~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| -4 | How /r/CreepShots was "assassinated." Could we be next?It looks to me like, Reddit itself is under attack from the mainstream media. Why? Maybe Reddit challenges the control that those in power have over the population, through the mainstream media and the school system. Think about it. Where else can a normal (brainwashed) youth be exposed to information about feminism, the federal reserve, 9/11 truth, foreign policy, zionism, monsanto etc... etc... ? Reddit is the gateway for a whole generation of youth, to learn about the facts without being brai… | /r/MensRights | 16/10/12 12:39 PM |
| 0 | Curious to see what r/MR thinks about this study - Female applicants rated significantly lower than identical Male applicants for lab manager position in double-blind study.How the hell do I know? How were the Tobacco studies flawed? I don't know but you can't argue with all the people who got lung cancer | /r/MensRights | 14/10/12 06:09 PM |
| 7 | Curious to see what r/MR thinks about this study - Female applicants rated significantly lower than identical Male applicants for lab manager position in double-blind study.The Tobacco industry had plenty of studies showing cigarettes are healthy. So what happened there? The democrats had plenty of studies showing minimum wage does not cause unemployment. So what happened since minimum wage went up by 50% a few years ago?? The republicans had plenty of studies showing Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. How did that turn out? Women's studies had thousands of studies on domestic violence that found no male victims. Really? I could go on and on... | /r/MensRights | 14/10/12 05:58 PM |
| 3 | Curious to see what r/MR thinks about this study - Female applicants rated significantly lower than identical Male applicants for lab manager position in double-blind study.In my experience, studies done by political activists are glorified junk science. | /r/MensRights | 14/10/12 05:49 PM |
| 9 | Curious to see what r/MR thinks about this study - Female applicants rated significantly lower than identical Male applicants for lab manager position in double-blind study.Sample size: 127. Lead researcher has phD in "thesis on the topic of negative reactions to women" source Pardon me, if I am skeptical, but it's not like "women's studies researchers" never lied about the wage gap, domestic violence, rape statistics, false rape occurences, health-care spending for men etc... | /r/MensRights | 14/10/12 05:37 PM |
| 1 | How can feminists say with a straight face that women were oppressed because they were made to work at home. What do you think men were made to do? [imgur]go fuck yourself | /r/MensRights | 12/06/12 10:57 PM |
| -8 | How can feminists say with a straight face that women were oppressed because they were made to work at home. What do you think men were made to do? [imgur]No, bitch. They are not children, they are boys. Also, child labor was abolished because technology made it obsolete. Technology invented by men. If some day, the technology disappears and we are back in the stone age, kids will be working again, if that's what's needed to survive.. wymen's groups or not! | /r/MensRights | 12/06/12 06:22 PM |
| 1 | A warning about this subreddit: It is run by leftist communist feminist troll ignatiusloyola!I think all the regulars who read r/MR know this by now (because they have probably been harassed or banned by ignatiusloyola at some point) I had a short chat with Paul Elam (from avoiceformen.com), and he is also aware of the situation. If you have been trolled or railroaded by ignatius, please PM me and share your story - we can make a difference if we stick together! | /r/MensRights | 14/04/12 07:05 PM |
| 4 | TIL Prenuptial Agreements Can't Limit/Specify Child Support.Source: family law. A woman cannot refuse "child support" because it is "for the child". The state will apply a formula by which a man will be left ruined, and transfer all his disposable income (and some) to the woman, regardless of any "agreement" or "prenup" between the parties. This is the law, and if you are a man considering having kids in the US, you better know about it! The nicer women will typically return a portion of the cs payment to the father, in cash, so that he doesn't have to l… | /r/MensRights | 16/10/11 04:02 PM |
| 2 | Where have all the men gone?Wow! For an author who claims to have barely finished high school, this was excellently written, both in form and substance. | /r/MensRights | 11/10/11 08:11 PM |
| 1 | Don't be a victim. Ignore MRAs who want to make you into one.Because women are victims and men are perpetrators, don't ya know? | /r/MensRights | 09/10/11 02:26 PM |
| 3 | Myth: The Wage Gap is Caused by Men's Higher Pay for Dangerous JobsThey are, actually. The key here is to compare jobs with the same barriers to entry. You can't compare a lawyer job requiring fluency in English, 10 yrs of college and a US work permit (green card or citizenship) with a farm job. Everything else being equal, dangerous and hard jobs pay more than easy and safe jobs; if they didn't, people would just not work there. Edit: Also the wage gap is explained by many factors: education, experience, work hours and benefits seem to explain most of the gap … | /r/MensRights | 05/10/11 02:46 PM |
| 1 | Would women be allowed financial abortions? If that became a thing?Women can already do it: they can drop the baby at a hospital or a fire station, and they will not be prosecuted or required to pay child support: the baby is then given for adoption. It's called "safe haven laws" and they exist in all 50 states - according to this paper there were 30,000 such abandoned babies in 1997.. | /r/MensRights | 02/10/11 05:09 PM |
| 0 | Internet investigating/vigilantism: let's not be hypocritical.Maybe if you weren't so worried about people "trying to undermine you" and if you weren't threatening those who ask polite questions with the ban-hammer, and if you would discuss issues openly and politely, then you wouldn't have to worry so much about being "undermined". (funny, I don't remember pn6 or kanuk or kloo ever worry about being "undermined" or threatening users with a ban because they felt "undermined" by someone) | /r/MensRights | 12/09/11 09:58 PM |
| 0 | Internet investigating/vigilantism: let's not be hypocritical.The topic I brought in was not about removing trolling posts (which I know you do), the topic was about banning users. Since I got served with a "final warning" (which I can only assume refers to a ban), it makes me wonder why trolls that post nothing but insults here every day are not getting banned. It isn't a strawman, you misunderstood my comment (maybe it was poorly worded, whatever) to mean that you don't remove trolling posts, but I meant that you don't ban obvious and obnoxious trolls. S… | /r/MensRights | 12/09/11 03:28 PM |
| 0 | Internet investigating/vigilantism: let's not be hypocritical.Wow!!? You really have a problem with me! WTF? What did I do? Did I eat your baby in a previous life? Since you are accusing me of making "so many straw-man arguments", I guess it would be too much to ask for examples? | /r/MensRights | 12/09/11 02:49 PM |
| 1 | Internet investigating/vigilantism: let's not be hypocritical.Yes, please! :) | /r/MensRights | 12/09/11 01:29 PM |
| -2 | Internet investigating/vigilantism: let's not be hypocritical.Straw-men arguments are not ok in r/MaleStudies (mostly because feminists use them all the time, and it just wastes time and energy of those who actually want to have a discussion) You may agree or disagree, but the policy is clear (and many others have also expressed their frustrations with concern trolls and never-ending straw-man arguments) | /r/MensRights | 12/09/11 01:29 PM |
| 1 | Internet investigating/vigilantism: let's not be hypocritical.Yes, I do. Example here: even though this troll was insulting me repeatedly and being a total jerk, I still took the time to explain why she got banned: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/kco7i/internet_investigatingvigilantism_lets_not_be/c2j9sic | /r/MensRights | 12/09/11 01:25 PM |
| -1 | Internet investigating/vigilantism: let's not be hypocritical.You got banned for two reasons (which should be obvious to anyone but you): your comment was a straw-man: I understand Ignatius explanation of why he is going after me (although it sounds like bs to me, but fine, I can accept the reasoning) what I asked is: why the double standard between how trolls are treated and those who report trolls are treated. It seems most would agree that trolls deserve at least the same harshness. You are a rude, vulgar ass*ole People in r/MaleStudies will be happy to… | /r/MensRights | 12/09/11 12:30 PM |
| 2 | Internet investigating/vigilantism: let's not be hypocritical.Troll. | /r/MensRights | 12/09/11 12:14 PM |
| 0 | Internet investigating/vigilantism: let's not be hypocritical.This is not a contest, we are all in this for the same fight, and even if it was advertising (which it isn't), sub-reddit's with the same topics should give each other a hand, not shoot each other in the back! I also notice that the link to r/MaleStudies in the sidebar has been changed to a link to a single post, rather than the sub-reddit in general. It seems that Ignatius has an axe to grind against r/MaleStudies or myself (further proof is the tone if his answers to me, which is always rude a… | /r/MensRights | 12/09/11 12:12 PM |
| 1 | Internet investigating/vigilantism: let's not be hypocritical.WTF? I have been part of this community since pn6 was mod, and if you drop a "final warning" on me (because I wrote "<user> was banned in r/MaleStudies"), I think you should be able to explain what it means, and why all the obvious trolls are not getting one? | /r/MensRights | 12/09/11 11:50 AM |
| -1 | Internet investigating/vigilantism: let's not be hypocritical.Great, does it mean NotTheHumanTornado gets a "final warning"? Also, what the hell is a "final warning"? Since I got one, maybe you can explain that.. | /r/MensRights | 12/09/11 04:00 AM |
| -1 | Internet investigating/vigilantism: let's not be hypocritical.I reported them, many times, today and yesterday and the day before that. His or her comments are all over the place, so stop pretending that you didn't see them. The drama queen would be the mod who gives "final warnings" for merely pointing out that a particular user is a troll. | /r/MensRights | 12/09/11 03:44 AM |
| -4 | Internet investigating/vigilantism: let's not be hypocritical.Since we are on the topic of hypocrisy and double standards, maybe you could explain why I got a "final warning" for writing this while NotTheHumanTornado has been writing mindless insults (example) by the dozens and for weeks without any action on your part? | /r/MensRights | 12/09/11 03:35 AM |
| 7 | Women Call the Shots at HomeHmmm. if I lived with a roommate, and if I could get my roommate evicted without due process, steal everything he loves and most of what he has, and turn him into my own personal wage-slave: I'd be calling the shots too! :-) And that's not even factoring sexual black-mail, if one partner has a stronger desire than the other.. | /r/MensRights | 11/09/11 09:55 PM |
| 1 | Sometimes, women lie about rape - That’s why we need to halt Obama’s attempt to end due process for college menYou know full well that those kinds of posts aren't allowed on r/MR No, I don't. As far as I know, r/MR's policy was always "donwvote whatever you don't like but the mods are not removing anything". When did the policy change? | /r/MensRights | 10/09/11 10:00 PM |
| 0 | Sometimes, women lie about rape - That’s why we need to halt Obama’s attempt to end due process for college menHmm. so you have no problem letting blatant trolls post on r/MR, but somehow advertising a moderated sub-reddit where trolls are not tolerated, is not kosher.. Edit: removed comment about Ignatius being a feminist, because it does not add to the discussion. | /r/MensRights | 10/09/11 07:56 PM |
| 2 | Discrimination against MenThis is very good. I am reposting to r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 08/09/11 12:35 AM |
| 6 | Shouldn't child support be capped at reasonable amount?What you describe is alimony, not child support.. Also, please keep in mind that child support is also paid by men who have never been married: they typically pay half of their after-tax income (in the US) to their baby-mamas, while she gets all the tax benefits, which can easily make her significantly wealthier than the father. Also, if the "best interest of the child" was really the concern here (let's not fool ourselves.. we all know it is really "the best interest of women"), why couldn't th… | /r/MensRights | 06/09/11 01:41 PM |
| 1 | Frenchman ordered to pay wife damages for lack of sex - TelegraphBecause you don't know how to trade money for food? | /r/MensRights | 05/09/11 04:31 PM |
| 4 | Frenchman ordered to pay wife damages for lack of sex - TelegraphReverse the genders, and you get this: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/aug/14/afghanistan-womens-rights-rape | /r/MensRights | 05/09/11 03:57 PM |
| 3 | Hilarious Fatherhood PSA: The US Government does care about involved fathers!The math goes like this; for 100 newborns: 40 are born out-of-wedlock (mom's choice to have sex without a man'c commitment, not use contraception etc) 60 are born to married couples of which: 30 will experience their parents divorce of which: 20 will experience their parents divorce initiated by Mom Total: 70 kids will grow up without a father (40+30) and it was the mom's choice for 60 of them (40+20). So it was the woman's decision in ~85% of cases (60 / 70) | /r/MensRights | 04/09/11 01:14 PM |
| 14 | Hilarious Fatherhood PSA: The US Government does care about involved fathers!It's not just family courts: tax and welfare policies provide tremendous incentives for low-income women to stay single and quickly discard their "baby daddies". The ad is really funny and cute, too bad it completely misses the actual cause of fatherlessness: it isn't fathers "abandoning" their kids, it is mothers choosing the government as a surrogate husband (which is quite understandable, since the gov't provides more benefits than your average low-income man), and the government effectively … | /r/MensRights | 03/09/11 05:32 PM |
| 1 | Do we need more mods, now that Kloo is leaving?Of course, I hope that I am just being a little paranoid, but I can't help but notice that r/MR has basically one mod now, and that mod is a feminist. Also, I am pretty sure I remember Ignatius stating that she is a woman (that was like a year ago, so I can't find the exact quote), and now it seems to be a guy.. was there a sex change or something? | /r/MensRights | 02/09/11 02:04 AM |
| 1 | Do we need more mods, now that Kloo is leaving?No offense taken :) I admit that r/MaleStudies is ban happy, which is why I am not applying for the mod position here! I have no pretense about "taking the high-road". I don't think it works when your enemy is constantly kicking you under the belt, but I'll let the young and idealistic think otherwise. When r/MR is hijacked and/or shutdown by our enemies, you'll be glad that r/MaleStudies is there as a back-up sub. | /r/MensRights | 01/09/11 11:56 PM |
| 9 | Court Forces Actor to Pay Deadbeat Mom Support (For those of you who believe "child" support has anything to do with the welfare of children you must read this.)Wow - it's like his role in "two and a half men" was created after his real life. Sad.. | /r/MensRights | 01/09/11 08:11 PM |
| 1 | Do we need more mods, now that Kloo is leaving?Regardless of whether Kloo comes back or not, I think a community of 25,000+ probably needs more than one or two mods. One mod is border-line dangerous for the survival of this sub. If tomorrow you drop from reddit, what happens to r/MR? | /r/MensRights | 01/09/11 01:33 PM |
| 3 | Apparently father's who choose to fight for custody win 70% of the time...As Kuonji mentioned, the study is flawed because men know that as long as the mother can show up at a court hearing on time and sober, there is no way they'll ever get sole custody; therefore the only men fighting for custody are those who are either particularly bitter or those whose ex is in prison, in rehab or dead. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/11 11:31 PM |
| 3 | Is it just me, or does anyone else feel that we are the morally righteous side in a war against Feminists?Of course we are (that's why feminists can't argue against us, all they can do is bully), but that is not enough: we need aggressive activism to make our voices heard - otherwise, nothing will change! | /r/MensRights | 31/08/11 01:40 PM |
| -4 | Fellow MRAs, have any of you created a group on your college campus devoted to Men's Rights and/or gender egalitarianism?That's terrible. Have a [hug] :) | /r/MensRights | 31/08/11 03:32 AM |
| 3 | First Comes Love, Then Comes Marriage, Then Comes a Baby in a Baby Carriage, Then Comes Divorce, Then Comes MurderI sympathise with the man's struggle (one of my friends was suicidal after a similar fate was served to him, courtesy of the family "court"), but there is no way I would ever approve the killing of a child. Looking at the big picture, it is obvious that to prevent this kind of violence, we don't need more restraining orders, but rather we need to start treating men like human beings. When a man is evicted from his home, humiliated, made homeless, his kids kidnapped by the state, his bank account… | /r/MensRights | 30/08/11 02:38 AM |
| 10 | Obama Creates "Women's Equality Day." MRAs who support the left have to swallow their cognitive dissonance again.Hmmm.. I am not so sure the right is necessarily much better for men. What has the right done for men's rights? It seems to me they implicitly support the misandry of the left (only they call it "chivalry"). | /r/MensRights | 29/08/11 05:07 PM |
| 1 | How you know when to leave the movement... [SMBC!]Ho ho ho! Better be good until Christmas.. naughty girls get no ponies! :) | /r/MensRights | 29/08/11 05:01 PM |
| 3 | How you know when to leave the movement... [SMBC!]I'm Santa by the way :) | /r/MensRights | 29/08/11 04:13 PM |
| 5 | What about the "Men only want one thing" standard?I don't intend to bang girls younger than 18.. (I typically date women in their early 20's) My original comment was poorly phrased if it gave that impression: I was only referring to how pedophilia got hijacked by feminists, expanded well beyond its clinical definition or even basic common sense (like jailing consenting kids or guys who had no reasonable way of suspecting the age of their partners), criminalized to the point of absurdity (sex offender lists for consenting kids having sex with ea… | /r/MensRights | 27/08/11 09:35 PM |
| 11 | Article from 1990, "The Failure of Feminism"Interesting article - I guess things were a little different when "child support" was based on the cost of raising children. Today, child support guidelines are so insane, that they can easily bankrupt a millionaire. The divorced guys I know are not buying real-estate.. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/11 09:21 PM |
| 10 | Feminist debating tactic 101: false accusations of pedophiliaThe "popular usage" is basically the pedo-scare created by feminists to criminalize healthy and normal male sexuality - as many boys who are either in jail or on sex offender lists have now discovered (how many? we don't know since there are no federal stats on who is actually on those lists, but some local studies point to a very significant percentage of "sex offenders" being kids just fooling around..) Just like the definitions of "rape" or "assault" or "domestic violence" that have been rede… | /r/MensRights | 27/08/11 07:49 PM |
| 12 | Feminist debating tactic 101: false accusations of pedophiliaNo, pedophilia has a clear-cut definition: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia interest in prepubescent children (generally age 13 years or younger, though onset of puberty may vary) | /r/MensRights | 27/08/11 07:33 PM |
| 13 | Feminist debating tactic 101: false accusations of pedophiliaThat's irrelevant because nobody is suggesting adults should be having sex with 14-yr olds, and it's also wrong: pedophilia is the attraction to children who are not sexually mature. A typical 14 yr old is sexually mature and capable of having children. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/11 07:13 PM |
| 9 | Hollywood actress beats up her boyfriend for 15 minutes but is let off with a warning when he calls the cops.Apparently, Perez Hilton is "not sure who is to blame" ( http://perezhilton.com/2011-08-26-robert-de-niros-daughter-attacks-ex-on-the-streets-of-greenwich-village ) | /r/MensRights | 27/08/11 12:51 PM |
| 5 | What about the "Men only want one thing" standard?I don't have the link anymore; but I found this FWIW: http://tahlequahdailypress.com/archive/x519330964 | /r/MensRights | 26/08/11 06:47 PM |
| 11 | What about the "Men only want one thing" standard?The root is deeper in my opinion: the "men only want one thing" is just a special case of "male sexuality is bad" which itself is coming from "men are evil". The decades-old smear campaign of lies, spearheaded by feminists has basically left the general public with an appalling opinion of men: men are considered as violent (never mind that women commit 50% of domestic violence, and over 90% of school fights in American schools are girl-vs-girl fights) men are considered as pedophiles (never mind… | /r/MensRights | 26/08/11 03:36 PM |
| 0 | What's fueling Bible Belt divorces - CNN.comI bet both my girlfriends combined weight less than you :) You realize, that everyone here expects you to be some kind of sad psycho-bitch that hates men because you are so ugly (and most likely obese) that no man ever notices that you exist.. | /r/MensRights | 25/08/11 08:22 PM |
| 0 | What's fueling Bible Belt divorces - CNN.comMany people in the MRM seem to think that marrying a religious chick is safer than marrying a liberal atheist chick: well, as I have suspected for some time, that is not the case. For those of us who want a family, the only rational choice is to GTFO from the West. The West is just not a place to raise a family, besides the family court and the castrating fear of divorce, you have to deal with cps breathing down your neck and preventing you from effectively parenting your kids, the brain-washing… | /r/MensRights | 25/08/11 07:22 PM |
| 7 | Student sues university over false rape chargesInteresting comment from one of the readers: Mr. South -- How about mentioning the rape "victim" fleeing the city and avoiding arrest for making false police reports, etc. Seems a pretty important fact to leave out in support of Mr Doe's lawsuit. Swanee did the same thing another University did to their Lacross team members a while back...it punished without cause and accepted a woman's unsupported word without due process for the true victim -- Mr. Doe. This is so typical of mainstream media "r… | /r/MensRights | 24/08/11 06:08 PM |
| 2 | Disgusting. Sexist women-only "abuse shelter" website provides an easy way to cover your tracks and help women who plan to leave deceive their partners.Hmm.. looks like this could perhaps be goole link bait (it's basically planting a link to a page you want to appear in google's search results with the keywords you are aiming for, hidden in the title of the link) Since r/MR has a pretty high page rank and talk about dv a lot, it would make sense to try to plant a link here.. | /r/MensRights | 24/08/11 03:20 PM |
| 1 | Male German politician forced to resign over perfectly legal relationship with teenage girlblah blah.. stop whining | /r/MensRights | 24/08/11 09:52 AM |
| 4 | /amr posts advice on Entryism : " a political tactic by which an organisation or state encourages its members or agents to infiltrate another organisation in an attempt to gain recruits, or take over entirely. "I am downvoting this - not because I disagree, but because I don't think we should be feeding the trolls. Everybody knows that r/AMR is a bunch of clowns that have the collective intelligence of a pigeon, and nobody takes them seriously anyway.. not even r/2xc. Thinking that we have to prove to r/AMR that we are "not paranoid" is lowering ourselves IMO Don't we have some damn activism to do? Let's not waste our time with stupid trolls (it's probably exactly what they want) Edit: just for the rec… | /r/MensRights | 24/08/11 03:06 AM |
| 0 | NOW Applauds Diallo for Courage, Condemns Prosecutors, Defense and Media in DSK Case (Statement of NOW President Terry O'Neill)Ah Britain.. this bring fond memories: "A nous les p'tites anglaises!" | /r/MensRights | 24/08/11 01:10 AM |
| 7 | NOW Applauds Diallo for Courage, Condemns Prosecutors, Defense and Media in DSK Case (Statement of NOW President Terry O'Neill)From http://www.now.org/organization/faq.html#member : NOW is the largest feminist organization in the nation, with more than 500,000 contributing members. That's half a million people who have no problem paying to support an obviously misandrist organization. I don't know what "coffee shops" you are going to, but I'd say that's probably not very representative of feminism as an organized movement.. | /r/MensRights | 24/08/11 12:19 AM |
| -5 | Male German politician forced to resign over perfectly legal relationship with teenage girlIt states that there is a place where your trolling fat ass is banned - those who are sick of reading your "opinions" can go there! | /r/MensRights | 23/08/11 10:19 PM |
| 5 | I love how calmly pointing out that you aren't a victim everywhere you turn automatically makes me a misogynist.... and they wonder why they take so much shit....It always cracks me up, how anarchists are such bullying nazis, often living on their rich Daddy's money (if you have anarchist friends, I am sure you know what I mean). Contrary to their anti-authority message, they love authority but are pissed because they are not the ones with it, especially after years of being spoiled by their rich parents, they just can't accept that their authority at home doesn't extend into the adult world. Anarchists always remind me of Eric Cartman in South Park - "r… | /r/MensRights | 23/08/11 02:01 AM |
| 2 | Institutional Resistance to Acknowledging Intimate Male Abuse (and similar refusal by Canadian National government bodies)I am reposting this to r/MaleStudies Edit: actually, kloo already posted there - thanks! | /r/MensRights | 22/08/11 08:18 PM |
| 8 | Baltimore leads in US unfounded rape casesPlease keep in mind that the "unfounded" cases as counted by the police are only a fraction of all wrongful accusations. The police is required by law to use a "politically correct" way of counting "unfounded cases" of sexual assault: only cases where the police has evidence that the woman is lying can be counted as "unfounded", he-said-she-said cases are explicitly excluded (funny how different this standard of poof is from say counting domestic violence or sexual assault "cases"). | /r/MensRights | 22/08/11 03:27 PM |
| 3 | Is current marriage predominately designed to help the traditional female as a way of locking a man into financial commitment through the fear of divorce fees and alimony?Don't feed the troll. You don't have to justify yourself, it is "Manginas" that should prove what she's saying.. | /r/MensRights | 21/08/11 02:34 PM |
| 3 | Is current marriage predominately designed to help the traditional female as a way of locking a man into financial commitment through the fear of divorce fees and alimony?Everyone in r/AMR has been banned in r/MaleStudies, Warden_05 is not in the banned list, so he can't be a "well-known troll". You, on the other hand: redditor for 21 hours - I banned you for lying. I'll lift the ban, after you show how Warden_05 is a "well-known troll". Fair? | /r/MensRights | 21/08/11 02:09 PM |
| 5 | I think this is wrong. what do you think? (from 2xchromosomes)What is so hard to understand? If they leave, they will lose their children and be financially ruined for decades. If they're unlucky and lose their job or have a health problem, they may even be jailed as "dead-beats". These women know it, and that's why they are so abusive. It's not rocket science.. Men: don't. get. married. Don't fucking do it. Like so many of my married friends, you will be stuck in a sexless abusive relationship with a woman who has absolute power to evict you from your hom… | /r/MensRights | 21/08/11 01:40 PM |
| 5 | It's not enough to just not feed the trollsAssuming there are more MRAs here than trolls this should work most of the time. This assumption is only barely true (mostly because trolls use multiple sock-puppet accounts) - a typical post on r/MR has 2 downvotes for 3 upvotes. We are not far from the tipping point, where trolling will make this subreddit completely useless (and yes it happened before, r/MR was hijacked by trolls around April-July of last year - that's why r/MaleStudies was created to remedy the problem) Many good posts are a… | /r/MensRights | 19/08/11 05:40 PM |
| 3 | Why are most men's rights issues so old and global?Men are the expendable gender. Biologically, young fertile women are the most valuable because without them, we go extinct (even though they only represent a very tiny fraction of the population). Despite what feminist revisionists claim, women have always been privileged. In every culture. Always. Female privilege is so deeply hardwired in our DNA that it is completely invisible to most people, male or female. Most feminist lies about some imaginary historical oppression stem from the fact that… | /r/MensRights | 19/08/11 02:17 PM |
| 14 | Mother of three sorely disappointed that a Taylor Swift concert featured Taylor Swift singing songs instead of pro-feminist messagesFor some reason, Taylor Swift is enraging feminists by her mere presence, and this article is yet another hit-piece on Taylor from some feminist bitch (she just used the concert as a lame excuse to rip on her). Personally, I think that Taylor Swift is the only mainstream female singer that doesn't look like used-up ball-busting tramp that is either in heat or pissed (like Kesha, Rihana, Britney or Beyonce). She is feminine, modest and graceful; I guess that's verboten in feminazi land? | /r/MensRights | 18/08/11 12:28 PM |
| 1 | Banned from posting to r/malestudies... no idea why, never been there before. I support MRA. Thanks for the love, community!Yes, it is hard work to keep banning these scumbags, and do it accurately - but I am totally up for it :) | /r/MensRights | 18/08/11 01:33 AM |
| 0 | All Men Are Perverts (xpost from /r/shitredditsays -- generalizations there are okay so long as they are one sided I guess?)If you redefine male sexuality as evil and perverted, then it becomes a rhetorical question.. | /r/MensRights | 15/08/11 06:20 PM |
| 2 | Why men date younger women...Haha! Dude, you should be my wingman - can you bring the guitar? :) You mention an interesting point: just like men have evolved to accurately identify young fertile females, women have evolved to accurately identify dominant males. The conclusion from this is that "game" cannot be learned; it can be studied, yes; and it works, yes; but I'd expect that women have evolved a very accurate social perception that allows them to easily weed-out the "fakers". | /r/MensRights | 15/08/11 05:08 PM |
| 7 | Why men date younger women...I am surprised the obvious evolutionary explanation is not mentioned: sexual attraction is nature's way of tricking us into making babies; why would men be attracted to women who are near (or at) the end of their fertile years? I would claim that not only men are more attracted to young fertile females than anyone else, but also that they have an instinctive ability to detect youth and fertility in a woman with absolute accuracy (and no amount of make-up can fool us). After all, those men who go… | /r/MensRights | 15/08/11 04:49 PM |
| 2 | Kids do better if they live with their dad, research showsI suspect every study that is financed by a special interest group. I'd have the same reservations if I saw a study paid for by Exxon finding that there is no global warming due to burning fossil fuels.. In addition, I am even more suspicious of anything coming from "gender" advocates, because they have a long history of producing some of the most sloppy bunk science found in "academia".. Finally, I clearly stated what I found wrong with the study: selecting a sample and self-reporting is not a … | /r/MensRights | 15/08/11 09:05 AM |
| 1 | Kids do better if they live with their dad, research showsConsidering that feminists had no trouble manufacturing "studies" to support all kinds of lies ranging from the "wage gap" to the "1 in 4 women will [insert bad thing here]" or "only men commit domestic violence" etc.. etc.. etc... Why should we trust a study carried by people with an agenda, financed by lesbian activists, and using a selected sample who was self-reporting the metrics being measured? The results are more than a little suspicious if you consider that lesbian couples are significa… | /r/MensRights | 15/08/11 02:48 AM |
| 2 | If it Weren't for Feminism...No problem, my friend! | /r/MensRights | 14/08/11 11:08 PM |
| 2 | If it Weren't for Feminism...I just said that women make 60% of college graduates today vs 40% in the 1960's. So the situation has pretty much exactly inverted in 50 years.. What part of it is wrong? | /r/MensRights | 14/08/11 11:05 PM |
| 2 | The child support catastropheThis is very insightful and well written - I am reposting it to r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 14/08/11 08:19 PM |
| 8 | University of Toronto: Starting a Men's rights club.Be flattered: your stupid comment, brought 2 subscribers to r/MaleStudies; always nice.. | /r/MensRights | 12/08/11 10:27 PM |
| 4 | Potential "Woman cheated on BF and is accusing guy she slept with of rape for damage control" story has frontpaged.I am not saying your explanation doesn't make sense, but I am not too comfortable invading the thread and calling the woman a liar, just because the story is a little suspicious.. also, it's hard to see what this will achieve: most people who don't know much about false accusations will just hate you for suggesting that the woman could lie, the feminists will you use it against you, and the only ones that will agree with you are probably coming from here, so it's pretty much zero (or negative) g… | /r/MensRights | 12/08/11 08:19 PM |
| 3 | What are men afraid of? Are men afraid?Since I date a lot of women, I am always fearful of being accused of some kind of sex crime. As we all know, it only takes one accusation, and your life is ruined. I try to withdraw something at the ATM, after each date (especially first dates), to get an electronic record of where I was. I also quickly dump women who appear mentally unstable - recently, I broke up with a girl who was absolutely stunning but also completely bat-shit crazy - it was a tough choice.. I am also afraid of getting tri… | /r/MensRights | 12/08/11 06:14 PM |
| 7 | Potential "Woman cheated on BF and is accusing guy she slept with of rape for damage control" story has frontpaged.I donwvoted this, because there isn't enough evidence to suggest that the woman is lying, in my opinion. | /r/MensRights | 12/08/11 05:48 PM |
| 14 | r/AMR links to troll-commenter to discredit MRAs, denies suggestion that they be skeptical, because possibility of troll-commenters is "ridiculous".And by "call you on it", you mean create dozens of fake accounts to post crazy stuff and then link back to it? Maybe we should call you a lying scumbag then? Fair? | /r/MensRights | 12/08/11 03:05 PM |
| 5 | If it Weren't for Feminism..... most women wouldn't be brainwashed into believing that feminism actually did something for them. FTFY Just for the record, there were more women in universities (40%) before feminism took off (in the 60's) than they are men in universities today (40% and falling fast). The only success of feminism was to lie about history and brainwash women into believing that they couldn't go to college (false: they already made 40% of students), they couldn't get jobs (false: they could, and many did, but … | /r/MensRights | 12/08/11 02:37 PM |
| -3 | How to downvote in subreddits that disable the down arrowWorks great! | /r/MensRights | 12/08/11 11:59 AM |
| 2 | BBC - The competing arguments used to explain the riots : #3 "lack of fathers"I don't think there is enough data yet, but from I have read so far, they turn a lot better than kids raised by single-moms but not as well as kids raised by a two-parent family. | /r/MensRights | 12/08/11 02:53 AM |
| 8 | BBC - The competing arguments used to explain the riots : #3 "lack of fathers"It's good to see that the mainstream media is catching on something we have been aware for years: the overwhelming majority of young drug addicts, school dropouts, and violent criminals are coming from fatherless homes. Everyone who deals with youth problems knows it, every study shows a shocking contrast between children growing in normal families (even if poor) and those in broken families, and yet it is hardly ever mentioned in the media.. From: http://www.canadiancrc.com/Fatherlessness/Fathe… | /r/MensRights | 12/08/11 12:46 AM |
| 19 | According to this NZ Police video, if a woman goes out, gets blind drunk and wakes up with a guy she doesn't know, YOU are responsible!And of course, it is accompanied by the standard feminist lie: "domestic violence expected to increase during [insert random men's sport event]" No matter how many times it gets debunked (or rather, it was never proved in the first place), the man-hating scumbags keep recycling it back. If anyone wants to give this paper a piece of their mind, here is the contact info of the Stuff's editor: Stuff Editor: Mark Stevens Tel: 04 474 0090 Email: [email protected] | /r/MensRights | 11/08/11 12:40 PM |
| 1 | Why do men on here think they are entitled to have sex with women but bear no financial responsibility when a child is born?Hmm. you're not too bright, are you? How are "fathers" different from sperm donors these days? | /r/MensRights | 07/08/11 09:08 PM |
| 3 | Why do men on here think they are entitled to have sex with women but bear no financial responsibility when a child is born?Because sperm donors aren't upposed to pay child support.. | /r/MensRights | 07/08/11 09:05 PM |
| 5 | German Police Study finds that one third of all the "honor killing" victims are male, killed because they are gay, adulterers - or even refuse a "honor killing". Stereotypically, public and press assume all victims are women, violating Muslim laws about chastity.The same could be said about "stoning"; the western media would have you believe that only women are victims of this practice, but in fact it's close to 50/50. Funny how the "unworthy" victims (men) are never mentioned.. | /r/MensRights | 05/08/11 07:50 PM |
| 5 | TED: Philip Zimbardo: The demise of guys?I think the main point is that it's all for nothing: it used to be that excelling in the workplace, meant that you could get a hot wife, who would give you sex and children, and you would have the satisfaction of providing the good life for the whole family.. Today, what do you get? Sex? Since the sexual market is now a free-for-all, money is not a factor any more.. if you have the looks, you'll get laid; if you don't, money won't make any difference; you'd be better off learning game.. Children… | /r/MensRights | 05/08/11 05:07 PM |
| 7 | TED: Philip Zimbardo: The demise of guys?I was with him until he started talking about what he thinks the causes are; he clearly doesn't get it (from my perspective anyway). Pornography and video games are not the causes of the problem, you are right: they are only a symptom of men being excluded from mainstream society and making the (perfectly rational) decision that video games and porn are more satisfying than dealing with the American woman and working in an uneven playing field just to surrender your paycheck to cupcake, for the … | /r/MensRights | 05/08/11 04:25 PM |
| 6 | Man kills self after being falsely accused of rapeActually, it's saying that there is a place where man-hating scumbags and feminist crooks and liars are not tolerated | /r/MensRights | 05/08/11 03:56 PM |
| 1 | I propose a new SubReddit to take on those pesky peeps over at AgainstMensRights ... whattaya say? Too meta, or just right?Exactly! Our goal should be to stand our ground (we don't owe a bunch of brainless man-hating trolls an apology, or an explanation). Let's focus on the A in MRA: activism. | /r/MensRights | 04/08/11 07:11 PM |
| 1 | Divorced single parents in Germany have no legal right to child support after their child turns three if the parent is capable of working full time, Germany's supreme court ruled on Tuesday.As someone who has worked on both sides of the pond; trust me, most European countries have insanely high taxes (especially the "older" ones like Italy and France), it doesn't even compare - but as you said, you get sthg from it, as opposed to spreading "freedom" by browning random brown people and building a police state at home.. I have three citizenships, including one from a European Union country, and I certainly envision myself retiring there. Europe is awesome, as long as you can afford i… | /r/MensRights | 04/08/11 02:33 AM |
| 2 | Divorced single parents in Germany have no legal right to child support after their child turns three if the parent is capable of working full time, Germany's supreme court ruled on Tuesday.The difference is a lot more once you factor the employer's side as well: for example, in France, the total of employer+employee payroll taxes is typically around 60%, of course that's not even counting a sales tax of 20% on everything you buy and an income tax at the end of the year, and a yearly "wealth tax" on any assets above a certain threshold (around $1 million I think..) and the gasoline tax pushing the price close to $10 a gallon. Germany isn't as ridiculously taxed as France, but you g… | /r/MensRights | 03/08/11 09:43 PM |
| 21 | Divorced single parents in Germany have no legal right to child support after their child turns three if the parent is capable of working full time, Germany's supreme court ruled on Tuesday.This ruling happened in Germany, so you have to place it in the context of the typical European welfare state: this woman has access to FREE health care, day care, schools and colleges, and also receives hefty subsidies and tax breaks for her child. In that context, the ruling makes sense, but the flip-side is: insanely high taxes which effectively transfer the cost of single mothers onto the entire tax base.. In a way, Europe has a welfare system for single mothers supported by the entire popul… | /r/MensRights | 03/08/11 07:58 PM |
| 2 | Chapin on the feminazis pathetic attempt to capitalize on the death of 76 youth to set-up a character assassination of the MRMThis has been feminists' favorite strategy for decades now: when you can't argue the facts, mount a character assassination instead. Unfortunately (for may academics, journalists, politicians and judges) this bullying has allowed feminists to completely eliminate any dissenting voice in college, media and politics. I think that this might be a good time for us to spread information about Valerie Solanas, not because she was a feminist and a killer, but rather because her brainless hateful screed… | /r/MensRights | 27/07/11 01:19 PM |
| 10 | Government-emitted ID proves she is 20. Men could not know she is 15, but will go to prison for underage sex, child porn | Due to strict liability laws, there is no safe way for men to have sex or watch porn.I don't understand how this application of the law can possibly be constitutional; isn't it "cruel and unusual" punishment? How can someone be punished for a crime he didn't know he was committing, especially if all reasonable and available precautions were taken to abide the law? What was he supposed to do.. remove one of her teeth and carbon-date it?? On a somewhat related note: if you ever sit on a jury where a man is being railroaded, please don't forget that you have the right to "nullify t… | /r/MensRights | 26/07/11 07:45 PM |
| -1 | 2XChromosome thread about an alleged rape where the top comments are pretty reasonable.most people most trolls FTFY | /r/MensRights | 26/07/11 06:11 PM |
| -1 | 2XChromosome thread about an alleged rape where the top comments are pretty reasonable.says the troll | /r/MensRights | 26/07/11 06:03 PM |
| 2 | The REAL reasons many women and their bidders don't like shared parenting: MONEY and CONTROLHe was being sarcastic. Every major feminist organization, from NOW to the women's bar association have always fought tooth and nail against shared parenting (usually by throwing idiotic lies like "don't give kids to abusers!"). It should be noted that shared parenting has wide support in public opinion in both men and women - so I am not sure who these "women's" groups are representing.. | /r/MensRights | 26/07/11 05:56 PM |
| 0 | Mantitties:Norweigian terrorist Anders Breivik’s manifesto reveals him to be a rabid antifeminist with views strikingly similar to many MRAsAnother difference is that the writing of feminist psycho killer Valerie Solanas (the "SCUM manifesto" which advocates the torture and mutilation of all men) is published as a book and was required reading in "women's studies" classes for years. Somehow I doubt that this guy's rambling will be made into a book and read by millions of students.. | /r/MensRights | 25/07/11 12:38 PM |
| 0 | Throwaway account, long time lurker and closet-convert to the MRM and have some thoughts to share that I've been working on for a long time (anonymously though, GF has a reddit account and I'm not ready to open that bag of worms yet).Just a piece of advice: I would be very careful about sharing your thoughts with your gf (if you care about your relationship). For some reason that still escapes my understanding, many women go absolutely bat-shit crazy when they are faced with the reality of gender relations in the west. To this day, I remember one of my ex-gf literally entering crazy-mode, screaming, yelling and physically shaking after I mentioned that it doesn't make sense for men to get married under the current law. I swe… | /r/MensRights | 25/07/11 04:30 AM |
| 3 | Future prospects for the Men's Rights MovementActually, this week, we showed the media that they can't air anti-male hate speech with impunity. The woman who was removed from The Talk knows it now, and anyone working in show-business has taken notice. This is a first time for us (to my knowledge at least)! We are also starting to see a few friendly articles in the mainstream media (unconceivable just a few years ago).. So, fuck you, this has been a great week! :) Anyway, kloo2zoo troll got banned in r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 25/07/11 12:39 AM |
| 3 | [comic] Feminists claim you (men) shouldn't speak up when they say something wrong.Apparently this comic shows men as typically having the moral high-ground in gender discussions, and also being able to articulate their point in a way that resonates with other men. The fact that the author felt it happened frequently enough to inspire a comic is a good sign and shows that the men's rights movement is starting to (slowly) go mainstream (even though the comic is just a pathetic (and devoid of logic) attempt at demonizing men who don't agree with her feminist bs). | /r/MensRights | 24/07/11 09:13 PM |
| 1 | Lawyer on trial for murder tells jury of wife's violent rageYes, but the law is supposed to be gender-neutral: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battered_woman_defense#Gender_of_the_victim Let's see.. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/11 11:11 PM |
| 6 | Lawyer on trial for murder tells jury of wife's violent rageWe have recently seen several women avoid jail, after claiming that they killed their husbands after being abused, with absolutely zero supporting evidence (for example: Mary Winkler: no police records of DV, no hospital records, no marks, children and her mom said they never saw any violence and yet she walked free after shooting her sleeping husband in the back before disconnecting the phone while he was dying in a pool of blood). On the other hand, this guy has extensive police and hospital r… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/11 11:01 PM |
| 7 | Roissy Shames MGTOWs (check out point #8 in this blog.)I think Roissy was influenced by some of the MGTOW forums and blogs that really reek of desperation and frustration, in a way that reminds me of the big ugly fat feminist so concerned about the imaginary rapist hiding under her bed.. So in a way Roissy is right, but he also misses the big picture: MGTOW, just like the "marriage strike" is a social phenomenon made of millions of men coming to the same conclusions at the same time, without talking to each other or even knowing what "MGTOW" means. … | /r/MensRights | 23/07/11 09:03 PM |
| 1 | A small victory for MRAsActually, half a dozen people subscribed due to this comment only. See? Even a a piece of shit like you, can be used for something ;-) | /r/MensRights | 23/07/11 01:06 PM |
| 2 | "Hazard Pay" and the gender wage gap: a questionI can't give you data (it would be pretty hard to compute anyway), but I wouldn't choose a dangerous job if a safe job (requiring the same education etc..) paid the same, so I don't see any reason to be "cautious" about assuming that risky jobs pay more; after all people who claim there is a wage gap without even looking at job title, work environment, education, experience and hours worked seem to have thrown "caution" to the wind a long time ago.. | /r/MensRights | 22/07/11 04:06 AM |
| 2 | "Hazard Pay" and the gender wage gap: a questionYou can't compare a lawyer (requiring 10 years of education) with a lumberjack (requiring only a high school diploma, if that). You have to compare jobs that require similar education and experience. For example, at the high-school drop-out level, you can compare a cashier (not dangerous) with a lumberjack (dangerous); obviously the lumberjack would make more: $38k vs $26k (according to simplyhired.com). It's pretty clear that everything else being equal, people will not choose a dangerous job u… | /r/MensRights | 22/07/11 03:19 AM |
| 51 | MRA's Support Womens rightsI upvoted this on principle, but we don't owe anyone an apology or an explanation. We shouldn't get shamed into "proving" that we are not "woman-haters" - doing so is playing by the rules of those who hate us (and no amount of apologizing for our gender will ever satisfy them anyway). Considering that feminists advocating the extermination of men (like Mary Daly) are hailed as heroes by most mainstream media, and show hosts can laugh about sexual assaults and genital mutilation of a man wonderin… | /r/MensRights | 20/07/11 11:20 PM |
| 6 | Latest lies and junk science from anti-prostitution feminazisInterestingly, there are a couple of hookers giving their opinion in the comment section on Farley' work (who has already been caught several times publishing bogus research): My clients certainly treat me with more respect than radical feminists with their biased, flawed "research". These people are the ones exploiting sex workers to further their own perverted agenda and ideology. another one: I have met some of the most interesting, well-versed gentlemen from all walks of life. Many treat wom… | /r/MensRights | 19/07/11 01:04 AM |
| 2 | Sugar Shane Mosley has been forced to give up 3 championship belts -- to his wife ... in his divorceYou don't seem to understand that out-of-court settlements happen because of what both parties believe will most likely happen in court. If both parties know that a judge will likely award ~100$ of damages, they can settle out-of-court for $100. The reason why many celebrities accept outrageous "settlements" is only because they know that the family courts will rip them a new one if they try to litigate. In this case, the wife is probably being a vindictive bitch and asked for the belts to humil… | /r/MensRights | 15/07/11 08:25 PM |
| 16 | Why Women Think That 80% of Men are "Below Average"Actually, this was a very well written article. I kind of came to similar conclusions, but never had the drive to articulate them (or look for citations). Yes, the free dating market will (or has already) devolve into a primitive hook-up culture where a handful of alpha (whatever that means) grab all the action; it is the logical consequence of unrestrained female hypergamy, as is single-motherhood and crime.. As accurate as your observations are, be prepared to be attacked by the "betas" who ar… | /r/MensRights | 15/07/11 02:37 PM |
| 1 | Court system unfair to men hurt by domestic abusesX-posted from r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 14/07/11 04:05 PM |
| 1 | How can a heterosexual man be a misandrist?If you get brainwashed by enough anti-male pseudo-science and propaganda (not hard if you go to public school and watch mainstream media & pop culture), you can easily become a self-hating man. You wouldn't even be aware of it. This is not different from the phenomenon that happened to some jews in nazi germany: some young jews brainwashed by nazi propaganda and "science" became self-hating jews. If history can teach us something, it is that when a class of people can be successfully denigrated,… | /r/MensRights | 14/07/11 03:20 PM |
| 3 | Article on Thomas Ball in the Boston GlobeMaybe we can get Thomas Ball's article on Wikipedia back now? If I remember correctly (?) it got deleted because mainstream media didn't cover the event? | /r/MensRights | 10/07/11 02:20 PM |
| 1 | Why Do Women Initiate Divorce? | LIVESTRONG.COMBernard Chapin's commentary (where I found the link) | /r/MensRights | 08/07/11 12:42 AM |
| 2 | It's SO hard being a 'modern woman' /sWow those are some real important issues she mentions, I am glad the Sydney Morning Herald published her article /s ;-) You know you're oppressed when a leading newspaper has to publicize your struggle against pubic hair etiquette. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/11 10:05 PM |
| 2 | Wikipedia activism opportunity: let's update Ashton Kutcher's page (he got caught spreading "sex trafficking" lies and is bullying the real JOURNALIST who caught him)Great! Thanks, I was wondering if someone would actually touch the Wikipedia page :) | /r/MensRights | 06/07/11 12:42 PM |
| 9 | Wikipedia activism opportunity: let's update Ashton Kutcher's page (he got caught spreading "sex trafficking" lies and is bullying the real JOURNALIST who caught him)This is the same "sex trafficking" bs that keeps popping up in other countries as well, and every time the media and politicians jump the save the "victims", millions of dollars are spent on law enforcement and funding women's groups (who spread the lies in the first place), and a few months or years later they have a grand total of... zero victims saved (but thousands of sex workers harassed and arrested, which was the real hidden agenda). If you think I am exaggerating, watch this BBC video: h… | /r/MensRights | 02/07/11 04:02 PM |
| 26 | Wikipedia activism opportunity: let's update Ashton Kutcher's page (he got caught spreading "sex trafficking" lies and is bullying the real JOURNALIST who caught him)You can also send a letter to the editor of the Village Voice, to make sure that the poor fellas (Martin Cizmar and Ellis Conklin and Kristen Hinman) who confronted Kutcher don't get fired: http://www.villagevoice.com/feedback/EmailAnEmployee?department=letters On a side-note: this is what happens when real journalists confront feminist propaganda. Now you know why you can never read anything non-PC in the mainstream media: journalists are perfectly aware of what happened to their coworkers who … | /r/MensRights | 02/07/11 01:56 PM |
| 1 | "The sexual assault case against Dominique Strauss-Kahn is on the verge of collapse as investigators have uncovered major holes in the credibility of the housekeeper who charged that he attacked her.., according to two well-placed law enforcement officials." Job? Gone. Reputation? Shattered.Happy Canada Day :) | /r/MensRights | 02/07/11 01:10 AM |
| 1 | A Letter to Jessica ValentiIf you come here to defend "Miss Valenti" (who couldn't find "equality for all people" if it came in a shoe box), we don't need your "support". | /r/MensRights | 01/07/11 01:31 PM |
| 2 | A Letter to Jessica ValentiGreat, so instead of being a feminist troll, you are just a self-destructive idiot. Congrats! | /r/MensRights | 01/07/11 01:12 PM |
| 1 | "The sexual assault case against Dominique Strauss-Kahn is on the verge of collapse as investigators have uncovered major holes in the credibility of the housekeeper who charged that he attacked her.., according to two well-placed law enforcement officials." Job? Gone. Reputation? Shattered.You're welcome - please send us a postcard ;-) | /r/MensRights | 01/07/11 12:54 PM |
| 5 | "The sexual assault case against Dominique Strauss-Kahn is on the verge of collapse as investigators have uncovered major holes in the credibility of the housekeeper who charged that he attacked her.., according to two well-placed law enforcement officials." Job? Gone. Reputation? Shattered.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kobe_Bryant#Sexual_assault_allegation [...] sexual assault complaint filed by 19-year old hotel employee Katelyn Faber. [..] Bryant admitted an adulterous sexual encounter with his accuser, but denied her sexual assault allegation.] However, in September 2004, the assault case was dropped by prosecutors after Faber refused to testify in the trial. Faber filed a separate civil lawsuit against Bryant, which the two sides ultimately settled with the specific terms of th… | /r/MensRights | 01/07/11 04:22 AM |
| 3 | "The sexual assault case against Dominique Strauss-Kahn is on the verge of collapse as investigators have uncovered major holes in the credibility of the housekeeper who charged that he attacked her.., according to two well-placed law enforcement officials." Job? Gone. Reputation? Shattered.Haven't you seen all the civil lawsuits against the basketball players accused of rape? Or were you living under a rock? Some gold-diggers even dropped the criminal case (no money) just to focus on the civil case ($$$). | /r/MensRights | 01/07/11 04:13 AM |
| 8 | "The sexual assault case against Dominique Strauss-Kahn is on the verge of collapse as investigators have uncovered major holes in the credibility of the housekeeper who charged that he attacked her.., according to two well-placed law enforcement officials." Job? Gone. Reputation? Shattered.You don't know much about rape prosecutions. The police report from the incident opens the possibility of her filing a second lawsuit in civil court where she can ask for as much money as she can dream of. Considering that DSK is loaded, it's like winning a lottery ticket. She was going to walk away with millions of dollars in damages, against DSK. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/11 04:09 AM |
| 2 | "The sexual assault case against Dominique Strauss-Kahn is on the verge of collapse as investigators have uncovered major holes in the credibility of the housekeeper who charged that he attacked her.., according to two well-placed law enforcement officials." Job? Gone. Reputation? Shattered.Every hotel is "a luxury hotel" if you read their marketing. Here is the very first consumer rating from trip advisor (http://www.tripadvisor.co.uk/ShowUserReviews-g60763-d208454-r107556157-Sofitel_New_York-New_York_City_New_York.html): Ideal location. Had quite a large room for the NY standard (same for the bathroom). The staff was ok but nothing more. The furnitures, carpet and curtains were a bit tired and colors were sad. The bar is not the Sofitel's bar and ordinary. I didn't experience the… | /r/MensRights | 01/07/11 04:03 AM |
| 10 | "The sexual assault case against Dominique Strauss-Kahn is on the verge of collapse as investigators have uncovered major holes in the credibility of the housekeeper who charged that he attacked her.., according to two well-placed law enforcement officials." Job? Gone. Reputation? Shattered.Many people in France believe that Sarkozy (the current French president) was behind this set-up. Sarkozy is running for re-election and polls were predicting that he would lose against DSK by a very large margin. The facts that point to Sarkozy's possible implication: before any media, two tweets from members of Sarkozy's political party broke the story - the second one was from Sarkozy's chief of "web public relations" (this guy is known for orchestrating vicious attacks against Sarkozy's poli… | /r/MensRights | 01/07/11 03:58 AM |
| -1 | A Letter to Jessica ValentiWell if you don't do shit for men's rights, kindly shut-up and don't criticize those who actually get off their ass and do something. Nobody is stopping you from doing what you think is right. I (and many other I am sure) will be more than happy to support you, because it is more important to fight misandry, than to play "purity olympics". | /r/MensRights | 01/07/11 03:10 AM |
| 21 | "The sexual assault case against Dominique Strauss-Kahn is on the verge of collapse as investigators have uncovered major holes in the credibility of the housekeeper who charged that he attacked her.., according to two well-placed law enforcement officials." Job? Gone. Reputation? Shattered.This smelled like a set-up from day one, not only because the maid's story did not make any sense, but also because the media had an entire web of lies ready to be printed to smear him and make him look like a monster (it takes time to prepare all the lies and arrange them in a coherent way, there is no way they (or the prosecutor) could have come-up with this in one day): they said he was in a luxury hotel, but Sofitel is NOT a luxury hotel they said he paid $3,000 for him room, turns out he pa… | /r/MensRights | 01/07/11 03:06 AM |
| 5 | A Letter to Jessica ValentiSo what have you done for men's rights, besides coming here to defend one of the most bigoted man-hating feminazis out there? | /r/MensRights | 30/06/11 04:09 PM |
| 6 | Response from Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi regarding the bullying incident in Ft. Myers.Kudos to you for doing something for men's rights! :) She gave you the contact info of the state attorney in charge of this incident, did you get a chance to contact him? | /r/MensRights | 30/06/11 02:41 AM |
| -2 | Activism opportunity: let's get Amanda Mercotte fired!At that level, I'd expect she has a writing contract with them. Regardless of whether she is being paid or not, we should make sure her writings are not being published anymore. | /r/MensRights | 27/06/11 07:48 PM |
| 6 | Amanda Mercotte defends her incendiary remarks on Thomas BallIf you want to do something about this psycho-bitch, here is some opportunity for activism: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/iakn2/activism_opportunity_lets_get_amanda_mercotte/ | /r/MensRights | 27/06/11 07:04 PM |
| 7 | If Feminists want equality, how come they only argue for quotas at the very top of society? E.G., Feminists Equality == 50 male and 50 female politicians in a state, but 95 male and 5 female homeless is OK.Some other examples that come to mind: The Bradley Amendment http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bradley_Amendment Revoking driver licenses and jailing men who can't pay their child support (pretty much guarantees the kids will not see a penny) Mandatory arrests and restraining orders in cases of dv, even when the woman wants her bf/husband back | /r/MensRights | 27/06/11 01:42 PM |
| 7 | If Feminists want equality, how come they only argue for quotas at the very top of society? E.G., Feminists Equality == 50 male and 50 female politicians in a state, but 95 male and 5 female homeless is OK.Hmm actually, yes it does, considering that they like to claim that they are for "equality", and unfortunately this blatant lie has been accepted by a big part of the public. In reality, feminists are at best a special-interest group that cares only about its constituents (women) and nobody else (men and children be damned), and at worst an organized anti-male hate-group (some of their positions appear to be only designed to hurt men without giving women any benefit; example: "women's groups" re… | /r/MensRights | 27/06/11 12:40 PM |
| 1 | Court Says Ex-Wife May Retain Ponzi Scheme Money - NYTimes.comYep, I think we all agree this is total bs, and sets a dangerous precedent: we already know that ex-husbands are routinely "taken to the cleaners" under whatever pretexts judges can come up with, but to also screw the investors of the firm: now, that's a new one! | /r/MensRights | 24/06/11 06:01 PM |
| 5 | Twitter policy provokes feminist hysteriaKloo, I am pretty sure this article was a joke :) (Twitter accounts don't have a "gender" and I doubt there is a women's group called "Tasmanian Womyn Are Tenacious") | /r/MensRights | 24/06/11 04:48 PM |
| 6 | Court Says Ex-Wife May Retain Ponzi Scheme Money - NYTimes.comYes, that's basically the bottom line of this court decision: the wife is entitled to being treated like a business partner (i.e. gets half the profits without the requirement to do any work) but without having to contribute any starting capital to the business, and without having any financial or criminal liability if the shit hits the fan (like a business partner would). Unearned privilege without any responsibility, as always. Man, I wish I could get a sex change ;-) | /r/MensRights | 24/06/11 03:25 PM |
| 5 | Court Says Ex-Wife May Retain Ponzi Scheme Money - NYTimes.comI don't pay a designer with "half my shit". Let's recap this "marriage transaction": the service provider (wife) does not actually have to provide any service at all: she may refuse to cook, clean, take care of the kids, have sex or get pregnant however, she receives a compensation at least equal to "half your shit", because she is an "equal" business partner "contributing to the success of the partnership" (contributing what? nobody knows..), but if the business fails, she does not share any re… | /r/MensRights | 24/06/11 02:23 PM |
| 1 | Court Says Ex-Wife May Retain Ponzi Scheme Money - NYTimes.comWhat services? | /r/MensRights | 24/06/11 01:30 PM |
| 8 | What do You Think about the Article: "The Myth of Women's Oppression"Women have always been the privileged gender (this privilege is so deeply hardwired in our DNA that even today it makes advancing men's rights such a difficult task - the reason boils down to biology: the few fertile females (10-20% of the population) are responsible for the survival of the specie, if we didn't privilege them, we might have gone extinct). Pick any period, any situation and women always had it better than men - that is not to say that they had it good, they didn't because nobody … | /r/MensRights | 24/06/11 02:08 AM |
| 0 | Don't Get Married, Exhibit #2,762: John Cleese Gets Fucked by the Long Strap-On of the Divorce Courts. Why would an ex-wife get more then half of his money?Yes Indog did all the hard work of exposing her, I just added the cheap lawyer joke :) I have no time to waste for feminazi lawyer cunts trolling us (given her definition of "fairness" I feel sorry for her male clients).. | /r/MensRights | 23/06/11 08:30 PM |
| -5 | Don't Get Married, Exhibit #2,762: John Cleese Gets Fucked by the Long Strap-On of the Divorce Courts. Why would an ex-wife get more then half of his money?Indog has wasted his time to clearly demonstrate the absurdity of your position as well as your complete inability to understand basic morality and "fairness"; I am not going to waste mine with you.. | /r/MensRights | 22/06/11 04:52 AM |
| -6 | Don't Get Married, Exhibit #2,762: John Cleese Gets Fucked by the Long Strap-On of the Divorce Courts. Why would an ex-wife get more then half of his money?Reading the exchange between Indog and you (above), my opinion of lawyers has sunk to an improbable new low, so I have only this to add to the discussion: Q. If you drop a snake and an attorney off the Empire State Building, which one hits first? A. Who cares? :) | /r/MensRights | 22/06/11 02:12 AM |
| 25 | Don't Get Married, Exhibit #2,762: John Cleese Gets Fucked by the Long Strap-On of the Divorce Courts. Why would an ex-wife get more then half of his money?It won't work. Men are routinely thrown in jail because the judge thinks the guy has hidden money somewhere before the divorce (don't forget that they have access to all your bank accounts). There was a pretty outrageous case of some businessman spending more than 8 years in jail in CA for contempt of the court, because the judge "thought" the guy had money stashed away (even though the judge could not prove that). Turns out the guy did not have money.. If they can find your foreign bank account… | /r/MensRights | 21/06/11 08:06 PM |
| 3 | Runaway fathers are like drink-drivers, blasts David Cameron - TelegraphConsidering that all family court proceedings in the UK are secret (an attempt to open them to the public failed due to opposition from the judges and co.), you can only imagine the level of corruption. Those guys climbing bridges in super-heroes costumes to protest family court abuse, are from the UK.. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/11 03:24 PM |
| 2 | Runaway fathers are like drink-drivers, blasts David Cameron - TelegraphAnother scumbag builds his political career on the corpses of fathers destroyed by the system. What else is new? | /r/MensRights | 19/06/11 08:45 PM |
| 4 | Pornography is directly responsible for causing rapeI think female jealousy plays some part in the whole feminist movement (because let's face it, it was never based on facts and logic, or it wouldn't have existed in the first place). Women are very jealous of one another, and they frequently try to destroy each other's happiness (it's very pronounced when many women hang out with few or no guys around). I suspect that the butt-ugly women who started feminism in the 60's were confronted for the first time with an efficient mating market (after th… | /r/MensRights | 18/06/11 03:56 PM |
| 11 | Pornography is directly responsible for causing rapeHaha! :) So true.. Actually pornography has been more or less linked to decreasing rapes (source), but a good feminazi never lets facts and reason influence her feelings of hatred, does she? Edit: some mentioned that this blog is actually a sarcastic take on feminism; after reading some more, I'd agree (although you never know - feminists can really be that crazy!) | /r/MensRights | 18/06/11 02:53 PM |
| 7 | Police chief speaks out about YouTube assault - FOX 4 News | Cape Coral-Fort Myers-Naples Florida - WFTXThis pathetic excuse of a police chief is completely sold to radical feminist groups (which probably contributed to his career: he knows exactly how to dance to the feminazi party line). Notice how he dismisses accusations of sexism with some illogical nonsense and then violently attacks "those who would make those accusations". Also notice how he inserts "domestic violence" when talking about prosecutions where the victim does not press charges (wink-wink to his feminazi masters). We often talk… | /r/MensRights | 17/06/11 09:12 PM |
| 1 | Question: Dont you think its time this subreddit kicks out all mods that arent actually MRAs and replace them with actual bona fide MRAs?No (not that I have anything against Paul Elam), I think the mods of r/MR are doing just fine. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/11 06:29 PM |
| 17 | Second paragraph. "...certain feminist groups consider the idea of comparing male and female genital cutting to be both offensive and unsubstantiated." Excuse me?This part just floored me: article 50 as either antisemitic or anti-feminist I can understand how Jews would not be happy about a circumcision ban, but feminists? WTF? How is it anti-feminist? Why does anybody even care what feminists think about male circumcision? | /r/MensRights | 14/06/11 03:48 PM |
| 10 | Throwaway account time: How many of you have to hide your membership to /MR? How many of you would lose their children/homes if your wife caught you reading this subreddit?I am sorry to tell you this, but you have just seen your wife's true nature: she is using you as a slave (obviously, you're far from being the only guy in this situation, so don't feel bad) and she will not allow her slave to have a glimpse of freedom. This is how she will be to you when she's done using you (after the divorce) My advice: minimize the damage and divorce her ASAP (you don't have kids yet, so you should still be able to get out). | /r/MensRights | 14/06/11 12:37 AM |
| 5 | You should know that this article is being passed around to all the other gender based subreddits, while it's specifically directed at you all.I don't think that our gene pool is "too big and diverse" to stay unaffected in the face of female hypergamy (considering said hypergamy is based on regressive selection criteria). As you mentioned, we like looking back at the latest matriarchical civilization in the West: the end of the Ancient Roman Empire. If there is a genetic legacy of that period it would be found in modern day Italians, correct? So what are the characteristics of Italians? According to wikipedia, italian men are stereotyp… | /r/MensRights | 10/06/11 09:26 PM |
| 19 | You should know that this article is being passed around to all the other gender based subreddits, while it's specifically directed at you all.Actually, I thought this was a surprisingly intelligent and well balanced article. The author has a very good understanding of both movements and draws accurate conclusions IMO. Yes, she criticizes MRAs but her criticism is valid: men's group have not been good at gathering actual active support from their members. It has always been the case. (I think that this is because men who complain are viewed as weak and pathetic - and the cause of this probably lies in our genes: males are the expendabl… | /r/MensRights | 10/06/11 07:22 PM |
| 27 | Feminist sexualises goodnight kiss between father and daughter and claims allied forces would rape given the chance to.One of the main goals of radical feminism is the destruction of the family unit - or to put it more explicitly: the separation of fathers from their children. Radical feminists do not recognize the notion of fatherhood (despite a mountain of social evidence showing how critical fathers are to the healthy psychological development of children). When she implies that a daughter kissing her father good-night is somehow associated with sexuality, she is basically using the pedo scare to further her … | /r/MensRights | 10/06/11 01:02 PM |
| 1 | So r/MensRights, did I do good?I think you read the comment soylentcoleslaw was replying to.. | /r/MensRights | 09/06/11 01:20 PM |
| 9 | Why are men almost always put in 'the dog house' after an escalated argument?Because she can call 911 and have him evicted anyway.. | /r/MensRights | 07/06/11 02:30 PM |
| 2 | Why Some Vixens Screw their way around the Globe.So if it's been happening for a while, it's not an issue then. ok.. (I guess rape is not a women's issue because it's been happening for a while too, correct?) That being said, I don't think that gold-diggers are anywhere close to the top of the list, considering all the other issues we are concerned about in this sub-reddit.. | /r/MensRights | 06/06/11 08:12 PM |
| 1 | Why Some Vixens Screw their way around the Globe.I often say that western societies are following the same pattern of social changes as those that happened in Ancient Rome (after no-fault divorced was introduced, and the family unit was destroyed, just like in the West today). One of those changes was a tremendous rise in prostitution as well as the emergence of a segment of Roman men who decided to only relate to the opposite sex by patronizing hookers. It is not hard to see that the west is trending in the same direction: we went from marria… | /r/MensRights | 06/06/11 03:50 PM |
| 3 | Women's "Wish List" = HR "Wish List" in EmployeesThis sounds totally retarded and flies in the face of every biological fact about sexual reproduction. You need a citation if you want to make your point (not vague unquantified stuff like "for every ugly girl there is an ugly guy") | /r/MensRights | 04/06/11 08:45 PM |
| 1 | The effect of feminism on menNo, it's not! Your so-called "strong" relationship is in fact a threesome with an uninvited guest: the state that is holding a giant dildo that will get rammed up your ass :) Your options are: threesome with the state, or nothing (or creative alternatives that you create for yourself). | /r/MensRights | 04/06/11 08:29 PM |
| 1 | The effect of feminism on menYou have to think out of the box - men who apply the old rules in our brand new world will get crushed, you're correct about that; but who says you can't make your own rules? Option 4. Work hard and bang American sluts in your 20's and 30's (just don't knock one up); then take all your savings, retire at 35 in some warm country, get a beautiful 20-yr old wife, live without fear of divorce and raise your kids away from the reach of America's pop culture, public schools, anti-family courts, fast-f… | /r/MensRights | 04/06/11 02:46 PM |
| 1 | Feminism and its Guaranteed OutcomeIt doesn't matter, my point is that the secular open-minded culture of the West will disappear and it will be replaced by a culture that "encourages" women to fulfill their childbearing duties (aka religion). It is mathematically inevitable. Which religion will emerge as the leading one is harder to predict, but I'd say that in the big scheme of evolution it doesn't matter that much. If you think that religious people have the same fertility rate as the rest of us, you are living in la-la land. … | /r/MensRights | 03/06/11 12:35 AM |
| 1 | Feminism and its Guaranteed OutcomeI am sorry to break it to you, but any culture with a fertility rate of 1 and change is not going to survive very long. You just have to look at the numbers: 1st generation : 128,000 babies 2nd generation: 64,000 babies 3rd generation: 32,000 babies (but the 128,000 babies of the 1st gen are still around and they are expecting to collect their retirement benefits now - good luck with that!) 4th generation: 16,000 babies 5th generation: 8,000 babies 6th generation: 4,000 babies 7th generation: 2,… | /r/MensRights | 03/06/11 12:24 AM |
| -1 | Feminism and its Guaranteed Outcomehttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/5994047/Muslim-Europe-the-demographic-time-bomb-transforming-our-continent.html I am looking at things from an anthropological perspective - there is no right or wrong.. | /r/MensRights | 02/06/11 11:56 PM |
| 1 | Feminism and its Guaranteed OutcomeThis future is not impossible (and many radical feminists openly advocated for the extermination of men - example: Mary Daly who received a glowing obituary in the mainstream media, when she died a few months ago), however I don't see it happening for two reasons: women have a "mama-bear" instinct and will protect their sons (to some extent) historically, this has not been the outcome of feminism; the typical outcome of feminism is the death of the civilization infected by it (one example: Ancie… | /r/MensRights | 02/06/11 11:26 PM |
| 4 | MRAs just need to go bowling with some women, then they will be happy and no longer have any grievances (and maybe get laid).Well, I am banging 2 women regularly and yet I still have grievances - so much for the cheap shaming tactic.. | /r/MensRights | 01/06/11 10:13 PM |
| 2 | Why American men have no reason to marryI don't know any man who is "happily married" (unless their wife is within earshot); I asked the question to many trusted friends and the answers usually gravitate around these themes: "You know.. you have to work on your marriage" (with a look of pain on their face ;-) "Well.. at least I love my kids" (implying: I don't love my wife so much) "Marriage was the biggest mistake of my life, don't do it!" I never heard any man say "marriage is awesome, you have to get married buddy" - not even once … | /r/MensRights | 28/05/11 10:16 PM |
| 1 | Man Jailed for Refusing to Pay AlimonyWhat contract? | /r/MensRights | 26/05/11 05:54 PM |
| 7 | Is feminism a hate movement?Actually, if you read early feminist writers, they are absolutely bat-shit insane and don't hesitate to advocate for the physical extermination of everything male and the establishment of a female-supremacist "utopia". Even in the early days (when one could claim that women might have actually suffered some disadvantages), the movement was already driven by hatred (and not necessarily a desire for equality). Case in point: many feminist leaders and major women's publications (like Ms Magazine) w… | /r/MensRights | 22/05/11 06:38 PM |
| 3 | Ridiculous relationship inequality (and I don't like my wife's friends)Haha! No, there isn't (you rapist :) You can have a marriage annuled if you never had sex, but this is different. | /r/MensRights | 20/05/11 02:18 PM |
| 21 | Ridiculous relationship inequality (and I don't like my wife's friends)You have discovered what legions of married men have found before you: sex stops after marriage (or, if you're lucky, after the 1st kid). Unfortunately, there isn't much you can do about it (and she knows it, that's why she has zero incentive to put out): you can't force her to have sex (that's marital rape), you can't leave her (you'd never see your kids or house again, and you'd get bankrupted by 20 yrs of pound-me-in-the-ass "child support") and you can't cheat on her (you pervert! - and of c… | /r/MensRights | 20/05/11 01:30 PM |
| 9 | Calls for MP Ken Clarke to resign for saying not all rape the same.What kind of fucked-up femofascist parallel universe do we all live in, if a man isn't even allowed to state the obvious? Yes, they are different degrees in violence in any crime, be it rape or murder or robbery or whatever else.. what the hell is wrong with these people??? Apparently the feminazi thought-police is hard at work to make sure this guy is eliminated - is there anything we can do to help? | /r/MensRights | 18/05/11 03:54 PM |
| 2 | French outraged at Strauss-Kahn ‘lynching’ by U.S. justice system.http://tweeting.com/tweets-could-be-evidence-in-possible-strauss-kahn-trail | /r/MensRights | 17/05/11 09:54 PM |
| 7 | Lawyers for Dominique Strauss-Kahn have proof the IMF chief was at a restaurant having lunch with his daughter at the time he was alleged to be sexually assaulting a hotel maid: Reutersfunny how his alibi has still not been reported by CNN.. (and yet they didn't hesitate to report wild (and later disproved by witnesses) speculations about his "fleeing" on the basis of nothing more than a forgotten cell-phone) | /r/MensRights | 16/05/11 03:02 PM |
| 3 | Lawyers for Dominique Strauss-Kahn have proof the IMF chief was at a restaurant having lunch with his daughter at the time he was alleged to be sexually assaulting a hotel maid: ReutersSarkozy might have done the same thing to his opponent at the last election (the "Clearstream affaire").. | /r/MensRights | 16/05/11 02:35 PM |
| 3 | Lawyers for Dominique Strauss-Kahn have proof the IMF chief was at a restaurant having lunch with his daughter at the time he was alleged to be sexually assaulting a hotel maid: ReutersApparently, NY police just changed their story and now they believe the attack happened before noon (therefore invalidating Strauss-Kahn's alibi). They can do that? Hell yeah! | /r/MensRights | 16/05/11 02:24 PM |
| 3 | Let me be clear, women: you have changed the arrangement so that there is NOTHING in it for me.Same here - 80% or more of the marriages I know have already failed (most within 2 years). People don't seem to realize that divorce statistics are lagging by a good 30 years - today's divorce stats are about women from the 70's and 80's. Today's (American) women are nothing like their mothers, and they are way more likely to divorce. California - the state that leads the way in most social changes happening in the western world - has a divorce rate of ~75% today (computed on marriages from 10-2… | /r/MensRights | 15/05/11 11:25 PM |
| 1 | Sometimes, We Men Can Be Dumb Too.Yes, but society expects us to take responsibility for our actions: "[dude] was arrested this weekend for filing a false police report" How many women are ever arrested after making false rape claims (or other false claims for that matter..)? | /r/MensRights | 10/05/11 01:30 PM |
| -1 | Prince William knowingly turned down legal advice to sign a prenuptial agreement "But he loves Kate and trusts her implicitly, and was adamant that no agreement was necessary."William is such a sucker, it is painful to watch (although it soothes any jealousy one might harbor of the British royalty) Instead of banging every royal groupie in sight, like a prince should do - this idiot dates the same woman forever (strike 1), marries her (strike 2) and is not even guaranteed offsprings because she is pushing 30 (strike 3), while she refuses to say "obey my husband" in her wedding woes (strike 4) and he fails to make her sign a prenup (strike 5). That's one Royal loser ;-… | /r/MensRights | 03/05/11 01:04 AM |
| 1 | Why have male-victim intimate homicide rates bottomed out since 1975? (Divorce?)I don't understand why you are getting downvotes. You are perfectly correct: there is a strong financial disincentive for women to kill their ex-husbands - after all, no one likes losing their alimony and child support.. Also, you are correct that women who kill their ex are less likely to be investigated, charged and sentenced than men who do the same (not to mention that they often use hitmen, which doesn't count as dv). It has been studied and well documented, and it only takes one look at Ga… | /r/MensRights | 01/05/11 01:09 PM |
| 1 | Why have male-victim intimate homicide rates bottomed out since 1975? (Divorce?)??? | /r/MensRights | 30/04/11 06:41 PM |
| 5 | Feminism: censorship has begunYes, because "people" have nothing better to do than use fake accounts to make men's rights sub-reddit look bad. Of course, that sounds like something that "people" without any particular agenda would do /s Just for the record, the cliffor case seems to point to feminists. | /r/MensRights | 30/04/11 05:57 PM |
| 10 | Why have male-victim intimate homicide rates bottomed out since 1975? (Divorce?)Why would you want to kill your husband, when you can take everything he has and loves, condemn him to lifelong poverty (or worse) and torment him at will with new motions in family court? It kind of makes sense | /r/MensRights | 30/04/11 05:52 PM |
| 8 | Feminism: censorship has begunI would suggest to ban the obviously misogynistic ones (like Cliffor) and for the milder ones, maybe we can have a disclaimer in the sidebar: "It has come to our attention that feminists are using sock-puppets accounts to post outrageous, vulgar and misogynistic comments on this sub-reddit. Some have been exposed and banned (cliffor), but others (probably including cliffor's other sock-puppet accounts) are still lurking. Please ignore them as they do not represent this subreddit or the men's rig… | /r/MensRights | 30/04/11 04:36 PM |
| 10 | Feminism: censorship has begunbeantownraces: redditor for 8 hours It's yet another trolling account. Not even worth replying to.. Kloo, did you notice that in the past few weeks the trolls have been taking a different approach: they seem to be voicing outrageous pro-mrm opinions with a very vulgar and misogynistic tone? (cliffor was just one example) It seems to be their new trolling strategy. Are we going to do something about it? | /r/MensRights | 30/04/11 04:13 PM |
| 41 | Feminism: censorship has begunWhat else is new? Feminists are some of the most censor-prone groups out there (thus the popular term "feminazi"), aside from religious fanatics, it is hard to see any other group that is so quick and effective at bullying its opponents into silence. There isn't one major feminist blog or forum that doesn't censor every bit of discussion that would challenge their idiotic and absurd beliefs. It is not surprising if one looks through the bs and sees feminism for what it is: a hate-group fueled by… | /r/MensRights | 30/04/11 04:00 PM |
| -1 | It's now sexist to tell someone to calm down if they're female.You're rambling incoherently to prove what exactly? "Dear" used in a sarcastic way is demeaning (I think everyone agrees on that), but it is not sexist (you could use it on a man as well as on a woman, and in both cases it implies an inability to act like a grown-up) | /r/MensRights | 28/04/11 01:41 AM |
| 0 | It's now sexist to tell someone to calm down if they're female.You can use "dear" on anything that you are fond of, it is not gender specific: example "my dear husband", "my dear children" | /r/MensRights | 27/04/11 10:42 PM |
| -2 | It's now sexist to tell someone to calm down if they're female."dear" can be condescending but not really sexist. If you think that male politicians make a big fuss over condescending remarks, you must have been living under a rock. "man-up" is sexist, condescending and way more offensive and I have yet to see one male politician make a fuss over it, and one female politician apologize for using the term (and it's been used frequently by most female politicians in the US) | /r/MensRights | 27/04/11 10:13 PM |
| 5 | It's now sexist to tell someone to calm down if they're female.Why is "dear" sexist? | /r/MensRights | 27/04/11 09:47 PM |
| 6 | It's now sexist to tell someone to calm down if they're female.The fact that calling a woman "dear" is somewhat considered "sexist" and a major newspaper reports on the "outrage" is just mind-boggling and shows how far down the rabbit hole of female-supremacy we have gone.. Just for the record, females in position of authority in the media or in politics routinely throw sexist remarks at men with complete impunity (the over-used "man-up" comes to mind, but there are so many other examples..) | /r/MensRights | 27/04/11 09:27 PM |
| 2 | I love this woman !and you can keep them.. thanks! | /r/MensRights | 27/04/11 01:52 AM |
| 2 | On the happiness of men - is Denmark better?Good for you - let us know how it works out if you follow up on your idea! | /r/MensRights | 23/04/11 03:10 PM |
| 3 | On the happiness of men - is Denmark better?Sounds good, but you will have to learn Danish (similar to German).. | /r/MensRights | 23/04/11 02:48 PM |
| 3 | 15 Aspects That Must Be Recognized in Third-Wave FeminismSilly me - I was hoping for some gender-equal perspective, maybe that's coming in the 5th wave? ;-) | /r/MensRights | 16/04/11 05:33 PM |
| 4 | 15 Aspects That Must Be Recognized in Third-Wave FeminismFunny how there isn't one mention of shared parenting, alimony reform or male victims of domestic violence (just to name a few issues that affect us).. | /r/MensRights | 16/04/11 03:46 PM |
| 3 | Remember that women who bragged about shooting her boyfriend on national radio? Here's a news report about it.It's called the pussy-pass. The same way Gary Coleman's wife got away with what obviously looks like the cold-blooded murder of her husband. The same way Tiger Woods wife got away with beating him with a golf club. The same way Mary Winkler got away with killing her husband.. etc... | /r/MensRights | 14/04/11 02:29 AM |
| 4 | Remember that women who bragged about shooting her boyfriend on national radio? Here's a news report about it.Too bad the DA refused to prosecute her (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Leykis#On-air_murder_confession) | /r/MensRights | 14/04/11 02:09 AM |
| 4 | Would this work for a man who wants children?Yes, it is possible; plenty of rich guys are doing exactly that, and it is supposedly a booming business. CNN had a segment on this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNpmIj4V2oI Legally, it is relatively bullet-proof as long as you do it in a place that allows it (India and California are the most popular choices) AND you can get a birth certificate for the kid in your home country (not a problem for US citizens, but other countries - like the UK - may refuse to recognize the foreign birth certifi… | /r/MensRights | 13/04/11 07:38 PM |
| 1 | You probably haven't heard of this political cartoonist, but needless to say his grip on reality and logic seems to be getting steadily weakerThat is not the only option but that is what is happening today, and therefore it is the explanation for the wage gap (not discrimination) as long as the present gender roles persist (hypotheticals don't matter). The cartoonist conveniently forgets to mention all the massive transfers of wealth from men to women, that result in women making 80% of household buying decisions - that is 4 times more than men! Hypothetically, If we wanted to get rid of gender roles and give men half of the household… | /r/MensRights | 13/04/11 12:12 AM |
| 1 | You probably haven't heard of this political cartoonist, but needless to say his grip on reality and logic seems to be getting steadily weakerSo a woman decides to have kids, and now employers have to pay her the same for less work, just so that there is no "sexism"... WTF? I understand the point that women's careers and wages suffer because they take care of the kids, but this is not to be remedied by employers (by forcing employers to compensate women for work they fail to do) - instead mothers should receive help from the government (which they do), their communities (which they do) and their partners (which they do). Corporations'… | /r/MensRights | 12/04/11 06:09 PM |
| 11 | Female reporters in male locker rooms? Is the reverse OK?That's not a real interview - it's a comedy show! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Partridge Alan Gordon Partridge is a fictional television and radio presenter ** portrayed by English comedian Steve Coogan and invented by Coogan, Armando Iannucci, Stewart Lee and Richard Herring for the BBC Radio 4 programme On The Hour. **A parody of both sports commentators and chat show presenters, among others, the character has appeared in two radio series, three television series and numerous TV and radi… | /r/MensRights | 12/04/11 11:52 AM |
| 1 | Did the Men's Rights movement win? Where did all the down-voters go? Most topics have 90%-100% up-votes. In the past it was always 55%-75%.I noticed the same thing. So quiet without the trolls - unbelievable! :) I always suspected, that this was the work of either one individual with many accounts, or a PR company hired by some feminist group to disrupt this sub-reddit (it's called "astro-turfing", and it is becoming very popular with corporations and special interest groups; most notably the US government spent millions on "astro-turfing" sub-contractors to troll and ridicule so called 9/11 "truthers"). Maybe some old-timers would… | /r/MensRights | 12/04/11 12:06 AM |
| 3 | What are things an MRA can do to directly spread the word? What has been done in the past?If you are in college, spreading the word on campus would be very helpful. Maybe even get a men's group started, if you feel adventurous and have thick skin.. | /r/MensRights | 10/04/11 02:17 PM |
| 0 | Why are most homeless people men?Yeah I don't understand the downvotes, either. I guess most don't realize all the different ways in which women exchange sex for money (streetwalkers are just the most visible, but many married wives are doing pretty much the same thing).. | /r/MensRights | 06/04/11 02:00 PM |
| -2 | Why are most homeless people men?because most hookers are women ;-) | /r/MensRights | 05/04/11 09:53 PM |
| 15 | This last paragraph pretty much sums up everything I fear about ever getting married.I have seen a few divorces amongst my friends, and I could not believe how heartless and evil the women become when "it is over" (and those were women who by most standards would be considered very respectable and "good catches"). It is a cliche to say that "you don't know a woman until divorce", but I definitely did see where the saying is coming from. Witnessing a few divorces pretty much made me decide that I will never, ever get married. The argument that the woman has to play dirty because … | /r/MensRights | 05/04/11 09:37 PM |
| 1 | Divorced From Reality by Stephen Baskerville (a must-read for all men)Absolutely brilliant essay by Dr Baskerville - I am reposting it to r/MaleStudies.. | /r/MensRights | 02/04/11 10:20 PM |
| -1 | Jasmin3 Cott3r, 18, Won't Sp3nd a Day in Prison for Killing H3r Boyfri3ndOhh poor little thing! Your man-hating lies and straw-man arguments were censored.. what will you do? | /r/MensRights | 02/04/11 09:41 PM |
| 1 | Jasmin3 Cott3r, 18, Won't Sp3nd a Day in Prison for Killing H3r Boyfri3ndIt's much easier to win an argument, when you just make up what the other side is stating, isn't it? (for the record: I didn't ban her because she was female, read the reasons again if you have reading comprehension issues; but then again, it's much easier to just make stuff up, right?) | /r/MensRights | 02/04/11 09:33 PM |
| 0 | Jasmin3 Cott3r, 18, Won't Sp3nd a Day in Prison for Killing H3r Boyfri3ndKeep telling yourself that.. it must have been the paaaaatriarchy! | /r/MensRights | 02/04/11 09:27 PM |
| 0 | Jasmin3 Cott3r, 18, Won't Sp3nd a Day in Prison for Killing H3r Boyfri3ndActually, they are if it makes you feel better (pretty much every feminist blog or forum bans anyone who doesn't agree with their religion; same thing happens in academia: anyone who dares criticize feminism is pushed out by "offended" feminists).. Also, the reasons for the ban are clearly stated, but you can pretend you don't understand them, like any good fem-bot.. | /r/MensRights | 02/04/11 09:24 PM |
| 0 | Jasmin3 Cott3r, 18, Won't Sp3nd a Day in Prison for Killing H3r Boyfri3ndAny excuse is good enough, right? /s | /r/MensRights | 02/04/11 07:29 PM |
| 0 | Jasmin3 Cott3r, 18, Won't Sp3nd a Day in Prison for Killing H3r Boyfri3ndTroll was banned in r/MaleStudies Reasons for ban: if you're a woman, please don't lecture us on what is an issue for men's rights and what isn't blatant bull-shitting: "had the tables been turned the outcome would have been the same if the girl's parents had asked for leniency" - no it would not have been, and that's why it is (very much) a men's rights issue! | /r/MensRights | 02/04/11 07:19 PM |
| 3 | Jasmin3 Cott3r, 18, Won't Sp3nd a Day in Prison for Killing H3r Boyfri3ndYou can also write about Mary Winkler, Gary Coleman's ex-wife (very possible homicide, never investigated by the police), Arturo Gatti's wife (very suspicious "suicide")... | /r/MensRights | 02/04/11 03:07 PM |
| 6 | Jasmin3 Cott3r, 18, Won't Sp3nd a Day in Prison for Killing H3r Boyfri3ndYes, because probation totally makes it a fair sentence /s I guess, we can just set rapists and drunk drivers who killed people free, as long as they are on probation, right? Idiot troll was banned in r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 02/04/11 05:32 AM |
| 11 | Jasmin3 Cott3r, 18, Won't Sp3nd a Day in Prison for Killing H3r Boyfri3nd500 hrs of community service - wow! that's like one third of what Chris Brown got! Justice was totally served /s | /r/MensRights | 02/04/11 05:20 AM |
| 1 | Jasmin3 Cott3r, 18, Won't Sp3nd a Day in Prison for Killing H3r Boyfri3ndTroll was banned in r/MaleStudies - but I feel sorry about it so it's ok :) | /r/MensRights | 02/04/11 04:29 AM |
| 17 | Judge to Dad: ‘Visitation’ via Skype is Good EnoughI was going for monopoly bills, but you beat me to it! :) This judge is a moron, and the guy has every moral right to leave the country without paying a cent, in my opinion. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/11 09:38 PM |
| 7 | I'm now in my 8th month of an unplanned pregnancy and the father has informed me he no longer wants to be involved in the child's life. I'm so overwhelmed and confused I don't know what to do.Disclaimer: I am not attorney and this is not legal advice: He says he's in financial ruin currently. If he is divorced with two kids, that's not too surprising. If I file for financial support, will that make him an enemy for the rest of our lives? Yes, probably. If I don't file and he reappears in the future wanting custody do I have the right to tell him NO? He can't ask for custody unless he pays child support, so it's unlikely that he would make that move. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/11 03:59 AM |
| 4 | I'm now in my 8th month of an unplanned pregnancy and the father has informed me he no longer wants to be involved in the child's life. I'm so overwhelmed and confused I don't know what to do.Your attorney is correct - I am not sure what other advice we can give you? | /r/MensRights | 31/03/11 03:46 AM |
| 3 | I'm now in my 8th month of an unplanned pregnancy and the father has informed me he no longer wants to be involved in the child's life. I'm so overwhelmed and confused I don't know what to do.Wellcrapola: redditor for 1 hour (hmm. I smell a troll). The law is on your side: he will support you financially whether he likes it or not, it's called child support. It doesn't matter whether he wants to be a father or not, and it doesn't matter if he told you yesterday or 6 mths ago. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/11 03:34 AM |
| 12 | Judge rules that its too late, and a man must continue to pay child support for a child he didn't father.Blaming the victim much? | /r/MensRights | 30/03/11 08:34 PM |
| 4 | Judge rules that its too late, and a man must continue to pay child support for a child he didn't father.$200,000 in unpaid "child support".. damn! I wonder how much he already paid, and how many more payments he is scheduled to make on top of the $200k? | /r/MensRights | 30/03/11 06:43 PM |
| 1 | People of Men's Rights reddit: if you're considering a committed relationship with a sane woman, how would you negotiate it to be win/win?You can't force your wife to get a job. It's pretty common actually for wives to "inexplicably" lose their jobs after they get married, even though they always so "wanted a career" ;-) | /r/MensRights | 28/03/11 05:18 AM |
| 1 | People of Men's Rights reddit: if you're considering a committed relationship with a sane woman, how would you negotiate it to be win/win?Not very well.. What's to stop her from quitting her job, waiting 6-12 mths and their filing for divorce as a housewife (hello lifetime alimony! ca-tching!) | /r/MensRights | 28/03/11 04:34 AM |
| 4 | Scott Adams claims to be trolling the men's rights movement.Big deal. He realized that he pissed off feminists, and that is pretty much a career-ender for anyone with a publicly visible job.. so he is back-pedalling a fast as he can to save his sorry ass.. Just another man who is selling off his fellow brothers, for money and p*ssy ; what else is new? Add him to the long list of politicians, judges, DA's, entertainers, cops, teachers, professors.. who have done the same.. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/11 02:34 AM |
| 2 | People of Men's Rights reddit: if you're considering a committed relationship with a sane woman, how would you negotiate it to be win/win?The most dangerous aspects of your relationship are related to children: child support and child custody is where the danger is (especially if you are a small business owner, CSA is too incompetent too greedy and too bureaucratic to deal with a small business; it's very likely that these morons would drain your cash flow and/or freeze your accounts and bankrupt the business). Unfortunately, a woman cannot refuse or lower your child-support under any circumstance (it's computed by an automatic fo… | /r/MensRights | 28/03/11 02:11 AM |
| 0 | Lawrence Taylor To Become Registered Sex Offender, Sentenced To 6 Years Probationnice try | /r/MensRights | 24/03/11 02:40 AM |
| 1 | Lawrence Taylor To Become Registered Sex Offender, Sentenced To 6 Years ProbationFeminist troll was banned in r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 24/03/11 02:36 AM |
| -2 | Lawrence Taylor To Become Registered Sex Offender, Sentenced To 6 Years ProbationAnother man criminalized for absurd sex "offenses": somehow L Taylor was supposed to know that the hooker was 16, despite her claiming being of legal age: how can anyone be punished for a crime he didn't know he was committing is just beyond me (and most likely unconstitutional)? How hard is it for a 16 yr old with make-up to look much older, especially in this line of work? somehow paying for sex is illegal (I guess unless you pay the unionized hookers, also known as "wives") - how is alimony l… | /r/MensRights | 24/03/11 12:37 AM |
| 0 | Usually I'm fiercely against double-standards, but I have to admit: I don't think that a woman hitting a man is the same thing as a man hitting a woman.except for the chivalry.. | /r/MensRights | 23/03/11 10:42 PM |
| 1 | Supreme Court Weighs Rights Of 'Deadbeat' ParentsPolitical progress is accomplished one step at a time (you can't just get in there and abolish the entire family court system) ; and F & F have accomplished a lot. Also, they have been very good at spreading the message (I found out about MR's from their blog) - this is very important because there are still a lot of men who are absolutely clueless about what is going on (and what is about to happen to them, if they aren't careful). The feminazis have taken control of the school system and the m… | /r/MensRights | 23/03/11 06:21 PM |
| 2 | Usually I'm fiercely against double-standards, but I have to admit: I don't think that a woman hitting a man is the same thing as a man hitting a woman.I strongly believe that we are about to see a pretty vicious spike in female violence, because we have a perfect storm of social trends that are all coming together to enable it: girrrl power culture: the media and society glorifies female violence one-sided enforcement of DV laws: the police only arrests (and crucifies) men who are found (or alleged) violent, while women are largely left off the hook (even in ridiculously obvious and publicized cases: Erin Nordegren?) lack of due process in DV … | /r/MensRights | 23/03/11 05:38 PM |
| 13 | Supreme Court Weighs Rights Of 'Deadbeat' Parents13 percent of the county jail population consists of nonpaying parents held in civil contempt Wow! As expected: those who end up in jail are low-income, and thus, "more likely to be a turnip than a deadbeat." [the article defines a "turnip" as someone who can't to pay vs a "deadbeat" as someone who can but refuses to pay] A more controversial observation would be: why are men who are de-facto relegated to the role of sperm donors by the family courts, effectively forced by the same family courts… | /r/MensRights | 23/03/11 04:17 PM |
| 2 | The Putative Father Registry - What's Best for Moms (as Usual)I agree that Robert Franklin and Glenn Sacks are some of the most level-headed, fact-based and non-controversial men's rights advocates out there. "Fathers and Families" is one of my favorite blogs ( -> link in the side-bar!) | /r/MensRights | 22/03/11 06:08 PM |
| -3 | Female privilegeThe fact the NiceGuysSTFU is using a personal attack indicates to me that it is a troll, and I banned him (her?) in r/MaleStudies :) | /r/MensRights | 22/03/11 04:30 PM |
| 1 | Because of one hateful comment, mensrights is exactly like feminism / 2X?[citation needed] Regardless, it's very easy to get a new IP (generally rebooting a home router should be enough).. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/11 04:04 AM |
| -1 | Because of one hateful comment, mensrights is exactly like feminism / 2X?What makes you think you are banned in r/MaleStudies? (your account is not in the banned list.) | /r/MensRights | 22/03/11 01:45 AM |
| -5 | Because of one hateful comment, mensrights is exactly like feminism / 2X?Well, I find it funny that people like you create multiple accounts to troll a sub-reddit, and even go as far as to pretend that they support it. [Note to the community: cuckoldedcock is another sock-puppet account trolling /MR ] | /r/MensRights | 22/03/11 01:09 AM |
| -2 | Because of one hateful comment, mensrights is exactly like feminism / 2X?Nice try - maybe they'll give you a raise ;) How much does an astroturfer make? minimum wage? | /r/MensRights | 22/03/11 01:03 AM |
| -5 | Because of one hateful comment, mensrights is exactly like feminism / 2X?The number of banned accounts is not publicly visible - yes, I banned tons of trolling accounts but I don't generally advertise it so the only way you could possibly know about it, is if you trolled /MR using multiple fake accounts and I banned them. So how many of your sock-puppet accounts did I ban? :) More interestingly: are you using some automated software to manage your accounts? Is someone paying you to do this? Edit: more on special interest groups using sophisticated software to spam so… | /r/MensRights | 22/03/11 12:41 AM |
| 1 | Because of one hateful comment, mensrights is exactly like feminism / 2X?The have so many accounts - it's easy to upvote each other.. I banned them in r/MaleStudies but I am not a mod in r/MensRights. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/11 12:24 AM |
| -3 | Because of one hateful comment, mensrights is exactly like feminism / 2X?[Just a note for the community: supercraptacular is a well-known feminist troll impersonating men's activists with the prupose of making us look "loony"] | /r/MensRights | 22/03/11 12:19 AM |
| -4 | Because of one hateful comment, mensrights is exactly like feminism / 2X?Ironically, BolshevikMuppet and supercraptacular are both trolls, they have been banned in r/MaleStudies a long time ago :) | /r/MensRights | 22/03/11 12:16 AM |
| 4 | What's it like knowing that /r/whiterights links & sympathises with you?Koshian was banned in r/MaleStudies. Reason for ban: selective ad-hominem attack (a movement is not defined by who agrees with it - also, why no mention that a former president of NOW is a MRA (Warren Farrell) and the woman who opened the first shelter for domestic violence victims in the UK and spent her entire life helping dv victims is a fervent supporter of men's rights (Erin Pizzey)) | /r/MensRights | 20/03/11 03:15 PM |
| 0 | Are women "entitled" to good men? Should men be allowed to reject women?.. and tomek77 :p | /r/MensRights | 20/03/11 03:08 PM |
| 1 | Are women "entitled" to good men? Should men be allowed to reject women?eight year relationship Great - 50 more years to go! Good luck, buddy! I hope everything goes well for you, but I know several people who got divorced in their 50's (it's a very popular trend because women try to lock alimony payments when their husbands' pay is still high) - they ended-up lonely (because their wives didn't let them develop friendships with other guys), broke and unable to retire (even though they could have retired at 40 had they stayed single). Most men think they are marrying… | /r/MensRights | 20/03/11 02:36 PM |
| 2 | Are women "entitled" to good men? Should men be allowed to reject women?I have been living this lifestyle for several years now. It's very attainable if you can elevate yourself above society's brainwashing, and avoid falling into the marriage trap, the debt trap and the 9-to-5 job trap.. | /r/MensRights | 19/03/11 07:08 PM |
| 8 | Are women "entitled" to good men? Should men be allowed to reject women?You are absolutely correct! Some are still in denial and haven't grasped the full implication of living in a matriarchy - which is why your comment is getting downvoted (plus the usual femitrolls of course). Men who follow traditional relationship patterns in this radically changed social environment are going to have a very painful awakening when they get divorced or when they find themselves working 12 hrs/day just to get away from their ugly wife that has them trapped in an abusive relationsh… | /r/MensRights | 19/03/11 06:55 PM |
| 0 | THE TRUTH ABOUT SEX TRAFFICKING AND SEX SLAVERYX-post from r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 17/03/11 10:24 PM |
| 3 | Heroic Team Inside Fukushima Nuclear Plant: How many of the 50 'technicians' are men? All of them?For another example of hiding the gender of men when they are victimized: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/13/iran-child-soldiers-tehran-protests Notice that the article is using gender-neutral words to describe the boy soldiers, except in this one sentence: "They are very keen to display violence. Teenage boys are notorious for that" | /r/MensRights | 15/03/11 08:05 PM |
| 4 | PZ Myers compares men's rights supporters to neo-nazisIt always surprises me when academics show a level of incompetence, bias and stupidity that even your average joe-six-pack can't equal. PZ Meyers picks on an anonymous comment, from under a blog post that doesn't even discuss any important men's rights issue, and uses it to mis-characterize an entire movement. Wow! That wouldn't surprise me if it was written by some uneducated bozo, but this guy actually pretends to be intelligent and has a freaking PhD - WTF? How can someone with so little inte… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/11 03:41 AM |
| 2 | A Feminist Gold Digger.My thoughts exactly! What a stupid, entitled, selfish bitch! Her bf is in for a life of misery.. It's articles like that make me wonder whether some women even have a moral compass at all - it's like the part of the brain that deals with moral judgment is missing in her.. Related: The Kohlberg morality scale - from http://faculty.plts.edu/gpence/html/kohlberg.htm : Women typically score at stage 3, with its focus on interpersonal feelings, whereas men more commonly score at stages 4 and 5, which… | /r/MensRights | 12/03/11 03:45 PM |
| 2 | Lol, apparently this subreddit is an example of sexism on RedditGood find! I wonder if the writers at the Merriam Websters dictionary noticed that their definition of sexism is sexist? ;-) | /r/MensRights | 11/03/11 08:43 PM |
| 9 | Lol, apparently this subreddit is an example of sexism on RedditThe politically correct definition of "sexism" is "anything that upsets a woman (regardless of validity)", so I am not surprised that this sub-reddit could be considered "sexist" by some in the pc establishment. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/11 03:38 AM |
| 5 | You gotta be shitting me. "misogyny isn’t a bug in the Men’s Rights Movement; it’s a feature."The good men project is a feminist site that is openly hostile to the men's movement - please stop linking there! | /r/MensRights | 10/03/11 10:53 PM |
| 1 | 30 years jail for sex with his wife: William J. Hetherington has been incarcerated in Michigan prisons for more than 20 years for having sex with his wife Linda. No parole because he does not admit his guilt, says he did not rape his wife.so? I don't see how it applies here? | /r/MensRights | 10/03/11 03:19 AM |
| 1 | 30 years jail for sex with his wife: William J. Hetherington has been incarcerated in Michigan prisons for more than 20 years for having sex with his wife Linda. No parole because he does not admit his guilt, says he did not rape his wife.From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem An ad hominem (Latin: "to the man"), short for argumentum ad hominem, is an attempt to link the validity of a premise to a characteristic or belief of the opponent advocating the premise. In other words: you can't invalidate Limbaugh's opinion, even if you can prove that he is stupid (characteristic) or brainwashed (belief). You have to prove that his opinion doesn't make sense, even if it was said by Ghandi himself. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/11 03:08 AM |
| 1 | If MRAs care about men dying at dangerous jobs, where's the MRA support for unions and workers' rights?You have a very simplistic and unidimensional understanding of this issue. Historically, the biggest driving force behind increased labor standards was the rise of standard of living. You can have all the labor unions in the world, but if people are starving and living in grass huts, they will risk their life to feed their kids and you can't stop them.. The rise of labor standards in the West during the last 2-3 centuries is just a reflection of the rise of our standard of living - unions were j… | /r/MensRights | 09/03/11 09:11 PM |
| 3 | Financial cost of limited reproductive/parenting rights in the US is up to 25 years not just 18.True, but only in divorce, if the parents are married they don't have to pay for their kids' college education. This never made any sense to me.. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/11 08:09 PM |
| 2 | If MRAs care about men dying at dangerous jobs, where's the MRA support for unions and workers' rights?What do you mean by "address"? It sounds like a cover for "support the same political party as me, because I think they have all the answers, and the other guys are wrong" | /r/MensRights | 09/03/11 05:59 PM |
| 2 | If MRAs care about men dying at dangerous jobs, where's the MRA support for unions and workers' rights?The men's movement is apolitical. Unions and work regulations are a left vs right issue. The left thinks unions and regulations are the solution, the right thinks their are the problem.. I think the men's movement should stay out of it, because it can only divide whatever limited resources and clout we may have. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/11 05:04 PM |
| 13 | 30 years jail for sex with his wife: William J. Hetherington has been incarcerated in Michigan prisons for more than 20 years for having sex with his wife Linda. No parole because he does not admit his guilt, says he did not rape his wife.This is the Wikipedia page and it pretty much confirms the content of the article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Hetherington_case So fuck you! [Wubzy got banned in r/MaleStudies for using an ad-hominem argument (attempting to discredit the source, rather than debating the content) ] | /r/MensRights | 09/03/11 02:39 PM |
| 1 | Amanda Marcotte is a false-rape apologist, scum sucking bigot. Which means we can stop posting her hysterical fem-speak diarrhea in /r/mensrights.We can also stop posting anything from the so-called "good men project" website.. it appears to act as a cover for some of the most hateful and bigoted man-hating feminists (also it got a big thumbs-up from the viciously sexist feministing - that can't be good!) | /r/MensRights | 09/03/11 03:07 AM |
| 1 | Amanda Mercotte says feminism is the solution to men's rights issuesIt figures. I agree, it's scary how the feminazi's are constantly trying to infiltrate and sabotage the mrm. It's also quite unbelievable how much funding they have (I wonder which part of that are taxpayer's dollars?) | /r/MensRights | 08/03/11 08:59 PM |
| 3 | 1 in 4 women are sexually assaulted. This is because a non-violent grope counts as sexual assault.Also, if we applied the same standards to men, we'd find that the same percentage of men is also getting "assaulted". I remember reading the methodology of the study that found that 1-in-4 women are getting raped in college, and realized that according to the same standard, every one of me previous gf's has "raped" me. Of course, they never asked these questions to guys, because have they done it, they would have found out that 1-in-4 guys are getting "raped" in college.. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/11 06:54 PM |
| 1 | "Women Perform 66% Of Worlds Work, Earn 10% Of World's Income And Own 1% Of The World's Property" True?I agree that numbers in developing countries could be different, but they are very small (most wealth and income is concentrated in rich western countries) in comparison - let's not forget that 80% of humanity lives on less than $1 per day :( | /r/MensRights | 08/03/11 06:21 PM |
| 3 | "Women Perform 66% Of Worlds Work, Earn 10% Of World's Income And Own 1% Of The World's Property" True?The claims are so vague and loony, that it would be very difficult to try to refute them scientifically (how the hell do you compute the work distribution by gender of 6 billion humans, most of them in developing countries, that don't even have schools or running water???). I think the burden of proof should be on the person making the claim, to provide a citation. It probably originated from some "women's group" that pulled it out of thin air, or is just an urban legend (the percentages are: 2/… | /r/MensRights | 08/03/11 05:59 PM |
| 3 | Amanda Mercotte says feminism is the solution to men's rights issuesYeah, most feminists at least pretend to have some decency in public while following their anti-male agenda in private; this one doesn't even bother hiding her hatred of men! I don't understand why the "Good Men Project" (never heard of it?) would publish this witch's ramblings (especially since it amounts to little more than 2 pages of straw-man arguments) | /r/MensRights | 08/03/11 05:58 PM |
| 1 | "Women Perform 66% Of Worlds Work, Earn 10% Of World's Income And Own 1% Of The World's Property" True?No, but since when do feminists care about what is true? Was the "wage gap" true? Was the "1-in-4 women raped on campus" statistic true? I don't know how they can compute the amount of work done by each gender, considering that most people live in developing countries and such statistics are not available there??? Regarding income and assets: most belong to corporations, which don't have a gender, so the stats are lying by omission (men's share is probably around the same as women's, the rest be… | /r/MensRights | 08/03/11 05:38 PM |
| 2 | Amanda Mercotte says feminism is the solution to men's rights issuesWhen someone quotes dumb and irrelevant things instead of the majority of well-thought and important points, it tells you that they have an agenda. It doesn't matter how much you "separate" yourself from fringe opinions, your enemies will always pick on them anyway.. I did some research on the writer, and it appears that she is one of the most radical feminist around - she was so out-there that even the Obama administration had to distance itself from this loon. She also led the "cyber-lynch mob… | /r/MensRights | 08/03/11 04:47 PM |
| 14 | Amanda Mercotte says feminism is the solution to men's rights issuesFrom Amanda Mercotte's wikipedia page: Reason contributing editor Cathy Young has described Marcotte as a "leader of the cyber-lynch mob in the Duke University rape hoax". Young has stated that in "Marcotte's eyes, the real crime of the 'independent feminists' is helping preserve the idea that the presumption of innocence applies even in cases of rape and sexual assault."[14] Marcotte declared on her blog that people who defended the [wrongly] accused Duke students were "rape-loving scum".[15] L… | /r/MensRights | 08/03/11 04:18 PM |
| 2 | Use of the Word “Creep” Demonstrates Female Privilegestop pretending that you're a man, you fat cow :) | /r/MensRights | 08/03/11 05:16 AM |
| 2 | Use of the Word “Creep” Demonstrates Female Privilege"Tiny penis", really? :-) Do all of you feminazi bitches read the same shaming tactic book? So.. how are your small tits? | /r/MensRights | 08/03/11 03:55 AM |
| 1 | Use of the Word “Creep” Demonstrates Female PrivilegeTroll was banned in r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 08/03/11 03:23 AM |
| 0 | Reminder: March 8th is International Women's DayTroll was banned in r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 08/03/11 03:18 AM |
| 2 | Dilbert author deletes his "get over it" post, but the Internet never forgetstroll was banned in r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 08/03/11 03:05 AM |
| 6 | Creepy phrasing: Australian government launches "National Plan to reduce Violence against Women and their Children". Men don't have children?According to feminists: no (but they will still take 80% of your wages for "child support"). Also, in most of the Western world, men have no real parental rights to their children, so technically (and sadly) the statement is perfectly accurate. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/11 09:09 PM |
| 3 | Success! r/mensrights campaign raises awareness on the Dilbert BlogI agree, the fact that we got noticed by a mainstream cartoonist is pretty awesome. Yes, that column was full of shaming language and nonsense (women are like handicapped people? WTF?), but I think it was a honest attempt at rationalizing something that his mind simply cannot process yet (i.e.: why are men so discriminated against?). At least, we got Scott Adams thinking :) On a side note: it is interesting how the male brain is programmed to resist seeing itself as a victim (the female brain is… | /r/MensRights | 07/03/11 05:44 PM |
| 0 | Why men love Charlie Sheen ("In a world that wants men to apologize for simply existing, Charlie Sheen is a man with zero regrets.")You can take your pity and shove it where the sun doesn't shine, my friend ;) | /r/MensRights | 07/03/11 02:14 AM |
| 1 | Why men love Charlie Sheen ("In a world that wants men to apologize for simply existing, Charlie Sheen is a man with zero regrets.")Putting aside for a second that Charlie has some serious drug addiction issues (and shouldn't be viewed as a role-model), this article touches on one aspect of his persona that I think touches a vibe with men: he is fiercely independent. In our deeply anti-male society, he doesn't answer to a boss or to a woman: he is free, in the true sense of the word. The article only touches on his freedom from work, from the establishment and from political correctness; but I think it misses another point: … | /r/MensRights | 05/03/11 04:16 PM |
| 2 | White House twists statistics to "prove" wage gap, ignores number of hours worked, and occupational hazardsI upvoted it for whatever it's worth.. | /r/MensRights | 05/03/11 02:35 PM |
| 1 | White House twists statistics to "prove" wage gap, ignores number of hours worked, and occupational hazardsOf all things, this post is downvoted in /MR. You have to be kidding me! The feminazi scumbags are lurking here to make sure the important posts get buried, it seems.. | /r/MensRights | 05/03/11 04:35 AM |
| 2 | What resources do you recommend for someone who wants to learn more about the MRM?As an introduction, I would recommend these books: "The myth of male power" by Dr Warren Farrell "Taken into custody" by Dr Stephen Baskerville | /r/MensRights | 04/03/11 03:54 PM |
| 3 | More women are the victim and wage gap crap, even though they admit more men drop out of school. I have known so many men who dropped out to pay CS to a babymomma who didn't let them see their kid.No, it isn't. I am reading page 32 of the report right now. What is the adjusted gap after taking into account, the most obvious things? Education (a degree in psychology or art history is not the same as a degree in engineering or finance) Occupation Work experience (someone with 10 years of experience makes more than an intern) Hours worked (full-time workers make more per hour, than part-time workers) None of that is even discussed on page 32.. Also, age and ethnicity (discussed on page 32) a… | /r/MensRights | 04/03/11 02:37 PM |
| 3 | More women are the victim and wage gap crap, even though they admit more men drop out of school. I have known so many men who dropped out to pay CS to a babymomma who didn't let them see their kid.No, the 75% figure is not adjusted for anything: occupation, work history, education, nothing. Quoting this figure is so stupid, the mind boggles.. Here is a department of labor analysis: http://www.consad.com/content/reports/Gender%20Wage%20Gap%20Final%20Report.pdf From the conclusion: Statistical analysis [...] leaves an adjusted gender wage gap that is between 4.8 and 7.1 percent. Additional portions of the raw gender wage gap are attributable to other explanatory factors that have been ident… | /r/MensRights | 04/03/11 02:22 AM |
| 4 | More women are the victim and wage gap crap, even though they admit more men drop out of school. I have known so many men who dropped out to pay CS to a babymomma who didn't let them see their kid.I always suspected that draconian child support enforcement might be behind men's college enrollment gap, I wonder if we could find some data on that? | /r/MensRights | 04/03/11 12:53 AM |
| 8 | Mail Order Brides!There is a (relatively) new law that allows a woman married to a US citizen to gain legal status in the US simply by claiming "domestic violence". What this means is that, as soon as your bride enters the US, she can claim DV, and obtain legal status in the US (instead of waiting for you to finish sponsoring her green card). As expected, there is a whole cottage industry of lawyers dedicated to taking advantage of this new law. Bottom line is: mail-order bride = bad idea. The most likely scenari… | /r/MensRights | 02/03/11 04:45 PM |
| 9 | Why Are Men Angry? (Modern Dating Scene In a World of Equality)It is clear to me that even the few points that she quoted from men's point of view, were cherry-picked to make men look bad and make her look like a victim.. | /r/MensRights | 28/02/11 07:02 PM |
| 22 | Why Are Men Angry? (Modern Dating Scene In a World of Equality)Funny how there isn't one reference to the family courts, and the inhumane widespread abuse of men, mandated by law. It's the nth article that this Hymowitch idiot writes on the same topic, and she still can't see the elephant in the room.. or more likely she doesn't want to see.. why write about female privilege and the thousands of men who commit suicide each year after being ass-raped by the "family courts", when you can write about game consoles and quote some anti-female insults from random… | /r/MensRights | 28/02/11 05:07 PM |
| -2 | "Societies in which women have lots of autonomy and authority tend to be decidedly male-friendly, relaxed, tolerant, and plenty sexy." Right, but they left out decadent, stagnant, weak, and ripe for a military/economic downfall.Well you are fat, aren't you? :) Seriously, what kind of stupid psycho-bitch sends a picture of herself to some unknown guy who banned her on reddit? WTF? Also, if you want to claim that you are not fat, at least send me a skinny picture! Finally, when you want to send me a PM to tell me how much you enjoy trolling /MR for "the looools", don't reply to a public comment, because everyone can see it and it blows your "cover".. dumbass. From all the feminazi concern trolls that I have seen on /MR (… | /r/MensRights | 28/02/11 12:54 AM |
| -5 | "Societies in which women have lots of autonomy and authority tend to be decidedly male-friendly, relaxed, tolerant, and plenty sexy." Right, but they left out decadent, stagnant, weak, and ripe for a military/economic downfall.wow you're a winner.. | /r/MensRights | 27/02/11 11:45 PM |
| -3 | "Societies in which women have lots of autonomy and authority tend to be decidedly male-friendly, relaxed, tolerant, and plenty sexy." Right, but they left out decadent, stagnant, weak, and ripe for a military/economic downfall.Straw-man argument. Troll was banned in r/MaleStudies. | /r/MensRights | 27/02/11 10:49 PM |
| 1 | "Societies in which women have lots of autonomy and authority tend to be decidedly male-friendly, relaxed, tolerant, and plenty sexy." Right, but they left out decadent, stagnant, weak, and ripe for a military/economic downfall.You are a product of a culture that is built on the (false) presumption that everyone is "the same", therefore you believe that to be true. However it is scientifically untrue, although saying so is very politically incorrect. If you are interested in evolutionary psychology, you will find this book entertaining: The Blank Slate. It was runner up for the Pulitzer Price a few years ago.. Or you can watch the author's speech at the MIT here: http://mitworld.mit.edu/video/23/ Regarding men being mo… | /r/MensRights | 27/02/11 10:39 PM |
| -5 | "Societies in which women have lots of autonomy and authority tend to be decidedly male-friendly, relaxed, tolerant, and plenty sexy." Right, but they left out decadent, stagnant, weak, and ripe for a military/economic downfall.Sure, we're all the same, snowflake.. | /r/MensRights | 27/02/11 10:08 PM |
| -1 | "Societies in which women have lots of autonomy and authority tend to be decidedly male-friendly, relaxed, tolerant, and plenty sexy." Right, but they left out decadent, stagnant, weak, and ripe for a military/economic downfall.Honor, honesty and truth are deeply masculine values. When those values are replaced with moral relativism and political correctness (female values), what you get is generalized corruption and eventually corporatism (which is defined as: big-pocketed corporations and special interest groups buying off the government). As little as half a century ago, the mere accusation of corruption (if justified) was enough for a man to commit suicide to avoid public humiliation. Today, the same man would book… | /r/MensRights | 26/02/11 06:57 PM |
| 2 | "Societies in which women have lots of autonomy and authority tend to be decidedly male-friendly, relaxed, tolerant, and plenty sexy." Right, but they left out decadent, stagnant, weak, and ripe for a military/economic downfall.Well, if it makes you feel better women are manipulated to make many babies.. the farm is tough on everyone! | /r/MensRights | 26/02/11 06:07 PM |
| 3 | "Societies in which women have lots of autonomy and authority tend to be decidedly male-friendly, relaxed, tolerant, and plenty sexy." Right, but they left out decadent, stagnant, weak, and ripe for a military/economic downfall.The US has become a matrifocal society. Clearly this has not been a male-friendly development as men have lost parental rights to their children, billions of dollars (houses, alimony, retirement, over-the-top child support, taxes to support the welfare system etc..) as well as their presumption of innocence, and the ability to exercise certain jobs (anything related to children). Let's not forget that the majority of inmates freed by the Innocence Project are men convicted of "sex crimes". And l… | /r/MensRights | 26/02/11 03:26 PM |
| 6 | "Societies in which women have lots of autonomy and authority tend to be decidedly male-friendly, relaxed, tolerant, and plenty sexy." Right, but they left out decadent, stagnant, weak, and ripe for a military/economic downfall.Male-friendly?? Fuck you! signed: a male | /r/MensRights | 26/02/11 03:00 PM |
| 6 | Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to Nevada pols: time has come 'to outlaw prostitution'Will they make alimony illegal then? | /r/MensRights | 24/02/11 11:13 PM |
| 6 | Thoughts on 'where have all the good men gone'The author is not very difficult to understand: she is an over-the-hill not-very-attractive woman who got dumped for the nth time, and she is taking her anger out on all men. The publisher of the article is easy to understand too: by printing the rant of an old cat lady, in one of the most well-knows newspapers, they cater to the powerful female audience, and show the usual disdain towards men (can you imagine a similar article titled "where have the good women gone?" published in a national new… | /r/MensRights | 22/02/11 06:38 PM |
| 9 | Are most relationships with women really like this?I have no problem avoiding marriage (what's the point anyway?), but not having kids can be a problem for some. There are solutions like moving to a more traditional foreign country or using a surrogate mother, but they are far from perfect.. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/11 06:45 PM |
| 1 | A mancation failure in San Francisco [ Can men spend some quality together? Nooooo, says mainstream media ]It's hard not to notice all the shaming language packed in this article, as well as the condescending tone.. Apparently, if the mainstream media writes an article about men, it has to be either insulting (why won't the damn dead-beats commit?) or condescending, like this one. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/11 06:04 PM |
| 91 | Are most relationships with women really like this?Many of the people in this subreddit have been personally hurt, and it shows, but the main point is that the current legal environment makes it extremely easy (and sometimes also profitable) for a woman to hurt a man. This is really the bottom line. Given the wrong set of incentives and rules, people tend to become abusive. If you have a good relationship, you should cherish it because it doesn't happen every day in this day and age, and it gets worst as people get older.. On the other hand, kno… | /r/MensRights | 16/02/11 03:00 PM |
| 2 | I just can't win in this child support/care system. (xposted here by suggestion.)Yes, and there are also "child support add-ons" which are not included in the calculator. Basically, if she spends money on extra-curricular activities for the kids (or health care or school supplies etc..), you have to pay for those on top of "regular" child support (this is a federal law that applies to all states BTW). | /r/MensRights | 15/02/11 09:44 PM |
| 7 | I just can't win in this child support/care system. (xposted here by suggestion.)I think that every man should google "child support calculator <your state>" (each state has its own mathematical formula), to see how much he would be paying in "child" support. Also, remember that you won't be getting any tax incentives for being a father, and there is NO deduction for child support paid (in other words: you will pay taxes at the same rate as today, basically). Now take your salary, substract taxes and "child" support, and see if you can survive on what's left. There is no bet… | /r/MensRights | 15/02/11 02:59 PM |
| 2 | Day of the lout: Unsophisticated, lazy, misogynist males may be the primary model for today's young American men. (And the bastards even drink beer instead of wine like us cool, hip, beautiful, hard working women.)Haha - now I have that stupid song in my head.. | /r/MensRights | 14/02/11 04:21 AM |
| 5 | Day of the lout: Unsophisticated, lazy, misogynist males may be the primary model for today's young American men. (And the bastards even drink beer instead of wine like us cool, hip, beautiful, hard working women.)Have you tried living other lifestyles besides the "relationship" model? I used to be like you, always longing for relationships, but those relationships never really made me happy. I always had to work for them, but then if I had to "work" for them... what's the point? A few years ago, I switched my dating style to the "hookup" model. Basically I refuse to allow any woman to call me her boyfriend, I only use text messages to set up dates (never call) and I don't buy them any presents. To my sur… | /r/MensRights | 13/02/11 05:32 PM |
| 3 | College men who file suit after being wrongly accused of rape may be disciplined by their schools for retaliationThis user was banned in r/maleStudies | /r/MensRights | 13/02/11 04:28 PM |
| 20 | Day of the lout: Unsophisticated, lazy, misogynist males may be the primary model for today's young American men. (And the bastards even drink beer instead of wine like us cool, hip, beautiful, hard working women.)Someone left a pretty articulate comment under the article, I am copying it here: You know, there's another way to look at this ... It could be, after years of women actively exploiting double-standards, arguing for "equality" while exploiting privileges traditionally offered to women, the end result is a net loss. Dismissing men as tools to be used to get what they want, or denigrating them as oafish animals that don't meet up to their standards and cannot be molded into the ideal servant they … | /r/MensRights | 13/02/11 04:18 PM |
| 13 | Day of the lout: Unsophisticated, lazy, misogynist males may be the primary model for today's young American men. (And the bastards even drink beer instead of wine like us cool, hip, beautiful, hard working women.)Exactly! What is the reward for being "responsible"? Answer: Living with a loaded gun pointed at your head until missus gets "bored" and then: enjoying your restraining order, child support order, alimony order, no visitation for "your kids" and working until 70, to finance someone else's retirement at 25. Great! Where do I sign up? /s | /r/MensRights | 13/02/11 04:10 PM |
| 6 | College men who file suit after being wrongly accused of rape may be disciplined by their schools for retaliationFYI: The Innocence Project frees people who have been wrongly convicted of crimes. The overwhelming majority of those freed were convicted of "sex crimes". | /r/MensRights | 13/02/11 03:48 PM |
| 1 | What are the serious benefits of marriage vs. staying single in a long term relationship?How is that a prize, if I can already have it before playing? | /r/MensRights | 10/02/11 02:37 PM |
| 2 | What are the serious benefits of marriage vs. staying single in a long term relationship?IF I gamble with my life, I expect to win something; what's the prize here? | /r/MensRights | 10/02/11 02:51 AM |
| 1 | What are the serious benefits of marriage vs. staying single in a long term relationship?Sure, in your dream world.. If you think a man would get the same alimony as a woman would if the gender were reversed, I want a puff of what you're smoking ;) | /r/MensRights | 10/02/11 02:50 AM |
| 1 | What are the serious benefits of marriage vs. staying single in a long term relationship?Yes, but their alimony is probably a fraction of what a woman would have received if the genders were reversed.. | /r/MensRights | 09/02/11 05:52 PM |
| 4 | What are the serious benefits of marriage vs. staying single in a long term relationship?Yes, I wish we spent some of that energy that is wasted debating the pros/cons of gay marriage into debating what marriage actually means. It seems to me that the definition of "marriage" was completely rewritten in the past half century, to the point where this institution is barely recognizable, and yet there was a complete lack of public debate about it! | /r/MensRights | 08/02/11 06:13 PM |
| 1 | What are the serious benefits of marriage vs. staying single in a long term relationship?Really? That's your example, of a woman being treated unfairly by the family court? How so? She had bad luck because her husband left her and she lost her job, but that doesn't mean she get shafted by the family courts. It sounds like they are both broke; the family court can't make money out of thin air.. as much as they would love to take his money and give it to his ex-wife, there isn't much to take.. she still got the house and the kids though. Everyone knows that men can't get restraining o… | /r/MensRights | 08/02/11 05:56 PM |
| 0 | What are the serious benefits of marriage vs. staying single in a long term relationship?Yes, that's why I refuse to have kids or let any woman move in with me, and I maintain a pool of "hookups" for fun / companionship. It works great and I have never been happier! :) If I want kids some day, I will move abroad or use a surrogate, but I am not thinking too much about that yet... Also, your information is wrong: men can't win a child custody case unless mommy is in rehab or jail or has abandoned the kid. Financially: I have seen many divorces and men get screwed all the time, even w… | /r/MensRights | 08/02/11 05:33 PM |
| 2 | What are the serious benefits of marriage vs. staying single in a long term relationship?"ms_zen" - are you a woman? What you said only applies to women, not men: security: yes it is a secure feeling for a woman to know that she will walk away with the house, the kids, most of the assets and a monthly check for who knows how long, if the relationship breaks down - do you really think that this makes a man feel secure??? commitment: yes, if you are a woman, you can feel more committed by knowing that your man will have to lose everything if he decides to leave you - do you really thi… | /r/MensRights | 08/02/11 05:09 PM |
| 1 | What are the serious benefits of marriage vs. staying single in a long term relationship?Please remember that many states have "common law marriage", which means that after a certain amount of living together, or acting as a couple, you are affectively married in the eyes of the law, and cupcake can now divorce you and invite the family court into your relationship.. The safe bet would be: don't get married, don't have kids, don't cohabitate, and don't date the same woman more than a few years. It's actually a pretty sweet lifestyle if you can pull it off ;) | /r/MensRights | 08/02/11 02:29 PM |
| -1 | All these posts about dads getting treated like pedos when they’re out with their kids mostly seem like BS to me.You come out as someone who just created a fake account, to come here and accuse several other redditors of lying. Also, your accusations are not particularly believable: /MR has over 20,000 subscribers, in such a large group, it's not very surprising that some have faced sexism. | /r/MensRights | 07/02/11 02:41 PM |
| 0 | All these posts about dads getting treated like pedos when they’re out with their kids mostly seem like BS to me.OP's account: aintseenthisshit: redditor for 1 hour tells us that Dads treated like pedos are making things up. hmm really? I smell a troll.. | /r/MensRights | 07/02/11 01:59 PM |
| 358 | Female Coworkers Chat With Kids Frequently Every Day; I Say "Hi" to a Woman's Kid Once and Get ReportedIt's not a "big deal out of nothing". You nearly lost your job because you said "hi" to a kid, that's f*cking sick! | /r/MensRights | 06/02/11 06:36 PM |
| 11 | The perils of the £30 paternity testWell said! I personally consider cuckolding as the female equivalent of rape (in the sense that it steals someone's reproductive freedom and causes unimaginable psychological scars - I knew a guy who committed suicide after finding that his daughter wasn't his..). What does it tell us about our society when such a horrific crime is not prosecuted, punished while the victim is further humiliated by having to pay child support and various "experts" are commenting on the "problems" brought by pater… | /r/MensRights | 06/02/11 05:09 PM |
| 2 | History Repeating Itself (Ancient Greece and Comtemporary Western Culture parallels)X-posted from r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 06/02/11 03:38 PM |
| -1 | Far from abandoning the concept of marriage en masse: "Findings show men are more interested in love, marriage and children than their peers in earlier times"Bwahaha! Yeah right :) | /r/MensRights | 05/02/11 01:00 AM |
| 1 | Guys: If you could not find the right partner, would you have a child and raise it on your own?Absolutely. I give myself a few more years to decide on the surrogacy options in California or India. | /r/MensRights | 02/02/11 06:38 PM |
| 1 | Change.org blatantly lies and misleadsThis troll was banned in r/MaleStudies because he wasn't a real redditor - hah! | /r/MensRights | 19/01/11 06:42 PM |
| 3 | Males have been oppressed throughout the ages, THIS is the reason for the MRMLet me just ask you this: how many feminist civilizations do we know of? For a more elaborate answer, you can read an older (and now famous, for some blogs have copied it) comment of mine: http://www.reddit.com/r/Equality/comments/cp35h/feminism_of_the_future_relies_on_men_nytimescom/c0u6hw8 | /r/MensRights | 15/01/11 05:45 PM |
| 2 | Males have been oppressed throughout the ages, THIS is the reason for the MRMThe root of this situation is probably our own programming: men are programmed to be expendable, and women are programmed to be resource hogs. The reason is obvious: any man can impregnate a woman, but fertile women are very few and they need a lot of resources to raise their babies. However, this natural programming makes little sense when there are already 7 billion of us, and it is time we rise above it. Feminism is the manifestation of women's natural programming to hog resources and shamele… | /r/MensRights | 15/01/11 04:14 AM |
| 2 | Article: sentencing disparities based on gender and raceIt was posted on r/MaleStudies a few months ago: http://www.reddit.com/r/MaleStudies/comments/ce1mz/racial_ethnic_and_gender_disparities_in/ | /r/MensRights | 14/01/11 04:57 PM |
| 7 | Take It Like a Man: Feminist attitudes towards male survivors of rape and abuseIn my dictionary, "feminism" is defined as "equality for women" (not men). If you believe in "equality for women and men", then you would be an "equalist". (On a side note, this "equality for women" definition makes no sense to me (it sounds like some Orwellian TrueSpeak). There is no such thing as "equality for [group]", you're either for equality and so there is no point in mentioning a particular group, or you are for a particular group and so there is no point in mentioning "equality") | /r/MensRights | 09/01/11 02:14 PM |
| -7 | women's rights > gay rights > animal rights > men's rightsInterestingly, the "gay rights" graph follows the "women's rights" graph with a 25 yr lag. I always thought that the rise of homosexuality is a consequence of women's lib (because women will only mate with a small percent of males, and those males have no incentive to commit, leaving most of the population sexually frustrated: women don't get the commitment they crave and most men don't get the sexual gratification they need - except for the few alpha males) Edit: Just to clarify, I am not talki… | /r/MensRights | 06/01/11 02:26 PM |
| 2 | My friend (19 years old) is going to be a dad. What are his options?Fighting for custody will not help much, because: It is incredibly expensive If he pisses the mother off, she will just retaliate with fake abusive & child molestation charges - by the time, the charges are cleared, the kid will already have missed several years with his/her dad (not to mention the legal costs to defend against the charges) The bottom line is: if shared custody can't be achieved amicably, attempting to force it will probably only end-up in a legal blood bath. His only practical … | /r/MensRights | 05/01/11 03:43 AM |
| 4 | My friend (19 years old) is going to be a dad. What are his options?He really doesn't have any options - unfortunately. If she decides to abort - he'll have to go with it. If she decides to give the baby for adoption - he'll have to go with it. If she decides to keep the baby - he'll have to pay her child support (edit: get a paternity test done privately though). If she decides to deny his "visitation rights" - he won't see "his" child. Sorry dude! | /r/MensRights | 04/01/11 11:51 PM |
| 0 | The new definition of rape in India: "The so-called consent under a false promise to marriage is no consent"Wish granted. Also, as a woman, you're welcome here but please don't act like you own this forum (why are so many women coming to men's sub-reddit's thinking that they can tell us what we to do or not do? Female sense of undue privilege never fails to amaze me..) | /r/MensRights | 02/01/11 08:03 PM |
| 1 | The new definition of rape in India: "The so-called consent under a false promise to marriage is no consent"I understand that men value virginity (I do also), but I also feel sorry for the woman who is an outcast because of a single mistake I guess.. Edit: Another thing that bothers me about this whole virginity obsession, is the lack of due process (how can a woman prove that she is a virgin?) and how easily a false accusation could destroy a woman's chances of getting married (kind of like a false rape accusation can destroy a man's life in the West). | /r/MensRights | 02/01/11 07:56 PM |
| -3 | The new definition of rape in India: "The so-called consent under a false promise to marriage is no consent"t makes sense in certain cases but not always Yeah.. man-hater, that's what I thought. You got banned in r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 02/01/11 07:04 PM |
| -2 | The new definition of rape in India: "The so-called consent under a false promise to marriage is no consent"Reason for ban: straw-man argument (three times in 4 comments). Please stop wasting people's time. | /r/MensRights | 02/01/11 06:38 PM |
| 0 | The new definition of rape in India: "The so-called consent under a false promise to marriage is no consent"Ok. You're either an idiot or a troll, just wasting everyone's time. You got banned in r/MaleStudies Reason for ban: straw-man argument, lack of the most basic empathy for men Just to clarify the obvious: 1st wrong: society that excludes women who are not virgins 2nd wrong: let's throw men in jail on rape charges, if they can sweet-talk a woman into pre-marital sex | /r/MensRights | 02/01/11 06:29 PM |
| 0 | The new definition of rape in India: "The so-called consent under a false promise to marriage is no consent"I never said I agreed with their "virginity culture", but I am mature enough to understand that two wrongs don't make a right. | /r/MensRights | 02/01/11 06:19 PM |
| 5 | The new definition of rape in India: "The so-called consent under a false promise to marriage is no consent"So your concept of justice is eye-for-eye? OK. Let me ask you this then: what would be the correct punishment for a woman who destroyed a man's life using the western family court system? What should it be: 20 years in jail? Lifetime reverse alimony? Death - considering how many men commit suicide, it would only be fair no? Does your eye-for-eye justice system apply to western women, or are you just a man-hater who is looking for excuses to justify the persecution of Indian men? | /r/MensRights | 02/01/11 06:15 PM |
| 6 | The new definition of rape in India: "The so-called consent under a false promise to marriage is no consent"I think you are making "western" assumptions here. In a society where women's virginity is so valued that she becomes a pariah if she is not a virgin before marriage, sex is not so casual that you can just say "let's have sex or I'll not marry you". It just doesn't make sense within their culture! Even if this hypothetical scenario made sense, you are still blaming the man for the woman's transgression. If someone tells you "let's rob a bank, and I'll give you X", you are still responsible for y… | /r/MensRights | 02/01/11 06:01 PM |
| 0 | The new definition of rape in India: "The so-called consent under a false promise to marriage is no consent"If this is such a big deal, why would a woman have sex before marriage then? And if she did, it's only her fault (regardless of the "promise" to marry, she is braking the rule anyway), no? And how does it help to throw a dude in jail, it's not like she is going to become indian marriage material now.. | /r/MensRights | 02/01/11 05:37 PM |
| 7 | New UN agency - UNWomenDude, in the countries were women are oppressed, men are oppressed just as much (or worst). The only difference is that men's oppression never makes it into Western media. Why does the agency have to be gender specific? Just taking a few recent cases that were in the media: Acid attacks: did you know that nearly half of the victims are male, and that most attacks are property / money related? (If you listened to western media, you'd probably think that the only victims are girls who refused to s… | /r/MensRights | 31/12/10 06:42 PM |
| 7 | Yesterday the cable repair person arrives and its a woman. I'm not paranoid, but I don't want to be alone in the house with a strange woman for fear of a false accusation. I've been falsely accused twice before...If your story is true and you have a paper trail to show gross negligence on the part of the police and the DA, then it seems like something that would be worth a shot. On the other hand, if all you have is non-written, subjective evidence, then the case is more difficult. The idea that no laws were broken, is completely ludicrous. Trust me, we have so many laws on the book, that every single one of us brakes a dozen laws before we even have breakfast. If your case is as egregious as it sounds, … | /r/MensRights | 31/12/10 06:30 PM |
| 9 | Yesterday the cable repair person arrives and its a woman. I'm not paranoid, but I don't want to be alone in the house with a strange woman for fear of a false accusation. I've been falsely accused twice before...I feel for you. Note that just because the DA doesn't want to bring criminal charges against the women, it absolutely does not mean that you can't start a civil lawsuit on your own. In civil court, all you need is 12 people who feel sorry for you, and you can get a lot of money. You can sue whoever you want in civil court: the city, the police, individual cops, anyone who has money. I say go for it (you can probably find an attorney who will represent you an a continegncy basis: you don't pay an… | /r/MensRights | 31/12/10 06:08 PM |
| 3 | Indian government to pay women $440 for each rape claim that they makeThere was, I am pretty sure there was also a story about a woman in the UK doing the same.. (maybe Pierce has the link?) | /r/MensRights | 31/12/10 01:06 AM |
| 5 | Indian government to pay women $440 for each rape claim that they makeThe same is true in the UK, and there have been a few cases of women crying rape to get their "cash reward".. | /r/MensRights | 31/12/10 01:02 AM |
| 7 | Dr. Phil.com - End the Silence on Domestic Violence - The entire show is devoted to domestic violence against women. Ironically, Dr. Phil remains SILENT about DV on men. Time to end the silence Dr. Phil?Dr Phil (and Oprah) is an entertainer that caters to the growing "bitter aging female" population. That's all! He tells women what they want to hear which is often just variations of the "blame the men" theme. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/10 08:34 PM |
| 3 | Kelsey Grammers estranged wife rejects 30 mill settlement because it didn't include Alimony or Child Support. Plus this way she could get up to 50 million.This moron was banned in r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 30/12/10 04:41 PM |
| 1 | Kelsey Grammers estranged wife rejects 30 mill settlement because it didn't include Alimony or Child Support. Plus this way she could get up to 50 million.Bwahaha! :) | /r/MensRights | 30/12/10 04:36 PM |
| 3 | Court corrects grievous wrong that sent a man to prison on testimony of serial false accuserLook up "rape shield laws": the fact that she accused half a dozen men before, is inadmissible in court. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/10 04:28 PM |
| 2 | Has anyone before getting married considered protecting their (or at least some) of their assets?If you go on divorce forums, you can see many posts from small business-owners who had to close / sell their business after a divorce. It happens a lot! The bottom line is this: the family court system is very poorly suited to deal with people whose assets are difficult to estimate or whose income is very variable. Think about this: how would the family court even establish a level of child support considering that your income might be $10,000 one month, and $2,000 the next month (and none of it… | /r/MensRights | 29/12/10 11:15 PM |
| 2 | Has anyone before getting married considered protecting their (or at least some) of their assets?I have seen a few divorces in my entourage, and "conniving evil" doesn't even begin to describe people's behavior. Moving to a different state to get a better outcome is a very typical thing to do (businesses do it all the time), there just needs to be enough money at stake to make the move worth it - that's all (why do you think most celebrity divorces are filed in the UK? because that's the country with the highest payouts for the wife). You can claim residency after 6 month, even if the sucke… | /r/MensRights | 29/12/10 10:43 PM |
| 2 | Has anyone before getting married considered protecting their (or at least some) of their assets?You have 100 shares in a business that brings $100k / year. Your wife gets 50 shares that entitle her to $50k in dividends per year. You have 50 shares left, which entitle you to $50k in dividends. Your income is $50k, of which half goes to your wife as alimony. Bottom line: your wife gets $75k / yr, you get $25k. That's what double-dipping is. Most business would need to liquidate some assets to repurchase shares (I don't know on what planet you are living), unless you're Apple or Microsoft, mo… | /r/MensRights | 29/12/10 10:36 PM |
| 1 | Has anyone before getting married considered protecting their (or at least some) of their assets?It's funny how you went from "but but your wife will be nice to you and she won't screw you over", to "I have no pity for you if you don't protect yourself" after I demonstrated (using your own links) that all the cards are in the hands of the custodial parent (as always). I don't know if all women are the same gold-digging heartless manipulative liars as many American women are accused of being, but you would not be the exception, it seems :) | /r/MensRights | 29/12/10 10:25 PM |
| 2 | Has anyone before getting married considered protecting their (or at least some) of their assets?Always the husband's fault, eh? | /r/MensRights | 29/12/10 09:57 PM |
| 2 | Has anyone before getting married considered protecting their (or at least some) of their assets?What I find alarming is that things have gotten so fucked up, that getting out of the country seems like the only alternative. If your ex-wife gets half of your business, then half of your income, she basically gets 3/4 of the business' total income (assuming no other shareholders). I don't see what's so difficult to understand about that? It's called "double-dipping" and Fathers and Families is trying to curb the practice ( http://www.fathersandfamilies.org/?p=11629 ). Valuation of a business i… | /r/MensRights | 29/12/10 09:55 PM |
| 2 | Has anyone before getting married considered protecting their (or at least some) of their assets?from your own link: invalid [...] unless the nonresident spouse consented to the jurisdiction of the court [...] A nonresident spouse consents to jurisdiction if [...] paying court-ordered child support Once the non-resident spouse consented to the order: The courts of all states will recognize the divorce. The only way that the non-resident spouse could not consent to the divorce in the foreign state is by not paying child support! Yeah, good luck with that! So yes, an ex (female) can move to a… | /r/MensRights | 29/12/10 09:10 PM |
| 1 | Has anyone before getting married considered protecting their (or at least some) of their assets?Yes, and you know this because you are a lawyer specialized in inter-state alimony enforcement? /s | /r/MensRights | 29/12/10 08:05 PM |
| 1 | Has anyone before getting married considered protecting their (or at least some) of their assets?Yes but states have agreements between themselves to keep business running, otherwise it would be chaos (that's why your Michigan driver license and insurance and license plate are recognized in CA). It is obvious that states have agreements to honor each other's judgments to a certain degree, and especially when they relate to child custody and child support. | /r/MensRights | 29/12/10 08:02 PM |
| 2 | Has anyone before getting married considered protecting their (or at least some) of their assets?Are you a lawyer, because that doesn't make any sense? It's just too easy to refuse another state's judgment. If that was the case people could get away without paying their bills, their child support or whatever they don't feel like doing.. | /r/MensRights | 29/12/10 07:56 PM |
| 3 | Has anyone before getting married considered protecting their (or at least some) of their assets?Yes exactly, so what's to prevent your ex from relocating in a favorable state with the kids, and suing there? | /r/MensRights | 29/12/10 07:55 PM |
| 2 | Has anyone before getting married considered protecting their (or at least some) of their assets?Yes, but they have authority over you, so they can jail you for contempt of the court until you bring the money back. That's the standard way of doing it (some guys have been sitting in jail for years - especially the unlucky ones who lost the money abroad). You are only safe if you and every property you care about are also abroad, in a country that does not honor extradition treaties.. | /r/MensRights | 29/12/10 07:51 PM |
| 4 | Has anyone before getting married considered protecting their (or at least some) of their assets?Yeah ok.. she won't do it because she is a nice person.. makes me feel so much better now /s | /r/MensRights | 29/12/10 07:49 PM |
| 2 | Has anyone before getting married considered protecting their (or at least some) of their assets?How difficult is it to move to a different state? All she has to do is call the cops, say that "she feels threatened", get a restraining order, load the kids in the minivan and hit the road. What's to stop her? By the time the poor sucker hires a lawyer and gets through the half a dozen court hearings to attempt to clear his name, she will already have established residency somewhere else.. | /r/MensRights | 29/12/10 07:42 PM |
| 2 | Has anyone before getting married considered protecting their (or at least some) of their assets?Doesn't that apply to your ex too? Why would she have to accept your state's jurisdiction? If that's the case, we have a "dead-lock" that has to be resolved somehow; I am not a lawyer but it's probably going to get resolved in the ex's favor if she is female, and especially if the kids are with her.. Do you think the child support agency would refuse to enter a child support order because the sucker-ex-husband is in a different state? Not a chance! | /r/MensRights | 29/12/10 07:31 PM |
| 4 | Has anyone before getting married considered protecting their (or at least some) of their assets?This is so retarded I have no words.. | /r/MensRights | 29/12/10 06:54 PM |
| 2 | Has anyone before getting married considered protecting their (or at least some) of their assets?Off-shore accounts don't work: keep in mind that the judge and your ex's attorney have access to all your US bank account statements. When they notice money being transferred overseas, they'll ask you to bring it back, if you refuse you'll be jailed for contempt of the court. If you lost the money overseas: too bad for you - you'll be staying in jail for a long, long time! Also, by IRS regulation, you have to report all your foreign bank accounts (with more than a certain minimum balance) every … | /r/MensRights | 29/12/10 06:51 PM |
| 2 | Has anyone before getting married considered protecting their (or at least some) of their assets?Trust me, as a businessman and someone with pretty high income, I looked into it: there is no way - if you have documented income, they'll get to it! | /r/MensRights | 29/12/10 06:44 PM |
| 2 | Has anyone before getting married considered protecting their (or at least some) of their assets?You realize that your ex can move to any state she wants, and sue you there, right? | /r/MensRights | 29/12/10 06:42 PM |
| 4 | Has anyone before getting married considered protecting their (or at least some) of their assets?Unfortunately, there is just no good way to protect yourself in the US. Pre-nups are very limited in scope, they can be summarily thrown away by the judge, and they can't help you much in child support / custody / DV matters - and those are the biggest ways you get shafted. Child support is typically around 50% of your after tax income, but you will be paying taxes at the full unmarried, childless rate (you get no deduction for child support paid). In other words you will be living on less than … | /r/MensRights | 29/12/10 04:07 PM |
| 2 | Woman's Mag calls sons a waste of time and gives "advice" on how to make them gay.I think it's satire, it's pretty funny actually if you don't take it at the first degree :) | /r/MensRights | 28/12/10 09:44 PM |
| 0 | For the women, feminists, and trolls in r/MensRights I give you a list of fallacies.They don't care ;) | /r/MensRights | 28/12/10 03:01 PM |
| -2 | HittingI banned this troll in r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 28/12/10 02:03 AM |
| 0 | Mother gives hours-old baby girl to California firefighters (Safe Haven law in action) - CNN.comFair enough, but she is still a dead-beat who should pay child support as far as I am concerned.. | /r/MensRights | 28/12/10 01:50 AM |
| -1 | Mother gives hours-old baby girl to California firefighters (Safe Haven law in action) - CNN.comI don't think that CNN would have omitted such information, had it been true.. | /r/MensRights | 28/12/10 01:17 AM |
| 12 | My view of men's rights: What all this arguing boils down to IMOYou're wasting your time; sympathizer is a troll :( For whatever it's worth I banned it in r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 27/12/10 02:02 AM |
| 22 | Has anyone else heard this remark? What was your reaction?How about this: "too bad, your husband didn't [train you as well]" :) | /r/MensRights | 27/12/10 01:06 AM |
| -1 | Mother gives hours-old baby girl to California firefighters (Safe Haven law in action) - CNN.com?? | /r/MensRights | 26/12/10 05:04 PM |
| 1 | Mother gives hours-old baby girl to California firefighters (Safe Haven law in action) - CNN.comand paying child support: the taxpayers will be paying big bucks for this kid (social services, nurses, foster families, maybe an adoption? We are looking at some very major costs) | /r/MensRights | 26/12/10 02:53 PM |
| 1 | Mother gives hours-old baby girl to California firefighters (Safe Haven law in action) - CNN.comNo I don't, as far as I know, foster kids have by far the worst outcomes of all possible scenarios (including single moms and dysfunctional families). So who are you to say that it's better for these kids if they are abandoned? | /r/MensRights | 26/12/10 02:51 PM |
| 3 | Mother gives hours-old baby girl to California firefighters (Safe Haven law in action) - CNN.comNo I don't: just because a special interest group makes a claim, it doesn't mean it is a valid claim. Did you look at the statistics about children who were placed in foster care? How many become homeless, drug-addicts, hs drop-out etc..? Last time I checked the numbers were very scary (even single mom's kids are turning up way better).. How can you know what's better for these kids? Maybe if their mom wasn't allowed to abandon them, she would have sucked it up, taken responsibility, and they wo… | /r/MensRights | 26/12/10 02:44 PM |
| 2 | Mother gives hours-old baby girl to California firefighters (Safe Haven law in action) - CNN.comNo I am just pointing the double-standard. My personal belief would be to hold her accountable and have her pay child support to the state, but I don't want to bring that into the discussion (how we equalize the situation is a different debate: you could either make men unaccountable (like women) or make women accountable (like men) - that's a whole different debate). As I said, my preference would be to make both sides accountable. | /r/MensRights | 26/12/10 02:28 PM |
| 11 | Mother gives hours-old baby girl to California firefighters (Safe Haven law in action) - CNN.comYes: she chose to have sex (she should know the consequences, no? I guess that's what people always tell me - but you know I am only a man, the accountable class), and she chose to not use birth control (despite having the most reliable form of BC available to her), and she chose not to have an abortion, and she chose to abandon her baby (despite having other options available: like adoption). Yeah that makes her a dead-beat scum. Actually, it's funny (tragic?) because she is more of a dead-beat… | /r/MensRights | 26/12/10 02:09 PM |
| -6 | Mother gives hours-old baby girl to California firefighters (Safe Haven law in action) - CNN.comHow is dropping a baby at the fire station not abandoning your child? She shouldn't be shunned: she should be jailed and/or she should have to pay child support to reimburse taxpayers for the burdern that she is placing on all of us and for being a disgusting dead-beat scum. | /r/MensRights | 26/12/10 01:15 PM |
| 7 | Mother gives hours-old baby girl to California firefighters (Safe Haven law in action) - CNN.comMen are often told to "take responsibility" for babies even if they didn't want them, or if they were mislead about birth control, or if they had no say in abortion decisions, or if they don't get to see their children (and sometimes even if the kid isn't theirs). Too bad, the same "responsibility" doesn't apply to the dead-beat mothers who abandon their children: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safe-haven_law Notice that at the time of writing, all the comments on this article are positive and pra… | /r/MensRights | 26/12/10 01:01 PM |
| 4 | MensRights, Quick question about impregnating a femaleI don't think you understood my comment (or more likely, you're just trolling). | /r/MensRights | 23/12/10 07:29 PM |
| 5 | MensRights, Quick question about impregnating a femaleProbably, but if he is financially responsible for 1/2 of the cost of the kid, he should also be eligible for 1/2 of the tax advantages. Or are you saying that he is only a Dad when it comes to paying? (that's a rhetorical question, we all know that that's exactly how Dads are treated by the courts, the IRS and society at large) Also, what exactly is the share that baby-mama is paying? What happened to "it takes two to tango"? She gets pretty much 100% of the cost of raising the kid from the "sp… | /r/MensRights | 23/12/10 07:06 PM |
| 5 | MensRights, Quick question about impregnating a femaleI was thinking about someone making 6-figures (that's what a "good job" is for me, but I guess I am a spoiled bastard!) Generally, child support comes to about half of your after-tax income. So, I think your figure is accurate for someone with a median-income job.. which is pretty outrageous still, considering that the total cost of raising a kid is around $200k and the custodial parent gets all the tax benefits, and welfare benefits.. (the "payer" gets no tax advantages, he is treated as an unm… | /r/MensRights | 23/12/10 06:47 PM |
| 7 | MensRights, Quick question about impregnating a femaleIt doesn't matter - also, a man with a good salary will be ordered to pay over a million dollars in child support over 20 years, which will be received tax-free by his baby-mama. That's the equivalent of a $2 million lottery win in cash (you lose half to taxes when you win the lottery), people will do crazy things for that kind of money, and getting knocked-up by "accident" is not exactly the most difficult thing.. | /r/MensRights | 23/12/10 04:57 PM |
| 7 | Just the title alone seems biased... why is this phrased like he's doing something wrong?You have a point, but this article was written with a clear intention to make him look bad - I would like to hear his side of the story.. | /r/MensRights | 23/12/10 03:46 AM |
| 4 | 'Intervention' TV programme - Paternity fraud.Banned in r/MaleStudies Reason for banning: straw-man argument (the quoted words were not in OP's text, and not very relevant to the submission anyway - which was about paternity fraud not drugs), insults. | /r/MensRights | 23/12/10 01:32 AM |
| -1 | Women's sexuality gives them, and the state, almost unlimited power to control men. As long as women are free to use their power of sex to exploit men, then all the things we resent in women will continue and get worse.I never said "immediately", I said "after a certain time"; it's the second time you blatantly misrepresent a quote | /r/MensRights | 23/12/10 01:19 AM |
| -1 | Women's sexuality gives them, and the state, almost unlimited power to control men. As long as women are free to use their power of sex to exploit men, then all the things we resent in women will continue and get worse.Yes, I have a very good citation: it's the same one you quoted from the link I provided, but with the remaining of the sentence included: They found 60% of 30-year-old women wanted sex "often" at the beginning of a relationship, but within four years of the relationship this figure fell to under 50%, and after 20 years it dropped to about 20%. From 60% to 20% sounds like plummeting, especially since: In contrast, they found the proportion of men wanting regular sex remained at between 60-80%, re… | /r/MensRights | 23/12/10 12:47 AM |
| -5 | Women's sexuality gives them, and the state, almost unlimited power to control men. As long as women are free to use their power of sex to exploit men, then all the things we resent in women will continue and get worse.Yeah, I think you are just being bitter because I provided scientific basis to something that is relatively obvious (and has been the butt of innumerable jokes).. but that you've been in denial about | /r/MensRights | 22/12/10 11:57 PM |
| -1 | Women's sexuality gives them, and the state, almost unlimited power to control men. As long as women are free to use their power of sex to exploit men, then all the things we resent in women will continue and get worse.So? | /r/MensRights | 22/12/10 11:40 PM |
| 1 | Women's sexuality gives them, and the state, almost unlimited power to control men. As long as women are free to use their power of sex to exploit men, then all the things we resent in women will continue and get worse.http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4790313.stm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lesbian_bed_death | /r/MensRights | 22/12/10 11:34 PM |
| 0 | Women's sexuality gives them, and the state, almost unlimited power to control men. As long as women are free to use their power of sex to exploit men, then all the things we resent in women will continue and get worse.FYI: this user was banned in r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 22/12/10 11:26 PM |
| 2 | DSMV definition of feminism: a pervasive pattern of grandiosity, need for admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five or more of the following:I don't particularly agree with this post, but regardless sicklove's comment got him/her banned in r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 22/12/10 11:23 PM |
| 1 | Women's sexuality gives them, and the state, almost unlimited power to control men. As long as women are free to use their power of sex to exploit men, then all the things we resent in women will continue and get worse.This is a very well-known phenomenon. I don't know what the scientific name for it is, but it was studied and proven scientifically. It applies to both hetero and lesbian women. Women's sex drive plummets after a certain time when they are in a stable relationship. It's a fact! Interestingly, some studies found that lesbians who have been in long term relationships are very often asexual (they don't have sex at all), because neither partner cares about sex anymore (in hetero couples, the male wo… | /r/MensRights | 22/12/10 10:57 PM |
| 1 | IMPORTANT NOTICE: If you don't trust the person you're sleeping with to tell the truth about birth control, you shouldn't be sleeping with them.Hey today's Dilbert comic was about you :) http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/2010-12-22 | /r/MensRights | 22/12/10 04:41 PM |
| 0 | IMPORTANT NOTICE: If you don't trust the person you're sleeping with to tell the truth about birth control, you shouldn't be sleeping with them.Good advice, Einstein /s ;) | /r/MensRights | 21/12/10 09:59 PM |
| 0 | IMPORTANT NOTICE: If you don't trust the person you're sleeping with to tell the truth about birth control, you shouldn't be sleeping with them.Exactly, if men had some basic human rights, they wouldn't need to take a fucking leap-of-faith every time they have sex, or have kids, or get married. That's the real problem, right there! Saying that "trust" is the answer is completely retarded; I know dozens of guys who "trusted" their wives / girlfriends only to get hit with "surprise-pregnancies" and divorces. When the system is totally rigged against you, trust is a very bad idea. My advice would be exactly the opposite: no matter how much… | /r/MensRights | 21/12/10 09:29 PM |
| 0 | IMPORTANT NOTICE: If you don't trust the person you're sleeping with to tell the truth about birth control, you shouldn't be sleeping with them.Sure, and you can buy my ocean-view condo in Nevada.. ;) | /r/MensRights | 21/12/10 09:19 PM |
| 5 | IMPORTANT NOTICE: If you don't trust the person you're sleeping with to tell the truth about birth control, you shouldn't be sleeping with them.Then you shouldn't have sex with anyone. | /r/MensRights | 21/12/10 09:13 PM |
| 2 | IMPORTANT NOTICE: If you don't trust the person you're sleeping with to tell the truth about birth control, you shouldn't be sleeping with them.I know at least half of dozen dudes who got hit by a "pregnancy-surprise" and I can GUARANTEE you that no one saw it coming, not them, not their friends, not their family. And most of these women where what some would call "good catches": nice, educated, good family, good manners etc... If you think you can trust a woman with taking her birth control, you are ABSOLUTELY RETARDED.. happy father's day :) | /r/MensRights | 21/12/10 09:08 PM |
| -3 | IMPORTANT NOTICE: If you don't trust the person you're sleeping with to tell the truth about birth control, you shouldn't be sleeping with them.Really? So, I guess you shouldn't sleep with anyone then? | /r/MensRights | 21/12/10 08:44 PM |
| 5 | A Prominent Feminist has tweeted to her 2,597 followers that I've been accused of RAPE. (100% FALSE.)If this is real, you can absolutely sue. And you should! Does she have any money? ;) | /r/MensRights | 21/12/10 01:13 PM |
| 1 | Gender pay gap 'down to women's lifestyle choices'Then we can add all the child-support, tax breaks, welfare and gifts that the feminists conveniently forgot to add to women's wages. | /r/MensRights | 19/12/10 10:04 PM |
| 7 | Tom Leykis: Thoughts?Tom is awesome in my opinion. He is one of the very few (the only?) mainstream entertainers who dares touching on the big issues that young men face today. I think it's fair to say that even though Tom Leykis in not an MRA per-say, he has spread the knowledge about men's rights more than any other mainstream show host. His candid advice to young men (about women, and the trap that modern marriage has become for men) is absolutely priceless. His radio show was #1 rated among young men in Californ… | /r/MensRights | 19/12/10 02:28 PM |
| 6 | Women Declare Victory Over MenYou didn't understand my comment: I was responding to a stereotype (the "modern independent woman") by painting another stereotype based on facts regarding government usage vs contribution by each gender. I think this type of answer is more colorful and gets the point across better. But yes, I could have pasted links with plenty of statistics to demonstrate each point (boooring!); feel free to research them if you think some of my claims are wrong (I am pretty sure every stereotype I painted can… | /r/MensRights | 19/12/10 12:10 AM |
| 6 | Women Declare Victory Over MenIt isn't about you! Look up who receives most of the welfare in this country, most of the alimony, most of retirement and health benefits, who makes most of pencil-pushing government employees; and then look at who makes policemen, firefighters or construction workers or farmers (to name a few) and who pays most of the taxes, and tell me who depends on whom in this picture? | /r/MensRights | 18/12/10 11:46 PM |
| 13 | Women Declare Victory Over MenThe "modern independent woman" wouldn't last 5 minutes without her useless government / office job, her child-support and alimony check, welfare, policemen to protect her, firemen to save her, construction workers to build her a house, farmers to grow her food... When you spit on the face of the MEN who have built our civilization, be careful what you wish for.. karma can be a bitch ;) | /r/MensRights | 18/12/10 06:46 PM |
| 3 | Women Declare Victory Over MenI watched this video attentively, and I agree with you: I think the speaker is somewhat sympathetic to men's rights (which could be explained by the fact that she has two sons - nothing changes the perspective of a rabid man-hating feminist like having sons: suddenly, men are human beings again!). What she did was very smart because she attacked women's victim power. I think that destroying the various lies spread by feminists in their (successful) attempt to claim the victim status is an import… | /r/MensRights | 18/12/10 03:17 PM |
| 0 | supercraptacular... feminist saboteur or just an extremist?Done | /r/MensRights | 17/12/10 12:51 AM |
| 1 | You guys are fucking pathetic.Probably, just another feminist bitch pretending to be a man.. In any case, FWIW I banned her in r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 15/12/10 09:43 PM |
| 1 | supercraptacular... feminist saboteur or just an extremist?I agree, it also looks to me like it might be a feminist trying to make us look bad. I have seen so many dirty tricks pulled by feminist trolls trying to shut down this sub-reddit, that nothing surprises me anymore.. | /r/MensRights | 15/12/10 09:02 PM |
| 2 | The woman language translator (xpost)Sadly, I don't think it is only in the commercial: I see guys like that everywhere - sometimes, they are so over-the-top that I feel like snapping a picture, and giving them a "pet of the month" award :) | /r/MensRights | 14/12/10 10:19 PM |
| 11 | Jessica Valenti: America should model rape laws after Sweden's -- where some legal experts want to make sex a presumptive crime whenever a woman cries rapeThe key points that I remember: the US govt will now do a periodic assesment of US foreign policy in regard to women's "issues" she wants to send troops to Africa to help collect "rape evidence" (not one word about helping child soldiers of course) she considers women's "rights" to be a "security issue" that should be driving all aspects of US foreign policy she is sending funding to "DV groups" in a bunch of foreign countries (of course, not one word about male victims of domestic violence): th… | /r/MensRights | 14/12/10 03:38 PM |
| 9 | Jessica Valenti: America should model rape laws after Sweden's -- where some legal experts want to make sex a presumptive crime whenever a woman cries rapeShe doesn't care, she is lying about it because it gives her more leverage to push for said law in the US. Since when do feminists have any regard to the truth, anyway? And it's not like the Washington Post would do some basic fact checking, when publishing political drivel from feminist activists, would it? | /r/MensRights | 14/12/10 03:20 PM |
| 9 | Jessica Valenti: America should model rape laws after Sweden's -- where some legal experts want to make sex a presumptive crime whenever a woman cries rapeIt tells us what we already knew: that feminists have control of the US, including its foreign policy (this week's Hillary Clinton's speech at Women's TED was quite chilling in that regard), its media, and its school system. | /r/MensRights | 14/12/10 03:18 PM |
| 22 | Jessica Valenti: America should model rape laws after Sweden's -- where some legal experts want to make sex a presumptive crime whenever a woman cries rapeNext time, we get our daily visit from the usual "but but not all feminists are man-hating feminazis", we can just point straight to Jessica Valenti. How is this man-hating retard even given a voice in the Washington Post??? Seriously!? Not only they are publishing what basically amounts to anti-male hate-speech, but it is also an attack on the basic fundation of our judicial system (i.e. due process and presumption of innocence). I think this shows that organized feminism is incredibly dangerou… | /r/MensRights | 14/12/10 03:06 PM |
| 1 | Feminists tout new report that supposedly shows (but really doesn't) that hardly any women lie about rapeIt is not the "false rape rate" (I don't know if you are really that stupid or just trolling). It's the "false rape discovery rate" or sthg. The way you label the statistics is basically putting a spin on them: "conviction rate" implies only a subset of cases where a rape happened (so readers are led to believe that there are more such cases) "false rape rate" implies all cases of false rape (readers are led to believe that all cases of false rape are counted here) - which isn't true, it's only … | /r/MensRights | 13/12/10 10:31 PM |
| 4 | Feminists tout new report that supposedly shows (but really doesn't) that hardly any women lie about rapeIt never was 6% to begin with because that number is misleading and based on a computation that doesn't make sense. They basically took all the cases that were unresolved and arbitrarily decided to count them as if a rape has happened. What if I arbitrarily decide to count them as if they were false rapes, and then the false rape rate is 90+%? As Pierce said, unresolved cases should not be counted either way, whoever is counting them either as false rape or not, is basically manipulating the num… | /r/MensRights | 13/12/10 10:02 PM |
| 5 | Feminists tout new report that supposedly shows (but really doesn't) that hardly any women lie about rapeExactly (but don't expect any main-stream media to report on that): "Based on a ~15% sample of all cases, 6 out of every 16 rape allegations are proven false. Considering that this sample contains cases with the most evidence, we could easily extrapolate that the remaining cases with even less evidence contain the same or higher rate of false claims." | /r/MensRights | 13/12/10 09:55 PM |
| 4 | Feminists tout new report that supposedly shows (but really doesn't) that hardly any women lie about rapeWhy is it misleading? If 19% of all rape accusation are false, then that's what it is (actually, studies are pointing to a 40% - 60% rate, so it still looks understated..). You can't say a statistic is misleading just because it doesn't conform with your worldview (especially since that worldview was shaped by 40 years of feminist propaganda making up bs statistics that wouldn't pass peer-review from a 5 yr old) | /r/MensRights | 13/12/10 09:47 PM |
| 3 | Feminists tout new report that supposedly shows (but really doesn't) that hardly any women lie about rapeI don't see what's radical about telling the truth to the general public. | /r/MensRights | 13/12/10 09:07 PM |
| 4 | Feminists tout new report that supposedly shows (but really doesn't) that hardly any women lie about rapeThe problem with this study (and why it is biased and unscientific), is that they use different standards for different parts of the calculation. The false rape rate is computed by dividing the number of false accusations by the total number of cases, right? But here is the problem: these 2 numbers are computed using different methodologies: the total number of cases is computed based on allegations only, which overestimates it, and therefore lowers the false rape rate the number of false accusa… | /r/MensRights | 13/12/10 07:58 PM |
| 21 | Feminists tout new report that supposedly shows (but really doesn't) that hardly any women lie about rapeWe have already seen sthg similar on another feminist blog, my answer is still the same: considering the absolutely over-the-top criteria used to count an accusation as false, finding a 6% rate of false accusations only shows how incredibly high the real figure has to be. Here are the criteria to count an accusation as false: "The determination that a report of sexual assault is false can be made only if the evidence establishes that no crime was committed or attempted. This determination can be… | /r/MensRights | 13/12/10 03:20 PM |
| 2 | Angry Harry on the lack of large organizations for menFYI: This troll was banned in /r/MaleStudies. | /r/MensRights | 13/12/10 12:50 AM |
| 1 | Suggestion: Guys I feel like we should also be posting some legitimate stories and cases of the good women who are out there.We already have the TV, the radio and the internet, pretty much every mainstream media publication doing that, no? | /r/MensRights | 12/12/10 11:28 PM |
| 3 | List of Rights that are being denied to Western MenYou don't seem to understand the double standard that I was referring to. Women are allowed to walk away from their parental responsibilities, and drop babies / small children at the nearest hospital or fire station, no questions asked. These are the same women who chose to have sex, got pregnant despite having the most reliable form of birth control available to them, and who chose to bring the pregnancy to term. Then, the state has to spend significant resources to save these babies, provide f… | /r/MensRights | 10/12/10 11:07 PM |
| 2 | List of Rights that are being denied to Western MenWell, then men should have the option to relinquish their (limited) parental rights and not pay child support. That was the initial thing that you seemed to have a disagreement with.. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/10 10:45 PM |
| 3 | List of Rights that are being denied to Western MenThat's fine with me, but only if we apply the same standard to women: namely women who give children for adoption should pay child support to the adoptive family. Also abortion should only be available to women who have been raped or would suffer health problems.. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/10 10:34 PM |
| 3 | List of Rights that are being denied to Western MenThe right to prevent an unwanted adoption (which is seriously challenged by so-called "putative father registries" : adoption agencies don't have a duty to make a good faith attempt at finding the bio dad, now they just look in those registries and basta, kiddo is adopted - they basically make fatherhood sthg you have to opt-in into by following a very peculiar and obscure legal process). The right to not pay cs for an unwanted child, as long as intentions were made clear from the beginning. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/10 07:16 PM |
| 2 | List of Rights that are being denied to Western MenI banned a bunch of feminists from r/MaleStudies yesterday. I think they are following me ;) [waves hand to following groupies] | /r/MensRights | 10/12/10 03:34 PM |
| 1 | List of Rights that are being denied to Western MenI know; it is (one of) the reason I'd rather not have kids .. I don't think I could survive having my kids torn away from me. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/10 03:28 PM |
| 9 | List of Rights that are being denied to Western MenQuick answer from the top of my head: reproductive rights parental rights (visitation, access to kids, decisions etc..) presumption of innocence and right to due process (domestic violence and "sex" crimes allegations) property rights (not be taken to the cleaners and evicted from one's home on bogus charges; not having to pay child support amounts that can be x10 times the cost of a kid, without any proof of how the money is spent, no debtor prisons for people who got behind because the court r… | /r/MensRights | 10/12/10 02:11 PM |
| 4 | Feminist Gulag: No Prosecution Necessary.Very good article. Re-posting to r/MaleStudies.. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/10 01:55 PM |
| 0 | What the rest of Reddit thinks of youIMO r/MaleStudies has some pretty good content.. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/10 12:13 PM |
| -1 | A terrifying day...You did the right: in the current anti-male climate, there is no way I'd stay 5 secs around a bunch of unknown unaccompanied kids in the woods. The sad part is: I probably wouldn't even stop to help if they were in trouble.. Panic attack though: maybe a little overreacted there! :) | /r/MensRights | 10/12/10 02:07 AM |
| 0 | Men Are More Intelligent Than Women?Sorry, I try to keep personal details private :( | /r/MensRights | 10/12/10 01:59 AM |
| -5 | What the rest of Reddit thinks of you/r/MaleStudies is brand new, so it needs some time to gain momentum, it has nothing to do with moderation policy: any new subreddit has to go through that stage. I remember when /MR was quite inactive and every post was from pn6. Regarding the aggressive banning policy: you have to understand that /r/MaleStudies was created as a reaction to trolls (mostly concern trolls) invading /MR. It's gotten better now, but a few months ago, it was impossible to have a discussion in /MR because of all the t… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/10 03:04 PM |
| -5 | What the rest of Reddit thinks of youSince r/MaleStudies and myself are being criticized here, let me respond: Her account of the conversation is ridiculously inaccurate (surprised?) and of course she did not provide a link to the actual thread: here it is - judge for yourself. Also her account of why she got banned is pure fiction, she doesn't know why she got banned because she never asked. Reason for banning: while everyone was being civilized and providing reasonable comments, antisocialmedic used the full spectrum of shaming t… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/10 02:16 PM |
| 0 | Men Are More Intelligent Than Women?Yes, it looked this way: like he has mental shortcuts for common scenarios that let him jump ahead to the most likely conclusion without having all the facts yet. Kind of like professional chess players I guess.. Anyway, cheers my friend.. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/10 02:26 AM |
| -1 | Men Are More Intelligent Than Women?Hmm. I used to work with an older dude (55+) who was there at the very birth of the industry I work in, he knows guys I would consider absolute legends; I would be honored to even shake their hands (I read their books when I was 15). Interestingly, he was a little slow now and very forgetful (working with him was a little painful b/c he'd forget everything), but one thing he still had was intuition. Unbelievable intuition, he would hear us talk about a problem and zap, he would know the answer e… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/10 01:49 AM |
| 0 | Men Are More Intelligent Than Women?In my experience with dealing with a lot of freaking geniuses; IQ is just mental speed, these people process the same information in the same way as anyone else (and come to the same conclusions), but the speed at which their thoughts move is absolutely astonishing. They also speak very fast, usually (unless drunk ;). I swear one of my ex-bosses, would say sthg to me, and I would walk out of his office still wondering what the fuck he was talking about, until it hit me.. at lunch time! Working w… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/10 01:10 AM |
| 0 | Men Are More Intelligent Than Women?It's political-correctness as a societal value. Men value truth, logic and morality; women value good feelings and agreement. When society switched from male-dominated to female-dominated, we replaced values of truth and honor with values of consensus and wishy-washy feel-good bs. The problem: a civilization built on fell-good bull-shit will not survive long.. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/10 01:04 AM |
| 1 | Men Are More Intelligent Than Women?I think the difference between male and female IQ is only 4 points (which isn't much considering the standard deviation). So it's pretty much meaningless. However, I would disagree with your statement that IQ is a bullshit measure. I personally have an IQ way above average (I tested it once, came at 150 but the test said that it was too high, I needed another test to measure it accurately, I never did the other test, whatever..), and in my line of work, I got a chance to work with people a lot s… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/10 12:53 AM |
| 2 | Men Are More Intelligent Than Women?I think the more interesting fact is that men's IQ is a lot more distributed than women's. As a consequence men make over 90% of the people with "genius" IQ as well as those with "really stupid" IQ. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/10 12:44 AM |
| 4 | The State Of Our Unions: New Study Reports Growing 'Marriage Gap'Social changes generally follow a pattern of progression that starts from the black community, then spreads to the uneducated whites, then the white middle class, and finally everyone else. Think: music, fashion, language, dating habits (hook-up culture) etc.. The article hints to that when it says: "The study argues that, while moderately-educated people traditionally mimicked the behavior of the upper class, they are now in the midst of a "historic reversal" insofar as they are mirroring the a… | /r/MensRights | 08/12/10 02:40 PM |
| 1 | Julian Assange’s lying rape accusers are Anna Ardin and Sofia WilénYes, it could be some kind of misdemeanor, maybe worthy if a little community service or sthg... Assuming the story is even true (considering that there are two jealous and angry lovers, one of them a feminazi bitch, I have my reservations) But an international Interpol arrest warrant and no bail? For that? You have to be kidding me! | /r/MensRights | 08/12/10 01:36 AM |
| 0 | Julian Assange’s lying rape accusers are Anna Ardin and Sofia WilénYes, that's another point: whether the charges are true or not, they are pretty ridiculous anyway (as far as we know). You know we live in a "men's world" when a man can get arrested in a foreign country and held without bail, because a woman complained about a broken condom. /s | /r/MensRights | 08/12/10 01:12 AM |
| 1 | An excerpt from a book I'm reading, with an insight into society and male-female relationsyou are slightly misogynistic I think you are "slightly" retarded.. | /r/MensRights | 07/12/10 08:04 PM |
| 1 | An excerpt from a book I'm reading, with an insight into society and male-female relationsI have seen ~ half a dozen studies from UK, US and India. Here is one article that discusses 1 or 2 of those studies: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,194032,00.html (sorry, Fox news) | /r/MensRights | 07/12/10 07:22 PM |
| 1 | An excerpt from a book I'm reading, with an insight into society and male-female relationsEvery study I've heard of, found proven false rape rates at around 40 to 60% of cases. FWIW I've also read testimonies of people who worked on rape cases who also say that roughly half of cases are from mentally unstable women (who sometimes come back regularly with new allegations against different men). There is a 2% false rape rate statistic that is floating around, that was invented out of thin air by a feminist writer - it has absolutely no basis in fact and is not backed by any study (but … | /r/MensRights | 07/12/10 07:07 PM |
| 1 | An excerpt from a book I'm reading, with an insight into society and male-female relationsI meant it is possible (and the research seems to back this) that many rapes are not reported, while at the same time those which are reported are often untrue. One fact does not contradict the other. On a side note: I don't buy the feminist agit-pop about all the underreporting (I am sure some exists, but nowhere near what the feminists claim). If feminists haven't been able to properly count male vs female victims of domestic violence, despite 30 years of "research" and billions of dollars in … | /r/MensRights | 07/12/10 06:34 PM |
| 1 | An excerpt from a book I'm reading, with an insight into society and male-female relationsOne does not exclude the other, you moron. | /r/MensRights | 07/12/10 05:59 PM |
| 1 | An excerpt from a book I'm reading, with an insight into society and male-female relationsHow is this related to my comment? (also: you should stop drinking the feminist kool-aid. there is no more rape crisis as their is a wage gap or a wife-beating crisis in this country..) | /r/MensRights | 07/12/10 04:52 PM |
| 0 | Woman has a friend that is trying to get impregnated by random men without telling them. this is what is wrong with women today.Yes, I am sure that 25% of aborted babies can be explained by medical reasons.. | /r/MensRights | 07/12/10 04:48 PM |
| 9 | Julian Assange’s lying rape accusers are Anna Ardin and Sofia WilénI have a tendency to think that the 2 are lying, but we don't know for sure yet.. | /r/MensRights | 07/12/10 03:07 PM |
| 2 | An excerpt from a book I'm reading, with an insight into society and male-female relationsVery true. Our society is obviously female-centric, but to illustrate the point one only has to look at the punishment and prosecution of rape vs the punishment and prosecution of cuckoldry (which I would consider the female equivalent of rape, but I guess that's subjective). Both represent absolutely horrifying crimes, and a negation of the victim's right to reproduce freely, and yet one is punished by 25+ yrs in prison (and has standards of evidence that are especially lowered, to the point wh… | /r/MensRights | 07/12/10 02:40 AM |
| 0 | Actress Alyssa Milano Dead at 38Looks fake, no one else is reporting on this.. (I hope she is ok!) Also, why in MR's? | /r/MensRights | 07/12/10 12:46 AM |
| -6 | Woman has a friend that is trying to get impregnated by random men without telling them. this is what is wrong with women today.No, only a woman can prevent a baby, because she is the only one who has reproductive rights in the matter. She is also the only one who can decide to kill the baby if she wants to, and she is the only one who can get rid of the baby after it is born by giving it away - and interestingly she doesn't have to pay child support to the adoptive family, and somehow she won't be chased by the police for being a "dead-beat". I guess taking "responsibility" for your children, is only something that men … | /r/MensRights | 06/12/10 08:11 PM |
| -8 | Woman has a friend that is trying to get impregnated by random men without telling them. this is what is wrong with women today.Oh how nice.. I can choose to wear a condom, what a wonderful choice. What else? I can choose to breathe or not? I guess I should consider myself lucky: imagine if breathing was illegal! Fuck you! | /r/MensRights | 06/12/10 07:54 PM |
| 0 | Woman has a friend that is trying to get impregnated by random men without telling them. this is what is wrong with women today.We don't need a new birth control method to prevent men from being abused by these women (although that would be a welcome development), all we need is for the state to start treating men like human beings instead of expendable walking wallets. That's all! When a woman gets pregnant, she should have to indicate who the father is and have him sign a document to make him accept paternity (and the financial burden that comes with it), preferably before many witnesses. If she can't do that (or doesn… | /r/MensRights | 06/12/10 07:12 PM |
| -4 | Woman has a friend that is trying to get impregnated by random men without telling them. this is what is wrong with women today.You don't seem to understand the meaning of "reproductive rights". | /r/MensRights | 06/12/10 05:32 PM |
| -3 | Woman has a friend that is trying to get impregnated by random men without telling them. this is what is wrong with women today.Wearing a condom is not a reproductive right. My proposal was the last line of my previous comment.. | /r/MensRights | 06/12/10 04:31 PM |
| -3 | Woman has a friend that is trying to get impregnated by random men without telling them. this is what is wrong with women today.I think a lot of people are missing the real problem here: yes, not all women are like that, but that's not the point. The point is that any woman can easily destroy a man's life if she manages to get herself pregnant (one way or another). The point is that men have no reproductive rights and can easily fall prey to nasty bitches who use the family court as a weapon. Men should have the option to deny supporting a baby - and women should have the option to decide whether to keep the baby or not. | /r/MensRights | 06/12/10 04:19 PM |
| -1 | Male veterans are significantly more likely to commit suicide, but who gives a damn?Actually, this article gives many figures but always manages to avoid the main fact: that men are several times more likely to commit suicide. It reads to me as if the text was intentionally edited to avoid mentioning that men make over 80% of victims of suicide. I don't think that if the genders were reversed, women would not be mentioned. If women were committing 80% of suicides, I am absolutely certain that there would be a national emergency about it, it would be studied (and I mean women's … | /r/MensRights | 06/12/10 02:20 PM |
| 1 | Male veterans are significantly more likely to commit suicide, but who gives a damn?Notice how the article forgets to mention that men make most suicide victims, both in the military and in the general public. Suicide rates for veterans: Male veterans: 31.5 to 35.3 per 100,000 Female veterans: 11.1 to 12.3 per 100,000 Suicide rates in the general public: Male non-veterans: 17.6 per 100,000 Female non-veterans: 4.5 per 100,000 (source: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/11/13/cbsnews_investigates/main3498625.shtml ) | /r/MensRights | 05/12/10 10:46 PM |
| 2 | What elements from the feminist movement could we use/adapt to our own cause?Lesson #1: Never talk of "making women subordinate to men". Feminists always claim that they want "equality for women" (whatever that means); it is bull-shit, and the feminist elite is perfectly aware that it is bull-shit, BUT it is very important to get public support. Lesson #2: Don't play fair. Feminists have swept the nation by lying, manipulating, and intimidating anyone who would disagree with their agenda. It goes against our nature as men to do the same, but I think if we want to have a … | /r/MensRights | 05/12/10 08:29 PM |
| 5 | Question on the 'wage gap': Man and woman with equal education, experience, etc.; man works 50 hrs/week in construction, woman works 35 hrs/week (still fulltime) in daycare. Do these stats go into reporting the 75% wage gap?What is misleading about Consad conclusions? (I am going to ignore the ad-hominem attack on the report..) | /r/MensRights | 04/12/10 09:59 PM |
| 22 | Question on the 'wage gap': Man and woman with equal education, experience, etc.; man works 50 hrs/week in construction, woman works 35 hrs/week (still fulltime) in daycare. Do these stats go into reporting the 75% wage gap?You can only take lower paying jobs if someone else is paying your bills.. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/10 03:34 PM |
| 48 | Question on the 'wage gap': Man and woman with equal education, experience, etc.; man works 50 hrs/week in construction, woman works 35 hrs/week (still fulltime) in daycare. Do these stats go into reporting the 75% wage gap?The 75% wage gap is a "raw" wage gap. It doesn't adjust for anything: education, job, experience, etc... After adjusting for these factors the wage gap practically vanishes (as found by the US dept of labor: http://www.consad.com/content/reports/Gender%20Wage%20Gap%20Final%20Report.pdf). So what we do have is a "work gap": women choose to work on aggregate several years less than men, avoid dangerous, difficult, and boring jobs and tend to prefer low-risk government jobs. That would be female pr… | /r/MensRights | 04/12/10 03:02 PM |
| -1 | White knight says blog that advocates for presumptively innocent men accused of rape 'brings all the assholes' togetherWhy worry about what some stupid loser on the internet has to say? Who cares about this retard? Fuck him! We have much work ahead of us, the moron isn't worth our time.. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/10 08:54 PM |
| 1 | White Ribbon Foundation in Australia Distorts Data on DVX-posted from r/MaleStudies.. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/10 03:59 AM |
| 1 | The Campus Rape MythWhat I meant was that a piece of evidence such as a hair will only matter in cases of stranger rape. On the other hand, in cases where both parties knew each other, DNA doesn't matter because it can always be explained by the relationship (we found your hair? Well yeah, we went to the movies, or hooked up or whatever): it basically boils down to a he-said-vs-she-said scenario. The Innocence Project can't do much for those cases. | /r/MensRights | 01/12/10 09:55 PM |
| 2 | The Campus Rape MythSo you read a lot of cases from the Innocence Project? Hmm ok.. For someone who did that, you don't seem to grasp what the Innocence Project is doing: they use DNA evidence to free innocent inmates. There are two groups of inmates: those whose cases have some critical DNA evidence, and those who don't. Cases where DNA is important generally involve an unknown perpetrator and some violence; cases where DNA doesn't matter generally involve a person known by the alleged victim. In other words: if t… | /r/MensRights | 01/12/10 09:30 PM |
| 1 | The Campus Rape MythSo you have heard possibly hundreds of false rape stories (if I were to believe your claims, which are getting more convoluted with each reply)? But the media never published any of them. Do you see a problem here? Maybe the media and politicians are creating an invisible wall between the general public and the truth, and maybe this has caused many innocent men to be incarcerated, no? Could it be that the majority of inmates freed by the Innocence Project are men convicted of sex crimes? Oh actu… | /r/MensRights | 01/12/10 09:05 PM |
| 2 | The Campus Rape MythYou said stories (plural) but you can only mention the Duke scandal (one story). Also in sept 2007, you could not have been inundated with false rape "stories" for a year and a half, because it took a very long time for the truth to come out in this case (as usual): the players were only declared innocent in april 2007, until then it was a "rape story". Are you saying that the Duke scandal prevented you from going to the police and reporting that you got raped? | /r/MensRights | 01/12/10 08:42 PM |
| 8 | The Campus Rape MythGetLikeMe: user for 22 hours - 7 comments - recently viewed links: 100% in /MR Listen, I don't want to minimize what happened to you (if it's real), but coming from an account created less than a day ago, I am a little suspicious. Some of your comments sound like trolling: "My goal in life is to become a housewife and have lots of babies, whilst vacuuming the living room and having dinner on the table promptly on time." Really? "biggest factor [for not coming forward] was false rape stories" Rea… | /r/MensRights | 01/12/10 08:03 PM |
| 2 | Okay, how many people in this "Men's Rights" subreddit are ACTUALLY MALE, rather than a woman trying to keep tabs on their perceived adversary??I am a man. While I agree that there is an incredible amount of feminist trolling going on (shameless plug - that's why I created r/MaleStudies where trolls are banned on sight), not every woman is hostile to men's rights. Actually, it was a pleasant surprise for me to see how many women strongly support us. Even many high profile MR "activists" are women (think Erin Pizzey, Carol Rhodes, Christina Hoff Sommers, Barbara Kay and many others). Many of my female co-workers also support men's rights… | /r/MensRights | 01/12/10 01:24 PM |
| -3 | How many of you think women are out to 'get' men?How many of you are feminist concern trolls? Oh wait.. | /r/MensRights | 01/12/10 01:16 PM |
| -1 | "Dartmouth College has since established an award in Wetterhahn's name to encourage other men to pursue careers in science. Whenever possible, preference is given to a man in granting the award." Whoops, thats sexist. I meant to say "women".Note: Troll (Xoltes) was banned in r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 30/11/10 02:11 PM |
| 1 | Are we facing a Feminist Shari'ah?sure.. | /r/MensRights | 30/11/10 12:41 AM |
| 1 | Generation Y, raised on nothing but feminism, will be a nightmare for men. feminists have taken over academia, media and the law, they control public discourse. Feminism is culture itself.| Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self DeceptionThat's because Mohammed has like a dozen different spellings. It comes to #1 if you total all the spellings. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/8091798/Mohammed-the-nations-secret-favourite-name.html | /r/MensRights | 28/11/10 03:41 AM |
| 1 | Generation Y, raised on nothing but feminism, will be a nightmare for men. feminists have taken over academia, media and the law, they control public discourse. Feminism is culture itself.| Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self DeceptionWe'll have to agree to disagree here; not that it matters much anyway: we won't see any significant changes in our lifetime, and in any case we are powerless to affect the future course of events. I guess it's just a hobby of mine: I enjoy watching the evolution of our social order, like a scientist watching an ant-hill.. | /r/MensRights | 27/11/10 10:28 PM |
| 2 | Generation Y, raised on nothing but feminism, will be a nightmare for men. feminists have taken over academia, media and the law, they control public discourse. Feminism is culture itself.| Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception"Assimilate" is the keyword here. What does it mean, and who is being assimilated by whom? ;) The Romans had an absolutely unbelievable level of human development: they were perfectly aware of advanced philosophical concepts such as democracy, the rule of law, human rights, women's rights, the scientific method of analysis; they enjoyed running water, baths, arts and entertainment, plenty of food and were importing spices from thousands of miles away. When the Roman Empire collapsed, the Dark Ag… | /r/MensRights | 27/11/10 09:20 PM |
| 1 | Generation Y, raised on nothing but feminism, will be a nightmare for men. feminists have taken over academia, media and the law, they control public discourse. Feminism is culture itself.| Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self DeceptionUnless the change that you are describing can dramatically increase birth rates, it probably won't prevent the downfall of our civilization. Any patriarchical religious sub-culture can very quickly outbreed us, and take control of our democracy (example: in the UK, Mohammed is already the most popular baby boy name). A culture where birth rates are (well) below replacement is unsustainable from an evolutionary standpoint.. it's just a matter of time before it gets taken over. | /r/MensRights | 27/11/10 07:05 PM |
| 3 | Generation Y, raised on nothing but feminism, will be a nightmare for men. feminists have taken over academia, media and the law, they control public discourse. Feminism is culture itself.| Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self DeceptionThat has worked (so far?) for my generation of men, but I am afraid the next generation may not be so lucky.. Sooner or later, we have to build a political movement and push those evil bitches back to regain our basic human rights. If not (most likely scenario), the next generation of men will turn out completely effeminate and homosexual (not that I have anything against it), and our civilization will collapse (as Rome and Athens did, after very similar social changes happened back then). | /r/MensRights | 27/11/10 06:15 PM |
| 1 | "Police to have power to order violent partners to leave home for 48 hours" — three guesses which sex the partner has to be for this to be applicable."the immediate aftermath of an attack" doesn't mean shit. Also, considering that the law basically removes the basic rules of evidence and due process: it is an incorrect statement, it should be "the immediate aftermath of an alleged attack". This error shows that the "journalist" is either stupid or has political bias (probably both). Again, it doesn't say anything about previous convictions or injury - these conditions exist only in your imagination. If they were true, the article would say "t… | /r/MensRights | 27/11/10 02:47 PM |
| 0 | "Police to have power to order violent partners to leave home for 48 hours" — three guesses which sex the partner has to be for this to be applicable.RTFA: there was no mention of previous offenses (let alone proven ones), or physical injury. Where did you read that? | /r/MensRights | 26/11/10 03:27 PM |
| 9 | Why would a girl/boy date a MensRights guy, with no offense intended. Would ask the same thing to strident furious feminists: why do people date them?Women love men who stand up to them. For whatever it's worth, I have a lot more success with women, now that I have rejected my "women-good-men-bad" social conditioning... Based on my observations I would say that women despise and hate men who place them on a pedestral (too bad I didn't know that when I was 18..) That being said, I generally don't discuss gender issues with my gf's, I tried once and I'll never do that again ;) | /r/MensRights | 26/11/10 01:25 PM |
| 7 | Swedish court prepares international arrest warrant for Julian AssangeDo you think you can find a link to this essay? I think we should cross-post it on other sub-reddits, to raise awareness of how the lack of due process in rape prosecutions can easily be turned into a weapon against innocent men (I remember a post where a high-profile feminist encouraged university students to make false allegations against another professor that criticized her women's studies dept..). | /r/MensRights | 25/11/10 01:02 PM |
| 8 | So, last night as work was winding down, one of my coworkers commented that her husband refuses to let any male besides himself change their daughter's diaper.Source? (I remember reading the opposite: biological fathers are 50 times less likely to abuse their children than step-fathers... I should have bookmarked that..) | /r/MensRights | 24/11/10 09:14 PM |
| 3 | I've gotta speak up against you mens rightsFuck you - and I feel strongly abou it :) | /r/MensRights | 24/11/10 08:01 PM |
| 2 | When it's man on woman its terrorism. When its woman on man DV its common.Agreed with the title. This play-on-words is nothing but an attempt to institutionalize sexism against men, and "train" the police to go along with it! | /r/MensRights | 24/11/10 07:09 PM |
| -2 | Are we facing a Feminist Shari'ah?Don't insult people if you can't deal with the consequences.. | /r/MensRights | 23/11/10 03:41 PM |
| -3 | Are we facing a Feminist Shari'ah?I am not suggesting anything; and you just got banned in /r/MaleStudies.. | /r/MensRights | 23/11/10 03:22 PM |
| 1 | Are we facing a Feminist Shari'ah?http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/8091798/Mohammed-the-nations-secret-favourite-name.html Immigrants from maghreb were allowed in France after the second world war, they were ~1.3 mil (or 2.4% of poulation) in 1979 (source in French, p59) I might have gotten ahead of myself with the 50% figure.. no one really knows how big this immigrant community is today, because the French government is forbidden by law, to ask questions about ethnic origin. But we know that there were 6-8 mil muslims in… | /r/MensRights | 23/11/10 01:13 PM |
| 2 | EuroMillions winner must pay portion of winnings to ex-wife 10 YEARS AFTER DIVORCE | The Sun |NewsI could probably have phrased my point in a more touchy-feely way, but I really don't care about the downvotes ;) | /r/MensRights | 23/11/10 03:33 AM |
| 0 | Are we facing a Feminist Shari'ah?Don't be so sure. Any strongly patriarchical social order can outbreed our western culture by a factor of 10 to 1, easily. Not too long ago, there was a story about Muhammed being the most popular baby boy name in the UK.. In the US, it is still up in the air which culture will eventually outbreed the current social structure: it could be the born again christians, maybe mormons, or maybe muslims. It's too early to tell, but look at France: they let in some workers from their former muslim colon… | /r/MensRights | 23/11/10 02:29 AM |
| 4 | EuroMillions winner must pay portion of winnings to ex-wife 10 YEARS AFTER DIVORCE | The Sun |NewsYou are not off-base, I am sure that there are many good women left. However, I don't think that betting your balls on your SO being sane is such a good idea, considering how little you have to gain from this gamble, and how people change over time and/or hide their true nature (and when in love/lust, you'd be the last person to see her true personality). | /r/MensRights | 22/11/10 11:37 PM |
| 2 | EuroMillions winner must pay portion of winnings to ex-wife 10 YEARS AFTER DIVORCE | The Sun |NewsOne can still date as long as girlfriends are "recycled" on a regular basis (not a bad thing in itself, since most men naturally crave variety). As far as continuing the specie, there is already 6 billion of us monkeys: it is more than this planet can take.. Western civilization spits in the face of men, I say it will have neither my labor nor my offsprings. | /r/MensRights | 22/11/10 10:12 PM |
| 18 | EuroMillions winner must pay portion of winnings to ex-wife 10 YEARS AFTER DIVORCE | The Sun |NewsMay this be a lesson to those men who are considering marriage. Don't! :) You will not only be dealing with the laws of today (which are inhumane enough) but also with the laws and court decisions of the next decades (which seem to become more idiotic and blatantly sexist, by the day). | /r/MensRights | 22/11/10 03:06 PM |
| 4 | A man is charged with sexual misconduct with a minor, even though the student was 18Expect the age of consent to go up (driven by older women's fear of competiton; and older men's frustrated jealousy): they will start with "special" classes of people, like students and keep extending it to more and more people.. Regarding this case: the teacher could be fired by his employer (the school): fair enough; but there was no "crime" committed. It is yet another example of how healthy male sexuality is criminalized in a culture increasingly hostile to men. | /r/MensRights | 20/11/10 07:56 PM |
| 1 | MTV 'Teen Mom' charged with felony after abusing fiance. Guy shows unbelievable restraint like a boss.Yes, that's exactly the point: the law doesn't apply the same - despite all the excuses that you are trying to invent.. | /r/MensRights | 20/11/10 01:45 AM |
| 1 | MTV 'Teen Mom' charged with felony after abusing fiance. Guy shows unbelievable restraint like a boss.What's good for the goose is good for the gander | /r/MensRights | 20/11/10 12:45 AM |
| 1 | MTV 'Teen Mom' charged with felony after abusing fiance. Guy shows unbelievable restraint like a boss.I think the press would have mentioned it, if it was.. She didn't even get arrested, and didn't have to post bail.. pussy-pass all the way | /r/MensRights | 20/11/10 12:27 AM |
| 2 | MTV 'Teen Mom' charged with felony after abusing fiance. Guy shows unbelievable restraint like a boss.http://www.clarkprosecutor.org/html/domviol/domfaq.htm In Indiana, a victim does not have the power to "drop" criminal charges. A criminal action involves a crime against the State of Indiana, not a particular victim. Routinely, when criminal charges are filed as a result of domestic violence, the Prosecuting Attorney requests that a Protective Order be entered as a condition of any bail posted by the abuser to gain release from jail So why is she not in jail? And where is the protective order ?… | /r/MensRights | 20/11/10 12:16 AM |
| 5 | MTV 'Teen Mom' charged with felony after abusing fiance. Guy shows unbelievable restraint like a boss.Not really, we live in a culture that accepts, excuses, and sometimes even glorifies female violence. She wasn't expecting this to be an issue: and she was right! It took a very peculiar turn of circumstances to even get the police to reluctantly charge her (let alone convict, sentence and jail her). Now imagine, if you are a man (or worse: a father) in a violent situation: what are your options? | /r/MensRights | 20/11/10 12:06 AM |
| 3 | MTV 'Teen Mom' charged with felony after abusing fiance. Guy shows unbelievable restraint like a boss.Restraining orders are mandatory if there is domestic violence (it doesn't matter whether the victim wants one, the judge has no discretion in the matter: generally, the judge MUST enter a temporary restraining order in all cases of domestic violence, regardless of circumstances). In this case, the restraining order is a no brainer: she should obviously not be around the kids, without supervision. | /r/MensRights | 19/11/10 11:59 PM |
| 6 | MTV 'Teen Mom' charged with felony after abusing fiance. Guy shows unbelievable restraint like a boss.the local police learned of the incident and went forward Forward? Yeah sure.. Is she jailed? No. Is she sentenced? No. Is she convicted? No. Was a restraining order entered? No. How long has it been? | /r/MensRights | 19/11/10 10:51 PM |
| 12 | MTV 'Teen Mom' charged with felony after abusing fiance. Guy shows unbelievable restraint like a boss.No it is the state/DA that presses charges, not the victim. They can press charges even over the objections of the victim (exmaple: Charlie Sheen got incarcerated and evicted of his house, despite his wife objections, the next morning when she sobered up) It sounds like you're looking for excuses.. | /r/MensRights | 19/11/10 09:21 PM |
| 18 | MTV 'Teen Mom' charged with felony after abusing fiance. Guy shows unbelievable restraint like a boss.I am not against it being shown (can't speak for the entire sub-reddit); I am against it being shown and her not being in jail. She should have been arrested on the spot, and slapped with a restraining order immediately (as would have happened to any guy accused of domestic violence, even when they are no TV crew, cameras, and no evidence). Why is she not in jail yet? Where is the automatic restraining order that she should have been served with? She should have been in county jail before the TV… | /r/MensRights | 19/11/10 08:32 PM |
| 46 | MTV 'Teen Mom' charged with felony after abusing fiance. Guy shows unbelievable restraint like a boss.It took a crew to film it (with no one reacting), then air it on MTV (with no one objecting), then a bunch of people making phone calls, then the police saying they will "investigate it" (what is there to investigate?), and finally.. maybe.. she might actually get sentenced to sthg (probably nothing or a tiny fraction of what a man would have been sentenced to).. But yeah, the "system" worked.. next time a woman hits me, I'll just call MTV, have them film it, air it, then have some people write … | /r/MensRights | 19/11/10 07:43 PM |
| 4 | Debtor's prison for dadsX-post from r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 18/11/10 02:07 AM |
| 2 | Though the Netherlands is consistently ranked in the top five countries for women, less than 10 percent of women here are employed full-time. Less than 4% wish they had more working hours or increased responsibility in the workplace, and most refuse the opportunity for advancement.I wonder if it has sthg to do with the widespread availability of prostitution (and drugs) in the Netherlands. As we know, prohibition of prostitution significantly changes the gender dynamics.. | /r/MensRights | 17/11/10 01:09 PM |
| 4 | Important Mens Problems Due To FeminismSure, in your dream world.. | /r/MensRights | 17/11/10 01:39 AM |
| 7 | Important Mens Problems Due To FeminismNot true. In the west, every woman has the power to kick a man to the curb ("restraining order"), steal his money, children and future income; and potentially have him incarcerated on bogus "violence" charges. If I follow your own logic, it means that every married man (especially if he has kids) is basically stuck in an abusive relationship: his physical, emotional, financial as well as sexual well-being is in the hands of one woman who has absolute, unilateral power over him, with zero account… | /r/MensRights | 17/11/10 12:51 AM |
| 18 | Government U-turn as men accused of rape will still be named"the Government had caved in to a chorus of protests from women’s groups and Labour MPs." Women's groups, eh? | /r/MensRights | 13/11/10 07:54 PM |
| 0 | Ontario to Begin Impounding Cars of NC Parents in ArrearsX-post from r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 10/11/10 11:10 PM |
| 0 | Arab men aware of the true character of Western women.I don't understand why this post is being downvoted? I guess some just can't handle the truth ;) On a side note, it is interesting how western culture not only completely refuses to apply moral judgment to women, but also blames anyone who does. "You want to kill your baby? You go girl - and anyone who dares tell you that you knew what you were doing when you chose to have sex, is a misogynistic asshole! You want to batter your husband? You go girl - He probably deserved it anyway! You don't fee… | /r/MensRights | 10/11/10 10:33 PM |
| -9 | Why are people on the womans side here? (false rape accuser)It only sounds this way because the article was written by "rape activists", with a political agenda and very little regard to the truth. Notice that the police referred to the incident as "perverting the course of justice" (which means lying and / or fabricating evidence), but the article claims that she was jailed only because she withdrew her complaint (which would be "filing a false police report"), so something doesn't make sense here. You really think the judge would slap her with a 8 mth … | /r/MensRights | 08/11/10 04:23 PM |
| 4 | AUS. laws giving children the right to know the identity of donor parents let to sharp decline in sperm donors.The same will inevitably happen in all western countries. If, as some predict, men will soon have access to a reliable birth control method (I want to see it, before I believe it..), then the birth rate will plummet to levels never seen before, as women will simply have no way to get pregnant. | /r/MensRights | 08/11/10 12:53 AM |
| 51 | CNN front page article: How to raise the men we'd want to marryReally? I wonder when we'll see an article about "how to raise girls into marriageable women".. (especially since women today are anything but marriage material). Also, notice how the advice presented is little more than female-supremacist brainwashing of young boys. | /r/MensRights | 03/11/10 02:36 PM |
| 1 | How NGOs are adopting a missionary position in Asia | spikedCross-posted from r/MaleStudies.. | /r/MensRights | 03/11/10 12:17 PM |
| 6 | How Far Is Too Far?Ugh! Definitely crossed the line, as far as I am concerned. That's why I don't give any personal info on the web :( | /r/MensRights | 01/11/10 02:38 PM |
| -3 | Obama's advice to man about to get married: “Do whatever she tells you to do.”As pathetic as it sounds, our pussy-in-chief is right: once married, a man loses many of his basic rights, and therefore his only available course of action is to do whatever his wife tells him to do.. | /r/MensRights | 29/10/10 06:07 PM |
| 0 | Article Review: The Fate of Empires (on the decline of civilizations and feminism's role)Maybe something like "The Rise and Fall of Civilizations" by Nicholas Hagger? Many authors and historians have touched on the topic, but I am not sure who wrote the most authoritative (and entertaining) book about it.. | /r/MensRights | 27/10/10 05:28 AM |
| 1 | Article Review: The Fate of Empires (on the decline of civilizations and feminism's role)Some skepticism is always healthy.. As far as I can tell there are at least 4 Empires that match this pattern (not sure about the 250 yr timing though): The Roman Empire Ancient Greece The Abassid Dynasty (middle east) Contemporary Western World :) As to what caused the Roman Empire to crumble, you know very well that there is no consensus on the answer, and hundreds theories abound. All we are saying here is that there is a correlation between certain social changes and a collapse of a civiliza… | /r/MensRights | 27/10/10 02:51 AM |
| 0 | Article Review: The Fate of Empires (on the decline of civilizations and feminism's role)Yes, but where does the runaway spending come from? We had several research papers claiming that the size of government increases dramatically in countries where women are granted the vote (I am not placing a moral judgment on women's vote here, by the way..) There are several social changes that generally precede the financial collapse that you are mentioning: liberal sexual customs, destruction of marriage, rise in homosexuality, empowerment of women, lowering of moral standards, corruption, m… | /r/MensRights | 26/10/10 02:12 PM |
| -1 | DV Debate: Futrelle Fulminates, Loses Temper and DebateWhy giving this unknown moron his 15 minutes of fame? | /r/MensRights | 26/10/10 02:09 PM |
| 8 | 8 million more women than men voted in the last presidential election, but CNN asks: "What's pushing women away from voting?"Here are the facts on women's turnout (which has been higher than men's for a long time): http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/fast_facts/voters/turnout.php Women's turnout has been consistently higher than men's for many years, nearly 9 million more women than men voted in the last presidential election, but CNN is publishing a "what-about-the-poor-womenz" article on the front page. Sigh.. Men are just invisible... | /r/MensRights | 25/10/10 04:27 PM |
| 14 | Who is /mensrights?You realize that democracy is barely 200+ years old, and we had slavery 100+ years ago? It took the French revolution (lot of chopped heads!) and a brutal civil war (over 1 million dead or wounded at a time when the US population was 30 million) to obtain those "rights". In comparison, women's "rights" were obtained without a fight, in barely a few years, from.. the men in power. So much for the "paaatriarchy".. If people knew a little more history, they could see how absurd the idea af an "evil… | /r/MensRights | 24/10/10 11:38 PM |
| 1 | 10 steps to get the womens vote-Basically chivalry, not equality.Wow! Female-supremacism at its worst.. | /r/MensRights | 23/10/10 12:18 PM |
| 9 | Newlywed jailed for false rape claimExactly! How about the poor dude whose life got wrecked by this accusation? Instead, we are supposed to worry about the plight of some unknown woman who might hypothetically, maybe, be deterred from coming forward because she read in the papaer that another woman made a false accusation of rape.. yeah sure! what a load of politically correct bull-shit! This reasoning is bigoted, irrational, and built on a totally female-supremacist mindset! It's sad how most people don't even recognize the heart… | /r/MensRights | 20/10/10 03:49 AM |
| 5 | Failing boys and the powder keg of sexual politics - The Globe and MailQuotes from the article: On the rewriting of school books: “If you had a picture of a person doing something positive, winning a race, performing an experiment successfully, etc., [you had to] make sure it was of a girl,” said one of the consultants involved in the revisions. “If you had to have a picture of someone doing a bad thing – bullying, making a mistake, being unsure which course of action to take, etc. – the image was invariably of a boy.” The facts: a hill of data suggests that boys, … | /r/MensRights | 19/10/10 01:28 PM |
| 1 | The truth behind MTV Teen Mom star Amber's violence and abuse...says the dumbfuck who trolls /MR everyday with the same bull-shit.. | /r/MensRights | 18/10/10 03:34 AM |
| 2 | DFS: The Disenfranchised Father SyndromeExcerpts: working with more than 8000 divorced Fathers, and in some cases their second families, through the DA*DI network, I originally outlined what I then called the Defeated Father Syndrome. In listening to their personal experiences and emotional responses to the experience of divorce and the attendant loss of their child or children, these Fathers almost universally shared a symptom cluster that bridged those symptoms associated with both Depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. X-po… | /r/MensRights | 18/10/10 12:47 AM |
| -1 | The truth behind MTV Teen Mom star Amber's violence and abuse.Pathetic excuse. If it was scripted, why was it ok to script DV against men? If it wasn't, why is she not arrested? FWIW: this troll is banned in r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 18/10/10 12:27 AM |
| 0 | Avoid Stroke by Marrying? A Case Study in Misrepresentation of Marriage Findings | Psychology TodayX-post from r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 17/10/10 11:37 PM |
| 1 | What happens when university presidents speak out against proper sexismMaybe the "women's studies" majors should take a class in "gender equality"? | /r/MensRights | 17/10/10 12:41 PM |
| 10 | Thinking about being an anonymous sperm donor? Justice Miriam Gropper: "Trial to identify sperm donor can proceed".Considering the current cultural climate, I wouldn't be surprised if donor anonymity was lifted in the next few years. Donate at your own risk! | /r/MensRights | 16/10/10 05:51 PM |
| 23 | Mensrights: "It was created in opposition to feminism." Why does men's rights have to be in opposition to feminism? What about equal rights for all?There is no such thing as "equality for [insert group here]". You're either for equality or for a special interest group. | /r/MensRights | 16/10/10 01:38 PM |
| -1 | The road ahead of us is just so long...FWIW: I banned this troll in r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 13/10/10 04:53 PM |
| -2 | Mel Gibson Writes Toilet Paper Check to Grigorieva for Child Support"child" support, yeah sure! Gold-digger support, sounds more like it ;) | /r/MensRights | 11/10/10 12:07 AM |
| 1 | I love my GF but fear marriage with a passion, any tips?It's time for a new girlfriend.. life is short! ;) | /r/MensRights | 08/10/10 11:05 PM |
| 2 | Can somebody fix this? Found in Domestic Violence, wikipediaYou're right, you don't understand.. | /r/MensRights | 08/10/10 12:17 AM |
| 13 | Can somebody fix this? Found in Domestic Violence, wikipediaYou will need good citations to change the page (and even then, it's not likely to succeed, because the "admin" for this area of wikipedia is most likely some feminazi bitch - but you can try). Some citations that might help you: On feminist manipulation of statistics: http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/V74-gender-symmetry-with-gramham-Kevan-Method%208-.pdf On feminist hijacking DV for political purposes: try googling Erin Pizzey - she is the woman who founded the first DV shelter in the UK and spent… | /r/MensRights | 07/10/10 01:56 PM |
| 2 | divorce: What to do before the restraining order comes (presented by an attorney in 2004)Wow! This was a sobering read. Jesus! I have never been so relieved not to be married. I can't even imagine what these poor guys must be going through :( I think this advice might explain the Tiger Woods incident: Even if she hits, punches, slaps, scratches, kicks or bites you, do not respond. Just shield yourself with your hands and try to get away [...] or get in the car and drive around the block. | /r/MensRights | 06/10/10 11:26 PM |
| -9 | THOUGHT OF THE DAY: If it is natural for men to be attracted to teenage girls, and it is illegal for men to have sex with teenage girls, then natural male sexuality is criminalized.Whatever.. same thing.. Who gives a shit about the legal technicalities? | /r/MensRights | 06/10/10 01:26 AM |
| 2 | The New Battle of the Sexes: How the (Unintended) Consequences of Feminism Made Both Men and Women Pickier in DatingVery good article that captures many facets of contemporary "dating" (whatever that means). I am reposting it to r/MaleStudies :) | /r/MensRights | 05/10/10 08:05 PM |
| 0 | Another "wage gap" bull-shit article..What this article "forgets" to mention: Women make less than men because they work less and easier jobs, mostly due to child care (source) Women are handsomely compensated for child care thanks to welfare, child support, spousal support, husband's money etc... women make 80% of buying decisions (source) single women have 40% more net worth than single men (source) women live longer but work less than men: social security is effectively a wealth transfer from men to women | /r/MensRights | 05/10/10 12:58 AM |
| 6 | Man gets 10 years, girl gets 12 months.Not sure why this is in /MR? | /r/MensRights | 04/10/10 09:19 PM |
| 2 | This Redditor could use some advice from /r/MensRights. [married his first love, have a child and a house together, she doesn't work... and they are only 21]Not really, he couldn't. He is done. He is in the worst possible scenario and his wife holds him by the balls now. What could we do to help? He can only pray that his wife doesn't rip his balls out through the "family" court system. | /r/MensRights | 01/10/10 03:35 PM |
| 1 | Female college grad's 'fuck list' goes viral -- now imagine if the genders were reversedOr she can keep telling herself that ;) | /r/MensRights | 01/10/10 12:52 PM |
| 0 | Female college grad's 'fuck list' goes viral -- now imagine if the genders were reversedYes, because a man who fucks 200 chicks can have 200 kids with his genetic legacy; a woman who fucks 200 guys can only have herpes, still just one child, and no father to help around, which significantly decreases the child's future prospects. | /r/MensRights | 01/10/10 12:27 PM |
| 34 | When teenage boys write software, its useless to society and also a "sad activity". But look out! A 16 y/o GIRL just wrote some software and apparently it's the first time in the history of the world that anyone this age did anything useful with software! (xpost from programming)Actually there was a comment from someone familiar with the project that said she didn't even program the damn thing. She came up with a relatively bland idea ("let's put all the energy data into a single big speadsheet" - big fucking deal, Einstein!), and some other people did all the work. However, since she is a GIRL, everyone is tripping over each other to praise her - absolutely ridiculous! | /r/MensRights | 01/10/10 12:07 PM |
| 1 | %60 of American wives cheat on their husbandsTrue, but popular culture would have you think it's always men who are cheating. Also: "when a man cheats it is his fault because he is a pig, and when a woman cheats it is the man's fault because he didn't make her happy". Of course, no one ever wonders whether the cheating man was happy.. or whether he was abused by his girlfriend, criticized and nagged constantly, and deprived of sex for months (you know, those same things, that, if a man did them, would make him an abuser..) | /r/MensRights | 01/10/10 03:03 AM |
| -1 | Old men chasing young women : a good thing :-)You don't understand evolution.. Eating sugary foods is not a good thing "evolutionarily" in today's environment. Old men with quality longevity genes banging reproductive-age women, still is. | /r/MensRights | 30/09/10 09:37 PM |
| 0 | Battered women who kill to be main beneficiaries as homicide law changes | Law | guardian.co.ukX-post from /r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 30/09/10 08:10 PM |
| 16 | I'd like some input on this observation of a discrepancy between men and women.Hint: Did you also notice that most hookers are female? ;) | /r/MensRights | 30/09/10 03:28 PM |
| 6 | "Redefining masculinity is key to stopping rape" (Hurl)I wouldn't put every woman or even every feminist in the same bag as this Katrina Fox nut-job. There are plenty of good women and I hear that there are some good feminists (although, let's be fair, the good ones are not in charge of major organizations). But Katrina Fox deserves her own special place in hell ;) | /r/MensRights | 30/09/10 02:08 PM |
| 10 | "Redefining masculinity is key to stopping rape" (Hurl)So when someone commits a crime, everyone else is guilty by virtue of having a Y chromosome. Fuck you, Katrina Fox! If I follow the reasoning of this man-hating feminazi idiot, we could also have: "Redefining feminity is key to stopping gold diggers, and false domestic violence claims" | /r/MensRights | 30/09/10 01:53 PM |
| 0 | Interesting article on "Are divorce laws unfair to men?"Ah Ok. I read the article when it had no comments, and didn't have the writing style in my head any more when comments appeared... BTW: The article is an SEO job to plant the link at the bottom ;) | /r/MensRights | 29/09/10 06:06 PM |
| -1 | Interesting article on "Are divorce laws unfair to men?"What redditors? You're the only one commenting so far.. | /r/MensRights | 29/09/10 05:38 PM |
| 4 | Is there a marriage industry?As someone who has travelled far away and lived in half a dozen countries, let me tell you this: in those countries where marriage laws are not stacked up against men, women do not want to marry! Yes, you read it right. For example: Germany, France, Italy have women who are just as entitled and fucked as american women, but they do not care about marriage. As a matter of fact, it is often the man who proposes and the woman who refuses saying it is just a "piece of paper" and that "she is not her… | /r/MensRights | 29/09/10 02:27 PM |
| 3 | Pornography : Why feminists really hate itWow! Sounds like I touched a nerve here ;) | /r/MensRights | 29/09/10 03:13 AM |
| 5 | Women are underrepresented in management, paid less - just another misleading article on wage gapThis article plays straight into the feminist-manufactured victimology discourse on the "work gap" (I prefer to use the term "work gap" rather than "wage gap"): we have a misleading title, victimology keywords ("glass ceiling"), the concerned politician making idiotic statements ("an economic security issue for families" - really? how is a woman's own choice to have kids, a security issue?), idiotic economic theories ("lack of profits" - yeah sure!) and of course the legislative remedy that ensh… | /r/MensRights | 28/09/10 09:36 PM |
| 1 | Living in a car after false DV chargesHaha! The feminazi scum just can't play fair, can they? Always lying, always scheming, always manipulating and playing the victim.. It's funny how her attitude (I doubt it's a "he") reflects the feminist movement's usual tactics: smoke, mirrors, bull-shit and lies, cheating, bullying and intimidation. | /r/MensRights | 28/09/10 02:16 PM |
| 35 | This was floating around in Facebook tonight...You can switch the genders and re-circulate your own version. It would be interesting to see how many "likes" it gathers compared to the original version: as an informal study of gender bias amongst your friends. | /r/MensRights | 28/09/10 01:51 PM |
| 1 | Living in a car after false DV chargesFWIW: I banned this troll in r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 28/09/10 01:05 PM |
| 8 | Pornography : Why feminists really hate itThey are jealous and angry at men for looking at chick hotter than them ;) | /r/MensRights | 28/09/10 12:14 PM |
| 4 | Who's oppressing who?X-post from r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 27/09/10 07:25 PM |
| 1 | I'd like your thoughts on this--the lack of women in family films. Less than 1/3 being female is a problem, sure, but at least there is one arena where men and boys are still being portrayed positively?Yes, and Toy Story was bout toys /s | /r/MensRights | 27/09/10 06:24 PM |
| 2 | I'd like your thoughts on this--the lack of women in family films. Less than 1/3 being female is a problem, sure, but at least there is one arena where men and boys are still being portrayed positively?Actually, there have been quite a few recent animated movies that portray females as good, strong blah bah and males as bumbling idiots (in line with the rest of our mainstream culture, I guess): Wall-e comes to mind.. but I am sure there are others based on the trailers I have seen recently. Also, as have been noticed on this sub-reddit, children books and films tend to be very sexist towards men and boys these days.. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/10 02:56 PM |
| 1 | Essay: Why I’m passionate about Men’s Rights, and why MensRights isn’t helpingYes, I realized he was another troll, after the second comment.. It would be interesting to find out where these morons are coming from; my theory is that there is an organized effort against this sub-reddit, because as you noticed, they all used the same "talking points". Also, I noticed many changes in trolling strategies over last year, and it seems that at any point, hundreds of (sometimes fake) accounts are trolling, most of them using whatever the current strategy is.. It definitely looks … | /r/MensRights | 25/09/10 10:18 PM |
| 2 | Essay: Why I’m passionate about Men’s Rights, and why MensRights isn’t helpingYou sound more like a feminist apologist and just another feminist concern troll.. You deny the facts because you 'don't trust' them (funny, how you wouldn't be bothered to double check those facts then, which would be the logical thing to do if you really cared), but somehow we are supposed to trust your meaningless, anonymous anecdotes.. | /r/MensRights | 25/09/10 07:50 PM |
| 6 | Essay: Why I’m passionate about Men’s Rights, and why MensRights isn’t helpingTrust me, I have been interested in men's rights for a while, and I can assure you that feminist organizations are absolutely positively responsible for blocking a whole range of legislation that would restore some sanity into the family court system, the domestic violence apparatus, rape prosecutions and many other areas. If you don't know this, you are indeed ignorant and a useful idiot of a movement that works against you. Women today have more rights than men in every aspect of life: reprodu… | /r/MensRights | 25/09/10 04:24 PM |
| 7 | Essay: Why I’m passionate about Men’s Rights, and why MensRights isn’t helpingAs this forum (/MR) has been gaining traction, it has become a focus for feminists to infiltrate and destroy. It is constantly invaded by feminists concern trolls, tons of fake accounts, and the occasional feminist dude useful idiot (that means you: brumbob). Every time, shared parenting legislation was introduced, it was blocked by feminists (never mind that the majority of women overwhelmingly support shared parenting; on whose names are those feminist organizations speaking?). Anonymity for r… | /r/MensRights | 25/09/10 03:58 PM |
| 2 | Why the New Macho Is Good for WomenMeh.. stupid article that doesn't get at all into the real issues of today; but let's face it: it's not like it was trying to; as with many articles in the mainstream media, it only cares about the well-being of men to the extent that is useful to females. | /r/MensRights | 23/09/10 07:53 PM |
| 3 | Feminist lobbies cheer the upcoming “paycheck fairness” bill despite the mountains of research showing that the mythical "wage gap" is in fact a "choice gap".Same thing happened to a divorced guy I know: he was primary caretaker of 4 kids from birth to college, and when his wife filed for divorce she got full custody of the one boy who was still not an adult. | /r/MensRights | 22/09/10 11:51 PM |
| 2 | Men's Rights traffic stats: >12500 subscribers, 400-800 unique readers each day, the word is out!Woohoo! Nice to see that the word is getting out :) [ Party here! ] | /r/MensRights | 22/09/10 07:40 PM |
| 1 | The case against marriageI think this blog post nicely describes the evolution of what we call marriage (and the social implications): http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2008/02/questionators-should-women-have-right.html | /r/MensRights | 22/09/10 03:58 PM |
| 4 | The case against marriageI agree with the premise (of course), but man was that poorly written! No wonder the printed press is going the way of the dinosaurs.. It is interesting how the inhumane family court system is so rarely mentioned in any mainstream article about marriage. | /r/MensRights | 22/09/10 01:57 PM |
| 13 | Married last week... I was troll faced last night. Now what?If you move quickly, you can get an annulment; consult your lawyer! (a similar thing happened to someone I know (who shall remain nameless..), he got an annulment based on the fact the union was never consumed - his bride was fucking her ex on the wedding night, true story, I guess it can always be worse than your case :) | /r/MensRights | 21/09/10 11:09 PM |
| 3 | Criminalizing America's fathers? - Washington TimesExactly! That was the point of the "welfare reform" of the 80's: to move the dead-beat moms from state welfare, to "single payer welfare" paid by ex-hubby-future-slave. | /r/MensRights | 21/09/10 06:10 PM |
| 5 | Popular culture's war on menX-post from r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 21/09/10 02:08 PM |
| 1 | Husbands the losers in divorce casesBullshit. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/10 08:46 PM |
| 17 | Husbands the losers in divorce casesDon't be so tough on your fellow men: many young men today are raised by single moms, have never seen a male teacher, have been brainwashed by feminist propaganda in school and the media and have never heard any other view. How is the truth about marriage, divorce and feminism going to get to them.. before it's too late? That's why it is so important that we organize men's rights groups on college campuses! | /r/MensRights | 20/09/10 06:58 PM |
| -4 | If a child is put up for adoption, neither parent has to pay child support. Yet if a woman decides to keep a baby, the man MUST pay? Someone please explain how this makes sense.clamb: redditor for 16 days.. | /r/MensRights | 19/09/10 01:42 PM |
| 3 | If a child is put up for adoption, neither parent has to pay child support. Yet if a woman decides to keep a baby, the man MUST pay? Someone please explain how this makes sense.Ok. I am banning this idiot in r/MaleStudies Reasons for ban: Dishonest debating tactics: claiming the opposite of what a citation says, repeated blatant bull-shitting Possible fake account (Rupp: redditor for 21 days) | /r/MensRights | 18/09/10 10:40 PM |
| 3 | If a child is put up for adoption, neither parent has to pay child support. Yet if a woman decides to keep a baby, the man MUST pay? Someone please explain how this makes sense.No, you need to take a reading comprehension class. | /r/MensRights | 18/09/10 10:29 PM |
| 2 | If a child is put up for adoption, neither parent has to pay child support. Yet if a woman decides to keep a baby, the man MUST pay? Someone please explain how this makes sense.No there isn't, you always pay child support, unless the kid gets adopted. | /r/MensRights | 18/09/10 10:18 PM |
| 7 | If a child is put up for adoption, neither parent has to pay child support. Yet if a woman decides to keep a baby, the man MUST pay? Someone please explain how this makes sense.Because that's the line that's fucking relevant to this discussion, moron! | /r/MensRights | 18/09/10 10:12 PM |
| 3 | If a child is put up for adoption, neither parent has to pay child support. Yet if a woman decides to keep a baby, the man MUST pay? Someone please explain how this makes sense.You should read your own links because they contradict your statements. Quote: [The judge] can still require the father to pay child support until the child reaches adulthood. This results in the father still being financially responsible for the child without having any visitation rights or say in how the child is raised | /r/MensRights | 18/09/10 10:10 PM |
| 9 | If a child is put up for adoption, neither parent has to pay child support. Yet if a woman decides to keep a baby, the man MUST pay? Someone please explain how this makes sense.Do you understand English or not? If you are a divorced millionnaire, you can make a motion to surrender your parental rights, the court can also take your parental rights away (if you have been abusing your kids for example). In either case, you still pay child support! If you could get out of paying child support by surrendering your parental rights, I bet that plenty of divorced men would do exactly that, especially since the majority of them have no real parental rights anyway, in practice. | /r/MensRights | 18/09/10 10:05 PM |
| 10 | If a child is put up for adoption, neither parent has to pay child support. Yet if a woman decides to keep a baby, the man MUST pay? Someone please explain how this makes sense.Divorces millionnaires pay child support, regardless of whether they have parental rights or not. Their parental rights can be cancelled (either by themselves or by the court) and it won't impact child support. So your point doesn't make any sense (your previous point made no sense either). You sound like another apologist for female privilege using logical contorsions to justify a blatant double-standard. | /r/MensRights | 18/09/10 10:03 PM |
| 4 | If a child is put up for adoption, neither parent has to pay child support. Yet if a woman decides to keep a baby, the man MUST pay? Someone please explain how this makes sense.Yeah, so? | /r/MensRights | 18/09/10 09:58 PM |
| 9 | If a child is put up for adoption, neither parent has to pay child support. Yet if a woman decides to keep a baby, the man MUST pay? Someone please explain how this makes sense.By this reasoning, men shouldn't pay child support if the woman is wealthy, and millionnaires shouldn't pay ridiculous amounts in "child support" either. And yet, in both cases, they do! | /r/MensRights | 18/09/10 09:48 PM |
| 22 | If a child is put up for adoption, neither parent has to pay child support. Yet if a woman decides to keep a baby, the man MUST pay? Someone please explain how this makes sense.Yes, women pay child support sometimes (although it's very rare, and their CS is often lower than men's, and they don't get aggressively jailed if they default - and they do default at a higher rate than men). But the question stands: why do women who give their babies for adoption, never have to pay child support to the adoptive family? It makes no sense at all! I can't think of any rational explanation for this double-standard! I think it is just one of those rules where it becomes clear that … | /r/MensRights | 18/09/10 09:46 PM |
| 4 | Gang Rape, or drunken regret once it got out?Exactly, we can't judge here. The facts seem to point to possible consensual group sex, considering that many local people saw the video, knew the girl, and believe that the sex was consensual (as pointed in the article). | /r/MensRights | 18/09/10 01:56 PM |
| 4 | This is what a mangina looks likeBwa ha ha! :) All jokes aside, these pussy-whipped morons will be the one arresting you for "domestic violence" when your wife wants to "cash-out" from her marriage. | /r/MensRights | 18/09/10 01:49 PM |
| 5 | Entrepreneur Says "I Do" to Divorce Insurancehehe! I didn't think about that, but yes that's a very good point! Any excuse is good to take a man's money these days.. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/10 11:12 PM |
| 4 | Entrepreneur Says "I Do" to Divorce InsuranceInteresting concept; however, the policy premiums come out way too expensive, which is the mathematical proof that marriage is a bad decision for men :) $16 / mth buys $1,250 in coverage. So, if you are a middle class man and have to pay child support + misc costs at $1,500 / mth (fairly standard and 4x times the real cost of the kid, by the way) for 20 years = $360,000. The insurance policy premium to insure that amount would be: $4,608 / month lol :) And I didn't even count lawyer costs, alimo… | /r/MensRights | 17/09/10 07:38 PM |
| 3 | Sexual Partner Divorce RiskQuite a fascinating study! Apparently, the risk of divorce is: 20% if the woman is virgin 46% if the woman had 1 sexual partner before marriage 70% if the woman had 5 partners I bet the findings of this study won't be on the front page of CNN anytime soon, as they go against our politically-correct "slut culture" ;) X-post from r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 16/09/10 06:17 PM |
| 11 | An anonymous survey of more than 10,000 teenage girls and young women reveals shocking statistics: STDs, drugs and unprotected sex are running rampant.Don't you remember your high school days? :) You can look up the stats on the percentage of people having kids: I think it's 80% for women and only 40% for men. Scientists found that the Y chromosome is the fastest evolving human DNA, because the evolutionary pressure is much higher on men. I don't mean to get cocky :) but men have on average 4 more IQ points than women (and at the "genius" IQ level, men outnumber women ten to one), are less emotional (i.e. can control their animal instincts bet… | /r/MensRights | 16/09/10 03:10 PM |
| 13 | An anonymous survey of more than 10,000 teenage girls and young women reveals shocking statistics: STDs, drugs and unprotected sex are running rampant.If STDs and unprotected sex are running rampant among young girls, it means they're running rampant among young men, as well No, because ~90% of girls are having sex with ~10% of guys. That's why the infection rate is higher in females. | /r/MensRights | 16/09/10 02:04 PM |
| 5 | So whats a "real man" anyways?I have noticed that many times when I hear "man-up", someone is trying to get a man to do something that will hurt him, but benefit the person who said "man-up"... It's definitely used as a form of manipulation in my experience! | /r/MensRights | 15/09/10 09:41 PM |
| 4 | Could anyone help me find some divorce statistics?Arguing with your "friend" about divorce statistics is the dumbest thing to do; some things are better left unsaid (it's like comparing penis sizes of her previous boyfriends :) My advice (for next time) on how to handle the marriage / kids topic is to say: "I am too selfish for that!". Say it in an assertive tone: no follow-up, no explanation, no nothing. For me, it worked every time with at least a dozen different girls. It will shut her up instantly.. at most , she will mumble something like … | /r/MensRights | 15/09/10 01:31 PM |
| 0 | From the Publisher of MenZ MagazineMaybe so, but what have you done for men's rights? | /r/MensRights | 14/09/10 05:35 PM |
| 1 | From the Publisher of MenZ MagazineGood work! I wonder if there is a way to print it and distribute it on college campuses? | /r/MensRights | 14/09/10 03:16 PM |
| 4 | I have refused to get married, cohabit, and have kids with western women. Here is what I have found.I am doing the same thing right now.. it's possible to achieve if you are smart and focused! | /r/MensRights | 14/09/10 11:55 AM |
| 8 | I have refused to get married, cohabit, and have kids with western women. Here is what I have found."I wanted a new bike, so I prayed to God. Later I realized, that's not how the Universe works, so I stole the bike and asked God for forgiveness!" :) George Carlin (my own re-phrasing, I don't remember his exact words) | /r/MensRights | 14/09/10 11:52 AM |
| 1 | My view on marriage has shifted. Not sure I believe marriage is relevant anymore.You can cheat while still being a good father to your kids, but you know the risks: if your wife finds out, she might divorce you and get a very favorable outcome if you are not careful, you might father kids with another woman (please don't do that: think about how fucked up their life would be) you might fall in love with another woman, and then what? | /r/MensRights | 14/09/10 04:29 AM |
| 11 | My view on marriage has shifted. Not sure I believe marriage is relevant anymore.Of course, marriage today is irrelevant, but in your case there is no reason to divorce because: you will horribly hurt your children (look up the stats on kids of divorce) you might hurt yourself by way of the family court system You have to do the best considering the situation you are in: enjoy the time with your kids and your family. If you don't love your wife, divorce will be an option after your kids are grown up, and if your wife works (otherwise, say hello to lifetime alimony)... As som… | /r/MensRights | 14/09/10 03:57 AM |
| 3 | Need some help, I dodged the marriage bullet, but worried that I may have thrown my happiness away.What are you smoking? | /r/MensRights | 13/09/10 11:40 PM |
| 3 | Need some help, I dodged the marriage bullet, but worried that I may have thrown my happiness away."stay at home wife" | /r/MensRights | 13/09/10 08:59 PM |
| 4 | Need some help, I dodged the marriage bullet, but worried that I may have thrown my happiness away.Not sure how that makes sense, because it depends on your personal situation, right? If you get divorced while you had kids and a SAHW, you have a 100% chance of getting screwed If you get divorced with no kids, no income, and no shared property, you have 0% chance of getting screwed | /r/MensRights | 13/09/10 08:00 PM |
| 5 | Need some help, I dodged the marriage bullet, but worried that I may have thrown my happiness away.Both the 5 mil and the 52 mil figures are shaky estimates. Why using such a convoluted way to compute something that we already now: the divorce rate? | /r/MensRights | 13/09/10 07:24 PM |
| 5 | Need some help, I dodged the marriage bullet, but worried that I may have thrown my happiness away.You are obviously very angry When everything fails, use the good ol' shaming tactic.. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/10 05:37 PM |
| 8 | Need some help, I dodged the marriage bullet, but worried that I may have thrown my happiness away.Dude, I don't understand your math at all: how did you get the 10% figure? | /r/MensRights | 13/09/10 05:34 PM |
| 6 | Need some help, I dodged the marriage bullet, but worried that I may have thrown my happiness away.Mandatory arrest means: even if there is zero evidence, the police MUST arrest someone (hmmm... who will that be?) before they leave the scene. This means that a man will be taken to county jail. The next morning the judge will enter a temporary no-contact order, regardless of anything that the woman could say (it's another mandatory policy that the judge must follow). The hearing to remove the mandatory no-contact order is usually set a month later. During this month, the man will not be allowe… | /r/MensRights | 13/09/10 05:11 PM |
| 6 | Need some help, I dodged the marriage bullet, but worried that I may have thrown my happiness away.I don't think that DV justifies taking someone to the cleaners. Especially, considering that it is so easy to stage. Not sure where you live, but the majority of states have "mandatory arrest policies" which mean a man always gets arrested, if his wife/gf picks up the phone and dials 911, regardless of evidence. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/10 04:52 PM |
| 3 | Need some help, I dodged the marriage bullet, but worried that I may have thrown my happiness away.It can be a good decision if your wife is loaded ;) It worked pretty well for Jesus (Madonna's boy toy).. :) | /r/MensRights | 13/09/10 04:27 PM |
| 10 | Need some help, I dodged the marriage bullet, but worried that I may have thrown my happiness away.Not really. There are a lot more reasons why a prenup could be thrown away, this explains why prenup drafting is incredibly difficult and expensive (in lawyer fees). Also, they are constantly adding new reasons to invalidate prenups (they work retroactively of course), your prenup may be ok when you get married, but not ok anymore when you get divorced. Finally, prenups can't affect anything related to kids or child support (those are the biggest ways men get shafted in divorce). Also, prenups c… | /r/MensRights | 13/09/10 04:16 PM |
| 8 | Need some help, I dodged the marriage bullet, but worried that I may have thrown my happiness away.You are married, so you are trying to rationalize your decision, I can understand that. Here are the risks of marriage for a young man with a successful career or business: risk of being evicted from one's home and ruined (and if very unlucky: thrown in jail) risk of losing your kids (if any) risk of being trapped in an abusive relationship that is too expensive to get out of (I know many guys in this situation) risk of the laws being changed in the future in a way that is even more vicious to m… | /r/MensRights | 13/09/10 03:40 PM |
| 11 | Need some help, I dodged the marriage bullet, but worried that I may have thrown my happiness away.Newsflash: men don't need marriage to be happy (and if I were to look at my married pals, I'd say that they seem more depressed and broken) | /r/MensRights | 13/09/10 03:12 PM |
| 10 | Need some help, I dodged the marriage bullet, but worried that I may have thrown my happiness away.Why would you take a risk that provides zero benefit to you? I can have a better lifestyle by being a bachelor, dating or even cohabiting? Why would I risk my financial future by signing a "marriage contract"? Will it make me happier? Will it change my relationship in a way that was not possible to change without it? | /r/MensRights | 13/09/10 03:06 PM |
| 8 | Need some help, I dodged the marriage bullet, but worried that I may have thrown my happiness away.This has been happening all over the Western world for years, nothing new here. Most men who decide that marriage makes no sense for them, have never even heard of "men's rights" or "marriage strike". Most of my yuppie friends fit the profile and yet they don't even know what MRA means.. The marriage rate is falling off a cliff in every industrialized country (and the downward slope is even accelerating in the US). Kids born today in the US, have only a 10% chance of ever getting married (discla… | /r/MensRights | 13/09/10 02:58 PM |
| 8 | Need some help, I dodged the marriage bullet, but worried that I may have thrown my happiness away.Dude, if I was 6'6 I would be running my own fucking harem :) Seriously, this girl has totally crushed your spirit and your potential.. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/10 01:25 PM |
| 5 | Need some help, I dodged the marriage bullet, but worried that I may have thrown my happiness away.Maybe you are not giving yourself credit.. Are you tall? Trust me, that's all that matters these days, if you are 6ft tall, just lose some weight (don't be fat), put some decent clothes, learn some pick-up techniques and you can have any single woman you want. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/10 01:15 PM |
| 7 | Need some help, I dodged the marriage bullet, but worried that I may have thrown my happiness away.Been there, done that! The only thing that will make you feel better: time.. and new girlfriends! ;) On a side note: if she can't understand your point of view, and is breaking up over a stupid marriage contract, she is not relationship material anyway; but you know that already.. You already understand your choices: you can get married and be a miserable door-mat, like your friends or you don't, and live the life of a serial womanizer (like most unmarried men these days) | /r/MensRights | 13/09/10 12:53 PM |
| 5 | A Lack of Rights for Men- A Mother Fights BackShe is the one who has all the reproductive rights: she can decide to keep the baby or not, she can decide to give the baby away for adoption or not. With rights, come responsibilities (well, unless you're a woman of course).. | /r/MensRights | 11/09/10 07:18 PM |
| 11 | A Lack of Rights for Men- A Mother Fights BackThe practical solution here is to have some kind of contract, that would work like this: girl gets pregnant, must notify guy ASAP if she wants financial support guy may (or may not) sign an "intent of parenthood" contract and take financial responsibility, hopefully before as many witnesses as possible, so he can't claim that his signature was faked if guy signed the contract, he is a Dad; if he didn't, she is a single Mom and he doesn't owe her anything (she can still abort or give the baby for… | /r/MensRights | 11/09/10 12:55 PM |
| -3 | Mainstream Feminism is not an innocent bystanderAnd I am Santa Claus from the North Pole... Seriously, maybe you are who you say you are, but considering all the feminazi scum constantly creating fake accounts and spamming this forum (with the same kind of obnoxious bull-shit as you), we have to take action. If you are not happy with it, go fuck yourself! | /r/MensRights | 09/09/10 08:59 PM |
| 0 | Mainstream Feminism is not an innocent bystanderCan you stop asking the same question (that has been answered by Factory2 and others) over and over again? Also, can you and all your fake accounts return to wherever you came from? | /r/MensRights | 09/09/10 08:55 PM |
| 0 | Mainstream Feminism is not an innocent bystanderYou have to draw the line somewhere. When I believe that a user is a troll, I ban. I would be more forgiving if the trolling problem was not so acute in /MR, but unfortunately it so bad that anti-MR comments are often upvoted to the top of the comment section. This is the reason why r/MaleStudies was created recently: to lock the trolls out (and also moderate the stupid posts that get sometimes submitted by MRA's that are a little too "passionnate"). | /r/MensRights | 09/09/10 07:52 PM |
| 0 | Mainstream Feminism is not an innocent bystanderConsidering that the #1 comment here is an idiotic pro-feminist comment that makes no sense whatsoever, and considering that Factory2 below pointed it out, and got downvotted pretty badly (-3); I think it's pretty clear what is going on. Also, it is easy to see how many fake accounts the feminazis have created to troll us: just look at all the pro-feminist comments that make little or no sense and that come from accounts that are only a few days old. | /r/MensRights | 09/09/10 07:38 PM |
| -3 | Mainstream Feminism is not an innocent bystanderAnother fake account of a feminist troll (Mercuryblade18: karma 1, redditor for 15 days). I banned it in /r/MaleStudies Reasons for banning: Concern trolling ("does nothing to further the cause of father's rights advocates") Ad-hominem attacks ("website [..] looks like..") using a fake account Illogical and absurd statement ("I hate the usage of quotes to somehow portray a entire movement") - considering that many of those people are influential writers, leaders and heads of major political orga… | /r/MensRights | 09/09/10 06:15 PM |
| 2 | Mainstream Feminism is not an innocent bystanderFake account of a feminist troll (FordSVT1: karma 1 redditor for 3 days). I banned it in r/MaleStudies Reason for banning: blatant lying: many of the feminists making these sexist statements are as mainstream as it goes, they have positions of power and influence, and are not perceived as "radicals" using fake accounts, to game to voting system in /MR (see Factory2's ridiculously downvoted comment below..) | /r/MensRights | 09/09/10 06:07 PM |
| 7 | All men should NOT MarryYou don't seem to know much about radical feminists from the 60's.. These people were claiming that all sex was rape (we don't), that women should never live with men (we don't), that all women should become lesbians (we don't tell men to become gay), that all women should work and never be a housewife. We only tell men to not sign a marriage contract, because the contract is not fair to them. We don't tell them who to sleep with, who to live with, where to work, and what kind of relationships m… | /r/MensRights | 08/09/10 09:40 PM |
| 4 | All men should NOT Marryyou don't marry anyone who isn't worth that much to you What do you mean by that? | /r/MensRights | 08/09/10 09:35 PM |
| 11 | All men should NOT Marrythe biggest benefit is our commitment to each other Do you have a cleanex? You nearly made me cry right there :) Seriously now, aside from the wishy-washy emo stuff (which means nothing in real life), most of the benefits you pointed out are some minor financial savings. I heard it before, and it always amazes me how people are penny-smart, but pound.. well not-so-smart. Think about it this way: if the insurance companies were selling "divorce protection" to married guys, to save them from the f… | /r/MensRights | 08/09/10 09:16 PM |
| 13 | All men should NOT MarryYou don't need a marriage license for any of that. At best (in your case, so far..) it is useless, you are living the same lifestyle as you would have lived without a marriage contract. Marriage is useless while everything goes well, but you will be cursing yourself for having signed it, when the shit hits the fan.. | /r/MensRights | 08/09/10 08:27 PM |
| 13 | All men should NOT Marry"All men should not marry" is not the same as "all women should live only amongst themselves", "all women should be lesbians", "all women should never have sex with any men", "all women should never be housewives" and "all women should have a career". | /r/MensRights | 08/09/10 08:19 PM |
| 8 | All men should NOT MarryYour comparison is weak (but not surprising coming from a feminist concern troll - don't you and your girlfriends / fake accounts have anything better to do than troll /MR all day long?): radical feminists typically advocate a lesbian lifestyle, zero sex with men (which they view as rape), and have a visceral hatred of housewives all we are saying here is that marriage is a contract that is not worth signing for men today, because the legal liabilities can easily destroy a man's life, and the ab… | /r/MensRights | 08/09/10 08:07 PM |
| 11 | All men should NOT MarryBeing anti-marriage is not the same as being anti-women, or anti-love. I don't need to sign a retarded contract, and invite the state into my relationships.. | /r/MensRights | 08/09/10 07:35 PM |
| 4 | All men should NOT MarryI am glad you aren't using a straw-man argument.. | /r/MensRights | 08/09/10 07:24 PM |
| 3 | /r/violenceagainstwomen is up and run by me.Dude, WTF? | /r/MensRights | 08/09/10 01:26 PM |
| 9 | Has anyone heard this set of rape statistics?It's obviously bull-shit, and borders on anti-male hate-speech. Probably, like in the "1 in 4" hoax, the "feminist researchers" used some ridiculous definition for "rape" that can easily be applied to any sex act and they applied it to men only (conveniently forgetting to mention that according to the same ridiculous definition, most women would be rapists too). Seriously, I have never heard any guy say that a woman is asking to be raped, so I would be curious to see this man-hating clown's meth… | /r/MensRights | 07/09/10 09:21 PM |
| 6 | Feminists pushing for UN global ban on prostitutionActually, yes we know: pretty much none! Citations: http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/2850/ and http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/oct/20/trafficking-numbers-women-exaggerated and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtaEdI3aiwg [video - BBC] | /r/MensRights | 07/09/10 06:24 PM |
| 1 | Time Magazine: Young Women Outearning Young Men, and That's a Good ThingX-post from r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 06/09/10 07:42 PM |
| 12 | Tens of millions of 'missing' girls - but not one word about "missing" boys... | CNN.com (front page article)WTF? A majority with 4%, seriously? :) | /r/MensRights | 06/09/10 03:19 PM |
| 14 | Tens of millions of 'missing' girls - but not one word about "missing" boys... | CNN.com (front page article)Considering that the problem of gender selection in the US favors girls to boys, by a factor of 2 to 1 (as was celebrated in the mainstream media, with this recent misandrist article), and that the US education system has been engineered to favor girls over boys, with boys now lagging girls significantly in all disciplines, you would think that this feminist cheerleader would use her tremendous influence and access to CNN, to help all children who are discriminated on the basis of gender. Well..… | /r/MensRights | 06/09/10 02:29 PM |
| 15 | IAmA Guy that has a father that is on the run because my mom wants $13,000 a month, AMAAlso, what is the rationale of giving his money to the ex? The kids? They don't need $10,000/mth! The wife? What the hell did she do to deserve it? It's theft, pure and simple. | /r/MensRights | 06/09/10 01:43 AM |
| 23 | IAmA Guy that has a father that is on the run because my mom wants $13,000 a month, AMAI have heard several stories of famous basketball players and entertainers ruined in the exact same way (the judge kept telling them to make millions, even though their career was ended) The problem is not the woman, it is the kangaroo courts. | /r/MensRights | 06/09/10 12:46 AM |
| 4 | Why Do Divorce Laws Marginalize Men? - AskMen.comThanks for sharing your experience! | /r/MensRights | 05/09/10 10:09 PM |
| 5 | Why Do Divorce Laws Marginalize Men? - AskMen.comPrenups aren't very useful, unfortunately. Most of the liability is in the child support area, which cannot be affected by prenups. Also, prenups can be summarily tossed away.. | /r/MensRights | 05/09/10 07:36 PM |
| 6 | Why Do Divorce Laws Marginalize Men? - AskMen.comMaybe you could post your experiences working in the family court system in /MR? I am sure, many would be interested in reading that! | /r/MensRights | 05/09/10 07:34 PM |
| 8 | New study blasts theory that women do more work | ReutersAnother feminist claim found to be a lie... Will it ever end? Once again, the media was complicit in spreading easily debunked propaganda (the idea of the so-called "double-shift"). Apparently, no MSM journalist felt like asking the "tough" questions like: how about paid work, who does more of that? Did you try adding paid work hours + housework hours, to see what the total is? X-post from /r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 05/09/10 03:10 PM |
| 11 | Why Do Divorce Laws Marginalize Men? - AskMen.comIt's good to see a recognition of such an important issue in a mainstream men's publication. It always surprises me how men's magazines generally avoid the topic - if there is one place it should be discussed, it's there! X-post from /r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 05/09/10 01:52 PM |
| 3 | Is it worthwhile to attempt to correct misconceptions about MRAs, or is it just a waste of energy?Yes, absolutely, but choose your battles: I wouldn't waste too much time on a stupid blog, because: it has no influence (too few readers) political battles are won in the middle, don't expect to win over feminazi scum (that would be a waste of time!) | /r/MensRights | 02/09/10 12:12 AM |
| 5 | Who Owes the Child Support Debt? - U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesQuote (emphasis mine): The best way to reduce the total national child support debt is to avoid accumulating arrears in the first place. The best ways to avoid the accumulation of arrears are to set appropriate orders initially, modify orders via simple procedures promptly when family circumstances change, and immediately intervene when current support is not paid. Parents should share in the cost of supporting their children according to their ability. Designing a system that establishes approp… | /r/MensRights | 01/09/10 05:31 PM |
| -1 | I broke my marriage and divorce is imminent. What are my next steps?Stay at hom wife + baby = you're fucked, buddy! If she divorces you, you'll get hit with the full combination of alimony + child support + division of assets and pensions + restraining order (= instant eviction order). You'll be broke or homeless, regardless of how much you make. On top of that, her having electronic proof of your cheating intentions, will make the judge even more vicious against you. Sorry, dude, if you get divorced, you'll be the poster-case of why men shouldn't marry or have … | /r/MensRights | 30/08/10 08:29 PM |
| 2 | 'Why should I care about males being raped in prison?'Yes, they do it all the time; that's why the media is so slanted against us. | /r/MensRights | 30/08/10 07:59 PM |
| 1 | 'Why should I care about males being raped in prison?'Yes, and I have the right to criticize Wordpress publicly and refuse to do business with them, and let them know about it. | /r/MensRights | 30/08/10 06:57 PM |
| 5 | 'Why should I care about males being raped in prison?'It's ok, I don't condone rape. Also, if this scum is free to publish, then I am also free to boycott Wordpress. | /r/MensRights | 30/08/10 06:51 PM |
| 2 | 'Why should I care about males being raped in prison?'It's also my freedom not to do business with Wordpress, and let them know about it. | /r/MensRights | 30/08/10 06:38 PM |
| 1 | 'Why should I care about males being raped in prison?'It's also my freedom not to do business with Wordpress, and let them know about it. | /r/MensRights | 30/08/10 06:37 PM |
| 3 | 'Why should I care about males being raped in prison?'Yes, we have free speech, but Wordpress is a corporation that I can choose not to do business with, because it associates itself with sexist bigots. I can let them know about it, and let my friends know about the unsavory content that this business promotes. | /r/MensRights | 30/08/10 06:35 PM |
| 52 | 'Why should I care about males being raped in prison?'This is hate speech pure and simple. It is hosted at wordpress, so it should be possible to have it taken down, if enough people use their contact form: http://en.support.wordpress.com/contact/ (I have no doubt that if the genders were reversed, this blog would have already been taken down) | /r/MensRights | 30/08/10 02:02 PM |
| 2 | I just saw an episode of House (Act Your Age) and...Thanks, I am reposting this in r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 30/08/10 12:56 AM |
| 7 | Man spends 26 months in jail awaiting trial. Case is dropped after Crown reveals the "victim" used the same sexual-assault story on two other men.Yes, they even have the nerve to bitch about "cuts" in the compensation - which is around $20,000: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7555299.stm | /r/MensRights | 30/08/10 12:54 AM |
| 6 | I just saw an episode of House (Act Your Age) and...Actually, an unrelated male (i.e. step-father) is 50 times more likely to hit on the daughter, than the biological father: it seems that nature has it all figured out (not surprising really!). (If anyone has the citation for this, please share (I saw it but didn't bookmark.. grr.)! I'll add it to the list!) | /r/MensRights | 30/08/10 12:14 AM |
| 8 | Man spends 26 months in jail awaiting trial. Case is dropped after Crown reveals the "victim" used the same sexual-assault story on two other men.In the UK, women receive several thousands dollars in "compensation" regardless of circumstances or trial outcome (as expected: there were several stories about women trying to cash in on the compensation, by crying rape multiple times). I wonder if the guy who lost two years of his life, his sanity, his job, his family and his reputation will get "compensated"? | /r/MensRights | 29/08/10 05:47 PM |
| 2 | Women's Testimony on Wikileaks/Julian Assange "rape"... broken condomThat too, but If you make a false police report, you should be prosecuted, regardless of stupidity - it's not an excuse! | /r/MensRights | 29/08/10 02:50 PM |
| 9 | Women's Testimony on Wikileaks/Julian Assange "rape"... broken condomThese women should be prosecuted for making unfounded allegations, and the DA (or whoever has that role in Sweden) should lose his job for publicly bringing such ridiculous charges on the man. But then again, maybe that's just business as usual in uber-feminist Sweden... On a side note: this sounds like a textbook set-up: pay an attractive woman to throw herself at a man, have sex with him and then tarnish his reputation. I am surprised Assange didn't see it coming: in his position, it's not a g… | /r/MensRights | 29/08/10 01:43 PM |
| 2 | 16 year old boy has consensual sex with his 15 year old sister, gets registered as a sex offender for life. Now, a potential 2nd round pick, no NFL team will even look at him.Unfortunately, my original question didn't quite zero-in on the issue at hand. There are 2 distinct cases: Two teens having sex together: in this case, it is always the boy who gets railroaded An adult and a teen having sex: in this case, the adult generally gets prosecuted regardless of gender but females' sentences are generally a fraction of what males get I had the first case in mind when writing the question, but didn't quite word it correctly.. | /r/MensRights | 28/08/10 09:06 PM |
| 0 | 16 year old boy has consensual sex with his 15 year old sister, gets registered as a sex offender for life. Now, a potential 2nd round pick, no NFL team will even look at him.He was 16 (underage)! It applies perfectly (when 2 teens are caught having consensual sex, it is always the boy whose life is destroyed, that's the issue here; not actual statutory rapists like pedo teachers - my original question was poorly phrased). Claiming that the question does not apply makes you another feminist troll with a fake account (rappydaddy: karma 1, user for 6 days). [Note: I am banning this user from r/MaleStudies] | /r/MensRights | 28/08/10 03:19 PM |
| 1 | 16 year old boy has consensual sex with his 15 year old sister, gets registered as a sex offender for life. Now, a potential 2nd round pick, no NFL team will even look at him.It doesn't matter for her brother because he will get charged with rape anyway, also in this case, she got off exactly for that reason: she said that the sex was non-consensual (after being pressured by cops to say so). Let me rephrase the question: Can you find one case of an underage female charged with statutory rape of a younger male? | /r/MensRights | 28/08/10 03:10 PM |
| 6 | 16 year old boy has consensual sex with his 15 year old sister, gets registered as a sex offender for life. Now, a potential 2nd round pick, no NFL team will even look at him.Common sense: if she gets caught, all she has to do is say that the sex was non-consensual, and boom: he is the rapist now. Can you find one case of a female charged with statutory rape of a younger male? | /r/MensRights | 28/08/10 02:57 PM |
| 6 | 16 year old boy has consensual sex with his 15 year old sister, gets registered as a sex offender for life. Now, a potential 2nd round pick, no NFL team will even look at him.sexist assholes FTFY | /r/MensRights | 28/08/10 02:39 PM |
| 30 | 16 year old boy has consensual sex with his 15 year old sister, gets registered as a sex offender for life. Now, a potential 2nd round pick, no NFL team will even look at him.Yeah, right.. unless the eldest is female. | /r/MensRights | 28/08/10 02:37 PM |
| 59 | 16 year old boy has consensual sex with his 15 year old sister, gets registered as a sex offender for life. Now, a potential 2nd round pick, no NFL team will even look at him.The sister probably shouldn't have fucked her brother. Why is he the only one to suffer consequences? | /r/MensRights | 28/08/10 12:49 PM |
| 2 | Why is /r/MensRights so negative to marriage? Not every woman is out for money or a divorce.Assuming you are not just another troll, you owe it to yourself to get educated about the contract that you are going to sign when you get married: take an appointment with a divorce attorney and have him explain this to you, go sit in family court for a few hours maybe even try talking to some of the guys there, if you have time you can read "Taken into Custody" by Dr Baskerville. As Grayswan said below: you don't need to use nuclear weapons to feel their effect; watch an episode of "Evrybody L… | /r/MensRights | 27/08/10 03:52 AM |
| 1 | Why is /r/MensRights so negative to marriage? Not every woman is out for money or a divorce.Not married and healthy weight here.. just saying :) | /r/MensRights | 27/08/10 03:46 AM |
| 4 | Why is /r/MensRights so negative to marriage? Not every woman is out for money or a divorce.Did you even read kanuk's comment, or did you just decide to ignore it and keep repeating the same senseless point that Kanuk (quite eloquently) just refuted? | /r/MensRights | 27/08/10 03:38 AM |
| -3 | My fiancee has decided to not take my last name (and I am fine with this). However, what are some problems that could occur?Get your meds.. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/10 02:22 AM |
| 0 | Why is /r/MensRights so negative to marriage? Not every woman is out for money or a divorce.I was going to write some elaborate answer, but yours captures the point I was going to make perfectly! +1 | /r/MensRights | 27/08/10 02:21 AM |
| -1 | My fiancee has decided to not take my last name (and I am fine with this). However, what are some problems that could occur?I don't have strong feelings either way; it is just a custom as far as I am concerned, and logically it makes no difference either way. However, I do think that women who choose to keep their last name have, on average, a different psychological profile from the general public. That's why there is a correlation with divorce rates: it's a random correlation rather than a causation in my view.. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/10 02:11 AM |
| 0 | My fiancee has decided to not take my last name (and I am fine with this). However, what are some problems that could occur?You forgot to mention your other fake accounts, are those for your split personalities? | /r/MensRights | 27/08/10 02:04 AM |
| -5 | My fiancee has decided to not take my last name (and I am fine with this). However, what are some problems that could occur?Creating dozens of fake accounts, and posting bull-shit shaming tactics instead of actual arguments, doesn't qualify as a "discussion". How about you answer this from your real account? | /r/MensRights | 27/08/10 01:49 AM |
| -1 | My fiancee has decided to not take my last name (and I am fine with this). However, what are some problems that could occur?No, I meant to warn the OP that the same personality traits that cause a woman to prefer to keep her name, may also cause other problematic things: abuse, divorce etc.. Someone mentioned that the divorce rate for women who keep their last name is around 90%. I googled it, and didn't find the citation, but found a few articles mentioning that it is higher than usual.. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/10 01:40 AM |
| -3 | My fiancee has decided to not take my last name (and I am fine with this). However, what are some problems that could occur?Yes, it is easy. Unfortunately this sub-reddit is completely invaded by very aggressive feminist trolls, that create dozens of fake accounts to downvote legitimate comments and derail discussions. This is the main reason r/MaleStudies was created: to get the trolling under control, and create a space where men can discuss their issues without being silenced by feminist bullies. Sorry if you got caught in this! | /r/MensRights | 27/08/10 12:26 AM |
| -5 | My fiancee has decided to not take my last name (and I am fine with this). However, what are some problems that could occur?I never said that wasn't the case | /r/MensRights | 27/08/10 12:24 AM |
| -1 | Am I the only one who find this article moronic and offensive? Article from the Toronto Star on why it's better to be a man.Entitled feminist bitch with penis-envy, what else is new? | /r/MensRights | 26/08/10 09:57 PM |
| -6 | My fiancee has decided to not take my last name (and I am fine with this). However, what are some problems that could occur?You're welcome | /r/MensRights | 26/08/10 08:55 PM |
| -9 | My fiancee has decided to not take my last name (and I am fine with this). However, what are some problems that could occur?Thanks for the heads-up. I banned her in r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 26/08/10 08:50 PM |
| -8 | My fiancee has decided to not take my last name (and I am fine with this). However, what are some problems that could occur?Yes, it's called a "divorce rate", moron. | /r/MensRights | 26/08/10 08:06 PM |
| -7 | My fiancee has decided to not take my last name (and I am fine with this). However, what are some problems that could occur?No big deal. However some would claim that this might demonstrate a negative attitude towards marriage, from your wife. I would expect that women who make this decision are statistically more likely to cause trouble later on... | /r/MensRights | 26/08/10 07:12 PM |
| -2 | How do you deal with women without getting burned?*This user was banned * in r/MaleStudies Reason for banning: using shaming tactics instead of arguments. Also: ladywonderlust appears to be part of the large network of fake accounts (karma 1, redditor for 2 days in this case) constantly spamming this sub-reddit. | /r/MensRights | 26/08/10 01:50 PM |
| -8 | How do you deal with women without getting burned?Fake account: karma 1; redditor for 11 days. | /r/MensRights | 26/08/10 12:26 PM |
| -6 | How do you deal with women without getting burned?I banned this user in /r/MaleStudies For what it's worth: I also banned half a dozen fake accounts (all brand new with karma 1) from feminazi trolls, offering their "advice" here, and hijacking the forum with the usual shaming tactics. The bitches have created so many fake accounts that the entire voting system is up-side-down in this forum :( | /r/MensRights | 26/08/10 04:02 AM |
| 3 | How do you deal with women without getting burned?Sorry to hear that, dude! Many of my friends are in the same situation.. | /r/MensRights | 25/08/10 02:14 PM |
| 1 | How do you deal with women without getting burned?You are very wise indeed to have recognized the danger of women in today's world. You need not cut all ties with them, but simple precautions can go a long way if you don't want to end up like your friend (or many of my friends..). Also don't listen to the feminist trolls (for some reason the trolls are commenting more on /MR than actual users...) Always use condoms, always your condoms, always flush them Never let a woman move in with you (if she does, it's very difficult to get her out) Have a… | /r/MensRights | 25/08/10 10:05 AM |
| 2 | Considering that child support is frequently abused, why shouldn't there be itemized receipts for purchases made with the money?I keep the receipts, just in case I get audited.. | /r/MensRights | 22/08/10 02:52 PM |
| 2 | Considering that child support is frequently abused, why shouldn't there be itemized receipts for purchases made with the money?It's not too difficult to implement: you just need a second credit card to charge the kiddo items to. ( I do the same thing with my business credit card, when separating my business expenses from personal.. ) | /r/MensRights | 22/08/10 02:37 PM |
| 0 | I think most MRAs would be ok with traditional gender roles AND most would also be ok with strict equality. What they object to is the confusion and unfairness of equality of benefits but not of responsibilities. Am I right or wrong?Yes, that pretty much sums it up. Don't think for a second that just because we have the moral high ground, it means things will change in men's favor. This has been going on for 30 years, and every year it is getting worst. We absolutely need to establish Male Studies curriculums in colleges, to wake up young men. Every social movement started on college campuses.. Once we have Male Studies programs, we'll have young supporters and funding, we'll be able to conduct research to debunk the unchal… | /r/MensRights | 21/08/10 04:00 PM |
| 1 | Another case of feminist/lesbian propagandaSo you're saying that a kid doesn't need a mother, as long as he/she has 2 dads? | /r/MensRights | 21/08/10 12:25 AM |
| 0 | Another case of feminist/lesbian propagandaWe don't have enough data yet, as far as I know. But we know that children do badly without fathers; do you think they will do well without mothers? Edit: Some are trying to make the case that it is not a father that the child needs, but only the father's paycheck. This has been debunked by a few studies: http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/05/26/single_mothers_and_the_baby_boom/ If children without fathers fare worse than children in two-parent families, say d… | /r/MensRights | 20/08/10 10:10 PM |
| 1 | Another case of feminist/lesbian propagandaThis particular study doesn't make sense.. | /r/MensRights | 20/08/10 09:53 PM |
| -1 | Another case of feminist/lesbian propaganda+1 here. I used to have two lesbian friends: one was gorgeous and sweet, her "honey" was a scary, mean bitch, who looked like a truck driver :) | /r/MensRights | 20/08/10 09:50 PM |
| 1 | Another case of feminist/lesbian propagandahttp://www.civitas.org.uk/hwu/fathers.php http://www.fathermag.com/news/2756-suicide.shtml | /r/MensRights | 20/08/10 09:40 PM |
| -1 | Another case of feminist/lesbian propagandaLook for them yourself (this way you won't claim that I am fudging numbers). Pick any metric you want: school, drugs, suicide, crime, anything.. Pick any study you can find, done by anyone (aside from LGBT advocate groups :) and you'll see for yourself. I don't know about those complex cases you cite; I just spoke about adoption: if we don't know where to put a kid, we should put it where he/she has the highest chances of a healthy development: that means relatively affluent hetero couple. By th… | /r/MensRights | 20/08/10 09:11 PM |
| 4 | Another case of feminist/lesbian propagandaThere is very little data on single-fathers' kids (although it is a fast growing trend in the western world), but so far the data is not bad: kids raised by single fathers are doing better than those raised by single moms but not as good as those raised by hetero families. However, the data is so sparse and the samples so self-selected (mostly rich urban dudes) that I don't think it can be trusted yet.. | /r/MensRights | 20/08/10 09:07 PM |
| -3 | Another case of feminist/lesbian propagandaYou can do whatever you want with your body; in that sense I am not against gays. But a child also has rights, and he/she shouldn't have to pay for your lifestyle. Hetero families are the healthiest place for kids to grow up as demonstrated by pretty much any study on any metric, so that's where they should be placed. Your rights end when the rights of another human being start. Deal with it! | /r/MensRights | 20/08/10 09:03 PM |
| 0 | Another case of feminist/lesbian propagandaYes, that is another valid point. Why are you accusing me of anti-gay hatred? I have nothing against gays, but I don't think they should be allowed to adopt children. Your gay rights end when the rights of a kid to a hetero family start! sorry! | /r/MensRights | 20/08/10 08:58 PM |
| 1 | Another case of feminist/lesbian propagandaThe study that the article refers to was a study done by a LGBT advocacy group, of a selected sample, and using criteria that don't seem to have much to do with kids' well-being. Did they measure kids school achievement, grades, depression rates, suicide rates, drug addictions rates etc.. Na'ah (or more accurately, they probably measured those but didn't like what they found..)! Instead they claimed that "lesbian parents may have an edge" because "Lesbian mothers tend to be authoritative rather … | /r/MensRights | 20/08/10 07:02 PM |
| 8 | Injustice by Default - How the effort to catch "deadbeat dads" ruins innocent men's livesYes, very much so. And it's not getting any better as every elected politician is pandering to the growing female vote (in particular single moms), and demonizing "dead-beat dads". Guys who are paying child support today, could very well find themselves paying child support forever; the laws are always changing, and not in men's favor... | /r/MensRights | 20/08/10 03:19 PM |
| 11 | What's the actual ratio of perverts to people who got screwed over by the legal system on sex offender lists?I have often asked myself the very same question: what is the cost to society of putting thousands of innocent men (many of them teens) in jail and on sex offender lists vs the benefit of saving kids from pedos? Or another way of putting it: is your kid more likely to have his life destroyed by a retarded DA prosecuting victimless "sex offenses", or by a "lurking predator"? | /r/MensRights | 20/08/10 12:45 AM |
| -5 | He is a husband so he must be guilty...I read it in the same way as all the CNN commenters who are already calling for the guy's head, after reading the article: it's written in a way that suggests guilt (starting from the title). | /r/MensRights | 19/08/10 04:20 PM |
| -5 | He is a husband so he must be guilty...Yes, it did. That's exactly why most of the CNN commenters are already calling for the guy's head.. | /r/MensRights | 19/08/10 04:18 PM |
| -3 | He is a husband so he must be guilty...Are you implying that all women are man-hating pigs that would not give any men the benefit of the doubt? Edit: Also, I read the comments and no, and I didn't see any reference to Dr Phil. I don't think that someone who watched Dr Phil on TV, would log on the net after the show, find an article on the same topic on CNN, and comment on it. | /r/MensRights | 19/08/10 04:09 PM |
| -5 | He is a husband so he must be guilty...I read it in the article: it's written as if the guy was already charged, tried and convicted. And I don't think I am reading the article wrong: look at all the comments, CNN readers are already asking for the guy's head, so they read it in the same way I did. | /r/MensRights | 19/08/10 03:22 PM |
| -7 | He is a husband so he must be guilty...No I am not kidding, and I am still waiting for the article.. | /r/MensRights | 19/08/10 02:40 PM |
| -7 | He is a husband so he must be guilty...fair and balanced, right? | /r/MensRights | 19/08/10 02:25 PM |
| -7 | He is a husband so he must be guilty...You have your request for justification up-side-down. It's the person who makes the claim, that should justify it - in this case CNN. Why is CNN smearing this guy's name, if they can't even report one fact that would suggest his guilt? | /r/MensRights | 19/08/10 01:43 PM |
| -7 | He is a husband so he must be guilty...Yeah, right! Then, show me one such article in the mainstream media. | /r/MensRights | 19/08/10 01:40 PM |
| 9 | He is a husband so he must be guilty...This was on the front page yesterday: http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/08/18/sc.mother.children.psychology/index.html So a woman who murders a bunch of babies must "have been driven to it" by some external forces (i.e. it's not "her fault"), but a man who happens to be married to a woman who disappeared must have killed her even if he can prove that he was somewhere else at the time. Hey CNN! Did Gary Coleman's wife have an alibi, for the time when she killed her husband? Oh wait.. you didn't repo… | /r/MensRights | 19/08/10 10:13 AM |
| 2 | Sexual Dystopia: A Glimpse At The FutureIt seems to me that you are trying to rationalize your own lifestyle :) Regarding obesity: the waste-to-hips ratio most sought after by men, is also the one which leads to the healthiest pregnancy. Clearly, there is a genetic factor here: how would all those men know what is the healthiest shape for a woman? How can it be socialization? Actually, American culture is trying to socialize men to be attracted to those ridiculously overweight American women; and I don't think it's working :) | /r/MensRights | 18/08/10 08:12 PM |
| 3 | Sexual Dystopia: A Glimpse At The FutureYou should be careful about getting all your facts from a single book. Books are not peer-reviewed, and the writer typically has her own agenda. She can easily cherry-pick facts to build her own hypothesis, while ignoring anything that doesn't fit into the picture. There is some research that points to women's natural monogamy (and men's polygamy), for example: Women's self-esteem goes down when her number of partners grows; for men, it is the opposite Women experience anger when imagining their… | /r/MensRights | 18/08/10 07:35 PM |
| 1 | Sexual Dystopia: A Glimpse At The FutureIt's an interesting analysis, and you made some very good points. However I would point to one difference between humans and apes (and any other specie for that matter): human offsprings are not productive for at least a decade (it's unique to our specie), and are therefore extremely expensive to raise. I think this is the reason for monogamy, and a whole set of female behaviors: Women are much better at building social networks, and care a lot about "relationships": it's because they need those… | /r/MensRights | 18/08/10 07:02 PM |
| 1 | Sexual Dystopia: A Glimpse At The FutureThis is the naive frat-boy view of polyamory: they think they'll get tons of action because of it; but it doesn't work this way. Women, because of their biology (1 egg every month or so) hold out for men who they think are at the top of the social ladder. The logical result of polyamory is all women sleeping with the top 1% or so of men, and 99% of men watching porn :) It is not what the frat boys are imagining.. Needless to say, 99% of women will never have the bf they crave for, and widespread… | /r/MensRights | 18/08/10 05:28 PM |
| 4 | Thoughts after watching a BBC historical film - women haven't been oppressed in the West since the early middle ages.If you want to go on a feminist rant, then be prepared to defend your facts :) They couldn't vote until 1920 Neither could men. The difference between men and women gaining the vote is barely a few years (10 in the case of the UK, for example). Why don't we ever hear "Men couldn't vote until 1918"? How many men died for our rights to vote? How many women? They couldn't go to many colleges, such as Princeton and Harvard, no matter how smart they were, until the 1960's When you don't have a washin… | /r/MensRights | 16/08/10 11:20 AM |
| 0 | Male and female ability differences down to socialisation, not genetics [xpost from r/cogsci]We have to agree to disagree! I think a reasonable look at today's research demonstrates that gender is a genetic construct, and the results are generally consistent with an evolutionary explanation. For example: Men have more brain area devoted to spatial skills, and score better on orientation tests; it is consistent with male traditional role historically (and also with casual observation) Men are more upset when thinking about their gf cheating on them, while women are more upset when thinki… | /r/MensRights | 15/08/10 10:35 PM |
| 2 | Male and female ability differences down to socialisation, not genetics [xpost from r/cogsci]The idea that gender is a social construct is absurd on its face: one: it makes no sense from an evolutionary perspective, considering that men and women have mostly done different tasks for thousands of years two: anyone who has observed kids will quickly notice gender differences in their behavior And yes, we do have proof thanks to brain imagery that even babies' brains are wired differently and respond differently to different stimuli. Babies aren't socialized yet. The statement that "there … | /r/MensRights | 15/08/10 10:10 PM |
| -3 | Male and female ability differences down to socialisation, not genetics [xpost from r/cogsci]In my experience, personality differences between the genders are quite remarkable.. | /r/MensRights | 15/08/10 09:54 PM |
| 4 | Violence ReformThe victims of domestic violence are equally split by gender. The fact that you seem to think that women make most victims of DV shows how widespread feminist propaganda is in our culture :( | /r/MensRights | 15/08/10 09:18 PM |
| 1 | Why Feminism’s Push For Female Entitlement Hurts Women.Even if the business doesn't work out, you can still go to college and use it as a positive point during the admission process. Your options are still open (as should be!).. | /r/MensRights | 15/08/10 04:29 PM |
| -2 | Male and female ability differences down to socialisation, not genetics [xpost from r/cogsci]The article doesn't cite a research paper, it is only citing a book written by a feminist (books are not peer-reviewed, and are generally more opinion than facts). | /r/MensRights | 15/08/10 03:35 PM |
| -1 | Male and female ability differences down to socialisation, not genetics [xpost from r/cogsci]What "emerging science" are you talking about? And what the hell is "neuro-gender-essentialism"? | /r/MensRights | 15/08/10 03:29 PM |
| 5 | Male and female ability differences down to socialisation, not genetics [xpost from r/cogsci]A nice example of how feminist propaganda gets into the mainstream media.. Since the discovery of brain imagery, scientists have observed and documented many gender differences in how male and female brain are wired. We now have the proof that at least some of the differences are due to genetics (duh!). Of course this directly contradicts a principal tenet of feminist ideology, so how do you write a feminist propaganda article to deny the obvious science? You quote a book (that was never peer-re… | /r/MensRights | 15/08/10 02:12 PM |
| 8 | *Update* I went to court and the system prevailed!Great to hear that. Out of curiosity: how much were the lawyer fees? | /r/MensRights | 10/08/10 07:14 PM |
| -1 | Why Feminism’s Push For Female Entitlement Hurts Women.Some of my friends jokingly told me that my lifestyle is a perfect application of the teachings preached in a book called the "4 hour workweek". I haven't read it, so I wouldn't know! If I were to start my life over again, with the knowledge I have today, I'd do the following: Forget college (wasn't worth it) Stay at Mom-and-Dad for a couple years after high school: this is the best opportunity of your life to start a business Start an internet business that you can run from anywhere, and develo… | /r/MensRights | 10/08/10 02:43 AM |
| -1 | Why Feminism’s Push For Female Entitlement Hurts Women.First, it will collapse, although certainly not in our lifetime (historians have studied the rise and fall of civilizations and have detected some patterns that usually precede a collapse - needless to say our civilization has all the usual patterns that indicate a collapse within a few centuries). Two, I liked this article because, for once, there is a little optimism amongst all the bullshit that we have to face. It is true: we, men, have never been as free as we are today! We have never been … | /r/MensRights | 10/08/10 12:50 AM |
| 0 | Age of Consent is MisandryI would say that it won't because women aged 18-25 have the right to vote - they won't let it happen.. but who knows? | /r/MensRights | 06/08/10 01:34 PM |
| 16 | Flashing teenage breasts could land man in prisonWe have been discussing the absurdity of age of consent laws recently; here is a case-in-point illustration of the criminalization of healthy and non-threatening male sexuality. X-post from /r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 06/08/10 12:37 PM |
| -6 | Age of Consent is MisandryNot a bad article, Jay (I always thought that the age of consent was complete bull* and was just another way to criminalize male sexuality and restrict the sexual marketplace - notice how the age of consent is the same as the voting age in most states: basically women who could vote pushed women who couldn't vote out of the "sexual market"). That being said, bringing up this issue does not do us any good politically. You are only preaching to the converted, and you just handed your head to your … | /r/MensRights | 06/08/10 04:59 AM |
| 3 | Obama To Award 13 Citizens For Their Good Deeds: 11 WOMEN, 2 MENI am not a right winger, you are the only one putting politics into this. Obama has been a terrible president for men's rights, and I don't think he should get away with that on this subreddit, just because it happens to conflict with your political views. | /r/MensRights | 05/08/10 03:01 PM |
| 0 | Obama To Award 13 Citizens For Their Good Deeds: 11 WOMEN, 2 MENThere is a purpose to the joke: it advertises the r/MaleStudies sub-reddit as a moderated space it puts pressure on the mods of r/MensRights to be more proactive in banning obvious trolls (a lot of people are fed up with the trolling that is allowed to go on here) | /r/MensRights | 04/08/10 10:38 PM |
| 0 | Obama To Award 13 Citizens For Their Good Deeds: 11 WOMEN, 2 MENReaders will be delighted to know that this idiot (atomicparot) was banned a long time ago in r/MaleStudies.. :) | /r/MensRights | 04/08/10 08:41 PM |
| 1 | Obama To Award 13 Citizens For Their Good Deeds: 11 WOMEN, 2 MENConcern troll using a shaming tactic, with no logical argument. This user has been banned in r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 04/08/10 07:54 PM |
| 10 | Obama To Award 13 Citizens For Their Good Deeds: 11 WOMEN, 2 MENNot very important in itself, but it shows the agenda of our "feminist-in-chief": Passed an anti-wage-discrimination act that imposes big burderns on govt and business, based on feminist lies about the "wage gap" hoax criticized fathers on Fathers' Day poured money into jobs in order to create a recovery, but most jobs were lost by men, and most jobs created by the program are for women created a cabinet-level position for women, but not for men | /r/MensRights | 04/08/10 06:59 PM |
| 2 | It's been proven repeatedly - female doctors "will not work the same hours or have the same lifespan of contributions to the medical system as males".Feminazi troll: this user has been banned in r/MaleStudies! Reasons for banning: false quote: the quoted text does not appear in the article, the closest being "Family duties are at least partly to blame" attempting to divert the discussion: who cares what the (partial) reason is? ignoring the main issue: the wage gap is due to women's choices (as proven by this anecdotal example as well as large scale government studies), so when women ask for the same pay while working significantly less than … | /r/MensRights | 04/08/10 01:27 PM |
| 1 | On Child Support Interest (real-life cases)Reason #765323 to not get married or have kids in matriarchy USA.. X-post from /r/MaleStudes | /r/MensRights | 03/08/10 12:33 AM |
| 9 | Woman Stabs Ex-Boyfriend's Penis Because He Refused to Have Sex With HerFalse rape allegation + attempted rape + genital mutilation = 2.5 yrs .. if you're a woman | /r/MensRights | 03/08/10 12:30 AM |
| 1 | 3 in 4 B.C. boys on street sexually exploited by women (x-post from /r/MaleStudies)To be honest, I was surprised myself. It's amazing how the feminist-led vilification of men (by primarily showing men as perpetrators in the mainstream media) has affected my perception. And yet, female pedophilia is everywhere around us, if one just looks for it: the "Twilight Mom's", Justin Beber (or whetever his name is), boys bands etc.. are all manifestations of female attraction to younger, underage boys. | /r/MensRights | 02/08/10 08:43 PM |
| 1 | 3 in 4 B.C. boys on street sexually exploited by women (x-post from /r/MaleStudies)Canada's largest study into the sexual exploitation of street kids and runaways has shattered some myths about who the abusers might be - with the most surprising finding being that many are women seeking sex with young males. X-post from /r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 02/08/10 08:06 PM |
| 5 | Some Call It KidnappingAn informative look at the "Putative Father Registries" - or the latest legal invention to summarily deprive unmarried fathers of their parental rights. X-post from r/MaleStudies - found on GlennSacks.com | /r/MensRights | 30/07/10 03:16 PM |
| 1 | 10,000 reader celebration party for MensRightsDon't know.. but I hope he is doing ok! | /r/MensRights | 29/07/10 09:27 PM |
| 5 | Men's rights during and after childbirthIt's true: I think that men are hardwired not to complain too much, it's part of our genetic make-up to be expendable cannon-fodder :( But on the other hand, men do get PISSED when faced with enough injustice, so we need to spread the word to wake as many men as possible (and also save them from the extortion and slavery that modern marriage has become) | /r/MensRights | 28/07/10 09:58 PM |
| 2 | Men's rights during and after childbirthYou shouldn't worry about complaining about it in constructive way, it goes a LONG way in making a difference. Most people don't realize that it just takes a few very motivated individuals to influence the media, policymakers and academics. Most government and non-government organizations are just looking to either make a quick buck or to not make waves; a few well-worded complaints is enough to influence them.. The jewish lobby and the feminist lobby are two (amongst many) examples of tiny lobb… | /r/MensRights | 28/07/10 07:45 PM |
| 12 | 10,000 reader celebration party for MensRightsAwesome, let's not forget pn6 who started this sub-reddit! He would be proud :) | /r/MensRights | 28/07/10 04:11 PM |
| 1 | Amnesty International suppresses a film depiction of how children are taken from their fathers in Family Court.+1 | /r/MensRights | 26/07/10 05:47 PM |
| 7 | U-Turn on Anonymity for Rape DefendantsAs some of us may know, there has been some discussion in the UK about granting anonymity to rape defendants until the court sentences them. This has come after many particularly egregious cases where women accused men of rape for as little as avoiding a cab fare, or being late with homework.. Unfortunately: [The law] is to be ditched by the Ministry of Justice after a storm of protest from MPs and women’s groups. Ahh. "women's groups", just when you thought they couldn't be more full of shit an… | /r/MensRights | 25/07/10 05:16 PM |
| -1 | Men stoned to death for adultery, murder in Iran - CNN.com (Where was the outrage of the West then?)I was demonstrating the use of the english language, it doesn't matter whether it is about coins or people ;) "Two [foo] have been [something] for [this] and [that]" doesn't necessarily mean every [foo] did [this] and [that] | /r/MensRights | 25/07/10 04:19 PM |
| 0 | Men stoned to death for adultery, murder in Iran - CNN.com (Where was the outrage of the West then?)Yes, it doesn't mean that every man committed every crime listed: you have 3 men and 2 crimes. It doesn't say that all of them committed adultery and murder, some committed adultery, some committed murder. When I say "I have 3 coins in my pocket including quarters and dimes", it doesn't mean that every coin is a quarter and a dime at the same time... | /r/MensRights | 25/07/10 02:02 PM |
| 0 | I'm as against censorship as the next guy, but if you honestly believe that "men can't be raped" you have no business in r/mensrights. Can we please ban these trolls?This idiot should have been banned a long time ago; chivalry is our worst enemy: playing "fair" against man-hating scum is the biggest mistake we constantly make! | /r/MensRights | 25/07/10 01:36 PM |
| -5 | Men stoned to death for adultery, murder in Iran - CNN.com (Where was the outrage of the West then?)Yeah sure.. | /r/MensRights | 25/07/10 01:29 PM |
| -2 | Men stoned to death for adultery, murder in Iran - CNN.com (Where was the outrage of the West then?)You have 3 men charged with two crimes: it doesn't mean that every one of them committed both crimes, some committed one, some the other, maybe some committed both crimes but that would be pretty unlikely. If you have 3 kids expelled from school: one for stealing candy and two for insulting the teacher; how would you phrase it? I think I would say: "3 kids are expelled from school for stealing candy and insulting the teacher", right? It doesn't mean that all 3 kids were stealing candy AND insult… | /r/MensRights | 25/07/10 01:28 PM |
| 0 | Men stoned to death for adultery, murder in Iran - CNN.com (Where was the outrage of the West then?)I don't understand why you say that and why you are getting upvoted (maybe some are just looking for excuses?): there were 3 men convicted of 2 crimes, it doesn't mean that every man was a murderer AND an adulterer: SOME were murderers, and SOME were adulterers. For those who were adulterers, it's the same crime. | /r/MensRights | 25/07/10 01:22 PM |
| -3 | Men stoned to death for adultery, murder in Iran - CNN.com (Where was the outrage of the West then?)Yeah, that was the point: to compare the media outrage for Ashtiani today vs 3 men, a years ago, in the exact same circumstances! | /r/MensRights | 24/07/10 09:39 PM |
| -1 | Men stoned to death for adultery, murder in Iran - CNN.com (Where was the outrage of the West then?)In the wake of all the international protests, media coverage, and political pressure that saved Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani from stoning a few days ago; where was the outrage when men faced the same fate, in the same country, for the same crime? X-post from r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 24/07/10 04:35 PM |
| 1 | I'm as against censorship as the next guy, but if you honestly believe that "men can't be raped" you have no business in r/mensrights. Can we please ban these trolls?He has been banned in r/MaleStudies a long time ago :) | /r/MensRights | 23/07/10 06:52 PM |
| 1 | I'm as against censorship as the next guy, but if you honestly believe that "men can't be raped" you have no business in r/mensrights. Can we please ban these trolls?Just because you got caught a few times, because you were stupid, doesn't mean that reddit can reliably detect duplicates. There is no technology to uniquely identify people on the web. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/10 02:33 PM |
| 1 | I'm as against censorship as the next guy, but if you honestly believe that "men can't be raped" you have no business in r/mensrights. Can we please ban these trolls?Atomicparrot has multiple fake accounts, so downvotting doesn't work on him/her :) Feel free to join r/MaleStudies where he is banned and so are other "concern trolls"! | /r/MensRights | 23/07/10 03:59 AM |
| 5 | "false [rape] reporting has reached an epidemic level" - Orlando PoliceDone, here: http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/crckd/false_rape_reporting_has_reached_an_epidemic/ | /r/MensRights | 19/07/10 09:21 PM |
| 3 | "false [rape] reporting has reached an epidemic level" - Orlando PoliceDone. Feel free to upvote to give it a little push: http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/crckd/false_rape_reporting_has_reached_an_epidemic/ | /r/MensRights | 19/07/10 08:33 PM |
| 2 | "false [rape] reporting has reached an epidemic level" - Orlando PoliceX-post from /r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 19/07/10 05:49 PM |
| 1 | Years and marriages later, former spouses still owe alimony: "You can get married in Massachusetts, you just can’t get divorced, at least not financially."Child support is nothing more than alimony in disguise these days. I encourage you to punch a few numbers in a child support calculator for your state (don't forget that the payor pays taxes on child support paid and health care and day care are extra on top of regular child support). | /r/MensRights | 19/07/10 06:31 AM |
| 5 | Question about the Mens Rights movementI can't speak for "the movement" because I don't know of any major organization representing our views - yet! But personally, I don't have anything against gays. Feel free to post about gay issues if you feel they are under-represented - reddit is what you make of it! | /r/MensRights | 19/07/10 05:46 AM |
| 1 | Is MensRights infested with trolls? Or people who are pro-Mens Rights?Shameless plug: there is /r/MaleStudies which is moderated; trolls (especially "concern trolls") are banned immediately there.. | /r/MensRights | 18/07/10 06:10 PM |
| 0 | The Unsustainability of Feminism and the MatriarchyI think this text might make the point in a more scholarly way: “When the Empire Strikes Out: Are We Repeating the Pattern of Past Civilizations” by Bernard Goetz. | /r/MensRights | 15/07/10 10:15 PM |
| 1 | ACTION OPPORTUNITY: Call House Speaker, Senate President in Support of Shared Parenting Bill HB 1400Cross-posted from /r/MaleStudies ... | /r/MensRights | 14/07/10 06:40 PM |
| 1 | From 1995 to 2005, the rate of suicide among 20 to 24 year-old boys was 20.7 suicides per 100,000, while the rate for girls was just 3.5 per 100,000.Come on. You have to admit that from our cultural reality, their approach was pretty hilarious! | /r/MensRights | 09/07/10 01:06 PM |
| 0 | Who else is disgusted by thisI swap them every couple months :) | /r/MensRights | 08/07/10 09:45 PM |
| -1 | Who else is disgusted by thisI hear you! I haven't dated American women for years :) | /r/MensRights | 08/07/10 06:02 PM |
| -1 | Who else is disgusted by this+1 here, my friend. No fucking way, I'll ever get married. I have a successful internet business, 2 houses on 2 continents, 2 girlfriends a decade younger than me :) and I am not planning on giving it away to some entitled bimbo because she learned how to fuck and has the feminazi state acting as her pimp. | /r/MensRights | 08/07/10 05:47 PM |
| 2 | From 1995 to 2005, the rate of suicide among 20 to 24 year-old boys was 20.7 suicides per 100,000, while the rate for girls was just 3.5 per 100,000.I don't understand why you are getting so worked up. My point was only to show the link between what is defined as a pathology, and who is in power. I didn't express a value judgment on the pathology itself, nor did I define it (I don't need the exact definition of the pathology in order to establish the link) | /r/MensRights | 08/07/10 01:16 PM |
| 1 | New guy question: Top Men's Rights sites?You have some good stuff on your blog, I was trying to give it a push :) | /r/MensRights | 08/07/10 01:09 PM |
| 2 | From 1995 to 2005, the rate of suicide among 20 to 24 year-old boys was 20.7 suicides per 100,000, while the rate for girls was just 3.5 per 100,000.There should be some good data coming out from all the brain imagery studies, in the years ahead. It looks very promising (they found some pretty fascinating stuff already)! | /r/MensRights | 08/07/10 01:40 AM |
| 5 | From 1995 to 2005, the rate of suicide among 20 to 24 year-old boys was 20.7 suicides per 100,000, while the rate for girls was just 3.5 per 100,000.I am not criticizing scholarly research in psychology, or history (of which there is plenty). I am questioning the objectivity of the end result: it seems both fields frequently end up "influenced" by the culture in power at the time. Examples: Communist regimes frequently classified anti-communist activists as mental Homosexuality was considered a disease when the Catholic church was in power Before feminism, unhappy wives were classified as "in need of an orgasm" :) and feminists were consider… | /r/MensRights | 08/07/10 01:04 AM |
| 8 | From 1995 to 2005, the rate of suicide among 20 to 24 year-old boys was 20.7 suicides per 100,000, while the rate for girls was just 3.5 per 100,000.Weren't suicide statistics more or less balances half a century ago [citation needed]? If so how come that male suicide went from 50% to 90% of cases? Also, if the genders were reversed I doubt that female victims would be so casually brushed away. As a a matter of fact, if 9 out of ten were female, I bet suicide prevention would be a national emergency, pink-ribbons everywhere, TV shows, multi-million dollar fund-raisers, government and non-profit studies, presidential speeches and the like. No… | /r/MensRights | 07/07/10 11:45 PM |
| 1 | Men in the media: The manufacture of contempt (from /r/MaleStudies)Cross-posted from /r/MaleStudies: http://www.reddit.com/r/MaleStudies/comments/cmxbe/men_in_the_media_the_manufacture_of_contempt/ | /r/MensRights | 07/07/10 04:17 PM |
| 0 | ACTION OPPORTUNITY: Boston Globe Covers F & F's Shared Parenting BillCross-posted from /r/MaleStudies: http://www.reddit.com/r/MaleStudies/comments/cmuaf/action_opportunity_boston_globe_covers_f_fs/ | /r/MensRights | 07/07/10 12:02 PM |
| 7 | DAE find arguing with a feminist so....exhausting?For those who prefer a moderated men's rights sub-reddit, /r/MaleStudies does not tolerate concern trolling and Atomicparrot is banned there :) http://www.reddit.com/r/MaleStudies/ | /r/MensRights | 30/06/10 08:49 PM |
| 3 | So, I got slapped by a feminist.Shameless plug: the /r/MaleStudies sub-reddit is moderated and feminist trolls are banned (Atomicparrot is banned there, obviously). http://www.reddit.com/r/MaleStudies | /r/MensRights | 29/06/10 11:12 PM |
| 0 | So, I got slapped by a feminist.Yes, I am guilty as charged of generalizing here. Obviously, but this observation has been very true based on my experience with feminists, their bullying behavior is off the chart vs. "normal population". YMMV of course.. | /r/MensRights | 29/06/10 11:08 PM |
| 12 | So, I got slapped by a feminist.Feminists exhibit frequently bullying and violent behavior (in other words: they are "abusive"). It's even noticeable on this subreddit, in how obnoxious the feminist trolls are.. (although, they have been quiet the last couple weeks). The same is true in academia, media and government: feminists don't hesitate to lie blatantly, make up ridiculously inaccurate statistics and "research", launch vicious personal attacks and bully ruthlessly anyone who doesn't agree with their "religion". | /r/MensRights | 29/06/10 08:31 PM |
| 6 | Tiger Woods Divorce Settlement Near - Elin to get $750 MillionYou forgot to factor-in 20-yr of mega-sized "child-support" and also the fact that a man probably can't enjoy a "call girl" 24/7 - Even Tiger needs some rest ;) | /r/MensRights | 29/06/10 01:17 AM |
| 2 | MensRights hit's 9000 subscribers - Party Inside -->Sure. I "unbanned" you, but please read the moderation policy.. | /r/MensRights | 23/06/10 01:53 PM |
| -2 | Bias Against Men and Boys in Mental Health Research [video] (from /r/MaleStudies)The moderated comment thread @ r/MaleStudies is here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MaleStudies/comments/ci4f2/bias_against_men_and_boys_in_mental_health/ | /r/MensRights | 23/06/10 01:06 PM |
| 9 | MensRights hit's 9000 subscribers - Party Inside -->There is plenty of women involved in /MR (surprisingly so!). | /r/MensRights | 23/06/10 03:59 AM |
| 3 | MensRights hit's 9000 subscribers - Party Inside -->Awesome! :) | /r/MensRights | 23/06/10 02:49 AM |
| -5 | Another father's day anti-dad hit-job: Science can't prove fathers matter. That doesn't mean we don't. (from r/MaleStudies)The comment thread @ r/MaleStudies: http://www.reddit.com/r/MaleStudies/comments/cgqkt/another_fathers_day_antidad_hitjob_science_cant/ | /r/MensRights | 19/06/10 01:33 PM |
| 0 | Senate Dems press no-fault divorce, other marriage bills (from r/MaleStudies)The moderated comment thread at r/MaleStudies is here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MaleStudies/comments/cgq88/senate_dems_press_nofault_divorce_other_marriage/ | /r/MensRights | 19/06/10 12:34 PM |
| -4 | International kidnapping case highlights systemic corruption in US family courts (from /r/MaleStudies)The moderated comment thread @ /r/MaleStudies is here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MaleStudies/comments/cg2hy/international_kidnapping_case_highlights_systemic/ | /r/MensRights | 17/06/10 04:50 PM |
| -2 | Happy Seed Provider’s Day, Dad (from r/MaleStudies)The comment thread in r/MaleStudies: http://www.reddit.com/r/MaleStudies/comments/cfrvj/happy_seed_providers_day_dad_national_post/ | /r/MensRights | 16/06/10 09:57 PM |
| 3 | The best way to deal with 'Concern Trolls' such as Saydrah, AtomicParrot, Catlebrity and the like? Starve them. If you talk to them, they win.Or just join r/MaleStudies, it's moderated and concern trolls are banned immediately :) http://www.reddit.com/r/maleStudies/ | /r/MensRights | 15/06/10 12:53 PM |
| 0 | Every Family's Nightmare (from r/MaleStudies)The comment thread on r/MaleStudies is here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MaleStudies/comments/cf0be/every_familys_nightmare_sbs_documentary/ | /r/MensRights | 14/06/10 11:21 PM |
| -3 | Marriage 2.0 - comments are interesting (from r/MaleStudies)Where did you read that he "calls himself [an] MRA"? I can't find this.. did I miss it? | /r/MensRights | 14/06/10 02:43 AM |
| -6 | Marriage 2.0 - comments are interesting (from r/MaleStudies)The moderated comment thread at r/MaleStudies is here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MaleStudies/comments/cenh5/marriage_20_interesting_comments_divorce_support/ | /r/MensRights | 14/06/10 01:20 AM |
| 2 | The Fatherless Family (cross-post from r/MaleStudies)hehe :) | /r/MensRights | 12/06/10 03:24 PM |
| -7 | The Fatherless Family (cross-post from r/MaleStudies)The moderated comment section in r/MaleStudies is here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MaleStudies/comments/ce39e/the_fatherless_family_institute_for_the_study_of/ | /r/MensRights | 11/06/10 09:44 PM |
| -1 | Britney Spears allegedly sexually harasses bodyguard. Bodyguard is told to "man up" and accused of his claims being "stupid"Dude, you're sick. | /r/MensRights | 11/06/10 05:02 PM |
| -2 | Britney Spears allegedly sexually harasses bodyguard. Bodyguard is told to "man up" and accused of his claims being "stupid"Seriously, what the hell is wrong with your sorry ass? | /r/MensRights | 11/06/10 04:08 PM |
| -3 | Britney Spears allegedly sexually harasses bodyguard. Bodyguard is told to "man up" and accused of his claims being "stupid"The private message was not from Dynomight, and I dod not create any reddit account. You have to take your pills.. | /r/MensRights | 11/06/10 03:55 PM |
| 1 | Britney Spears allegedly sexually harasses bodyguard. Bodyguard is told to "man up" and accused of his claims being "stupid"Another user notified me that you were making these claims.. You sound like you need psychiatric help, buddy. | /r/MensRights | 11/06/10 03:35 PM |
| 3 | Britney Spears allegedly sexually harasses bodyguard. Bodyguard is told to "man up" and accused of his claims being "stupid"We don't care about your respect. | /r/MensRights | 11/06/10 03:19 PM |
| 2 | A question: Are you happy with the moderation of r/MensRights?Hi Ignatius! I think that it's nice to have a strictly moderated community (r/MaleStudies) and a more lax one (r/MensRights). The community has grown large enough that we now have 3 sub-reddits (the 3rd one: r/mensrightslinks). What a change! I remember a time when there was only one sub-reddit and everything was posted by pn6 :) | /r/MensRights | 11/06/10 12:02 PM |
| -2 | Britney Spears allegedly sexually harasses bodyguard. Bodyguard is told to "man up" and accused of his claims being "stupid"Dude! WTF? I am reporting this to the moderator! | /r/MensRights | 11/06/10 11:37 AM |
| 1 | Just for laughs: Council helps jobless women find a rich man to keep them (from r/MaleStudies)There were only two very short periods of history during which marriage disappeared (that I know of, there could be more): The peak of the Roman Civilization (before it collapsed) The peak of the Babylonian Civilization (before it collapsed) Both only lasted a couple centuries at most, and were a time of extreme enlightenment (human rights, relative democracy, developed commerce and science etc..) after extreme opulence was created (the Romans had running water, bathrooms and were importing spic… | /r/MensRights | 09/06/10 10:04 PM |
| 1 | Just for laughs: Council helps jobless women find a rich man to keep them (from r/MaleStudies)I never said that they didn't get help from relatives; but the nuclear family was always there, as the primary social construct and the primary way to help the survival of offsprings (gandpa and auntie can help babysit, but they won't put food on the table every single day for the 5 kids of each relative they have). Throughout all written history (except maybe the last 50 years), humans were very religious. Look at every major religion: they all had a concept of a man and a woman putting their w… | /r/MensRights | 09/06/10 09:56 PM |
| 0 | Just for laughs: Council helps jobless women find a rich man to keep them (from r/MaleStudies)I have no idea what you are talking about (and the book is about contemporary psychology, not history): Middle Ages: nuclear family Ancient Rome: nuclear family Early ancient rome: nuclear family Chinese civilization : nuclear family Muslim civilization : family (although they can practice polygamy) Ancient babylon: nuclear family (they even had divorce and child support and that was 4,000 years ago!!!) You would have to go pretty far back in time to find a civilization that does not rely on the… | /r/MensRights | 09/06/10 09:26 PM |
| 1 | Just for laughs: Council helps jobless women find a rich man to keep them (from r/MaleStudies)Well, I did. Marriage rates are going down in each bracket, and the pace seems to be accelerating every decade. But you can believe that men will suddenly decide to flock to the altar ;) Marriage all but disappeared in Ancient Rome after no-fault divorce was established. I don't see any reason why the same won't happen in the Contemporary West. | /r/MensRights | 09/06/10 09:15 PM |
| 1 | Just for laughs: Council helps jobless women find a rich man to keep them (from r/MaleStudies)You can do them yourselves: you need to find marriage rates per all people of a given age bracket. Then, it's just a matter of adding the odds in each age bracket. You can also try to predict future rates, by extrapolating the downward trend accordingly (for example: the 20-30 yr-old marriage rate for a baby born today should be adjusted forward by 20-30 years). Edit: Your data set should be "per all people", not "per unmarried people": it's much easier to do the math that way. And it's even bet… | /r/MensRights | 09/06/10 08:21 PM |
| 1 | Just for laughs: Council helps jobless women find a rich man to keep them (from r/MaleStudies)Now would be a good time for a citation ;) Given how much resources and time is needed to raise a human baby (compared to other species), collaboration between genders seems inevitable, but fathers will refuse to collaborate if they are separated from their kids. | /r/MensRights | 09/06/10 08:17 PM |
| 3 | Just for laughs: Council helps jobless women find a rich man to keep them (from r/MaleStudies)And as marriage slowly disappears (according to my calculations children born today have only a 10% chance of getting married during their lifetime vs. a 40-50% chance for people in their 30's), the inevitable outcome is : http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/06/08/children.wellbeing/index.html No civilization that separated children from their fathers has ever survived. | /r/MensRights | 09/06/10 02:29 PM |
| -5 | Just for laughs: Council helps jobless women find a rich man to keep them (from r/MaleStudies)The moderated comment section at r/MaleStudies is here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MaleStudies/comments/cd4b7/just_for_laughs_council_helps_jobless_women_find/ | /r/MensRights | 09/06/10 01:14 PM |
| 2 | Cross-post from r/MaleStudies: Family Conflict and Suicide Rates Among Men - Dr. Hazel McBride, Child PsychologistThanks Kloo! | /r/MensRights | 08/06/10 08:29 PM |
| 2 | Cross-post from r/MaleStudies: Family Conflict and Suicide Rates Among Men - Dr. Hazel McBride, Child PsychologistThe r/MaleStudies comment section is here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MaleStudies/comments/ccpsr/family_conflict_and_suicide_rates_among_men_dr/ | /r/MensRights | 08/06/10 01:38 PM |
| 0 | Say hello to the new r/MaleStudies sub-reddit!Thanks! | /r/MensRights | 08/06/10 01:08 AM |
| -2 | Cross-post from r/MaleStudies: Fathers Bear the Brunt of Gender Bias in Family Courts - GlennSacks.comThe moderated comment section in r/MaleStudies is here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MaleStudies/comments/cchfi/fathers_bear_the_brunt_of_gender_bias_in_family/ | /r/MensRights | 07/06/10 09:37 PM |
| -5 | Cross-post from r/MaleStudies: About Half of Rape Allegations are False, Research Shows - Media RadarThe moderated comment section in r/MaleStudies is here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MaleStudies/comments/ccg00/about_half_of_rape_allegations_are_false_research/ | /r/MensRights | 07/06/10 07:38 PM |
| 2 | Feminist trolls on /MRYou are free to believe what you want.. | /r/MensRights | 07/06/10 06:41 PM |
| 5 | Feminist trolls on /MRNo, I don't care about your gender. | /r/MensRights | 07/06/10 02:39 PM |
| -2 | Say hello to the new r/MaleStudies sub-reddit!If you troll it, you will be banned regardless of how many accounts you use. | /r/MensRights | 07/06/10 02:15 AM |
| -9 | Say hello to the new r/MaleStudies sub-reddit!No, it isn't. There is a moderated and an unmoderated forum. People have different tastes and they can choose which one they prefer. | /r/MensRights | 07/06/10 02:09 AM |
| -4 | Say hello to the new r/MaleStudies sub-reddit!We have an upvote brigade? That's nice! :) Thanks Kloo! | /r/MensRights | 07/06/10 01:48 AM |
| -2 | Say hello to the new r/MaleStudies sub-reddit!Pretty amazing, isn't it? I think it shows the very need for its existence! | /r/MensRights | 07/06/10 12:23 AM |
| -8 | Say hello to the new r/MaleStudies sub-reddit!I see nothing wrong with cross-posting between the 2 sub-reddits. | /r/MensRights | 06/06/10 10:11 PM |
| -3 | Say hello to the new r/MaleStudies sub-reddit!Many (including myself) feel that the lack of moderation on r/MensRights is not satisfying (~100 upvotes on http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/cc03z/feminist_trolls_on_mr/) I have created a new community r/MaleStudies that will be more moderated, by yours truly ;-) Cross-posting between the two is strongly encouraged: I would love this to be a collaborative effort with r/mensrights rather than a competitive one. The description of /r/MaleStudies is : Links to studies and articles about … | /r/MensRights | 06/06/10 09:47 PM |
| -9 | Feminist trolls on /MRAs much as I strongly suspect that this is happening, there is no way to know for sure.. | /r/MensRights | 06/06/10 09:40 PM |
| -3 | Feminist trolls on /MRI have no idea. He left at some point, replaced by Kanuk, who told us that pn6 left to pursue "new life opportunities".. or something like that. | /r/MensRights | 06/06/10 09:07 PM |
| -14 | Feminist trolls on /MRNo, you haven't proven anything. | /r/MensRights | 06/06/10 07:52 PM |
| -10 | Feminist trolls on /MRYou pointed to a study of a sample of 40 cases hand-picked by a feminist researcher, who admits that the results go against the mainstream opinion. Why do you think this study is more valid than the prevailing studies done on samples of hundreds of thousands of cases? I just said I'd rather believe the overwhelming evidence, what's wrong with that? | /r/MensRights | 06/06/10 07:06 PM |
| -22 | Feminist trolls on /MRJesus Christ, you just can't stop your bull-shitting. I am not labeling them because I disagree with them, you fucking moron. Can you read? | /r/MensRights | 06/06/10 05:36 PM |
| -2 | Feminist trolls on /MRI had a few unfortunate encounters with atomicparrot and he/she is definitely a feminist troll, despite playing the victim card and the "but I'm on your side" card. He also used to have multiple accounts to upvote his own comments.. I suspect that the feminist trolling accounts that are overrunning this sub-reddit might belong to only a few scheming feminist "hijackers". | /r/MensRights | 06/06/10 05:25 PM |
| -21 | Feminist trolls on /MRBlatant in-your-face lie (even many of these quotes, out of context, show a clear reason for labeling people as trolls; and the reason has nothing to do with me disagreeing with them). Why do you have to lie to make a point, atomic parrot? Doesn't that make you a troll? And why do you keep doing it over and over again? So yes you've earned your label: [Atomicparrot is a well-known feminist troll, please do not feed] | /r/MensRights | 06/06/10 05:16 PM |
| -10 | Feminist trolls on /MRI agree, it's absolutely unbelievable how aggressive and obnoxious those feminists are (but not surprising really). They come here, act as if they own the place, tell us what is ok to talk about, and when called on their bull-shit arguments, play the victim card. What floors me is that they even succeeded in getting a feminist as a mod of /MR. Un-freaking-believable. Unfortunately, I think this sub-reddit is becoming useless, as a forum for men to talk about the problems they encounter in today'… | /r/MensRights | 06/06/10 05:06 PM |
| -14 | Feminist trolls on /MRFunny how you all sound the same and employ the same bull-shitting strategies.. You've heard one fem-bot you've heard them all, it seems! | /r/MensRights | 06/06/10 04:58 PM |
| -9 | Feminist trolls on /MRJust because you make noise by writing lots of feminist bull-shit arguments that don't make the slightest sense, doesn't mean you are making an "intellectual" contribution, my friend. Also, I did upvote you when you presented something that made sense (not very often). | /r/MensRights | 06/06/10 04:48 PM |
| -2 | Feminist trolls on /MR[citation needed] | /r/MensRights | 06/06/10 04:42 PM |
| 1 | Feminist trolls on /MRI think it might explain a lot... | /r/MensRights | 06/06/10 03:17 PM |
| 9 | Feminist trolls on /MRI want it to be without trolls using shaming tactics, ad-hominem, straw-men and other illogical debating tactics; and then using multiple accounts to upvote their bull-shitting, ^ I have nothing against people who disagree and can make a logical argument, as a matter of fact, I welcome them. | /r/MensRights | 06/06/10 03:15 PM |
| 4 | Feminist trolls on /MR[citation needed] What makes you think that my views are extremist? What makes you believe that I call people trolls because they don't share my opinions, rather than because they use shaming tactics, ad-hominem attacks and other dishonest debating tactics? Can you not tell the difference between the two? If so, what are your credentials for being a mod here? Shouldn't a reddit moderator be able to tell the difference between a logical argument and a shaming tactic or even an ad-hominem attacks?… | /r/MensRights | 06/06/10 03:08 PM |
| -6 | Gary Coleman Murdered by Wife?You don't realize that this only proves my point.. You can keep trolling all you want, you man-hating lying scum-bags. You can use multiple accounts to hijack /MR, and up-vote your own bull-shit, no matter how idiotic and senseless. But EVERYONE ELSE sees what you are doing. Your feminazi downvote brigade doesn't make you right, it just makes you a man-hating fem-bot. | /r/MensRights | 06/06/10 01:37 PM |
| -2 | Gary Coleman Murdered by Wife?[troll, please do not feed] | /r/MensRights | 06/06/10 01:33 PM |
| -1 | Gary Coleman Murdered by Wife?I just did a study of 2 people by comparing our comments (using my own very objective method) and I found out that I won the argument with you, which proves that all feminists are wrong! :) Can I have my reward now? | /r/MensRights | 05/06/10 11:18 PM |
| -3 | Gary Coleman Murdered by Wife?I am sure it is very convincing to feminist man-haters! :) I am not convinced though.. | /r/MensRights | 05/06/10 11:00 PM |
| -3 | Gary Coleman Murdered by Wife?As I said, 40 cases are not going to convince me. If what she is saying is true, then the case-by-case differences should even out on a large enough sample. That's not the case: studies done on thousands of cases all find a very significant female sentencing discount. I have absolutely ZERO trust in openly feminist "researchers" (like this woman). 40 cases? "Randomly" picked? Adjusted subjectively for "investigation reports and transcripts"? Coming to a conclusion that is the opposite of those f… | /r/MensRights | 05/06/10 10:54 PM |
| -5 | Gary Coleman Murdered by Wife?From your own link: her statistics, like those of other studies, suggest that women are favored The only way that this "feminist researcher" manages to disprove this well-know fact is by "compar[ing] forty matched pairs of women and men accused and convicted of statutorily similar offenses". In other words: every piece of literature points to a female sentencing discount, but she can pick 40 cases to prove otherwise. Sorry, but I am not convinced at all! I am sure I can hand-pick 40 cases, and c… | /r/MensRights | 05/06/10 10:43 PM |
| -3 | Gary Coleman Murdered by Wife?Really? And where did I say that he is a troll because I disagree with him? | /r/MensRights | 05/06/10 10:12 PM |
| -5 | Gary Coleman Murdered by Wife?a few suspicious circumstances Are you kidding me? People are routinely convicted on a fraction of the kind of circumstances that exist in this case. All that is needed to secure a conviction is for the jury to find the defendant guilty beyond reasonable doubt. You don't need a video showing her smashing his head with a frying pan! (for example: Scott Peterson was convicted of the murder of his wife, on nothing more that him subscribing to two porn channels after his wife disappeared, and trying… | /r/MensRights | 05/06/10 09:27 PM |
| -4 | Gary Coleman Murdered by Wife?Ad-hominem attack (address the message, not the messenger, if you want to be taken seriously in /MR). [troll] | /r/MensRights | 05/06/10 09:00 PM |
| -8 | Gary Coleman Murdered by Wife?[Note to the /MR's community: This is a pattern of a typical feminist troll. We are getting the same crap from dozens of different accounts employing the same strategy (fake accounts?). It's good to be able to spot them quickly; it's easy, they always follow the same pattern: They attempt to dismiss a submission, with a combination of straw-man ("Woman Haters Club"), shaming tactics ("I am disappointed"), overly emotional but empty rhetoric ("come on, guys") and sometimes, irrelevant anecdotes (… | /r/MensRights | 05/06/10 06:45 PM |
| -5 | Gary Coleman Murdered by Wife?I am not sure if you are hopelessly retarded or a bull-shitting feminist troll; but since we have dozens of feminist trolls employing the same "hijacking" strategy as you, I am going to classify you as yet another feminist troll. Yes, I know you "care" about men's rights and blah blah blah.. [Feminist troll. Please do not feed.] | /r/MensRights | 05/06/10 06:15 PM |
| 2 | Gary Coleman Murdered by Wife?Please stop trolling around here. If you don't like this subreddit, you don't have to feel compelled to comment here. The point of this post is to show yet another example of women getting away with killing their husbands, despite ridiculously overwhelming evidence of their culpability, because the police and the DA are completely blind to female-initiated domestic violence and FAIL to investigate, charge and prosecute the women. There is largely enough evidence here to put her on trial for the … | /r/MensRights | 05/06/10 05:59 PM |
| 16 | Gary Coleman Murdered by Wife?Also, they were divorced at the time of the incident: http://www.showbizspy.com/article/205786/gary-coleman-shannon-price-were-divorced-when-he-died-lawyer-says.html So, we have: wife has a history of domestic violence against husband wife is alone with husband husband suffers massive head injury on back of head, with significant blood loss wife calls 911 but refuses to stop the bleeding with a towel wife unplugs husband from life support it turns out they were legally divorced wife claims that … | /r/MensRights | 05/06/10 11:30 AM |
| 1 | Is it offensive to ask your girlfriend / wife for a paternity test, even if you don't suspect her of cheating?Hmm.. you're correct. If you get the results early enough after the baby is born though, you should be able to cancel the paternity (but you have to act fast, most states have statutes of limitation!) | /r/MensRights | 04/06/10 09:30 PM |
| 3 | Is it offensive to ask your girlfriend / wife for a paternity test, even if you don't suspect her of cheating?You don't need to ask, just take a sample of the baby' saliva and send it to a lab yourself; she doesn't have to know.. | /r/MensRights | 04/06/10 06:06 PM |
| 1 | Feminists lobby against law criminalizing rape of men by women. Who are the rape apologists?I often claim that this sub-reddit is constantly invaded by man-hating feminist-trolls (many of them pretending to be on "our side" but judging by their actions, their real motive seems to be to disrupt the discussion). I think this submission is clear proof: despite being perfectly clean and uncontroversial (who the hell would downvote this?), IT GOT 70 DOWNVOTES. That's nearly a 1/3 downvote ratio!!! There is clearly an organized effort by feminist man-hating scum to disrupt this sub-reddit. I… | /r/MensRights | 02/06/10 01:21 AM |
| 8 | Feminism really the enemy?I'd say NOW and Women's Bar Association... | /r/MensRights | 30/05/10 08:41 PM |
| 1 | Feminism really the enemy?Nice, can I move to Sweden? :) | /r/MensRights | 30/05/10 07:44 PM |
| 16 | Feminism really the enemy?Feminists in feminist organizations that shape public policy, are absolutely rabid man-haters! (The current legislative situation that men face can be directly attributed to them) ON THE OTHER HAND: Feminists in your day-to-day life aren't necessarily man-haters (although some definitely are), but they are usually not involved in organized groups and therefore not influential. If you are an equality feminist (as opposed to gender feminist), you should get involved in organized feminist groups, a… | /r/MensRights | 30/05/10 07:09 PM |
| 2 | "It seems fundamentally unfair to impose a major life decision on someone who's made it clear they didn't want it." How much say should a man have in the choice to become a parent?I don't want to live in a society where a parent is simply allowed to turn his or her back on a child. You already do. Women are allowed to walk away from their children. Regarding "putative registries", it is nothing more than an attempt to strip men from their parental rights. Before the existence of these registries, adoption agencies had a duty to make a good faith effort to locate the dad; now, they don't have to do it anymore, they just look at the registry (supposedly), and the adoption m… | /r/MensRights | 28/05/10 01:04 AM |
| 2 | "It seems fundamentally unfair to impose a major life decision on someone who's made it clear they didn't want it." How much say should a man have in the choice to become a parent?If the father is known and involved, why would she give the baby away? What do you mean by "not allowed"? Actually, the law in the US is viciously stacked against unmarried fathers who want to have custody of their children, despite the mother wanting to give the baby for adoption (to weasel her way out of child support!). This is another important men's rights issue: unmarried fathers are powerless to stop the adoption of their own babies. Glenn Sacks has some good articles about it: http://gle… | /r/MensRights | 27/05/10 12:52 PM |
| 6 | New guy question: Top Men's Rights sites?Hi nlakes! Welcome aboard! http://GlennSacks.com is my favorite blog. There is some education material at http://www.youtube.com/user/manwomanmyth If you are more intellectual: http://feck-blog.blogspot.com/ If you are a conservative, you might enjoy Bernard Chapin's videos http://www.youtube.com/user/pinegrove33 (he covers politics, books and frequently men's rights issues) If you like conspiracy theories :) you might like http://angryharry.com | /r/MensRights | 27/05/10 12:46 PM |
| 2 | "It seems fundamentally unfair to impose a major life decision on someone who's made it clear they didn't want it." How much say should a man have in the choice to become a parent?Should I remind you that this "perfectly unworkable" solution is working quite well.. but for women only? Don't you know that women are allowed to give a baby for adoption, or just drop it at the nearest hospital or fire station - no questions asked? Somehow they are not labeled "dead-beats" and they DO NOT PAY CHILD SUPPORT to the adoptive family. Why are these women allowed to opt out of their responsibilities? Why are they not "expected to provide support" like everyone else (i.e. fathers)? W… | /r/MensRights | 27/05/10 04:51 AM |
| 3 | "Women are disadvantaged in life because of male privilege and patriarchal oppression; which tells them they're inferior"They sometimes go on a rant about "slut shaming" (because some woman wore a short skirt) or something. I am not a regular reader, as you might imagine :) | /r/MensRights | 27/05/10 12:36 AM |
| 2 | "Women are disadvantaged in life because of male privilege and patriarchal oppression; which tells them they're inferior"I don't have a citation handy for this, sorry! If you find it, can you let me know: I'll bookmark it! | /r/MensRights | 27/05/10 12:35 AM |
| 2 | Please, explain: why is this relevant?Hahaha! Eh bah je l'ai appris en France mon francais, comme tout le monde, non? Non c'est pas ma langue maternelle, mais je l'ai quand meme apprise tres jeune. J'ai pas le temps de faire de resumes de livres. Il y en a plein sur internet, ca prouverait rien de toute facon! Mal eduque toi-meme! Abruti! J'ai jamais dit que les femmes n'ont jamais subi d'oppression, j'ai dit que les hommes ont subi une oppression egale sinon pire. (J'ai pas les accents sur mon clavier anglo-saxon.. ) | /r/MensRights | 26/05/10 10:13 PM |
| 0 | Please, explain: why is this relevant?Dude, I am French (it's one of my many citizenships) and fluent in French, although I do admit that my memories of school readings is not the best. Qu'est-ce-que je peux faire pour te convaincre que je parle français? | /r/MensRights | 26/05/10 09:31 PM |
| 2 | Please, explain: why is this relevant?School was a long time ago.. I'm willing to bet you don't have, and never had, the mastery of French to read a 19th century French novel and understand it Je crois que tu perdrais ton pari! | /r/MensRights | 26/05/10 09:25 PM |
| 0 | Please, explain: why is this relevant?Can you find the data? | /r/MensRights | 26/05/10 09:16 PM |
| 0 | Please, explain: why is this relevant?I read Germinal in French, moron. It was a required school reading. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/10 09:15 PM |
| 1 | Please, explain: why is this relevant?Actually, I think I found the best data to settle this: this is the 1851 UK Census:http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/burnette.women.workers.britain As you can see, your "common knowledge" is debunked: even within the textile and clothing categories women make only half of workers! | /r/MensRights | 26/05/10 09:11 PM |
| 1 | Please, explain: why is this relevant?So what was the typical occupation of these women's husbands? | /r/MensRights | 26/05/10 09:01 PM |
| 2 | Please, explain: why is this relevant?True. Textile workers were mostly female, but this is just one kind of factory work that happens to be suited to females. How about other factories? Weren't there factories more suited to male employment? | /r/MensRights | 26/05/10 08:57 PM |
| 2 | Please, explain: why is this relevant?I read Germinal a very long time ago in French, as it was a required school reading. Just because there are some female characters in the book, my understanding from the novel was that the overwhelming majority of miners were men. And even the few women who were working in mines did the easiest jobs. Since you pride yourself on being so smart, why don't you take a scientific approach and try to find mining casualties by gender from the past or today, instead of relying on a novel (that doesn't e… | /r/MensRights | 26/05/10 08:52 PM |
| 4 | Please, explain: why is this relevant?Aren't you the one who started the discussion with:"Women made up most of the factory workers during the industrial revolution"? Where is your citation for that? (outside of WW1 & WW2, I don't think this is true) | /r/MensRights | 26/05/10 08:36 PM |
| 9 | Please, explain: why is this relevant?The only reason women were doing factory work is because men were being slaughtered by german machine guns, during the same time period, and the government desperately needed the factories running. If you look closer at agricultural societies, you will find that men generally tend to do the most dangerous tasks (like hunting, traveling, defending the farm etc..). There aren't many women warriors, hunters or travelers; and there aren't many men knitting sweaters. Your 1842 article about miners wo… | /r/MensRights | 26/05/10 08:28 PM |
| 3 | "Women are disadvantaged in life because of male privilege and patriarchal oppression; which tells them they're inferior"Divorce rates vary tremendously by socio-economic group. Immigrants and religious people drive the statistics down, while the urban areas have much higher rates than average (I think California leads the way..) As far as I am concerned, even 40% is still too high a probablity of failure. I will not gamble my house, my kids, and my future with such odds. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/10 08:11 PM |
| 1 | Please, explain: why is this relevant?If you are so smart, why can't you come up with a citation that does not contradict your own claim? Germinal refers to miners as "men", and your quote about medieval agriculture has "Mostly men did the plowing, because you have to have very strong arms". Since you think of yourself as so smart, why don't you look up medieval mortality rates for men and women (excluding child-birth) and we'll have a scientific proof: we'll know for sure who was taking the blunt of the hard life-threatening work! | /r/MensRights | 26/05/10 08:06 PM |
| 0 | Please, explain: why is this relevant?Why are you so aggressive and rude? Do you care so much about your "victim status" that you can't handle anything that challenges your preconceptions? Germinal is a NOVEL (as in fiction) and even there the miners depicted are overwhelmingly MALE, as in this excerpt (from wikipedia): "Beneath the blazing of the sun, in that morning of new growth, the countryside rang with song, as its belly swelled with a black and avenging army of men, germinating slowly in its furrows, growing upwards in readin… | /r/MensRights | 26/05/10 07:43 PM |
| 4 | "Women are disadvantaged in life because of male privilege and patriarchal oppression; which tells them they're inferior"There is no clear statistic: some put the divorce rate as high as 70% (in California, and in big cities). I don't have a citation handy (you can try to look it up), but 80% of men end up being accused of DV during divorce, less than 15% get custody of the kids, and basic child support guidelines are generally enough to bankrupt any middle-class worker (look them up in your state, and do the math for your own income, see if you can survive of what would be left of it!) | /r/MensRights | 26/05/10 07:30 PM |
| 5 | "Women are disadvantaged in life because of male privilege and patriarchal oppression; which tells them they're inferior"Wait until half of them get divorced.. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/10 07:19 PM |
| 2 | Please, explain: why is this relevant?[citation needed] Today, men make 95% or more of workplace fatalities. This is a list of workers who died during the construction of the Brooklyn Bridge in the 19th century: http://www.endex.com/gf/buildings/bbridge/bbridgedeaths.htm This is a picture of workers on the Hoover Dam: http://www.hooverdamstory.com/apachescrownavyaquis.jpg Another one: http://www.hooverdamstory.com/blackworkerreals.jpg These are children working as coal miners in Pennsylvania, 1911 : http://www.latinamericanstudies.o… | /r/MensRights | 26/05/10 07:03 PM |
| 6 | "Women are disadvantaged in life because of male privilege and patriarchal oppression; which tells them they're inferior"On male vs female situation: I think the easiest way to get an idea of what each gender is facing is to look at the top feminist blog (Feministing) and the top men's rights blogs (in my opinion: GlennSacks.com) and compare the topics covered. On the female side you have things like dress codes, cat calls and sexual harassment On the male side you have things like: losing your children, being ruined by the predatory CS system, committing suicide as a result, being kicked out of your home without … | /r/MensRights | 26/05/10 06:58 PM |
| 1 | Please, explain: why is this relevant?It was, but I don't see your point.. Child-bearing for obvious reasons can only be done by women, so there was no way to shift the risk to men, like they did for other tasks. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/10 06:41 PM |
| 10 | Please, explain: why is this relevant?I think that would be an accurate description: "gender roles" are basically the devision of labor, that humans found gave them the best chance of survival. It was asymmetrical in the sense that men had obligations to women that women did not have, and vice-versa. Obviously, the history rewritten by feminists never mentions men's historical obligations, it only focuses on women's obligations. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/10 06:38 PM |
| 7 | Please, explain: why is this relevant?What!? I can't believe they are teaching such crap these days! It's un-freaking-believable. What these men went through is beyond our civilized imagination! Talking about the "poor factory workers" and ignoring WW2 veterans is like spitting on the face of the men who gave everything for our freedom. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/10 04:58 PM |
| 37 | Please, explain: why is this relevant?I don't want to get into historical debates of who was the most oppressed, but let's just say that the points you mentioned are only half of the story. The other half might look like this: men were required to stand up when a woman entered the room and kiss the hands of women as a form of greeting (chivalry) men were required to sacrifice their lives for women, under penalty of death (For example: see Titanic) men were risking their lives on a daily basis to feed their families (I would like to … | /r/MensRights | 26/05/10 04:26 PM |
| 18 | "Women are disadvantaged in life because of male privilege and patriarchal oppression; which tells them they're inferior"It is not for us to refute it, but for them to prove it! When I read this description it doesn't match any of my own life experiences. It sounds as if they describe some kind of alternate reality! What the hell is "male privilege"? And how does it compare to "female privilege"? Can you prove that men have more privileges today than women? I doubt it! What the hell is "patriarchal oppression of women"? Unless you can prove the point above about men being privileged, you can't prove this one eithe… | /r/MensRights | 26/05/10 03:24 PM |
| 1 | The pedo-witch-hunt continues to hurt women."a picture of two males masturbating each other with "Safe Sex" written above it" She showed this to a class of 9 years old, and only got suspended? I think she got off easy! Seriously? Call me prude if you want, but I don't think this was appropriate for 9-yr old kids! | /r/MensRights | 26/05/10 02:50 PM |
| 0 | Moderation of r/MensRightsA few questions (if you don't mind): Who are you? Have you done anything for men's rights? Are you a public figure of the movement? In other words, have we seen / read you on other sites? :) | /r/MensRights | 26/05/10 02:31 AM |
| 5 | Why Men's Rights Activists need to be Environmental Activists tooI am not sure about being environmentalist (I think it's better to keep the men's movement apolitical to avoid internal fights), but this is definitely a men's issue. It's quite scary actually: the FDA & EPA are absolutely not doing their jobs because big corporations have bought the US govt. This is what you get when you let corporations finance political parties (i.e. "soft money")!!! (and it won't get any better with the recent supreme court ruling. Grrrr!) (Atomicparrot: I upvoted your submi… | /r/MensRights | 25/05/10 07:58 PM |
| 13 | Acquitted Georgia teacher files lawsuit over molestation trial against Catoosa County sheriff's department, two child advocacy centers, parents of her accusers, social workers and a child therapist.Definitely relevant: she could set up a precedent for the falsely accused whose case was grossly mismanaged, by suing authorities. Of course, we all know that men would find it much more difficult to sue and win such a case; but it's still an improvement.. | /r/MensRights | 25/05/10 07:16 PM |
| 21 | P.Z. Myers thinks MRAs are rape advocates.RTFA! [...]. "Rape is equality." You'll find his type is fairly common among a group who call themselves "Men's Rights" proponents [..] | /r/MensRights | 25/05/10 06:41 PM |
| 8 | PZ Meyers lashes out at freak who claims "rape is equality." Fine. Then he lumps him together with all the other MRAsWTF? "Rape is equality." You'll find his type is fairly common among a group who call themselves "Men's Rights" proponents. Really? This is common? I have never heard of such a point of view even though I have been in the "movement" for quite some time now. What is this guy smoking? Feel free to write to him (politely) to educate him on men's rights (he seems to be totally clueless): [email protected] Good resources to learn about men's rights are: http://glennsacks.com http://www.reddit.com/r/M… | /r/MensRights | 25/05/10 06:27 PM |
| 3 | Repost from /r/Feminisms - How to argue like a feminist: (1) misrepresent what your antagonist said, (2) don't offer any evidence to your claims, (3) embrace dogma.Did you forget what started this thread? Or are you bull-shitting again? I got banned from /r/Feminisms. I don't even know why, I don't think I've ever posted in there and I'm usually really sympathetic towards feminism. ; I got banned too. I think someone is trying to "thought crime" you. I never even knew about /r/feminizims until i was banned | /r/MensRights | 24/05/10 11:03 PM |
| 3 | Repost from /r/Feminisms - How to argue like a feminist: (1) misrepresent what your antagonist said, (2) don't offer any evidence to your claims, (3) embrace dogma.Your argument was bull-shit, as always! I pointed to a general trend to which you replied with isolated examples. Can you prove that most major /MR sites ban people based on their opinions? Can you prove that most major feminists don't? | /r/MensRights | 24/05/10 09:26 PM |
| 4 | Repost from /r/Feminisms - How to argue like a feminist: (1) misrepresent what your antagonist said, (2) don't offer any evidence to your claims, (3) embrace dogma.I am not going to argue whether you had fake reddit accounts, because I don't have a solid proof, but I can argue the rest! Dude, I am not hurt (in the butt or anywhere else) because some of your opinions are popular here. If you managed to write something meaningful for a change, why would it bother me? Throwing random shaming tactics, straw-men arguments and ad-hominem attacks isn't enough to "challenge my opinion". When someone has been doing this for a while, I eventually classify him/her as… | /r/MensRights | 24/05/10 08:29 PM |
| 0 | Would You Marry A Woman That Refused To Take Your Last Name? This Woman?Sure. It's just a name, who cares? (This woman though: hell no!) | /r/MensRights | 24/05/10 08:18 PM |
| 3 | Repost from /r/Feminisms - How to argue like a feminist: (1) misrepresent what your antagonist said, (2) don't offer any evidence to your claims, (3) embrace dogma.I don't buy your "one account" story at all. You weren't very subtle with them in the past :) Also, for the record, I don't support burning books, killing kittens or eating babies.. | /r/MensRights | 24/05/10 08:13 PM |
| 4 | Repost from /r/Feminisms - How to argue like a feminist: (1) misrepresent what your antagonist said, (2) don't offer any evidence to your claims, (3) embrace dogma.Just because you use your other reddit accounts to upvote your own posts, doesn't mean that people agree with you! How many accounts do you have? It looks like 4-5 to me :) Somehow there are always +4 upvotes just after you post. Although recently, you've been a little less obvious after I called you on it! :) | /r/MensRights | 24/05/10 07:56 PM |
| 7 | Repost from /r/Feminisms - How to argue like a feminist: (1) misrepresent what your antagonist said, (2) don't offer any evidence to your claims, (3) embrace dogma.Pinch your nose then! :) I don't mind when someone comes here and can prove a well-argumented point. And it does happen sometimes! But don't try to think for a second that this applies to you. Most of the time, your comments are nothing but unadulterated bull-shit. You bring little more than a constant stream of shaming tactics, ad-hominem attacks, straw-men arguments and blatant bull-shitting. Feminist sites routinely ban and delete perfectly well written, polite, and logical comments, that go … | /r/MensRights | 24/05/10 07:43 PM |
| 5 | Repost from /r/Feminisms - How to argue like a feminist: (1) misrepresent what your antagonist said, (2) don't offer any evidence to your claims, (3) embrace dogma.Well, you can thank Kanuk for being nice: if it was up to me I would have banned your feminist trolling ass a long time ago :) It does prove your point though: some MR's sites are starting to ban the most obnoxious fem-bots. It is still significantly less frequent than feminist sites IMO. | /r/MensRights | 24/05/10 07:17 PM |
| 0 | Repost from /r/Feminisms - How to argue like a feminist: (1) misrepresent what your antagonist said, (2) don't offer any evidence to your claims, (3) embrace dogma.Do you know how to read? (Obviously you can't reason, I am hoping you can at least understand English) There are at least 4 arguments that can be easily proven / disproven logically, in my last 3 comments. Can you find them? Apparently not! Instead you keep ranting on, about the straw-man that you built. I am going to repeat this simple point one more time so that your small feminist brain can understand it: you are not entitled to upvotes, and being down-voted is not the same as being banned (o… | /r/MensRights | 24/05/10 05:59 PM |
| 5 | Repost from /r/Feminisms - How to argue like a feminist: (1) misrepresent what your antagonist said, (2) don't offer any evidence to your claims, (3) embrace dogma.Well you do sound like a close-minded idiot, don't you? :) (If you quote me, don't pick a few words in a sentence to create a straw man argument - like every other fem-bot's poor attempt at debating) | /r/MensRights | 24/05/10 05:27 PM |
| 1 | Repost from /r/Feminisms - How to argue like a feminist: (1) misrepresent what your antagonist said, (2) don't offer any evidence to your claims, (3) embrace dogma.You're getting down-voted because your statement is false, based on the experience of those down-voting you. But you are not being banned, that's the big difference between us and feminists. You are not entitled to upvotes, you are only entitled to free speech; I really don't see what point you are trying to make.. Why do you have trouble taking my word on this? | /r/MensRights | 24/05/10 05:07 PM |
| 9 | Repost from /r/Feminisms - How to argue like a feminist: (1) misrepresent what your antagonist said, (2) don't offer any evidence to your claims, (3) embrace dogma.Actually, it's extremely common behavior on feminist websites. They constantly delete and ban anything they don't agree with (even within themselves). Notice that this pretty much never happens on men's rights sites. Actually even this sub-reddit is constantly invaded with pretty obnoxious feminist trolls, as well as less obnoxious ones who pretend to be on "our side" only to derail discussions (atomicparrot comes to mind, but there are others); but no one is getting banned. Also submissions to … | /r/MensRights | 24/05/10 04:56 PM |
| 2 | Hidden epidemic of women beating up menIf they leave they won't see their kids anymore (plus alimony + child support + restraining order etc...); I read several interviews of abused men and they basically stayed for the kids. | /r/MensRights | 22/05/10 02:24 PM |
| 3 | Controversial disorder at center of bitter custody casesThis is not surprising, psychology is well known for being a discipline that is very "amenable" to whatever ideology is in power. Another such discipline is history, which is well known for being "rewritten by the winners". We had a few submission on /MR about historical events being rewritten to increase women's contribution even when the facts blatantly contradict it.. | /r/MensRights | 21/05/10 11:39 PM |
| 2 | UK Govt plan for rape defendant anonymity causes anger from women's groupsThere are other studies as well, done in several countries, they all came out with more or less the same results.. | /r/MensRights | 21/05/10 05:20 PM |
| 2 | UK Govt plan for rape defendant anonymity causes anger from women's groupsThe 2% figure did not come from any study. What makes you "sure" that the 40% figure came from a "small" study? | /r/MensRights | 21/05/10 01:59 PM |
| 3 | UK Govt plan for rape defendant anonymity causes anger from women's groupsYes, there were several research studies done on the topic (in the US, Europe and India): every study that I read points to a false rape ratio of somewhere between 40% and 60%. Keep in mind that this does not include he-said-she-said scenarios. I have also read interviews with court personnel, prosecutors and lawyers; and it seems everybody who was involved in prosecuting rapes knows that roughly half of accusations are bogus. Feminists always cite a 2% false accusation rate, but there is absolu… | /r/MensRights | 21/05/10 02:18 AM |
| 1 | "What made these women snap and commit these gruesome crimes?"I don't mind the word "snapped", I can understand that people can loose their temper sometimes. It is the word "finally" that makes me feel uncomfortable.. To me, it sounds like an attempt to rationalize the "snapping". | /r/MensRights | 21/05/10 01:13 AM |
| 2 | "What made these women snap and commit these gruesome crimes?"Thanks, pal! | /r/MensRights | 20/05/10 12:40 PM |
| 21 | "What made these women snap and commit these gruesome crimes?"I have noticed this too: you never hear "what made him snap" when a man murders someone you never hear "he must have felt unloved" when a man is caught cheating you never hear "he was abused" when a man kills his wife ... Also, if you follow the link to the TV show, there is a poll on the right: "What's your favorite part of Snapped?" "Seeing how these crimes are solved" "Learning what makes women finally snap!" Am I the only one who feels that the word "finally" there, is a border-line incitati… | /r/MensRights | 20/05/10 01:51 AM |
| 1 | Time to Abort Fatherhood at WillYou mean child support from men (who have no parental right to their children and no say in the decision to bring them into this world), correct? You don't mean child support from women who (willingly) gave their kids away for adoption (despite choosing to have them), because we both know they don't pay a cent, right? | /r/MensRights | 19/05/10 10:34 PM |
| 1 | Time to Abort Fatherhood at WillSometimes, it is; sometimes, it isn't. What's your point? | /r/MensRights | 19/05/10 10:27 PM |
| -1 | Time to Abort Fatherhood at Will:) Haha! You're right: maybe I jumped to conclusions too quickly.. | /r/MensRights | 19/05/10 07:37 PM |
| -2 | Time to Abort Fatherhood at WillYou are using the same vocabulary ("fallacy", I don't think I've seen anyone else using it here), the same writing style, and the link you gave to the definition of "straw-man" was something atomicparrot was also linking to in one of his past comments (I don't know which one, don't remember..) That's what ticked me off, plus the patting on the back comments in this thread, but who knows? :) | /r/MensRights | 19/05/10 02:58 PM |
| -4 | Time to Abort Fatherhood at WillAtomicparrot, is that one of your fake accounts? :) | /r/MensRights | 19/05/10 02:45 PM |
| 0 | Time to Abort Fatherhood at WillWTF? | /r/MensRights | 19/05/10 02:45 PM |
| -2 | Time to Abort Fatherhood at WillI didn't read it that way. I think you could remove the abortion issue from the article, and everything else would still be valid. Maybe the author should have done that, to avoid distractions.. The way I read it, the article was about the double-standard in male vs female responsibilities towards children: men have to pay and cannot get out of it (even though they have no parental rights and no reproductive rights) women can give a child away for adoption and NOT pay child support (why not? Wou… | /r/MensRights | 19/05/10 11:35 AM |
| 0 | Time to Abort Fatherhood at WillActually, I am not necessarily pro-life. I see Atomicparrot's usual shenanigans: he/she is trying to hijack the discussion and turn it into an abortion argument (which is NOT the main point of the article). This is an old and tired tactic very frequently used by feminists.. | /r/MensRights | 19/05/10 11:28 AM |
| 0 | Time to Abort Fatherhood at WillThe article was NOT about abortion.. He built his case against an imaginary argument that wasn't even the main topic of the article. That's a typical strawman. Also typical atomicparrot :) (BTW I don't necessarily disagree with hm/her on the abortion issue) | /r/MensRights | 19/05/10 11:20 AM |
| 2 | Time to Abort Fatherhood at WillHey! I am glad if I can help, please keep on the good work, we need people like you who are not afraid of speaking out! | /r/MensRights | 19/05/10 03:05 AM |
| 0 | Time to Abort Fatherhood at WillAtomicparrot is a well-known feminist troll. For some reason he or she can't help but to comment on /MR submissions, even the ones he/she doesn't actually bother to read :) I think any sane person would see his comment for the obvious straw-man argument that it is. | /r/MensRights | 19/05/10 03:00 AM |
| 6 | Time to Abort Fatherhood at WillI think that overall I agree with the author's expose of the hypocrisy of letting women kill babies (abortion), abandon children (adoption) while at the same time forcing men to foot the bill for kids. Especially since men have no say in the decision, and have no parental rights. It is absolutely obvious that the "best interest of the child" is nothing but "the best interest of the woman". On a side-note: If I could give one advice to the writer, it would be to focus on just one aspect of the di… | /r/MensRights | 18/05/10 10:59 PM |
| 3 | Hollywood Stars, Sex Offender Laws and the General PublicIn the collective hysteria that has taken hold of our society, it seems that few would actually stop and wonder whether the number of kids who have their lives thoroughly destroyed by senseless "statutory" sentences is MORE than the number of kids attacked by pedophiles? Relevant quote: "Dude, our parents are really stupid" - South Park episode about sex offenders (where South Park residents ask the chinese restaurant owner to build a "china wall" around the city to prevent child molesters from … | /r/MensRights | 18/05/10 09:31 PM |
| 1 | BREAKING NEWS: Supreme Court rules Sex offenders can be held indefinitelyExactly, the key here is that those in power create a "crime" with a very subjective and fuzzy definition, ratchet-up fear in the general public to justify ever harsher sentences (assuming those accused even get a fair trial), and then broaden and apply the definition of the "crime" to whoever they want to target (typically political opponents). Who is a "terrorist" (bad)? And who is a "freedom fighter" (good)? It depends on who the gvt wants to eliminate. Who was an "enemy of the people"? A "sa… | /r/MensRights | 17/05/10 09:19 PM |
| 2 | No-fault divorce destroys the concept of marriageI remember reading a US divorce attorney's blog sometime ago, and his experience was that the asset split usually favors the female 80% / 20%. Unfortunately I didn't bookmark this. I should have! | /r/MensRights | 17/05/10 06:58 PM |
| 17 | BREAKING NEWS: Supreme Court rules Sex offenders can be held indefinitelyWelcome to the gulag: just don't ask what a "sex offender" is or what he has actually done, or why he wasn't sentenced to life in prison in the first place.. That wouldn't be politically correct: you don't support pedophiles, do you? I think this reddit submission should be linked here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/c35up/how_your_son_could_end_up_on_the_sex_offender/ | /r/MensRights | 17/05/10 03:56 PM |
| 1 | No-fault divorce destroys the concept of marriageThe other guy I know, got screwed too. Did he also have a bad attorney? Or are men's attorneys somehow worse than women's attorneys? Yes, that must be it! /sarcasm | /r/MensRights | 17/05/10 03:23 PM |
| 2 | No-fault divorce destroys the concept of marriageIt happened to two of my friends (or 100% of the divorced men I know well enough to ask private questions). Also, the courts are sexist in the way they apply the law (the law being sexist itself). Case in point: One of my friends was a stay-at-home Dad, raised 5 children from toddler to college, built the family house from scratch. You would think that upon divorce, he would get custody, or alimony, or even get to stay in the house that he built. Na'ah my friend! He got kicked out of his own hom… | /r/MensRights | 17/05/10 03:02 PM |
| 3 | No-fault divorce destroys the concept of marriageAs much as I agree with the title, the linked text doesn't seem to relate to it?? | /r/MensRights | 17/05/10 12:52 PM |
| 1 | Does anyone else wish they DIDN'T know how horrible the divorce statistics are to men?Ridiculous straw-man argument. [This user appears to be a troll.] | /r/MensRights | 16/05/10 12:18 PM |
| -8 | Does anyone else wish they DIDN'T know how horrible the divorce statistics are to men?[Feminist troll, possibly using multiple accounts to influence the reddit voting system. Please do not feed.] | /r/MensRights | 16/05/10 12:10 PM |
| 5 | Does anyone else wish they DIDN'T know how horrible the divorce statistics are to men?Multiple gf's works great for me, although I admit I like living dangerously - haha ;-) The point is: society does not reward "good" behavior any more. If you commit, marry, have kids, you'll become cannon fodder for the feminist state. But you know that already! Since we live in such fucked up times, we might as well make the most of it. After reluctantly abandoning my hopes for a family, I embraced the bachelor lifestyle and I have to say it's not bad :) My eyes are wide open but there is noth… | /r/MensRights | 15/05/10 06:24 PM |
| 1 | Does anyone else wish they DIDN'T know how horrible the divorce statistics are to men?I think you have to move from gf to gf ;-) Also, it doesn't help for those who want kids some day.. | /r/MensRights | 15/05/10 04:13 PM |
| 6 | Does anyone else wish they DIDN'T know how horrible the divorce statistics are to men?I felt exactly the same as you, so many times! Every time I felt like I was in love with one of my ex-gf's, the knowledge of western-style family law, and the sheer impossibility of building anything with her (house, kids etc..) was absolutely devastating. Sometimes I wished I was ignorant, but of course I realize that ignorance is just postponing the inevitable reckoning.. I completely understand what you mean by "I fear that I will become afraid of her". I feel the same: even if I don't get di… | /r/MensRights | 15/05/10 01:23 PM |
| 4 | Cited rebuttals to common misandry questions: 70 cents, etc.This is the DOL study: http://www.consad.com/content/reports/Gender%20Wage%20Gap%20Final%20Report.pdf | /r/MensRights | 14/05/10 05:11 AM |
| 2 | Another lie spread by the DV industry: Pregnancy and Greater Risk of DV [video]Here are the primary causes of infant death, according to the CDC: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr57/nvsr57_02.pdf (page 25) Domestic violence, the "biggest baby killer" according to some DV "advocates" is not even on the list. Surprised? Apparently men aren't busy chasing pregnant women around and kicking them in the stomach! Who'd have thought? /s | /r/MensRights | 14/05/10 04:06 AM |
| -1 | How Your Son Could End Up on the Sex Offender List - from parenting websiteAre you the rape apologist I was discussing with yesterday? Are you the same user who claimed that a man attacked by his ex-gf with a knife, after he refused sex with her, was not a victim of attempted rape? Are you the same user who claimed that it was ok that the perpetrator was not charged because the prosecutor had to make a plea bargain (despite an easy case with overwhelming evidence of her culpability)? http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/c2ljj/tatiana_baston_stabs_exboyfriend_in_… | /r/MensRights | 12/05/10 11:50 PM |
| 4 | How Your Son Could End Up on the Sex Offender List - from parenting website[Note to the community: this user is a known feminist troll who pretends to be interested in /MR but is only here to derail the discussion. This user is also known for using multiple accounts to influence the reddit voting system] Comment is blatant bull-shit (I won't even glorify it with an answer) and flat in-your-face lie (we had countless reports of boys convicted for child pornography distribution because they received a naked picture from their underage gf (what were they supposed to do, t… | /r/MensRights | 12/05/10 08:02 PM |
| 2 | How Your Son Could End Up on the Sex Offender List - from parenting websiteYes, this comment appeared shortly after the link was submitted on /MR, and was posted by a new user. Looks like we have feminist trolls hanging out on /MR :( This is just evil.. | /r/MensRights | 12/05/10 07:45 PM |
| 10 | How Your Son Could End Up on the Sex Offender List - from parenting websiteNotice that 46 man-hating trolls came here just to downvote this submission (that's a 30% downvote ratio!!): this should tell you all you need to know about the level of humanity and compassion we can expect from the sexist scumbags that hate us. Some even followed the link and started posting comments under the article; as expected, they bring little more than the usual feminist arsenal of in-your-face lies, intimidation, shaming tactics and blatant bull-shitting. Edit: Some feminists troll cla… | /r/MensRights | 12/05/10 07:12 PM |
| 39 | How Your Son Could End Up on the Sex Offender List - from parenting websiteEven though this article was only published yesterday, notice how many comments it already has from all the dudes who were railroaded onto sex offender lists, the mothers of sons who got thrown under the bus, friends who describe what happened to their buddies. It's really sad.. | /r/MensRights | 12/05/10 04:09 PM |
| 0 | Tatiana Baston stabs ex-boyfriend in groin for refusing to have sex (he has a new girlfriend). Tatiana reports to police that she was defending herself from rape.From what you are saying, whoever wrote these laws doesn't give a damn about rape victims (sorry honey! you weren't raped by a qualified penis! it doesn't count!); the real intent of the law seems to be on incarcerating men, and men only using rape as an excuse. As always with feminists, watch what they do, not what they say, and their intent becomes crystal-clear.. and absolutely disgusting! | /r/MensRights | 12/05/10 03:10 PM |
| 0 | Tatiana Baston stabs ex-boyfriend in groin for refusing to have sex (he has a new girlfriend). Tatiana reports to police that she was defending herself from rape.WTF? How do these evil bitches get away with passing such blatantly sexist laws? Don't get me wrong, I could understand if "rape" was defined as penetration of the vagina (it doesn't make sense to me, but if we decide that this is the definition, then so be it). But even with this definition, what does the gender of the perpetrator have to do with anything? If a woman wears a dildo and rapes another woman: it's not rape? just because she's a woman? You have to be kidding me! It's this kind of la… | /r/MensRights | 12/05/10 02:58 PM |
| 9 | Minister wants rape put back into criminal code: Collapsing rape, attempted rape and indecent assault into the offence of sexual assault was "perhaps the biggest mistake in criminal law that the Parliament of Canada has ever made."Collapsing all sex offenses into a big umbrella offense was a brilliantly evil move by feminists. It allowed them to easily lobby for increased statutory penalties for "offenders" by pointing at the heavy end of the spectrum ("Congressman, do you defend the rights of child molesters?"), while at the same time expanding the list of behaviors that qualify as an offense, to the point of absurdity ("Drunken sex is now a sex offense - for the male only, of course"). This is how we ended up with count… | /r/MensRights | 12/05/10 05:37 AM |
| 5 | Tatiana Baston stabs ex-boyfriend in groin for refusing to have sex (he has a new girlfriend). Tatiana reports to police that she was defending herself from rape.There was no need for a plea bargain here. At most, they would have been unable to prove the "perverting the course of justice" charge, which is not really the big one here. Making a plea bargain to drop a "rape" charge and gain a a "perverting the course of justice" charge makes no sense, given that they could have had "aggravated assault" easily at trial, which is enough to lock her up for some time. | /r/MensRights | 11/05/10 10:27 PM |
| 4 | Tatiana Baston stabs ex-boyfriend in groin for refusing to have sex (he has a new girlfriend). Tatiana reports to police that she was defending herself from rape.FTA: Those allegations were later proved to be false. From this phrasing, it doesn't sound like the rape lie was discovered during the plea bargain phase. It sounds like they already had some other proof before, which explains why she had no choice but to admit to it during plea bargain. Edit: in this case, it's very likely that she was bombarding the dude with voice mails and text messages, which is possibly how the cops figured out she was lying.. | /r/MensRights | 11/05/10 10:09 PM |
| 7 | Tatiana Baston stabs ex-boyfriend in groin for refusing to have sex (he has a new girlfriend). Tatiana reports to police that she was defending herself from rape.Oh right! You can't have an attempted rape if the victim still has its clothes on. Right! But, you are not a rape apologist! Regarding the legalities: the prosecutor can throw all the charges he/she wants and see what sticks; the conviction for assault + weapon possession + lying was pretty secure given that she stabbed him and admitted to fabricating a false rape accusation, so I don't see the need for a plea bargain here! Please go crawl back under whatever rock you came from, you're just maki… | /r/MensRights | 11/05/10 08:49 PM |
| 6 | Tatiana Baston stabs ex-boyfriend in groin for refusing to have sex (he has a new girlfriend). Tatiana reports to police that she was defending herself from rape.WTF? Did you somehow miss the attempted RAPE part? Should we consider you a rape apologist from now on? Or maybe you're only a rape apologist if the rapist is a woman? (You can claim penis-pass when you find a case where a man attempted to rape a woman, used a deadly weapon and cut her genitals and got only 2 years..) | /r/MensRights | 11/05/10 08:32 PM |
| 24 | Tatiana Baston stabs ex-boyfriend in groin for refusing to have sex (he has a new girlfriend). Tatiana reports to police that she was defending herself from rape.Why is she not charged with attempted rape? If a man stabbed a woman in the boobs after she refused to have sex with him, what would the charges be? IMO at least attempted rape and sexual assualt. Pussy pass as usual.. | /r/MensRights | 11/05/10 02:11 PM |
| 3 | "Deeply devoted" father murdered in child custody exchange by mom's boyfriend who claimed that he felt threatened, apparently because his victim was unarmed and didn't touch him.Since he and his wife separated earlier this year, he had only seen his 9-year-old daughter a handful of times. | /r/MensRights | 11/05/10 12:53 AM |
| -1 | Obama appoints butch lesbian, feminist, with no judicial experience, Elana Kagan to supreme courtI would agree with it, if it was true. Bein a butch lesbian feminist is sometimes a political statement as well as a lifestyle choice. Since we don't know much about her yet, I think that it's quite normal to be concerned about her potential anti-male bias. Anyway, in the coming days, the media and bloggers will be combing her past for any detail that could shed some light on her positions an various issues, so we should have more information.. | /r/MensRights | 10/05/10 09:53 PM |
| 0 | Obama appoints butch lesbian, feminist, with no judicial experience, Elana Kagan to supreme courtOk. I did some research to figure out who this woman is. What I found is quite scary (and very disappointing if you are an Obama supporter) : According to wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elena_Kagan she has limited judicial experience aside from having been appointed Solicitor General by Obama less than a year ago (probably to give her at least some judicial experience before nominating her to the Supreme Court) "At her confirmation hearing, Kagan also drew criticism for arguing that batt… | /r/MensRights | 10/05/10 06:54 PM |
| 0 | Mean Mothers Who Psychologically Abuse Their Children Are As Bad as Sex Abusers, Say ExpertsI don't see your point. Keep looking.. | /r/MensRights | 08/05/10 06:32 PM |
| 27 | " If your husband hopes he can get out of paying you alimony by filing for bankruptcy, he's going to be very disappointed.""If your husband expects to be able to buy food and shelter, instead of maintaining you in the lifestyle you were accustomed to, he'll be very sorry he signed a marriage contract." | /r/MensRights | 08/05/10 06:15 PM |
| 2 | DailyShow segment, a drunk woman slaps male interviewer in the face; true comedy. Now imagine if the genders were reversed. (@2:17)Shaming tactic. [Please don't feed the troll] | /r/MensRights | 08/05/10 12:21 PM |
| 6 | Carol Rhodes, former child support enforcement officer describes systematic corruption to receive the maximum fed $$$ awarded for CS collection[video]For the newer members amongst us: the feds award billions of dollars to family courts based solely on the amount of child support "collected". This is usually the main source of financing for the family court system. In order to receive the maximum amount of fed dollars, the family court system is doing everything it can to collect as much child support as possible. BUT the family court system is also responsible for setting child support levels, computing child support due, collecting the money… | /r/MensRights | 07/05/10 01:22 AM |
| 2 | Maine police training manual on primary aggressor doctrine: no examples where female is worthy of arrest. (see self defence #1 and #2) .DOC alertOfficers’ job is to figure out who is the Predominant Aggressor, not to arrest both and let the DA figure it out. [...] In determining who is the predominant aggressor, officers should consider: Who in the relationship is the overall aggressor in terms of power and control dynamics? [the Power and Control Wheel section - straight from the Duluth model of DV - shows only men as controlling] Who is at most risk of future harm? Was the amount of force used appropriate and reasonable? What is the re… | /r/MensRights | 04/05/10 04:16 AM |
| 4 | Maine police training manual on primary aggressor doctrine: no examples where female is worthy of arrest. (see self defence #1 and #2) .DOC alertPolice indoctrination into anti-male sexism, paid for by our tax-dollars... VAWA-mandated sexist police training has been discussed in the past on this sub-reddit, but seeing the actual training document just makes me want to throw up! | /r/MensRights | 04/05/10 03:48 AM |
| 2 | Maine police training manual on primary aggressor doctrine: no examples where female is worthy of arrest. (see self defence #1 and #2) .DOC alertBe ready for audience members to protest that predominant aggressor is really just creating or reinforcing a gender bias against men. Remind them of the reality that predominantly women and children are being killed and seriously injured in Maine. and forget to mention the men killed and injured... (nationwide men make 1/3 of DV-related hospital visits, not sure about Maine, but it shouldn't be too different) | /r/MensRights | 04/05/10 03:46 AM |
| 3 | Federal Court: Man accused of rape has no right to present expert testimony that some women lie about rape . . . because everyone knows thatIf you want to debate on /MR, you have to learn how to make your points using logical thinking, and without weasel words ("obscure"). I can easily rewrite your comment, by switching the sides, which is a good sign that your comment is little more than empty rhetoric, without substance: "And what does telling the jury some obscure study found that it is not unusual for victims of sexual assault to delay reporting the assault to law enforcement do? It's basically saying, "she probably was delaying… | /r/MensRights | 03/05/10 02:10 PM |
| 7 | Proposed MensRights logoWTF? I think you meant the reddit chatroulette logo? | /r/MensRights | 30/04/10 08:57 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter