TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

lazlounderhill Archive

View 23 posts and 1,055 comments by lazlounderhill on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
62

lazlounderhill/r/MensRights21/08/13 06:36 PM
51

lazlounderhill/r/MensRights19/09/13 05:31 PM
28

Outragelazlounderhill/r/MensRights13/02/15 08:38 PM
19

lazlounderhill/r/MensRights02/08/14 08:10 AM
17

lazlounderhill/r/MensRights10/09/13 05:20 PM
16

lazlounderhill/r/MensRights29/08/14 04:38 PM
16

lazlounderhill/r/MensRights02/04/14 05:01 PM
14

lazlounderhill/r/MGTOW23/01/14 09:24 PM
11

lazlounderhill/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:50 PM
5

lazlounderhill/r/MensRights18/03/13 03:18 PM
5

re: Feminismlazlounderhill/r/MensRights07/05/14 07:03 PM
3

lazlounderhill/r/MGTOW12/02/14 09:34 PM
2

lazlounderhill/r/MensRights19/08/14 08:35 PM
2

Discriminationlazlounderhill/r/MensRights04/01/15 05:32 AM
2

Outragelazlounderhill/r/MensRights18/06/14 05:26 PM
0

lazlounderhill/r/MensRights21/05/13 04:13 PM
0

lazlounderhill/r/MensRights04/04/14 08:38 PM
0

lazlounderhill/r/MensRights25/07/13 04:08 PM
0

lazlounderhill/r/MensRights20/09/13 03:48 PM
0

lazlounderhill/r/MensRights21/06/13 05:28 PM
0

lazlounderhill/r/MGTOW02/04/14 09:07 PM
0

lazlounderhill/r/MensRights20/03/13 04:19 PM
0

lazlounderhill/r/MensRights23/07/13 04:11 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,055 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

I've been doing it for well over a decade now - it's a fucking relief. Life is so much more peaceful. I was glutted with women early on - the drama. I don't miss that shit at all. Don't make the mistake of confusing "horney" with "lonely". You're only alone if you choose to be. And hornyness can be cured with a night out on the town. Point is - you have a choice in the matter. You can step in and out at will - doesn't matter how old you are. That's the gift of being a man - you age like fine win…
/r/askTRP28/12/20 09:34 PM
1

You stop by perceiving the world and accepting the world as it is. Read Briffault's Law, accept the truth of that law and live life for your own sake, for once. The only woman who ever gave a shit if you lived, or died - and for non-selfish reasons - was your mother (if she was mentally/psychologically normal/healthy) - and that was only because of a biological predisposition to do so, as a function of evolution. To all other women, you are nothing more than a source of safety and provision for …
/r/askTRP22/10/20 05:57 PM
47

Because men are conditioned - almost from birth - to measure their sense of self-worth by female approval. Taking the red pill is the solution to that problem.
/r/askTRP21/10/20 08:41 PM
5

Yeah - those would be "self-reporting" statistics, which is tantamount to astrology. Ask yourself how many men you personally know who have been cheated on - then ask yourself how many women you personally know who have been caught cheating, and I think you'll have a pretty accurate idea of how frequently women cheat. From what I've observed, 90 percent of women who make the decision to end a relationship do so via cheating. Plan B is always in effect. Dissatisfaction is the ever present justifi…
/r/askTRP05/10/20 07:01 PM
13

Or pap smears. Midwifery?
/r/askTRP13/07/20 08:54 PM
15

Become a hairdresser.
/r/askTRP13/07/20 08:34 PM
2

No shit. It's not like it's not challenging enough just to earn a damned living these days. Who has time for that shit?
/r/askTRP08/07/20 07:43 PM
11

Yes. This. There was a time not that long ago when it was considered simply bad manners to talk politics in a professional setting. I miss those days. You have a right to concentrate on your work and keep your political views to yourself. I've been pressed like this (different circumstances, but nonetheless invasive) and I basically made the same case, as I did here. There is no legitimate argument, if you tell them that you find it rude to talk politics at work.
/r/askTRP07/07/20 08:02 PM
1

Hypergamy is no more something that "happens to you", than gravity is something that "happens to you". It's a ubiquitous aspect of nature. You navigate life accordingly. All women will trade up, if the opportunity appears safe, assured and secure. Briffault's Law is always in effect - no exceptions.
/r/askTRP02/07/20 02:26 PM
1

It's a risk, and the stakes are potentially life altering (ruining) - because false accusations do occur, and evil - sociopathic - women do exist, and they are far more common than anyone here wants to think about - or admit. Anyone who tells you otherwise is whistling past the graveyard. Ultimately it's a matter of your individual tolerance for risk. If you find yourself at the mercy of a genuine female sociopath with the criminal justice system the way it is - there's nothing TRP can do for yo…
/r/askTRP30/06/20 06:00 PM
2

Take them both out, focus most of your attention on the "friend" even if she looks like a straight up goblin.
/r/askTRP16/06/20 05:18 PM
1

I should have disclosed that I'm not a PUA or PU-enthusiast, I just know that women are solipsistic by nature, so it follows (and is readily observable in the wild) that they prefer talking over listening - by whatever means or prompt.
/r/askTRP12/06/18 02:52 PM
-1

Only when conversing with autistic lesbians.
/r/askTRP11/06/18 07:27 PM
9

You don't talk. You ask questions, and let them talk. They don't want to hear you talk. They want to talk.
/r/askTRP11/06/18 06:33 PM
3

For the same reason that you would become unnerved if a known sociopath suddenly took an interest in you.
/r/askTRP14/05/18 04:04 PM
3

Threaten her with a restraining order - THEN NO FURTHER CONTACT. If that doesn't work, look into getting one. Look into it seriously enough that it creates a record - if things escalate (and if she's crazy things will escalate) - you've got compelling evidence for stalking. Finally and most importantly (and it bears repeating) - sever all contact with her. Do not ENGAGE at all. Do not acknowledge her existance in any way. Document every attempt she makes to contact you. Once again NO CONTACT. NO…
/r/askTRP31/07/17 04:24 PM
2

There's no truth to be found in feminism.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/06/17 03:57 PM
2

Erosion of the soul.
/r/askTRP12/05/17 08:50 PM
1

I don't disagree, but it was only through sheer dumb luck that I managed to not fuck up my life. I would not endorse my former lifestyle to any young man who was not fully aware of female nature. I understood Briffault's Law on an intuitive level, and that served me VERY well, but there is a generation of young men out there shambling through the same minefield, and I would warn them at every available opportunity. Hubris can be a very dangerous thing for a man who is just starting out in life.
/r/askTRP02/05/17 08:45 PM
2

From a MGTOW monk's perspective, and speaking for myself: I glutted myself with sex in my 20s and 30s and I was fucking lucky enough to make it through unscathed (no diseases, no fuck trophies, no worries). At a certain point in life, you wake up and look around and realize that you've got enough to lose to start worrying about losing it, and conquest no longer seems worth the energy and risk. In other words "satiety". Naturally, your mind (if you're lucky enough to still have autonomy of your m…
/r/askTRP02/05/17 07:52 PM
9

The Feminist Inquisition: This particular man is not ill, he is morally corrupt and under the influence of the devil. I have the moral authority to proclaim this, because I am the hand and mouthpiece of God's wisdom. As an agent of the feminist inquisition, I have the sole authority to "name" and determine the nature of an affliction. Illness is the manifestation of Satan in the world, those who are weak willed enough to manifest the Devil's work are morally corrupt and should look for examples …
/r/MensRights12/10/16 04:34 PM
-3

She only knows she's gotten to you if she remembers the incident to begin with - she won't, and he won't have to lift anything heavy.
/r/askTRP28/03/16 08:48 PM
4

Indeed. I just hope that the amount of comfort you'll privately enjoy as a result of taking the moral high ground will prove to be adequate.
/r/askTRP28/03/16 05:54 PM
-17

Next time she asks you to lift something heavy, or do something icky you say, "help yourself out" - next time, and thereafter.
/r/askTRP28/03/16 05:18 PM
3

So can the recently deceased.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 09:36 PM
2

We live in a gynocentric society - this is what passes as "equality" and "justice" in such a society. Get used to it.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 03:01 PM
2

Why would you EVER assume that she was telling the truth?
/r/askTRP10/09/15 07:15 PM
1

"pills you can forget to take" (yeah, right - I'm just going to forget to take this pill even though in doing so I'm essentially taking a life altering decision and giving it a spin on the roulette wheel.) I sincerely hope that if a male pill is ever developed, that someone studies and takes note of the incredibly low occurrence of "forgetting" and "oops" when compared to women.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 08:36 PM
1

lefty here.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 07:44 PM
3

Patriarchy strikes again.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 04:42 PM
1

throw her in the gutter and go buy another.
/r/askTRP07/05/15 09:07 PM
1

I agree - wholeheartedly.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 03:31 PM
2

Anyone who thinks "the draft" is a relic is whistling past the graveyard. There's a reason selective service is still being implemented and considering recent world events, I'd wager we'll see it again sooner than any one of us wants to think about.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 09:19 PM
1

The fact that this ram is tethered would undermine what I think you're trying get across.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 06:10 PM
3

I'd love to take a crack at filtering out the audio problems with this recording. Honestly, I don't know if it's just because I've listened to this presentation before, or what, but it seems to me that recordings of Janice Flamengo have a high probability of being riddled with irritating and distracting audio pops and crackles - which is truly a shame.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 06:05 PM
1

MGTOW is not a movement to effect change in society. Some MGTOW do in fact fantasize about a "fempocalypse" especially early on, but the philosophy/lifestyle is a process, and anger is part of that process. Some linger in that "anger" stage longer than others. The red pill is not an easy thing to digest. I personally don't see MGTOW as a movement at all - it's a rejection of gynocentrism and a process of personal evolution away from gynocentric habits of thought, with ultimate goal of complete a…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 09:25 PM
2

I'll vote with Men's Rights in mind the day that I see a political party that shows even the slightest interest in the rights of men - I can tell you that this party does not exist in the United States.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 07:47 PM
2

Teaching women that it's not acceptable to initiate violence against men is the most effective way to prevent the vast majority of violence against women. As for the rest, there is no way.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 07:41 PM
94

She's going to have a very bad time.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 07:39 PM
2

You said that people who don't conform with society's standards think too much on their own and thus have no control over your life? I did? An attraction to non-conformity is a feature of the lizard brain, not the opposite. Conformity is a choice, it's a resistance to ancient biological impulses that have not caught up to the environment in which we currently find ourselves. This is the source of many human problems - the ever present conflict between personal freedom and the desire for safety (…
/r/seduction30/03/15 08:43 PM
2

No shit, but at some point you have to take an objective look at the cost/benefit of allowing your lizard brain to be the dominant influence with regard to the decisions you make in life. The sooner you gain the ability to do this, the sooner you have granted yourself some level of control over your own life.
/r/seduction30/03/15 07:14 PM
-2

Nether ape.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 04:24 PM
0

In this society, whether you like it or not, a man's value is measured a great deal by his attractiveness to women, and that attractiveness is dictated - by in large - by his ability to "provide" which is a euphemism for his ability (and utility) to attain and distribute resources to women. This commercial encapsulates and reinforces the notion of male utility and disposability, and does so shamelessly and unapologetically. In this case our perceived value can be measured by superimposing a man …
/r/MensRights16/02/15 04:47 PM
1

Sure, there are a subset of people, men and women, who have no sexual attractions, or severely reduced libidos. Gotta stop you right there and point out that "having a libido (great or small)" has nothing to do with allowing/preventing oneself from making life decisions based on "libido" great or small. Again, you may be at the mercy of your libido, I am not. claiming that we need to get rid of this desire to have reason, and defeat gynocentrism. I made no such statement. "Getting rid" of and "p…
/r/MensRights16/02/15 04:38 PM
0

. . . and when men do spend, they should - of course - only spend money on things that make them pleasing to women.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 04:16 PM
-2

No - I'm not concerned with "unfair". The idea that "sexy car = sexy man" is the basis for hypergamy. Hypergamy is the root cause of the vast majority of injustices men face in this society. It is a salient feature of the widely held belief that men are mere utilities in society. You cannot give hypergamy a pass out of one side of your mouth and then claim that men shouldn't be viewed as utilities out the other side of your mouth. The notion that hypergamy is as old as time as well, as is "men a…
/r/MensRights15/02/15 05:04 PM
0

I think you are way under thinking it.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 04:49 PM
0

It's not working on me. Maybe I'm alone in this, but I don't give money to people who insult me. That is the purpose of marketing is it not? To generate sales? If this peice of shit commercial appeals to blue pill men, who are undoubtedly the majority of men, so then it's no big deal because most men aren't offended by this - then what the fuck is the purposes of the MRM? Afterall, most men aren't offended by the injustices they face everyday because they are wholly or partially blind to them, b…
/r/MensRights15/02/15 04:48 PM
-3

Male here. Whether or not you have internal plumbing is as irrelevent as your opinion to me.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 04:36 PM
1

So a man's value can be distilled down to how women, in general, perceive him. So you agree with Chevy that men have no value beyond their appeal to women - it's "okay". Duly noted.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 04:33 PM
-2

Who said anything about "objectification"? The ad is an insult to a man's capacity for reason. I don't like seeing men reduced to their libido - I think men are more than they're sexual desires - don't you? This commercial says that men have no value outside of women. Are you that kind of man?
/r/MensRights15/02/15 04:27 PM
0

You may make life decisions based on and driven by sex - I do not, and I may be among a minority of men, but I am certainly not alone in this. Rest assured, gynocentrism - which is the author of every injustice the MRM concerns itself with - will persist and flourish as long as enough men allow their penises to trump their capacity for reason.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 04:21 PM
-2

The difference between this and the marketing for women is the blatancy of it. Revlon sells make-up to women to feel "confident". Chevy sells trucks to men "to get fucking laid". Two ways of selling the same bullshit - which one is more respectful? Which one has long since passed the point of giving shit about offering a crumb of respect to its consumers.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 11:02 PM
-4

I will and do blame Chevy - as i see it Marketing has become about so much more than selling these days. Propaganda for sales - I have no problem with, but there is another agenda here. People like hypergamy? What people? Most people, men and women (and for very different reasons) would never openly support hypergamy, but this commercial is designed to chip away at that taboo. It's social engineering, but what's insidious about it is that it's not for the purposes of merely selling trucks - like…
/r/MensRights13/02/15 10:57 PM
-2

Well, believe or not, there are areas in the world (and no small amount in the United States) where driving a car is simply not feasible or practical - in fact it could be dangerous.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 09:45 PM
-4

So, just to be clear, it's okay for men to be characterized as mindless, walking, consumers who allow their libidos to trump all of their higher capacity for reason because feminists would be offended by a commercial that Chevy wouldn't fucking dare to ever make. Right? I mean we're men afterall, we wouldn't want to dare be offended by anything that a feminist would go mental over. This is just a variation of "man up", and to that I say "fuck that shit".
/r/MensRights13/02/15 09:42 PM
1

I don't give a fuck what women find sexy, or why - I know what motivates women. What I don't understand (and what pisses me off) is why Chevy thinks that I'm willing to give them $45,000 dollars to validate and endorse female hypergamy. This shit isn't funny, at all.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 09:35 PM
3

The only fact being presented here is that society thinks men are fucking dumb enough to be effectively marketed to this way, or we're too fucking brow beaten to protest this kind of insult.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 09:30 PM
2

Honestly it was the blatant and unapologetic message being served here that pissed me off. We've arrived at a place where subtlety is no longer required when exploiting men. I feel like I'm now living in the film "Idiocracy" now, as a result of this commercial. Society sees men as that fucking dumb, and that's way beyond my threshold of misandry. We matter that little to the world.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 09:25 PM
3

No, it's not very flattering to women either - to be sure, but the thing that pisses me off about the message here is, it's essentially saying "HAVE TRUCK; YOU THINK EXCLUSIVELY WITH YOUR DICK". That doesn't bother you? It pisses me off beyond belief. I'm tired of seeing men reduced to their libidos - it's dehumanizing. I'm tired of being dehumanized by popular culture and you should be tired of it too.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 09:08 PM
3

Cognitive dissonance requires a certain level of discomfort with opposing ideas occuring simultaneously - I see very little evidence of discomfort, only hypocrisy (and blissful ignorance) with regard to the redpill comments verses the anti-MRA status quo. This only shows the effectiveness of the Reddit anti-MRA propaganda campaign. It also shows a lack of capacity for actual cognitive dissonance in the minds of those commenters and reddit in general.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 10:09 PM
3

I sympathize with you - I encountered the same environment in retail food and merchandise. I wish I had an easy answer, but the fact of the matter is - I sought the first position I could find that women didn't want. In retail - that was working 3rd shift as a stock clerk. There were hardly any women in that position precisely because it involved physical work. I should also mention that I am a MGTOW and frankly I've been fortunate to find work well into my 30s in situations that involved limite…
/r/MensRights09/01/15 08:21 PM
3

I'm so tired of running into these fucking bigoted mods everywhere. Fucking zombies.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 05:53 AM
0

I think it had more to do with inclement weather than anyone wants to admit.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 09:14 PM
1

The law states that a father's signature is required except in cases of rape - this will only encourage false rape accusations in my opinion. If an affordable and effective male birth control pill was available, this would become an almost non-existent issue over night.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 08:05 PM
4

All the time, although I have to say I've been encountering many more friendly eyes since #gamergate. I ALWAYS draw attention to the ridiculous "knee jerk" attempt to summarily dismiss the MRM, or MRAs and I ALWAYS use that opportunity to raise awareness in other people who might be watching. Wear it as a badge of pride and encourage others to check out your post history to learn more. The campaign of disinformation only works because people remain largely ignorant and/or unaware of the issues t…
/r/MensRights22/12/14 10:29 PM
1

"Knowing how to go out and have fun in an era when most prefer to sink into their couches and play video games / watch TV / stagnate on Facebook" Priceless. Because men who prefer to stay home and not deal with an epidemic of female narcissism really just lack the knowledge of "how to go out and have fun (translated "do what women want to do for fun").
/r/MensRights02/12/14 05:33 PM
6

And that pop culture is fixated with female “hotness”. And pop culture is not fixated on male "hotness"? Please cite the number of fat and/or ugly men given lead roles in films that weren't comedies about fat and/or ugly, slovenly men in the past decade or so? This is what gynocentrism looks like.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 03:58 PM
10

Not a crime if the perp has internal plumbing. Throughout the United States, children as young as nine years old who are adjudicated delinquent may be subject to sex offender registration laws. (I wonder how many nine year old girls, who got caught molesting their brothers, sisters, cousins and friends made the list of 9 year old offenders?) If Lena Dunham had been born with a penis, her career would now be over. This is what gynocentrism looks like.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 07:32 PM
3

I think they made this realization far too late.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 07:49 PM
12

I seem to remember a time, not so very long ago, when posts like these were being removed (censored) almost instantly, en masse, all over reddit (and this subreddit). I wonder what has changed?
/r/MensRights30/10/14 04:01 PM
1

Anyone who makes the claim that "America may never have a draft again" is whistling past his own graveyard. The day that women are required to register for Selective Service, is the day that men should stop worrying about "the Draft".
/r/MensRights16/10/14 08:54 PM
1

"The good old days" were not that good for men and boys. See Arlington Cemetery.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 03:03 AM
1

/feminists do make great cultists.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 03:00 AM
1

Creepy: Gynocentric epithet used to obfuscate the feminist paradox of simultaneously criticizing masculinity as "toxic" and "aggressive" in nature while clinging (like grim death) to the almost global social belief that men, and men alone, should be the "pursuers" (and "unaffected" subjects of rejection) with regard to heterosexual dating, sex and relationships.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 04:07 PM
1

yes. I have indeed noticed.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 03:39 PM
2

They don't bother to care enough to ask.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 03:38 PM
1

people (women and men, in general) believe women to have greater empathy and to be more understanding. This makes women think they're right and they can understand men while men can't understand them. It also makes men think that the wise empathetic women can understand them. However, this is very untrue. I couldn't agree more with what you've written here. Women, in general, I believe view the world relative to their own experience. They relate everything to their own experience of the world. T…
/r/MensRights14/10/14 03:37 PM
1

Which "whole" place?
/r/MensRights13/10/14 09:47 PM
6

Of course there are different levels - but the result is the same, "You do what I want you to do/feel/think . . . or the dragon in the forest will eat you." In some American neighborhoods, certain men are told they are actually not safe to walk alone at night (and they're actually not). You can characterize that as "oppression" if you like, but oppression by whom? Certainly not oppression by an entire race, religion or gender - no, that would be unreasonable, wouldn't it?
/r/MensRights13/10/14 09:31 PM
4

Reputable, according to who? You? A feminist? Part of a "movement" that wants to completely dominate and control any and all thought and discussion about gender? Sorry - I'm not entirely ready to completely surrender my capacity for critical thought - yet.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 08:58 PM
1

I'd settle for a reliable way to identify physically abusive women.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 08:48 PM
49

More importantly - why do feminists assume that men FEEL 100% safe walking around at night? Irrational fear, and loads of it, is a great way to justify the existence of a great many unnecessary things.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 08:45 PM
2

LOL. You seriously view wikipedia as an unbiased and accurate resource don't you? Of course you do.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 08:38 PM
3

Historical facts do not support the theory of patriarchy throughout the entire history of humankind - so that leaves you with "belief" and a version of a "cult" that clings to certain "facts", at the expense of others.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 08:20 PM
3

So you're saying that feminism is akin to a religion? I tend to agree. #1 article of faith: "patriarchy". Anyone who follows that dubious concept to its irrational and inevitable conclusion will find nothing but misandry and gynosupremacy at the end.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 08:04 PM
2

Projection. They just cannot conceive of a man being happy living alone. I've known so many truly happy old bachelors and widowers - some of the most interesting people I've ever had the pleasure to know. Why does this bother them so much?
/r/MensRights13/10/14 07:59 PM
1

I think the number of people diagnosed with clinical depression is much greater than the number of people who actually suffer from clinical depression. I base this on my experience working with the mentally ill and nothing more. There is a staggering amount of fraud in the mental health care industry in the United States - of that I'm certain.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 07:54 PM
1

It should read 72% of people treated for "depression" are female.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 09:32 PM
1

Feminist hysteria has caused, is causing, and will continue to cause the infantilization of women.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 08:40 PM
1

Actions speak louder than definitions. There is no evidence to support your claim or your definition.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 08:37 PM
2

Scenario 1: MGTOW level 4 Scenario 2: MGTOW level 4 Scenario 3: MGTOW level 4
/r/MensRights08/10/14 05:14 PM
1

Every woman I have had intercourse with since I was 16, has raped me (many, many times over) by this definition.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 10:08 PM
1

Men have a greater physical capacity for physical violence because throughout human history men have been burdened with the responsibility of defending the family/group from outside threats - both inter and intra species. If tomorrow women were somehow magically gifted with that burden/strength (it is both), that ratio would be 50/50 I guarantee it. Furthermore, our gynocentric society refuses to recognize in MOST cases, a woman's propensity for violence, which is equal to men. The problem is th…
/r/MensRights27/09/14 04:10 PM
1

If this is real (and my bullshit detector is going off here - but not because I don't believe something like this could happen): This is a kind of attempted child abuse. Imagine a father bringing dick cookies to a 2nd grade classroom. He would be in jail right now, and I think justifiably so. "I hope you end up with a husband that beats you every night" ~ Vagina Pastry chef, Autumn So feminists hate women as much as they hate men - apparently.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 08:36 PM
1

Wow. A week ago this subreddit was discouraging any discussion of this topic. What's changed?
/r/MensRights19/09/14 06:55 PM
5

It's 2014: Why Are Men Still Dating? ~mgtow
/r/MensRights19/09/14 06:52 PM
1

Ok. This shit is getting VERY creepy now. So we have a pretty, afluent, Syrian "gamer" girl about to analogize this whole clusterfuck to the even bigger clusterfuck in Syria and I'm beginning to feel like a fucking puppet on a string. How insanely surreal would it be if gamergate went down in history as the catalyst for WWIII. This is a fiction writer's geeky wet dream.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 06:41 PM
1

Holy shit. The jedi level hamstering.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 08:16 PM
1

Because vagina = truth = feelz.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 09:37 PM
2

I tried to find a recording of it. I heard it with my own ears about a month ago. They were playing a clip of some guy wailing and the bastards could barely contain their laughter. I know the foreign correspondent who was doing the actual reporting was not amused.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 05:03 PM
5

Is it acceptable for two BBC news radio anchors to chuckle like 13 year old school chums over a recording of an African man wailing over his murdered son? The BBC is not known for having empathy for men.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 03:57 PM
1

Appeasement.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 09:55 PM
1

Well then I humbly extend the compliment to her minion(s).
/r/MensRights29/08/14 09:01 PM
1

And once again Typhonblue elegantly and thoroughly explores and explains a concept at which I can only throw crudely hewn, monosyllabic word rocks.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 08:58 PM
1

Yes, you are correct. I'm merely suggesting that we should be mindful of the fact that cases of discrimination with regard to race often contain elements of deep seeded cultural misandry - that is often entirely eclipsed by the racism of an event such as this.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 07:57 PM
1

Yes, I agree. But the issue remains - if this had been a woman, would "loitering" have been an issue at all? I'd love to see some national statistics on the crime of "loitering" as it relates to gender.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 05:47 PM
3

I think the MRM has a tendency to lump a lot of discrimination into the "race" category, when misandry is frequently as much a part of an incidence of discrimination. Look at the "stop and frisk" phenomena in NYC. I don't hear about woman of any race or ethnicity being subjected to that.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 05:31 PM
2

Well I was also taught to remain calm and polite with law enforcement, but I've also been hassled and questioned after someone described me as "suspicious" for walking alone with my niece in a public park - which is something my sister-in-law will never have to worry about.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 05:20 PM
2

And would you feel any different if you were waiting to pick up your kids and some faculty member called the cops on you, describing you as a "suspicious" character, because you happen to have a penis?
/r/MensRights29/08/14 04:55 PM
0

No, this should be a "feminist" father - if feminism was about equality, and female empowerment - which it isn't.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 07:19 PM
0

Do you think the father of a teenage girl has the right to insist that she not shoot heroine? They have free clinics for that too - even in western nations without universal health care.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 07:08 PM
-2

Fixed
/r/MensRights26/08/14 07:01 PM
2

Hey everybody - this guys got a line on FREE ABORTIONS! Groupon? There is no such thing as a FREE ABORTION, or a FREE anything - someone pays for it, and someone gets paid to do it. But please direct me to the nearest all-volunteer abortion clinic and I'll show you to the nearest abortion clinic that you wouldn't subject a dog to.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 06:41 PM
1

If you have sex with a woman who is under the influence of any substance - including alcohol (I don't care if it's a glass of wine) you are essentially risking your freedom and your ability to support yourself for an indefinite amount of time in the future. Just don't do it - it's simply not worth the risk - EVER.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 04:56 PM
1

Her body, her abortion, but I'll be the one paying for it --because I'm a good feminist dad and this will somehow "empower" her to become a strong, independent woman.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 04:45 PM
2

It's not male spaces that feminists want to control - it's male attention (and thereby thought) that feminists want to control. Think of Otaku culture, herbivore men and MGTOW to a much lesser (but perhaps not for long) extent in the west. These men have found passion in their fandom and "self" that has entirely eclipsed (in many cases) their interest in romantic relationships and certainly state sanctioned marriage. These men are a real threat because they've taken themselves completely out of …
/r/MensRights22/08/14 07:08 PM
3

Well then we should have "all female gyms" and "all male gyms" - oh wait, that's sexist too. Also, for my part, I don't give a shit if you're thin or not - so I hope I alleviated a tiny bit of that unbearable pressure.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 03:54 PM
5

Let's not forget that every man conscripted into essentially every war since the birth of civilization has been the property of that army he was forced to join.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 09:15 PM
11

mgtow here: state sanctioned marriage is a scam.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 09:12 PM
1

No. Rapists will rape. Sex robots might very well drastically reduce marriage rates, however.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 04:19 PM
8

You should have invited her to be conscripted.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 04:12 PM
1

this one always makes me smile
/r/MensRights12/08/14 03:24 PM
1

MGTOW is the answer you're looking for.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 03:38 PM
2

there is clearly an ongoing, deliberate and organized campaign to demonize and misrepresent the MRM here and elsewhere - nothing new to see here.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 08:39 PM
1

hmmm, sounds good in theory, but in practice . . .
/r/MensRights02/08/14 08:15 AM
1

I guess you missed the part where it cites weight and height as a factor when determining the prominent aggressor. It's more subtle and clever than "has penis", but the results are the same.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 07:59 AM
1

LEOs I don't know what LEOs is, but I do know that in the United States law enforcement agencies are trained, as a matter of policy, to arrest men involved in a domestic violence complaint, even when they are the one issuing the complaint, by default - because men are perceived to have the potential to cause the greatest injury. Height and Weight is a salient and prominent factor in the process of determining the "prominent aggressor" under VAWA and so the policy quite clearly and openly discrim…
/r/MensRights01/08/14 07:55 PM
1

because I will hit her back. . . . and this is all the evidence a court would require to "prove" that you are "abusive" in nature - context matters not.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 04:47 PM
1

This essentially says that the only thing women have to offer men is sex. How progressive.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 07:20 PM
2

Except that she's (Whoopi) basically encouraging men to subject themselves to a criminal justice system that openly and actively discriminates against them. So . . . don't be surprised if he hits back and gets arrested and loses his fucking job and permanently damages his ability to support himself for the rest of his fucking life. Ah, but you can take comfort in knowing that Whoopi fucking Goldberg doesn't blame you. Here's a good litmus test for you: if your girlfriend giggles or smiles every …
/r/MensRights31/07/14 07:15 PM
2

What a fucking sociopath.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 02:08 PM
4

I avoid kids like the plague. I will literally cross the street to avoid them.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 02:32 AM
4

No. I stopped doing favors for any woman (under the age of 70), who wasn't a family member (and only when the need was dire by my standards - not hers) around 2000. I don't see any point or purpose for taking the risk. I basically adopted the "Treebeard" attitude on all of that and it has served me well.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 02:27 AM
4

I wonder how many death threats will be leveled by feminists against Cathy Young for writing this. I'm amazed it was published. If a man at TIME had written it, I suspect it wouldn't have.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 04:05 AM
1

Do these people seriously not understand that every man (whether or not he would admit it or not) has experienced the same anxiety with regard to walking alone at night? You'd be a fucking idiot not to be hesitant to walk alone at night in many places both rural and urban. Men are 3.5 times more likely to be murdered - 1.8 times more likely to be robbed - 2 times more likely to be the victim of aggravated assault.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 06:22 AM
1

e) they don't want to acknowledge or address the existence of false rape allegations, at all. And more than a few will tell you (and mean it and believe it) that women are incapable of lying about rape (female supremacists) others (misandrists) will simply refuse to address it because they think men are so evil that they deserve it (he must have done some kind of asshole-ish thing to upset her, so he deserved to have his life destroyed). You will be hard pressed to find a feminist ANYWHERE who i…
/r/MensRights18/07/14 03:54 PM
2

Buzzfeed is discouraging women from entering STEM fields by characterizing electricians as exclusively men (and men who rape).
/r/MensRights07/07/14 07:34 PM
1

Yes. It is entirely possible. I did it at a liberal arts college and it was easy. I had loads of friends and I was able to socialize as much as needed - all that is required is that you make your sexuality conspicuously difficult to ascertain and act completely indifferent to sex.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 07:18 PM
5

precisely - it's absolute junk science and there is a very good reason that polygraph tests are inadmissible in a court of law. It's smoke and mirrors and anyone who tries to convince you otherwise is a shiester.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 03:24 PM
1

What the hell happened with the guy that Elam had to ask to leave - what was that all about?
/r/MensRights27/06/14 08:35 PM
2

They truly don't have anything else to offer. They have plenty to offer, it's just easier to use sex as a currency to get what they want, and to get others to do/think/believe what they want. MGTOW have devalued that grossly inflated currency in their own lives, and I can tell you that it is incredibly liberating. I describe my own liberation this way: It's like someone strapped sand bags to an adolescent boy and twenty years later said, "You do know you don't have to carry that shit around, rig…
/r/MensRights25/06/14 03:56 PM
1

Sure, there are "bad" people who align themselves with all kinds of groups. That doesn't mean they represent those groups. There are people who think in terms of zero sums, who ask questions like "is anything bad an mra says 'satire'?". When what they mean to say is "It's not 'satire' when I'm offended by it - because it is critical of my beliefs". They're intellectually dishonest, but it doesn't mean that they lack the capacity for rational/critical thought - they just choose to deliberately su…
/r/MensRights25/06/14 04:44 AM
5

You're wasting your time. I understand the concept of satire. I also understand the concept of cherry picking quotes and using them out of context to mislead lazy minded people.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 04:11 AM
5

I have and do. Hating feminism and hating women are not the same thing.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 04:02 AM
1

I don't see this subreddit banning critical voices, from within or without. As long as that policy remains, I don't think we have anything to fear. In the long run, I have faith that our healthy respect for free speech (and thought) will ultimately help the MRM achieve it's egalitarian intent, In many powerful ways I see feminism's fear, and war against, free speech and thought already working to undermine feminism. Here, for example, how many times per week do we see a "I thought I was feminist…
/r/MensRights25/06/14 03:48 AM
2

It's strange how effective feminists have been at diminishing and denying the lower dregs of their own movement (lower dregs who are frequently powerful and influential within the movement). They are Ghandi in public and they are Jim Jones behind close doors. Feminism is amorpheus - it shows one face to the mainstream, another face in academia and literature, and yet another face in activism. One face it lacks, is the inward looking, self-critical face. Self Criticism, introspection, agency and …
/r/MensRights25/06/14 03:26 AM
3

r/feminism is a scary place for anyone with the capacity for critical thought. It is no accident that r/mensrights is thought of as a misogynistic place - there has been a deliberate and organized campaign to misguide the lay person, but as you said - upon closer inspection (which is exactly why this organized campaign exists) the issues raised on Mens Rights, and particularly the criticism of feminist ideology, are not so easy to dismiss. SRS knows this. Against Mensrights knows this as well, t…
/r/MensRights25/06/14 03:05 AM
6

right here.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 11:39 PM
8

Oh you don't think so? Try this: go over to r/feminism and raise a deliberate "criticism of feminism" and then argue your case. Then come back here and tell us how many times you were called a misogynist (before you got banned).
/r/MensRights24/06/14 08:46 PM
3

There are hateful people in every aspect of society. The spreading of misperception is entirely deliberate and orchestrated. There is no such thing as a free press. The media answers to (and parrots) its corporate sponsors. The corporate sponsors (and their advertising agencies) know all too well the demographic of their client's clientelle - and in the vast majority of sectors it is women who do the vast majority of purchasing. It simply makes good business sense to appeal to women, and where m…
/r/MensRights24/06/14 08:43 PM
4

You don't have to imagine. All you have to do is say "no", and let me tell you, it's fucking glorious.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 08:34 PM
2

When enough men get tired of defending (serving as cannon fodder) a nation that views and treats them as unnecessary, and bad for society while simultaneously shaming them into serving as disposable utilities.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 08:31 PM
5

Raised by a single mother disciplinarian. 90% of my elementary school teachers were women, and they were all proponents (and practitioners) of corporal punishment for boys, but not girls. I witnessed a male classmate's father get arrested for screaming at my elementary school principal (a woman) for paddling his son.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 08:20 PM
12

I have yet to see a single example of "Mens Rights" promoting the hatred of women. Unless, of course, you consider criticism of feminism "hatred of women" - and that attitude is exactly why feminism continues to go unchecked. That is just plain fucking stupid and dangerous.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 08:15 PM
2

News to me. I was completely unaware of that AVFM was the "head of the movement". According to whom, I wonder.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 05:15 PM
0

No, I'm not discussing anything further with you - you fucking hack troll. Fuck off. I've wasted far too much time muddling through your inane babble and double speak. Gio fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 04:45 PM
1

I think you are making this way too complicated. I'm going to restate the only problem that is relevant to this disagreement. Is the statement Fucking genius! You get to dictate to me what is relevent while simultaneously dictating what you perceive (incorrectly and tenaciously) as the disagreement, and then insinuate that I'm the one with comprehension issues? Do you think I'm oblivious to this tactic? Go back to your SRS shitlord, misandric echo chamber - you mindless, complacent lemming. No, …
/r/MensRights23/06/14 03:38 PM
1

Here's your problem - you keep referring to what the victim considers to be coerced or not coerced, as if you have any fucking way of drawing any reasonable conclusion as to what a victim might, or might not, consider coerced or not coerced. Self reporting is not evidence - especially when it comes to juvenile males, because juvenile males (or adult males for that matter) are socially conditioned from birth to accept female sexual predation - the pervasive and lenient sentencing of the epidemic …
/r/MensRights22/06/14 11:20 PM
1

that sexual contact that the victim considers to be uncoerced is more likely to be with a man due to the fact that most women are straight, and as such would inherently consider sexual contact with a woman to be coerced. What? What the fuck are you talking about? This is fucking troll nonsense. If we accept your black and white view of sexuality and your premise that most women are heterosexual (which is entirely up for debate) then would it not follow that most men are also heterosexual? Furthe…
/r/MensRights22/06/14 09:43 PM
1

Yeah, I still have no idea what you're referring to, or how that relates to my ill-fated post.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 04:32 PM
1

(Considered by whom, I wonder?) IF Thus, it is far more likely that sexual contact between a male juvenile detainee and a woman will be considered 'uncoerced' sexual contact than if the perpertrator was a man. THEN Thus, it is far more likely that sexual contact between a female juvenile detainee and a man will be considered "uncoerced" sexual contact than if the perpetrator was a woman. RIGHT? Would you feel comfortable making that statement? Because I guaran-fucking-T Professor Mercier would n…
/r/MensRights20/06/14 04:29 PM
1

b) The guy posted negatively about men's rights. http://np.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/26ssc6/is_mens_rights_a_terrorist_group/chubsqj What guy. I have no idea what part b. is in reference to. I'm lost.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 04:14 PM
0

95% of juvenile offenders who have a non-coerced (which is not to say consensual, as children cannot consent) sexual relationship with a staff member are straight, as otherwise it would clearly be coerced. Jesus Christ, you don't get it do you. THERE IS NO FUCKING DIFFERENCE between coerced and non-coerced sex in a fucking prison! When someone, anyone, who is IMPRISONED has sex with a "staff member" - it is COERCED, by default because there is an EVER PRESENT POWER IMBALANCE! Mercier clearly doe…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 04:10 PM
3

It worries me because it works, on a frighteningly large number of people.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 05:32 PM
8

Yes. I've personally known at least one man who ruined his career - availing himself of this company policy.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 05:41 PM
5

go over to r/theredpill and use the word "egalitarian". Take screen shots.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 04:10 PM
3

He's on the side of the Motor City Muckracker and the number of his own "article" views.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 03:34 PM
1

Disgusting.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:46 PM
46

fixed
/r/MensRights10/06/14 03:27 AM
5

Feminism = Egalitarianism. Now be good little allies, shut the fuck up and go pull that fire alarm over there.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 02:56 AM
4

New network "sensitivity" policy: only women can operate press drones, because penis means peeping tom.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 02:51 AM
3

Have your read the SCUM manifesto? Feminists Must Own Their Shit.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 02:46 AM
1

Ah yes, tradcons have always had the best interest of (wealthy) men and boys at heart. And naturally everything can ultimately be boiled downed to partisan politics (especially when you want to keep those utilitarian serfs divided and conquered).
/r/MensRights10/06/14 02:00 AM
2

She simply towing the Faux News party line there.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 10:00 PM
5

Dean did a fantastic job of highlighting key issues that the "lay person" simply doesn't think about, or is completely unaware. This was a concentrated and effective dose of the MRM for people who would otherwise never have been exposed. In a sea of media propaganda bullshit and misinformation, this was a rare and shiny beacon of truth - and Dean deserves your gratitude for doing a GREAT job of representing the MRM.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 04:23 PM
2

And another MGTOW is born.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 09:34 PM
2

Is there no end to the kind of underhanded and deceptive tactics you people deploy? What exactly do you think you'll accomplish?
/r/MensRights02/06/14 08:02 PM
1

The people who are trolling for dirt will skip right over this thread, I guarantee it. Feminists aren't interested in determining the truth about the MRM, they just want it to go away, and there is no activity too underhanded, dishonest and apparently violent for them to achieve that goal.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 03:16 PM
4

I took in my friend and let him live with me for several months - rent free - after he caught his fiance cheating on him. He was essentially broke, out of work because he had a dislocated shoulder (biking accident) and would have certainly been living on the damned streets if I hadn't.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 03:01 AM
0

It means "gynocentrism". It is an uapologetic, terrifying admission and celebration of female Narcissism.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 09:43 PM
2

Still think you have a free press? This is your "4th branch of government" in action - all of this is by design.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 03:40 PM
10

I wish we could get this to the front page.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 03:38 PM
2

Feminists seek to control language and information. That is number #1 in their modus operandi (and there's no denying how effective they've been at doing just that). Wikipedia was ripe for the picking and they picked it, and they continue to pick it, because it is a shining beacon of light for lazy minds. Lazy minds are ripe for manipulation and control.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 05:02 PM
1

Amorpheous Feminism at its finest.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 01:36 AM
7

Not funny - she threatened to kill him. This girl is clearly violent and has rage issues. This is a matter for law enforcement. You can't just call people up and threaten them with violence.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 09:16 PM
2

Why not take one of those free self-defense courses for women? Girl power. You go girl.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 03:14 PM
1

We pay (plenty) for oversight and accountability - we're not getting our money's worth, but someone's sure as hell is getting paid, aren't they? This is an administrative problem, and until we start holding administrators accountable - in a very real way - nothing is going to change.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 03:05 PM
2

Of course it's about money. It's always about fucking money.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 05:48 PM
5

This should be question number 1 in every upcoming U.S. political debate: "You've had ample time and resources Why haven't you solved the problem of veterans dying as a direct result of VA negligence?"
/r/MensRights21/05/14 04:37 PM
3

He who lives in a world occupied by monsters had damned well better be prepared to identify and defend himself against monsters.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 07:39 PM
11

veritas
/r/MensRights20/05/14 07:19 PM
1

Women are not allowed to register for selective service, and therefore cannot be systematically called upon like cattle to serve as cannon fodder upon congressional authorization of conscription. Clearly this is oppression.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 03:38 PM
17

. . . you can quote me on that.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 03:04 PM
27

Avoid drunk women altogether. They are inherently fucking dangerous.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 03:01 PM
14

Start using it on women who act like creeps - you have the power to "right size" that word. Feminists understand the true power of language and it's high time MRAs make full use of it as well.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 05:13 PM
1

League of Extraordinary Gentlemen was great No, no it wasn't. It was a disaster - in so many ways. That film may have ruined Stephen Norrington's career.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 03:39 PM
2

He pulled out of an interview for the Edinburgh Festival of Politics in August 2006 after George Reid, the presiding officer of the Scottish Parliament, vowed to ask him why he once told a magazine that some women want a "smack". Sir Sean, the Scottish National Party's most famous supporter, said it was "unacceptable" and it would have compromised the interview. It had a negative effect on his career. Highlander II, Dragonheart, League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, bit parts shitty films and voice…
/r/MensRights15/05/14 03:14 PM
-4

Being worth "hundreds of millions" and "having a career" are not the same thing. Sean Connery's career was never the same after he told Barbara Walters "I don't think there's anything particularly wrong about hitting a woman - although I don't recommend doing it the same way you'd hit a man." He's currently worth 300 million. Now imagine Will Smith saying the same thing today - what do you think would happen? Do you think any major studio would touch him in 2014?
/r/MensRights14/05/14 08:32 PM
8

I guarantee that if he had hit back, Whoopi and "The Chew" would still be crucifying him and it would be the top network story for a week, and Jay Z's career would be over.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 06:03 PM
-2

Western women? What about non-western women? There is no NAWALT - there is only cultural constraint (or lack thereof).
/r/MensRights08/05/14 09:45 PM
6

Here's one reason why, based on my own personal experience. A few years after I got my BA, I decided to look into possibly returning to get a degree in primary school education, after hearing about the shortfall in male primary school teachers. I went back to my alma mater (a small, but highly regarded liberal arts college - which shall remain nameless) and I set up an appointment with the head of that department (primary school education). She all but stonewalled me - I mean she actually seemed…
/r/MensRights07/05/14 09:53 PM
8

Perhaps, but I'm inclined to believe - in fact I do believe - that feminists are pathologically incapable of recognizing, or taking seriously, predatory behavior in women (especially when they are engaging in this behavior themselves) - woman on woman/girl sexual predation in particular - because there's no readily available "toxic masculinity" to serve as a scapegoat. Basically it boils down to "I can't be the predator; I'm the victim, even when I'm doing the harm, because . . . patriarchy".
/r/MensRights07/05/14 09:17 PM
5

You fucked up. I don't agree entirely with the DHS decision, but you should be up - no matter what - to see your 8 year old onto the bus - and then of course locking the fucking house up if you're going to sleep with a 3-year-old in the house - unless of course you live in Mayberry circa 1958 - fuck that - even then. I mean this is just irresponsibilty on your part, dad. I can't defend this. This is just bad parenting.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 05:05 PM
2

And here we have yet another fine example of "sexism is okay if it benefits women (a.k.a. "thanks for the cake, I think I'll eat it".) How about this message: People with the capacity for child birth should be the only "parent" charged with grocery shopping and other similar, trivial, domestic toils - so here's your conciliatory VIP (Vagina Important Person) pass for suffering under the "patriarchy" You don't see a problem with this? Really? Here's a better, less gynocentric (and sexist) approac…
/r/MensRights06/05/14 04:49 PM
4

I agree with this. It's a not-so-direct acknowledgement and a pro-active step toward addressing the problem of a burgeoning (and privatized) prison-industrial complex. Yes, it's 1/2 to 3/4 assed, but it sure as hell is more pro-active than "the war on drugs".
/r/MensRights06/05/14 04:21 PM
4

Karla Homolka is, by definition, a predator and a convicted serial killer. A serial killer who is walking free.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 07:57 PM
6

And here, once again, we have yet another fine example of the NAFALT defense. Yawn and yawn. Move along.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 03:59 PM
9

And here we have yet another fine example of the NAFALT defense. Yawn.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 03:57 PM
5

That's cute . . . you think I want to talk to you.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 03:46 PM
14

The fact alone that you are free to say that in this subreddit without being immediately banned should reveal something to you, but it doesn't . . . it just never seems to get through does it?
/r/MensRights05/05/14 03:34 PM
17

Wow, this should pretty much put an end to SRS and AGMR right? Right?
/r/MensRights04/05/14 11:56 PM
3

Mislabeled but relevent to MensRights.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 03:26 PM
6

The "women are weaker" argument is absolute bullshit. I hear people make the argument "how is a woman going to drag a wounded man?". Maybe not, but she sure as hell could drag a wounded woman if she received the same training and conditioning. This whole thing is a fucking sham. Women have more than proven their ability to kill men, women and children. If we are going to have conscription - at all - (which I am against) in a society that values gender equality, then women soldiers need to die in…
/r/MensRights02/05/14 03:22 PM
21

When feminists use the word "conversaton" they mean "pontification".
/r/MensRights01/05/14 03:09 PM
1

What happens when an entire society is based on a gender role, and that gender role is suddenly devalued?
/r/MensRights30/04/14 03:55 PM
2

In Detroit, no one can hear you scream.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 03:50 PM
3

It's unfortunate that feminism adopted fascism as its modus operandi.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 03:00 PM
3

On a related note: "Women have two choices: Either she’s a feminist or a masochist." ~ Gloria Steinem. "O con noi o contro di noi" ~ Benito Mussolini
/r/MensRights28/04/14 03:53 AM
2

How about "no".
/r/MensRights25/04/14 05:18 PM
7

Whatsmore "anti-feminist" does not equal "hate-group", that particular world view falls under #4 of the "Am I A Member of a Cult? checklist".
/r/MensRights25/04/14 04:46 PM
2

Why? We're hated because we are deliberately misunderstood and mischaracterized - there is an on going organized and concerted effort to demonize, undermine and put to an end, the MRM. This is not a paranoid statement; this is a fact. You don't have to look far and wide to find ample evidence of this fact. What? Challenge anyone you encounter to read the sidebar here. Challenge them to explore the source material here and elsewhere. There is no - zero - misogyny (criticism is not hate) in the so…
/r/MensRights22/04/14 04:05 PM
6

A lot of reddit mods are quite sympathetic to feminism (and misandry). Yes, that's an understatement.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 07:36 PM
1

And here we have a fine example of the NAFALT defense.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 07:33 PM
2

No. Suppression of free thought/speech has NO PLACE - especially in an academic setting - in a free society.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 04:03 PM
10

Reddit actively seeks to repress MensRights issues because it doesn't fit neatly into the social narrative. Any evolution in human thought/consciousness will invariable be met with the same suppression/resistance.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 03:52 PM
42

Men already do kill themselves as a result of this - no one cares.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 03:39 PM
1

You should take a look at the SCUM manifesto sometime.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 03:45 PM
1

"If you hate something, don't you do it too."
/r/MensRights18/04/14 03:41 PM
1

Misandry is lucrative.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 04:04 PM
4

The MRM isn't what makes you sad.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 07:28 PM
6

They don't read "the above two lists", they have their own materials, their own "research", their own set of "facts", and that's the end of the discussion - anything further is anti-woman. We are talking about a cult that derives research from intuition, facts from feelz, and supports it all with subterfuge. You cannot argue with someone who puts his/her fingers in his ears while chanting "patriarchy", like some kind of mantra.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 09:34 PM
6

good point.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 07:37 PM
14

I hope you explained to them that MensRights also includes Gay MensRights.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 07:28 PM
23

That was nauseating. If this doesn't make you want to protect yourself at all times with some kind video recording device, I don't know what would.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 07:21 PM
4

Yes, what you are experiencing is sexism. I think the only thing you can really do about it is to make as many people aware of the phenomena as possible. Also, if you ever get an opportunity to attend some kind of "ethics" workshop provided by your employer - that would definitely be a good time to bring up the phenomena.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 03:08 PM
11

What I haven't yet heard, is a direct denial of what she allegedly said. If she is the author of the views attributed to her, she needs to be outed for having those views and "feminists" had damn well better take a stance for or against those views (and Mercier), and own that position - publicly. I predict we'll get a "that's not what I meant" - that is if the enitre thing doesn't get swept completely and utterly under the rug.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 04:34 PM
2

I can't imagine why men would want to seek escapist entertainment in lieu of reality with all its glorius male privilege.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 06:47 AM
1

I don't subscribe to the "end of civilization" notion either, but I do believe that there are certain entities that have taken a disapproving interest in this particular lifestyle choice and they are not shy about expressing their disapproval, and I find that very odd. What could be more benign than dropping out of the gene pool?
/r/MensRights06/04/14 01:41 AM
2

I stopped opening anything for women in 1993.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 03:33 PM
4

This is just a creepy fucking thing to do all around. Good rule of thumb for people with some measure of ethical standards: don't take photos of people when they are dead, asleep, in comas or otherwise unconscious and then post them to the internet unless you are covering some kind "news", and especially when that photo contains some aspect of said person's anatomy that he/she would normally not expose to public view.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 03:25 PM
0

I love the open disdain these women have for "middle america". I fucking hate Faux News more every fucking day (and that is an impressive feat). Has anyone else noticed the prevalence of privileged, non-"middle american" women, media major flunkies squawking on this network? Well, it's not an accident, and it has everything to do with the fact that this demographic voted for Obama in the last election, causing Karl Rove to have an existential crisis on live TV, and O'Reilly to poop in his pants.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 04:24 PM
2

Here's why
/r/MensRights03/04/14 12:22 AM
2

No it would mean you have a sense of humor, but that doesn't make it less misandric.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 12:02 AM
2

I don't disagree with you entirely, but the fact is that more men are opting out, openly and they are talking about it and they are looking to each other for support and comraderie (God forbid that men actually support each other). I think this is good thing. I also think that this lifestyle choice (which is how I view it) is going to become more commonplace than you think.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 12:00 AM
1

Here's something you can do
/r/MensRights02/04/14 09:12 PM
2

We need to make this a call for action here and elsewhere.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 09:01 PM
3

Great work. Just awesome.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 08:53 PM
7

THAT sounds like a very good idea for a campaign to raise awareness about the apparent permissive attitude the media and this society has adopted with regards to female teacher on male student perpetrated rape in schools, particularly in the United States.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 04:06 PM
2

If you are a MGTOW, identify yourself as a MGTOW. NOTHING terrifies those institutions that are aligned against you more than men going their own way.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 04:01 PM
35

Well I can understand the impulse to believe that the response was an impersonation because this is just a batshit-crazy-psychopathic justification for rape (and it is rape, as feminists have seen fit to define it, if you accept that what's inappropriate for the goose is inappropriate for the gander - which feminists seem to be pathologically incapable of doing). She basically cites the same statistics and then arrives at the conclusion that in cases when people in postions of authority have sex…
/r/MensRights02/04/14 03:55 PM
5

I'm supposed to be Classey? According to who? You?
/r/MensRights28/03/14 07:24 PM
2

This is a masterpiece.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 04:43 PM
7

Note: >"She said that on the day he died (you mean the day she murdered him?), the newlyweds had driven to the Montana park and walked down to an embankment on the cliff face, where she told him she wasn't happy and "wasn't sure we should be married." I hope she gets gutted like a fish in prison.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 03:45 PM
4

Exactly, they never address the fact that women rarely attempt the type of violent/effective methods of suicide. In the vast majority of cases they take pills - overdoses can be treated. Take a handful of aspirins and tell someone you did it - the ambulance gets called - and that gets counted as a suicide attempt. I have personally known 5 women who have "attempted" suicide in this manner. I've known 2 men who attempted suicide by violent means, and they were both successful. Shotgun blasts to t…
/r/MensRights27/03/14 09:27 PM
1

I won't be ordering from them again (Their bread is salty as fuck anyway).
/r/MensRights26/03/14 05:16 PM
6

I don't believe that rape culture exists in western civilization anymore than "murder culture" exists in western civilization. I don't believe that predatory behavior is a result of culture. I do believe that culture can be permissive of all kinds of predatory behavior, including rape. I do not believe that those conditions exist anywhere in western civilization and certainly not enough on western campuses to justify a campaign of posters that makes the appeal (and the insinuation) to "not be th…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/14 10:18 PM
1

Well said.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/14 08:52 PM
11

By taking a criminal/predatory act that has been occuring throughout the history of humankind, and adding the word "culture" to it as if it is somehow a new problem in a failed attempt to raise awareness of a very real problem by presenting the ridiculous argument that predators will magically stop engaging in predatory behavior if they are educated not to prey on people, for whom they have zero human regard for - and then attributing that predatory behavior to an entire gender, at the exclusion…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/14 08:42 PM
3

If you're referring to the victim of pedophile Loren Morris, this is not only victim blaming it is child rape condoning.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 08:17 PM
3

Both. Imagined by Feminists. Made into reality, by feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/14 08:11 PM
3

I've never seen a study that suggests that - but even if that's true, it's a great (and incorrect) leap to assume that this somehow indicates that men substitute men for women in prison. It's more likely an indication of reduced stress/aggression as a result of having some positive/affectionate contact with the outside world.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 03:18 PM
4

I think physiologic gender and one's mental/psychological gender identity sometimes do not match. In the face of that, "Sex" is more a term of convenience. "Sexual preference" is something else entirely.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 07:25 PM
6

So according to this anyone with an orifice in a male prison has, "technically", the potential to be a woman, and therefore should be promptly relocated to a female prison and have "her" sentence, by default, reduced.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 07:01 PM
34

Sexual gratification and even "bitch" delineation has no relationship to gender or gender identities in a population of incarcerated/institutionalized men. Prison "Bitches" are NOT female substitutes - they are more closely akin to "dog" substitutes. And men can and are frequently raped without official "bitch" status - usually as means to humiliate, exact revenge or establish population hierarchy, much in the same way that certain species of animals will mount and hump each other - regardless o…
/r/MensRights19/03/14 06:36 PM
48

Prison rape has nothing to do with being "considered a woman". Only a person who is willfully ignorant of prison culture could make such an outrageous claim.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 04:45 PM
1

It's a nice story, but it's childish and naive in its simplicity. I laughed when the female narrator kept saying "not yet" with regard to women collectively agreeing to increase the value of "access". I hope I live to see the day when the male pill can nolonger be suppressed.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 08:45 PM
1

Jesus Christ, you must hate Warren Farrell.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 01:31 AM
1

Look, I understand that you disagree with my view point - but the fact that you continue to carpet bombing me with insults has only reinforced my belief that being a complete, thick-headed, rude asshole netherape is perhaps not the most effective method to communicate and spread ideas to people. My plan: to communicate and bring attention to the very apparent inequities that men are subject to in this society and do so with truth and calm reason - and in a manner that doesn't pre-emptively alien…
/r/MensRights11/03/14 03:45 PM
1

mealy-mouthed mincing that's your mischaracterization - not mine.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 09:52 PM
2

I still think it was a hit peice of propaganda. The fact alone that they characterized the MRA as agreeing with the statement that "Women shouldn't be paid as much as men", which is a gross misrepresentation (and oversimplification) of the MRM's stance on the matter of equal pay for equal work. There are political agendas among the SNL writers (there always have been), and I get the feeling that this skit was pushed forward, knowing full well that it was an awkward and poorly written and execute…
/r/MensRights10/03/14 08:09 PM
4

This woman is a genuine psychopath. The fact that "mainstream" feminists remain largely silent and tolerate the message and agenda of this psychopath and her ilk (and lets be clear, this is an unapologetic hate group) serves as a silent endorsement of their destructive and anti-human world view.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 04:35 PM
1

Any time a person begins a sentence with "All men . . ." (or "all women . . ." for that matter) it's safe to assume that you are dealing with a person that lacks reason, and someone who has a flawed world view with a malevolent agenda attached to it. The only proper course of action to take when faced with such a person is to disregard him/her completely, much as you would the word salad of a crazy person, because that's what a lack of reason is - insanity.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 04:40 PM
1

Will the real Tom Givens please stand up?
/r/MensRights03/03/14 09:38 PM
0

"Now that the men’s movement is starting to gain traction, and seems to have the potential for some measure of public approval, it may be time to more accurately define our goals and how we intend to get there." ~ Subtitle to A funny thing just happened to the MRM by Tom Givens "You assume I am trying to win them over. You also assume there is value in doing so. There is not." ~ Tom Givens? I guess you don't write your own subtitles?
/r/MensRights03/03/14 09:37 PM
18

Try it. I use it "neutrally" all the time - I think it's high time you did too. The phenomena certainly isn't gender specific, why should the word be? Here's a fine example: A female friend of mine posted a photo she took of a man she did not know, without a shirt, driving a jeep. I called her out on it - it was a "creep shot". She didn't like the way I characterized it, but I don't give a shit - it's still creepy.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 09:08 PM
0

You're a shill. I don't argue with SRS shitlords. Move along.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 08:39 PM
37

a creep.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 08:35 PM
0

That is what you have? One would expect you would point out a concern, valid point, fact, or strategy you may think you have proffered. But even you have to admit there is none. So, instead of actually making a point or even having something to say, you attack others for not 'doing it right'. Well now we've com full circle haven't we? Tell me, do you even remember what I said that prompted you to respond to me in the first place? Of course not, because you don't fucking listen - you react. Your …
/r/MensRights03/03/14 08:21 PM
0

Sorry. Your self-proclaimed "credentials" impress me even less than anything you've written on this thread. Now move along.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 07:51 PM
0

right wing republitard I called you this? Source? Tell you what, go get a sheet of notebook paper and carry out your imaginary argument (including the words and thoughts you seem to be taking great delight in inventing for my part). Write it in the form of a monologue, read it back to yourself and masturbate in private on your own time - no need to do it here. Or don't. In any case, I could give a shiny fuck about anything further you have to say to me - real or imagined.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 07:37 PM
0

fucking YEARS fucking YEARS is the pace of human change, my friend. Loud and angry has its place - so does celebrating the fact that the issue of false rape allegations was even brought up in an article like this. Be my guest - if you want to spew venom at the author of that article. She'll be about as receptive to you as she was to being publicly criticized for even talking to us. You want violent revolution, tough guy? Be my guest. You go start the violent revolution - I'll eat my fucking hat …
/r/MensRights03/03/14 07:15 PM
0

You are wrong. You're just a mirror image of what you're fighting against. Reason will win this fight, not anger, not hurling adolescent school yard bully insults. In my mind, you're no different than those shitheads over at SRS and againstmensrights - incapable of responding to anything without spewing forth venom and copious diarrhea. Your sarcasm and insults has done nothing to challenge any of the points I've made. There is value in winning over popular opinion - especially with reason - whi…
/r/MensRights03/03/14 06:24 PM
0

You don't win the hearts and minds of fence sitters by screaming in their fucking faces. You either win the hearts and minds of fence sitters (the vast majority of people) or you don't, and you will lose, you will be marginalized and dismissed. You can do this without sacrificing your integrity. Most people, like it or not, are comfortable with having main stream media do their thinking for them. You're not going to win them over by acting like a rabid fucking uncompromising fem-nazi.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 01:42 AM
1

Very low. I still say the article is a win for the MRM. The fact, alone, that the issue of false rape allegations was even mentioned in the article is a huge victory in my mind.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 04:19 PM
9

Me too.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 09:55 PM
2

The article was a lot more neutral than I expected. To be blunt, the author risked a great deal to write an article that didn't completely mischaracterize the MRM. Journalists (good ones) don't tolerate being bullied very well.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 09:44 PM
5

A list of situations where it’s OK for a woman to hit a man Posted on February 20, 2014 by lazlounderhill Let’s begin, shall we? Here are the THREE scenarios where it might be acceptable for a woman to punch a man: 1) Never 2) Under no circumstance 3) Anytime, with the exception of every time Oh, also never.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 05:31 PM
2

She paints a convenient wide brush that adheres lock step with caricature MRA feminists have created and defined for the echo chamber. I, for one, am a huge proponent of women serving in all women combat platoons - I think we'd have a much less cavalier attitude, especially in the United States, with regard to "putting boots on the ground" if every 1 of 2 soldiers coming home maimed or in body bags was a woman. I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH THAT AT ALL. And for those of you who would argue that these w…
/r/MensRights21/02/14 05:26 PM
41

Stop "mothering" criminals. They expect us to risk our own freedom with vigilanteism? Isn't this why we have law enforcement? Why should I have to share the legal burden (not to mention the risk - including financial cost - of my own life, health and safety) of defending myself AND strange women? My solution: Take a self defense course and/or buy a gun - why can't women do this?
/r/MensRights19/02/14 05:08 PM
2

"They (unicorns and leprechauns) do not hold political, economic or institutional power", unless of course they have a penis.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 10:31 PM
1

Not to put too fine a point on it, but in many cases it is outsourcing what amounts to slavery, child labor and the forced labor of political prisoners.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 08:12 PM
1

I don't have a problem with that at all - in fact I think the current "for profit" model of our colleges/universities is probably the biggest contributor to economic/opportunity disparity (certainly in the United States). Raising entrance and graduation requirements makes sense as well, but again, only if we eliminate the concept of "poor and rich" primary or secondary schools. Everyone, regardless of economic status, should have access to our highest standards with regard to primary and seconda…
/r/MensRights14/02/14 07:25 PM
2

It took me ten years to pay mine off. I don't have a problem with helping ALL young graduates out, but if that help is more available to women, then I have a BIG problem with it. I continue to have a BIG problem with the amount of waste and nickle&diming our institutions of higher learning currently get away with.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 06:06 PM
12

Don't be surprised if you find those last two sentences copied verbatim in a Jezebel "article" 2 years from now.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 08:59 PM
39

We've had a number of trans women expressing their support for the MRM in this forum.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 08:02 PM
28

You underestimate the power of feminists to "victim" themselves into legislation that would completely alleviate women from student loan debt.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 05:44 PM
2

This is dead on accurate. This is exactly the kind of reaction that truth elicits, and that also elicits change. Don't be affraid of the truth.
/r/MGTOW31/01/14 08:52 PM
10

No, but male privilege is being cannon fodder for conscription - actually and figuratively.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 06:18 PM
1

O'Reilly is the biggest White Knight in the propaganda industry to date.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 05:53 PM
58

This is like saying that I will have lost 5 million dollars over my lifetime because the mafia refuses to employ me as a hitman, because I refuse to kill people for money.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 05:47 PM
6

"Women are six times more likely to need medical attention for injuries resulting from violence and are much more likely to be afraid" Yes, because men are impervious to thrown appliances and fear. Truth Translation: Women are six times more likely to seek (and receive) medical attention for injuries resulting from violence and something, something, about something completely subjective and immeasurable about fear that men have been conditioned from birth to be ashamed of, overcome and/or deny.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 10:31 PM
3

The United States is doomed.
/r/MGTOW08/01/14 06:10 PM
2

This is a histrionic teenaged girl. She will grow into a very unhappy adult - there's no doubt - and for that I have nothing but pity for her. But I understand why you posted this: this is just the same kind of widespread epidemic of female sociopathy/gynocentrism taken to an almost theatrical absurdity.
/r/MGTOW03/01/14 07:05 PM
1

Do you think raiding it with false allegations of all fucking things will destroy it? Think again.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 04:37 PM
1

They are similar in purpose and embarrassingly similar in hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 04:23 PM
2

Anyways, no one would have paid attention to Ted Kaczynski if he had just sent a bunch of letters (sans pipebombs), so I guess ole Ted had the right idea. Right? That's basically the argument you're making. Anything goes, so long as we draw attention to a problem. Here's the point that you miss, because of the way a few MRA's decided to draw attention to this problem, even fewer people will sympathize or even hear the very good and legitimate reason we oppose this form -because "those puppy kill…
/r/MensRights20/12/13 04:20 PM
1

What are talking about, I'm not defending them. I'm arguing against using similar shithead tactics. What are talking about, I'm not defending them. I'm arguing against using similar shithead tactics. I've heard a number of people excuse the rhetorically indefensible "raid" by pointing out it's effectiveness. Well if "effectiveness" is the only litmus test we apply to the activism we participate in, we are measuring ourselves by the same dubious standards that feminists use. I don't understand wh…
/r/MensRights20/12/13 04:06 PM
1

What are talking about, I'm not defending them. I'm arguing against using similar shithead tactics.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 03:45 PM
1

But a false rape accusation isn't always, and most of the time probably isn't, made on purpose. I can't agree or disagree with this. My gut tells me that false accusations are deliberately leveled more often than anyone realizes - I also suspect that law enforcement coercion, by overly zealous or jaded special victims professionals play a significant role in these "memory" problems and misidentification cases. In any case, deliberate intent should be hard to prove. We should give everyone the be…
/r/MensRights19/12/13 11:06 PM
-2

Are you high? I can't believe that you believe that this kind of attention is in any way positive.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 09:51 PM
0

Exactly. That's why you don't go around making stupid fucking allegations, even in jest, or to "make a point". You take the moral high ground and let the bottom feeders wallow in the mire of their own hypocrisy. Why is this so hard for you to understand?
/r/MensRights19/12/13 08:22 PM
0

Oh yes, I can't wait to see how "effective" this is going to be. I'm sure they'll completely change their views on this.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 07:45 PM
0

Alright to answer your question, yes, as ridiculous as it is, it is technically an allegation and that's all that is required to serve as ammunition for anyone who cares to misrepresent the MRM. Only a complete fucking idiot would think that it wouldn't be characterized by someone already against us as a "false rape allegation" because it is, essentially. We're going to have this shit thrown up into our faces for years to come, in every argument, and it was absolutely pointless, because it did a…
/r/MensRights19/12/13 07:41 PM
-1

I think the fact that the form was used at all by so-called MRAs is embarrassing. An email campaign, on a grand enough scale, explaining clearly our objection would have been just as effective and we wouldn't have looked like a bunch of 4chan nether-apes. But clearly we have different views with regard to the notion of "activism".
/r/MensRights19/12/13 06:40 PM
-1

Pulling fire alarms is effective too, I guess you approve of that kind of shit. Good to know. I guess I won't be hearing you complain about "anything-goes-nether-ape-ish" feminist tactics in the future.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 05:53 PM
0

You don't see anything ethically wrong or hypocritical with protesting a form that basically invites false rape allegations by raiding that form with false rape allegations? You serious don't see how fucking dumb that makes the MRM look? And how dare you accuse me of having poor judgement - this subreddit has turned to absolute shit over the past year because of people like you, who just don't fucking get it. I'll tell you what I'm on the fence about, I'm on the fence about whether or not I shou…
/r/MensRights19/12/13 05:26 PM
-1

Bad publicity is still good publicity. I think the Feminists who like to pull fire alarms to silence MRAs would agree wholeheartedly with you. No Bad publicity, when it is deserved, is bad publicity. It's dumb shit like this that will undermine the MRM. I cannot understand why you don't understand how fucking dumb it is to battle false rape allegations by making false rape accusations. Fuck it, I'm done with this shit. You guys want to jump into the SRS cesspool and use desparate, childish tacti…
/r/MensRights19/12/13 04:38 PM
2

does it make MRM as a whole deserve to be lumped with them? I'd say no, And you would be correct. I don't approve of the form either, but the fact that some have championed and/or used that form to make false allegations - the very point of contention with regard to the form - is just plain fucking stupid. I have no problem with the fact that you drew attention to it, and I'm not accusing you of baiting the dumbasses who made fools of themselves by swarming that form like a bunch rabid feminists…
/r/MensRights19/12/13 04:21 PM
2

I've expressed my disapproval publicly about this behavior. This is not something that the vast majority of MRA's approves of. It's VERY disappointing to me that a few fringe individuals have taken it upon themselves to do this.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 04:11 PM
1

I don't disagree - it would be better to enforce the laws we already have equally and universally.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 08:26 PM
1

False rape accusation is a problem, but isn't rape a worse crime I'm on the fence about that. Here's why: An actual rape victim will likely have experienced physical violence/damage in addition to the emotional/psychological damage, but that doesn't guarantee a ruined life, with adequate health care, counseling and support - that is NOT to say that it DOESN'T carry a very real potential for a ruined life. But you're right "Rape Culture" only reinforces rape victim stigma. We shouldn't be stigmat…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 08:03 PM
5

This whole clusterfuck has only helped to cement the notion that the MRM uses 4chan as hatchet men here and elsewhere, and to anyone who participated in this dumbshit or supported/encouraged it - you need to own up to the fact that you have contributed to the villainization of the MRM here and elsewhere - so remember that the next time someone dismisses you out of hand the moment they view your comment history and see MensRights, and think twice before you let someone bait you into this kind of …
/r/MensRights18/12/13 07:15 PM
1

I messaged all seven - not the OP, because I'm even less uncomfortable calling him an MRA than the others. Eight names, Eight zealots, but even if it had been 40 or 100, or 1000 - still not fair to say that this is representative of the entire MRM, and yes I am invoking the NA(MRA'S)ALT defense. Here are the messages I sent: BlueOak9 - The fact that you openly entertained and/or supported the idea of raiding the Occidental website has only helped to perpetuate the notion that the MRM uses 4chan …
/r/MensRights18/12/13 06:54 PM
1

Is that a necessary risk? Yes. In my opinion. how many of the 'false rape accusations' that were actually 'failed rape prosecutions' do you think belong to the statistics? Again, a failed prosecution and a false accusation are two entirely different things. A false accusation should require compelling evidence that the accusation was leveled under false pretenses - and should, by design, be challenging to prove. A failed prosecution simply means that a conviction wasn't achieved because there wa…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 05:29 PM
0

Show me the name of one known or self-proclaimed MRA who participated in that raid and I'll defame him/her myself. If not, stfu.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 04:53 PM
3

I read through the entire link you provided. No mention of the MRM. No one identified themselves as an MRA. It's a 4chan thread with posts by 4chan(ers). Have you got anything else you'd like to waste my time with? What is it that you don't understand about the fact that 4chan and Politically Incorrect does not represent the MRM? I mean why not go to NAMBLA.com or PUPPYKILLER.com and quote your imaginary MRA persecutors from their? You see here's what you fail to understand. Just because other p…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 04:45 PM
0

A false rape accuser is a criminal, as predatory as a rapist - the trauma is essentially the same. That criminal history should be taken into account. If a known con artist, with a criminal history of conning people, one day levels an accusation against another person - that should be taken into consideration - wouldn't you agree. This is no different. Maybe they just couldn't provide enough evidence. A false rape accusation is not the same as a failed rape prosecution. Every rape allegation sho…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 04:31 PM
1

Only if it is 100% provable that the accuser was knowingly lying should their name be added to any kind of registry. I agree with this completely. This protection should also be afforded to the accused, until proven guilty. Affording anonymous protection to an accuser, while not simultaneously affording anonymity to the accused undermines this protection, completely. You either do away with anonymity altogether, or you afford it to both the accused and the accuser. Anything short of that is basi…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 04:15 PM
1

Yeah, that means absolutely nothing to me, and it mystifies me that it means something to you.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 03:56 PM
-3

You need to stop confusing the MRM with 4chan - it makes you look silly, and more than a little crazy.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 10:42 PM
2

Can you honestly say that being falsely accused under either jurisdiction would be any more or less traumatic to the victim of the allegation? This is an absolute recipe for abuse and disaster, and you know it. When you anonymize sex crime victimhood, you only reinforce actual sex crime victimhood stigma in society. You reinforce shame, and you only discourage real victims from coming forward. Why don't you understand this? Anonymity only perpetuates under reporting, "Justice must be seen to hav…
/r/MensRights17/12/13 09:24 PM
3

They should subject to the same punishments as actual, convicted rapists, including having to register, publicly, as a false accuser. False accusations should be treated with the same levity as sexual assault.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:34 PM
2

They even bully their own, including women. They are cultists, not activists.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 04:59 PM
4

Post this over at Redpill, it doesn't belong here.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 06:48 PM
5

Musician friend of mine got the old heave hoe from his girlfriend a month after her little sister had her first child - this after a decade of "I'm never having kids" from the lot of them. I saw it coming, so I cleared out a spare room, knowing full well that he had no plan and was going to get blind-blind sided. Sure enough, he calls me one day out of the blue, destroyed, everything he owns packed into the bed of his truck. "She gave me 4 hours. She's already seeing another fucking guy." He did…
/r/MensRights12/12/13 07:27 PM
10

The fact is, if this had been a girl behaving in this manner, you would have never heard about it - that's really the only "culture" that exists with regard to rape. Feminists created and perpetuate rape culture, and here we see the inevitable absurdity of a shitty (and sexist) fallacy come to fruition as the media feasts greedily at the rancid tit of feminism and feminist propaganda as it infects and undermines academia and education studies. Feminism It's like a monster truck you can pour into…
/r/MensRights12/12/13 07:10 PM
6

Okay ezplain to me how bus stops and kindergartens are "female" spaces like someone who has never been to Sweden. Are male children not allowed to attend kindergarten now? Or ride the bus, at all, even with their legs tied together?
/r/MensRights12/12/13 06:57 PM
3

Yes, and Virginia Woolf would have kicked a fucking hole through her casket if she'd witnessed second wave feminism and what it did to "language" in the free world.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 10:48 PM
10

Yes! You should definitely bring this issue up. If the company is indeed concerned with the "comfort and well being" of its clientelle, this cannot be ignored. Night or day is an irrelevent point. I did a very similar job, only the facility was for the mentally ill, one thing I learned very quickly working the graveyard shift was that if someone was going to fall (most our clients had health/mobility issues as well) it was going to happen at night, and it did. The incidence rate was 10:1. I neve…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 08:28 PM
0

more pride in masculinity Not in western civilization - not today. You have only to sit and watch 4 hours of television to see how proud this society is of "masculinity". I just don't think we're on the same page with regard to what masculinity really is, and I think that's a great deal of the problem overall. Feminists have been allowed to define and associate masculinity with "power", "aggression", "ambition" and "domination", but the fact of the matter is these aspects of human behavior are u…
/r/MensRights07/12/13 09:13 PM
1

I think you need to re-examine your notion of "doomed" and take another look at MGTOW.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 09:27 PM
13

No, they just pick and choose and groom their students.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 08:50 PM
8

... and so the pouting begins.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 02:25 AM
3

I had a good relationship with my dad. He was no saint, but he was very MGTOW in his final years and we connected on that level - though we had no name to call it. He did me a huge favor by teaching some very hard truths about the nature of women, truths I resisted for many years but that life experience ultimately proved to be correct. It was his own brand of Briffault's law and the fact alone that I was introduced to the basic notion of it at an early age enabled me to recognize it in practice…
/r/MGTOW05/12/13 06:18 PM
1

Delete this post. This is irrelevent to this subreddit.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 05:57 PM
3

There is no such thing as toxic masculinity - there are only toxic individuals. Masculinity is as benign/malicious as Femininity - they are merely human artifices used to describe the social manifestation of biology. When feminists malign masculinity, they are practicing misandry - there is no honest way to deny that fact. You need to understand, and I'm deadly serious, that when you demonize an entire gender, you are practicing a form of hatred that is worse than racism. This is something the S…
/r/MensRights05/12/13 05:02 PM
6

ok. I see what you're doing. Good luck with that.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 09:28 PM
5

Little sharp bits of anything inside the body will never be worth the money. Ever hear of toxic shock syndrome?
/r/MensRights03/12/13 09:18 PM
7

If she's fucking dumb enough to insert sharp bits of metal or glass into her vagina, semen theft is the least of his problems.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 09:10 PM
16

His semen, His choice.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 09:02 PM
-2

hair, skin and saliva is less damning evidence in a potential false rape or false sexual assault allegation. Semen certainly would undoubtedly be viewed as damning evidence. Honestly, what do you think would happen to a man who was falsely accused of rape or molesting a child by an angry ex, who managed to squirrel away some of his semen and put that sample on an article of clothing worn by the alleged victim? Honestly, what do you think the outcome of that would be? You might be tempted to make…
/r/MensRights03/12/13 08:51 PM
-1

"extraordinarily" is still a risk. He's protecting himself in more ways than one. Let's say his girlfriend gets pissed at him down the road, the relationship fails and she wants to get even with him - think of all the horrific trouble she could get him in by having a rainy day sample of his semen/DNA. How hard do you think it would be to convince a jury that he was innocent of doing any number of horrific things when there was ample (and nephariously acquired) semen containing his DNA to suggest…
/r/MensRights03/12/13 07:32 PM
1

We will never post on your Facebook, we promiser. LOL
/r/MensRights29/11/13 08:41 PM
-1

Men need to opt out - remove themselves from the equation en masse. As time goes on, I'm increasingly convinced of this. The myth of patriarchy can only be exposed for the farce that it is by showing the greater society, in a very real and tangible way, what male "privilege" really looks and feels like. I can't think of a more effective way than forcing empathy by way of scarcity and necessity.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 09:29 PM
2

When it's relevent, I ALWAYS identify as an MRA. Of course that means that someone is going to immediately disqualify anything I have to say. It also (very likely) means that someone else (someone who isn't even aware of the MRM) has actually read or heard me, or heaven forbid agreed with me, googled "MRA, MRM, or MGTOW" and possibly learned that there is a group of like minded people, who have brought a voice and activism to something they have long since recognized and felt, but were unable to…
/r/MensRights25/11/13 06:24 AM
1

I think you'll find that a great number of "the men who have been here since the beginning" have abandoned reddit long ago.
/r/MGTOW22/11/13 09:33 PM
5

No, it isn't. Unless you make it so, and thereby undermine it.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 09:30 PM
2

My question is, "What could she possibly have to say to a MGTOW?" I mean there's absolutely nothing she could contribute to this philosophy or lifestyle, so I would be immediately suspicious of her intentions. If she has issues with MensRights, she should go there. MGTOW has nothing to do with women, that's kind of the point. Men who arrive at "going there own way" nolonger feel any need or justify or defend themselves to anyone, so a woman, and especially a feminist, has nothing of value to con…
/r/MGTOW22/11/13 06:51 PM
1

Go on OkCupid and count how many men list "camping" as an activity they enjoy and then count how many women list "camping" as an activity they enjoy. Honestly, I have no doubt that women are every bit as physically capable of "surviving in the wilderness" as men (and I've known a precious few that could), but the vast majority lack the skill and desire to learn how to rough it, because they assume (foolishly) that they'll never need to. These are the people that do not fare well in disasters.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 05:59 PM
1

. . . and again my opinion of feminism is diminished further.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 09:40 PM
1

Wow, I was genuinely unaware that feminists insist that young boys do not commit suicide as a result of racially motivated bullying, and now my opinion of feminism has been diminished further, which was something that I no longer felt was possible. I retract my previous question.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 08:33 PM
1

how is this a mrm issue?
/r/MensRights18/11/13 08:19 PM
1

I personally know multiple men/boys who have been raped by women. As for the last time the U.S. anyone into the military - what do you think the purpose of having men register for selective service? Do you think it couldn't happen tomorrow, under the right circumstances? To answer your question - 37 years ago was the last time a man was conscripted into the United States military.
/r/MensRights16/11/13 01:56 AM
8

Impressive mental gymnastics in this article. Though I think the conclusion is correct, but not for the reason fabricated in the article. The mainstreaming of porn consumption IS as alexanderkirkegaard suggestion a function of supply and demand. The consequence of saturation (and we are at the point of saturation) is that sex ceases to be the huge, ridiculously inflated thing that it has historically been. It no longer functions as a motivator, and thus an agent of control. This, above all else,…
/r/MGTOW15/11/13 08:05 PM
-10

Bleh. He's playing her like a fiddle. This is a great PUA study. How many times did she happen to mention she was single? This is like some shit you would hear at closing time. Waste of time.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 06:42 PM
3

A Female Supremacist suffers from the same flawed world view as a White Supremacist. The comparison you make is spot on. The solution is raise awareness while simultaneously rising above that flawed world view.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 05:45 AM
1

This is just another slight variation of the whole "neck beard" fallacy. Move along.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 04:15 PM
1

When was the last time you were drafted and riddled with bullets in a war you didn't understand or support?
/r/MensRights05/11/13 04:07 PM
3

What's more disturbing to me about this is the celebration of the word "sociopath". If society, at large, embraces a permissive and truly celebratory view of sociopathy, you might as well throw in the towel and drop out of it altogether. There's no coming back from that.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 05:10 PM
1

good link!
/r/MensRights02/11/13 01:09 AM
1

yeah. no.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 09:45 PM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 07:26 PM
10

Record everything - keep a personal log book. Carry a Digital Voice Recorder, Carry a camcorder, if she calls you, immediately put her on speaker phone. Above all, understand and adhere to the mandates of the restraining order, without exception.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 07:13 PM
2

There is no "organization" per se, at least no over arching bureaucracy. There is definitely "no authoritative voice" in disputes. MRAs disagree all the time, sometimes rather heatedly. All of this is my take, and though I've been advocating for human rights my entire life, I've been aware of the MRM for only a few years. In fact, it was the nagging and then disturbing lack of male inclusion/consideration in human rights issues that lead me here. I'm no authority, I haven't met one yet. There ar…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 05:05 PM
2

I like your approach and here's why: The MRM had undoubtedly been the target of a widespread and ravenous smear campaign for a very long time. That's not going to change, because it's so damned easy to gang up on a relatively young movement (1970's?) by spreading lies and misinformation about it, en masse - especially when that movement has a very keen interest in drawing attention en masse to some very dubious fundamental aspects of Feminist Dogma. Of course feminists view this as an attack on …
/r/MensRights01/11/13 04:39 PM
4

No, that percentage represents the percentage of men convicted of child molestation. That statistic in no way represents the gender distribution of child molesters, because female child predators are rarely even charged with the offense. I urge you to ask that this video be shown in your class.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 06:57 PM
2

I can't read this until you reconcile the following two statements you made Wouldn't MRA be a dead giveaway that it's a troll? and But, the way they use "MRA" (that I've seen) isn't similarly false or combatative. You are effectively saying that making the post, in question, that you are willing to do, posing as an MRA, on r/feminism makes it a "troll" post for no other reason than (your words again) because "Wouldn't MRA be a dead giveaway that it's a troll?". And you want to try to convince me…
/r/MensRights31/10/13 06:32 PM
5

I tell you what, insert MRA in place of "Feminists" in your original question and post that, word for word over at r/feminism, complete with sarcastic trolling tone, and after you are immediately banned from that subreddit, come back here and we'll talk about hypothetical persons with bad views of feminism.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 02:51 AM
3

when you say "her assumptions", who, exactly, are you referring to?
/r/MensRights30/10/13 09:19 PM
3

Men aren't expected to shave their entire bodies. We aren't? How many times have I heard a woman say that male body hair is disgusting? How many times have I seen commercials advocating the removal of mail body hair as "grooming'. The fact is, since the 1980s "fashion" has dictated to all of us that hairless bodies are preferable. Women are told to "dumb down" or lose on purpose to a guy to protect his ego. Who tells them this? I've seen this advice in women authored "advice" articles enough tim…
/r/MensRights30/10/13 09:12 PM
3

There is a difference between "engaging in a discussion" and stirring up bullshit via loaded and insulting questions. I think you're more than capable of creating a discussion without resorting to trolling. Try that next time.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 08:48 PM
3

Why are you indulging an obvious troll?
/r/MensRights30/10/13 08:18 PM
3

the second because drunken husbands often abused their wives. Actually the primary reason for the women's league crusade against alcohol (which evolved into prohibition) was due in large part to the fact that men were blowing their paychecks in taverns and not spending any time, or any money, at home.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 01:13 AM
3

why wouldn't it - what you're describing is essentially the authentic form of the ruse that I'm describing. What's good for the goose should be good enough for the gander.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 12:34 AM
1

By your logic, Nolan shouldn't be punished for falsely accusing someone of falsely accusing. I don't agree with that. The only way to discourage wrong behavior in a society is to ensure that there is a consequence for that wrong behavior. I have no problem with vigilanteism in the MRM. Shame has a legitimate and valuable purpose in a society - in fact, I would argue that civilization could not function without it. "Law" is not, and never has been, sufficient. The lesson to be learned here, is th…
/r/MensRights29/10/13 04:15 PM
26

the woman didn’t remember what happened. BULLSHIT Yeah, I think I'm going to start going around doing shit I'll later regret and then afterwards I'll say "I don't remember". That's a fucking genius way to go through life with zero culpability for anything.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 03:26 PM
1

Kids take those stories to heart - they basically engender and reinforce hypergamy, and kids grow up having some very distorted notions and expectations about life.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 01:03 AM
1

Yes, that totally justifies dumping an infant in a ditch.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 12:52 AM
15

A young single mother dumped her infant in a ditch and claimed it was abducted in my area several months ago. The infant was found before the coyotes ate it. She was incarcerated, will probably be out by Christmas. It was a very big local news story. Everytime the women in my office started discussing it amongst themselves, they placed the entire blame on the absentee father.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 02:03 AM
1

Disney has fucked up several generations of people.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 01:57 AM
1

In my neck of the woods you can hear someone say this on a daily basis - maybe colloquial, but in common use nonetheless.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 01:31 AM
1

yep. Now go up to the next woman you meet and ask her "Hey guy, how are you doing?" then tell me how gender-neutral her expression looks. Or the next time someone asks you to point out a woman that they're not familiar with, just point to her and say, "that guy over there". I'm sure they'll know who you're talking about.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 09:27 PM
9

I love how offended she is by the guys with the virtual girlfriends. NOTICE she NEVER asked the single guy why he was not interested in marriage, and then explains it away as "men in perpetual childhood". I would love to hear her definition of male adulthood, and then I would love to hear her definition of female adulthood.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 08:15 PM
2

Be sure to point out the fact the term "GUY' does in fact come from the infamous Guy Fawkes, and that everytime you refer to a male as "guy" you are in fact associating an entire gender with a notorious Catholic terrorist.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 07:54 PM
1

MGTOW here. Artificial wombs have nothing to do with me or my life. I could care less and have no stake or interest in the concept. The only reason I'm commenting on this is to disagree with the insane babbling of the dude accusing MGTOWs of whatever the hell he's accusing MGTOWs of (because after watching the video, I'm still not sure what the hell his issue is, exactly).
/r/MensRights24/10/13 04:53 PM
0

If I had the opportunity to choose between $10 million and 17 high profile years imprisonment for the false accusers in recompense, I'd choose the 17 years.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 03:37 PM
1

I've wondered the same thing, and I think you will be proved correct.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 03:32 PM
5

These issues transcend politics. If the MRM aligns itself exclusively with any party, it will be eclipsed and undermined by those politics, I promise you. Fixating on legislation and two or three party politics is like looking at the world through a straw. Law will be passed, repealed and adjusted at the whims of an election cycle.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 06:34 AM
-7

Yeah, okay, if that helps you sleep better at night - you go with that.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 09:50 PM
7

Does anyone remember the "Slane" girl from, like, a month ago? Guess whose face didn't get blurred by the mass media in that charming little spectacle? I'll give you a hint, it's the face of the person who had a dick. I don't think that "rape culture" is a thing - I'm starting to really believe that false rape accusation culture is a "thing".
/r/MensRights23/10/13 09:04 PM
5

NAWALT. NAFALT. NA(MRA)ALT. If you really want to experience just one startling difference between the MRM and Feminism, I urge you to cross post your entire post to r/feminism. Then come back, after you are banned, and we can discuss it.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 08:31 PM
1

Well that's just nightmarish = your screen name is well suited.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 05:19 PM
3

Indeed. At 15 I was frotterized by two women at a Danzig concert while waiting in line to go to the bathroom. They forced me against a wall, started grabbing at my crotch, and called me a fag for protesting. A security guard "rescued" me by throwing me out of the venue, but not before they'd managed to get my pants down around my ankles. I guess I was "asking for it".
/r/MensRights21/10/13 05:01 PM
4

Welcome to Idiocracy. New definition of Rape: When a woman willingly participates in public sexual exhibition, but later regrets having allowed that exhibition to be filmed, and subsequently distributed and viewed by countless others. This is what hypoagency looks like.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 04:33 AM
4

This is MensRights, not Women's Problems. Jesus Christ, must every fucking thing on the planet revolve around and concern itself with women? This is NOT THE CONCERN OF THE MRM. How fucking gendercentric can you be? If there is hostility towards women in this movement, it is precisely because of this. The world does not revolve around women alone, I'm sorry, but it doesn't, it can't. That is not an unreasonable viewpoint - until feminism reconciles itself to that fact, we are going to have proble…
/r/MensRights18/10/13 05:16 PM
1

I don't think men being confined to 10% of the population is a core doctrine of feminism. This is one of the very clever things about the cult of feminism - the myth that there is a "core doctrine of feminism" - there isn't, it's amorpheous, like most cults, it resists being held up to scrutiny because it can, and does, change shape to defy the scrutinizer. Here's a telling and undeniable illustration of this: link
/r/MensRights10/10/13 06:45 PM
1

like some people's ideas of fighting for the rights of men is fighting for the right for men to be free of criticism. Yes, this should be avoided at all costs, because this is exactly what feminism has evolved into: fighting for the right for women to be free of criticism. The MRM dares to criticize and hold accountable women and their behavior, and that gets right at the heart of the seething hatred for MRM. We pick and chip away at the pedestal by exposing the hypocrisy of feminism and expose …
/r/MensRights10/10/13 06:34 PM
7

This is absolutely the world view of so many women I have known. "I did something bad, something inexcusable, something I would never tolerate from anyone else - FUCK YOU for pointing it out and making me feel justifiably guilty. Fuck you for not giving me an all access pass to do whatever the fuck I want with zero consequences. because I'm a woman and my feelings MATTER."
/r/MensRights10/10/13 06:05 PM
3

It never ceases to amuse me how threatened people feel by men who don't base their entire purpose in life and sense of self worth on women.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 05:12 PM
18

It's not. Ask any MGTOW.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 07:41 PM
16

I have peices of cinnamon altoid in my sinus cavity thanks to this: blackriachy Point(s) well taken.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 03:53 PM
3

I am a man, and I'm an androphile.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 07:13 PM
4

I am a man, and I approve of this man's opinion.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 05:51 PM
7

Imagine going around proclaiming "I am a man, and I . . ." - actually I think I'm going to start doing this.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 04:33 PM
13

I have an alternate theory - they don't like men encroaching on the "good ole girl's" club.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 03:43 PM
19

They hire men to work at female clothing stores? Not in my neck of the woods.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 03:24 PM
78

Hilarious. This is what happens when you allow other people to make your mind up for you, and then you stumble upon the boogie man MRA and have to come to terms with the fact that he/she doesn't have cloven hooves and a forked tail. Honestly, I don't think most of these campus feminisits really even know exactly what they're getting their knickers in a bunch about anymore. It's just feels good to be in the cult of patriarchy with your oppressed sisterhood, knocking about and bullying the shit ou…
/r/MensRights07/10/13 05:33 AM
2

This is nothing new - the media is just starting to take notice.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 05:04 AM
1

Binary thinking is not intellectually dishonest. It's a necessary function of organized thought. Artificial? Yes. Oversimplification? Absolutely. All dichotomy is a fallacy by your apparent estimation, but then should we agree with feminists that gender is also a false dichotomy and reject it? Maybe we should - that certainly would throw a wrench into the patriarchy machination, but I don't think that's what you're suggesting.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 07:31 PM
1

I agree with the notion of this: What is important is that we address social issues based of severity of issue, much like an E.R. doctor sees patients; "I'm sorry that you have a bloody nose, but the person with blood clot in the brain is a more pressing issue. Get over it." I disagree with this: Humans do not fall into alpha/beta categories These "categories" are readily apparent from the school yard to the board room. One has to be willfully ignorant to avoid observing this phenomena.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 07:05 PM
1

Fair enough. I wonder if you would be willing to explain to me your vision of how things should be, and what you think the MRM should be working to achieve.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 06:59 PM
0

moot?
/r/MensRights04/10/13 06:25 PM
1

And who is a more precious resource in a population when the one man (let's call him the Alpha) has exclusive access to the "many" women?
/r/MensRights04/10/13 06:04 PM
1

I think you need to re-read or re-think about what I've written. I'm not arguing that women don't need protection, I am advocating for equal protection of men. Edit: Seriously considering you as an SRS troll right now or a simple asshole.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 05:47 PM
1

No. It makes no sense to say that oxygen is a more precious element than hydrogen in the formation of a water molecule. That makes no sense at all.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 05:39 PM
1

So it's an elemental truth, in you opinion, that men need no protection, that fathers need no advocacy? Pack your bags folks, this one figured it all out - we've been wasting our time here whining, just like the feminists have been trying to tell us. Best to go back to accepting and embracing your "traditional" and "silent" roles, as defined by feminism. Man up.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 05:31 PM
18

The day that the MRM aligns itself with the construct that is conservatism or liberalism, is the day that it loses any legitimate purpose. There are injustices inflicted on men and perpetuated on both sides of the aisle, and in equal measure. The issues the MRM addresses transcend politics.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 05:18 PM
3

I'll accept your concept when women gained the ability to reproduce asexually.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 05:11 PM
0

Aren't willing to try what, exactly?
/r/MensRights04/10/13 05:09 PM
0

It is a biological imperative that women must be protected, this is true for all mammals and a large part of reptiles. Why is it anymore a biological imperative to protect women than it is to protect men? I will never understand or accept the notion that motherhood is of greater importance than fatherhood. Men are NOT expendable. If you continue to "protect" women to such an excessive and extreme extent that you undermine and destroy men in the process - you will undermine and destroy all of us.…
/r/MensRights04/10/13 04:55 PM
2

Preeeeecisely. And it will get worse. Some will make the mistake of characterizing this increasing attention as "negative", but as I've said before - the issues that the MRM seeks to draw attention to are NOT controversial to the vast majority of men and women on the planet. It's easy to forget that when you're knee deep in the "gender war".
/r/MensRights03/10/13 07:01 PM
2

I hope you don't think I'm suggesting that you are a troll.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 06:15 PM
2

Some men are angry - justifiably. You can call that negativity if you like. Anger is valid emotion. I do agree that there is too much focus on feminism in this movement - that's a very natural reaction to the over-the-top,and very real, persecution the MRM has been subjected to on Reddit and elsewhere. I think it's safe to say that identifying oneself as an MRA on Reddit takes a bit of nerve and conviction. I get comments on almost a daily basis - even on completely unrelated matters to this eff…
/r/MensRights03/10/13 05:14 AM
13

"hit of credibility"? "recently"? There has been a concerted effort to villainize and mischaracterize this movement from its inception. Provide for me another subbreddit entitled "Against(Insert Activist Group here)." Does that seem like a normal or reasonable response to any group that concerns itself, exclusively, with issues that have a direct influence on the very laws and daily lives that the individuals of this group are subjected to? This is not controversial stuff we're discussing here, …
/r/MensRights02/10/13 07:18 PM
1

Here's my take on it: If providing birth control helps diminish over population - I'm all for it. It's the responsible thing to do. Having said that, the notion that birth control is a "woman's issue" infuriates me to no end. It's not a "woman's issue" it's a "human issue". If you legislate tax payer subsidized birth control for women, you had damned well better provide tax payer subsidized birth control for men. Anything short of that is pure hypocrisy. To those who believe that tax payer subsi…
/r/MensRights02/10/13 07:07 PM
1

First world problems are still problems. Although I would argue that men loosing their freedom over false allegations and/or biased legal system very much resembles the kind of systemic corruption that can be found in the third world. Middle/upper class - Nope. Men living in poverty are subject to the exact same issues - the only difference is, they are even more vulnerable and equiped with fewer resources to defend themselves. This is true with regard to most if not all of the issues addressed …
/r/MensRights02/10/13 06:53 PM
3

You're the one who made the implication that people living in remote areas of Africa are monsters. That characterization belongs to you. You can try to hamster your way out of it all you like - or maybe you actually feel comfortable characterizing an entire geographic population of human beings "monsters" based on one unfortunate custom. How disturbingly ingnorant of you.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 05:55 PM
3

"remote areas of Africa" "uncivilized monsters" That's all I need to know about you.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 05:23 PM
2

"invented racism". I don't have the words.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 04:07 PM
5

Guy's taking one hell of a risk in my opinion.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 11:42 PM
2

We wouldn't? I don't have a problem with it. In fact, let's let the next war that requires mandatory military service, be fought by women - then we can talk about male privilege.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 06:41 PM
1

You're missing the point. The graphic is challenging the concept of "male" priviledge - it's not whining about the fact that women don't die making a living or from military conscription. Like, join the coast guard or something. Wow. I'd encourage you to look into how difficult it actually is to get into the coast guard. That's almost like saying "Like, join the delta force or something."
/r/MensRights26/09/13 06:39 PM
3

Men die when they commit suicide, because they mean it. When men attempt suicide they have a higher success rate, so the "attempted" numbers are low. I don't understand why people don't understand this. Suicide for men is rarely about "attention seeking", it's about suicide - and it's no small wonder when you look at that infographic.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 06:34 PM
0

irrelevent. One of the top five reasons boys/young men join gangs is to gain the acceptance/approval of neighborhood girls.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 06:29 PM
3

"Women aren't allowed" is irrelevent, until Feminists start demanding that women be included in all present and future mandatory military service, instead of shaming men into serving as cannon fodder, as feminists have historically done link. Feminism owns this (or needs to).
/r/MensRights26/09/13 06:24 PM
4

I actually LOL'd when I saw that.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 08:16 PM
0

No, this goes on and I'm more than a little suspicious that it's happening at an administrative level. Try this: post a "bad female" meme and immediately refresh (I do mean immediately - quicker than the average person could read even it), and draw your own conclusion from what you observe.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 04:19 PM
3

There are two ways you can view this, and I think both are legitimate: 1 - This is censorship and bad. 2 - This is sending a very clear and demonstrative message to feminists that "hate speech" rules and regulations are oppressive, fascist and indiscriminate in their capacity to suppress free speech and thought. Call it a forced lesson in empathy.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 03:50 PM
1

For every 1 outspoken mra, there are a 1000 men and women who perceive the same problems we perceive, they just haven't found a name or a place for it yet.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 03:37 PM
-2

No but she is toying with the idea of dumping him. It's very difficult for a man to make a living "making people happy", unless of course that person is paying his salary.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 05:22 PM
1

This is a fine example of how feminists usurp and co-opt language to further their misandric agenda. Why do they do this? Because once you redefine the meaning of words, you can baffle and mystify otherwise reasonable and intelligent people into believing and agreeing to everything you say, simply for fear of being perceived as stupid. It's a malevolent trick, invented by the most ruthless propagandists, and it's high time we started drawing attention to it, in a BIG way.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 03:34 PM
9

I think that I'd have a very hard time getting a job as a nanny. I think I'd have a very hard time entering into the daycare business. I once approached the head of the primary education studies department at my university about entering into the primary education teacher's program. She urged me to pursue a degree in secondary education because I was a male and would find it next to impossible to find a job as a primary school teacher (I wonder how many other male students she discouraged during…
/r/MensRights18/09/13 04:11 PM
3

They won't be happy until there's a "nodicksallowed" section and then they'll bitch about exclusion and the whole thing will start over again.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 03:53 AM
2

I would strongly encourage you to begin the documentary with an interview with Karen Straughan and here's why: My main concern is that I am a man, so no matter what my end product is, it may be largely ignored. This is a very legitimate concern. If the purpose of your documentary is to raise awareness, I would argue that there's no better way to navigate the irrational, knee jerk hatred and dismissal of men talking about the MRM than to make it as difficult as possible for those who would dismis…
/r/MensRights17/09/13 04:23 PM
1

The Lehman Brothers debacle had much more to do with out of control greed than "risk taking". There is no risk when you're gambling with other people's money, and no gender has the market cornered on reckless greed.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 03:57 PM
1

Adopt and embrace humanism first. Proceed with an open mind.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 03:52 PM
1

Advertising appeals and pays very close attention to whose spending their money, and what they're spending their money on. Stop patronizing businesses and companies that endorse a message that offends you. I really do not understand why the MRM doesn't aggressively engage in boycotting. There should be a targeted boycott on this forum everyday of the week. Ad agencies don't give shit about "egalitarianism', but you can damn well bet they'll change when their clients figure out that their revenue…
/r/MensRights15/09/13 12:26 AM
5

Keep your mouth shut and/or bite your tongue. Speak only when spoken to. Feel free to disagree, but then agree that you're wrong. Women come first, you always come last. We want an openly gynocentric society, not a closeted gynocentric society. Willingly accept your subservient status in society. Don't speak with authority about anything women experience, regardless of whether or not you share that experience. Again, speak only when spoken to and do not reveal your thoughts or feelings. Stop ack…
/r/MensRights13/09/13 04:57 PM
1

men do not understand what body forms triggers those responses in women yeah, I think it might be more fair to say that "some" men do not understand what body forms and/or proportions (and visages) trigger those responses in women. I'm not going to speculate on whether that describes a majority or a minority of men, because I really don't know. It certainly isn't rocket science to even a casual observer, but I don't doubt that there are a significant amount of people for whom it would never occu…
/r/MensRights12/09/13 08:35 PM
0

This is an absolute work of fiction.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 03:15 PM
2

so if a dad wanted bigger balls, he could grow them by being less nurturing - this is very helpful information. Science rules!
/r/TheRedPill11/09/13 05:45 AM
1

You are insightful and wise.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 04:34 AM
1

Cheers and good luck brother. I wouldn't discourage you from hope, in fact I commend you for it, but please don't think of MGTOW as giving up or closing oneself off from women, think of it more as persuing self actualization and potential without needless distraction or false attachment.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 03:38 AM
1

To be clear, I'm not excusing it. In fact, this is probably the absolute worst indictment I have toward western women (I say western only because, I still want to hold on to the belief that this is the result of a very powerful and destructive western social indoctrination, instead of believing wholeheartedly that this more the result of evolution and hard wiring, even though there is no small amount of evidence for the latter). This belief, which I have arrived at honestly, long before I was ev…
/r/MensRights11/09/13 03:16 AM
1

Nothing to be sorry for - to me it's like apologizing for rain being wet.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 09:20 PM
0

I wish I could attribute my perception to this, but the unfortunate truth is that my perception is based on my 30+ years of interpersonal relationships.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 08:58 PM
3

Here's just two reasons that the whole "MRA's are just mad because they can't get laid" myth/insult is ineffective and irrelevent to the MRM, and they are clearly evident in two of the MRMs hallmark "issues". 1) The MRM advocates for fairness with regard to child custody. Men who can't get laid do not father children. 2) The MRM advocates for fairness (and truth) with regard to child support. Men who can't get laid do not father children. It's shame mongering, and yet another fine example of fem…
/r/MensRights10/09/13 04:24 PM
2

Take out every reference to the word "black" in this video, apply it universally, and it still rings true. This isn't a "black" problem, it's a contemporary western human being problem.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 03:44 PM
1

Really? That's good news. You wouldn't happen to know the names/contact information of any (specifically in the U.S.). I'm only asking because you sound like you have some experience/knowledge with/of the subject.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 03:37 PM
1

I've basically lived my entire life under the assumption that no adoption agency (especially in the U.S.) would even entertain the notion of allowing a single male to adopt a child. As a MGTOW, I'd be very interested in adoption, and I'm sure there are others. Maybe I'm wrong in assuming that I would be discriminated against by an adoption agency?
/r/MensRights05/09/13 09:30 PM
7

-let his friend make jokes about pansexual people fucking objects to my face and didn't say a word My god. Really? It's his duty to defend your sensibilities against the entire fucking world? This is why I date black chicks, if I date at all - you don't have to worry about defending their sensibilities because if someone offends them they have enough god damned initiative to speak up for themselves.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/13 05:26 PM
1

Yeah, I don't believe that women feel sexual desire less often - that in no way aligns with any experience I've ever had with women whom I've been in a sexual relationships with. I am not a cocksman either. I guess I'm not understanding the difference you elude to with regards to sex drive and sexual desire.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 04:53 PM
3

I have an alternate theory: Have you ever turned a woman down - refused to have sex with her, because you simply didn't want to? I have, and the reaction could not have been more unpleasant than If I'd taken up a puppy and disemboweled it before her very eyes. Try it sometime (turning a woman down, not disemboweling a puppy) and I think you'll have a broader sense of why men "succumb to sexual temptation".
/r/MensRights05/09/13 03:23 PM
29

This is a completely inappropriate situation for selection of any kind. "That I didn't understand" in this case means "I'm not comfortable verbalizing the justification for this because there is no reasonable or legitimate justification for this that can verbalized without hypocrisy and gender discrimination copiously streaming from my mouth like the raw sewage that it, in fact, is". I would purchase a full-bodied, 1920's style bathing suit link here and wear it everyday to swim class/practice, …
/r/MensRights04/09/13 05:25 PM
2

I understand, but I suspect that those who would "dismiss us", would not (and do not) have too much of a problem with dismissing "them" regardless of gender, as long as "they" don't conform and yield completely to the strict and dogmatic ideology that those who would "dismiss us" have invested and surrendered themselves utterly. In other words, I've never heard a feminist claim that "vagina" precludes "misogyny". I have observed feminists attacking bullying, threatening intimidating and verbally…
/r/MensRights04/09/13 05:07 PM
9

On the contrary, they care enough about "you" to put "your" entire future at risk, by falsely accusing you of a very real crime, with a definition they would like to have expanded to a level of absurdity in which all interaction between genders would carry an intolerable amount of risk, and thereby cease to occur. Men will never accept the notion of "Speak only when spoken to", especially when the vast majority of even hard line feminists will cling to "it's the man's duty to approach" like grim…
/r/MensRights04/09/13 04:51 PM
13

If we changed the definition of "murder" to include "exfoliating dead skin cells" you could create a homicidal pandemic if you like.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 04:10 PM
2

Why would it be unacceptable to say "don't let crazy stick its dick in you?", according to who? Feminists? I have expressed this sentiment many times (grant it, in a less crude manner). It's not victim blaming, it's reasonable advice, provided it's not given in hindsight - in which case it's Captain Obvious. I have no - zero - sympathy for women who willingly and voluntarily remain in abusive relationships - be they mental, emotional or physical. I have no - zero - sympathy for men who willingly…
/r/MensRights04/09/13 04:03 PM
5

Why does it seem necessary to qualify oneself as a "female" redditor, when addressing "men's rights", or the apparent capacity for violence and brutality that women share in equal measure to men? Does the fact that OP is a female somehow make the physical assault of her friend more true/valid? Does the fact that the OP allegedly has a vagina make her words ring with more truth? You see this is very much a part of the problem, and while I welcome the support of women for the extension of basic hu…
/r/MensRights04/09/13 03:40 PM
5

LOL. Yep, it's a "thing".
/r/TheRedPill04/09/13 02:29 AM
3

oldest "teacher" or "teenager"? If they're the oldest teacher in the room, it's because the male mentor has systematically and prematurely died.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 06:51 PM
4

This guy is a class act - a shining beacon. I hope he never fucks up, but I don't think he will, because he understands the fundamental nature of the problem with feminism.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/13 04:16 PM
12

Spend a day going around identifying yourself as a happy, sated and fulfilled MGTOW if you really want to see how hell hath no fury like a woman's scorn.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/13 04:05 PM
64

The "smart" ones (and I have observed more time than I care to count) start fucking every pre-med/pre-law student they can get drunk enough to lure back to their room to impregnate them. Wedding planning starts the summer immediately following graduation (if they bother to graduate) and then it's smooth sailing on the peaceful sea of hypergamy, where they can spend endless, idle days picking out cute outfits for baby showers, writing shitty craft/feminism blogs and crafting/selling shitty jewelr…
/r/TheRedPill03/09/13 04:00 PM
19

If we accept this notion (that men don't reach full maturity until age 43), I believe we have to accept the notion that women stop maturing at age 16.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 03:47 PM
1

Would sex slaves be needed if armies were comprised of 100% women? That's a question I would love to see answered.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 03:46 PM
5

"I write a hate speech blog and make shitty jewelry, spend the rest of my day sitting on my fat ass watching 'Create" TV/Lifetime/Oxygen - I don't make enough money to meet the fictional living standards of the mass media/movies I've poisoned my mind with since before puberty, and it's all the fault of men, so I will commit emotional/financial extortion/prostitution/thuggery to exact revenge and comfort myself (and further reinforce my manic sense of entitlement) by convincing myself that it's m…
/r/MensRights03/09/13 03:40 PM
1

are we really having a discussion about NASCAR? Dude was assaulted, and people think this shit is funny.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 03:30 PM
1

They're like wild, rabid animals in a cage if someone dares to risk the instrument of their hypergamy.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 03:29 PM
11

Good luck getting that notion to sink in when there are legions of white knights and Disney princesses to reinforce the paradigm of the infallible, unaccountable woman.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 03:23 PM
20

Where was this predator's concern for her children when she leveled the false rape accusation? She's not worthy of having guardianship over children. It's criminal.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 03:15 PM
0

Prefer them for what? Exploitation? Pass.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/13 06:41 PM
3

what kind of sick shit is this? Is this the psychopathic woman berates man until he can't stand anymore and finally says something and gets slapped show? I'm sorry, but it's actually unreasonable to expect anyone not to react that way - autonomically speaking - when getting struck.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 12:52 AM
2

Right on. Well said.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 06:05 PM
9

"feminism is the belief in the equality of men and women" I used to believe that this was feminism, and maybe it was at one time (it certainly was the flavor of feminism that I was exposed to in college), but then I read things like this coming from self-proclaimed feminist gurus, "Feminism is about women's liberation from gender, not equality with rapists". Recently I've begun to think that perhaps the "good" feminist is a PR figure, masquerading as an egalitarian, unwittingly and serving as a …
/r/MensRights30/08/13 04:04 PM
86

Hilarious I excluded things on his side that I don’t really call work, because he enjoys the solitude (lawn care, weeding, finances, cooking, etc.). He doesn’t think that’s right. I can't imagine why he would enjoy the solitude. Fucking ROFL.
/r/TheRedPill29/08/13 08:33 PM
1

Makes sense, but I really do think a lot of us do "give two tugs on a dead dogs cock if some one thinks we are misogynists" - that concern may very well be pointless and futile considering the really strange and frankly frightening amount of guttural hatred aimed at the MRM.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 02:46 PM
1

Got it.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 02:42 PM
5

Yeah, shame is for non-psychopaths.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/13 04:22 PM
2

Try getting that published in 2013.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 04:14 PM
-2

Solicitation of a prostitute.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 04:13 PM
6

How is this a Mens Rights issue?
/r/MensRights28/08/13 04:11 PM
6

Be proactive - if they're sitting around doing nothing, insist that they help share the load. If that sort of thing is frowned upon, take it up with your foreman. If your foreman doesn't listen, take it to management. Insist on equal work for equal pay. I've experienced this kind of shit in every job (labor, retail, office) I've ever held, and I've seen plenty of white knights coddling their female co-workers. Don't do it. If you have any opportunity to ask for assistance on the line, or anywher…
/r/MensRights28/08/13 04:06 PM
1

Yeah ok. You create change your way, I'll do it as I see fit. At least we're working toward the same end, I think.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 02:38 PM
1

No.So long as feminism is treated as an intellectually valid ideology it will continue to create problems. The reason feminism has the power it has is because it's taken seriously and treated as fact. Again, feminism as you concede and allow it to be defined.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 09:30 PM
1

Let me assure you that if every man suddenly dropped out of society for a year, any society, democratic or not, would cease to function. Elections, feminism, gender politics would be so far down the list of priorities that it would seem to be laughably absurd to even contemplate them. I'm completely and passionately against vote boycotting - but what I've described is an entirely different animal. What I'm describing would undoubtedly bring about the almost immediate collapse of any society that…
/r/MensRights27/08/13 08:40 PM
10

the redpill is a system to successfully navigate a social imbalance. the mrm seeks to identify and correct the social imbalance.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 08:24 PM
1

They (who?) say (what?) about voting? I don't follow.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 08:07 PM
1

I respect your thoughts on this, but I think you are allowing your emotions (i.e. you're disdain (certainly justified) for feminism - the concept and the word itself) to cloud your understanding of what I'm proposing. Feminism as a concept and a word isn't going to disappear, therefore it can only be reshaped and/or redefined. So long as "feminism" is allowed to mean and represent what it currently does - according to a consensus (and it has not always been so), the problems that feminism create…
/r/MensRights27/08/13 07:03 PM
1

Here's my personal belief: Women find, understand and exert a great deal of power by sticking together in society. They recognize that this is a weakness in men. If you haven't noticed male comraderie is frequently the subject of humor, shame and ridicule. Why? Fear. Men who bond and cooperate in an internally non-competitive way, but as a team, as a brotherhood, are extremely powerful and can affect great change. Men could end the concept of feminism in less than a year (and I'm being extremely…
/r/MensRights27/08/13 05:00 PM
3

There is nothing, absolutely nothing, preventing them from testing out this (peaceful, idyllic) matriarchy in an experimental community. I find extremely odd that they haven't tried - or maybe they have, and maybe it didn't work out, and maybe that's why I've never heard of it.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 03:57 PM
2

They'll find a way to completely hamster this into patriarchy in some way.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 03:48 PM
1

This is precisely the same business model that News Corp uses. Is Gawker it's own thing, or is it a Rupert Murdoch joint?
/r/MensRights27/08/13 03:44 PM
1

I agree with 99.9 percent of what you've said here. My only question is what authority do they have with regard to the definition of feminism? What prevents more reasonable people from claiming that word and redefining it? A consensus is required for any word or concept to be universally understood. Is it not possible to "(remove) all of the parts about hating men, victimizing women, gaining special privilege, etc." by hijacking the term, and redefining it via consensus, an thus affect a paradig…
/r/MensRights27/08/13 03:24 PM
1

Precisely. Very succinct.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 02:54 PM
1

"Selectively rational" is a foothold, an overgrown path in the wilderness that can lead one to the clear road of truth and logic, or the aimless and indiscernable bushwhacking of the lost, all depending on who the guide is.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 01:55 AM
1

. . . and it has to remain so? Why?
/r/MensRights27/08/13 01:49 AM
15

Yes, but we've established that women don't find men like this sexually attractive in the least, and therefore cheat on their "good husbands". So can someone please explain to me what exactly the incentive is for any man, beta or alpha, to get married? Let's run down the list of cons, because I honestly do not see any pros. I'll go first. Cons: "Shared" Income/Assets
/r/TheRedPill26/08/13 07:13 PM
2

That's where the MRA enters into the struggle.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 05:52 PM
4

Why do you even care?
/r/MensRights26/08/13 05:34 PM
8

As far as I'm concerned, if you don't live in constant fear of being murdered or eaten 24 hours per day, if you don't spend every waking moment of the day trying to figure out how you're not going to starve or die of thirst - you have a comparable amount of privilege to the vast majority of other human beings living on this planet. Anything over and above that is self-indulgence and you basically need to "check your concept of privilege" and perhaps see about helping the vast minority of people …
/r/MensRights26/08/13 05:30 PM
1

The problem (and perhaps solution) resides in the question "who gets to define what 'feminism' is or isn't?" Why should MRA's allow feminism to be defined by batshit crazy feminazi gurus? Why should "feminists" allow feminism to be defined by batshit crazy feminazi gurus? Who gave them the authority to even promote the notion of patriarchy? Self-identified feminists might claim to comprehend and believe in the notion of patriarchy, but in my experience, when you really delve into it and follow i…
/r/MensRights26/08/13 05:14 PM
1

Point is there are feminists, people who identify themselves as feminist, who are good - even rational - people, but their beliefs are tempered with reason and critical/independent thought. They would fall off the batshit crazy wagon on the way to batshit-crazy-feminazi-cult-member town. Nor would they be welcome in batshit-crazy-feminazi-cult-member town, and the population of that place is dwindling and will continue to do so, because you cannot follow the mental exercise of "patriarchy" to an…
/r/MensRights26/08/13 04:55 PM
2

Honestly, I'm just trying to avoid completely alienating all feminists. I mean there is such a wide spectrum of belief, that at some point you have to make an artificial distinction for the sake of those batshit crazy people (like the author of the article in question) just so you can have any hope of communicating with the more reasonable members of this amorpheous ideaology.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 04:18 PM
4

Nevermind coexistence or compromise - they have no interest in truth or facts. How can you even communicate with someone with such a perceptual disturbance?
/r/MensRights26/08/13 04:13 PM
6

women barely had any rights til 40 years ago, they couldn't even go to college and were looked upon as property by their fathersthey couldn't even go to college 40 years ago? Are you kidding me? Are you seriously going to tell us that women didn't have the right to go to college in 1973? What nation are we talking about, specifically? Who told you this lie? Whoever it was, they've done you a grave disservice, and I urge you to seek out some independent sources with regard to your world view, bec…
/r/MensRights26/08/13 04:09 PM
6

If that's true, like men, all women are also potential rapists, pedophiles, psychopaths and murderers. There is no crime, no violent act, in the entire realm of human possibility and behavior that hasn't been commited by women. Anyone, and I do mean anyone, who claims that any gender is somehow incapable of any aspect of human behavior, good or ill, well - they are full of shit, and worse they are promoting gender supremacy. I know full well that some feminists have absolutely no problem with co…
/r/MensRights26/08/13 03:33 PM
6

It's actually a meaningless word, based on a mental exercise that has no basis in reality, upon which an entire system of belief has been erected with the singular intent of providing psuedo-legitimacy and cult (and by cult, I do mean CULT) support for a very real neurosis that remains deliberately unstudied and unidentified in the field of contemporary psychology and sociology, BUT that is becoming so bizarre and anti-social that society, as a whole, is starting to really take notice and re-eva…
/r/MensRights26/08/13 03:15 PM
3

I don't even know what on earth a person could reasonably do with this world view. It's an absolute dead end.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 03:00 PM
1

Let me assure you that "Catholic sexual repression" is not the sole domain of Ireland.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 07:48 PM
1

Wow. Okay - I can't respond to that.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 07:30 PM
1

Really? And how would you characterize this: http://www.reddit.com/r/WTF/comments/1kxuyf/my_friend_caught_someone_masturbating_over_her_on/ example of exhibitionism? Is this also not worthy of ridicule? Should we characterize this gentleman as a victim for the ridicule he's being subjected to at this very moment?
/r/MensRights23/08/13 06:35 PM
1

So tell me, what behavior is worthy of ridicule if you meet the following criteria: You are an exhibitionist, you are a "youngster", you are intoxicated, you are a female? Anything? Baby eating perhaps?
/r/MensRights23/08/13 06:16 PM
2

And what do you suppose the reaction would be if you started legitimately criticizing Kirk's solution to the Kobayashi Maru?
/r/MensRights23/08/13 06:00 PM
25

Totally understand. I didn't really expect you to reveal that.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 05:52 PM
2

Could have and probably should have.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 05:51 PM
5

Any movement that prohibits earnest criticism, intraspection, reasonable and open debate and dialogue, both from within and without is more aptly named a cult. The notion of a "safe place" is a clever euphemism for a place or venue in which alternative view points are not welcome, and history has shown again and again, that such places are inherently anti-social and dangerous in nature.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 05:26 PM
1

I do believe, however, that patriarchal society presents challenges to men that are unique to their sex. The oft-cited need for "solidarity" (some would call it "uniformity") among women in the feminist movement trumps some very legitimate concerns regarding the role that women play in reinforcing patriarchal gender roles (both for women and for men [e.g., "real man" shaming, etc.]). Until feminists can responsibly address the part that women play in reinforcing patriarchal gender roles for both…
/r/MensRights23/08/13 05:05 PM
7

I urge you to invite the journalist, during your interview, to go on r/feminism, identify him/herself as a male (first and foremost) and make any statement that calls into question any aspect of "this is what consent looks like", or that dares to explore the feminists take on "resistance play", or "bdsm".
/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:59 PM
1

Yes, she is a victim of bullying. I'd be curious to know how truly delighted the male party was with having his activities plastered all over the internet. Of course that's inconsequential since he's been arbitrarily deemed the "hero/villain" in this case, because he has a dick - certainly no victimization for him. We won't look into that any further because this entire incident has been summarily framed. There is something that doesn't add up here. A young girl, who is apparently comfortable en…
/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:46 PM
3

that patriarchal society is supported by women as it is by men. This sentence alone confirms that the term "patriarchy" is at best a misnomer, and at worst a notion concieved with a deliberate misandric and female supremicist agenda and intent.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:06 PM
3

Women universally claim and guard jealously emotional privilege. Society in general perpetuates the myth that they are more emotional beings, more emotionally sensitive, more emotionally intelligent, more empathic, more nurturing - they've even hijacked the notion of an instinctual desire to protect and nurture offspring, by reserving it for the "maternal instinct" . Their feelings "matter". Men's feelings are inconsequential - a weakness at best. Even some of you believe this, I know. Feminists…
/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:00 PM
98

What fucking university is this? The grammar on that question is incorrect.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 03:43 PM
14

They would both be summarily banned from r/feminism and r/askwomen for taking this position.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 09:51 PM
1

That being said, I wander around and try to absorb a lot of information and form my own thoughts. If I get banned for doing so, meh. That's their choice. I applaud you. I think this is the only sane and reasonable attitude to adopt.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 08:09 PM
3

Aside from the technical/safety issues - if a completely harmless and reversible male birth control pill was possible, there would be a huge movement to suppress its development and distribution, of that I am certain. I think many underestimate the social significance of such a technology. You have to really be motivated to have a vasectomy - most men are extremely fearful of having any part of their reproductive system messed with. A safe male birth control pill would not only see reproductive …
/r/MensRights22/08/13 07:45 PM
1

It's ironic - it looks "better" because it's the status quo of mainstream porn, for this and no other reason. This comes from the exact same source as perfectly spherical, large, fake globe boobies, or sterile clean shaven barbie/ken doll body/pubic hair removal. It's called conditioning and the notion of "normalcy" or "beauty" via mainstream media. If you were raised in a society that deemed this "normal" or "better", guess what?
/r/MensRights22/08/13 06:55 PM
3

Reverse this and post it somewhere: There is pretty much nothing a man can do, short of shooting or stabbing a woman that warrants being hit. Now bathe in the glorious sea of hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 04:56 PM
-2

Here's yet another fine reason to boycott Electronic Dance Music.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 04:48 PM
2

Nor do I.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 07:38 PM
3

Yes, it's silly. Ask for ID anyway. And if there's the slightest doubt, run, don't walk, away from the situation. There isn't a piece of ass on the planet worth a sex crime charge.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 07:35 PM
1

Out her, publicly. Destroy her reputation. Do it carefully and anonymously. Hang ninja fliers. Warn others.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 07:30 PM
7

up for parole exactly 1 year later.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 06:44 PM
3

No, actually the media has spun it to now mean (despite the actual words that were in the tweet) "Is it ok to have sex with a drunk teen girl?" Why you ask? Because then every drunk, adult woman who has sex (I would argue that a vast majority of single adult women are more often slightly intoxicated while having sex, than not) would have to reconcile the notion that consent is not possible (according to feminists) while under the influence of drugs or alcohol, with the accepted and commonplace b…
/r/MensRights21/08/13 03:35 PM
3

“I love my husband.” She says. ” He has given me a comfortable and stable life. Because of his great job and his ability to provide me and my children with resources, I will never divorce him.” Love and Faithfulness as defined by women.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 09:55 PM
9

There's little doubt that women tend to be more focused on the well-being of others compared with men. No actually there is MUCH doubt. That's the moment I stopped reading. I'm sorry, on my 30+ years on this planet, that statement does not jive (in the least) with my life experience.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 03:44 PM
1

You don't live in an active war zone right now. Let's hope it doesn't come to that.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 01:38 AM
1

I am prepared. You're deluding yourself if you think your life and your priorities aren't going to be vastly different. No amount of preparation can change that.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 09:34 PM
1

Even for those who are extremely well prepared, there will be a significant transition period in which the demands of survival will eclipse reproduction.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 08:39 PM
1

Procreation will be very, VERY, far down the list of priorities during a collapse.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 08:17 PM
12

This message brought to you courtesy of the Koch brothers. This guy is a corporate shill. Notice how he never broaches the question "who is the National Debt owed too?" It's all "taxes bad, big government bad". No mention of the Iraq War, Afghanistan - he actually says "we're currently at peace". We've been at war for over a decade folks - no mention of it. Gen Y may very well be screwed, but rest assured the team this guy is batting for doesn't have the answer, and they are precisely to blame -…
/r/TheRedPill16/08/13 06:04 PM
2

Women don't think, they feel and call it thinking.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 04:32 PM
3

"Are the single mother's shit out of luck?" They will be shit out of "help" that's for certain. Most women will be an absolute liability in a severe SHTF scenario, especially early on. Without a functioning government, with no law and no order, Single mothers, their children, and the elderly will comprise the vast majority of a population die-off in this scenario. It's no mistake that you will find single mothers to be among the quickest to dismiss the notion that anything bad could happen, and …
/r/MensRights15/08/13 07:31 PM
1

Well let's just offend every Australian on here and get us bickering among ourselves. Divide and conquer. You won't find feminists "fucking" an entire nation (and thereby risking offense to a fellow feminist with some level of national pride) in general for fear of possibly offending feminist allies in that nation, and thus preserving a somewhat unified front. That is a notion that the MRM needs to consider. I know we're all anti-political correctness here, but you can take the extreme opposite …
/r/MensRights15/08/13 02:57 PM
1

Ha! It's a trap!
/r/MensRights14/08/13 06:24 PM
1

Get stuffed, ya bloody wallaby-humping pile of cockatoo shit. This may very well be the greatest zinger ever written in the English language.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 06:22 PM
1

And here is a fine example of how feminist trolls work to undermine the MRM.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 05:40 PM
4

Three words: Helen of Troy.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 09:48 PM
4

Cosmo doesn't know about MGTOW.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 12:55 AM
3

Can someone provide some context to this video. Location? Event? Whoever this woman is, I don't care if the guy she pushed was from the Westboro Baptist Church, this is fucking insane, violent, criminal, psychopathic behavior. She clearly stepped up to him, frotterized him by rubbing her breasts on his arm, clearly lied about him touching her and then shoved the fucking guy from a high enough distance to warrant a charge of attempted murder.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 01:04 AM
11

Yes. Wikipedia does not mean truthipedia. There's a reason you can't cite Wikipedia as a reference in academic papers - a very good reason.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 12:53 AM
1

It's a shaming tactic. If you respond in any way, you're playing straight into the kind of manipulation and mischaracterization that the MRM is fighting against. Say nothing or ask them why they're so curious about your sexual life - in other words, call them on their creepy disregard for your privacy. Allow me to explain further. This is a feminist's rhetoric trap (and I'm being extremely generous by calling it "rhetoric", because it's really nothing but a veiled insult). If you defend yourself…
/r/MensRights06/08/13 08:48 PM
2

Works for me, I've never been more happy and content. It's so easy that it's almost frightening. It's the absolute most beneficial thing a man can do with his own life, and it basically only requires that you maintain and guard your personal freedom.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 08:16 PM
8

Uberfacts must in fact mean "wishfully thinking these are facts".
/r/MensRights06/08/13 08:14 PM
2

She's a pedophile, by any contemporary and fair definition - a child rapist. If the genders were reversed, Reddit would be informing the authorities. I'm so tired of this bullshit.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/13 08:12 PM
3

Just visit any post-industrial city in the midwestern United States, go downtown and walk into the nearest (and most dangerous looking) tattoo parlor - it should be tucked in between a discount smoke shop and a pawn shop/pay day loan. The entrance will likely be in the alley behind.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 03:38 AM
7

Well that's not entirely true. There are some genuine, DIY, punk girls who are not feminazis, but you're not going to find them on a college campus.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 06:17 PM
7

This absolutely encapsulates contemporary feminism. No discussion. One way communication. Shout your talking points as you read them off a note card, so you don't have to defend them. They're like automatons. They are cult members.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 06:16 PM
5

This might have been applicable in 1960-1970. Also, absolutely no mention of child custody. "and leave with an enhanced earning capacity?" how? Complete bullshit - someone please reconcile how alimony and child support lead to enhanced earning capacity? Why, because the guy can logistically work 70 hours per week, as opposed to the 50 hours per week which led to his divorce in the first place? Women, if anything, have equal or more resources with regard to hiring quality attorneys. Most women wi…
/r/MensRights04/08/13 04:10 PM
1

Interesting theory.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 05:20 AM
2

Doesn't align with my life experience, so I will remain highly skeptical.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 05:03 AM
11

This is a huge problem for Reddit in general. SRS is basically undermining the concept of Reddit and it amazes me that they tolerate it. Mark my words, it will be a significant aspect of Reddit's inevitable decline. That subreddit needs to be done away with entirely, and any subsequent incarnations prevented from coming back into existence. I've seen them bully their own. These are the enemies of free speech and the free exchange of information and ideas.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 04:16 PM
5

Complain to your department head.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 07:07 PM
3

Maybe, but I can't imagine anything more simplistic than good old fashioned self deception - it's been preserving egos since the dawn of mankind.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/13 04:41 PM
3

"I dunno" means, "I don't want to think about it, because it might lead me to an insight about my myself, which I would rather remain blissfully ignorant of and thereby entirely unaccountable for, with regard to my choices in life".
/r/TheRedPill31/07/13 03:14 PM
18

Now ask them what truly evokes "the tingle" and enjoy the avalanche of bullshit.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/13 10:00 PM
53

Exercise in futility. This assumes that anyone of the four women are capable of being honest with him, much less themselves. laughable.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/13 09:46 PM
3

Women use sex for power/dominance openly and unapologetically. It's undeniable - so there's no cause for accusing men or criticizing them for doing it as well. The world would be a much more pleasant place to live in if everyone would stop viewing all sex as a power exchange. BDSM is the only exception, because that is its "kink", but it's roleplaying, consensual and adherent to rules and protocol - it's actually a much more healthy and honest approach to power/dominance than the more subtle, da…
/r/MensRights30/07/13 09:39 PM
7

You can check with Newsweek and The Daily Beast. I'm sure they wouldn't appreciate someone going around impersonating one of their journalists.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 09:25 PM
5

You start with the assumption of patriarchy - it's overly simplistic, and it's the shakey foundation upon which feminism has built its fortress of rhetoric. Many of us don't accept the concept. No one accepts it as an idea that in anyway repreresents contemporary western society. "patriarchy hurts men" is a fallacious argument, because it assumes that patriarchy actually exists, as it is (not-so-well) defined by feminism. 1- You've answered your own question and validated it's existence in your …
/r/MensRights30/07/13 08:55 PM
2

I value honesty, sincerity, accountability, loyalty and reason in women, but I have yet to meet a woman with any of these qualities . . . so, I guess, just sex.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/13 10:36 PM
3

Well that certainly explains the tendency (which I have observed innumerable times) of women to stand by and do nothing but call for "someone to do something" when they observe some impending danger or imminent catastrophe.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/13 10:33 PM
2

The only valid need is food, shelter, oxygen, and water - anything beyond that is overstating the matter.
/r/TheRedPill26/07/13 09:54 PM
5

I don't understand it either, but it exist nonetheless, needlessly.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 09:53 PM
1

The simple and undeniable fact of the matter is this: if a particular community has few opportunities to advance in this society, there will be an anti-social cultural reaction to that fact "Thug life", in this case, and you can trace that back as far back as you care to look. That deficit of rights and opportunity will get filled with something negative and it will persist. The only way to shift that paradigm is universally, as a culture, re-evaluate what success is, and how it should, be defin…
/r/TheRedPill25/07/13 09:50 PM
1

Language has a powerful influence - a teeny tiny victory can have large long term effects. I can't thank you enough for taking an interest in this. Cheers.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 08:05 PM
3

I agree wholeheartedly.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 07:58 PM
1

You're fucking awesome. thank you!
/r/MensRights25/07/13 06:28 PM
2

So you're suggesting that through apparently deliberate efforts, certain words have been removed from the dictionary that Firefox uses. That's very interesting. I wonder if anyone has taken the time to cross reference these two versions of the same dictionary in an effort to make a comprehensive list of words that have been omitted? And I wonder if these edits are crowd sourced in some kind of wiki fashion?
/r/MensRights25/07/13 05:46 PM
1

So you're suggesting that someone edited a correct entry in Aspell so that it appears incorrect in the Aspell derived dictionary in Firefox?
/r/MensRights25/07/13 05:12 PM
1

I've pointed this out in two different threads, and both were instantaneously down voted. So far I've learned that Chrome and IE don't show Men's as a misspelling. Firefox surely does.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 04:54 PM
3

Unicorn's - in dictionary. Marsupial's - in dictionary. Albino's - in dictionary. Cobbler's - in dictionary Pokemon's - in dictionary Feminist's - in dictionary Serf's - in dictionary Slave's - in dictionary Men's - not in dictionary.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 04:49 PM
5

yeah, this is spot on. Especially the bit about being "wanted". It's an aphrodisiac for both sexes, there's no doubt. But so many women see it as a loss of power to initiate sex or openly acknowledge sexual desire or withholding sex is power, and that my friends is the source of so much misery and needless strife in this world. This whole "sex is power" shit needs to go.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 03:51 PM
5

I think you mean "Most men are not potential child predators", not "Not all men are potential child predators". The former is a fact, the later suggests the possibility that a large percentage of men are, which they are not.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 08:46 PM
61

If that guy hadn't been recording this, he'd probably be in jail, or worse. That fucking psycho bitch should be incarcerated, along with her two goons.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 05:50 PM
3

The woman gets to do whatever she sees fit. The man has absolutely no say in the matter, but will be held the most accountable, financially speaking to a greater or lesser extent, depending on his ability to avail himself of a lawyer.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 04:17 PM
2

That's the point I'm making - they're not using your test, at all. There would be absolute public outrage in your scenario.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 10:10 PM
2

I don't see much evidence that the test actually exists in the world of marketing, so in this way, it is a unicorn.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 08:17 PM
10

'let's switch the genders and see if it'd be socially acceptable'? The test is a unicorn, apparently.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 06:02 PM
3

Precisely. In fact, I guarantee it would make national syndication on one of the major networks.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/13 05:55 PM
11

Yeah, what the fuck is this about? I don't even get it. I would've loved to be a fly on the wall at that marketing meeting. "A man offers spicy food to woman. Woman eats it and smacks him full across the face. What do you guys think?" "Well men getting assaulted by women is testing really well right now, and we all know who has control (notice I didn't say makes) of most of the money in our demographic." "I like it. It's simple. And who doesn't like to see a man smacked full across the face?" "L…
/r/MensRights22/07/13 05:15 PM
9

link Youtube keeps taking the video down under their "harassment, bullying and threatening" violation. How is this video in any way harassment, bullying and/or threatening? This is this man's reality and he's sharing it. Ask yourself "who is really being harassed, bullied or threatened here?"
/r/TheRedPill22/07/13 05:07 PM
3

link Youtube keeps taking the video down under their "harassment, bullying and threatening" violation. How is this video in any way harassment, bullying and/or threatening? This is this man's reality and he's sharing it. Ask yourself "who is really being harassed, bullied or threatened here?"
/r/TheRedPill22/07/13 05:02 PM
8

Clearly :)
/r/MensRights22/07/13 04:58 PM
31

Youtube keeps taking the video down under their "harassment, bullying and threatening" violation. How is this video in any way harassment, bullying and/or threatening? This is this man's reality and he's sharing it. Ask yourself who is really being harassed, bullied or threatened?
/r/MensRights22/07/13 04:49 PM
6

She deserves to be humiliated! She humiliated him apparently numerous times by PUBLICLY airing grievances she had with him on facebook, and he's simply publicly vindicating himself by providing the other side of the story. She's the one who took this fucked up marriage into the public space - and you're going to criticize him for defending himself? You can't have it both ways. Do you get that, at all? Her tantrum would be seen as emotional abuse if the genders were reversed, and you know it.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 04:48 PM
13

So we need women to remind us to sacrifice ourselves for the benefit of others while simultaneously taking complete responsibility for all the "bad" stuff in the world and thereby villainized while making damn sure to keep our collective mouths shut, lest we be deemed emasculate. That's shaping up to be the contemporary definition of a "good man" and I have to say, it doesn't appeal to me in the least. No thanks. I'll pass. MGTOW. You know what this is? It's giving gold digging whores a moral "p…
/r/MensRights22/07/13 03:37 PM
1

I was once interested in persuing a BA in Primary Education. I went to meet with the head of the Primary Education department who in the space of 5 minutes admitted that there is a glaring shortage of male primary school teachers in the United States, but discouraged me from entering into that program because she said that in all honesty, it would be extremely difficult for me to get hired, because I was a man.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 04:30 PM
1

There is no "south", there is only blue and red, divide and conquer.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 03:14 AM
5

Unconstitutional because it's a woman? You have two choices here. You either apply the law equally to both genders, or you change the law and apply it equally to both genders. Anything short of that equals REAL gender oppression.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 03:12 AM
1

Romantic Love is an archaic invention of the Courtly Love Poets - it represents an idealized character of "woman", with no basis in reality, even back then. Heterosexual women don't love men, they selectively depend on/use them according to their own needs at any particular moment in time. The rush of emotion women feel in response to "love" is narcissistic in nature - it's a release of addictive, pleasure giving chemicals in the brain brought about as a result of feeling desired to such an exte…
/r/TheRedPill17/07/13 08:56 PM
1

Something about that photo, the sign in particular, looks wrong. I think this image has been manipulated.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 03:36 PM
1

Boycott Village Inn. Stop supporting businesses that contribute to the problem.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 03:36 PM
0

What absolutely amazes me is the arrogance in which they do it! The thought of "this guy might think I'm a disgusting, wrinkled-up harpy" never seems to cross their mind - and what's worse, some of them are actually quite rapey about it (especially if they've had a few cocktails)! It's absolutely mind boggling. I mean do they really think that men will fuck anything with a pulse? (shivers). Here's to you Mrs. Robinson, keep your harpy claws of my ass and your wino breath off my neck - Try spendi…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/13 09:13 PM
2

2 victims of police negligence, rape culture does not make.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 07:03 PM
13

Women know exactly what they want, they just refuse to admit it to themselves, or anyone else. Above all, women want to remain unaccountable for anything that happens to them in this life.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 03:28 PM
3

He said after 4.5 years of working as a sexual assault detective, he had only seen one false report. Let's talk about how this is a nonsense statement for a second. 1)He's only seen 1 false rape report (and of course, the only "false" rape is that rape that goes unprosecuted, and we all know how scrupulous and careful the police are in making certain that innocent people don't get arrested and prosecuted.) 4.5 years is not long enough to form this kind of opinion. There's absolutely no justifica…
/r/MensRights14/07/13 04:01 PM
1

Think of the extra effort required to add that little caveat to the definition, when the definition itself was entirely sufficient. You think that was accidental? It was not.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 03:46 PM
1

I don't believe they failed to anticipate it. In fact, I think it was entirely expected and part of the point. Women' victims rights matter. Men's do not. But you've touched upon the very thing that could have prevented the entire incident in the first place: "bad men, victimize women". The original posters don't address "bad men" alone, they address "all men" as if "all men" somehow need to be instructed not to rape women, which is insulting. It's the very subtle, but undeniable message that al…
/r/MensRights14/07/13 02:28 PM
1

Why can't the male equivalent be a rape fantasy?
/r/MensRights14/07/13 02:19 PM
1

Point I'm making is that if the "slave" decides things went too far, there's nothing stopping her from taking real action against you. That contract won't be worth anything more than the paper it's printed on with regard to showing consent, in a court of law. And good luck finding a jury that's sympathetic toward such activities.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 02:16 PM
2

LOL. That may very well be, but it's not going save you if you ever impregnate an amoral sociopath - and remember Crazy is crazy good at hiding crazy until crazy sees fit to raise its crazy head. You should rebrand helmet cams as anti-false rape accusation kits - you might make a fortune.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 03:12 AM
1

Yeah, I think I get it. It's following the idealogy to its absurd conclusion. I sincerely hope that all the offers of gold were also meant to be ironic, but sadly, I can't say that with any amount of certainty.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 03:05 AM
4

Remove the source of empowerment and subsequent delight. Drop out. MGTOW. Nothing scares the shit out of a predator more than having nothing to prey upon.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 02:49 AM
3

It's funny, I was watching that Ken Burns documentary on prohibition in United States and they talked at length about the Women's Christian Temperance Union - 1874 (arguably the roots of the modern feminist movement in the United States, along with the women's suffrage movement, of course), and the primary motivation for prohibition had nothing to do with any concern for men destroying their livers (an appeal to men's health was a convenient after thought). No the primary motivation came from th…
/r/MensRights13/07/13 02:45 AM
8

"I think I just met my future wife."
/r/TheRedPill13/07/13 02:24 AM
2

Society wouldn't be shocked - Society sees men as a collection of paraphilia's. We are the gender of deviants. Look at how differently male and female homosexuality is viewed by society in general? When you say the word pedophile, 99% of men and women will form the image of a man in their heads. Men wouldn't be condemned, they'd be shamed, as always - and most will find that strangely comforting. That's how insane and self loathing this sick society has become. You want to see some real hamster …
/r/MensRights12/07/13 10:05 PM
2

Rape, as it should be defined, is not something anyone who is not "suffering" from a paraphilia would enjoy. There is a difference between fantasizing and realizing a fantasy. The percentage of people who would enjoy actual "rape" is in no way related to those numbers. Furthermore - "living out those fantasies" still cannot be equated with actual non-consensual sex. A woman can make a false rape accusation for a number of despicable reasons - but I suspect that regret and a very strong desire to…
/r/MensRights12/07/13 08:37 PM
23

Now this is a parody.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 06:47 PM
11

"amazing" isn't the word I would have used to describe it. Maybe "terrifying"?
/r/MensRights12/07/13 06:21 PM
2

Misandry is a thing.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/13 06:12 PM
6

Exactly.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 05:48 PM
6

Oh, you misunderstand. I'm not disagreeing with you. I'm just providing a glimpse at the scope and prevalence of the fantasy. The rape fantasy is just a very concrete and illustrative example a woman's capacity for delight and indulgence in their own unaccountability. Never trust a woman who has a rape fantasy, and never trust a woman who denies fantasizing about rape. A rape fantasy is not a fantasy about rape, it's a fantasy about unaccountability. For heterosexual women, The "fantasy" enables…
/r/MensRights12/07/13 05:32 PM
5

The mainstay of feminism is that women are equal to men. Nope - The mainstay of feminism is that women are, and have always been, victims of men and therefore deserve special rights, priviledges and protections under the law, while aggressively spreading and preserving their gilded mantle of eternal victimhood and unaccountability. Equality is what feminists talk about in polite company. Paternalism is the religion they practice.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/13 05:27 PM
3

Oh yeah. I would absolutely love to see the entire interview. I swear I could hear the teeth gritting from here.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 05:09 PM
-1

Seriously, who downvoted me for this. Are you kdding me?
/r/MensRights12/07/13 04:58 PM
7

So, if I'm understanding this correctly - if you have a vagina, you are not only granted the right (because vagina) to unilaterally define a crime as it applies to all genders, but you are also granted the right to unilaterally suspend one of the most vital and fundamental precepts of common law (Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat) as it applies to all genders? Is that about right?
/r/MensRights12/07/13 04:55 PM
7

That means that at least 37% of the women you will ever meet "are by far the most fucked up and dangerous individuals". (I suspect that the percentage is actually much higher).
/r/MensRights12/07/13 04:37 PM
4

"slave contracts" don't mean shit in a court of law.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 04:34 PM
1

A good reason not to indulge women, period.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 04:33 PM
7

And before an entire generation of young people began using text messaging as a primary mode of communication.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 04:30 PM
47

How can they say that this is a "hurtful parody of a SERIOUS campaign". Can someone please explain to me how anyone in their right fucking mind can insinuate that FALSE RAPE ALLEGATIONS aren't SERIOUS? How on earth does this discourage ANYONE from leveling a LEGITIMATE RAPE ALLEGATION? Fucking grow the fuck up.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 04:25 PM
8

It's absolutely amazing that any studio would even touch the screenplay - so this is a WIN, no matter what.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 04:08 PM
2

Why the hell not? As long as they're held to the same exact standard and given absolutely no special consideration whatsoever.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 04:05 PM
10

This entire notion, the statistics, all of it just does not and has never jived with my own observation and experience in the world. I've never seen any actual, real world, evidence that this is true, and so I will remain skeptical.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 04:03 PM
1

How do I know you're not what? Poor? Helping them? I don't. I didn't know I was assuming you were or weren't (doing) anything.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/13 03:52 PM
0

I don't know where you're getting your quotes from, so I have no context for the purpose of your quotes. But what about the poor? There's no shortage of poor, productive, peaceful and honest people in this world, in fact most of the poor are productive, peaceful and honest people - they're just not very sexy, so you don't hear much about them, because their names don't get in the paper, unless it's an obituary. I am them, and so are you. Civilization was built on their sweaty backs. Help yoursel…
/r/TheRedPill12/07/13 03:40 PM
-1

And that class deserves social justice, but it's not going to get it, or have any say in shaping it, by villainizing and dismissing the concept, to the delight (and as a very direct result) of another class of people who would love nothing better than to eliminate the notion of any kind of justice for the 99% of the population they exploit and work tirelessly to disenfranchise, undermine and turn into dependent serfs.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/13 03:23 PM
-2

You're allowing someone else to define "social justice" for you, and you can't see past the baggage of this phrase, into the actual meaning of the words. Read the words like you've never heard it used on Faux News. Now tell me how terrible a thing is "social justice". Tell me how terrible "social justice" sounds if it included hard working, law abiding, men? You don't think you need it? What about the mentally ill veteran living in a god damned tent under the bridge. Do you think he could use so…
/r/TheRedPill12/07/13 02:09 AM
12

Because feminists are organized. Bottom line. Don't lose perspective on this. Imagine a "bunch of man-hatin' dykes" claiming that Misandry doesn't exist. They're actually making fun of that very notion, because they know it to be true, not because they're trying to be ironic by insinuating that it does not, the antagonistic intent clears that up and leaves no room for doubt, despite what they think. Double speak doesn't change that fact and neither does irony or ambiguity. Popular opinion doesn'…
/r/MensRights12/07/13 02:01 AM
-2

I don't think you're even trying to digest what I've said here. Try harder. In the mean time, enlighten me. Explain how you think my logic is flawed.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/13 01:25 AM
-1

The abuses of the welfare system are as inexcusable as the corporate welfare system. What do they have in common? Powerful lobbies, "think tanks", and most importantly money. Think how much more "productive" you would be without the distractions? Think how much more "wealth/power = influence" (one in the same) you would have if you weren't paying for what has been carefully crafted as "normalcy' (trophy wife with 1.5 children and a mortgage on a fancy house you get to enjoy at most 2 hours of th…
/r/TheRedPill11/07/13 08:22 PM
-3

This is why we can no longer allow feminists to "genderize" language in the popular vernacular. Which gender do you think of when you hear the phrase "reproductive rights" or "domestic abuse", or the words "rape", "pedophile", "predator", "creep", "care taker", "nurse", "nurture", "inmate", "soldier", "pervert", "loser", "social justice", "planned parenthood"? You need to be aware of how language is used to undermine your rights, because the power of language is undeniable. When you encounter a …
/r/MensRights11/07/13 03:34 PM
2

that sounds quite right.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/13 03:08 PM
16

Women are not monogamous by default. You can blame whoever you want for trying to impose monogamy on them - it won't change the fact that most will continue to claim the exact opposite in polite company.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/13 04:19 AM
2

I don't find them offensive, but they certainly are antagonistic. They are illustrative of the same wide sweeping generalization and false logic of the original posters - which is exactly why they are getting so much attention. I understand the argument and impulse to "rise above", and perhaps that is wise in the long term, but you can't deny their short term effectiveness with regard to raising awareness.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 04:12 AM
2

SRS should change their name to SRC - Shit Reddit Censors (via down voting brigades).
/r/MensRights11/07/13 04:03 AM
6

Nothing. Just more misinformation being disseminated by those who don't know and don't care to know the purpose of the MRM.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 04:01 AM
1

Let's get a link to a PDF of the original. I want to distribute these in my neck of the woods. The sooner the better.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 09:47 PM
1

Give it 10 years, and he'll be the one looking after his parents anyway. Seems like to me he's just avoiding the ten years of indentered servitude that would have otherwise been "marriage" and "starting his own family", which would have likely ended in divorce anyway. I bet he's good with his money.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 09:44 PM
8

Forget "hello", how about piss on his head if it was on fire. Sorry girls, you're own your now. I'm MGTOW. Try not to get raped.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 08:09 PM
3

This is so offensive - women are not culpable for their own decisions, actions or behaviors. They are perpetual victims and passengers in their own lives, cannot be held accountable for anything because of patriarchy, and wouldn't change that for anything in the fucking universe. WOMYN - VICTIM - GOOD. MAN - PREDATOR - BAD.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 08:06 PM
10

Fuck that. I'm not going anywhere near any of that shit, unless it's a member of my immediate family. What is there to protect you from being accused of participating in a sexual assault, if you intervened? NOTHING. You could literally be at the wrong place, at wrong time, in an adjacent, but accessible room and be accused of it. Treat that shit like the plague that it is - and run for your life. I have absolutely no fucking qualms with evacuating and distancing myself from any situation that ev…
/r/MensRights10/07/13 04:45 PM
3

But the legal justice system is fair and blind - why on earth would anyone fear to tell the truth? (to be read with a high, whiney, naive voice).
/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 06:06 PM
1

It's very necessary, but what's being practiced in the United States isn't feminism - it's misandry calling itself "feminism".
/r/MensRights09/07/13 04:02 PM
14

Feminism prizes emotion above reason and logic, and you will find this attitude prevails in their "rhetoric". Criticism - no matter how reasonable, logical, or even tempered - is considered an attack on "feelings", and isn't tolerated. Show me a movement/system of beliefs that shuns critical inspection (or introspection), and I'll show you a cult. The day that "safe-places" for women began to mean "freedom from criticism and culpability for one's own actions" is the day that feminism awarded wom…
/r/MensRights08/07/13 06:26 PM
5

aye.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 05:51 PM
1

I challenge you to define "true love" universally. It's an artifice, created by courtly love poets.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/13 05:50 PM
8

These are merely the same considerations that men have given to women for thousands of years. But they continue to take them for granted, and will continue to take them for granted until those considerations are withdrawn.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 05:19 PM
8

I'm not going to waste my time - life is too short. There comes a point at which the effort and risk outweighs any possible benefit - that's the reality I live in. But I'm sincerely happy to hear it's not your reality.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 05:05 PM
29

5 - Immunity to Cognitive Dissonance.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 04:31 PM
16

Put up a poster that reads "Real Women Don't/Do _____" (anything, fill in the blank), and it will be met with hostility and taken down. We love to perpetuate the notion that a "real man" is something that women can, and should define, and we love to perpetuate the notion that "real women" are beyond, or transcend, definition.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 04:22 PM
11

I read things like this and it absolutely amazes me that a man would willingly subject himself to marriage. I have yet to observe any beneficial aspect of marriage (including having offspring) that would offset the sheer peril and ruination that is divorce, alimony and child support. After visiting this subreddit for several months and comparing it to "marriages" I have personally witnessed throughout my entire 30(ish) years on this planet, I can confidently say that there isn't a woman in exist…
/r/MensRights08/07/13 04:12 PM
11

Precisely, yet another fine example of having your cake and eating it too. Men who don't build their entire identities around their career. Men who don't put work above all else are looked down upon by society - especially by women. All you need to do is peruse a few online dating websites and observe the importance that a vast majority of women place on wanting a mate who is "financially secure" (and/or is in possession of at least equal or greater educational level) and you see, once again, th…
/r/MensRights08/07/13 03:40 PM
1

I think that's a good thing to be proficient in, I just think it's a shame that it's necessary.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/13 02:28 AM
4

"Sir", said I, "or madame, truly your forgiveness I implore; But the fact is I was buzzing, and I felt a nic fit coming, And ahead I saw you smoking, and I yearned to be one smoking, So I solicited one cigaratte, one cig and not one more;--- bitchiness there, and nothing more.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 04:20 PM
2

They need people like you to talk to them - it's very easy to develop tunnel vision in that subreddit and the moderators and members are very aware of the problem, and they frequently encourage "breaks" from that subreddit. The amount of vitriol in general towards MensRights, makes some of them feel persecuted, and when people feel persecuted they turn in on themselves and lose perspective. You need only to go visit r/feminism to see how that works, and it's working over at MensRights. The only …
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 03:55 PM
1

Thanks. By the way, I am "one of the guys' over at Mensrights. I'd encourage you to lurk around there a little longer, I think you'll find that there are plenty of less than bitter men over there, though bitterness is certainly a feature of the subreddit - and I think if you care to observe them for a while, you'll find that a great deal of the bitterness isn't entirely unwarranted. Whatsmore, I applaud you for taking enough of an interest to form your own opinion here and there. You should mean…
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 03:43 PM
0

I don't blame you at all for that. It's not an unreasonable position to take when you take into account everything else. I'm just saying that from a personal ethics stance, I, personally, refuse to go there. For me, it's about something larger and more significant than "the dirty game".
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 03:37 PM
9

I don't doubt what you say, but I'll gladly dump (and have dumped) any previous girl who goes through my phone or hacked my email or private areas of any social websites - they are the same thing in my mind. I simply refuse to do it, though I know 99% of women would have absolutely no moral qualms with doing it. In fact, I got into a pretty nasty argument with a woman about it recently. The hamstering was truly awe inspiring. I finally asked her if she would feel comfortable going through one of…
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 06:10 AM
1

That makes me feel very good to hear that.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 12:19 AM
2

$80 dollars? I don't know what the hell to even say to that.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 04:33 AM
6

Sounds like a potential money making opportunity to me.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 05:36 PM
11

Someone should tie them to a chair and force them to listen to an audio book version of Tim O'Briens "The Things They Carried". In fact, it should be required reading for anyone before applying for a marriage license with anyone in the service.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 05:04 PM
7

Porn magazines? Really? They went after the porn magazines? (nevermind the strip clubs, massage parlors (brothels), paydayloan stores, discount liquor stores and bars that surround every base I've ever had the pleasure to visit.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 05:02 PM
2

Do you believe that men and women should have equal opportunity? Yes. Do you think they have equal opportunity in the U.S.? I don't believe anyone, and I do mean ANYONE, has absolute equal opportunity in anything in the U.S., or anywhere else for that matter. As a man, I don't have an equal opportunity to start and run a daycare business. As a woman, I don't have an equal opportunity to be drafted into the military and have my legs blown off in a war that I did not volunteer to fight in. These i…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 04:57 PM
7

I was just about to comment on how remarkable it was that you didn't get banned and then: And now, after asking some questions at r/AskFeminism, they've banned me. Both subs. No explanation given. To the best of my knowledge I broke no rules. In response to your question - it's extremely difficult, if not impossible to concede anything to "Feminism" because their ideology is so fluid and transient and sujective in its precepts and application. How can you concede to a point or issue that refuses…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 04:39 PM
-8

douche.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/13 04:07 AM
1

Well I'm sure as hell not going to try to synthesize it and test it, but if you do, and it works, let me know will ya?
/r/MensRights03/07/13 03:30 AM
6

This will never see the light of day, but I sincerely hope that I'm wrong.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 06:30 PM
5

Charged with what, exactly?
/r/MensRights02/07/13 06:27 PM
2

Do your parent's know you get on MensRights? Let me assure you that the seed of "gold digging" is planted long before anyone is old enough to "date". As far as obligatory "sex" for "dinner" is concerned. If that seems like a reasonable expectation to you, I suggest you cut out the middle man and just go straight into hiring escorts, so you can continue to allow yourself to be exploited and managed by your own penis, and thereby falling lock step into the neo-feminist idea of what a "man" is.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 06:11 PM
2

What in the actual fuck are you talking about?
/r/MensRights02/07/13 06:04 PM
1

This is in no way "social justice", it's adolescent trolling.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 06:02 PM
3

you will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy ". . . We must be cautious."
/r/MensRights02/07/13 05:12 PM
2

This is hilarious, as if women, at any time in the history of humankind - patriarchy/matriarchy be damned, have been able to reconcile "what they should desire (according to even their own self interest)" with "what they actually desire (which they have absolutely no interest in acknowledging and/or understanding)". I know, I know, this a "gross" generalization of women - but no one and no thing is going to convince me that it's not true.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 05:11 PM
1

You make a valid point, and I understand where you are coming from, but the fact is (and I think you might agree with me) that the legal definition of rape has been raped with a kind of linguistically lazy, malicious, misandric intent. I personally believe we need more precise language, and less under the umbrella of "rape" - because that word conjures up a universal image and triggers emotions that do not always (in fact, one could argue usually does not) accurately reflect the circumstances an…
/r/MensRights02/07/13 04:55 PM
2

Then why on earth does "Maine" need a "Sexual Assualt Forensic Examiner"? Why not train a monkey to push a button that says "raped" and proceed from there. What the ever loving fuck is going on here? I have to add that this woman is doing an unforgiveable disservice to actual victims of rape, because any defense attorney would seize upon this clip and that quotation as grounds to dismiss any forensic "evidence" coming from that department.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 04:02 PM
5

Not rape, but tricking someone into conceiving a child is every bit as deviant and predatory as rape. The effects are lifelong, and I think one could make the argument that it might actually be worse than rape, because there are two victims - the person being tricked into conceiving a child, and the child him/herself, who will likely be faced at some point in his/her life with the knowledge that one of his/her parents did not want to bring him/her into this world, or did so unwillingly.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 03:47 PM
9

Yeah, I don't agree with that last part. I had a girlfriend who had a VERY strong sex drive, and she basically felt that if she was horny, it was my obligation to drop everything, at any time, under any circumstance - and I do mean ANY CIRCUMSTANCE, to satisfy her - and if I didn't she would do one of two things (and sometimes both): 1) Become upset, pout and accuse me of not finding her attractive, or loving her, anymore. 2) Become upset, angry and then intimate/threaten that she might be force…
/r/MensRights01/07/13 10:02 PM
40

This would be a great and powerful social experiment. Please do this.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 08:23 PM
2

The "test" is essentially a method of determining how receptive her boyfriend is to being manipulated. The more willing he is to be manipulated, and suppress any real world sense of fairness, equity or independent thought, the more "desired" she feels. This is how women experience "love". It has absolutely nothing to do with any of the other bullshit that they say, or want men (or themselves) to believe. Women do not "feel" anything with regard to men (or anyone else, for that matter, including …
/r/TheRedPill01/07/13 04:57 PM
2

It can still mean attractive, but that doesn't make it any less ironic.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 03:04 PM
2

I was referring more to a scarcity of men, but the two aren't unrelated.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 04:03 AM
3

It's because they haven't experience scarcity (at least in the west) for many generations. That's going to change one day, for one reason or another, and it's not going to be pleasant for anyone.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 03:50 AM
1

I'd like to add a caveat to this: If you historically attract crazy (and you know who you are), assume crazy is the default and then consider MGTOW.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 03:34 AM
3

I'm going on 8 years without being able to take a vacation at my place of employment because the women in my office refuse to adhere to deadlines. The last time I tried to take a vacation, I had to cancel my trip entirely because a female coworker simply ignored my requests to get her orders in by the established deadline. If I don't get my work done, our company doesn't have a product - so it's simply not an option for me not to get my work done on time. This means that I frequently (and needle…
/r/MensRights01/07/13 03:30 AM
109

Her feelings matter, your feelings do not. end of story. and if you are foolish enough to point this out, your feelings still do not matter and you are a whiney, substandard man. Also, her vagina is sacred and makes the world go round.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 02:42 AM
12

Who do you think conditioned you to even think of mentioning that your a "short 5'5 male who has always struggled with being over weight"? Do you see the irony in what you've said here? Allow me to translate: Despite being 5'5" and having spent a lifetime feeling ashamed of my weight, my lovely, noble, girlfriend has been able to overlook these "flaws". For a lark, go on okcupid sometime and count how many women you find who have absolutely no qualms with plainly stating that they would prefer n…
/r/MensRights01/07/13 02:37 AM
5

They also refer to themselves as the "fair sex". You don't even have to leave your house to see how ridiculous the claim that "women judge, based mostly on other things" is.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 02:26 AM
1

Boycott The Clorox Company (NYSE: CLX ). OUR BRANDS
/r/MensRights01/07/13 02:22 AM
1

Just be smart about it. VERY smart.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/13 02:01 AM
2

Ha. Considering recent events, you never know who might be listening.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 02:00 AM
3

This woman obviously has a history of violent behavior and interactions with the police. You can tell she new the drill the second the officer told her to put her hands behind her back. Obviously emotional and impulse control problems there. I think I heard him say something about her "son". Nothing he could have said would justify that kind of insane behavior.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 07:51 AM
2

the un-fair sex boo. Muhahahaha.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/13 07:32 AM
1

It's got nothing to do with the ability (or inability) "to show up at social venues and pull with little to no effort". It's got everything to do with finding a more meaningful and satisfying sense of self and self-worth. It's about measuring yourself with something greater and more valuable to society in general than pussy. It's not for everyone, that's for sure. And I can't deny that if I hadn't been satiated earlier in my life, that this would be something I would have willingly chosen. But s…
/r/TheRedPill29/06/13 07:14 AM
5

I think you're exactly right. Your quotation only serves to reinforce my belief in and practice of the philosophy of MGTOW. I don't have a problem with any one who wants to play the game, but it's a risky one, filled with pitfalls, and one would be well advised to educate oneself in those pitfalls - because the consequences can be lifelong.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/13 06:49 AM
15

We understand the motivations of the "white knight" - that phenomena will resolve itself, because misandry is an out of control wildfire at this point. It's all consuming, and that fire is heading their way, it's only a matter of time. Shaming the enablers is only going to slow that process down, in my opinion. If you want to really test that social agency, go pose, for a lark, as a MGTOW. Nothing appeals to the fear you describe of "being alone and without constant attention/ego-boosting" more …
/r/TheRedPill29/06/13 06:38 AM
9

Now go out and fight against the campaign to mischaracterize and demonize this movement by educating those who care to listen.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 05:51 AM
4

Steal away, I didn't coin it, I just observed it, absorbed it, and pooped it out.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/13 05:43 AM
1

I wonder how many years (or months) it will be before we see the exact scenario played out with a pistol shot and an equally celebrated folk murderess? At this rate, I'm putting my money on months.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 05:40 AM
35

And conversely that Nice Guys are all conniving sexual predators. Jesus Christ, did you notice the universal inability to actually describe what they want? It's a silhouette that can be conveniently filled with what the fuck ever strikes my fancy (which I have absolutely no real understanding of, and worse, am completely disinterested in) at any given millisecond. It's really kind of pitiable. I just can't imagine suffering from this kind of disorganized thinking 24 hours a day, seven days a wee…
/r/TheRedPill29/06/13 05:20 AM
16

My face hurts from smiling at this.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/13 04:37 AM
3

Not a fan of the practice, but there certainly is a precedent for it. In fact, in my humble experience, it is the modus operandi when it comes to men bashing.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 05:29 PM
1

Couldn't agree more with this - it's certainly more egalitarian in intent. Misandrists don't own the concept of feminism, they claim it, they co-opt it, they exploit it, they distort it, they change it at will to suit whatever misandric motivation occurs to them at any given time. Irrational hatred is a self-consuming fire. The hypocrisy of some of the most salient issues that neo-feminism trumpets is readily apparent and undeniable to most intelligent and reasonable people. Neo-feminists are ab…
/r/MensRights28/06/13 04:32 PM
1

"Why are women so successful at commiting crimes, at avoiding/deflecting detection, and when detected, prosecution?"
/r/MensRights26/06/13 04:28 PM
3

Polygraph tests are bogus - junk science. There's a reason they're not admissable in a court of law.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 03:34 AM
4

Ideological Amorphism - "I'm not that kind of feminist" "she's not a real feminist" "we don't endorse that kind of feminism".
/r/MensRights25/06/13 07:47 PM
18

And a feminist would assume that you or I get paid more, but let me assure you that in my case, that is not the case. I've worked my entire adult life (I'm in my mid-thirties), and I have never witnessed a man getting paid more for doing the same job. Not once. That notion holds no weight with me, not in the 21st century.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 07:44 PM
1

It would have to be legally mandated and actively enforced by local law enforcement before it would apply to my gender.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 07:39 PM
37

I know men who have been demoted and/or simply lost their jobs because they blew out their knee. According to this article, there's no such thing as "talented male workers" who don't have the option to "quit altogether" because they want to "have children" and also provide them with financial support. Here's what happens at my place of employment. Women are hired full-time, they take one of those five days off on almost a weekly basis, to take care of "personal business" which apparently include…
/r/MensRights25/06/13 05:58 PM
1

you're joking right?
/r/MensRights25/06/13 04:36 PM
2

Fucking ridiculous. Emergency! Run to man! Man suppose to make it all better. (Man oppress woman - but useful as cannon fodder, sperm dispenser, and when SHTF). There's absolutely no justification for this. The woman who found her was every bit as physically capable of saving this woman, or not saving her. If you don't know what the fuck you're doing, you shouldn't be trying to resuscitate anyone. Best to call 911, and you don't need to fucking run to the nearest male to do that. If Planet Fitne…
/r/MensRights25/06/13 04:34 PM
2

the only reason feminism is associated with the left, is because we're allowing that association to continue. Mark my words, if we allow the MRM to be identified with a political idealogy (left or right), it will be marginalized into a fringe, non-existence.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 04:09 PM
1

the most efficient way to undermine a movement:
/r/MensRights24/06/13 03:35 PM
10

System number one to "no longer support": Marriage and children. Don't do it. If a majority of only 1 generation of men removed their support for this system and took ownership of their own reproductive powers, this notion of male expendability and exploitation would come to a permanent end.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 03:10 AM
1

You're either too subtle for me, or you suffer from disorganized thought. I honestly cannot determine if you are agreeing with me or disagreeing with me. You say that Conservatives turned "do-gooder" into an insult, and I have to agree, wholeheartedly, but have they not also turned "social justice" into a dirty word? This may be the most socially "fair" system of the last 1000 years, but that's no reason to stop striving for improvement. People who are terrified for their children's future would…
/r/MensRights22/06/13 09:41 PM
1

So this is from the future? (it says July 21st, 2013)
/r/MensRights21/06/13 09:44 PM
2

but egalitarianism is not possible when there exists an imbalance in power, responsibility and privilege.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 09:19 PM
2

I get your point, and I see the problem with my statement, but this fact remains: despite one's motivation or intent, a desire to correct obvious legal inequities, especially with regard to marriage and child custody/support, is compatible with egalitarianism in that context.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 09:07 PM
1

I don't have to accept or reject them, and I can fully support the fight against default motherhood custody, default child support and government sponsored single-motherhood, without adopting a complementarian position. The last I checked, Feminism had no small number of well known "gurus", with no small number of devotees quoting them left and right, as good devotees should - is that what's required to be a MRA as well?
/r/MensRights21/06/13 08:38 PM
2

I see your point, but it's not extreme or unreasonable to you, or to me, and we're the only ones looking our for us, at the moment. So let them be enraged - they have no power over us, unless we willingly participate in the systems/institutions that exploit us.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 08:30 PM
3

I think this subreddit has done a very admirable job of that, and people outside the movement are aware of the difference.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 08:14 PM
1

I think most people already know that feminism, in it's current manifestation, is extremist in nature. You cannot endorse mensrights without endorsing the concept of egalitarianism. I know full well how fascist and cult-ish this neo-feminism (and that's really what it is, because it's evolved into something quite apart from it's original intent) is, and by all means, make it known how they operate, and defend mensrights, but not at the expense of actually spreading the issues and inequities that…
/r/MensRights21/06/13 08:12 PM
3

The problem for us is that we find ourselves between a rock and a hard place. Scylla and Charybdis. Feminism and Traditionalism. This is exactly why the MRM should resist any impulse to be affiliated with any particular political party - especially conservatism, which is the feeling I'm getting from this subbreddit. You can't align yourselves with feminism, because the egalitarian intent of that movement has been hijacked by extremists, and conservatism (especially in the United States), has bee…
/r/MensRights21/06/13 07:27 PM
4

And I'm starting to think that they're doing it (effectively) in conservative attire.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 06:56 PM
0

If you say you are against "social justice" you are in effect excluding Men from "social justice". Social justice is not a "bad" thing, it's an abused and deformed thing, because it lacks balance. Part of the imbalance is that it excludes Men. How many times have I heard one of us complain about being excluded from public health programs/research? Do you expect to be treated fairly by these institutions by merely cursing their existence? You should be outraged not at their existence, but at thei…
/r/MensRights21/06/13 06:54 PM
2

Being and extreme leftist is no more foolish than being an extreme rightist. Shall we allow ourselves to be labeled as well? Shall we cut of our noses to spite our own faces? A little perspective is in order. The vast majority of people (men and women included) do not belong to the extreme. Most women are not, in fact, feminists - according to the mandates of that very exclusive club. Do we want to position ourselves as their polar opposite? How effective do you think we'll be in accomplishing t…
/r/MensRights21/06/13 06:44 PM
4

Feminism is doing this to itself, and that's exactly why it has become what it has become. We would be well advised to avoid doing the same.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 06:29 PM
-4

It's only black and white if you allow "social justice" to be defined by someone else.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 06:22 PM
4

90% of the issues that we face as MRA's have to do with the paradigm of "paternalism" - that mythology isn't going to be overcome with legislation. People, by their very nature, are resistant to mandates. The legal rights gained by the civil rights movement pale in comparison to the change in thought and attitude that the civil right movement was able inspire. Don't make the mistake of devaluing the power of a paradigm shift. We have the power to bring our issues into the popular conscience - bu…
/r/MensRights21/06/13 06:21 PM
2

You don't need to align yourself, lock-step, with a particular political party to vote your conscience, to be part of a movement, or effect change.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 05:51 PM
4

Politics is, and will always be, reactive - not proactive. Social change never comes as a result of politics - social change comes as a result of popular thought and belief - that's the only thing that moves and inspires politics to do anything. Politics is a means to define and limit the inevitable winds of change in any society.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 05:38 PM
4

The scene in Batman may have been propaganda, but it's no less poignant. . . . and you don't find that a wee bit disturbing? Here's the thing about radical groups in general, they cannot exist without propaganda (the ability to manufacture consent), and they never consider themselves radical - it's always "those guys, over there". Take great care.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 05:17 PM
5

That scene, that franchise, is politically motivated and it's not accidental. Be very careful how you allow someone else's vision to influence your opinions. If you think there aren't people trying to manipulate your beliefs through popular media (and this is a very fine example), you are burying your head in the sand.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 04:36 PM
-5

Who is allowing them to define "justice"? You are, by not participating in it and adding your voice to it. Social Justice, as a concept, should not belong to a single political ideology. The fact that it has been politicized is a HUGE problem, but swallowing the "us and them" pill will only perpetuate this problem. If you allow the MRM to become a "conservative" or "libertarian" movement, you might as well fucking throw in the towel now.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 04:29 PM
-6

The MRW is, and should remain, part of the social justice movement. You either have social justice, or you have social injustice. Choose. You may not like aspects of "social justice" or certain practices/ideas, but villainizing it, or setting MensRights apart from it is a HUGE mistake. We're advocating for many of the same things, because we want MEN and Men's rights included in this activism. The exclusion is the problem. Be very careful here. If you allow MensRights to alienate its liberal adv…
/r/MensRights21/06/13 04:12 PM
2

If they care to know the truth, they can come here and lurk. Those that don't care to know the truth, won't, no matter what. Why dignify that ridiculous claim - when its sole purpose is to decieve and antagonize.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 04:03 PM
1

Amorpheus Ideology example #1 "Be assertive and set boundaries in a relationship" vs "It's not necessary to verbalize consent, or lack thereof, because some women are too shy/affraid to say no. It's up to "someone else" to determine whether or not consent has been given, and it's the responsibility of "someone else" to behave accordingly.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 03:58 PM
3

Very "cult" like behavior.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 03:33 PM
1

Assholes delight in putting their own safety (and everyone else's) at risk, in my experience.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 09:08 PM
1

FWIW, I don't like "Jay-dens" any better. But you're right, this isn't a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:04 PM
2

(I had to look it up too, ahem)
/r/MensRights20/06/13 07:15 PM
18

misocynist
/r/MensRights20/06/13 06:56 PM
7

Safe? I think everyone has a right to feel safe, even when they're an asshole. The problem isn't safety, it's too many people thinking it's okay to be an asshole.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 06:51 PM
8

Exactly - it's called IRONY, and some people find IRONY, FUNNY, if not merely IRONIC.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 06:46 PM
4

I make a practice out of getting personal with vile human beings.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 06:17 PM
1

This is actually insulting to men and women.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 05:07 PM
10

lol. I cannot think of a single exception for any of the names on your list, and that worries the shit out of me.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 04:45 PM
1

This will replace the sports car for many people, I guarantee. This would be a very good investment opportunity in the long term.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 04:44 PM
2

The effect (when hypocrisy is the effect) is the same. The motives are irrelevant. Capitalism is no justification for hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 04:01 PM
26

Her name is "Brittany", that's about all you need to know about her.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 03:48 PM
2

It is one entity and it functions in that manner. This is not a left or a right issue, it's a gender issue. Why must everything be associated with political ideology? I'm not saying there isn't a left and a right wing element to feminism. I'm saying that the hypocrisy of both effect men (left or right) the same. The moment I see the MRM as a right wing movement is the moment that I will abandon it. Some things transcend political ideology and this is one of them. The politicizing of gender is wh…
/r/MensRights20/06/13 03:44 PM
18

Ideological amorphism is a cornerstone of cultism, and it is a hallmark trait of sociopathy. It's nearly impossible to prove that anything is good or harmful, when that thing has no consistent purpose, function, or goal. Feminism operates in the same manner as a loosely defined and disorganized religious sect.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 03:22 PM
2

The only way to win the game is not to play.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 08:30 PM
1

If a woman wants to wear hairy leg stockings, I don't give a shit. Not my concern.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 03:58 PM
0

I've noticed that I've taken to avoiding looking directly at all women in any context, it's as if they all have medusa heads. I found that it makes life, in general, easier.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 08:30 PM
2

If society doesn't approve of "slutty" behavior, the ONLY effective way to alter or "correct" that behavior is for men and women to collectively stop reinforcing that behavior by not having sex with "sluts". Society has not shown a desire or willingness to do that, so "slut shaming" does. and will remain. a weapon of desperation by a fringe subset of people - which is characteristic and typical of all hate speech.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 03:56 PM
2

"Bias" requires exclusion. Advocating for male "inclusion" with regard to equal rights and fair treatment under the law and elsewhere cannot, by definition, represent cognitive bias - it's precisely the opposite of bias.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 03:42 PM
-3

LOL. just LOL.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 02:33 AM
3

True. There's actually quite a bit of good, practical, advice in the Old and New Testament as well as in the Quran, but it's frequently overlooked. I guess people, in general, prefer hard, fast and absolute rules, over good advice.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 06:37 PM
2

I know, I'm just a silly head today. Here's another silly thought: if all Feminists and all Christians actually practiced what they preached in their own lives, all of their works would actually be good, and no one would be able to call them "actually" evil, because they wouldn't be guilty of hypocrisy and double standards.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 06:10 PM
2

Well if any of the gossippers are Christian, I would certainly point out that gossiping is sinful behavior - Proverbs 20:19. He that goeth about as a talebearer revealeth secrets: therefore meddle not with him that flattereth with his lips. I love to point this one out, every chance I get, to the Methodist crones, when they start clucking.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 05:52 PM
24

Said the man who has never been subjected to female authority.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 03:38 PM
3

ah fuck. why not.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 03:36 PM
3

My god, did you read that article? It reads exactly the same way that Jim Jones sounded on that final recording. Actually gave me the same chills.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 07:41 PM
7

It was a zinger - a one liner - relax.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 08:28 PM
2

I do get what you're saying. It's called Men Going There Own Way (MGTOW), but it's not for everyone.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 07:10 PM
2

Amen to that. It took me a long time to get there, but I've never been happier.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 03:59 PM
14

This is why you don't date women who listen to popular country music.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 03:43 PM
5

When I was about this age, this whole "kicking boys in the nuts" thing had become like a "cool/fun thing" for the girls to do, like a fad. So one day, after school, I was walking through the playground on my way home and these two girls came running up from behind me, one of them grabbed me and whirled me around and the other straight up kicked me in the nuts HARD. I slumped to the ground, and the other stomped my hands, which of course I had between my legs at that point. Then they both just ra…
/r/MensRights12/06/13 03:27 PM
1

which is exactly what I meant by "above all support/promote genuine egalitarianism".
/r/MensRights12/06/13 02:55 PM
5

Please do, because much of what has been perceived and promoted as "feminism" on these forums, academia and elsewhere, is not true feminism in my humble opinion - or at least it certainly does NOT represent feminism's original egalitarian intent.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 09:24 PM
6

Don't participate in any of the activities that MensRights advocates against for starters (i.e. false rape allegations, gender based legal abuses/inequities, gender shaming, male domestic abuse denial, male rape denial, misandry, and above all support/promote genuine egalitarianism).
/r/MensRights11/06/13 09:05 PM
7

The entire basis for theredpill can be basically summarized this way: Women are incapable of the kind of love that men are conditioned from birth to believe they are. This is by evolutionary design. The best a man can hope to achieve is to manipulate the base instincts of women in order to achieve some level of satisfaction through lots of sex with many women. "Love" is an artifice. Women are perpetual children, who are only stimulated by and attracted to strong emotion, drama, and domineering a…
/r/MensRights11/06/13 04:51 PM
2

I met with my father's financial advisor when my father passed away. This was shortly after the U.S. economic collapse, and I asked her for some general investment advice, as a man in my late twenties - with the goal of retiring in reasonable comfort someday. This is exactly what she told me: Get out of debt as soon as possible. Stay out of debt. DO NOT GET MARRIED AND/OR HAVE CHILDREN. I've heeded her advice, and so far it seems to be working out just fine.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 04:00 PM
1

This is a form of abuse - not terribly far removed from allowing children access to pornography - in fact it might be worse. So, no that's not what I'm saying, but if you care to explore the truth of the matter, by all means do. If you care to preserve your ignorance on the matter, by all means, don't.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 03:29 AM
1

I think childhood is difficult enough without adding adult sexuality into the mix. There is value in allowing children to be innocent and free of all the artifice and trappings of adulthood while their brains are still forming. Call me Holden Caulfield if you like, but there it is.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 03:11 AM
1

Well here's the first result that came up on Google. Did you want me to go through the entire 29,000,000 million results and pick what - a thousand - articles that support my point? 2000?
/r/MensRights09/06/13 10:39 PM
1

The problem with women in the military is that they're still treated like women, when they should be treated like soldiers - no more and no less. If, on the battlefield, women are a risk to their male counterparts - then why not give them their own platoons, even battalions? Use their service for the best tactical purpose and hold these military units to the exact same standard. Let their performance determine their own use and purpose. If that means a lot women soldiers in body bags, so be it. …
/r/MensRights09/06/13 10:32 PM
1

Of course, there's absolutely no research that would suggest that children suffer negative effects by being exposed to adult sexuality. I'm sorry, I thought I was posting to MensRights, not NAMBLA.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 09:28 PM
2

Well shit - maybe we should just open up strip clubs and adult movie theatres to children - call it family entertainment. I'm sorry you don't see how that increases the risk to the child, or all children for that matter. This kind of bullshit emboldens pedophiles and mainstreams pedophilia - if that's not risky, I don't what is.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 08:20 PM
0

and he could have just as easily been instructed or posed.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 08:14 PM
2

There is no way you can determine that from a still photo.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 03:05 PM
2

And what if the guy was wearing assless chaps? Would it still be okay then?
/r/MensRights09/06/13 03:03 PM
2

I understand what you're saying, and I agree, but there is no legitimate justification for a situation in which a person, dressed this provocatively, should be in a child's presence, much less kissing him.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 02:08 PM
0

If the genders in this photo were reversed it would be justifiably seen as child pornography. This reminds of that The (child) Bachelor bit on Jimmy Kimmel (and maybe it's from that), and as a victim of female perpetrated sexual abuse as a child, this image and that bit takes me right back to the summer I was abused, and it bothers me, a lot.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 03:11 AM
1

I dared to assert that women should actually verbally communicate the word "no" when confronted with an unwanted sexual advance.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 03:06 PM
0

You could get your TEFL certificate first, but if what I've read about the women in Shanghai (especially in the blossoming middle-class) is true, you'd be well advise to choose another city.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 08:03 PM
3

Not worth arguing - she's literally reading "perpetuate" when "perpetrate" is what has been written. You can't argue with a person who has perceptual disturbances, and you certainly can't change their minds.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 06:59 PM
3

Sounds like a good screenplay idea, but good luck shopping this one around the studios.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 06:55 PM
0

I'm really surprised she didn't pull out the old "Do you know many women?" or "Do you get out of the basement very much?" She didn't disappoint us with the whole insane, repugnant race card Alakazoo Alakazaam! How is it that these "feminists" manage to get through high school, let alone a BA, or MA, with apparently no exposure to the most basic fundamentals of rhetoric and critical thinking? I mean are they teaching people to argue this way in our universities now? Finally, facebook? Who gives a…
/r/MensRights05/06/13 05:27 PM
2

A rare public example.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 05:12 AM
2

No, but stressful, sedentary office jobs and poor work/life balance will shorten life expectancy just as effectively in the long term.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 09:11 PM
4

The nearer it get's to 50%, the less the difference in life expectancy - watch and see.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 06:58 PM
42

Can someone explain to me why we should give two fucks about yet another feminist having to come to terms with the paradox of her own ideology? She obviously has no problem with the cognitive dissonance she's experiencing, so what the fuck is the point? How can you take feminism seriously at all in the face of that? It's nothing more than a mental exercise for her, apparently.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 03:50 PM
2

You're making the very dire mistake of assuming that "households" means that there are men in that equation at all. The source article you reference is completely unrelated to the observation Sasha_ makes. The article goes on to state that 60% of these households are those of single mothers, so your counterpoint is moot.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 03:42 PM
1

You're talking about the stated goal of feminism, which is completely at odds with much of their contemporary rhetoric. Offensive or not, it's not entirely untrue - a sweeping generalization? Yes. but the fact of the matter is that it's very much in vogue and widespread. I think a vast majority of the men I know personally would very much agree that sympathy, and certainly empathy (reciprocated - because it is very much expected of men), are becoming an increasingly rare feature of relationships…
/r/MensRights03/06/13 03:34 PM
1

I can't argue with that, but there's no law forcing you to participate (and subsequently being denied access) in any or all social programs. Perhaps we've gotten to the point of dropping completely out of all exploitive systems. Hard to imagine? Yes. Impossible? No.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 05:08 PM
2

WHAT THE HELL is wrong with these kids we're raising? How can we stop this? Spend less time blogging. Spend more time making sure you're not raising a rapist, a greedy and/or violent sociopath, a mass murderer, or a false rape accuser, etc.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 01:00 AM
1

You assume that my life is some kind of tragedy? Why? Because I don't think and feel and devote my life to what society (and you) think is "life"? Let me assure you that there have been some pretty damned remarkable, happy and content men and women who have chosen to live as I do throughout the entire history of humankind. "Hurt" has nothing to do with it. "Joy" and "Self Fullfillment" has much to do with it.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 08:09 PM
2

And I would remind you, that a man also brought me into this world. If you want to achieve true egalitarianism, you need to remind yourself that you are an equal part in the human reproduction equation, and equally valuable. Those drives are not the exclusive domain of any gender, but there is an artificial imbalance in gender value, and when you play that game, knowing the table is rigged against you, you are playing a fool's game, and it's prudent to drop out of the game until it achieves bala…
/r/MensRights30/05/13 07:58 PM
1

How so? Please explain to me how I'm subject to it? I'm not married, I'm not getting married, I'm currently a practicing celibate, I minimize my interactions with women as much as humanly possible, I've never been happier in my entire life.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 07:32 PM
1

You might be subject to a thousand years of evolutionary psychology, but I refuse to be, and let me assure you that it's easy and very liberating.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 07:22 PM
-3

The day that men stop caring about how women measure them, or seeking their approval, is the day that MensRights is no longer a necessary movement. You hold the key to the chains of your own oppression in your hands - all that's required is a paradigm shift. So many bitch and complain about how unfairly women treat them. YOU GIVE THEM THIS POWER. STOP IT.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 07:19 PM
-1

I don't get this, at all. I don't understand why men still measure their own self worth by their salaries and their sexual prolificacy. Take a freakin' break.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 06:57 PM
0

The only sexual and reproductive power women have is the power you freely and willingly give them.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 04:22 PM
10

Companies just can't seem to function without grinding their employees into the ground. In most cases this is absolutely by design. We live in a throw-away society. Abuse your tools until they no longer function, go buy (hire) new ones at discount prices. Rinse and repeat.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 03:48 PM
11

Work life balance has always, ALWAYS, been an issue for working men - and that's precisely why we have shorter lifespans. Now we see an increase in heart disease in women, and everyone loses their minds? Demanding Career + Stress + Poor Work-life balance = Health Problems.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 03:43 PM
1

Yeah, I unfortunately predict that there won't be any significant research into this until the effects are already widespread.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 06:49 PM
1

I think the increasing number of men who are opting to avoid the marriage trap is going to become a very significant issue in the west in the coming decade, but I think it's going to be difficult to find the kind of data you're looking for to support this now. It will have a dire impact on all aspects of society in the not-so-distant future.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 06:13 PM
0

You don't see it, yet.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/13 05:53 PM
1

In the grand scheme of things, and as a significant amount of time (perhaps generations) passes - assimilation is inevitable. Culture, despite what many believe, is not a fixed thing - it never has been and it never will be. The effect of immigration, in any form, will invariably effect the culture of the immigrant and the "host" culture (whatever the hell that is). It's always been that way, and it will always be that way - at least until globalism becomes such a dominant factor, that the notio…
/r/TheRedPill27/05/13 04:46 PM
1

Political affiliation should not be related to MensRights. In the United States, no political party is interested in mensrights issues, so I personally support whichever candidate is the least likely to endorse U.S. imperialism abroad and true egalitariansim domestically.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 02:13 PM
8

You're arguing over yet another paradox in feminism? Afterall, I think it's very well established fact that feminists have fully embraced the notion that it's exclusively the perogative of a woman to change her mind (and with mind-blowing speed and frequency) as it suits any given situation, at any given time, and for any reason as long as it benefits her. I'm a huge proponent of "multiculturalism". In the case of "mail order brides" (a term I don't particularly llke), it's undeniable that it is…
/r/TheRedPill27/05/13 01:53 PM
5

but since the arguments of women are almost always rebutted with "you don't have to be so feisty," or "you’re so cute when you’re mad, Jesus Christ, are we talking about reality or are we basing reality on watching Mad Men? "Almost always"? Really? This statement alone forced me to stop reading. I can honestly say I've never heard either of these quotations actually uttered by a real person. It reads like hackneyed day time TV dialogue and I'm convinced that this is exactly where it came from, a…
/r/MensRights25/05/13 05:47 AM
2

Once again, a fine example of taking a genderless aspect of human interaction and assigning it to men in a pathetic attempt to evoke vitriol. I have observed and been spoken to this way countless times by women - it's called being a patronizing asshole, and as assholish as it is, it's not gender specific, and it sure ass hell isn't any more or less insulting no matter what kind of genitalia the person being an asshole happens to have.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 05:41 AM
0

Yeah really shouldn't take it upon yourself to decide a person's potential for change.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 05:28 AM
4

I agree with about 10% of what he says, but his refutations are as lazy and adolescent as the allegations he lampoons. The list he's criticizing is meant to elicit an emotional response at the expense of reason, and that's pretty much the definition of propaganda. There's a whole lot of propaganda verses propaganda going on the west right now and the gender issues being discused on Reddit are certainly no exception, and it's sole purpose is to appeal to people who lack critical thinking skills. …
/r/MensRights25/05/13 04:42 AM
15

She should be in prison - no visitation rights.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 03:32 AM
2

And this is why I would encourage any young man, just starting out, to proceed with extreme caution, especially if he wasn't born in affluence. I mean women are not shy about expressing their preference for "men who can provide them with financial security" - so in light of that, it actually seems irresponsible for a man of limited means to even aspire to get married and start a family. You're considered worthless if you can't, or won't meet a certain expected level of lifestyle, and if you spen…
/r/MensRights25/05/13 03:16 AM
2

Not yet, but if she regrets it later - well I guess it's entirely up to her to decide.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 02:54 AM
-1

yeah, that'd do it.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 02:51 AM
-2

It hasn't become bad enough yet, that could change in less than 5 years. All that is required is a few block buster movies, a couple hit pop songs and a celebrity endorsement or two - oh and no mention of the huge number of "illegitimate" babies that get concieved, born and shuffled around while Johnny is off spilling his guts for "freedom".
/r/MensRights24/05/13 09:29 PM
7

Ever notice how much of the imagery and media throughout the Iraq War and later Afghanistan was (and continues to be) devoted to handsome young GI's kissing and hugging their beautiful army wives? If you did a count of PUBLISHED AP images throughout the entire conflict of GI's hugging their beautiful army wives and compared that to the number of amputees, disfigured servicemen and coffins, I'd be willing to bet that you'd get more than 100 to 1. That's not accidental - that's effective propagand…
/r/MensRights24/05/13 05:34 PM
6

Everyone needs and deserves the right to develop personally - and that frequently involves the pursuit of hobbies. If you've spent a good portion of your life working to become a good Kendo fencer, should you expect to only marry a woman who is into Kendo fencing, or should you be prepared to give up your lifelong love of Kendo fencing, because your wife doesn't share that interest? I think both are unreasonable expectations, and so do some of the men in the article.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 05:24 PM
1

"Lower" class men (i.e. working class men) would do well to avoid women like the goddamn plague. They are absolutely the most vulnerable population (next to "lower class" children) to a society that (historically) views men (especially poor men) as completely expendable.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 05:10 PM
1

The phrase "depending on the situation" has come to mean "depending on my personal opinion and biases, which I will apply to anything I'm too fucking lazy or stupid, or self-centered to view 'the situation' from any other equally legitimate perspective."
/r/MensRights24/05/13 05:04 PM
-36

This is absolutely relevant now in the West, and I guarantee it's only going to increase, and I'm not entirely convinced that it's not by design. It sure would be handy to have a large percentage of unattached, disgruntled, single men available for a second American Civil War, or a Third World War, wouldn't it?
/r/MensRights24/05/13 04:12 PM
34

. . . and if you go to r/feminism and say this, you will be banned instantly, after being accused of condoning rape.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 03:52 PM
1

Could you imagine how fucking crazy, chaotic and violent this world would be if everyone subscribed to the crazy fucking idea that "Yes doesn't always mean Yes"? I just cannot believe that these words weren't photoshopped - my mind cannot accept that someone actually thinks this is remotely acceptable.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 03:50 PM
2

So basically it was okay with her that he was "rubbing up against" her, but when he ejaculated in his pants - then it becomes "dry humping" and exploitive? Well this is a revolutionary thought gentlemen - it's now illegal for you to ejaculate in your pants without a woman's permission, so you damn well better get a handle on your autonomic functions quick, because your erections will likely be targeted next. Absolutely ridiculous.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 03:43 PM
2

Want to see what a histrionic personality disorder looks like? This is it.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 05:46 PM
2

Let's not forget that at least part of the "virgin-policing" aspect, especially for fathers, may have a lot more to do with financial concerns than guarding virginity. I mean if a father's teen daughter gets knocked up, society generally expects the father to automatically fill in the financial gaps and literally work to pay for his daughter's irresponsible behavior, lest he be deemed a "mean, heartless, father", and he's a worthless peice of shit, if he can't step up to the plate and see daddy'…
/r/MensRights22/05/13 03:25 PM
1

Oh, well that's perfectly acceptable then. Thanks for clearing that up.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 02:35 AM
1

(facepalm)
/r/MensRights21/05/13 07:51 PM
1

Assumed by you, but not assumed by others on that thread (before it was deleted.)
/r/MensRights21/05/13 06:35 PM
1

It may very well be a troll, but I think it's appropriate to stand up to (even hoaxed) female sexual predation. Maybe this would have just gone quietly into the night, and maybe this would have emboldened a real female predator to try it too, and maybe a young boy gets his childhood stolen from him as a result. Who is looking out for us, if not us?
/r/MensRights21/05/13 06:33 PM
1

after 5+ hours. I guess that's better than being completely ignored.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 06:28 PM
1

Yes, because there's no precedent for female teachers propositioning, seducing, or having sex with underage boys. I mean, this sort of thing just isn't done. Right?
/r/MensRights21/05/13 06:27 PM
1

Assuming that this is completely real, how do we know she's not an elementary-school teacher?
/r/MensRights21/05/13 06:25 PM
0

LOL. (Still not an answer).
/r/MensRights21/05/13 05:36 PM
-1

Because I don't think you would "allow it". But you're not going to answer that are you?
/r/MensRights21/05/13 05:32 PM
3

I wonder if you'd say the same thing if she was diddling your 11-year-old son?
/r/MensRights21/05/13 05:28 PM
3

Sorry to disappoint you, but no, I did not.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 04:46 PM
3

Well, if you're a dude. I suggest you test this hypothesis yourself and let us know how it works out for you.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 04:34 PM
3

Thank yiou for posting this.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 03:54 PM
0

Not really, what? I don't see anything that I've written that would contradict what you've written here. Most reasonable people can and do make the distinction, but not everyone is reasonable. I would argue that the self-professed feminist was clearly having a difficult time reconciling his/her ideology with this particular woman's fetish and/or kink, because she was directly contradicting the "what consent looks like" protocol (and she was one of many women, who paradoxically agreed with the pr…
/r/MensRights21/05/13 03:10 PM
1

It was a reference to The Rape of the Lock - which has proven to be a timeless (unfortunately) satire of gender issues we still face today. I'd encourage you to read it for yourself.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 09:48 PM
1

I think Alexander Pope would have heartily agreed with you.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 09:03 PM
1

I'm referring to the post that inspired this meme. In other words "vulnerable to prosecution".
/r/MensRights20/05/13 08:54 PM
0

So this is what they mean when they say "I want you to make yourself more vulnerable".
/r/MensRights20/05/13 08:40 PM
1

proof? The fact of the matter is "rape fantasies" and "rape play" are a real thing - you can blame the "patriarchy" for their existence, but you cannot do so without simultaneously artificially sanitizing and restricting the potential and spectrum of a woman's sexuality. I understand what the article was trying to do - time will tell what kind of actual effect it will have as satire. It's a valid criticism not just of dismal critical thinking and fact finding skills in feminism, but of psuedo-in…
/r/MensRights20/05/13 08:20 PM
8

I'd be very interested in hearing what r/feminism has to say about it.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 07:26 PM
23

It's call indoctrination (it's also a fine example of self-fulfilling prophecy). What happens when you call someone "bad" enough times?
/r/MensRights20/05/13 04:08 PM
2

I couldn't agree more.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 01:33 AM
2

I'd encourage you to pose this question to r/feminism - I have no doubt that they could get you up to speed.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 01:32 AM
6

The day that I hear feminists stop denying the existence of female pedophiles, is the day that I'll accept that this is not a mensrights issue. Did you see what she was hitting those boys with? I don't think they sell those kinds of flays at the "child corporeal punishment store". Why was it being filmed? Did you see the obvious delight in the girl's face?
/r/MensRights17/05/13 10:02 PM
1

LOL
/r/MensRights17/05/13 09:51 PM
6

self-fulfilling prophecy?
/r/MensRights17/05/13 08:24 PM
12

I don't mean to be rude, but... do you get out a lot? This is absolutely a canned response. It's so eerily consistant with every argument I've had with feminists on Reddit, when reason and logic fails them: I get the feeling that you've had a bad experience with a woman Have you spent much time with many women All insults in disguise, but there's something very significant and consistant being revealed in these veiled insults, and it is this: The (incorrect) assumption that a heterosexual man's …
/r/MensRights17/05/13 08:03 PM
1

And the Electric Company TV show (Rita Moreno), which Sloth is referencing positively hysterical!
/r/MensRights17/05/13 07:05 PM
42

Because betraying someone else is the most effective way to discover one's "self"?
/r/MensRights17/05/13 06:26 PM
2

Yes! "Hey you Fawkers want to help push this poor Fawker's car out of the ditch?"
/r/MensRights17/05/13 06:10 PM
23

Abusers of self and/or others, quite cynical and yet according to contemporary sociology and psychology - very likely. Of course this seventeen year old "woman" (I've recently learned that the term "female" is derogatory, and "girl" somehow doesn't seem appropriate) couldn't possibly have developed this very apparent sadism on her own - so the obvious blame rests with the unknown and presumed male abuser in her life, and if not that, certainly patriarchy.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 04:42 PM
3

I've (not-so) arbitrarily decided that "guy" is a derogatory way to refer to men, because it is in fact an eponym derived from the person of the infamous Guy Fawkes. Therefore, I urge all MRA's to boycott the disrespecting and mischaracterizing term "guy" when it is used to refer to all men and thereby associated with the treasonous and violent intention of the Gunpowder Plot (not to mention revolutionary Catholicism - I think the men of r/atheism would certainly bristle at the thought). How can…
/r/MensRights17/05/13 04:36 PM
72

What sort of men do you suppose these little fellows are going to become? Hilarious - right?
/r/MensRights17/05/13 04:12 PM
2

Exactly. Legally, he could be completely free and clear. Socially, he's stigmatized for life. Sociopaths like this girl, know exactly what they're doing, and there is nothing - NOTHING - that can prevent them from doing this, and in this insane, amoral society, sociopaths operate and thrive. There's no concept in the mind of a predator about external right or wrong - what's right, is what serves their own personal/emotional interest at any given time, and ANYTHING GOES to achieve this. Mark my w…
/r/MensRights17/05/13 03:29 AM
1

And I suppose this is just "playing doctor" - innocent curiosity right? No harm done. Afterall, it's just a boy.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 05:40 PM
-3

Indifference enabled the Holocaust.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 12:26 AM
0

I don't think it's necessarily wrong, but I do think it is a fetish.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 12:23 AM
41

If you're a caucasian male and you want to find how racist your female friends and co-workers are, just date outside of your race. I don't think finding Asian women attractive is a fetish - unless you only find Asian women attractive, or only find Japanese, or Chinese, or Vietnamese, etc. Having said that, I don't think I've met a white man who only finds "white" women attractive - I'm sure they exist, and I'd be inclined to think of them as a racist. I have met white women who claim to only fin…
/r/MensRights12/05/13 03:46 AM
1

I can't find any fault with that, but I hope you realize that in this society fathers are considered fully expendable.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 03:00 AM
1

I meant enjoying the health insurance benefit of a spouse. It was mentioned that a woman had "married someone she shouldn't have, so she could be covered by his health insurance". My point is, anyone who would marry anyone for such a shallow, cold and calculating reason doesn't deserve to be married - in fact the woman in question is really a prostitute by any reasonable estimation.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 02:57 AM
6

Explain to me again why any male in his right mind would subject himself to marriage? By the way, if "health benefits" figures into your decision to marry someone, you don't deserve anyone.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 09:02 PM
0

Anyone?
/r/TheRedPill09/05/13 07:20 PM
8

Nevermind her appearance. Her prose is atrocious. Can someone please explain to me how someone actually gets paid to write this poorly?
/r/TheRedPill08/05/13 06:49 PM
9

good point.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 07:33 PM
50

Sad to say, but this is pretty much universal treatment. I avoid children - I feel uncomfortable in their presence and I'm actually kind of frightened of them for this very reason, and that pisses me off. The thing that concerns me (as a childhood victim of sexual assault perpetrated by a woman) is the absolutely insane amount of access we, as a society, freely grant strange women to children, as if female pedophilia doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 04:40 PM
0

Yes, they should change the term/major "Women's Studies" to just 'Studies", just to be clear and fair. "So, what's your major?" asked Felix. "Studies." replied No One. "So what's it about?" asked Felix. "Stop being sexist." replied No One.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 03:54 PM
-1

I was being a smart ass.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 03:10 PM
0

are you addressing me, as "you're all", or are you addressing r/MensRights? If you're addressing all of MensRights, I think you should start your own thread and express this sentiment - and I mean this sincerely. If you're just addressing me, then duly noted, and thanks for the discussion. I want to make sure that you understand that I do not speak for MensRights as a group.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 11:54 PM
0

Speculating on my experience with "girls" seems to be a "go to" response on these forums whenever I get into a discussion that involves any precaution one might take against predatory or deceptive behavior in women. I'm well aware that "most (girls) are not up for the idea of (me) filming them (which I don't). I know that's suppose to be some kind of blow to my ego, unfortunately my sense of self worth seems to be rooted in something other than my encounters and interactions with women. I'm not …
/r/MensRights01/05/13 10:11 PM
0

I see your point, but the fact is, if you allow someone into your house, and you're alone with them, and they falsely accuse you of rape, and you have taken the precaution to record your interaction with them, while alone, and with no witnesses available, you have eliminated or greatly reduced the possibility of being accused of rape in the first place. Let's say my friend from high school had filmed his interaction with his accuser, and the accuser was fully aware that this interaction was bein…
/r/MensRights01/05/13 09:14 PM
1

I was chastised for this once (holding a door open). Since that afternoon, I don't hold doors open for able bodied women anymore. Old ladies, my aunt, my mother and men (young or old), the infirm and only if they are clearly in need of my assistance, I still hold the door. If and when the day comes that some old lady or man, or my aunt, or my mother, chastises me for holding a door open, I'll let the door swing back into their respective faces.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 08:49 PM
13

Clearly a man coerced her into doing this.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 08:37 PM
0

People can take or leave whatever caution, or precaution, they like. I choose to take and endorse precautions against false accusations of rape. I don't masturbate in front of my window, not because I'm not an exhibitionist (which I'm not), but because I also don't want to be mistaken for or rumored to be an exhibitionist (because I'm not). Fair enough? You might think that it's unreasonable that I feel this way, that I'm suppressing my sexuality by choosing to take precautions via closing the b…
/r/MensRights01/05/13 08:11 PM
0

I would agree that it's "also" a cautionary tale to not believe in rumors.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 07:45 PM
0

When rumors magically lose their potential for ruining reputations let me know, so I can revise my world view.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 07:30 PM
2

It is risky. Unjustifiably risky.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 07:23 PM
0

None. How many people do you know that are serving time for a rape they did do? I did know a guy in high school who was accused of rape (never formerly charged or prosecuted), who subsequently dropped out of the air force academy as a result of "a rumor", who subsequently became an alcoholic, and a class A asshole and fuck up. Maybe he was a rapist, maybe he wasn't, but the accusation certainly had an effect on his fate. If that's not a cautionary tale, I don't know what is.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 07:20 PM
0

If that works for you, so be it. Happy trails.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 07:01 PM
0

Maybe so, but I guarantee it won't seem silly if you're ever falsely accused of rape.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 06:49 PM
7

There is a disproportionate number of female primary school teachers in the United States. Ask her why, when I approached the (female) head of the educational studies department at my "liberal arts" college about continuing my education and double majoring in primary school education (after successfully acquiring a BA in English) she immediately suggested I pursue a degree in secondary school education, because it was more suitable for my gender?
/r/MensRights01/05/13 06:46 PM
0

I'm happy for you. I'll look for you under the nearest oak tree during the next thunderstorm.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 06:31 PM
0

It only has to happen once in a lifetime, to ruin a lifetime. One could argue that it's really not that big of a risk to stand under a tall tree during a thunderstorm, because even in a thunderstorm the odds of being struck by lightning are astronomical - yet, reasonable people still heed the advice to not stand under a tall tree during a thunderstorm. Go figure.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 06:25 PM
0

I don't think they do, but the consequences for being accused is a risk that far outweighs the benefits for an increasing number of rational minded men.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 06:19 PM
0

Altruism can be exhausted.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 03:09 PM
0

[here] (http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/story?section=news/local&id=9002990)
/r/MensRights01/05/13 03:08 PM
0

If that's true, then matriarchy is the current system we find ourselves.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 03:03 PM
6

Let's go for it. Let's just stop fulfilling our "gender role in a patriarchy" for one month. I guarantee that if every man on this planet suddenly did this, for a mere month, even the most hard line feminist would refuse to utter the word "patriarchy" ever again.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 08:40 PM
2

yeah, I'm not arguing against your point. Clearly she is a criminal, a kidnapper at the very least. My point is, she may very well be a sexual predator and she may very well avoid being convicted, or even prosecuted, as such.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 08:24 PM
2

My impression was that the newspaper was quoting the lawyer of the accused woman, the quote: She worked at a daycare that the girl attended, her lawyer Fred Harrison Jr. told CNN affiliate KYW. But, Harrison said, Regusters was not a "major participant" in the incident -- but did not elaborate.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 08:00 PM
3

You're absolutely right, she absolutely was a major player, but I guarantee her defense attorney will cast her as a victim, and the jury or judge will likely agree to that notion to some extent, and that will have an effect on her sentencing (that is if she doesnt get out of it entirely). This whole case just further supports my comment with regard to the amount of dangerous access we allow strange women to our children. The odds of a strange male having this kind of access to a child is almost …
/r/MensRights30/04/13 07:32 PM
-2

It means that her attorney is planning on implicating the accused's father (who apparently has a history of sexual predation) or some other male, who may or may not have actually committed or co-participated in the rape, because in this society a vast majority of people mistakenly believe that women are incapable of pedophilia without being coerced into it by a male, or the patriarchy at large. The defense attorney is going to base his/her defense on this myth and the jury will likely be lenient…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 06:58 PM
1

Yes, put a sticker or sign up that indicates that security cameras are in use. Also, why not just make it known to anyone who enters your house that cameras are in use? If they don't like it, then they don't have to visit. If "a woman" asks why you have security cameras in your house, tell her point blank why you do. I guarantee she'll think twice about accusing you of rape. Problem averted. If "a woman" or anyone else tells you that they think it's weird, ask them if they think it's weird "when…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 06:01 PM
1

I get that, but there are some cases when it's really not fun at all, in fact it can be terrifying. women love stories about crazy women I wonder why that is?
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 02:52 AM
2

And that was an enjoyable experience for you?
/r/TheRedPill26/04/13 09:51 PM
7

So what I'm hearing is that you've never had a woman try to cut you with a knife. There's a movie you should watch, it's titled "In the Realm of the Senses", it's a true story about a woman who falls psychotically in love with a man.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/13 07:50 PM
14

Believe me when I say, "You don't want any woman to ever fall 'psychotically in love with you'".
/r/TheRedPill26/04/13 06:58 PM
1

Just so you know, I was banned by r/askwomen for subsequently crossposting this to r/mensrights. My intention was apparently to create "drama" and was deemed "disruptive" in nature. Obviously this has left a very bad taste in my mouth with regard to the discussion of gender issues on Reddit and I suspect that this may very well be a futile venue for it. I offer this as a cautionary tale, and I won't be commenting further.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 05:36 AM
0

Ignore it - it doesn't matter. I shouldn't have bothered with it.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 04:30 AM
1

I think that danger is very real, yes.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 06:36 PM
4

That's kind of the conclusion I was wondering if the thread would ultimately arrive at. We'll see.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 03:22 PM
1

Excellent post.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 03:19 PM
1

WTF! Maybe we should just have two different "911s". 911 for women and Dial 9(your shit out of luck) for men.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:45 PM
0

I sadly agree - but there are more of us who live our lives through love. We're just not very good at aggressively promoting our agenda . . . yet.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 10:02 PM
0

Me too, but if the current culture of our criminal justice is any indicator, I suspect that because she is white and female, her sentence will be less than severe, if proven guilty.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 09:45 PM
0

Of course it is. Racism is all about power, control, hate and fear. So is rape.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 09:37 PM
1

There are no males being sketched in the commercial. Saying that a commercial wasn't about "male image" doesn't make it less sexist. Men don't use soap? "Marketing" is the mother of propaganda and social engineering, just ask Freud's nephew. I challenge you to find a marketing campaign - or any other mass media medium, for that matter - that does address "male image issues" - it's a non-issue as far as the greater society is concerned - yet, male depression and suicide rates would indicate other…
/r/MensRights18/04/13 09:07 PM
0

The commercial is sexist. There isn't a single male, aside from the "police sketch artist" in the commercial. The message is, only women have poor self images, and it assumes that all "men" have somehow magically transcended "insecurity".
/r/MensRights18/04/13 08:29 PM
0

If I remember correctly, they omitted that little factoid from my high school history book.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 06:03 PM
-1

Wow, I was wondering why the major news networks suddenly stopped covering this.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 04:21 PM
2

Yeah, because no racist ever raped a black person. She's a pedophile and a racist. She deserves to lose her freedom, just like any other predator.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 04:07 PM
2

This is no accident.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 03:56 PM
4

Celibacy is freedom, and power.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 05:03 PM
2

"true" feminism and mensrights are not mutually exclusive - in fact that aspire to the same egalitarianism. What's being called, or identified as "feminism" (especially in the Reddit community) lately is not egalitarian in nature. Extremists have hijacked the word feminism, turned it into an crazy-fucking-country-club-gender-hate-clan.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 05:53 PM
5

The "unattached male" is, should (or has the very real potential of being) completely independent and self-sufficient, and that is the greatest threat to contemporary western society, because it depends entirely on maintaining the subjugation of men through state sanctioned marriages and the subsequent legal quagmire it uses to enslave by design.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 04:45 PM
1

This is why I became an MRA.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 08:57 PM
0

A dog would never hang your girlfriend. Get a dog, live happily.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 08:39 PM
1

As an alum of a liberal arts college, I would warn you (unfortunately) if you use "men" and "rape" in any speech that casts them in any role outside "perpetrator" or "enabler" you're going to have a bad time. You say you want to educate "boys" and my question to you is, are you going to speaking to "boys" or adult men. My advice for educating or advising male college students on how they can prevent themselves from finding themselves in situations where the law would consider them rapists is thi…
/r/MensRights04/04/13 01:11 AM
7

Oh if I had a dollar for every SASS friend of mine in college who married the first pre-med/pre-law sucker they could get their hands on when they saw those college loans looming in the not so distant future. (well actually I'd have about 10 dollars, but you get the point)
/r/MensRights04/04/13 12:51 AM
-2

Oh no, you misunderstand - if you're not with them (meaning if you don't agree 100% with every talking point they endorse), you're against them. Complex culture be damned. Western feminists will rid the world of their male oppressors if they have to carpet bomb the planet to do it.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 12:32 AM
1

Empowered Mom, until Mom's mom and/or dad becomes too sick (or dead) to serve as safety net, then "overwhelmed" and "aggressively seeking stable and financially secure male companion" Mom.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 09:01 PM
3

As a MRA, I think It's awful. I can't speak for all MRA's, but I think it's safe to assume that a vast majority of MRAs feel the same. I personally don't feel that it is over-reported. I do feel that there are literally thousands of human rights violations (of all genders) that do go un or under-reported. Here's at thought: Maybe we should relax immigration laws for women who live in nations that treat women poorly in an attempt to encourage intermarriage with less oppressive (and more progressi…
/r/MensRights03/04/13 08:19 PM
1

And women will scratch and claw each other into extinction 1 year later.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 07:58 PM
2

My feeling about this is that if men can't "experience sexism" then sexism doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 06:00 PM
0

Let us imagine the nightmarish world in which "presumption of guilt" is the default.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 09:01 PM
1

ABSOLUTELY SAGE ADVICE.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 04:49 PM
2

This is exactly why I always use a condom (never kept in place that it could be deliberately sabotaged - you are taking this risk everytime if you take her word for it. I'd be willing to guess that 1 out of every 3 pregnancies is a direct result of this. The OP did exactly the right thing by getting the hell away from her - she's forever untrustworthy and a sociopath.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 04:48 PM
1

that's messed up. Sorry.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 05:16 PM
3

Have you seen those "slave" auctions for charities, where they auction off high school football players to do yard work (etc.). I've rarely seen women used in these.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 04:40 PM
0

On a personal note - Why end a friendship(s) over this? You're certainly not doing them any favors by severing yourself and your view point from them - you make it all too easy for them to forget that there is an opposing view point. It's much easier for someone to blindly accept a widespread, but misguided belief, when they're never challenged, and I suspect this a large part of the reason feminism has swung so far into the realm of the absurd in the first place.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 03:25 PM
2

I've got a better idea - let's do everything in our power to become the "superiors", remember what we've seen and experienced and then enforce the rules set before us to the ridiculous extreme, and when they get pointed out as ridiculously extreme, you'll have plenty of ammunition (and the power) to demonstrate the hypocrisy we've seen and experienced in a very real and educative manner.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 06:28 PM
2

1 problem with this - the "superiors" don't care. I know if I did this I would be openly laughed out of the office. The "superiors" like the way things are, and they don't like dealing with "problems".
/r/MensRights25/03/13 04:31 PM
5

Rapists by default. Fuck this world.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 08:54 PM
9

You rock, bro. He's lucky to have a friend like you.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 06:46 PM
1

survey in 1978 - glad to see they're using up to date statistics. This qualifies as naked propaganda.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 04:31 PM
2

I set up an OKC account as a kind of experiment. I get about 2 visitors per day. I have yet to have a single visitor who isn't A.) A 20-40 something divorcee with 3 or more kids, or B.) A 20-40 something single mother (never married) with at least 1-2 kids. They invariably rate the question "Is your ideal match well-off financially (or at the very least someone who has high income potential)?" as very important.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 06:37 PM
2

I'm affraid it would give me an anxiety attack.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 06:08 PM
13

Who the fuck has that much free time at work to cover their cubicle with that much "flair".
/r/MensRights21/03/13 06:02 PM
1

Yes. Exactly this. A real man is a master of his own desires. No one has any power over you, unless you give them that power. Take it back.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 03:59 PM
0

I wonder if this was a twenty year old male, chatting up a naive 13 year old girl, telling her how to get herself off, would it be the actions of a pedophile then?
/r/MensRights20/03/13 08:18 PM
4

Go ask a rapist to help stop "rape culture", I want nothing to do with it. Since women are the only ones who are apparently getting raped, it's not my problem. I do my part by not being a rapist, or associating with rapists - maybe you should try to do the same.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 06:58 PM
2

I'm sorry - I'm not picking up on the "sympathy for the rapists" thing. Yes, it's tragic that these two predators decided to rape this girl, tragic that the girl was raped, tragic that these two rapists ruined their lives by being rapists, and tragic that this girl allowed herself to get passed-out drunk, tragic that her parents failed to impress upon her the very real danger of drinking to the point of unconsciousness - dangerous for many reasons, not just the danger of being raped - in fact, I…
/r/MensRights20/03/13 01:39 AM
0

Okay so here's my bumper sticker "You can't be for human rights and be against men's rights"
/r/MensRights19/03/13 08:36 PM
10

"Individual cases of women hating men does not prove that misandry exists" LOL. How else do you prove that anything exists without "individual cases". What kind of logic is this? Read this sentence: "Individual cases of whites hating blacks does not prove that racism exists". I'd be surprised if George Wallace didn't try to use the same "logic" to argue against the civil rights movement.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:41 PM
-1

My god. Are you telling me that there is a subreddit entitled "againstmensrights"? Is there also a subreddit for "againsthumanrights"? What reasonable person on this earth would be against anyone's rights?
/r/MensRights19/03/13 03:54 PM
2

"probably a false statistic" because you say it is? I think you underestimate the number of boys who do in fact get raped. What's disturbing is that people like you only help to obscure this kind of abuse, and thus contribute to under reporting by perpetuating the idea that it's somehow rare or unlikely. And the fact that you are "a man" has absolutely no bearing, and adds no extra legitimacy to anything you have to say on the subject. The fact that you felt it necessary to draw attention to you…
/r/MensRights19/03/13 03:18 PM
5

If you can read this and still think "wow, as a woman I have it much rougher than men," you should be ashamed of yourself. 1 in 6 men have been the victims of sexual abuse.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 07:46 PM
-2

You know, you're absolutely right. It's a non-issue for non-rapists, and women should feel empowered to prevent and avoid their own rapes.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 05:58 PM
5

I would argue that most of the posts I've read on this subreddit are more feminist than most the posts I've read on so-called feminism message boards.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 05:48 PM
3

First of all, who is "We"? There is absolutely no evidence to support that "drinking around men is high risk" anymore than "drinking around women, or chinese people is high risk" Drinking oneself to the point of, or near to, unconsciousness is risky and unbelievably irresponsible no matter whose company you happen to be in. If I get inebriated and decide to ride a subway, and someone robs me, I'm behaving irresponsibly, by riding on a subway, drunk off my ass. The robber (could be a male, could …
/r/MensRights18/03/13 05:44 PM
1

Why?
/r/MensRights18/03/13 03:38 PM
1

Be mindful, that's all I ask. Prove me wrong to yourself, everyday.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 03:36 PM
-2

BA in creative writing. Things change after college, unfortunately. Some of my best friends in college were in SASS, most of them got married as soon as possible thereafter and set their brains and ideals aside for a hubby and financial security.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 07:29 PM
38

Yes. Now try to get the police to take you seriously.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 06:38 PM
-3

Not for any considerable length of time.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 05:57 PM
1

Yes. There is no "safe" defense against a female attacker, because anything you do, aside from getting struck, can be twisted against you. I say cover up and retreat, and photograph the bruises (your bruises) as soon as possible. Humiliating? Yes, but that's what it means to be a man in this society - humiliation. You've got to look out for yourself from a legal stand point, first - because no matter what the circumstances, the legal system favors women. Get the fuck out of the situation as quic…
/r/MensRights16/03/13 09:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter