "laws" which previously underpinned the Judaic understanding of how to live a righteous life, you might want to reconsider this approach to success or righteousness. Instead, ask, what are you trying to do? Where is God leading you? As you then proceed down that path, ask yourself, how does this fit into the plan? Everything will have one of three answers: 1) It helps, which means it's good so long as it help; 2…
/r/RPChristians06/05/18 04:36 PM
1

First, I think she played a huge power move on you and hit you where she knew you were weakest--her attraction to you. She wasn't telling the truth, or lying, she was attacking. Lies, truth, what ever was going to hurt or do damage was launched, without regards to veractiy, just efficacy. Second, and this is because you are elevating theology above everything else. Are you certain you understand scripture's teachings on marriage? In both Matthew (chapter 22) and Mark (12), Jesus talks about marr…
/r/RPChristians06/05/18 04:30 PM
0

First, I think she played a huge power move on you and hit you where she knew you were weakest--her attraction to you. She wasn't telling the truth, or lying, she was attacking. Lies, truth, what ever was going to hurt or do damage was launched, without regards to veractiy, just efficacy. Second, and this is because you are elevating theology above everything else. Are you certain you understand scripture's teachings on marriage? In both Matthew (chapter 22) and Mark (12), Jesus talks about marr…
/r/RPChristians06/05/18 04:18 PM
6

This.
/r/RedPillWomen05/05/18 12:37 PM
3

You do not have a girlfriend; you are the girlfriend.
/r/askTRP04/05/18 05:47 PM
2

SHe's already fucked the other dude.
/r/askTRP04/05/18 05:46 PM
1

I hear about “alpha fucks beta bucks” a lot, but i think if a man chooses, he can be happily married with children if he can maintain his game (using dread, competition anxiety). Let me rephrase that statement for you: There is no need for a man to enjoy a leisurely retirment when he can bust his ass all day everyday until the day he dies. Do you see the falacy in your logic?
/r/askTRP04/05/18 05:44 PM
1

Hell yes it is. And the best way is for you to go ahead and lead the charge. I'll hold back in reserve and keep the women warm and well lubed in your absence. God speed and victory or an honorable death!
/r/askTRP04/05/18 05:42 PM
1

She's no more a virgin than your mother is. You're problem here isn't her sexual experience, it's yours. You clearly are believing that her words are conveying the literal truth. It's as if you've never met a woman before. When a woman states, "I'm a virgin" she is not making a statement about how many dicks have or have not been inside her. What she is saying is, "I don't want you to think I'm a slut and you should take the lead."
/r/askTRP04/05/18 05:37 PM
1

SHe either doesn' want to fuck you because she veiws you as her beta meal ticket, or It's an extreme form of ASD. If she really thinks you're her dream man, she may be trying to present herself to you as a "good girl" and therefore relationship material. This is instinctual and not necessarily bad. It is also a subconscious shit test. Here's how you tell the difference. If she's really in to you, she'll follow your lead. You can then-through action-lead her to understand what a really good girl …
/r/askTRP04/05/18 05:30 PM
2

The only proper response to "I like you" or "I love you" is to be a gentleman and reply in kind. For example: Her: I really like you You: I really like how you suck my dick Her: I love you you You: I love you when you are face down and ass up. Her: I like being with you soo much You: I like being in you soo much It's that simple. Of course, delivering those lines with a twinkle in your eye a smirk on your lips and a playful smack on her ass, really helps to seal the A&A.
/r/askTRP04/05/18 05:15 PM
7

I think it is a very important relationship factor, but not due to attraction but protection. Having status will not make you attractive, not having it will make you an unatractive partner. This is greatly amplified given most court systems eager willingness to divest a man of his wealth, both current and future, by giving it to the women upon termination of a committed relationship in forms of child support, spousal support, palimony (where applicable) and all the other forms of "equitable" dis…
/r/RedPillWomen04/05/18 05:01 PM
6

So, the solution to my problems is to forget about answering my own questions and instead sell, at great price, the solutions to other people's problems. That is a great analogy for religion. I will stand here and tell you what you need to know and in exchange you will fill up my offering plates.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/18 03:55 PM
6

They didn't belive in the physical existance of the Greek pantheon. Exactly. In fact, if anyone thinks about the pantheon for any amont of time, they should readily see that is is an anthropomorphisized taxinomical representation of the forces at work in universe. It was a proto-scientific attempt to understand where things come from and why. For example, take Zues and his two brothers, Hades and Posieden. Most people may not realize it but, Zues was the youngest of the brothers. It was not comm…
/r/TheRedPill25/04/18 03:28 PM
1

"If her daddy's rich take her out for a meal, if her daddy's poor just do what you feel." --Mungo Jerry.
/r/RedPillWomen23/04/18 05:49 PM
5

Having money and career does NOT make you attactive to men with money/career. NOT having money/career makes you very UNattractive as a LTR partner to man who has that.
/r/RedPillWomen22/04/18 08:34 PM
1

That trust issue wasn't big, it's the single biggest issue from a guy's perspective. However, it sounds like you've gotten a lot of valuable insight and that has helped you considerably. Your issue was/is very legitimate and I've heard many women eccho the same sentiments, usually asked as "If he won't marry me if I don't have sex, and he won't mary if I have sex, how do I get married?" That is the female's dilema.
/r/RedPillWomen21/04/18 07:55 PM
1

And you've just done an excellent job describing why the current dating scene is massacering so many people.
/r/RedPillWomen21/04/18 07:35 PM
1

I don't mean to be harsh, but reading through your post and all your replies, you simply have trust issues. You lack the capacity to enter into a relationship as a full fledged emotinal partner. You either have to fix that the best you can, or be well aware of what your partner is agreeing to in accepting you as his partner. Denying that you are "broke" in that regard and/or denying that your partner is making that sacrafice to be with you will cause huge issues in any long term relationship you…
/r/RedPillWomen21/04/18 07:33 PM
2

Exactly, it can be summed up as follows: Her past establishes a known quantity of what she's capable of, so men use it to measure what she's giving now. If she isn't giving the same to her man, it's because either A) she isn't motivated to give it, or B) she is no longer capable of that, i.e., she's broken.
/r/RedPillWomen21/04/18 07:20 PM
2

"Do this or I leave" is essentially blackmailing. So, you consider it emotional blackmail when a woman gives a man the marriage ultimatum? Marry me or I'll leave. Do you despise Beyonce for making a very popular soang about "If you liked it you should have put a ring on it." Do you despise all the women who ate that song up? More importantly, do you realize almost no healthy man ever really wants to enter into a an exclusive, monogomous commitment?
/r/RedPillWomen21/04/18 07:13 PM
74

Exactly. The only thing he had going for him was that he was there and able to entertain her. Had he been boring-nothing. Had bf been there, nothing. But Bf wasn't exciting her from back home, OP was and she was fairly certain she wouldn't get caught. When it come to feelings, the feelings she can have now trump the feelings she'll be having later.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/18 06:30 PM
9

The best option for a women is to go for the best man she can exert the most control over.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/18 07:11 PM
4

It's mainly an issue of perspective. First, reason is all well and good until the emotions take off. You know he's bad, but you want him even worse. Second, remember which is the carrot and which the goal--because it reverses for the sexes. Men use commitment to get sex and women use sex to get commitment (broadly speaking). The greater a man has to play up his commtiment credentials, the less anything else he (likely) has going for him. So, let's look at the reality of what you are asserting. A…
/r/RedPillWomen04/04/18 08:13 PM
4

This is a simple issue of priorities. What is your number 1 priority? Treat it as such.
/r/RedPillWomen29/10/17 11:17 PM
0

I make a lot more than my wife. I work a lot more to. And this is after I supported her getting her graduate degree so she could have her career. We had a fight about my not treating her career as equal to mine. She let me know that she was tired of having to change her schedule to accommodate family life while I refused to do so. She was tired that my career was so much more important than hers. I thought a moment, smiled and conceded, "I'll cut my hours back to mach how much you cut your spend…
/r/RedPillWomen29/10/17 11:12 PM
12

Not because you didn't believe he was the most amazing carpenter ever, but because you didn't believe he could become one, because you believed he was incapable of learning what so many men have been learning for centuries. There's her solution. She needs to go to him and sincerely apologize for confusing the man he is with whatever man he chooses to be.
/r/RedPillWomen29/10/17 11:03 PM
2

Ego--the analysis controls. When someone uses "ego" in a derogatory manner, they tend to mean the ego is in control. 1--Exactly, the only issue is where the bottom of the barrel begins. For players it starts right underneath the virgins. 2--Good article weak men--at lot of my response was directed to the video embedded in your post.
/r/RedPillWomen28/10/17 01:30 PM
1

Legitimately asking for the female perspective on this. Can women tell when a man is a dedicated orbiter of many women? If so, how do those men rate as potential mates? Are high N count women the corollary?
/r/RedPillWomen28/10/17 12:11 AM
3

But with lying isn't there a worry that you're building on top of a bomb? If the number is a deal breaker isn't the relationship always subject to it being found out? Why build something, and heaven forbid a home and family with kids, when a casual sentence can destroy it in an instant? If the thought is we can work it out, can't it be worked out now? If not, how can it be worked out in the future?
/r/RedPillWomen28/10/17 12:02 AM
2

It will help tremendously to stop trying to view men's perspective in the terms of only feelings. It is NOT an ego thing as women would understand that. For most men it is an emotional reaction to an analysis of facts. Most men who have issues with N counts (and most men do have issues) are of two groups: 1) Those who have used countless women and 2) those for whom obtaining women have been a terrible struggle. 1) Players. Many of these men really do begin to see women as subhuman because those …
/r/RedPillWomen27/10/17 11:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter