TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

toptrool Archive

View 164 posts and 473 comments by toptrool on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1216

toptrool/r/MensRights17/10/12 01:43 AM
1106

toptrool/r/MensRights25/06/13 07:41 PM
617

toptrool/r/MensRights18/02/13 01:21 PM
345

toptrool/r/MensRights16/05/13 05:47 PM
237

toptrool/r/MensRights18/06/13 06:01 PM
188

toptrool/r/MensRights23/03/12 07:03 PM
160

toptrool/r/MensRights17/09/12 12:49 AM
134

toptrool/r/MensRights13/03/13 11:24 PM
126

Red Pill Exampletoptrool/r/TheRedPill25/06/13 07:41 PM
122

toptrool/r/MensRights02/05/12 05:21 AM
98

toptrool/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:10 PM
97

toptrool/r/MensRights10/06/13 11:20 PM
85

toptrool/r/MensRights09/03/13 05:52 AM
81

toptrool/r/MensRights24/07/12 04:57 PM
80

toptrool/r/MensRights04/04/13 12:01 AM
74

toptrool/r/MensRights23/07/12 09:06 PM
73

toptrool/r/MensRights08/06/13 10:46 PM
72

toptrool/r/MensRights20/02/13 04:53 PM
71

toptrool/r/MensRights30/01/13 04:13 AM
63

toptrool/r/MensRights17/09/13 05:21 PM
61

toptrool/r/MensRights04/12/12 03:48 PM
60

toptrool/r/MensRights09/04/12 01:07 AM
58

toptrool/r/MensRights26/04/12 01:36 PM
56

toptrool/r/MensRights12/06/13 03:10 AM
54

toptrool/r/MensRights12/06/13 04:10 PM
53

toptrool/r/MensRights27/04/13 06:47 PM
50

toptrool/r/MensRights17/05/13 04:09 PM
50

toptrool/r/MensRights07/07/12 01:38 AM
48

toptrool/r/MensRights15/03/13 12:05 AM
48

toptrool/r/MensRights24/05/13 10:31 PM
47

toptrool/r/MensRights09/10/12 10:55 PM
38

Men's Rightstoptrool/r/TheRedPill02/07/13 10:33 PM
37

toptrool/r/MensRights21/11/12 09:23 AM
37

Blue Pill Exampletoptrool/r/TheRedPill29/05/13 03:30 PM
34

Men's Rightstoptrool/r/TheRedPill24/06/13 07:58 PM
33

toptrool/r/MensRights24/04/13 03:15 AM
32

toptrool/r/MensRights04/04/13 10:59 PM
31

toptrool/r/MensRights12/08/12 02:06 AM
30

toptrool/r/MensRights10/08/12 08:00 PM
29

toptrool/r/MensRights18/03/13 08:35 PM
28

toptrool/r/MensRights08/12/12 06:06 PM
28

toptrool/r/MensRights27/06/12 06:48 PM
26

toptrool/r/MensRights25/06/12 04:28 AM
25

toptrool/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:25 PM
25

toptrool/r/MensRights28/11/12 04:12 PM
24

toptrool/r/MensRights02/10/12 04:02 PM
24

toptrool/r/MensRights21/04/13 02:35 AM
24

toptrool/r/MensRights05/06/13 04:02 PM
24

toptrool/r/MensRights06/10/12 06:13 PM
23

toptrool/r/MensRights28/08/12 07:13 PM
23

toptrool/r/MensRights05/06/12 12:25 AM
23

toptrool/r/MensRights05/12/12 10:34 PM
23

toptrool/r/MensRights05/12/12 02:17 AM
23

toptrool/r/MensRights24/10/12 03:51 PM
22

toptrool/r/MensRights02/07/12 11:19 PM
21

Off Topictoptrool/r/TheRedPill28/06/13 04:31 AM
21

toptrool/r/MensRights12/04/13 07:50 PM
20

toptrool/r/MensRights31/10/12 03:56 PM
20

Red Pill Theorytoptrool/r/TheRedPill15/07/13 11:42 AM
20

toptrool/r/MensRights23/08/12 05:46 PM
20

Men's Rightstoptrool/r/TheRedPill31/05/13 05:33 PM
19

toptrool/r/MensRights07/04/12 01:37 AM
19

toptrool/r/MensRights22/09/12 02:47 AM
19

toptrool/r/MensRights21/09/12 02:34 AM
19

toptrool/r/MensRights16/03/13 10:06 PM
19

toptrool/r/MensRights12/05/13 01:03 AM
18

Red Pill Exampletoptrool/r/TheRedPill07/06/13 05:06 PM
17

toptrool/r/MensRights26/04/13 11:41 PM
17

toptrool/r/MensRights21/05/12 08:05 PM
16

toptrool/r/MensRights15/05/12 05:49 PM
16

toptrool/r/MensRights23/08/12 04:45 AM
16

Men's Rightstoptrool/r/TheRedPill23/06/13 09:04 PM
16

toptrool/r/MensRights03/04/13 11:48 PM
15

toptrool/r/MensRights14/02/13 04:55 AM
14

toptrool/r/MensRights04/05/12 12:37 AM
14

toptrool/r/MensRights29/05/13 01:03 AM
14

toptrool/r/MensRights29/12/12 05:17 PM
13

toptrool/r/MensRights05/10/12 02:37 AM
13

toptrool/r/MensRights29/11/12 01:52 AM
12

toptrool/r/MensRights18/11/12 03:36 AM
12

toptrool/r/MensRights17/07/12 05:54 AM
12

Red Pill Exampletoptrool/r/TheRedPill31/05/13 05:39 PM
12

toptrool/r/MensRights31/03/13 04:35 PM
11

toptrool/r/MensRights16/03/12 03:44 AM
11

toptrool/r/MensRights30/10/12 04:08 PM
11

toptrool/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:17 PM
11

toptrool/r/MensRights17/09/12 01:14 AM
10

toptrool/r/MensRights07/07/12 02:35 AM
10

toptrool/r/MensRights18/05/13 03:00 AM
10

toptrool/r/MensRights24/06/13 08:00 PM
10

toptrool/r/MensRights05/04/12 02:02 AM
10

toptrool/r/MensRights08/04/12 01:08 AM
9

toptrool/r/MensRights13/04/12 03:18 PM
9

toptrool/r/MensRights05/04/13 02:15 PM
9

toptrool/r/MensRights30/08/12 07:16 PM
9

toptrool/r/MensRights26/04/13 02:11 PM
9

toptrool/r/TheRedPill23/06/13 04:20 AM
9

toptrool/r/MensRights18/12/12 05:05 PM
9

toptrool/r/MensRights12/12/12 05:51 AM
8

toptrool/r/MensRights12/02/13 10:40 PM
8

toptrool/r/MensRights08/12/12 06:36 PM
8

toptrool/r/MensRights11/11/12 05:58 PM
8

toptrool/r/MensRights04/05/12 04:13 AM
8

toptrool/r/MensRights31/01/13 12:00 AM
8

toptrool/r/MensRights22/10/12 02:03 PM
8

toptrool/r/MensRights23/01/13 11:00 PM
8

toptrool/r/MensRights31/03/13 02:39 PM
8

toptrool/r/MensRights05/05/12 08:38 PM
7

toptrool/r/MensRights13/02/13 12:03 AM
7

toptrool/r/MensRights22/07/13 03:42 PM
7

toptrool/r/MensRights22/03/13 09:07 PM
7

toptrool/r/MensRights19/04/12 02:26 PM
7

toptrool/r/MensRights24/10/12 08:33 PM
6

Blue Pill Exampletoptrool/r/TheRedPill11/06/13 07:59 PM
5

toptrool/r/MensRights09/05/12 01:18 AM
5

toptrool/r/MensRights19/01/13 06:04 AM
5

toptrool/r/MensRights16/01/13 07:38 AM
5

toptrool/r/MensRights22/05/12 04:26 PM
5

toptrool/r/MensRights05/02/13 03:34 AM
5

toptrool/r/MensRights18/06/13 12:40 AM
4

toptrool/r/MensRights25/03/12 05:40 PM
4

toptrool/r/MensRights12/03/12 06:46 PM
4

toptrool/r/MensRights17/02/13 07:18 PM
3

toptrool/r/MensRights09/01/13 02:33 AM
3

toptrool/r/MensRights27/04/12 03:39 PM
3

toptrool/r/MensRights11/11/12 01:12 AM
3

toptrool/r/MensRights22/12/12 03:46 PM
3

toptrool/r/MensRights17/11/12 04:48 AM
3

toptrool/r/MensRights11/03/12 12:18 AM
3

toptrool/r/MensRights14/03/13 01:13 AM
2

toptrool/r/MensRights06/02/13 12:44 AM
2

Blue Pill Exampletoptrool/r/TheRedPill17/09/13 05:24 PM
2

toptrool/r/MensRights31/05/13 04:18 PM
2

toptrool/r/MensRights28/10/12 03:19 AM
1

toptrool/r/MensRights08/03/13 06:50 AM
1

toptrool/r/TheRedPill30/05/13 03:23 AM
1

Off Topictoptrool/r/TheRedPill25/06/13 03:36 PM
0

toptrool/r/MensRights21/02/13 12:11 AM
0

toptrool/r/MensRights19/07/13 08:26 PM
0

toptrool/r/MensRights17/02/13 03:09 AM
0

toptrool/r/MensRights27/05/13 08:19 PM
0

toptrool/r/MensRights08/12/12 05:40 PM
0

Men's Rightstoptrool/r/TheRedPill13/06/13 05:00 PM
0

toptrool/r/MensRights28/03/12 11:43 PM
0

toptrool/r/MensRights17/08/12 09:50 PM
0

toptrool/r/MensRights26/07/12 02:28 AM
0

toptrool/r/MensRights30/05/13 03:26 PM
0

toptrool/r/MensRights03/05/13 12:04 AM
0

toptrool/r/MensRights01/04/12 06:27 PM
0

toptrool/r/MensRights17/09/13 04:29 PM
0

toptrool/r/MensRights08/06/13 01:30 AM
0

toptrool/r/MensRights14/11/12 01:51 AM
0

toptrool/r/MensRights19/04/12 02:03 PM
0

toptrool/r/MensRights29/11/12 04:18 AM
0

toptrool/r/MensRights16/04/12 02:06 AM
0

toptrool/r/MensRights22/03/12 08:48 PM
0

toptrool/r/MensRights23/09/12 07:05 PM
0

toptrool/r/MensRights17/06/12 08:07 PM
0

toptrool/r/MensRights14/06/12 04:38 AM
0

toptrool/r/MensRights18/12/12 10:48 PM
0

Men's Rightstoptrool/r/TheRedPill29/06/13 04:49 PM
0

toptrool/r/MensRights29/06/13 04:49 PM
0

toptrool/r/MensRights25/01/13 04:48 AM
0

toptrool/r/MensRights17/01/13 11:15 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

did nanny bloomberg order this? i thought he was on a crusade to cut obesity.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/13 02:09 AM
8

interesting how she doesn't see her wanting men to behave according to her standards to be a form of entitlement. if you look at the pictures she provided, 1) everyone is able to fit themselves into one chair (one per person), and 2) those who take up more than one seat are sitting next to an empty chair.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/13 05:30 PM
11

interesting how she doesn't see her wanting men to behave according to her standards to be a form of entitlement. if you look at the pictures she provided, 1) everyone is able to fit themselves into one chair (one per person), and 2) those who take up more than one seat are sitting next to an empty chair.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 05:30 PM
0

it was tongue in cheek using the same rhetoric feminists use to justify abortion.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 05:20 PM
-1

this is why we need legal parental surrender, otherwise men will resort to dangerous back-alley abortion methods that may also kill women.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 04:30 PM
15

doesn't really matter nowadays . . . politicians are getting more creative when it comes to transferring wealth from men to women. just look at the common "marriage" laws and income tax as examples. soon they might even propose a bachelor's tax to "combat falling birth rates."
/r/TheRedPill24/07/13 05:34 PM
4

more "freedom" quotes: “Women who cannot decide for themselves if and when they have children are not free" "The fight over abortion has never been about babies, it has always been about the attempt to control women and enslave women to their reproduction." "Either you think women should be enslaved to their ability to have children, or you recognize that women are full human beings who must have control over their own lives, their own destinies, and their own reproductive decisions."
/r/MensRights22/07/13 03:44 PM
1

did i claim it was a natural response? no.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 09:38 PM
1

You therefore implied that what he did was a natural response to that predicament. i don't think he would've done so otherwise. the poster saint2e below pointed out another parallel.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 09:23 PM
-2

did i speak on the morality of it? no.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 09:07 PM
2

it's most definitely relevant; he doesn't have the option to abdicate responsibilities to his child like his girlfriend does.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 08:45 PM
1

she had posted another article about how feminism is ruining men and women. plenty of feminists were outraged by it.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/13 06:59 PM
0

so?
/r/MensRights13/07/13 06:57 PM
0

it's absolutely similar -- the end result of both is a parent abdicating responsibilities to a child.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 05:05 PM
0

or abortion.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 01:02 AM
0

what does adoption have to do with this?
/r/MensRights12/07/13 07:02 PM
0

so it's not about men being pro-choice, but it's just another pro-abortion article. if he were really concerned about "choice," he'd be lobbying the government to give men the right to choose when to be parents.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 05:30 PM
2

It's about men being pro-choice. It's just a catchy phrase. CLEARLY. Read the post. is he lobbying the government to stop going after men who choose not to pay child support?
/r/MensRights12/07/13 05:27 PM
1

don't be naive. if it were about the kids' rights, then abortion would be banned.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 08:31 PM
2

of course equality can happen. either ban abortion or allow parents to abdicate responsibilities to their children.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 08:30 PM
1

i agree. abortion should be banned.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 08:28 PM
5

obese women have been observed not to carry their pregnancies to a full term (resulting in preemies). it makes sense for a man not to mate with an obese woman.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/13 05:28 AM
1

if you go back to my conversational example, person a has already "proved" that women are like that. person b would have to disprove what is presented to him. let's try it. claim: nice guys turn women off. women find swaggering, brooding "bad boys" a lot more attractive than "nice guys." go disprove it.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 10:19 PM
2

statistically speaking, "not all women are like that" implies much variation within the whole group of women. the outliers would not be significant, and thus would be irrelevant in the conversation. and if it's true, statistically, that not all women are like that, then there would be a significant amount of variation between women. proving such variation would be left to person b, the one attempting the "not all women are like that" rebuttal. "this woman is not like that" implies some particula…
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 10:05 PM
5

if you read carefully, you'll note that i said "women are like that," and not "all women are like that." statisticians do admit that there are outliers, and if we are using boolean logic, those outliers would be a counterexample to the claim "all women are like that." the statement "women are like that" is however different -- it expresses what is normal for women. like i said, inductive reasoning is not "either or." statistical inferences make generalizations about the population based on the s…
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 09:20 PM
3

Yes, and since no one has run this experiment (it would be almost impossible anyway) and since any such study would never be referenced in a casual reddit comment, you can see why I am skeptical to accept "All women are X" statements at face value, especially since confirmation bias is the simplest explanation due to current pickup methodology. there's plenty of research out there that studies the differences between men and women. In fact any man who could feasibly attract and sleep with the 10…
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 07:59 PM
3

and statistics doesn't deal with boolean logic. if the number of women who "are not like that" is statistically insignificant, then yes, it's safe to say that women are like that.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 07:55 PM
6

we're not talking about boolean logic, we're talking about inductive reasoning, what majority of sciences use. a couple of deviations away from the mean imply abnormality -- something that is "not generally the case." but generally speaking, given a large enough number of observations, you could make the case of what is normal behavior.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 07:40 PM
2

A man who uses this as his mating strategy would be prone to making excuses for the ones that got away "She wasn't into me", "Bad Night", "Something wrong with her", "Frigid", and then concluding from his string of successes that "All women are sluts." well he would be wrong to say all women are sluts; but he would not be wrong to say that women who visit bars are sluts if, based on sufficient numbers of observations, that is the mean of all the data he's collected (from the all the women he's s…
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 07:29 PM
3

that makes no sense. the whole point of statistical inference is to create generalizations about a certain population -- to infer something about the population based on the sample data you collected. how would that be statistically impossible? do you doubt the law of large numbers? now obviously there will be outliers, but that's what they are, outliers. as you collect more and more observations, the data will point to some mean, which would be something true of the general population.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 07:23 PM
1

so what makes you think not all women are like that?
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 06:51 PM
6

He was the father to these kids for 16 years. so what? let him decide whether or not he wants to continue raising those children instead of the courts.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 01:53 AM
2

wow, so much for not judging others. only special snowflakes believe they have immunity from being judged. it's impossible not to be judged. this type of attitude demonstrates the extreme narcissism of modern women -- they really don't think they are responsible for their actions.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/13 01:47 AM
20

labor economists can map out wage differentials through several factors, risk being one of them. feminists need to realize that they're not getting paid less because of their gender.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 11:23 PM
13

legalzoom.com article explains how men are screwed in the u.s. as well: http://www.legalzoom.com/marriage-divorce-family-law/child-support/can-you-get-refund
/r/MensRights02/07/13 10:39 PM
3

here's another article on it: http://www.torontosun.com/2013/02/06/dad-must-pay-child-support-for-3-kids-that-arent-his-court-rules
/r/TheRedPill02/07/13 10:33 PM
5

it's an equality under the law argument. read my post here: http://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1hbf83/statistics_maternal_mortality_workplace_hazards/ and here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1h8i70/just_feminists_explaining_why_its_okay_for_women/cas1pvq
/r/MensRights02/07/13 01:02 AM
1

read my post here: http://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1hbf83/statistics_maternal_mortality_workplace_hazards/ more people die/are injured due to working than pregnancy related complications. mandating labor is a violation of bodily autonomy.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 12:59 AM
5

you think like a girl because the answer is obvious but you're still trying to make the situation convoluted.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 04:18 PM
1

pretty much it, but more specifically: If you met a girl who was smart, funny, pretty, kind, gentle, the total bring-home-to-your-parents package, but then you found out that she escorted 6 years ago for 2 months, you'd leave her? in my family, that's instant shaming and disowning.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 04:11 PM
1

if you want to compare rates of death, and by occupation, the international labor organization has good statistics: fatalities injuries
/r/MensRights29/06/13 06:08 PM
0

another scientific illiterate pro-abort. if you're going to deny that a pregnant woman isn't carrying an offspring, then there's simply no reason for you to be even attempting to debate things you have no knowledge of. the purpose of a pregnancy is that a woman is carrying an offspring. keep your silly beliefs about a child magically appearing during birth to yourself. the risks of pregnancy are nearly insignificant (21 out of 100,000 last i checked). in fact, workplace fatalities (fatalities al…
/r/MensRights29/06/13 04:40 PM
6

So, question. If you met a girl who was smart, funny, pretty, kind, gentle, the total bring-home-to-your-parents package, but then you found out that she escorted 6 years ago for 2 months, you'd leave her? exercise: find the contradiction.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/13 02:22 PM
1

anti-science feminism at its finest. name me one credible biologist/embryologist that denies that human development doesn't start at conception. your entire comment presupposes that an embryo or a fetus is the same as a child. so do you think a pregnant woman is carrying only fat throughout the pregnancy and that a baby magically appears?
/r/MensRights29/06/13 02:04 PM
-6

my thoughts: where elective abortions are allowed, abortion is female privilege: 1) females are allowed to legally kill their offspring if they do not desire it; males have no say on whether they want to be a parent and they are legally mandated to provide for the offspring. 2) the "bodily autonomy" argument feminists often try to object with does not work. if we consider the purpose of child support, that is providing shelter and nutrition to the offspring, then there's no reason why females ca…
/r/MensRights28/06/13 04:28 PM
3

why not just dump her?
/r/TheRedPill28/06/13 04:36 AM
6

this sort of political correctness wouldn't even see the light of day in the courts here in america.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/13 04:33 AM
5

today some guy on fox news read out tweets from women who praised this guy for being sexy. examples: "he may be a murderer, but he is damn sexy!" and "he is too sexy for jail!" documentation: http://www.uproxx.com/webculture/2013/06/twitter-fans-think-aaron-hernandez-is-too-sexy-to-kill-someone/ http://blacksportsonline.com/home/2013/06/meet-twitter-women-turned-on-by-aaron-hernandez-being-an-accused-murderer/ http://twitchy.com/2013/06/26/its-come-to-this-15-aaron-hernandez-groupies-tweet-their…
/r/TheRedPill28/06/13 01:08 AM
55

my disgust with feminism: majority of feminism is leftism. why do feminists often complain about how fewer people identify as feminists? why do feminists give out the standard dictionary definition of feminism (equal rights and opportunities) in attempts to recruit people into their ranks? simple reason: outside the academic elite, most people and their experiences tell them that feminism is unnecessary (at least in the western nations). if you look past the dictionary definition of feminism, yo…
/r/TheRedPill28/06/13 12:56 AM
35

excellent response by er0s. i don't understand why women feel entitled to a guy's commitment.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/13 05:28 PM
-12

most women have victimhood mentality -- a persecution complex. you look at all the surveys done with both men and women about general questions like "do you feel (my emphasis) that you are being treated unfairly?" and most women answer pessimistically.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 02:34 PM
2

i wonder how many men she slept with?
/r/TheRedPill27/06/13 05:03 AM
1

it wasn't government enforced though. but that goes to show the steps feminists are willing to take to weed out opposition. politically correct laws aid feminists in this.
/r/askTRP26/06/13 06:45 PM
5

1) it's not his fault the girl doesn't feel wanted. 2) he recommended that she get the problem checked out, he didn't mock her. 3) he's not satisfied with the relationship and is justified with ending the relationship for whatever reason. 4) telling a fat person to lose weight is good advice. 5) here's a standard definition of abusive.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/13 06:40 PM
2

proof?
/r/askTRP26/06/13 06:32 PM
1

is abortion still an issue? (rhetorical question)
/r/MensRights26/06/13 06:30 PM
2

meanwhile in france, germany, italy, and england. tell me more about how awesome the mighty USA is. its not like american arrogance and ignorance isnt already a stereotype. it's literally the best country in the world. the less political correctness, the better.
/r/askTRP26/06/13 06:22 PM
2

free speech isn't freedom of privacy.
/r/askTRP26/06/13 06:02 PM
2

if you're going to cite wikipedia, why don't you cite the entire thing? Traditionally, however, if the speech did not fall within one of the above categorical exceptions, it was protected speech. In 1969, the Supreme Court protected a Ku Klux Klan member’s racist and hate filled speech and created the ‘imminent danger’ test to permit hate speech. The court ruled in Brandenburg v. Ohio that; "The constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit a state to forbid or proscribe …
/r/askTRP26/06/13 06:00 PM
2

yes i realize europe isn't a single nation . . . but do go ahead and name any european country that doesn't have its own hate speech laws on the books. hint: look for european countries that aren't in the european union, because the e.u. does have prohibition against hate speech.
/r/askTRP26/06/13 05:57 PM
2

you don't have free speech to the extent we have in america. europe has plenty of "hate speech" laws that feminists and other activists hide behind.
/r/askTRP26/06/13 05:41 PM
2

did you look up the term "abusive" in your feminism unabridged dictionary?
/r/TheRedPill26/06/13 05:31 PM
1

my thoughts (also posted in the political discussion topic): where elective abortions are allowed, abortion is female privilege: 1) females are allowed to legally kill their offspring if they do not desire it; males have no say on whether they want to be a parent and they are legally mandated to provide for the offspring. 2) the "bodily autonomy" argument feminists often try to object with does not work. if we consider the purpose of child support, that is providing shelter and nutrition to the …
/r/MensRights26/06/13 05:25 PM
3

never had one to begin with. i feel vindicated after the recent revelations of government snooping.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/13 04:53 PM
10

He recommended I go to a gynecologist or buy some tightening cream. i don't know whether to praise him for trying to take some initiative or look down on him for coming off as desperate.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/13 04:52 PM
4

who's rights are you taking away here?
/r/MensRights26/06/13 04:31 PM
1

leftism currently has a strong streak here in america. i'm pretty sure this country will eventually fall. the only reason it hasn't declined at the same rate of europe is because of the first amendment (free speech).
/r/askTRP26/06/13 04:29 PM
15

the whole picture: make women's lives that of princesses at the expenses of peasant men.
/r/askTRP26/06/13 04:28 PM
2

they don't have the same brains.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 03:19 PM
7

i don't think it's limited to just norway. here in america there's plenty of gender studies departments at our universities and colleges, supported by government funding. north america has the most of these i believe.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 11:52 PM
0

it wasn't really touched upon. one of the doctors they interviewed is a specialist that deals with babies who are born with undeveloped genitalia or both genitalia (let's call them abnormal). he puts the babies in a room full of toys and monitors them. since it's true, according to research, that normal boy babies will choose the mechanical toys and the normal girl babies will choose toys with big faces (dolls and teddy bears), the doctors and parents decide how to proceed with surgery on the ab…
/r/MensRights25/06/13 11:01 PM
6

the norwegian parliament selects the committee that chooses the nominees and such for the peace prize.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/13 10:54 PM
8

nudity.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/13 10:30 PM
0

watch this entire documentary: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1h23bq/brainwash_norwegian_documentary_examines_how/ there's more rationale behind evolutionary psychology than feminist studies, sociology, and other social sciences.
/r/RedPillWomen25/06/13 08:01 PM
20

there is a lot of red pill content in this documentary (as well as blue pill content from feminists and gender researchers). i recommend you watch them all.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/13 07:53 PM
10

the nuclear family, no question about it.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/13 10:19 PM
2

his lawyer kept arguing that the court in milan was biased: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2013/06/03/berlusconi-defense-denies-erotic-escapades-at-ex-premier-villa-says-court/
/r/TheRedPill24/06/13 10:09 PM
4

age of consent in italy is 14: http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/14/world/europe/italy-berlusconi-trial
/r/MensRights24/06/13 08:10 PM
6

other interesting tidbits about the girl from the b.b.c. article: Later, Ms Mahroug became a belly dancer but denied ever working as a prostitute. "I tried but I didn't succeed. Like my mother told me, you're born a hooker, you don't become one." Ms Mahroug turned her role in the scandal to her advantage, appearing in lucrative TV interviews, adverts and by making special appearances in nightclubs around Italy. She is now a mother and reportedly married to a nightclub manager.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/13 08:09 PM
4

from the new york times: The trial, involving a then under-age woman named Karima El-Mahroug, nicknamed “Ruby Heart-Stealer,” had become the most personal, and tawdry, of Mr. Berlusconi’s many legal sagas. The three presiding judges, all women, handed Mr. Berlusconi a seven-year sentence, tougher than the six years that prosecutors had requested. . . . Both Mr. Berlusconi and Ms. Mahroug say they did not have sex, although Ms. Mahroug said the prime minister gave her 7,000 euros, or about $9,100…
/r/TheRedPill24/06/13 08:04 PM
3

from the new york times: The trial, involving a then under-age woman named Karima El-Mahroug, nicknamed “Ruby Heart-Stealer,” had become the most personal, and tawdry, of Mr. Berlusconi’s many legal sagas. The three presiding judges, all women, handed Mr. Berlusconi a seven-year sentence, tougher than the six years that prosecutors had requested. . . . Both Mr. Berlusconi and Ms. Mahroug say they did not have sex, although Ms. Mahroug said the prime minister gave her 7,000 euros, or about $9,100…
/r/MensRights24/06/13 08:04 PM
4

how is hugh jackman feminine?
/r/TheRedPill23/06/13 03:01 PM
31

another great comment by the same user in the same post: Dating a single mom is like playing someone elses saved game. http://www.reddit.com/r/AdviceAnimals/comments/1gusuk/as_a_divorced_mom_with_2_kids_i_have_not_been/cao298y
/r/TheRedPill22/06/13 07:00 PM
22

you're not looking at the whole picture; i.e., you're looking at this subject only in terms of monetary value. modern women only have sex to offer to men. they can't cook or clean; they're not family-oriented. they're too afraid of becoming housewives because feminists have succeeded for the most part into deceiving women into thinking housewives are weak and enslaved. their personalities are repulsive. anyone who questions them is a misogynist, wants to go back to the 1950s, etc. and so if we a…
/r/TheRedPill22/06/13 06:53 PM
6

taranto is one of the few in the mainstream media who speaks the truth about feminism. feminists will go out their way to make the lives of such reporters hell.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 05:47 PM
-1

solution: outlaw abortion.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 09:17 PM
3

like i said, a successful man raise child with, grow with, travel with, enjoy nice things with any woman he wants. your wealth and success are irrelevant to him, your cleanliness is irrelevant to him, since he could also hire maids and butlers, and your "feminine" style is nothing special. law of diminishing marginal utility: A law of economics stating that as a person increases consumption of a product - while keeping consumption of other products constant - there is a decline in the marginal u…
/r/TheRedPill19/06/13 05:20 AM
1

not on any specific leader, but: the art of war by sun tzu.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/13 10:06 PM
3

Well... no. Only because if his career is more successful than mine, it will make more sense that I should quit my job and be the stay-at-home parent. And I don't want to. so then what do you have to offer to man, other than great genes (giving you the benefit of the doubt)? not to mention child born through assisted reproductive technology have a higher likelihood of having birth defects, so what good will be your genes anyway? a successful man has no need for your careerism. you don't want to …
/r/TheRedPill18/06/13 09:46 PM
6

he has a point. i've seen plenty of women talk behind their dates' backs about how they didn't pay the bill. the "equality" talk modern women spout is a sham. they want all the rights but none of the responsibilities. they want to be taken care of.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/13 08:57 PM
2

Finally, what value (according to TRP) does a man have to me if not financial? If I don't need him for his ability to provide wealth or protection, what do I need him for? status. you're envious of the women around you who are 1) in a relationship with affluent/alpha men and 2) content with their lives. you want to marry up; which means you want to marry a man who has a more successful career than you. you want to have it all, even though it's unrealistic. if you marry a man who is more successf…
/r/TheRedPill18/06/13 08:42 PM
0

"new feminism," at least according to the wikipedia page, is much different from the mainstream feminism. they see women and men as complementary rather than equals.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 08:30 PM
5

were you expecting a pat on the back for this post?
/r/TheRedPill18/06/13 08:25 PM
1

Is objective beauty a thing? yes.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/13 07:40 AM
54

I know not all women are like this false. all women are alike.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/13 05:29 PM
2

Peachmelba peach, 1 month ago: If there is a next life,..... I hope you come back as a woman!! Lol theignoredgender, 1 month ago: So do I. That way my life will be easier. great one.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 04:36 AM
7

wow, did they really remove the entire post because it was "misleading"?
/r/TheRedPill15/06/13 04:17 AM
1

she must be halal.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/13 04:09 AM
3

same author: so what if abortion ends life? [abortion] saves lives not just in the most medically literal way, but in the roads that women who have choice then get to go down, in the possibilities for them and for their families. And I would put the life of a mother over the life of a fetus every single time — even if I still need to acknowledge my conviction that the fetus is indeed a life. A life worth sacrificing.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 03:47 AM
6

why do feminists think they're special snowflakes? every human being is an object in the universe.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/13 03:37 AM
16

My problem is that in the beginning, Daniel asked me how many men I've slept with. Being a little scared of his reaction, I lied and told him seven. But after a few months, I could not live with the lie and finally decided to tell him the reason why I still haven't slept with him yet. I told him I didn't want to make love because I was scared that he'd lose respect and eventually leave me like all the other men. At this point he asked me again, just how many men were there, to which I replied fo…
/r/TheRedPill14/06/13 03:34 AM
10

this sap has deluded himself into thinking christian conservative women aren't like that.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/13 02:04 AM
7

don't waste your time and money studying anything that won't net you any benefits in the future; if the future value of your investment (in education) is less than the present value, don't bother with it. for example, spending 3-4 years of your life studying lesbian studies, art history, chinese literature, social work, english, poetry, philosophy, history, etc., won't make you better off in the end, since none of those subjects will arm you with any desired skill sets that the market seeks. the…
/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 03:52 PM
2

What if I said "Black people are utterly incapable of loving each other in the way a white person expects them to." That's racist right? So why isn't the previous quote misogynistic? 1) sex and race are not related. 2) it's not misogynistic because it shows no hatred of women. i've got a bridge to sell to you if you think a woman will fall in love with a homeless man she meets. i'd say most women have long-term relationships in mind, and such relationships obviously require financial security. i…
/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 04:51 AM
9

plus, many women have convinced themselves that what they did really doesn't count as sex; and so by fooling themselves they would fool a real lie detector too, because that is what they truly believe.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 04:16 AM
7

i bet they still deflated the numbers a bit.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 04:13 AM
26

I don't care if I'm her first, I just want to be her last. i wonder what motivates such fairly tale beliefs? and by that i mean this thought process looks like it came straight out of a disney movie: "she could've had all the men in the world, but she left them to settle down with me. i'm the best." to me, being the "one and only" is the bigger ego boost than being the last one in line, especially if the woman dropped her standards to settle down with a beta because her biological clock was tick…
/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 03:57 AM
43

it sickens me how many people are deluded into thinking "it's not my business" or "what happened in the past stays in the past, it's about who she is now that matters." it's like they have no long-term planning when it comes to long-term relationships.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 03:51 AM
13

here's the full, unedited video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxJ-rGJBmAQ the feminist media is taking it out of context as always: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-205_162-57588725/e3-audience-offended-by-rape-joke-at-microsoft-xbox-one-event/ The audience laughs at the remark that many have been interpreted as a rape joke. The banter continues between the two, further adding fuel to the allegations that the joke mimicked a sexual assault scenario. "You have a fight stick," she says. "Wow, you lik…
/r/MensRights12/06/13 03:15 AM
1

no, i meant to reply to someone else.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 01:12 AM
25

here's the unedited video: http://www.tmz.com/2013/06/10/chad-johnson-slapped-lawyers-ass-court/?adid=hero4 you can see how the judge blew it out of proportions.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 12:02 AM
17

they were going over his plea bargaining and the judge said "you have a very good attorney" and that he should thank him. the slap on the butt was johnson's way of saying thanks (teammates do such things all the time on the field).
/r/MensRights10/06/13 11:59 PM
-22

wrong reply.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 11:58 PM
6

i wouldn't marry someone who is pro-abortion, no matter how "traditional" she claims to be. 1) i wouldn't trust her with my offspring. 2) she's clearly not family-oriented if she thinks women should have the legal right to kill their offspring based solely on their desires.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/13 03:14 PM
5

this isn't an "either or" situation. the government could pay for neither.
/r/TheRedPill09/06/13 11:47 PM
2

yeah, i missed my window of opportunity for doing that kinda thing. what? you can still go on campus and meet girls, no?
/r/TheRedPill09/06/13 10:27 PM
3

no, that's not my logic. i suggested that you find young women before they become "hos."
/r/TheRedPill09/06/13 10:07 PM
4

it's not anger, it's a filtering system. the whole point is to reduce the time you take to find a mate. chances are an older woman has already slept around with 500+ men (slight exaggeration), is likely infertile or going to be very soon (no kids for suave89), has lived her life longer to have even more things handed to her (thus making her feel more entitled), but of course all of this means i hate older women and i want to control women.
/r/TheRedPill09/06/13 10:06 PM
6

also, what you're asking for is essentially "which country has the most amount of women that are virtuous, loyal, can cook and clean, and are family oriented?" that's a passive approach to finding a mate. presumably you're going to fly off to whichever country is most recommended to you here to improve your chances of finding such women. i keep a mentality that all women are like that, and by "that" i mean completely opposite of what you want. in other words, none of them are virtuous, loyal, or…
/r/TheRedPill09/06/13 09:50 PM
4

go to college campuses and find potential mates while they're young. your age is slightly older than your average girl there, but it won't create any suspicion. chances are you could pick up a young woman who hasn't unleashed her inner slut yet and discipline her. many women are sucked into the slut/feminist culture around their late teens and early twenties, and so if you want, you can "save" them by steering them onto a different path -- a path that you desire.
/r/TheRedPill09/06/13 09:32 PM
17

you're not going to hold women accountable no matter how hard you try. back then, women relied on their fathers and husbands for income. if they weren't on their best behavior, they'd get their money supply cut (and often also their relationships). now they rely on the state to redistribute incomes to provide for them. some engineer in new york is paying for some single mom and her three kids in california, none of whom he's ever met. here in america single women overwhelmingly vote leftist, sin…
/r/TheRedPill09/06/13 09:21 PM
5

so you don't think that tossing him in jail for not making payments for child support while the mothers are getting checks from the government, instead of the same jailing threats, isn't a men's rights issue?
/r/MensRights08/06/13 03:38 AM
11

No, this is not the way relationships should be. You know how your friendships with other guys work? How ideally you're all equal, and you do things you decide on together, etc? Relationships with girls should be similar. The pattern of relationships doesn't really change with the genders of the people; a good dating relationship is simply a good friendship with certain particulars added. that is some silly equality nonsense. those who are the least interested have the upper hand in the relation…
/r/TheRedPill08/06/13 03:36 AM
1

i would say multiple miscarriages would have effects on relationships. if a woman is not able to carry an offspring and the man wants an offspring, then he might leave. couples at greater risk of breakup after pregnancy loss pregnancy loss can strengthen relationships, or tear them apart after an abortion, the rate of marital breakups and relationship dissolution is anywhere from 40 to 75 per cent
/r/TheRedPill08/06/13 03:20 AM
1

i don't see how that is relevant. no child support laws are based on "independence."
/r/MensRights05/06/13 11:24 PM
2

then why is it that the rights of the child go out the window when women want to abort it?
/r/MensRights05/06/13 11:11 PM
10

kids at a young age are indoctrinated with nonsense starting with "sharing is caring," and then being bombarded with "equality is ideal!" and finally, in college they're shaped to become "social justice warriors," and so it might be hard to break apart such dissemination that you've been fed throughout your entire life. if you need motivation, read some existentialism philosophy. make every interaction you make with others into a transaction. when entrepreneurs meet with investors, they need to …
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 05:13 PM
0

probably because it gives the image of being secure with food. procreation wise, i'm sure it's the opposite.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 11:12 PM
2

if the goal is to alert future sex partners about each other's problems, then: 1) we should make women wear a tag that says if she gets pregnant, she has all the options available to her and you have none. she can keep the child and make you pay up or she can kill the child you want. your only role is to sit by and cater to either of her decisions. 2) we should also make fat women wear something that highlights obesity being linked to premature births. my hypothesis: men do not find fat women at…
/r/MensRights03/06/13 10:27 PM
12

i'm proud of him. i thought this was going to end up like all the other stories about men getting suckered.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/13 09:58 PM
2

why "a" students work for "c" students and why "b" students work for the government the "a (grade)" students become academics and the "c" students become the wealthy donors. i would go as far to say that being a social animal is more advantageous than being an intellectual one. you can't be dumb as rocks, but you certainly don't have to spend so much time reading books in order to be successful. most students are being fooled into believing that they'll be happy doing what they love, and that th…
/r/MensRights03/06/13 05:18 PM
4

this should be a red pill example (hypergamy).
/r/TheRedPill03/06/13 05:50 AM
2

kaitlyn hunt would have been a better example.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 04:14 PM
17

i expected a "not all women are like that" reply, and there they were.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/13 11:21 PM
29

because historically, feminism has no track record of helping women of color.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 05:54 PM
24

I will add here the requisite qualifying paragraph that I'm writing about a narrow cross-section of well educated women, who have the financial ability to determine the amount of time they spend with their kids. proof feminism is only about helping rich, white women. also, why does she think that the entire world should cater to the desires of feminists? these type of feminists sound like spoiled brats. feminism: the radical notion that grown women are children.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 05:18 PM
19

According to Lesko, Nicole McCarthy is a fake account set up by the mother of his son, and he's hoping to clear his name and put this in the past. wow. i hope she loses all custody, gets sued, and sent to jail.
/r/MensRights26/05/13 05:36 PM
2

it's a silly comment. 1) a state of paranoia is not exclusive to one gender; 2) men do worry about unintended pregnancies.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 08:02 PM
7

highest rated comment on the daily mail article: Just try being a married woman who doesn't want kids. I was very fortunate that my husband was of like mind, but the comments we've gotten over the years from family, friends, and even strangers are offensive and ludicrous. We're "selfish." We're "delusional." "One day you'll change your minds." "Who will take care of you when you get old?" "You don't know 'real love' until you're a parent." And on and on. I'm sick to death of parenting pushers. I…
/r/MensRights25/05/13 07:58 PM
2

i didn't suggest all women are useless. what i said was based on my experience, most women bring no benefits to me.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 07:15 PM
3

what sexist comment?
/r/MensRights25/05/13 07:12 PM
2

So, with those sort of laws being passed what is to stop hetro men getting married, as a sort of business arrangement? Find a guy you trust, get an airtight pre nup drawn up and then basically agree to make the use of the legal benefits of being married. . . . This would ALSO protect you from laws in regard to women taking your stuff. that is a naive way of looking at it. most courts don't even go by what is explicitly written on paper; instead they'll account for several other factors such as "…
/r/TheRedPill25/05/13 06:23 PM
3

of course they would be. what do modern [western] women have to offer other than sex? from my experience: nothing. they can't cook, clean, look after themselves, nor are they family oriented.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 02:37 PM
11

I can hardly believe the entitlement and lack of remorse from this woman. Somehow SHE is the victim. Wait, what? western women thrive on victimhood. just take a look at the comments: most of it includes portraying the husband as an abuser and/or the typical "you go girl!" attitude.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/13 01:30 AM
7

No one can be blamed but themselves in this case, since they must know they're responsible for their future. or they can simply shift responsibilities to taxpayers. single women overwhelmingly support a big government. solution: stop giving student aid for silly degree programs.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 04:19 AM
5

clearly this is the work of the patriarchy and rape culture. only an institution like the patriarchy could promote the idea that only some rapes are legitimate.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 12:57 AM
2

You are basing your argument on the assumption that the fetus is a child and abortion is killing it. neither of those are assumptions.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 05:49 AM
2

In the eyes of the law, the ability to request child support payments requires the child to have been born. i'm arguing the law is being inconsistent with child support laws, and so you agree with me, yes?
/r/MensRights23/05/13 04:37 AM
2

i didn't ask for your position; i simply pointed out that those who believe a fetus isn't a child are simply ignorant, and the views of ignorant people are irrelevant to this discussion. a fetus is a child and the law is being inconsistent by denying the child the support it needs. A fetus at the time of abortion is a bundle of cells. at any point in time, so are we. They are human cells but they do not fulfill what I consider the most basic requirements of personhood and what exactly are these …
/r/MensRights23/05/13 04:35 AM
6

I'm not much of a conspiracy theorist but I don't like the idea of the government compiling a DNA database of its citizens at birth. who says the government needs to create a database?
/r/MensRights23/05/13 04:20 AM
1

it's not a separate issue at all. if the purpose of child support laws are for the "betterment of a child," then allowing abortion is inconsistent. The trouble you run into is a majority of people do not believe that fetuses are children. so, do these people think pregnant women are only fat, i.e., they're simply carrying more weight around their midsections? the whole point of being pregnant is carrying an offspring. if such people do not believe pregnant women are carrying their offspring, the…
/r/MensRights23/05/13 04:18 AM
0

No, that's be cognizant of the current legal landscape in regards to child support. You can't get child support for an unborn child, therefore in regards to child support, a woman does not have a child until it is born. what exactly are you saying? it's not a child because you can't give it money yet? i'm not understanding. If he's doing it to explicitly dodge paying child support, then I think that's behavior that needs to be addressed legally. so you're saying that he can't make decisions abou…
/r/MensRights23/05/13 04:12 AM
0

Pregnant women don't have a child yet. (until the viability mark) that's simply being ignorant of the reality. is a pregnant woman not carrying an offspring? a child exists in a pregnant woman, otherwise she wouldn't be pregnant. it doesn't magically begin to exist at birth (or a some viability mark). if the law is going to be for "the betterment of a child," then it should apply to all children, instead of relying on a metric solely dedicated to the convenience of women. I don't think anyone ha…
/r/MensRights23/05/13 03:56 AM
2

The idea of financial abortion being allowed opens the door to suggest parents have no obligation to the children they are legally the parent of. do you think pregnant women should not be obligated to provide for their children? more specifically, do you believe that abortion should be legal? if the law were truly for "the betterment of a child," then elective abortions would not be allowed. the reality is that jurisdictions that mandate child support but also allow elective abortions are being …
/r/MensRights23/05/13 03:30 AM
4

that's a good take on it.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 08:51 PM
0

the bodily autonomy case only works for pregnancies resulting from sexual assault. i believe the personal responsibility objection to it is pretty strong for all other cases.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 10:37 AM
0

Also, aren't women more then just uteri? Aren't they people too? what's your point? are you saying women shouldn't take responsibilities towards their children? that would mean women should be treated differently.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 05:26 AM
-1

the quickest way to disassemble the bodily rights argument is by appealing to moral intuition. simply bring up parental obligations and personal responsibilities. responsibility: if you've created the need for someone to be dependent, then you should be morally obligated to provide for that need. suppose that two drunks decided to pull some shenanigans on you. while you were asleep, the drunks kidnapped you, took you to a medical clinic, and removed your liver. one of the drunks volunteers to su…
/r/MensRights14/05/13 05:16 AM
3

yes.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 01:40 AM
0

i'm saying that a woman needs to take personal responsibility for her child and the government needs to enforce that responsibility by ensuring that she does not kill it.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 01:04 AM
3

you can't police a woman's body so #1 is a no go. says who? there's plenty of places in the world where abortion is illegal. If #2 happens, you are basically saying that all personal responsibility in procreatment is being lifted from men. so?
/r/MensRights12/05/13 12:55 AM
3

the law is inconsistent where abortion is allowed for elective purposes. a mother can legally kill her offspring if she does not choose to be a parent. the father has no options -- he is mandated to pay child support. solutions: 1) outlaw elective abortions; or 2) allow men to opt out of parenthood.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 12:49 AM
1

it is an argument against abortion; most feminists use such arguments when it comes to child support. my argument is simply that you can only consent to acts, not consequences.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 01:11 PM
0

i did make an argument. do you think men should be forced to pay child support?
/r/MensRights03/05/13 12:26 AM
-3

i bring this up every time this argument pops up: abortion, wherever allowed (for elective purposes), is female privilege. reasons being: females are allowed to legally kill their offspring if they do not desire it; males have no say on whether they want to be a parent and they are legally mandated to provide for the offspring. the "bodily autonomy" argument feminists often try to object with does not work. if we consider the purpose of child support, that is providing shelter and nutrition to t…
/r/MensRights03/05/13 12:05 AM
0

try reading my post again.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 12:49 AM
1

i prefer to bring abortion into this debate just to see the hypocrisy ooze from the feminists, whose main arguments against abortion can work against child support.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 01:02 PM
4

i bring this up every time this argument pops up: abortion, wherever allowed (for elective purposes), is female privilege. reasons being: females are allowed to legally kill their offspring if they do not desire it; males have no say on whether they want to be a parent and they are legally mandated to provide for the offspring. the "bodily autonomy" argument feminists often try to object with does not work. if we consider the purpose of child support, that is providing shelter and nutrition to t…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 01:00 PM
1

it's a subtle (and politically incorrect) jab at feminists' insistence that things would be better if more women were in charge (gender quotas, etc.) and that women can and should do everything men can.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 03:32 PM
8

more than 60 percent of the corrections officers at the detention center are women
/r/MensRights27/04/13 06:58 PM
0

we should get together and make a wikipedia group.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 02:34 PM
3

there's plenty of research supporting female hypergamy. i'd say she's absolutely spot on with her claim: women are very reluctant to marry men that are "beneath" them; and their time at ivy league schools is perhaps their best shot at finding men of equal or higher pedigree to them. nowhere else do such concentrations exist, or if they do, they are very limited.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 02:18 AM
2

most fields are objective and deliver results.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 11:55 PM
5

you are right. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_science#Feminist_critiques
/r/MensRights13/04/13 11:55 PM
24

for feminists to spread their messages, they need to maintain a presence in the universities. so, in order to create an image of seriousness, the "academic" feminists create their own technical terms and [conspiracy] theories in attempts to give their field some weight. anyone who wants more information on this stuff can simply google "science wars," "scientism," "positivism," and "postmodernism." if the right-wing and anti-feminists alike want any results, they'll have to axe funding for many o…
/r/MensRights13/04/13 03:44 PM
1

there's a lot of misinformation in that article (unrelated to the actual survey). it seems to me that the author is pushing her agenda.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 07:52 PM
3

also, i bring this up every time this argument pops up: abortion, wherever allowed (for elective purposes), is female privilege. reasons being: females are allowed to legally kill their offspring if they do not desire it; males have no say on whether they want to be a parent since they are legally mandated to provide for the offspring. the "bodily autonomy" argument feminists often try to object with does not work. if we consider the purpose of child support, that is providing shelter and nutrit…
/r/MensRights05/04/13 02:41 PM
5

what i found to be the most important part of the article was the reluctance of feminists to even discuss men's reproduction rights: In 2005, Dalton Conley, dean of social sciences at New York University, who specializes in family issues, wrote an op-ed for The New York Times titled "A Man's Right to Choose." In it, he recounted how angry he'd been in his twenties when a former girlfriend chose to abort a child he'd wanted. It's a passionate rumination on the value of making fathers and fatherho…
/r/MensRights05/04/13 02:36 PM
3

no; most feminists rely on censorship.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 03:18 PM
22

sort of unrelated, but: in america, we already have unqualified feminists sitting on the boards of institutions, where they can dictate new policies of the company/organization. such policies include changes to the culture of the organization to cater to the sensitivities of the "oppressed" at the expense of others, replacement of objectivity for agendas, and accruement of power for their ideology. just look at what happened to the american psychological association: http://www.dadi.org/eg_apa.h…
/r/MensRights30/03/13 04:13 PM
8

because the marriage rate is declining, they're going to start their own new definition of marriage just to enable more transfer of wealth from men to women. why don't these fools just get on with a bachelor's tax already?
/r/MensRights30/03/13 01:22 AM
3

The mother would still be able to give up the baby for adoption, but would not be allowed to have an abortion. Does this change how you think at all about paternal surrender? yes. the inequality in reproductive decision comes from the fact that women can (where abortions are legal) kill their offspring to avoid parenthood, while the law simultaneously puts men on the hook for children they don't want. if abortion is not an option, both parents are to take responsibility of the child.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 09:24 PM
6

this ad is basically taking a male victim to amplify the victimhood of women.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 09:09 PM
-16

what is "alcohol-facilitated rape"? this sounds like something written by a gender feminist.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 07:35 PM
8

next thing you know she'll be crying victim and she'll have her own kickstarter. with thousands of dollars in donations too!
/r/MensRights19/03/13 10:01 PM
18

feminism is about victimhood. it's quite obvious what their plan is: 1) continue deceiving the masses into believing that feminism represents all women; and thus feminism becomes the monolithic representation of women in the eyes of the people. 2) consequently, criticism of feminism becomes criticism of women. this proposed law would essentially ban/criminalize criticisms of feminism. this is happening in the united states already, where criticizing feminist policies (v.a.w.a., "obamacare" contr…
/r/MensRights15/03/13 04:20 PM
1

i have seen people collaborate on some things. i think they are called projects? i am not sure, i just started using wikipedia recently.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 01:51 AM
5

how can we create a men's rights group in wikipedia? (so that we can keep in touch with one another and create a watch group)
/r/MensRights11/03/13 09:13 AM
1

it's back up (they undid everything). what should i do?
/r/MensRights10/03/13 05:36 PM
1

i got reported by a feminist (and subsequently blocked for 24 hours). how can i appeal?
/r/MensRights10/03/13 02:13 AM
2

i got reported by a feminist (and subsequently blocked for 24 hours). how can i appeal?
/r/MensRights10/03/13 02:12 AM
1

according to the study: m.m.r. decreased due to advancement in medical technology and improvement of education for gynecology/neonatal care. in fact, in chile, m.m.r. has decreased drastically after abortion was criminalized (it was legal before).
/r/MensRights09/03/13 05:50 PM
16

i added counter arguments; here are my additions: Objections to this argument is that men are already legally obligated to provide child support, and such laws lead to a double standard where abortions are legal.<ref>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-2230.6602001/full</ref> In the [[United States]], laws exist in both the State and Federal levels that penalize the failure of not meeting child support payments; penalties range from fines to imprisonment.<ref>http://www.ncsea.org/doc…
/r/MensRights09/03/13 05:54 AM
0

relevant
/r/MensRights08/03/13 07:15 AM
161

we have to raise the minimum wage because . . . women.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 12:34 AM
3

False allegations of DV are the tip of the iceberg. Adultery. Mental illness. Addiction. Child abuse. The lies would blossom like kudzu on both sides of the gender divide, if lying became the only way to get out of a bad marriage. this already happens for child custody hearings. it could be either lie for divorce or lie for child custody.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 11:34 PM
4

i also support this legislation (albeit not as extensively). if there are children involved, they should have a say in whether their parents get divorced, since divorce has a huge impact on their lives.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 09:37 PM
0

no thanks.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 03:39 PM
1

I see your point with this approach but I worry the "fetus is not child" clause would be a simple escape for them. The approach I like better is your... obviously then they are oblivious to the facts. child = offspring. is the pregnant women carrying an offspring?
/r/MensRights20/02/13 03:30 AM
32

it was added for political correctness purposes, most likely. obviously we can't have feminists feigning outrage over such studies.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 01:55 PM
15

i bring this up every time this argument pops up: abortion, wherever allowed (for elective purposes), is female privilege. reasons being: females are allowed to legally kill their offspring if they do not desire it; males have no say on whether they want to be a parent since they are legally mandated to provide for the offspring. the "bodily autonomy" argument feminists often try to object with does not work. if we consider the purpose of child support, that is providing shelter and nutrition to…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 05:11 AM
1

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/joshua-woodward-searched-internet-abortion-tips-prosecutors-article-1.1187647
/r/MensRights17/02/13 04:36 PM
1

i'm just saying that there's a possibility of such laws being extrapolated into prosecuting people who are simply "convincing" women to get abortions.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 05:15 AM
2

don't be so naive. most laws sound good on paper, but aren't enforced/applied properly.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 05:05 AM
-1

once a child has been conceived, men have very limited options (or none at all). 1) attempting to convince their partners to get abortions might be grounds for a lawsuit. 2) child support laws mean that you must take care of the child, regardless of whether or not you wanted it. the only thing men can do is fight for custody or convince their partners to put the child up for adoption.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 03:09 AM
1

once a child has been conceived, men have very limited options (or none at all). 1) attempting to convince their partners to get abortions might be grounds for a lawsuit. 2) child support laws mean that you must take care of the child, regardless of whether or not you wanted it. the only thing men can do is fight for custody or convince their partners to put the child up for adoption.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 03:07 AM
10

do not try to force her to get an abortion. there are laws that allow women to file lawsuits over forced abortions.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 03:02 AM
5

contact your representative in the house: http://www.house.gov/representatives/find/
/r/MensRights13/02/13 12:52 AM
-1

1) only get married if you are 100% sure that you want children in the near future. 2) get a pre-nup agreement. 3) avoid western women.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 02:36 AM
7

exactly what i thought. too many feminist keywords.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 06:22 PM
2

other relevant reads: http://standyourground.com/forums/index.php?topic=3302.0;wap2 http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/society-and-culture/sedation-nation-the-cost-of-taking-boisterous-out-of-boys-20110216-1awij.html
/r/MensRights05/02/13 03:37 AM
0

then i'm sure you'd have no problems being rejected because the man didn't want a slut for a wife, or because he wanted his wife to stay home and raise children, correct?
/r/MensRights03/02/13 09:02 PM
0

right -- not wanting to settle down with a partner that shares your values is being insecure. i totally understand where you're coming from.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 12:13 AM
6

i bring this up every time this argument pops up: abortion, wherever allowed (for elective purposes), is female privilege. reasons being: 1) females are allowed to legally kill their offspring if they do not desire it; males have no say on whether they want to be a parent since they are legally mandated to provide for the offspring. 2) the "bodily autonomy" argument feminists often try to object with does not work. if we consider the purpose of child support, that is providing shelter and nutrit…
/r/MensRights01/02/13 04:32 PM
1

you mean the wording of the article? otherwise, the law also includes young boys.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 12:02 AM
1

statutory rape (sex with a minor) is criminal activity -- even if both parties consented (as in this case). the court is now considering the idea whether both are criminals since they both consented to a criminal activity.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 11:39 PM
6

so? it doesn't matter what his options were before the pregnancy (both the man and the woman have similar options), what matters is what his options are during/after the pregnancy. answer: zero.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 12:06 AM
11

it has everything to do with men's right. abortion is female privilege. in most western countries, women are allowed to legally kill their offspring while men are on the hook for parenthood they did not desire.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 11:06 PM
2

my take: laws like this will only gives incentives to cry abuse.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 07:39 AM
1

new york times article can't hide its bias: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/09/us/politics/under-obama-a-skew-toward-male-appointees.html?_r=2&
/r/MensRights09/01/13 02:33 AM
1

so you're saying women should be above the law. got it.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 10:51 PM
2

so you would be a fine with a law that says pregnant women are obligated to provide support to their offsprings, and thus abortion should be outlawed, right?
/r/MensRights06/01/13 10:35 PM
1

so? they still should be obligated to provide food and nutrition and shelter to their offsprings, right?
/r/MensRights06/01/13 10:31 PM
1

People should absolutely be required to provide material support for their offspring if they are capable of doing so. that has everything to do with reproduction. but i take it that you've changed your mind on abortion now? a pregnant woman should be required to provide food and nutrition to her offspring, right?
/r/MensRights06/01/13 10:22 PM
4

just because you pay support doesn't mean you get to decide what the woman should do why shouldn't it? it's my money. why can't i decide what to do with it, or what others should do with it?
/r/MensRights06/01/13 10:20 PM
31

the media likes sensational stories. if there's a victim, the media will be there to sell the story. unfortunately, the feminist culture has made it seem like that only women are victims.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 10:19 PM
1

I don't believe reproductive decisions should be legislated. so you're against child support/child neglect laws? even though you are personally against men walking out on their children, you don't want your opposition to such acts to be legislated, correct?
/r/MensRights06/01/13 10:16 PM
1

it basically comes down to whose body the child is growing in and that's where the problem is. it should also come down to who's paying for support.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 10:03 PM
1

as a man who thinks women who should also take responsibility for risky behavior, i advocate for restricting abortions to only few circumstances. you should help, since we share the same views.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 10:02 PM
3

share it anyway. we won't be successful in spreading our message if we are too afraid to speak out on the issues. we need to start conversations.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 10:00 PM
-4

In choosing to have an abortion, the women isn't choosing to "leave the kid," she's choosing to not bring the child into existence. false; the child is already in existence (otherwise she wouldn't be pregnant). she's choosing to kill the child to avoid responsibility; men can't do the same (the same as in, avoid responsibility, not kill the child.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 09:55 PM
5

i take it you would be fine with outlawing abortion in most cases?
/r/MensRights06/01/13 09:49 PM
1

to me, it seems to be contradictory for one to be for legally enforced child support (and to an extension, child neglect laws) and be for legal elective abortions. setting aside the obviousness of the responsibility argument cutting both ways: what child support laws do is mandate that parents provide nutrition and security to their children. one could extend child support laws to create an obligation for pregnant women to carry their pregnancies to term. the uterus' sole purpose is to provide n…
/r/MensRights06/01/13 09:03 PM
0

my idea: restrict no-fault divorces in couples who have minor children by allowing the children to have a say in the divorce proceedings.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 12:23 AM
2

am i the only one here who sees the bigger problem?: feminism is about female entitlements (privilege) than about equality.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 05:30 AM
3

I think this argument has some merit. except it doesn't. this "double standard" is another myth created by feminists in order for them to be perceived as victims. i can show you one study that demonstrate that promiscuous men are shamed just as much: http://www.medicaldaily.com/articles/11565/20120817/casual-sex-america-peer-respect.htm there are more studies that show the double standard doesn't exist, but this is the latest ones i've read.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 06:45 PM
34

i believe this was tongue in cheek.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 03:10 AM
7

i see that feminists are up to the same old shaming tactics. you want a paternity test? you must be the cause of an unhealthy relationship.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 02:48 PM
27

there is no double standard here. men are shamed just as much for being promiscuous: http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2010/04/generation_scold.html virgin shaming, slut shaming, none of that matters to me. i am more interested in neutralizing the government when it comes to rights, because that is what truly matters.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 07:57 PM
1

i'd rather not jump to conclusions, and in particular about her stances on abortion (though some of her posts, in particular where she says abortion would have been an option had the pregnancy might not been her last chance for children, imply that she is in favor of it). but this is a comment for the general case: to me, it seems to be contradictory for one to be for legally enforced child support (and to an extension, child neglect laws) and be for legal elective abortions. setting aside the o…
/r/MensRights18/12/12 11:17 PM
-1

great one. we should spread this around just to see feminists wild out in their hypocrisy (since feminists love pointing out how mass killers are males).
/r/MensRights18/12/12 09:39 PM
11

it's a well hidden fact, in a politically society, that children who grow up without fathers end up with behavioral problems. society as a whole needs to stop praising single mothers like they're some sort of heroes. you can expect the media to talk about some emotional "feel good" anecdotes of single moms, but that will not mask the real problem society faces as a result of broken families.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 05:10 PM
6

speaking on the moral issue: if the government is to take this man's liberty away, it should also take away the six women's as well. they're all at fault.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 02:24 AM
-1

the feminist controlled media has been praising the posters since they push their preferable image for non-masculine genders (women/gays) as victims and males as perpetrators ("don't be that guy"). i have been seeing similar posters on my campus (though not the exact ones), where women are portrayed to be the victims. the problems we face are that 1) we do not have the resources for awareness campaigns like women's groups do, since plenty of government policies are weighted in favor of "lifting"…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 06:55 PM
1

many societies have been convinced that a woman killing her child through abortion is "empowering," or a "human right"; yet no society allows a man to choose not to provide financial support for his children.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 03:35 AM
3

it has less to do with gender politics and more to do with racial politics. white women overwhelmingly went for mitt romney. it was the latino + black women vote that carried obama to a second term. the media is just hyping up feminist rhetoric, perhaps to "empower" them.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 02:36 AM
3

two books: mismatch: how affirmative action hurts students it's intended to help, and why universities won't admit it here's a review: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444734804578063650361070668.html affirmative action around the world: an empirical study review: http://www.economist.com/node/2765848
/r/MensRights11/11/12 04:35 AM
1

before feminists try to give abortion as the reason for the gap, here are some relevant articles: according to exit poll data, 59% of those who voted said abortion should be legal in most or all cases compared to 36% who say it should be illegal in most or all cases: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/elections/2012-exit-poll however, men and women are equally divided on the issue of abortion: http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/314640/abortion-and-gender-gap-numbers-ramesh-ponnuru http://news.y…
/r/MensRights11/11/12 01:40 AM
1

the problem is that men are being sent to jail for having consensual sex. the age is only a problem because the law said so.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 01:31 AM
8

in america: women already have equal opportunity and are treated as human beings. that was accomplished in the first wave feminism. feminist movements from the second wave and beyond were created by elite white women because they wanted a feeling of self importance. as a result, they started creating conspiracy theories (the patriarch, rape culture, etc.) to create an illusion of oppression. the fact of the matter is women had it all after the first wave feminism, and there was no way anyone cou…
/r/MensRights30/10/12 05:29 PM
5

apparently only women should be allowed to hold rallies where they can act indecent, and have society's approval as well.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 03:21 AM
1

yes.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 06:47 PM
1

Sperm exhibit all those characteristics no, they do not. sperms do not have any parts nor vital processes. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/biology-individual/
/r/MensRights26/10/12 09:00 PM
1

sperm aren't organisms, they're cells.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 08:51 PM
1

no.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 08:36 PM
1

Even if true, this does not requite "government" to be that party. Ex. Individuals. yes, that is true. but who's going to enforce those rights? a right can be created through contracts between two individuals, but who will enforce the contract? of course you can say another third party, other than the government, can enforce the contract. but the point i'm making is not that the government is the only arbitrator of rights, but that if it were decided that the government would outlaw abortion, th…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 04:29 PM
-1

it is not horrid at all. for there to be rights, there needs to be a party that is ready to fulfill the duty of guaranteeing those rights. if there is no party that does that, there can be no established rights. whether or not i'll be able to convince them or not is dependent on the meaning of "'full' human." i have already demonstrated that there is no such thing as a complete human being. thus, the question i would propose to them is whether they believe not all human beings are deserving of e…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 04:18 PM
18

If a woman wants to abort, she can, it's unfortunate that men don't have an equivalent, but that's nobody's fault. it's society's fault (assuming a representative democracy) for not guaranteeing fathers the right to abdicate responsibility like they have for mothers. When a man has sex with a woman he's put the ball in her court voluntarily - he should be prepared for whatever outcome may arise a woman also makes the decision to have sex. she better be ready to accept any consequences of her act…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 04:10 PM
0

my retort: 1) there's no such thing as a "full" human. development of human beings start from a single cell organism and ends the day the human dies. it is a continuous process, not something that can be completed. 2) rights come from the government. a government can give rights to the unborn, and establish a legal relationship between a child and its mother.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 04:06 PM
16

it is relevant because the same argument you are using can be used to justify outlawing abortion. if you aren't ready to support a child, don't copulate. if a child does come into existence, you better be ready to take care of it.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 03:52 PM
1

you can't be for laws mandating child support and be against laws that bar [elective] abortions. i only talk about elective abortions -- those done to abdicate personal responsibility due to inconveniences a mother might not want to face. the hard cases of abortion done to save the mother's life, or when a pregnancy resulted from rape, or when the child is severely malformed, are not included in this discussion. when you bring this topic up to feminists, they give the (very weak) response of the…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 03:47 PM
6

just imagine you are a professor of "african studies" in a respected university. a girl who is well-versed in feminist tropes raises her hand and asks you a question about female circumcision that is so prevalent in africa. your reaction is to quickly dismiss her and joke about how she should get circumcised to see how it is before she bashes the practice. the next day you would be waking up to reporters ringing your doorbell, a call from the university officials telling you that you have been f…
/r/MensRights21/10/12 03:05 PM
4

Lets not mention invasive inter uterine sonagrams being required to get abortions; most, if not all, abortions require sonograms, regardless of the law. politicians taking funding away from planned parent hood clinics taking away subsidies could be attributed to many, valid reasons other than a "war on women." for example: 1) we are spending money we do not have, thus we should cut funding for this organization; or 2) we do not want to subsidize anything; 3) we do not want to support organizatio…
/r/MensRights21/10/12 02:41 PM
0

if republican politicians were smart, they'd limit student loans to only s.t.e.m. fields or remove the department of education altogether.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 02:44 AM
4

i can only advice you to stay away from entitled princesses. avoid obnoxious women as well . . .
/r/MensRights18/10/12 08:35 PM
3

are there any warning signs you should look out for before your life goes through the crapper at the hands of some vengeful woman? there are many signs of a failing relationship. a failing relationship is not the problem for men's rights activists; the problem is the systematic bias executed by the government. if we are successful in making the government neutral, then there would not be a need to fear the repercussions of a failed relationship.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:19 PM
21

the question was about the supposed inequality women face in the workplace, but the question also specifically asked about equal pay. romney dodged the question about equal pay with anecdotes about his time as governor of massachusetts. he only mentioned how he actively sought after women to fill positions in his cabinet.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 02:10 AM
19

the moderator decided which questions to allow. mitt romney ingeniously dodged the question.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 02:06 AM
1

perhaps -- there is ambiguity in the quoted sentence. i interpreted it as meaning that republicans and paul ryan want to ban contraception and sex outside of procreation.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 05:27 AM
1

broken families are caused by absent parents, not parents who are told to take responsibility for their children.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 05:07 AM
1

Making abortion illegal completely eradicates any small hope that MRAs have of making financial abortion a choice for men, because if women no longer get to opt out, why should men? men's rights activists argue for "financial abortion" because they have no equivalent method of abdicating parental responsibilities, something an actual abortion does. if you remove actual abortions, then both parties are responsible for the child, and thus removing the inequality.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 03:46 AM
1

Ya, they plugged the hole and tried as best they could to clean it up. To me that seems a lot like an abortion. If you want to go with this analogy, even if pregnancy is a consequence, you have a choice in what you do about it. Childbirth shouldn't be forced on anyone against their will. No childbirth without consent to childbirth. Consent to sex is not consent to childbirth, and childbirth is an act, not a consequence. You have a choice. 1) b.p. didn't have a choice to walk away. ergo, the gove…
/r/MensRights13/10/12 03:42 AM
1

wrong reply, but i'll reply to your content: we're talking about republicans, not catholics.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 02:50 AM
1

there's no way the Republicans plan to ban abortion prove it. just because they haven't been successful due to obstacles doesn't mean they aren't trying.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 02:45 AM
0

The republicans want to deny that, because Paul Ryan is anti birth control, and anti-sex for recreation. He thinks sex is only for procreation. prove it. You can consent to sex without consenting to pregnancy. again, pregnancy is a consequence. there are indeed people who choose to get pregnant at the right time, but pregnancy itself is a consequence. when b.p. spilled its oil in the gulf, they consented to drilling -- but they obviously didn't consent to the spill. they obviously had to take re…
/r/MensRights12/10/12 03:07 PM
2

it's a evenly split court. regardless, abortion isn't a right-wing/left-wing issue. the issue of court appointments has become more and more important in modern politics, and i'm sure every nominee will be scrutinized much more carefully by the senate.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 02:39 PM
1

Cause sex is bad, mkay? not really.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 02:35 PM
2

no, they really couldn't. the opinions from the supreme court of the united states are the highest "law" outside of the u.s. constitution. unless the supreme court changes its mind on the 14th amendment in regards to abortion, congress can't pass laws that act contrary to the opinions of the court. the supreme court can certainly change its position through a demographic shift in the court, so it's very possible to undo roe v. wade.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 02:23 PM
3

I forget many Redditors are very young. No, there's no way in hell the Republicans will make abortion illegal. If they had wanted to they could have done that under Bush. no, they couldn't have.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 02:17 PM
4

Personally I argue that consent to sex is not consent to pregancy, but that arguement usually doesn't work on them. you can only consent to acts, not consequences.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 02:15 PM
1

er . . . regardless of your politics, join the men's rights movement?
/r/MensRights12/10/12 02:04 PM
4

"very slightly" because the republicans never actually execute their ideology to the fullest extent. now-a-days, "limited government" is equal to maintaining the status quo. i have yet to see a mainstream republican politician advocate for gutting the department of education (the #1 source of power for feminists, and other postmodernist people), cutting down on the welfare state (the #1 threat to fathers, in my opinion), or for ending affirmative action and title ix. modern republicans seem to c…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 07:01 PM
11

Now that it is election time, I got to thinking: what, if anything are elected officials doing to help single fathers? nothing. republicans are [very] slightly better when it comes to men's/father's issues, but only because their ideology is inherently anti-feminist.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 03:16 PM
1

exactly . . . considering that it was a girl who brought this lawsuit, i believe feminists were successful in making sure female opinions have more weight than opinions from any other population (based on gender, race, etc.).
/r/MensRights10/10/12 03:05 PM
1

yes, it's disheartening to see that supreme court is only revisiting the law because a white girl couldn't get into the college of her choosing.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 02:59 PM
15

although this case primarily focuses on college admissions and racial preferences, a precedent ruling against affirmative action could help fight back against gender preferences as well -- including outside of colleges and universities.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 10:56 PM
1

women want security. it's why single women support the welfare state more than any other segment of the population.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 04:37 PM
28

here's something everyone should know: "professional" feminists are only in it for the political gains. they will ignore several "sexist" or "misogynist" comments/acts from politicians who promise to further their agenda. if you're bill clinton, you're good. if you're rush limbaugh, expect outrage.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 02:49 PM
3

when one of the "biggest" women's rights issues is whether the government can come between an employer's and employee's contracts -- whether it's for health insurance or pay -- you know the feminists are just desperate to play the victims. there are two roles men have been reduced to: 1) funding the government with their labor, and 2) defending the government with their lives. an expansion of the welfare state removed the need for fathers*, just look at all the praise single mothers get. whether…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 04:17 PM
171

it is ironic how the definition itself can be used as an example of sexism. perhaps this is a new way of "teaching"? this is indoctrination. no wonder modern men feel powerless -- they've been raised to think that only women can be victims, and that women have it worse, so even if your problems are legitimate, just shut up, because women have it worse. if you have children or are planning to have them in the future, pay very close attention to what your children are learning.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 03:28 PM
3

i believe that if we truly want to end feminism's influence, we need to start with academia. if our legislators limit public assistance for college to only those studying the s.t.e.m. fields (or remove pubic assistance completely), the demand for women's studies, psychology, sociology, social work, etc., would drop immediately.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 02:47 AM
1

i assume that "everybody" rejected the feminist's bid for something?
/r/MensRights30/09/12 02:36 AM
3

i don't understand.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 02:31 AM
1

1) opinions can't be wrong. 2) it's a scientific fact that abortion kills a human being. (each word has its own hyperlink)
/r/MensRights29/09/12 10:17 PM
1

what's the lie? could you give us more information?
/r/MensRights29/09/12 04:36 PM
2

you can't be for laws mandating child support and be against laws that bar [elective] abortions. i only talk about elective abortions -- those done to abdicate personal responsibility due to inconveniences a mother might not want to face. the hard cases of abortion done to save the mother's life, or when a pregnancy resulted from rape, or when the child is severely malformed, are not included in this discussion. when you bring this topic up to feminists, they give the (very weak) response of the…
/r/MensRights29/09/12 03:29 PM
-1

abortion kills a human being.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 03:24 PM
-7

another country groveling at the feet of gender feminists.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 04:01 PM
2

it brings attention to their cause, because sex sells.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 04:58 AM
6

because sex sells. everyone knows this, but only feminists rail against "objectifying" women while hypocritically using sex to further their agenda (see: "femen" and "slut walks").
/r/MensRights23/09/12 04:52 AM
2

women in western cultures plagued by feminism love to play the victim. because they have it so much better compared to women in the middle east, or in africa, they resort to making up conspiracy theories about rape culture and patriarchy to feel oppresed. it has to do with wanting feelings of self-importance, and receiving sympathy from others.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 12:53 AM
1

try this: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/zzzaj/uk_musters_support_to_block_eu_women_quota_ftcom/ if it works, let me know so i can delete this one.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 01:14 AM
7

paywall system.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 01:04 AM
-9

the only way to achieve equality in the abortion topic is to outlaw all abortions.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 12:13 AM
1

i understand. i was just pointing out the feminists' tendency to censor dissent through whatever means necessary.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 02:01 AM
1

feminists love to censor dissent. i am glad i live in the u.s. where the freedom of speech is paramount, and being politically correct isn't required by law.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 04:20 PM
2

A party that eliminates a woman's right to choose while at the same time cutting pay, jobs, and access to health care and food security exposes a bizarre and dangerous lack of understanding of the challenges facing American women. http://qkme.me/3qqwi3
/r/MensRights03/09/12 04:47 PM
14

the need for deceitful advertizements for feminism ("why men need feminism," "feminism is for everybody," etc.), i believe, could only be explained by feminists fretting over their dwindling numbers.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 07:26 PM
19

most western women are raised in an environment that praises them to be entitlement-minded, that they are everything for which the world owes them everything.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 02:17 AM
1

personhood is a subjective measure - since there is no definite standard. Look at it this way- a nut is not a tree, a tadpole is not a frog and an egg is not a chicken. So why should a foetus be a person? that's a false equivalence. a nut to a tree, a tadpole to a frog, a (fertilized) egg to a chicken are life stages, whereas going from fetus to a person is not. if you had said a fetus human being to an adult human being, then you'd be right. the question is whether you want the law to be object…
/r/MensRights28/08/12 11:19 PM
1

trust me, you haven't read the pages.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 11:12 PM
1

well then you obviously haven't even read the links.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 05:35 PM
0

you're obviously ignorant of the science, so let me refer you to some sources so you can educate yourself on the matters. what are the differences between an ovum (haploid) and a fertilized ovum?: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK9901/ how do biologists define a human being? http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/biology-individual/ http://eol.org/pages/327955/details what more experts have to say on fertilization - the start of a new human being's development: https://www.princeton.edu/~prolife/…
/r/MensRights27/08/12 10:01 PM
4

the problem isn't that men don't want to accept responsibility, the problem is that they are forced to accept responsibility. and as many have said before, you can't be for abortion and be for child support.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 06:24 PM
0

except you forgot the part where science already deemed it to be a human being.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 05:53 PM
0

1) the declaration of independence is not legally binding. 2) the 14th amendment limits what the state can do. it still does not give a right to life, it still doesn't answer why legally it's wrong for a person (not the government) to deprive another being of their life. 3) most, if not all, positive rights stem from moral expectations. as for your butterfly analogy, it's obvious that the stages of development are not equal. a toddler is not equal to an adult, and that's not what the abortion de…
/r/MensRights25/08/12 07:03 PM
3

point out to me where there's a right to life in the either the united states constitution (or statutes), or a state constitution or statutes. you can't deprive someone of a right they do not have. but let's put murder aside for a moment and look at other policies are that law because of morality. how many times have you heard leftists say "the government should provide healthcare/education/welfare for all because it's the right thing to do"? or how about "prostitution is bad so we should outlaw…
/r/MensRights25/08/12 05:38 PM
3

bzzzt! several wrong answers. 1) we legislate morality all the time - that's the whole point of laws. 2) there is no right to life in the united states, so murder isn't against the law because it denies someone their rights (presumably the right to life). 3) a new human being comes into existence at the moment of conception.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 05:09 PM
2

modern feminism relies on the state (government) to succeed.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 03:07 AM
1

that's how it is in the u.s. as well. you're not married if you've lived with your girlfriend. however, once a child is in the picture, the law recognizes your relationship as "informally married."
/r/MensRights23/08/12 08:31 PM
1

i said marriage should only be for procreating, meaning you shouldn't get married because you just happen to love someone. as for your other question, are you asking what difference a marriage license (or a lack of) makes? the answer is none. if you're raising a kid with a woman you have been living with for months, but you don't have a marriage license, the law will still consider you as married, burdening you with the same legal implications.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 07:08 PM
12

i personally am vested in ending government discrimination, and not so much as the societal implications of being a man (i believe the culture will fix that eventually). men's rights. most of our current rights (or lack of) stem from the government.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 06:54 PM
1

marriage should only be about procreating; if you don't want to have children, do not get married! there are no other reasons for marriage. don't buy into the government benefits talk either, because those small benefits do not outweigh the risks. now, you can pay some surrogate to help you produce a child, and skip the marriage process altogether, but if you truly want what's best for your children, research has shown that children are best raised under both their biological parents. some tips:…
/r/MensRights23/08/12 06:49 PM
6

too lazy.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 05:01 AM
2

whether a rapist should have rights over the child is a good ethical question. however, i would have to say the rapist should pay child support regardless, assuming the victim has decided to raise the child by themselves (as in, not give it up for adoption).
/r/MensRights23/08/12 12:59 AM
0

just more feminists playing the victim. feminists think that most of society (except those who agree with them) are stupid and will advise people not to do something that they have no control over.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 06:25 PM
3

presidents need their executive order powers revoked. this is like the 1000000000th time obama used an order to bypass congress.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 10:58 PM
1

no, under my thinking insurers are free to decide what products to offer. nice try though.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 09:33 PM
1

m.g.t.o.w. until the government becomes neutral (which might take quite some time).
/r/MensRights12/08/12 05:48 PM
6

since we're on the topics on politics, i am a conservative, but i don't think the republican ticket is any different from the democrat ticket when it comes to men's rights issues. sure the republicans in the house opposed v.a.w.a., but they wanted to "reform it" rather than completely get rid of it. sure they opposed additional "equal pay" laws, but no republican has advocated for gutting the e.e.o.c. and other affirmative action bureaucracies. the republican ticket is slightly better when it co…
/r/MensRights11/08/12 07:36 PM
144

if it weren't for the bank's videotape this guy would be in jail right now.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 05:36 PM
1

that's exactly why feminists hate game: they want to break down gender roles by making everybody effeminate - because they think women's behaviors are superior.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 09:41 PM
1

i would say most of the problems you cite are due to inflation.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 06:29 PM
10

i have yet to see any pro-abortion advocate justify child support without contradicting their stance on abortion.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 06:36 PM
24

you can tell she's proud of her accomplishment by the smirk on her face.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 09:48 PM
17

acquittal is not enough; there needs to be charges brought up against them, lest the justice system accept being defrauded.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 07:19 AM
2

With 50 percent of the population, only 15 percent of us are in Congress. I wouldn’t go into politics myself . . . someone make this into a meme "doesn't want to go into politics wonders why not many women are in politics" well, maybe not many women are interested in politics? the same could be said for s.t.e.m. fields in academics.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 02:30 AM
2

i asked in a feminist subreddit whether or not society should shame single mothers. i was censored, obviously, without responses. typical feminist comment from the slate article: Donna Gratehouse says: I think a resurgence in the labor movement and a stronger social safety net would do a lot more to shore up families than endless lectures to poor women to "make him put a ring on it".
/r/MensRights26/07/12 01:47 AM
16

men going their own way seems more desirable.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 06:43 PM
11

before reading my post further, acknowledge that i believe the sole purpose of marriage should be for procreating. with that said, it is not surprising that men are rejecting 30+ year old women when it comes to dating. in my view, to financially secure men, desiring children seems to be the only reason for them to wed (or, to commit). older women are at a disadvantage not only because of their fading looks, but also their fertility. the 7% rise in spinsterhood is not surprising. feminism has not…
/r/MensRights24/07/12 08:09 PM
3

the term the author should've used is "restricted."
/r/MensRights21/07/12 03:59 PM
1

new "women's rights" initiative: rape awareness.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 03:55 AM
5

Also consider that a job that requires a large amount of strength will probably have that as a prerequisite, regardless of how the job is measured. No one is going to hire someone that can't do the job. the affirmative action crew at the e.e.o.c. (united states agency) will make sure women are hired regardless by threatening lawsuits worth millions.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 02:58 PM
1

what is m.g.t.o.w.?
/r/MensRights08/07/12 12:20 AM
-5

marriage is supposed to be beneficiary to both partners. i would not marry a woman who did not cook and clean.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 07:17 PM
8

i doubt it. girls also have parents, and the students have the same teachers. the article points out systematic ways boys are discouraged form learning. my inner conspiracy theorist is saying feminists are the cause of this. feminist teachers declare to their parents that their sons are violent and need medication, boys think there's something wrong with them. feminist teachers use testing and teaching methods that benefit girls, boys who don't benefit from such methods end up thinking they're n…
/r/MensRights07/07/12 02:30 AM
2

no one is safe from censorship on the internet. feminists mass report insignificant things and get them removed. i recall my twitter account being mass reported, leading to a suspension. they later restored my account, but everything was gone, so i quit twitter.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 06:23 PM
6

i am a conservative. i believe feminism relies on the state to succeed. feminists went from being dependent on their husbands and fathers to being dependent on the government. i am sure there's plenty of information on this subreddit about the legal discrimination men face, and i believe it can only be combated through less government, not more. expanding government gives more venues for unchecked bureaucrats to push their agendas. if anyone here is american, they can see the policies un-elected…
/r/MensRights06/07/12 03:06 AM
-3

find me a big government that allows women to vote that isn't led by feminist ideology.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 02:13 AM
-3

the only reason why feminism doesn't have hold there is because the government is actively oppressing women.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 02:01 AM
-3

unfortunately, modern feminism relies on the government. and if your political beliefs include expanding government, then you are inadvertently giving feminists more power.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 01:21 AM
-2

in america, the only way to stop the feminist indoctrinating mills is to end the department of education and its student loan programs. as a result, colleges will be forced to cut down on many of their humanities departments, including gender studies.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 11:01 PM
-5

i'm pro-life, no exceptions.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 10:24 PM
3

more information: http://www.sba.gov/content/contracting-opportunities-women-owned-small-businesses/
/r/MensRights02/07/12 11:19 PM
5

1) the justice department needs to crack down on perjuries that put innocent people behind bars because of one person's word. 2) the law enforcers need to crack down on false accusations because they waste resources. if there was such a systematic crackdown, feminists would wild out and claim that it will only hurt women because they'll be too scared to report crimes.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 10:36 PM
2

and that's why there's the option of adoption, or giving the child to the father.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 04:14 AM
3

is this something women do intentionally just to spite the fathers? i mean there's adoption or father custody, so why would anyone want to abandon their child on the streets?
/r/MensRights01/07/12 03:30 AM
7

i do not know which government you are referring to. the american government gave women the right to vote around 1920, nearly 150 years after the country's birth. rich, white men had the right to vote since the beginning. perhaps you meant after african american men?
/r/MensRights29/06/12 08:48 PM
4

wow. this is why "equal pay" laws hurt women - no sane person will ever want to hire women due to the fear of the government suing them.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 08:44 PM
9

well, the first wave of feminism in the early 20th century had a lot of good points. the government was legally oppressing women. the waves of feminism from second and beyond have been the most damaging to society. the ruining of american culture due to feminism should be evident, but the damage extends to the government. you see, beyond the first wave of feminism, feminists went from being dependent on their husbands and fathers to being dependent on the state. feminist organizations gained muc…
/r/MensRights29/06/12 08:39 PM
8

There's something odd about this subreddit, and correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like there's a tendency to disregard women's oppression in favor of male oppression. you find it odd because you haven't realized that women are privileged in western societies, not oppressed.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 08:23 PM
0

then the government can jail you. maybe that's what the feminists want. if all men are in jail, they can finally have all the male dominated jobs and achieve their work equality. then of course, feminists will then lobby to lower taxes since women are the richer sex now.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 03:11 AM
1

by implicitly taxing strippers, feminists have conceded that women are sex objects, since sin taxes are only levied on products.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 03:01 AM
7

i'm sick of feminist propaganda being circulated around on social media. we need to pass around our own infographics.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 02:59 AM
2

all feminism criticism is welcomed here. i know that in reddits dominated by feminists, people often tend to get censored for speaking against the groupthink.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 02:51 AM
2

still, the rabbi should get sued.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 09:12 PM
1

and why do you think insurance companies discriminate people with pre-existing conditions? because it will cost them more right now, not because they'll get more sick later on (because no one knows that).
/r/MensRights28/06/12 09:09 PM
1

problems with american healthcare system: https://mises.org/daily/5496/The-Economics-of-US-Healthcare http://mises.org/daily/4434 how insurance works: http://mises.org/media/3972/Economics-of-Risk-and-Insurance-From-Healthcare-to-Welfare?ajaxsrc=audio http://mises.org/daily/3708 the solutions: http://www.galen.org/topics/price-transparency/ http://www.galen.org/topics/health-savings-accounts-a-research-guide/ http://www.galen.org/topics/providing-coverage-for-all-through-private-health-insurance…
/r/MensRights28/06/12 09:07 PM
1

expectation is assessing risk. you are determining the prices based on what you already know, not what you think will happen. if insurance companies wanted to offer "preventive care," because they figured they would save money, they would have done so long ago without any government mandates.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 08:55 PM
1

why do people get insurance? because they don't know how much it's going to cost them if they get into an accident. i can't just say "if i get into a car accident, it will cost me $3,000 in medical bills, but my yearly insurance will cost me $3,400, so i'll skip buying the insurance." insurance companies' job is to assess risk, not the outcomes.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 08:35 PM
1

of course i can; i can vote for the government i want. i'll be voting for a representative that will help my presidential nominee mitt romney repeal obamacare, lower my taxes, be cautious about going to war, etc., that's how democracy works.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 08:32 PM
1

you can't tell what the costs are going to be in the future.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 08:30 PM
1

you do not increase efficiency by having the government bog down on insurance companies. increasing efficiency should be the insurance companies problem, not the government's. the reason why insurance is unaffordable to many is because the government is incurring unnecessary costs to insurance companies through mandates (for example, "free" birth control, domestic violence counseling, screenings, etc., these items should be paid out of the consumer's pockets).
/r/MensRights28/06/12 08:29 PM
4

the point of insurance is, or at least was before the government got involved, to have coverage for accidents or when diseases hit, do you agree? the reason being is that you can not control catastrophic events. when the government gets involved and tells insurance companies what they must offer and at what price, they are essentially failing to effectively set price controls (like they do with every business they get involved with). by spending money on "preventive care," you are spending money…
/r/MensRights28/06/12 08:22 PM
1

we're not discussing the effectiveness of abstaining from sex here. not to mention abstinence can not be measured in the first place, and whether a person decides to abstain depends on their willingness. it's not a "monetary fact" that "free" birth control is cheaper, not at all. if you're assuming that the expenses are going to be incurred onto me, then me not paying for someone else's birth control, abortions, or babies is cheaper for me.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 08:13 PM
-2

and abstaining from sex is cheaper than both, what's your point?
/r/MensRights28/06/12 07:55 PM
-2

man, people should just sue these doctors out of business. if we can't stop them legally, we have to go after the supply.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 07:45 PM
1

i don't know where you got your economics lessons from, but they are self-contradictory. 1) you don't save money by spending, you save by not spending. 2) there is nothing more valuable in the world than money. money makes the world go round, you can't have anything without it.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 07:44 PM
4

economics 101: there's no such thing as free lunch. nothing is "free." routine checkups are not insurance, and they should be paid for out of pockets. insurance is for risk, not for "preventative care."
/r/MensRights28/06/12 07:33 PM
2

the poll in the article already asked that. by reverse i meant asking how women would feel about being rejected for being unemployed.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 06:30 PM
10

not necessarily. "women" usually refers to adult females. i'm sure there are plenty of children, male and female, who are uninsured.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 05:53 PM
2

this is why healthcare costs are so high: because we consider things like birth control, std testing, and domestic violence counseling as "insurance."
/r/MensRights28/06/12 05:18 PM
2

these women in the stories i see around here, mostly psychos.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 06:23 AM
2

the groupthink must not be questioned. i get downvoted all the time there.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 11:19 PM
7

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/04/why-the-us-economy-is-biased-against-men/256023/
/r/MensRights27/06/12 10:04 PM
0

my reply to feminists and their rape culture: http://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/vpbm1/i_have_some_questions_for_twoxchromosomes_they/c56g0u0
/r/MensRights27/06/12 08:55 PM
7

these women are crazy! i hope i never end up tying the knot with a psycho.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 07:25 PM
-1

wasn't there a study out recently that showed that older men produce children who live longer? anyway, i might be just paranoid, but anyone else think this is some feminist propaganda to scare men into marrying quickly?
/r/MensRights27/06/12 06:58 PM
21

perhaps there should be a reverse poll asking women "would you be fine if a man rejected you because of your unemployment status?"
/r/MensRights27/06/12 06:49 PM
4

more feminist propaganda to shame men for being men.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 06:42 PM
2

more feminist propaganda to make men feel shameful for being men.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 06:41 PM
1

i have two workable theories on why the mainstream media rarely reports on men's health issues. either works, even both: a) the media is focused on victimhood, for sensationalism of course. the reason why the media focuses more on women's health is because feminists have convinced people that all of women's problems are due to the oppressive nature of the patriarch. they'll play the victim and talk about how not much is being done to help women, and due to systematic sexism, women are at a disad…
/r/MensRights27/06/12 06:41 AM
8

I wonder if that shit would fly if he was a single mom with a special needs child. nope. she's be praised as being a "strong, independent woman." oh, and donations through internet campaign to help her would flow in faster than an open dam.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 04:07 AM
17

we need to make more info-graphics. feminists sugarcoat (through info-graphics) their false statistics and spread it around on social media. i believe we need to get into this business, with real statistics.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 03:40 AM
5

conservative women will help defeat the feminist establishment. they are the only group of people who can go against feminist ideology without being accused of waging a "war on women."
/r/MensRights25/06/12 10:56 PM
2

does everybody vote based on what benefits them? probably. but the distinction between left/right becomes clear on how people go about on receiving the benefits.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 10:45 PM
-5

you should have. most college leftists are leftists because it benefits them, not because they reasoned through the ideology.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 07:38 PM
62

i'd say it's also because the mainstream media rarely reports on men's troubles. they're more fixated on women losing their birth control and the "war on women."
/r/MensRights25/06/12 05:53 PM
2

feminists on amazon.com gave the book raving reviews. 220+ five-star reviews compared to 5 one-star reviews.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 06:06 AM
7

apparently you have to buy their book for the references.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 05:21 AM
7

feminists started a new global campaign to make themselves feel important.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 04:35 AM
31

i don't understand this. is it because the picture is a woman on woman violence, and not man on woman violence as the post describes?
/r/MensRights25/06/12 02:15 AM
1

a boyfriend, but not a father. having a successful environment to raise children in involves both parents. yes, there are cases where both parents are the abusers, but had the kid's father been in the picture, i doubt that this would have happened.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 12:14 AM
2

i did not know that, thanks for pointing it out.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 04:01 AM
21

it's what feminists do man, they censor the opposition. i could argue that the only reason the u.s.a. has not been taken over completely by feminist ideology is because we have the first amendment. "raper no raping!" that one made me laugh, but the correct term is rapist.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 08:24 PM
1

what's this have to do with feminism? i mean, why were feminists saying that in the first place?
/r/MensRights23/06/12 05:58 PM
3

i have some faith in the courts here in america, and i think this would be dismissed by a judge immediately.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 05:01 AM
8

i wouldn't be surprised if there was some government out there that allowed her to exactly pull off what she described.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 04:45 AM
36

it's what feminists do man. they get into positions of power (real life example: sitting on health committee boards) and then they start changing policies to benefit them and spread their influence. wikipedia is no different.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 05:28 AM
1

what is the link they were passing around? the indiegogo.com one...
/r/MensRights16/06/12 03:33 AM
-4

their biological sex alone makes them unqualified for the fitness training.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 10:49 PM
2

definitely not a "western" country, since most are tainted by feminist ideology. the east asian countries (japan, singapore, taiwan, and even hong kong under china) on the other hand are very impressive.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 09:38 PM
7

yep. the best way to do deal with this type of stuff is to boycott their business.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 06:12 AM
14

it's a private club, and i agree with the sentiment that private businesses should be able to do business however they please. most feminists would also agree with such sentiments (at least, that's how i see most feminists trying to rationalize this type of discrepancy), except when it comes to "equal pay for equal work." then it becomes a lobbying purpose for them.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 05:28 AM
8

feminists raid the internet, i am not surprised. check out other terms like "feminist," "feminazi," "mra," and you'll see massive amounts of thumbs up for definitions from the feminist perspective.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 12:46 AM
0

feminists do not process rational thoughts. they'll try to rationalize their ideology in any way, even if it means leading to a contradiction.
/r/MensRights10/06/12 06:20 PM
-1

the only way to get true reproductive equality is to outlaw abortion.
/r/MensRights10/06/12 06:15 PM
-2

we have to be realistic. outlawing abortion is the easiest goal when compared to the other two: 1) "legal paternal surrender" will never happen, since it will be opposed by nearly every segments of the population. and even if it does happen, it will not protect men like the guy from the article. 2) similarly, outlawing birth, assuming you mean mandatory abortions, or penalties for giving birth, will also be opposed. also, it's not in a country's best interest to outlaw birth, as it would have di…
/r/MensRights05/06/12 03:22 PM
-5

the only way for men to get reproductive equality is to outlaw abortion.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 02:59 PM
1

i think he means when they're ready to be moms.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 02:53 PM
6

like divorce, "equal pay" laws are just other means for women to get rich through the courts.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 02:58 AM
0

my point is this: if the promiscuous woman holds back the society, then it's in that society's best interest to hold her back.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 10:26 PM
0

and sluts aren't the only ones who get abortions, commit adultery, and get s.t.d. - what's your point? if a promiscuous woman is responsible, then it's not the society's worry, at least in financial terms. they might still want to shame her to make sure she doesn't become some role model in the society.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 10:19 PM
-1

it's in society's best interest to make use of shame to keep order. now, applying this principle to promiscuity ("slut shaming") is very important since out-of-wedlock births, single-parent households, sexual diseases, adultery, etc., all have a negative effect on society. the feminists on the other hand follow their "politically correct" ideology where people shouldn't be judged, "live and let live," yada yada yada. i wouldn't have a problem with such an ideology if it weren't for the governmen…
/r/MensRights04/06/12 10:03 PM
2

are you a man? because then you're already forced to have kids you don't want depending on the mother.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 04:16 AM
1

okay. enjoy not having any reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights03/06/12 06:29 PM
-5

it's not a complex issue to resolve at all - outlaw abortion.
/r/MensRights03/06/12 04:28 AM
6

this ain't the feminist sub-reddit.
/r/MensRights03/06/12 04:20 AM
2

not happening.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 06:59 PM
-1

i disagree with those objections. 1) native americans should be completely off-limits. they are their own sovereign lands and should not fall under u.s. jurisdictions. 2) we should not give anybody any incentives to report abuse, and that includes incentives for (illegal) immigrants; the victim's desire to survive and to preserve their well being should be enough. 3) l.g.b.t. persons have been protected under the previous laws, and this new bill does not change that. the democrats just want to a…
/r/MensRights17/05/12 01:50 AM
3

i'm proud of the republicans.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 04:39 AM
6

And here is where we can start talking about The Modern American Male, and why guys suck specifically. The reality is that guys don’t receive this societal pressure to partner up. another example of women blaming men for problems of societies. also, the comments are hilarious. Nothing other than you are dead on it seems to me. I’m 43 and single. So what is worse is that men my age want women 20 years younger than me. the whole purpose of marriage is to create a foundation for a family. a 43 year…
/r/MensRights07/05/12 04:43 PM
1

it's what feminists do man. they want to be victims of everything and anything. when they longer can claim the title of victim, for example, say government treatment, they'll move onto more ridiculous things.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 03:55 PM
3

what the hell? just how many "equal pay" laws do feminists want passed?
/r/MensRights07/05/12 11:40 AM
3

they probably won't market it as "100% effective" to prevent lawsuits.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 11:39 AM
3

conservative women will help defeat second wave and beyond feminism.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 03:07 PM
3

hahaha... oh man, how stupid do you have to be to write the article and use the picture.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 02:40 AM
3

the article gives a few examples of republicans attempting to cater to feminism, or addressing issues feminists care about: equal pay for "equal work," "hostility" towards women in the workplace, and wanting clubs to be inclusive.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 02:51 PM
1

how so? you do realize that democrats want to tax the upper class, whom the majority are men, so they can help welfare queens live without having to take responsibilities for their actions, and as well as funnel the money into women's organizations. democrats are in the feminists' pockets. just look at "obamacare," which is centered around benefits for females. look at the obama administration pushing for a rape culture in college campuses, making it easier for men to be penalized for supposed r…
/r/MensRights09/04/12 02:43 PM
-1

the second option will never be a reality; men's rights activists are better of teaming with the pro-life movement.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 02:34 PM
1

i have a theory that america's freedom of speech is what kept the feminists from fully taking over. it is well known that feminists love to censor things that aren't in line with their beliefs.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 11:43 PM
-6

by voting republican
/r/MensRights08/04/12 11:40 PM
0

absolutely.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 08:11 PM
4

bastard? is it because you like liberal policies?
/r/MensRights08/04/12 04:07 AM
1

rolling stones is a liberal publication, so not a surprise here.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 01:39 AM
8

google "women buoy democrats in senate" and click on the wall street journal link for the full article. it explains how there's an increasing gender gap in the two parties: men leaning more towards republican and women leaning for towards democrats.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 01:45 AM
1

for those living in the u.s., please contact your senator and ask them to not vote for the renewal. there are currently 61 sponsors, and only 2 of them need to retract for a filibuster. list of cosponsors: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d112:SN01925:@@@P
/r/MensRights06/04/12 04:21 AM
2

i guess women in general have this sense of superiority ("smarter sex"). however, since conservative women are the bane of feminism, they could be a great asset to the men's rights movement.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 02:06 AM
4

fuck this shit man. weren't the feminists mad as hell when some publication put a panda in one of their top 20 females list?
/r/MensRights02/04/12 02:09 PM
-1

get your butthurt out of here.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 04:58 AM
1

thrown her in the pond
/r/MensRights01/04/12 01:48 AM
-1

what the fuck is this? man, the best thing that could've happened in this situation is he whoop her ass after taking a few beatings. the mainstream media would have been all over it, and then people would have finally been exposed to violence against men.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 10:39 PM
-18

abortion is a sacrament to feminism. the only way for men to have equality in the reproductive field is to have abortion outlawed. so i doubt the two can work together.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 05:53 PM
-2

the only way for men to get equal reproductive rights is to outlaw abortion. there is no other way, and anyone who's advocating for other methods is wasting their time. financial abortions will not be a reality, as the idea will be opposed by every other segment of the population. even if such laws existed, it would still not protect all men, for example, what if a man wanted his children but his woman decided to abort them?
/r/MensRights27/03/12 10:24 PM
1

organize for the republican party.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 02:41 PM
0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ykbholw9wgU
/r/MensRights25/03/12 10:50 PM
3

yep. people should be free to do what they want.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 06:28 PM
0

absolutely.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 06:24 PM
1

i don't see the problem. if a man doesn't want to marry a slut, he doesn't have to. the same with the genders switched around.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 06:07 PM
24

my man.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 03:50 AM
1

"our own people" are a very small minority. most people aren't even aware of a men's right's movement. financial abortions will be opposed by every other segment of the population.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 02:25 PM
1

"everyone" will not have a choice. "financial abortions" will not be a reality. if no one has a choice in the matter, then its equal/
/r/MensRights23/03/12 02:01 AM
0

and you're not going to get equal rights by being pro-choice.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 09:52 PM
15

i don't see how it's enforceable. women could just lie and claim one of her friends is the father and get it done.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 09:40 PM
-8

you missed one critical point though: not all women are brainwashed to think that abortion is not killing. a woman's conscience also plays a role on whether or not she decides to abort, not just her financial motives.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 02:55 PM
-3

abortion is a sacrament to feminists, and the pro-life movement is certainly making them squirm. i think the pro-life movement is certainly keeping the feminist organizations in check. rather than spending money to lobby for more benefits, feminists are now using those resources to fight back against anti-abortion gains throughout the nation. aside from abortion, the republicans still hold a powerful economic platform on welfare reform + cutting spending, which would also have an impact.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 02:51 PM
-1

any mra that votes democrat is certainly hurting the men's right movement. the democrat party is completely in the pockets of feminists (including the president, see: obamacare, planned parenthood defense, his appointments to critical agencies). and in contrast the republican party has a powerful "anti-feminist" base in the pro-life movement. we have to roll back the "gains" feminists made through government. feminists think women need to be empowered and independent, so what better way to make …
/r/MensRights22/03/12 02:40 PM
3

some key parts of the article: Janice Shaw Crouse, a senior fellow at the conservative Concerned Women for America, said her group had been pressing senators hard to oppose reauthorization of legislation she called “a boondoggle” that vastly expands government and “creates an ideology that all men are guilty and all women are victims.” Republicans say the measure, under the cloak of battered women, unnecessarily expands immigration avenues by creating new definitions for immigrant victims to cla…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:30 PM
3

the only reason vawa recently failed to pass the subcommittee in the senate was because it included benefits for illegal immigrants and gays. wasn't there already a case of an illegal immigrant woman using vawa for a path towards citizenship?
/r/MensRights14/03/12 05:12 AM
0

i was referring to the part in the comic when they guy asks if there's science backing it up, and she replies it's all a social construct. and by "harping on equality" i was referring to those specific feminists who deny a woman's psychology and biology.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 10:25 PM
-3

obama is in the pockets of planned parenthood and naral and other feminist organizations. his health secretary is a feminist herself, so it was just a move to cater to them. this is a good article (satire) on the government mandate: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203370604577265461876605408.html?mod=rss_opinion_main#articleTabs%3Darticle
/r/MensRights12/03/12 07:43 PM
7

i don't know much about child sex laws, but would she not be listed as a sex offender if convicted?
/r/MensRights12/03/12 07:06 PM
-3

there's plenty of neuroscience that says men and women are different... only the ones harping about "equality" are feminists from gender studies departments.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 05:01 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter