TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

runitonce007 Archive

View 2 posts and 224 comments by runitonce007 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Right, but being responsible isn't attractive as an individual quality.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/16 01:30 AM
2

Yeah, by 'successful', I meant lasting. I dare say plenty of the men & women are also happy - at least to an extent - but it's hard to tell. In any case, it doesn't really appeal to me. I don't want to dominate my wife, but nor do I relish the idea of a marriage that resembles an employer-employee relationship with some companionship thrown in. I can be quite sarcastic (usually in an attempt to be funny) & this obviously isn't everybody's cup of tea. But whilst some women take offence very easil…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/16 01:10 AM
3

I'd like to think not, but most successful marriages do seem to resemble that dynamic. I enjoy dating & being around women that have personality & will call me out on my bullshit, as long as they can take some of their own medicine occasionally. This doesn't seem to be typical of any of the long-lasting marriages I see or hear of though
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/16 12:32 AM
2

Women marry responsible men later in life because it makes their life easier. That's not 'attraction'. 28 yr-old women aren't 'attracted' to wealthy old men, but they'll fall over themselves to marry them. Maintaining a marriage does seem to require that the man adopt an awful lot of beta traits. If he doesn't, the marriage doesnt last. In most functioning marriages, the Dad works like a dog & his needs are way down the list of priorities behind the wife & children - hence the "Happy wife, happy…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/16 11:54 PM
1

......the plot thickens
/r/MGTOW09/07/16 05:18 PM
7

Yeah. The vast majority of men bragging about having lots of sex are - shock, horror - exaggerating. A couple of my friends are pretty much studs. They are very good looking & dont have to work hard to get very attractive women. The rest of my friends waver around average - say from 4/10 to 7/10 (myself included) - & they all have all gone looooong periods without sex
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/16 12:21 AM
4

Funnily enough, just yesterday, a friend of mine (28, moderately attractive) was shaming a guy who had tried contacting her again after she had ignored him on a dating site. Her exact words were; "if I replied to every pile of flesh that contacts me, then I'd never get anything done". That's how much attention they get
/r/MGTOW19/06/16 01:58 AM
5

Correct. Just because a variety of attributes are important, doesn't mean all attributes are of equal importance. Attractive men don't have to jump through hoops to get women - quite the opposite. Interestingly, the dating roles defined by gender are somewhat reversed for attractive men. Instead of worrying about working on their 'game', & having to pass 'shit tests' in order to pursue women, the women pursue them. However, physical fitness does play a big part in looking attractive. Some men lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/16 12:03 AM
5

They talk degradingly about women, & then basically dedicate their lives in pursuit of those women. They complain that the game is rigged because average women can sleep with attractive men, & then their advice is to put crazy amounts of effort into trying to compete in that rigged game. Fucking laughable.
/r/MGTOW29/05/16 01:52 AM
2

lol, no you didnt. Even if you killed yourself in the gym & somehow managed to put on 22lbs in 5wks, you haven't put on anywhere near as much actual muscle as you think you have. This is a common misconception & the reason lots of serious bodybuilders hate the word "bulk" - its intentional meaning has been diluted after being bandied around be gym goers who have no idea what it really means
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 11:56 AM
2

It doesn't make me angry. It's just when you haven't seen your friend for a month or so, & then the next time you show up at his house the girl he just met is moving in, its a natural reaction to think "slow down a fucking minute". Honestly, I hope this works out. But if it doesn't he'll only have himself to blame. That goes for anyone else on this sub who rushed in headfirst like this too. Very naive
/r/MGTOW13/04/16 12:04 AM
5

Remember hearing about this story a while back, but Holy fucking sh1t, I didn't imagine it to be this bad
/r/MGTOW04/03/16 06:06 PM
1

I think they do find it interesting. Maybe they didn't 30yrs ago but the celebrity culture now is crazy. Every aspect of their lives is news. If it were happening regularly, we'd be hearing about it regularly.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 02:05 AM
1

Stop derailing my narrative with facts. Cheers . Lol, in all seriousness, it happens but it genuinely must be about 2% of cases
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 02:03 AM
1

How is being attracted to a smokin' hot ass any different than being attracted to personality or intelligence? Just because all attraction is to some degree shallow, doesn't mean all attraction is equally shallow. The situations you described just sound like women using men for their money. There's no attraction. It sounds like we need to rewrite wedding vows because apparently this "for better or worse, for richer or poorer" is a load of BS. It's not in women's DNA, you see. It's weird that pre…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 01:05 AM
1

I can't remember an instance of a female actress or sportstar ever marrying, or even dating, a normal working class guy. It doesn't happen. Women tennis players date the No1 golfer in the World, the founder of reddit, Hollywood stars, etc. Andy Murray is with the girl he met at 15. Women & men are both attracted to hot members of the opposite sex. You said earlier that people aren't attracted to what's on paper but women do choose based on this method. They will dismiss a physical attraction if …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 12:27 AM
1

No, I'm more attracted to the hot girl, just like women are more attracted to the hot man in the same situation. Because of this ATTRACTION, I would marry this hot girl if we proved to be compatible over time. Even if I was rich and she was poor. A woman would not. Brad Pitt isn't getting with Angelina Jolie if he just worked in a bank. Despite her being attracted to him, he has literally zero chance. Yet rich famous men date 'down', & marry high-school sweethearts all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/16 11:57 PM
1

Why are you so sure it's 'attraction'? And not just a calculated attempt to go after the highest status man (in looks &/or money) that they can get?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/16 11:09 PM
1

Errr, no,desire & want are identical to me, I just didn't feel like using the same word. Overall, you could be right, I just have a hard time accepting this mindset. Evidence could somewhat support the theory but it's hard to tell. Women paired up with tough, alpha men in years gone by, but this may have been more out of calculated necessity than attraction. Weaker men ended up dead
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/16 10:52 PM
1

The desire to want chocolate cake isn't a flaw but wanting to eat it when you've already eaten a shitload is pretty much greed 101. A failure to stop yourself is definitely a lack of self-control.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/16 10:10 PM
2

Yep. I'd rather be in a marriage where I spend my holidays watching paint dry with a woman whose company I enjoy, than go the Bahamas in a 'loveless void', as you aptly describe it. I can't empathise with the fact that so many women apparently wouldn't. It also makes marriage vows like "for better or worse, richer or poorer" a laughable crock of shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/16 10:05 PM
1

Greed & a lack of self-control. That's that settled then. I wish people would stop pretending every decision they make is out of their own control
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/16 09:55 PM
1

Yep. But is that 'biological attraction' or just animal self preservation? It seems really hard to tell
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/16 08:32 PM
1

All attraction is somewhat shallow, but some is obviously more shallow than others. This is the part where everyone gives women a free pass & posts that they're 'biologically programmed' to like the guys with the most money. No evidence for this theory, mind. This is the sort of explanation that would explain the behaviour of a primate, not a highly sophisticated human being with an IQ over 100
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/16 08:29 PM
1

Where's the evidence that's it's biological? If it was about providing for ones offspring then why do millionaire female tennis players need a man with even more money than them? It's very strange. Women seem to choose men the way I'd shop for a car - very cold-bloodedly.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/16 08:19 PM
0

Reads opening post & starts to reads comments. Goes back & checks username of thread starter Chuckles
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/16 05:57 PM
1

Shallow standards? Not really - men have low standards. They're bound to be picky about something, ie' weight. As long as a woman isn't overly fat then then she'll do well. Seriously, how hard is that?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 05:25 PM
2

Ha. I've known women to turn down a man because the shoes he was wearing werent fashionable. Surely if men dont care about personality, money, ambition,etc, then they have low standards? Women 'settle' because their ideal man is so unrealistic for a normal human being
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 05:03 PM
1

There's no such thing a 'single mother' ffs, unless the Dad is dead or something. If you willingly brought a child into the World then strap on a pair, be a man, & help look after it. If the Dad made it clear he didnt want children then that's a different matter entirely. He should be able to opt out, just like women can opt out.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 02:56 PM
2

Agreed. Although I do think most men grow out of that phase -some at 18, some at 25, or 30. But some probably never do
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 02:26 PM
10

That women want to be treated as inferior is very questionable. That many women are willing to tolerate as being treated as inferior by attractive &/or rich men is undeniable. This whole "treat em mean, keep em keen" strategy works because its attractive guys doing it. Women don't tolerate that behavior from an average Joe. A 7/10 woman will put with a lot of crap from a guy who is a 9/10, or a guy providing a lavish lifestyle. They like feeling special. Being with a guy who is their equal or ne…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 02:17 AM
1

I'm referring more to men who are on the attractive side of average. Guys in the 5-7 range (genuinely,not just in their heads). Ugly men are with ugly women. Hot men are with hot women. But decent looking women often hold out for hot men and get them, leaving decent looking men in limbo somewhat. They can't often hold onto those men, which is where this 'all men are assholes' narrative comes from, even though they were dating men out of their league in the first place
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 06:37 PM
2

Depends what you mean by sexually active. It also depends what your standards are. I think many men are having an increasing problem getting laid with their female equivalent, yes, because women tend to look 'up' in dating terms & frequently overestimate their own attractiveness. Some men are delusional about their attractiveness too but when you're the one doing all the pursuing, & jumping through hoops, & buying the spiel about 'confidence & personality', its only natural that you'll approach …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 12:15 AM
3

Haha. Imagine you were looking to launch a product for women & said; "I've done some market research & most women don't like it, but I can think of at least 5 off the top of my head that do, so therefore, there is no reason to think this product cant be successful". You'd be laughed out of the room. Also, the women who, when asked, constantly say they value personality & confidence the most are the ones giving guys the impression they like personality & confidence. Honestly, I think women have s…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 11:30 PM
4

Yep. Wasn't suggesting otherwise
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 09:48 PM
5

Depends entirely on whether you're content with being a worthless loser or not. Or at least perceived as one.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 07:17 PM
5

Make no mistake, there are good looking guys out there who have behaved in all manner of ways around women, & almost never been called creepy. Its subjective & very linked to physical appearance, although your general manner will definitely have an affect. I have female friends who have called guys 'creepy', & when I ask what happened, it turns out the guy basically just asked them their name. When I laughed, & explained that thats not really creepy, they just said "I don't care. I'm not interes…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 10:41 PM
2

More often than not, they get away with it. Rewarded, infact. So they keeping do it
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 10:34 PM
3

Well, 25 is young. I think the bigger issue is the amount of women who let their looks go alarmingly quickly. In places like Spain, Italy, eastern Europe, or South America, there are good looking women (18-40) all over the shop. Having been to these places on holiday it is actually unbelievable how much better looking the women are there...(I guess the men are too but I wouldnt notice).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 09:13 PM
5

Why would a 30 year-old grown man wanna date a teenager? Ok, he might up for a one-night-stand, but thats it. Top tier 30 year-old men are with top tier WOMEN, aka 22+
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 08:32 PM
8

U have to commend women on still managing to perpetuate this myth about them valuing personality the most, despite all the evidence to the contrary. Looks are obviously way more important. I've seen good looking guys get away with behaviour that would have gotten an ugly man slapped or worse. People with too much time on their hands have make fake tinder profiles of hot guys & posted the results. They had women flocking to them, & deliberately said the most random, weird, &\or sexual stuff. Gues…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 05:46 AM
1

Most people just get a divcorce
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/16 07:17 PM
3

Women very rarely date down, & almost never marry down. They often think they are, when in fact, they're just an average girl with an average guy. Thats the whole point of this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/16 07:15 PM
2

You started off well, but made some ridiculous comments near the end. As you say, women approach men all the time. They're not the sexually passive species they're made out to be. Thing is, this only happens to certain men, & even a very good physique wont magically attract advances for most guys. If an ugly ,average, or even fairly decent looking man takes the same approach with women as these guys who are 8/10+ in looks then he obviously wont be successful. He has to do the approaching & show …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 08:44 PM
3

For goodness sake man, stop saying 'you cannot force people'. I'm havent mentioned forcing anyone since I used the word 'mandatory' about 4 posts ago. I'm talking about raising awareness of the issue & giving people the option. Yeah, u can do it right now if you really want to, but most men won't for various reasons. It would be pointless in most cases -so what? The cases where it isnt pointless drastically alters someone's life, & those cases would also be far more common than I think u realise…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 08:54 PM
3

What can be done is that it can be talked about more & paternity tests encouraged when the child is very young - they take loads of tests when they're young, one more wont make a difference. CSA cases are besides the point & too late anyway- the kid could be 15 by then. I'm not only worried about men paying child support for an illegitimate kid they had with a woman. I'm more concerned about 'happily married' men oblivious to the reality that the child they're raising isnt theirs
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 08:34 PM
1

I just said at the bottom of the post that u can't 'enforce' it but it should be an option, & it should be discussed more. When the king (I know he's not quite king) of the fucking country has it happen to him, & it still gets swept under the carpet, then u know u have a problem
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 07:49 PM
2

A simple DNA test isnt all that expensive, its not 1985 anymore. And whys it embarrassing? Unnecessary? Siiiigh. This is the problem - we've just established why its very necessary. Society is willing to let a man sacrifice his whole life for a child that isnt his, because the alternative is that results of a paternity test might shatter the 'women are wonderful' illusion.....of a woman who has CHEATED. Of course u cant really enforce such tests by law, but if the genders were reversed in this s…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 07:25 PM
2

Meh, i dunno. Thats like saying every woman has the legal right not to be raped - it still happens. Challenging paternity could have disastrous consequences for a marriage. The problem is also way for more widespread than I ever imagined until I stumbled across an article on it. Be better if they made these tests mandatory tbh. But u would acknowledge that this is a specific problem to men caused by women?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 06:17 PM
2

False paternity. The statistics on this are frightening & its one of the worst things u could do to someone IMO. Its one thing being cheated on but imagine raising a child for years, decades even, that isnt even yours! What kind of person hides something like that. FFS, its even happened right at the top of the Royal family in the UK. Without speaking ill of Diana, everyone knows Harry is really the son of James Hewitt, & not Prince Charles. Hewitt & Harry look identical so unfortunately theres …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 04:31 PM
1

This is actually incorrect. Women all fancy the same men. They vote the vast majority as below average as I'm sure you already know. As a women, you can be 5'0 tall or 6'0" tall & still be considered attractive, & men will also wildly disagree on which woman is hotter. This doesn't apply to men. The overwhelming majority of women will prefer the tall guy in that same scenario. Similarly, put a variation of bodytypes on the screen & women will largely agree which is hotter. There wouldn't be the …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 01:34 AM
3

This kinda backs up the notion that women have all the rights & none of the responsibilities
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 12:59 AM
1

I think most men are, or at least were, fine with giving women extra leeway on certain things. I think the new wave of feminism is starting to change things though, because those same men have a big problem giving a woman leeway, when they don't appreciate it. I'm seeing so many examples of instances where men have gone out of their way to help a woman (in many instances putting their own safety at risk for a complete stranger) only to hear women say things like "thats what every man should do" …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 12:47 AM
3

haha, indeed. And it would be understandable
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 12:36 AM
1

I have little sympathy for either - male or female - unless there is something medically wrong with them. I have less for women though because the rewards for just looking OK are so much greater than if you're a man. Therefore, they have much more incentive to at least look decent. If you are in decent shape as a woman you will attract plenty of suitors - some of which will be decent guys. Keeping these men long-term may be more of a challenge but you have to put some effort in yourself, after a…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 07:42 PM
2

Well yeah. Naturally, I need food just as much as a starving African kid. But I'll want more than just any old food. He won't, for obvious reasons
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 07:30 PM
2

Often, there's a big difference between a 25 yr-old & a 35 yr-old woman - physically & mentally. Its not about the age gap in numbers. A 55yr-old dating a 35-yr-old isnt the same as a 35-yr-old dating a 16 yr-old.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 06:35 PM
3

Because he's 69 ffs, &, to him, women in the 20's are immature & he cant stand being around them. What happens when the 28 year-old he married turns 35?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 06:24 PM
2

They do choose, & they're quite calculated about it - thats the point. A multi millionaire loses his fortune & the 'attraction' gets turned off like a light switch
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 06:41 PM
1

Nah. That's like saying the biggest difference between me & a starving African kid is our desire for food. In reality, we both need similar amounts, but food is more readily available to me, so I'll be far more picky & value it less
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 01:58 PM
1

Hard to quantify with words - maybe someone like the actor Jamie Bell. Some people's ratings are ridiculous. They'll give Brad Pitt a 6/7, or Jennifer Lawrence a 5, or a reasonable looking dude 3/10. 6/10 is someone looks slightly better than average. I would consider myself a 6/10. I would consider that guy a 3 & the women a 6 or 7.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 04:34 PM
4

You realize that being thin, wearing makeup & having a nice smile is a piece of cake, right? Makeup actually makes things considerably easier. Men have to have waaayyy more going for them than that to be considered attractive & they'll be judged on much more than just looks. I see 6/10 men with worse looking women ALL the time. In fact, several of my best friends are married to such women. They're nice women, dont get me wrong, but they could never be considered good looking & earn much less mon…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 04:19 PM
3

Often in these things people exaggerate how much more attractive the woman is than the man, but in this instance its justified - she has at least 3points on him. It's somewhat dangerous when one partner considers themselves to be 'settling' or superior to the other. If this guy is wealthy I'd be concerned about the motives here.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 04:11 PM
7

Good joke. Keep em coming
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 12:23 AM
1

They can wear whatever they want. Just like a man can. Difference is, a man wouldnt walk down the street with a tank top on & then complain about people staring at his muscles or making comments. He'd be laughed off the street if he did that. If boys have to wear certain clothes to school, they why is there such an upheaval about girls having to do the same? Can boys start turning up in shorts & vests? We're constantly teaching women that the rules dont apply to them
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 01:52 PM
1

Confidence is immeasurable & somewhat subjective so people can twist these things to suit their narrative. Many men are confident around women because they've been successful with them, they're not successful because they're confident. Being confident about something you've experienced no prior success at is delusional. Confidence/personality is important but only for guys who fall into the 5/10 to 7/10 range in the looks department. Any lower than that & it wont be enough to compensate. If you'…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 01:40 PM
1

yeah, thats because you're just basing your opinion on too small a sample size. Like how people base their opinion of ALL Muslims on a few terrorists or, conversely, the few close friends they have who are muslims. Its like saying "Occasionally its cold in June. Therefore, I cant believe someone who associates June with warm weather".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 01:30 PM
8

There's a big difference between an 18 year-old & a 22 yr-old. A 30 yr-old man (like myself) wouldnt wanna be with an 18 yr-old (for various reasons) but could imagine having a relationship with a 22-yr-old.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 10:39 PM
1

Wow, thats a lot of swearing in one post. The idea that women dont control the relationship market at any age is ridiculous. By virtue of divorce courts alone, basically every married woman is in control of their relationship status
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 08:50 PM
1

All very good points. FWIW, I'm relatively familiar with the Red pill brand of thinking &, although they make some good points, I completely disagree with some elements of it. For instance, a woman's 'only value being hotness' is complete garbage.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 01:20 PM
1

I didnt know what SMV stood for but, dont get ahead of yourself, I already knew what your 1-dimensional "women are the gatekeepers" theory is all about. It's basic common sense. Thank you, captain obvious Red Pill thinks its solved the theory of relativity or something!! Haha, Christ. The idea that a decent looking woman is out of the league of an average looking guy who had multiple things going for him is ridiculous. Average looking men are realizing this at rate of knots. I've only ever been …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 10:19 PM
1

I have no idea what SMV is or means, so I dont understand the first sentence. I don't understand the 2nd sentence for all kinds of reasons. P.S ......It is ridiculous
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 09:31 PM
8

The big difference is that far more men are considered ugly than women are. The vast majority are considered below average by women, whilst men rate most women as above average. A woman really has have no redeeming features to be considered ugly, whereas a man only has to have one below average feature to mean he is categorically not going to be rated above average. This could be any one of being too short, slightly overweight, bald, looking unathletic. A man who is 6'0 tall can be considered ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/15 08:35 PM
1

I get what you're implying. Women are often not the sexually reserved species that they're made out to be, who will 'stand & wait' for a guy to approach. It's not 1965 anymore. Lots of women will be very forthright with guys that they find attractive - hot men dont have to go to huge amounts of effort to attract them. A hot guy can approach a women with the most feeble of attempts & experience success. I havent really read up much on Red Pill advice but it seems geared towards anyone not in the …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/15 02:58 PM
2

You dont think money is also a simulation of that then? U would consider that the real thing? Otherwise I agree, for the most part
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/15 03:00 PM
1

Why is first guy going to such lengths to MAYBE get regular sex? Why doesn't he just pay for it? Hell, he's probably effectively paying for it anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/15 02:12 PM
3

nah, he's right. People just dont understand what the word 'attraction' means. So if a millionaire is declared bankrupt overnight, his wife is suddenly not attracted like someone hit an 'off' switch....what a ridiculous idea. She'll leave, because she's not attracted to him & never was. She was simply settling for him.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/15 02:05 PM
1

Why is it generally accepted that women are attracted to successful men? & if it is accepted, then what does this say about them as human beings? Women are obviously attracted to good looks too, just like men are.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/15 01:59 PM
5

Errr yes, they do want casual sex. They just get it so easily that they dont see it as something to be attained.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 10:01 PM
1

.....And yet she'd still consider him to be beneath her.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 05:04 PM
1

Soucres, lol. Why does everyone always say that on here? I'm just chewing the fat on reddit not writing my finals dissertation. Sometimes you just have trust what you're seeing with your eyes rather than trust the results of some 'study' that draws conclusions with a predetermined outcome in mind from the outset.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 01:23 PM
1

No, but you're clouding the issue by taking two people at opposite ends of the spectrum. I'm not saying Emma Watson should date a 30-yr-old truck driver. I'm saying its amazing how rare it is even for a female banker on 50k p/yr to be dating the truck driver.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 12:15 AM
1

I mean, yeah, although we're getting kinda off topic here. You've gotta take the rough with the smooth. There are benefits & negatives to being both men & women. You said yourself, great looking women get treated almost like celebrities - I'm friends with a few such women & it beggars belief how much attention they get. The thing is, even average women experience this sometimes but only the absolute top tier men experience it. Of course, some of this attention will be unwanted but usually its a …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 12:11 AM
0

Agreed. And the infidelity & divorce rate for those women is also astronomical. Edit: you're also right about beautiful women getting that attention without having to be rich, famous, or successful. A few of my best friends since I was 18 are very beautiful women & the attention they get is insane. Guys throwing themselves at them just like you'd imagine girls would boy band singers. When I went travelling the World for 6 months with friends, one came with us & she slept with 3 or 4 different gu…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 11:11 PM
0

The divorce rate is far higher amongst these people, definitely. Sometimes because the men are arrogant assholes, sometimes the women are goldiggers. I will say though that the temptation for those guys is crazy - they have women flinging themselves at them. You dont have to go looking for trouble if you're wealthy & famous -it comes and knocks right on your door. Numerous famous sports agents have recounted stories that defied belief about how women would regularly behave around their clients. …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 10:49 PM
2

Hang on a minute. Rich men & young girls dont stay married because often (always) the young girl was just in it for the money in the first place. Obviously. Women are the ones that usually initiate these divorces (look up the numbers), & it doesnt take a serious thing like infidelity for them to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 10:44 PM
2

Priceless. Some loser on the internet using phrases like TRP & SMV ( fucks that?) thinks I cant get shit. Nobody with any self-respect in the real World even knows what these terms mean, let alone uses them. They're for sexually repressed fools like you who have had to hand over their hard earned money for dating advice because u cant even get a girl. Now simmer down, virgin
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 09:22 PM
2

"thriving community"....HAHAHAHA. Go out on the street & start talking about "The Red Pill" & see how people know WTF you're talking about. Even I barely know anything about it other than what it stands for. Anyway, hot waitresses are part of the 'higher quality tail' that you're referencing you absolute dumb truck.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 08:58 PM
1

You're making ridiculous blanket statements that apply to about 10% of the male population. For instance, ignoring all the men who get married in their early 20's, despite being able to get any woman they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 07:58 PM
5

Lol thats not what u said 2 posts ago! Almost every man wants to pump & dump, remember?- now you're saying it depends. Of course it depends, but you've changed your tune.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 07:32 PM
1

Right, but a nice woman who bags groceries will date & marry successful men without fail. I dont get how that situation almost never happens in reverse. A somewhat ugly, dumb, rude, illiterate, 23yr -old professional footballer will have women throwing themselves at him (These women wont all be immature losers either). Thats not personality based.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 06:06 PM
1

Why ever debate anything then? If u cant prove it with a mathematical equation, we cant make any assumptions? I'm taking my experiences + those of countless others you come across in the global sharing medium that is the World, television, internet, etc, & drawing conclusions.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 05:57 PM
1

I'm not familiar with every thread on reddit unfortunately. & I dont take their conclusions as gospel anyway. They value the financial security a committed guy provides, yes. They dont value commitment as an independent quality, at least not to the extent we're led to believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 05:52 PM
5

Women also prefer hot men though. So insisting upon a hot + wealthy man is surely more shallow than simply insisting upon hot women. People are born with intelligence, just as they are born with beauty. It's not a dumb persons fault they were born with low intelligence just as its not an intelligent person's success. Why is one valued over the other? Maintaining beauty actually requires plenty of effort. Suggesting wealth is directly related to positive personality traits is crazy & typical self…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 05:48 PM
2

Agreed
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 05:18 PM
1

Fair enough, good post. The part I struggle with is when people on here compare humans to apes in terms biological programming & how this influences women to go after men with money or high 'status'. Whilst this doubtless influences some of what we're attracted to in the opposite sex physically, it shouldnt be used be overused as an explanation for everything. Most women have an IQ of around 100, & some will be well above that. When choosing a partner, to almost exclusively associate all their d…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 05:09 PM
2

What about once the initial attraction phase is over then? Why do so many men marry & remain loyal to these women? Why dont similarly high-status women do the same for similarly low-status men? Why does the guy have to have more money than them?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 04:21 PM
2

Wow, that seems unbelievably unlikely. Plus, you just said almost every man wants to pump & dump as much as physically possible with no emotion. Why would settling down interest them at all? That's a complete contradiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 03:59 PM
7

This explanation would certainly make sense. Although at least with men their 'attraction' is an attraction, & not simply a calculated appraisal thinking "what can this person do for me".
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 03:53 PM
1

But how do u know they're biologically programmed like that? That seems like a statment of fact thats based on something that is immeasurable to me. I dunno if you're giving them too much credit, or not enough credit. & if what ur saying is right, does that not suggest that men are biologically superior? You've made some good points but I'm not sure what the overall conclusion is.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 03:47 PM
0

Yep. It shows how gullible the majority of men are that even though this fallacy is exposed under even the slightest scrutiny, people still respond by repeating the myth & it continues to be believed.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 03:42 PM
-3

So we keep being told. How do you explain all these multi-millionaire sportsman who have been married 20 years then? Yeah, plenty cheat, but plenty more don't. Which is quite an achievement, given the amount of women who literally throw themselves at them
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 03:39 PM
1

Right. Why do you think this has to do with boilogical programming though? And even if it does, doesnt that suggest women nare more superficial. Ana Ivanovic doesnt need money, yet she doesnt date a guy who doesnt have it. Surely there are plenty of guys out there who dont have money (which she doesn't need) but would make good providers in every other aspect (which u suggest she is biologically programmed to desire).
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 03:23 PM
0

But u are more pure. You value looks and personality which are specific to individuals. They only value those qualities if you have a certain amount of money, which is a a far more superficial approach
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 03:20 PM
0

I dont agree with that comparison tbh. I mean, yeah, they dont choose high-status men to spite 'me', but they DO consciously choose them. That's not related to attractiveness - at least not in the sense that I understand attractiveness. Choosing a partner based largly on their money/ standard of living seems a very pragmatic/practical approach, like the way you'd shop for a new car or a house . Whereas my finding a playboy model more attractive than a 50+ yr-old is purely biological. I would dat…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 02:59 PM
12

Errr, you've never heard that men are more shallow & more superficial than women? Now that is the most ridiculous statement. Women between 20-40 outearn men so they do have access to wealth. Its not 1975 anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 02:12 PM
0

And here's the other thing. When a guy is with a woman who's more attractive than him (say she's a 7 or 8/10 to his 5 or 6), she will constantly be told that she could do better or he'll be well aware that people believe her to be 'out of his league'. Never mind that often times this guy is her superior in literally every other aspect - earns more money to provide a better life, is more motivated, has more personality, intelligence, etc. So she's better looking than him?.....lol, she better fuck…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 02:02 PM
4

Commitment needs to be made more appealing to men - what do they really get out of it? Women have more to gain out of commitment. Once you're married, all the power lies with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/15 04:47 PM
3

...siiiigghh
/r/MensRights27/10/15 06:04 PM
4

You "guarantee" he was already fixing to throw the ball. What a ridiculous statement. One kid swears at another kid, who then throws a basketball. Happens every day. Sucks that she was riding hands-free (good skills) & could have been hurt but its not like he celebrated when she fell off. Bizarre that she can swear at him & he just has to like it. If the roles were reversed this would be held as some 'girl power' moment. Is this whats gunna happen every time children have a disagreement now?
/r/MensRights27/10/15 02:22 PM
3

Its laughable the way actions of 12 yr-olds are being held up as barometer of deep lying male-female issues. Would this be OK if it was a boy on the bike? So if she says fuck you for no reason....he just has to take it? If a woman spits in my face , I'll be OK, it wont hurt, but that doesnt mean I have to put up with it. Yet again girls are being taught not to expect any repercussions for their actions. All he did was throw a ball as a reflex action anyway. Its not like he walked over there & be…
/r/MensRights27/10/15 01:01 PM
2

She was definitely flipping him off before she said it. Thats what he reacted to.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 12:57 PM
1

Nah, no way. No amount of word association experiments will convince me of this. Men can be incredibly loyal & self-sacrificing for other men that aren't even family members. They literally take bullets for eachother
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 05:01 PM
0

Women tend to look up in dating terms. Because of the amount of attention they receive, many also overestimate their own attractiveness. A female lawyer with money, reasonable looks & a house, would never marry a decent looking man with an excellent personality who only earns £15k p/year. A man, on the other hand, would, if the scenarios were reversed. A guy working garbage disposal never has a hot wife. A professional sportsman ALWAYS has a hot wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/15 11:13 PM
8

Look, if the divorce system was as ridiculously lopsided in favour of men as it is women, then I'm sure plenty of men would exploit it, just as women do. I would never vilify all single mothers & haven't come across anyone else who would. That seems bizarre
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 12:46 AM
1

Men probably get harassed online more than women tbh, but far less in real life. A man will often not insult another man on the street because even if he thinks he could take the guy in a fight - he's not SURE of it, & knows it's probably not worth finding out for sure. A jacked 6'3 30yr-old will get plenty of abuse online that would never get said to his face. It's all subjective though. Men & women have different definitions of term 'harassment'. I've known women to find offence in the most tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 12:31 AM
1

Living with a woman, or even sleeping with her, will be deemed some kind of 'marriage by association' & they will still get your house & money should you choose to break up. Guarantee it
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/15 04:12 PM
1

Some of their behavior around attractive women is cringeworthy, no doubt about it. Look at the recent storm in a teacup around Jose Mourinho criticizing Eva Carniero & banning her from the Chelsea bench. All these white knights are leaping to her defence but if she was a 40yr-old man no1 would give a fuck! We know they wouldn't because he also banned the other MALE medic (who is a 40 yr-old man) & no-one gives a damn. No-one even knows/cares what his name is or that he's been banned. Recently, I…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/15 10:34 PM
0

Lol, there's no butthurt. I'm not some 19yr-old kid pining for a woman's attention, which is likely who most of your advice appeals to. Any woman who sits there contributing nothing isnt worth my time & I will/ have told them that in such scenarios. That wasnt OP's point. He made an observation, he's not looking for advice about how to deal with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 05:18 PM
-1

Agree. They've been told they're special so often that they actually believe it. They see themselves as doing you a favour or as a prize - even distinctly average ones. When I see well how any good looking woman gets treated I'm actually shocked at how many I've met that are still genuinely nice people because that amount of attention is bound to go to anyone's head. If I ask a woman out then the onus is on me somewhat to make the date entertaining. But at the same time, the idea of her sitting …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 05:09 PM
1

This is why women are terrible people for men to ask for dating advice. The concept is completely alien to them - they cant get their head around it. Like most women, you've been rejected a few times but have probably been inundated with offers besides that. Who would care about the odd rejection in such a situation! If the dating roles were reversed & men started blackballing women with small boobs, I dare say you would start seeing the situation somewhat differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 10:57 PM
0

How reassuring. I should expect to see a clamor for plus-sized male models soon then
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 04:53 PM
1

Sometimes, yes. The crudest example of this is obviously when a man & woman get in altercation. Can u ever imagine a man verbally abusing or physically assaulting someone & then complaining when the person defends themselves? Whenever a man hits another man -or even just insults him- he does it fully aware that he should expect consequences- either retaliation or prosecution or whatever. He knows he's responsible for his own behaviour. SOME women treat men poorly all the time, fully expecting to…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/15 03:32 PM
0

Define high status. You either need to be attractive or very wealthy, & attractiveness is genetic for the most part. Also, women have higher standards for men's looks than men do for women's. Only male model types will be flocked around, but even only moderately attractive women will experience this behaviour. Men do try & improve their status by getting good jobs, or going to gym, or whatever. But even these improvements are just to improve their chances when they approach a woman. Improving th…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 02:11 PM
3

You're right when you say that top tier men have women falling over themselves to be with them. But you seem to be suggesting that there's something wrong with other men approaching women because the top tier ones dont have to. Lol, what are they supposed to do? Just be ignored their entire life? If an average man uses the exact same tactics as an attractive man he will lose. It's like saying a guy with little money should go to an auction & outbid a millionaire. Wont work
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 01:43 PM
3

Regardless of whether she earns the same/more
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 10:45 AM
2

You shouldnt. But the difference is this; if you decided to get married & regretted it later down the road, then you wouldnt be stripped of your home & money (& potentially children) in the event of a divorce. A man has more to lose
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/15 10:46 PM
2

An ugly guy has more chance of being a model than an attractive guy has of being a successful comedian - OP is right about that. No1 wants to listen to a guy who has everything going for him, take the piss out of everyone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/15 11:56 PM
1

It definitely makes sense to emulate attractive guys. U need to emulate their attractiveness. Unfortunately, thats kinda impossible. Attractive nice guys get laid. Attractive dickheads get laid. Attractive intelligent guys get laid. Attractive idiots get laid.....seeing a pattern yet?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 12:29 AM
6

What do you think I might mean?
/r/MensRights27/07/15 03:21 PM
4

Of course there's a double standard. Same reason there's no clamoring for plus-sized male models. Because society is being programmed, & men repeatedly being told, that you have to make women happy & indulge their every whim.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 02:33 PM
1

OP has self esteem issues that are fairly typical of a 19-yr-old. Dunno why everyone is ripping him to shreds. But yeah, two things. 1) You're not short, & 2) you didnt trick people into liking you. They just liked you
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/15 01:28 AM
2

They will just respond to this analogy by saying "women aren't property".
/r/MensRights23/07/15 11:41 PM
3

Because society has brainwashed everyone into believing that women are attracted to confidence & assertiveness when, in fact, those qualities are only really desirable in men that have the desired level of physical attractiveness. This leads ugly men to believe they have a shot with women clearly out of their league. Women have to take most of the responsibility for this. If they were just honest about being attracted to attractive men, instead of giving half-truth answers in an attempt to come …
/r/MensRights23/07/15 11:20 PM
1

Yeah, its like, ok have some self-esteem , but have some self awareness too ffs. Some people are flat out delusional, largely due to the way society has brainwashed them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 03:26 PM
3

The biggest problem is people thinking they've 'settled' when infact they're with a man/woman who is their equal in attractiveness. This is especially a problem for women because of the amount of attention they get. An average 6/10 woman gets approached by all different men - some of which are hot - so when a 6/10 man approaches, she considers him to be beneath her because she dated an 8/10 man for 2months last year. It doesnt occur to her than this 8/10 was actually out of her league & thats wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 03:07 PM
46

They want to be approached by attractive men & ignored by unattractive ones. Saw a women complaining about unwarranted approaches the other day,whilst saying women can wear whatever they want. Another woman responded saying; "of course they can but, can I just ask, why do you wear clothes like that if you dont want men to look?". They complainer couldnt answer & eventually just kept repeating "I'd expect better from another woman". Imagine if a man walked down the street wearing almost nothing &…
/r/MensRights23/07/15 02:12 PM
0

As technology gets more & more advanced, men are becoming more & more disposable. Their superior physical attributes that helped first build civilization are being rendered null & void by machines that can do the work in a fraction of the time & effort. Those machines are just as easily operated by a woman as they are a man. Unless they're offering/ providing something, Men aren't seen as valuable a human being as women are.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/15 04:04 PM
5

What possible good can come from asking this question? lol I think research has shown that the average woman is smarter than the average man but that male intelligence is far more diversified. There are way more male geniuses than female but there are also way more men who are dumb rocks. Physically men are obviously vastly superior. There's a huge difference in things like reaction time & reflexes, nevermind the more obvious speed & strength advantages that biology has given them. Its unfair to…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/15 03:55 PM
1

Everybody knows how easy it is for any remotely decent looking woman to get laid so a high count is interpreted as her being easy/ having no standards. Everybody also knows how much effort it can take for any remotely decent looking man to get laid so a high count suggests he must have a lot going for him.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/15 10:34 PM
4

Well said. People's critical thinking & grasp of probability is truly awful & it rears its head in their analysis of everything - dating,sports results,winning the lottery,etc,etc. Everyone has that one friend that they beat relentlessly at, for example, exams. But the friend still maintains he's smarter. Then, when he beats you ONCE, he will proclaim without a trace of irony "there, told you I'm smarter". Its simple probability & yet they think one example outweighs an entire trend. There is no…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/15 10:22 PM
3

Darwinism is survival of the fittest. Not survival of the most attractive. This is great until all non-alpha (in an attractive sense) males gradually cotton onto the fact that they're being used, overlooked, & settled for. A large portion of such men remaining unmarried is a disaster for society, which is why society has begun to introduce laws where a woman can still bleed a man dry in court regardless of marital status.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/15 10:09 PM
6

No idea WTF that last question even means & I dont wanna know. Of course it matters. No-ones really gunna bat an eyelid when its 18 & 22, but 35 & 18 is close to a generation gap. 18 is still very young. Its an age where you should really still be dating people close to your own age. An 18 yr-old dating a 26yr-old is not the same as a 23yr-old dating a 31-yr-old.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/15 12:30 AM
5

Older men? How old are talking here? 22? 26? 35?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 11:19 PM
6

Exactly. Both men & women are superficial in terms of attractiveness. The difference is, men get called out on it. Teaching unattractive guys to "do this" & "do that" gets them jumping through hoops, when in reality they dont have a shot in hell no matter how many 'personality' boxes they tick. As you say, it's just another way of perpetuating the myth that woman are less superficial. WOMEN WILL TURN YOU DOWN BECAUSE OF THE SHOES YOU'RE WEARING FFS!!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 04:38 PM
2

....BOOM! Haha
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 10:26 PM
1

Yep, I agree for the most part. However, why should a man go to a lot of effort for a woman he isnt attarcted to? For instance, I hold the women I approach to a higher standard of attractiveness than I do the women who approach me. There are women that I would agree to go on dates with if they asked me, that I wouldn't necessarily have asked out ask myself tbh. That's just common sense. If I'm making all the effort, then their needs to be a motivation
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 09:50 PM
1

Far more likely that she just doesnt know her true height. She's probably closer to 5'5 than 5'7. People -women in particular- make this mistake all the time
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 09:24 PM
16

It happens, but only to certain men. Its more optional for women. If the average woman never approaches a man in her life, then she will still do just fine as far as relationships are concerned. If the average man never approaches a woman in his life, he will probably die alone
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 09:18 PM
1

Lol a woman wont develop an attraction if you act indifferent to her. She won't notice you exist. This only works once there is an initial attraction. Its funny when a guy who looks like Brad Pitt is acting cocky, & still getting attention while giving the women the cold shoulder, & people come to the conclusion that he's successful with women because of his attitude. Err, no, he's successful because he's attractive. Nice guys finish last with women.... if they're ugly. Attractive nice guys do j…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 10:39 AM
2

I think everyone (men mainly) just want consistency. When a man & woman have an altercation, & the woman begins attacking him, I've seen many people say that the women should be treated "like an unruly child because she doesnt pose as much physical threat". I've heard reasonably intelligent women say this too, & the law oftens upholds this theory. Lol, what? Now, I'm not advocating the man start swinging for the hills in such a scenario but he's allowed to use appropriate force to defend himself…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 03:24 PM
1

By being attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 03:00 PM
5

Lets be honest, if boys were outperforming girls to the extent girls currently outperform boys, then they would rip the whole system up. Having said that, they only outperform them because they do the work. Nearly 100% of the kids disrupting lessons & acting like attention seeking idiots were boys when I was at school
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 10:41 AM
1

The OKCupid study that others are citing is an accurate reflection of the situation. Women of all levels of attractiveness get lots of attention, but for men, women restrict their attention to only very good looking ones. Women arent as passive as society has u believe, they're just picky. I've seen women (good looking ones) make a beeline for attractive friends of mine in a bar & pretty much offer them sex in their car right that minute. These guys didnt need 'game', or confidence. The women di…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 10:13 AM
1

80% of women are not a 6 or above, geezus man. You're just guilty of putting all women on a pedestal.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 09:38 AM
1

Because many of them are capable of much more than that
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/15 12:57 PM
1

Riiight. Lets not pretend these are all great looking women. This isnt Spain, Sweden, or Venezuela. Its pretty simple. A woman who is a 6/10 sees a 6/10 man as beneath her because she often gets attention from men, plenty of whom are better looking than him. Cant blame them really, my ego would get overly inflated in those circumstances too
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/15 12:54 PM
4

Of course not. The biggest invention in the 20th century was the washing machine. Because it meant women didnt have to be at home all day washing clothes & freed them up to contribute to society. Society & technological progress skyrocketed from there because there were twice as many people contributing. We're in danger of going too far the other way though. Quotas ensuring Women are filling 50% of all prominent position just because they're female. lowering the entry requiremnts for difficult j…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/15 08:42 PM
1

But the women isnt unlikely to get an 8,9,or 10. Thats the point. A woman who's a 5 or a 6/10 will be approached by men who have several clear points on her, even if its just for sex. So then they start thinking that that standard of man is their level. OK Cupid did research & they came to the exact conclusion I have. Women were far harsher in their judgments & also agreed on who the good looking men were, as opposed to the men. OK Cupid r in the business so they should know. Women voted 80% of …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/15 08:17 PM
1

Well by 'nothing' I obviously didn't mean literally mean nothing as in living in a cardboard box. You should have been able to interpret that correctly. Lets not play word games. Men will always approach women earning more than them. The trouble is women trade up, not down, in much the same way as you appear to be looking to. I've been around women claiming they cant get a man good enough for them, in terms of attractiveness or intellect. The women I'm referring to were plain Jane primary school…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/15 07:17 PM
1

Lol, I was under the impression you gradually became more conscious of a guys maturity. Wasnt suggesting you'd had an epiphany in the last few hrs. So you'll still sleep with men you find attractive. "Maturity & decisiveness" have moved up your list, but until you've spent a huge amount of time around a person, this is often measured by how much money a guy makes. This 'true love' thing is a myth for the most part. Otherwise, why arent garbage disposal workers able to marry attractive, ambitious…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/15 03:46 PM
-1

Where did I say they find them equally attractive? I said they would get the same amount of attention. Congratulations on my missing my point, although I do agree with everything u just said because ur agreeing with me. Women are picky because they're allowed to be, because women of all levels of attractiveness get approached by men. If all men got that kind of attention from women, then their standards would rise accordingly. Men are DEFINITELY more subjective though. Women will universally lab…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/15 03:36 PM
1

Nah, I've seen studies completely contradicting that. Google them & you'll find them easily. Women like Taylor Swift & Snooki look so different that they could be a different species but both would get loads of attention off attractive men even if they werent famous. The same cannot be said of two non-famous men who differ that much in looks (a foot height difference, one skinny, one chubby, etc). One man would be considered hot, the other not. Take dating sites. I have attractive male friends w…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/15 01:00 PM
0

Women generally agree on what constitutes an attractive man. Men however, wildly disagree on what makes a woman attractive so this exercise is kinda pointless
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/15 11:30 AM
1

This is kind of exactly how many rep pillers read the situation though, & get pelted for saying so. When you were in your 20's you slept with the guys you were attracted to. Now, as you get older, you'll 'settle' for someone less attractive if he can pay your bills. But if the day comes when he can't, you'll split. Whats the man getting out of this? He's effectively having to pay/ sacrifice his life for a woman that put out for other men for free & would do so again if a better offer comes along
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/15 11:26 AM
1

I like mixed race girls the best, or women who come from Spain,Italy,South America. Looks wise,they tend to be the best of both Worlds. Visiting somewhere like Valencia or Barcelona & walking down the street, & its truly shocking how much better looking the women are than those in the USA or UK.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/15 01:22 AM
4

History has, yes. Women were oppressed for centuries. Nowadays though, you'd lose your job just for saying something like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/15 03:51 PM
10

Its just another way of society dictating what constitutes a "real man". Must do this, cant do that, blah, blah, blah. Heaven forbid anyone should start dictating what constitutes a "real woman".
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/15 02:49 PM
2

Direct. Only the most attractive of men can get away with indirect/passive approaches.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/15 01:46 PM
1

Some of the advice given to men is getting ridiculous though. Its hilarious reading profile reviews on dating sites. The guy is repeatedly told to be unique, charming, etc, etc, when infact very few people are that unique. I saw it recommended to 1 guy that he write a message in Italian in order to appeal to a woman who had Italian ancestry. Bear in mind that these men are also encouraged to send off hundreds of messages....I mean, just lol. They have to go to a ridiculous amount of effort to ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/15 01:13 AM
-1

It makes perfect sense, especially when 99% of statistics are false :D What are these statistics based on? Total heresay?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/15 07:40 PM
12

Women have a similarly hard problem relating. "I know an ugly guy who has a pretty wife". Yeah, & I saw Halley's comet fly through the sky but that doesnt mean I sit infront of my window every night expecting to see it again. People have a very poor understanding of probability & are terrible at critical thinking. They think one example outweighs an entire trend containing 100x more examples showing the complete opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/15 04:41 PM
4

Women are attracted to guys that r physically attractive & will put out for guys that have money, especially as they get older. The fact that the guys are douchebags is irrelevant. They will overlook or make excuses for his behaviour until the guy loses his money, at which point, the women immediately feign disgust at his behaviour & leave. A man who looks like David Beckham could approach a woman in the sleaziest of manners & have sex with her that night. The exact same approach to the exact sa…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/15 12:27 AM
7

Absolutely no way does the average guy lose his virginity at 17. Statistics? C'mon, you think people r honest about these things? I've witnessed average women get pursued by numerous guys at once loads of times. These guys werent losers either, they included friends of mine. One of my best friends is a good looking woman who is now married. When we were in our earlier twenties a group of us traveled the World so I spent an awful lot of time around her, & it would seriously blow your mind how muc…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/15 12:12 AM
3

I would never randomly catcall a woman so I'm on the woman's side fairly quickly tbh. Catcalling is a point blank no-no really. I just dont see why you'd do it. If he approaches her more respectfully & she says no, or ignores him, then he should just move on. If she's really rude, he's entitled to respond in kind However, it would have to get pretty bad for me - as a stranger - to intervene. I'm not some social police officer working for free & putting myself in danger for people who, if they di…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 01:46 AM
2

Most of the scenarios you outlined are over the line tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 01:37 AM
2

I dont have a problem with women being as (or sometimes, even more) focused on looks as men are. They dont have to apologize for that. It's the hypocrisy that begins to grate after a while
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 01:33 AM
0

The last 2,000 years of civilization
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 03:42 PM
0

Of course. Confidence is only relevant once you meet the minimum required level of looks. Women dont even notice a confident ugly guy in a dating sense unless its to be repulsed by them. Once they get older & they're not as desirable because they're own looks have faded, women may well 'settle' for a man they consider to be beneath them if they see him as a good provider. Even though, in reality, the guy is often as least as good looking as they are
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 02:39 PM
1

Lol, this is a myth, its the complete opposite. Studies have shown this. Women all typically agree on what constitutes an attractive man, whereas men's opinions on women can differ wildly. Also, women are far harsher judges than men, rating the vast majority as below average.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 01:18 PM
2

Women already make way more than men if you judge it on money as equated to work done. The amount of women I've seen earn the same wages as me for doing FAR less work, never having to do the hard jobs, getting the easier shifts, etc, is beyond belief.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 01:14 PM
9

Meh, that & the fact that average women can regularly get attractive men if they're patient enough. This is what causes them to over-value their won attractiveness & regularly talk about their male equivalent as if he's not good looking enough for them They cant hold onto such men though because those men are were out of their league to begin with. Woman dont want to hear that though, & end up thinking 'all men are pigs'. But if they were with a man who was their equal in attractiveness they'd h…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 09:04 PM
2

This idea that so many women look fantastic is hilarious. Maybe in Spain or South America somewhere, but not the USA or UK. Most guys with this so called "dad bod" are with women who look worse than them, or at the very least, no better. Looks like the comments set her straight anyway.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 01:27 PM
3

Its kinda summed up in the opening paragraphs.... Women dont want to "marry down". They look at relationships or marriage as "what is this guy offering me". They can like the look of you, & you can get on well, but ultimately they'll still see you as "beneath them". It becomes increasingly difficult for men to measure up to these expectations when women have a hugely inflated sense of their own beauty or self-worth, as has been drummed into them by society.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 05:00 PM
11

Suspended sentence just means, she scarred someone for life, & effectively got told "dont do it again".
/r/MensRights01/05/15 10:22 PM
1

Its quite simple. They give just enough welfare to the poor to keep them satisfied/controlled enough, that they wont form an uprising.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 08:41 PM
2

Its not a political philosophy that can be applied to this scenario though, considering we are continually told women are the equal of a man in every respect. The scenario you're describing is more to do with special dispensation being given to those with disabilities that dont render them completely incapable, but also dont offer them an equal opportunity unless special dispensation is given. It also covers the welfare state as you say, but even then, the welfare state still doesnt come anywher…
/r/MensRights01/05/15 08:38 PM
20

Those double standards are rearing their ugly head again
/r/MensRights01/05/15 09:53 AM
1

I agree to a large extent. An extremely good looking man has it best. They'll get success with dating behaviour that would get an ugly man slapped or berated, & wont be hindered by jealousy socially or professionally. If you're attractive & look bored or even kinda moody in a bar, a woman may approach & ask if you're OK just to initiate a conversation. If you're ugly she'll stay the hell away, if indeed she even notices you're there at all. But really good looking men - top 5-10% - experience wh…
/r/MensRights30/04/15 02:27 PM
9

Reminds me of how exasperating it is when women go mental at initiatives about how to be safe on nights out or whatever. They go "why isnt the same advice (staying in groups, not getting paralytic drunk) given to men?"... as if they're being so clever! I always just tell them its because no1 gives a fuck if a man gets attacked! He's just another victim among many. Its the same reason why so many dont give a damn when someone gets falsely accused of rape. It almost doesnt register that this guy i…
/r/MensRights30/04/15 11:42 AM
2

If it wasnt on camera, he'd likely be suspended & under investigation right now if she pushed it. & even though it is on camera, she'll just go on her merry way. Its a no-risk strategy for women
/r/MensRights29/04/15 02:07 PM
1

The Wage gap thing is infuriating because of the amount of women I've worked with who have been payed exactly the same as me for doing less or easier work. In many jobs that involve any kind of manual labour, women are either not given the harder tasks to do, or if they are, they simply dont do them & nothing gets said. A man will face disciplinary action for identical behaviour. This is especially the case in lower paid jobs. Seriously, just go into any supermarket & you'll see men lifting & dr…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 01:26 PM
1

Come on now, that sounds like the most ridiculous 'study' ever. No way in the World would 80%+ of men say yes if they were asked randomly for sex by a stranger. I wouldnt, & numerous hidden camera experiments show most others wouldnt either Like I said, women are obviously going to say 'yes' to propositions less than men because they get asked all the time! & therefore will naturally be more picky. The last time a guy was asked out by woman may have been 2years ago, whereas a woman was probably …
/r/MensRights28/04/15 03:36 PM
1

I agree that much of is men's fault. If the roles were reversed, men would likely be excatly the same - its just human nature. But I disagree that women are less likely to have sex with a good looking man than men are a good looking woman. This poll, other studies, & what I've seen with my own eyes suggest otherwise. They're much less likely to have sex with an AVERAGE looking man, than men are an AVERAGE looking woman - thats the difference. An average looking woman will get propositioned way m…
/r/MensRights28/04/15 12:17 PM
11

I'm not a parent but this seems to me one of the lowest things u could ever do. Cheating is one thing but you've got men bringing up kids for decades that later transpire to not be theirs. What kind of person does this? Fucking disgraceful If statistics r to be believed, it seems to be happening wayyyy more often than I ever thought possible too. And no1 gives a shit
/r/MensRights27/04/15 04:37 PM
1

Hahahaha. Nothing to see here. From the comments I think we can assume that before the video was released, this was molehill turned into a mountain though
/r/MensRights27/04/15 09:25 AM
2

Hahaha remember hearing about this a while ago. Kinda scary that, after being assaulted, he needed a gameplan that Colombo would've been proud of, to avoid to going to jail himself
/r/MensRights26/04/15 01:26 PM
43

Why work when you can just divorce somebody?
/r/MensRights26/04/15 01:23 PM
11

Exactly. Women can afford to be picky, even very average ones. They often get propositioned by men that are better looking than them or have money or whatever...especially if they're prepared to be patient. A man does not. You really notice it when u have female friends that u spend a lot of time around. One friend of mine - very attractive female - has always had men falling over themselves for her, but so has another friend who is far more average looking. They've both had boyfriends whilst be…
/r/MensRights25/04/15 11:02 PM
3

Although he's saying nothing more than what is blatantly obvious common sense to most of us, you're simply not allowed to say this nowadays. I expect there to be repercussions for this Its alarming how I've seen women say that they want more latitude for rape convictions "without any proper evidence". Thats their exact words. How can they not see how fking crazy that sounds?!?! This idea that women never lie or do anything bad is infuriating, but its successfully brainwashing a lot of people. In…
/r/MensRights24/04/15 11:01 AM
2

If only the man works, then the women should do 80%+ of the housework stuff. But 50% of 'his' money has to be considered her money (which it will be) while they're together & if they should break up. Cant expect her to work for free. But the idea of splitting the housework when only 1 partner works is crazy.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 11:13 AM
1

19yr-olds dont give a fuck about politics, & I dont blame them
/r/MensRights22/04/15 10:58 AM
4

Meh, you're probably giving them too much credit. Literally the first words out of their mouths were "because she's a woman"...its not like he had to lead them down the garden path
/r/MensRights22/04/15 10:56 AM
3

Nah, she knew what she said & I can see what she was saying. If there had been 5 female presidents, then I dare say far less women would vote for Hilary Clinton just on the basis of her being a woman. They just want a woman president because there has never been 1 before. Cant remember who said this but it reminds me of the quote ; "we're in the habit of swapping what works, for what sounds good".
/r/MensRights22/04/15 10:54 AM
3

Women have been oppressed for years, but your sister hasn't, so in that case sexism doesn't exist against her either then.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 10:20 PM
2

Pretty straight-talking article & somewhat surprised they printed it. Trouble is, once u get married, you can no longer afford upset a woman. Or to rephrase, no longer have her be upset with you. Because they have all the power & a divorce will screw you over in any number of ways. Thats why so many men are whipped or browbeaten into acceptance Whilst marriage is undoubtedly a good choice for some people, it does make me laugh hearing 28-yr-olds who've been married 18months going on about how gr…
/r/MensRights20/04/15 04:51 PM
3

I wondered to myself how long it would take before this guy would need to prove he hadnt done anything to 'deserve this'. 3 comments down & some idiot (hopefully troll) is suggesting he might have been a pervert Yeah, thats way more likely that her just being a fking psycho. This is attempted murder, no doubt about it
/r/MensRights14/04/15 11:25 PM
1

I interpreted the Muslim clerics 'buddy system' advice to be more forceful than a police guidance article. Whats your solution? Educate men that rape is wrong? lol, all men already know this but a small minority just outright ignore it anyway. Always gunna get some bad apples
/r/MensRights09/04/15 03:38 PM
1

Ah ok, was kinda under the impression that u just wanted to throw the Muslim clerics in for shock value So if I dont examine it more....you'll understand, I'm sure
/r/MensRights09/04/15 03:30 PM
1

I see plenty wrong with that. Although I have no idea what that extremist view has to do with the initial article, or anything I've said, for that matter
/r/MensRights09/04/15 03:18 PM
1

Well, yeah because people who could potentially drink & drive can be reasoned with. Potential rapists can't be. You're far less likely to be assaulted if you're not alone. Whats the problem here? The reason u dont see similar posters aimed at men is because the general public dont care if men get assaulted. Its just another crime. If a woman gets attacked or robbed then its a 'crime against a woman' which is considered in a whole different stratosphere. If u get blind drunk & wander down a dark …
/r/MensRights09/04/15 03:03 PM
3

FFS its not 'victim blaming' to tell women to try & avoid walking alone through dangerous places at night. I'm a near 30yr-old male who's athletic & can protect myself against most people if needs be, but I'd be wary of going certain places alone at night unless I had to. They're not saying you CAN'T. Go whenever u want, drink whatever u want, but its not everybody else's responsibility to look after you in such circumstances. Rapists dont need 'educating'. They know its wrong, they know its aga…
/r/MensRights08/04/15 09:19 PM
1

£40M WTF?? Hows that even possible . Poker players across the planet would cut their foot off to be able to play a billionaire for these stakes.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 04:12 PM
7

Even in social experiments where women are set up to be seen attacking men, an audience of women watched the footage back & -with A STRAIGHT FACE - said; "yeah, but what did he do to her to deserve it". Its literally a brainwashing. Women are good & always right, men are bad. Having said that, I'm not a big fan of this 'single mothers' term because theres no such thing. Not unless the Dad is dead or something. If he made it clear he didnt want children from the outset then thats a different matt…
/r/MensRights31/03/15 10:32 PM
12

Great video I think the problem is the younger generation - & I would even include myself in that at 29 - are being brought up with a certain amount of entitlement. They expect to be handed things. But the difference is that girls are being taught this entitlement is OK. If u cant get a certain job or earn certain money then feel free to complain & we'll lower the entry requirements or introduce quotas. Literally just read this on the BBC Sport website http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/32138596 If bo…
/r/MensRights31/03/15 04:34 PM
7

Pretty sure even if he died, the women walk free. If a man was present, the hold 0% responsibility for their own actions.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 01:37 AM
4

In most Western countries, every day is International Women's Day.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 07:22 PM
2

Judge Judy is the best. Doesn't tolerate fools
/r/MensRights24/03/15 12:30 PM
2

No way this maniac will get prison for this, just some sort of suspended sentence. She's probably been doing shit like this for years without any comeuppance
/r/MensRights13/03/15 09:51 PM
3

There are crimes & crimes against women If 10 people are attacked over a given period & 2 are women, they will scream bloody murder about a sexist society allowing 2 women to be attacked. As if the sheer fact that women are victims of any type of crime, ever, is proof of sexism
/r/MensRights12/03/15 07:23 PM
1

Agreed. If a woman is wailing away at a man - physically or verbally - everyone finds it funny. They also wonder aloud (with a straight face) what he has done to deserve it - they've already made up their minds that he undoubtedly must deserve it. Society has been brainwashed to believe that all women r intrinsically good. But should they do bad things, they dont have to assume responsibility for them. Its lucky that the majority of women still remain decent human beings because the law & societ…
/r/MensRights12/03/15 07:18 PM
1

Men are victims of crime way more often women, yet all u ever hear are that "x amount of women were victims of...." .Apparently society is sexist until only men r victims of crime, which is absurd.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 07:12 PM
2

If boys were outperforming girls to the same extent girls outperform boys, then they'd rip the whole system up.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 12:32 AM
4

Meh, doesnt seem to be much alternative but to work somewhere else. You've been kinda vague as to what your work actual is I worked with only women once & it was fine. They were all great Its much harder when you have problems with female co-workers than male ones though, obviously. In my experience, its just much harder to talk to them straight & clear the air that way. Dont get me wrong, most women can handle straight talking, but they're not expected to handle it in the same way a man is I ge…
/r/MensRights26/02/15 11:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter