TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

swejap Archive

View 8 posts and 341 comments by swejap on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

Yeah, I'm with you that this sub has some surprising censorship choices you wouldn't expect from an men's right forum. Like banning memes. (Preemptively: no, I don't care they created a separate sub for memes. They do no good there where there is no traffic. Which of course was on purpose. And no, it doesn't water down content compared to what this sub sees in a day). I don't think they are quite honest.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 09:46 AM
21

I've always felt it was more of a gender envy thing when people had problems with "boys will be boys". Same with men standing while peeing, having urinals or other things that threaten to remind people that men might be different.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 08:10 PM
3

Thank you and yes, maybe we can evolve artificially past biology if we wanted to. I mean all other things we have bred extensively (crops, livestock, pets), so of course humans are malleable as well. I know there are a lot of people who don't want to give in to biology and while I disagree, I understand. (However, I don't think biology itself is the root cause. I think that biology has adapted to a reality that states that the genders will provide the most benefit if they occupy two as separate …
/r/MensRights30/07/24 10:39 AM
3

I've been an MRA for 25 years now and "inconvenient"data has been disappearing or "polished" consistently throughout the years. From their perspective, I think they see it as a part of an effort to shift power from men since men have been so absolutely dominant and succesful. So to them it feels more or less justified. (I don't know who 'they' are, but it is happening) To me, the way of doing it is underhanded and not how I thought of democracy, transparancy or open, public discourse. And these …
/r/MensRights30/07/24 08:25 AM
1

This is an ongoing negotiation between the men and their nation about on what terms men are willing to serve their country. Throughout most of history men were rewarded, greatly even, for going to war. Sure, if they won, but still. It's only recently men serve out of duty alone and little else. Besides compensation, there are other things many men would like to bring up. Fighting for a country that has been shitting and pissing on you for your entire life because of feminism? Fighting alongside …
/r/MensRights30/05/24 11:25 PM
14

It's almost as if we are seeing slavery being played out.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 11:09 AM
2

How convenient that it was a guy making the false accusations.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 09:34 AM
12

You're not allowed to disagree with women.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 06:48 AM
5

I see, ty
/r/MensRights09/05/24 08:38 AM
6

Ok, ty.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 08:37 AM
8

Why are falling birth rates a problem with the overpopulation globally? I don't mean to question the post, I just don't know why.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 06:12 AM
5

Scored seems ok, I go to the MGTOW sub there.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 10:40 AM
2

What are DIE principles?
/r/MensRights20/04/24 09:29 AM
4

Differences in physical ability is almost always mentioned. So I want to ask, in your opinion, are there significant differences in mentality, temperament or social group dynamics between the sexes?
/r/MensRights07/04/24 07:22 AM
11

OP and the couple of comments on top are making it look like this revolution is only for women... Nah, they don't. The only thing they actually say is that men contribute a lot to this revolution. Which you in a confused way yourself are saying when you say it goes beyond being a gendered issue?
/r/MensRights19/11/22 08:05 PM
5

No, you dont.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 12:09 PM
2

What do you mean?
/r/MensRights02/11/22 05:50 PM
1

Yeah, they should be allowed to set up camp again, you're right.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 08:16 AM
0

Heads up. The article states they do try provide shelter, which is good news. OP choose to focus on another angle in the article, voiced by Utopia 56 ... something in the article, who still critique the french police. I gave gold because it seems they tried to find shelter for these men. And I like that a lot.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 07:47 AM
3

Why, what happened?
/r/MensRights18/10/22 03:09 PM
4

Apparantley EU doesn't recognize discrepancies in sentencing between the sexes as discrimination as it has chosen to not include it under EU equality laws. Very deliberately for sure. So they won't ever adress the issue and by not including it under th Equality law, they want to keep men from challenging this praxis. EU has discriminated against men since before, so no surprise. Just make sure to remember and to never forget the day EU wants something from you, like join their army and fight for…
/r/MensRights01/10/22 12:34 AM
0

Not at all. The "men did it too back in the 70s" equals "black people were slavers too". So, exactly what I said.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 04:21 PM
1

Yawn.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 02:31 AM
-17

You sound like white people complaining that black people were slavers too.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 07:49 PM
1

Yes, as in being unreasonable gets rewarded.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 05:03 PM
8

Yeah, that's what I think too is going to happen. Definitely. And yes, as you say, we only have to look and see what happens in civilian jobs. Not only danger, but heavy jobs, unpleasant jobs get heaped onto men. While when shoehorning in women, just in order to find them a position, they easily seem to end up in management. Or am I biased here?
/r/MensRights20/09/22 04:59 PM
15

Really, that's interesting, I didn't know that. To be honest though I think most countries are actively looking for excuses to not put women into danger. The NYT only talks about non combat service in association with female draft. When Ukraine talked about female conscription last time, weren't they talking about positions such as nurses, war journalists and such? Also, many countries have tried, are trying to put the females into leadership positions so to "protect them from the evil men", but…
/r/MensRights20/09/22 02:36 PM
4

ETA Yes, there is a difference, isn't there? I always thought this was because men are the suitors, so they need to be able to read adults.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 08:33 AM
30

Or like the UNs #HeforShe.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 10:54 PM
1

Nothing of what you bring up explains why you can't mention men as a high risk group, though. Not recognizing men as a group when clearly disadvantaged is an age old and rather large men's rights issue and prevailing across the board of most men's rights issues. As for suicides, for decades media and mainstream society droned on and on about women and their suicide attempts, without ever once mention (no joke, no hyperbole) that during all that time men's suicide rates where actually three times…
/r/MensRights17/09/22 02:30 PM
5

You have to be joking. You worked as an editor and you claim to be surprised at the gamma bias in msm? I don't buy it.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 02:03 PM
2

Thats a great response. I would like to add another possible side effect from pursuing the 8% - the way it would impact mainstream society. It would make it clear that false allegations against men ARE NOT rare, at least not compared to actual rapes. It may make it harder for mainstream media to dodge male victimhood, maybe in general even. I'm thinking about teenage boys even be found having committed suicide after allegations. It might even reign in tendencies of witch hunting men. And maybe a…
/r/MensRights30/08/22 02:35 PM
4

Looks like the mainstream media has a lot of catching up to do.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 02:09 AM
2

I guess they want men to refuse military service, then? I mean, to supress our inherent toxicity? No problem.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 05:44 PM
15

Yes, and say that men are violent and warmongerers and toxic.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 08:31 AM
4

Yeah, no thank you.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 07:55 PM
35

My guess is that relationships and marriages with a family where the guyjust has to 'suck it up' and be shit upon in order to maintain familialharmony is the rule and not the exception. Yes, and I think it's a generalized expectation that is used to then exploit men. Just yesterday a commenter here mentioned how he was under the impression that men had to "de-escalate" any situation.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 08:19 AM
6

Nah, the difference is saying boys are the problem instead of boys face problems. Godwin not applicable.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 02:59 PM
2

You misread his post. He didnt ask for more war coverage. He asks for men's rights to be covered in regard to conscription. Totally different. Considering it is a huge male rights issue, it should be on your radar.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 09:41 PM
-1

Nah, conscription for males has never been thourougly discussed simply because countries really don't want to risk men refusing. Some countries allegedly outright ban men from questioning conscritption even, Singapore. So, since it never has been adressed, referring to news worthiness isn't really fair of you. Further, there are plenty of angles where male conscription could become a topic, but it never does. As for instance when female draft is discussed, the male side is never brought up other…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 08:45 PM
2

Not at all. Its wasting energy on a bullshit tsunami.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 12:22 PM
6

Im not proposing to ban because of differing opinion. But because it doesn't add anything to our conversation. Rather, it bogs us down.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 05:00 AM
24

God, Im tired of these sacs of shit telling us what to think of feminists or women. Are they essential or can we pls just ban them?
/r/MensRights02/06/22 07:16 PM
6

What this Sterling claim to have heard teen boys discuss sounds fake.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 05:22 PM
5

There are always excuses being made for discrimination. As in this case, they would make vague claims about corruption and outright blaming young men for robbing foods (maybe they were just starving?). Nobody said equality was going to be easy all the time. Instead of taking the easy way out and deny all men food, these people need to stick to their mission for equality, even when it's not all sunshine. Maybe start looking deeper into male issues for once and find root causes? To simply heavy ha…
/r/MensRights27/05/22 03:43 PM
2

Yes, they preach equality, but then turn around and discriminate based on sex. That's less than good.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 02:36 PM
5

Some people have argued that handing over to women actually made them targets, but I don't know. Or maybe distributing to women only and making sure to exclude men really does work (against corruption)? Me, however, I don't trust that strategy.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 01:51 PM
1

I know it's not recent. That wasn't the point. The point is I don't trust food delivery will work when there will be famine.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 01:39 PM
7

CNN 2010 I think this is the closest report.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 01:38 PM
3

They would hardly publish this, now would they? But if I remember correctly they still are working for prefernetial food delivery for women? Go to their site UN women and read. Come back after.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 01:08 PM
9

Not at all. Pls stay on topic.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 01:07 PM
0

?
/r/MensRights20/05/22 03:12 AM
10

They don't need to. Just push them out of education.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 06:05 AM
-25

As far as I can tell this document is about prohibiting sex changes on minors. You should probably change your title.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 05:47 PM
1

No.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 09:37 AM
3

Thanks a lot.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 04:22 AM
3

Awesome. I would like to know more, is there any not to advanced resources available?
/r/MensRights04/05/22 08:39 PM
3

Looks interesting, maybe I should read it. Did you know men have asymmetrical brains with the right hemisphere being larger? You probably did, but i couldnt bear the risk that you didnt.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 05:33 PM
6

We should sticky this post and everytime we have a feminist here, direct them to this post and ask them to first explain themselves?
/r/MensRights02/05/22 11:40 AM
1

I literally wrote about males already being exploited to max. Im sorry the phrasing reminded you of Marx. Still its a leap of you accusing me to be a communist (or a feminist). You should check my post or guilding history.
/r/MensRights29/04/22 10:08 PM
1

You need to explain more than just "no", I don't understand. Also, stating that workers can be exploited doesn't make you a communist? Anyway, why do you think the narrative is so important? ETA Just wanted to add, I'm not saying that I think it is right to do so, I'm saying I think that's how media and the mainstream are thinking.
/r/MensRights29/04/22 10:12 AM
3

Here is a theory as to why the narrative is so important: You always want to grow you economy as much as possible. Having women earn their own wages doubles the consumer base, doubles the economy. Men have been exploited as workforce since long and are a wellknown factor. Women are just recently being exploited as workers and a new entity. So noone knows their true capacity as workers. Therefore every measure possible is made to discover the limits of how much you can exploit women before someth…
/r/MensRights28/04/22 09:21 AM
6

Me too, my perspective is also shifting with age. I no longer believe in equality; I don't think there will be justice or change and I think your picture of gender relations is correct and will persist like that. I mean, there is a good reason it has been in place for at least 1.5 million years. BUT, I'm more optimistic about it, though. It HAS worked well (sofar) and HAS brought men a lot of glory (for the sacrifices) and HAS forged men quite well, so I'm fine with status quo. That doesn't mean…
/r/MensRights27/04/22 04:23 PM
1

Hey, mods, wake up!
/r/MensRights26/04/22 03:18 PM
4

We need more bans. Not wanting an echo chamber is fine to a certain degree, but the backside of it is discussions get bogged down constantly by nonsense such as accusations of "woman-hating". Maybe we even should consider to adopt a "forgiving stance" for mra theory building, in the sense that some lenience would be allowed for non PC -speech when exploring new territory.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 02:17 PM
3

"Y'all", again.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 10:58 PM
2

They always say "y'all", dont they?
/r/MensRights29/03/22 06:29 PM
6

Why doesn't it cover crime and justice? What justification can there be?
/r/MensRights24/03/22 09:03 PM
12

Yes, because the term toxic feminity was launched by the same crowd who think toxic masculinity is a thing. This was done shortly after toxic masculinity came under heavy criticism in an attempt to justify the use of toxic masculinty. As in, 'hey, we say that feminity is toxic too!'. Difference being though that toxic feminity is defined by women being too altruistic and caring and goody people for their own good. *barf* So yeah, not only fuckwits, but the very same fuckwits.
/r/MensRights12/02/22 10:23 PM
2

I believe the misconception stems from India having chosen to define marital rape as sexual assault instead of rape.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 10:01 PM
8

Here is a good mainstream news article provided by u/EnvironmentalWar4627 for reference. It is of course slanted towards women as expected, but does bring up issues with this law, including risks of fake allegations against men. At least. Indianexpress
/r/MensRights04/02/22 12:12 AM
3

Very nice article, thank you. It doesn't support your stance though as it does point to problems with the exception being removed too, in several ways and does touch upon among other things burden of proof and the issue of fake allegations. But i like the article a lot.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 11:58 PM
1

Where is the link?
/r/MensRights03/02/22 11:39 PM
8

Did you have a source to back up your claim?
/r/MensRights03/02/22 11:32 PM
8

The issue seems to be about the burden of proof and not about whether or not it is illegal to rape: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/sa1unk/why_marriagestrike_is_trending_in_india/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3
/r/MensRights03/02/22 11:18 PM
33

Previous post about this Apparently: 1) marital rape is already illegal in India 2) this is about extending the rape laws that are in place for unmarried men to married couples. These rape laws cancel the presumption of innocence for men in rape cases
/r/MensRights03/02/22 11:13 PM
2

Copied from the article directly: "The campaign to sterilise men involved many levels of harassment."
/r/MensRights03/02/22 05:58 PM
2

Because men were pressed into it and women arent.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 05:54 PM
3

It seems it is easy to cancel mens human rights.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 12:00 PM
0

Maybe, but it is an insanely uphill battle already just trying to further mens' rights. Instinctively therefore, even though maybe wrong, I just want to focus on men. It' is a large enough issue to deserve more public attention and reflection as is, I think.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 03:49 PM
1

Maybe, though I think an honest introduction of women into the military could play out in several ways politically. But yes, a huge setback for men would be if it was used as an argument against male rights, as you say. But in that case, we all have lost. It could go the other way too though. In the meantime, I'm debating under the presumption that in reality female draftees aren't a factor as of yet.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 03:45 PM
7

Yeah, it's a lazy approach from these kind of people. They decide they think something is wrong with men and then they try apply a convenient fix-all solution instead of asking themselves, should we really be pissing people in their faces?
/r/MensRights31/01/22 12:15 AM
11

Yes it would be interesting to know how many further cases of false accusations could be proven true, if the police committed the same efforts into investigating these crimes as they do with rape? I mean considering it is a crime that deserves at least the same amount of prison time...
/r/MensRights30/01/22 07:04 AM
6

I think he is talking about how men are judged in public, socially. To me this would be a rather big men's issue that interlinks with topics such as the empathy gap or the mainstream narrative, both putting men at a disadvantage. There is a problem with public opinion influencing legal processes and predominantly men seem to have been innocently jailed, no? Then there is a certain mob mentality going on when people are so eager to condemn someone that they resort to scrutinize to body language. …
/r/MensRights22/01/22 07:37 AM
8

Actually, men did most of the fighting and sacrificing for the rights we have today.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 05:29 AM
4

Well, its their own fault, because toxic masculinity. Otherwise they wouldnt have felt that sense of duty. /s
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/21 06:41 AM
3

ETA strikethrough No, 1,05 is the baseline birth ratio. ETA 2 added clarification The point is nature proves mens lives are harder, not that it is the doing of nature. And it proves that mens lives always has been harder.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 01:47 AM
6

Another indicator might be sex birth ratios. According to biologists skewed sex birth ratios is due to life being harder for the sex with the higher birth ratio. And since human males are born at a ratio of 1,05 that means life is harder for men.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 10:25 PM
3

One thing to consider is whether or not you believe men and women to be the same or very different. If same, then something in the environment is causing men and women to protest differently. If the genders are very different, then maybe men and women employ very different strategies, meaning that what works for rallying women behind a cause, won't work for men and vice versa.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/21 04:24 AM
0

Well, I disagree on the numbers of men and yes I do READ these subs (me commenting wouldn't change the ratio of men either way, now would it?). A) I see lots of men expressing disagreement with antimale rethorics, notably toxic masculinity, rather than gender roles. B) I see a some men trying to explain male issues along that narrative, that the root cause is gender roles, but they are ideologues, commenting as an outsider. C) Very rarely have I seen men complain personally about gender roles co…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/21 09:15 PM
1

"I offer you the freedom to stop being you" Absolutely brilliant!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/21 07:21 AM
4

The discovery channel had a series of jingels about 'what is a discovery', and among those, one was to exterminate all men after freezing their sperm. It wasnt removed until i contacted media about it, asking how the hell this is acceptable. Otherwise no reaction whatsoever. ETA Point being, it wasn't fringe, it easily made its way into the mainstream.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/21 07:54 PM
0

Yes I know. Its a compromise. Very unsatisfactory, but the best that I can manage.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 05:42 AM
3

Yeah, probably. My first choice is only men and zero women, not even in support roles. However, IF women need to be included, then full on equality, no bullshit compromises shielding women from danger. All or nothing.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 10:43 AM
11

This is why IF women are to be included on the same terms as men, this introduction needs to happen during peacetime. The reason for this is to give time for women to fully integrate into the military. Otherwise they will just say: "Oh, sure equality is important, but right now there is an emergency and all that equality stuff will have to wait until after the war!", and proceed to draft males only. (And then after the war, they'll be like: "NoBOdy ShOULd Be DRafTEd!!!")
/r/MensRights29/11/21 06:35 AM
5

I agree with you, the disposable part is only half of the story. Whereas the female usually is the sex more directly tied to reproduction, the male sex indirectly tries to increase the odds for his offspring vs competitors. Males do this by bringing in benefits in addition to their part in reproduction. ​ Just think about it; why does it seem that species where males provide lots of benefits other than impregnating females, their part in reproduction gets minimized, while in species where the ma…
/r/MensRights26/11/21 10:47 PM
7

Sometimes I suspect men are deliberately left to fend for themselves. Those that make it are the ones that pass on their genes, and strengthen the human breed. I'm not saying it is right. I am undecided yet. But that may be an explanation.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 10:21 PM
2

The only thing I agree with you is yes, it is valuable to remind oneself how your opinions are being perceived, but other than that you're wrong on several levels. ​ First, giving up opinions because you believe the issue won't be moving anytime soon is nonsense. Firstly, because you can't know for certain and you may end up abandoning issues that the very next generation is ready to embrace. Even though things move slowly, each generation post-boomers have progressed leaps and bounds concerning…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/21 05:12 PM
1

We can know three things with reason able certainty: 1) Its not due to gender roles or expectations. Once male only professions such as teaching have changed into female only, so gender norms seemingly dont pose any problems. 2) Except for special cases such as kindergarten, i dont think false sexual allegations are keeping men away. As far as I am aware, this gender drift was happening before the metoo like movements were common. 3) We can very clearly observe that when women enter, men exit. L…
/r/MensRights24/11/21 10:54 PM
3

Why didnt they want more than five boys gather?
/r/MensRights23/11/21 11:58 AM
23

"..we have seen the treatment of women trying to make it in those careers..." No, you haven't.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 05:01 PM
37

Like literally nobody I know is vocally angry about Latin heritage week, women’s day, Black history month. So why is it socially acceptable to be such giant assholes about men’s day? Yeah, it really is strange. And it is such a strong, primal reaction too. But when you ask for reasons why they feel so strongly about it, they are always surprisingly stumped for any rational answers. Its interesting, because to me, its because it is a genetically encoded behavioural reaction.
/r/MensRights19/11/21 11:59 PM
14

I can't help but note how strikingly effective memes are at getting points across. Compared to lengthy wordy arguments about definitions and goal posts in the swamp of sofistries.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/21 08:34 PM
6

This is a joke, right?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/21 05:50 PM
9

Compensation in one way or another was actually common. It could be plunder, loot, honor, social status, voting rights, citizenship.
/r/MensRights12/11/21 03:59 AM
14

Do you think men should be compensated for giving up part of their bodily autonomy? Also, as you say, men have always been drafted. So men will discuss this topic any fucking time they please. FYI.
/r/MensRights11/11/21 10:18 PM
3

Thank you!
/r/MensRights10/11/21 11:05 AM
2

Thank you very much
/r/MensRights10/11/21 11:04 AM
2

Money is universal and easy I guess. But I had more rigorous compensation in mind. You see there are severe consequences for men when societies decide they have the right to conscript them; the same societies will the automatically assume they can always treat men anyway they want, that they always can have men making all kinds of sacrifices whenever convenient. Like, if you let people push you around, then you become a doormat. This is happening with men, this is I think a reason why men don't …
/r/MensRights05/11/21 04:24 PM
1

Its a noble though but wont work in reality. As soon war happens, and it will, always, men will be forced to fight. Regardless of anything.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 12:25 PM
4

Yeah they are the ones who have sculpted and shaped men through eons of sexual selection. So inevitably, they cant help but think men are awesome. They are so pleased with their results (and im not complaining) that they even think men will be attracted to butch women.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 12:01 PM
9

Your points are valid. Do you have a suggestion for how men should be compensated for giving up part of their bodily autonomy?
/r/MensRights04/11/21 11:45 AM
2

I agree with op. It's tedious dealing with feminists. Complete waste of time. Every good post devolves into a discussion about whether or not the patriarchy exists or if masculinity is toxic, just because some feminist was commenting. How many times do we need to have the same tedious discussion? Especially when we know we won't change feminists mind? Even worse, every opportunity for what could have been a really interesting discussions following these good posts, are completely lost. Some peop…
/r/MensRights03/11/21 06:04 PM
3

Im saying the same rules should apply to both genders. Since its fine for women to spew hate, we really dont need any dumbfucks tonepolicing men.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 04:36 AM
1

There is nothing wrong with being an anti-feminist. People will disagree. Grow the fuck up. Also, since misandry is fine, then so is misogyny. Anything else is bigotry. Women dishing it out but not being able to take it? Fucking pathetic.
/r/MensRights26/10/21 11:28 PM
-2

Its roughly the same it has always been and it always will remain. Biological reasons. Feminism is simply female nature translated into an ideology. (That is why being an anti-feminist equals being a misogynist to women; they feel they are being personally attacked).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/21 05:51 PM
2

Go back to menslib, autmod
/r/MensRights20/10/21 04:09 AM
1

Join a mgtow forum. Try goingyourownway.com for instance
/r/MensRights30/09/21 09:09 PM
3

Thank you
/r/MensRights13/09/21 08:49 PM
134

but fEmeNiSm is For eQUalITY, iT SaYS sO In The dICktIoNnarY
/r/MensRights07/09/21 05:12 PM
2

Is it because they want to increase male support for another war effort?
/r/MensRights21/08/21 06:14 AM
4

It's nice to see that the title clearly says it's about men. And not "workers", "people", "miners"... I haven't been following the MSM for a long time. Is this a first or have they started to acknowledge males as victims? BBC and/or other outlets?
/r/MensRights21/08/21 06:01 AM
3

Apparently unequal gender birth ratios in animals reflects a harder life for the gender with the higher birth rate. So since humans have 1,05 (5%) more males born, that would suggest men have a harder life than women. It doesn't reflects how much harder though. It could be that 5% more men is enough to deal with a 200% tougher life; it could also be that a 1% increase in difficulty requires as many as 5% additional males.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 09:42 AM
6

If women are allowed to vent but men not, thats bigotry. Mgtow got quarantined. Fds not.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 07:53 AM
5

Yes, its sad how male culture is being erased.
/r/MensRights03/07/21 04:19 PM
9

Thank you very, very much.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/21 04:24 PM
9

Thats big of course, because those are in the important genius territory (0.15% of population). But whats even more striking to me is that already at an IQ of 115 (15% of population) which is 1 SD, you have two males for every female. And thats among almost normal people that you meet and interact with everyday. I think this has also a huge impact on society and peoples perception of how smart men and women are.
/r/MGTOW09/05/21 10:18 PM
15

I think what this is all about is the NYT is smelling the coffee. They realize they can no longer justify a male-only draft. However they still don't want to send women to the frontline. So they want to open the possibility for a civic duty draft, with the intention to offer women a way out of combat.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/21 09:16 AM
2

You're right. I gave gold, because that's what I do (try ignore misandry) and works for me. But thinking more about it, the debunking done here by people is so valuable to have as a reference. So, yeah, I don't know.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 05:55 PM
14

I know that MRA’s stand with men like me. Thank you for sharing. It's so valuable to get men's own words describing what they are put through when confronting the mainstream narrative. I can tell you having lived through all that, that there is no more horrible thing to live through than a false accusation. I would live through my childhood a hundred times before going through this once. I am still broken and slowly picking up the pieces of my shattered life and I still do not know if it will ev…
/r/MensRights16/03/21 07:52 PM
4

Lol
/r/MensRights06/03/21 10:18 AM
4

A really good point.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 10:47 AM
131

Nobody will ever be able to convince me that the fact male sufferings are lesser known to the general public is something that the general public has chosen.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 12:12 PM
1

Well, this is how I see it. Men are responsible for everything, even things beyond their actual control. Women aren't responsible for anything. Short-term and for the individual male this is of course a very heavy burden and many men pay very steep prices for this. Similarily, short-term and for each individual female, this benefits women greatly. As they as you say can get away with anything. But think about it long-term and what it does for men as a whole, the entire male population and compar…
/r/MensRights16/10/20 08:20 AM
3

If I had been a woman I would have regarded the presumption of female hypoagency or lack of female accountability as the single biggest problem females are facing.
/r/MensRights15/10/20 12:21 PM
-1

Oh, I'm certain you can find the single odd examples of fun females. But as a general rule and on the whole, men are way more funloving than women, who frankly quite often can be real bores. I mean, they can't allow toys of their sex organs because they feel objectified? Besides being boring beyond belief, what does that even mean? Whereas men quite happily are volunteering high resolution images of their sex organs. In full glory. On the regular. To complete strangers. Now, apparently a lot nee…
/r/MensRights13/10/20 05:40 PM
-5

Yeah, women aren't any fun. Work with men, work around women.
/r/MensRights12/10/20 10:30 PM
2

Try r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates Just in case you haven't seen it.
/r/MensRights09/10/20 07:28 AM
30

a welcome development Yeah, no kidding. I was over on your site, Hequal, reading the post and it was a great read. Good news indeed, and if you say they did a good job, then I know they did a good job. Thank you for your work. Even if we only get tokens, if they are high quality with solid facts, they are immensely valuable as references and to spread awareness. I hope others will consider becoming longtime donors to you too, like me. Considering the power state medias have, you do important wor…
/r/MensRights11/09/20 08:17 AM
1

Just because a viper every once in a while happens to slither it's way in the same direction you are going, doesn't make it a good travel companion.
/r/MensRights09/09/20 12:40 AM
1

Even if the male only draft is abolished, would it really make any difference? The day war comes nations will draft males regardless of law or constitution. The argument, to protect family, is very strongly rooted in males. And women will almost certainly overwhelmingly be assigned support roles. How much have women been used in combat? I've heard of snipers, at most, but does anyone know if females have been tested in field? ETA And are females as efficient as males in said support roles?
/r/MensRights08/09/20 07:35 AM
1

In case you haven't seen this, I think you'll like it, it supports your notion and discusses all of the things you're talking about. Sex differences in general intelligence For instance: "Adult males have a mean advantage in g of about 7.5–9 IQ equivalent points. The variance in mental test scores is 10–20% greater for males. The combined effect of higher mean and greater variance result in an exponentially increasing male over-representation from average g (IQ=100) and up, from 2 males for each…
/r/MGTOW07/09/20 12:46 PM
4

I don't disagree with you, it's just that a thought occurred to me while reading your comment. What if female only rail cars were introduced in an attempt to protect the males from false accusations? Of course, this can't be publicly acknowledged, that "woman bad man good", simply because women are unreasonable when it comes to dealing with negative feedback. So the only option is to work around women and make sure that it looks like "men bad woman good" in public. I've been thinking the same ab…
/r/MensRights30/08/20 06:28 AM
4

If conscription becomes gender neutral, will men benefit from that or will men's average burden increase due to cushiony positions being reserved for women? And are cushiony positions reserved for women, in both military but also civilian workplaces?
/r/MensRights05/08/20 11:28 PM
1

So to be honest about peoples' capabilites isn't harmful? You know, here's a crazy thought, maybe it's even beneficial. Thanks for a great post.
/r/MensRights31/05/20 06:39 AM
0

Japanese blue pill anime.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 05:32 PM
1

I don't think witch hunts is activism.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 05:35 AM
1

I like it. All women should look like that.
/r/MGTOW12/12/19 11:37 PM
2

You're probably right, and I hope the medical profession is aware of the risk that men might go undermedicated. ​ BUT: Look at it this way, I think she is only trying to protect you. She knows that men have higher risk behaviours and get into trouble easier than women. In this case she worries that because you're male there's a higher risk that you'll start abuse the medication. Not because there is something wrong with you or because she wants to be unfair, but simply because that's how men are…
/r/MensRights01/12/19 09:34 AM
2

Jules Vernes books were great adventures
/r/MensRights15/09/19 07:44 PM
2

Maybe Tom Sawyer, Huckleberry Finn.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 07:35 PM
1

I also liked the mystery books by Enid Blyton.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 07:34 PM
1

The Hobbit, Tolkien
/r/MensRights15/09/19 07:21 PM
1

The Belgariad by David Eddings. Also look into mangas.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 07:07 PM
1

I don't know, but that headline, with the genders reversed, sounds like it originally was a feminist catch phrase.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/19 03:57 PM
1

The only solution to the puzzle "why are men treated badly by a supposedly liberal society", is that the society in question believes that men are superior to women. As in, for instance, nobody is going to listen to the individual, who has an IQ of ten gazillions, complaining about quotas for people with carrot-level IQ. In fact, he would be treated with contempt. The reason for modern western society's belief in male superiority is it's feminization. What we are hearing are the female experienc…
/r/MensRights14/08/19 10:50 PM
1

I don't think so. I don't think they are even close to that level of control. I think their experience of power is more like precariously balancing on an edge.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 03:32 AM
37

Probably not, but that's an issue of personal maturity rather than being about the actual issue of MGM. Actually, he's got a dad with a real fucking spine to brag about once he has grown up a little.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 12:54 PM
32

Notice how her first kneejerk, go-to reaction is to lie about being assaulted. That the very first thing that comes to her mind is to lie about being assaulted. And she only backtracks after the guy tells her they got her on tape.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 10:32 AM
0

I agree with you. This isn't a male rights issue. This is all about the fears of mainstream society that men won't play ball.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 07:35 PM
1

Yeah, whatever
/r/MensRights03/08/19 02:45 PM
60

Step 1. Piss on men Step 2. Ask why men are angry Yeah, it's baiting. Kind of a form of gaslighting, isn't it? What a fucked up sale strategy. What harm does it do to society? Enough to be regarded as high treason? I'm completely ignoring the MSM or the state here in Sweden, and I've never felt better.
/r/MensRights03/08/19 02:00 PM
2

Yeah, I get I was off topic, sorry for that. But this, spelling out the male victim, is massive progress. Or a big slipup, we'll see
/r/MensRights03/08/19 11:22 AM
1

Yeah, like no. The rule is new and memes weren't a problem before that either. Especially not if you compare with other spam content. But, coinicidentally, the trumpsters seem to ready themselves for another memetic war. I think that's the real reason for the ban here. Regardless of what one thinks of Trump, we should learn from those that actually have managed to topple an established narrative in real life. But maybe you don't want that.
/r/MensRights03/08/19 11:17 AM
4

Look, they actually spelled out it was a man that died! I'm reeling here! Does that happen regularly down there in Australia?
/r/MensRights03/08/19 03:03 AM
1

I know, right.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 09:37 PM
2

Background: The BBC did a piece on MGM about a year ago with the title claiming the issue of MGM being a moral maze. They were referring to religious groups and blah blah, you know the arguments. Funny thing is though that liberal society has no problem in determining the morals in women forced to wear burkas. They wouldn't call it a moral maze to question womens right to not wear burkas. Somehow, as soon as it is a male rights issue though, it transforms into a "moral maze". That being said, th…
/r/MensRights02/08/19 08:42 PM
1

Have memes been a problem? More so than other posts?
/r/MensRights02/08/19 12:04 PM
2

1) Yes, but their audience is way larger, that's the point. Our audience isn't. 2) I'm sorry, your analogies confuse me. 3) Railing? Attacking? I'm asking and questioning.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 12:01 PM
1

In that case it is better to change the rule into banning low effort spammy posts, rather than memes. Which clever memes have been given leeway since the rule? The rule is fairly new and for you to say that "they often are given leeway" seems a bit early ruling. ETA Also, the low effort thing applies very much to other content as well. I'm not for banning those either, but i don't believe memes have been spammier or of lower effort than other types of posts. Actually, I haven't seen that very ma…
/r/MensRights02/08/19 11:46 AM
1

Also, if you wish to encourage people to make good mra memes, you do it where there is a larger audience that can get an upvote economy going. A tiny sub like r/mramemes isn't as likely to motivate people to put in the effort of making memes. It's crazy to subdivide content like this.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 11:44 AM
2

That's number one of my two points (pls see post). Subdividing an already small community is the wrong way to go. We need to attract people and build mass. Not fragment into tiny slivers of thousands supetspecilized subs.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 11:29 AM
2

That's number one of my two points (pls see post). Subdividing an already small community is the wrong way to go. We need to attract people and build mass. Not fragment into tiny slivers of thousands supetspecilized subs.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 11:28 AM
2

This too. Mixing it up is good.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 09:56 AM
2

It has always been like that. High quality content will always be less accessible. People won't start reading Dostojevski just because you remove tabloids for instance. Also, low effort articles, catch phrases and such is what has been used against mra arguments forever by the mainstream against men . Memes is a way to adapt and counter. Further, whether or not a meme is low effort isn't as important as to how big response it manages to illicit. A low effort meme can result in high quality comme…
/r/MensRights02/08/19 09:55 AM
12

They've painted themselves into a corner. They need to believe that men are bad or else they need to face their vile treatment of men and male rights. So new reasons to piss on men need to be fabricated faster than we can debunk them. I think they are loosing that race, though.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 07:30 PM
8

Yeah, right. Let's run a grammar and spell check too on that car.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 06:25 AM
2

I really don't see any cringe?
/r/MensRights20/07/19 04:23 AM
16

It's BECAUSE women complain more, that they have it easier by every objective measure. It's not a bug, it's a feature. It's biologically wired to be like that, so that male resources get transferred to females. Incidentally, that's what got them the burka, too.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 10:40 PM
49

"being upfront about limitations of methodology" So as long as you include a disclaimer that you might be wrong, nothing you post can ever be questioned. Fucking brilliant.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 07:05 PM
1

Feminists want men to go their own way , as a way of bringing down the patriarchy.
/r/MGTOW20/06/19 08:13 PM
1

It's easy to understand why the female narrative of men oppressing women is so important to mainstream society. It offers women a feel-good explanation for the lack of female achievements historically. ​ If you step back and take a look at what men have accomplished, it is absolutely mind-boggling. Of course women, when comparing themselves to men, will feel overwhelmed. ​ But with the feminist narrative women can comfort themselves believing to be the same as men, only having been denied the op…
/r/MensRights19/06/19 08:26 PM
1

The interpretation of "not knowing" meaning you're a doormat is wrong. It means you choose to overlook discrepancies by pretending you didn't see them happening. For example, you're caught with your head up your ass. I pretend not to notice. I act as if I don't know why you're making those muffled sounds. I'm sparing you the humiliation. I'm being nice to you. It simply states you should be nice to those beneath you.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/19 09:03 AM
11

To women projection is deep thinking.
/r/MGTOW18/06/19 08:06 PM
8

Easy. The woman is definitely way, way more violent. It takes a lot for society to take female violence seriously enough for charges to be made against her. If the victim is male, most probably it would be be laughed off and the male is basically charged for not defending himself. If the victim is female, it's lesbo wrestling porn rather than an act of violence. If the victim is a child, the primary victim is the violent female because she is then suffering from a male-induced psychosis. So if a…
/r/MensRights18/06/19 09:00 AM
14

This is funny. It's news when inaccurate claims by females do not get published.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 02:50 AM
6

We just need to be careful that if there will be such a minister, that the appointment doesn't get co-opted by feminists. Anytime there has been any progress for males in Sweden, women needed to butt in to make sure they remained in control of the narrative. Resulting in any pro-male efforts being watered down. Predictably. The MSM, including the state media (sic!) being very instrumental in supporting efforts to foil pro-male progress.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 04:56 AM
1

I don't think it is that bad. Some bias is showing, but not much? Although: I'm not going to read the wiki entry for feminism, but my blind guess is that female grievances are presented as established facts, whereas the outright violations of male rights in this entry is presented as "claims" only? If you would compare I mean.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 05:12 PM
3

Is this really surprising? I mean men are biologically wired to pursue women, why would you think it strange women, one way or the other, are of interest to men? Isn't the real question here: how come men find women repulsive? Despite the male biological drive...
/r/MGTOW07/06/19 11:49 PM
3

It's an observation from being an mra for over 2 decades. The only time mainstream society will present male rights issues as such is when there is a greater (in their eyes) benefit to women. ​ No benefit for women? Crickets.
/r/MensRights06/06/19 10:14 AM
1

It's not paranoia, it's not twisting and I didn't say it was anti-male. I said it isn't about male rights. It's a simple observation. Anytime mainstream society seemingly supports male rights, it actually is about women.
/r/MensRights06/06/19 10:05 AM
4

This isn't progress. This is feminist propaganda. The only reason they bring up paid paternity leave is because they hope it will benefit the women's careers. That's the ulterior agenda. ETA To be clear, I'm all for men getting more paternal rights.
/r/MensRights06/06/19 04:09 AM
-10

That's a compliment
/r/MensRights05/06/19 02:01 PM
0

Why stop at complaining about the use of male mice? Why not complain about the use of young men skewering medical research against women? Because it might lead to men not having to be sacrificed? And require women to share the risks? Probably.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 11:51 PM
2

The link is interesting. The table shows how prosperous societies choose to prioritize women (gynocentrism). The funny thing is that the feminine narrative wishes to interpret this as it being women who generate wealth, ignoring the fact that these societies already are prospering. Thereby persuading organizations such as the UN or wellfare organizations to invest in women rather than men. And when data show men being discriminated against compared to women, they will point to men's statistics h…
/r/MensRights27/05/19 07:13 AM
1

You know how both traditional society and modern liberal society is telling men they should listen to women? Now, why is that? Obviously because men don't. What's interesting though is that all these men have decided it is a waste of time to do so. Just saying.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 05:11 AM
1

You know how both traditional society as well as supposedly modern liberal society constantly keeps telling men they should listen more to women? Now, why might that be? Obviously because men don't listen to women. But probably all these men have decided it's a waste of time to listen to women. Just saying.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 05:05 AM
1

It's amazing how I time after time conclude that I should stop listening to women. It's a complete waste of time.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 04:57 AM
1

It's amazing how I time after time conclude that I should stop listening to women. It's a complete waste of time.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 04:57 AM
1

It's amazing how I time after time conclude that I should stop listening to women. It's a complete waste of time.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 04:57 AM
1

It's amazing how I time after time conclude that I should stop listening to women. It's a complete waste of time.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 04:57 AM
1

It's amazing how I time after time conclude that I should stop listening to women. It's a complete waste of time.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 04:57 AM
1

I would be glad if you did, no credit needed.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 07:10 PM
7

The lack of empathy for men is an artificial artefact from the way media chooses to report on men and women as victims. Men are never acknowledged as victims, whereas any circumstance finds a female victim. And this affects how people treat male and female victims differently. The way abuse of males and females is being reported differs. Take Boko Haram as an example. The media DID report on the burning of boys alive. However, it was reported in a more factual or rational manner, which doesn't c…
/r/MensRights01/05/19 01:09 AM
1

I started watching it but got bored from all that whine, whine, snivels, snivels, boo hoo drama. When I think of superhero movies I expect fast-paced action, with some spikes of Hulk smashing things.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 06:08 PM
5

The whole world around him is now ready to move on and put this behind them, because everyone else but him have gotten what they wanted. They got the answers to their questions, forcefully. He didn't get to ask questions. He didn't get any answers. And he definitely didn't get to slap those answers out of that bitch, or the police or any of the fucks around him. He also fought for his life. And now that the fight is over, he has spent all that energy without furthering his life one inch. He isn'…
/r/MensRights17/04/19 05:26 PM
5

A top PR firm can find a way of marketing men without alienating others. That would have been one of the main goals regardless, because: 1) team building by designating enemies is old and what team woman does 2) attacking someone harmless makes the attacker look bad. This way we're not promoting divisive, controversial male rights issues. We're not shitting on women or anybody. We're simply saying, he is awesome. Which I think is a welcome message 3) it will be hard to claim it will harm female …
/r/MensRights15/04/19 05:09 AM
5

Hire top PR firms and task them with selling masculinity.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 07:22 PM
1

This is funny. Conclusion, women act like assholes.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 04:34 AM
1

Thank you, that is helpful
/r/MensRights01/04/19 07:39 PM
4

I am currently being 'persuaded' to let go of male rights issues. The resources spent on trying to prove that male mens' rights activism stems from male angst is staggering. Someone is anxious to prove a point. Anyhow, I have a question. Would you you happen to know what the plan for the female angst is? Try to masculinize them too? (Because they end up extraordinarily unappetizing). Or is there another way to extract female productivity that will allow for feminity to be preserved? Is the maleb…
/r/MensRights01/04/19 01:59 AM
2

Actually, now that you made me start thinking about it, the more unlimited does the female entitlement seem to me.
/r/MensRights29/03/19 07:01 AM
3

Words. Men have always been told to watch their language around women, both in traditional societies and in modern days with new gender neutral words being invented. Men. Men are expected to change according present needs. Wartime? Be aggressive and go to war to protect the women. Peacetime? Don't be even assertive since it scares the women. Chivalry - hold the doors, but not on days they want to feel empowered. Work places, only male behavior is scrutinized. Awful female bullying is ignored, go…
/r/MensRights29/03/19 06:51 AM
3

Car manufacturers have made efforts making cars female friendly. (steering, pedal sizes and distances, pedal forces) Functional foods for a very long time only made female oriented products. The Swedish military have tried to adapt equipment for women, I've heard. Malmö city (sweden) built a big building all round since all other buildings were too phallic. Female only gym spaces. Female discounts, gym and clubs. The criminal world is also more accessible to women thanks to the sentencing gap. T…
/r/MensRights29/03/19 06:39 AM
7

Society. As in name male rights that men have and women haven't. While on the other hand, for instance, men lack bodily autonomy (mgm, draft). The consumer culture, where for some reason misandry is key when selling to women. News and mass media, that will back female rights to for instance bodily autonomy for women but not for men. Certain laws designed to protect female interests.
/r/MensRights29/03/19 06:03 AM
1

RNA expression levels can both be regulated by genes, or as a response to external demands. For instance, someone lifting will have different expression levels in their muscles compared to someone who doesn't. So what I thought was funny: she worries that this would argue for a return to gender roles. While instead, the study might actually indicate that the gender roles haven't changed at all. For instance, women want equality? Well, of course men need to provide that equality, without burdenin…
/r/MensRights29/03/19 12:10 AM
6

Well, you know all these double standards about women needing special protection is the same thing as saying women are inferior to men. And who am I to argue? That would be mansplaining.
/r/MGTOW22/03/19 05:54 AM
2

I lost it a bit, I'm sorry. They're trying to reach out and that's good.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 03:52 PM
9

I don't believe this. Sounds like an excuse. Instead of asking, has decades of one-sided debate and reporting anything to do with it? The fully accepted and even institutional misandry? The exploitation of males, domestically and at work? Etc. But no, let's settle for an explanation that leaves the mainstream scot free, the narrative intact and nobody needs to feel bad about men despairing. *spits
/r/MensRights21/03/19 11:40 AM
1

Yeah, it does explain a lot, I think.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/19 10:53 PM
3

Here's a great review of general intelligence and sex differences. ​ Sex Differences in General Intelligence ​ *it reviews the sex differences focusing on the male brain *it talks about differences i "raw" processing power *it explains how and why the male brain is wired differently than the female brain *it also mentions how IQ tests have been sex normalized to hide sex differences in IQ ​ For instance, regarding IQ distribution, he comments: ​ Adult males have a mean advantage in g of about 7.…
/r/TheRedPill11/03/19 07:45 PM
10

It was thought that having careers would help with female self esteem. This because men were thought to derive their confidence from identifying with their job. Turns out men, who validate their egos internally, are fine playing video games. Whereas working women, who still are wired to validate themselves externally, now have to be praised as professionals as well. I think there is a marked difference in dealing with a professional who doesn't need to validate his ego at your expense in doing b…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 04:33 PM
1

I'm perfectly fine with women's subjective and emotional experience be given certain priority. It should be done while openly acknowledging the bias, though.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 12:09 PM
2

Women have the best whine.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 10:20 PM
1

I really don't think sjws are the biggest factor though. The main difference I would say is that animes communicate constructively with young men about topics that interest them, including masculinity. The west never does, it only addresses its young males with negative references to masculinity. Otherwise not at all.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 05:25 AM
2

I think it is part of the reason anime and manga became so popular among young males in the west. It was quite a feat. The west and Japan are far apart culturally and there is a large language barrier. Overcoming the language barrier to the anglosphere, was especially impressive. And add to that a pre existing, very strong angloculture (Hollywood and more) and still young western males chose anime. Tells you a lot of things. ETA 20190306 Also known as dropping the ball.
/r/MensRights03/03/19 04:42 PM
-7

*women
/r/MensRights02/03/19 05:11 AM
0

I don't think it is possible to teach females the concept of objectivity. It's like oil and water. Whereas for males, it's basically second nature.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 05:05 AM
3

Another reason they use men is that women can be early in pregnancy without knowing it and one doesn't want to risk the fetus being adversely effected by trial drugs. However it would be nice if this yet another male sacrifice by men could be acknowledge as such. Sweden refuses to. I have checked.
/r/MensRights28/02/19 07:03 PM
13

When reality (yet again) fails to line up with the feminine world view - fabricate data, fabricate facts, fabricate stats, fabricate science, fabricate grievance, fabricate words, fabricate concepts, fabricate narrative... even fabricate the male experience.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 05:53 AM
1

First, you can't always rely on new laws actually be enforced. This was the case when young boys who were old enough were granted the right to be fully informed about being circumcised and then the right to decide whether they wanted to go through with the procedure or not. I contacted every landsting in sweden to ask what procedures they had put in place to ensure the boys were properly informed and given a fair chance to refuse despite supposed cultural pressure. None had made even the slighte…
/r/MensRights24/02/19 02:25 PM
1

I know they CAN. But WILL they? I don't think so. See my response to clockgirl.
/r/MensRights24/02/19 12:59 PM
0

The draft is still in place and actually phrased gender neutral. But I won't believe for one second that sweden actually will draft females into combat roles in case of war. This simply based on history. This of course won't be outspoken, since it would not fit with the swedish facade, so I can't provide links. In this case however, I would argue that anyone claiming that women actually will be required to equally share all burdens of war across the board, is the one who has the burden of proof.…
/r/MensRights24/02/19 12:29 PM
12

Sweden: women can join the military if they want to. If they do, they get preferential treatment. Only men will be drafted in case of emergency, explicitly stated by law. In Sweden men don't even have the option not to register. I mean, if we are talking about men's rights?
/r/MensRights24/02/19 08:11 AM
4

One of the things that puzzles me with this one sided reporting is how on earth do they manage disregard male victims so consistently? Regardless of whatever the reason behind it might be, it shouldn't be 100% consistency in failing to report men as victims . At the very least one would expect the occasional slip-up: "Hundred men working in the mines are still being trapped hundred feet below". But no, the stonewalling against male victim hood is absolute. Complete. My theory is that it's women …
/r/MensRights24/02/19 05:47 AM
14

I would have loved friends. I haven't had friends with whom I could hang out with on a regular basis for twenty years. I'm just hoping that I will be able to make a few friends despite being a bit older now. I mean since they say it gets more difficult the older one is. At the moment this is not going to happen due to being hounded for not agreeing with the swedish, whiny women narrative. It depends on how much more of my time they are going to waste, already having wasted my past six years, if …
/r/MGTOW24/02/19 04:07 AM
1

Hahaha, this is female projection.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/19 01:34 AM
20

Females do this. It's a feminine trait.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 05:49 AM
3

It seems that also drivers license might be tied to registering in some states. Regarding the vote, maybe the notion of being tied to voting rights is by not registering you commit a felony? I think most countries keep their draft option without males registering, meaning in most other countries men will be drafted without having a choice. This would be the case with for instance Sweden. Even if it goes on about how men need to stop being men and whines about violent and toxic masculinity, when …
/r/MensRights16/02/19 02:33 AM
2

I agree with this. And also, for a new procedure like this (you're talking about partial limb restoration) the normal, expected research and development time would be what, 10 to twenty years? This with extensive resources. And with no guarantee of success after that even. Ideally you would have wanted test samples, like artificial penises to experiment on so you can adapt your protocol according to unforseen problems that most probably will occur multiple times at every step of the way. Talk to…
/r/MensRights15/02/19 07:32 PM
2

Could you provide this information that is available instead of that link you sent? Because that one is an opinion piece and not a scientific study. For instance, he doesn't mention the setup for the study with cystic fibrosis clearly enough for me to be able to rule out that the fact that males affected by cystic fibrosis have immobile sperm didn't affect the results. Consider how much metadata there is available at your fingertip as a medical scientist; it would be very easy to look at other d…
/r/MensRights29/01/19 11:44 AM
7

When I went to med school over twenty years ago we had a class about donor compatibility, organs and blood. As a sidetrack the teacher mentioned that ten percent of all fathers turn out to not be the real fathers, and that the results were consistent. We asked if the fathers were informed, but no, usually not. ETA He mentioned it to prepare us for the moral dilemma we could find ourselves in. Also, from the way he mentioned it, it was clear that this wasn't a new relevation. But rather something…
/r/MensRights29/01/19 03:52 AM
3

When I went to med school over twenty years ago we had a class about donor compatibility, organs and blood. As a sidetrack the teacher mentioned that ten percent of all fathers turn out to not be the real fathers, and that the results were consistent. We asked if the fathers were informed, but no, usually not.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 03:48 AM
2

There's a huge difference in not having the mental discipline for objectivity and actively blurring out reality with hysterics.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/18 03:19 AM
1

Someone who is an agent will assume and treat other people people to be agents as well. So agents do not objectify people, including women. Most men are not even clear on what women mean when being accused of objectifying women, or what the big deal is supposed to be, since 1) men don't objectify and 2) men are treated as tools all the time.
/r/MGTOW29/11/18 08:26 PM
0

Those lines sound like things a female would say?
/r/TheRedPill28/11/18 11:52 AM
24

It's interesting and hopeful to see a study against circumcision coming from a Muslim country.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 10:49 AM
10

Before cutting; has to use condom to protect against hiv. Condoms decrease sex sensation somewhat. UN propaganda; cutting protects against hiv. After cutting; STILL has to use condoms. Only now with markedly decreased dick sensitivity to start with, then apply the condom. Net result; exact same hiv protection (condoms). Males genitally and sexually mutilated. Ethics, human rights violated for males. UN conclusion; pleased with net results. Let's target minor boys.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 06:21 AM
1

Nah. I need the physical activity.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/18 09:14 AM
1

?
/r/MensRights13/08/18 12:14 PM
9

Both Sweden and the UN are hippocritical sacks of shit. ETA what I mean to say is I fully understand your point. Sweden is all about one-sided political propaganda, so I know what you're talking about. I've completely ghosted Swedish public discourse as a result and never felt better.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 11:16 AM
4

'All the rights to women, nothing more. All the rights to men, nothing less.'
/r/MensRights11/08/18 03:31 PM
2

The vaccine wasn't given to girls only because of limited supply. It was patented and very expensive. Supplies were there, they even tried to make it a business, selling it to adult (women).
/r/MGTOW25/07/18 02:10 AM
6

I'm just going to leave a suggestion without knowing whether it might work or not, you decide. As you say, it's easier if you're seeing the cracks already in blue pilled society. Also he is reluctant to discuss his dating with dad. So how about going at it from an Mra angle? At younger ages people tend to be more idealistic and it should be easy pointing towards a few choice glaring double standards. Misandry, MGM, sentencing gap, pussy pass... I'm not saying to make him an mra, but you could st…
/r/TheRedPill23/07/18 05:11 AM
0

I think you're right.
/r/MGTOW25/06/18 03:15 AM
1

Fabricate grievance.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 11:13 AM
-9

A captain and his first mate? Wow, that's gay.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/18 11:35 AM
5

Just a reminder. If there is no conviction, he's been innocently jailed. The use of "wrongfully convicted" negates the presumption of innocence and is a convenient word play, because it sounds better that men are wrongfully convicted than actually innocent people horribly treated. The presumption of innocence is not a statement about reality. It's a social statement meant to protect against mob justice.
/r/MGTOW29/04/18 07:43 PM
6

I'm more concerned with people underthinking things, though.
/r/MGTOW26/04/18 01:20 PM
2

They frame the assumption of female victimhood as "androcentrism in anthropology/history". Anyone knows how jealously women guard their victim status. And how usually men are being accused of being male chauvinists if they don't buy into the female sob narrative. Funny how that works.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 09:48 AM
2

I agree with bullying being a consequence of a social order. But that doesn't mean it is necessarily beneficial, it might be just a byproduct. Another thing is, I don't think bullying is a result of dominance. If you dominate someone, they don't need to agree with you, they just need to stay in line. This is why hierarchies are more tolerant to differences between people, it doesn't need consensus. Instead I think it is a lack of functioning hierarchies that has a social group resorting to bully…
/r/MGTOW15/04/18 02:00 AM
4

In my case, I got reprimanded by my boss in front of the whole department at the next staff meeting. But this is Sweden of course. I didn't apologize and never put the toilet seat down though.
/r/MGTOW14/04/18 12:29 AM
5

Thank you for the review, I've been eagerly waiting to hear about the movie. Also glad it meant a lot to you. Can I ask you about the audience's reaction? And your opinion on how do you think the movie will impact mainstream people?
/r/MensRights10/04/18 07:01 PM
4

No. Never. Pls fuck off.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 01:34 AM
10

Here's a mental trick I learned a few years ago. It's about pretending to being your own parent. Maybe it can help? Anyway, imagine you have a son who is furious about having been circumcised (not by you) and he comes to you, venting his anger. What would you say to your own son or tell him to do to help him feel better about it? Then try to apply that to yourself. Hope it helps. I know how much anger can suck
/r/MensRights08/04/18 10:56 PM
6

Anyone heard anything more about the supposed circumcision ban in Iceland?
/r/MensRights08/04/18 02:38 PM
12

There is no surprise here considering how heavily biased the reporting by said media has been. I don't know why you're shocked? Just the fact there's been intense media coverage of a non issue is telling.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 11:33 AM
6

I'm calling it; any day now they'll unearth tablets addressing the toilet seats back then.
/r/MGTOW07/04/18 10:38 AM
12

Yeah, this. I was watching an archeology documentary a few years back. They were uncovering lots of those cuneiform scripted clay tablets that people started writing on thousands of years ago. And they mentioned a tablet that was a letter from a wife to her husband. In it, she was asking when they were going to get a new expansion to their house, like their neighbour already had gotten. I thought that was real funny.
/r/MGTOW07/04/18 08:33 AM
2

The biggest strength/weakness of a man is his ego, hence why they use these types of attacks. This is a specific case of a more generalized principle, which is that anything you care about can be a source of strength to you or exploited by others as a weakness. Examples, you being madly in love can feel great to you, but can also be targeted as your weak spot by others. You being passionate about something? Same goes here, it's a strength to you, but can also be used by as your soft spot. And so…
/r/MGTOW30/03/18 12:14 PM
4

Let's just hope these countermeasures against lack of female professionalism will be enough.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 11:37 AM
1

There's a big difference between a woman using these terms to state preferences in males privately, and for mainstream society to base public policies on concepts such as 'male fragility' (EU trying to whitewash misandry) or feminist lobby groups shutting down male issues by referring to 'toxic masculinty'. The latter being unprofessional and unacceptable.
/r/MGTOW29/03/18 02:50 PM
3

It's probably another 'moral maze' to the BBC...
/r/MensRights29/03/18 01:58 PM
4

News from foreign countries are very interesting. Please keep posting if relevant.
/r/MGTOW22/03/18 07:57 PM
1

No, they want men to take it so they don't have to deal with the side effects of their pill.
/r/MGTOW20/03/18 03:01 PM
0

No interest in pills. No interest in vasectomy, no way. Gloves and condoms, yes. Protects against diseases.
/r/MGTOW20/03/18 12:40 AM
1

So, anyone know when they'll decide whether or not to ban?
/r/MensRights19/03/18 08:51 PM
7

In her description box she posts the following lists of how narcississts treat you and how you are supposed to be treated healthily. And I think the items are spot on how men are treated by mainstream society, as if society as a whole is a big narcississt abusing men. I guess that's only to be expected for any gynocentric society? I've added some comments in bold to the lists, just off the top of my head. Here are the lists: Healthy conversations – sincere, honest, open communication ( some idea…
/r/MGTOW01/03/18 08:13 PM
1

This is only damage control.
/r/MensRights24/02/18 11:43 PM
2

Is forcing women to wear burkas also a moral maze to the BBC?
/r/MensRights24/02/18 11:25 PM
3

"gynosniffic"... 😁
/r/MGTOW23/02/18 01:11 PM
8

It's also interesting because it will affect the "women spending 85%" tripe. All of a sudden, businesses will need to cater to male customers.
/r/MGTOW23/02/18 12:23 PM
29

They're prying with their slimy tentacles.
/r/MGTOW20/02/18 06:57 AM
5

Only some were upvotable? I wanted to upvote that false accusers need to be punished but was unable to.
/r/MGTOW16/02/18 11:38 PM
21

I'm all for female spaces. Think about it, it means all other spaces are going to be, uhm, less crowded. Next step is to introduce them to the burka. Only we tell them it's a portable female space, designed to take them safely from female space A to female space B.
/r/MGTOW11/02/18 03:32 AM
15

And now apply 200 000 years of evolution to that.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/18 09:38 PM
1

Boy soldiers. Not child soldiers.
/r/MGTOW28/01/18 01:59 PM
1

Boy soldiers. Not child soldiers.
/r/MGTOW28/01/18 01:59 PM
4

It's one of many bullshit terms, with the sole purpose of trying to deny men feeling righteous anger. Usually they originate in mainstream society, and I've always found this concept an ill fit within the manosphere, but whatever. In short; as a man nobody wants to "have to deal with your emotions" of any kind, not just anger. That goes across the board for feminists, manginas and redpillers, for both women and men. And for most of the time, men have evolved to emote feelings differently to suit…
/r/MGTOW27/01/18 04:21 PM
3

Is there more to the beta male than being a failed alpha? Claim: I'm entertaining an idea that the alpha male and the beta male are two (of many different?) kinds of breeds of males rather than betas being failed alphas. Background: Gynocentrism is biological. The male population is the buffer zone between reality and the protected females. This means the capabilities or competence of a tribe's males in dealing with said reality is of outmost interest to the survival of the tribe. Example: Let's…
/r/TheRedPill12/12/17 03:01 AM
4

This one deserves a click http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/09/opinion/sunday/australia-refugee-prisons-manus-island.html?hpw&rref=sunday-review&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=well-region&region=bottom-well&WT.nav=bottom-well&_r=0
/r/MensRights11/12/16 04:27 PM
4

Here's another link on the topic, dealing with it in depth. I think you're going to like it. http://www.sciencevsfeminism.com/the-myth-of-equality/sex-differences-general-intelligence/ It not only reviews different angles to comparing male and female intelligence, concluding : "All of the aforementioned measures reveal that men process information more efficiently than women do." But it also discusses political correctness resulting in efforts to eliminate gender differences by rigging the tests…
/r/MGTOW01/12/16 01:16 AM
3

Projection.
/r/MGTOW02/11/16 08:08 AM
1

Just remember it's all depends on the state of affairs. If someone declares war on me, my responsibilities to them naturally cease to exist.
/r/MGTOW21/07/16 11:35 AM
3

Don't use tampons when angry. They may end up unretrievable.
/r/MGTOW19/07/16 08:03 AM
1

Yeah, well, to me it seems the fem movement has been running on fumes for a very long time now. I'm not expecting any real claims to be emerging from camp mangina no more at this point. Don't you think all this cognitive dissonance is a build up for a massive paradigm shift that needs to take place if ever gender issues are going to make sense ever again to mainstream society. I certainly do and am popping popcorns.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 04:04 PM
5

It's from 2011! Gee, this is old. And they rejected his case: http://archive.is/tm1eo
/r/MensRights18/07/16 02:10 PM
7

I'm a fierce boycotter of MSM, but for this they deserve my click. If they get clicks and support from men for publishing articles like this, maybe that's gonna keep them coming. Man, this made my day!
/r/MensRights18/07/16 01:59 PM
1

Yeah, now that's mind-blowing science fiction, I guess, huh?
/r/MGTOW17/07/16 11:21 PM
1

Faggots? Bullshit. You'd be hard pressed finding more well mannered people. This is more of a shaming tactic, having someone decide you owe them your gratitude. And such tactics are more closely associated with other, well-known demographics. Think white feathers, for instance.
/r/MGTOW17/07/16 10:05 PM
1

As I remember it: small, cute stories with unusual elements. Entertaining, but not breathtaking epic grand scaled vision or mind-blowing awesomeness. But I suspect you ask because of his cringey mangina tendencies? In those days that was considered manly, so he only made sure to document it, I think. There are even some gay stuff, with a well-hung male clone or whatever showing the protagonist how to use some high-tech urinals in one of his books. I don't think he had gay tendencies or was into …
/r/MGTOW17/07/16 09:02 PM
3

The worst kind, though, are those that take it upon themselves to decide whether you owe them anything, at all. And then expects your gratitude. Oftentimes being the ones causing the mess to begin with. Like, they spill out your beer, and upon buying you a new one, they expect you to thank them. Instead of actually apologising. Such people would do better worrying what their own debts are, instead of bitching about any imaginary lack of gratitude.
/r/MGTOW17/07/16 02:31 PM
19

Or Iran is trolling the west and laughing it's ass off?
/r/MensRights07/07/16 11:59 AM
1

I think this is a great idea. It's interesting with new perspectives. Great post, I'm following your endeavours over there, checking in now and then.
/r/MGTOW07/07/16 08:09 AM
1

Come on, princess. I'm sure noone intended to ruin your weekend on purpose. Relax.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 02:23 PM
3

Media is a hippocritical whore. Thanks for sharing.
/r/MGTOW01/07/16 11:26 PM
6

I didn't know that, thanks. What pisses me off so much about this is them (the UN) targeting minors. In some areas they have been campaigning so intensely, adult men have been mutilated by mobs. AVFM forced circumcision Them targeting underaged boys tells me they can't persuade enough adult men to undergo the so called voluntary procedure. Seriously, I thought that the age of fifteen already was way to low. At what age won't it be considered voluntary any longer? As with any human rights or ethi…
/r/MensRights29/05/16 06:34 PM
7

Money has entered the equation. Us and Israel making sado-peddo business. Nothing less. Fucking disgusting pigs.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 05:59 PM
2

Karen Straughan summed it up perfectly: Feminist: -What do you want from feminism? Karen Straughan: -Nothing.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 01:27 AM
14

And yet women have still been spared any "worse" treatment than this, equality. They should try being alienated as parents (PAS), falsely accused of abusing their own children, lose all custody, be forced to pay alimony, go to jail for missing payments, AND THEN be ostracised for being dead beat moms. AND THEN be told to check their privilege. AND this is just one single male issue of many where men and boys are treated like shit! The difference in the male experience compared to the pampered fe…
/r/MensRights05/05/16 01:42 PM
1

Bwahahaha!!
/r/MensRights05/05/16 12:29 PM
18

Now, that would be rape culture. The man simply laughing, "it's only a boy". Compare that to western cultures, who happily bend til breaking point in efforts to pander to whiny women. To the point where western governments are gladly throwing away basic rights such as presumed innocence. To which women only respond with claiming west to be a rape culture, thus further whining. And spewing out more baseless misandric shit, because, hey "it's only a boy". Throw rocks at them, genitally mutilate th…
/r/MensRights29/04/16 09:15 AM
225

Well, at least society is pro-male enough to allow male issues to be brought up in men's toilets.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 03:27 PM
3

Those are really good news. Glad to hear you say they referred to it appropriately, never seen that myself. Thanks for posting.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 05:05 PM
8

Women need to learn how to EARN mens' respect. Period.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 08:38 PM
2

Yeah. To bad only people seem to appreciate less and less basic legal or democratic standards. I guess there's the difference between fighting for your freedom vs passively inherit it, that's making the difference?
/r/MensRights11/04/16 10:38 PM
4

I have so much anger now. It comes fast and is hard to control. I can relate. Here's what's helped me. 1) You are in your right to be angry. Anger is a valid emotion, just as any other. Society tends to deny men reasonable options. So, you've got all the right to be as fucking angry as it pleases you and no you don't have anger issues. You have been provoked and are now denied to respond emotionally. That's what's happening. 2) Find outlets. Do you have a buddy that can take you venting your rag…
/r/MensRights06/04/16 12:01 PM
2

And good luck! Take care of you!
/r/MensRights05/04/16 10:08 PM
1

Your basing your entire argument on: You: revenge porn: invalid topic. Was not the topic here. Revenge FANTASY porn, whereby a future fictional revenge will be had by a future fictional technology which may never exist for the purpose of being mentally unhealthy in revenge-rage instead of living your life Let's summarize: revenge porn = revenge fiction with sexual component revenge fantasy porn = revenge fantasy fiction with sexual component Which means the difference between those two terms are…
/r/MGTOW28/03/16 11:47 PM
0

revenge porn: invalid topic. Was not the topic here. Revenge FANTASY porn, whereby a future fictional revenge will be had by a future fictional technology which may never exist for the purpose of being mentally unhealthy in revenge-rage instead of living your life: You're resorting to semantics. Don't. This is a non-issue. Revenge porn, whether fantasy or not, or whatever, is a sign of unhealth regardless. THAT is the topic here. No, the topic is my reply to OP: Banning things is an excellent wa…
/r/MGTOW27/03/16 07:06 PM
0

Revenge FANTASY, something that's mentally unhealthy to spread and based purely in fiction... Fantasies aren't based in fiction. Fantasies are fiction/not real. Posts or content (read revenge porn) based in fiction or fantasies on the other hand are real manifestations of said fiction or fantasies and thus part of reality. Therefore they don't need to be invented. I mean, if they didn't manifest in reality, how would OP even know about it, let alone be able ban it? ... THAT is the kind of conten…
/r/MGTOW27/03/16 12:12 PM
4

Thank you! Here in Sweden the Department of Justice coined a new term for all the innocently jailed men for various accusations of sex crimes. Nowadays they are referred to as "wrongfully convicted" instead of just being innocent. They even made sure to publicly point out that this term, wrongfully convicted, was "more accurate", because innocence isn't proven and the men might still be guilty. I contacted them and asked if they had done away with the presumed innocence. I was told no, basically…
/r/MensRights25/03/16 07:22 PM
1

Are you a hippie or something?
/r/MGTOW25/03/16 05:58 PM
1

Exactly where did I claim that engaging in revenge porn is to be dealing with reality? I did not say that at all. (Please note, that I haven't commented on that at all, neither pro or con) My point is that banning or censoring revenge porn is in itself an act of avoiding reality. Because revenge porn exists. People do engage in revenge porn. It's not even new. Banning or censoring it won't solve the issue. Now, I would start with: -what is the root cause of male revenge porn? I mean, are we even…
/r/MGTOW24/03/16 02:40 PM
1

Hmm? You mean revenge porn needs to be really invented before OP can ban posts about revenge porn? I think you mixed this one up in your head, thinking that the topic is sexbots. It isn't. It is revenge porn. Not sexbots. OP wants to ban revenge porn posts. Not sexbots. Yes, sexbots need to be invented to be reality. No, revenge porn doesn't need to be invented. Revenge porn is already here. Revenge porn is already reality. Hey, female revenge porn has even been mainstream since the 90s. And tha…
/r/MGTOW24/03/16 02:28 PM
13

Yes, me too. I guess shaming men is so ingrained in society that even a mgtow mod is perfectly fine using such language. As well as silencing men who express uncomfortable emotions. Just fucking wow. How about finding a constructive way of dealing with male feelings for a change? Even if we wish to insist on banning these posts, how is such language and contempt of men helping?
/r/MGTOW23/03/16 02:11 AM
3

Banning things is an excellent way of not dealing with reality. I am not impressed.
/r/MGTOW23/03/16 01:50 AM
2

Hope you're doing fine and that you're not letting being falsely accused get to you too much. And that your friends are staying at your side. Good luck!
/r/MensRights17/03/16 01:08 PM
1

Mgtow might suit you.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 06:14 PM
3

Please note I never claimed that you mention feminism in your post. I actually was criticizing that you ARE NOT addressing feminism when "worrying" about gender relations!!!!
/r/MGTOW08/03/16 03:44 PM
6

Yeah, but part of me hopes she doesn't get deleted. Hamsters are so fun to read. Like: "... good luck with all your generalizations about the opposite sex. Keep fighting the good fight until there is no more harmony between the sexes. Surely this will work out for everyone's benefit. I guess. Whatever." Yeah, she never had a problem with feminism though, did she? And didn't she say something about hypocrites before that? Oh, yes she did: " - because, unlike many men, I actually value people for …
/r/MGTOW08/03/16 01:38 PM
3

Oh, yes there is. How about all these female teachers and underaged boys? Lower sentences for women, excuses made for female peddos, boys presumed having been in on it, even accused of being the seducers? There's quite a thick false feminine narrative here as well.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 12:53 PM
3

Definitely not. Men and boys have been demonized for decades as perpetrators and marginalized as victims. Therefore it is actually very important designate genders and provide the public with the full picture. It's about countering the feminine brainwashing of the public and restore, sorry, introduce male rights in society.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 12:17 PM
2

I don't buy the academic sounding explanation. Because why wouldn't they bother to sound academic when referring to girls in trafficking?
/r/MensRights07/03/16 02:20 AM
1

Here's a great site that is featuring a lot of inequalities on just one page, where you can just click any of the topics that interests you to get to the references or more info on that subject. So it's both extensive yet comprenhensive. The Real Sexism Project
/r/MensRights01/03/16 07:55 PM
0

No, far from everybody "craves" respect. I only used that phrasing when questioning the mangina author, since that's how he worded it. I simply state that anyone benefits from being respected. Which is not the same as craving it. What men and boys need is misandry to end. Now, about respect. Men have to earn respect. Women demand it by proxy. Both traditionalism and feminism instruct men how women are to be respected, because both are gynocentric culture systems. So to say nobody cares if women …
/r/MensRights01/03/16 05:24 PM
1

I'm no expert on economics but from what I've read, it was about growing the economy. Modern economy has been trying to rely on continuous growth every year. One way of growing the economy is to increase the number of consumers. How to do that? Easy, make women work too and get salaries, now you suddenly have twice as many consumers.
/r/MGTOW29/02/16 04:10 PM
1

The misandry lies in the way he is framing mens' issues as something wrong with men, in this case lack of the "male-specific need for respect". Instead of pointing at the obvious elephant in the room, the misandric mainstream society. In fact, it isn't about respect at all. It's about men tired of being shat on constantly. What I want, and I bet many men with me, is to have the misandry in society adressed as an issue directly and head-on, instead of perpetually being told there's this or that l…
/r/MensRights29/02/16 03:53 PM
1

If men are denied the respect that is due, why do men have to attend programs to remedy that? How about instead entertain the idea that society is actually treating men badly and that it is an issue with a misandric culture rather than with men.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 02:28 PM
2

The idea of respect is an interesting one?! You mean it's a new concept that people should be treated with some courtesy!? And men are being denied common courtesy by society, so therefore it's mens' responsibility to go to specially designed programs in order to be respectfully treated?! How about this totally radical and outrageous idea: what if society stops promoting misandry?!
/r/MensRights29/02/16 12:51 AM
4

I can't believe this shit is considered anything else than misandric. I mean wtf, men and boys crave respect as some kind of special male need? What human being doesn't want to be or thrive when treated with respect? As if women or girls aren't demanding to be treated respectfully? This goes to show how deeply ingrained misandry is in our culture. That men, just because they want to be treated with some common decency, therefore are said to having special needs? I'm reeling here, at the complete…
/r/MensRights28/02/16 11:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter