TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

probably_quite_drunk Archive

View 0 posts and 2,157 comments by probably_quite_drunk on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,157 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Don't forget the attempted murder of an ex. Hugo is a piece of shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/16 07:47 PM
1

It is based heavily upon morality. That doesn't seem to track though. If it did, then the law is saying it is moral to lie to a child about its paternity for two decades or more, it is moral for a man to suffer and pay for/raise someone else's child for two decades or more despite any mental/physical/financial hardship he may endure to do so, and it is moral for a mother to lie to both her husband and her child for two decades or more causing a mountain of strife in the process. If one must take…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/16 07:30 PM
2

"I'm a witch." "You mean a warlock?" "You mock me!" Ahhh Julian Sands, you creepy bastard.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/16 03:49 PM
2

Honest question, who do you think told other men how to attract women? My mother and grandmother both gave me plenty of terrible advice when I was a teenager and started wanted to date girls. My dad and grandfather gave me slightly better advice, but even then it wasn't very applicable, this no longer being the 50's and all.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/16 10:10 PM
1

Sarcasm is not hostility. It can be, and you should know that. It is usually used as veiled hostility when open hostility cannot be seen publicly - as you have been. But like I said, there's no use reporting when the MODS ARE CIRCLEJERKING as you are continuing to do now. Reporting you for breaking that rule will do no good, as no action will be taken and we both know it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/16 06:11 PM
1

Schools later discovered that many of the girls were keeping their vaginal virginity, but having anal sex instead. The old poophole loophole, I think it's called. Interestingly, this same phenomenon occurred at my college in the late 90s. Lots of "good girls" saving their virginity for marriage, but taking it in the back door in some dude's bedroom at frat parties. There was even a student health bulletin about anal gonorrhea going around because of its prevalence at one point.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/16 06:04 PM
2

Then how does one determine "the right woman"? Isn't that the whole point of dating in the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/16 06:00 PM
1

You keep accusing me of hostility, yet you're the one trying to make this personal. No, your constant sarcasm is the cause/origin of hostility. That you can't grasp that is quite telling. (That's not me making a personal attack, merely a factual observation of your exact behavior.) I'm not making anything personal, but I can't help that you are personally getting your feelings hurt by my perfectly valid criticism of the mod team and its policies.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/16 05:55 PM
1

And you accuse mods of tone policing comments. Well, when the shoe fits. I'm sorry if the truth offends your delicate sensibilities. Your replies have gotten more and more hostile as time progresses. whatever you feel is circlejerking that's being missed or overlooked by us, send it through It doesn't help when the mods are the ones circle jerking. we're here to make sure the sub doesn't devolve into people mindlessly flinging insults at one another at the expense of discussion and debate. Then …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/16 05:18 PM
1

What difference does that make? I just wanted to know. Call it idle curiosity. Your hostility is showing, though. Bad form for a supposedly neutral party. We're trying to discourage people from circlejerking. Doesn't seem to be going so well for you there. It's almost as if that part about you all being wholly ineffective is, in fact, a true and relevant statement. I'm not going to apologise for the mods doing what we can to reduce downvoting just because we can't stop all of it. I wouldn't expe…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/16 03:52 PM
1

Yes, this got reported today and I responded when it did. So it was reported by someone not directly involved in the conversation is what you're saying? Someone who was not a part of the discussion, and who somehow got more offended by my words than the person I was actually talking to reported it, and their opinion is somehow relevant? Makes total sense. So sorry I didn't catch your rule breaking more promptly Somehow I doubt that. We don't have the power to see who downvotes "So we make rules …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/16 03:05 PM
0

You're a day late to the party. Did someone report way later than the conversation happened, or are you mods just wholly ineffective? And are you bothering to take action against downvoters, or is that another toothless rule?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/16 02:27 PM
1

The correct comparison would be to ask Brady and one opponent of Brady who played against him. Both hold information that can be useful. Yes, both would be useful, but one of them may not be actionable. Again, any advise given by that opponent is only valuable for playing against that opponent. It isn't applicable to literally anyone else in the world. Either way the point is that to get the best ACTIONABLE advice on a specific topic, you need to ask someone with experience in that very topic. Y…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/16 06:05 PM
0

However, OP's example is a false comparison, because the media guy is literally in no way the equivalent of the woman here, because he, or any other media guy, has never had a game played against him. And that's where you are failing to understand the difference between generalities and specifics. Which is odd since you managed to delineate between one woman and all women. He's not saying Bayless is the equivalent of the woman. He's saying he represents women's advice for men in a broad and gene…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/16 05:54 PM
0

But asking advice from someone who often has the game played against her IS a good idea Only if you're trying to play against/date THAT SPECIFIC PERSON. Otherwise her advice wouldn't necessarily apply to any other woman on the planet. You're acting like women are somehow not a part of the dating game. No, I'm not. I am addressing OP's specific point, instead of going off topic, like you repeatedly do. There is no point addressing the myriad of ways that even the best offense can be shut down. No…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/16 05:36 PM
2

where a blue has an idea of what is going on in a red's head, when the red in question is too emotional to properly understand This is where we're getting into hinky, uneducated guesses. Unless you honestly believe that blues are psychics, and reds are incapable of introspection. In which case debate isn't really possible. I feel compelled to point out that TBP is there is to laugh at TRP. It selects the funniest examples, not the most representative. It doesn't have to give TRP a fair represent…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/16 04:39 PM
-1

For your analogy to work, the player should want to have the most media attention possible. I disagree. The player only has to want to win the game. Tom Brady wins games. Skip Bayless doesn't even play. I think you are digging too far into "special snowflake-ism".
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/16 04:13 PM
1

You did. Not in so many words, but it's pretty easy to read between the lines.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 11:46 PM
4

Cool, now recognize and accept your role and don't ever breed. And don't get mad at me for saying it, it's your OP after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 09:18 PM
3

Im not saying kill them, JFC. Im just saying You're just saying to remove them from the gene pool and prevent them from propagating. Functionally that isn't much different.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 09:16 PM
3

If you understood statistics, you would understand that it does prove this, but you don't understand statistics. If you had reading comprehension, then you would know that isn't what that page says.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 09:02 PM
1

Especially considering most baldness is caused by a defect in the X chromosome that men inherit from their mothers.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 04:05 PM
1

He posted these things, and its not like his actual person is connected to them, so it's his truest innermost thoughts. Except you don't know if that's true. Many people project an online persona and say things anonymously that they would never say out loud in public. And you have no way of knowing which is their true self. Also, some people are just trolls and say outrageous things specifically to get a rise out of others. Why shouldn't people be able to criticize this if that's what reddit is …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 07:41 PM
1

TRP shames and dislikes crazy feminists who want to oppress men, why can I be critical of someone who wants to promote sexism towards women? Because that isn't debating. You're perfectly free to do it, but doing it outside of the confines of a relevant discussion by cherry-picking hateful statements from their comment history isn't exactly debating in good faith, it's just witch-hunting. And I agree with him mostly I just feel like TRP needs to look out for these people and try to find a way to …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 05:10 PM
1

Check out his history it's so wonderful hers some of my favorite quotes: Not to be that guy, but none of that is relevant to the conversation at hand. In fact, bringing it up specifically with the intent to shame him publicly kind of proves some of the anecdotal stories in this thread about women being shamers more than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 02:17 PM
0

I'm just making witty banter mate, I'm not critiquing the nuance of your statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 02:01 PM
2

They're mostly women of lower socioeconomic status who have relationships with men of a lower socioeconomic status While I'm not trying to be pedantic or disagree with only anecdotal evidence, I see TONS of firmly middle class white single moms on dating apps all the time. It's practically a given that 2/3 of the women over 30 on OKCupid are single moms. I don't claim to know the circumstances of all of them, but the handful I dated all had similar stories. They got pregnant as teens or early 20…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 01:50 PM
0

But women don't sleep around with muscular aloof assholes until 30, at which point they find an unwitting beta to marry when they realize they can't do better. Of course not. Statistically it happens around 26, not 30. (/s)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 01:42 PM
-1

there are women who look at cartoon porn all day If they're doing it all day, then they have no job (or are terrible at their job), and ain't nobody got time for that chick.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 01:41 PM
0

I can't find them at the moment, but I recall people have posted several studies showing that men have a greater variety of tastes than women do. Our statements have exactly the same validity.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 01:39 PM
9

Interestingly when reading on the social order of elephants, I came across this gem: "When one male splits from all other company and becomes excessively aggressive and violent, he is known as the rogue male. He will usually win at any domination battles and, therefore, mate with more females than the other bulls. This means that his offspring are strong and that the herd enjoys fairly pure genes."
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 09:33 PM
5

Probably goes back to the Romans. They didn't really have notions of "top" or "bottom", they didn't differentiate between gay sex or heterosexual sex. They saw it as being active vs. being passive. The giver/penetrator is the active participant, the receiver is the passive participant. Being active = success, power, satisfaction Being passive = losing agency, no power to act on your own, used for someone else's satisfaction Take that all as you will though, since I'm probably quite drunk.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 09:25 PM
1

This is straight /r/iamverysmart material right here. Please keep it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 10:09 PM
1

Also, I am not a sociopath. Source? (I kid, I kid)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 10:04 PM
2

Religion does provide good morals though, that I will admit. Dunno about that. Advocating for murdering people who don't worship your god, murdering people who wear mixed fabrics, murdering people who touch pig skin, murdering people who plant different types of crops in the same field, shunning women on their period, selling daughters into slavery, and being cool with rape just don't stand out as particularly moral to me. Call me crazy, but I just can't get behind those as a basis for good char…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 09:45 PM
1

Then why do they get so bitter and angry if people succeed in ways TRP doesn't acknowledge? Why do they always give these supposedly bad scenarios to people who don't listen to their advice? Dunno, why are you doing that here?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 09:29 PM
2

So you managed a single heavily biased throwaway sentence out of how many words? So much for reading before you formulate an opinion, huh? I did read it. It was a sad hit piece. Poorly written I might add. I weep for the future if this is considered legitimate journalism these days. The fact that you're proudly spamming your article for clicks is an indication of just how little integrity you have. If the piece had merit, it wouldn't need you to promote it on reddit for pageviews.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 02:46 PM
6

Well, for the record, he does still care about issues facing men. It's a shame you couldn't be bothered to actually write that. So much for journalistic integrity, huh? Clickthroughs and ad revenues are all that matters these days I guess.
/r/MensRights15/04/16 08:38 PM
1

I could argue the same for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 05:26 PM
1

because your comment is a leading question which implies something negative Actually it was sarcasm, which you seem to have a deficiency in detecting. And it's not like we're 'internet friends' and you're joking around. Nope, my friends understand humor.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 05:23 PM
2

Yeah to teach them not to pay them for sex. The prostitutes weren't paying. They were paid. And he did it because they were the worst off in society, same with the lepers he hung with. He did it because he loved everyone and did not judge them.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 05:20 PM
1

Well then, who is the present leader of feminism? Who is the executive council of feminism? Where do they convene and vote? How are policies presented and decided upon? Since you believe to know the answers, I am genuinely curious.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 05:15 PM
1

Sorry if you don't like it, neither of us get to decide what the movement is about. I never understand why people like you automatically assume someone dislikes an opinion based upon nothing more than a 1 sentence question. It's almost as if YOU are the one feeling attacked, and thus you project that outward.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 05:14 PM
2

If solicitation of whores is not degenerate, nothing is degenerate. Again, that's your OPINION, and you are welcome to it. But it is not an objective fact. promiscuous Only if it happens frequently enough to be a pattern adulterous Only if the person is married lecherous Only to those with low libidos unwholesome Only to religious conservatives sinful Only to religious conservatives who don't understand that Christ hung out with prostitutes. depraved Again, only to religious conservatives and pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 05:10 PM
2

That isn't surprising.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 04:56 PM
2

Men who sleep with prostitutes are degenerate: TRUE = I am right But you haven't defined WHY that's true. It's just your opinion. People who judge men for sleeping with prostitutes are degenerate: FALSE = he is wrong Same here. You have expressed your opinion, but have not defined how this is a fact. Things must be factually correct in order to be called truth. You can't just say it's true because you think it is. That's the realm of religion.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 04:55 PM
2

How is that a double standard? Because you are saying he's wrong for doing the exact same thing you are. If he's wrong for judging someone, so are you. Do you literally not understand the definition of double standard?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 04:47 PM
2

He's got a lot of porn links to comment on too. Can't get distracted from that.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 04:46 PM
2

How is it wrong? You say you're free to judge, and you are. Nalka says he's free to judge you for judging, and he is. Unless you're just advocating for a double standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 04:43 PM
1

Good feelings by definition don't win conflicts.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 04:40 PM
1

but feminism is defined by it's leaders And here I thought it was defined by the actions of its adherents.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 04:35 PM
0

I've correctly pointed out that your working definition of feminism is wrong Are you one of those who think dictionaries are oppressive?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 04:31 PM
1

I feel like women use the word respect in a different way, because why would they ask for the male version of respect? PPD has had this discussion before. It usually comes down to men using the actual dictionary definition of the word, and women using it to mean "common courtesy".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 04:12 PM
1

Out of curiosity, how many women do you know? Like, really know, not just are acquaintances with? A dozen or less? How can you speak for all women, or even a majority of women if you don't know enough to be statistically significant? I realize I'm being pedantic here, but so are you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 04:08 PM
1

I've always just dismissed that claim as outright nonsense. I was raised by a single mom. By all objective measures of success, I'm doing alright as a person, as society doesn't seem to be falling down because of my mother.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/16 10:12 PM
1

I'm not sure how 'geothermal energy' could negate the fact that Iceland has some of the most progressive views of equality in the world. It wasn't meant to negate it. I was simply pointing out that when your overhead expenses are lower, the cost of being a single parent is more manageable.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/16 09:03 PM
1

I think Iceland is a bit of an outlier though. First, it's an island nation, with a largely centralized and homogeneous population. Second, its entire national economy is worth less than Apple Inc. Third, it can rely on geothermal energy for much of its heat and electricity needs, which further reduces individual overhead. Fourth, it has a population of only 313,000. That's less than 10% of the USA. I don't think most of their policies would work in any country that shares borders with anywhere …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/16 06:32 PM
5

Post history says otherwise. Because people never lie on the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/16 10:05 PM
2

In her youth she was abducted by Theseus. A competition between her suitors for her hand in marriage sees Menelaus emerge victorious. An oath sworn beforehand by all the suitors (known as the Oath of Tyndareus) requires them to provide military assistance in the case of her abduction; this oath culminates in the Trojan War. When she marries Menelaus she is still very young; whether her subsequent involvement with Paris is an abduction or a seduction is ambiguous.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/16 09:52 PM
1

Well, when said question begins with "logic aside", is it worth answering? DrunkGirl is actually asking someone to belay all reason in order to agree with her. If one has to set aside all logic to get such an answer, is it really a worthy question in the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/16 03:50 PM
2

Why isn't the onus on men to have a more realistic attitude towards women? Didn't you get the memo? Doing that is considered misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/16 03:13 PM
2

Not since a single march in Boston in 1980, from what some BP's have linked here in the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/16 03:11 PM
1

I have never, ever seen a single man give up a seat to a young, healthy, able bodied woman. Similarly, I've never seen an able-bodied woman give up her seat for a man, ever. Even elderly men. You are spinning bitter shit. Pot, meet kettle.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/16 03:07 PM
2

even with that caveat, you're still wrong. You must not even know what I was talking about then. I meant the caveat about me lurking in IRC, which I do. It's okay though. I know you're just one of those people who can never admit to being wrong about something stupid you've said. I've accepted that as just part of who you are, and we all love you anyway, peanut.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 09:12 PM
2

I love how you put a caveat on your statement about something you don't know, and then make a definitive follow-up as if you did. It's fascinating.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 08:40 PM
3

Sure it is. You specifically said "women actually approach first. We make the eye contact". Are you moving goalposts now?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 08:28 PM
2

It's more of a traffic light turning green, letting drivers know they can proceed. Except that is a universal, and is actually taught to prospective drivers before they are allowed behind the wheel. What you are describing would be more like one light among many lights turning green for a second or two, then turning off completely. Was that a signal to go? Are all the other signals broken? What gives?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 06:04 PM
3

Plausible deniability, friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 06:02 PM
6

My point was just that women make contact first If you count casually looking in a dude's direction and not immediately looking away as contact, sure. I still wouldn't call that initiation, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 06:01 PM
1

If you started working early on in life at the sort of place that employs kids just as they become legal to work, then it must have taken a huge effort to avoid socialising. I never said I avoided socializing. That was never any part of any of my comments so far. You are inferring things that aren't there. I'm merely pointing out that lower income people don't get to have play dates, swing sets, and pools for their kids. Or move to wherever has better kindergartens.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/16 11:20 PM
1

Well, I'm not RP, but I can see how you'd make that mistake.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/16 10:02 PM
1

And you don't like porn? Sure I do. Which is why I'm glad the internet is full of it. It wasn't an attack. It was an attempt at lighthearted banter. Grow a sense of humor, bud. Might want to work on getting those emotions under control. If you're ashamed of your habits, maybe you should make an alt account for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/16 09:46 PM
1

Having raised kids myself on a really tight budget I can tell you most of it is attainable unless you're unemployed. Again, I think it relates to your salary. My mom worked 3 jobs while I was growing up to keep us afloat. I started working fulltime as soon as my state's child labor laws allowed for it. We certainly couldn't afford scouts, or camps, or musical instruments & lessons, swing sets, pools, etc. I appreciate that you are able to do so, but your experience isn't likely to be extrapolate…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/16 09:19 PM
2

I like the way you think. (Is your username a reference to Shogun? If so - awesome!)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/16 09:07 PM
2

Parents choose kindergartens according to how well socialization is managed, make play dates for their kids, send their kids on camps, enroll their kids in groups like boy scouts or girl guides, make their kids learn a musical instrument, throw birthday parties, buy swing sets and pools and other tempting large play equipment all with the aim of attempting to force asocial kids out into their peer group. Many parents offer their kids use of a basement or rumpus room and a TV and games equipment …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/16 09:04 PM
1

so, as i said before: if ECs don't enter TBP to cause problems, they likely won't be blocked. I guess you missed the part where TBP had a thread going for users to block the TRP EC's, regardless of if they came into TBP or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/16 08:57 PM
1

i don't often see the ECs in the TBP sub though Hint hint: they don't have to be in TBP to be blocked.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/16 08:22 PM
0

TRP in a shallow one where your status, wealth and price of your clothes count and where relationships are based on power So, professional business environments. TBP in one where your personality and passions count and where relationships are based on friendship So, college campuses. Sounds like TBP is just much younger and idealistic/sheltered.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/16 07:45 PM
1

I'd rather not see blues, reds, and incels talking to the centrists and not each other. Sadly I think it may be inevitable, at least from an outside perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/16 01:28 AM
2

there would still be plenty of TRP content for them to criticize if they so desire Hence why my example was them blocking all the EC's. You know, the users who produce most of the TRP content.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/16 01:25 AM
2

they'd probably be blocking them so that they're not as bothered when RPers wander over to their sub and make a scene. Which is fine. But it also means they would never see those user's posts or comments, so they'd have nothing to link to, and thus nothing to be outraged over. i didn't think RPers cared that much about what others thought of them, though, so i don't know what the purpose of hoping the sub disappears is if (general) you run around claiming you don't care in the first place. First…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/16 10:22 PM
4

There's already a thread over on /r/thebluepill where they're circlejerking about the possibility of blocking all red pillers - which is particularly funny if your stated goal is to satirize them. I was actually tempted to make a PPD post about that earlier. If they block all the TRP EC's, then they won't have any content to object to, and hopefully the echo chamber circlejerk would end forever. We can only hope.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/16 09:56 PM
0

At that point dating looks more like a job interview This doesn't change as you get older either. First dates basically are interviews.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/16 07:34 PM
1

Then men should pick better partners They are. That's why you constantly hear "where have all the good men gone?" The answer is they paired up with better women. But of course, that only serves to piss off the shitty ones more.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/16 07:21 PM
1

What someone deserves to demand from an intimate partner has to do with far more than their age or level of attractiveness. I guess that's where I have to disagree with you. I don't believe anyone deserves to demand anything from someone else. They may feel entitled to something due to their own self-perception, but that doesn't mean they deserve whatever they are demanding. And often, those who are most vocal about feeling entitled to said demands are the least deserving of anything, and usuall…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/16 07:17 PM
6

Almost all of the lesbians I know already dressed that way before coming out, and were usually "tomboys" in school. I say this as someone whose little brother is gay and who took him to MAGY (Metro area gay youth) meetings so he didn't have to feel alone. Suffice to say, I've known lots of lesbians for a couple decades now.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/16 04:33 PM
8

They probably dyed their hair after their weight gain. IME, it happens when the weight gain makes them invisible to the vast majority of men AND women, so the hair dyeing is way to attract attention - both positive and negative - that they had lost. It's a way to "stand out", to be a "nonconformist". But really it boils down to "I wanna be different, just like all the other different people I know".
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/16 04:10 PM
14

I believe it based on the amount of upvotes 82? That's a microcosm of TRP. That's literally 0.0002% of TRP users. and the fact that this isn't the only time we've seen these sentiments. But you had to dig back an entire year to find the most recent? Seems suspect.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/16 03:46 PM
15

Why then, does the redpill endorse surprise edgeplay, with complete strangers? Really? You believe RP endorses this based on a year old thread/comment made by someone who has since deleted their account? That's some absolutely priceless cherry-picking logic there. You rode the short bus, didn't you?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/16 02:50 PM
0

Well, whenever you can prove that I'm doing what you're accusing me of, then you'll have a case. Otherwise, you're just being harassing for no reason. What's interesting is that it doesn't even occur to you that literally ANY of the 7800 other readers of this sub could be downvoting you. In fact, you're being downvoted in threads I haven't even seen, during hours I'm not online, in comment chains I'm not a part of, so your logic isn't exactly bulletproof.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/16 01:41 PM
1

I haven't downvoted at all. I don't get your obsession with fake internet points.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/16 03:59 AM
1

Then you are being dishonest by still saying that LittleKnownFacts is adding subtext that doesn't exist in the post.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/16 12:08 AM
3

You're adding a lot of subtext that doesn't exist in this post Actually, no. The post goes on for more paragraphs that the OP has left out here and says exactly what /u/Littleknownfacts is saying. /u/Barbara_Logan-Price just decided to stop copying before she got to that point.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 10:09 PM
6

In this thread alone you've railed against the type of people who would post this while simultaneously using their same tactics. You've called them indoctrinated and then gotten upset at the same accusation used against you. You've stated that you don't justify hate unless it is warranted, and then justify it anyway without defining what warrants it. You say you can't stoop to their level, then you make a thread about them specifically to shame them. So like I said, laying the hypocrisy on thick…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 07:43 PM
3

We can't stoop to their level But you're going to anyway, hence this thread. You're laying the hypocrisy on thick today.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 07:33 PM
1

How am I cherry picking? Well, all you said was "but I will say the 70% number came from a study that looked at 92 divorces". You did not include the fact that the study was covering more than that. Your wording obviously implied that it ONLY looked at 92 divorces and not over 2,000 people. You're getting quite defensive No, I'm really not. You're projecting that onto me because I pointed out that you were obfuscating contextual data through intentional use of specific verbiage. If you can point…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 05:26 PM
1

If you look at the actual study he performed though, it contains quotes like this one: "Women seem to have a predominant role in initiating divorces in the U.S. as far back as there is data from a variety of sources, back to the 1940s," Rosenfeld said. "I assumed, and I think other scholars assumed, that women's role in breakups was an essential attribute of heterosexual relationships, but it turns out that women's role in initiating breakups is unique to heterosexual marriage." And the linked s…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 05:11 PM
2

You realize no fault divorce helps men too right? Is that why 70% of divorces are initiated by women?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 04:38 PM
1

what is with the frequency of threads recently talking about something one woman does and then applying to all of them? Isn't that the entire modus operandi of TBP? Take one post by one RP'er and apply it to all of them/all men?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 04:35 PM
1

But I do not take kindly to my words being misinterpreted, and then deleted by what are largely RP mods, because they are hostile toward me just because I identify as BP Just FYI, only 2 mods are RP. The rest are either BP or completely neutral.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 08:58 PM
1

You seemed to be arguing that deciding to pursue something other than a high powered position is virtually the same as being undriven and incompetent But I didn't argue that at all. You may have chosen to interpret my words that way, but I in no way said or implied anything of the sort. I.have also reposted.that comment,and will be taking up that deletion with the mods. Go right ahead. I doubt breaking the same rule twice will garner you any favors though.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 08:37 PM
1

I doubt there have been any polls to verify which RP ideas are popular and which aren't, so again I cannot speak to that. Do I realize that it is a notion within RP and at least some contributors believe it? Yes. But as we all know, "argumentum ad populum" is a common fallacy to make around here, and you wouldn't want to be committing that, would you?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 08:30 PM
1

I'm not implying it, you outright did it. I'm assuming that's why your comment was removed.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 08:23 PM
1

when the majority don't Do you mean the majority of divorced men do not pay any form of spousal support? Or do you mean the majority of men with spousal support orders are not paying them? Do you have a source for your claim - I flexed my Google-Fu but could not find any governmental source(ie: based on actual court decisions) that agreed with either claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 06:00 PM
1

My comment was 4 letters. Perhaps you are still having difficulty reading usernames, because I said nothing of the sort that you are "unpacking". I routinely see women trying to define masculinity through a constant stream of "A real man would XYZ", hence my snarky edit to your statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 05:38 PM
1

I was addressing the specific assertion of female incompetence. And you were projecting that assertion onto me, which I never made. I understand your POV, but resorting to name-calling isn't exactly a reasonable response.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 05:04 PM
1

It's quite different, and just because you choose to not operate those qualities in one specific avenue does not mean you don't operate them in another. And I never implied or said that it did. I also made no judgements on the subject at all. I merely stated that there was little practical difference. Because that's what you're arguing. No, it isn't. But it's always nice to see just how many people think they can read minds.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 04:41 PM
2

So you do agree that they think doing chore will lower attraction, not just simply not increase it? I agree that multiple studies have shown that husbands doing chores does not lead to increased sexual satisfaction/frequency in marriage. I do not claim to speak for what 140,000+ individuals think. Good, glad we are on the same page. We aren't agreeing or on the same page. You are conflating two different issues. The study I provided did look at marital happiness and how much the husband contribu…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 04:38 PM
1

They have said that it would cause her to lose attraction, which would result in a less happy relationship They said that because multiple studies showed that to be the primary result. See this highly upvoted post made by an EC. Who backed up his singular opinion with at least 2 studies concluding the same thing, one of which was a meta-study of previous studies with over 20,000 participants total. That's difficult to disregard when the only evidence to the contrary are the vocal opinions of det…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 04:24 PM
1

have you ever felt that you're less masculine since you're infertile? Not at all. I never wanted children, and still don't. I made a conscious and deliberate choice. It may have been different if I were born infertile, but that wasn't the case. I don't feel that the ability to impregnate a woman is necessarily a "masculine" trait, so much as a biologically male fact of reality. Any idiot can knock someone up. Not every man can be a good father. That said, it isn't as if my testosterone levels ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 04:11 PM
2

This is in the face of the reds’ claim that a man supplicating the wife and doing housework will be her less happy. Incidentally, they didn't say it would make her less happy. They said it would not lead to more sex, when women claimed that it would; ie: "I wouldn't be too tired for sex if you just helped out around the house more."
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 03:39 PM
1

There appears to be a lack of understanding of the varying degrees of masculinity in American culture from RPers women. FTFY
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 03:20 PM
4

a stallion who identified as a mare How do you know? Did he tell you? Did he write it out? Are you Dr. Dolittle?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 03:12 PM
1

It is not because I am incapable, it is not because I lack discipline, it is because I know I cannot be there for.my family in the way I need to.be if I did choose to pursue a high power, time intensive career. Not having the capability and discipline isn't much different from having it and intentionally choosing not to exercise it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 03:09 PM
1

Getting snipped lessens the amount of ejaculation? It doesn't affect total volume at all (or at least only incredibly minor amounts of difference). It just removes sperm from being in the seminal fluid. Source = I had a vasectomy 6 years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 03:03 PM
1

The oppressed try and take back the oppressors language. Do you honestly believe the word "vagina" is somehow "oppression language" and not a precise term relating to physiology? I've certainly never heard it used in a derogatory manor, which is sort of a prerequisite for oppressive language.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 02:55 PM
2

Classic bloop response. Get proven factually wrong multiple times, resort to name calling and denial. I honestly feel sad for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 04:56 PM
3

You see it in online dating profiles all the time. Many people, men and women both, will list their travel destinations as evidence of status. But when you talk to them about it, they can't actually tell you anything about the local culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 04:54 PM
2

Great apes are by definition apes. If you read my original reply, I in fact said great apes. I quoted you the wiki article on it, so my facts ARE straight. Nice attempt at backpedalling though.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 04:48 PM
2

What are you talking about? I'm not an RP'er, and I don't want anything of the sort. Literally all I did was point out that humans ARE in fact apes, in correction to your supposition otherwise. That's it. You're the only one making claims and extrapolations here.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 04:42 PM
2

Did I say we are exactly like them? No. I just pointed out that your statement was incorrect. No need to get angry about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 04:30 PM
1

When travel is used as a substitute for personality, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 04:23 PM
2

because racism has been defeated Spoken like someone who grew up in an ivory tower, and has never visited, say, Detroit or Chicago or Memphis or anywhere that isn't predominantly white. Racism is alive and well, just look at Trump's campaign. To deny that is simply ignorance of the highest order.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 04:14 PM
6

I'm saying there should be consequences and stigma for believing things Really? You are literally advocating for thought policing? How would you enforce that, and who gets to decide what beliefs cause harm? And how would you even discover who believes/thinks what? Are you psychic?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 04:08 PM
2

That's behavior, not just words. Then you aren't arguing against using words to shame, you are arguing against shunning.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 04:06 PM
1

we are not apes Actually, we are. The family Hominidae, known collectively as the great apes, include orangutans, gorillas, chimpanzees, and humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 03:59 PM
1

nah, just the dead ones And, you know, everyone else who got to live because of the dead ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 03:54 PM
1

The true content that was easy to deduce within the 3rd paragraph on the first page that I skimmed through before replying? Yeah, makes perfect sense. Enjoy your crusade wherein 1 group hosting 1 march in Boston 36 years ago counts as modern activism.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 02:42 PM
2

I literally just said "I will read it later", implying that I hadn't read it yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 01:58 PM
2

That wasn't NOW, that was WORD, but thank you for the citation. I will read it all later.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 12:24 PM
1

More projection. Classic.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 10:12 PM
1

No I haven't. I never once TOLD you what you think or what your intentions were. You must have reading comprehension or self-awareness problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 10:03 PM
-1

This argument is over. There was never an argument. I asked 2 questions, which you had no answer for, thus proving you made shit up.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 09:16 PM
1

You told me what my intention/goal was. The only way you could possibly know what my internal thoughts were is if you were psychic. Since you aren't, it's pure projection on your part.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 09:10 PM
1

You are trying to twist my words to prove yourself right. And you are claiming to read minds. Which makes you the worst psychic ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 09:05 PM
3

A statement policy from NOW So they released a statement. Did they actually DO anything? Any protests? Any petitions? Anything? Or did they just say some hollow words for good press coverage?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 08:49 PM
1

I just literally said that being too nice is bad. No you didn't. You LITERALLY said "when the attraction is there, niceness will not lower it". Your comments are there for everyone to read. Acting like you said the opposite of your actual words is simply silly.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 07:37 PM
0

And what is your central point? You really do have reading comprehension problems, don't you? I repeated it in my reply to you. My central point was that TBP can easily avoid being offended by not reading TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 06:13 PM
4

But why though? Why was there a shortage of actionable and blunt advice to begin with? You see, for years the only mainstream advice columns were in print magazines or newspapers and were limited to (in America at least) Dear Abby, Ann Landers, Carolyn Hax's "Tell Me About It", and Emily Yoffe's "Dear Prudence". Notice a theme? They're all written by women. There were no forums of advice for men by men. And the only mainstream advice men could get were from women, who had no idea what it was lik…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 05:35 PM
0

That is irrelevant to what I said. OP posited that TBP'ers don't know how to "escape the situation" of being offended by TRP. I replied that they do. If they don't read TRP they can't be offended by TRP. Field reports don't enter into it. If you are suggesting that field reports are a way to reap karma, then I agree. But TBP has them too, so it isn't like they are unique to TRP. And it still doesn't address my central point at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 03:47 PM
0

They don't know how to do step 2 either, so they fight back by mocking and shaming RPillers. Sure they do. It's really easy. Don't read TRP. But then they would have nothing to rant about for their sweet echo chamber fake internet points.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 03:10 PM
2

That definitely works both ways I don't see how. It's not like dudes are walking around with other men's sperm in vials just waiting to inject it into a woman while having sex so that any resulting kid wouldn't be his and she wouldn't know the difference. Don't act like that doesn't also happen to women who find out their significant other has had a kid with a different women. Having a kid with someone else before meeting your current partner isn't cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 02:56 PM
1

Are...are you seriously saying that your secondhand reading of a comment from someone whose credentials you don't actually know, and in a situation you cannot verify, is somehow proof of anything? If so, then I know an awesome guy you should meet. He's a Nigerian Prince, and he needs your help to get his fortune out of Africa.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 02:54 PM
1

Depends on jurisdiction and privacy laws. ie: HIPAA. Some countries have laws in place that require all medical service providers (including services such as genetic material collection and storage) to maintain absolute privacy for all patients' personally identifying information. The provider can be fined, sued, and the medical practitioners on staff could have their medical licenses revoked if they violate these laws.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 02:49 PM
1

I think people misunderstand the French (& German) ban. The intention is not done to hinder paternity tests per se. It’s to protect the genetic integrity of the individual - i.e., the child. Not true. In France, it is done specifically to maintain "family cohesion". They would rather have a non-biological father pay for the child than split the family and have the state pay for the child.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 02:43 PM
1

ok but the majority of feminists don't agree with it How do you know that? Was there a vote wherein all feminists everywhere cast their ballots?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 02:37 PM
1

How would that be determined? What metric would you use to separate the active participants from the passive readers? Threads started? Comments? Comment replies? You can't see who upvotes/downvotes, so you can't tell who does that to determine those who vote but don't post - but I would argue that they are active participants too.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 02:23 PM
1

It isn't an insult to point out an oversight. No need to be hypersensitive.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 02:21 PM
2

Did you miss the part of my post where I actually did provide a rational rebuttal? Considering you ended it with your same invective and accusations, I probably did. including saying that using shame instead of rational rebuttal is typical of me and other blues And you're saying it isn't? Seriously? Given the fact that you ended your reply with a shaming/silencing tactic, how can you possibly deny this? I was hoping you'd act a bit more civil Again, shaming tactics. Especially considering my ini…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 08:55 PM
6

Yes ma'am. Originally I got a puppy to help me through. Now he's a giant, lazy couch cuddler who steals my blankets and cookies. I've also been dating a wonderful nerdette for 18 months now whose personality quirks compliment my own quite nicely.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 06:22 PM
4

Welcome :) I'm doing good. It was my late wife who had cancer. It'll be 7 years since her death this July.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 06:13 PM
5

Have you ever left one women for another? No Have you ever comfort or shit tested your girlfriend or wife? Not to my knowledge. Did you plan to have casual sex when you are younger, then settle down with a more appropriate woman when you get older? Or did you already do this? Had casual sex. Settled down and got married. Became widower. Eventually had casual sex again. Currently dating, but not planning on marriage. Do you catch yourself being solipsistic at times? If you catch yourself, is it s…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 05:30 PM
2

You really should work on your anger and hatred issues. It would make it more pleasant to talk with you. I don't have any. Maybe you're just hypersensitive. Or maybe you just use the standard Charge of Irascibility to silence dissent when you have no rational rebuttal. Typical bloop shaming tactic.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 01:59 PM
1

They don't ever consider the possibility of exceptions. Here's the thing, neither do you or other bloops. You paint any and all TRP'ers as a monolithic entity who all think and act the same, while hiding behind your own special snowflake-ism. If they realized not all women were really like that, they would consider how to tell which women are like that, and how to find women that are or aren't like that. They do. Which is why they talk about what qualities would be necessary for a plate vs. LTR …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 01:57 AM
2

but I don't see why that's related to... And I wasn't addressing that. I was addressing your bias, which you are still wiggling out of admitting.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 01:54 AM
1

Only to the extent that you uphold the law. Break the law, lose those rights. Also, you still don't deserve anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 09:43 PM
1

Many insurance carriers now allow for domestic partners to be on shared policies without marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 09:38 PM
3

That did not answer any of my questions at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 09:14 PM
1

If a guy was that hesitant about being married, I would be concerned he was keeping me around while hoping for a better option to come along, and then later settle for me if no such option appears. Similarly, if a woman wanted to be married within less than a couple of years of being together and possibly not having lived together for very long, I'd be worried about being used because she just wants to be married/have a wedding, but not necessarily work on being in a marriage for life. I've seen…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 09:09 PM
1

I've never claimed to be a victim. You are confusing the message with the messenger. Typical for those who lack reading comprehension.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 08:54 PM
1

Do you believe the "general populace" is in favor of TRP theories? I believe the general populace is unaware of them. I believe certain internet crusaders make a mountain out of a very small molehill in the grand scheme of things.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 08:08 PM
4

To be fair, you've seen the guys who ended up liking it. Have you seen one who didn't? One who was uncomfortable or hated it? What was their reaction like? If not, are you willing to call this confirmation bias?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 08:05 PM
1

have a healthier relationship than the average couple What is your metric for this? Also, how happy is the average couple? How do you know?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 08:03 PM
1

you think I'm the only one person who has a problem with TRP and thus, I cannot point out the obvious that TRP is notoriously disliked on a lot of Reddit as a whole? No, I'm pointing out the lack of logic in your statement. I can be offended by something and also have a valid argument against it Yes. You can. But what you cannot do is act like your opinion represents the general populace as you are trying to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 07:35 PM
1

No. I'm pointing out the tactics that TBP users employ. You really are proving the point about lacking self-awareness though.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 07:34 PM
3

I'm looking at how reds actually use it You mean how they come into PPD every time this same thread topic is started and point out that it isn't literal? Because that's how I see them use it quite frequently.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 06:29 PM
1

TBP is getting together to spread the knowledge that TRP is a toxic hate swamp No, they pick on anyone who says somethng that hurts their feelings in any sub they dislike. Hence why you see u/girlcherry starting threads from MGTOW and such. TBP is completely hateful and toxic, just less self-aware.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 06:27 PM
2

You didn't use those words to describe TRP/toxicity. I quoted you directly. If you want to move the goalposts, change your original qualifying statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 06:05 PM
3

I find a lot of the conversation highly offensive to people Here's the thing, you aren't people. You can't speak for people. You're one singular person. You are projecting what you find offensive onto a nebulous mass, mostly as an argumentum ad populum, because doing so seemingly gives you the moral high ground. The problem is that you don't have the high ground when you start with a fallacy and build up a mountain of bullshit to justify your own hurt feelings as belonging to an entire populace.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 05:31 PM
3

Toxic is when a bunch of people get together, spread their negativity and hate around, and infect others with it So...TBP? Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 05:28 PM
1

Ah, ignorance at its finest right here. Male Pattern Baldness - the most common form in the Western world - is carried in the X chromosome. Men get it from their mothers and it is usually triggered in later adolescence or early adulthood by an overabundance of testosterone.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 05:12 PM
1

I deserve what I deserve. No one deserves anything. You aren't entitled to anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 04:52 PM
15

there's no reason to date or not date someone for their sexual history Even if it includes never having sex? I don't want to date a virgin in my 30s. Even if it includes a history of sexual abuse/rape? That's a lot of baggage for many people, and most probably aren't strong enough to support that person in the best way. Even if it includes unprotected sex with IV drug users? Is my health not a good enough reason to not have sex with someone?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 08:49 PM
3

I can tell you that a campus wide, anonymous survey at my unversity supports these numbers. Something like 1 in 2 have been sexually assaulted I always find those to be super suspect though. We had them when I was in college as well, but they counted things like "lustful gazes" as sexual assault. If that were true, then I've been sexually assaulted hundreds of times while working out in the campus gym. I'm not saying that was true in your case, but the criteria for what constitutes sexual assaul…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 05:41 PM
3

Sexual assault is one of the most under reported crimes, with 68% still being left unreported. How can something like that be proven though? If they don't know how many times an event happens, and they don't know how many times said even is then reported, how can they definitively say they do?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 05:21 PM
1

TRP = 145,000 users, 14 mods. TBP = 26,000 users, 64 mods. TBP is much more totalitarian than TRP, and sheer number bear this out.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 03:37 PM
2

They've got to at least be smooth about it. At least convince me that I'm enjoying their company, ya know? So you're advocating for them lying to you and manipulating you? As long as you don't catch on, it's all fair game? Interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 03:02 PM
2

That sounds like a terrible date.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 03:01 PM
1

What was your point about remarriage being driven by women though? How can you conclude that from the remarriage rates going down for men and up for women? I didn't conclude that, it was the study in the link you provided that concluded that. Your supposition was that men are more likely to remarry than women, but your link said otherwise. I just read more of it than you did.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 02:20 PM
1

It was the emphasis that I was highlighting. Remarriage being driven by women, not men per your supposition. And that, among whites at least, men remarrying is going down while women remarrying is going up. And that among all other demographics, remarriage is down as a whole. I find it interesting that you chose not to acknowledge the rest of my rebuttal though.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 12:50 AM
1

Good, I'm glad you double checked that, as I didn't. Proof positive that Bloops won't read their own damn sidebar! However, that still doesn't explain why the 64 mods can't be bothered to enforce the NP linking rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 09:57 PM
2

That source goes on to say: The gender gap has closed mainly among younger and middle-aged adults who are eligible to remarry. Divorced or widowed women ages 25 to 54 are now about as likely as men in that age range to have remarried. The gap in your source is for adults over 55. Interestingly enough, it then goes on to break down ethnicity, and includes this particular gem(emphasis mine): "The increasing prevalence of remarriage among whites is driven entirely by increases among white women. In…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 09:24 PM
1

I'm pretty sure they say that your shouldn't downvote, and do push for np links. Well yeah, it's in bold letters on the sidebar. So either TBP members haven't read the sidebar (no surprise there), don't adhere to their own rules (again, no surprise), or they just don't care.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 08:58 PM
1

You know blue pill ideas are different from TBP subreddit. As the person who pointed out that you identify as BP without actually reading TBP or seeing how they act/what they say, it's somewhat disingenuous of you to not give the same benefit of doubt to TRP. There is much more to what is considered "red pill" than just the TRP subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 05:33 PM
1

Taibo did that with those same links a coupe months ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 04:54 PM
2

Does the truth of the statement effect whether or not mods will remove comments that are personal attacks, though? And how would that truth be determined in the first place, when it's usually a direct insult/opinion rather than a factual commentary with indexed sources? Because I've seen some that get left up despite being reported lately.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 04:36 PM
2

Sometimes I have my moments.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 04:33 PM
1

ha, so you agree older men going for younger women is creepy? Not moodyprism, but that isn't my conclusion. Rather, I believe anyone who enjoys watching a show that drove an innocent man to suicide has severe issues. However, I do not condone the pervs who actually showed up at the trap house to fuck an "underage girl". Those dudes are scum.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 04:27 PM
2

Believe it or not, your opinion doesn't change reality. I just wish you and your ilk realized that as well. Instead of brandishing your happy hypocrisy around like weaponized shame.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 01:54 PM
2

And not something TBP derides or speaks out against either. Nor do they use NP links like almost every other sub whose entire content is crossposted links. It's a tacit endorsement of the downvoting/silencing tactics.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 01:52 PM
2

Or in other words, "I'll make a claim that I refuse to back up. You'll just have to take my word for it."
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 02:14 PM
3

We aren't there to harass TRP, but stand on the sidelines and laugh amongst ourselves. Except for that whole brigading thing you love to do so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 02:13 PM
2

We just argue within the TRP framework against TRP's claims. This thread showed otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 03:04 AM
1

He had military experience. Yes, he had 3 years of military experience 50 years before the Iraq War. How hard is it for you to understand that the military isn't monolithic, and that a ton of things change every year, let alone over HALF A CENTURY?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 09:52 PM
1

However, don't countries other than those specific countries still enforce their own (as opposed to the U.S.'s) child support laws? Some of them, yes, but only if you have a kid in those countries with a citizen of that country. Hence why I said "move to a country without child support laws if you got someone pregnant". Ie: the pregnancy comes before you moving.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 08:43 PM
2

if a doctor agrees to remove a man's entire vas deferens and a man's entire epididymis and re-canalization occurs afterwards, then can one conclude that this doctor screwed up with this surgery? From a purely legal perspective (because again I'm not a urologist), probably not. The doctor cannot stop your body from trying to heal itself. At least not ethically. Now, if we want to take this thought experiment a little bit further and say that when the doctor completed the surgery, he then coated t…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 08:40 PM
1

Secondly, can't I still be forced to pay child support in these countries? The ones I listed are the ones that WILL enforce support. Hence why I said avoid those. Finally, I would like to point out that I strongly prefer surgical castration and a lifetime of hormone replacement therapy to your suggestion here No doubt. But I hereby reserve the right to make jokes about your future silicon ball implants. :-p
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 08:27 PM
5

Yes. And as I'm sure you've read about, that isn't 100% guaranteed to be always effective, no matter what either.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 08:23 PM
4

Fair enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 08:22 PM
3

another easy way to see it is that i know how to do it, and simply don't. Sure, but that comes with a separate hypothesis of acute laziness. special snowflake right? Not really. Nothing special at all, from what I've seen. though i imagine someone so bothered about something like this on reddit is unlikely to want to see anything but the worst possible conclusion. I'm not bothered at all. We're having an academic discussion on the possible reasons from your observed behavior. I'm stating one pos…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 08:21 PM
2

Are such metal caps 100% effective, though? Yes or No question. I don't know. Again, not a urologist.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 08:18 PM
5

However, no offense, but it's a bit strange for you to say that metal caps prevent the vas deferens from growing back only to be unable to provide an explanation as to why exactly this would always be the case. I'm saying that's the purpose and intent of having the metal caps implanted. I'm not saying they are 100% guaranteed to always be effective, no matter what.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 08:17 PM
0

Are you one of those people who doesn't answer direct questions, but rather deflects or responds with a question of your own?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 08:15 PM
3

you're wrong How so? You don't capitalize sentence beginnings. Thus, it's an easy hypothesis to make based on repeated observations of your behavior. Are you saying the Scientific Method is wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 08:12 PM
2

I'm not a medical doctor, so I'm not qualified to answer that for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 08:11 PM
2

Oh it most definitely would. Courts only consider what's "in the best interest of the child", and would invalidate your contract on the spot. I think your only solution at this point is to not have sex or move to a country without child support laws if you got someone pregnant. Of all the official independent 195 countries on the planet, only Australia, Canada, Czech Republic, El Salvador, Finland, Hungary, Ireland, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Switzerland, and The Uni…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 08:00 PM
-2

So you basically adopt a position based on what a 3rd party says without doing any independent research of your own? Is that how you vote as well? Because adopting a label for oneself without understand said label is kind of silly, in my opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 07:56 PM
3

I certainly want to have sex, though. Well, I want to never have to work again but still maintain my lifestyle. We can't always get what we want. Wouldn't falsely promising 100% effectiveness be a case of medical malpractice, though? Again, no. Because the promise is not part of the treatment process. Additionally, the promise would not be enforceable in court, if the doctor did nothing to alter his handiwork after the surgery. Basically you would have the burden to prove that he was responsible…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 07:47 PM
4

I find it amusing that you're willing to associate with a group to the extent of adopting their flair/label, but you don't actually go to their sub to see what you are representing with said flair.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 07:42 PM
3

I never talked about chopping off my dick, though. Rather, I was talking about chopping off my balls. I realize that. I'm just saying that since you need a guarantee that you will never have, you might as well chop off your dick now, because you're not going to be using it for sex, ever. However, can't I sue a doctor for malpractice if he promises 100% effectiveness only to have my sterilization fail later on? No. Malpractice is if something goes wrong during treatment or a misdiagnosis leading …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 07:38 PM
3

if you want a specific answer, ask a specific question about a specific situation. Okay, read below. having a reason for doing so is better than not having a reason, though. Meh. I don't think having a reason for insulting someone is justification unto itself, unlike you. For example, I could say that my reason for saying something like "u/sen--sen was not blessed with an overabundance of intelligence" is that you seem incapable of following basic English grammar rules, such as capitalizing the …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 07:33 PM
3

Good luck with that. If you really need a guarantee in writing that is completely unenforceable in court, then you may as well just chop your dick off now.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 07:29 PM
3

if you provide examples of what i've said in the past that you felt were lies or that you don't agree with and post about it, then you're welcome to do so Again, the point has gone over your head entirely. I'm not accusing you of being a liar or despicable. I'm just saying that since you're totally okay with those insults, and don't see it as name-calling, then you'd be cool being called them as well, deserved or not. I'm not criticizing or attacking you at all. I'm turning your rhetoric around …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 07:21 PM
5

specifying... ? you may think i'm despicable or an awful nutty person, but i haven't lied about anything. Not at all. In fact, I never said anything of the kind. besides, posting a thread actively calling for people to insult me for no reason isn't anything like the post we're discussing. That's not what I said either. I was simply saying that since you don't consider those insults name-calling, then by your own standards, you should be fine being called them as well. Since that idea seems to of…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 06:28 PM
2

A careful reading of my comment will show that I was responding to the quoted bit and "saying what I had to say". I did not say that sen--sen was the bloop in question.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 06:26 PM
4

along with any comments personally attacking me It isn't a personal attack if it's your own comment specifying that exact thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 06:21 PM
6

just say what you have to say. I've been saying TBP isn't satire for months! I even said it multiple times yesterday. It's always refreshing when a bloop finally admits it too.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 06:10 PM
2

women outnumber men now in medicine Actually they don't. There are more women in med school than men (and even that number is down to 55% from 68% a few years ago), but more men finish it. There is projected to be more women docs in the UK than men by the end of next year, but worldwide there are still more male doctors.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 05:43 PM
2

All female employees = man claiming discrimination of gender. That is only true if those men can prove they were discriminated against based on their gender. They can't just make a claim with no evidence. Maybe you should learn how the legal system works before making incorrect generalized statements about a likely fictional situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 05:36 PM
2

What do you mean "Influence?" Well, what do you mean by it? I'm just using the word you chose here: consider it evidence that socialization influences preferences You are literally saying that all of those societies in the study just came up with their own preferences, and that magically they were all the same preference, despite almost all other markers of their cultures being different. I'm asking you WHY you believe that, instead of the more logical conclusion? Occam's Razor and all that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 05:34 PM
2

Similar to how a dangerous dog is a danger to you as a human even if you knew it's that way because its former owner abused it. That analogy isn't very good. A dangerous dog is only dangerous to an unprepared human. Since you know about RP, its tenets and practices, how is it a danger to you personally?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 05:25 PM
2

Does that mean you honestly believe that all societies influence all women to prefer good financial prospects? And if you truly do believe that, then ask yourself why all societies would do so? Can they all have had the same spontaneous cultural preferences? They would have to in order to truthfully say there is no evo-psyche going on.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 05:21 PM
2

That's why you get the nice metal caps placed on the severed ends of the vas deferens. Then they can't regrow together. It's what my urologist did during my vasectomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 05:13 PM
3

The US caused the Taliban to take control in the first place! That's a massively uninformed oversimplification. The US, along with Pakistan, helped fund militia groups to resist Soviet invasion & occupation of Afghanistan in the 90s. The Taliban as we now know it did not exist then. What emerged was a group of resistance fighters who overthrew what they saw as a corrupt government after pushing out the Soviets. Unfortunately, they were lead by zealots who sought to impose their own brand of reli…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 02:55 PM
3

women see a bigger picture Source please? Most women I know tend to obsess over the smaller details of things and lose track of the big picture entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 02:49 PM
3

I don't know where you guys heard the social narratives that women are perfect. Dude, it's way common. It even has its own Wikipedia page. To say you've never heard of it implies that you do not consume any kind of mass media, which would be hypocritical considering you're on reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 02:43 PM
4

Except that you're including Rumsfeld as one of only two people who count for this scenario, and his active duty in the US Navy was only from 1954-1957, hardly a career sailor. And you're also acting as if he didn't graduate from Princeton before entering the Navy. For all of his asshattery, he is a very smart man. Plus, he was a co-sponsor of the Freedom of Information Act. Do you honestly believe that he would have been so if he didn't want some sort of transparency in the government?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 02:04 PM
7

And where do these politicians come from????!!!! Well, when a mommy and a daddy love each other, they make a baby. I didn't think I'd have to explain human reproduction to you. I'm talking about prominent positions that people rise to via the military - as I stated in my post. Except they don't. Most politicians are lawyers, not career military vets.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 11:33 PM
14

You mean the military that started insane wars they can't get control of and spend endless money on? The military doesn't start wars. Politicians do. Your opening premise was so incorrect it makes the rest of your comment incoherent.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 09:23 PM
5

Even so, I still don't think that's the general viewpoint of the rest of society. Most of society (even Western society) is just people trying to get by on paycheck to paycheck. They don't have time to worry about being a reaction to TRP. Hell, TBP isn't even satire, really. It's just name & shame, same as SRS.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 09:05 PM
7

TBP represents what the rest of society is like I don't think it does, though. I think it represents the ultra-feminist/liberal population of academia (I say that as a white college-educated democrat), but very little else. Rarely have I seen a BP'er over 30, or one who is self-made, or one who has faced any significant amount of hardship in life. I'm not saying they don't exist, I'm just saying the actual subscribers of the TBP subreddit are all fairly homogeneous and utterly intolerant of anyt…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 08:59 PM
1

I just take what I see there and repackage it for women to read in other places, complete with quotes, screenshots, and the whole shebang. So you're saying that you just like to name & shame while gossiping to the girls? Seems pretty immature.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 06:00 PM
2

Losing property just doesn't compare. We're not talking about the experience itself, we're talking about how you feel afterwards. You just admitted that you can't speak on it for rape, so of course it doesn't compare for you. I'm not trying to make light of rape, so don't think I am. I'm just saying that the constant state of fear, violation, and loss of confidence is real for both. My home was broken into and I was robbed by an anonymous person at gunpoint. Maybe you got over it easy enough, bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 06:53 PM
1

And you felt nothing? Sounds fishy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 06:17 PM
2

The feeling of deep, personal violation and fear Except that's the exact feeling you have when your home is broken into. You feel violated. You feel fearful. You feel unsafe in your own home. You are speaking like someone who has never had any of this happen to you, so this comes off very heavily as projection on your part, with a heaping load of "just world fallacy" mixed it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 03:40 PM
1

But giving someone advice on how to avoid being raped, after they've been raped, is not helping that person. That's just it, though. Everyone is given that same advice. Not just rape victims post-assault. But somehow offering it is still considered victim blaming. My little sister has been told all of this stuff her whole life, and she's never been raped. That doesn't mean she's actually adhered to it, but she is aware of it nonetheless.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 03:37 PM
6

Do you remember the last clerk you had casually chit-chatted while checking out at the store? Do you remember their name? Do you remember the exact words of the conversations. Didn't think so.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 01:22 PM
2

I just find the hypocrisy of some here pathetic. Me too, but yet you're still here.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 01:29 AM
3

Why else would you have mentioned it if you didn't care? Can you actually state a logical reason? Either you care about karma, or you care about bashing RP'ers because of a perceived slight over karma.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 10:34 PM
5

If they downvote me, it is forbidden Oh how the tables turn. You're okay with BP'ers coming in and downvoting when you crosspost, but someone else does it to you and you get upset. I honestly Dont give a Damn. That isn't true or you wouldn't have brought it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 09:59 PM
4

Maybe your comments are being crossposted elsewhere and those people are downvoting you. Since that's your go-to tactic, you shouldn't be offended at all when it happens to you as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 09:47 PM
2

Good one! Trying to get cherry to be objective isn't going to happen, like ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 09:41 PM
1

You've obviously never been to China/India.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 06:25 PM
1

Well since I am in South Africa, I don't have Equal Opportunity hiring standards to meet. Fair enough. we notice all sorts of drama caused by men And I could point to lots of others in this thread whose experience with women in the workplace is dramatic. Either way, it's simple confirmation bias on yours/their part.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 05:07 PM
1

So what you're saying is that you don't meet Equal Opportunity hiring standards, and have no plans to become compliant?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 04:18 PM
2

Men tend not to multi-task and to want to handle one thing at a time. So you're saying men are focused and women can't stay on task? And that's somehow a bad thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 04:15 PM
2

It doesn't. I parsed the entire article for the words 'man', 'woman', 'men', 'women', 'male', and 'female'. It doesn't mention gender or sex of any employee at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 04:14 PM
2

Your first link does not mention genders of employees in any way. In fact, the words "men", "women", "male", and "female" aren't even anywhere in the article. Your second link does not parse failures by gender either. But I read the top 10 and none of them mentioned being all male or all female either. So nothing you posted is relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 04:11 PM
1

What are the odds of finding enough women with TJ or TP sets to run an entire business, though? Most women are going to fall along FJ or FP sets (in my experience).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 03:50 PM
0

I'm a male that has worked with an all female technical group Just being pedantic here, but if you were a dude working there, it wasn't all female.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 03:48 PM
8

What's the minimum wage in America? $7.25/hour What is it in Australia? $17.29/hour Only a 2.4x difference. No big deal. (/s)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 03:02 PM
1

I'm being downvoted too. So at least whoever is doing it is equal opportunity about it. I understand that something about the link and laugh style of TBP rubs you wrong Not really. It just isn't satire. So the common shield you all hide behind is just a cowardly facade and you're all being dishonest about it. there's no need to misrepresent what we do or why here. That's the thing: everyone who claims the "satire" moniker is the party misrepresenting TBP. I'm just calling it like I see it. If yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 07:44 PM
1

Now you're contradicting yourself. You haven't proven anything or given a legit answer to anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 07:33 PM
1

So you admit that it doesn't prove anything and you were wrong? Cool! Glad we agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 06:56 PM
2

No, that link compiles data from feminist blogs. None of it has peer-reviewed studies or empirical evidence of any kind. It doesn't prove anything other than some feminists believe that feminism has helped some men in some very specific ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 05:22 PM
2

"Most people" aren't aware of its existence.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 05:18 PM
0

It's just why TBP exists. We've been over this a dozen times at least. It may have been the original reason for TBP. These days, TBP is just link-&-shame in the exact same vein as SRS. It's just "this offends my delicate sensibilities, so I want you all to see it and hate it as much as I do". That isn't satire. It's a sad need for validation.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 05:05 PM
2

Many dominatrices have said that a lot of their clients are CEOs or high-powered businessmen. They relinquish power in sex because they have so much of it in their everyday life - BDSM becomes a source of relief. They aren't relinquishing power during sex, since having sex with your dominatrix almost never happens. Most professional doms are not prostitutes, although some prostitutes are also doms. They are there for release, yes, but not necessarily sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 05:02 PM
3

People probably aren't playing a 5 year old game for 6 hours every day either. I've certainly never seen someone with 11,000+ hours played time on Skyrim.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 03:45 PM
0

Just because we link here doesn't mean we are asking for brigading. No, you're doing it "for satire". We know. It's the same tired lie you always fall back on.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 02:00 PM
3

I don't downvote anybody. That's an outright lie. Now if people have downvoted YOU, it is not my fault. Only if you're delusional enough to believe that those downvotes would have still happened without your crossposting. Either way it's sad that you feel the need to cause downvotes to come in from others subs just to silence someone you disagree with. It's not even just PPD, you also do it to MGTOW posts. As if those guys need another woman insulting them.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 10:19 PM
3

The point still stands Not until you can prove that point with evidence of RP'ers posting to TRP with links to PPD comments to cause downvote brigades. Otherwise, you're just blowing smoke or trying to compare apples to oranges.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 10:05 PM
2

What are you talking about? Who is this plural "you" that you are referring to? I'm not RP. Although it's a common dismissal from BP'ers to accuse someone they disagree with of being RP just to write them off, as you are proving here. And you haven't addressed my point. You can't show it, because it doesn't happen. So it isn't selective on my part at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 10:02 PM
5

If you can show me where on /r/TheRedPill are posts linking to PPD comments in order to stir up outrage and cause downvote brigades, then you'll have a valid point. But since TRP specifically disallows linking to other subs, you won't be able to do that. So again, selective outrage, thy name is OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 09:58 PM
5

As if it's only blues doing it? Did I say that? No. In fact, I only pointed out one single user doing it. Nice misrepresentation, though. Selective outrage, thy name is OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 09:52 PM
3

Then I went over to the blue pill and sure enough I find this Yep. They linked my comment and brigaded everyone down who isn't BP-flaired, as you can see. You'll note it was /u/girlcherry who started that thread and was the BP'er arguing in that PPD thread. Usually when I see it, I post the links to a PPD modmail. Although I haven't gotten a response from mods on this in a while, which isn't actually surprising in the slightest. It's kind of sad that BP'ers feel the need to downvote in order to …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 09:08 PM
2

I love how you didn't even bother relaying the rest of the info, though. There is no federal law in place regulating putative father registries. Among all signatory countries only the United States refuses to ratify the Convention on the Rights of the Child and registries are not regulated under the U.N. Charter. Currently 33 states in the U.S. have putative father registries. Unknown is the number of children adopted without consent or notice to the biological father under the registry program …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 06:04 PM
1

it's obvious you're trying to write off one definition because you don't like it Not at all. The dictionary lists definitions in order of common usage. You are attempting to say that a less common usage is as established as the most common, which is simply illogical. You even acknowledge this in your first reply to my comment admitting that I am not wrong. But now you're backpedaling. Presumably because you have issues with conceding points on the internet, at least based on your post history.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 05:05 PM
1

Spoken like someone who doesn't understand the meaning of connotation or denotation.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 03:31 PM
1

one is more in line with general courtesy, while the other refers to admiration. So like I said, it's connotation vs. denotation. Or feels vs. reals to make it appropriate for this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 02:28 PM
4

I've always been surprised by the red definition of respect Really? The RP definition is almost exactly the dictionary definition. The BP definition most closely resembles "courtesy" rather than respect. It's a denotation vs. connotation issue, really.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 09:51 PM
2

Yes. Women kill their kids 2-3x more often than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 09:39 PM
1

Even when it comes wolves, who used to be believed to be clearly divided between alpha and beta Except in a wolf pack, the alpha and beta aren't in direct competition. They work cooperatively. Alpha/beta denotes the hierarchy of the group.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 09:31 PM
0

It's looking at the relationship in a cynical way, just to soften the blow if it doesn't work out. Cynicism is just a dirty word for pattern recognition.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 09:19 PM
1

That's where you're wrong. They do have the right to wear whatever they want. They do NOT have the right to not be shamed for it, since they do NOT have the right to police someone else's thoughts or words.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/16 07:33 PM
2

If hazard pay was so rewarding, why do MRAs keep complaining about the 93%? Because you can't collect hazard pay if you're dead. Pretty self-explanatory.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/16 04:11 PM
2

Title of what? "weak feminine BP commies"? No thanks. You're welcome to that one.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 10:50 PM
2

Not doing a great job if you're still here posting comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 10:41 PM
4

Spitters are quitters.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 06:05 PM
2

The irony of posting that on PPD with a BP flair must be lost on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 05:34 PM
6

To be fair, negareddit is basically the same as SRS, just without the established hierarchy. It's an ongoing circlejerk meant to shame anyone who disagrees with the SJW party line.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 05:19 PM
2

So you have a sample size of 4? That's still not "large".
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 04:59 PM
1

No you aren't. You even admitted that you're just going by what your husband says to you. So your sample size is 1.That isn't "large" by any means.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 04:46 PM
1

You're trying to define it by what a few men do and you're extrapolating that. No, that's what YOU did in the OP, not me. How can you not grasp that?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 03:18 PM
-4

You don't want to answer because you know I made a point. Are you literally claiming to be psychic now? Time to head off to the institution with the nice men in white coats.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 12:54 AM
-7

And you still didn't answer my two questions. Because that's you moving the goalposts. You're inventing fictional scenarios to obtain an answer in your favor, and you know it. I'm choosing not to engage in your bullshit rhetoric.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 11:24 PM
-7

No, you said: I think they have a conscious or subconscious need to offend women. THAT IS A GENERALIZATION. That is what I'm refuting. Nothing else. Moving the goalposts here just makes you look bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 11:21 PM
-2

And I don't offend them. How do you know that? I could be offended by some of your sexist generalizations here, but I don't speak up because ultimately it doesn't effect my real life in any meaningful way. How can you be so sure? I said "may". So did I. Didn't stop you from pushing on through with your rhetoric. *nice ninja edit there, peanut
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 11:17 PM
-1

Maybe. But you are not allowing for other possibilities, such as I presented, you are just rolling with your projection. Now, I could say that you hold that opinion because you may have a conscious or subconscious aversion to men. But I'm not trying to apply sweeping generalizations to 3.5 Billion individuals like you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 11:14 PM
4

but he offends women because he hates them Or maybe he just doesn't care about their opinion of his language choices. Similarly, I don't care about not offending people on PPD, but that doesn't mean I hate them. The concepts are not mutually exclusive, no matter how much you want them to be. Also, no one has the right to never be offended. That right does not exist in any country's constitution or charter.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 11:09 PM
1

I was talking about You were talking about "what you see". So now you're saying you don't see your husband? That's an even worse failure. So you married a racist deadbeat who fancies himself an intellectual and doesn't spend time with his kids? Wow. You certainly can pick a winner.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 11:07 PM
1

Men aren't spending much time with their kids at all, from what I see. Well then your husband is failing as a dad, since you see him too. See? I can play the "your life experience is bullshit" game too.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 10:48 PM
15

You don't get to define masculinity! Your shaming tactics don't belong here.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 10:46 PM
21

Oh look. It's another thread where someone who is not and has never been a man tells men how to act, speak, and think without realizing the enormous sexism implied therein.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 10:40 PM
1

That was almost a direct quote from a RP mod which i linked, so how could it be a strawman? Because it was a deliberate misrepresentation of all RP'ers, and not just the 1 dude who said something vaguely like that. At this point I'm starting to think you don't actually know the definition of the term "strawman" because you keep replying with denials of the exact thing you are doing. I understand that not all RPillers believe the same thing, but just because you don't personally believe it doesn'…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 06:35 PM
1

Can you be very specific? Sure. This is a direct quote from you: "RP: Believe that the woman you are with is an entitled dumb cunt, because it makes you confident and being confident makes her want to fuck you." Several RP's said this was projection and incorrect. But you stand by it. That's a strawman. I am very biased against RP. Yes I know. Hence why I said that in my very first reply that you denied.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 06:11 PM
1

I don't see how I am dismissing anyone in those examples you gave. Really? You don't think strawmanning 130,000 individuals as saying things that conform to your bias when some of them are directly disagreeing with you isn't dismissing? I am genuinely trying to understand the RP viewpoint. No you aren't. You are assuming all of them think they exact same way about everything, and then you project that out. You are even directly telling some of them how they think in one of my links. If you hones…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 06:04 PM
1

If your views are changing, awesome. Just looking at your replies to others from the last 10 hours, you very much waved off any reply that didn't agree with your bias. Such as this, this, and this.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 05:47 PM
3

I live in Australia. Arguably more lenient towards women in tech.(from my experiences) I mean I don't see the sexism and I've been in the field 10+ years now. I've been in the industry for a long time in the US as well, and there isn't a sexism problem here either. There are TONS of women in the field (it's about 60/40 m/f ratio in my Fortune 100 company), they're just mostly Asian and Indian, so white-centric feminism doesn't count them.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 05:13 PM
1

You read them pretty quickly, I'm impressed. It doesn't take much to copy/paste. Plus, scientific studies are given their own type of demarcation which wasn't listed for any of those sources but 1. You'd know that if you ever did any actual research of your own, or even bothered to think critically about the sources in that list. It's obvious that 3 pages in Current Directions in Psychological Science is an article in a magazine, for instance, and not a full study. Thus googling that article rev…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 05:06 PM
2

Do you not realize that every reference but 1 in that article is just a survey or article in another magazine, and not an actual scientific study? The only actual peer-reviewed study in that entire bit of garbage you linked is "Axelsson, J., Sundelin, T., Ingre, M., Van Someren, E.J.W., Olsson, A., & Lekander, M. (2010). Beauty sleep: Experimental study on the perceived health and attractiveness of sleep deprived people [online version]. British Medical Journal, 341. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c6614" And …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 04:39 PM
1

Classic Wub. "This has been proven by hundreds of studies, which I cannot find or produce in any way".
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 04:13 PM
1

That's because you came here with a bias and were just looking for someone else to validate it. Which is also why you are dismissing all of the actual RP'ers in this thread who disagree with your presumption.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 04:12 PM
1

This has been proven time and time again in studies. Then please provide said studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 04:04 PM
4

Unbreakable confidence here. Bravado isn't actual confidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 04:02 PM
2

Should we leave them high and dry too? You've been doing a pretty good job of that already.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 03:57 PM
1

When is the earliest that you can do the dna check, when RU486 can only be used until the 12th week? A DNA paternity test can be performed accurately before a child is born through amniocentesis, chorionic villus sampling and NON-Invasive prenatal paternity testing (fetal genetic material testing) at between 8 - 13 weeks into the pregnancy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 07:20 PM
2

Why would anybody force me to pay that? Because that's how credit works. You use someone else's money, and then you pay it back. If you choose not to do so voluntarily, then the agency gets the government involved. Why can’t I simply opt out and let the state take on the responsibility? You can. But the debt isn't erased. It'll go to collections or eventually a court summons wherein the State will take it from you via wage garnishment or tax refund deductions, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 05:48 PM
6

Abortion is still a surgical procedure. Only in the minority of late-term options. The vast majority of abortions performed these days are via an orally ingested pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 05:42 PM
2

Okay, wanted to be accurate. Cheers! ;-p
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 09:35 PM
1

Okay, so I have unprotected sex quite a bit with someone I'm not married to. However, I've had a vasectomy. Is this more or less degenerate?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 09:31 PM
1

It's equally bizarre to me that you cannot stay on topic but must invent fictional scenarios to justify your illogical beliefs. Similarly bizarre that you can claim to know what I want, despite having never met me. And BTW, internet points aren't real. I don't downvote on this sub. Odds are more likely that someone just went down your user page downvoting because of something else ridiculous you said. But hey, if you need to villainize me because you can't stand the thought of your precious fake…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 09:13 PM
2

I didn't bitch about anything. I pointed out the absurdity of you using a term you said you didn't know the meaning of in order to denigrate an entire gender. But once again, higher order concepts are lost on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 09:09 PM
1

That's right. You're a bloop. You don't recognize irony. Or any other higher order concepts. Thanks for the refresher that your ilk don't actually debate in good faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 08:58 PM
1

Let's see here, you didn't answer any of my questions, then you strawmanned me. You also managed to advocate AWALT. That irony is probably lost on you though.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 08:53 PM
1

My point is men want a hot "bitch" who is a 10/10 in the beauty department. Do they? Do all men want that? How do you know? I don't want a "hot bitch", so that alone invalidates your theory. Is that shallow? The flaw in your logic is that if ALL MEN EVERYWHERE want the exact same thing, it isn't shallow, it's the standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 08:49 PM
3

So you don't know what the term means, but you're using it to accuse men of being shitty? Well done, professor.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 08:46 PM
2

So you're saying that women can't even kill themselves as well as men?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 08:15 PM
8

You literally, in the same comment, berated someone for not displaying empathy, told them to stop asking for empathy, and then told them to exercise empathy all while offering none of your own and committing the exact same sin you're railing against. The irony, it burns.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 08:12 PM
1

oh well, i will own it. Just, you know, not in person.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 06:57 PM
1

Ahh, but now you're moving the goalposts and involving others. The original scenario did not involve children. So what about those who do not have children but still leave the medical profession? What's your excuse for them? Would you not agree that a "life of leisure" isn't exactly one that promotes discipline and hard work?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 05:09 PM
1

That does not, in any way, shape, or form, make them lazier. So you're saying that prioritizing comfort and time NOT working isn't laziness? Okay then...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 03:04 PM
1

The whole premise of your argument is predicated on the acceptance of the belief that women are lazy Once again, that was not MY argument. But since you cannot be bothered to read usernames, that still isn't getting through to you. If you can't be assed to do something so simple, how can you possibly assert that laziness isn't a factor? Unless you're advocating for willful ignorance instead, which may be worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 12:35 AM
1

Actually, if you could be bothered to exercise some reading comprehension, I wasn't the one who mentioned laziness, that was FieldLine. I only said there may be a correlation, not causation. Has it occurred to you to try and understand a series of comments before typing something stupid that makes you look bad? Of course not.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 02:19 PM
1

the fight looks different to different people. Granted. But you'll notice she never answered with what SHE is doing. like if a co-worker says something you perceive as sexist, you can key their car or start rumors about their child porn collection. Well, you can, but that's actionable and could land you in serious legal trouble and out of a job. But hey, I won't stop you from fucking yourself over if that's what you want. Plus, that's not exactly "fighting for what she wants", so much as retribu…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/16 02:32 PM
1

Quotas, yes. Paying someone more based on gender is very illegal though. So again, nice fictional scenario you've invented.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 06:34 PM
3

I'm not appropriating anything. I have actively done relief work in Sierra Leone to help them because I believed they needed it. Why are you trying to appropriate the experience of men worldwide who work physically demanding jobs when you've never had to be one?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 06:26 PM
2

Brazilian Butt Lift, I believe it's called.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 06:23 PM
3

There's no other logical interpretation. You are not defending those men at all, and they are stuck in a role they aren't suited for just because of what's between their legs. You deflected, plain and simple, because somewhere deep down you know it's true, and that you don't actually care about them. You likely have never devoted a single thought to them, because they don't exist inside your 1st world privilege bubble.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 06:13 PM
2

Pediatrics averages 50 hour weeks As opposed to 80 hours/week for surgical specialties or cardio/thoracic or oncology. Nice deflection. And it didn't address women doctors leaving the field either.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 06:09 PM
2

Nice deflection and non-answer. Not surprising from you at all though. Apparently you lack the courage of your convictions.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 06:09 PM
3

I don't want to be forced to act in a role I'm not suited for just because what's between my legs. Sadly, most men in jobs that require hard physical labor don't get that choice. Neither do child soldiers or the like. But you're not out there defending them, are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 06:04 PM
1

However, I believe in fighting for what I want and take whoever I can down if they stand in the way of destiny. And what, pray tell, does that fight look like? Do you protest injustice, or just click "like" on a facebook post? Are you writing up petitions to abolish sexist laws? Are you actually doing any "fighting" for what you want at all, or is it mostly served up to you with a price tag you agree to?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 06:03 PM
2

Source please? Oh wait, you made it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 05:54 PM
1

How many prominent female programmers/tech persons do you know? Umm, Admiral Grace Hopper immediately comes to mind. So companies like google put a hiring preference of women and pay them more, because having women in the company is viewed as a possible competitive advantage. Actually that does not happen, because it would violate state and federal labor laws. It's a nice fictional scenario you've invented though.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 05:39 PM
3

You dont think this has anything to do with why I graduated with an engineering degree and they got liberal arts degrees? I think it has to do with how open-minded your parents were. If the people who informed your world views early on enforced gender norms and gender roles onto you, then that likely had a large impact on your later development. Same with your cousins.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 05:23 PM
5

Do you think women choose to be doctors because they can be lazy and reap financial success? Considering the majority of female doctors later go into specializations that allow them to work less hours, like pediatrics, or leave the profession entirely within 10 years, I think there is a correlation.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 05:21 PM
5

Guess what happened? People second guessed her way more often than her male supervisor collegues. And that thread also had people saying that because she had never actually worked construction a single day in her life, that she maybe shouldn't have gone around telling the guys who do it everyday how to operate in a confrontational manner. I don't see that as a sexism issue, so much as defending the particulars of your profession against someone who has never worked that profession. It happens al…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 05:18 PM
1

It's like you guys are aware that misogyny is bad, but haven't quite worked out why. It's a shame that you're not nearly as self-aware, then. Keep on trollin'.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 02:54 PM
2

It's a copypasta. Hence the quotes.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 02:51 PM
1

I know that. It's a copypasta.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 02:51 PM
2

Hey, I recognize you! You're that person who only shitposts and never contributes in any meaningful way. I feel honored to be trolled by such a pro.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/16 11:08 PM
1

it is usually outilined in the course description that the class is being conducted in critical analysis using feminist theory While this is true, I doubt most syllabi expressly state that disagreeing with the professor's views will cause automatic failure, even if that disagreement falls into line with the theory being discussed. It seems that most teachers involved in Gender Studies courses are not actually open to critical analysis if it doesn't toe the party line.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/16 06:53 PM
5

"You have a great resume, you have all the qualifications we are looking for, but we're not going to hire you. We will, however, use your resume as the basis for comparison for all other applicants. But, we're going to hire somebody who is far less qualified and is probably an alcoholic. And if he doesn't work out, we'll hire somebody else, but still not you. In fact, we will never hire you. But we will call you from time to time to complain about the person that we hired."
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/16 05:48 PM
6

Feeding your baby in public has nothing to do with you or other feminists accusing people of rape due to regret sex. You are aware of this, which makes your strawman deflection statement intellectually dishonest.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/16 05:43 PM
4

Look up the Aurora movie theater shooting then. Several articles were dedicated to the men who died taking bullets for the girlfriends/wives/kids. Jezebel and the like, however, wrote articles about the toxic masculinity and privilege that kept the other men from dying too. They were literally upset that more people didn't die - but only the men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 11:24 PM
1

So you're deflecting rather than admitting that your only example didn't actually show what you thought it did. Typical for you SS.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 08:47 PM
2

I simplified it, of course, but it has to do with the fact that men have much smaller, narrower ischium bones than women do. The inguinal ligament and hip flexor muscles are attached here, must be consciously flexed continually in order to keep our legs closed. Because women have much wider ischium bones, the ligament does not pull against the hip flexor muscles like it does in men. If your fictional anatomy TA's didn't know that, then they are in the wrong field. Also, your entire argument is b…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 08:44 PM
2

I think we all need to listen to Amy Winehouse's "Fuck Me Pumps" to confirm it. Do you really believe a song about clubbing written for entertainment by a deceased junkie/alcoholic is proof of greater societal truths? Really? And if so, are you conveniently forgetting the lyrics that actually back TRP, such as: You don't like players That's what you say-a But you really wouldn't mind a millionaire You don't like ballers They don't do nothing for ya But you'd love a rich man six foot two or talle…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 08:34 PM
1

Could it be that those images have a tendency to get shared among anti-feminists? I dunno. Most of those image links went to feminist blog sites, so it looks like they were being shared among feminists themselves more than anti-feminists. My guess is that feminism is mostly uncorrelated with physical attractiveness I agree with this, which is why I asked for a source beyond personal bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 08:28 PM
3

Manspreading as biological right implies the male penis makes his pubic symphysis require 1.5 the space as a female. I have seen the penis. That is not truth. You are also telling me men cannot bear the tiny bit of pressure put on the penis by closing their legs to fit a chair. You seem to have failed basic human anatomy. Males must flex a muscle to keep their legs closed, women do not have to do this. You try squeezing/flexing your pelvic muscles continually for a long time. Not just squeezing …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 08:24 PM
3

So why not have tests that do this directly. There are tests to address this. So once again this goes back to you not understanding the realities of the job and juts throwing out scenarios that you think will be a "gotcha" for TRP'ers. Are you telling me it would be too hard to actually test the ability of candidates, after a physical fitness prep, to drag, swing, and carry? I'm telling you that it can be difficult to obtain the necessary permits to intentionally burn down a building (especially…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 08:14 PM
2

majority of feminists are attractive though Really? Because a quick Google search disagrees. Even more so when many images for the stereotypical "This is what a feminist looks like" t-shirt comes up. Most of those women are the opposite of attractive. Do you have any source for that claim besides personal bias?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 05:35 PM
2

I'm just saying it's not offensive. HR would likely disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 05:32 PM
1

Pretty much, yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 05:28 PM
1

What exactly is "soft power" Violence (read: coercion, intimidation, manipulation, etc) by proxy. The ability for others to do violence in her name/wield power in her name rather than her executing it directly. why is it "good for her"? Plausible deniability. Also diminished likelihood of direct injury or personal accountability.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 04:48 PM
2

inconceivable achievements like criminalizing "manspreading" This has always bothered me, and it comes down to an anatomical difference. Men have to flex a muscle to keep our legs closed, women do not. Thus it is the natural resting position for men to open their legs. But of course, that falls under "biotruths" so it gets disregarded by angry feminists everywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 04:43 PM
2

Is it rational for firefighters to say an applicant must do a certain number of pull-ups, which will screen out women but not necessarily determine job fitness? I'd say no. Then you don't understand the realities of the job. Pull-ups have a direct muscle group analogue to climbing ladders in full gear, and a secondary muscle group analogue to swinging an axe/mattock and removing/clearing burning debris, as well as dragging bodies if they cannot be lifted. If someone cannot perform this task, it …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 04:39 PM
1

You do realize that applying TRP logic makes you exactly like them, bigotry-wise? If that's how you want to live, you do you. But you have no moral high ground to stand on.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 06:33 PM
0

You should know better than to trot out an old and tried strawman here, DD. Is that what I said? No. So why do you believe that your reply is a logical or rational response? Better yet, why do you believe that all TRP'ers think and act exactly alike in all facets of interaction?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 06:23 PM
-1

not insane amounts of hate towards one gender as a whole I would disagree. Lots of comments full of male hate and female hate based on a single point of view, depending on the post in question. It's what comes with it that is bad Except that TRP isn't dogmatic like that. They freely say "take what works, discard the rest". And many RP PPD posters will agree that's exactly what they do. They use the actionable advice that works, and discard the sexism and shitty attitudes. Pretending like those t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 06:15 PM
1

but it is nessecary to indentify when it is a fragmentation or radicalization of the ideology. My point was that even radical elements still count. If the central core of those who self-identify with an ideology do not disavow the radical elements, then they are tacitly accepting them. If acceptance is granted, then that applies to their words and actions as well. If a person explicitly states that their actions are in the name of feminism, even if it's not the mass-understood version of feminis…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 06:10 PM
1

Have you ever read /r/relationships? You mean the sub where the most common form of advice for relationships is "lawyer up, delete facebook, hit the gym"? How is that functionally different from TRP?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 06:07 PM
1

In observation, we need to observe feminism is not one omnibus entity While this is true, it begs the question: if the individuals involved self-identify as feminists or are acting in the name of feminism, why should they not be counted under the umbrella of feminism? A radical feminist is still a feminist. For example, no one argues that the Westboro Baptist Church hold views that run counter to most Christian teachings, but they are absolutely still considered Christians to the outside world. …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 05:51 PM
1

Into politics?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 05:43 PM
1

I'd say that acting immorally is always bad for society Is it though? Is a drone strike that has civilian casualties but prevents a terrorist attack bad for society? Is shorting a market through a loophole in order to fix the loophole bad for society? I think it's difficult, if not impossible, to use an absolute like 'always' when there is no real universal morality in play.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 05:24 PM
1

ya'll I'm not RP. No flair, chief. So I can't speak for TRP members. Just stop being bloody hyper-sensitive hypocrites, who take everything that offends you literally Pot, meet kettle.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 01:48 AM
8

It's fairly common for a high-earning woman to support a low-earning man. I think you may have a skewed definition of "common".
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 10:52 PM
2

Women without stereotypical female minds get the same problems as male problems but they are dismissed because there are less of them around. This premise presumes several factors with no evidence. First, that there are women without stereotypical female minds. Second, that those women "get the same problems" as male problems - with no effort to define these male problems or how they only relate to the mind. Third, that these women are dismissed. Fourth, that they are dismissed because there are…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 10:45 PM
1

For me, setting out to be intentionally sexist is misogynistic by its very nature. If sexism only worked one way, you might be onto something. But that line of thinking would also reduce racism to just hating black people, for example, but not Asians, Hispanics, etc. Logically, this isn't the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 10:28 PM
2

When the lead moderator of such an intensely moderated community looks down on rational debate, this is quite a problem, don't you think? Well then, you should take this crusade to all the sub who commit the same behavior. You can start with r/askfeminists, r/twoxchromosomes, r/askwomen, and r/shitredditsays. Also, you're not even looking at TBP itself, which has 63 moderators. Which is actually down from 75 they used to have. How can you say that isn't heavily moderated?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 10:22 PM
1

You deliberately offend a lot of men and women who want nothing to do with you. Who cares? If they don't want anything to do with TRP, what does it matter? They won't even see it if they are avoiding TRP. Also, nowhere in life are you given a right to never be offended. That right does not exist in any country's constitution or charter.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 10:15 PM
1

That tells me many of the companies handling the grind dehumanize their workers. But they don't. In fact, they have some of the most generous and liberal benefits packages in the world requiring some of the least amount of hours worked on a weekly basis to qualify.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 09:31 PM
3

I can be ridiculous too. I just don't need as many words. Well, at least you've managed to sum up all of your PPD comments ever in one handy package. Time for a permalink.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 09:26 PM
1

There is no honor in a typical fist fight. Are you trying to imply that there is honor in a gunfight? Or in straight up murder?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 09:24 PM
2

You just asked to point out hateful comments and I did. So you found 5 comments that fit your criteria out of 11,963 comments across the front page Top All Time posts. You realize that's 0.00001% of comments right? I don't think that can definitively or even quantitatively be called misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 09:07 PM
1

I am just asking you to calm down And I'm saying I'm not worked up. Thus you telling me to calm down is meaningless. The attempt at control of others is what is sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/16 03:37 PM
1

Again, typical. I'm not making angry statements or getting upset. I am debating. I am asking question that you refuse to answer. But making accusations of it is a common way for people, notably women, to attempt to control others' behavior. It's sad really.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/16 03:35 PM
0

Typical. You get called out on bullshit, and I'm the one who needs to calm down or not be invested. Sure, a Brazilian woman knows more about the women in Brazil than I do. But again, I mentioned other countries as well. Can she speak for those? No. Can you? No. So why are you making blanket statements that you cannot possibly know? Egotism? And AWALT = all women are like that
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/16 03:28 PM
1

Blatant sexism? Yep. You basically just agreed with TRP that AWALT. And again, I mentioned other countries as well. You're the one claiming to speak for all of the women in a couple dozen countries across two continents. And since you've never been a man in those countries, you have no personal experience of your own to speak of.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/16 03:16 PM
0

So no, you're not saying the truth. I'm stating my personal experience, which is true. I'm not making universal statements like you are for TWO ENTIRE CONTINENTS. And you'll note that I also listed other countries besides Brazil. So if you are claiming to know what every Brazilian woman wants, and that they are all the same, that's fine. I will accept your blatant sexism on the matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/16 03:14 PM
2

Most European and South American women will prefer beta males. Trust me. Gonna disagree here. At least for Brazil, Uruguay, Paraguay, Argentina, and Chile. The women there will constantly test your frame, and challenge you to remain alpha to keep them. I lived in and traveled around South America for years and saw this everywhere. Masculinity is idealized and constantly striven for.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/16 03:07 PM
1

Sure they would. Especially if it furthered their agenda. Most people probably wouldn't say yes to those even if they thought it/felt it/believed it though, specifically because they know other people wouldn't like that answer. Which sort of proves the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 11:03 PM
1

I think a better question would be "why do so many women feel that the "cool girl" speech resonates with them"? Is it because they feel similarly pressured into being "perfect" for a man, without realizing that men do this for women too? Is it because they feel bitter and entitled? Is it because they relate to Amy? A "yes" answer to any of those would be a dealbreaker for most sane people. No one wants to live with a perpetual victim who refuses to take responsibility for their own decisions and…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 10:33 PM
1

I didn't take it out of context, and I read the entire thing. I just disagree. You say you are reading between the lines. I'm saying that's just your projection. Flynn wrote a feminist revenge story about a psychopath who grew up with rich, doting parents; someone who was given everything she ever wanted. But because she couldn't have the perfect marriage to the perfect man to go with it, she set out to not just destroy the marriage (admittedly he did so by cheating and generally being a shit al…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 10:12 PM
2

Meh. It's two narcissists who deserve each other and exactly what they get.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 09:22 PM
2

I understand that the character has those things but I'm reading between the lines. Are you, really?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 09:20 PM
2

To get a job, you have to be something you're not. If that job is acting maybe. In most jobs, if you're pretending to be capable of the function they are hiring for but you can't actually perform that function, you won't have a job for very long.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 06:41 PM
1

I feel like people always told me I need to change. Be skinnier , straighten your hair, be quieter, don't ask questions, work harder, etc. Out of curiosity, were the people telling you these things mostly other women?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 06:31 PM
2

I wholeheartedly agree. Cleaning my kitchen after a big meal is pretty zen, but I don't like any other chores.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 03:34 PM
0

And complaining about downvotes isn't petty? Way to preach the double standard Maude.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 10:34 PM
0

But you're continuing it. By trying to stop it in the future. I am confused as to why you're more concerned with people noting a rule being broken (regardless of how it's framed) than the rule being broken. I'm not. I just like pointing out that complaining about it won't stop it from happening. Especially since you can't even see who downvoted you. It's basically the equivalent of standing in the hall and shouting "Someone somewhere disagreed with me in a way I don't like, even though they were…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 10:30 PM
0

One could argue that "internet points aren't real" adds nothing to the debate, is of zero factual value to the conversation, and in the end does not actually resolve whatever feelings the poster noting downvotes had in the first place. Sure could. But again, I'm not the one who starts that train. I'm the one trying to point out how stupid it is to start it in the first place. I get trying to improve the community- report personal attacks or circle jerking but I don't see the harm is saying "why …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 10:23 PM
0

why do this repeatedly? What is the point? Because people are placing value on literally nonexistent things. It adds nothing to the debate, is of zero factual value to the conversation, and in the end does not actually resolve whatever feelings the poster complaining about the downvotes had in the first place. I'm simply pointing out how counterproductive it is to even mention it in the first place, since reddit-at-large tends to downvote those who complain about downvotes even more heavily. In …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 10:14 PM
1

Happily. Here is one by the American Sociological Review.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 10:05 PM
0

Because people aren't wording it as, "Why aren't folks following the rules of the sub?" Instead, they whine about being downvoted. A better question becomes why do people, yourself included, care about fake internet points at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 09:56 PM
1

Why the f. are you crusading so hard against me? Not you specifically, just people who continually spout stupid shit. Since you're doing that hard today, you're getting called out on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 09:03 PM
1

I am well aware people have their own opinions Then why did you make bullshit claims in your edit? ala: although I can't really think any other hate all feminists would share. Probably other things that promote patriarchy like certain religions and political aproaches but that kinda falls in the dickpowery category. Right there you are stating that all feminists share a common hatred of at least one thing. That's you extrapolating your opinion out to all feminists. That you fail to comprehend th…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 08:55 PM
2

Well for starters groups like Boko Haram specifically torture/kill the male children when they invade villages. That is an example of violence based on the gender of the victim. The fact that you only consider violence against women to be gender-based is a glaring admission of your own sexism.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 08:52 PM
1

No, there have been surveys that self-report improvement in relationship satisfaction/communication, but not studies that show improvement in attraction or sexual satisfaction. The two are incorrectly conflated quite often.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 08:37 PM
1

You don't need a proof, it's a logical conclusion No, it isn't. You are making a blanket statement about tens of millions of people and saying they "only" dislike one kind of person, when in reality they probably dislike lots of types of people. For instance, people who talk/text in movie theaters are probably disliked by "feminist types" as well. Your edit really only serves to show your personal bias. You are extrapolating your opinion to all feminists everywhere, and that's basically the oppo…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 07:59 PM
4

If you aren't serious, why are you in a debate sub? Are you just trolling and complaining?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 06:50 PM
1

Double spaces on iPhones get entered as periods.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 06:41 PM
3

Vamp, If the downvotes weren't the point, you should not have framed the issue around them. Doing so comes off as passive aggression, which is also cowardice. All the best, Drunk
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 06:12 PM
-1

Internet points aren't real.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 06:09 PM
3

Dear Vamp, It is a reddit truism that complaining about downvotes leads to being downvoted more. Also, internet points aren't real. Hugs n kisses, Drunk
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 06:05 PM
2

Nope. More men are killed by men than women killed by men. Nice try though. However, the reverse is also true; more women are protected/saved by men from violence than men protected/saved.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 05:55 PM
2

"if women find choreplay sexy, why don't men find women in the work force sexy?" The problem is that the assumption of choreplay being sexy is false. It's something women say they like, but fundamentally don't. In fact, studies/surveys have been done that show the opposite; that the more chores their male partners perform around the house, the less sex they have.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 05:31 PM
1

I know, because I've done it. So your personal experience is to be extrapolated out to an entire gender? Isn't that the very definition of projection?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 05:12 PM
1

"Feminist types" only have dislikes against people who want to make the world run on dickpower. Can you find any peer-reviewed source on this that isn't from a feminist blog? Because your use of "only" is highly suspicious.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 05:06 PM
5

Men need to figure out who will be theirs, and then make a move. How do you suggest doing this short of developing psychic powers?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 04:43 PM
1

I always find it fascinating when someone tells someone else they haven't understood something. That's actually pretty typical for feminists to say as well. But when you ask, much like here, the claimant cannot actually explain how they were misunderstood or point to any resource that backs them up in a more concise way than "nuh uh".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/16 10:46 PM
1

The next time I hear a woman say "where have all of the good men gone?" I usually just respond "They're with the good women, notably not you."
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/16 10:33 PM
1

I suppose I'm just interested in what they have to say since it did speak to truths about my nature but it's hard to accept all of it when some of it is untrue and bad. That's how most men feel about feminist claims of their natures, just FYI.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/16 10:30 PM
2

Eh, not really true, but OK. Are you honestly claiming to know RPS's motivations better than he does himself? Because with that kind of psychic power, you should be doing better things than hanging out on reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/16 10:29 PM
1

So your point is that whoever is more hateful obviously deserves it? By that logic, feminists are the worst and most widespread hate group in the world, and thus deserve it. Interesting train of thought there, Dev. I'm glad you pointed that out.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/16 10:26 PM
1

That's because Bloops say those things in PPD, silly.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/16 10:19 PM
1

how so? That's what I asked you. You're the one who said it was attractive. I guess it's only attractive if you're not the one being next'ed.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/16 02:56 AM
1

But they weren't doing it anywhere near the time when American women were seeking the vote. Probably because Isreal didn't exist as a political entity until the 50s. Nice copout though, considering almost a century after American women got the vote, nowhere near 65% of them volunteer for the armed services.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/16 02:54 AM
1

And I find it more attractive when a man has prospects but turns them down. he doesn't go just for any person. So you're saying abundance mentality is attractive?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 11:19 PM
1

Or more likely, the assumption is simply incorrect because statistics don't work like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 11:16 PM
1

I asked whether or not a society that was very divided in how it treated the sexes could force that many women to take part in the military, without serious problems resulting. Well, Israel has done this for many decades and been very successful at it. It was far removed from our present society, which encourages women's athletics, tries to take sexual assault more seriously, and makes use of weapons technology that takes away upperbody strength requirements. This right here shows that you are e…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 11:07 PM
1

If you will apply some reading comprehension (and I know it's really, really difficult for you to do so) you'll see that I didn't copy that part of the quote and did not mention it in my reply because I wasn't disagreeing with that. I was merely pointing out your factual inaccuracy with regards to race. But if you want to get into it, women were a very important part of the war effort. They may not have been frontline soldiers, but they were very much a part of both sides. And if you're the one …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 10:29 PM
1

Do you really think the armed forces of the era were ready to be integrated Considering there were black soldiers on both sides of the American Civil War, yes. Please read some history before making ridiculous statements.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 09:39 PM
2

Of course not.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 08:24 PM
3

Shadow I know you're smarter than this I wouldn't bet on that, actually. She seems to display a pattern of ad homs and strawmans the size of the Goodyear Blimp, and totally believes the conspiracy theory-level of rhetoric about TRP to be absolute truth. Combine that with constant trolling and it looks more like she's here specifically to shit stir.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 08:21 PM
1

Well, luckily for you, none of them want to fuck you in the first place, so whether you find them attractive or not is irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/16 02:08 AM
1

Dunno. Blasphemy fetish?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/16 07:15 PM
1

I wasn't using labor in relation to obtaining sex, but obtaining money to spend on expensive things sold with using sex. I also never mentioned the quality of sex. It seems like you're conflating two separate ideas here.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/16 07:14 PM
2

People will make fun of each other on the Internet for everything Sure, but you're the one saying BP's don't do that. So either drop the BS or the double standard. Still doesn't justify going to a hate-filled ideology. If you can point to where I ever advocated for that, then this sentence makes sense. As it is, you're just projecting advocacy onto me to justify your BP defense.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/16 09:33 PM
3

I'm talking about the actual people who post to the TBP subreddit. Most of the worst offenders don't actually post to PPD, they stick to the echo chamber where no one will speak out against their shitty attitudes. But one of them actually just quit reddit earlier this week and she was well known for making fun of regular non-RP dudes who just had no luck with women. She regularly bashed them as being fat virgin neckbeard losers, despite no evidence to backup that stereotype.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/16 08:51 PM
1

Nope. Men can't be ambiguous if they want to be successful. They have to let a woman know they are romantically interested fairly early. Plausible deniability doesn't work for the same reason. Passive strategies only work for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/16 07:17 PM
1

clueless people can't really fix/help other clueless people.. No, they just accuse them of being broken narcissists.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/16 07:15 PM
3

A satyr sub Those are for furries. That's a whole different lifestyle entirely
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/16 07:04 PM
1

I would never date someone who disagrees with feminist principles What about disagreeing with TERFs and thinking that trans people are worthy of all the same individual rights as everyone else? After all, TERFs are by definition feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/16 07:01 PM
3

They don't make fun of "lonely men" Actually they very much do. Saying otherwise is simply ignorance of actual TBP posts.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/16 06:58 PM
2

Around the same place as the rest of the bloops who think anyone who isn't them is a virgin neckbeard loser.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/16 06:57 PM
1

Ambiguity and plausible deniability are critical parts of the flirting process FOR WOMEN FTFY
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/16 06:54 PM
1

I think most people that spend a significant amount of time online are probably not super attractive I love that it doesn't even occur to you that most of them probably work desk jobs that involve sitting in front of a computer all day on the internet. Thus being online for a significant amount of time every day.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/16 06:40 PM
1

Hey, it works for programmers. Only if they have examples to back it up. They can't just walk into a job expecting to succeed just by doing 10 hours of CodeAcademy work.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/16 06:26 PM
1

surely things that matter for someone's job are also things they can go to the library and learn My local libraries do not have high-end technical manuals or access to the Microsoft or Cisco Enterprise training sites. So, no, things that matter for someone's job are not always available at the library. Plus, many smaller cities/towns and rural communities may not even have a library.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/16 06:24 PM
2

Any subconscious anger I have at advertising cheap products using sexual images is due to using something sacred to sell something cheap. Here is where we have a disconnect. You should be angry that something you consider sacred would be used to sell ANYTHING. But because xyz item has a high dollar price tag, it somehow makes it alright. That, to me, does not sounds like sex is sacred, but rather valuable to you in a way that can be quantified. And because it has a real-world value, it can be as…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/16 03:19 PM
1

What audience? We're like 40 comments deep in a 2 day old thread. You have no idea how fast reddit moves. Also, you sound deeply paranoid. You should probably get some help for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/16 03:10 AM
2

Compare with this data. That data is very odd. It's only counting women over the age of 30 and it defines "sexually active" as having had sex at least once in their entire lifetime. Seems incredibly broad and easy to manipulate results if that is the criteria.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 10:18 PM
0

but to claim that it's universal that women give nothing back? I can't get behind that. Neither can I. I've known many wonderful women who are equally giving and caring in their relationships. But of course I'm only seeing the highlight reel from the outside, I don't see the day-to-day interactions in private. I'm only speaking of my own relationship experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 10:10 PM
0

I am saying that some women (in my experience most most women) give love to men without demanding exponential returns when RP claims that doesn't happen. I'm not RP, but my life experience contradicts this pretty heavily. I have always been asked to provide and protect for every woman I've been in a relationship with, often to an incredibly unequal degree. My last long term gf was an aerospace engineer, easily the smartest person I've ever known, and the most staunch equity feminist I've ever me…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 08:52 PM
0

Um, one can choose not to compete. Thus competition is a choice. That said, not competing often yields no reward.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 08:45 PM
0

No you're not manipulating me So you finally admit that your accusations are full of shit. Only took 24 hours or so.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 08:44 PM
1

Could you expand on that? Doubtful. TSS is a troll who just has an anti-TRP agenda to push. He/she/it doesn't actually care to debate in good faith using logic and facts.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 07:40 PM
0

Where did I use the term and say I read minds? I didn't. I did, however, claim to know what you thought of me These two statements are contradictory. Once again you are failing at very basic logic. That's your manipulative bullshit. I'm not manipulating you at all. You are the one choosing to respond. You are the one making untrue claims, that you cannot back up when I ask you to. You are making choices. I haven't robbed you of your agency. And accusations to the contrary are ludicrous. You can …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 02:57 PM
0

You did this to me. Nope. You said what you meant. It isn't my fault what you meant was dumb. It isn't my fault you think you have superpowers.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 01:42 PM
0

You don't know how to separate your thoughts from the thoughts of other people so you project this on to me. Sure I do. For one, I can't read others' minds. So my thoughts are always mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 11:36 PM
0

I never admitted to being ridiculous, naïve, and hypocritical. You saw yourself that way. You just projected it onto me.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 11:26 PM
0

My nature is to see everything at once. So you're omniscient? Omnipresent? Your ego is getting bigger. You've gone from psychic to godlike.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 11:25 PM
0

I can look at trends, individuals, and groups all at the same time. And then lump them all together to confirm your own personal biases. How convenient for you. I compartmentalize everything. That's the opposite of getting a gestalt on society, by the way. So now you're contradicting yourself again.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 11:16 PM
0

I know what "they" think from observation and from speaking to people. I don't know of any other way or context to take that in. You are literally claiming to know what all of society thinks, even though you admit that different sectors of society exist, as well as admitting that you are being ridiculous, naive, and hypocritical. Given all of this information, can you really expect to be taken seriously?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 11:13 PM
-1

Anti-slut defense
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 11:04 PM
0

No, I don't think those groups have the same beliefs for everything but it's acting obtuse to think that there are no societal forces out there. I'm not saying there are no societal forces in play, I'm saying there are no universal societal forces other than propagation of the species. Then again, I'm not the one making claims to read minds like you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 11:02 PM
2

A better question to ask then becomes "why do women not want sex to have a low value"? Is it because men would be less inclined to labor for them if sex were not special but rather easily obtained?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 08:55 PM
2

No. Women are biologically conditioned to associate sex with resources because more resources are what gives their children a better chance for survival. These two sentences contradict each other in the context of answering the question. These days, though, women are perfectly capable of earning these resources themselves rather than being a whore or golddigger and only acquiring them in that way. That's not what the linked study says. Also, a whore or golddigger is someone who wants resources f…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 08:49 PM
0

In the context you were thinking of me I was right. No, I was agreeing with what you said about yourself, but that's not what I was thinking. The context was irrelevant. However, I do know a lot of their core beliefs. Oh yeah? I think you understand a small subset of certain people's beliefs, and not society as a whole. For instance, do you know the core beliefs of Shiite Muslims in America? How about orthodox Jews? Are they the same core beliefs? What about Buddhists? Same core beliefs? This is…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 08:18 PM
0

Actually no, I was thinking how much I really want a pastrami sandwich right now. So we've established that you cannot read minds, thus you do NOT know what anyone, let alone all of "society" is thinking. That said, you are acting ridiculous and hypocritical and naive. Now if you'd only take the steps that remedy that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 07:20 PM
0

That didn't answer the question. At what point is is freedom limited by compromise? How often would you be okay with him spending time alone or with friends instead of you? 3 days/week? 5 days/week? Does personal freedom have limits?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 07:19 PM
7

Actually, he closed with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 06:46 PM
1

I don't understand why people come on the internet and rant so strongly about things they supposedly don't care about. You should. You did it in another thread here earlier today.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 06:44 PM
0

People and their shared interactions with one another form society. "People" includes you. You are a part of society by definition. I know what "they" think from observation and from speaking to people. Okay, you're speaking to me now. What am I thinking?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 06:39 PM
0

Okay, so what would that look like? If your partner didn't want to spend time with you, but instead chose to pursue other activities during time that you want to spend together, would you be okay with that? For how long? At what point is his freedom not being limited by your wants? At what point is there a compromise on things besides sex? It seems like you're being incredibly naive and unrealistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 06:38 PM
0

This sounds like paranoia. Who is this "society"? Can you point them out? How do you know what "they" think?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 06:36 PM
0

Sounds like you're arguing against long term commitment because you want an open or poly relationship. That's fine for you, there's nothing wrong with that, but don't project that onto others and assume it's the norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 06:34 PM
-1

I'm talking about a man raping a man in a park or somewhere else that isn't in a prison. Yes, and we know from studies that stranger rape is almost nonexistant. Especially male on male. We're talking hypotheticals here. I engaged yours. There's no need to deconstruct mine in an attempt to invalidate it. And if a man is in jail due to raping a woman, he already hates women. I didn't say he was in jail for raping a woman. Nice projection though. But in a different way. How do you know? Are you a m…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/16 09:51 PM
2

But in general, a woman didn't hurt him so it would be logical to imagine that most men wouldn't loathe women as a result of male on male rape. This is probably contextual. I understand why you'd say that, but I think you're trying to apply linear logic to an illogical function. For instance, if a straight man was raped in prison - but was in prison due to a woman - who hurt him more? The physical rapist, or the person who put him in the situation to be raped? Like I said, psychology is more tri…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/16 09:26 PM
3

we BPers agreed to leave that stuff outside of PPD I would love to see that agreement, because I still see that behavior from lots of Bloops nigh-daily. Are you all outliers?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/16 08:23 PM
2

I think the importance is debatable. If you always cater to the vocal minority, you are ignoring the vast majority, often to your eventual detriment.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/16 08:22 PM
1

Why take on all that extra stress for money you probably wont have time to enjoy? Free lifetime medical/dental/vision insurance and retirement pension after only 4 years commitment. Not a bad gig, all things considered.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/16 07:15 PM
3

Not as many as the 4 out of 5 who disagree though. Last I checked 80% is a majority, 20% is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/16 07:11 PM
4

We don't call all TRPers neckbeards here so trp123's argument that we generalize them just like they generalize feminists is moot. You might wanna check your in-group generalizations then. YOU may not do that, but other Bloops like PettiCoat and company do almost every day.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/16 06:49 PM
2

Unless he has the might to back it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/16 05:57 PM
0

On the other hand, after rape by a male, a straight man will not fear and have disgust for females Gonna need a source on that one. Psychology is more tricky than the binary you are assuming. Rape causes all sorts of trauma, and even straight guys may not be able to recover with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/16 05:53 PM
1

Lol except I did. Read it again. I did. And you didn't. You must not be blessed with an overabundance of education if you honestly believe you did somewhere in that inane rambling.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/16 03:00 PM
1

You realize seem like you can't communicate. I realize that you have a failing grasp of the English language.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/16 02:59 PM
1

And why is it not an example of that? Let's follow your train of logic. The only factor that has been mentioned thus far is that it's a need. Is it not an example because, in your mind, it's not a need? Or is it due to some other factor that you haven't brought up for some unfathomable reason? (Perhaps because you don't have one and are simply talking out of your ass) Why are you moving the goalposts? It's obvious that you're young and have never been married. What makes you an expert on the sub…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/16 01:45 AM
1

This is the reason relationships based on sex don't work, people lose the desire. It's common knowledge. You know what else is common knowledge? Not basing a marriage on sex, but integrating it as a mutually enjoyable act of intimacy. And as predicted, you couldn't actually point out where I was wrong about anything or used any logical fallacies. You just cherry-picked one line to respond to and act as if that was a full rebuttal. Which is not surprising in the least.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/16 01:40 AM
1

Please show me where I said it wasn't a need Happily. OP said "Relationships involve occasionally making compromises with your needs to meet your partner's needs out of recognition of and empathy for tjose needs." To which you replied: "Sex is not an example of that." Thus, you said sex is not a need.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 11:23 PM
1

I can't think of any reason to believe that implies "We have to have sex with each other regardless of whether or not we want to" It's part of the earlier vows. "To have and to hold" specifically. The only thing "harming" the relationship is nature. So "nature" is responsible for one partner throwing away the marriage? Kind of a cop-out there. Let's pretend this is a fact, which I'm sure it isn't. Or you could Google it, since you already admitted that you have no education in this area. Calling…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 11:21 PM
1

Then what is a current replacement? The thread you linked could not provide a comprehensive one at all. Outdated is relative, though. Consider that we still use BMI (despite knowing it isn't as useful or accurate as we want), and it was developed in the 1700s.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 11:14 PM
2

Then making blanket statements about what is or is not a need is well outside of your jurisdiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 11:13 PM
1

Mazlow disagrees. And I'm willing to bet you do not have the formal education and training necessary to logically argue that he's wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 10:52 PM
1

I don't think the interpretation of these vows is universal. I can't think of any possible other interpretation of "Til death do us part". If someone vows to love you forever (which is already an insane thing to believe) So you think all marriage vows are a scam, because no one could love like that? Sounds like pure projection on your part. My grandparents were married to one another for 64 years and never cheated. One person didn't create an unhealthy marriage, they both did. You're the one who…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 10:48 PM
1

I would imagine that no one expects to fall out of love with the person they marry. So now we're back to the original comment I made. If one person fell out of love with the other despite making lifelong vows, and that person has now unilaterally cut off all physical intimacy, how is that empathetic or sympathetic at all? How is that not "unreasonably selfish" as you put it? It's not. A desire to have sex with each other is a sign of a healthy marriage. So now you have one person who has unilate…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 09:07 PM
2

It's an axiom of this discussion that people have 100% control over who they have sex with, it's morally okay to decline or accept sex, and any violation of that is immoral. I agree with this. Of course it begs the question: why would you marry someone you don't want to have sex with? A "lack of empathy" refers to someone who does something unreasonably selfish. Do you not consider marrying someone you don't want to have sex with, despite agreeing that sex is part of marriage, then unilaterally …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 07:40 PM
5

So you decided to chime in without actually answering any of the questions. That is the opposite of debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 07:34 PM
2

Maybe you should tell him that, then. Not me.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 05:54 PM
3

Where did I say you should? Why do you think that using a strawman is a valid argument? Why did you refuse to answer the question?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 05:52 PM
3

"Men don't give a fuck about your feelings, only about how about how you look and how you perform in bed." If this were not the case, a sub like /r/DeadBedrooms wouldn't exist. Except that if you go to that sub, you will see plenty of both sexes complaining that their partner isn't interested in sex anymore either. Nice strawman, but it's obvious that: A) you have no fucking idea what you're talking about. & B) you're into making sexist generalizations, which sort of runs contrary to your stated…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 04:30 PM
6

Unilaterally deciding to end physical intimacy for your partner, while knowing that they're suffering, certainly displays a lack of empathy AND sympathy. How can you logically justify it otherwise?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 03:58 PM
3

Is this Thread#147789 touting "just lower your standards"? Is it that time again?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 12:27 AM
1

And you fixate on hating them so much you are blind to how much your own intolerance and bigotry shows to others. I would say I feel sorry for you, but you do it to yourself, so I really don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 09:47 PM
2

If William Farrell is your idea of a moderate, no wonder you're not as bothered by extremists on that side. If you can't be bothered to use the correct name, what else are you wrong about?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 09:09 PM
0

Your reading comprehension is failing at a massive level. He even thanked you for the sources! But of course that contradicts your intolerance and bias, so you lash out. Sad, really.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 08:57 PM
2

If anything, your hatred and intolerance are on show here. The fact that you don't even see it is even more telling of how strong your bigotry is.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 08:56 PM
2

*this includes people who used BC and it failed on them That isn't irresponsible though. That's the very essence of responsibility by any standard of mens rea. The participants went into the act with the state of mind to specifically prevent pregnancy. It isn't their fault if the method used failed due to no fault of their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 05:39 PM
2

Well, when you can show where I ever called you crazy, then you would have a valid concern. But since you can't, then we'll add this to your list of things about reality you are denying. Case in point...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 08:30 PM
2

it still seems to be mentioned as something attractive here, at least. Usually by folks like yourself who don't actually keep up with media trends, and just remembered seeing it last summer. but again, that's not what i was referring to in the statement being questioned. Maybe not, but NalkaNalka's statement still stands, there isn't a movement praising or promoting men being fat like there is for women. Thus, "it happens to everyone" isn't accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 08:08 PM
1

And I clarified the context in which my comment applied. You're the one who keeps failing to grasp that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 08:06 PM
3

By being inept yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 08:06 PM
1

Just as I love your denial of reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 08:05 PM
3

I understand that. And if you'll read my reply, I said I was talking about this thread we are in right now, where YOU brought it up, not an RP'er. If you cannot understand that, I can't help you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 07:05 PM
2

And once again, I said it in relation to this exact thread we are in right now because no RP'er brought them up, a BP'er did. Please exercise some reading comprehension.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 07:05 PM
3

Not that's a BPer What are you talking about? /u/s_yfr87g23nld brought it up in this thread. He has a Blue flair. That's BP. I wasn't talking about in all of reddit as a whole, but in this specific case in this specific thread we are in right now. If you really want to play the bullshit extrapolation game, I can happily point you to many PPD and BP threads involving folks taking single instances of statements and applying them all out. But in the words of feminists everywhere, "it isn't my job t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 07:00 PM
4

And yet, whenever we take a position, and back it up, the redpill just nopes out of the conversation. I'd love to see an example of this. Where BP takes an actual concrete stance on something and debates it with logic and factual sources, and RP casually dismisses it with no logical rebuttal at all. Please link me to this. you can spend hours getting nowhere with those determined to troll That right there is basically every interaction with BP'ers I've ever had. Since they swear up and down TBP …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 06:41 PM
4

You don't have to scour, it's literally 3 comments up.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 06:40 PM
2

I'm more amused that you switched the positions of your "lol"s in replies, rather than trying to factually debate them if you have real world experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 06:34 PM
3

well, dadbod is pretty popular. Not it isn't. It was a Twitter trend for like 2 weeks, then was thoroughly shut down because women in the media started writing articles about why "dadbod" was just glorifying being out of shape, and isn't actually attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 06:32 PM
5

But you are the one getting offended.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 06:08 PM
4

It's sexist as hell of you to assume that a person only holds a door open for women and not for all people out of simple politeness.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 06:07 PM
3

Maybe Channing Tatum? His wife is an actress and dancer, FYI.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 06:01 PM
9

Seriously, why the fuck do they even care about the dating/fucking standards of fat women? They don't. You'll notice is was a fellow BP'er of yours who brought them up.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 05:59 PM
6

The redpill's best rebuttals to any blue observations, summed up. TBP doesn't have observations. The party line is that "TBP is just satire, it has no position".
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 05:54 PM
1

No, I said TBP was SRS for TRP, and full of bigots. You never rebutted that, you just fell back onto "it's for laughs" without ever addressing how it's not full of bigots. Apparently you don't know the definition of the term, which goes back to your reading comprehension problems. And unlike TBP, I don't engage in name'n'shame tactics.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 05:02 PM
1

You have yet to successfully rebut anything I've said. You're just falling back on the standard "it's satire" excuse so many other pathetic BP'ers try to use disingenuously. We both know it, but you're the one who cannot admit to it. Probably because of the aforementioned lack of empathy and unwillingness to own your own shitty words and action. Meaningful enough for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 05:00 PM
1

Considering your post history, lack of reading comprehension skills, and obliviousness, I already don't take you seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 04:46 PM
1

I pointed you to the TBP front page. If you cannot tell by looking at that vitriol, then you have bigger problems. Like having no empathy, which incidentally is a sign of being a sociopath.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 04:29 PM
1

You know BP posts these things to share the laugh? I already answered that. Do you have a reading comprehension problem?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 04:25 PM
1

Umm, dude, look at the TBP front page. It's full of assholish headlines saying mean things with the user behind it being totally serious. Because if they weren't serious, they wouldn't have taken the time to post it in the first place, they would have had a laugh and moved on. TBP is like a support group for people to be assholes to/at another group of people they perceive as assholes, while totally denying the same behavior in themselves. The fact that you can't see that is pretty telling of yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 04:15 PM
1

You realize it's mostly for laughs right? I realize that's the standard party line that TBP'ers must toe in order to not accept responsibility for their words and actions. Notably it's the same standard abusers use on people. They say the most horrible shit, then follow it up with "I was just joking" to absolve themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 04:07 PM
1

You have an odd definition of amused then, since yours is including outrage.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 04:04 PM
1

Sure I have. TBP is slightly less self-righteous, but still easily offended by damn near everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 03:48 PM
1

I don't think you specifically make up the entire userbase of the sub. Thinking you do is quite egotistical of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 03:42 PM
1

SRS are a bunch of bigots who get offended at anything. Thus far I've seen nothing to indicate BP isn't exactly this same way.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 03:33 AM
1

Only if your idea of normal people is folks who have literally nothing better to do with their lives than get their jollies from insulting others on reddit all day.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 03:32 AM
1

But the BP sub isn't there for an undecided audience. It's for people who want to make fun of RP ie: bigots
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/16 11:22 PM
1

Once again you are just proving that TBP = SRS for TRP. It's just another name'n'shame sub for people to feel better about themselves by bashing others.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/16 11:18 PM
1

Jesus fucking christ, this made it past Cracked's editors? I thought they were better than that. You may be the only one who thought that. I'm not sure they even have a copy editor on staff anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/16 11:14 PM
1

I prefer "sobriety impaired", please. :)
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/16 03:39 PM
1

male actually decreases it because then bacteria can't breed under the foreskin Except that studies have shown the intense pain to cause permanent brain alteration in the infants it is performed on. Also, due to the fact that you cannot put a bandage on a recently circumcised penis, they tend to get infected - which runs counter to your bacteria argument. Finally, cleaning your foreskin isn't difficult or time-consuming, and as someone with intact foreskin I didn't need anyone to ever teach me t…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 11:22 PM
2

Basic human dignity?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 11:06 PM
6

The world doesn't work in a binary way. But apparently it does operate on universal absolutes, by your logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 11:04 PM
1

Nah. You at least recognize rationality.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 10:59 PM
1

I am telling BP what they want to hear. The truth. BP never wanted to hear the truth. You know that as well as I do.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 10:57 PM
2

Maybe not, but eventually some of them are going to want bacon again.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 10:57 PM
1

So you're saying that women can't even kill themselves as successfully as men do?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 10:55 PM
4

Generalizations about women = Sunjammer up in arms. Generalizations about redpillers coming from Sunjammer = all is well. The irony, it burns.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 10:52 PM
1

I just can't wrap my head around wanting something nonessential to survival so bad you feel as though you'd rather die than be without it, or feeling that life without it isn't a life worth living. When is the last time you went without electricity for a month or more?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 10:07 PM
3

Negative, you're a Martian. A royal one, in fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 09:49 PM
2

what is there to argue? That /u/dejour isn't BP, as evidenced by his flair?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 09:38 PM
1

Your response amounts to nothing more than "That's not very nice!" Not sure what you're expecting. She said she doesn't have discussions from an emotional place, but her posts blatantly show otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 08:49 PM
1

But I'm sick of this notion that gets batted around here that women don't do dirty, depressing, demeaning, shitty, underpaid jobs It's a popular notion because it's fairly common. The fact that you only know ONE women who defied the stereotype kind of backs that up. I mean, how many women garbage collectors do you know? How many women diesel mechanics? How many women farmers or fisherman (fisherpeople?) And like most fields, those plumbers don't start off making big bucks. You usually have to jo…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 08:42 PM
3

It's somewhat telling that you even misspelled the word and Google had to correct you in order to provide the definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 07:16 PM
1

Whereas being friends with someone for months/ years then showing sexual interest can sometimes be interpreted as deceptive, manipulative or dishonest Which is ridiculous considering how many women here on PPD actively tell folks they can't feel attraction for someone unless they've known that person for a long time. Closeness often leads to stronger feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 06:35 PM
1

Because the world isn't fair, and no one is entitled to the exact thing they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 02:53 PM
1

i would surmise this is because they are too stuck in their own head, feelings... resulting in a poor theory of mind, mind blindness. I would surmise that's pure projection on your part. Especially given that you tend to claim to know the thoughts of others quite frequently, and that simply ins't possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 10:31 PM
2

it's red pill's problem It's your problem. They are just doing their thing, you are the one making accusations and saying they have a problem. they have the time, need, and motivation to fix it that i don't have. According to you. Are you now claiming to know the intimate details of their schedules and what they are motivated towards? i'm simply here observing they are poorly addressing that problem, presently. And being unnecessarily insulting in the process. You're exhibiting many of the same …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 10:26 PM
1

Ask TBP, it's their mantra.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 03:09 PM
3

No, even using Safe Haven laws, there must still be a reasonable attempt to notify the father before the adoption can take place. Depends on the state. In my state, Safe Haven laws typically let parents remain nameless to the court, often using a numbered bracelet system as the only means of linking the baby to the parent. Otherwise, it's totally anonymous to drop off a baby at a shelter, no question asked. The shelter then tries to find a home for the child, not contact the father.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 03:08 PM
1

But I don't think many women choose a mate solely on the basis of whether they will take a bullet for them. I'm not saying they do. I'm saying that when the opportunity does arise, if ever, men are still shamed for not dying. But no one asks that of women. Like, ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 03:06 PM
0

Why are you asking me? Are you incapable of comprehending that I said it was a quote from one of my professors in college?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 03:04 PM
1

I repeat, to quote the TBP mantra: they should lower their standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 12:57 AM
1

So, no, you can't directly answer a question. That's what I thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 12:57 AM
2

One of my PoliSci profs in college once told me "A liberal is just a conservative who hasn't been robbed yet. When you don't have a personal stake, universalism is obviously appealing."
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 11:25 PM
1

where do i say everything? Really? You want to argue semantics rather than answer a direct question. Why am I not surprised? is calling attention to a socially inept person's socially ineptness denigrating? When you refuse to take the time to address them as individuals and jump straight to calling them narcissists and sociopaths, yes it is. Very much so. if i truly didn't care, i wouldn't say anything. It's difficult to get any sense of caring from a constant stream of insults and indirect host…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 11:06 PM
1

I countered that it was hostile to redpill sexism Nowhere dd you say that. You said that it was venting and "assuming the worst of TRP members". Why am I not surprised that you don't even know what you yourself said here. You've failed to defend your arguments, other than calling me a troll. I've defended them with facts. You've counter-argued with opinions and not facts. And you are a troll.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 11:03 PM
1

It costs tens of thousands of dollars and involves years of waiting to get a healthy baby; they can't give older children away. Seems like fucked up priorities on the part of those prosepective parents, then. To quote the TBP mantra: they should lower their standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 10:59 PM
8

Actually it is. It falls under Safe Haven laws.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 10:54 PM
1

And again, you fail to explain how you tie the blue pill to the dictionary definition. I did that yesterday. You failed at comprehending it then, and you refuse to scroll back up now. And if you agree that the redpill has questionable behaviors, you can't simply dismiss my claims that it's a hate group. You haven't explained how they fit the qualifications at all. Your only qualification is rampant sexism. I'm not denying that exists, but it doesn't make it a hate group. If that were the only qu…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 10:52 PM
1

look i don't have the issue so i don't know how to help them Really? Because you seem to imply that everything they are doing is wrong. If you can identify wrong behaviors, why can you not identify "right" ones? Also, do you think it's fair to brand 100,000+ individuals as narcissists and sociopaths? I know we've discussed your appalling lack of qualifications to make such a diagnosis, so why do you feel the need to continue denigrating these men? Does it make you feel superior? If so, does that…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 10:47 PM
1

Your claims that the redpill doesn't qualify, because it wants to attract more women, ignores the "Don't show this to women" aspects. It ignores the bullshit negative stereotypes. It ignores the slurs. I'm not ignoring anything. I said I find it questionable. Which you failed to comprehend. So once again you fail at reading comprehension and are continuing to troll me. Or you're willfully ignorant.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 10:40 PM
1

Only if you don't understand the definition of 'personal' or 'attack' or how they could be used together.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 10:37 PM
1

So far, your entire argument has been to quote the definition of a hate group, then fail to tie the blue pill to it. Only because you failed at reading comprehension repeatedly. My argument directly pointed out that by the dictionary definition of what constitutes a hate group, TBP qualifies. You, on the other hand, have failed to show how TRP qualifies. You just change the subject, bring up other groups, appeal to emotion, and constantly strawman. Trying to guess what the hell you're talking ab…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 10:36 PM
1

We don't need to earn protection from men through sex to protect us from life-or-death situations anymore because there are people who choose to get paid for doing those things and because we are a civilized society. And yet the dudes who didn't jump in front of their girlfriends/wives/etc during the Aurora shooting were openly shamed for not doing so. Incidentally, the people who are paid to do so are a finite resource. They cannot be everywhere all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 10:31 PM
1

Don't get me wrong, I salute you for being candid. It's entirely refreshing. I hope nothing but the best for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 10:09 PM
1

We were talking about the blue pill and the KKK No, I was talking about TBP. YOU brought up the KKK, not me. Losing your shit over your misunderstanding is childish as Hell. I haven't lost my shit at all. I've been perfectly reasonable and coldly logical this whole time. You're the one who's been getting all up in their feelings, making accusations, changing the subject, and claiming to read minds. That's all you, peanut, not me. At this point I'm convinced you're just a sad little troll who can…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 10:03 PM
1

This feels like a trap, but an interesting one. Because it is. Tai is one of those people who often answers a question with another question rather than being direct. I'll let you draw your own conclusions about why a person would intentionally avoid ever being direct.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 09:55 PM
1

i am inclined to think that something can be done about it. Such as?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 09:52 PM
1

They're both hate groups - according to you. No. They both are according to YOU. I never said TRP is. For the 5th time you are putting words in my mouth and projecting. You've yet to explain how the blue pill is, and the red pill isn't. I gave you the exact dictionary definition that explains how TBP fits. Your entire claim that TRP qualifies is that they hate women, which I find questionable since they are trying to attract women. Why would you want to attract something you hate? Asking me to r…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 09:49 PM
1

And yet here are users asking you for instructions on how to fix just that, and all you have are the same old platitudes and insults. Do you honestly believe that's going to help? Do you honestly believe that further denigration is a positive thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 09:46 PM
2

but I should have the equal opportunity to go to medical school after HS(and college), and earn the right to be a heart surgeon That seems like a bit of a red herring though. By which I mean, is there anyone out there actively campaigning for you to not have that opportunity? Keep in mind that there is a massive difference between equality of opportunity versus equality of outcome. You currently have the opportunity to train to become a surgeon, but that doesn't necessarily mean that you will co…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 07:20 PM
2

Didn't have that issue in Computer Engineering either.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 05:41 PM
3

Well, lawyers are paid to argue whether they actually believe what they're arguing about or not, so that kind of makes sense. Luckily as a STEM major, I rarely had to debate theory, as we dealt mostly in hard facts and cold numbers.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 05:34 PM
1

Comparing them to the KKK suggests a level of narcissism I can't be bothered to deal with. And where did I do that? Once again you are projecting and putting words onto me that I never said. It's actually kinda predictable at this point. Do you have any retort besides a strawman?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 12:15 AM
1

Especially since, according to you, all they need to do is complain, and mock feminists on the internet. Actually no, that isn't according to me. Once again you are projecting your bullshit onto me. This seems to be your modus operandi. Please exercise some reading comprehension before responding, your inane rants are becoming tedious.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/16 11:04 PM
1

By the definition you've given me, by the way, all anti-feminists also belong to a hate group. Oh yeah, what group is that? Is it organized? Because the definition requires organization. You also realize most of us just check in from time to time, contribute a little bit, then go about our lives without giving it much more thought? I realize most of you get your jollies by "othering" people you've never met in order to feel superior.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/16 10:30 PM
1

"A hate group is an organized group or movement that advocates and practices hatred, hostility, or violence towards members of a race, ethnicity, nation, religion, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation or any other designated sector of society." TBP exists solely to hate/be hostile towards TRP. Ipso facto hate group.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/16 08:14 PM
1

The bluepill venting about the worst of the redpill, and generally assuming the worst of its members. That's your definition, chief. I never said those words. Nice try, though. Because your effort to feel oppressed was a joke. Um, I didn't attempt to feel anything. I'm not RP, so I don't really care. Now you've gone from trying to put words in my mouth to trying to put emotions/thoughts in my head. You're failing spectacularly here, peanut. And the projection is palpable.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/16 08:01 PM
-1

I said he does treat her like a girlfriend No, sandman said he doesn't have to treat her like a gf, and you replied that he does. You're confusing yourself bruh. No, you just failed at reading comprehension and replied without fully understanding. As usual.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/16 06:20 PM
1

More like ANGEALT (NGE=nice guy explainers - the ones who constantly defend a difference while disparaging both sets)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/16 06:19 PM
-1

Where have I said she was? Um, right here: No but he does. That's the point. He does. Right there, you said he does have to treat her like his girlfriend. Are you honestly denying what you said when it's literally 1 comment up? Because, while typical, it would be frighteningly dishonest.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/16 06:16 PM
0

No but he does. That's the point. He does. Why is she entitled to his commitment? Why is she entitled to a relationship? It seems like you are trying to enforce your personal morals onto a hypothetical scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/16 05:59 PM
11

people who disparage Nice Guys™ aren't talking about genuinely nice men... they are talking about guys who are insincere in their supposed niceness, who dole out favors to women in the hopes that they'll be returned in sex. But they often take out their aggression on actual nice guys who have done nothing wrong to them at all. Which only servers to perpetuate the confusion and stereotype.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/16 05:53 PM
1

By your definition, the redpill is a hate sub too. What definition have I offered? It seems you are trying to put words in my mouth. Pretty typical tactic for people with an agenda to push. Hell, you didn't even answer my question - which is not the least bit surprising.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/16 05:13 PM
1

It always amazes how me how fast the anti-PC people demand that everyone else be PC about their own beliefs. Is that what you think I'm doing by pointing out that TBP isn't a satire sub, but rather a hate sub aimed at another sub? Doesn't the hypocrisy bother you? Well, of course TBP's hypocrisy bothers me. That's why I bring it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/16 03:56 PM
2

How would they identify the robber? And why does your personal fairness apply to someone else? Why shouldn't their idea of fairness apply since they were robbed?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/16 03:45 PM
2

TRP aren't studying this as an anthropological study Actually, they kind of are. They are looking at women through an anthropological lens, analyzing their actions, and advocating for following behavioral patterns that conform to what their subjects are acting on. Some of those actions may not be moral to you, but similarly some of the actions of the women being studied aren't very moral either.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 10:53 PM
2

TBP focuses on... TBP also focuses on individual RP members and attempts to shame them openly. TBP also focuses on trying to police thoughts and words. SRS also has a somewhat nutty community. Do you honestly believe that TBP doesn't? Not to call out other individuals (as that's BP's thing), but you guys literally have a member with a mental illness fetish, not to mention plenty of folks who openly laud their double standards while swearing up and down that such things don't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 10:38 PM
1

I'd rather go for someone who does more Okay. Why, pray tell, would someone who does more want you if you do less?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 10:32 PM
2

My view is life isn't fair but it should be and the ends justifies the means when seeking personal fairness. Really? So if someone robbed you because they were robbed, that's totally cool since they have now achieved personal fairness? Does that then mean that you will rob someone else in the name of fairness too? This position seems out of touch with reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 10:30 PM
6

It's SRS for TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 09:58 PM
2

Fathers were at fault in 75% of cases when children were shot to death by a parent and in 64% of cases when a child was beaten. I love how you conveniently left out that women were overwhelmingly at fault when kids were drowned, poisoned, asphyxiated, or burned. Which were all more common than shooting. And that when an infant under 1 year old was killed, women were at fault 85% of the time. eta: You also conveniently left out the paragraphs that stated women committed 66% of neglect cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 09:28 PM
2

I want to be her friend and her lover That kind of backs up what the OP said. On the other hand, being someone's friend makes that person less likely to betray you. This isn't necessarily true at all. Many people cheat on their SO with a friend of that person. For example, my sister cheated on her husband with his "best" friend. In this case, he was betrayed by both of his so-called "best" friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 09:25 PM
1

The grass is greener where there's more shit to fertilize it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 07:29 PM
1

it is still true that men commit more sex crimes against minors than women Is it really? How often do you hear about a teacher sleeping with an underage student? And how often is that teacher a woman, and the student a boy? Because that's way more common than the gender reversed scenario. Also, women are 2-3x more likely to abuse or kill their own children than men are.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 07:04 PM
2

Sure. Similarly, everyone here has the same right to judge you for your regressive and backwards mentality.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 10:45 PM
1

I am shocked that you want to enforce your morals onto someone else. Actually, you're a BP'er, so I'm not shocked at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 07:56 PM
2

I could agree in terms of things like "oh that lewd joke offends me, I'm telling HRRRR!!" It goes deeper than that. In fact, studies have been done that show when men treat women as equals in the workplace, they perceive it as sexism because they aren't being treated better than other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 07:53 PM
-1

I don't need to add the word "particular" just because you assume I mean "all shoes with heels" Because that's how the English language works. If you do not specify exclusivity, then inclusivity is implied.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 07:47 PM
4

But you have a responsibility to control them Please tell that to the people of TBP who get upset at any perceived slight or recognition of their own shitty behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 07:40 PM
3

because his behavior sleeved people out Well those people need clothes made from better fabrics then.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 07:37 PM
1

There's a huge difference between a fringe group like Westboro and governmentally enforced religion. Fundamentalism is fundamentalism, no matter how much you want to distance the comparison. Fundamentalist Islam is the only true Islam. If you don't believe me go talk to anyone who's lived in these countries. You might gain some perspective. Um, I have lived in those countries. I have real perspective, and not just Fox News talking points. Like almost everywhere else, the common citizens are just…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 03:34 PM
0

Any extreme religion is going to lead to what we're seeing with the Muslims. Like Catholicism? That whole Crusades and Spanish Inquisition thing, as well as looking the other way during the Holocaust. That's why we need to eradicate extremism in any form. Judging by the Westboro Baptist Church, that would include Christianity, if the fundamentalist Muslims you see represent all of Islam to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 12:44 AM
0

Trump openly admits to gaming the system, and is the best at it in the current field. And do you honestly believe that he will fix the system he acknowledges benefiting from? What motivation would he have to do so if it would ultimately be robbing himself later?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 07:11 PM
3

And yet he built an empire from the failures.. No, he didn't. He was handed an empire by his father, which he lost. The government bailed him out, and he took the handout. And then he lost the empire again. Rinse, repeat 2 more times. No matter how you spin it, it's hard to argue success If you define success as failing more often than any other business empire in American history, sure. But I doubt most reasonable people would define it that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 03:47 PM
6

Or Christian Bale in 50 Shades Something tells me you don't know what you're talking about here.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 03:37 PM
3

And even that is a massive red herring. There are TONS of women in the tech sector, they are just mostly Indian and Asian women. But because they aren't white, they don't count.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 03:29 PM
7

going broke twice Don't forget mismanaging casinos so poorly that they declare bankruptcy 4 times. CASINOS! Like, how do you screw up a casino empire so badly that it can't make money?! And this is someone that conservatives hold up as a savvy businessman?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 03:17 PM
1

I think this is his biggest fan base. Sadly, that fan base is blissfully unaware that his businesses have declared bankruptcy more than any other American institution in the last 30 years. He's all about debt forgiveness and government handouts, as long as he's the one receiving them.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 03:15 PM
2

People seek out the worst in the people they hate so that they can justify their feelings to themselves. So TBP is the Westboro Baptist Church of reddit? I think that's the perfect metaphor.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 03:13 PM
0

You didn't answer the first 2 questions. Not that I actually expected you to.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/16 05:05 PM
1

He likes that they are submissive and traditional as well, let's not forget.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/16 05:05 PM
1

See, your post is an example of something that isn't useful. What can I say? I take after you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/16 05:04 PM
3

don't expect any real outcomes of this debate Does anyone expect a real outcome from a gender conflict sub on reddit? Really? You may be the only one expecting societal change from a relatively tiny corner of the internet, chief.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/16 11:19 PM
1

And you lot couldn't prove my instincts incorrect. Still don't, in fact. At least you're finally coming around to acknowledging that TBP isn't satire, and isn't interested in debating at all. It's just a sad club for unfulfilled people.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/16 11:16 PM
0

People would be disgusted if they knew what terps really thought. And you know this how? Are you literally claiming to have psychic powers? Do you know what terps really think? If so, how?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/16 11:11 PM
1

I wouldn't pay much attention to r/thebluepill. It's a sub full of people that are not interested (at that point in time anyway) in debating or taking TRP seriously. In my experience, it's a sub full of people whose lives are so empty that they needed to create a reddit community just to bitch about another reddit community that they aren't even a part of. People with fulfilling lives don't do that. In effect, it's just a derision echo chamber.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/16 11:04 PM
1

Looking through that page, it reads more like "things that got national media attention and also happened to have a change.org petition". It's more correlation than causation.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/16 10:49 PM
1

In a way it's a violation of a person's right to choose what to read for themselves and form their own opinions thereof. I thought feminists were all about the right to choose. So why are they trying to take that away from people? Don't get me wrong, Amazon can sell whatever it wants to. But trying to enforce censorship based solely on one group's pressures is silly.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/16 10:38 PM
1

Depends on the topic at hand. I see BP ladies accuse RP'ers of lying constantly about their field reports.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/16 10:28 PM
1

wtknight only wants petite Asian women (or at least that's his stated preference), so you can extrapolate from that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/16 10:10 PM
1

There are tiny tricks to every small social interaction, most of which I don't know. Pretend you heard a joke right before answering the phone. Whenever you meet someone's eyes for the first time that day, smile. Memorize good jokes and learn how to tell them well. How is that any different that PUA "game" though? You are literally suggesting a script or "if/then" reaction, which is no different from what those guys suggest for socially awkward guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/16 04:30 PM
1

Keep in mind that Ozy has a mental illness fetish (and that's not me making up shit, she outright said it), so her testimony is literally the dictionary definition of an outlier every time.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 11:17 PM
1

The risk is pretty manageable by being selective with 30+ quality women. How does one identify such women without spending an inordinate amount of time or money on them first?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 09:54 PM
2

I'm willing to bet most of reddit is ambivalent at best. Hate is probably much too strong a word to use here. After all, I find SRS distasteful, but I don't hate them. At best they register as a misguided annoyance. TRP is probably analogous to that for the greater reddit population.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 09:28 PM
1

So, you literally cannot spell Freud correctly, but you think his theories are the epiphanies that will lead to deeper understanding? Really? The phallic stage, penis envy, Oedipus complex? Keep in mind this is the same guy that was praising Lacan and dismissing Freud entirely just the other day. It's like his opinion changes based on what his Psychology 101 class read that day.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 09:19 PM
1

Maybe if instead of getting triggered by particular keywords you read the conversation in context Maybe if you could get all BPs everywhere to do that same thing, we could have an honest and intellectual debate around here.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 09:16 PM
1

I happen to have proof of the opposite For all women, or just one/a few? I'm only asking because it seems like you're fallaciously extrapolating, which makes you just as guilty of false generalizations as RP guys. Why lower yourself to that level? Why be a selfish asshole? Well, because by watching women, one could deduce that those behaviors will get you laid. If getting laid is your goal, it makes sense to act in a way that will accomplish said goal.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 09:07 PM
2

My girlfriend's ex before me was an emotional mess, and she couldn't deal with constantly being unloaded upon. So your own GF doesn't want a BP man. That alone should tell you to reevaluate what it is you're preaching.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 09:04 PM
1

Incidentally, selfishness isn't evil. It's the very basis of capitalism. At best it's amoral (not to be confused with immoral). Selfishness is what allowed the strongest to survive and our species to continue through hardships. Trying to moralize survival traits is a fool's errand.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 09:00 PM
1

So why did you point out the divorce and infidelity statistics of couples who get married early? Um, to show you facts and statistics that were counter to what you were saying. And if you'll read the comment again, I specifically said "Not to rain on your parade, or say that bad things will happen, but..." I wasn't saying bad things WILL happen, only that they can, and that you being absolutely certain that nothing bad ever will happen IS foolish, and incredibly naive.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 05:24 PM
3

Yeah, and I didn't think my wife would be diagnosed with terminal cancer 5 weeks before out 1st anniversary. But the universe doesn't care how you choose to worship, shit happens that you can't predict and it's foolish to use absolutes about a future you know nothing of.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 01:58 AM
1

I'm not RP. No flair, chief. I get that projecting that onto me makes it easier for you to "other" me and dismiss anything I've said though. A habit which may, in fact, have a lot to do with why you date the women you do who fuck you up so badly.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 11:23 PM
4

All women do NOT want to follow AFBB, I am 20 and getting married this year. I still have plenty of years of youth left to fuck around, but naa, I'm going to get married instead. Not to rain on your parade, or say that bad things will happen, but getting married that early is one of the greatest predictors of infidelity and divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 11:15 PM
1

each statement of yours is just a new form to relate to me condescendingly each time demonstrating contempt disguised as some form of compassion. Now that's just more projection on your part. Are you actually saying you know what I'm thinking? That you have an intimate understanding of how I think, and how I relay that information to others? OR are you claiming to be psychic? You have already prejudged me and you need me to contain your own projected shame to validate your narrative and self ima…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 11:03 PM
1

You've said nothing here that does not convince me further that you desperately need to get off of the internet and outside into the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 10:55 PM
1

You're just a sad person. Actually I'm quite happy, as I don't feel the need to neatly categorize everyone like you do. I don't have to label them. I don't have to assign them into groups. I'm perfectly happy just letting people be themselves. You, on the other hand, have done nothing but tell others how and what they think, what they believe, and you've claimed to know what all women are thinking and want. If anything, you're highly delusional, and I fear for anyone who is ever a patient of you…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 10:09 PM
1

what you have done is merely find something you see as a fault with me to undermine the validity of anything that comes out of me Well, when the fault in question is something that you admit you have and are doing, I'm not exactly off base. And I'm not invalidating what you're saying. I'm saying that you are obsessed with a certain pattern (or "structure" if you will), and that you are seeing it here, specifically because you're already looking for it. Or in other words, when you're a hammer, ev…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 10:06 PM
1

It isn't condescending to point out that words do have objective meaning, despite whatever personal connotation you may feel towards it. You saying that definitions don't matter is what's stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 09:59 PM
3

You are a... It's always fun when one of you folks flat out tells someone else how they should self-identify. When you try to decide for them how their sexuality works. It's seriously the least feminist thing ever, and yet here you are. Didn't we have this conversation already about how you don't have psychic powers?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 05:24 PM
1

Because it's easier to cry on the internet about how awful women are than it is to get a social life and go to the gym. Or in your case, cry on the internet about how awful men are when they go to the gym and get a social life through means other than how you personally would.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 05:13 PM
3

You could lose honor. Do women not care about that in the slightest? No. In fact, my old sensei emphatically told me that "Honor is a male trait. Women will rarely understand it." Now, if you phrase it as "social standing based directly on accountability for your actions and words", they would understand the concept just fine, but still ignore it completely.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 03:25 PM
1

Whether I am an obsessional neurotic or not is besides the point No, it's exactly the point. You are aware of it, but are refusing to admit that it's causing you to think this way about RP/PPD, and thus you are projecting it outward. Do you think maybe this gives you an escape from seeing something? Not sure what you're saying here. I'm not RP, so I"m not trying to argue in favor of that ideology. I'm just pointing out that your behavior is not exactly healthy. Also, as the other users have poin…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 03:13 PM
1

So you have reading problems on top of delusions of psychic powers. How interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 03:08 PM
1

I'm sorry counselor, you should probably hire an attorney before you accidentally implicate yourself in that brutal murder of a young woman in 2009.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 03:40 AM
1

It's not absolute. Then why do dictionaries exist? Is there a dictionary cartel just desperately keeping the business going, in the hopes that people don't catch on that words don't actually mean what the dictionary says they do?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 03:40 AM
1

I haven't decided anything. I asked questions. So I'm afraid to inform you that your psychic powers don't work.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 03:38 AM
2

So essentially you're just admitting to projection. I wish it didn't take you so many comments to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 10:38 PM
1

So are you suggesting that all relationship roles are set in stone, and utterly immutable? Because that would imply that if I married a woman who I chose because she is a good partner, and then she got pregnant, then we'd have a problem because mother was not the role I married her for. I think roles are fluid, and do change over time. I'm sure you and your hubs share responsibilities differently, and how those are arranged today are not the same as they were when you first started dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 10:34 PM
2

And I'm saying you're reaching to even come to such a deluded conclusion. Your statement of: That is why I understand the strategy trp employs it is specific to a certain kind of woman regardless of what is being claimed. I know her well. Implies that you are the one who either makes bad mate choices, or lacks situational awareness when dating. Projecting that outward is simply silly and illogical.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 10:30 PM
2

You can control outcome if you spend enough hours researching treatments and physicians and how to get treatments done. The more hours you research, the more control you have. Sometimes you need drastic or unconventional measures to make sure everything turns out the way you want it to. Really? So those hours/days/weeks I spent reading every source material and textbook on my wife's cancer would have produced a cure? Or if I had found that one other experimental treatment, it would have had a di…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 10:27 PM
3

And which one of those models assigns women to men they didn't choose to be with?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 10:08 PM
2

Very similar lack of capitalization, but no links to unrelated studies to "prove" his point.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 10:00 PM
2

That's a pretty weak defense. I could easily same the same about your underlying psychology. You can deny your problem all you want, but if you look, the structure is there, and it is hard to deny. RP guys didn't cause your interpersonal relationships to fail. Either you did, she did, or some combination thereof did. End of story. Projecting your failures onto others doesn't really play into it, other than as a very temporary relief for your emotional pain - an outlet to vent if you will. When t…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 09:58 PM
3

Or maybe you are just attracted to women with BPD. I'd look inward before trying to blame your relationship problems on 100,000+ people who weren't involved.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 09:52 PM
2

Spoken like someone who has never set foot onto a ship of any sort, and has no inkling of knowledge about how the ocean works.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 09:50 PM
1

So you're saying you're not innocent of brutally murdering a young woman in 2009? You're just not guilty?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 09:34 PM
1

To me, feminism and equality are interchangeable. Does that apply to all flavors of feminism? Is radical feminism for equality as much as equity feminism? Or ecofeminism? Or liberal feminism? Or cultural feminism? Or Marxist/Socialist feminism? it's semantics and doesn't matter Unfortunately for you, semantics DOES matter. Semantics by definitions is about the meaning of words, and that is important. What words actually mean does matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 09:21 PM
1

whereas a woman playing a game of hoops shirtless/braless would raise eyebrows and probably get into public decency issues. Total aside, but it depends on jurisdiction. In NYC, for example, it's perfectly legal for women to be topless in public.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 09:16 PM
1

I said women support women being in the draft. Do they really? All of them everywhere? How do you know that? Sounds like a ton of projection on your part.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 09:14 PM
1

I find it amusing that you admit these women are "shit", but you still defend them or imply that they aren't common.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 08:57 PM
2

Probably because statistically there are more unattractive men than attractive men in any given random population sample. I get that explaining this to you is probably not going to assist in your education at all, since you purposefully pick your nose and eat your own boogers in front of men you consider unattractive so you don't have to interact with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 06:51 PM
24

why do you hang out with people you don't wanna have sex with? Are you literally asking us why we have friends? Because if you can't figure that out, then you've got bigger problems in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 06:46 PM
1

I said "damage your property". I didn't specify what property. Please read carefully before responding.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/16 11:13 PM
2

I mean, if you want to add criminal charges to the potential lawsuit, go right ahead. In the meantime, should we be encouraging your coworkers to damage your property due to your poor hygiene? You know, something that you admit to that's actually affecting the other people in your office.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/16 11:11 PM
1

I don't think you can report someone to HR for what they read on the internet away from work, or for what they believe about social dynamics. Subsequently, HR cannot take action based on those same criteria, as it violates Equal Opportunity Workplace standards that says they cannot discriminate based on "race, sex, religion, creed, sexuality, etc." RP beliefs falls under 'creed'. In fact, reporting him for that without any offending action on his part would more than likely end with you being re…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/16 08:47 PM
4

No wonder the stats show women are more likely to kill their children.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/16 08:36 PM
1

I'm not here to debate. Well as this is a debate sub, you can leave.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/16 08:30 PM
2

I'm saying that you don't know what other women find attractive, you only know what you find attractive. Which is fine if your entire advice for your son is to try and find someone exactly like you. If, though, you want him to be able to find someone on his own who may be entirely unlike you in almost every way but gender, then your advice isn't going to be terribly helpful to him. This is coming from someone raised by a single mom who thought exactly as you did. She told me what she found attra…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/16 08:23 PM
2

I think I know what qualities are attractive to women. I mean...I'm a woman. No, you know what qualities are attractive to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/16 08:10 PM
1

Are you honestly surprised, though? Because I'm not.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/16 08:06 PM
1

I'm an introverted workaholic in a high-profile position with tons of executive interaction for hours every day. So by the time I finally get home after work, I usually just want to be alone to rest and recharge. This does not mesh well with women who want to go out a lot or have me entertain them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/16 07:48 PM
1

I'm not doing that at all. I'm pointing out YOUR behavior, which you refuse to acknowledge. And I didn't bring up these 10 women, and never mentioned them at all, so what is it that I'm not addressing? Your strawman?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/16 12:06 AM
1

You realize that you just labeled me as RP so you could dismiss everything I said, even though I'm not RP and do not have any flair? Rather than continue a civil discourse, you chose to "other" me, because then you don't have to actually think critically about what I am saying. That's really sad. Not surprising, but still sad. It's even more ironic considering that you are using the same broad strokes you claim to oppose as they promote heartlessness, which you are now exemplifying.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 11:08 PM
2

That's not what I said and you know it. You are completely mischaracterizing my entire comment, and that is a strawman. I'm simply saying that if you honestly believe that you are a constant victim of circumstance, that you are being oppressed by an invisible and utterly improbable force, you will lack empathy for the problems others are having as well. It's self-reinforcing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 10:41 PM
1

There is a mainstream belief and social enforcement of a victim mentality within feminism (ie: the patriarchy, or "women have it worse"). This mentality tends to blind the most zealous to reason or empathy for challenges others must face according to race, gender, sexual orientation, age, etc. (like you just said)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 10:36 PM
1

The real issues stem from this victim mentality. This blocks out reason and empathy for challenges others must face according to race, gender, sexual orientation, age, etc. That's a perfect representation of what's wrong with feminism in the West, right there.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 10:09 PM
1

I don't think the population of a dating site is representative of life out there, is it? It's representative of the people who are not currently in a relationship and actively trying to find a sex or relationship partner. Which is not an insignificant number of people.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 10:04 PM
1

nobody on this thread seems to question the "most women prefer men to be dominant in bed" part, but with the "most women prefer egalitarian relationship", suddenly they must be lying because they feel it's the only acceptable answer, etc etc. And if you would have looked at the rest of my original comment, I addressed why that reaction might be taking place. From my own personal experience, as well as open ended questions about the occurrence. But instead you chose to ignore all of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 05:55 PM
1

So your objection - 8 days late I might add - is that you believe me to be sexist, based on nothing but your own projections? I mean, you literally singled out 3 sentences of a 4 paragraph comment without addressing any of the specifics I brought up. It actually sounds like you're the one with an axe to grind, not me. Especially given how you decided to cherry-pick what you are replying to and how late you did it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 03:28 PM
4

If women are told from early on they are "bad at math", why is it their fault? That isn't what UA HAmmer said at all. Where did you even dig up that ridiculous strawman?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 10:22 PM
2

You do realize that letting sweat build up and dry on your skin repeatedly causes all the grime that came out of your pores to resettle, right? That's not healthy for your skin in the long term. Especially if you're doing that every work day and only bathing after the 2nd or 3rd workout that week.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 10:07 PM
3

Wow. If your hygiene is so terrible that you have a reputation among your coworkers for smelling bad, it's time to quit being disgusting. I mean, that's just unprofessional at the very least.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 09:23 PM
3

A lot of bluepill people often see this as an example of systematic sexism, discrimination on the part of the University, because women aren't represented in Engineering. Now the question becomes, would those same people scream sexism when they see that nursing or education majors are 80% or more women? Or to answer you question, no. I do not believe there is a natural symmetry in humanity. Especially when it comes to personal interests.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 09:14 PM
4

it doesn't do anything negative to them Except express to them nonverbally that they are beneath your notice and unworthy of acknowledgement as a fellow human being.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 07:26 PM
3

on a side note, do you think its normal for adults to do that? Probably not. Especially in public. Especially when addressing another human directly. At the very least I would question your manners, parental upbringing, education, and hygiene.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 07:24 PM
2

I see angry OP! She HATES men! Men are nothing except mystical provision fairies to this angry OP! But these men won't perform for her. I propose that this happens because OP has learned to utterly dehumanize men to the point where she can't have a relationship with a man. Sexual contact, sure, but with people who aren't even.. people. OPs who don't act like this (the mystical "Bitch") can have real relationships with men that are mutually fulfilling. Not every relationship is free of abuse, of …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 06:14 PM
2

Not everyone gets to let go of their agency and just have life happen to them. Someone has to make shit happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 06:07 PM
1

And again, it will take a Constitutional Amendment to do so, and Congress has no political or financial motive to do that. So how would you suggest going about it?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 10:51 PM
1

it does not seem intuitive to me that people who don't live in states would deserve less representation than those who do live in states. Well, you have to understand how it was set up 200 years ago. Washington, D.C. was created to be a neutral home to the federal government in a federal district that in itself is not a state. This was specific and intentional, so that Washington, D.C. would not owe allegiance or pay taxes to any state, nor would it allow a Governor to have greater power over it…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 10:23 PM
1

bullshit argument Firstly, I'm not moralizing or saying it's a good thing. I'm simply stating the facts. It would quite literally take a Constitutional Amendment to change the way it is currently set up. DC is a federal district created for the express purpose of running the federal government without owing allegiance or paying taxes to a state. It's setup that way so that no state can control or influence it. It wasn't originally created with the intention of it ever being so large that it woul…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 09:33 PM
1

Correct me if I am wrong but isn't porn filmed from the male perspective? Sort of. But the byproduct of this is that most male performers are nothing but silent, disembodied penises. They rarely have lines, and the camera isn't usually pointed at their faces. So what you have is less of a male perspective, and more of a male stand-in. That man could be any man, and that's the point. He isn't special at all. Also, lesbian porn is arguably one of the largest mainstream genres of porn, and it is mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 07:40 PM
1

Residents of Washington, D.C. do not have a voting representative in Congress Well, first that's because Washington, D.C. is not a state, but a federal district. Hence, "District of Columbia". Also, while their District Delegate cannot vote on the Senate floor, they can vote in Congressional Committees, which is arguably where most political groundwork is laid. Washington, D.C. also has 3 Electoral Votes despite not being a state unto itself. Most of the reason DC doesn't get a Congressperson to…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:38 PM
1

Rappers don't exist to be our representatives. Neither do actors, but Ronald Reagan, Jesse Ventura, Al Franken, and Arnold Schwarzenegger have all been fairly successful at it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:31 PM
1

I don't really believe what he's saying is genuine. I think he's just saying what he wants BP'ers to agree with. Especially since wtknight has admitted to being a white guy with an Asian fetish who wants a subservient "traditional Asian woman" to be in a relationship with.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:18 PM
3

I think the problem is that's her entire schtick. She drinks a lot and fucks randos. That's her entire setlist for the night, just different variations on those themes. It's no different than Lisa Lampanelli, except Amy's dudes aren't all black. At least comics like Margaret Cho had a fairly diverse repertoire. To me, it isn't that she's not funny. She definitely can be. It's that she only has 2 jokes/stories that she tells with minor variations. Give her another 2-3 years and we'll be talking a…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:07 PM
2

I'm pretty sure a woman oppressed in Afghanistan has overcome more adversity than the average man raised in the suburbs. And I'm absolutely certain that a man from Afghanistan has overcome more adversity/hardship than your average middle class, white American feminist. What's your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 06:01 PM
1

I've been saying for months that TBP isn't satire, but rather just another SRS-style "gotcha" sub. It just has an extremely myopic scope. The fact that they have 65 mods (down from 75 last month), many of whom actually ARE SRS Archangelles only serves to confirm this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 05:47 PM
1

Something outside my own feelings made me love my son the first few horrible weeks of his life. It's called oxytocin.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/16 08:39 PM
2

Then the joke either went over your head, or you're really into double standards. My guess is the latter.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/16 08:19 PM
2

I know. You two just had very similar posting styles, and we hadn't seen you around lately. But she's American and very insulting, so definitely not you. :)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/16 08:18 PM
1

You 're bargaining over semantics tbh. She also fetishizes mental illness, so her opinion is highly skewed.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/16 05:35 PM
1

Actually you do but not in the way you think. Really? So you are a psychic now? You literally know what and how all men everywhere think? Your claims are becoming more and more unhinged as you go along. I'm starting to worry about your grip on reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/16 05:29 PM
1

/u/happilysinglewoman, also known as /u/thatgreeklady
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/16 05:27 PM
2

I asked that myself last week. There are many similarities, but from some of her replies, questioningwoman is an American, not Greek. /u/thatgreeklady is still around, she just hasn't been posting here lately.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/16 05:27 PM
1

Really? No man anywhere in the world at any point in time has ever seen a woman without makeup on? My life experience alone invalidates that bullshit statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/16 05:26 PM
1

Spoken like someone who didn't look at the username of the OP in this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/16 05:23 PM
1

Hey. A lot of blue-haired, pierced, tumblr and instagram white chicks are Pretty hot and beautiful, and their tattoos are works of art that make them even more attractive I'm not denying that. As someone who is heavily tatted myself, I kind of dig it. I'm simply stereotyping the tumblrina's that RP'ers hate. I'm implying that red pillers are below average looking and their female equivalentt are the same. Okay. Is this projection on your part, or do you actually know this for sure? I only ask be…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/16 04:24 PM
1

Are you implying all RP'ers are overweight, ugly, and bald? Or just their female equivalents? I guess in my mind the RP equivalent would be the blue-haired, facial piercings, tattoo'd up, shrill tumblr feminist. Someone utterly convinced of their own correctness and willing to put down an entire gender to prove it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/16 03:13 PM
1

I'm not even sure what that would be.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/16 05:09 PM
1

You guys want... Nothing better than being told what I want by someone who knows absolutely nothing about me. Also, wanting a woman to actually do the approach for a change isn't the same as wanting "sluts". Your strawman argument is interesting, and typical of feminist misrepresentation.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 09:28 PM
1

You guys don't want us to change our behaviors. Except for the overwhelming consensus by dudes IN THIS VERY THREAD who disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 09:05 PM
2

For a starter, in US that would violate freedom of speech constitutional protection Actually no. You see Freedom of Speech only means that the government cannot limit your speech in certain ways. It does not mean that a college cannot have rules preventing information about ongoing legal investigations from leaking. In fact, the latter is pretty standard practice with many types of criminal proceedings. When your comment starts off by spreading misinformation, it doesn't look good for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 08:26 PM
1

I was the charming scoundrel. There needs to be a title for that. I nominate "Han Solo-mode".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 08:19 PM
3

You literally just summed up OP's point. You offer no alternative, and even admit that you won't change your own behavior due to how you believe you will be perceived. Which is somehow "society's" fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 08:14 PM
1

It's not deleted, you read it wrong. He said: Men would much rather fuck a nonfeminist. He didn't say no man would fuck a feminist.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 08:12 PM
11

The little rebel without a cause inside of me thinks, "hell no I don't have to be anything I don't agree to!" My usual reply is "You don't get to decide how I self-identify. Check your privilege." It really fucks with their heads, because they know it's true.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 08:07 PM
3

a reaction to modern missteps That's an incredibly polite way to say glaring misandry.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 08:04 PM
1

Didn't want this to get buried as a top-level reply, but I have an interesting perspective on your questions. I grew up with a gay brother (and I knew he was gay LONG before he ever came out to me), and my lady bestie of 20+ years is a lesbian. From what I've seen, gay male relationships tend to either be very stable long term partnerships or very short hookups. I'm not saying there is no middle ground, that's just what I've seen the majority of. Lesbian relationships tend to be different from t…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 07:54 PM
3

Many, many more than I've seen women approaching men ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 07:48 PM
3

Most bluepillers are people that manage to have more or less satisfying sex lives without employing some "sexual strategy". I'm not so sure about that one. They probably do have a strategy of sorts, they probably just don't have it codified and written down for them in a steps to follow arrangement.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 07:44 PM
4

being good looking if possible DING DING DING! We have a winner!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 07:17 PM
1

amirate? No, you aren't. Harassment requires intent. Sexual harassment requires that the words or actions are known to be unwelcome. In a date scenario, unless otherwise already stated, a kiss at the end is standard and not typically considered unwelcome. So I repeat, this sounds like an awful lot of projection stemming from your lack of social awareness, and has nothing to do with "being creepy".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 07:15 PM
1

Sounds like projection of your shitty social awareness to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 07:08 PM
1

Starting? Oh honey, have you read some of the shit you've been writing for a few months now?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 03:32 PM
3

but said TRP does this less than MRA. And then YOU linked to another thread in reply to his statement. The implication being that the thread you were linking to was backing up your point, but it doesn't. And you still refuse to answer the question. So how about you do us all a favor and just stop posting. Or commenting. Forever. Since you are obviously not debating in good faith, but merely circlejerking yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 09:22 PM
3

Jesus wub, do you have a reading comprehension problem. You still didn't answer my question. You're still deflecting. You said that, and then ian rebutted you, and then you linked to a thread that isn't showing what you're implying it does. So why did you link that thread?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 09:12 PM
3

Assuming you'll even bother answering instead of deflecting yet again. Boom! Nailed it! I did read your original posts, and none of those explain WHY you linked to that thread when someone else said that RP'ers don't advocate for abuse of women more than MRA's do, especially considering nothing in that thread backs up your point that RP'ers DO advocate abuse more than MRA's. You even denied that's what you were saying by linking that, but can provide absolutely NO alternate explanation. It's sad…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 09:05 PM
3

I already laid that out. But unlike you, I'll actually point out what I said. Because your reply of "See this thread" with a link as a response to "I've not seen that as frequently from RPers as I have from MRAs" certainly implies that the link you provided is showing RPers doing that exact thing. So I ask again, what exactly were you trying to imply with that response and link? If it wasn't what I said above, then what was it? Assuming you'll even bother answering instead of deflecting yet agai…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 08:53 PM
4

What a circular and thoroughly stupid reply. Pretty typical of you though, wub. "I already said that somewhere else, so now I don't have to" even though you never did.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 08:48 PM
1

wub will never admit to discrimination in favor of women, because wub is what feminists call "privilege blind".
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 08:19 PM
3

Then what exactly are you saying? Because your reply of "See this thread" with a link as a response to "I've not seen that as frequently from RPers as I have from MRAs" certainly implies that the link you provided is showing RPers doing that exact thing. If that's not what you are trying to say, then why did you link that thread with that reply?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 08:16 PM
4

I know that RP advocates strongly against physical abuse and domestic violence, but I still thought it was relevant as is illustrates a situation where RP ideas very well may have caused or exacerbated an abusive situation. That's like saying "I know that Driver's Education advocates strongly against unsafe driving, but in this case the driver's unsafe driving illustrates a situation where Driver's Education very well may have caused or exacerbated an unsafe situation." Do you even see the backw…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 07:47 PM
5

I'm not seeing RPer's form a consensus that physically abusing women is perfectly okay in that thread like you are claiming.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 07:38 PM
1

You didn't ask for clarification, you made an assumption and projected it onto me as if that's what I had said. Which is a strawman. If you don't like being called on it, you shouldn't do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 03:40 PM
1

Are you seriously trying to claim that "my dad was rich" is a legit resume for leadership and demonstrates personal sacrifice? No, but your strawman is interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 03:13 PM
3

I value your penis more. Sadly, society at large does not.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 11:16 PM
0

Coming from you, that means less than nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 11:15 PM
1

The implication that he is doing that in the first place, when that wasn't his statement. He said "It's just that girls seem unattainable to you", which is his personal perception. He didn't say attaining girls was his goal, or that he was defining his life in those terms. He said he didn't understand why he would be labeled: a creep a loser a boring "friend" a stalker a pervert a rapist while doing everything he is told is normal and good.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 11:14 PM
1

Why do Bloops like to play the oppression olympics? Because it rallies other Bloops to their side and helps reinforce their point anecdotally. Same with RP. Why do people make these threads competitive? Because everyone is convinced of their own correctness, and unless you can factually show how they are actually smug and incorrect, they will never listen. Why do you sometimes confuse comparison with competition? Only belle knows.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 11:00 PM
1

It reflects on your great great granfather's worthiness and sacrifice. You didn't do anything for that money, but HE did. Thus the origin of the money, and therefore power, did come through hard work and sacrifice. Even though it wasn't personally your hard work or sacrifice. The fact that you can't understand that inherited money comes from someone else is staggering.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 10:50 PM
1

I think you're a bit confused about what constitutes a straw man. Not at all. You did not refute what he said. You refuted a made-up scenario that resembled what he said, but wasn't, in fact, it at all. It wasn't an inference, it was a projection on your part. There is a VAST difference, which is entirely lost on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 10:48 PM
1

Self-reported is even in the link title. How many younger women will self-report obesity honestly?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 10:40 PM
3

Probably because as a woman ages, that haircut becomes the default hairstyle for the "let me talk to your manager" type of shrewish soccer mom. It's a stereotype thing, I'm sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 10:39 PM
0

I haven't seen that at all. Their friendships tend to begin based on a shared hobby or activity, like meeting people in voice chat in online games or playing Magic:TG at the hobby shop. But that does not mean those friendships cannot become just as real and emotionally gratifying as any other. It seems like you've either never spent any time with stereotypical "geeks" in their own environment, or you are just projecting the standard feminist fantasy of these guys because it means you don't have …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 10:00 PM
1

You need to learn to read. First, reading does not equal reading comprehension. We can all see which one you need improvement with. Then learn to argue. Second, this is a debate sub, not an argument sub. That you don't know the difference isn't surprising or unexpected, but definitely telling of your responses.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 09:55 PM
3

is he allowed to just tell stories his patients have told him in confidence? Even if he changes the name? Yes, as long as there is no personally identifiable information, he is not violating HIPAA compliance. It's the same reason doctors and nurses can tell ER horror stories about their patients on reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 09:51 PM
1

Not sure why everyone keeps straw-manning me. I'm no expert, but probably because you started it with your own strawman of: "Then maybe you should stop defining your social life in terms of "attaining girls"." when that wasn't what was said, and you know it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 09:48 PM
1

No, all I have claimed is that nepotism disproves the idea that societal power is derived from sacrifice. And that claim is demonstrably false. Nepotism doesn't disprove that, as someone had to make the money that was inherited in the first place, and THAT person likely did sacrifice much to obtain it. Wealth doesn't spontaneously appear, someone has to be the original earner. It appears the Oligarchy and the myth of the meritocracy is safe with you. Nice strawman. It's becoming increasingly obv…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 09:05 PM
1

Ha! I'm not upset at all. You don't even possess the ability to upset me. Interesting attempt at redirection though. Just pointing out the truth that you're free to feel however you want about GLO, but he is just as free to disregard your opinion as utterly worthless.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 09:03 PM
1

I don't need data. Because you cannot possibly back up what you're saying as a general trend in NYC outside of your circle of friends? It's literally my life and the life of everyone around me. Everyone? You live in a city of nearly 10M. Are you seriously egotistical enough to believe that you know all of them and what they are doing in their lives and with their relationships? How do you even keep it all straight? Seems like you'd need one hell of a spreadsheet. If someone in the Midwest I am n…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 07:37 PM
2

And to him you're just another shitposting hater on the internet who has no effect on his real life whatsoever. What's your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 07:33 PM
2

I find the tongue sticking out emoticon highly ironic in this case.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 07:30 PM
2

The HARD partying stops around 23 for most. I would LOVE to see your data on that trend, belle.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 07:29 PM
2

You think the only people in the 1% are folks who have made their fortunes in their own lifetimes? No, but your projection is palpable. And, in case you've forgotten already, YOU are the one who posited that the 1% is all old money. I simply proved you wrong. You think Mark Zuckerberg is going to make his kids take out loans to start their own businesses or live in rented apartments? Maybe, since he's donating most of his fortune. As is Bill Gates. As are many other billionaires who are more phi…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 07:28 PM
1

Or someone who read the thread on r/tinder about how easy it is to hookup in NYC.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 07:24 PM
3

You can't trust self reporting, which is the entire point of this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 07:19 PM
3

If you have to task about the logistics, then your fiance is failing to deliver.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 07:04 PM
2

I don't think anyone gave Mark Zuckerberg or Bill Gates their fortunes. It wasn't inherited through nepotism. They both worked and sacrificed to build their businesses. If you believe that entrepreneurs are dying out or that they are part of the handed-down 1%, then you're the delusional one, friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 06:50 PM
1

TRP is not a cult, or even cultlike. So that would be a "no". Cool. Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 07:52 PM
3

Seems like you're reaching. Do you honestly believe that every person who has ever walked away from TRP has had ALL of their posts and comments deleted? If so, how? How would TRP even know if someone left, unless they made a spectacle of it? And even if that was the case, are you really trying to equate deleting posts/comments with excommunication or death?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 07:48 PM
1

I'm not trying to end the discussion, I was trying to get a clear answer out of you to a yes or no question. One that, notably, you still refuse to outright answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 07:46 PM
1

Ah, but YOU made accusations of TRP being a cult. Is it a cult or not? This is your CMV after all. By your own logic and admission, if TRP is a cult, and TRP is no different than feminism, then feminism is also a cult. You don't get to weasel word your way out of this, or use language that affords you plausible deniability. It is a yes or no question. However, if you are now saying that TRP is a religion and NOT a cult, then your CMV is over, and you have changed your mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 06:43 PM
3

So since you're admitting they aren't different, are you now also admitting that feminism is a cult?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 05:37 PM
2

Funny how it only seems to be an issue when a woman does it. Funny how manipulation is "natural" when a woman does it, but bad when a man does it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 05:27 PM
1

If people viewed porn as purely "acting" we would not then find so many examples of people quite clearly trying to live out some porno fantasy in real life. This sounds like a slippery slope fallacy. Kids smack each other with cardboard tubes to act out lightsaber fights too, but I don't think they seriously believe they are going to become Jedi.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 05:24 PM
5

Again, I've never seen TRP excommunicate a member, or threaten to kill them for disagreeing with any part of their theory. So your comparison isn't exactly holding up.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 05:15 PM
3

And how is that different from the feminist "patriarchy" boogyeman dogma, exactly? Or accepting things on faith that have already been debunked, such as the wage gap? In other words, how exactly is TRP different from feminism by the definitions you are trying to use? Feminism acts like it's the vanguard of rationality but there's so much that you're asked to just believe in, on faith. I don't see how that is an untrue statement, either.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 05:12 PM
6

You're free to disagree with Christianity or Islam too. Last I checked that was called apostasy, and it generally comes with an excommunication or in some cases a beheading. I don't think TRP is killing anyone or banishing them from society or their community.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 05:09 PM
7

I doubt you could ever get any conclusive data either way. But thus far we haven't seen RP'ers pulling fire alarms in college auditoriums to prevent feminists from speaking. We haven't seen RP'ers block physical passage into an arena while assaulting feminists. We haven't seen RP'ers publish documentation stating that we should kill all but 10% of women, and to only use the rest for breeding stock. But we have seen those actions from feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 04:40 PM
4

My issue is with conclusions 2, 3 & 4. The issues being the same issues you always run into with self-reported data. Especially considering the data is not impartial, but based entirely upon someone trying to attract a potential mate - meaning they will downplay any faults and play up any virtues. Are the answers given actually truthful, or are they a projection of what they believe the person they are trying to attract will want? Did some women think that saying they would want a dominant partn…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 04:30 PM
1

Forgive me, but I fail to see how reducing household income is going to cause less tension for the family.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 11:59 PM
6

It is a goal of feminists to fix this. That's a nice platitude, but what is actually being DONE?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 11:24 PM
1

We need more men in our children's lives. Currently, it's very unequal. How, other than having women OUT of the home more to compensate for lost income from the men, do you suggest correcting that?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 11:22 PM
1

If TBP did any of that, maybe it would apply. As it is they simply link to posts SRS-style and use an attention-grabbing headline to garner upvotes. How is that not exactly what I described? Hell, the TBP sidebar actually says "hateful people from hateful subreddits are not welcome here". Which is the greatest irony of all. Or perhaps to you the greatest satire of all. Except it's self-satire.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 10:08 PM
1

Ah you think being fat is like being gay. No. And you can tell that because I used the word "if" to begin my comparison statement. Notably a comparison that YOU made in the first place, not me. They're not equivalent. Then why did you compare them? I know you have problems with reading comprehension, but come on little dude, this is basic stuff here.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 10:05 PM
1

It's interesting that you're banned as well, but you question my integrity and knowledge. You can at least just say that you don't believe me. You don't have to obfuscate it in language that allows for plausible deniability. And no, it isn't any different. When an EC makes a misandrist post, and the mods actively remove disagreeing comments, that's what we call collusion. When the mods then ban dissenters who point out the misandry, that's also collusion - especially for a first strike. Also, th…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 09:48 PM
1

Or you failed at reading comprehension when you attempted your original reply. Or you don't understand the definition of satire. Or you simply refuse to admit that TBP isn't satire, for whatever reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 09:29 PM
2

You do realize that the Seneca Falls Convention was still organized by the temperance movement, right? I mean, it's even in your linked data. Just because that movement hadn't been formalized yet as the WCTU doesn't mean it wasn't still responsible.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 08:05 PM
1

That statement did not address or rebut my comment in any way.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 08:04 PM
1

its not fat shaming if the girl isn't there First, this shows how little you understand human discourse. Second, it shows how little you understand shaming, even though you perpetuate it constantly. Third, if it isn't shaming because she isn't present, then using a word like "faggot" isn't childish if he's not really gay. Your logic fails on so may levels, it's honestly laughable.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 06:56 PM
2

The suffrage movement was BORN from women not being allowed to speak. Actually it was born out of the Woman's Christian Temperance Union in Ohio in 1873. The purpose of the WCTU was to create a "sober and pure world" by abstinence, purity and evangelical Christianity. It's 2nd president, Frances Willard, has been called the greatest American feminist of her century. The WCTU was very interested in a number of social reform issues, including labor, prostitution, public health, sanitation, and int…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 06:49 PM
1

And what are human beings but panicky, herd-mentality loving, higher order primates?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 06:18 PM
1

This leaves my right hand free for hand to hand sword combat. I appreciate your priorities!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 05:55 PM
1

I couldn't respect a feminist sub that operated like that. Don't go to /r/askfeminists then. I got banned from there for pointing out mainstream feminists who were actively promoting misandry and in turn being promoted by the mods of the sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 05:48 PM
1

Yes the bp sub is satire Trotting out that old and disproven lie again, are we Petti? BP hasn't been a satire sub in a long time. These days it's just another SRS-style shame sub and you know it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 05:45 PM
3

So either way, doesn't that suggest that women don't have it easier than men? Only if you have issues with reading comprehension. TRP may preach about "the wall", but they also say that most women can still easily get laid past that point. They may not be able to get that lifelong dedicated relationship they feel entitled to, but sex they can still get easily.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 05:41 PM
1

Calling someone out about the fat chick they slept with using words that are safe for the workplace, that's shit giving. No, that's fat shaming. Wrapping it up in acceptable work language doesn't change that. If this is your go-to example of "more intelligent ways of giving each other shit", then perhaps you should revisit what you consider intelligent in the first place, stoo. That said, I'm not surprised in the least that you consider social shaming intelligent.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 05:37 PM
1

Australia too. It can actually mean "good friend" to an Aussie.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 05:29 PM
3

Tends to be pretty effective as well. Just ask Donald Trump.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 05:27 PM
5

Of my peers (22 year old student) there doesn't seem to be much of a difference in success rates. Well that's what we call confirmation bias. See if those numbers still hold up in your 30s. Hint: they won't.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 05:12 PM
5

I'm not seeing any saltiness or jealousy in Pem's post. That seems like an awful lot of projection from you, though. Are you attempting to push the standard "all terpers are just jealous" narrative? Because it's kind of played out, chief.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 05:10 PM
1

I've been married, in fact. But thanks for the assumptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 05:21 PM
1

Yeah and has nothing to show from it when she gets divorced. What would he have to show for it if he paid for the house but didn't get to live there anymore?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 03:56 PM
1

Legally, if you're on call on the premises, you're working, whether you're asleep, watching TV, writing the Great American Novel, or anything else. The then father is working during the hours he is at home as well. Are both parents going to be paid for that time, or does his time cancel hers out? Is his time also overtime since he's working during the day as well? Methinks your nerdsnipe was a bit myopic.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 03:52 PM
-3

I'm sure there is a decent crossover. Most people I've met on fetlife either already have a partner or aren't looking to be exclusive. Your blanket statement for 30 Million OKCupid users is patently ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 09:21 PM
4

Your whole comment just summed up how I feel about feminists demonizing all men with campaigns such as "teaching men not to rape" etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 07:05 PM
1

There are also plenty of people, both men and women, who make the mistake of confusing being well-traveled with having a personality. If all you can talk about are the things you did in XYZ country 10 years ago, then your life is boring.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 07:03 PM
1

Out of curiosity, have you ever actually tried having lots of sex with various women?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 06:50 PM
2

Well done madame!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 11:38 PM
0

Misanthropy is so time-consuming, as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 10:18 PM
5

Did you just wait half an hour and quote/reply to yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 10:15 PM
1

If I told most guys I was bisexual, they'd probably condemn me as a "faggot". Only the ones who aren't worth hanging out with in the first place. I'm 35 and living in the conservative South, and still have several gay, lesbian, bi, & trans friends; as well as a gay brother. Other people's sexuality doesn't effect my life in any way, and wouldn't effect our friendship - at least on my part anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 06:47 PM
1

Men place a high, mystical value on the female orgasm Probably because we are told by women and the media that if we cannot get our lady to orgasm, then we are failures and unworthy of being called "men".
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 06:44 PM
2

Saved for permanent reference later.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 06:33 PM
0

The thing is the vast majority of people understand that and don't start crying when someone starts arguing with them in a debate sub. You'll have to keep in mind that belle also edits her posts to complain about downvotes a lot too. Internet validation is real for some people.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 06:31 PM
1

Weed is illegal. Not really shameful. Depends on if you are trying to fuck your weed plants or not, I suppose.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 06:28 PM
2

Obviously it's an opinion. And yet that didn't stop you from presenting it as fact. That's you trolling, btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 09:40 PM
2

Problem? Your habit of making blanket statements as being factual with no evidence to support them, and only admitting it's an opinion when specifically called out on your shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 09:32 PM
3

Admittedly, I don't read every thread on PPD. I've just noticed the similarities in writing style/threads and the lack of HSW around in the last few weeks.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 09:30 PM
2

Certainly. Have you even been tested for reading comprehension deficiencies?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 09:25 PM
2

I'm offering an opinion. Thank you for finally admitting that you aren't stating facts, as per your premise in the OP, and you're literally just making up shit that sounds good and conforms to your worldview.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 09:17 PM
3

Do you see a flair? I'm not RP, I'm just pointing out the flaws in your argument. Your pathetic attempt at shaming notwithstanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 08:48 PM
3

So like I said, utterly unproven and unprovable opinion. Thanks for clarifying.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 08:45 PM
1

I guess some people are just too sensitive to safely live in reality. Reading about the Holocaust or the Killing Fields in Cambodia would likely send this type of person to the ER.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 07:13 PM
5

One that obviously doesn't prevent you from spending all day on reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 06:52 PM
1

Out of curiosity, you know male fantasies how, exactly? Ever been a man?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 06:50 PM
12

Also, I wanna point out that I see your antics everywhere Speaking of, I haven't seen HapppilySingleWoman/[deleted] recently. I'm wondering if questioningwoman is just the latest incarnation, as the writing and debate styles are eerily similar.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 06:35 PM
6

Clearly the OP linked to a video that you didn't watch.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 06:34 PM
10

Considering the word "western" is only mentioned 3 times in this entire thread (not counting the one I just said), and 2 of those are in this exchange between me and you, no. But thanks for proving my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 06:24 PM
4

Do you have any hard evidence to actually back your point at all? Or is it simply your unproven and utterly unprovable opinion?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 06:18 PM
10

Most of Africa, the Middle East, and Asia would disagree with you. That's not much though, only a mere 2/3 of the global population. Like most bloops, you cannot see past your Western woman privilege/entitlement.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 06:10 PM
1

You said he was turned on when he said he wasn't. That's you telling him how his sexuality works. That's you dictating.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 10:45 PM
1

You're the one trying to dictate someone else's sexuality to them. I'm not over here policing sex, that's all you, peanut.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 10:08 PM
1

I would love to see some data on that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 09:54 PM
1

If you're "excited" and your dick hard, you are revved up and in some way turned on. And that right there is the argument that small-minded people use when they say men can't be raped. Congratulations for regressing society.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 09:46 PM
1

what I'm trying to say is RP has its place, but its certainly not the only solution the the problem that created it. I agree with this line of thinking. But I also believe that in order to obtain a workable solution to the problem that created it, we must first properly identify said problem. Which I think is where people start talking past one another, and discounting others' lived experiences.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 09:25 PM
1

That more women graduate than men has no bearing on earning potential Totally untrue. Graduation itself, earning a college degree, is often THE barrier to entry into the current workforce, especially for professional or corporate jobs - which are usually the best paid. Thus women graduating more, earning more degrees, puts them in a more advantageous position for future potential wage earning.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 09:21 PM
1

I think if society conditioned people to be more considerate of their partners, rather than selfishly minded in relationships, things would be a lot better for a lot of people. And I think that's the dividing line for a lot of people. Society does condition men to be considerate of their partners, ie: happy wife, happy life - if mom isn't happy, nobody's happy - etc., but it does not do that for women. Which is why if you browse the women's profiles on any dating site, they read like a list of d…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 07:52 PM
1

Yes, it is. Which is why I pointed out that more women graduate than men do. It seems like you're actually disagreeing with /u/treebog's point, not mine, and we're just talking past one another.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 07:43 PM
1

So I repeat, is society telling them they were born wrong? Or is it internal to the individual trans person? If it's internal and individual, then how is it societal?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 07:42 PM
1

I'm not mad at all. Sad does not equal mad. Your projection is insightful though. You assume anger because it allows you to dismiss anything I say, which is a classic bloop tactic.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 07:40 PM
1

Is that somehow men's collective fault, though? Are men to blame for women not wanting to go into careers that actually make good money?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 06:44 PM
1

Honestly, why does this bother you so much? You brought it up, not me. I'm just saying that imitating or virtualizing social contact instead of actually having it is sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 06:42 PM
3

I didn't say it was harmful, I said it was vapid. And yes, you are pretentious. Thanks for noticing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 06:30 PM
3

You must be a blast at parties Well, I'm not talking shit about the people around me based on appearances, so yeah I am. How does that affect you? Apparently the same way that RP guys doing their own thing in their own subreddit/personal life affects you. Which, incidentally, you haven't been able to quantify in this thread yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 06:18 PM
3

That makes much more sense now. Cheers!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 06:15 PM
2

At least I actually talk to people I'm sharing a meal with, instead of living a shadow of a life glued to a phone, like you apparently do.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 06:14 PM
2

The problem is that stem fields are so heavily male dominated that there must be something else going on here That isn't entirely true. I know this is anecdotal, but STEM fields have plenty of female technicians, engineers, etc. They're just mostly Indian or East Asian. And feminism doesn't count them. Only white women in STEM fields count for their activism. Hell, I'm a Director in technology for a Fortune 100, and our developers and network engineers are overwhelmingly Indian women. But every …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 06:00 PM
2

Not true. So what you said, that gender is assigned at birth, is not true? Or are you saying that gender is assigned at birth by a nebulous and all-powerful "society" that hasn't actually influenced that new life at all? That is really really bad logic. I'm not even sure how to respond to that. How so? Do you honestly believe that a newborn's brain is developed enough to correctly or rationally interpret societal influence? Especially on an issue as complex as gender identity? Remember, you're t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 05:49 PM
3

Upon graduation is the key word More women graduate than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 05:00 PM
1

Sounds like pure vapidity to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 04:57 PM
2

Because gender is assigned at birth. If this is true, then gender is biological, as birth is well before the brain is developed enough to receive society's influence and act accordingly - whether consciously or subconsciously. How did you conclude this? I didn't. I'm asking because you haven't defended your conclusions with any sort of evidence, and I genuinely want to know the answers to these questions.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 04:55 PM
1

Doesn't the fact that transgender's gender was constructed incorrectly prove that gender is a social construct? That's what I'm asking. Was it socially constructed incorrectly or biologically constructed incorrectly? Why? The very notion of transgender is predicated on the basis that people have a socially conditioned gender identity. But if it's purely internal to the individual, it isn't society doing anything at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 04:53 PM
1

Actually, this was found to be true through restaurants going back and watching old security footage to see why there was a difference in order and serving times, as seen here. Your snide commentary is not necessary when you are as ignorant of the facts as you are. I mean, I get that you're a troll, but still...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 04:49 PM
2

Does that answer your question? Not in the slightest. I am a bit confused on what you are trying to get at. I am curious about the line of reasoning that leads people to believe that "gender is a social construct". In order for such reasoning to be true, it needs to stand up to questioning and criticism. Thus, I am asking if that supposition is true, how does it explain transgender people? Trans people live in the same society as the rest of us, but are somehow excluded from having their gender …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 04:12 PM
1

Not despises as much as sympathetic for. I think you mean UNsympathetic. They have admitted it here in PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 04:08 PM
5

So you're saying that you will never admit to being wrong, will always attempt to pass the buck, and aren't worth debating as you aren't here in good faith? Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 04:03 PM
3

If gender is a social construct, why do transgender people exist? Is society telling them that they were born wrong and need to change? If so, why? Or is society wrong? And if society is wrong, wouldn't that mean gender isn't a social construct?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 04:00 PM
8

When we go shopping my wife and I always try to play Spot the TRPer, Spot the SRSer, Spot the _____. So you guys go out specifically to stereotype people? That's a really shitty thing to do, and not exactly socially healthy. Congrats, you're making the world just a little bit worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 03:51 PM
4

Nope, try again. Here, I'll help you out. "A heuristic technique (/hjʉˈrɪstɨk/; Ancient Greek: εὑρίσκω, "find" or "discover"), often called simply a heuristic, is any approach to problem solving, learning, or discovery that employs a practical method not guaranteed to be optimal or perfect, but sufficient for the immediate goals. Where finding an optimal solution is impossible or impractical, heuristic methods can be used to speed up the process of finding a satisfactory solution. Heuristics can…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 03:47 PM
10

It's a closed feedback loop. Then their actions shouldn't bother you, as they do not affect your life in any way. And yet here you are, taking exception and trying for the "gotcha!" for no other purpose than internet validation. You know who does that? Insecure people.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 03:44 PM
1

First, I have no flair, so your RP accusation attempt at shaming me means less than nothing. It's just another sad tactic on your part. Pretty standard response when you have no rationale. Second, the personal attack is unwarranted. I asked questions because you made a ridiculous statement. If you feel that your statements cannot stand up to scrutiny, then perhaps your shouldn't be making them. As it stands, you did not actually answer my questions, likely because you know for a fact that your s…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 03:12 PM
1

Nice strawman you have there. It's bizarre that you think you can project your words into someone else's mouth.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 03:10 PM
1

I'm talking about you pretending to be psychic, making up futures, making assumptions about what will and won't be needed or why. I'm talking about you making blanket statements about an industry you obviously know next to nothing about. I'm talking about you literally making shit up to justify your original statement, because you either refuse to be logical about it, or refuse to back down from your uninformed opinion. For example: How many and which professional IT certifications do you curren…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 11:05 PM
1

but I wouldn't go so far as to say that she feels entitled to be heard or is upset at him for not responding "But it don't matter it clearly doesn't tear you apart anymore" She expects it to matter. She expects it to hurt him still. She's upset that it doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 11:02 PM
1

You create more jobs but most of the jobs that traditionally required 'masculine' traits are starting to go. You should round up the IT staff at any Fortune 500 and count the male/female ratio. Men are still overwhelmingly represented in that demographic. Otherwise, you seem to have a pretty nice, reductive "just world" delusion going on here.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 10:51 PM
1

I know the world has a hardon for Adele, but reading those lyrics for the entire song, she seems more upset that the guy doesn't care to respond to her attempts to communicate than anything. It's like she feels entitled to be heard out, even though she's the one who fucked up, and she's upset that he doesn't want to hear her shit anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 10:40 PM
1

Men can't get pregnant. By definition men cannot become single mothers from a one night stand. Your argument is intellectually dishonest and you know it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 10:30 PM
1

So you admit that your linked study is flawed, but you're still standing by it? Seems intellectually dishonest to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 10:22 PM
1

Not all construction workers are male, either. Just the overwhelming majority for the entire history of mankind. Unlike teachers, who again, were almost exclusively male until 30-40 years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 09:48 PM
1

No? You honestly believe that every machine will go on working forever with no human intervention? I don't know how many, it depends on how many machines there are, what type, and what their workload is.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 09:47 PM
1

Did you even read the study from your second link, because it's painfully bad. It only involved 274 subjects in a 10-minute experiment and resulted in only a 4% difference in productivity with a 3% margin or error. Meaning there is only a 1% effective difference, or to put it another way, a statistically insignificant difference. Also, the experiment was not repeated for more participants or in more locations for confirmation. It was a one-off event, which should never be taken as definitive wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 09:39 PM
1

The VA hospital I go to in Memphis is staffed almost entirely by men. I know there are 3 women in the intake department, but I haven't seen any female nurses or doctors there in the 10 years I've been visiting. Although I do believe the 2 physical therapy techs are women. All of that said, the hospital is painfully understaffed and only operating at like 20% actual capacity.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 09:30 PM
1

That's a bit disingenuous, don't you think? Since that 43% is only accounting for female farmers in developing countries. It doesn't actually count women farmers globally. And when you consider that in the USA alone, farming is 86% male, the numbers you are listing are obviously biased towards proving your point without factually examining the entire issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 09:28 PM
1

Like I am pretty sure that if all the construction workers of the world suddenly disappeared, civilization would survive much longer than if all the nurses and elementary school teachers suddenly disappeared. Stated like someone who has never lived or worked in a 3rd world/highly impoverished country. Here's a clue: not all teachers or nurses/medical professional are women. In fact, prior to the 70s or so, most teachers were men. But your sexist views are duly noted.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 09:10 PM
1

Motherfuckers, automation is gonna wipe away a ton of male jobs. Meh, there will always be a need for someone to fix/maintain the machines, and women aren't exactly lining up for manual labor type jobs in industrial sectors.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 08:54 PM
1

I can totally see how the dishonest plate-spinners can create a couple sluts/alpha widows by lying, manipulation and causing tremendous psychological damage. Are you saying your example slut in this case has no personal agency whatsoever? That even though she was lied to, she didn't actually choose to have sex with multiple/lots of men? Was she forced?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 07:03 PM
1

I'm curious as to why a "plate spinning" man is responsible for the actions and choices of a woman he is sleeping with. Does she have no agency herself?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 07:01 PM
1

i don't engage in casual sex Yet still a slut-beast? I get that it's just a flair, but this seems contradictory.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 04:53 PM
0

Stop using your biases and really think these through, young lady! That's not an expectation I would hold if I were you. It isn't likely to happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 04:52 PM
1

Hence I said "socioeconomic." Sounds like unnecessary elitism on your part. I know pipe welders who make $250k+ for only working 6-8 months out of the year. I also know teachers and nurses who make $50k or less. Your life isn't necessarily representative of the grad melting pot of society. Just because you won't mingle with them, doesn't mean it doesn't ever happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 04:06 PM
1

His obviously sarcastic and hostile questions? Yes, I could answer them. But since he didn't actually ask them in good faith, I chose not to.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 03:14 PM
1

While I don't mean to belittle that, it hardly seems life-altering or vastly important. If you'll further indulge my curiosity, was your Social Studies teacher a woman? I only ask because when I was in school, I never had a male Social Studies teacher in any grade.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 02:43 AM
10

"When you get married, you make a plan to die, in a way." I can somewhat speak to that. My wife was diagnosed with terminal brain cancer 5 weeks before our 1st anniversary. When we got married, I knew that she would be okay after I died, and that I would certainly die first. All the math predicted it. But the universe, as I've learned, doesn't give a shit for math or logic or probability. Entropy is always going to be a factor. So all of the pretty platitudes are nice, but from someone who's alr…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 08:38 PM
3

Well, it shows that it's an outlier for sure. The study doesn't disclose the actual incomes of the families involved, and I suspect that scenario is only happening among the "trophy wives" of very wealthy men. I know it's anecdotal, bu my buddy Nick just got divorced this last May after 10 years of marriage. His wife never worked during that time, despite having 2 advanced degrees. He also paid for multiple cosmetic surgeries that she requested. Now, he has to pay for her house (that he bought b…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 06:04 PM
3

Just because you weren't able to do it doesn't mean someone else couldn't. The fact that you believe your own opinion to be absolute and are openly hostile towards someone telling you their life experience contradicts it makes you the dictionary definition of a bigot, btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 05:35 PM
3

EDIT: https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/files/iser_working_papers/2008-07.pdf I don't know if you bothered to actually read this study, but it finds that most men without children experience less than 5% extra income, and only after 13+ months post divorce. Men with children did not experience a similar income increase. It also shows that women who were in a household in which the man was the main provider of over 65% of the household income were the demographic whose income consistently went down, b…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 05:20 PM
3

Anyone who has lived through this period will tell you what I am saying is true. I've lived through this period, and you are wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 05:01 PM
5

Whoah there, Chester! That's an awful lot of bullshit in there. Who are you to dictate to others how to live their lives? Personally, I got married at 25 and my wife died when I was 29. So I was single in my 30s by no fault or choice of my own. And here you come condemning me for it. Telling me that being single isn't fun. That I have no friends. That casual sex isn't fun or gratifying in any way. Well maybe it isn't for you, but guess what - your standards mean nothing for my life. So maybe you…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 04:57 PM
1

I'm not excluding them, I just see it a lot from the die-hard BP crowd. They seem pretty entrenched in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 09:41 PM
2

What if he ejaculates on my face but I never touched his penis? Well that's just masturbation on his part. What if it was ten guys? Circle-jerk?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 08:36 PM
1

Whatever helps you sleep better at night, peanut.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 08:33 PM
1

Yep, tone policing at its best. I expected nothing less from you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 08:15 PM
1

Your response tells me that you know absolutely nothing about me, but you are still willing to draw conclusions based on fuck all. Which also tells me that you are an illogical and irrational person. So naturally you're into policing anyone who disagrees with you, like you just tried to do to me. Here's a hint for the future, don't ever try to tell someone about their own lived experiences when you don't know shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:49 PM
1

I'm talking about all "fems". Rad, lib, equity, eco, marxist, neo, socialist, cultural, et al. Every feminist group I have ever encountered was only too happy to thought and tone police anyone who didn't toe the party line.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:28 PM
1

They reject the idea that personality should be gendered and policed. Gendered, maybe. But they police the hell out of anyone they don't approve the "tone" of.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:18 PM
3

It's probably because most BP'ers live in this "just world fallacy" bubble, so pointing out the double standard to them forces them to see, if even momentarily, that the world isn't fair and they are full of shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:06 PM
1

Incidentally, when you use a word like "all", it is no longer a generalization, it is an absolute. I get what you're trying to say, and I'm not necessarily disagreeing, I'm just making the case that you didn't actually answer OP's question at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 04:35 PM
1

You've misrepresented me completely, especially in my answers. No I haven't, which is why I keep asking you about them, so you could further explain. You chose not to. You've taken my sarcasm and made it out that I think I'm psychic and have magical powers. Either you don't understand the definition of sarcasm, or this is a sad misdirection. YOU made the claim that you could understand RP'ers thoughts, not me. I asked you to back that up, and you couldn't, going as far as to say it was sarcasm b…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 06:26 PM
1

I'm going to repeat the line my sense of sarcasm is clearly going unnoticed. And I'll repeat that it's incoherent. Or perhaps nonexistent. Or perhaps a pleasant fiction to cover your ass because you refuse to admit you said something dumb and won't take it back. I try to be honest and avoid dishonesty. You should try it sometime. I haven't said a single dishonest or untrue thing in this entire exchange, unlike your claim to the supernatural. In fact, I've mostly been asking you questions which y…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 06:16 PM
1

I did answer them. No, you didn't. I specifically asked: "What are you doing when you say you are "getting a sense of what they're thinking and feeling"? How are you doing that? What is your process?" To which you replied: "My process of thinking that maybe TRP is a hate group is clearly out of whack." Can you not see how this isn't actually an explanation of your process, simply a blanket statement? Can you also not see that you just admitted that your own process doesn't work, if it's "out of …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 06:10 PM
1

So you're not going to answer my questions at all. Not really surprising in the slightest. And where did I ever make any claims about them not hating women? Can you show me? (Not that I expect you to answer this question either) All I did was point out that you stated that you have magical powers, and I asked you to prove it. You balked at that idea, and went on to expound further by changing the subject and doing exactly what OP describes BP'ers doing wantonly. When I gave you the opportunity t…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 06:01 PM
3

Assuming public schools= low income is just silly. I assumed no such thing. As you can see by my statement of: "Many likely went to school surrounded by women of varying socio-economic classes." I'm sorry if you are having issues with reading comprehension.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 05:39 PM
1

Still sounds like projection. You are taking the worst-case scenario and applying it to all men with poor romantic luck. And admitting to making fun of them really just places you squarely into the "shitty person" camp you are so desperate to place them in as well. So I hope you're happy with your slightly different flavor of shittiness that you've built for yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 05:19 PM
1

As in, I do get laid so why would I be projecting about it? Because maybe it's so rare an occurrence, and you are not in a long term relationship, so you need to "other" these men to separate yourself from them in the hopes that doing so will put you in women's good graces.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 05:09 PM
5

Do you really think the women in the social circles of men attending MIT are rejecting the MIT guys and having sex with men in gangs Keep in mind that the MIT men had to go to high school somewhere. Many likely went to school surrounded by women of varying socio-economic classes. You can see by their own admission stats that the vast majority of their students came from public schools. So assuming there is no overlap is a massive fallacy on your part. Then again, I doubt you bothered to lookup a…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 05:07 PM
4

Your wit and breadth of wisdom knows no bounds. Truly you have humbled me.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 05:04 PM
1

But I... do get laid? If you're asking a question about it, then I highly doubt its veracity. Why would you be so desperate to frame these men as terrible people, if not to make yourself out to not be one of them? Do you have any concrete evidence to back your claims?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 04:59 PM
5

And yet by your own admission, you obviously spend time gathering data on this phenomenon. Which would contradict your claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 04:56 PM
5

So you have no source other then your own biased observations? Are you actually tracking the numbers of these posts and cross-referencing usernames to verify that they are the same people? Or are you just making shit up so you don't look like a petty liar on the internet?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 04:53 PM
6

Does that mean you agree with my properly qualified point? No. Or are you just arguing semantics to no particular end. Also no. What, pray tell, am I projecting? "Psychological projection, also known as blame shifting, is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against their own unpleasant impulses by denying their existence while attributing them to others. For example, a person who is rude may constantly accuse other people of being rude." Given the above, and your statements …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 04:50 PM
4

But most people who subscribe are angry children who have always been angry with women, never tried, and expected people to love them for who they are when in reality they are bitter, lazy, and have no talent. Do you have a source for this, or are you simply projecting your own insecurities?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 04:45 PM
2

Just because you make your point condescendingly doesn't mean you're right. Expressing it with condescension doesn't mean I'm right. You being wrong means I'm right.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 04:41 PM
7

No, you didn't. In fact, what you said was: More that, if you've never been able to get laid, there is a common denominator in play (it's you) and you're probably not a very nice person. Your sexual success does not determine your character (unless you have none and deal with it in the worst way), but your sexual success is probably a crude proxy of your quality of character. Nowhere in those statements were any details about interacting with women a lot, or going on dates at all. And even then,…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 04:37 PM
2

And yet that still doesn't contradict my point. Using "total" would still make it an oxymoron. As would "complete", "utter", "entire", "perfect", and "outright". All of those words imply a totality, which does not work with "generalization", because as you can see from the definition of that word, it requires an inference from specific cases, and therefore cannot be a totality. Also, using an accepted definition does not diminish my point simply because a word has more than one. I understand tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 04:34 PM
2

So I use that to get a sense of what they're thinking and feeling and all of a sudden, I'm psychic. Okay, so let's break it down. What are you doing when you say you are "getting a sense of what they're thinking and feeling"? How are you doing that? What is your process? Because it seems like you cannot separate words on the internet from the complete day-to-day thoughts and actions of people. Even though I'm willing to bet how you act on Reddit isn't necessarily 100% representative of who you a…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 04:28 PM
2

The words "absolute" and "generalization" do not make an oxymoron. Maybe if, once again, we are faced with the fact that you don't understand the actual definition of those words. Here, I'll help you out, since you seem to be reliant completely on your own rhetoric instead of facts. ox·y·mo·ron - noun a figure of speech in which apparently contradictory terms appear in conjunction ab·so·lute - adjective viewed or existing independently and not in relation to other things; not relative or compara…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 04:20 PM
4

Sometimes I don't get a thing because I am a woman. Such as? I'm genuinely curious here.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 04:11 PM
2

Sure I do. But I'm not the one claiming to read people's minds over the internet. That's all you, peanut. If you believe that such a claim is preposterous, then perhaps you shouldn't be making it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 04:04 PM
7

I don't see what's so controversial about thinking that, if a succession of people don't like you very much, you're probably a shitty person. Perhaps because you are overlooking the obvious: those people don't dislike "him", they don't even acknowledge "his" existence. There is a world of difference between the two, and to automatically assume that "he" is at fault is what makes it a biased, sexist, and shameful line of thinking. But that's bloops for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 04:02 PM
3

The blue pills existence is based on satire Maybe originally. Now they're just SRS-lite.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 03:52 PM
4

You're a psychic? That's awesome! What am I thinking right now?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 03:50 PM
2

I'm making a point against absolute generalizations. I'm saying that there is no such thing as an "absolute generalization". In fact, that's an oxymoron unto itself. Nothing can be both absolute AND generalized. You attempting to justify your bias and prejudices using an oxymoron is even more telling. It's literally justification by contradiction. You would make an excellent Republican Presidential Candidate with that line of reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 03:47 PM
4

Oh god I do understand what a theory is. If so, then your incorrect usage of the term was intentional. Which implies that you were using a rhetorical device in order to defend your biases. In a thread about generalizations, the irony of that seems to be lost on you. (Assuming you also know the actual definition of irony as well)
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 03:37 PM
3

Incidentally, saying "nuh uh, other people do it more" isn't really an acceptable answer to a "why" question, or valid method of debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 03:31 PM
1

Why if the 40 year old is a 9? More baggage. She may be attractive, but she probably has kids and at least 1 ex husband. She'd be better in bed Maybe, but not a guarantee. In my experience, the hotter girls are usually more entitled in bed and less prone to enthusiastically engage in sex, as they are used to men going crazy over them for their looks alone. Thus they've never had to learn to be good at sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 06:14 PM
1

I meant bald as in "no hair" or shaved head already, not "balding" as in bald spot with a rim of hair, ie: male pattern baldness. (Which I've always thought got a bad rap, since it's carried in the X chromosome and transmitted by a dude's mother anyway)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 03:37 AM
2

She still treated him like shit and her marriage fell apart. Gee...wonder why.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 03:33 AM
2

Widowed men are a catch. Being a widower myself, I once overheard a lady say "I love widowers. They can commit and are single through no fault of their own."
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 03:31 AM
3

I volunteer as tribute
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 03:28 AM
1

Just to play devil's advocate, what about bald guys? No haircut can help, and many will automatically disqualify a bald dude, even if he looks good otherwise and has a good personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 03:27 AM
4

This is silly and doesn't merit a real response. If you feel that your post and comments cannot stand up to scrutiny, and you must resort to insults rather than logical rebuttals, then you have no business posting in a debate sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 03:19 AM
2

So your objection is what, exactly? That the English language is alive and well? I don't see "female solipsism" as being any different than, say, "toxic masculinity" as far as idiomatic use goes.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 08:51 PM
3

By definition yours, belle.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 06:30 PM
4

So you can't, is what you're saying? Gotcha.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 06:26 PM
5

I'm not talking about how they look, belle. You said you're not talking about actual nice guys, just the stereotypical "nice guys". I'm asking you how you can tell the difference between the two types on sight. And how do you know you're only mocking one type and not mistakenly mocking an actual nice guy?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 05:52 PM
6

The more liberal or feminist a woman is, the more likely she will lean towards a classic Red Pill type of man anyway for an LTR, and will also seek out these types of men for ONS. I've personally seen this in action recently. My little sister's best friend is a biochemistry lab tech at a university. So she works in both STEM and academia. She is also your typical purple-haired, lip-pierced, upper middle class, white tumblr feminist. She doesn't really "date", but she has been having a near endle…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 05:47 PM
6

I am talking strictly about the "nice guys" I described above. And you can separate them out from the normal nice guys on sight and never ever confuse or conflate one for the other how, exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 05:41 PM
1

It doesn't chop my balls that one in a billion women has the chops to invent Perhaps you should lookup the definition of that word. Because logically, she didn't. She refined a design, she did not invent anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 05:29 PM
1

Holding the patent just means she registered it for trademark and copyright, it doesn't mean she invented it. As seen above, the technology was already 166 years old by the time she did anything with it. In fact, Florence's fiancee was the one who did the electrical wiring in her fridge, so even saying she "invented" the modern electrical refrigerator isn't entirely true either.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 05:21 PM
1

this was my issue with the other c word Chinese? That's just racist. (/s)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 05:10 PM
3

but the refrigerator was invented by a woman William Cullen at the University of Glasgow demonstrated the first artificial refrigeration system in the year 1748. However, he never used his discovery for practical purposes. In the year 1805, US inventor Oliver Evans, designed the first refrigeration machine that didn't use liquid and instead used vapor to cool. So, um, no. You are incorrect.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 05:06 PM
1

Chromosomes don't work that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 05:04 PM
2

I wouldn't say it's ever "free", per se.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 04:44 AM
3

Most women are not actually prostitutes. Well, maybe in the sense of directly transactional sex. Most women exchange goods & services for sex, but only a small percentage actually exchange money for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 11:27 PM
17

You are obviously not aware of the Gawker Media empire built upon that very premise.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 11:25 PM
7

Plus their advice is almost always: "Break up now". Which isn't exactly a working alternative.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 10:33 PM
1

I love how your reply to being called out on your "other people do it too" rhetoric is to literally say "other people do it too". The irony seems to be lost on you, though. Also, assuming I'm upset because I'm pointing out your debating flaws is simply projection, and sad at that, because it allows you to internally dismiss everything I've said and continue on as normal, secure in your ivory tower of ignorance and judgment.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 08:56 PM
7

Then please enlighten me and link to where that has ever happened without any form of strawman or ad-hom of RP.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 08:47 PM
16

What is Blue Pill sexual strategy, exactly? There isn't one. They simply say "RP doesn't work" but cannot explain why or offer any working alternative.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 08:44 PM
1

When said observation adds nothing to the debate, and only acts as a shorthand for "I'm not reading that" in a very dismissive way, it isn't exactly adding anything to the thread. I mean, if you want observations alone, I'll happily start replying to all of your "but but but men do that too" comments with my own observations of your debate strategies. Sadly, I think I may have just listed the one you use most often already.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 08:41 PM
0

In other words, not debating in good faith?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 08:27 PM
5

Godwin's Law?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 08:16 PM
1

Was that supposed to be a logical counter or rebuttal to anything he actually said?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 08:15 PM
1

Probably because they came to you, with little to no effort on your part.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 10:08 PM
1

If a women hits a man and he doesn't hit her back, there is supposed to be no question and she should be arrested. Yes, but police also aren't supposed to shoot unarmed civilians, but that shit happens all the time, and to say otherwise is intellectually dishonest. If the man is arrested in that case it is at worst a gross violation of the law and his rights, or at best a mistake on the part of the police. And the police NEVER violate the law or make mistakes, right? You make two contradictory c…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 07:18 PM
2

EVERY state has a "Primary Aggressor Stature" No they don't. In fact, if you check YOUR OWN LINK you'll only see 38 states on board. I know math is hard, but 38 is not EVERY state, as you are claiming. Not a single state has a statute that says anything about the gender of the parties involved being a factor in determining which party is at fault, or which party to arrest. I'd like to point you to Kentucky then, whose policy is to arrest the male by default. (Or rather to arrest the party "most …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 06:39 PM
3

You won't see topless women walking down 6th ave in NYC Incidentally, it's already perfectly legal for women to go topless in NYC.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/15 10:31 PM
1

How would you write a paper on that? It's basic fact. No, it isn't. Unless you don't understand the actual dictionary definitions of the terms. For instance, by its very nature "dimorphic" represents a biological entity that exists in two different forms, ie: binary. Humans, homo sapiens, do not exist as more than 2 biological sexes. Hence we are, in fact, a sexually binary species. That does not mean that we have a binary sexuality or binary sexual gender preference. It simply means that at bir…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/15 10:12 PM
0

Depends on the state. If it occurs in a state that has adopted the Primary Aggressor standards, then it absolutely IS correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/15 10:02 PM
1

I think it would be difficult at best, and nightmarish at worst to even attempt a quantification. Since most women I know at one point or another in their lives held this view -though likely while still young and inexperienced.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/15 09:50 PM
1

Biologically, yes it is. And I challenge you to provide a single peer-reviewed paper by an accredited organization that says otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/15 09:47 PM
1

The point is that it's a more common belief than perhaps you are giving it credit for. Especially if I could pull examples from just this sub in just the last week, and we're a relatively insulated community in a tiny corner of the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/15 09:39 PM
2

Well, 4 days ago on this very sub, EmpressofMars stated that a little bit of extra PT in boot camp could bring women pup to the same level of physical strength as male soldiers.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/15 09:38 PM
2

Really? Because just a couple days ago in this very sub, EmpressofMars outright said that she believes a little bit of extra PT could even out the differences in strength between male and female soldiers.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/15 09:35 PM
1

Stating the origin of a term is not a "dated definition" by any standards. Like I said, misguided. I weep for your future.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/15 04:31 PM
2

Thanks for the snide attempt at correction, but just because you've bought into a misappropriation of terminology doesn't make it right. It just makes its adherents misguided.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 07:52 PM
7

You're misunderstanding what the term "rape culture" means. Actually, you are. The term originates from a 1975 documentary about men being raped in prison, and how that had become normalized, expected, and just part of the rehabilitation process; instead of a heinous crime.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 03:19 PM
1

Same reason feminists promote such ideas as "Teach men not to rape".
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 03:16 PM
1

Me too, hence calling you out on yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 01:49 AM
1

You are part of the problem and you in all your TRP glory That's an awful lot of projection from someone who clearly lacks any sort of reading comprehension proficiency. Do I have a red flair? No. Thanks for your immense short-sightedness. It seems like "Be Shitty" is firmly part of YOUR playbook.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/15 04:33 PM
2

So you're saying that women can't even kill themselves as successfully as men can? Is that really a statistic you want to be on top of?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/15 04:17 PM
2

Yes it is! Went to Guero's on S. Congress while the ladies were shopping on Black Friday, and then hit up Torchy's on Saturday. I honestly don't want my queso any other way now.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/15 03:59 PM
1

Until then , TRP is essentially what TRPillers say it is. And that's different from every other ideology in existence how, exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/15 03:57 PM
2

So you're an Aussie who has no legal expertise and is not qualified to practice in your own country (judging by the fact that you've claimed to be a firefighter and not an attorney), yet you are assuming that you know how the American legal system works? Sounds like unjustified and undeserved arrogance to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/15 03:19 PM
2

Not yet anyway. He didn't mention a specific timeline. :-p
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/15 03:26 PM
1

Totally unrelated anecdote: I was in Austin, TX for Thanksgiving to visit some friends, and we went out for tacos and such. Apparently putting guacamole in the queso dip is a common thing in Austin. I'd had guac and queso separately before many times, but mixed together it became something infinitely better than the sum of its parts. Gooey nectar of the gods indeed. Anyway, that's all I had.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/15 03:24 PM
1

Not owning a uterus of my own, I've never gone to get one for myself. But I went with my sister for support when she got one. There wasn't any dramatic fuss or issues with the performing doctor try to dissuade her. Everyone was extremely courteous and professional. That said, your question is irrelevant to my point, and does not rebut it any way.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/15 02:43 PM
2

I think you are vastly underestimating the physiological differences in upper body strength between the sexes, and exactly how long it would take to overcome that difference with PT alone. But I appreciate your intentions.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/15 12:32 AM
2

The weaker ones could also serve in more administrative roles or as roles such as pilots, medics, etc, not necessarily ground troops. Like I said, slippery slope. You can't have 2 sets of regulations, as it would create a "stronger" and "weaker" caste, as per your example. And that is unacceptable for morale and team fitness. Also, there are currently many female pilots, including Naval/Marine fighter pilots. And medic is by default a ground troop. Almost every combat squad on deployment has a "…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 11:31 PM
3

I agree. But that brings up another slippery slope argument, which is physical requirements of battle-ready soldiers. There has been a long debate about changing the physical requirements that soldiers must meet so that more women are qualified for combat roles. However, this alteration means that you are potentially risking other soldiers' lives unnecessarily, as in the case of a female soldier not being able to carry her wounded squadmate out of a hot zone.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 11:24 PM
2

I'm not Proto, but he probably means things like Selective Service. If you are male, you MUST register for the Selective Service or you are not allowed to go to college or hold a government job. Women are not held to this responsibility before being allowed to attend college or hold government jobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 11:16 PM
5

That line of reasoning relies upon the massive assumption that no woman ever lies about wanting children.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 07:14 PM
4

none of them are starving. Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 07:11 PM
2

That's still support that is "external of oneself" and still in effect when one is otherwise engaged. The fact that it is paid for by one's labor means little.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 06:57 PM
5

Only recently did generic birth control become free. So you're saying that women don't have any excuse now?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 06:25 PM
2

I wouldn't consider your hired staff external. Well they certainly aren't internal.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 06:24 PM
5

taibo is a dude, though. So the rabbit hole goes deeper.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 06:14 PM
5

god forbid we take a sympathetic view of women who have unwanted pregnancies The difference is that those women have options. They don't have to carry the pregnancy to term. No one is holding a gun to their heads and making them go through with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 06:12 PM
1

Well not with that attitude! Now get out there and give it the ol' college try!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 05:21 PM
4

If they're cool with the professional camgirl thing, they'll likely be cool with a gangbang too.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 05:17 PM
3

Considering T-Pain literally exclaims "I fucked a mermaid" during the song, I don't think it's innuendo.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 05:13 PM
1

I did my college cluster in Queer Theory and also have a minor in sociology, pretty sure I know more about it than you from spending a day reading stuff on the internet. Okay, then please present some peer-reviewed and tested data that supports it in any way. This should be easy for you, since you are so confident in it. Or is your usual tactic to take offense, retaliate with ad hominems of your own, and never actually present any factual data to backup your claims?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 02:55 PM
1

I love how you attempt to critique my writing style, and then follow it with: However, one could argue that posts submitted on reddit do not need to apply to the same standard one would utilize when writing, say, a to-be-published textbook. And then you attempt to critique it again. Please attempt to maintain an internally consistent stance. Things like this are what prevent you from being taken seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 02:51 PM
1

Did you hear little girls giggling about penis size in the 8th grade? Yep. Especially in gym class when everyone had to wear those ridiculously short shorts.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/15 09:54 PM
1

I live in Memphis, TN - the first majority black city in the US. I can confirm that black women, like women of any other ethnicity, can age very well if they take care of their bodies and eat well. Similarly, I can also confirm that black women, like women of any other ethnicity, can age VERY BADLY if they do not take care of their bodies and eat poorly.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/15 09:40 PM
1

You had to ask your gf, meaning you didn't know it was happening when you were also in the 8th grade. That's an awfully big assumption on your part. I asked her so that I would have a female perspective on whether or not what you were saying held any merit. Because if I directly contradicted you otherwise, you'd likely have said that since I'm a male, I wouldn't know what junior high girls felt or talked about. If anything, I asked her for YOUR benefit. But thanks for the unnecessary projection.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/15 09:27 PM
1

But this kind of talk doesn't start until a woman's mid-20s I just asked my gf about this and she said her volleyball team in the 8th grade was already talking about this kind of thing. Not sexual performance necessarily, but definitely about "hot guys and dicks" (her words). I think perhaps your experience is not universal here.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/15 09:02 PM
1

You just said I wasn't even asking a question, then you answered my two questions. You need to join MENSA. I know you have trouble counting dearest, but you only asked 1 question. Your second point was a declarative statement, not a question. Sincerely, MENSA member
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/15 08:48 PM
1

You have high school boys talking about how much they love big boobies and it's "oh boys will be boys" while there is no excusing girls talking about dicks (it's so unladylike). You've clearly never been to a bar with a group of other women before then. There's a circle of them at my local watering hole who are constantly and loudly talking about their most recent hookups, bfs, etc and their dicks/sexual performance. They don't seem to be operating as if it isn't socially acceptable or unladylik…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/15 08:44 PM
1

I feel that if I felt that there was a matriarchy messing stuff up (which I don't, but let's say I do) I feel that I have enough conviction about beliefs generally that I would AVOID having children and perpetuating the cycle of matriarchy, considering that some of these children may be girls. To me that sounds logical. Not to nitpick, but you just ascribed logic to something you specifically mentioned feeling three times in one sentence. Logic doesn't really work that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/15 08:35 PM
1

So much for critical thinking in institutes of so-called "higher learning".
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/15 07:11 PM
1

Sadly we now have a generation of people who cannot read or understand body language due to most of their human interaction being digital on a phone screen. This has already been documented a few places. There's even a Psychology Today article on it, but it's behind a paywall, sadly.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/15 06:53 PM
4

Not knowing where to eat seems like more of a guy stereotype to me. I'm pretty sure everyone here could point a finger to the other sex for this behavior, based solely on their own personal experience. Most people don't want to admit to perceived "negative" traits in themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/15 06:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter