TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

namae_nanka Archive

View 3 posts and 1,559 comments by namae_nanka on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,559 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

And astonishingly, as late as 1964, the labor force participation rate for Swedish women remained steady at 30 percent, lower even than the American figure for that last baby-booming year. Only 25,000, or a mere three percent, of Swedish preschool children were in public day-care centers. As two feminist analysts would later admit, the “increasing attention extended to working women [in Sweden] did not result from an overwhelming constituency demand from women themselves.” http://profam.org/pub/…
/r/MensRights01/02/16 07:26 AM
1

Include diversity there as well. Similarly, Denice D. Denton was celebrated for standing up to Summers to, in her words, "speak truth to power." This heroic tableau of the humble, no-doubt-discriminated-against woman engineering professor daring to defy the mighty male university president lost some luster when it emerged that Denton was UC Santa Cruz's chancellor-designate at $275,000 annually. One college supremo attempting to intimidate another one into not mentioning inconvenient facts is no…
/r/MensRights01/02/16 07:18 AM
13

Not just now, feminists not only denied the facts, they turned them upside down. What is worth remembering is that boys used to be the group considered shortchanged by the schools. The idea that the schools shortchanged boys was part of the common wisdom through the 1970s. As Brophy (1985) reminds us: "Claims that one sex or the other is not being taught effectively in our schools have been frequent and often impassioned. From early in the century (Ayres, 1909) through about 1970 (Sexton, 1969; …
/r/MensRights13/01/16 05:11 AM
2

Edit: If you down vote please explain your view point. Same as the 'true communism' posts you find on reddit.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 06:12 PM
1

Girls fare higher on non-subjective tests such as multiple choice questions because simply girls try harder. They might try harder but boys actually do better with MCQs except for verbal ability. In fact, tests like SATs have been deemed sexist for giving lower scores to girls with same grades. Students who remember SAT scores with the greatest pain are the girls at the top of the class. A high school girl with an A+ grade point average typically scores 83 points lower than a boy with an A+ aver…
/r/MensRights22/10/15 05:52 PM
1

Since at least as early as 2003, possibly longer, there are more girls who have been getting into university, Happened in the early 80s, about a decade after Title IX was passed which is now used to give equal numbers of women in college sports. "What can we do for boys now that they're lagging behind". The funny thing is that they've always been lagging behind. Even in maths they've got worse grades ever since the records have been kept. Till 70s maths gender gap hysteria, boys lagging behind w…
/r/MensRights22/10/15 05:47 PM
2

Not for lesbians.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 01:09 AM
2

Interesting that both of them were mixed racial kids but that angle doesn't seem to come up in all this brouhaha of gun rights and feminist beratings of toxic masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/15 04:26 PM
-1

Of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/15 12:23 AM
1

http://purplemotes.net/2012/04/22/deadly-sex-discrimination-in-titanic-chivalry-myth-reporting/
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/15 10:25 AM
18

In 1981, the U.S. Forest Service entered into the Bernardi Consent Decree against the advise of its own attorneys within the Department of Justice. In essence, the Washington Office determined that 43% of its employees, within each of its some sixty professions and trades, should be women. Beginning, ironically enough in 1984, through the year 2000, a mass exodus of men with “on the ground knowledge and skills” took place in a purge so extensive that today no institutional knowledge of the 174 i…
/r/MensRights24/05/15 10:56 AM
1

Economics is the shitlord of social sciences, much like philosophy is of humanities. And he is quite right.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/15 05:45 PM
-1

Nothing new under the sun. http://unknownmisandry.blogspot.com/2011/09/alimony-racket-quotations.html
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/15 05:42 PM
2

The 15 year old me would have loved Sweden, the 25 year old me would take Saudi Arabia over it. ceteris paribus of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/15 05:40 PM
1

Wasting your keystrokes there, just the first rule would raise cries of misogyny with roles reversed.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 11:22 AM
1

If Men have all the power, how come women make the rules is a lightweight book to get the (liberal) men's point across. “Early on in a relationship, the man is the adversary.” “Invariably, we find that men who insist that their dates meet them halfway... turn out to be turds.” “You will probably feel cruel when you do The Rules. You will think you are making men suffer, but in reality you are actually doing them a favor... They get to experience longing!” “[The woman] doesn’t have to do anything…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 10:57 AM
1

http://www.revolucionantifeminista.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/how-can-women-make-the-rules.pdf
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 10:34 AM
1

I am not confusing anything. You OTOH are.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 06:08 AM
1

The insistence on diversity of experiences while reiterating the commitment to raise them all equally. Or was it something else?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 05:53 PM
3

Wow, 1913. Are you a time traveler? And what are you with this stupid snark? Stop giving me this stupid feminism 101 nonsense, I've had enough of it over the years. It's even more irritating when I am pointing that this shit hasn't changed over the years. As for your 'academic' citation, what of it? The state practices benevolent sexism to the hilt on the insistence of feminists, nothing new under the sun. Again from 1913, https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2vfoiw/red_blue_pillers…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 05:29 PM
7

Nothing new under the sun. The penalty ordained by the law for crime or misdemeanour was the same for both and in general applied equally to both. Likewise in civil suits, pro- ceedings were not specially weighted against the man and in favour of the woman. There was, as a general rule, no very noticeable sex partiality in the administration of the law. This state of affairs continued in England till well into the nineteenth century. Thenceforward a change began to take place. Modern Feminism ro…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 04:42 PM
3

It doesn't help when the scientific establishment also believes in the nonsense of diversity and equality at the same time. One of the high priests was only recently brought down and some still don't know of it, http://voxday.blogspot.com/2015/04/sjw-science.html Then the fight for maths supremacy, http://endofwomen.blogspot.com/2014/12/why-boys-are-better-at-maths.html and getting the third view of gender politics out in the open, http://slatestarcodex.com/2015/04/15/trouble-walking-down-the-ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 03:53 PM
8

Or maybe feminism is not a monolith and we're back to square one? Or maybe the patriarchy that is supposedly thinking of women this way is only feminism's doing? Do I have to repeat all this again and again?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 03:49 PM
9

Aren't we all? This feminist supports that, another supports that, the whole gamut is in there! Maybe you guys should get tired of this stupid gotcha.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 03:33 PM
2

It's a pretty simple conclusion once you consider men and women equal, and then dwell on why women aren't equal yet? Why, men made it so!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 03:32 PM
1

Did I link the wrong article? I won't bother, but many feminists do.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 03:51 PM
3

Which has continued to this era, nevermind I don't believe you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/15 02:25 PM
1

If you're gonna fear like that, you're not gonna achieve anything. And she was not the fringe, be honest with yourself. , they will laugh you and any other MRA they subsequently encounter out of the door. The only one laughing here is me, at your nonsense.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 02:24 PM
3

So the feminists, By: George McAdam New York Times 1914 "And so there are no men and there are no women! W. L. George says that this is the revolutionary biological principle upon which the feminist propaganda rests. I should say that it is about the best example of biological bosh that I have ever encountered in cold type." http://unmaskingfeminism.blogspot.in/2010/03/feminists-as-mistakes-of-nature_07.html
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/15 12:10 AM
2

Yeah, better than ultra conservative, but then your conservatism might just be be 'transphobic' and the likes.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/15 11:41 PM
3

There is a red pill thread on /r/darkenlightenment, doesn't look like red pill is getting glowing reviews. And you think those guys are ultra conservative?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/15 11:26 PM
2

You believe in ultra conservative morality?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/15 11:13 PM
-1

How does it relate to what garglemesh said? And how exactly is equality not a SJW concept? NPR is SJW cabal, if you really think your pointing out those things make it not so, then you're horribly mistaken.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 09:08 PM
2

The german heiress made history by having it hold up in court. Not a precedent though, lest some men might get it in their cases as well.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 05:51 PM
1

http://www.feministcritics.org/blog/2007/11/19/the-mary-daly-test-feminism-and-complicity-part-3/
/r/MensRights26/04/15 05:49 PM
3

He probably had to pay for the lawyer.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 04:51 PM
2

Not that I think this is true, statistics like that don't tell the whole story. It's not inconceivable that those statistics are not the same for all people, besides Kenya is a whole different ballgame than the western nations.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 02:30 PM
-1

/r/subredditcancer
/r/MensRights24/04/15 03:45 PM
1

Woman's virtue is man's greatest invention. Your reasoning is nothing new with its 'gotcha' moment. These and other very obvious logical inconsistencies in TRP beliefs mean TRP lacks internal validity. Keep believing and maybe it'll become true one day.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/15 11:40 PM
-1

Women even have a number because men have allowed them in, and voila there are quotas lest the myth of equality falters. Replies such as yours is one of the reason why I want feminism to die, nonsense upon nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/15 11:29 PM
3

It's all about profits. Even if it were, too much bad PR would still be a problem. And I don't care about the comic books. And boys don't care about reading, wonder why that is.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 02:09 PM
1

Women are more neotenous, it's far less tenuous when Ashley Montagu is using it to make a case for superiority of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 01:53 PM
1

as much as Though there's the 10,000 year explosion, I don't think that it has superseded what went before that when it comes to sexuality and reproduction.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/15 08:13 PM
1

Feminist Intentions by WL George, 1913 https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2vfoiw/red_blue_pillers_is_feminism_equal_rights_and/coh8c91
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/15 07:59 PM
1

They do exist, the problem is folks who'd have everything labelled as a fucking right and then claim that they don't exist. Feminism deserves a swift death for all the fucking nonsense that it's created.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/15 07:36 PM
1

There's no way to give you a serious response because it's just -that- out of touch with reality. Indeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/15 07:31 PM
1

https://familyinequality.wordpress.com/2011/03/15/stop-that-feminist-viral-statistic-meme/
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/15 07:20 PM
2

Infact the opposite is true, Stallings (2005) were given research money to find that circumcised women had a greater susceptibility to HIV (Probably to confirm our moral superiority in the west vs the barbaric female circumcisers) But alas the researchers were devaststed when they found that circumcised women had half the rate of HIV infections compared to uncircumcised women. http://mondofown.blogspot.com/2012/06/female-circumcision-health-benefits.html
/r/MensRights31/03/15 08:14 PM
3

Did they mention her false rape claim? So ridiculous that even the sisterhood was divided.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 09:56 AM
3

Good feminist fiction - Men are dead, if not, they should be.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 09:51 AM
2

A study in Tanzania found the same for women, they're disappointed.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 09:50 AM
27

Have to do it slow and steady, comrades! Can't let the cat get out of the bag too soon!
/r/MensRights30/03/15 05:01 AM
3

This calls for burkha adoption.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/15 03:13 PM
1

Yeah Glenn Sacks wrote something similar, but it has been taken down. iirc it was 'why I will not marry a jewish woman'.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/15 05:51 AM
5

Nope don't see where you get that idea from. One Feminist, C. Gascoigne Hartley, in The Truth About Women, outlines a bold hypothesis: "What, then, is the real cause of the lowness of remuneration offered to women for work when compared with men? Thousands of women and girls receive wages that are insufficient to support life. They do not die, they live; but how? The answer is plain. Woman possesses a marketable value attached to her personality which man has not got. The woman's sex is a saleab…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/15 08:36 AM
6

Now only if the human race could accept that. ~.~
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/15 04:05 AM
4

It's free on the net. Strange thing is why it isn't here on the sidebar.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 03:55 AM
20

Similar reason to why Ronda Rousey's beating up of men would be seen as cheerworthy while a male MMA fighter doing the same to women wouldn't be.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/15 03:48 AM
0

Men are more likely to follow through. Suicides would be similar thing. I don't think being a woman is preferable to a man for the vast majority.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 08:55 PM
5

Nothing new under the sun. "It will be seen, therefore, that the wife in any case receives from the husband economic advantages compared with which the wages of the most highly paid servant in existence are a mere pauper's pittance. This talk we hear ad nauseum, from the Feminist side, of the wife being an "unpaid servant," is typical of the whole Feminist agitation." "We find the same de- liberate and unscrupulous dishonesty characterising it throughout. Facts are not merely perverted or exagge…
/r/MensRights25/03/15 08:54 PM
10

Men's sports are especially the target of feminist venom because they remind them of the one place where they can't hope to achieve equality(though some have delusions). Also, Title IX and how it was passed. http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2012/06/how-title-ix-sneakily-revolutionized-womens-sports/258708/
/r/MensRights25/03/15 08:51 PM
1

Read about a stabbing where the police arrested the guy(he was stabbed) and it's only when his daughter said that mommy had done it, that they let him go.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 08:09 PM
1

Simon Baron Cohen is world's apart from his cousin. LOOKS NAIVE, BUT IS WELL PREPARED For many people, it was difficult to see Eia in his new role as an investigative science reporter (a kind of science journalism’s Michael Moore), but he was well prepared. He could look naive, but he often knew more about the subjects than the scientists he interviewed, which made some of them look like arrogant ignorants. One of them fled the country, declaring that Eia had «ruined her life» lol nice. and …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/15 04:05 PM
2

That's a big 'almost' they got there.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 05:40 PM
12

Has modern woman set out to avenge Eve? Blaming each individual man for all of the evils of this old world, thus reversing Adam and the Bible story seems to be orthodox feminist doctrine today. • ‘In Defense of Man – praise him as hero and he’ll be a regular lion’ by Winnie Lee, 1914 https://unmaskingfeminism.wordpress.com/2012/08/12/woman-have-quietly-snitched-from-man-his-really-human-qualities/
/r/MensRights24/03/15 05:31 PM
1

It wasn't a problem for Wenneras and Wold.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 05:09 PM
3

Made this comment in an ELI5 thread about wage gap, also touching on how these studies work: accounting for every variable except sex Actually they don't account for 'every' variable except sex. They do consider a number of them, but not 'every'. For example, Yale did a study for rooting out biases against women in STEM fields. Curiously that study was about lab managers who don't really go on to become luminaries in their fields. A better study focusing on the those who do came to the opposite …
/r/MensRights24/03/15 05:07 PM
1

The Sweden of patriarchy.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 05:04 PM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men's_rights_movement_in_India
/r/MensRights24/03/15 05:01 PM
0

With you, I don't have to.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/15 02:12 PM
0

To not answer your retarded question, ayy lmao. Go home man, you're drunk. Inferiors revolt in order that they be equal, and equals that they be superior.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/15 01:51 PM
0

And I don't bother. Cute.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/15 01:42 PM
0

http://charltonteaching.blogspot.com/2011/06/revolution-or-permanent-anarchy-gk.html
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/15 12:46 PM
3

https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2mu694/im_curious_how_did_each_of_you_come_across_red/cm7rexi
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/15 09:08 AM
2

http://www.slate.com/articles/life/education/2014/05/mike_adams_unc_wilmington_conservative_professor_wins_academic_freedom_lawsuit.html
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/15 05:48 PM
1

He already a girlfriend when his site was active.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 06:11 AM
10

A conspiracy theory on another such woman who broke the narrative. http://standyourground.com/forums/index.php?topic=13061.msg144131#msg144131
/r/MensRights22/03/15 02:47 AM
6

Let us now take the crime of violent assault with attempt to do bodily injury. The following cases will serve as illustrative examples:--From The News of the World, 9th May 1909: A nurse in Belfast sued her lost swain for breach of promise. She obtained £100 damages although it was admitted by her counsel that she had thrown vitriol over the defendant, thereby injuring him, and the defendant had not prosecuted her! Also it was admitted that she had been "carrying on" with another man. Fraud of F…
/r/MensRights22/03/15 02:42 AM
9

A horrible thing to happen, fucked up. But does that have to do with men lacking rights? So why does feminism continue to exist?
/r/MensRights22/03/15 02:37 AM
1

http://www.the-spearhead.com/2009/11/15/how-to-deal-with-not-all-women-are-like-that/
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 06:07 AM
5

They will keep pushing the limit until they get a little pushback, then it's time to cry "MIGYTHOGNGYGGY!!!!111". Sometimes they pre-empt it though, like Susan Faludi's Backlash.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 04:03 PM
-1

Why not? Though the clincher would've been that video where one 'expert' was talking about how they would murder someone in order to get street cred and the chickas.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 04:30 AM
2

Pack them in jails, what could go wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 04:29 AM
3

So conservatism works.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/15 06:31 AM
2

lol robust and not gracile. Both a case of bad timing.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/15 11:35 PM
3

Cultivate the frontal portion of her brain as much as that of man is cultivated, and she will stand his equal at least. Even now, where her mind has been called out at all, her intellect is as bright, as capacious, and as powerful as his. -Ernestine Rose Moral superiority of women at the time was quite accepted, as for modern feminism and extremism, Likewise in civil suits, pro- ceedings were not specially weighted against the man and in favour of the woman. There was, as a general rule, no very…
/r/MensRights16/03/15 08:07 PM
0

www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4_t2ezntXU
/r/MensRights16/03/15 07:38 PM
-1

Yes. Nothing new under the sun. Feminism, the extremist - and of late years the predominant cult of the Woman's Movement, is Masculinism. It makes for such training and development in woman, of male characteristics, as shall equip her to compete with the male in every department of life; academic, athletic, professional, political, industrial. And it neither recognises nor admits in her natural aptitudes differing from those of men, and fitting her, accordingly, for different functions in these.…
/r/MensRights16/03/15 07:29 PM
2

Don't worry Title IX is here for equality, oh wait. The Court found that use of SAT scores only was unfair to female students and violated Title IX: White males represented 47% of the scholarship competitors; they received 72% of the Empire Scholarships and 57% of the Regents Scholarships. http://www.titleix.info/resources/Legal-Cases/Sharif-v-New-York-State-Education-Department-.aspx On the bright side, SAT unlike GCSE doesn't take into account grades. The GCSE change meant that girls now outpe…
/r/MensRights16/03/15 07:24 PM
10

Surely you can't think that suffragettes sending men to war while not fighting for conscription themselves is proof of their fight for equality? When on leave during World War I, I confess that I was often shocked by the women, young and old, who every day could eat hearty breakfasts whilst from their newspapers, propped against the milk jug, they announced between their mouthfuls the tragic end of some relative or friend; whilst, despite the lethal misery we were all enduring in the trenches, t…
/r/MensRights16/03/15 07:21 PM
2

There's also Anatomy of Female Power which makes the same case in a more systematic way. A review, http://web.archive.org/web/20101018080046/http://novaseeker.blogspot.com/2009/04/anatomy-of-female-power.html
/r/MensRights16/03/15 07:17 PM
1

MRAs should accept feminist premises at which point they'd realize that men's rights are not needed, you don't say!
/r/MensRights16/03/15 07:16 PM
1

Standards for thee, not for meee!!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/15 07:14 PM
5

http://www.theonion.com/articles/man-finally-put-in-charge-of-struggling-feminist-m,2338/ http://www.theonion.com/articles/i-dont-support-feminism-if-it-means-murdering-all,37301/ O'Sullivan's Law.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/15 06:52 PM
5

feminist relationships The what now? Where are feminist relationships when poor feminits can't even get their wage gap bill passed, and you're talking of your father and grandfather having feminist relationships!! Have you no sense of decency, Madam?! Why must you trigger the poor feminitss who might come upon your delusions? https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2y485g/how_does_trp_explain_happy_feminist_relationships/cp64oq0?context=3 I was expecting the 'Marital rape is an oxymoro…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/15 06:43 PM
2

Are you trying to say men use the prison system by being in it and should pay taxes for it? If so, that's completely asinine. The anglo chump merely following the scandinavian schmuck. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gudrun_Schyman#Leader_of_the_Left_Party
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/15 06:27 PM
2

Not being a virile(?) high school jock. And not bitmining instead of reading about the fraud of feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/15 06:15 PM
5

Now let's wait for the newest spin.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/15 05:03 AM
2

Other thoughts? http://www.thinkinghousewife.com/wp/2012/06/how-feminism-wreckedestroyed-the-u-s-forest-service/ and I'm not saying we can't do it The cancer of equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/15 03:11 AM
1

Scroll up for my other posts there.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 02:33 AM
4

The anit-discrimination laws passed in the 60's really where needed to combat wage discrimination that was happening at the time. No. http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2012/06/so-that-everybody-gets-fair-shot.html#c7987497047946015793
/r/MensRights15/03/15 09:41 PM
9

So did Unreal Tournament(UT).
/r/TheRedPill14/03/15 09:06 PM
6

http://endofwomen.blogspot.com/2015/03/steroids-are-new-skinny.html Unless they're jacking up on steroids, RPers aren't exactly getting the musclehead look. Too much of everything is a bad thing, men might like boobies, doesn't mean they don't become grotesque beyond a point. why does red pill, a self professed sexual strategy sub, interested in figuring out and emulating what females find most attractive Dunno, https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2012/10/19/manly-men-confused-why-unmanly-men-get-gi…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/15 05:14 PM
1

The whole thing is a clusterfuck, http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2012/06/how-title-ix-sneakily-revolutionized-womens-sports/258708/ http://savingsports.org/2014/10/02/appeals-court-ruling-paves-way-for-gender-quotas-in-high-school-sports/ and since girls are so much better in academics, equality is rarely needed in academics, http://www.titleix.info/resources/Legal-Cases/Sharif-v-New-York-State-Education-Department-.aspx
/r/MensRights14/03/15 03:11 PM
1

clearly violating title IX ayy lmao
/r/MensRights14/03/15 05:40 AM
6

The Misandry trilogy by Nathanson and Young touches upon these points. The thing is that it's always been this way. From their male studies publication, Either way, men have oppressed women ever afterand will do so until the advent of a feminist utopia. It does not take much imaginationto see this ideological story as an upside-down version of earlier Western stories abouthuman origin and destiny. The biblical story blames Adam and Eve equally for sin (what Christians eventually called Original …
/r/MensRights14/03/15 05:35 AM
3

And astonishingly, as late as 1964, the labor force participation rate for Swedish women remained steady at 30 percent, lower even than the American figure for that last baby-booming year. Only 25,000, or a mere three percent, of Swedish preschool children were in public day-care centers. As two feminist analysts would later admit, the “increasing attention extended to working women [in Sweden] did not result from an overwhelming constituency demand from women themselves. http://news.twelvetribe…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/15 05:31 AM
4

Yes quite, feminism is quite an overarching oppressor and wants to take ever more control of their lives from day one.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/15 05:23 AM
1

There are some good articles on heretical.com on that, I am not really concerned with it. As for war and gender roles, there was an interview with some (ex?)UN guy who pointed out how UN was spreading matriarchy in the african nations. I can't find it now, but it made quite a lot of sense. But not due to shell shock, but simply because men were dead and women ended up controlling the reins. There is the anatomy of female power which points out how feminism is an intra-sex struggle foremost, http…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/15 05:20 AM
44

In 1991, the governors of Ohio and Maryland commuted the sentences of a number of jailed women who had killed or assaulted their mates because they claimed to have been victims of battered-woman syndrome. But reporters turned up embarrassing evidence indicating that 15 of the 25 women freed in Ohio had not been physically abused. http://www.newsweek.com/no-tears-lorena-187404
/r/PussyPass13/03/15 11:42 PM
4

Quantity has a quality all its own.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/15 11:11 PM
2

I think the educational and psychological studies I mentioned are examples of what I would like to call cargo cult science. In the South Seas there is a cargo cult of people. During the war they saw airplanes with lots of good materials, and they want the same thing to happen now. So they've arranged to make things like runways, to put fires along the sides of the runways, to make a wooden hut for a man to sit in, with two wooden pieces on his head to headphones and bars of bamboo sticking out l…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/15 09:09 PM
4

Being asian helps more.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/15 07:43 PM
1

Probably a little HGH too in the mix, gets abs on mothers of four, you can still see the puffiness under eyes though. edit: scratch that, it's more of a feature than a bug. https://i.imgur.com/DklDQ6x.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/15 07:39 PM
2

She isn't hiding skin so that a plus, face is easier to maintain an appearance of youth.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/15 05:28 PM
2

It's quite lovable 'hoisting by their own petards'. Much like the men's righters do to feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/15 04:25 PM
1

Looks like Mary Daly acolyte to me. Ashley Montagu reborn.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/15 04:35 AM
1

My misogyny, lol! Maybe it had to do with living with a bunch of dudes for a few years in my institute, who knows!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 06:23 PM
1

I can't exactly say that it's voluntary in India.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 06:16 PM
2

Islam doesn't even have coverture, beta to the max! And didn't this topic come up before, from a quick search, https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2srg0g/what_do_you_think_of_islams_treatment_of_women/
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 06:14 PM
1

Well, I was going on Mitchell Heisman and his pronouncements on the Declaration. Interesting stuff about the Norman-Anglo Saxons relations, slaves and cowards. Though this is also a waste. Kevin Solway? Read them and don't remember much. I'm pretty miffed that I should've ended up in this place instead of bitmining during that time. about your own sexual strategy None before I knew about this, none after. Which is why I don't usually comment here without dragging in feminism somehow. There's not…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 06:11 PM
3

but at 31 he dips back into that "prime aged" pool of women You don't double dip! The boomer expansion and movement of young women into erstwhile male dominions was gonna have that effect, and it is hard to put the genie back in the bottle when the conditions have become the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 06:02 PM
1

Of course, man the stupid philogynist is responsible for feminism's overarching success. I wonder if she understands the Declaration anyway. Anyway, a waste of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 05:40 PM
1

equality before the law, equality of opportunity And where do you think these abstractions descend from? The great goddess? What happens when men close their doors and we are back to square one? And why have they the temerity to ask for it? This is women's 'equality' and their 'earned' status in the world, and we are going around in circles now. I can understand that I take for granted the knowledge of the lying nonsense of the feminists right from the start, but we've gone over this earlier. Of…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 05:24 PM
1

But this doesn't invalidate the views that made them useful to the radicals It's all built atop a bunch of lies of those radicals, it invalidates everything they think they stand for. Nevermind that their 'earned' 'equality' is bunk as I've told you before. http://www.thinkinghousewife.com/wp/2012/12/suffragette-lies-1-and-2/ The Fraud of Feminism was published more than a century earlier in 1913. Bax's other work is also an enlightening read. Their lying scumbaggery isn't a modern invention nor…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 05:14 PM
1

"Moderate feminists" post third wave are radicals by objective measure. They've always been radicals, the 'moderates' are useful idiots who do the bidding and are thrown out once they stop being useful. Why do I have to keep repeating this to you? As for those self-identified 'feminists', http://endofwomen.blogspot.com/2012/10/the-biggest-success-of-feminism.html Translation = afraid to answer because hasn't thought it out. lol
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 04:58 PM
1

you see the radicals foremost because shrillmost sigh, the moderates of today are talking about how to get 50% of women wherever they want, the ship sailed long ago. This radical-moderate nonsense is only useful for the useful idiots like CHS. https://wombatty.wordpress.com/2013/03/15/early-feminists-moderate-or-radical/ Do you want your children's first education to be handled by an illiterate slob? This is going nowhere. They are appropriate only for maintaining social orders impossible in mod…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 04:36 PM
1

This is something to be ashamed of? Nothing of the sort, besides the point anyway. It is almost an accident You're being quite uncharitable to them. That is where I am, it is very clear. You're pretty clear in your original post and me in my reply. You think there is something to be salvaged from feminism, I don't think there is anything unless you want the useful idiots' version of what it is supposed to be, but then it isn't, so it ends there.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 04:25 PM
6

He is brought up as an MRA, wtf.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 04:07 PM
1

So is Indian independence and its movement a bunch of losers wearing their loserdom as a badge? Children of slaves and cowards. The whole Gandhian nonsense is a fucking joke. Rawat is not usually Muslim, are you? That's amusing. Nope I'm not, not really a Hindu either. Though religions can make sense even without the God stuff. I know, that's why I said quoted. For all that I've seen in feminism, that's the truest of its description by someone who claims to be one. At least made some sense to Da…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 04:03 PM
1

This is just dumb. It isn't, feminists get to claim everything and at the same time hold men morally responsible for not giving it to them earlier, so they are equal and yet they are better. This is the modern world, turned upside down on its head where the winners are supposed to feel bad and the losers wear their badges of loserdom with pride. They claim patriarchy stopping a woman from achieving and thus making her achievements automatically better than the men's by the simple magic of not me…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 03:52 PM
4

Racist, or maybe not racist, or maybe racist, or maybe Pavlov's racist or maybe Schrodinger's racist, submit it to CMV sub and sit back and enjoy.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 08:36 AM
1

At least they are even for the relevant population. http://www.gallup.com/poll/148187/americans-prefer-boys-girls-1941.aspx
/r/MensRights12/03/15 03:11 AM
1

Boy child preference is still strong even in America. I doubt most mothers will be that tolerant of the shit that feminists have pulled if they knew that the boy trouble in schooling has been there from a century and that feminists deliberately have hid it from general public.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 03:06 AM
1

That's the problem, they wouldn't turn into nonsense if it was hammered into your head from the very start. Much like feminism doesn't appear nonsense to anyone who hasn't bothered to look it up from the start. Even the /r/mensrights folks. Also, how does this address Wollstonecraft? How it doesn't?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 03:04 AM
2

It's more T&E rather than STEM as a whole. Maths actually has been quite well represented in women since the 70s. As for the top performing boys, their scoring higher isn't proof that they are achieving at the same level that girls are relative to their aptitude. It's just that they don't fall below girls' level like on the other side of the curve.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 01:15 AM
1

Maggots gonna maggot.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 11:30 PM
4

The repetition of IQ bell curve being more variable for men is damaging for it easily allows the easy explanation of more boys failing the system at the low end. It doesn't take into consideration that reading gaps and lack of effort are the real driving forces and while it may not be equal at the lower end, the disparity can be reduced quite a bit. It also leaves the top performing boys to fend on their own, while it's quite likely they are underperforming as well compared to girls. http://endo…
/r/MensRights11/03/15 11:08 PM
1

I doubt that this will really get off the ground before mothers of boys start taking action. It's an unfortunate reality that a political action is better served by women's interests, but then that's the world we seem to be living in today.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 11:05 PM
1

http://endofwomen.blogspot.com/2012/10/male-dominated-history-and-definition.html
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/15 09:11 PM
4

And feminist statistics help him in making the case for Islamic womanhood, win-win for him!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/15 07:01 PM
4

See my comments here, https://np.reddit.com/r/AgainstGamerGate/comments/2ymzow/offtopic_quoting_academics/ I didn't include Murray Straus there, so for you, Murray A. Straus, "Processes Explaining the Concealment and Distortion of Evidence on Gender Symmetry in Partner Violence," Eur J Crim Policy Res 13, no. (2007): 227-232.) He provides an excellent discussion of the seven methods used by feminists to conceal, deny, and distort evidence. These methods included: Suppressing evidence Avoiding th…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/15 06:22 PM
1

per se If they are being use to bolster your points then I'm pretty sure they are influenced by those folks at the very least.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/15 06:17 PM
1

stats
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/15 06:12 PM
1

It was meant to convey that I don't think they come from the US military per se, but from groups with similar roots like the campus feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/15 06:04 PM
2

US military
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/15 05:32 PM
2

The Brazilian magazine Veja recently interviewed Margareta Winberg, Swedish ambassador to Brazil and the former Swedish minister of equality. During the interview Winberg said that 40 percent of Swedish women are exposed to violence and that the numbers have climbed steadily as equality has increased. The Brazilian journalists were quick to explain that equality was harmful to women, noting that violence towards women was only 11 percent in the less equal society in Spain. Tax-Hungry Swedish Fem…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/15 05:31 PM
2

To say it doesn't or shouldn't affect other facets of life is just naive.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/15 06:24 AM
3

A man has to be sexist for sex at least. Besides that there's the problem of 'othering' women. Apparently if men thought of women as the same way as do they of men, they they'd appear as short, weak and squeaky voiced men, kinda the Schopenhauer topic a few days ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/15 06:06 AM
3

They're women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/15 04:36 AM
18

Better than feminist quantum mechanics anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/15 04:11 AM
0

Someone who believes that: Men and women should be equal(in practice: women should be at least as good as men) and thus be comparable to get those 2 points you wrote. https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2vfoiw/red_blue_pillers_is_feminism_equal_rights_and/coh8c91 And cathedral is academia+media from what I could gather out of Moldbug's long drawn out tirades. Just checked and yup, And the left is the party of the educational organs, at whose head is the press and universities. This…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/15 05:28 PM
0

There are a ton of ultra conservative evangelical Christians in the united states, and they have a ton of political sway. Of course, but their churches aren't the ones that are effective today.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/15 05:16 PM
1

The amusing thing is that the reason that boys were so much into video games was because the school didn't cater to their needs. So the crowding out of women happened because boys were pushed out of traditional school subjects and then pursued it out of their own wills.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 08:23 AM
1

song sending up Germaine Greer
/r/MensRights10/03/15 08:19 AM
6

They think so, and it's quite amusing until the stupidity becomes unavoidable.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/15 08:02 AM
4

Yes, even men who win the genetic lottery have to put in the effort to achieve.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/15 10:55 PM
0

I stopped spoon feeding folks here long ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/15 10:26 PM
1

Women raised by men, figures.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/15 10:09 PM
4

na na nna na na nna nature vs nurture you gotta equalize the boy and girl culture forget the past and present, await the glorious future! Na na nana na na, Nature vs nurture, “Feed me or suffer!" Cries the gender-equality vulture!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/15 08:50 PM
1

We'll march to a glorious progressive feministic patriarchy comrade!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/15 07:49 PM
-1

I wish death to feminism, and not just the turd wave but right from the vapid whore that was Wollstonecraft's start.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/15 07:43 PM
1

Of course they lie even when they tell the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/15 06:47 PM
6

SJW infestation of howstuffworks, sigh.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/15 10:45 AM
1

Dude, wat!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/15 08:54 AM
1

Reality has a misogynistic bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/15 06:02 AM
1

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/15 04:43 AM
1

But it's being taken far too far Umm no, nothing of the sort. It really hasn't changed much since its 'modern' inception. https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2vfoiw/red_blue_pillers_is_feminism_equal_rights_and/coh8c91 A wild wish has just flown from my heart to my head, and I will not stifle it, though it may excite a horse-laugh. I do earnestly wish to see the distinction of sex confounded in society ... For this distinction ... accounts for their [women] preferring the graceful …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/15 08:06 PM
10

I've been reading up on the maths gender difference for some time now, the takeaway from the article for me, The OECD found that boys did much better in its anonymised tests than in teacher assessments. The gap with girls in reading was a third smaller, and the gap in maths—where boys were already ahead—opened up further. and The average 15-year-old girl devotes five-and-a-half hours a week to homework, an hour more than the average boy, who spends more time playing video games and trawling the …
/r/MensRights08/03/15 02:27 PM
9

Has begun? This is the land of the 30 second rapist.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 02:25 PM
6

Nothing new under the sun. We have here a double phenomenon, the unreasoning hatred of man as a sex, by men, and their equally unreasoning indulgence towards the other sex. As we indicated above, not only is the sense of esprit de corps entirely absent among modern men as regards their own sex, while strongly present in modern women, but this negative characteristic has become positive on the other side. Thus the modern sex problem presents us with a reversal of the ordinary sociological law of …
/r/MensRights08/03/15 07:30 AM
1

hahaha this was fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/15 05:37 AM
1

At least allow it for your own sub, wtf mods!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/15 05:17 AM
1

A wild wish has just flown from my heart to my head, and I will not stifle it, though it may excite a horse-laugh. I do earnestly wish to see the distinction of sex confounded in society ... For this distinction ... accounts for their [women] preferring the graceful before the heroic virtues. and more here, https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2vfoiw/red_blue_pillers_is_feminism_equal_rights_and/coh8c91 what a majority of feminists believe That's a new one.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/15 05:11 AM
1

What god-fearing honest man wouldn't care for the nourishment of his future off springs!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/15 05:03 AM
2

as a feminist I must believe a number of outlandish things Well, yes, the problem is that they have been normalised now. So you'd be the misogynist for the 6th wavers, not as virulent as the RP ones, but a misogynist still.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/15 11:38 PM
1

Schopenhauer was a chummy old lad, but he got it wrong in one important aspect, It is only the man whose intellect is clouded by his sexual instinct that could give that stunted, narrow-shouldered, broad-hipped, and short-legged race the name of the fair sex; for the entire beauty of the sex is based on this instinct. While the 'othering' of women might happen due to the sexual instinct, the 'beauty' doesn't. Weininger correcting him, Love is a phenomenon of projection just as hate is, not a phe…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/15 09:48 PM
3

The anglochump has always been there, After much debating and argument, the result of the vote was 48-48. Burn's vote broke the tie in favor of ratifying the amendment. He asked to speak to the House the next day and told them he changed his vote because his mother asked him to and that she had always taught him that "a good boy always does what his mother asks him to do." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_T._Burn In 1869 Catherine E. Beecher and Harriet Beecher Stowe were still discussing the …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/15 09:33 PM
1

The detailed ones were on his isteve.com site which has been hacked. :(
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/15 08:46 PM
1

moral decline Is undoubtable, using crime numbers, even without taking into account the police state that has sprung up now, doesn't seem like a good idea. Unless you're using it as an proxy for the single family children who are said to commit crime at a vastly higher rate.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/15 08:04 AM
4

The abortion theory was flayed by Steve Sailer, I liked the lead one more. The no nonsense incarceration that has followed would be the other one.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/15 07:52 AM
2

Yeah, earlier I used to find out scores from the national level exams vs. the grades, but I suppose PISA can serve a similar purpose. The reality is that boys have better potential, however the lack of effort and reading skills compared to girls either lowers them to equality or even worse state. Why is this not the reigning explanation of the gender inequality in schooling is rather easy to pinpoint if you look at the data instead of the conclusions that the "gender-equality" advocates proffer.…
/r/MensRights07/03/15 05:49 AM
1

Throwing women out of the mainstream would work for making TRP mainstream. Well, that's why religions tell women to shut up. Death of feminism would be required.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/15 04:23 AM
3

"new underclass", wtf m8! They have always been the underclass. That's the problem with male advocates, they start from the feminist premises and thus end up hacking their own feet.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 04:15 PM
2

Yeah, Whitmire has been an advocate for boys and has singled out their lack of reading skills as the biggest problem which also has impact for other subjects. I wrote as much regarding the maths gap here, also the first pdf links to the 70s brouahaha in gender gap in mathematics. http://endofwomen.blogspot.com/2014/12/why-boys-are-better-at-maths.html The problem is, if boys close the reading gap, the maths gap will increase even further. And that will enrage the feminists to no end. Besides oth…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/15 12:18 PM
3

ayy lmao What I have called, how- ever, the sentimental aspect of Modern Feminism undoubtedly did make some headway in public opinion by the end of the eighteenth century, and grew in volume during the early years of the nineteenth century. It effectuated in the Act passed in 1820 by the English Parliament abolish- ing the punishment of flogging for female criminals. This was the first beginning of the differentiation of the sexes in the matter of the criminal law. Fraud of Feminism, 1913
/r/MensRights06/03/15 11:49 AM
-2

feminist relationships The what now? Where are feminist relationships when poor feminits can't even get their wage gap bill passed, and you're talking of your father and grandfather having feminist relationships!! Have you no sense of decency, Madam?! Why must you trigger the poor feminitss who might come upon your delusions?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/15 10:02 AM
1

Since feminists deny any genetic inferiority of women, they're going against their memetic inferiority in the society. Red pill memes can offer a counterpart, for example things like streotype threat being women are worse at maths because they're worse at maths or that women couldn't get education because they couldn't come up with any, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/15 09:57 AM
1

The fuck am I reading! Seems to be a mismash of the nonsensical 'females are default' and the stupidity of 'Y is male' despite the fact all men have an X chromo as well.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 08:38 AM
3

wat, anyway I am not in the mood right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/15 05:01 AM
5

Stop repeating that lie. lool "Claims that one sex or the other is not being taught effectively in our schools have been frequent and often impassioned. From early in the century (Ayres, 1909) through about 1970 (Sexton, 1969; Austin, Clark, & Fitchett, 1971), criticism was usually focused on the treatment of boys, especially at the elementary level. Critics noted that boys received lower grades in all subjects and lower achievement test scores in reading and language arts. They insisted that th…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/15 04:33 AM
2

sex-positive And the other sex-negative. Anyway, same thing with Scott Aaronson's kerfuffle a few weeks ago. Treat sexual object respectfully! Though that seems to be an own goal. By the end of his essay Rothbard cut to the real motive of the feminists: the campus date-rape campaigns of the early 1990s weren’t motivated by a genuine concern for the well-being of women. They were part of an ongoing attempt to delegitimize heterosexuality to young, impressionable women by demonizing men as rapists…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/15 04:28 AM
2

Both are unfounded and damaging sources of prejudice. Less damaging than seeing the victims photos on the sidebar of /r/coontown. assuming a biological basis ignores the potential underlying social factors Yeah this talk might have been cute half a century ago, now not so much. I am of a certain age, and I was around 50 years ago. I was reading the newspapers and following world events and I remember the civil rights movement. I was in England, but we followed it. I remember it, I remember what …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/15 11:13 PM
4

Personally I think Yeah don't dare it say publically or a dozen lardasses will descend on you. 'I think' is enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/15 09:59 PM
4

Giving women what they need is eminently moral.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/15 07:23 PM
1

Fuck 18, wanna be 13 again.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/15 07:05 PM
1

Seems like the Scott Aaronsons rant, and that those who would have been the good guys ended up following advice that should be meant for bad guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/15 11:45 AM
2

That is gold, Jerry! Gold!
/r/MensRights05/03/15 11:33 AM
0

This came up a few days ago, left two comments there. Steroids are a helluva drug though.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 11:32 AM
5

So feminism?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/15 10:50 AM
2

The wage gap rhetoric first did it to the working class man, then the 2nd wavers did it to the middle class man. Nothing new under the sun. All through the nineteenth and twentieth centuries the fundamental economic mischief was the underpayment of the married working man. It was this that wrought havoc in his home by turning his wife out of doors and condemning her to pitiable drudgery. The fact that Feminism, whether aspiring to, or possessed of, power, never concentrated on this evil, is one …
/r/MensRights05/03/15 05:54 AM
2

Narcissism is apparently found more in men from your article, though of course I didn't believe it back when I read it. Nor now. RP's focus on muscles could be simply a reflection of our times. When the male female difference has been diminished in other spheres, the physical dimorphism becomes the most important. Isn't that what feminists keep harping on, anyway?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/15 07:34 PM
0

Forgot to add, this was Weininger's defining difference between men an women, unlike the list of various personality and cognitive variables. To put it bluntly, man possesses sexual organs, her sexual organs possess woman. and thus, The exclusive and persisting sexuality of the female has important physical and psychical consequences. As the sexuality of the male is an adjunct to his life, it is possible for him to keep it in the physiological background, and out of his consciousness. And so a m…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/15 07:29 PM
3

Depends on whether it's implicit or explicitly, I am pretty sure RPers do it rather explicitly. Anyway, narcissistic men tend to resemble women, and thus saw through their facade.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/15 07:22 PM
3

One could expect that homophobia would be a problem with those who are homos themselves before it becomes rather well known, but after? Same goes for the pedophiles. Narcissistic men coming to that conclusion vs. red pillers having to learn it and then become narcissistic themselves goes against the whole theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/15 07:09 PM
1

circlebean-fiddling is the correct term.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/15 06:46 PM
1

I posted this here earlier, the reading gap muddles water at least in PISA test. Most importantly, data and results can be spun any way, http://endofwomen.blogspot.com/2014/12/why-boys-are-better-at-maths.html Are the feminist researchers biased against boys?
/r/MensRights04/03/15 05:10 PM
5

What I have called, how- ever, the sentimental aspect of Modern Feminism undoubtedly did make some headway in public opinion by the end of the eighteenth century, and grew in volume during the early years of the nineteenth century. It effectuated in the Act passed in 1820 by the English Parliament abolish- ing the punishment of flogging for female criminals. This was the first beginning of the differentiation of the sexes in the matter of the criminal law. Fraud of Feminism, 1913
/r/MensRights04/03/15 04:26 PM
-1

blue pillers are SJW cultists, the amazing thing is that they can even comprehend RP. Somewhat.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/15 03:54 PM
4

Risque! Anyway, her mentor Bailey came under attack for not believing that one of them sexuality groups existed. Then he believed them. As for Ms. Chivers herself, her paper showed that lesbians did show somewhat similar pattern to men(either this one or a later one). There have been other papers as well, though saying that women like or rather they get gina tingles from bonobo sex didn't earn her a place in the feminist good books.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/15 03:48 PM
3

Someone posted a comment about how Bangladesh's encouragement of free education for girls leading to gross gender imbalance in the poor classes. It was pushed by international force, like BBC iirc. I can try searching, unfortunately it is next to impossible to search anything on reddit.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 06:50 AM
3

Blackstone was a sexist misogynist white male. So his formulation can go to hell.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 02:36 AM
1

He's been at the wage gap for decades now, www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHmiPT_AA-c The whole fucking canard just won't die!
/r/MensRights04/03/15 02:32 AM
2

You outshine them though.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 02:30 AM
5

Already happened in Bangladesh. lowering birthrates The most important.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 02:26 AM
5

She might give one of them a blow job and then kiss you with the same lips. That'd be quite gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/15 12:06 AM
1

Taliban against girls' education?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/15 04:13 PM
1

He's a great catch though.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/15 04:09 PM
3

Effect sizes were generally lower than ideal, with the highest effect size for a psychological variable at d 1.17 (appeal of sex with more than one partner). http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0029265
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/15 03:58 PM
1

Over (grand) parented. did they help you with your homework? A little but mostly a self-made boy. did they care about your grades? Not much, not that they had much to care about. were you expected to work a job growing up? Yep.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/15 03:52 PM
1

How is this "disproved"? Think of it if it were the other way round and then think what feminists would say.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/15 11:42 PM
0

The problem with sexism is? Especially in the realm of sexual relations where the physicality makes it real? And of course feminists blame the system because otherwise what power could they wield? It allows them tremendous leeway to do whatever the hell they want with the culture. Why should their forcing of equality be better than the inequality of patriarchy?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/15 11:29 PM
0

Like this one?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/15 09:55 AM
4

violates Title IX And not the fact that boys earn lower grades and end up outnumbered in colleges? And look at how full of themselves they are at passing the law 'sneakily', some democracy. http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2012/06/how-title-ix-sneakily-revolutionized-womens-sports/258708/
/r/MensRights02/03/15 03:51 AM
-1

Of all human traits, variation in general intelligence (g) is the functionally most important in modern life. The first question that behavior genetics tackled was ‘‘how heritable are within-group dif- ferences in intelligence?’’—the answer: ‘‘very.’’ The next obvious question is ‘‘how heritable are the between-group differences in phenotypic intelligence?’’ It could easily be answered using today’s analytical methods, but no scientific discipline will touch it. Most would have to be shut down c…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/15 12:01 AM
-1

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/rabble-rouser/201309/liberal-bias-in-social-psychology-personal-experience-i something something privilege
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/15 10:20 PM
0

WTF are cat-kin? Tomorrow's conservative reactionary rethuglican right here, folks!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/15 10:19 PM
2

Indeed, too bad they lost. Honesty is a bad policy.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/15 09:03 PM
4

I am not saying that as a society we should limit people to certain roles or anything. Sigh, I keep seeing this, wrong for two reasons. 1)This comes off like 'I'm not a racist but' 2)You should limit women from joining male institutions and subverting them from within. And lastly if someone points says there might be a difference among men and women, or black and white, don't treat him as a bigot. That's so 1950s bro, keep up with the times, The very meaning of Alienism's vocabulary has changed …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/15 08:53 PM
-1

Hey, at least Naomi Wolf believed in it. Wouldn't exactly be TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/15 08:45 PM
2

1950s was the greatest era of America, all downhill from there. b-but women were in homes, blacks were in the ghetto and the homos in their bathhouses, so it was them evil timesss
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/15 04:16 AM
3

As typhonblue said, iirc it's the same study where they were funded to show that FGM causes HIV/AIDS but it ended up showing the opposite. edit: "Stallings et al. (2005) reported that, in Tanzanian women, the risk of HIV among women who had undergone FGC was roughly half that of women who had not; the association remained significant after adjusting for region, household wealth, age, lifetime partners, union status, and recent ulcer." The disappointment of the researchers was palpable, no celebr…
/r/MensRights01/03/15 03:58 AM
2

Folks like these are intellectuals of these age... Success comes most swiftly and completely not to the greatest or perhaps even to the ablest men, but to those whose gifts are most completely in harmony with the taste of their times.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/15 03:47 AM
0

This woman shits all over any accomplishment you will ever reach hahaha, amusing. She is one of the highest rated law professors at Harvard Law School I thought my senior was exaggerating by quite a bit when he told us that our one day lab sessions were equivalent to month long projects at MIT, I still think he was boasting but not as much as I thought at first. Trust me when I say I don't hold these folks in any sort of awe. and you are saying she is trash / a useful idiot merely because she is…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/15 04:55 PM
-1

feminist jurisprudence Into the trash it goes. And that's an official harvard site? Looks like a single mother's blog. feminists like Halley don't exist Useful idiots. Ideological feminists are not in the majority, but they are also not all on the lunatic fringe. On the contrary, they produce exceedingly sophisticated theories (such as theconspiracy theory of history and adopt equally sophisticated strategies (such as work- ing within the established law schools and government bureaucracies inst…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/15 04:13 PM
2

Yeah even with that, their other pages were hacked too. I am not sure on the specifics though.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 09:32 AM
2

Just look at the shenanigans that happened with gamergate.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 07:48 AM
2

Yeah internet is the wild card but what can it accomplish if feminists ensconce themselves in government and academia?
/r/MensRights26/02/15 10:03 PM
2

The thing is feminism has always had a pushback, why should this one succeed?
/r/MensRights26/02/15 07:29 PM
1

And he was blamed for pushing her off a glass cliff. The ride never ends!
/r/MensRights26/02/15 07:17 PM
3

A great step forward for /r/botsrights!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/15 06:00 AM
1

http://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2u6jm6/according_to_birtian_women_cant_make_choices_for/co5l4dc
/r/MensRights26/02/15 01:30 AM
1

Well one of the lady in some position of power came out and confirmed it as that, but others downplayed it. Strange thing, most of the newspapers reported it as 'yes means yes' law.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 01:22 AM
8

The red pill has become useful to bash any manosphere forum. Yesterday I read an article where the author linked PUA hate(and thus Elliot Rodger) as a part of the red pill movement. The fucking ignorance an stupidity of it all.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 07:04 PM
6

Feminism.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 07:01 PM
1

Yeah, but another article restored the balance.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 05:53 PM
4

There was the recent 'yes means yes' kerfuffle there too.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 04:28 PM
0

Feminists hold the belief that women and men are equal. http://tech.mit.edu/V124/N7/crandall7.7c.html Of course the counter is that they don't believe in a God, though they all believe in that men got things from sky fairy and then kept women out of them. Then there is the Gaia cult.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 03:46 PM
2

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_Chauvinist_Pigs
/r/MensRights25/02/15 03:44 PM
2

The problem with such articles is that they don't realize that boys have been doing worse in schools since the start. It's unfortunate that they start from the feminist premises. The 60-70s maths hysteria, the Title IX passage and then the 90s self-esteem hysteria to today's spatial skills and bossy, have obscured the fact that boys were thought to be shortchanged right from the start. What is worth remembering is that boys used to be the group considered shortchanged by the schools. The idea th…
/r/MensRights25/02/15 02:40 PM
5

When Title IX comes up, always a good reading how they got it through. She said: "I don't want you to lobby. Because if you lobby, people will ask questions about this bill, and they will find out what it would really do." ... And she was absolutely right. It was quite a big break that no one was watching. http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2012/06/how-title-ix-sneakily-revolutionized-womens-sports/258708/ Utterly shameless.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 11:57 AM
3

Yes of course. The primary woman, the peasant woman, is mother. The whole vocation towards which she has yearned from childhood is included in that one word. But now emerges the Ibsen woman, the comrade, the heroine of a whole megalopolitan literature from Northern drama to Parisian novel. Instead of children, she has soul-conflicts; marriage is a craft-art for the achievement of “mutual understanding.” It is all the same whether the case against children is the American lady’s who would not mis…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 05:54 AM
2

You know which country has an even lower fertility rate? Japan, with one of the highest gender gaps in all developed nations. This is supposedly an argument here.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 05:51 AM
4

https://deansdale.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/blogheader.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/15 05:20 PM
-1

Aaaannd it's gone!
/r/MensRights24/02/15 04:29 PM
1

I think believing in data isn't wrong, however one study doesn't make for real proof and even many studies don't make for proof if publication bias is in effect. One of the studies which he uses to show racism against blacks, actually also shows sexism against men, see the values here. https://abagond.wordpress.com/2008/02/11/why-white-americans-are-so-racist/#comment-81070
/r/MensRights24/02/15 01:38 PM
2

Sailer has often written about the whole stupid narrative of why women don't code, for instance because the nerds are jerks as opposed to the lawyers and doctors where women have parity. http://isteve.blogspot.com/2011/03/pc-whipped.html In one article the diversitarians cried about girls not having enough TV shows to brainwash educate them into careers in technology. For instance most of their 'girls for code' applicants listed Bones as their favorite serial. The reality dawns on them later tha…
/r/MensRights24/02/15 01:23 PM
3

One of my problems with this dynamic in Television is that it's still a male-bound fantasy. Do you really think that attractive women really want to be stuck to an idiot fat slob of a husband? lol feminism hurts men too. Do you guys even read what you write?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/15 12:50 PM
4

Well there was a supreme gentleman here who told us that LMR is the biggest proof that PUA techniques don't work. The Tyranny of Ambiguity, one more reason why marital rape is fucking joke played on the unsuspecting idiots going into marriage. http://www.amazon.com/review/R2S2U1X81SCOPG/ref=cm_cr_dp_title?ie=UTF8&ASIN=1901240169&channel=detail-glance&nodeID=283155&store=books
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/15 12:32 PM
2

Tell her to stop being an agent of patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/15 09:35 AM
3

7 million more? And an actress whose best years are behind her vs. the red hot macho hero Hemsworth, it wasn't just men being paid more than women. Equality shouldn't be the desired result between unequals.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 05:00 PM
2

Those are some strange looking men and dat digit ratio!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/15 09:50 AM
1

We're going right to the first wave here. http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2vfoiw/red_blue_pillers_is_feminism_equal_rights_and/coh8c91
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/15 02:01 AM
2

They gotta have their 'equality' and that's it. Of course how they're going to get equality if girls get better grades and are equal in SAT scores is anyone's guess. Even worse, In both Study 1 and Study 2, girls ended the school year with GPAs that were more than half a standard deviation above those of their male classmates. Notably, girls outperformed boys in every course subject, including both basic and advanced math. In con- trast, gender differences favoring girls on a standardized achiev…
/r/MensRights22/02/15 06:50 PM
1

This is not zero-sum. When feminists are fighting for the last percentage, then yes it is zero sum. This does not disprove that girls faced some minor issues in education 21 years ago. The hysteria even 40 years ago was asinine. And doesn't matter what you think, if there is equality of effort and reading skills, the inequality in other subjects will make feminists wanna burn everything down. http://endofwomen.blogspot.com/2014/12/why-boys-are-better-at-maths.html
/r/MensRights22/02/15 06:26 PM
1

Terman made efforts to correct item bias in the Stanford Binet so that as many girls as boys would be identified, and he went so far as to obscure the drop in girls' IQ scores between 11 and 17 by collapsing their means scores with the boys, yielding a nonsignificant decline in IQ for the entire group. Barbara Kerr, Gender and Genius Gender-equalizing has always been there. "Male Mindedness" of the SAT was a minor issue, but real. Where? what you linked doesn't disagree with what I've said It do…
/r/MensRights22/02/15 04:07 PM
1

Holy shit, this reads like a hollywood parody.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 08:06 AM
1

Ok, but going to a SRS infested sub isn't gonna help them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/15 06:19 AM
1

lol with the resident faculty of cordis_melum teaching you how brave the feminist warriors were in their pursuit of teh vote!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/15 06:04 AM
4

http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2mu694/im_curious_how_did_each_of_you_come_across_red/cm7rexi At first I was like the MRAs and the GGers thinking that feminism had merely overreached and the pendulum had swung too far, but then I started reading the older strains of it and they were the same as today. http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2vfoiw/red_blue_pillers_is_feminism_equal_rights_and/coh8c91
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/15 05:59 AM
2

Well the 70s were for the maths hysteria and Title IX equalling, What is worth remembering is that boys used to be the group considered shortchanged by the schools. The idea that the schools shortchanged boys was part of the common wisdom through the 1970s. As Brophy (1985) reminds us: "Claims that one sex or the other is not being taught effectively in our schools have been frequent and often impassioned. From early in the century (Ayres, 1909) through about 1970 (Sexton, 1969; Austin, Clark, &…
/r/MensRights22/02/15 05:31 AM
3

There was another reason for devaluation of SAT-M, at least what I read on the net, asians would do far better on it than on verbal. Another one would be that the ceiling of the maths test was lower, so when you are considering scholarships for the best students you'd give more weight to the verbal scores. Of course if you make the maths test harder, it'd only increase the male-female discrepancy. And since boys would do better on verbal as well at those percentiles, by doubling the score they'r…
/r/MensRights22/02/15 05:26 AM
6

The 90s hysteria about teacher attention was a big one, Christina Hoff Sommers wrote about the more egregious of these studies with the 8 to 1 ratio. Suddenly the researchers accidentally misplaced the whole data and the ratio went down to 2 to 1, though you could still see it repeated by the online feminists. Their books contained these kinds of zingers by the way, Students who remember SAT scores with the greatest pain are the girls at the top of the class. A high school girl with an A+ grade …
/r/MensRights21/02/15 11:41 PM
2

These guys, though. It's like they snapped out of the first part... and now they want REVENGE. lol, wow just wow!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/15 02:04 AM
1

Otto Weininger agrees.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/15 01:58 AM
1

destroy your credibility Are you having some trouble parsing just what sort of forum that is? terms like "faggot I do like maggot more.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 10:18 PM
1

Women also often greet each other by hugging though. All women are lesbians. My uncle doesn't want to fuck me because he hugs me hehe and people wonder why women sell themselves short hehe Anyway, women do seem to be more into making bodily contacts with their friends, the faux lesbian kissing craze was taking it too far though.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 11:14 AM
4

They try to look young for their age.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 11:11 AM
1

Old isteve habit.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 06:37 AM
2

I should've made it clearer, what personal reason? As far as I can see it's another meddling scots irish with the culture of critique.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 06:28 AM
1

Robert Nozick His essay on Intellectuals and capitalism was a good read. Being a woman is different from having advantages/disadv. because of being a woman. I thank, like some jews, the god in heavens that I wasn't born a woman. Even being an ugly man is better.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 02:23 AM
2

Someone at half sigma suggested Flight of Conchords instead of this shit. 10/10 advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 02:06 AM
1

Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 02:04 AM
2

I wonder how much of it's due to imposition of rules and law so the assholes appear to be interesting just by the virtue of breaking those conventions.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/15 09:53 PM
6

gave F's to two members of the lacrosse team who were in one of her classes lol had a psychology professor who gave the best grades only to girls and one of her male pets. Didn't really think of it much though in the context of gender-equality since I was unaware of this rot. Another reason I think men have lower grades in college is due to this. 1.)Affirmative Grading: Grading a student based on his race, ethnicity, or sex — which includes inflating the grades of blacks, Hispanics, and females,…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/15 06:56 PM
1

medical science mitigating most of the biological consequences of being a woman Still not at the level of hyena society where rape can't happen and to do away with the horror that is pregnancy, hump a vat to make children.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/15 03:03 PM
-1

Feminism is shit scum.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/15 08:35 AM
2

Your drama doesn't interest me.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 08:41 PM
4

Coontowners must be some dedicated trolls.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 08:39 PM
0

The anti-feminist of the next wave. https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2vfoiw/red_blue_pillers_is_feminism_equal_rights_and/coh8c91
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 08:35 PM
2

Feminists are not a monolith. So they want equality everywhere and so they also want their own safe space. They want equality if men and women are the same, they want equality if men and women are different. It's quite easy, comrade!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 05:24 PM
1

They are feminists and they believe in equality. RooshV rightly called them impotent and they don't know their history. Eivind Berge is another one who points out their stupidity. I thought the works of Belfort Bax would be common knowledge there, but my confidence was misplaced. As much as I like fedrz, MGTOW is going to accomplish nothing. More amusingly he was called nasty names for subverting the MGTOW movement, lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 09:16 AM
4

Well, it's a common solution to blue balls, doubt that Paglia is hiding any.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 07:20 AM
2

No, negative discrimination for women everywhere. And they have been trying this outright for quite some time now, Title IX for Women in Academic Chemistry: Isn't a Millennium of Affirmative Action for White Men Sufficient? http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK44858/
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 05:02 AM
9

The difference between rape and seduction is that of salesmanship.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 05:01 AM
1

And where's the WKKK mention when you need it?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 05:00 AM
6

Many feminists have criticized Paglia; Christina Hoff Sommers calls her "Perhaps the most conspicuous target of feminist opprobrium," noting that the Women's Review of Books described Sexual Personae as a work of "crackpot extremism," "an apologia for a new post-Cold War fascism," and patriarchy's "counter-assault on feminism." Sommers relates that when Paglia appeared at a Brown University forum, feminists signed a petition censuring her and demanding an investigation into procedures for inviti…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 04:37 AM
4

I don't get why she keeps up the charade when the 1st wavers were nothing like she imagines. Perhaps waiting for conditions to improve before they are attacked too.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 04:34 AM
1

Consciousness was raised and off they went!! edit: But the groundwork for the feminism that masculinizes women was laid by the factory system not equal to feminism per se.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/15 10:47 PM
7

PAGLIA: A woman I'm talking with at some event says, "Let's leave here and go to this bar," which is a lesbian bar. We go to the bar and we're talking and then she says, "Let's go have coffee," and we go to this coffee shop and end up, at three in the morning, half a block from her apartment. Finally, she says, "All right, well, goodnight." She's ready to go home alone and I look at her, like, "What do you mean? Aren't we going to go back to your apartment?" "No." "What?" And she says, "Do you t…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/15 10:45 PM
3

Feminism is all about making women unequal anyway, previously all women were slaves and there was great equality in being chattles. Do women in the global South struggle with issues of patriarchy? Err – yeah – alongside all the other problems fostered by an unequal capitalist system, they also struggle with local variations on the virtually universal problem of patriarchy. Hoo boy! That's one indoctrinated puppy. The global brotherhood of man might not have materialised but the sisterhood is dam…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/15 10:35 PM
1

Ludovici knew that feminist movements are revolts conducted by a riffraff of androgynous females, spinsters and disgruntled wives, all of them coming from an idle middle class. But the groundwork for the feminism that masculinizes women was laid by the factory system and by degenerate men, themselves often androgynous, like John Stuart Mill and John Ruskin. Man: An Indictment (London and New York, 1927) argues that such Englishmen, ignorant about sex owing to the Anglo-Saxon's weak insight and V…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/15 10:20 PM
2

Standards for thee, not for meee.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/15 10:17 PM
4

Just know that there are probably at least as many feminists who feel the exact opposite. Yeah yeah feminism is not a monolith, they can't agree on anything, as many opinions as there are feminists, yawn.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/15 05:12 PM
1

For strongly held beliefs, Modern scientific study published in peer reviewed journal with numerous citations. Stereotype threat is one where this is so much shit. Since we are in the realm of psychology look up some of the issues that have plagued it in the past years.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/15 02:47 PM
1

Yeah they wouldn't be using those words if the shoe was on the other foot. Imagine girls doing worse in a decade of schooling and then outscoring boys on a standardized test, feminists would have burned the schools down! And their numbers, though more rightly percentages, are plateauing and dropping already. http://www.randalolson.com/2014/06/14/percentage-of-bachelors-degrees-conferred-to-women-by-major-1970-2012/
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/15 07:30 AM
1

Well, they have the other refrain of this not being real feminism or feminism is not a monolith, and [rewriting history](www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/96jun/cancer/kadar.htm). One camp claims men and women are the same give us more, the other says they are different so give us more. All your bases are belong to us.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/15 07:26 AM
1

People's brains see men as a 'whole' and women as 'body parts'. Wasn't this debunked later? It's been proven girls and women don't perform at their peak when they feel objectified. Stereotype threat sure has changed a lot. What about boys and men not performing at peak when they are being aroused?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/15 04:37 AM
2

http://i.imgur.com/xFw9kfM.png
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/15 03:21 PM
2

since by your admission you didn't read any of the papers Because stereotype threat's biggest criticism has been the fact that they are choosing not at random but at similar aptitudes and thus the whole 'ta-da' moment of no difference is not exactly something amazing. According to Paul R. Sackett, Chaitra M. Hardison, and Michael J. Cullen, both the media and scholarly literature have wrongly concluded that eliminating stereotype threat could completely eliminate differences in test performance …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/15 02:59 PM
2

girls did as well as boys Because they're being selected by that criteria? That's how the whole hoopla over stereotype threat started when it was first observed on black-white test difference. The m-f maths difference is certainly lower than the b-w difference and might be eliminated if ST works the way its propounders want it to, but it'd still not remove the disparity in effort expended and that verbal abilities also make a difference in maths score.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/15 02:37 PM
2

You're referring to the fact that the Stoet & Geary paper excused a large number of studies for using ANCOVA with pre-experiment test performance as the covariate. Nothing of the sort, I told you I haven't read through them nor have the inclination to do so. The one good thing from the Nguyne study was the funnel plot which looks way asymmetrical for small studies and large effect sizes and thus proof of publication bias which I why I linked that comment. Just using far fewer studies does not au…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/15 02:02 PM
0

circlebean-fiddling
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/15 07:57 AM
-1

it's quite widely accepted that female children in general will develop language skills earlier and better than male children, who in turn will in general have superior spatial skills Yeah but the expectation used to be that boys would catch up with girls after puberty, doesn't happen no more. And boys are better in quantitative too. it's totally possible for a male foetus to receive less testosterone in utero and for a female one to receive more Really? Doubt a mother can produce the adult leve…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/15 07:30 AM
0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ViF6JRNjTk
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/15 06:13 AM
-2

Gender orientation is now fixed like homosexuality and gender does nothing else you understand! Only a few diseases might differ between the sexes but nothing in the head and even if that might be, we cannot tease out nature vs. nurture there and the brain is incredibly plastic so it can be changed to whatever we like! Since we don't have equal nurture and will not have it until women are half of every human endeavor, we cannot make a guess about how innate the gender roles are. kthxbye!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/15 05:28 AM
5

Someone posted on 2xChromo that they were A-Ok with men having to ask for sex first, the example given by OP, paraphrasing, "Oh how good it is if he asks for sex while stretching my undies".... Used to similar levels of lack of self-awareness on Roissy's blog when some girl would lose her way on to the chateau. As for BPer method of touching women, feigning non-sexual interest would work as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/15 12:08 AM
7

One of the studies over at heartiste claimed that security was the biggest reason for women falling out of lust in marriages, dreadgame seems to strike at that very failing. Since marriage was diluted since the 1st wavers time, it might be far more efficient in today's boyfriend-girlfriend relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/15 06:33 PM
-2

the Ship of Theseus problem- being that if you take away enough of something and replace it, at what point does it stop being the original thing? Patriarchy is still going strong, feminists can teach us how to keep the charade up.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/15 06:29 PM
9

And this article has the same issue as with the findings from '79 - 2000 was over 15 years ago so not very current. wat, pointing out feminist lying is not current and they have done some volte-face in the meanwhile? The article you linked to does the same gender and racial disadvantage dance, while not acknowledging the fact that who exactly made gender just a difference of innies and outies and race as just color skiin. It's what I wrote before, bigots think men and women are different except …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/15 06:59 AM
7

You really expect me to take feminists seriously with their nonsense? http://www.salon.com/2000/09/20/womens_health/
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/15 06:26 AM
2

Be re-incarnated as a robust high school jock and don't achieve enlightenment.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/15 06:13 AM
5

I'm not sure how the FeMRA post is relevant huh? They are the current folks for this feminist initiative. If you only study men and apply that to women of course there are going to be issues for women that go ignored. b-but men and women are the same but for society making the difference!!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/15 06:13 AM
9

I am simply saying that feminists have insisted of diminishing male-female differences, then they are aghast that doctors would simply experiment on men and then extend those results to women. The whole initiative boils down to accept that men and women are not different except when they are and you better be sure of it. Are you disputing the '79 findings? Dunno what they say, this came up in FeMRA debate sub and the recent hijinks are carried out by people like Janet Hyde and Cordelia Fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/15 05:41 AM
1

Yeah, they are all on the juice. It's become a fucking joke how many of people in plain sight are no on the juice but you have idiots arguing about b-but the genetics broo!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/15 04:48 AM
3

Yeah there is this Cordelia Fine who wants the differences science to be shut down. And then there is Sweden denying books to be published, "Jens Orback, a Swedish minister, that "The government considers female and male as social constructions.that means gender patterns are created by upbringing, culture, economic conditions, power structures and political ideologies. "Our Swedish gender equality policy is based on us being equal and socialised into different gender roles. Annica Dahlstrom is a…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/15 04:43 AM
8

This is how Rosalind Franklin came to have her extraordinarily fine analysis of the structure of DNA pirated and appropriated by Wilkins, Watson, and Crick, who then turned around and explained to the world that "Rosy" was really good at taking X-ray pictures but would surely not have been capable of interpreting them. Fine analysis my ass, Watson and Crick were faster and poor Wilkins was left behind. The first paper went into some detail on the conceptual ideas which shape scientific research,…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/15 04:29 AM
0

A few good men is already gone.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/15 05:01 PM
-1

Supposedly the gender orientation is fixed and nothing else so that we can have equality with this inequality. As for the folks themselves, whether children who can't consent to sex or old farts who suddenly found the 'courage' for the woman within, they are horribly deluded and so are the normies praising them for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/15 01:29 PM
1

See the world, find an old-fashioned girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/15 09:09 PM
1

are done on students of an age at which gender differences appear to begin with You think that stereotype threat plays no effect later or that it's cemented itself so that it wouldn't remove the difference? How can you reconcile it with the fact that girls get better grades throughout schooling on maths and thus put more effort in it? And the first comment in the andrewgelman's blog has NAEP results in it. stereotype threat effect in at least some circumstances I like John List's take on it, So …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/15 08:26 PM
1

The Ganley paper referenced in your first link That wasn't the reason I posted it. Stoet & Geary's other papers don't address the existence of stereotype threat. And? Their study led them to conclude that the wrong problem is being addressed, that programs devoted to erasing “stereotype threat” do more harm than good by allocating resources to a nonexistent problem. That outcome “really irritate(s) me,” Geary said, because redressing this gender gap is important “for our economy and for our futu…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/15 08:15 PM
4

You're boring me now. http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/01/19/genetic-testing-and-self-fulfilling-prophecies/#comment-30369 which you'd know if you'd actually read and understood the paper I've wasted my time enough as it is on this nonsense, I don't think I'd be gaining anything. Stoet and Geary trashed stereotype threat in 2012, their 2013 paper went about the verbal and maths gender gaps inverse correlation and their 2015 paper shows that gender-equality doesn't do anything for those gaps. scien…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/15 07:24 PM
3

What has that got to do with emotions vs. logic? And do you think such research would be couched in those terms or like stereotype threat would be explained away as a 'nurture'? Rhetorical.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/15 07:06 PM
4

The effect sizes found in stereotype threat studies are gigantic. All the more why it is not a real effect. It's absurd to think that there are Marie Curies who'd burst forth on the scene just if you once tell girls that they are equal or better than boys. Hey, I am all for it if it cuts down the spending on gender-equality initiatives. You're 100% full of shit. Psychology's replication crisis went into overdrive in 2012, stereotype threat is full of shit. The reality of the maths gap is that gi…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/15 07:01 PM
1

That's precisely why I choose to rely on empirical evidence, which is as close as I can come to un-tainted knowledge. None of your knowledge displayed in this thread concerns how men and women behave outside of those logical tests.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/15 06:44 PM
1

My bad I meant publication bias though replication bias could be an interesting topic in itself. I am not sure why you think it doesn't address your assertion.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/15 06:15 PM
1

Stereotype threat is replication bias, and it works by making women perform worse than they normally would.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/15 06:01 PM
5

Firstly, men consistently outperform women by a moderate margin on mental rotation tasks, especially 3D mental rotation tasks. The terms 'moderate' or 'small' used to denote the effect sizes are not a good thing. The B-W IQ gap is 1SD, I've read that the mental rotation M-F gap is about the same. women outperform men on tests of verbal fluency by similarly moderate margins That's new, I didn't know the difference was that big. the very largest sex differences were approximately 0.5 standard devi…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/15 05:39 PM
6

Nor a sexual strategy. Nonsense. Under Feminist rule, women will be able to select, because they will be able to sweep out of their minds the monetary consideration; therefore they will love better, and unless they love, they will not marry at all. It is therefore probable that they will raise the standard of masculine attractiveness by demanding physical and mental beauty in those whom they choose; that they will apply personal eugenics. http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2vfoiw/…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/15 04:30 PM
1

I don't understand why people think TBP is feminist or has any ideals at all. Yeah not all of them are beyond Christina Hoff Sommers's equity feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/15 11:46 AM
2

It isn't, people dig in and don't stop believing.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/15 08:44 AM
1

How is it different from Taken in Hand? Just because it is down under?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/15 08:26 AM
3

What brings people to TBP and gets them to become BP advocates? Their mods are SRS? Besides that bitching about an out-group seems to be a common bonding technique. For ugly women it's Sailer's law of female journalism. For hot women it's that they'd rather have something else in the armory and be appreciated for another attribute. Equality is a good buzzword, compounded by the fact that it's in the constitution. Feminism is a prepubescent fantasy that isn't let go of by adult women and most of …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/15 07:28 AM
-1

lol if they weren't there would be no need for TRP xDDD. The problem is they assume they are being told the truth by the women about their feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/15 04:07 PM
1

Looks like the birth of a new Feminist Initiative to me. www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminist_Initiative_(Sweden)
/r/MensRights12/02/15 01:40 PM
2

feminist Into the trash she goes. It’s a no-brainer that (gay people) should have the right to marry, but I also think equally that it’s a no-brainer that the institution of marriage should not exist Why no shit shirley! Nothing new under the sun. "It [Gay Marriage] is also a chance to wholly transform the definition of family in American culture. It is the final tool with which to dismantle all sodomy statutes, get education about homosexuality and AIDS into public schools, and, in short, usher…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/15 01:05 PM
0

I think they're closer to Krauser's perception of game and PUA. www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpYWQRpxzQs
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/15 01:57 AM
1

www.nytimes.com/2009/01/25/magazine/25desire-t.html
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/15 09:55 PM
8

Last Friday's article on date rape by Murray Rothbard in these pages brought back a lot of college memories (not many of them good). By the end of his essay Rothbard cut to the real motive of the feminists: the campus date-rape campaigns of the early 1990s weren't motivated by a genuine concern for the well-being of women. They were part of an ongoing attempt to delegitimize heterosexuality to young, impressionable women by demonizing men as rapists. The only point I'd add is that the regulation…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/15 09:37 PM
5

There is more variation within RPers and BPers than between them, therefore they do not exist. Seriously, it's an interesting question. The manosphere often make case that women are herd animals who follow the crowd unwittingly and they themselves follow logic. Now if you are applying logic correctly, then you'd end up in the same place as the others, and thus look like a herd yourself, especially to those who don't have the same mindset. And the contradictions of liberals as collectivists and c…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/15 07:04 PM
1

contributin' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezVib_giTFo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkoMbxHQmuM
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/15 04:42 PM
2

manunkind.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/15 12:12 PM
7

http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/320/900/b22.png
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/15 11:19 AM
3

Silence is not consent you monster!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/15 09:01 AM
-1

MRAs are making efforts to get envelopment as rape too, women won't need to engage in BP fantasies to rape men then.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/15 03:54 AM
1

Snake and apple!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/15 03:28 AM
1

The problem is that they can't leave the other alone, Relative to men, women tend to be more conformist. They want to do what other women are doing, and they want other women to do what they are doing. http://isteve.blogspot.com/2009/10/female-conformism.html
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/15 03:22 AM
1

Do we need new ways to talk? In the end, it doesn't even matter. Feminists have made rape out of everything, MRAs will get their enveloping too, and then rape will be everywhere!!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/15 06:27 PM
2

Feminist Intentions by WL George is the best thing to see what feminism is and has been since the very start. Published in 1913 it isn't much different from what feminism is more than the 'equal rights'. The Feminist propaganda--which should not be confounded with the Suffrage agitation--rests upon a revolutionary biological principle. Substantially, the Feminists argue that there are no men and that there are no women; there are only sexual majorities. To put the matter less obscurely, the Femi…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/15 06:12 PM
2

And many more would if not for traditional feminism. b-but muh patriarchal indocrtrination!!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/15 03:02 PM
2

One of the aims of error management theory is to explain sexual overperception bias. [4] Sexual overperception occurs when a type I error is committed by an individual. Under this type error, the individual falsely concludes that the member of the opposite sex has a sexual interest in the individual. [4] Males are more likely than females to commit sexual overperception bias, as evidenced by previous research. [4] Findings have found that men “overestimate women’s sexual interest” while women te…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/15 01:00 PM
7

https://davidcollard.wordpress.com/2010/11/15/women-policing-the-hierarchy/
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/15 12:59 PM
3

A woman who thinks she is intelligent demands equal rights with men. A woman who is intelligent does not.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/15 07:48 AM
1

hehe Inferiors revolt in order that they may be equal, and equals that they may be superior.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/15 07:43 AM
-2

younger, hotter and tighter was a common phrase over at heartiste.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/15 10:04 PM
3

http://satwcomic.com/welcome-to-oh-no
/r/MensRights09/02/15 09:38 PM
0

His initialism of MIT sounded like something to be included in Caltech admission essay. Low IQ, high risk taking, end result dead men. However the women remain in the gene pool. The male variance would lead to lower classes thinking men are stupid, middle classes than men are equal and the higher classes thinking that men are superior. Of course that assumes that they don't come in contact with each other. I found one upright man among a thousand, but not one upright woman among them all.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/15 06:42 PM
1

Fancy seeing you again, so how you doing?
/r/MensRights09/02/15 12:05 PM
1

Join the club.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 12:00 PM
0

It's art. :^)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/15 03:48 AM
12

DAE think women were literally chattel?!!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/15 08:04 AM
5

And here's the classical Feynman's red pill revelation, Well, someone only has to give me the principle, and I get the idea. All during the next day I built up my psychology differently: I adopted the attitude that those bar girls are all bitches, that they aren’t worth anything, and all they’re in there for is to get you to buy them a drink, and they’re not going to give you a goddamn thing; I’m not going to be a gentleman to such worthless bitches, and so on. I learned it till it was automatic…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/15 06:14 AM
1

Redpill theory is built upon field reports which should not be mistaken for scientific. They are, at best, insightful anecdotes. wat, some of the influential 'studies' and policy recommendations have been made on anecdotes. It just isn't from the RP side. Them disregarding science is not exactly a bad thing considering how corrupted it is. As for feminism not being the same thing, 1860s Eliza Linton addressed feminists as "you of the emancipated who imitate while you profess to hate". She critic…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/15 05:41 AM
1

You live in the age of equality and tolerance comrade, if you dare utter that someone is not equal just for their body parts, prepare to be lynched! They might tolerate you saying that it's your own personal sexual preference but if it suddenly became the preference of vast majority of men, prepare for the chimes of society is too damn patriarchal! and expect to be sensitized with more fat role models since we haven't really got equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/15 09:13 PM
5

Estrogen is the hormone of corpulence, so figures that women get dumpy with age. Most of the modeling figures and the fitness models strutting their stuff are on some sort of androgen or some other drug. Since fat also is an estrogen producing organ, you have a quaint situation of estrogeners and androgeners in US, amusingly both proud of themselves. http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/1122522-jodie-marsh-on-steroids And see Bigger, Stronger and Faster: The Side Effects of Being American.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/15 07:45 PM
1

Porn is degenerate but hey not that there's anything wrong with that! Do you watch it? Like it? yes, welp. Please identify your pill when you answer and state your reasoning. On the redder side of red maybe, and it makes my peepee feel funny. How do you feel about series like "Bound Gangbangs", where a women consensually enact gangrape, or "deepthroat" series where a woman is choking on a penis? Eww. Are those socially dangerous? Yup, especially if she becomes a normal and proud member of societ…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/15 02:58 PM
0

First, I read Alas, A Blog‘s recent post on the subject into the trash it goes. there's a lot of straight up womanhating in TRP Anything sexist is now seen as womanhating. Saying women show more neoteny isn't disputed, saying that it might extend to their brains is a no-no, unless of course you're using it in a good way like Ashley Montagu. That's not really up for debate, in my eyes. And since sexism and racism are the new modern sins, the sub imgoingtohellforthis shows how far gone it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/15 04:35 AM
1

The Republicans, aka the leftovers.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/15 04:14 AM
1

I'm from India, I doubt that my schooling was representative of what happens in US, past or present. We didn't even hear about girls being bad at maths, it wasn't a stereotype in my schooling but one I heard through feminist texts and wished my younger sister to get over with. She still chose PCB(physics, chemistry, biology) over PCM(maths). The maths gender-gap hysteria in US was not born out of real numbers anyway. http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/samples/cam051/2003069686.pdf
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/15 06:28 PM
1

otoh, this one, hoochie mama! http://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/2uw8mf/robyn_lawley_sports_illustrateds_first_plussize/
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/15 02:20 PM
1

Yeah the laissez-faire right wing is an oxymoron with conservatives thrown in there. The social vs. economic division isn't really justifiable, but there are more of them adhering to it than one would expect.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/15 01:27 PM
1

Everything has become rightwing. http://www.atlassociety.org/myth-ayn-rand-was-conservative
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/15 01:00 PM
1

'conservative', iirc he is a right wing liberal which passes for conservatism in Australia. Mark Richardson wasn't having any of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/15 12:51 PM
7

women are insecure, crowd-followers, and overemotional. Good things if you state them from feminist viewpoint.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/15 11:48 AM
3

Ashley Graham fatso
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/15 11:18 AM
4

because their portrayal is simply inaccurate http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Useful_idiot
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/15 06:57 AM
2

/r/redpillfeminism
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/15 06:10 AM
1

which is the date of the ruling you link to Umm yeah, it codified that behavior into law. It vacillated between the two options earlier, but gotta have equality! I'd think that the school would've done something similar. PSAT exists and they include a writing section to make it more equal because double counting the verbal still left too many boys in the ranks.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/15 05:21 AM
2

lel, poor white women who had to live in gilded cages and did have to undergo the ignominy of going to bed with their masters unlike the free-spirited negro. As for the intersectionality and other nonsense, it sure is fun seeing them in wild, http://andrewgelman.com/2012/12/29/sexism-in-science-as-elsewhere/#comment-123122
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/15 05:14 AM
1

I doubt they will make the case for that based on an aptitude and not achievement test. And, http://www.titleix.info/resources/Legal-Cases/Sharif-v-New-York-State-Education-Department-.aspx
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/15 05:11 AM
8

http://www.thinkinghousewife.com/wp/2010/11/the-solitude-of-self/ Anti-suffragism was a political movement composed mainly of women, begun in the late 19th century in order to campaign against women's suffrage in Great Britain and the United States. It was closely associated with "domestic feminism", the belief that women had the right to complete freedom within the home. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-suffragism Feminism, the extremist—and of late years the predominant cult of the Woman's Mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/15 05:05 AM
3

lol they revolve around the white majority of women, the grumbling sometimes does come to the surface though.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/15 05:00 AM
1

The concepts of "makers" and "takers" is very randian, and thus very right-wing. TIL Ayn Rand was the right wing.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/15 04:51 AM
4

I find it amusing when feminists who got them from patriarchy say they don't want patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/15 04:42 AM
3

If you truly believe in feminism, then no. Oz Conservative had a list of posts detailing how and why, sadly they have gone down under.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/15 04:28 AM
1

honors program Based on grades or exams? And you might not be an outlier for I am speaking from another country.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/15 03:34 AM
1

we'll all survive, comrade!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/15 09:49 PM
-5

no, An animal usually living in the vicinity of Man, and having a rudimentary susceptibility to domestication. It is credited by many of the elder zoologists with a certain vestigial docility acquired in a former state of seclusion, but naturalists of the postsusananthony period, having no knowledge of the seclusion, deny the virtue and declare that such as creation's dawn beheld, it roareth now. The species is the most widely distributed of all beasts of prey, infesting all habitable parts of t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/15 09:43 PM
1

That women had the same brain but in a woman's body. That they didn't like violence and aggressiveness. That women were being kept down in society physically and mentally, etc. So as good as men but without the criminal aspects. Wish I had never read all those stupid stories with oh woe is to be a woman theme to satiate my voracious appetite for literature. Such a fucking waste. Personally, one of the biggest misconceptions of mine was the belief that women were smarter than men when I was in el…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/15 09:30 PM
6

Women cannot be fully human until they are just like men, ergo women can never be human. QED via a simple application of feminist logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/15 09:01 PM
6

Roissy(heartiste) has been around since at least 2007. http://hawaiianlibertarian.blogspot.com/2009/09/game-is-red-pill.html and nothing new under the sun, THE ACTUAL HUSBAND views it as a great testimony to his prowess at amour to yield up his liberty, his property and his soul to the first woman who, in despair of finding better game, turns her appraising eye upon him. But if you want to hear a mirthless laugh, just present this masculine theory to a bridesmaid at a wedding, particularly after…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/15 06:44 PM
1

Look up some facial symmetry profiles, the right half morphs come out looking substantially bigger and manlier.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/15 03:35 PM
0

Mom: You’re stealing the best years of their lives! Don’t you feel guilty? https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2007/10/08/i-have-stolen-many-prime-years-of-girls-lives/
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/15 11:49 AM
3

A review of beauty and the beast, 1991, Feminist Pandering Turns Timelessly Wise Fairy Tale On Its Head
/r/MensRights05/02/15 08:23 AM
5

A discussion of male-female cognitive differences and how they are related to video gaming along with criticism of feminist politics.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 08:02 AM
1

Anti-suffragism was a political movement composed mainly of women, begun in the late 19th century in order to campaign against women's suffrage in Great Britain and the United States. It was closely associated with "domestic feminism", the belief that women had the right to complete freedom within the home. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-suffragism
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/15 02:13 AM
4

Never google 'taken in hand' for it might cause a brain anus rhythm.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/15 02:13 AM
1

you must be new to this.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/15 01:25 AM
1

lol so true, I'M SURE A 40-YEAR-OLD WOMAN WITH BIG HIPS AND TWO KIDS WON'T HAVE ANY TROUBLE FINDING ANOTHER HUSBAND. Papa Titus
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/15 01:22 AM
6

No no feminism is academic, so no matter how stupid its nonsense you can't refute it out of hand even if it be worse than the hated daily mail.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/15 01:17 AM
-1

What does PPD think of this person's take on TRP and divorce? I dunno what TRP thinks of it, but his 70% custody number comes from here, http://www.breakingthescience.org/SJC_GBC_analysis_intro.php and this divorce study is a must read, http://www.acbr.com/biglie.htm As such higher earning spouses pay more. Since TRP insists their spouse should ideally be stay at home, lesser educated, and if working make less money so they don't emasculate them they have dug their own grave on this one. Well, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/15 01:07 AM
3

TIL cats and dogs are same species.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/15 08:53 PM
0

http://www.plosone.org/annotation/listThread.action?root=14681 Same would go with your example.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/15 08:53 PM
1

It's a good way to break out of the Tyranny of Ambiguity. http://www.amazon.com/The-Tyranny-Ambiguity-Development-Procedural/dp/1901240169 http://yohami.com/blog/2010/12/13/instructions-to-get-out-of-pavlov%C2%B4s-machine/
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/15 07:18 PM
2

*Grauniad
/r/MensRights04/02/15 07:06 PM
0

A study was posted here where they found that the malefingered women were more likely to show effects of testosterone on behavior. A simple model could be of men and women who are have different testosterone exposure in womb and then after puberty.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/15 06:27 PM
6

/pol/ is always right
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/15 12:25 PM
6

She should check her asian privilege
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/15 08:19 AM
-1

Diversity is good because you get different views, equality is good because people should be raised the same. Does not compute. Then there are other shenanigans, more variation between men and women than between them, well, more variation between men and women on the issue of income.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/15 07:25 PM
1

Game can be good for relationships too, in fact that was my first encounter it. http://hawaiianlibertarian.blogspot.com/2009/09/game-is-red-pill.html
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/15 04:06 PM
2

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/07/the-end-of-men/308135/
/r/MensRights02/02/15 01:38 PM
7

In fact even the veteran gender gap buster Janet Hyde accepted that the throwing gap is huuuuge. That best girls throw slower than the worst boys once puberty sets in. “The overhand throwing gap, beginning at 4 years of age, is three times the difference of any other motor task, and it just gets bigger across age. By 18, there’s hardly any overlap in the distribution: Nearly every boy by age 15 throws better than the best girl.” Title IX means that less boys play sports growing up and it's alrea…
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 08:27 AM
3

In 1998, when stories about schools short-changing girls still played in the press, and research continued to chronicle the gender bias against females in the classroom, some of Canada’s leading educational publishers began revising their standard science textbooks for Grades 7 through 10. Several studies had faulted textbooks for pushing sexist stereotypes of Dick and Jane, driving girls away from certain subjects, science in particular. Mindful of that, publishers instructed their contributors…
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 08:21 AM
4

Now the usual refrain from the usual suspects is that even if you control for things, there is still a wage gap, so a better explanation should be engaged, http://np.reddit.com/r/FeMRADebates/comments/2u0320/lets_discuss_the_harvard_business_school_case/co41y2o As for the 1963 law, even that was a stupid. In the late 1950s and early 1960s research had established that U.S. women working full-time outside the home earned, on average, only about 60% of what U.S. men working full-time outside the h…
/r/MensRights02/02/15 04:41 AM
1

Reminds me of the german heiress case, it was a historical ruling where a prenup held up in UK courts. Amusingly, I was told that it wasn't setting up a precedent to be used further down the road for presumably, mostly men.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 04:23 AM
3

Should've linked to the whole comment chain, Jayne Dallas, a senior studying advertising who was seated across the table, grumbled that the population of male undergraduates was even smaller when you looked at it as a dating pool. “Out of that 40 percent, there are maybe 20 percent that we would consider, and out of those 20, 10 have girlfriends, so all the girls are fighting over that other 10 percent,” she said.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/15 12:05 PM
1

Sounds like a High V Low M bleating, http://infoproc.blogspot.com/2011/06/high-v-low-m.html
/r/MensRights01/02/15 09:27 AM
2

The 80/20 rule was a subject of a rather heated debate, 20% of both women and men are quite promiscuous, and that 80% of women and men are very dissatisfied in this SMP. https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2011/10/23/thoughts-on-the-8020-college-hookup-question/ Someone commented the same on an earlier 80/20 thread on PPD. And commented on that comment here, http://www.reddit.com/r/bestof/comments/2u71ji/uexileonmeanstreet_explains_the_societal_effects/co6i6da
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/15 06:26 AM
3

Indeed, stop thinking of sexism as a sin.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/15 08:03 PM
3

It is codified by positive action in UK, nothing subconscious about it.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 10:14 PM
2

lol Tablet: "The Chinese Believe That the Jews Control America."
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/15 09:25 PM
2

These ideologies are in total opposition to one another and the claim makes no sense. straight white men, makes too much sense to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/15 09:18 PM
1

There were many on his blog(krauserpua) circa 2009-2010, I think he took them down sometime later.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/15 08:20 PM
3

We were playing checkers. I used to kid her once in a while because she wouldn’t take her kings out of the back row. But I didn’t kid her much, though. You never wanted to kid Jane too much. I think I really like it best when you can kid the pants off a girl when the opportunity arises, but it’s a funny thing. The girls I like best are the ones I never feel much like kidding. Sometimes I think they’d like it if you kidded them – in fact, I know they would – but it’s hard to get started, once you…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/15 05:14 PM
0

I'd be more worried about the new left wing that will supplant the radical egalitarian lefties if I were one of them. Painting them as right-wingers won't change reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/15 04:53 PM
2

some inaccuracies I found Well, I'm glad to see that even you guys can find them. The whole article is downright comical, especially trying to aim at gamergators(the author is a rabid anti-GG) and kicking an own goal by calling a TERF as a biological essentialist(lol wtf!). The neo-reactionaries are a different breed altogether, I posted a rather long serious reply at againstgamergate sub, http://www.reddit.com/r/AgainstGamerGate/comments/2u63h6/do_you_think_gamergate_is_a_reactionary_movement/c…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/15 04:46 PM
3

Might explain Sarkeesian's PTSD. And since I was on a /r/science posting binge, might include Feynman's cargo cult science as well, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cargo_cult_science
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/15 04:37 PM
1

Last time I checked, I had checked out of spoon feeding.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/15 03:07 PM
2

That would be good assumption if they were responsible for the monstrosity that is Title IX today.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/15 02:59 PM
1

Even the bbc article says, The law already states consent must be given fully and freely, but the new guidance instructs officials to look at the whole context of a rape allegation. And as for the other woman whose remarks are being used for those headlines, wouldn't be the first time someone would rather not popularise it the way it's meant to be enforced. http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2012/06/how-title-ix-sneakily-revolutionized-womens-sports/258708/
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/15 02:44 PM
2

Everyone is reporting it as a 'yes means yes' nonsense that went down in California last year.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/15 01:16 PM
3

Of course we aren't, I am pointing out how quick one is to that defense, if you bothered to read what I linked you'd realize that.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 04:22 AM
2

Your argument is utter nonsense. It's not. And yeah you're asking to control for the time women spend with children, something conveniently left out when the wage gap is to be popularized.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 04:16 AM
2

http://unamusementpark.com/2011/07/cop-killers-mother-he-didnt-mean-to-shoot-the-gun-just-fired-five-times-florida-part-3/#comment-2113
/r/MensRights30/01/15 03:26 AM
1

The newer reports of HHS(circa 2007) combine biological parents with step and adoptive ones. Newer ones made the definition even more nebulous, I remember making a post about it on the now defunct elusivewapiti blog.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 03:23 AM
2

Sounds like a soft Title IX in the making.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 03:18 AM
2

Even Roissy didn't do any videos, I've only seen Krauser do them, the funniest being when a girl he had already talked to returns to find him talking the same way to another girl!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/15 03:13 AM
2

The thread has been nuked, all those RP comments gone.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/15 07:30 PM
1

Blacks do more test prep and they've better attitude towards schooling(I saw this one from one of the race gap deniers themselves), so it's not for the lack of trying. A good case is to be made that whites underperform if you compare them at the same IQ as do boys compared to girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/15 04:12 PM
1

You should look up sociologist's fallacy, besides of course the numbers for SAT by income class.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/15 04:00 PM
1

That has been true since Galton's studies, though he did recommend chinese to take over africa.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/15 03:59 PM
1

wat https://archive.today/pYpn9
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/15 03:58 PM
6

I can't find the article now, pretty sure it was on dailymail. Got the stiletto one, though she did had to go to jail and it wasn't suspended sentence, so it's the jail time that was more for the former. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1265339/Teenager-blinded-man-stiletto-heel-jailed.html Though the Ched Evans's case keeps coming up, which was another travesty.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 03:34 PM
1

Hey there, I posted this study in the science subreddit, didn't get much playtime though, looking at your comment history, your recent comment doesn't show up there. http://np.reddit.com/r/science/comments/2tvg6x/sex_differences_in_academic_achievement_are_not/
/r/MensRights29/01/15 02:30 PM
1

Girls get better grades in all subjects but not on all standardized tests which are less amenable to effort. In fact the study on which this news is based on points out the large gap in reading that favors girls which leaves boys struggling in other subjects as well since reading is a fundamental skill and is required for all subjects.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 02:23 PM
1

/pol/ is always right!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/15 02:17 PM
4

Not in the way men approach sex, but women's sex drive can be far greater than men's if you take sexual differences into the equation. Fedrz's take on this issue informed by Otto Weininger's philosophy, Male sexuality is like a pushy door to door salesman; it picks one target and gets in your face so much that you simply cannot ignore it. Female sexuality, however, is like annoying junk mail. It is everywhere and steadily drones on and on at everybody, whether they are the intended target or not…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/15 02:16 PM
1

Roissy is supposed to be the heart of the manosphere(now heartiste) and it's around him that most of those sites grew up and he has gone full 'white power' mode for quite some time now. Though the BPers didn't like it when I pointed it out on their sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/15 02:11 PM
11

I remember seeing two news reports from UK, one where a woman accidentally blinded a man with her stiletto and another where a man accidentally date raped a woman. The latter ended up in jail with a harsher sentence.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 01:56 PM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2mu694/im_curious_how_did_each_of_you_come_across_red/
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/15 01:53 PM
2

lol onto the big leagues boys!! boingboing, oh wait a minute...it's that a man in black again..talk about movie cliches! this is him on reddit. http://www.reddit.com/user/PopcornDotGif
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/15 01:34 PM
2

I mentioned the study yesterday in another thread. The inflammatory girls are 'smarter' was clickbait. The authors Stoet and Geary are basically on our side. Their paper on publication bias in stereotype threat affecting girls' performances in maths was a craw in the feminist establishment, and here is the lead author(Stoet) on the paper mentioned yesterday, At the moment we see that, with the exception of high-achievers, boys have poorer educational outcomes than girls around the world, indepen…
/r/MensRights29/01/15 11:02 AM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloom%27s_2_Sigma_Problem
/r/MensRights29/01/15 10:56 AM
1

Catalina was supposedly voiced by a hottie, amusing character though, right up the blue pillers alley.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/15 10:19 AM
2

My view is that sequels should be fresh and interesting, not rehash the same old stuff. lol the sequels themselves become a rehash of old stuff. It happens often, a RP type movie either ends up with a female butt kicker added or a previous female character turned into one. Apparently turning Irene Adler's character upside down wasn't enough, now you gotta have Shirley Holmes as the main character, presumably fighting against the patriarchy at the time and hence twice as good for half the acknowl…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/15 03:22 AM
2

ayy lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/15 10:39 PM
2

Of course it isn't, being skinny plus abs, easily done. Muscles plus bulging abs, steroids!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/15 07:39 PM
-2

I have male friends who are 6'5 and wouldn't mind being a bit taller. No wonder, that's the manlet territory.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/15 07:20 PM
-2

Re: dieting steroids - the "tell" is washboard abs.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/15 07:18 PM
0

I was thinking that it had something to do with this Nietzsche quote: The sexes deceive themselves about each other: the reason is that in reality they honour and love only themselves (or their own ideal, to express it more agreeably). Thus man wishes woman to be peaceable: but in fact woman is ESSENTIALLY unpeaceable, like the cat, however well she may have assumed the peaceable demeanour. For the body type, there is the difference in what you'd find attractive alone vs. in a crowd and the prol…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/15 07:08 PM
6

The fact that humans can get inured to a lot of shit scares me. Consider the putrid mass that is feminism which has ensconced itself in daily life and academia, and despite being disliked by the vast majority is allowed to continue festering them both. As for biology and culture, First Law. All human behavioral traits are heritable. So, how iron-clad is the First Law? Clearly, not all traits are heritable, right? Right. However, there are only a distinct set of exceptions. Traits that are depend…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/15 12:20 PM
1

Another white knight feminist male. tch.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/15 05:08 AM
2

Sex differences in academic achievement are not related to political, economic, or social equality. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289614001688 Not much there though, here is the lead author talking of on his university's site: “At the moment we see that, with the exception of high-achievers, boys have poorer educational outcomes than girls around the world, independent of social equality indicators. What’s more is that this gap in not reducing. If policy makers are seriou…
/r/MensRights27/01/15 07:42 PM
0

It doesn't have to be a zero-sum game you know.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/15 06:06 PM
1

Do you think that, say, Saudi Arabia is developing as fast as it possibly could? They don't have the IQ, what they do have is loads of money. Keep the women in check, make more babies, consider the male bell curve produces more talented folks and the m-muh 50% of population is untapped comes off as sheer nonsense. Anthony Ludovici was pointing this out during the 1st wavers' time as well. Rob. Schumann, Emily Brontë (greatest European woman of genius), Charles Darwin, De Quincey, Voltaire, Samue…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/15 05:32 AM
1

Inferiors revolt in order that they be equal, and equals that they be superior. I always confuse him with Chesterton, from his anti-suffragette work: "A revolution is a military thing; it has all the military virtues; one of which is that it comes to an end. Two parties fight with deadly weapons, but under certain rules of arbitrary honor; the party that wins becomes the government and proceeds to govern. The aim of civil war, like the aim of all war, is peace. * "Now the Suffragettes cannot rai…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/15 05:20 AM
2

Women's contributions are brought up as something they did against the patriarchy and thus should be considered even better than the value that should be placed on them objectively, besides of course the usual hand wringing of how poor women's talents were wasted away for all those centuries. The patriarchy quickly takes a stage exit when it's about where those contributions were wrought from in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/15 05:09 AM
2

As someone who wants feminism dead, preaching to the choir here. Cultivate the frontal portion of her brain as much as that of man is cultivated, and she will stand his equal at least. Even now, where her mind has been called out at all, her intellect is as bright, as capacious, and as powerful as his. Ernestine Rose
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/15 04:33 AM
3

That's why men shouldn't have given away anything, now they should have to contend with contentions like yours which would then go on to state see if only men had not denied them education who knows where we would've been!.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/15 04:23 AM
2

lol and goldmax sax and the one cock rule
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/15 02:23 PM
2

Because one of the greatest pleasures of life is to be loved by a woman so much that she is willing to jump down a chimney to get to you. i would wager that for every awkward 'beta' guy out there, there is also an equally awkward 'beta' girl but who can get lots of cockas and butthex as preached by Tucker Max and Carolyn Hax!!! lolzlzlzlazlzlzlzlzll
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/15 12:56 PM
1

There is an option of biological reality being considered without coming off as hitler, nope.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/15 12:50 PM
2

Not being in the league, feels bad man :(
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/15 06:22 AM
-1

The trans issue is rather amusing in the context of "gender equality" and a children's ability to consent. Apparently life-altering decisions like that are A-ok but someone gets a little nookie with a fully-developed teenager are a big NO-NO nevermind the pre-pubescent ones! Though right now it's the time for World War T after the closing chapters of World War G, the World War P will have to wait its turn. The pronoun 'they' also has a funny history: If any single person is responsible for this …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/15 06:16 AM
0

Wasn't Elam the Happy Misogynist? Glad to see some people have lived up to their itnernet names and fames.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/15 12:31 AM
0

Old news matey! https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2010/10/12/the-duke-rejection-list/ Tucker Max was the original douchebag PUArtist on the internet scene with his stories. He went kinda like the Neil Strauss way with his book deal, misogyny doesn't sell, another such guy who lost his balls in the real world would be maddox; and you might be engaging in a pointless endeavor here.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/15 12:10 AM
3

Yeah, the whole ethos of 'I am the one more oppressed' is so quaint when you look at it as an outsider. People are legitimately proud of the fact that they, or rather people like them, have been powerless throughout history and use it to achieve power. That being said, I like to copy-pasta Fraud of Feminism here, there and everywhere for pointing out the inequality in 1913. It's fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/15 10:38 PM
3

Things that still exist today in some form or another. Yeah, men should've seen that they'll always be unequal and gone along with it without a whisper.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/15 10:01 PM
3

I don't see why it has to necessarily lead to end of feminism. The feminists actually don't like men fucking around with men too much, their more pressing concern is that in some way women are thought of as lesser than men, which should be applicable even in a society where indiscriminate rutting has been done away with.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/15 09:59 PM
1

www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uPcthZL2RE
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/15 09:45 PM
1

Oh god, this brings back the greatbooksformen memories. lolzzlzlzlz Then I saw it over and over again...and realized people were serious. Yeah, the dawning realization that you've become the relic of a shameful history. The guy she graded the lowest is that one who didn't kiss her, fucked her quickly and then left the bedroom, treating her like a prostitute. iirc he was also shyer than the others, so it might be that instead of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/15 09:23 PM
1

“Hot girls” are not another species of human completely devoid of insecurities and other human emotions. Women don't have the testosterone to make them immune to them as such. Putting a “hot girl” down because you think she must get complimented all the time The type I vs. type II error rates for human attraction is still relevant. Even if men complimented her most of the time, she might not still believe that they do it for the sexy time. Since women are said to be more concerned with social cu…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/15 09:01 PM
2

The point I wanted to make was that sexually active men can no longer rely upon fathering children. They have lost that evidence of potency and source of male pride. 'So,' I say, 'men's insecurity may actually derive from women's access to the Pill and easier abortion, which means they can no longer be sure of reproducing themselves with, say, every tenth unprotected act of intercourse?' 'Ah]' he says. 'I see where you're coming from] I see what you're going to write]' http://www.independent.co.…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/15 08:49 PM
3

One of the criticisms I've seen is, have the preference but don't preach it to others lest they adopt it too and the bad juju of society against makes madonnas out of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/15 04:18 PM
1

Why are there no cute terms for things in BP as there are in TRPerland? I'm sorely disappointed. Feminism has had enough already.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/15 04:15 PM
1

The talk about the wife being a chattel, for example, is so palpably absurd in the face of the existing law that it is nowadays scarcely worth making (although we do hear it occasionally even now). But it was not even true under the old common law of England, which, for certain disabilities on the one hand, conceded to the wife certain corresponding privileges on the other. The law of husband and wife, as modified by statute in the course of the nineteenth century, as I have often enough had occ…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/15 06:49 AM
4

Another blue piller on the case: The woman who is not pursued sets up the doctrine that pursuit is offensive to her sex, and wants to make it a felony. No genuinely attractive woman has any such desire.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/15 05:57 AM
6

Reasoning from emotion vs. emotion from reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/15 05:42 AM
1

Patriarchy and power, rinse and repeat. Happened with DV too, not that hard to see why it wouldn't be extended to rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/15 06:43 PM
6

http://www.bostonglobe.com/lifestyle/style/2013/10/19/new-state-alimony-law-once-hailed-model-causing-confusion-and-being-misinterpreted-ignored-judges/jeWGmkiyGiR6Q0lkshlNkI/story.html
/r/MensRights24/01/15 02:26 PM
13

lol the Massachussetts alimony reform passed a few years after a documentary showing the plight of women giving their ex-husbands lifetime alimony showed up. Though that didn't stop a man from getting the same old treatment because the judge didn't bother with the new guidelines.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 04:22 AM
4

the less you want to know.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 08:00 PM
1

Maybe yes maybe no, but he is a male Cordelia Fine, I am surprised she didn't get a mention there or an article to herself, did find this though. http://gender.stanford.edu/news/2011/neurosexism-and-neurononsense
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 07:56 PM
1

Because I am pretty sure I've already posted it a 1000 times. Men are better at maths and stereotype threat is BS. You can even find some on wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encephalization_quotient#Criticism
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 07:38 PM
1

lol it's that site again, a male Cordelia Fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 07:30 PM
0

Proportionate to the size of the organism. Ah honey, it doesn't work that way in a single species itself. Even if it did, boys are smaller than girls before puberty and still have bigger brains. Even if you hand wave that away, men still have bigger brains correcting for body size. Try again, just don't go full Cordelia Fine on me.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 07:13 PM
-2

Since IQ is positively correlated to the brain size and men have bigger brains, women coming about about equal to men leaves the sex egalitarian between a rock and a hard place.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 07:03 PM
-1

very slightly hahaha
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 06:49 PM
2

/r/botsrights
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 06:40 PM
0

So men and women do have sexually dimorphic brains!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 06:40 PM
1

but ultimately, the Netherlands is ranked the 7th most gender equal country in the world. The US is ranked 47th. You can't really argue against that. The gender inequality index raises its head again.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 04:22 PM
3

. Finally, we would have the economic conditions behind such powerhouses like Bangladesh. But I digress... hahaha To not worry about changing that which you can't change, because the only person you can or should truly change is yourself. Which is what millions are doing, including women, most of whom have never read TRP. ahahahaha So what RP men is he talking about? The one's who busted their asses at Stanford and Google and then started their own business? Or the one's whining about the same? …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 04:08 PM
1

Revelant username. Strap-on is just another device which places the default male bodied persons' anatomies over others in our culture, thankfully feminism would put an end to that. Small dicks, no dicks, would be all equal in our utopia.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 03:24 PM
0

We'll have a glorious progressive patriarchy, comrade!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 01:37 PM
1

Death of feminism for one, though it's cute to hear that poor feminists have went against the patriarchal structure of judge so much that even they have conceded defeat.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 01:34 PM
2

Yeah men would grow boobs and uteri any second now. I know what you're arguing, and know it's a waste of time. haha, the poor judges mired in patriarchal values...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 01:28 PM
2

Who is saying it's out of control? Anyway, patriarchy meant default custody of children to fathers until feminists changed it, and now continue to block default joint custody. Your solution is a comical accept feminism's demands and we'll give you what you want, why NSS!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 12:51 PM
5

instead of working to destigmatize males expressing emotions Well, the champions of men's emotions don't like to see them angry for some reason. See my other reply in the thread. For example: men have a hard time getting custody. I wonder who did it?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 03:42 AM
2

No it wouldn't, doublethink would unless you think they are really good at keeping mental stress at bay.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 03:37 AM
3

lol patriarchy did it! The law, it was assumed, and the assumption was acted upon, was the same for both sexes. The sexes were equal before the law. The laws were harsher in some respects than now, although not perhaps in all. But there was no special line of demarcation as regards the punishment of offences as between men and women. The penalty ordained by the law for crime or misdemeanour was the same for both and in general applied equally to both. Likewise in civil suits, pro- ceedings were …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 03:36 AM
0

then why do TRP men constantly pine for their validation and attention? and TRP men also don't see them more than an object to put their dick in.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 03:32 AM
1

I honestly believe a wider dissemination of RP thought would lower the amount of male on female murders and male suicides. lol I used to wonder why there weren't more Marc Lepines, it might do what you think, but also what I think.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 03:27 AM
-1

It is certainly understandable that many men feel that they must go on the defensive in the ostensible intellectual battle of the sexes. After all, we have been hearing for years about women surpassing men in college graduation rates, mean GPA, and income. Wait, one of those doesn’t belong, does it? Indeed, when I was a boy of around 12 or 13, I was filled with righteous indignation that there was no such thing as a “masculist.” Most of the highest GPAs in my middle school belonged to girls. At …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/15 02:55 AM
1

http://www.aei.org/publication/women-earned-majority-of-doctoral-degrees-in-2012-for-4th-straight-year-and-outnumber-men-in-grad-school-141-to-100/ The idea that the schools shortchanged boys was part of the common wisdom through the 1970s. As Brophy (1985) reminds us: "Claims that one sex or the other is not being taught effectively in our schools have been frequent and often impassioned. From early in the century (Ayres, 1909) through about 1970 (Sexton, 1969; Austin, Clark, & Fitchett, 1971),…
/r/MensRights22/01/15 01:45 AM
1

Nothing to do with marxism, but he was an influential man and now is a persona non grata because he was a misogynist. His reservations against women's suffrage, The conclusion I draw from the above facts alone, and apart from all other considerations, such as those previously indicated, is, that setting aside the question of the intrinsic suitability or unsuitability of the female sex for the exercise of political functions it is at least not just or equitable that women should exercise such fun…
/r/MensRights22/01/15 01:12 AM
1

Yeah, I just searched and wtf the results don't even go for a full page. Apparently, from a two year old thread, This is important as even the mods here tend to believe the feminist version of history. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/vkh2j/the_legal_oppression_of_men_in_britain_1820_1908/ Keep in mind this was written in 1908:Every moth-eaten scrap of privilege, which is in favour of the woman, they retain. All privileges of the husband, no matter how firmly established, they deny as…
/r/MensRights22/01/15 12:34 AM
-1

Masturbation or no masturbation, women leak their gametes anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/15 12:20 AM
1

I doubt that Belfort Bax isn't rather well known here, anyway, here's a little summary, http://ernestbelfortbax.com/
/r/MensRights22/01/15 12:16 AM
3

Nothing new under the sun!
/r/MensRights21/01/15 11:10 PM
5

Matters are such under this unrighteous combination that how- ever men may laugh at it and make jokes, they do not willingly travel with single unknown female companions in railway carriages. They know very well that for a man to have the finger of a woman pointed at him with a charge of a sexual offence is to secure that man's extinction, no matter what the verdict of a jury may be. In 1881 (Lond. Med. Gazette ) a case was tried in which a girl, to shield 48 herself against her equal share of g…
/r/MensRights21/01/15 10:27 PM
9

lol, reminds me of another fiasco, A Slovenian TV programme that tried to prove top models were brainless bimbos was scrapped after a beauty queen turned out to have a higher IQ than a nuclear physicist. Iris Mulej, a former Miss Universe contestant, was found to have an IQ of 156 by scientists working for the programme makers. She had to take a series of logic tests looking at spatial awareness, mathematical equations and problem solving ability. The test result forced Slovenia TV, the state br…
/r/MensRights21/01/15 10:10 PM
1

Imagine, then, the surprise and disappointment of the laws'(equal pay act) supporters when for nearly twenty years following the laws' passage, the ratio of women's pay to men's pay remained almost exactly 60%. http://newmarksdoor.typepad.com/mainblog/2005/08/some_notes_on_c.html "Surprisingly, Farrell argues that comparable males and females have been earning similar salaries for decades, though the press has yet to notice. As long ago as the early 1980s, he writes, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Sta…
/r/MensRights21/01/15 10:03 PM
4

Theantifeminist claims feminism as a sexual trade union, quite applicable in this scenario.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 09:58 PM
0

Sounds like Neil Strauss taming his book for more sales and less notoriety. It seems like he started out talking about dating advice, but eventually became more interested in leftist, feminist, and social justice causes. It's cancer that happens to everything of note. cracked or for that matter onion. Just saw that he isn't anonymous, scratch that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/15 05:24 PM
1

Can't find the thread, or whether it was on reddit or some other forum. Here's the professor himself in his paper, By “postmodernists” I mean not just self appellating postmodernists such as Lyotard and Rorty, but also post-structuralists, deconstructivists, exponents of the strong programme in the sociology of knowledge, and feminist anti-rationalists. I unite them under the term because, philosophically, they are united by a sceptical doctrine about rationality (which they mistake for a profou…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/15 03:50 PM
2

I saw an email from the prof. who coined this in some anti-feminist sub. And it's logical that it'll be easily discerned in a movement that is mainstream with many adherents and useful idiots who don't understand to what ends the real feminists aim at. That's why I like this essay, Now there are two kinds of people who labor under illusions as regards the Feminist movement, its opponents and its supporters: both sides tend to limit the area of its influence; in few cases does either realize the …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/15 01:43 PM
1

The way I honestly see it is that feminists don’t actually want to end the generalization of groups of people. That's rather obvious, however not usually remarked upon. When to show similarity between the sexes, they'd break down the categories and show that men and women don't differ too much on them, when to show the difference that doesn't favor women ply the statistics under the men and women categories. Though I don't get what these arguments for criminality or for that matter lower black I…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/15 03:49 AM
4

"Venerate the Alpha" YOU FUCKING WHAT MATE? Yeah conflating avfm and rok sounds like she never read of the great falling out, afaik they haven't ever patched up.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/15 05:57 PM
2

Oh lordy, the great Futrelle! The anger of many younger MRAs seems to have a similar psychosexual source. lol they are angry because they are feminists who have been mugged by reality. She is cute in her naivete, the liberation of male sexuality will undermine one of patriarchy's principal foundations Sure sure. hahaha And men are, of course, raised with a tremendous, and all-encompassing, sense of male superiority, which is constantly reinforced I dunno if boys have been raised with that feelin…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/15 05:53 PM
6

Erin Pizzey also gave a few accounts of her run-ins with such folks. Wasn't even surprised with what happened to Warren Farrell in Toronto. yet will loudly and violently insert themselves into and disrupt events discussing men's issues They keep goading and claiming misogyny, once they get a response, 'Aha! See, they were misogynists all along!'.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 03:50 PM
12

Remember coming across this video when I was a newbie to all this. Feminists Disrupt a Forum About Battered Husbands
/r/MensRights20/01/15 03:41 PM
3

Anthony Ludovici wrote of the first wavers not doing enough for the working class women to stay at home. http://np.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/2mncl5/cmvi_think_women_are_economically_inferior_to_men/cm60vjw The second wavers and the wage-gap hysteria did the same for the middle class.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 02:23 PM
1

chump change.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 01:48 PM
3

Perfect video for feminist ingrates.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/15 01:46 PM
-2

Gamers had a run-in with feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/15 10:50 PM
-5

Indian guys have a reputation for creepiness, even the reddit CEO got a taste of it. Story and other tidbits here, http://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/2swoue/admin_kn0thing_clarifies_how_his_call_to_contact/cntovu5
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/15 10:39 PM
0

no spoon-feeding
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/15 04:12 PM
0

I am saying that it doesn't even back up your assertion; to top it all off, they ended the article with Catherine Hakim, a devil to feminists much like Christina Hoff Sommers. Her 'erotic capital' sounds straight out of the RP handbook and her paper 'Feminist myths and magic medicine' was a manosphere delight. This time no spoon-feeding!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/15 03:52 PM
1

Do you think that article even supports your assertion? Oh wait, data can be interpreted in various different ways! edit: ends on a Catherine Hakim note, strange.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/15 03:35 PM
2

Really, grauniad for arguing feminist points, I might as well pull out fox news on obama.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/15 03:22 PM
1

Hypergamy is not a gendered term. And neither is polygamy, doesn't mean that they aren't gendered traits
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/15 02:23 PM
2

Should you treat people equally in as in the same or the way they want to be treated?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/15 07:25 AM
4

TIL Charles Darwin was lesbian in a man's body.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/15 05:02 AM
2

there is many a happy slave
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/15 04:52 AM
1

If the equality is created socially, which it is, then feminism is very unjustified. b-but muh Lewis's Law!!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/15 03:25 AM
-1

It is impossible for women, because they are only sexual to recognise their sexuality, because recognition of anything requires duality. With man it is not only that he is not merely sexual, but anatomically and physiologically he can "detach" himself from it. That is why he has the power to enter into whatever sexual relations he desires; if he likes he can limit or increase such relations; he can refuse or assent to them. He can play the part of a Don Juan or a monk. He can assume which he wil…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/15 03:24 AM
2

The problem with those agreeable, extrovert and neurotic traits is that they are 3 of the big five personality traits and subsume many smaller factors on which the difference is substantially larger. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0029265
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/15 03:18 AM
0

Got nothing on sweden. www.youtube.com/watch?v=fBmeOffXxkA www.youtube.com/watch?v=yn3cHsHnUPM Both by gender traitors.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/15 03:06 AM
0

Sexual differentiation of sex organs is the big one. Not including physical ones. wat
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/15 04:00 AM
2

http://i.imgur.com/vSXycpz.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/15 01:19 AM
3

They don't even have coverture, weak.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/15 08:11 PM
3

"feminist privilege" http://www.salon.com/2001/04/12/science_women/
/r/MensRights17/01/15 08:04 PM
1

It is no accident that NSF has doled out grants so disproportionately to female applicants. Beyond scientific merit, the agency uses a “second criterion” when evaluating grant applications. As the GAO explains it, “This second criterion includes promoting teaching, broadening the participation of underrepresented groups, and enhancing…the integration of diversity into NSF projects, and research mentoring, particularly for students typically underrepresented in the sciences.” And some numbers her…
/r/TheRedPill17/01/15 07:53 PM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_Much_Can_We_Boost_IQ_and_Scholastic_Achievement%3F
/r/TheRedPill17/01/15 06:32 PM
0

Let me describe in detail. Your talking up of points that are irrelevant to whether including women in the workforce raises or depresses the wages don't matter. If you bothered to read, even they don't matter as much as you think they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 08:08 PM
-2

Voxday is your source material? If you bother to click on it, he isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 07:42 PM
2

Coming from a culture with arranged marriages still ruling the roost, it's like being a great grandparent in 2014 america. As I remarked before, religion is a technology based on the proto-science of human behavior; not letting teenagers rut themselves to pansexuality before marriage which is predicated on reproduction and not economic gay equality is still the best way. b-but muh interests and expectations and we don't even know each other!!! shush Lets say I'm an 18 year old woman. By then it'…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 07:41 PM
-1

I can't find his post about the change in workforce structure leading to male wage stagnation in the 70s, but found this one that makes it sound even worse. http://voxday.blogspot.com/2007/11/workforce-and-wages.html
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 07:21 PM
0

I guess all people interpret data differently, though, so I'm not saying there's no merit to this argument. That said nothing of substance, comparing white women to men of all racial categories and then coming to the conclusion that discrimination is the cause of white women earning more or that men and minorities suffer, is neither here nor there. Even if it might hold true for some other topic, it doesn't when you're talking of women vs. men. This is the spoon-feeding that so much irritates me…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 06:42 PM
0

Jesus, Allah and Krishna, here is what I said in my first reply before giving the link to Andrew Gelman's site, The same authors who conflate the women category against the caucasian males, otherwise it shows discrimination in favor of women. in response to the first study you linked to. It's a newer study by the same authors(Milkman et al), but most probably using the same data set, and the same methodology of conflating women together when it comes to comparison with the white males. This is t…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 06:28 PM
0

The replies are: Martha Smith's comment excerpt: The Moss-Racusin et al paper used plain old ANOVA and t-tests (no shrinkage estimators), performing over sixty(!) hypothesis tests on a data set with 127 observational units. This definitely calls for some discussion of family-wise error rate. I tried a Holms procedure, but p-values were not given with enough precision in the paper to determine whether any of the tests were significant at a 0.05 FWER level (but it appears that only the nine listed…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 06:07 PM
-2

Male wages stagnated before outsourcing.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 05:57 PM
0

Link them then.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 05:44 PM
0

Because the other comments in your link would suggest that you're wrong. Which ones? The one saying it didn't concern this study or the one where they faulted the paper too? But keep insulting me, I'm sure that will bolster your point. Hopefully it can do the same for your reading comprehension.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 05:40 PM
0

Nothing new under the sun. The combination of Sentimental Feminism with its invocation of the old-world sentiment of chivalry which was based essentially on the assumption of the mental, moral and physical inferiority of woman to man, for its justification, with the pretensions of modern Political Feminism, is simply grotesque in its inconsistent absurdity. In this way Modern Feminism would fain achieve the feat of eating its cake and having it too. When political and economic rights are in ques…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 05:35 PM
0

Yup, second wavers did to middle class what happened to working class during first wave's time. http://np.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/2mncl5/cmvi_think_women_are_economically_inferior_to_men/cm62i7n?context=3
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 05:33 PM
-1

And, as I've pointed out, the blog comment you linked is highly disputed. It isn't, but you seem to be beyond that understanding. The other one was Ceci and Williams recent study. From my first reply to you, People pointed out that lab managers aren't exactly a male-dominated job. Women usually get an advantage in reality for better jobs in academia(Ceci and Williams). http://www.reddit.com/r/FeMRADebates/comments/2l5jpz/academic_science_isnt_sexist/ You don't need to spoon-feed anyone You haven…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 05:27 PM
0

Yes, you said that, but you've yet to show anything career related that shows men are discriminated against. I did in my very first reply besides Simonsohn pointing out how the data of the first study you linked showed a bias in favor of women. And nobody that replied to him is well-versed in the field? They didn't for that study, did you even read? You just linked a quote from yourself in a blog? Pointing out that a study should come to the opposite conclusion it did with the data it had, yes. …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 03:10 PM
0

The soul of the godless.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 03:03 PM
0

This is going around in circles, But the studies I cited do show that it happens. And it happens for men too but nobody cares about that, one study is not proof especially with such huge differences, publication bias etc. You mean a blog comment by someone well-versed in the field. Andrew Gelman's blog is not just another blog. "End of Women". Great, unbiased source. You can find tl;dr here. No, I want you to show me where feminists proudly proclaim that it changed schooling to benefit girls and…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 02:42 PM
-1

I said that, It jives with what many men think, however no one cares what they think. So studies don't bother to check if that happens, but come one that shows that women are at an disadvantage(or even if they aren't), expect it to be blared from every media. If "feminists" followed suit Then boys would have results in school which would remove the discrepancy down the road. Women with the same credentials aren't as good as men... that's true to you? Yup. Do you have anything to back that assert…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 01:53 PM
1

simply because "It jives with what many men think" wat, that sentence was for something else entirely. A mechanism that takes gender into account more than merit is discriminatory no matter who it benefits. Sounds good to me, now if feminists could follow suit... "women with same credentials aren't as good as men" is discriminatory and biased It is true however. Feminism did nothing of the sort. Yes it did, it even proudly proclaims of the fact that it did, this isn't even the ooh patriarchy thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 01:19 PM
1

http://www.avoiceformalestudents.com/a-landmark-new-study-overall-girls-get-better-grades-than-boys-at-all-ages-all-subjects-all-over-the-world/ but if your basis for hiring is "he's a man, so he'll automatically be more suited to the job", you're not taking qualifications into account. Eh? I am proposing a mechanism that takes gender into account when presented with same qualifications that mimics the one that has been in effect when it comes to SAT. It doesn't. Girls are more suited to classro…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 12:34 PM
0

Girls getting better grades while doing worse on standardised tests is not a US only phenomenon. They aren't arguing about those studies, what is there to even argue? No, that's not true, and that's not the subject under discussion. It kinda is, see Fair Test for example. If for same credentials men have an advantage in intelligence(and a disadvantage in conscientiousness) then the scenario is similar to admissions by SAT scores. Though feminists are loath to admit that schooling favors girls. W…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 11:42 AM
1

The PISA is an imperfect measure. Tell me about it, but the chinese and other asians also do impressively on TIMSS. While the selectivity might be a problem, other data for less privileged provinces also puts them at least at OECD average. As for Nisbett, it's suspicious when someone claims environmental only explanation for differences. A change in educational environment and achievements might decrease the differences but it's highly doubtful that they will equalize them. The differences on SA…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 11:36 AM
1

The US results are of admission stats, iirc in UK poor whites have dropped below blacks in school performance too. US spends quite liberally in education per capita, however not all of it is going to teachers.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 11:08 AM
0

Well, someone said that america is rules by lawyers while China is by engineers. Social prestige does play a part, though looking at his work, I wouldn't be a fan of Nisbett. http://isteve.blogspot.com/2009/11/james-j-lees-review-of-nisbetts.html The english advantage has certainly helped Indians considering their large cognitive disadvantage. http://blogs.economictimes.indiatimes.com/therovingeye/pisa-china-tops-india-has-fled-the-race/ The japan case is interesting, especially with their econo…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 11:02 AM
2

The other study in that link also showed that white women had an advantage while black women didn't. Since the study was about racist expectations so that wasn't dwelled on. Same with the much celebrated Espenshade study, most of the brouhaha was about asians having to score higher on SAT, a few pointed out that poor whites do worst of all, but the advantage of women in elite admissions was not remarked upon, I only came to know of it from a poster called siserune on collegeconfidential. Amusing…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 10:37 AM
2

Should employers not take qualifications into account, They do, as do the feminists who claim SAT is sexist because girls get better GPAs than their scores would suggest, and so should be admitted with a lower score. Where does it say that anyone has "conflate(d) the women category" in what you've linked? HUh? He says further down, I think the wording and graphs can be a bit confusing in that paper because of the fact that white-males are the omitted category. If one compares just gender overall…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 10:26 AM
-1

I'm not even talking about weed out courses. I meant intro ones, like "intro to CS" or even "the joy of programming". Yeah, though even these are problematic since 'boys have been hacking since elementary school' while poor girls are hit with the daunting prospect of getting a B. The northeast asians do better on visuo-spatial tasks which is correlated with going into engineering, so their women are usually the ones encountered in these programs in US.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 10:19 AM
1

Yeah once it is in place the competition gets fierce since debauchery also brings about the fertility collapse.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 09:51 AM
0

They will make up for the elite which is what they hunger after. It can be rather drastic. http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/harvey-mudd-college/908801-girl-guy-ratio-class-2014-a.html I thought weed out courses meant that easing out the first year would mean more women would stay, haven't seen those numbers though. unless the US gov't holds a gun to India and Eastern Europe and forces them to comply to the same standards iirc they have better numbers than US, it's a paradox why gender inequal…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 09:46 AM
2

Because that seems like a huge assumption. It jives with what many men think, however no one cares what they think. Women/minorities are less likely to be mentored be professors while studying The same authors who conflate the women category against the caucasian males, otherwise it shows discrimination in favor of women. http://andrewgelman.com/2012/12/29/sexism-in-science-as-elsewhere/#comment-123122 They're less likely to be contacted for employment, regardless of qualifications People pointe…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 09:15 AM
2

Western feminists have very limited influence on any of these. MIT and Maria Klawe are trying their darndest, however. Outsourcing also has been bad for women, however it runs up against the progressive agenda so too bad. http://isteve.blogspot.com/2011/07/programming-women-and-h1-b.html
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 08:58 AM
2

That's the problem with letting in young women in the workplaces and contact with older men. Combine that with baby boom and a surfeit of young women compared to older men and it's a perfect recipe for old men having the fun of their lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 08:32 AM
2

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qh9ZZgDqzAg
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 08:31 AM
2

http://www.warrenfarrell.net/Summary/
/r/MensRights15/01/15 08:58 PM
7

A year or so later I was in the audience when my colleague Murray Straus presented the results of a study on which we had collaborated with Suzanne Steimetz …. The study included data on violence by women towards their husbands or male partners. Straus was unable to complete his presentation because the yells and shouts from members of the audience drove him from the stage. To even discuss female offenders, I was told later, could only undermine the case for battered women. Straus, who also cons…
/r/MensRights15/01/15 08:53 PM
2

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1w9y0x/the_creator_of_xkcd_doesnt_want_rxkcd_associated/
/r/MensRights15/01/15 08:52 PM
3

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men%27s_rights_movement_in_India
/r/MensRights15/01/15 08:43 PM
2

Neil Strauss's Game was him apologizing for every little thing, perhaps had to get the book passed from feminist publishers.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/15 07:04 AM
1

Or Cochran and Harpending for that matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/15 08:15 PM
2

what you think evolution is That which survives, survives. Screw Darwin, Galton uber alles. Though he made a mistake when he thought of eugenics for improving the race. If you're an elite, it's quite stupid of you to bring up contenders to your progeny, it's better if you allow the lower classes to harangue the competitors from the middle class and in the name of equality educate them into mediocrity. More slaves to work with, comrade! The assortative mating in progress was pointed out in Bell C…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/15 07:30 PM
1

Forgot to add that this guy is a crook most probably, perhaps the same guy I came across a few years earlier. http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=8381.0 edit: looks like it is him http://www.reddit.com/r/raisedbynarcissists/comments/27ixa2/is_sam_vaknin_a_healed_narcissist/
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/15 06:52 PM
2

The income inequality and social mobility(in US) came up before in one askreddit thread. One of the sources given was this, http://www.verisi.com/resources/prosperity-upward-mobility.htm While the father-son numbers are worse than the scandi nations, On the other hand, intergenerational upward mobility for daughters whose Fathers were in the BOTTOM 20%, is only marginally worse in the US. Income inequality is also correlated with the rise in assortative mating with women earning more and the wag…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/15 05:15 PM
3

Roissy in DC, now Chateau Heartiste. After, http://www.theabsolute.net/misogyny/ and Simon Sheppard's works, http://www.heretical.com/ Though I wish I had seen the bitcoin opencl client instead of this stupidity.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/15 01:49 PM
6

I keep missing the good ones. As they say it's about equality, basically a few women who would like to be men and can't sleep at night if women are not as good as men in the endeavors they place value on. Born of a gargantuan inferiority complex which is in large parts related to women's physical inferiority and they would love to show how that doesn't matter because while man the brute might be stronger(upper body only!) he is deficient in mental skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/15 01:30 PM
4

lol you might want to read up on this first, http://www.reddit.com/r/funny/comments/2rwwrv/best_used_car_advertisement_ever_by_aston_martin/cnl4ml5
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/15 09:26 AM
-1

Would women benefit? Of course, since feminism would be dead.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/15 10:00 PM
1

Well they are also big fans of Weininger's theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/15 06:43 AM
6

'gina tingles. Is there a similar behavior by women? They wish.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/15 12:14 AM
0

He was active on PUAhate too, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/15 12:10 AM
1

They are goood. Misogyny, the right way. http://theabsolute.net/misogyny/
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/15 11:26 PM
0

You should know the likes of Kevin Solway. http://www.theabsolute.net/minefield/j3.html
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/15 09:57 PM
0

What do Blue Pillers do to ease the anxiety of knowing you may be cheated on? www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qh9ZZgDqzAg
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/15 09:35 PM
1

I usually only listen to one or two songs from a band; those that I've heard a substantial oeuvre of and from what I can recall right now, Pendulum and Vertical Horizon. Currently listening to a few from Owl City. Don't like movies, Memento would be top, perhaps Fight Club and Matrix too, the latter has aged poorly. Don't like TV either, but liked shows like Scrubs, Seinfeld, HIMYM, Cheers, Frasier when I used to watch them. Breaking Bad was good, but didn't like dramas. Besides its feministized…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/15 08:29 PM
1

dat hyperbola doe
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/15 03:09 PM
1

I'd find that a very strange/unlikely scenario, a really male-dominated progressive patriarchy, comrade!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/15 09:12 PM
1

It's amusing to hear her rhetoric and the enthusiasm with which it's greeted among the lefties and how easily it could be applied against feminism and women's "equality". It gets even more ridiculous in the face of her acceptance to harvard professoriat.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/15 08:58 PM
2

Once upon a time a young man's worst enemies were other young men, now it is old women cooped up in academia.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/15 01:01 AM
1

You implied that for a guy to cheat, a woman has to cheat as well. That's manifestly untrue. Of course, but where were you when the same goes for the other sex....hence the nitpicking. That's the non-sequitur. No it isn't, it starts from I think if the average guy had the same amount opportunities for infidelity as the average woman, than male infidelity would sky rocket. If the average guy is as attractive as the average women then we wouldn't be having these real world sexual differences in th…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/15 11:18 PM
2

Non sequitur wat, are you that daft to not realize that if women have better husbands in the first place they wouldn't be single, this little nitpicking of yours is treated as such a earth shattering argument...wow. The fact remains that a lot of single women have been hoodwinked into going out with married/taken men. The reverse is rare. This started off from an assumption which would make this discrepancy irrelevant, the non sequitur is yours, that's why my surprise.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/15 11:03 PM
2

I am amused that your reply got so many upvotes. Not if the girl is single. Why is she single again?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/15 10:10 PM
1

Goddamned conservatives, talking about sanctity of life when it's in the womb but once out it's pull yourself up by the umbilical cord!!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/15 04:11 PM
0

Physician heal thyself.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/15 03:29 PM
1

Yeah it was something like in that in and old study which was quite flawed because of the fact that its author had accidentally the whole data. The methodology she used seems to be similar to the new one u/taiboworks posted in an earlier thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/15 12:52 PM
-1

Except that laws work within a moral framework. Society works within a moral framework. A society that murders its unborns should do away with such pretensions. It's even more amusing when they are outraged at other societies for doing it by half.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/15 11:46 AM
1

Redpillers has an entire men’s rights section that gets angry over men receiving longer prison sentences, or being defaulted as possible rapists. There is difference between that and the feminists calling it as a product of a patriarchy while being responsible for the former and creating the rape hysteria. If I am not capable of love because I am always looking for a taller, smarter guy, are men incapable of love because they are just looking for another vagina? Sex and love are more differentia…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/15 08:53 AM
1

the vast majority of rapes are perpetrated by family/friends/dates Men they know is not the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/15 03:13 AM
-1

With X-inactivation women, will have one or the other X chromosome expressed in their cells which makes them diverse, where as men only have one X chromosome to express. Consider a group of alleles that go from 1 to 10 on X, you're saying that women will have more combinations of them and this makes them more diverse, whereas the RPers are pointing out that the range for men will be higher since they won't be diluted by the alleles on the other chromosome and this makes them more diverse.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/15 12:24 AM
1

PsychologyToday has done a number of articles on the concept. http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-how-and-why-sex-differences/201101/how-womens-brains-are-calico-cats
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/15 11:37 PM
1

Men are more prone to expressing mutations etc because of the Y chromosome. is right, and iirc are further from male chimpanzees than women are from the female chimps. Since most of the time the Lewontin's fallacy is invoked with respect to genotypic and not phenotypic variability, I don't see why you're having a problem now.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/15 11:34 PM
0

You'd be surprised how unlikely you are to be banned in /r/Feminism. lol when the whole place was regularly flooded with MRAs. seems to be the problem with femradebate sub now.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/15 04:15 AM
0

You don't need to argue for that, there is /r/darkenlightenment doing that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/15 09:28 PM
0

Ok, It's just in the lower classes that marriages are suffering and wedlock births are happening. Yeah, and that's another way that feminism increases inequality.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/15 09:05 PM
3

What scares? The McCarthyism which was correct? I haven't really read much of the com/soc literature, the lunacy of feminism has been enough. The comments on reddit usually devolve to true communism which is a classless, moneyless and stateless society, and hence it was never tried anywhere! A communist state is an oxymoron(reminds me of another), comrade! Mencius Moldbug, the father of neo-reactionaries somehow comes to the conclusion that it is moving towards communism and I believe in a bit w…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/15 07:47 PM
11

http://www.the-spearhead.com/2011/03/09/the-real-lesson-of-scott-adams/
/r/MensRights06/01/15 03:24 PM
-1

hahaha, this is great. The demise of facebook couldn't come fast enough.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 05:47 AM
2

feels bad man. born in the wrong place and wrong time.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/15 05:04 AM
3

One of them is getting off in this very circlejerk.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/15 05:03 AM
0

Someone put it here beautifully, iirc it was something like equality for women and nothing less, equality for men and nothing more. I think it goes back way to the very start, Cultivate the frontal portion of her brain as much as that of man is cultivated, and she will stand his equal at least. Even now, where her mind has been called out at all, her intellect is as bright, as capacious, and as powerful as his. Ernestine Rose Most of them do recognize that this isn't true in the physical attribu…
/r/MensRights05/01/15 04:58 AM
3

The men with higher partner count grew confident, women grew anxious.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/15 03:42 AM
5

I think all of you guy have seen TRP cite that the cock carousel damages women, affects pair bonding. I don't think there is any way to definitively prove it besides anecdotes (virgins being clingy), and correlation (infidelity/divorce rates). A study posted here by TBP said that it did made them more anxious and wary of men. I have another as well, you should ask them too.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/15 02:04 AM
-2

No one cared about girls doing well in school. wat
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/15 01:33 AM
3

it should be noted that girls and boys are not as different as men and women as far as hormones But boys are more physically aggressive than girls so they might be using verbal abuse as well, anyway, the divorce study you linked uses similar methodology as the Weitzmann one. At least they don't hide their data for a decade and publish a book and get national fame. From the acbr link, Warren Farrell, the San Diego-based author of The Myth of Male Power, agrees with Pollock and adds that Weitzman'…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/15 06:27 PM
3

this study found boys and girls were equally likely to abuse a parent And this concerns how? Though interesting to know we have data for children's equality, children's liberation now!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/15 05:58 PM
1

http://gynotheory.blogspot.com/
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/15 05:53 PM
3

So they've reduced the numbers a little now. Since its publication in 1985, sociologist Lenore Weitzman's The Divorce Revolution has had a critical role in shaping the national debate on divorce and its economic effects. In particular, the book's claim that in the year after divorce women's standard of living decreased by a whopping 73 percent while men enjoyed an increase of 43 percent caught the attention of pundits, legislators, and judges. This statistic has become one of the philosophical b…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/15 05:51 PM
6

My experience of the world has taught me that the average wine-bibber is a far better fellow than the, average prohibitionist, and that the average rogue is better company than the average poor drudge, and that the worst white, slave trader of my acquaintance is a decenter man than the best vice crusader. In the same way I am convinced that the average woman, whatever her deficiencies, is greatly superior to the average man. The very ease with which she defies and swindles him in several capital…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/15 05:41 PM
5

Feminism loathes masculinity in men. And all its brouhaha about traditional code breaking by women would be chucked out of the window when its own formula become the tradition. But who knows, the fifth wavers might make a revolution for the kitchen! Doesn't feminism still give women the freedom to be traditional and get married with kids still, since feminism is about choice? Nope. And astonishingly, as late as 1964, the labor force participation rate for Swedish women remained steady at 30 perc…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/15 09:53 AM
2

Not in women, but in women who are thought to have a low 2D:4D ratio and thus a masculinised brain, which of course would go against the AWALT. Wilcoxon repeated-measures analyses (Fig. 1C) showed no effects of testosterone administration on cognitive empathy whatsoever in subjects with low fetal testosterone exposure [i.e., high 2D:4D ratio; Z(1,8) = 0.00; P = 1]. However, in line with expectations, subjects with high fetal testosterone exposure (i.e., low 2D:4D ratio) showed a strongly signifi…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/15 09:20 AM
1

kinder kuche kirche, at least something is.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 09:17 PM
1

The WEIRD.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 09:15 PM
1

Title IX is scummy all around. How it passed, She said: "I don't want you to lobby. Because if you lobby, people will ask questions about this bill, and they will find out what it would really do." ... And she was absolutely right. It was quite a big break that no one was watching. http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2012/06/how-title-ix-sneakily-revolutionized-womens-sports/258708/ The funny thing is that the law doesn't mention sports or athletics, and comes up with a very funny d…
/r/MensRights03/01/15 08:20 PM
1

His writings are overcompensation for the fact that he's gay. Some say that might be the reason for Weininger's misogyny and exaltation of masculinity(genius or die), but it's good.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/15 05:33 PM
0

What does feminism offer a woman like Kaley who is very traditional? wat http://www.the-spearhead.com/2010/03/01/is-this-really-what-men-want/
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/15 08:11 AM
2

Sociology had a women's caucus for putting the male-bias away. It's always amusing to hear how feminism has its hands in social sciences. http://np.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/2r2lw2/til_that_men_actually_pioneered_wearing_high/cnc2g5c?context=3
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/15 07:50 AM
2

Folk can change and discover new things about themselves all the time. Just ask John Travolta!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/15 07:39 AM
5

Well, your own solution smacks of it; instead of raising the men's wages, we've to consider turning women out of the home to earn more which btw also serves the very useful purpose of satisfying feminist egos. This came up before too, and the 1st wavers were guilty of it too, http://np.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/2mncl5/cmvi_think_women_are_economically_inferior_to_men/cm60vjw The japan case also came up on femradebates yesterday and reminded me of the mice utopia experiment. http://en.wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/15 03:47 AM
5

did women or feminists design the current economic system? They did or didn't, what's the point? There are other reasons why a society might not reproduce itself besides the feminist lunacy of getting women to be men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/15 03:16 AM
6

And? What I referred to was here, Other major points for Japan’s bad performance are due to a lack of political empowerment (ranking 118 out of 135 in the subindex). In the current diet, only 8% of the parliament seats are hold by women. Moreover, Japan has had no female head of state since the establishment of a parliament in the late 19th century. This numbers seem quite shocking, but actually Japan has established a very good basis for empowerment in all areas of life for women. A high number…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/15 02:49 AM
4

gender inequality judged by the gender gap index, which is not a gender equality measure at all but a female superiority one. And funnily enough, it would be higher if women had a better position in hell than a slightly lesser one in heaven.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/15 02:44 AM
9

Also most of men act like women and an unusual number of them enjoy being pegged. hahaha
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/15 02:35 AM
0

I can't find the comment for some time now, but it was by an author who wrote of feminism as women getting the power to change things which they had even before as mothers. When I first visited a traditional English family, I endured a slight culture shock as I was faced with something I didn't really see before, as the mother there was quite a bit more submissive than what I had previously been exposed to. Interesting, for the anglochump is only slightly behind the scandinavian schmuck in follo…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/15 11:02 PM
1

Are you yohami?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/14 10:23 PM
2

Sweden seems to be on the way, http://lostinstockholm.com/2008/03/31/the-swedish-male-look/
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/14 08:29 AM
3

Five Feminists On Board The Titanic – Four Survived…The Other Was A Male Feminist
/r/MensRights30/12/14 04:28 AM
0

MKP has its origins in the mythopoetic men's movement of the early 1980s loool Hopefully it isn't as bad/good as the good men project.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/14 03:52 AM
5

How is she ruined exactly? Some BP made a topic with a study showing that these women are more 'jaded'.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/14 03:48 AM
0

When copying the list it put an x on the end of every sub, just ignore that Considering some of them are part of the chimpire, yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/14 03:45 AM
2

Gaming. Not just a hobby though.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/14 03:37 AM
3

http://www.slevnet.com/blog/index.php/why-do-working-class-and-rural-republicans-vote-against-their-own-interests/
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/14 08:24 AM
3

Amusingly the supporters of right wing who don't have much are bitterly criticized for not being more selfish.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/14 03:49 AM
2

Posted about his yesterday here, http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2qimcj/woman_accuses_man_of_rape_man_gets_1_year_jail/cn6tyab
/r/MensRights29/12/14 02:07 AM
0

Misogynist: A man who hates women as much as women hate one another. another noted BPer
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/14 04:18 PM
-1

Where?
/r/MensRights28/12/14 12:49 AM
2

https://girlgame.wordpress.com/ woops it is closed, http://sexliestruth.blogspot.com/2009/09/girl-game.html
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 09:51 PM
1

Well, the difference in testosterone during those ages wouldn't come close to after puberty. Secondly, if testosterone is that important, then what happens to women? Thirdly, IQ does jump around quite a bit from there to puberty. http://occidentalascent.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/increasing-heritability.png?w=644&h=331 This was more interesting, www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/21o9bw/the_effects_of_testosterone/
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 09:49 PM
1

Reminds me of Patrick Waring from Australia, who was a 15 year old when he spent a year in jail. http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/tv-and-radio/a-parents-worst-nightmare-20100602-wyxx.html The documentary in on youtube as well.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 09:29 PM
1

Pre-pubertal children at an age where IQ is not stable.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 08:09 PM
2

Pre-pubertal children at an age where IQ is not stable.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 08:09 PM
1

There were two 'scientific' studies there, a third as well if you like La Griffe, the point was that the most popular of them should have come ot the conclusion that boys do better in maths despite environmental effects and due to them. The brain size and g correlation was something you brought up, it wasn't even necessary to the point I was making. As for your article, While men have larger brains on an absolute level, there are no sex differences in brain size once body mass is controlled. The…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 06:32 PM
4

No it can't, if you think you can avoid feminism's misogyny chant then you're living in a dream land. And there is no gender equality unless men somehow become asexuals or bisexuals(to the degree that feminists approve of), no chance. The seeming similarity to a pick-up artist cult, Not just that, https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2014/12/24/the-difference-between-game-and-the-red-pill/
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 05:09 PM
3

This article says he was cleared last year itself. http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/local-news/dustin-toth-cleared-woman-arrested-in-kidnapping-sexual-assault-case
/r/MensRights27/12/14 01:47 PM
2

Nevermind that it didn't matter in what I wrote there, it's outdated and debunked the way the boys aren't better at maths is outdated and debunked. http://endofwomen.blogspot.com/2014/12/why-boys-are-better-at-maths.html
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 08:47 AM
1

http://endofwomen.blogspot.com/2012/10/womens-brains-and-upper-body-strength.html
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 10:50 PM
5

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coming_Apart_%28book%29
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 07:43 PM
2

seems like women who can't get men to commit (presumably because they are lower quality, less attractive) Presumably. experience with low quality women Well, at least there is acceptance that there are low quality women who are, to use the vernacular, sluts and not able to get commitment. Interestingly these are college students with liberal aspirations and don't run the gamut of normal society. Depending on the institution one could make a better prediction of their class. Multiple-partner fema…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 07:40 PM
7

Better than going around in circles.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 11:33 AM
3

The best place where one would expect to see cognitive dissonance is the american academia with its two pillars of diversity and equality. High IQ doesn't preclude one from doublethink.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 11:28 AM
6

And I'm baffled by the use of cognitive dissonance; if they're suffering from it they surely aren't showing it. Doublethink is the word you guys are looking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 10:21 AM
2

many people misjudged him He was allowed to speak? You should see the MRA push to get enveloping as rape, they already have studies with men and women showing similar rates of forced sex. Equality achieved! Goddamn American academia, the rapiest institution of the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 09:04 AM
1

If Men Have All The Power Why Do Women Make The Rules? The pdf is free, begins with a female system(The Rules) and the writer is a progressive, of course that won't absolve him of the S&M charge. The sexes deceive themselves about each other — because at bottom they honor and love only themselves (or their own ideal, to put it more pleasantly). Thus man likes woman peaceful — but woman is essentially unpeaceful, like a cat, however well she may have trained herself to seem peaceable.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 07:14 AM
3

Hyena society bestest society, except for the childbirth part. Once vat humping for offspringing future generations is achieved, we'd have perfect equality. Glorious future in the offing, comrade!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 02:08 AM
8

They do this, but then they also reinforce that reality and encourage it. Oh the horrors. I don't think they are completely permanent aspects of our society. Feminism is temporary, gender roles are permanent, until we finally achieve the end of women. That's why you need this humongous machinery to keep it going, nevermind that its anti-traditionalism is already making housewifery the new occupy movement.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 01:04 AM
0

Cognitive Dissonance is part of being human. Oh, if only.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/14 11:34 PM
-1

The religions are a technology based on the primitive science of human behavior, paraphrasing Mitchell Heisman. which are uncommon to simultaneously have. because the atheists™ are a fucking stupid lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/14 11:26 PM
3

Ezekiel 25:17.1 "The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil women. Blessed is he who, in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of the darkness. For he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know I am the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/14 06:51 PM
0

That's a good question, how do they?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/14 10:29 AM
0

By controlling access to money, you can create a situation that leaves your partner totally dependent on you, for their survival. Has the basic rule of the marriage contract of keeping up your wife level with your station in life changed? inb4 the 'women were chattel' crowd.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/14 10:19 AM
2

Men, clearly, do need protection, both from their own stupidity and from their susceptibility to female beauty. Indeed, one of the best laws ever passed by men, one of the few which male legislators have passed in the male interest, was an Act of the British Parliament of 1770. It said: All women, of what ver age, rank, profession or degree who shall after this Act, impose upon, seduce, and betray into marriage any of His Majesty's subjects by virtue of scents, paints, cosmetic washes, artificia…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/14 07:24 PM
1

As to the prejudice accusations of sexual crime incite, Dr. Lawson Tait says:-- "Matters are such under this unrighteous combination that how- ever men may laugh at it and make jokes, they do not willingly travel with single unknown female companions in railway carriages. They know very well that for a man to have the finger of a woman pointed at him with a charge of a sexual offence is to secure that man's extinction, no matter what the verdict of a jury may be. In 1881 (Lond. Med. Gazette ) a …
/r/PussyPassDenied24/12/14 01:39 PM
2

Oscar Wilde: They are always satisfied with the best. Sounds pretty philogynic to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/14 07:06 AM
1

confusian Well, the unbearable lightness of being is something along the same lines. Though not for the above reason. edit: my bad, it is Houellebecq https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/02/04/choice-quotes-from-michel-houellebecq/
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/14 06:59 AM
1

They need a man. For getting quotes such as these, Like a fish needs a bicycle. Amusingly the coiner of the phrase was the kind of low standards woman that BP talk of. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irina_Dunn#Background
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/14 02:08 PM
3

"We refer to the unrestricted sale of sulphuric acid (vitriol) which is permitted. Now here we have a substance subserving only very special purposes in industry, none in household economy, or in other departments, save for criminal ends, which is never- theless procurable without let or hindrance. Is it possible to believe that this would be the case if men were in the habit of using this substance in settling their differences with each other, even still more if they employed it by way of emph…
/r/MensRights22/12/14 02:23 AM
3

Ah, the little piggy is all grown up! Poor girl, she ain't no superman.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 02:14 AM
-5

The great outdated comeback, that's why I am bored.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 11:17 PM
-2

The marriage contract has always been understood as a sex contract. If it were not, marriage would be meaningless—which is perhaps the real intention of the feminists who clamored for the new law outlawing marital rape.60 It was Hetherington’s misfortune that he came to trial at a time when the issue of “marital rape” was being publicized by feminists as a grievance against the patriarchal family and men in general. One result of this agitation was the; passing of a law which, in effect, declare…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 10:46 PM
3

Nope, nevermind that it doesn't address what was said.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 01:29 PM
-1

Bold talk for someone like you. Someone mentioned media, that's where it is at.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 01:29 PM
1

Steven Goldberg held the record for most rejections for his Inevitability of Patriarchy, who knew that patriarchy was so powerful!
/r/MensRights21/12/14 11:51 AM
1

The feminist efforts at reverse programming are the exception, not the rule. lol the feminist efforts are merely labeling it as societally constructed and then getting the carte blanche to do whatever the hell they like.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 05:21 AM
3

http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2012/04/marxist-dialectic-of-family-part-one.html
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/14 12:12 AM
4

That's the spirit!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 11:17 PM
5

youre easily persuaded isn't that right. sorry wtf why are you using this for when you're not, and if you're, don't be.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 11:12 PM
2

that has no citations oh lookee, we have a badass over here. Im sorry good.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 10:53 PM
4

http://blog.jim.com/culture/on-what-used-to-be-called-marriage/
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 10:49 PM
-1

High school is GREAT if you are ROBUST jock. QFTFT!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 09:46 PM
2

with a dominant woman It's comical. is there really anything wrong with that? Fantasies taken to such extremes tend to get loopy, but hey we are living in the times of not that there's anything wrong with that!. Keep in mind, D/s relationships are based on consent and negotiating boundaries--everyone knows what they're getting into. If only they'd allow for same respect to the institution of marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 07:10 PM
0

The catcalling situation was downright comical, http://www.scifiwright.com/2014/11/wolfwhistling-is-sexist-and-complaining-about-wolfwhistling-is-racist-and-courtesy-toward-women-is-sexist-and-demanding-courtesy-from-all-men-regardless-of-race-is-racist-and/ It's unfortunate that you'd to go back to the likes of Tom Wolfe to satirize this nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 05:32 PM
-11

A little googling will prevent my rehashing the same old tired arguments, and I thought reading about the devil incarnate that is Vox Day was compulsory already.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 11:03 AM
-14

bored
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 09:24 AM
2

otoh this guy got a film http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1054588/
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 04:25 AM
-13

Once you reason out why it is so, then you can start applying logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 03:27 AM
-17

I genuinely think that marital rape is an oxymoron.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 03:18 AM
-18

Marital rape is an oxymoron, and yes would like to go back to a time when such stupidities didn't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 02:51 AM
2

Indian drama, best drama.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 02:24 AM
2

Diversity of opinion and viewpoint is always better. It's why I push for more women and minority representation in STEM. But they are having the same opinions and viewpoints. And this diversity runs smack dab in the face of the other cherished ideal of equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 01:50 AM
1

gender gap in STEM education is actually pretty small Physics is male biased along with E&T, maths is about 40-45% women and has been since the 70s. Biology otoh is majority women while chemistry is about equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 01:47 AM
2

female biologist Nancy Hopkins and she was upto it even earlier. http://www.salon.com/2001/04/12/science_women/
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 01:38 AM
-4

The media. gosh darn the conservative media fooling these poor sods with pleasantville imagery! They watched Stepford Wives wat
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 12:30 AM
4

In 1900, only 6 percent of married women worked outside the home, usually when their blue-collar husbands were unemployed. Among wives with children at home, very few worked at all. Almost half of single women held jobs, but they usually stopped working when they married or, at the latest, when they got pregnant, and most never worked for pay again. About a third of widowed and divorced women worked, typically out of economic necessity. Never-married women with children were virtually unknown. a…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 12:24 AM
-5

It's a common misconception than many RP men have. And why do they have that?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 12:20 AM
1

Traditionalism would help. Religion for all its sky god fairy tales, at least was predicated on observable human behavior that is verboten today. As for modern realities, better education for boys and enhancing their ambitions so that traditional marriages come about on their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/14 08:00 PM
1

The funny thing is that I haven't been in the RP sub for a tenth of the time that I've been here. I don't know what they believe, but I used to be a regular in manosphere where they take their material from. Rob Fedders, Fedrz, was the one that made me realize that marriage had gone to shit way before these 50s decrying liberals appeared on the scene. http://mattforney.com/2013/08/01/rob-fedders-retires-paying-tribute-to-one-of-the-godfathers-of-the-manosphere/
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/14 07:25 PM
1

They don't know *their history or you don't know yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/14 07:09 PM
2

http://www.reddit.com/r/sociology/comments/2mx5pe/thinking_about_taking_sociology_at_university/ all deleted. Though the reply in question, I have a B.S. in Sociology, and am working on a M.S. in Sociology...If you're going into this with the frame of mind you've discussed here, I don't think you're going to enjoy your major. I actually wouldn't recommend going into any major with the intention to combat it. I think if you want to learn more about Sociology, then go for it (and you'll learn that…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/14 01:15 PM
5

Until the manosphere can offer more than thinly veiled misogyny, it has no place in academia... top kek and here the feminist establishment keeps telling us that there is so much misogyny in the academia that poor women are still so far from the top top positions.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/14 01:11 PM
2

Sex and Culture by JD Unwin is a good book in this regards.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/14 12:02 PM
1

It's wrecked the lower classes. The widely reviled Charles 'Bell Curve' Murray wrote his new book about the new white underclass in his Coming Apart which is following along the black lines. As for masculinity, feminists love it, they just don't like seeing it men. The toxic masculinity nonsense is just that. Is marriage no longer as good of an idea as it once was? It was wrecked for men and Mencken(aw hell no, he ain't a RPer) mentioned it in his In Defense of Women. I posted Einstein's opinion…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/14 09:53 AM
5

The end of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/14 09:25 AM
1

Some RPer posted in /r/sociology talking about how he wanted to get in the field and do kind of RP studies, one of the responses was dripping with condescension remarking how she had never seen a conservative in her field. The topic came up in FeMRA sub recently. http://www.reddit.com/r/FeMRADebates/comments/2o2jbb/liberal_privilege_in_the_social_sciences/
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/14 09:21 AM
4

I believe that modern American marriages are, by and large, conducted on a basis of equality, but I also believe that the opposite contention is far closer to the truth than that of the New Feminists: namely, that it is men, not women, who are more likely to be the oppressed class, or gender, in our society, and that it is far more the men who are the "blacks," the slaves, and women their masters. In the first place, the female militants claim that marriage is a diabolical institution by which h…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/14 12:33 PM
2

And like blue pill and feminism sub, I got banned from there.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/14 09:50 AM
6

That's a cute euphemism for pregnancy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/14 09:30 AM
3

If you're going by Vox Day's classification, then those categories aren't in sexless state. Sigmas are guys who would be alphas if not for anti-social lone wolf nature, betas are replacement alphas, gammas are the ones who could learn from game, while the omegas are the classical fedora tipping neckbeards who have no hope and are the social outcasts. http://alphagameplan.blogspot.com/2011/03/socio-sexual-hierarchy.html
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/14 07:16 AM
-1

Wasn't Lysistrata a comedy because it's considered preposterous that women can keep off from having sex? iirc many women in the play try to slink away to get some, but the eponymous character foils them. do you sympathize with sexless betas or are you laughing at their predicament? A good question is if one of your own was one of these guys then would you?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/14 12:53 PM
0

Distribution of number of sexual partners approximates a normal curve for both sexes where?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/14 12:17 AM
1

Of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/14 11:11 PM
2

Well, Naomi Wolf did call Gore a beta male in the previous century. As for RP and conservatism, George Gilder's conclusions about women being responsible for domestication of men and in turn civilization is a complete 180 to RP. There's a reason why most of RedPillWomen fit into the 1950s housewife stereotype. And who created that stereotype? Mom got herself out of the nursery and the kitchen. She then got out of the house. She did not get out of the church, but, instead, got the stern stuff out…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/14 09:33 PM
-1

We'd march onto a progressive patriarchy, comrade! Patriarchal feminism FTW!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/14 08:44 PM
0

A few of them are like a few rams.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/14 07:08 PM
8

women now are often out earning men Started from the 2000s probably even earlier for young women in big cities. and more of them receive college degrees than men They started doing that in the 80s. Assuming this trend continues what do you think will happen to dating? Who will win, RP or BP? Let's get a historical BP perspective: Under Feminist rule, women will be able to select, because they will be able to sweep out of their minds the monetary consideration; therefore they will love better, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/14 07:00 PM
0

... from wanting to pick up women. sigh. That you're encountering LMR is due to the fact that PUA techniques worked and have landed you in the current position. That I've to spell out your stupidity in clear terms before you get an inkling of it and that you'll continue to spout your BS even after that is what is killing this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/14 03:16 PM
6

And where do you think pick up starts from?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/14 03:01 PM
4

Why do you think it is named "last minute resistance"?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/14 02:36 PM
6

This does not even make any sense, last minute resistance is after the PUA techniques have worked already.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/14 02:30 PM
1

AWALT if I am remembering it correctly simply meant a response to any woman who came into those blogs talking about how logical women were and that they should shut down all that misogyny talks while being a prime exemplar herself of what was being talked about. http://www.the-spearhead.com/2009/11/15/how-to-deal-with-not-all-women-are-like-that/ To add, most of that behavior was similar to when it is pointed out that women are passive, and feminists then rage on about how they aren't. Roissy in…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/14 02:28 PM
3

Nothing new under the sun. At the back of it lies something even more tragic: the imminent fear in the American noncommitted right that the left, so nicely rooted in American folklore, after all, is riding the Wave of the Future. How, otherwise, could one understand that temperamentally very conservative boards of trustees of colleges and universities have repeatedly hired professors notorious for their leftist ideas? How could one understand that archconservative American businessmen have sent …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/14 08:17 AM
0

No disagreement there. Really? I am sick and tired of this whole nonsense, it's mindboggling to me how a few deranged lying scum have led to this. And the MRAs going on ahead with their male studies to compete with the gratuitous nonsense of feminist academia, simply mindboggling. Wish I had stopped poking this nonsense few years back. You are being purposefully ignorant Talking at cross purposes here. The property rights came about before suffrage. Poor women stopped being chattel. http://www.r…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/14 08:34 PM
0

It didn't matter much with the 2% claim. Another source, cited by Rumney (2006) and widely referenced in the literature on false allegations is a study conducted by the New York City police department and originally referenced by Susan Brownmiller (1975) in her book, Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape. According to Brownmiller, the study found a false allegation rate of 2%. However, the only citation for the study is a public remark made by a judge at a bar association meet-ing, and, therefor…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/14 08:24 PM
0

I think humans thrive with competition, not socialist tendencies which I think will cause things to stagnate and get worse. lol iirc it was Milan Kundera's Unbearable Lightness of Being that talked of traditional relationships being akin to communism
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/14 07:39 PM
2

So what? Ideological feminists are not in the majority, but they are also not all on the lunatic fringe. On the contrary, they produce exceedingly sophisticated theories (such as the conspiracy theory of history)6 and adopt equally sophisticated strategies (such as work- ing within the established law schools and government bureaucracies instead of riot- ing in the streets, to achieve a social revolution that most people still find hard even to imagine). They develop these theories at respectabl…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/14 07:27 PM
1

Huh, well you learn something new every day. You've got much to learn. Emily Davidson was hardcore She's harddumb, it's amazing that you call RPers extremists and crazies when this stupid woman is one of the martyrs of the suffragette movement. http://www.johndclare.net/Women2_DidSuffragettesHelp.htm Big Red is a nutjob For now, she will be the good feminist who fought against the gamergators led by the likes of Warren Farrell and CHS to those finding the fourth-wavers crazy. She and her ilk how…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/14 07:11 PM
0

Feminism as a movement has been around for centuries It is old, but the word was coined by Charles Fourier. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Fourier “Third-wave” feminism has its nut-jobs and certainly lacks the urgency that the first two waves had lmao the first wavers had nut jobs who were willing to run in front of horses, these turd wavers have nothing on them. It’s just the purpose is less tangible than Section IX or the right to vote. Title IX? It's already a problem that this thing ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/14 06:46 PM
0

what matters is if the study itself is sound What naivete, anyway there was more of the Kanin study besides that first paragraph.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/14 06:32 PM
1

Baroness Stern can put out all the reports that she wants, but this shamelessness has no signs of abating.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/14 06:26 PM
-1

Not for the likes of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/14 04:13 PM
-2

Okay, so.. p values are the number that tell you whether something is a real result or not. Thanks for the statistics lecture, you could use some help yourself. As for discrediting his study on the lack of p-values, the first study in that wiki criticism by David Lisak doesn't have any either. Their sample size is 136 to Kanin's 109(excluding the universities), moreover Kanin himself states, Most problematic is the question of the generalizability of these find- ings from a single police agency …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/14 04:10 PM
-4

It is you who is sheltered one, and judging by the length of the your outrage, a waste of time to even post that.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/14 11:44 AM
-1

Oh, and no p value mentioned anywhere? That is huge. Almost discredits the study by itself. Why exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/14 10:11 AM
1

http://forums.avoiceformen.com/showthread.php?13493-Huffpo-article-on-rape-inspired-me-to-look-into-David-Lisack-rape-stats&p=115819&viewfull=1#post115819
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/14 10:09 AM
2

2% The Brownmillerian number again, sigh. Let's delve into this further shall we? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/14 10:07 AM
-3

The rape hysteria has already gone too far when a man gets sentenced to more time for accidentally raping a woman than a woman who accidentally blinded a man. http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/mens-rights-feminism/whats-so-terrible-about-rape-rape-is-not-as-bad-as-it-used-to-be
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/14 10:04 AM
1

Yeah, I never gave much thought to it before coming to PUA sites. I also remember reading that NOW prevented a study on female fertility presumably because they'd rather have women having equality with men than their children.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/14 09:05 AM
2

It's not like they like they are fans of Blackstone.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/14 11:05 PM
-2

Why is it wrong to teach men about this aspect of women? Because then the change of heart or the so-called maturation of the earlier distant/friendzoning high school girl would be revealed to be a lie. Curiously I first heard about this sex difference in a chick flick where the woman was groaning about her husband remaining good looking while she ages.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/14 10:56 PM
0

Right now being a skinny woman is the shit www.femininebeauty.info has a few articles on just who really likes those really skinny girls. what's sexual about that? Difference is attractive. The pelvis being one of the most sexually differentiated part of human skeleton, add the hormone driven deposition of fat, and you have assmans in the wild. Boobs are just imitation asses on chests, according to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/14 10:41 PM
2

Jim Webb's Women can't fight and the forestry department's decimation excerpted on thinkinghousewife site.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/14 09:07 PM
0

Feminism is needed because women are still not seen as good men and often better. The other issues are icing on the cake.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/14 11:14 AM
1

Not a new phenomenon. http://radishmag.wordpress.com/2013/09/27/fair-sex/#against-suffrage The recent nonsense with gamergate has them crying about third wavers but hey the earlier ones were cool. Christina Hoff Sommers FTW!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/14 03:14 AM
1

http://www.isteve.com/nerds.htm As for mentality, the "manly man" wants to win arguments, not to be right. The scientist wants to be right, even if it means losing an argument and ceding it to someone who is right. LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/14 10:39 AM
3

A good point for cultural side can be sexual imprinting, what exactly boys are surrounded when they are coming into sexual maturity.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/14 09:36 AM
4

I would say the elite ruling class is in control, rather than "men are in control." The equality of women with men means that the women from the same elite strata would occupy or make it easier for the elite men to continue dominating the ranks. The real challengers who are the men from lower classes find themselves either out of motivation in broken families or crowded out by female quotas.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/14 03:46 AM
1

Anatomy of Female Power made the same claim. Taken against the background that he sees as the basic underlying matriarchalism of human society, Chinweizu sees feminism as the revolt of a few women not against patriarchy, but as against the matriarchalist order which underlies the patriarchal mask -- a "revolt in paradise". http://web.archive.org/web/20101018080025/http://novaseeker.blogspot.com/2009/04/anatomy-of-female-power.html
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/14 03:41 AM
2

Daddies who can't see their poor little princesses' dreams shatter. sniffle There was even a goddamned paper on it when I searched for it. Anyway, Steve Sailer did a piece during the Larry Summers's harvard fiasco which covers them. http://www.vdare.com/articles/why-some-men-dont-support-summers
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/14 03:38 AM
1

http://www.breakingthescience.org/SJC_GBC_analysis_intro.php http://amptoons.com/blog/2006/01/18/mens-rights-myth-typical-child-support-payments-are-insanely-high/comment-page-2/#comment-115308
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/14 01:02 AM
6

"It's not that grownup society is hostile to boyishness as such. On the contrary, grownups eagerly encourage risk-taking and adventuring -- provided only that it's done by girls. There's no shortage of books for young readers about wars and western exploration, about mountain-climbing and bravery during floods and hurricanes. But the protagonists of these books are usually 10-year-old girls. "Stories for boys are no longer permitted to be so exciting. Here is a publisher's blurb for a book about…
/r/TheRedPill10/12/14 11:10 PM
4

The hypocrisy and the golden rule arguments don't work. Hypocrisy for the simple reason that nobody is claiming that they are believing in what you think they are. Hypocrisy is when you claim you want equality between the sexes and chide men for weight and other preferences, while at the same time piling abuse upon /r/short(men). But let's say a short woman wants a tall man. Would anybody care? Talletes do, though they don't make much noises about it in /r/tall
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/14 10:25 PM
-1

Great things aren't the only reason. http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2008/02/questionators-should-women-have-right.html http://mattforney.com/2013/08/01/rob-fedders-retires-paying-tribute-to-one-of-the-godfathers-of-the-manosphere/
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/14 02:35 PM
1

Matters are such under this unrighteous combination that how- ever men may laugh at it and make jokes, they do not willingly travel with single unknown female companions in railway carriages. They know very well that for a man to have the finger of a woman pointed at him with a charge of a sexual offence is to secure that man's extinction, no matter what the verdict of a jury may be. In 1881 (Lond. Med. Gazette ) a case was tried in which a girl, to shield 48 herself against her equal share of g…
/r/MensRights10/12/14 01:59 PM
1

5-10 years ago almost NO ONE would have thought to question such a claim. Add zeros.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 07:54 AM
0

The problem with Kanin is that he went against the feminist dogma, in a similar vein Murray Straus is another methodologically bankrupt researcher.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/14 02:11 PM
2

implying you would believe
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/14 01:03 PM
0

sigh, my fault for bothering with the likes of you. The one valid criticism of Kanin is that he didn't disclose his data sources, but then it doesn't seem to be a problem for other studies and policy implementation. www.acbr.com/biglie.htm
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/14 12:57 PM
2

he even makes an offhand admission this may impact the results! Like a good researcher.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/14 11:23 AM
2

Rape of Belgium rhetoric was used during 1st wavers' time. And Russia was feministised before Sweden, so wtf is that even gonna do?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/14 11:21 AM
1

What are you going on about?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/14 10:41 AM
0

but combining it with lingerie photos and thigh high boots isn't sending the right message. Tanja Bergkvist is a cutie too. As for TV role models, they are also more like women with personal issues and relationships doing those jobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/14 09:41 AM
2

Well, Winnie Cooper from the Wonder Years tried something similar for maths. Unfortunately she ran up against the Sailer's law of Female Journalism. TV might help too. Public narratives about a career make a difference. The most common career aspiration named on Girls Who Code applications is forensic science. Like Allen, few if any of the girls have ever met anyone in that field, but they’ve all watched “CSI,” “Bones” or some other show in which a cool chick with great hair in a lab coat gets t…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/14 08:55 AM
1

ahaha http://www.cotwa.info/2010/06/a-whirl-around-wacky-wonderful-world-of.htmlh The day when a police chief It was an example. a bunch of clearly biased internet warriors are taken more seriously than actual scientists is the day science dies. Still better than the 2% Brownmillerians.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/14 08:07 AM
-2

The contradictions within TRP are often hashed out on this sub Oh if they would. That's like me saying that man-haters aren't real feminists. Except they are the real feminists. The other useful idiots that you are calling feminists keep parroting the slogans. I respect some of what TRP stands for wow, and think harder.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/14 12:47 AM
0

I tend to disagree with many feminists anyway, despite being a woman eh, ok. Anyway, The law, it was assumed, and the assumption was acted upon, was the same for both sexes. The sexes were equal before the law. The laws were harsher in some respects than now, although not perhaps in all. But there was no special line of demarcation as regards the punishment of offences as between men and women. The penalty ordained by the law for crime or misdemeanour was the same for both and in general applied…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/14 12:33 AM
0

In fact some feminists would argue women are socialized with more moral obligations than men who are given the "boys will be boys" excuse. Other feminists would argue that women are seen as like children and that's why the justice system is lenient on them. All your bases are belong to us.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/14 12:18 AM
3

I read the Koss report last week for the first time in months, and I was reminded of an interesting fact. Here's a quiz: which scholar, who is cited on this site from time to time, was relied on in the Koss report? That's right, Prof. Eugene Kanin. Koss didn't rely on Kanin for his false rape report, of course, but for his other work. Kanin, many feminists don't know, was highly respected in the feminist community before his false rape studies. His studies on male aggression and acquaintance rap…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/14 08:32 PM
1

Camille Paglia could've used it. PAGLIA: A woman I'm talking with at some event says, "Let's leave here and go to this bar," which is a lesbian bar. We go to the bar and we're talking and then she says, "Let's go have coffee," and we go to this coffee shop and end up, at three in the morning, half a block from her apartment. Finally, she says, "All right, well, goodnight." She's ready to go home alone and I look at her, like, "What do you mean? Aren't we going to go back to your apartment?" "No.…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/14 08:07 PM
0

http://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/2oext7/83_of_the_psychologyeducation_articles_with_four/ http://www.cotwa.info/2012/07/not-enough-falsely-accused-to-worry.html
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/14 08:07 PM
5

Those who control the present control the past and hence the future. A few decades down the line, the fourth wavers would be seen as going too far, but the toilet equality third wavers will be lauded for their great struggle to destroy the young boys' network in video gaming industry and the macho man randy savages in STEM fields who turned off women with their testosterone dripping hijinks. Tumblr in Action subreddit can give you a few ideas for the dystopia. edit: the quote was from way before…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/14 07:56 PM
1

Same for the researchers.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/14 07:52 PM
2

False Rape Society used to have lots of news stories, it ranged from getting back at an ex to something as mundane as being late for job. They've moved over to cotwa.info now, Pierce Harlan the creator is also on reddit. http://www.reddit.com/user/PierceHarlan
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/14 07:42 PM
1

The researcher vs. law enforcement disparity is quite high. http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/mens-rights-feminism/4-out-of-5-rape-accusations-are-false-austrian-head-of-vice-police
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/14 07:39 PM
1

https://familyinequality.wordpress.com/2011/03/15/stop-that-feminist-viral-statistic-meme/
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/14 06:19 PM
0

I thought this was common during the 50s, the most hated years for liberals? And that sexual revolution ended it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/14 04:01 PM
1

Feels bad man.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/14 09:20 PM
1

http://np.reddit.com/r/science/comments/2o9hqm/subclinical_psychopathy_not_physical_strength_or/
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/14 09:20 PM
-1

despite clear studies that candidates with identical resumes are judged much more favorably when they are male. Not this again. This only came up yesterday, http://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/2oext7/83_of_the_psychologyeducation_articles_with_four/ And patriarchy gave custody to fathers, see the work of Daniel Amneus, The Case for Father Custody for bringing it back. Nevermind that we could've had had the alternative arrangement of throwing the mother out of the house and then ordaining he…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/14 09:47 AM
-1

More women try to suicide but more men end up an hero. Women already dress up in men's clothing than the other way round but don't have it in them to usually go the whole hog. Though with the proliferation of steroids, you might see some unfortunately ending up that way. See East German Krieger and that recent bodybuilder woman who looks like a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/14 09:44 AM
3

quelle surprise!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/14 07:55 AM
6

This female clock is really driving me mad, for her quarrelsome din doesn't stop for a moment. The tongue of a quarrelsome woman never tires of chiming in. She even drowns out the sound of the church bell. A nagging wife couldn't care less whether her words are wise or foolish, provided that the sound of her own voice can be heard. She simply pursues her own ends; there's not a grain of sense in what she says; in fact she finds it impossible to have a decent thought. She doesn't want her husband…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/14 07:18 AM
1

Amusing that you'd say that. http://np.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/2nqtw6/haha_this_article_about_girl_coders_will/cmg1cq5
/r/MensRights07/12/14 02:04 AM
1

http://np.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/2nqtw6/haha_this_article_about_girl_coders_will/cmg9tnq?context=3
/r/MensRights07/12/14 01:40 AM
2

Which one?
/r/MensRights07/12/14 12:51 AM
2

Gender roles hurt everyone. Sigh. Haven't read much about Canada, they don't seem to have SAT and do college admissions on school grades which favor girls. This was an article that I read a few years earlier. “If you had a picture of a person doing something positive, winning a race, performing an experiment successfully, etc., [you had to] make sure it was of a girl,” said one of the consultants involved in the revisions. “If you had to have a picture of someone doing a bad thing – bullying, ma…
/r/MensRights07/12/14 12:49 AM
4

Don't forget Hofstra.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 12:30 AM
1

The racial difference is on a surer footing than the standard deviation difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/14 06:44 PM
0

No, women are ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/14 06:41 PM
1

James Thompson? Fairly active in racist circles.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/14 06:32 PM
1

They straw man "Feminism" as this international conspiracy It is. and they also take shit idiot sexist "bloggers" and SJWs seriously Where do you think they are coming from?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/14 10:30 AM
0

http://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/2014/05/sexual-cant-from-asexual-kant.html
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/14 10:04 AM
1

Figure out why feminism exists and you begin to solve problems. Women are dissatisfied with not being able to vote, having less say in household matters, having little say in political matters, having less choice comparatively about how they live their life, etc. That's quite a herstory you got there.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/14 09:37 AM
2

Teaching was an acceptable female career pre-feminism. Feminism didn't start in the 70s. Claims that one sex or the other is not being taught effectively in our schools have been frequent and often impassioned. From early in the century (Ayres, 1909) through about 1970 (Sexton, 1969; Austin, Clark, & Fitchett, 1971), criticism was usually focused on the treatment of boys, especially at the elementary level. Critics noted that boys received lower grades in all subjects and lower achievement test …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/14 09:07 AM
1

The PUA and MRA had a big falling out a few years back, the schism remains. There are guys like Eivind Berge who might be on both sides of the aisle.The manosphere opposes feminism, but for their own reasons, http://www.the-spearhead.com/2013/06/19/main-ideologies-in-the-manosphere/
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/14 08:25 PM
1

considering it's just mix of conservativsm hahaha https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2011/10/28/another-conservative-traditionalist-gets-it-wrong-about-men-and-women/ https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2010/03/10/why-do-conservatives-sanctify-women/ Unless you're talking of somewhat of a Dabney conservative, "It may be inferred again that the present movement for women’s rights will certainly prevail from the history of its only opponent: Northern conservatism. This is a party which never conserves an…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/14 02:21 PM
1

Oh, this BS again.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/14 12:34 PM
2

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men%27s_rights_movement_in_India
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/14 11:14 AM
2

If this is the case, why is feminism even a thing? You answer your own question.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/14 11:00 AM
3

Women are genetic celebrities while even successful men have to work for it. You're the one kidding.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/14 10:59 AM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/2nfjz1/techraptor_has_been_in_the_midst_of_a/cmejwl5
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/14 10:57 AM
9

Women's prisons should close, says justice taskforce http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-13666066
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/14 10:53 AM
3

To add, there were about equal number of women in colleges at the start of the 20th century, though not in the same fields which is the stick in the craw of feminism today.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/14 09:54 PM
11

No human ever likes being the lesser. Well those anti-suffragette women weren't humans then. "I am surprised beyond all things to find how many men are favorable," Harriet Taylor Upton informed a friend while campaigning for suffrage in Ohio. "Now if only stupid women would get awake and yell we might make it." But feminine silence remained smothering. As a fair belle told one ... organizer in Mississippi, "You know we women do not desire to be other than we are." From a train chugging across th…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/14 09:08 PM
0

Most of the stigma against feminism comes from what feminism represents now, and that's understandable. The problem is that this shit has been said for every wave of feminism. The next wavers critics will be thinking how good the third wave was. Modern society is so thoroughly and deeply saturated with feminist prejudices and ideas, and the sentiments which most promote feminine power and feminine tastes are so universally popular both in the Press and in modern literature generally, that anyone…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/14 08:37 PM
1

1)women were not getting same grades as men, change the system. 2)women are not getting lab manager jobs, that's why women scientists and professors are under-represented.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/14 08:24 PM
3

http://np.reddit.com/r/india/comments/2o62fn/must_see_other_side_of_rohtak_bravehearts/cmk4y5r
/r/MensRights04/12/14 03:16 PM
2

The law, it was assumed, and the assumption was acted upon, was the same for both sexes. The sexes were equal before the law. The laws were harsher in some respects than now, although not perhaps in all. But there was no special line of demarcation as regards the punishment of offences as between men and women. The penalty ordained by the law for crime or misdemeanour was the same for both and in general applied equally to both. Likewise in civil suits, pro- ceedings were not specially weighted …
/r/MensRights04/12/14 02:44 PM
0

Betty Friedan and ilk whined about it, apparently the 80s saw a regress of some sort which was decried as backlash by the likes of Susan Faludi.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/14 04:57 AM
0

In a conservative enclave in those liberal cities. edit: forgot to add this article was linked to: http://www.salon.com/2012/06/30/jenny_mccarthys_playboy_spread_hurts_older_women/
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/14 12:53 AM
2

The study, which appeared in Public Opinion last fall, contrasted "TV's Dream Girls" in three different decades (those beginning in 1955, 1965, and 1975). It concluded that women in all three decades are depicted in ways suggesting they are not truly equal to men. The femmes come across as less important than men in TV dramas; they "are less likely to be mature adults, are less well educated, and hold lower status jobs." Furthermore, women in the dramas tended to derive their identities from the…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/14 12:45 AM
2

Yes, though I think their losing would be better. r/kotakuinaction is the subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/14 12:07 AM
1

Asian neoteny is good for women, not for men. Asians have a masculine cognitive profile. As for black alphas, www.youtube.com/watch?v=BzfNl0QxIwE
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/14 12:02 AM
6

ceteris paribus http://www.isteve.com/images/Intermarriage_graph_1-gif.gif
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/14 11:45 PM
1

Rapees don't offer getting raped for money Of course. you can bet prostitutes were urged by a very natural hunger Of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/14 11:43 PM
1

The other day, at a court held in a fashionable town of the south coast, on a prostitute being brought up charged with soliciting, a female "justice," recently appointed, declaimed against the wickedness of punishing prostitutes for soliciting while men were never brought up charged with the offence. (Needless to say, there was the usual male fool to be found in the body of the court, who shouted: "Hear ! Hear !") Now is it conceivable, I ask, that anybody can be so infatuated with Feminism as n…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/14 11:17 AM
-1

The World War G has been almost won, WW T is in full swing, WW P will too come comrade, all in good time. Children's right now!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/14 03:00 AM
2

wtf they have you guys for everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/14 02:29 AM
3

The sex education classes keep getting younger, if anal is already on the menu what's the big deal with giving a handjob to big daddy? Teach them young! If there is no harm then this pedophilic bigotry doesn't deserve a place in our enlightened society. The nonsense of consent is only a social construct. Welcome to a brave new world, comrade.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/14 02:28 AM
1

raped People get incensed at girls being married to their rapists in some religious areas. Rape culture! When it's more like the poor lad gave into passion and is now on the hook for the rest of his life. And his mother would be angry at the young vixen who spoiled her dreams for her son. Same with the women being 'property' of their fathers, once you've seen a father cry like a stupid baby when his daughter's finally leaving his house, it puts the feminist nonsense into perspective. Alternative…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/14 02:24 AM
0

Children deserve to be protected within society. What's the big deal with protecting them from sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/14 02:01 AM
1

https://hvren.wordpress.com/2010/06/24/to-whatever-self-be-true/ and the next parts.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/14 10:39 PM
3

lol fairtest http://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/2nqtw6/haha_this_article_about_girl_coders_will/cmg9tnq?context=3
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/14 08:28 PM
2

Islam doesn't even give men right to their wife's property, weak.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/14 08:20 PM
1

Babies are now men and women, careful there sport, next thing you'll be claiming fetuses as persons and misogynise yourself. And, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men%27s_rights_movement_in_India
/r/MensRights30/11/14 10:40 PM
1

It was Miley Cyrus I think, and then the article was gone, I thought they got to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/14 04:31 PM
3

The feminine gender is going obsolete and as reproduction is removed from the human domain it's obvious which sex loses its identity. It's the end of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/14 04:28 PM
1

http://gynotheory.blogspot.com/2011/01/pig-latin.html And check out Feminist Intentions by WL George, 1920.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 09:45 PM
1

Of all human traits, variation in general intelligence (g) is the functionally most important in modern life. The first question that behavior genetics tackled was ‘‘how heritable are within-group dif- ferences in intelligence?’’—the answer: ‘‘very.’’ The next obvious question is ‘‘how heritable are the between-group differences in phenotypic intelligence?’’ It could easily be answered using today’s analytical methods, but no scientific discipline will touch it. Most would have to be shut down c…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/14 10:07 AM
-3

It was a while back, apparently things have been getting shriller there now.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/14 03:41 AM
1

Kraut posted something about the swedish beauties and thousand of years not realizing that they were sterlizing the ugly ones as recently as the 70s.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/14 01:47 AM
4

Naah, posted it because the quotes from the OP came from the sweden topic. http://lostinstockholm.com/2008/03/31/the-swedish-male-look/
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/14 01:46 AM
5

Sweden has a party of them. http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/216858/fanatical-swedish-feminists/stanley-kurtz
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/14 01:39 AM
1

I got called sexist there or at least saw one guy being called that. -_-
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/14 12:13 AM
1

Well the progressive camp's unity is based on hatred of white man so don't see why you're surprised?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/14 12:09 AM
2

The sex is awesome, for one.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/14 11:46 PM
0

anti-Semitism, Arabophobia, racism some races are more equal than others. sexism, homophobia, xenophobia, rape, Islamophobia And nothing of value was lost. HOLY FUCKING SHIT. Dude check your bigotphobia, anyway that's some impressive work. Gold jerry Gold. I'll let the RPers comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/14 11:38 PM
0

tl;dr?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/14 06:56 PM
1

Oh of course, there used to be an interview where a guy pointed out that UN was evolving a matriarchy in the african countries where wars ended up destroying the patriarchal order. Western education and women's rights are also a part and parcel of the war on terror. The black scenario is being played out with the lower class whites now as Charles Murray documented in his book Coming Apart.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/14 06:33 PM
2

How it was named, … an old joke about Calvin Coolidge when he was President … The President and Mrs. Coolidge were being shown [separately] around an experimental government farm. When [Mrs. Coolidge] came to the chicken yard she noticed that a rooster was mating very frequently. She asked the attendant how often that happened and was told, "Dozens of times each day." Mrs. Coolidge said, "Tell that to the President when he comes by." Upon being told, President asked, "Same hen every time?" The r…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/14 09:02 AM
2

there are no serious efforts to export Western MRM ideas to the 3rd world MRMs are better in 3rd world countries like India. And I don't mean it as sarcasm. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men%27s_rights_movement_in_India#History I've also seen some african countries with the same. Even Islam doesn't make a woman's property her husband's unlike English law did before feminists changed it, so they might have grievance too but it's doubtful that anything will change there. As for MRAs caring about th…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/14 07:42 AM
4

Comprehensive series of article, it's only later on they mention the genetic propensity. As surprising as it may be to some, I actually do believe that nurture plays a substantial role in our lives. However, the thing is when these studies talk about the environmental effect, they basically group the genetics to one side and name the other stuff as environmental, which in turn falls under shared and nonshared environment. Shared environment is the common family environment, while the nonshared o…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/14 01:29 PM
5

Scott Barry Kaufman, now where I have heard that before? A little googling shows Another IQ weasel. WEIRD is always a problem with such studies. Taken together, the research suggests that the ideal man (for a date or romantic partner) is one who is assertive, confident, easygoing, and sensitive, without being aggressive, demanding, dominant, quiet, shy, or submissive. Ok, and? TRP suggests violence? Women with a “fast life” history (meaning they grew up in an insecure and unstable environment wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/14 10:34 AM
2

I liked Hugo when I first saw him at PZ Myers site babbling about kyriarchy and intersectionality, and he's actually quite moderate for the cesspit that is Jezebel. But I was assuming that his twitter meltdown was far well known to have escaped your attention, if you were interested in such matters. It's better that you weren't, iirc dude also did some pretty oneitis things for his old lady besides having sex with students. So a good case study if TRP turns into an academic discipline. As for th…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/14 07:23 AM
0

I often see connections being made to latent homosexuality with homophobia, would be interesting if the same held true of these ardent equality preachers.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/14 07:01 AM
1

It might be interesting if it does, there might be some real blowback against feminism. However sounds like wives, sisters and other female relatives will end up in their stead. http://www.vdare.com/articles/why-some-men-dont-support-summers
/r/MensRights27/11/14 05:20 AM
3

Yeah this is lower than Norway's 40%, feminists be slippin'.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 05:16 AM
2

http://endofwomen.blogspot.com/2012/10/women-are-victims-either-way-in-more.html
/r/MensRights27/11/14 05:15 AM
3

Indeed, people take RP too seriously for something that that is so supposedly lulzworthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/14 05:03 AM
0

Yes, unfortunately too few of to be much of a concern.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/14 04:53 AM
4

Men fuck and women get fucked. The problem is assuming equality and then working from that assumption. Even alpha men have to work for their status, women by contrast are 'genetic celebrities'.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/14 03:59 AM
1

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/07/18/article-2175517-141B4353000005DC-731_306x492.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/14 02:53 AM
1

of gender? Bad book.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/14 02:48 AM
2

Written by Hugo Schwyzer, goodmenproject's Jian Gomeshi...are you not acquainted with him? And most of the 'criticism' I see is taking it as an insult, apparently it has stuck since Kay Hymowitz's days. Game goes even further, actually encouraging men to “neg” their “target” women—that is, to undermine their confidence subtly by ignoring or mildly insulting them. Why is it so hard for women to grasp the neg concept? No term has been as misconstrued as this one. A neg is not an insult, it’s a bac…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/14 01:17 AM
4

Dunno much but apparently he was a well-spoken feminist activist. Duplicitous maggots like him deserve what they get.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/14 09:20 PM
1

Depends, for instance I read a case of a feminist who felt nice feeling feminine but was against it because it went against her superego's equality programming. The human female might be an animal, but she also has memory. So once pointed out that women are passive in sex, feminists set out to prove that no they weren't. And the nonsense continues until someone rediscovers the traditional as revolutionary.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/14 09:09 PM
5

Do you guys ever tire of the sloganeering? Everything has its pros and cons, 'sexism hurts everyone' is a simple platitude to paper over the fact that enforcing parental leave is done to make men as bad employees as women. Nevermind that the topic doesn't even concern it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/14 09:12 AM
1

Interesting that it is posted on that site.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 05:47 PM
5

Saw parallels with make-up in another sub, reminded me of a section from Anatomy Of Female Power: Men, clearly, do need protection, both from their own stupidity and from their susceptibility to female beauty. Indeed, one of the best laws ever passed by men, one of the few which male legislators have passed in the male interest, was an Act of the British Parliament of 1770. It said: All women, ofwhatever age, rank, profession or degree ,:"ho shall after this Act, impose upon, seduce, and betray …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/14 01:44 PM
5

Sounds too late, wasn't there an Israeli case a few years ago? Then there's the 30 second rapist. California yes means yes is still on campuses right? A NZ party included it in their election manifesto. But no, feminism isn't extreme in any way, it's just a few bad apples, yada yada yada.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/14 10:02 AM
0

It's easy when you realize that feminism is an intra-sex struggle. Regarding the 'autonomy' part, ozconservative's Mark Richardson was right on the mark at blaming it for the liberal nonsense that pervades society today.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/14 08:34 AM
1

The double standard that feminists so decry is based on garnering more benefits, not for some ethical reason. Else they wouldn't have been crying about divorce being only based on infidelity on woman's part in the olden days.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/14 06:31 PM
2

Oh you're the rapid fire questioner from before, I'd suggest google, thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/14 06:16 PM
-1

From where that CMV thread started. http://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/2mncl5/cmvi_think_women_are_economically_inferior_to_men/cm5wj3t
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/14 01:31 PM
3

I am talking of a time when washing machine had already been invented. If that wasn't already clear from the CMV thread that I linked to. they just decided that they wanted to be allowed to try other types of work that didn't involve domestic drudgery and baby poo. And astonishingly, as late as 1964, the labor force participation rate for Swedish women remained steady at 30 percent, lower even than the American figure for that last baby-booming year. Only 25,000, or a mere three percent, of Swed…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/14 10:49 AM
1

Yeah Alain Soral makes a similar point in an interview. Living as a housewife who doesn't have to work was a privilege that feminists ended up throwing away in their zeal. Anthony Ludovici made similar accusations against the first wavers. http://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/2mncl5/cmvi_think_women_are_economically_inferior_to_men/cm60vjw Feminism is an elitist ideology. In more ways than one. The affirmative actioners even lament the fact that the biggest beneficiaries have been white…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/14 09:38 AM
2

as it should be.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/14 09:08 AM
1

a masculinist.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/14 09:04 AM
1

No matter what is said, you're going to turn it around into "women are victims!" bingo!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/14 08:14 PM
1

I don't think that places like MIT can't differentiate between the right tail of the SAT scores. There are other math competitions that can do so. And this has been going for quite some time, if you google Marilee Jones and admissions to MIT, it will bring up articles about how they went about circumventing the qualified criteria to get more girls in. I think only caltech is immune to this, most other elite colleges give admission advantage to girls to get their ratio close to 50-50.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 07:34 AM
1

some feminists think it's just oppressive gender roles that we need to get rid of They are the feminists, the others are useful idiots who don't get that feminism goes against their interests and would be better off if they followed the likes of Phyllis Schlafly.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/14 07:29 AM
1

My parents both subscribe to feminism which is making it so that women don't have that choice. If feminism was confined to masculine women who can't get off their tomboy stage, it would have been over long ago. It isn't, it's about one group of women trying its darnedest to transform the majority to its wishes.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/14 12:17 PM
1

2000 - MIT women faculty study. Cathy Young's article. www.salon.com/2001/04/12/science_women/ 2007 - Marilee Jones, the Dean of Admissions is ousted after more than two decades when her resume is found to be fraudulent. See MIT's admission numbers from those last years here: http://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=1319665&postcount=39 If you want to get a little tinfoily, google "The Real Reason Why MIT Dean Marilee Jones Was Fired" and David Usher.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 11:57 AM
1

What I have called, how- ever, the sentimental aspect of Modern Feminism undoubtedly did make some headway in public opinion by the end of the eighteenth century, and grew in volume during the early years of the nineteenth century. It effectuated in the Act passed in 1820 by the English Parliament abolish- ing the punishment of flogging for female criminals. This was the first beginning of the differentiation of the sexes in the matter of the criminal law. Fraud of Feminism.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 11:46 AM
1

Woman wants to be a stay at home mum? That's fine, she can do that. She can't do that, that was what I gave you in the first reply.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/14 11:37 AM
3

Oh, it is the standard feminist MO, by claiming the widespread influence of a patriarchy they get to justify their social engineering. If they're so against stereotypes of women, in little time we'd have started seeing 'back to the kitchen' movement.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/14 11:11 AM
1

lol two in one rage material.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/14 10:35 AM
3

Even then, Jewish men have been frequently derided as feminine schlubs, there is even a caricature of menstruating Jew. “Jewish masculinity is not traditionally defined economically by a man’s being the main bread-winner or by macho physical prowess but by the prestige of his religious scholarship.” http://hornstein2011.blogspot.com/2010/12/masculine-and-jewish-critical-theory.html
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/14 08:12 AM
1

A basic tenet of feminist theory is its view of intimate violence as a manifestation of our culture's "patriarchal" structure, with its attendant differential status, power, and control, which are reflected in individuals' attitudes and behaviours. Dobash et al. (1998, 1992) propose that gender asymmetry in partner violence reflects a context of gender inequality both within the household and in the larger society. Their research program conceptualizes men as perpetrators and women as victims, b…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/14 07:56 AM
3

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judeo-Christian#Ethical_value_system american nonsense
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/14 07:50 AM
2

Judeo-Christian has only been around since the 1950s.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/14 07:42 AM
2

I really respect Lovelace No don't, it's already too bad that Babbage has been reduced to a cabbage wrt to her fame, but it'll be doubly bad that such a respected icon who inspires girls then turns out to be a feminist myth.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/14 07:19 AM
-1

From that quote Hillary Clinton is a misogynist who believes in interdependence of sexes, denying women their own personhood. A perfect example of the fact that even women in power aren't immune to internalized misogyny! But she is certainly better than Obama surely, http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/stop_calling_us_wives_and_moms/
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/14 07:09 AM
2

Judeo-Christian is newer than feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/14 07:07 AM
6

Everything that MRAs talk about that men can’t do or are socially punished for arise directly and immediately from misogyny. Not “misandry.” Misogyny. And that's why I like to quote the first-wavers, because most of the people who make this stupid argument don't realize that the so-called patriarchy they are railing against has been corrupted by feminism for more than a century already. it is happening because they are things women, not men, are expected to do, and our society at large fucking h…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/14 06:53 AM
-2

r/short disagrees. By that I mean men of r/short. They believe that feminists and their tearing down of gender-roles will be their salvation. And that crying about heightism will get them the sexual favours, the lack of which is the bane of their existence. Reminds me of West Ham's song. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDaEmlnBl8k
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/14 06:34 AM
2

lol with toxic masculinists such as these, wither masculinity!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 07:55 PM
3

So a new goodmenproject.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 07:19 PM
0

Repeating the feminist slogans, a simplistic view that you keep on claiming though reality is something else entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 07:02 PM
0

Good sloganeering, but actions, not words. http://profam.org/pub/fia/fia.2104.htm
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 02:24 PM
2

They're toxic outside of their proper spheres.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 02:14 PM
2

as women are gradually becoming brainwashed into masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 02:07 PM
0

In other words, feminist theory cannot be accurately regarded as a competing or rival account, diverging from patriarchal texts over what counts as true. It is not a true discourse, nor a more objective or scientific account. It could be appropriately seen, rather, as a strategy, a local, specific intervention with definite political, even if provisional, aims and goals. In the 1980s, feminist theory no longer seems to seek the status of unchangeable, trans-historical and trans-geographic truth …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 01:13 PM
0

It's what I have written, I will write more for your pleasure when the fancy hits me. Good bye and good luck.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 01:01 PM
2

Put some effort in. Put together an argument. 2/10. Can't fault you for effort though. http://endofwomen.blogspot.com/2012/10/male-dominated-history-and-definition.html Show me that MRAs have a valid reason for their hate. lol they grew up believing feminism's lies, true believers make for best enemies.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 12:57 PM
4

Who cares about feminist sites? Outdated? I quote her and the likes of Belfort Bax and Anthony Ludovici to point out that there isn't much of a difference in aims between the first-wavers and the ones running the show today. They were shameless liars back then, they are so now. See my other post this thread from a CMV thread for excerpt from Ludovici's book. Oh wait, I already linked you to it in a reply.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 12:54 PM
1

Doris Lessing, useful idiot. Someone is smarting from yesterday!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 12:12 PM
1

NOTHING TO DO with the technology in the OP Ok, so what?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 12:09 PM
5

Which MRA site has Arabella Kenneally on it?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 12:08 PM
3

The feminists here contradicted other feminists, so don't blame feminism, just accept feminism, it's right, once you understand it you won't have any hate, just get informed and see the rainbows and shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 11:23 AM
1

Voila! Straw feminism. lol the straw feminists are the likes of you, the fun feminists ruining the movement and mostly useful idiots for the cause. I don't understand how so much of your hate can be directed to a movement you know nothing about. Feminism, the extremist—and of late years the predominant cult of the Woman's Movement, is Masculinism. - Arabella Kenneally, Feminism and Sex Extinction, 1920 Brose my history at your leisure, I'm not gonna bother.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 11:21 AM
4

Be original. Boldly go where no MRA has ever gone before. Death to feminism, smash the gynarchy!! Show how they're in any way representing feminist thought more than the links I showed. Little useful idiots writing on their safe internet spaces, I'll take my chances. The only ones quoting and requoting these cherry picked sources are those on the manosphere. cherry-picked? You really think that feminists who believe that women have only been regarded as wombs won't ever conclude that once separa…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 11:10 AM
2

Really I could as easily turn this around and ask why men would have a problem submitting in obedience to their wives since they already submit to their bosses. That's besides the point that feminists make so much of their individuality and taking shit from no man. The simple reason is that they despise such relationships. It's amazing that people still have to argue against it. http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2mus35/what_trpers_miss_is_that_beta_bucks_is_actually_a/cm7tnws Bec…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 07:34 AM
1

Feminists keep saying that masculinity is the root of all evil Feminists love masculinity, they just don't like seeing it in men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 05:30 AM
5

Feminists don't value femininity, least of it all in women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 05:28 AM
-1

What you're asking me is like asking a little black boy in America, "Why do you seek to attend an Ivy League institution? Or work on Wall Street or in the medical field? Or as an architect? You know white men made that?" Precisely, at least have the decency to accept that. Do you think those are all male traits and that women in utero somehow skipped receiving that? Kinda. What people say, what they do and how they speak with members of their own sex differ considerably from how they behave when…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 05:26 AM
3

You are certainly in the wrong to conflate women with feminists. It is not surprising that it seems to be these very masculine women, these mistakes of nature, aided and abetted by their counterparts, the feminine men, who are largely responsible for the feminist movement. Nor is it surprising that ‘they recognize’ as W. L. George puts it, ‘no masculine or feminine “spheres,” and that they propose to identify absolutely the conditions of the sexes.’” “But what is surprising, or at least unfortun…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 05:16 AM
2

Why would any woman who would refuse, properly, to take the marital vow of obedience (on the ground, presumably, that subservience to a mere human being is beneath human dignity) then regard as “liberating” a job that puts her under the authority of a boss (man or woman) whose authority specifically requires and expects obedience? http://www.crosscurrents.org/berryspring2003.htm
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 05:14 AM
1

And I am pointing out the decline of American society. For instance your claim that more people are getting 'educated' is bereft of the quality of it. Your claim about falling crime rates is comparing them to some of the worst decades and after the rise of the current prison-industrial complex. Try to remember how you got into this thread... Try to remember what I said to your 'objective metrics'
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 04:24 AM
1

OK well you haven't contributed anything positive to the conversation so I'll just leave it there. Oh, well. I'm not interested in discussing things with people who make normative claims and refuse to defend them. Nonsense, the article in OP made claims and provided evidence for them, I provided others to back them up. Your criteria for society's well-being differ.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 04:19 AM
1

I provided you the metrics I think are important For you. I am asking you to defend it Oh come come, this won't do. You don't get to respond to questions with questions. No, I get to respond however the way I want.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 04:15 AM
1

Of course, my other reply in the thread is about how I don't uphold the holy virtue of equality. The Moynihan Report and Charles Murray recent reworking of the same on whites will be one. Economy is improving, and? more people are getting educated, To what end? crime is going down, compared to what? and at what cost?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 04:10 AM
6

http://www.antifeministtech.info/2011/05/feminist-paranoia-about-artificial-wombs-and-other-reproductive-technologies/ https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2012/05/14/why-are-feminists-against-the-male-pill/ Also, from what we know of feminism they lie even when they tell the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 03:48 AM
2

I don't think the blame solely falls on feminism. It might not even be a primary influence, but rather a symptom of something larger. Feminism, the extremist—and of late years the predominant cult of the Woman's Movement, is Masculinism. - Arabella Kenneally, Feminism and Sex Extinction, 1920 I posit that as soon as women became educated and "aware" they became uncomfortable about their vulnerability and reliance on others, and that has never changed. No. And astonishingly, as late as 1964, the …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 03:36 AM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/2mncl5/cmvi_think_women_are_economically_inferior_to_men/cm60vjw
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 03:28 AM
2

Which way? lol JSM, of course, and didn't you mean Harriet Taylor Mill? Anyway, enjoy. http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Legal_Subjection_of_Men
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 03:10 PM
4

No. The talk about the wife being a chattel, for example, is so palpably absurd in the face of the existing law that it is nowadays scarcely worth making (although we do hear it occasionally even now). But it was not even true under the old common law of England, which, for certain disabilities on the one hand, conceded to the wife certain corresponding privileges on the other. The law of husband and wife, as modified by statute in the course of the nineteenth century, as I have often enough had…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 02:57 PM
2

So the most possibly essentially human thing to do is to use your brain to adapt to the modern world - or to anything life throws at you. That's what TRP is. And that's why it is so disliked. their behavior quickly changes. Adaptation. Fast adaptation. The hallmark of the species. hahaaha, and the feminist social engineering is just for giving jobs to some poor dears.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 02:05 PM
3

Sexism and Racism are the two sins proscribed by the Cathedral of secular humanism, not hard to see why there wouldn't be some overlap between the two. But RoK is Roosh's site right? His boards don't do racism like "proximity + diversity = war" roissy does.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 01:52 PM
2

Now view the situation of the husband. The instant he submits to marriage, his wife obtains a large and inalienable share in his property, including all he may acquire in future; in most American states the minimum is one-third, and, failing children, one-half. He cannot dispose of his real estate without her consent; he cannot even deprive her of it by will. She may bring up his children carelessly and idiotically, cursing them with abominable manners and poisoning their nascent minds against h…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 11:51 AM
2

stable ain't sexy enough
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 09:05 AM
5

Like the one about TRPers being angry because they are not gettings the HB8-10, this is wat level questioning. Getting married/dating makes you BetaBucks by default It didn't use to. NO MORE than a century ago, even by American law, the most sentimental in the world, the husband was the head of the family firm, lordly and autonomous. He had authority over the purse-strings, over the children, and even over his wife. He could enforce his mandates by appropriate punishment, including the corporal.…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 08:38 AM
1

so you're from norway?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 07:49 AM
5

5 years ago I used to be a feminist. So strong was my belief in its truth that I even tried to persuade my sister to take up maths thinking society/patriarchy/stereotypes were limiting her. Then one day while reading a review of the Fight Club I came across the fact that women are the majority of US college graduates and a woman's comment that men should do a movement of their own which kinda hurt my feelings... Anyway, so I find the inchoate men's righters, like guys from the-spearhead and the …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 06:11 AM
1

Forgot posting this yesterday, http://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/2mncl5/cmvi_think_women_are_economically_inferior_to_men/cm60vjw
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 05:52 AM
2

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gender_War
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/14 10:29 PM
2

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_slave_trade
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/14 10:24 PM
1

how about this norwegian book? http://www.amazon.com/Shavenballs-Mads-Larsen/dp/1445777037
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/14 10:21 PM
4

Scientists aren't exactly known for being "politically correct" or beating around the bush. Yeah they are. This fundamental dishonesty is just appalling.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/14 10:08 PM
1

I reference Larrson's "The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo" elsewhere in this post. If we want to discuss some non-PC themes. His book does that. wat That's the non-PC gist. huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/14 09:13 PM
2

Most rapes are made by men in relationships. Men they know is not the same as men in relationships(raping the ones in relationship with).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/14 09:10 PM
1

The funny thing is how it came to be called that way: … an old joke about Calvin Coolidge when he was President … The President and Mrs. Coolidge were being shown [separately] around an experimental government farm. When [Mrs. Coolidge] came to the chicken yard she noticed that a rooster was mating very frequently. She asked the attendant how often that happened and was told, "Dozens of times each day." Mrs. Coolidge said, "Tell that to the President when he comes by." Upon being told, President…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/14 08:49 PM
0

American society isn't in decline by most objective metrics. Yeah, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/14 06:33 PM
2

You don't need nostalgia goggles to see that American society is in decline. He isn't old people.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/14 06:22 PM
5

My thoughts for the likes of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/14 06:21 PM
3

The original article is here: http://www.singularity2050.com/2010/01/the-misandry-bubble.html He is an Indian-American and was quite active on manosphere boards frequently deriding the fact that there is no men's rights movement. The article is hyperbole.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/14 06:18 PM
1

Your analysis was wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/14 06:12 PM
2

Disagreement on whether gender equality is good at all is bad. Nonsense. Mutual respect is impossible when one side does not agree that gender equality is desirable. So which flavor of feminism would you like and now can we show that the one you do isn't the good one.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/14 06:06 PM
1

He is an Indian expat.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/14 05:50 PM
1

Of course, a gym going woman wouldn't get buffer than a sedentary man just because her testosterone spikes during the sessions. But you still have to eat to put on that kind of muscle.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/14 09:00 AM
2

You don't magically get big on steroids, if that were so there would be no scrawny teenagers with testosterone levels reaching for the moon. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/7858951/What-kind-of-man-are-you-chimpanzee-or-bonobo.html
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/14 08:40 AM
1

No they don't. http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2014/03/11/pathways-to-sex/ If not for a protein women's ovaries would turn into testicles.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/14 08:18 AM
-1

The trailblazer days are long over, she is just another brick in the wall now for old cunts still trying to live their feminist dream. 2/10 lacks proper beginning and conclusion. It was a TL;DR of his other articles. Still better than the stupidity of this thread where the daughters are raised without any regards to their sex, except of course for the fact that they shouldn't have a problem with getting into male dominated fields which would be reversed in the case of sons. The girls are too you…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/14 08:02 AM
3

at first I thought the men who were angry were angry because literally nobody would date them or speak to them The TRP anger phase comes from the realization that you've been lied to. The MRA anger phase comes from the same realization.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/14 03:02 AM
-1

ah, warms the cockles of my heart to see isteve on reddit. The comments used to be top notch too. Bookmark description taken from the whiteknight put down, That you take such great offense on Ms. Wiltz's behalf only underscores Steve's premise that being considered beautiful is very important to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/14 02:57 AM
2

A new study of Harvard Business School graduates LOL A lot of those women were wrong. top kek Last year's HBS and women's equality article from NYtimes, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/08/education/harvard-case-study-gender-equity.html?pagewanted=all
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/14 02:50 AM
-2

Hey, I told him to read it too.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/14 11:06 PM
2

The word is the argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/14 09:36 PM
1

google?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/14 09:21 PM
2

Neurosexism you mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/14 08:15 PM
-3

As if you need any, up until your use of daughter itself turns S&M.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/14 07:51 PM
-2

meh, I tried. Keep up with your nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/14 07:38 PM
-5

It is a TL;DR, now read it. I don't like to use other people's work and pass them off as my own.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/14 07:27 PM
3

It isn't. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_sex-determination_system#Genetic
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/14 07:19 PM
-1

Read it then.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/14 07:15 PM
1

Bruce Lee was most probably on steroids as well. I haven't seen experiments but I think any kind of courage-testing challenge does it. Depends on the man in question, some act like chimpanzees while other act like bonobos.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/14 07:13 PM
-6

what are the important lessons needed for her to have a happy, successful life? You can be as smart and capable as any man or woman Fall at the very first hurdle. You should strive to be the best in your chosen field Naturally follows from above. Don't be afraid to head into male-dominated fields. It won't be easy but the glory will be double; one for the triumph, and one for being a trailblazer. Too bad. http://dalrock.wordpress.com/2012/07/07/feminist-dream-vs-feminist-nightmare/
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/14 06:50 PM
1

Jesus, you must hate 90% of people on TRP then! Hey that's still less than the 99.999% idiots on your side. we're talking about rigorously defined concepts cough Moynihan cough For example, the idea that a woman can speak her mind - what society are you living in? lol seriously? Which society are you living in where women don't get away with their nonsense?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/14 07:21 AM
0

It's not enough to keep screaming, "Muh feelz! Muh feelz!". Except when it's women, eh? The MIT report provides no indication that such elementary scientific steps were followed. Nor were male faculty members polled to see if similar proportions felt unfairly treated. No matter. The study treats the feelings of small numbers of senior women as evidence of gender discrimination. http://www.massnews.com/past_issues/other/4_Apr/aprmit.htm and the rigor of sociology, lol!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/14 07:12 AM
1

Uh no, that's a very outdated understanding of feminism. Come on now, not this nonsense again.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/14 07:09 AM
1

Uh-huh, that's what I implicated. huh? We're making a gigantic fuss about "schools failing boys," after all. lol are you kidding me? This "gigantic" fuss should have happened long ago. It came after the maths gender gap hysteria from the 70-80s and then the female self-esteem hysteria of the 90s despite the fact girls had been pulling away. And today we are bleating about the fact that girls aren't doing STEM, playing video games and getting into computers. The sheer disingenuous is breathtaking…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/14 02:50 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter