TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

newmobsforall Archive

View 1 posts and 208 comments by newmobsforall on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

newmobsforall/r/MensRights24/06/13 08:22 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Wouldn't that make more sense that if you have an understandable but not legally defensible reason for killing someone, you probably knew them? Wouldn't the only reasons to kill someone you didn't know would be in the commission of another crime, or because you are a complete monster?
/r/MensRights23/11/15 02:18 AM
4

There really just isn't going to be a scenario where by itself fewer resources is more attractive, unless you are inherently self-destructive.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 06:33 PM
11

Of course, things change when we talk about objectifying in a non-sexual sense. The man as a status symbol, the man as a fashion accessory, the man as walking ATM is pretty rampant.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 02:13 AM
4

I will say campaigns against female genital mutilation are a good. Maybe not inclusive enough, but good. I would also say that there are valid points in the feminist camp in the way gender is thought about and portrayed that I think does translate over to men's rights as well; that is we see similar but different inequalities ourselves, and want those inequalities addressed.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 05:38 AM
3

Really, men are way more likely to be murdered, although admittedly by other men generally. There might be some skewing on the data on that one though - if a woman shoots her "abusive" husband for instance (he was both taller than her AND sometimes he shouted at her!) then it may be ruled "self-defense" and I don't know if that would count as a murder for statistical purposes.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 06:02 AM
8

At least there was the assumption of the possibility a girl was the culprit, although I doubt if it had been boys only anyone would have brought it up.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 05:49 AM
1

Men don't take more dangerous jobs to prove their masculinity. They choose more dangerous jobs because they pay more, and a man's worth is measured by his ability to provide, since he has no inherent worth as a human being. Again, the idea that a woman should act as judge, jury, and executioner is really screwed up, and seems like a good way to open the flood gates to psychopaths.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 12:55 AM
1

How the hell did they manage to come a conclusion of accident on the incident with her brother? Pussy Pass.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 09:46 PM
15

This makes me enormously sad, because Eclipse Phase is one of my favorite games, and I run a continuing game of it every week. Now every time I try to run it I'm going to remember this. God damn it, this isn't about overturning suffrage or kicking women out of the workplace or maintaining unequal pay because we're all assholes. It's about wanting men who have been raped and abused to be taken seriously. It's about not getting the short end of the stick in the legal system, every time. It's about…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 01:45 PM
14

I'm certainly not impressed with Ireland's sex laws.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 11:27 AM
1

I think in the long run it's a losing argument. It's much the same as arguing evolution to a creationist; nothing you say will ever make them change their minds. When someone has such a deep-seated hatred it takes a life-changing event for them to move past it, and no amount of debate is going to do that.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:32 PM
2

My preference in a woman would be a multibillionaire goddess who is capable of painlessly fixing all of my problems, improving me without me having to give any effort myself, anticipating and accepting and providing for all of my whims and perversions, and matching lockstep in my personal tastes and opinions but in a natural way that reassures me that I'm objectively right about everything. Also I prefer redheads.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 08:44 AM
2

1.) The question that arises on this point is "Would women still do porn if money wasn't involved?" Amateur porn and /r/gonewild and such prove that a certain segment of women enjoy the attention and sexual thrills of being a porn star, even if not compensated otherwise. There may be issue with women in sex work purely because of economic disadvantage, but the solution to that is better opportunities outside the sex trade rather than censorship. 2.) Honestly I think the more of a fan of pornogra…
/r/MensRights11/04/14 08:10 PM
2

Yes, there are situations where it is okay to hit a woman. Yes, men are stronger than women, just like some men are stronger than other men. That's why they developed this lovely thing called weapons. If a woman decides to attack me with a knife or a baseball bat, then yes, I am going to strike to disable her assuming I can't get away.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 04:50 PM
2

4chan does things because it's funny. Suffering is funny. So, 4chan does things to promote suffering.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 02:37 AM
1

I'm certainly thinking it doesn't make sense since there doesn't seem to be a ready parallel to any other field. Women are less represented in jobs requiring manual labor since they don't have the similar average body strength as men. Women don't tend to take jobs that are dangerous or perceived as dangerous because they tend to be more risk-averse than men. Women don't usually end at the top of their fields because they take more time off and tend to focus more on the family side of the work/fa…
/r/MensRights05/02/14 02:26 AM
3

Fair point.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 02:11 AM
1

An exact match isn't necessary, but if 50+% of the population is only submitting 10% of the scripts, all things equal, then that does seem weird.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 02:05 AM
1

So why are they not applying I suppose is the question? Sexism seems silly-why turn down a good script based on the gender of the writer? That'd be stupid. Lack of risk taking seems a little off too - what is the risk of submitting a movie script? Zilch. Oh no, I didn't get hired. No risk here. It's not like it's a dangerous job. So why the disparity in submissions?
/r/MensRights05/02/14 01:39 AM
1

I was really hoping I could Google something to help provide me with more concrete evidence from my position, but unfortunately all I have is anecdotal evidence. That said, regardless of the actual balance of writers in real life, all of the people I have ever known who aspired to be writers were female, any child I have seen in media aspiring to be a writer is female, and any time I see a fictional character who is a writer on TV, they are typically female, although I really wanted to find a ma…
/r/MensRights04/02/14 08:55 PM
1

Let me switch to girlie career aspiration. I feel I'm dealing with a lack of clarity here.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 08:40 PM
-1

At least since Little Women. It's up there with veterinarian.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 08:32 PM
-4

That honestly seems weird enough to merit further investigation. "Writer" is one of the traditional "girlie" career choices; why would there be so few female applicants?
/r/MensRights04/02/14 07:40 PM
2

Plus, the logic they use is completely fucked.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 09:58 PM
6

For the sake of making sure genetic history is correct, yes, paternity testing should be mandatory. That is an issue dealing with the health and welfare of the child and thus transcends the whims of the parents.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 07:42 AM
3

Something the article doesn't mention is that women do not by and large enter into dangerous professions, which are also higher paying. The reasons for this fairly complex, and there doesn't seem to be a good solution. You can't really institute gender quotas in fields that would require female workers to be significantly greater above baseline than make workers - it's just not practical. You can't really pay people who work in dangerous conditions less - that's just an enormous dick move. So th…
/r/MensRights30/01/14 07:40 AM
4

I'm fine with the drink but the magazine can certainly go drive itself wild in bed 18 new and exciting ways.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 11:49 PM
3

In fairness, Cosmopolitan and several other women's magazines are largely underwritten by companies trying to sell women their products. These companies had, at least for the majority of these magazines' lifespans, final authority over what kind of content could be in the magazine-which makes sense, since they were basically the owners. So how much its women telling women what to do and more Revlon, Kraft, or Proctor & Gamble telling women what to do might be debatable.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 10:24 PM
2

And even gay men.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 10:14 PM
6

Of all rape prevention advice, what the victim wears is really not that important. What a rapist looks for is an opportunity, and if you fulfill that opportunity is far more important in victim selection than in the victim's overall appearance. Now out there are probably a few psychopaths who will be triggered by a given article of clothing, but guess what? That article of clothing could be anything, "slutty" or otherwise. There is lots of good advice to prevent rape that shouldn't be ignored an…
/r/MensRights22/01/14 02:56 PM
4

Funny...probably not really relevant. Is there a Men's Rights humor sub? Maybe there should be a men's right's humor sub.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 04:03 PM
3

Nice. No blatant gender superiority; it's good.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 09:06 PM
10

A growing number of these arrests are for behavioral problems in school students, sometimes for literally nothing.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 10:07 PM
2

I will say the more likely reason for the temperance movement and how it passed with women is that alcoholism is more common than man - about twice as prevalent - and men are more likely to solve problems with alcohol. The rate of abuse probably has roots in gender dimorphism: Women get drunk faster, suffer more adverse effects from alcohol, and start suffering from long term effects of alcohol abuse faster than men, even when they are the same height and weight. This means it probably takes mor…
/r/MensRights06/01/14 09:46 PM
17

Sure. "Men typically use logic and reason, rather than shaming tactics, to persuade" Not sure if this guy has seen a presidential debate in the last 20 years, but okay. "Women hate alcohol because drunken men are less productive, and thus produce less wealth that can be extracted by women." Notice how this phrase is structured to make it look like it was just calculated greed by women. Had the phrase been "endangered their lifestyle", or "might be unable to fully support them", it would have bee…
/r/MensRights06/01/14 09:41 PM
9

Video is just too biased for me to take seriously; the author only falls short of saying that women only have children as an emergency food supply.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 06:16 PM
-1

Rape, as far as I'm concerned, is when someone is forced to have sex (oral, anal, or vaginal) against their will by the use of threats or violence, or is forced to have sex in a situation where their consent could not possibly be obtained. Men and women can be both perpetrators and victims, and it may be heterosexual or homosexual. As for false claims versus actual rapes, that would be impossible to know. I would think rapes would be slightly less frequent than rape claims, if only because false…
/r/MensRights25/12/13 03:32 PM
6

While noting the differences between the two, I think it's worth considering that He-Man represents an obviously fantastic character. Sure, it's fun to pretend to be He-Man, but in the end he's like that because he has fabulous magical powers; you can't really grow up expecting to be like He-man. Likewise most other male characters who present such an image are frequently exceptional individuals who are usually superhuman or supernatural in some way. Barbie on the other hand is usually presented…
/r/MensRights17/12/13 09:34 AM
37

The upshot of this is giving wives the legal right to murder their spouses and walk. Should we consider it ethically okay to kill someone vigilante style for a crime they would not receive the death penalty for if convicted in a court of law? No. No no no.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 03:25 AM
3

During n event called the Sex Worker's Art Show, I heard from a woman who talked about how she had first stripped to pay for college, then stripped to pay off her massive student loan debt, and then stripped when she couldn't find anything in her field (counseling I believe it was). Once you get in it's hard to get out.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 03:14 AM
3

I think he makes a very valuable point in that needlessly demonizing the feminine isn't really doing anyone any favors.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 11:20 PM
6

Even though nothing is stopping that same women from going to college, opening a store, being a physicist or anything else. Going to college requires multiple years even on a fast track, and several thousand dollars of debt for a chance to have picked the right major that still has jobs in your field. Opening a business requires capital and a successful business plan along with the right personal traits, with the odds being that the business will fail and leave you worse off than before. Exotic …
/r/MensRights10/12/13 10:59 PM
1

There really isn't currently a hard and fast metric for emotional intelligence, which would be divorced from IQ scores and degrees. If you want to prove the emotional intelligence of MRAs, you would need some sort of test showing that.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 07:58 AM
1

I would note that similar behavior can be seen targeting any man who works away from home often outside the military as well.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 05:09 AM
4

No, because it is very hard to get over getting killed. Even with a great deal of therapy, time, understanding, and the support of good friends, bouncing back from being murdered and going on to enjoy a full, productive existence just doesn't seem to happen.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 04:10 AM
3

Bechdel has always been meant as a thought experiment to showcase women's roles in movies; it is not a litmus test for whether a movie is feminist or not and anyone using it for such is going about things the wrong way.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 07:25 PM
2

Taken in the context of previous statements "You're Beautiful" and "Never Settle" seem more in line with don't settle just because your current boyfriend cheats on you/hits you, which is a pretty reasonable.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 04:48 AM
11

It really does help that height is a fairly concrete measurement that never produces counterintuitive results.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 10:07 AM
2

Yeah, contraceptives should be covered. It sucks there are few male contraceptive options, but I blame medical research for that, not the law.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 04:23 AM
1

Costs aside, there is something to be said for someone educated specifically to deal with children and vetted to not be abusive.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 06:14 AM
1

Matching colors is a good idea, and as a bonus can be helpful if you get separated. (Doubtful you'll get separated from an 18 month old, but still, maybe useful later.)
/r/MensRights01/10/13 05:31 AM
1

Very much so.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 05:27 AM
1

There's a conflation in the public's eye between men's rights, men's superiority movements, and pick-up artists. So that tends to make people assume MRAs are somehow against women's rights, which by and large we aren't, or that we don't view women as people, which by and large we do. It doesn't help that people have really internalized how shitty existence has been for women while simultaneously normalizing the suffering of men, so many people aren't even aware of men's issues or don't see why i…
/r/MensRights30/09/13 09:45 PM
2

It was probably removed less due to the opinion presented and more due to the frank nature of expression used by the commentator.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 09:29 PM
2

Yeah, it's useful when it reinforces the dogma, but it'll be quickly returned to the closet when it doesn't serve that purpose.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 08:16 PM
2

That is so manipulative it's breath-taking.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 10:25 PM
2

Common Law is recognized in the following US States: Alabama, Colorado, District of Columbia, Georgia (if created before 1/1/97), Idaho (if created before 1/1/96), Iowa, Kansas, Montana, New Hampshire (for inheritance purposes only), Ohio (if created before 10/10/91), Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas, and Utah.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 07:29 PM
8

We're no strangers to love; You know the rules and so do I Translation: We both have a history and he knows you aren't a virgin, so you can't not want it A full commitment's what I'm thinking of; You wouldn't get this from any other guy Translation: We are going all the way, I'm doing a slut like you a favor I just wanna tell you how I'm feeling; Gotta make you understand Translation: See, your saying no doesn't matter, if you only understood his feelings, and he'll force you to understand those…
/r/MensRights18/09/13 07:47 AM
3

Traditional racial hatreds often cross-section with envy of some perceived characteristic of the group in question - Jews are supposedly undeservingly wealthy and influential, blacks are supposedly sexual powerhouses, etcetera. So it wouldn't be that unusual.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 06:38 PM
3

More of the current generation has seen their parents' marriages erupt in an ugly divorce, or known someone else who has. That is enough to throw you right off of marriage regardless.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:35 PM
3

You forgot status.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:33 PM
1

Feminists get their jennies rustled.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:30 PM
2

Indeed, and I feel that the message that being a white male automatically makes life better and easier for you is a contributing factor on some level. walking around with the idea that so many people would be better off if you and your people never existed can not be healthy for the psyche.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:29 PM
5

No fucking shit.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 05:35 PM
0

Statistical data would be useless here. Such a thing would have to be based on self-reporting, and between under-reporting, over-reporting, and surveyor bias any data collected would be highly suspect.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 12:06 PM
2

The criminal standard with drinking is usually that if you chose to drink, then any decisions you made under the influence are your fault...yes, you may have done things you didn't mean to while drunk, but you made a choice to get drunk and are expected to have a reasonable grasp of consequences. Now if the person passes out, then consent can't be obtained, and if you're somehow gotten drunk against your will, then that should definitely count as non-consensual, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:40 PM
1

I can't think of anything that really crosses the line, but I was held down by a group of girls and kissed around middle school era when I really wasn't comfortable with it at all, and received some sexual comments generally meant to mock and belittle me. There also has been a fair number of times when I have been hugged by female coworkers or in similar situations which I would be very reluctant to call sexual, but which still seemed somewhat inappropriate for the work environment and would lik…
/r/MensRights19/08/13 08:39 AM
0

The American public needs to get the fuck over it's phobia of penises. A picture of a cock can't hurt you. Make like a shaft and harden the fuck up.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 08:19 AM
3

It's nice to see something acknowledging that not everything men do they do for sex.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 01:04 AM
3

Pretty apt comparison this time.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 03:33 AM
-7

Not exactly an apples to apples comparison here.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 04:03 PM
1

Not all states have consensual battery laws though, so in some places you can still be arrested for beating or spanking someone even if they asked, paid, and begged you to.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 08:41 AM
1

Attempted murder would require proof of Mens Rea (wHy iS It nEvER WOMYN'S REA?) more. Assuming she didn't know she could kill him doing that when a lot of people don't and she was doing something he deliberately asked her to do, if it didn't actually involve long term consequences then it would be very difficult to prove it was an attempted murder.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 08:40 AM
3

YES YOU DIPSHIT
/r/MensRights26/07/13 03:09 AM
6

I've known several.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 06:56 PM
2

The article is right in terms of the floordrobe, but that's any partner. Unless you just really love housework they will make your life hell.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 02:35 PM
2

The "Convince him to buy new shit" tone that keeps going on in the article is bothersome. If I have a problem with my desk, I'd get another one. If you need a desk, go buy your own damn desk.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 02:34 PM
1

Probably dying off because it's mostly paying for advertisements for shit. either formally or informally.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 02:27 PM
1

I don't see a problem with this.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 02:24 PM
5

No. Lie detectors do not detect lies, they detect nervousness. They are not reliable, they are not accurate, they are simply a tool used to get people to confess to things they otherwise wouldn't and their results are entirely informed by the biases of the examiner. Put it in the hands of a feminist and no female accuser would ever fail.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 03:08 AM
1

I certainly didn't say anything about it being female only.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 12:34 AM
203

Improbably impractical clothing may be stupid, unjustified, or a poor artistic choice, but no, it's not hatred and oppression by a large stretch.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 01:40 PM
7

Considering how many states ban sex toys it might not do us any good. The legislature has a mighty unhealthy obsession with out sex lives.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 07:39 AM
8

Faster it happens the faster it will be struck down.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 07:36 AM
3

Forced fatherhood is more a form of theft.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 05:49 AM
4

Something to keep in mind is hat a lot of issues aren't really gendered issues, they've just been made out to be by people with an agenda.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 11:46 AM
1

I would say that one of the biggest contributing factors is that women can get men to perform crime for them, while technically remaining free of conspiracy, and when they are involved in crime, they have an easier time making themselves out as a helpless bystander or victim.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 06:27 PM
1

What if it's the other way around though?
/r/MensRights24/06/13 01:02 PM
1

Feelings before property.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 10:07 AM
2

It is absolutely not fair and extremely shitty way to treat someone.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 09:53 AM
2

Was your mother or stepmother: Often or very often pushed, grabbed, slapped, or had something thrown at her? or Sometimes, often, or very often kicked, bitten, hit with a fist, or hit with something hard? or Ever repeatedly hit over at least a few minutes or threatened with a gun or knife? I will add that Mom physically assaulting dad or both parents brawling is also pretty damn terrifying.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 08:06 AM
2

I consider myself pretty strongly liberal/left-wing/whatever. Currently MR is basically fringe since no real political group is really all that interested in us; the left is mostly dominated by feminism, but the right seems by and large happy to keep us locked in traditional gender roles. So for right now it doesn't matter until someone in power notices and takes a stance.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 07:49 AM
4

Common law marriage is recognized in the following states: Alabama Colorado District of Columbia Georgia (if created before 1/1/97) Idaho (if created before 1/1/96) Iowa Kansas Montana New Hampshire (for inheritance purposes only) Ohio (if created before 10/10/91) Oklahoma Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina Texas Utah
/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:41 PM
1

Dress codes are largely bullshit, but anyone thinking it's a one gender problem is way off mark.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 12:43 AM
3

Should go in the meta subreddit.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 10:06 PM
7

BUT WHAT ABOUT TEH MONITORZ
/r/MensRights16/06/13 06:12 PM
2

I can understand not taking things too seriously, but on the flip side, there comes a point when a stereotype becomes harmful - when people start to forget that it's a stereotype and not reality. There have been television comedy dads in the past who managed to be funny without being entirely useless boobs, and relying on dumb, ditzy dad to always bring the yucks is incredibly lazy writing. No, I don't expect Homer Simpson to suddenly become a good parent (or to suddenly reverse years of charact…
/r/MensRights16/06/13 06:05 PM
9

I don't normally sue my best friends.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 05:34 PM
2

Certainly not my parents unless the line is "Hey, what's in this bong?".
/r/MensRights04/06/13 03:17 AM
1

Yeah, it really is amazing what the change in sexual mores can do for a work over time.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 07:47 PM
-3

Outside of not letting her leave, emotionally manipulating her, and potentially drugging her? Dude the song is not kosher.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 01:42 PM
-1

"Baby it's Cold Outside" is so date-rape it's ridiculous. However it's really not meant as a Christmas song - the only way it relates to Christmas is the weather. It's also almost 70 years old.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 12:57 PM
1

Not in the modern era. Passion marks you out as a psycho these days.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 07:40 AM
1

Personally, I'm just happy to see something nerdy not be the target of feminist bashing for a little while.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 07:38 AM
4

Mostly positive, but I'm very careful to pick my battles in the real world.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 09:34 AM
3

The best dangerous, mute lunatic of all gaming history.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 08:01 AM
3

A gender-swap of the characters in Zelda would remain just as problematic for feminists, as all of mute sword-woman Zelda's actions would be for the benefit of a man, with hints of romantic motivation. That is not even addressing being literally unable to speak.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 07:55 AM
2

I saw the article come up in my Facebook feed, skipped it and came here instead. I'm glad I didn't waste my time. Notably it's usually the same couple of people who write this crap over and over again; the rest of the time it's interesting. Fortunately you can usually tell whether the article is going to be social justice horseshit from the title.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 04:01 AM
1

It's a satire, if you pay attention to the potholes.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 03:57 AM
1

Indeed. The high risk/high reward nature of drug trade makes it very alluring to certain types of young man.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 03:44 AM
8

It's still in common use, and it's still pretty stupid.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 03:38 AM
2

Most sexual based offenses have no statute of limitations.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 05:13 PM
3

In all fairness, if I woke up to find myself in magic underwear one morning, I'd feel pretty violated.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 05:07 PM
0

On financial abuse: This is a very real form of abuse. I'll give some examples. Hey, he has such better credit than I do. Surely I'll get a better line of credit if I apply for that platinum card in his name. He makes so much more than I do, but he's so stingy. Surely he won't notice if I help myself to a couple of $20s. Yeah, I know I said I was going to get a job when we signed the lease agreement, but I've decided I really want to try to pursue my writing career right now. Oh, sorry honey. I …
/r/MensRights13/05/13 09:40 PM
5

That's kind of normal for subs whose content is gonna generate a lot of anger.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 06:24 PM
7

Isn't "you probably really wanted it/acted like you wanted it so it wasn't really rape" really part of the definition of slut shaming?
/r/MensRights25/04/13 05:45 AM
7

I doubt a human intelligence as we understand it dressed Gaga.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 08:16 PM
4

I've yet to have a woman get mad at me for holding a door. Gratitude tends to be mixed.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 08:53 PM
1

The loss of sensation really does need to be taken more seriously, as I find it can not only make sex unenjoyable, but actively impossible.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 11:53 AM
2

But apparently not enough so yet.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 05:54 AM
5

Apparently war isn't violence, so maybe we can fix this problem by having more wars.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 05:18 AM
4

While the intent may be less malicious, the net effect is the same, so I would say that it's still equally bad.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 05:15 AM
3

Really, after watching this and the video on the topic, besides some needlessly antagonistic language, the main problem with her argument seems to lie in the idea that actions, situations, and representations in fantasy reinforce actions and attitudes in regards to reality - and this assumption is fairly baseless. It's basically the same idea as violence in video games creates violent urges and tendencies. It's the same bullshit, except being fed to adults instead of children and teenagers. Dams…
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:28 AM
-2

A world without men would be...well, largely the same, although perhaps slightly less efficient in some areas.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 08:25 PM
6

I'm waiting for the first women to get sued for paternity so I can laugh my ass off.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 08:21 PM
9

You insist that it’s a scientifically proven fact that men are stronger than women. But you complain about society believing that it’s worse for a man to hit a woman than for a woman to hit a man. Men typically have greater upper body strength, which is why women who abuse are both more likely to attack by surprise and with weapons. It's also why female on male violence leads to more deaths. EDIT: The former is true, but I seem to be getting mixed info on the latter. It's been a long time since …
/r/MensRights26/02/13 08:04 PM
1

Love and infatuation will make you miss many potential red flags and warnings, and being aware of a psychological mechanism does not make you immune to that mechanism. Also I would note that in my experience, it's fairly normal for a woman to undergo a personality shift after having a child, and there are no predictors how the shift will effect them.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 11:42 PM
0

Or even just "something happened that we don't like".
/r/MensRights25/02/13 11:24 PM
1

Artist is Barry Deutsch, and this is a fairly typical example of his work.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 11:21 PM
2

I'm familiar with this particular artist, and this kind of theme is normal for his work.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 11:00 PM
2

I would cautiously say MOST women are not abusive, in the same matter that MOST men are not abusive. Outside of that I would suggest setting reasonable boundaries, and if you find she can't respect these boundaries then don't continue to associate with her.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 09:01 PM
3

Well, sensible answer is how much oral means to you. If you get a partner that doesn't go down, then you'll never be able to make them. So at that point it's a matter of how important that is to you. Sexual preferences are pretty personal things, and should be respected.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 01:06 PM
2

I wouldn't mind this so much if violence against completely fictional representations of female characters in video games had not become totally overblown in recent years.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 01:01 PM
2

Surprised it's not taken actually.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 04:23 AM
4

"Cheap date" is also slang for a woman who puts out after a mild amount of alcohol consumption, or an easy drunk.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 08:02 PM
1

I think the underlying humor isn't that a male is being sexually harassed so much as they just both seem bored with the whole thing.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 07:59 PM
2

Jail time for child support is kind of a stupid policy to any view point; if somebody isn't paying their debts now then they sure aren't gonna start in prison. Debtor's prison is dumb.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 11:23 PM
2

It's pretty typical that women are never portrayed as racist, anti-gay, or really genuinely bigoted in any way openly acknowledged by society to be bad. Occasionally you will see a woman in media engage in class based discrimination, but that's it, and just as frequently she'll be shown as justified in that discrimination.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 03:13 PM
9

Yeah. She was always violent and narcissistic, but she kept getting away with it and getting free passes until she finally did enough damage for people to realize she was fucking psycho.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 12:01 AM
30

You know who, after following the case for some time, likely went on a massacre because of being an entitled shithead? Amy Bishop.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 10:00 PM
3

Of course when we are talking teen girls then the responsibility for her remaining pregnant most likely lies with her parents than with anyone else.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 09:33 PM
1

I love you too, honey.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:13 PM
4

The language of accidental pregnancy is almost always accusatory to one partner or another. Something needs to change here.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:30 PM
14

If boys are failing, it's because the things they like are dangerous, addicting, and possibly immoral. If a woman is failing, it's because of discrimination.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 05:42 PM
5

Man, teenage boys being obsessed with sex? What has the world come to? /s
/r/MensRights18/12/12 05:41 PM
8

12 Pornography addiction is a major problem among our young men. An astounding 30 percent of all Internet traffic now goes to pornography websites, and one survey found that 25 percent of all employees that have Internet access in the United States even visit sex websites while they are at work. Naturally no woman ever views Internet pornography.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 05:40 PM
2

Well, I don't know about romance novels, which are usually very specifically geared to women anyway, but I have a lot of guy friends who would like an animal calender and I personally would prefer cookbooks to political biographies.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 08:38 AM
1

A slightly misaimed slap can wind up hitting the ear instead of the cheek. While the cheek is painful, and humiliating, the slap to the ear can wind up causing permanent hearing loss. So no, I don't think risk of going deaf on one side of the head is equivalent to having a sweaty fat guy say something you don't like about your ass.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 08:00 PM
1

r/forfeiture
/r/MensRights10/11/12 05:34 AM
11

"Car door now in custody as potential predator"
/r/MensRights09/11/12 09:13 PM
1

I've known lots of men who have known the agony of stiletto heels and toe glitter.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 01:41 AM
1

You really can't know. At best you can get an idea of how many men were accused and then not convicted, but conviction doesn't prove a rape happened and non-conviction doesn't prove it didn't. It also won't show accusations made that never got that far.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 11:39 AM
2

Belongs on the meta sub.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 10:53 AM
1

Ahh, Cosmo. Source of so much insanity. Psychotic Relationship Advice Psychotic Sex Advice
/r/MensRights03/10/12 09:53 AM
1

So can I.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 09:17 AM
2

Unless you live in a swing state it doesn't matter anyway.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 09:15 AM
4

That's not really news. Family budget matters have been considered "women's work" in Japan for ages.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 08:45 AM
2

I like the "boner-werewolf" turn of phrase. It really illustrates the ludicrousness of the whole concept.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 06:32 PM
1

Oh, that's another mistake. Death to everyone now. Crap.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 06:15 PM
1

I'm not joking about anything.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 05:54 PM
-1

A big problem with suicide prevention is that it's kind of whack-a-mole in how it works; one group pops up as being particularly "at-risk" so resources shift to that group, leaving suicidal people in other groups feeling left out or ignored. It used to be young people were very high risk, and then old people who were very high risk, and now we see middle aged people as very high risk. So it tends to shift in that sense.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 07:24 PM
2

As a cute exercise to underscore your point, watch Lady and the Tramp sometimes. One of the major plot points is Lady turning on The Tramp when she finds he has a history of sexual conquests prior to her.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 07:20 PM
0

That heavily depends on the individual woman.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 07:14 PM
1

This has ramped up a lot recently, actually. I've been seeing more and more accusations of racism/sexism on here and on sites dedicated to video games and tabletop rpgs as well siting that widespread misogyny is a deep underlying problem in these cultures.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 06:53 PM
2

This is obviously a joke.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 01:02 PM
19

I'm for it. Circumcision is largely a matter of preserving a religious tradition of dubious medical benefit; I can't really lump it in with something that might save my kids from muscular dystrophy.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 10:38 PM
2

Women should be made to sign up for selective service too, and that's it. In the event that a draft needs to be instated, given what a unpopular idea it is, it makes sense to get as many able-bodied individuals as possible. You don't need a dick to hold a gun.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 04:50 AM
2

As well as the constant news of the epidemic.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 04:37 AM
3

Is this meant to be a serious, "this is a bad law and we would like to demonstrate that" kind of article, or is it a "it's fun to be assholes on the phone to people" kind of article. Because if it's meant to be the second then it's probably best shrugged off as trolling and left at that. Also, who calls an Italian restaurant in England over a law made in Italy? In response to Chinese censorship did you call up the nearest Panda Express and yell "CHING CHONG BING BONG" into the phone?
/r/MensRights31/08/12 04:28 AM
1

Damn that ovarchy.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 02:45 PM
3

The sad thing is the reason to invest in the girls: those third world boys are probably gonna die fighting some asshole's war. :(
/r/MensRights30/08/12 07:48 AM
4

There is a female on the ballot - Jill Stein, the Green party candidate.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 07:37 AM
2

Question: Did anyone here suffer in Grammar, History, Language, or Literature classes because you thought they were "girl subjects"? Did anyone not feel they could compete or keep up in said classes because of same? Did any of your conscious career or academic decisions hinge on the idea that these subjects were for women only?
/r/MensRights30/08/12 07:31 AM
3

It depends on the stupid. Apparently this woman is too stupid to figure out how to crack goddamn eggs. But you'll notice it's an expected stupidity; that is, the commercial is assuming you really are this dumb. For circumstances where the end viewer is supposed to feel superior, the butt monkey is almost always a man; in This Loser Is You scenarios, it's a bit better gender divided.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 07:24 AM
14

Reference to female organs is somehow way more offensive while depictions of male organs are somehow way more offensive...it's complicated.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 09:00 PM
2

DeBeers is an evil, evil company.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 08:54 PM
4

Yeah, never ever. Drinking and sex just tend to lead to bad outcomes.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 08:44 PM
1

Men being a primary support of our own undoing tends to be a reoccurring theme in this subreddit, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 09:18 PM
3

Disgust of male sexuality is rampant in our culture. A naked woman is beautiful; a naked man is a gross joke. Open discussion of sexuality by women is empowering; open discussion of sexuality by men is creepy. Female homosexuality is beautiful, erotic, and empowering; male homosexuality is depraved and diseased - notice how to gain acceptance in mainstream media homosexual men have to be practically neutered. Female bisexuality is hot; male bisexuality is creepy. Breasts are PG-13; penises are R…
/r/MensRights27/08/12 11:12 AM
1

I remember once espousing the view that as a man I didn't really have any right to input on abortion to two female acquaintances, and for the next hour they screamed at me about "What If It Was My Baby". I think mostly what I pulled away from that conversation was that if abortion comes up, leave the room.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 06:58 PM
1

I had a cousin with muscular dystrophy. This hits pretty hard.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 09:30 PM
1

Really, statistics on any illegal activity are extremely dubious at best and utter bunkum at worst.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 08:57 PM
1

The problem with prison is that it's supposed to suck, but we really can't agree on how much.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 03:52 AM
8

I'd rather have one million potheads go free than have another man raped in prison. WHY IS THIS CONTROVERSIAL HOLY SHIT
/r/MensRights23/08/12 03:51 AM
36

"I would rather imprison people who didn't deserve it the not imprison people who did." That's really not how it works, and because of the rape dynamic so commonly accepted in the penal system, that's basically just switching who it is who gets raped. I wouldn't call that justice by any stretch.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:11 PM
1

It's something at least, although I don't know what there is to do than be bigger, stronger, and more vicious than every potential rapist in the prison.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:03 PM
1

Real world Curly would have been murdered several times over with severe brain damage and ocular trauma, and I still like the Stooges. Comedy is suffering.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:00 PM
4

This is probably a controversial opinion, but I think men, especially as they get older, are more prone to ramble on, and occasionally completely insult the intelligence of our audience. I've been on both sides of it and I could see how a woman could mistake it as an attitude towards women but I've sen it applied equally to other men; I've had plenty of experiences of men telling me shit I already know and of me boring sometimes experts in the field that I'm mindlessly rambling about. Personally…
/r/MensRights22/08/12 07:36 AM
1

I don't think I'm going to stop finding groin shots funny, but I do find it funny in both genders if only to be equally horrible.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 07:05 AM
15

Interestingly enough, as a guy, I'm more likely to develop high blood pressure. Because of my high blood pressure, I have to take a pill everyday to not die from the veins in my head spontaneously exploding. If I already have that as part of my daily schedule, I think I can toss an extra pill on there no problem.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 06:56 AM
1

Yeah. the humiliation was probably a contributing factor, but I think there was more going on here.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 06:23 PM
3

Yeah, I remember that time I sucked a guy's dick for a copy of HALO 2. Oh wait, no, because that never fucking happens. Lots of things release chemicals in the brain. We can just say the symptom of men's disease is their overuse of chocolate, or television, or action movies, or books, or jogging, which all release chemicals in the brain. Spicy food causes endorphin release, TIL Taco Bell is the number one drug pusher on the planet.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 01:21 AM
3

You have room to talk about strawmen comparing dopamine to meth. He also is pretty explicitly not talking about just NEETs, but all men in a general sense.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 01:14 AM
3

What self-sustenance? Navel-gazing? Self-help? Workshops and seminars being sold by someone who is convinced you enjoying pleasure is a sign of deep spiritual turmoil? These men aren't starving themselves.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 01:08 AM
4

That's not exculpatory. That's still condemning perfectly normal behavior as something deeply wrong based on the preconceived biases of the author. It's hypocritical bullshit for someone to on one hand spout how terrible it is men are forced to be something by society, and then turn around and demonize the personal tastes and preferences of those men as a sign of a deeper sickness.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 12:54 AM
7

"This year, in a new book called the Demise of Guys author Phil Zimbardo claims that the reason boys and men are flailing so hard is due to arousal addiction, specifically the rampant overuse of video games and online porn. I can’t argue with this one, especially in younger men." The article pretty much lost me here.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 12:16 AM
7

Yeah, he was date-raped.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 01:08 PM
2

Certainly. Drunk drivers aren't considered absolved of responsibility, nor are people who start fights, steal, or set fires when drunk. Initiating sex should be the same. At the same time, I would probably take away my friends' keys and ignore sexual advances, because I think that's what a gentleman does.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 12:48 PM
2

I've seen women argue about whether having sex when drunk counts as consent or not, so there is a certain amount of controversy on both sides. That said, I believe friends don't let friends do things that seem like a good idea while high that they'll later regret.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 12:25 PM
3

Same.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 12:09 PM
73

The whole privilege concept as it's currently being used is horribly destructive and demeaning.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 12:07 PM
1

And what constitutes acceptable should be gender-blind: if it's not cool for a man to yell and hit things, then it shouldn't be okay for anyone to yell and hit things.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 04:54 AM
1

Legally, yes. Practically you really can't have any such thing. practically you have twelve proven airheads yelling "Let's hurry up and send this asshole to the chair so I can go home and catch Jeopardy."
/r/MensRights25/07/12 06:35 PM
1

Probably best to not lavish the money on young girls either, because that's just throwing chum in the water.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 06:27 PM
2

This is a pretty alien concept to me too. If anyone does this they should probably stop.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 05:02 AM
1

Alimony is getting to be a rarer and rarer thing these days, and it's not always without just cause when it is implemented.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 04:51 AM
5

Men are pretty emotional in certain capacities and concepts. It's just a matter of what is and is not socially acceptable. the biggest purveyors of things like war films are by and large men, and most of said films are crammed with sentimental pablum. It's not that men are less emotional. If you want to talk hormonal cycles men are on a daily one, so we should be less stable than women, not more. No, it's that emotions are a trained response, and we have been trained to hold our emotions in and …
/r/MensRights24/07/12 04:43 AM
2

The whole term of "privilege" is a terrible, terrible term that does nothing but belittle the experiences of others and shut down any kind of meaningful dialogue that could be had.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 04:27 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter