TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

v574v Archive

View 0 posts and 1,184 comments by v574v on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,184 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

hey, what’s the proper way for a father to hug his teenage daughter without it being creepy? I ask because I have a young daughter and I imagine that I’d like to continue to be affectionate with her when she’s a teen so I’d really like to know... I’d hate to suddenly have to treat her like she’s a grotesque monster just because she’s growing into an adult - perhaps I should leave the front door of the house open when it’s just me and her at home so that you know I’m not creepy?
/r/MensRights17/07/18 01:56 PM
2

50 Cent is a persona used by big business to sell teenage rebellion between middle class white kids and their parents by exhibiting the most absurdly cartoonish racist features of a black man. He should have the same crediability as a professional wrestler but that would ruin the illusion and more importantly sales... 50 Cent is a black faced minstrel for America's youngest generation. How's that for denouncement?
/r/MensRights16/07/18 01:23 PM
1

I disagreed with your conclusions and illustrated with your own quotes why you yourself also disagreed with your conclusions - that’s not a strawman argument it’s a correction and clarification your own thoughts for you. I’ve illustrated why your two points are in fact one point and why your conclusions of those two points is bullshit by using your own words to validate my counterpoint... and your defence is to engage in an entirely unrelated and unimportant discussion about strawman arguments..…
/r/MensRights15/07/18 06:32 PM
13

The power imbalance is that women fear men and women are taught to fear men because parents use a fear of boys to control their daughter’s behaviour, politicians use that fear to gain public support, newspaper use that fear to sell copies, women’s groups use that fear to borrow power from the powerful, charities use that fear to get donations, and lastly women themselves use that fear to bond with each other and create in-groups of accepted males. Men are not the problem - it’s the sexist fear o…
/r/MensRights14/07/18 02:30 PM
1

So long as the media chooses to call flirting “sexually inappropriate behaviour” it would be stupid for any man in the public eye to flirt with women.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 02:12 PM
3

So... she intends to be the one to provide material comfort and physical security in her relationships with men? Awesome! Let’s hope she finds herself a willing domestic partner and directs her focus on that instead of placing value on his bank account or future career prospects. Unless she defaulting on the entire partnership by rejecting her traditional roles and refusing to adopt his traditional roles because then she’s made herself worthless in any domestic partnership.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 01:55 PM
1

one is man's hard tendency to want to be depended upon... Men are absolutely addicted to being depended upon and so they go out of their way to show their utility in hopes of being recognized. The other reason is that men want to have sex with women, which causes men to vie for their favor. Here’s your own quotes and I highlighted the specific parts of your own thoughts that show women are the gatekeepers to male behaviour so there’s not two reasons as you’ve suggested but one and they don’t ste…
/r/MensRights14/07/18 01:34 PM
1

Uh, the two reasons that you speculated... men’s utility serves the woman’s benefit not his own so proving his utility gets him access to your second point which is men facilitating women’s needs in order to mate which means that women set the standard for men - both of your points are the same point stemming from a woman’s desires not men’s and your folly is trying to absolve women as co-conspirators by placing the reasons entirely on men - ‘men are absolutely addicted to being depended upon’ i…
/r/MensRights13/07/18 03:56 PM
0

You post indicates that females initially set the standards so there’s only one ultimate reason - because it’s what women want and they want it because typically women have a crippling aversion to suffering injury which is probably related to men’s sexual attraction. For the furthering of the species we all conspire to ensure that women have the best odds at her being at her optimal attractiveness to a man by allowing her an out from facing any significant health destroying hardships.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 02:23 PM
1

Ah, yes, let’s shame a man for enjoying the company of young women while we overlook the fact that Jackie’s husband is an executive partner specializing in insurance litigation at a law firm...
/r/MensRights07/07/18 02:21 PM
6

I don’t like him either and as far as ‘no one should...” - he has already taken action against other people in his party for these types of unfounded allegations so he’s been an active participant in the witch hunt and I for one am not very sympathetic to a witch-finder general being put to his own test. I also wasn’t a fan of Patrick Brown but I sympathized with him and his plight even though I wasn’t sad to see him out of the top spot - that was bullshit but Trudeau is poetic justice.
/r/MensRights07/07/18 01:45 PM
6

From what I understand, he can recommend himself for a pardon but the Queen of Canada needs to grant it through Canada’s Governor General. This only applies to convicted crimes so he’d need to be charged and convicted and since the ex-reporter has no interest in that at the moment - it doesn’t seem likely. His political problem right now is that he handled previous cases of sexual misconduct within his own party with zero tolerance whether the allegations were proven or not and he’s exposing him…
/r/MensRights07/07/18 01:33 PM
3

My mother was half-despicable on her mother’s side and I take offence to you using that word - that’s our word!
/r/MensRights06/07/18 02:04 PM
5

Didn’t you hear? Women are victims who commit crimes because of social and/or economic pressure. Men are culprits who commit crimes because they have a penis. One of those two group’s problems are solvable and the other can’t - this is the nature of sexism and the reason why they are only considering women.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 01:57 PM
2

That's a lot of words just to say: 'People who work long hours with low pay are at risk of diabetes.'
/r/MensRights04/07/18 08:44 PM
3

It will be the death of both women in sports and organized women's sports unless she's also proposing that organizations protect women's sports or create a quota system to place women in sports instead of a merit system where the best suited gets the job. I find having women's sports organizations is the more just compromise than barring women completely by forcing them to compete with men. From what I understand men aren't permitted to play for the women's world cup either.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 08:12 PM
2

There's a group of people socially taught and naturally inclined to access power by mandating special protections from a second group who are socially taught and naturally inclined to provide that group with their special protections. These two groups need to work together to create this level of intrusion into our personal lives at our places of business.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 07:06 PM
0

So that's a big NO on the whole sacrifice thing and you'll keep making yourself useful to them?
/r/MensRights04/07/18 06:37 PM
14

https://elpais.com/elpais/2018/07/04/inenglish/1530712876_413216.html English article about the case.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 06:18 PM
0

Child labour was made illegal so a parent was required to tend to the children and women are more inclined to want that role and men are more inclined to facilitate women’s inclinations. Children were the people who held women back and with birth control, day care, school, day camp, summer camp, after school care women can finally get back to work.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 01:23 PM
2

I’m wagering the company intervened to get those results for fragile women while not intervening for the tough-as-nails men’s results. It’s a great example of women being mollycoddled by the village elders and men not even considering that they need to be protected. Women and men don’t share equal status in the eyes of both women and the village elders because they view females as somewhere between child and adult whereas men are always adults. Sadly, my kids are seeing their misdeeds and formin…
/r/MensRights01/07/18 02:34 PM
79

If a girl hits a guy her access to being a damsel in distress is revoked and she should no longer be protected by the codes of chivalry - she is a glorious warrior and she should face a warrior’s fate. Stop denying women their power and the responsibilities they have to face that come with exercising their power which includes facing reciprocal violence or the justice system.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 01:52 PM
14

It was a male on male sexual assault and if Crews was inclined to be a violent person Crews probably would of went to jail over it. He would be required to explain why using violence was a better option than evasion and from what I read of the incident his violence would of been viewed as retaliatory and not defensive, so depending on the damage done (Crews is a big man) - he’s looking at the option of prison. Crews did everything right and the man who assaulted him needs to face the justice sys…
/r/MensRights30/06/18 03:26 PM
1

Problem solving based learning over remembering facts and figures based learning. ADHD meds only help normal brains with remembering facts and figures not problem solving so it wouldn’t help boys with feminized learning criteria.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 03:54 PM
2

Incel was coined by a woman to describe her predicament...
/r/MensRights28/06/18 10:01 PM
1

Although women are inclined to adopt the primary caregiver role and males the primary provider role it would be inaccurate to suggest that child rearing is a female sex role since males play a vital role in child development and fathers are also inclined to actively participate in child rearing. Mothers and fathers both provide important ingredients to raising healthy children and both bring something important to their role as parents. That primary providing human male is also a secondary careg…
/r/MensRights27/06/18 01:16 PM
1

Uppers given to an already hyperactive kid calms them down... Personally, I would expect that by giving an already hyperactive kid a stimulant it would make them worse, but it calms them down.... Strange no? I think it would be helpful to have everyone who replies to your post declare whether or not they have ADHD? I have it and I’m pro-drug as is everyone I’ve ever spoken to with ADHD who didn’t have negative side effects...
/r/MensRights26/06/18 08:42 PM
1

It’s a shame that you think that you are doing good by supporting evil. What’s in a name? A rose by any other name would smell as sweet. You hold onto that name as if it has some important legacy aside from pushing patriarchy theory and rape culture. Women’s lib, women’s rights, women’s suffrage movement, etc. Feminism stole their individual identities and repackaged them all as feminists. The thing that you claim to support doesn’t exist anymore and only really existed for a decade and that’s o…
/r/MensRights26/06/18 04:00 PM
5

From what I read the article is correct ‘sexual intercourse without consent’ is the state law they would use. 45-5-503. Sexual intercourse without consent. (1) A person who knowingly has sexual intercourse with another person without consent or with another person who is incapable of consent commits the offense of sexual intercourse without consent. A person may not be convicted under this section based on the age of the person's spouse, as provided in 45-5-501(1)(b)(iv).
/r/MensRights26/06/18 03:31 PM
1

The bullshit artists are the actual feminists and they are completely unopposed because if you faux feminists dared to challenge them you’d be out on your ass and you know it. All you are doing is furthering the lie that feminism is moderate to people who don’t know better. The bullshit artists rely on you spreading their bullshit. You are to them what’s know as a ‘useful idiot’. Look that term up.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 04:00 AM
1

You didn’t outline anything, you simply stated it and gave nothing further...
/r/MensRights26/06/18 03:48 AM
1

Navy critics are blaming these problems on less people in the navy spread out over the same number of ships which means people are spread out too thin and covering multiple jobs. We can listen to the retired admirals who have hands on experience and knowledge of the problems facing the modern navy or we can believe the other McCain and the extensive naval expertise of political bloggers with an agenda. Hmmm... tough call. I guess we’d have to see who was in charge of the other three crashes the …
/r/MensRights25/06/18 03:03 PM
10

Internally you have no power and no voice within the feminist movement but people who think like you are used by an them to sugarcoat their hostility while they work against what you say you believe. You support their lies and betray your own views when you call yourself a feminist. If you actually held power within the feminist movement that would be different, but you don’t, so you are the lie that grants them more power than they should have.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 01:54 PM
3

This is exactly what career minded women need to do in order to have a family and a leadership career. Hopefully she keeps at it and doesn’t quit over envy because of the special bond between her husband and their child or her envy of the lifestyle her husband has at home at her expense. Two things a person in her position needs to overcome.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 12:34 PM
1

My data is worthless because you say so? Ahhh... the delay is also what’s making certain men unsuitable for career women, thus, adding to my point that career women are driving the problem and not some ridiculous philosophy on the part of men.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 12:20 PM
2

...and can often be imagined by those that don’t feel they have it.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 12:09 PM
5

Haha! No. Her entire premise is a hypothetical! Her fear is utter bullshit and whenever we’re confronted by bullshit we need to look for another angle that makes more sense... Perhaps she doesn’t want you to take the baby out alone in public without her ‘supervision’? This is a common anxiety for moms and she needs to just get over it. You can help by reminding her that you are the man she choose to have a child with and frankly speaking you are an amazing man.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 11:44 AM
1

According to the Washington post only 5% of married people are on their 3rd marriage... My data is still chugging along.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 11:03 AM
11

We don’t have to imagine those people exist and are not given a voice or platform to spew their bullshit, infact, her assertion that men are a problem and not men of colour is directly related to the above people not being given a platform. Let’s face it - if these people have these views of men they must also have certain views about people of colour and they just are smart enough to not speak about it in public.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 10:53 AM
5

I think she’ll find a lot of the sexy companies like this are owned by women. Those women charge 100 dollars an hour and I’d argue that the topless women are the exploiters not the exploited so the degraded are the men not the women.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 09:10 PM
1

Simple facts make dizzy? The only control men have with regards to having children is to not have them by not risking a pregnancy with a woman. After 30 suddenly women are getting pregnant so either they are staving off pregnancy as I’ve asserted or men are crumbling on their bizarro philosophy after a decade of adhering to it after they’ve accumulated significant assets which can be taken from them...
/r/MensRights20/06/18 12:21 PM
-4

We can pretend that there’s some philosophy that young men adhere to that has them sacrifice having children on principle but stats Canada has women delaying their pregnancies until their later in life, so, either those men are betraying the cause after years of obedience to their philosophy or women are putting off children until later. I’m inclined to believe that women are the gate keepers and keep the gates locked until it’s too late for many of them.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 11:41 PM
9

To look is human - to stare is just weird.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 08:34 PM
-2

In marriage men gain access to fatherhood and raising healthy children with the best odds of success would be more accurate and it still applies today despite what an author is peddling. That author is partially correct about men but it’s foundation isn’t found in male attitudes but women’s behaviour. Women are delaying childbirth in favour of a career and it’s in that pause that men find a comfortable lifestyle and to break men from that lifestyle takes more than a lot of career women who are f…
/r/MensRights19/06/18 08:27 PM
9

How does being associated with violence provide a service for men? Fatherhood is the pinnacle of manhood and it involves the farthest things from violence there is...
/r/MensRights19/06/18 07:37 PM
1

The idea that men are in control of women’s security against scofflaws makes all men the custodians of all women. That’s not good for women because women lose their own capacity and gain a child’s status around men. I find it interesting that women are currently at the peak of their own direct power historically and certain women’s groups are suddenly pushing for males to once again adopt a benevolent guardianship over them. Perhaps these ladies believe that the men will be even more benevolent …
/r/MensRights19/06/18 04:02 PM
1

We already do that. We have laws to protect people from violence and punitive measures for those who break the law. Everybody knows by the time they are a kid that hitting people is wrong and the vast majority of people not only respect the rule but agree to it. Non-violence is such a part of human behaviour that the military has a costly system in place to condition their people to be violent. Those women are not protecting themselves from a gender they are protecting themselves from a scofflaw…
/r/MensRights19/06/18 01:39 PM
0

I’d rather have the best person who exhibits those listed traits than a lesser person ruled in because of a non-valued triviality not on that list.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 12:49 PM
-2

most Did you see what you did? When you have a system that weeds out non-hackers there’s no need to rely on sexism - you are free to judge people by their individual merits and weigh their values accordingly so ‘most’ is significantly less important.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 12:41 PM
2

‘Why women are less likely to code’ because some women do indeed code.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 12:24 PM
1

Words have meaning and people today need to stop pushing this doublethink bullshit.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 12:20 PM
-7

My friend is taller than her husband. If only there was some way to prescreen people for military roles - like some sort of medical exam or something so that we can screen people better than relying on the “penis” or “no penis” questionnaires.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 04:59 PM
1

The mother is empowered with the knowledge that she’ll be operating alone and she will have a more informed opinion when she weighs her options. Women do quite well for themselves statistically until they have a child and then they option to reduce their hours to become the primary caregiver while their husband becomes the primary provider. A mother’s work/life balance can not be changed if they don’t have a person bankrolling that decision so the mother will be forced to continue with her lucra…
/r/MensRights18/06/18 04:39 PM
2

They’re allowing her to justify her exhibitionism because she attributes it to a protest? I miss the days when people were smarter about this kind of bullshit.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 08:26 PM
7

They couldn’t spare any of that empathy for men when it was men being accused of sexual misconduct?
/r/MensRights16/06/18 02:18 PM
2

A movie, directed by a man and co-written by a man, can only be understood by a female critic... lol.
/r/MensRights16/06/18 02:11 PM
4

Who claims that Father’s Day isn’t relevant? Not me or my kids and it’s our relationship that we are celebrating so it really doesn’t involve those other party poopers.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 07:10 PM
1

The judges and legislators have access to shared parenting that the rest of men don’t? Nope, they’re in the same sinking boat that all men are, so, if they aren’t exerting their power for their own benefit as you’ve suggested - it kinda looks like you’re wrong and that men have a bias for women over anyone with a penis including themselves.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 06:38 PM
1

Tell that to a father standing in front of a male family court judge. Women had influential power over the male legislators and judiciaries who held direct power and the result is an imbalance favouring women over men which is why we are MRAs... A friend of mine from work went thru the courts and got custody no thanks to the judge who pretty much bent over backwards to support the mother. This ‘mother’ was such a fucking terrible person that she out of jail on bail from abusing another one of he…
/r/MensRights15/06/18 03:19 PM
1

millennia of woe you have produced and benefited from A woman trying to benefit by exercising her power of influence over today’s men is ignoring the fact that historically women had benefited with that same power of influence over yesterday’s men and although women have always had this influence over men - men are to blame!
/r/MensRights10/06/18 03:58 PM
1

Incel was coined by an involuntary celibate woman and I’m guessing it was more than just her hair that stood in her way. Ugly women know what it’s like being a man.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 12:46 PM
1

Microsoft itself has people in the building who probably don't have a share in the company's prosperity! If it's like any other company out there the janitors, cleaners, cafetria staff, and building security are all agency and make comparable wages to every other company out there even though they work at a prosperous corporation. If these fuckers actually gave a shit about the horseshit they spew they'd pay all of their people according to the company's profits and not similar wages to what som…
/r/MensRights07/06/18 01:07 PM
3

It wasn’t recognized in the USA when marital rape was still legal. Let that sink in. Men could not be raped at all. Men afforded women protections that they didn’t afford themselves married or otherwise is being presented as an example of men’s terrible authority over women!
/r/MensRights06/06/18 01:04 AM
2

I found the specifics and it turns out that rape itself was a law that only protected women. Apparently men couldn’t be raped at all whether they were married to the rapist or not married to the rapist so it’s kinda bullshit that you cite marital rape as an example of men’s power when men themselves couldn’t legally be raped...
/r/MensRights06/06/18 12:58 AM
1

Did the law say specifically wife or was it married person?
/r/MensRights05/06/18 10:24 PM
1

Owe: have an obligation to pay or repay (something, especially money) in return for something received. Monogamous sex partners demand exclusivity and in exchange for that exclusivity they pay in sex to their partner. Entitled: believing oneself to be inherently deserving of privileges or special treatment. My sex partner entitles me to consider them for sex by calling me by the title of ‘sex partner.’ I don’t blush when I request sex with them.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 10:21 PM
6

Running the entire judicial system That’s direct power and that’s not wielded by feminists, however, feminists have influence over those who have direct power which in itself is a power which is probably why the word ‘instigated’ was used to describe the process. Women have always had influencial power over men in positions of power and authority.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 04:25 PM
13

‘Dag-gum! We will have to learn to make sandwiches again if we want to compete with these gawd darn sex robots! Consarn it!’
/r/MensRights05/06/18 03:41 PM
14

Going with her estimation of women the Lehman sisters wouldn’t of started up a business to begin with because that involves a level of significant risk...
/r/MensRights05/06/18 03:06 PM
1

So, nothing? Really? Nothing? Tons of changes! but you and I can’t think of any that would alter those numbers for men? I’ve asserted that, for men, things haven’t changed for the better since that data, so the onus is on you to illustrate how things have changed that would lead to a change in those numbers. For example: In Canada in 1976 2% of families with a stay at home parent had a stay at home father which rose to 10% in 2015. That’s an increase of 8% over four decades... It’s a change, but…
/r/MensRights05/06/18 01:11 PM
1

You sound like a Canadian politician when it comes to dealing with aboriginal affairs because every decade they address the native problem by conducting a costly study to examine problems facing bands and then take absolutely no action to resolve any problems and a decade later they need to conduct another study to address the problems because, although they’ve taken no action at all, they assume the problems have magically changed. If an insurance company doesn’t rebuild your home after a fire …
/r/MensRights04/06/18 09:20 PM
5

The broken windows theory sending more men to prison is something that has changed but that’s not going to show a positive change in those numbers. Law enforcement policy on domestic violence changed after those numbers came out resulting in many men being arrested even when they called the police... Would that result in a positive change for men in front of a family court? I keep being assured of positive “changes” that render those numbers moot but nobody seems to be able to toss one out and t…
/r/MensRights04/06/18 06:14 PM
5

But not one of those things has changed in favour of men’s rights or father’s rights over the past multiple generations, so, again, what to you indicates that those numbers will be different today? Remember the shared parenting law that was introduced a few years ago? Me neither... Remember custody reform that push through a decade ago? Me neither... Remember the massive advertising campaign that made fathers critical to child development? Me neither... Things are different? My outlook in family…
/r/MensRights04/06/18 03:55 PM
3

by an attractive woman Women don’t enjoy being touched by attractive men? Whatever variables he uses to excuse a sexual assault on men I suspect you will find also apply to women.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 03:37 PM
14

What policy changes have been made that would indicate to you that the outcomes have changed? From what I can see men’s societal roles haven’t changed in the past 400 years much less the past thirty but certain women’s influences over the public perception of men in society over the past thirty years has taken a turn for the worse.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 01:49 PM
1

It’s a moral panic spread by moral entrepreneurs to achieve their selfish goals. In the witch trials the witchfinder general used the fear of witches to make himself a bunch of money, and in this case the witchfinder generals are using the fear of men to get themselves better parking.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 01:56 PM
22

Girls also benefit significantly from having their dads around - am I the only one who finds it odd that the title and one sentence specifically note boys yet the links discuss children? Why stress boys when the father/daughter relationship is often more at risk of when the father is out of the house?
/r/MensRights01/06/18 07:46 PM
496

I can’t decide on what more ridiculous - a strong powerful independent adult behaving like a toddler or a society violating it’s own citizen’s rights by mollycoddling them and their infantile fears.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 07:03 PM
3

You see the ‘bad things women have done’ posts as guns aimed at women and not as fortifications against the stereotyping of men. The famous smack down of micheal Moore’s ‘women are wonderful’ tweet is a great example of why those posts are made. https://www.boredpanda.com/gender-equality-women-dark-side/ The greatest argument against the negative prejudice of an out-group is the knowledge of the dark things the in-group is guilty of. ‘Women’s shit ALSO stinks’ is equality not an attack of women.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 04:00 PM
1

As a typically gay person, who’s not gay, I find those people’s behaviour gay. = As a typically happy person, who’s not a homosexual, I find those people’s behaviour unimpressive. The English language at it’s finest! My dog’s breakfast is cleaner than english.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 02:27 PM
7

The metoo mindset is death to her career choice.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 12:28 PM
6

Well, it’s not him against her - it’s him against her and her unborn baby so that’s two against one... Great! Now he’s a violent rapist that these women will need to fend off? A star who earns his income by getting people to like him will escalate his bawdy remarks with violent blows against a pregnant woman? Even if the man was a devious fiend there’s no way in bloody hell he would shoot himself in the wallet by going toe to toe with a women and her unborn child! Again... women need to stop fea…
/r/MensRights31/05/18 04:00 PM
18

Women need to get over their fear of men. An 80 year old man making bawdy jests is really a career ending crime? I used to work at a store and every week on the same day an old-age home would bring in the old folks to do their light shopping and the old ladies would perch themselves in chairs at the front and do exactly the same shit to me that these ladies are accusing him of doing... Good fucking grief! If a sixteen year old teenager can survive a team of old lady perverts surely a career woma…
/r/MensRights31/05/18 02:41 PM
23

I suspect that some dipshit alienated her kids from their father and doesn’t want to feel like an asshole every Father’s Day so we all need to hide her shame rather than have her admit that her selfish bullshit has actually done her kids harm.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 01:59 PM
0

I’m not the one in denial.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 01:50 PM
25

I, on the other hand, like having a day set aside that specifically has my kids celebrate my fatherhood with them and has them reflect on the things that I do with them that they enjoy.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 01:43 PM
0

By using women’s fear of men and confirming women’s fear of men.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 11:24 AM
0

People can be taught to overcome both the flight and freeze responses, but let’s not teach our daughters to fight let’s take their own welfare out of their own hands and make it another person’s responsibility. As a kid I was taught how to deal with drug pushers and child predators on the rare chance that I’d meet these people and we can’t spend time talking about dangers of alcohol consumption or strategies for women to avoid becoming a deer in the head lights? A class of nine years old childre…
/r/MensRights30/05/18 11:18 AM
1

True, but they are specifically selling it by making certain people fearful of other people...
/r/MensRights29/05/18 04:38 PM
1

A warning or caution sign is best when it’s as brief and as quickly identifiable as possible. ‘Men at work’ is quick and brief and entirely expected. The sign is meant to save idiots from getting injured not inspire future generations of women to become construction workers.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 02:45 AM
3

Most parents have a unsurprising interest in not wanting to fuck over future generations when the resolve current problems.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 02:30 AM
0

How likely is it that a man will murder a police officer in broad daylight at a routine traffic stop infront of his own family? What kind of crazy idiot thinks that’s a dangerous situation that requires a lethal response? If he was anything but black I guarantee he wouldn’t of been shot under those terms because the officer wouldn’t of been on edge - he wouldn’t of even asked the passenger for his driver’s licence? What the fuck for - he’s not getting the ticket! C’mon dude! Fear was the primary…
/r/MensRights29/05/18 02:10 AM
11

Women also use/used men as their agents. During the chaos of a house spider invasion my wife grants me total and absolute dictatorial authority until the vicious threat has been neutralized. Am I oppressing her by being forced to take action even though she's the one who's surrendering her autonomy to me? There's a post in this subreddit right now that has a woman surrendering her own direct power to two male neighbours which meets the criteria of historical oppression if you overlook her own re…
/r/MensRights28/05/18 09:50 PM
1

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=11670523
/r/MensRights28/05/18 08:15 PM
2

Her phobia of men is what lead to her believe that man was a pervert. That company and vice are utilizing that same phobia to sell a dangerous product to an already fearful population. How do you think an unarmed black man at a traffic stop gets shot and bleeds out in front of his wife and kid by a trained police officer? The cop's phobia of black men lead to the belief the dad driving his family somewhere was a menacing threat. Bang! Fan the flames of fear and then sell the fearful a dangerous …
/r/MensRights27/05/18 01:30 PM
3

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3076246/Mum-shamed-man-Facebook-taking-photos-kids-just-taking-Star-Wars-selfie-offers-grovelling-apology.html
/r/MensRights27/05/18 11:12 AM
35

Using paranoia to sell a dangerous weapon to fearful people - what could go wrong?
/r/MensRights27/05/18 11:01 AM
2

And it’s for children so the traits need to be easy to identify for children and convey to children.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 10:30 AM
4

They are trying to profit by presenting damsels in distress. Men a protectors not damsels. There’s a reason why they used an androgynous white kid with blonde hair and blues eyes crying - they are maximizing the potential for the majority of people to identify with that kid. There’s a reason why they tied domestic abuse with homelessness - a lot of focus is on domestic abuse in Australia and they want to poach some of that money by presenting their cause with providing more bang for your charita…
/r/MensRights26/05/18 02:09 PM
6

The host of the program is working on advancing robot movement beyond the clunky motions we see today. From what I gather she believes that robot AI is out pacing robot motion and it’s retarding robot development. Her second love is choreography. It’s sad that a person as smart as she is can look at any type of segregation of people and grant her approval by providing her support.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 01:52 PM
25

A sexy girl dressed sexier than her and she bullied the girl even though she dresses sexy herself? Huh... girls bully and victimize other girls over fashion? Huh... Remind me again why girls can’t dress sexually provocative in school? Oh, that right! Boys are the problem! Silly me here I thought that girls bullying each other like this would be the reason, but it turns out that boys are a problem. Girls can’t have access to sexual provocation because in disrupts boys learning and not because of …
/r/MensRights24/05/18 02:06 PM
2

Don’t we usually put people in jail because they victimized a person and they can’t be trusted not to victimize others? Whether they themselves were victimized really doesn’t protect people from becoming their victims.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 01:42 PM
2

Having a phobia of other people is also a barrier but usually those people aren’t seen as victims.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 12:39 PM
0

As with women’s self-defence courses the correct solution probably lies not with teaching boys anything but teaching girls how to command in these types of situations and getting girls to equate murder with being asked out a second time after saying no isn’t going to help anyone.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 05:05 PM
13

For a subreddit about women by women there’s a significant lack of girly interests discussed over there. It reads more like a physical and mental illness support group that bonds over complaining about other people’s misdeeds and although those are within the scope of women’s behaviour there’s a bunch of more fun girly things that are suspiciously absent. It’s like they want to reimagine themselves as men but with boobs except they only have experience with boobs and can’t really relate to thems…
/r/MensRights21/05/18 03:19 PM
1

It’s not about men or boys - it’s about women bullying each other over sexually provocative fashion choices. Men are used because no one stands up for them. Even the idiot who wrote that openly accepts that men and boys are so easily distracted by sexy clothes instead of ridiculing that point.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 01:18 PM
1

Monogamy relates to much more than a sexual relationship. Sex is a component but it’s not the entirety. Monogamy is the optimal path for people to live happy and healthy lives.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 12:32 PM
1

That’s not typical of monogamous relationships and it’s not a healthy relationship for two people to be in. Also, I checked to see how people respond to Taylor Swift’s behaviour and sure enough it is being commented on negatively by the masses. Apparently, she’s a messy ham sandwich down there...
/r/MensRights21/05/18 12:27 PM
3

I suspect old timey problems like lax workplace safety had an effect on reducing the amount of eligible men while other old timey problems like maternal mortality played a roll in increasing the number of whole bodied healthy men having multiple wives over a lifetime. The eligible 60% of men had children with 80% of women but the difference has those women pay with their lives to match the 40% of dead or maimed men leaving a few years gap between men and women actually favouring men which doesn’…
/r/MensRights20/05/18 04:28 PM
2

Those seem to be the only charges that are against him which are not related to the ‘dine and dash dating’ and if those women want their money back they’ll need to take him to civil court.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 02:33 PM
16

Monogamy creates the best results for bonding two people’s interests together for their future and the future of their children into adulthood. Human children take a very long time to mature into adulthood and during that time they need for both parents to be accessible which is best done under the same roof. Family creates permanent advocates for all stages of human life from the cradle to grave with each person’s roles adapting to new situations and all from a place of love not money or sex so…
/r/MensRights20/05/18 02:06 PM
3

There’s a bunch of common threads between these shooters to the point that it’s blatantly obvious that these fuckers are triggered to copy cat past killers and it’s both irresponsible and unethical for the media to report these shootings way they do because they are responsible for creating a Contagion Effect and then profiting from it.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 08:37 PM
8

You’re confused. Women have historically had power with their ability to influence the behavior of people in the course of events. Their power of influence has both powerful men and women support all women OVER men. Even though a powerful man has direct power he will direct that power in a woman’s favour. Even though a woman has direct power today she will also direct that power in a woman’s favour. This creates a predictable model that places common men’s needs after every women’s need no matte…
/r/MensRights18/05/18 04:03 PM
19

When men leer and rank their female colleagues like cuts of meat, Aside from heterosexual men, guess who else does this? If you said women you’d be right. If you said lesbians you’d be right. If you said gay men you’d be right. Infact, the person who wrote that garbage had probably done it more than once on the very day the article was written...
/r/MensRights18/05/18 03:21 PM
18

What an interesting mind that uses words like probably, majority, and most to describe evils that are ‘unlikely’ because the perpetrators are a ‘minority’ and the instances of crime are ‘few’ and not even exclusive to men.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 03:11 PM
5

According to a brief look at your post history accusing people of being libertarians, shills, or feminists seems to be your only reason for this sub to exist. Sometimes it’s not the mods, the shills, the feminists, or the libertarians being a problem - sometimes it’s just you and having briefly reviewed your post history, I’m inclined to believe that it’s you. Here is where you turn your eye inwards and access yourself and your own flaws and if you are still cool with everything you’ve contribut…
/r/MensRights18/05/18 02:57 PM
2

I’m shocked that you don’t know what satire is to the point that I’m almost sure your post is a joke mocking SJWs, but in case it’s not... Satire: the use of humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize people's stupidity or vices, particularly in the context of contemporary politics and other topical issues.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 01:09 PM
2

I suspect the emotions she’s referring to in the first comment are socially acceptable male emotions that add value to her life: when in public - happy; when directed towards her - tender; and when directed away from her or at a target of her preference - anger. Scared and sad are not acceptable since they are of no value to her.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 02:29 PM
1

Parents in nations without retirement schemes also make investments in their children with education and it’s usually in their boys over their girls and it seems to extend beyond cultures ; is this behaviour a directed assault by multiple cultures against hated females as we’re being told or is something else at work? Is that ‘something’ being shown here?
/r/MensRights17/05/18 12:33 PM
1

Are those African countries as African as they were before the French arrived or did they adopt, share, and assimilate some French culture? Is France the same as it was after or did they change too? Are they better off culturally?
/r/MensRights16/05/18 02:36 PM
8

Mr Judd also said he had spent more time in hospital than the 14 days of pre- sentence detention the woman served after they were arrested. He did more time than they did.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 12:42 PM
7

It’s common for abused women to be as abusive as their abuser and it’s common for children in abused relationships to become future abusers and victims. You can’t solve domestic violence by pinning it exclusively on men so they only thing they seem to be doing is creating government jobs and tax engines in the same manner as man-blaming DV charities is creating executive jobs and revenue engines by damseling women.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 02:58 PM
4

Who issues that authorization? The prime victims of the patriarchy issue themselves that authorization. After saying that out loud it seems quite stupid doesn’t it? Victims of a system of oppression directed towards them have the authority to choose to stop working while also having the authority to choose for their husband to continue working. Damn you patriarchy for increasing women’s luxury at the expense of men!
/r/MensRights15/05/18 02:29 PM
56

was more the response within the wider community that led us to cancel the event, not any views expressed by the speaker. So, this suicide prevention charity is cool with her repeated calls for men to die? Keep up the good work of saving lives... Oh, wait...
/r/MensRights15/05/18 12:19 PM
22

The baby drought will be even worse than that - enthusiastic consent as they usually describe it is a turn off. If you ever want to piss somebody off try enthusiastic concert with your everyday interactions. ‘Would you like for me to make you a coffee like I’ve done every morning for the past 10 years?’ ‘I’m going to make your coffee but please clearly explain to me what you enjoy in your coffee’ ‘I’m going to add the milk you asked for right now - do you want me to add the milk you asked for?’ …
/r/MensRights14/05/18 01:53 PM
3

There’s a long list of women and men who I know who are not using the diploma they earned in school or the diploma earned them a spot in a job that really doesn’t require higher education. We’ve been seeing ‘college preferred’ on general labour jobs that require zero education for at least fifteen years now and it’s becoming more and more ridiculous. The police and fire dept. do their own training but still require a college diploma... With my higher education I qualified to work in a high earni…
/r/MensRights14/05/18 01:21 PM
3

I have a daughter and a son and I’m not inclined to cut the throat of one just to facilitate the other.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 01:20 PM
1

Interesting choice going ad hominem right out of the gate? Traditionally it’s supposed to be a person’s last maneuver during an already lost debate so it’s surprising that it’s your very first counterpoint. Shocking actually.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 11:35 AM
43

Her husband is worth even more than her. She’s rich and she still married a man who was richer than her. Not an auto mechanic! Not a garbage man! Not a taxi driver! It’s amazing how many feminists marry up even when they have their own lucrative careers.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 04:59 AM
1

The real hilarity is the notion that having husbands earn less income is a gain for women.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 04:38 AM
24

This is where we get men losing their friendships to the demands of their girlfriends who become men's only emotional support. If she leaves him he loses his entire emotional support system when he needs it most and becomes emotionally isolated. This article is a great example of some women's uneasiness about their boyfriends having an alternative emotional support system. Some women also demand more time from their boyfriend which also crushes men's relationships since men bond over activities …
/r/MensRights12/05/18 08:58 PM
1

A surefire way, the 22-year-old undergraduate reasoned, to guarantee an interesting debate. Fun? No way! Let's have a debate about the topics she's educated in. Don't strong debating skills scream quality motherhood material for your future children together? What's in store for you dating this debater? Does she want coffee? Let's debate about it! Tea? That's debatable! Let us also understand what her estimation of her own intelligence is going to mean in a debate... You are wrong. Always wrong!…
/r/MensRights12/05/18 03:57 PM
1

Who says that you can retroactively rescind concent? You've already estabilshed that the people don't believe that and it's the people that form the government and create laws. Even if a few people disagree with rest of the people those reformers don't wield the people's authority to mandate the changes they want. They are welcome to continue to try to bring the people to their position but they can't dictate obedience from the people without assuming more authority than being just one of the pe…
/r/MensRights12/05/18 03:29 PM
26

I’m sure she wore those shorts to prom right? Or her grandmother’s funeral? Certainly, she’s going to be cool with her bride’s maid wearing jean shorts and fucking up the photo? Date night at an upscale bar? Jean shorts it is! Want to impress a date? Jean shorts! Her sorority is having a dinner? Jean shorts!
/r/MensRights11/05/18 03:47 PM
5

The dicks that organized the event demand an unbalanced sex ratio in their favour? Those dicks!
/r/MensRights11/05/18 03:21 PM
11

At a rate of 0.17 out of 100,000 people I’m sure those three trans people in metro Glasgow are very happy right now for this win of preventing drag queens from doing there thing assuming of course that those three people actually gave a shit and this isn’t another case of people telling other people what’s best for them - with words like ‘over fears acts will offend trans people’ it would seem that they didn’t bother to even ask those three fucking people - how hard is it to pick up the phone an…
/r/MensRights11/05/18 03:03 PM
3

Women need to stop looking for men to provide material comfort even if they are strongly inclined to do so or unions need sharper teeth to ensure prosperity for everybody. My old boss believed that if owners paid their employees what they were worth to the company and not what some other company paid their people there would be no need for unions.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 12:56 PM
3

Men don't live in a world where we are believed on our intentions - we live in a world based on other people's perceptions. pervert 'dad' used his child to sneek peeks as vulnerable women... At the very minimum you've handed the mother full custody. Men have been put on the sex offenders list for pissing in public. http://www.businessinsider.com/surprising-things-that-could-make-you-a-sex-offender-2013-10
/r/MensRights11/05/18 12:30 PM
3

If they are both too drunk both of them will want a nap not sex. There’s a difference between being drunk and being too drunk to consent to sex.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 12:11 PM
12

brownie points if you know how to insult... This person is encouraging aggression between two people and directly associating dominate males with her sexual selection. Effeminate, weak, or short men are not the victims of bullying because of their lack of masculinity or even their opponents masculinity - they are the victims of a person’s desire for dominant mates and their potential mate’s desire to prove their dominance.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 06:53 PM
2

Blatchford did a better job at the national post: http://nationalpost.com/opinion/christie-blatchford-moore-may-not-be-the-feminist-conscience-she-has-branded-herself-to-be
/r/MensRights09/05/18 03:48 PM
1

The strong protect the weak is the only standard he’s observing and the flaw is found in that it’s appreciated and rewarded by gender as much as it’s expected and facilitated by gender.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 02:49 PM
1

I just read that she is suspended not kicked out and her story involves not following sexual cues and what SJW call rape because she was seen as a superior by the person she had sex with.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 01:11 PM
2

It comes from the same system of prejudice - they are assigning poverty to skin colour and not a bank statement.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 06:04 PM
8

there is something wrong with how our culture socializes men. Whose culture? I live in a multicultural community of middle class families and there’s been a ridiculously small amount of murders in this community - none. Zero murders in a community of thousands of men from hundreds of different cultures all living side by side you’d think it would be carnage in the street! There are even a lot of black people here! Black people! No crime! No murder! Black people everybody! Black men who I’ve been…
/r/MensRights07/05/18 03:38 PM
37

I wonder why women seem to gravitate to jobs that are close to residential areas that occur during school hours? It’s probably due to something speculative and absurd like internalized misogyny after a lifetime of negative stereotypes directed at women by evil men and not something more practical like they have children and desired a mate who earns more than they do.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 03:01 PM
2

Another consideration is that he used direct power to help her (men’s traditional power) and she used her power of influence to help him (women’s traditional power) and both mutually benefited in their roles accessing their traditional paths to power.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 07:18 PM
0

He volunteered his services and she made a conscious decision to entirely surrender her own agency to him and use him as her agent. Certain people call this power exchange problematic and proclaim him an oppressor of her even though she benefited almost exclusively from the exchange.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 07:12 PM
2

Am I an egalitarian or a complainer about racists?
/r/MensRights06/05/18 05:57 PM
1

Can we not draw a straight line from the witch to the sensuous Jewish woman? Is the persecution of the sensuous woman not a permanent reality, one that is not economic in origin, but which derives from the specific social organisation of gender relations in patriarchal Europe? Most women accused of witchcraft were old beggar women as seen in the writing of John Gaule in his criticism of the ‘witch finder general’ Mathew Hopkins: Every old woman with a wrinkled face, a furrowed brow, a hairy lip,…
/r/MensRights06/05/18 04:02 PM
1

The board of directors of the Boy Scouts changed Boy Scouts to the scouts not feminism. From what I recall, they already had a judicial decision from the late 1990s that established that they could determine their own membership criteria which protected them from including girls.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 03:44 PM
2

Children can’t concent so no charges for her and I would also be inclined to let the guy off the hook since my nation’s judicial branch recently afforded a women the same and I believe in equality.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 03:33 PM
2

> a man She agreed to have sex with a specific man not ‘a man‘ and it certainly wasn’t that man. Yeah, she could of prevented the entire situation by exercising a toddler’s command of due diligence but she was operating in good faith, and I’ll even admit that for me it looks more like an insane leap of faith, but it’s still in good faith and he didn’t live up to his end of the deal.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 03:27 PM
5

They don’t delete obnoxious troll posts and downvoted a criticism of someone’s MRA thread so they are head and shoulders above anything else I’ve seen associated with women’s rights aside from us and the egalitarianism subs.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 02:35 AM
6

A gambling person huh? How about you ante up with your own teeth and tits then talk about body part re oval to prevent totally preventable health problems?
/r/MensRights06/05/18 02:06 AM
29

Tooth extraction significantly reduces tooth decay. Mastectomies significantly reduce breast cancer. Vaginal cancer is also a thing and treatment involves vulvar and clitoral removal. 0.3 out of 100,000 men get penile cancer. 0.5 out of 100,000 women get clitoral cancer. Is FGM back on the table if it prevents a rare cancer type too or is it still a violation of human rights?
/r/MensRights06/05/18 01:17 AM
14

If I close my legs I decrease my stability pyramid and you will be required to structurally support me or forgive me when I crush you. Take your bag and place it on your head to increase your center of gravity and observe what you do to increase your stability.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 03:27 PM
2

Women aren’t choosing STEM careers on their own so let’s spend money to try to brain wash them into STEM careers? It’s the movie Stepford Wives but the wives are becoming robots for all of us not just evil husbands...
/r/MensRights05/05/18 03:21 PM
0

Prehistoric? Roe vs. Wade was in 1973. The first oral contraceptive came out in 1960. Day care services started to gain momentum in the 1980s and 1990s. Up until the 1930s one woman out of 100 died from complications from childbirth and the farther back you go the worse that number gets - women a few centuries ago used to write wills before giving birth it was so bad! All of these factors placed men as the most reliable choice for education and career employment which in turn made them the obvio…
/r/MensRights05/05/18 03:09 PM
5

Let’s all just pretend that the modern benefits and conveniences that place men and women on an equal footing today have always existed and sexism is the result of the blind bigotry of men and not any imbalance that comes from one gender being best able to provide the highest amount of utility to their family under incredibly hostile circumstances.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 10:43 PM
3

Men? Aren’t them those folks trained from cradle to grave to facilitate the needs of women and children over men? Isn’t she presenting herself as a person in need and isn’t she asking her needs to be met by them folks? As disgustingly intrusive as facilitating her needs would be she feels absolutely no shame in asking CEOs to get involved. Perhaps HR can screen male employees with a lie detector screened sex survey and female employees can option the survey or offer medical records to attest tha…
/r/MensRights04/05/18 03:23 PM
6

Of course they do there’s a nice return of investment involved. A pricey degree sold with little overhead - it’s not like gender studies involves purchasing expensive equipment or even results for that matter. They just need to make everything look legitimate and at 140k you get a PT Barnum level of showperson and they rake in the money from gullible rubes. Come one, come all! Come and see the terrible things that men have done historically to women! Step right in folks standing room only! Twent…
/r/MensRights04/05/18 02:57 PM
10

She’s most famous for embroiling a company into her sex life and now she wants even more companies to be embroiled in other people’s sex lives.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 12:27 PM
2

Explain to me how freedom was compromised when the board of directors of the Boy Scouts themselves decided to include girls into the organization not any branch of government?
/r/MensRights04/05/18 12:03 PM
2

This list of men who actually have access to direct systemic power is considerably smaller than the list of women who have influence over it.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 12:17 PM
3

Women did their part in Britain by distributing white feathers to men and boys out of uniform as a symbol of that man’s cowardice and in Canada by rewarding the government who granted certain women the right to vote by voting for the party that wanted conscription. Male power is historically to direct and women’s power is historically to influence but nobody today should make the mistake that women never had power.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 11:27 PM
16

It was an internal company decision not brought on by a legal challange - the boys scouts were losing membership and looked to recruiting girls to boost their numbers and the girls scouts actually fought them on poaching their girls so what you have is a company looking to boost it’s profits by opening up their business to a larger community and a second company objecting to the increased competition The name change should of been expected - it’s about mo ey.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 04:16 PM
3

I get the impression that the author would love nothing more than for all women to be secret lesbians... I guess being a lesbian chickenhawk preying on young heterosexual women isn’t as heroic as it sounds and needs a little spin?
/r/MensRights02/05/18 03:53 PM
2

Sexual deviancy doesn’t disprove a theory. Natural selection doesn’t guarantee you’ll always mate with the most suitable mate ever of all time it means you’ll mate with the best suitable mate that you can attract and fend off rivals at a specific point in time. Females also compete with other females to increase their odds at finding and securing their most suitable mate.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 12:33 PM
3

Men bond over activities and women bond over conversations. When men enter a serious relationship they lose their free time to their partner and it just gets worse the more serious the relationship becomes. The women becomes the man’s only friend. It’s not masculinity- it’s the notion that modern men should surrender all of their free time to other people’s needs.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 03:25 PM
2

Will women still be able to hide behind men when people discuss things like global colonization and wage slavery?
/r/MensRights29/04/18 02:48 PM
1

Feminism is ultimately the right for women to choose. Feminism is ultimately the right for women to choose first. In a binary system giving one party the option to choose first means the second party has no choice and must facilitate the needs of the first group. Women have the option to act or pass and be respected for either choice and men have to act if women defer to them or pass if women want the role. Women’s liberation freed women from their obligations and responsibilities to men but the…
/r/MensRights29/04/18 02:24 PM
3

When people with learning disabilities or grade school children understand the power that comes with making a false accusation the system is out of control.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 07:19 PM
7

Because they are using you to promote a positive image of feminism as they further everything you dislike about them? They hold you up as a shield to protect them from the shit they are shoveling out. You’ve protected them for decades - please stop. In the infancy of second wave feminism they formed a men’s liberation movement to liberate men from their roles in society to counterbalance women’s liberation. This group went off to think of the most pressing problems facing men and came back with …
/r/MensRights28/04/18 03:45 PM
2

With education. If you websearch ‘men are trash’ you will find a significant amount of black commentary on the subject compared to white - this is because it comes from the black feminism as ‘black men are trash’. It’s significance in the black community is found during the Memphis sanitation strike. On Feb 1, 1968, two sanitation workers, Echol Cole and Robert Walker, took shelter from the rain in the back of their garbage truck. As Cole and Walker rode in the back of the truck, an electrical s…
/r/MensRights28/04/18 02:09 PM
1

A lot of people like to vent and it’s not always appropriate to create a policy with what comes out of the mouth of a person venting.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 06:14 PM
1

And his kids were assholes.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 05:59 PM
29

Both see increased demands for equality, whether it’s Black Lives Matter or the #MeToo movement, as coming at the deadly expense of the privileged group — white people or men, respectively There’s no expense paid. The simple fact is that black men have not been elevated today - they are in the same place they were all along and the complaint of white men today is the same as black men - we are not rapists, we are not thugs, we are not toxic and the vast majority of us are honest and caring. This…
/r/MensRights27/04/18 05:56 PM
1

Raising children is best done when the parents and their children all live under the same roof observing a healthy relationship. Mate poaching runs against the best strategy for raising healthy children.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 04:31 PM
1

I'm able to stop other men and women from having offspring?
/r/MensRights27/04/18 02:42 PM
3

How utterly useless do these people consider women when they recognize that women have unlimited choices but are oppressed because they made the wrong choice? Is it really any fucking surprise to anybody that when given the choice to work or the choice to stay at home most people will stay at home? A bunch of people at work won a big lottery and promptly quit their manly man job and they were all manly men... The company offered an early retirement package and all of the old men working there re…
/r/MensRights27/04/18 02:28 PM
6

You described the qualities expected of a knight 600 years ago. In 600 years the only thing that changed for men is some marginal iconoclasm by fools.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 01:25 PM
14

Women don’t have access to chivalry with other women and they have no convenience to blame for their failures such as sexism. Right now on another subreddit a woman is seen complaining about the sexism involved with her getting fired for being late to work. Without sexism to blame these ladies still need to be the gender victim so here we are with some trumped up queen bee bullshit. They should NOT be confused with strong, ambitious women in the workplace Great except the difference between the …
/r/MensRights27/04/18 01:00 PM
1

Is it really so distracting that you can’t make your grades? You look, appreciate, then move on with your life and all of that happens in a few seconds not for an entire school day.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 12:16 PM
7

A plain Jane can elevate her status with sex appeal and the other girls have the option of meeting her sex appeal or bullying her back in line. It’s about female bullying. The Supreme Court ruled that rules that prevent distractions to the learning environment are permitted, so boys are used to stem fashion bullies. Show me a guy with shit grades and I’ll show you a guy that doesn’t take school seriously not a kid distracted by women’s fashion.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 11:02 AM
10

It’s a guy and he appears to be doing this as a mercenary. It would appear that a bit character in another comic he made got attention so off he went to write this crap for a fist full of pocket change.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 12:49 AM
1

This is a perfect example of women's traditional power. They were exercising their power of influence to induce a man to do something they had the same capacity to do but would rather not do. It's only because women are now equals that men can finally rid themselves of women's influential power and hopefully those women can finally understand their own direct power, define themselves as adults, and manages themselves accordingly.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 11:38 AM
1

Power = the capacity or ability to direct or influence the behavior of others or the course of events. Historically men had the ability to direct and women had the ability to influence.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 11:03 AM
1

Unless you are escaping peril I don’t see how you can claim self defence if someone is blocking your path.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 01:01 PM
1

Prejudice that comes from traditionism requires no thought. Women are expected to buy the family's supplies. Under that rule the outcome of women keeping or receiving more money is expected.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 09:42 PM
1

Equality means she pays your share or feels negative emotions over it.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 09:36 PM
2

Or more likely it's good old fashion domestic traditionalism with the respondents assuming that the woman would be the principle family shopper (women's traditional role) under both circumstances of her making more than her husband and her making less than her husband and from that the woman would always require more money than the man.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 09:17 PM
2

It's got nothing to do with the boss and everything to do with turnover. The smart person will get bored, move on, and waste all that money training them. If this is happening with smart women then I'd suspect the reasoning behind it to be similar because HR is a female dominated field. According to an HR study in the United States, women represent 73 per cent of HR manager roles - the globe and mail
/r/MensRights23/04/18 08:45 PM
2

Reliable birth control was invented and abortion was legalized. Those two factors allowed women the freedom to plan childbirth and prove their worth in more responsible careers. As more women proved their worth daycares became more popular and spread allowing even more women to access even more careers. Blame somebody? Blame women dropping out of the rat race when they have a baby? Blame the baby for being born? Blame company men for being hesitant about hiring a woman who was likely to quit her…
/r/MensRights23/04/18 01:52 PM
2

Somebody doesn’t know how babies are made...
/r/MensRights23/04/18 12:29 PM
1

tender years doctrine
/r/MensRights23/04/18 12:22 PM
1

The biggest problem facing men everywhere has always been their parental rights in the event of a divorce - everything else is less important when compared to that one because there are at least two victims involved - the father and his child. The feminist sanctioned men’s liberation movement during the second wave of feminism was shuttered by feminism over this specific issue. It effects every single man and their children without any consideration to any demographic they might belong to - all …
/r/MensRights22/04/18 05:35 PM
1

Let’s complain about the advice we face when we burden other people with our own physical safety!
/r/MensRights22/04/18 01:17 PM
3

You make it sound one sided... If by ‘society’ you mean men and by ‘force’ you mean women are rewarded by men then your position would be more accurate. It’s complimentary between men and women co-conspiring together sometimes to their detriment but mostly to their personal advantage.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 11:56 AM
4

Fathers? Hahaha! Surely you mean parents! The parents of the children make the arrangements for the marriage between their children so both boys and girls are subjected to this treatment but somehow it only makes victims out of girls? ‘Subjugated to their husbands’ who are his parent’s retirement plan - did I say parents? The boy’s father is probably going to die early, so the matriarch directly benefits from male empowerment in a nation lacking RRSPs or a 401k.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 04:58 AM
4

I’m saving for my retirement to live a few years of the historically disadvantaged life my mother and grandmothers had.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 04:40 AM
6

Property is not purchased on a bended knee with a promise to love honour and cherish. We know what it looks like when humans are bought and kept as property and it looks nothing like a marriage. A married woman has influential power over her husband and gets access to his agency a slave does not have a voice in their master’s affairs.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 04:30 AM
1

It’s a fair judgement although ‘don’t like women’ is bullshit because men love women more than they love men. Most female characters are men with boobs. They are inclined to be agents more than operators.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 03:45 PM
43

If there was ever a group of people who didn’t understand the logistics involved with filling a ballon with semen...
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:36 PM
1

What’s any of that have to do with the fact that she’s still pushing the same bullshit narratives she did as a SJW? She still defines life experience with physical traits but that’s okay for you because she doesn’t like the same people that you don’t like? Let’s not criticize her and support her same SJW bullshit. Laci green 2015 vs. Laci Green 2018 It’s the same shit just in a different pile.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 03:21 PM
1

https://www.humanrights.gov.au/complaints/make-complaint
/r/MensRights16/04/18 03:07 PM
1

She's off side. A lived experience? Is that when you see a sign that says your race and colour need not apply? Conjure in the minds of 10 people the race and gender of a person who has experienced that and I bet none of them will describe me. She's just throwing her own shit back over the fence - it's the same shit and she's just making a different pile.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 01:48 PM
1

I think it’s a joke. You can’t watch 1984 and walk away thinking 2 + 2 should equal 5.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 12:48 PM
-9

Changed? Take a look at what she’s saying - she complains about people with dismissive attitudes by expressing a dismissive attitude. She’s just on the other side of the fence tossing back same shit she tossed over a few years ago. It was funnier when she was an opponent.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 12:45 PM
5

It shouldn’t be her decision to make it should be a human right.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 12:32 PM
2

You probably bailed before it got weird. We already have what he’s advocating for from hollywood’s historical fiction and comic books. Wonder Woman didn’t advance the frontline on inch in the Great War nor did the events of the movie the dirty dozen. Wait a second... he’s not advocating for historical fiction he’s advocating for the death of historical fact. Do I get to determine the new facts? No? Then fuck off we should all just stick with historical accuracy and be mature enough to see it for…
/r/MensRights16/04/18 12:27 PM
13

Easy for you to say - you consider yourself to be an adult! Take a moment to think of the helplessness of post pubescent women who aren’t aware of their adulthood status. Everybody tells them they aren’t smart enough but nobody ever tells them that they are an adult and should seriously grow up. Are we honestly expected to believe that some dude’s idiot comment stopped a big girl from their life’s career choice?
/r/MensRights15/04/18 10:21 PM
3

Are they discouraged in the same way some women are discouraged from going out after dark?
/r/MensRights15/04/18 09:52 PM
6

The fact that he yelled for the police and there was actually a police officer there was what told me this didn’t happen in Canada or the USA. “Pfft! Damn fool yelling for a cop... WHAT?!!??!’
/r/MensRights15/04/18 07:18 PM
3

The women are opposed to feminism’s tendency to restrict women’s choices - they are not opposed to women’s rights. Their critic is that modern feminism’s tendency to restrict women’s choices is as limiting as the complaints presented by Betty Friedan when she criticized traditionalism with her book the feminine mystique which is credited for igniting second wave feminism. The liberators of women have exceeded their mandate to the point that they’ve become subjugators of women. As an MRA I should…
/r/MensRights15/04/18 05:33 PM
5

Not to the people who perceive his sister to be more docile and compliant to western powers and not to the people who want to slow the spread of certain religions that promote a male bias over female. Interesting that the people who frown upon western colonialism and cultural genocide also strongly support these government initiatives.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 03:07 PM
20

Is it that subreddit about women for women that couldn’t be any less feminine if it was about 1980s professional wrestling?
/r/MensRights15/04/18 02:34 PM
1

Given that the main themes of the film seem to be the building and demolishing of experience and innocence I'm not surprised that a person today would draw that conclusion and that was probably the intent of the film but not quite as abrupt as an incident of child abuse more over a longer period of time - the building of experience demolishes innocence. But then what the fuck do I know... I just lift heavy things for a living.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 01:48 PM
1

I like sex. Great but what about those women who's brains and loins don't fire at the same time? The sexual response cycle has been described as a 3-stage process in men and women: desire, arousal and orgasm. However, this may not be so straightforward in women for a number of reasons. Many women do not move through these stages in a step-wise manner (for example, some women may become sexually aroused and achieve orgasm as a result of a partner’s sexual interest, but did not feel sexual desire …
/r/MensRights14/04/18 09:30 PM
17

She's isolating him from his alternative emotional support system which will make her his only emotional support moving forward. If she leaves him he loses his entire emotional support system at a time when he needs it most. Can you guess what happens to these men?
/r/MensRights14/04/18 07:47 PM
8

It's not rape - it's sexual assault and it's also a crime. Shoving a person isn't attempted murder, but it's assault and it's also a crime. If somebody was shoved and wants me to act like it was an attempt on their life - I'm not going to; I'm going to place the specific crime under it's correct definition and work from that. I'm also not going to support the idea that a person being the victim of a shoving proves that we live in a culture of murder - I consider this ridiculous.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 07:33 PM
2

Arthur Schopenhauer? Oh no wait it's some other dude not giving credit to Schopenhauer. Web search "the art of controversy".
/r/MensRights14/04/18 07:16 PM
6

It reads like the writer is downplaying the underage angle of the story to make the narrative more about prostitution than about underage prostitution. This article is another great example of the practitioners of patriarchy theory making no distinction between grown women and children.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 05:10 PM
6

It’s not a mental illness because she’s rewarded by her social peers for projecting this attitude. She’s a member of a casual social hate group - they sit around and talk shit about another demographic of people as a method to socially bond with their accepted social group. One of the complaints about mensrights follows this idea when we are critical of feminism because they conflate feminism with women and support the narrative that feminism is the only path to women’s rights - the SPLC lists M…
/r/MensRights14/04/18 04:37 PM
2

Another asshole to add to the pile of historical assholes who pushed the idea that ‘other people’ are a problem without ever concluding that it’s their own prejudice that is the problem.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 03:25 PM
1

Stephanie Speck from Short Circuit is so mean for most of the film it’s hard to watch.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 10:09 PM
13

Secondly, as a woman who has hooked up with men of both conditions my honest assessment is that I prefer men who are circumcised. Should those of us who've been the victim of genital mutilation to please a woman's sense of artistic taste be permitted to show the world our "pretty penis"? Ladies, enjoy the aesthetic beauty that is my penis! Hooray for the dick pic! /s
/r/MensRights13/04/18 01:24 PM
6

It's had little impact on my wife's social network - She' got several friends who gave birth to multiple boys but who still push anti-male bullshit and it boils my wife's blood. Fun for us because while they were pushing for girls, my wife and I didn't care about gender and we got a girl. More fun - they don't acknowledge my daughter's photos on facebook but comment on my son's like he's the second coming. Even more fun - my daughter, who's a toddler, doesn't like to be around them.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 01:14 AM
1

Depends on who I meant when I typed ‘he’ - you’ve fallen for the same slippery word usage that she did. I bet you’ll cut yourself a heaping helping of hypocrisy mr. black-pot.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 09:35 PM
1

Feminism is about giving women unlimited choices and in a binary system when one side has all of the choices the other side is left to facilitate those choices. Men’s rights puts limits on women’s liberation. During it’s infancy second wave feminists betrayed men’s liberation by refusing to sacrifice shared parenting on the alter of gender equality and more than 40 years have passed since without results and even in this day and age women’s groups like NOW lobby against shared parenting.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 04:11 PM
6

A ‘bob’ is a very specific hairstyle for women. I image searched for ‘bob hairstyle men’ and a picture of Kurt Cobain was one of the top images which isn’t a ‘bob’ hairstyle at all but then I searched for ‘bob hairstyle women’ and I got the universal female hair style with hundreds of images of different women all with a very specific style.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 03:22 PM
1

He needs to claim that his barber shop is a safe space where men are to be found in compromising positions that are gender sensitive. Isn’t that how it’s done - we declare a ‘safe space’ and suddenly discrimination is permitted?
/r/MensRights09/04/18 03:11 PM
1

However you should be aware that current laws allow her to destroy it all at any moment without cause. For both of us it would be an absurdly pyrrhic divorce. To tie this back to the original point, she wasn't raising your kids when you dated her. Wouldn't the money spent while dating, under these terms, be considered an investment for the future?
/r/MensRights09/04/18 02:36 PM
8

If you study the violence between two people by only focusing on one person that you've selected by gender victimhood your work is not going to be worth much for contributing to an end of the violence.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 02:16 PM
1

It's a partnership and she's living up to her end of the partnership so it can't be defined as slavery. I pay a portion of a tradeperson's bills when they provide a service - does that make them my slave?
/r/MensRights09/04/18 01:52 PM
1

if thats what works for your relationship What need would the primary provider have for the primary caregiver if the primary provider was also the primary caregiver? When I was a single man I did it all but when I married I had a reasonable expectation that my partner would take some of that "all" off my hands and we would both mutually profit from each others strengths. This is the typical expectation of most people entering a serious relationship and not the expectation of random outliers. It'…
/r/MensRights09/04/18 01:36 PM
5

get in the kitchen and make me a sandwich woman because thats all women are good for Ignoring the "because thats all women are good for" because it's clearly a flag for domestic abuse which is a very rare event in most relationships - is it wrong to expect the primary caregiver in a relationship to give care to the primary provider?
/r/MensRights09/04/18 01:55 AM
5

That she can turn a circumcision into a case of abuse that she can use in family court against the father or that she can cash in on the circumcision by suing the doctor in civil court?
/r/MensRights09/04/18 12:01 AM
2

It depends on the return they get. The two beautiful children that we made together are priceless.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 11:39 PM
2

They have a great marketing team don't they?
/r/MensRights08/04/18 11:22 PM
13

Children typically mean mates divide themselves into some combination of provider/caregiver role - rarely is the split completely equal and typically men become the primary provider and women primary caregiver. If dating is a preparation for marriage and children then having men pay for dates places men automatically in the primary provider position. If men are eager to pay for two but women are only willing to pay their own way (split the bill - current so-called ‘equality’) then men still are …
/r/MensRights08/04/18 03:52 PM
1

They illustrate their ability to produce healthy offspring by showing themselves as young as they can and keeping a trim figure. They will often present homemade food to illustrate their ability to provide care for offspring. They primp their prospective mate to also signal their willingness to care for future offspring. There’s a bunch of stuff both men and women do to signal and highlight their individual abilities to provide for and care for each other and the children they will have together…
/r/MensRights08/04/18 01:05 AM
57

Even panel 4 qualifies as an attempt of some dude trying to, albeit foolishly, sensually impress a mate.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 07:33 PM
1

If he doesn't find that recording or have a statement from the witness or have any evidence - he will lose.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 12:35 PM
1

An agent of Trump acting for the sole benefit of Trump is claiming that Trump did not pay her hush money but he has admitted to paying her hush money. There's no dishonesty in this statement.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 12:28 PM
1

We need to bribe them with free stuff because a human rights violation isn't enough of a reason to gain women's support? We need to pretend apples are oranges in order to appease the women folk because they don't understand the difference between restoring a normal biological function and preventing a normal biological function?
/r/MensRights07/04/18 12:11 PM
16

But she remembers how often she was told she wasn’t good enough, simply because she was female. “As a graduate student, a fellow male student said, to my face, that he had no idea how I was admitted to the program because I clearly wasn't smart enough to be there,” Pearson recalls. So... once? And that example was because she was stupid not because she was female.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 06:18 PM
3

TIL: Pregnancy is a medical dysfunction that needs to be treated with preventive medicine.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 05:42 PM
12

Feminism is worse - at least with traditionalism it’s women and children, but with feminism it’s women are children. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/feminist-hysteria-is-causing-the-infantilization-of-women https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/more-mortal/201609/is-modern-academic-feminism-harming-women
/r/MensRights06/04/18 02:38 PM
25

I was a traditionalist, which basically means my role as a man was to facilitate the needs of women and children. My traditionalist role was never at any time in opposition to feminism. Feminism will call that the patriarchy, but remember my role as a traditionalist: it was to facilitate the needs of women and children but not men. I was not working for men's benefit at all they are men tough and resilient and able to take on all life pushes towards them. My initial presence here was as an activ…
/r/MensRights05/04/18 11:46 PM
2

There’s a massive difference between the criticism of a political movement and an incident of mass murder and people with a political agenda conflating the two to slander other people is an obvious example of the intellectual dishonesty that plagues political debates these days.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 09:33 PM
3

David wrote in the piece that she didn’t think it was a “sexy photo” that she posted. An adult woman had no clue that posing in a skin tight black lace leotard would be considered sexy...? I think it would be less insulting to everybody if she just said: I’m just a girl!
/r/MensRights05/04/18 08:17 PM
1

To me it usually looks like the fire accusing the frying pan of hurting men.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 02:15 PM
41

They aren’t distracted from the learning environment any more than you or I was. Work with the principal that females can’t be wrong under any circumstance and start from there. Females bully with fashion but we can’t admit that openly - it’s sexist! A girl wearing sexy clothes knows she’s wearing sexy clothes and is introducing sex into a place with underage kids but we also can’t admit that openly - it’s sexist! Although, suggesting that boys are perverts and easily distracted by skin is sexis…
/r/MensRights03/04/18 03:36 PM
45

She’s rewarded for being provocative under both definitions of the word.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 03:26 PM
1

An agent of Trump acting for the sole benefit of Trump is claiming that Trump did not pay her hush money but he has admitted to paying her hush money. Occam’s razor - she, and the rest of the world, are under the impression that Trump paid her hush money no matter where the money came from.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 03:04 PM
22

Obviously it was her peer group taking the pics and she was most likely posing for them. Good grief! You act as if teenagers exploring their burgeoning sexuality is a one sided exchange that only rewards boys and that little darling of a vestal virgin woke up and accidentally tossed on just anything within reach completely oblivious that her ass was hanging out! Oh my, the poor little darling, knows nothing about topics such as sex appeal or what body parts are sex related - we should protect wo…
/r/MensRights03/04/18 01:58 PM
3

I created a domestic power imbalance with my wife when she elected me to get the driver’s licence when we had our first baby. I increase the wage gap by being the primary provider because my wife wanted to be the primary caregiver. I set sexist standards when I demonstrate that I’m able to lift heavy things when my wife asks me to move something in front of our children, the same when I kill spiders she’s discovered with my bare hands as nonchalant as turning off a light switch, the same when I’…
/r/MensRights02/04/18 02:47 PM
2

According to the article he denied that he made a payment when he actually did make a payment and his denial made her look dishonest. It would seem like his deception brought her honesty into question. A person in his position can’t lie but he also didn’t have to answer the question - that’s rule number one when working for an honest company as a personnel manager.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 02:15 PM
1

They are only ‘proud members of the master race’ because they make racial distinctions that validate their racism just as these new folks make gender distinctions to validate their sexism. The irony is that they use the racism that black men suffered in the past to silence the sexism that white men complain about (check your privilege!) while conveniently ignoring the fact that black men are still subject to the same discrimination they always were but that’s okay because they are seen as men no…
/r/MensRights01/04/18 04:52 PM
17

Yeah! We should stop tossing boys under the bus and tell the truth. The school’s admin is protecting other children who may not yet be sexual from her expressing her burgeoning sexuality and they are preventing fashion bullying of the girls who don’t want to dress that way at school. I wish these people would stop pretending that girls don’t want to be sexually desirable like boys do and that girls don’t know what it takes to attract sexual attention from boys. You never seem to have these wardr…
/r/MensRights31/03/18 09:07 PM
1

Sorry, to be more clear, there needs to be a specific victim of the harassment in order for it to be a hate crime - that’s what I meant by target. That person was probably not white and therefor not a victim of directed harassment.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 03:37 PM
1

If you fear losing don’t try harder to overcome your adversity - cheat!
/r/MensRights31/03/18 01:22 PM
2

‘Birds of a feather flock together.’ In college I had a cafeteria debate with a racist who insisted that we were among “his people” and that I was a minority and my counterpoint was that he was only right if they were as racist as him otherwise, his being a racist, made him the minority. It only serves to divide if you support his racism.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 12:52 PM
9

Police said Lemon stated that he hates white people and couldn’t wait “for the panthers to give the OK and a revolution begins because he will execute every white man he gets his hands on." He hates white people but will only kill white men - this reveals systemic discrimination against men even within murderous hate groups.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 12:29 PM
1

There needs to be a target of the harrassment in order for it to be a hate crime, so, if he said that infront of white people then it would qualify as hate speech and it's unlikely that he said it infront of whites. Thankfully somebody in that classroom didn't stay silent about his bullshit and came forward.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 12:15 PM
2

As the Islamic invasion of the United Kingdom continues and police are more concerned with enforcing political correctness than stopping terrorism, male suicides have hit an epidemic rate in the commonwealth. British men are killing themselves to make room for muslims? I know the British are a very polite people but this is an absurd level of consideration! Or perhaps there’s another less stupid reason British men are dying and it’s shameful that some asshole is exploiting their deaths to push a…
/r/MensRights31/03/18 01:26 AM
2

who has power? Well men do. Power is ‘the capacity or ability to direct or influence the behavior of others or the course of events.’ Traditionally men had the power to direct and women had the power to influence them so men exercise their power for the betterment of the women who have influence over them. Women in return exercise their influence for the betterment of men... no, that’s not true - since women are using their influence power to gain access to men’s direct power the result has both…
/r/MensRights30/03/18 09:03 PM
10

safe space This is how it’s done. Women are permitted to feign weakness. They are winning small rewards by pretending to be pathetic and then scratching their heads as to why they can’t seem to break that darn glass ceiling.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 11:09 AM
5

Is it really about her son or is it that by considering her son's future she has a better understanding of what women get from men? Maybe she sees that women have no use for the man her feminism wants her to build so no grandkids and if he did manage to win a wife, her old age relationship with her son will be at the mercy of his wife's benevolence and she's at risk of losing her position as a family matriarch.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 12:32 PM
1

I would be advising my daughter of the importance of being independent, becoming educated, earning her own money and not relying on anyone. She has to earn more than her own keep if she intends to be more than a secondary provider to the family income but she's only being taught to pay for herself but not her husband or children. It's great that she doesn't rely on anyone for material wealth but under the terms described above she can't afford anyone to rely on her. Men are not taught to be inde…
/r/MensRights29/03/18 11:55 AM
5

That article is blocked so I checked another story about this and that title is misleading - they still sell it but they moved it from the checkout to the paper section because of the sexy covers it has. My old barber kept the playboys in a special shelf away from the kids even though the covers weren’t that racy. Magazine stores typically keep the sexy covers on the top shelf away from kids. It’s a bit of a stretch to say that men are to blame for the move more than the kids.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 10:08 PM
34

In 2008, men were the victims of 80% of all reported attacks by strangers. From stats Canada in 2008. The entire fact sheet is worth looking at. http://www.victimsweek.gc.ca/res/r512.html
/r/MensRights28/03/18 01:12 PM
1

These young men are upset about the erosion of white male privilege, about the need to compete with women and minorities for jobs and spots at top universities, and they are angry about the way feminists and racial justice activists describe society. Here’s another point that’s utter bullshit since it implies that black men have been elevated in today’s society but fails to acknowledge that black men’s social status is exactly where it was 20 years ago. Black men were not elevated - white men we…
/r/MensRights27/03/18 08:13 PM
0

We are for the rights of men, not to attack women. We are also not to attack men by making their gender a criminal one, which is what you are doing when you punish all men for the protection of women. I don't hate women, but I also don't like racial prejudice or gender prejudice because I recognize these things as unjust and I've lived long enough to of seen the criminalization of a demographic of people using alarmist statistics. Supporting this segregation means that we've not abandoned though…
/r/MensRights27/03/18 03:42 PM
3

This article should be satire since it argues against his criticisms by providing great examples of them. right wing He's left wing but he rejects the notion that we should blindly submit to authority which makes him appear right wing because his oppositions are too often directed to left wing authority. It would be more accurate to call him a left wing rebel than to call him a right wing anything. white male anxiety Middle class and white male are not synonyms and the connotation that they are …
/r/MensRights27/03/18 12:52 PM
2

This is how it worked for me: Day one - talked to doctor about a concern who sent me to a specialist. Another day - shit on a newspaper to collect a shit specimen to send to the lab. Another day - talked to the specialist about the problem who recommended a colonoscopy and informed me of the complications of such a procedure and what preparations I needed to make before he booked a room at the local hospital. Another day - did the preparation Another day - had the colonoscopy. That’s more than 2…
/r/MensRights26/03/18 03:26 PM
3

Nope, it's more like me asking a kid why he's hitting himself while I'm forcing him to hit himself... Why ya hitting yourself? Why ya hitting yourself? Why ya hitting yourself? Why ya hitting yourself? Kinda tells you what sort of principal that school has.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 01:24 PM
1

The top definition makes that person a men’s right advocate as well as a feminist. The bottom example limits that person to feminism.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 06:42 PM
3

Or.. people could just sit in an empty seat and we stop allowing idiots using alarmist statistics to build prejudice.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 06:10 PM
3

If they are merely asking I don’t see a problem with it because you should be tolerant of people while you’re asking tolerance from people. That professor was made famous when he exposed their disgusting intolerance by being disgustingly intolerant.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 08:53 PM
1

Fairer in terms of providing women with unlimited choices that even men don’t have?
/r/MensRights23/03/18 04:28 PM
1

Copycat criminals copy those whom they identify with and with every copycat the shooters become more demographically exclusive. School bullying, race, gender, sexual orientation are all demographics and each one acts to eliminate and attract a prospective shooter but it’s still not exclusive since there are those who might identify with one or two traits and find those traits sufficient to emulate the violence.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 04:05 PM
8

It’s mostly just smoke and mirrors. One of the key takeaways of creating an equal pay culture at Starbucks was them openly discussing unexplained differences in pay between women and men performing similar work when discrepancies are found. So there’s still a gap but it can quickly be explained without the victim being able to rely on race or gender as the source of the gap and that’s how starbucks tackled the gender wage gap by creating a system that denies the victims access to their victimhoo…
/r/MensRights23/03/18 03:46 PM
3

From my experience some women feel threatened when men take over their roles so rather than accept the competence they bring out the ‘white glove’ and embarrass themselves with what we all imagine child services are like when they inspect a home and we men choose to overlook the petty behaviour because we’re too polite but we won’t submit ourselves to that embarrassment again so we’ll not tread on her domain again.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 02:27 PM
9

Cheating with bigotry to get to the front of the line.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 02:10 PM
13

Are they going to compensate the children of innocent parents for the issues that might develop from one of these adult themed confrontations?
/r/MensRights23/03/18 01:37 PM
2

Explain the violence of the suffragettes then Mr. Kimmel.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 01:35 AM
1

It’s not equal. He wants to pay for two. She wants pay for one. That is not equal and their mindset is what drives the wage gap later on down the road. He will strive to pay for two while she only wants to pay for herself and in that process he will become the primary provider for his family and she will at best become a contributor to family wealth but not the main supplier. We all have a choice - learn to pay for a family or learn how to cook for a family. The boyfriend has made his choice and…
/r/MensRights22/03/18 02:00 PM
1

He wants to pay for her and himself. She wants to pay for herself but not him. I think she has no ambition to become the primary provider in her future relationships but he does so she should just let him pay.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 01:00 PM
4

That qualified person was a less qualified person and that is the entire point.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 11:38 AM
1

They are mostly in prison. 2290 out of 100000 are in prison. 39 out of 100000 are murdered. 5 out of 100000 commit suicide.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 11:36 AM
15

The gender pay gap, for example, has the practical effect of privileging men’s careers—particularly white men’s—over women’s and yoking white women’s economic interests to their husbands’. So for some married white women, a vote for the Republican candidate may appear to be the self-interested choice A white woman chooses a husband who makes as much or more than her and then chooses to have a baby and then chooses to be the prime caregiver/secondary provider of that baby and then suddenly this w…
/r/MensRights21/03/18 04:44 PM
1

It showed how stupid nazis were that in 1941 a dog could be one. In 2018 a person taught a dog to be a nazi and we are offended by the sacrilege?
/r/MensRights21/03/18 12:52 PM
13

There's two types of Dads: the ones that wanted children and the ones that only wanted sex. Problems occur when people conflate the two of them; so when a person says deadbeat they are referring to a man who had the choice to be a parent made for him and to call him a deadbeat is just as bad as using these men against the men who had sex to become fathers. Imagine a society where men are asked what they'd prefer and then we respected their decision - so called "deadbeat dads" would cease to exis…
/r/MensRights19/03/18 08:56 PM
2

Those issues are still as critical a problem as when feminism 'solved' them and they also didn't conflict with women's list of wants like shared parenting after a divorce and alimony reform does. What's feminisms stance on shared parenting? THEY LOBBY GOVERNMENT AGAINST IT!. That person wants men to join a group that lobby government against their main problems but take credit resolving men's issues that still aren't resolved? That person wants to silence MRAs because they know that even if MRAs…
/r/MensRights19/03/18 02:45 PM
12

Her sex prejudice against men is not the fault of men - it’s her own fault. A person should be treated as innocent until it’s proven that they aren’t and to paint all people with the same brush because of their physical similarities to another person is unjust and everything that stems from that is injustice. What she’s doing is what history’s monsters have done and look at the responses! Her prejudice is supported! Her prejudice is validated! If that pesky bill of rights wasn’t protecting again…
/r/MensRights18/03/18 03:22 PM
2

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15491274 Women have a bias that has them pull for women and men have a bias that has them pull for... women! Did you really expect... men? If women have an issue and men have a different issue which issue do you think will be addressed first when both groups are pulling for women? No matter how trivial the issue women’s issues will typically be championed by men and women. By remaining focused on men’s issues MRA’s are immune to the bias but there’s a lot of d…
/r/MensRights16/03/18 08:38 PM
2

I agree, however, not within the content of that article - for me, it was a needle suddenly scratching across a record playing. It was disappointing to see the writer come so close and then betray the entire premise of her own story by tacking on a completely unnecessary line about men. If she understood why she failed her story wouldn’t she have a deeper understanding of the phenomenon she’s observed? Instead she fell into the trap while being completely aware that it’s a trap so the story beco…
/r/MensRights16/03/18 05:41 PM
2

Let’s put it this way - If I write an entire article about how white people’s fear of black people is what drives their racial prejudice and then conclude that black people need to stop committing crime as a condition to end that prejudice... I’m actually enforcing the prejudice not alleviating it. She’s enforcing the notion that men should be blamed while critiquing women’s blaming of men - it’s absurd!
/r/MensRights16/03/18 03:57 PM
3

Is there any room in the article for any criticism of men with a title like that? The article is about women's failings and yet one of the conclusions is about men's need to improve themselves. Presenting men's need to change themselves as one of the reasons why women blame men is simply furthering the abusive behaviour.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 03:03 PM
2

She's having difficulty with her shitty behaviour so she makes someone else at fault for it, but that's not working out for her so... She's developed a philosophy that supports her shitty behaviour, but that's also not working out for her, so... She's invoking her 'rights' to shitty behaviour and that's that - it's a right! Rights are defended and respected! They are rights, dammit! So, if you tread on her right to be shitty you are a fascist trying to remove her rights! The right becomes the ob…
/r/MensRights16/03/18 01:54 PM
8

...and at the end she still blames men. For men, it is cultivating their real strength and power through facing their feelings and being able to relate to their partners on a level of intellectual and emotional equality.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 01:16 PM
3

It’s bragging sexism more than virtue signalling because the Editor-in-Chief, Executive Editor, and Managing Editor are all women. These are women in positions of power celebrating the fact that 63% of authors they published were also women when they should observe their own power structure at HuffPost and see the 63% as a sign institutionalized sexism directed towards men. It’s another dismal failure at diversity just like that all female team photo they posted to Twitter a while back.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 04:39 AM
1

It’s bragging sexism more than virtue signalling because the Editor-in-Chief, Executive Editor, and Managing Editor are all women.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 04:26 AM
1

It’s bragging sexism more than virtue signalling because the Editor-in-Chief, Executive Editor, and Managing Editor are all women.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 04:26 AM
1

It’s bragging sexism more than virtue signalling because the Editor-in-Chief, Executive Editor, and Managing Editor are all women.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 04:26 AM
6

After 22 years and $1,434,000 a judge finally put and end to her gaming the system.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 03:20 AM
1

These issues also apply to those unfortunate oppressed women in the third world that the government of Canada is trying to save by promoting female centric programs.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 10:49 PM
2

His solution is a part of historical gay conversion therapy - the mere-exposure effect was employed in the 1950s when doctors encouraged gay men to have sex with prostitutes.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 10:20 PM
2

I don’t buy it because the font used was popular with nazis. He doesn’t seem ashamed of that shit stain on his stomach either since he’s posing topless with a big smile.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 09:30 PM
1

There’s a whole lot of gender stereotyping involved with it about men and women but so long as they allow for outliers I can’t see a problem with it. If there’s discrimination it would lean towards men if men weren’t able to leave their girlfriend in the pod, but from the picture it doesn’t look like the kid’s zone at IKEA where you drop off your person and get a device to claim them when your done shopping - it just looks like a chair open to anyone.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 02:52 PM
20

How could men have a problem with something that’s entirely voluntary?
/r/MensRights15/03/18 02:43 PM
10

The average man can tolerate just 26 minutes shopping with a female partner before becoming bored, a study shows. http://archive.is/pUcGp
/r/MensRights15/03/18 01:34 PM
3

who hate to see progress and lose their puppets What was their home life like growing up to think that men consider women puppets? Or is it another case of 'my dad was one of the good ones'?
/r/MensRights15/03/18 12:38 PM
39

that barely a quarter of husband-killers are victims of domestic abuse 100% of them were domestic abusers.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 12:34 PM
9

Women tend to act through agents and men are usually those agents when it comes to crime. Men are more likely to have charges pressed against them. Men are more likely to be convicted. Men are more likely to be sent to jail. Men are more likely to serve longer sentences. It's a compounding effect. Again women tend to act through agents and men are typically those agents when it comes to dangerous tasks (remember crime?). Men are rewarded by women for stoicism and men often die by medical stoicis…
/r/MensRights14/03/18 02:24 PM
0

Male feminists? Let's get em boys! Female feminists? (Crickets chirping)
/r/MensRights14/03/18 01:51 PM
10

In 5 years she changed her personal philosophies about sexism and racism by building a company that discludes the people she was sexist and racist towards? It takes people decades to purge themselves of prejudice and when they are no longer bigoted they wouldn't support much less help build a company that aligns with their old prejudices.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 01:28 PM
1

Depends on the stay at home parent - if the stay at home parent goes 'all in' with their role then the provider will find fair and just compensation within the partnership. There are significant advantages if both people do their best in their roles. If the stay at home parent leaves stuff for the provider to do, then yes, it's a bad deal.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 05:14 PM
1

I remember when being an atheist didn't involve homework and simply meant that you were unable to make a leap of faith.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 03:05 PM
1

Presenting women as damsels is as lucrative for charities as presenting them as sexpots is for advertising.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 01:24 PM
7

The definition of power: the capacity or ability to direct or influence the behavior of others or the course of events. The historical male version: the capacity or ability to direct the behavior of others or the course of events. The historical female version: the capacity or ability to influence the behavior of others or the course of events.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 02:15 PM
1

young school-aged kids develop an emotional and physical foundation for sexuality in many subtle ways as they grow. I highlighted the opinion of your experts on the subject of child development. There is a massive difference between myself and my kids in terms of development.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 01:49 PM
1

You honestly consider an adult woman’s sexuality to be comparable to that of a five year old? Your own quote clearly indicates that there’s a massive development still to occur when it comes to young children.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 04:56 AM
2

How about this study then? https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/features/do-women-talk-more-than-men/
/r/MensRights12/03/18 04:34 AM
2

The study would indicate that both men and women had less of a desire to interrupt men.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 04:30 AM
1

Female talking to female was the second highest and comparable to men talking to women. Women excelled at using personal pronouns and self referencing.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 04:23 AM
2

According to the study men talked to women the most and they talked to men the least.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 04:06 AM
2

The national post is center right. Globe and mail is center left. The toronto sun is right. The toronto star is left. The national post among Canada's conservatives is seen as center left.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 02:06 AM
5

Have you read your own links? One of your links explaining exactly what I'm telling you and immediately pointing out your flawed thinking: It is curiosity-based with no erotic or sexualized meanings. It is adults who add these interpretations – causing them to flip out when they see “sex play.” Flipping out would certainly include calling a five year old a pedo.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 10:03 PM
1

I have one and the erections don't include directed sexual stimulation with a clear sexual objective - it was more curiosity than getting off and I'm guessing this kid is doing the same.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 08:56 PM
1

I seriously doubt that kid gets sexual gratification from what he's doing which he would need to get in order for his behaviour to be motivated by sex. A dog humping a leg has an erection and that kid most likely doesn't - if he did he'd be a strong candidate for sex abuse.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 08:35 PM
15

The kid has talked to the teacher and the parent talked to the teacher... And that's it for options? Now it's time for violence? Now it's time for blood! we've tried nothing and we're all out of options! The parents of the kid? The principal? The school board? Naw! We'll settle this by kindergarten thunderdome!
/r/MensRights11/03/18 08:08 PM
4

'Internal screaming' is not a 'nonverbal sign', silly!
/r/MensRights11/03/18 03:25 PM
2

It's always somebody's morning.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 03:14 PM
11

Women are permitted to be frail.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 02:45 PM
4

7 ate 9?
/r/MensRights11/03/18 01:11 PM
1

Women are permitted to be weak is the short answer.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 12:41 AM
7

That's a perfect example of victim blaming.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 09:29 PM
4

I wonder why they forgot family wealth in favour of all of those less significant privileges?
/r/MensRights10/03/18 09:06 PM
2

Knights slay dragons to rescue damsels. The knights are working to make women's lives better. The knights have always worked to make women's lives better. The damsels have simply changed their minds about what a dragon is.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 07:39 PM
11

Birthing loving children who will probably care for their parents in old age is fucking stupid? I'm caring for my aging mother right now and I don't feel stupid for doing it. If you don't have kids you'll need to borrow mine and they wont love you as they love me so don't expect the same quality of service. Stupid is not having kids because you're going to need an advocate one day and the able people who love you will do it for their love of you.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 06:14 PM
9

Nope. Feminists didn’t strike the jackpot as that pic would have us believe - they purposely exploited chivalry to borrow power from that foot to secure their privileges.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 04:09 PM
11

Female sex selection and male sex competition are aspects of toxic masculinity? Human sexual reproduction is the goal of life and the methods supported by men and women can’t possibly be toxic.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 03:33 PM
2

While my wife and son were out shopping my son started playing with a little girl - I guess the mother wasn’t paying attention because when she saw him playing with her she stormed in and scooped her up like she was on fire. The impression my wife got was that the mother believed my son was a rapist - he was only 2 at the time. I thought she was being silly until I’ve saw this behaviour first hand when I took my son to an indoor play ground and him and another little girl were hiding behind a bu…
/r/MensRights10/03/18 03:12 PM
3

It’s not common and that’s the entire point - they are creating fear for political gain much like other people used fear for political gain all though out history. Remind me again who was going to protect us from these people: They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists
/r/MensRights09/03/18 08:50 PM
3

The segregation of the sexes for the protection of women certainly does presuppose that all men are sexual assaulters.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 08:41 PM
0

So the Indian media says but they seem to disagree with the government in charge of reporting criminal statistics. There were 34,000 instances of rape out of a population of 1,324,000,000 people. According to my websearch estimates are that roughly 11% of rapes are reported and the estimates for India are 5% are reported. These stats are comparable to the rest of the world so to say that India is suffering a rape crisis more so than anywhere else in the world is false.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 06:29 PM
14

Justice demands that you treat innocent people accordingly. Judging innocent people guilty because of their physical similarity to a guilty person is the foundation of social injustice.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 06:04 PM
12

You do realize that history’ greatest monsters also used alarmist statistics as propaganda to undermine people’s freedoms?
/r/MensRights09/03/18 05:46 PM
14

India’s National Crime Records Bureau and the India media do not often agree on india’s rape statistics. The media often reports significantly higher numbers. How do you account for this discrepancy between a bureau whose function is to track crime data and an agency whose function is to sell copies of newspapers?
/r/MensRights09/03/18 04:43 PM
2

Here we see women give their authoritative power to other people in exchange for protection and down the road they’ll meet the personal limits of being a protected person and they’ll call this system, that they currently celebrate: oppressive to women. What we are seeing here is exactly how men historically get dominion over women - it’s not by men’s own nefarious effort but by a popular request of women.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 03:30 PM
1

Sexism is always fed to kids in small doses like this.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 01:31 PM
0

You don't have kids.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 12:54 PM
20

She's happy and smiling and as free as a bird! His photo? That's a mug shot - he's a threat to society.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 12:53 PM
1

You do not give in to children with childish views of the world. You make their world make sense to them and they clearly aren't doing that which brings us back to - the father needing to define the roles of these women in his son's life and not spare their feelings in the process. The loot probably isn't what he wants - there's most likely something else that he's not getting in that household that his brother gets and it's not resentment.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 12:31 PM
1

No, how they claim that she treats him like her own but she gives her own a different treatment entirely and how that’s an inconsistency that would cause a kid to exhibit the odd behaviour they are seeing. Step back from the adult world for a second and consider the kid’s view of the differences between her own kid and him and try to consider a way for her to illustrate that she actually treats them both the same or perhaps more accurately, that she loves them both the same. I don’t think you ha…
/r/MensRights07/03/18 10:17 PM
1

. Across cultures, the bias against daughters has been closely tied to women’s second-class status. Sons have been more likely to be successful, carry on the family name and earn money to support family members in old age. Under what definition of ‘first class’ do such people earn money to support other people?
/r/MensRights07/03/18 09:10 PM
0

The facts are that a preteen is being fed bullshit and is acting out because of it. As an adult, would you not take issue with a person who says one thing but behaves opposite to it? You wouldn’t call her out on her hypocrisy? Why should she be permitted hypocrisy at the expense of that kid’s emotional stability? Her hypocritical thought that she’s so lovely a person that she treats her husband’s son as her own... but not really! Fuck him - he’s not mine! This doesn’t register with a preteen liv…
/r/MensRights07/03/18 06:37 PM
1

Him: she treats him as her own. Also him: Her money does not go to my older son because he is not her financial responsibility. Anyway you slice it his wife has two faces for his son and the father is covering her other face while also protecting the other mother's reputation as a greedy shit - as i've already pointed out. Edit: No - I don't buy him clothes but then I also don't consider him to be a child of mine and he doesn't think of me as a caregiver.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 05:32 PM
14

The villifying of men for exhibiting normal human sexual behavior is not a men's issue? Women exploiting men's sexual desire while permitting themselves innocence of that exploitation is not a men's issue? Women being permitted to trade sex for talent isn't within the scope of gender equality?
/r/MensRights07/03/18 05:14 PM
1

The wife has no emotional connection to that other kid even though he spends four nights at her house and they sought custody of him? You think so? She’s able to maintain emotional boundaries towards her husband’s son that she’s known for 12 years and treat him in the same regard that I treat my neighbour’s kid? Maybe you are correct and she’s emotionally dead to the kid - that would explain his jealousy issues and his reluctance to live with his father.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 04:17 PM
1

The more advanced the country the less optimistic people become towards something their nation has, for the most part, already achieved?
/r/MensRights07/03/18 03:26 PM
1

Right, it’s bullshit since black and women are still protected from derogatory comments so the system works to protect all black people including kids and all women including the ones that suck at driving.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 12:52 AM
2

She still rang his bell and he's probably not inclined to have her hit him like that a second time.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 09:03 PM
-4

He's creating the problem for himself by probably covering for the mother's shit and he probably did the same thing during the custody fight and that's why he lost so badly. However, if his wife considers herself a Mom to his kid than I fail to see a problem with treating both kids the same... I'm guessing that his wife see's a distiction between her son and her husband's son which also contributed to him losing custody so badly. He needs to take a serious look at his and his child's relationshi…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 05:02 PM
6

There are when a child's parent tells them that there are structural impediments. That dad is pro-girl and he's unaware that the jobs he's talking about have already opened up to women? Consider his daughter's future views of society and men when she's being raised by that meathead? She'll celebrate iceland as the first nation to create laws to ban gender wage discrimination. She'll post garbage about masculinity being the root of all evil by ignoring the evil that women do.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 10:59 PM
1

Middle aged rural alcoholic aunt? Oh my! We’ll dearie let’s look at the trends of three years ago shall we? According to stats Canada: In 2015, almost three-quarters of non-working mothers were stay-at-home moms, while one-quarter were either unemployed, students or unable to work. Among families where the mother was the only earner, approximately one-third of the fathers were stay-at-home dads in 1976 (32%) and 2015 (35%), while about half were unemployed in 1976 (52%) and 2015 (49%). In 2015, …
/r/MensRights05/03/18 02:55 PM
7

And her notion continues regardless.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 02:24 PM
8

Women expect their man to provide for her and her children material comfort and physical security. Women seek tall men because they have more weight and longer reach than short men. Women do not seek men who earn less money - only the same amount or more are desired. Men prove their ability to provide material wealth by paying for dates and the rule that a wedding ring bought should be a percentage of his wage is also for this reason. Men on the other hand will seek out healthy women who have pr…
/r/MensRights04/03/18 11:47 PM
12

Sexual violence is everywhere What’s the goal of all this fear they are generating? We need an all-gender “feminist revolution” now They instigate a fear in women so that they can use women’s fear to access power.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 07:07 PM
3

Technology doesn’t work for women? My wife seems to be able to get technology to work for her... is she the chosen one? Wait... My mother also knows how to work technology! Come to think of it - all of the women I know have no issue getting tech to work for them... OMG. It’s me!!!?!!!? I’m able to inspire women to be able to use technology! That is the only way it makes sense according to that title... I’m the chosen one! I’m the conduit by which women can get tech to work for them. Or that titl…
/r/MensRights04/03/18 04:33 PM
1

Seems like something that can be resolved by the transgender woman saying “no” and the staff respecting the word “no.” The staff respecting the word ‘no’ is probably the issue. The hospital my kids were born in are notorious for pressuring new mothers into breastfeeding - they have such a bad reputation that multiple people my wife has talked to over the years, who opted out of breastfeeding, have compared them to nazis.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 04:08 PM
2

The prime minister of Canada is a feminist, so... although I don’t take him seriously (how can you?)... It’s a bit inaccurate to say that feminism isn’t taken as seriously as it used to be.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 08:24 PM
1

That’s the main problem. Instead of understanding the injustice of discrimination they simply remove one offending factor and reapply it to people. It would be much more preferable for the idiots who think this way and write these articles to be called out for their gross bigotry in the same fashion Archie Bunker was in All In The Family.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 06:06 PM
5

Conflating is the right word. She's in Canada publishing in a Canadian newspaper arguing that masculinity is to blame for a regional increase thousands of miles away in an entirely different nation with an entirely different culture; now, add to this the fact that an acid survivor website is claiming that there's a significant decrease in acid attacks since they've been tracking attacks - only 38 last year that they found. Billions of men worldwide exuding masculinity everywhere they go but ther…
/r/MensRights03/03/18 04:31 PM
13

I am an MRA and I’ve spent 3 years around here at least once a day and in that time I’ve noticed a trend where a post like this pops up and suddenly MRAs become horrible racists when normally they are mostly egalitarian in their views. It’s like all the scumbags suddenly come out in force and it leaves me wondering about whether they are agent provocateurs - but for what purpose?
/r/MensRights03/03/18 01:46 PM
4

No. Most of the victims AND suspects are men which means criminals are using acid in the same way American criminals use pepper spray.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 01:06 PM
11

Middle aged woman are outraged to learn that ‘There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch’!
/r/MensRights02/03/18 03:54 PM
28

Isn’t that the pro FGM argument and also for the protection of girls?
/r/MensRights02/03/18 03:23 PM
22

In a desperate attempt to show that they aren’t racially prejudice Google becomes racially prejudice. Google: We’d have a better view of the forest if we cut down all of those trees!
/r/MensRights02/03/18 01:59 PM
11

That's unlikely. The majority will waste their time chasing digital rainbows looking for a pot o' gold.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 01:40 PM
10

58% are brain damaged That's not what the pics says. It places the data in terms of IQ - it doesn't suggest men are brain damaged. This data suggests that women are foolishly gaming the system which will prevent them from finding a suitable match.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 01:27 PM
8

A Quebec woman who pleaded guilty to infanticide must take a pregnancy test every six months, a judge ordered Thursday. The tests for the Quebec woman were a joint recommendation by the Crown and defence. With all those other people making decisions for her you'd think that she'd get a shitty deal instead of 20 months to be served in the community as well as three years' probation. Oh wait... the defence? That's her legal advocate! What strange wording this article uses to leave an impression th…
/r/MensRights02/03/18 01:10 PM
1

With the age of men getting married increasing more men have a lot of experience with traditional 'pink jobs' so much so that a woman might find herself feeling outclassed since he's able to do it all 'pink and blue' and this can make for very strange behaviour coming from a wife.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 02:05 AM
3

white Scotish? Irish? Russian? Ukranian? Polish? Italian? French? Portuguese? Or is white just some sort of amalgamated clump of people who don't have different cultural backgrounds that define them?
/r/MensRights01/03/18 10:15 PM
4

He decided not to report his ex-girlfriend to the police The next guy will face the same shit and that police report might save his ass.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 02:20 PM
4

They claim that women are just as good as men but their schemes tell a different story. This information illustrates that men are tough and resilent - they can face insurmountable adversity without flinching. Women aren't and can't. Will the guardians of women's equality demand that women face the same that men face? Shhhhh! They are still napping after having their milkies and belly-time.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 01:12 PM
6

"The more you tighten your grip, Tarkin, the more star systems will slip through your fingers."
/r/MensRights01/03/18 12:25 PM
2

I’m shocked that it’s so low in Australia when other English speaking nations are higher and have comparable numbers. I’m guessing it costs money and it’s a substantial enough amount to discourage parents and that might be a demand we can start to make in our countries. Defund state funded circumcision and make parents pay out of pocket for it.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 01:38 AM
12

you may enter or leave this place but only on my say so. That only works if the woman is too weak to open the door herself or too stupid to understand how doors work - both are unlikely events so her symbol of aggression looks a lot more like a common courtesy. reminding her that all men are in control of women’s choices. I’ve never seen a person approach a door without the forethought of using the door, so holding the door open for a person already intent on using the door is not making a choic…
/r/MensRights28/02/18 09:04 PM
1

Is there a cost attached to it? If it's done while the baby is still in the hospital it was free in Canada.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 06:54 PM
25

TLDR: Donald Trump breaks up liberal marriages because wives can’t stop complaining about him.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 06:08 PM
1

Suppose there were mentally unstable people who related their current situation with the situation of past publicized mass shooters - would those people more strongly identify with the shooter if they were of a similar demographic? As the number of similar shooters increased wouldn’t the effect become even more pronounced and the traits even more refined until the majority of people who identified with a mass shooting would more than likely to be a specific type of person? Isn’t the scheme of af…
/r/MensRights28/02/18 04:07 PM
7

How do they intend to legislate the women not wanting to look for employment to look for employment? According to stats canada: In 2015, almost three-quarters of non-working mothers were stay-at-home moms, while one-quarter were either unemployed, students or unable to work. Among families where the mother was the only earner, approximately one-third of the fathers were stay-at-home dads in 1976 (32%) and 2015 (35%), while about half were unemployed in 1976 (52%) and 2015 (49%). In 2015, stay-at…
/r/MensRights28/02/18 01:03 PM
1

EI maternity benefits are offered to biological mothers, including surrogate mothers, who cannot work because they are pregnant or have recently given birth. A maximum of 15 weeks of EI maternity benefits is available. Benefits can be paid as early as 12 weeks before the expected date of birth, and can end as late as 17 weeks after the actual date of birth. The weekly benefit rate is 55% of the claimant’s average weekly insurable earnings up to a maximum amount. EI parental benefits are offered …
/r/MensRights28/02/18 12:11 PM
1

If my principal is to look into it yourself if you disagree with it - how does that make people susceptible to following erroneous facts? The reverse would be true.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 10:40 PM
6

I remember when this scandal broke commentators were shocked at how intelligent she was in interviews and they were politely reminded that this young woman was a whitehouse intern and as a whitehouse intern she had to have maturity and intelligence to compete for the position never mind get the spot. Now, 20 years later, she’s back to being a stupid little girl and by her own estimation no less.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 10:16 PM
27

Are we seriously being told to believe that an ambitious 22 year old whitehouse intern has no power over an adulterous politician when she keeps a dress with his cum on it in her closet?
/r/MensRights27/02/18 02:55 PM
9

Oh, that’s right - this happened in Texas. Ugh.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 02:20 PM
1

If you disagree with somebody because you have knowledge about the topic you shouldn't need the other person's source you can quickly post your own counter points with sources. If you disagree with somebody because their information doesn't sound right to you, which is mostly the case here, then you should do your own homework before you engage them in a discussion. In this case - it took less than two minutes to disprove the pic. Men aren't "too pretty to do homework!" so the next time you are …
/r/MensRights27/02/18 01:38 PM
3

The same shaming ploys they use to induce boys not to hit women an abusive woman will also use to emotionally attack men. What they should be teaching boys is how identify signs of being in an abusive relationship and how to manage a physically or emotionally abusive woman. It’s all well and good to tell boys not to hit women but try doing that when you’re being called every name in the book while she chases you from room to room not leaving you alone or after she hits you with a wine bottle or …
/r/MensRights27/02/18 01:32 AM
9

Even if you did everything right - these gender complainers will not reward you because they are parasitic not symbiotic.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 02:13 PM
-4

I think that if you disagree with something you should try to refute the point by doing your own research before you ask for the other person's sources.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 01:53 PM
9

It comes down to the difference between how men and women socialize - men socialize over an activity while women can socialize over a phone call. As relationships become serious men lose contact with their friends and rely entirely on their partner for emotional support but during a break up they lose that emotional support at a time when they need it most. Society would need to acknowledge this difference and chastise the women who don’t offer their partners play dates with friends.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 12:07 AM
4

Have you ever seen the movie Tangled? The witch exploits her ‘daughter’ to further the witch’s own gain by using fear as a control. Feminism keeps women in a state of fear so they can damsel women and use them as political leverage. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTJvlsHlSpo
/r/MensRights25/02/18 11:47 PM
4

Male supremacy misrepresents all women as genetically inferior, manipulative and stupid It's impossible for a person to be considered "manipulative and stupid" at the same time. I get the feeling that the author of this is trying to manipulate people with fallacies into following a political agenda.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 02:19 PM
3

Since when did the decendants of the spanish who conquered mexico become people of colour Mr. Reyes?
/r/MensRights25/02/18 02:04 PM
1

Getting the job or not getting the job is determined by your resume and your behaviour in the interview. You can "look for a job" while not really looking for a job just ask kids that exploit the social safety net.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 01:50 PM
12

For many women, the wage gap needs no explaining: Female workers, on average, earn around 80 cents for every dollar a man makes. "On average" the choices women make to balance work and life are subsidized by the father of their children who were not presented with a choice. She chose her role as primary caregiver and he took what was left - primary provider. To present women's power to choose their role in life as demonstration of gender imbalance is complete bullshit especially when you frame t…
/r/MensRights25/02/18 01:44 PM
3

So I search for the top three females and they are all very beautiful young women. I then look up the top three guys and they look like guys I used to work with.
/r/MensRights24/02/18 08:55 PM
1

But they aren't sedatives which is what these anti-druggers are suggesting.
/r/MensRights24/02/18 06:23 PM
23

If I had a lawsuit against google for discrimination: I wouldn't look for a job. I would say that my lack of job is because of google.
/r/MensRights24/02/18 06:21 PM
1

I think this line of thinking comes from certain people having never played on a sports team. They've never seen the value that an individual can have over outcomes and therefor they think that anybody can fill in anywhere without any consideration to merit. For them the fact that Jackie Robinson broke a colour barrier is more important than why that barrier was torn down to accommodate him and in that exchange we lose out on a learning experience that would better enable us to not follow prejud…
/r/MensRights24/02/18 04:08 PM
1

There's no considerations made to feelings or thoughts or fairness when it comes to men in the current scenario, but we need to address these things because - women? A woman armed with the knowlege of the man's intention before the birth of the child is better equipt to make a decision.
/r/MensRights24/02/18 02:48 PM
1

or even a porter A porter was an official in charge of a gatehouse who screened people before they were permitted to pass thru the gate of a city. They would need to be able to read at a time when only 5% to 15% of people could read, estimate the cost of goods entering the city, and be strong in mathematics to tax those goods. You'd also need to pay them well to make them less susceptible to bribery.
/r/MensRights24/02/18 02:28 PM
1

Even if every reliable dictionary and many people disagree with your definitions?
/r/MensRights24/02/18 01:06 PM
1

I feel the same way about A Voice For Men.
/r/MensRights24/02/18 12:53 PM
1

I'm Canadian. If there's a will there is a way. The kids here can't emulate a person defined as: the name of the individual is being withheld. People use these events to push a political agenda and we shouldn't let them. CNN was forced to focus on the victims when they couldn't promote the suspect and that's what they are doing - they are promoting the shooter with publicity.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 07:41 PM
1

Methylphenidate, amphetamine/dextroamphetamine, and lisdexamfetamine are the most common ADHD drugs and all of them are stimulants. An ADHD diagnosis is most common with boys so these are the drugs they get. Diazepam (Valium), chlordiazepoxide (Librium), and alprazolam (Xanax) are tranquilizers and are given to people with anxiety disorders which is most common with girls. There's a long list of common antidepressants which also apply to mostly girls that range form sedatives to stimulants. As y…
/r/MensRights23/02/18 07:07 PM
5

The percentage of the U.S. population who own guns decreased slightly from 25% in 1994 to 22% last year. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016/09/22/study-guns-owners-violence/90858752/ 17 per cent of (canadian) respondents said they owned firearms http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/905c8b94-7b55-4ccc-bebd-07cdb27d8c3aGun%20Ownership%20(2016%2007%2006%20-%20JC).pdf That's a 5% gap in household gun ownership between the US and Canada. In Canada there's two shootings since 1989. Did you know th…
/r/MensRights23/02/18 02:05 PM
4

The FBI claimed a few years ago that shootings are likely due the shooters emulating past shooters who they identify with which is why they are often very similar.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 02:53 AM
3

This controversy is about masculinity being a factor in mass shootings and your addendum to his position puts you in the controversy supporting his arguement.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 02:15 AM
6

It's ridiculous to claim that masculinity is a factor in these shootings since there is ridiculously low numbers of shootings when you consider the number men who exhibit masculinity walking around America. You'd make a better arguement by saying they are copycat killings which seems to be the case because psychologists always recommend a behaviour change with the media whenever they report these incidents. The phenomenon has been seen before with other issues such as suicide reporting and arson…
/r/MensRights23/02/18 01:03 AM
11

1:650,000 is a ratio.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 11:30 PM
3

Well there's 59,764,677 American men who are eligible for military service and there's been 92 male shooters? That means 1 out of every 649,616 males are shooters. Those other 649,616 men don't seem to have a problem with their masculinity but for you that one fucking dude clearly indicates a masculinity problem?
/r/MensRights22/02/18 10:40 PM
-2

How many men are there in the USA? What percentage of American men are shooters?
/r/MensRights22/02/18 10:29 PM
0

It seems more like she's being catty towards those women just like jimjoneskoolaidy said and it's embarrassing to read.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 06:22 PM
216

Shootings in America are rare and males in America are abundant so you gotta reach deep down into the bullshit to come up with something relating shootings to masculinity. Majority? So, it's not exclusively male? Instead of blaming masculinity we should probably find out why females shoot people and then we can learn the real reason why people shoot people. We stopped talking this type of shit about colour only to start doing it about gender?
/r/MensRights22/02/18 06:10 PM
4

It’s not even that - it’s that women advantage men by using men as their agents and then act shocked when men have agency.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 04:11 PM
1

There’s a significant lack of Robo-advisors on that list?
/r/MensRights22/02/18 03:54 PM
12

...and when they finally drop they will say: ‘I wish I spent more time at work. Long live feminism!’
/r/MensRights22/02/18 03:36 PM
6

The article does suggest a middle ground be found Not really. The writer criticizes Kipnis, Paglia, Hynde, Yoffe and Princeton Mom and then confirms everything they argued by introducing the strategies of "harm reductionists" who, big surprise! - suggest that physical and psychological self-assertion works which was the main point of Paglia et al.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 02:43 PM
1

preventing women from moving forward, If women moved anymore forward they’d be in the future. what feminism has become. It was always like this.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 12:02 PM
8

They need to compensate for the fact that I’m the bread winner, bug killer, family driver, bump in the night investigator, household repairman, and so on and so on - yes, you are correct - my wife can do all of those things herself but she’s permitted to opt out and with her opting out I become something more than her - I become better than her because not only can I do my jobs without complaint but I also do the jobs she doesn’t want to do without complaint - I do it all! How’s that on her ego?…
/r/MensRights21/02/18 09:15 PM
9

I doubt it - people are watching this one. There’s a bad history about false accusations from white women and black men and her complaint probably had the police questioning and carding innocent black men which also has a bad history attached to it. Both black people and the police are the victims of her bullshit.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 05:02 PM
3

The police probably carded and questioned black men in the area furthering the complaint of black people when it comes to being singled out by police and all because she lied. She instigated an action by the police that too often harms the relationship between the police and the black community.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 04:55 PM
-1

Read this out loud and see if it makes sense without an underlining mental disorder: Stimulants cause some people to behave as if they've been given a sedative. If you still think 'boys are being drugged' read it again. The problem isn't boys staggering ADHD stats it's that girls are too often misdiagnosed with anxiety and depression.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 02:27 PM
1

There's a history of lynching black people that's related to her behaviour that can't be ignored and when put it in that context her actions come very close to domestic terrorism.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 01:48 PM
2

They were also more likely than single mothers to be separated, divorced or widowed which the authors predict could have additional psychological stress if they were unexpectedly becoming single parents. Why didn't they isolate the the single moms by choice from the moms that were separated, divorced or widowed and get a better picture of the gender differences?
/r/MensRights21/02/18 01:27 PM
3

that sport should follow in the footsteps of the Australian Army If they are equal why are women only expected to do 8 push ups while men have to do 15 during the army's Pre-enlistment Fitness Assessment? Why are the minimum fitness level requirements for the army different by gender in push ups, running, and walking? You read that correct - apparently, men over 46 have to walk faster than women of the same age...
/r/MensRights21/02/18 01:13 PM
3

Women are permitted to easily access victimhood and men aren’t. Women are also aware of what constitutes sexual harrasment and it sounds stupid but many men have no idea that they’ve been a victim of it. If men had the same access and awareness - I wouldn’t be surprised if the numbers between men and women were comparable.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 09:11 PM
3

Same reason women do. Attractive people get advantages and some people are naturally attractive and others need to employ sex appeal to boost their attractiveness. The naturally attractive person has two choices if they want to stay on top - match the sex appeal or bully the opponent back in line.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 09:05 PM
0

That's taken into consideration and added to the cost factor.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 02:58 PM
8

He said MacNair was “great in a fight but not so good in a car” And then later in the article: MacNair spoke during a break in a three-day stunt driving course which cost $2,800. So, he was right and her skills needed to be improved before she should stunt drive? We should risk accidents because somebody with a vagina decided her vagina was equal to experience or training.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 02:55 PM
0

That's taken into consideration and added to the cost factor.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 02:37 PM
3

Women are under the control of fear based management and fear of men is the great method to keep women compliant and docile just ask mom and dad about their teen daughter.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 01:23 PM
3

You are probably correct. i did a search for "mother's room in malls" and this popped up for a mall: Mother's Room Store Information Categories Services Description: Mother's Room includes change table for your infants/toddlers, comfortable couch for nursing and lots of room for your strollers.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 12:23 AM
1

you have to have a fair finding of the facts. Not when you use cost to determine which person is the problem - a violation of a code of conduct doesn't always end in firing for the accused and it's cost determines that. The US government created the due process problem when they threatened funding. The accused students are less valuable than the government funding so it's an easy choice for the school. A person can be a problem person within an organization through no fault of their own - what's…
/r/MensRights20/02/18 12:00 AM
2

That's pretty much what i said.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 11:44 PM
3

Right and more patriarchy to be smashed.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 11:34 PM
1

I used your own reference to explain where James Damore made his error. I was not quoting the damore word for word - I’m sorry that you didn’t pick up on that. Do his theories on why women behave as they do rely on gender stereotypes? Does the definition of sexism include the use of gender stereotypes? Does google have a policy prohibiting stereotypes pertaining to gender? Did google fire him for his comments relating to gender stereotypes? How are you not able to see that he put a gun in their …
/r/MensRights19/02/18 07:42 PM
2

He did something similar right? He got fired AND proved his point about the company. This loss of his isn’t the lawsuit that he’s bringing to google - it just clears google of firing him - the class action suit is about discrimination he faced.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 06:35 PM
2

The follow up question is - did they work for google?
/r/MensRights19/02/18 06:24 PM
1

"stereotyping them as a group" is how you dishonestly refer to making statements about averages (of people as a group). (Addendum) that shows pretty much the entirety of the word stereotyping as defined by all reliable dictionaries. I can post some of those definitions here if that will help you... Do you want me to post the word ‘dishonestly’ too since you don’t seem to understand it or maybe ‘stupid’ because...?
/r/MensRights19/02/18 06:05 PM
8

Men have always advocated for women when women had something to offer in exchange. What are feminists offering men?
/r/MensRights19/02/18 05:49 PM
0

Codes of conduct are not designed to be fair they are designed to expedite the removal of problem people within an organization.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 04:56 PM
1

We're talking about the ability to treat people as individuals, OK? Which is best done by stereotyping them as a group...? Lol.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 04:33 PM
1

My contention is that making a generalized statement about a people is as about as far as you can get from individualism but you disagree.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 03:34 PM
7

My local costco does the same - no backpacks. There's just no manly way to carry diapers without looking like a paramilitary contractor. Q: Is that a purse? A: No, it's my shoulder slung Modular Lightweight Load-carrying Equipment (MOLLE) tactical field pack for baby crap.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 02:59 PM
4

The Power of 420 To some people cannabis is the path to crazy.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 02:24 PM
4

Did they use the brain differences to explain why men dominate an industry over women? James Damore did that and was fired. Edit: I do find it interesting that the positive traits he listed for women weren't viewed as sexist nor were any of the male traits.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 02:15 PM
2

Hyper-sensitive? I’m merely pointing out that this is a low quality post and look at the result! If this was war I’d of been already shot yesterday at dawn.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 01:25 PM
2

I assumed it was rhetorical. The mods appear to value free speech would be your answer.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 01:16 PM
2

So why the hell should this subreddit find an interest that this dude was banned over on a subreddit that bans everybody for any reason? Why should MRA find novelty in the all too obvious? Random person: Hey MRA! I went out in the rain and got wet! MRAs: OoOoOooooooO! Upvotes and reddit gold for you!
/r/MensRights19/02/18 03:01 AM
0

To use that fact of yours as evidence that men are deficient in some manner (toxic masculinity for example) is sexist and that’s what he did when he used an alternate theory for the lack of women in STEM - but he’s all about the individual, right? You get it or you don’t and you clearly can’t get the idea that generalizations about a people is about as far as you can get from respecting the individual. ‘I’m all about respecting people as individuals - now let me tell you what’s wrong with _____ …
/r/MensRights19/02/18 01:40 AM
0

I can’t dumb it down anymore for you. You either get that applying sex stereotypes to explain something constitutes sexism or you don’t. It ridiculous to rely on sex stereotypes to explain a phenomenon and then later argue that you support individualism - they are exclusive ideas. He fucked himself over by trying to explain the lack of women in STEM when he should of just focused on the sex discrimination he was facing by working at google.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 07:38 PM
2

You don't see that feminism's claim that white male sexism is to blame for the gap is as wrong as his position when discussing individuals and their motives? They've both made a sweeping generalizations of a group of people. He fucked up by offering sexual prejudices as an alternative to combat google's prevailing sex prejudice.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 06:47 PM
1

Yet he still manages to do just that which is the point.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 06:33 PM
0

Knowing any of those averages has no impact on an individual standing in infront of you at any given time. On an individual basis, which is where he claims to judge people, it’s irrelevant material.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 02:59 PM
1

I can’t speak for them but going on their past stupidity I’d say a gyne exam not only teaches virgins about sex it also gives them insight into being a sex trade worker.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 02:51 PM
2

Are they really treating each person as an individual when they point to gender generalizations? That's his fatal flaw.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 04:30 AM
-9

The intention of the post is to bring awareness of the discrimination and the toxicity that goes on over there. That's why it's a shit post - it's so bloody obvious it's obnoxious. I hear feminism bans people for criticizing feminism - so head there next and bring that garbage back here so you can show us just how awful they are too. Menslib is your next stop - I can't wait to see how poorly they take to your criticism. Then head over to Canada and tell those people 'canada sux' and remember to …
/r/MensRights18/02/18 04:17 AM
-42

They banned you and now I’m downvoting you for bringing your nonsense here - it’s rough day for you princess.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 10:48 PM
22

Does my colonoscopy really give me insight in being a woman? Does the additional prostate exam make me know what it’s like to be a grandmother?
/r/MensRights17/02/18 10:31 PM
2

She’s not an elected official. She seems to be a Provincial NDP staffer of some sort with a title that she probably made up herself... I guess ‘executive member’ sounds better on a resume than volunteer. Saskatchewan has a population of 1.13 million. The city of Toronto alone has a population of 2.73 million. The mayor of Toronto governs twice the number of people than the premier of the province of Saskatchewan and her party only holds 12 seats out of 61.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 10:24 PM
5

she pointed out that the sign forbidding tank tops only shows women's shirts. I don't think she's allowed to ignore the dress code and then complain that the sign is pointed towards her - it seems wrong. You're not allowed to complain about a prejudice while exhibiting the prejudice.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 08:51 PM
61

It's illegal to cut the tail off a dog to make it more pleasant looking.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 02:46 PM
17

I love my wife conditionally.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 02:45 PM
7

Homeschooling is legal in Norway, but Kristiansen says Barnevernet officials told her family they were concerned their son would not receive “socializing” while being homeschooled. Why was he pulled from school again? Oh yeah! He was being threatened with murder by the kids at school...
/r/MensRights17/02/18 02:34 PM
4

Same brain contains these thoughts at the same time: women are "more prone to 'neuroticism,' resulting in women experiencing higher anxiety and exhibiting lower tolerance for stress" and that "men demonstrate greater variance in IQ than women. and: I’m also not saying that we should restrict people to certain gender roles; I’m advocating for quite the opposite: treat people as individuals, not as just another member of their group
/r/MensRights17/02/18 02:14 PM
2

I`d say it is normal human behaviour. I`d also say the BBC only acknowledges normal human behaviour when women exhibit it. According to the BBC men are either supermen who fail to live up to the above human standards placed on them or they are sub-human and BBC needs to exploit every excuse to show them as monsters or both and it all depends on the esteem the presenter has for women.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 01:24 PM
2

It's mel magazine. A years ago they came to reddit looking for an ex-MRA to help write about MRAs. They are a men's magazine that is hostile to men's advocacy so expect nothing but garbage from them.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 01:11 PM
2

Depends on the lie and the motive of the person telling the lie. I've lied to add wonder, magic, and joy to my children's lives and I've lied to spare a person's feelings. I don't profit from the lies I've told, in fact, it's the opposite - I've paid more for the lies than the truth would of cost me. The lies are a curse and an increased burden and that is what a lie is to a decent person.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 12:22 AM
1

It's too rare an event to blame on any regular social occurance and insanity doesn't require a rational catalyst.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 12:09 AM
0

Do you honestly believe that a burger king installed 1 single use toilet for one gender but a multiuser toilet for the other gender? More likely, they converted a handicap bathroom into gender neutral and the multiuser men's room is not in the photo. Look at the door handles for both washrooms: one's single use and the other is not. The law applies to single use toilets. If there's a single use women's only room - it's against the law so call the inspectors and have it converted to the same as t…
/r/MensRights16/02/18 04:43 PM
1

boys are broken Okay, so who is breaking them? These incidents are mostly do to emotional isolation and a mental disorder which are not gender related - so why boys? Boys are being told to express their emotions in the same way girls do which doesn't work in the boy's favour, infact, it leads to more emotional isolation. Boys are being told that their normal sexual behaviours are predatory. Boys are being told that expressing normal masculinity is toxic. Emotional isolation, predatory, toxic... …
/r/MensRights16/02/18 03:55 PM
1

I'm sure it's a building code violation so make the phone call and have the building condemned.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 03:28 PM
2

Her staff are probably still supporting her so she can still function in her role. The fault isn't due process it's people allowing her to continue to access her damsel in distress privilege in the face of accusations, infact, the accusations themselves allow her to access the damsel role.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 03:13 PM
1

They're talking about sex appeal. The men have 'it' by writing a book and the women don't.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 02:24 PM
2

They are correct but the prestige comes from women. It's women who value those men. Men don't much care about the success of a women so focusing on female authors for a year isn't going to change the romance that women have for successful men.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 02:22 PM
1

Hiring a qualified relative over a more qualified applicant for a job is good policy but knowledge of the person's hiring motives will ensure the best qualified person gets the job.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 12:26 AM
7

I didn’t want to name names but we all know who those other people are, right?
/r/MensRights14/02/18 11:39 PM
31

Women are permitted to feign childlike weakness in order to keep their clubs and although that presents them as weaker than the other members of peoplekind - we’ll all just agree to look the other way and hope our kids are listening to what we say and not what we do or else we’ll need to compensate for this imbalance by smearing men and by further expressing patronizing behaviour to women. You go girl! Just not after dark, or alone, or with a bank loan, or as the CEO of a company, or as a leader…
/r/MensRights14/02/18 08:01 PM
-1

Don’t question a representative politician’s motives when they’ve a proven history of contrary ideas?
/r/MensRights14/02/18 07:30 PM
3

Web search: trump - Central - Park - five - newspaper. He’s already given his thoughts on the issue of due process and still maintains they are rapists even though DNA proved otherwise and the real attacker confessed to working alone. He’s not the man you think he is.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 07:18 PM
0

His attitude towards due process can be seen with his comments in 2016 with regards to the Central Park five - a decade after they were exonerated by DNA evidence. Forget DNA - they confessed under police interrogation! is not the attitude of a person who supports the concept of justice never mind due process. Spending your own money to take out a full page of a newspaper to propagandize the guilt of men who’ve not yet been proved guilty at trial isn’t a person who believes in due process.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 07:13 PM
2

The stats were for women specifically when it comes to murder and peoplekind when it comes to rape. When it comes to men being murdered (four times more likely as I recall in the US) - neither male American's or Koreans have their safe parking spots but they are far more likely to be murderered so by gender they should have a more secure parking spot and your arguement becomes even worse. We are discussing the dangers for women vs. men in Korea and statistically men are in far more danger than w…
/r/MensRights14/02/18 06:25 PM
14

Her age was the only thing most people had a problem with and now it turns out she was 19 years old?
/r/MensRights14/02/18 06:08 PM
13

That person has taken a strange stance when you consider that out of 100,000 people 1.7 are raped in Canada. That’s a hell of a lot of rape not happening to Canadians for the argument that boys are taugh to ignore the word ‘no’. Shit, South Africa is the worst on the UN list and it’s at 132 out of every 100,000 people, still not a lot of raping and they are a bunch of times more likely to partake in it.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 05:14 PM
2

According to UN statistics women in the USA are twice as likely to be the victim of rape and murder over women in South Korea. Your position in favour of those parking spaces in Korea has no merit. You’d have a better argument for women in the USA needing those special spaces to keep them safe, but that would mean I’m right on all counts.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 04:33 PM
2

So: Western men are supermen? Yay! Or: Men are the same all over the world and you can tell them about that time you attacked a woman in a parking lot?
/r/MensRights14/02/18 02:57 PM
2

Describe the qualities of what a leader should be and ask yourself if cowardice (well lit near the door) or incompetence (larger spaces) are on your list? If the qualifications for those spaces are gender based what are you saying about women to my son and daughter? What are you saying about men? Women are lesser men and men are fear objects?
/r/MensRights14/02/18 02:43 PM
-5

He’s doing it because he has an axe to grind not because he believes it. If women’s groups suddenly shut the fuck up about him they’d see how quickly they could exploit his chivalry just as they exploited all of the past presidents.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 02:10 PM
3

You can be an MRA and an egalitarian but the same can’t be said for people who support patriarchy theory and rape culture theory.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 02:02 PM
6

being alert to the power imbalance that may exist between older men and younger women in the community does not support the view that it operates on stereotypes about men or that it may have done so in Mr. Gichuru’s case. Again we see an observable imbalance between the adulthood of men and that of post-pubescent girl-women and because this imbalance suits the adult girl women there’s no reaction from the the watchmen of women’s equality critiquing the ‘just a girl!’ mentality. Adulthood is not …
/r/MensRights14/02/18 01:30 PM
1

Unless it's a list compiled to highlight controversial subreddits and then yes being omitted from that list speaks for itself. Of course, the reverse is also true - if there's nothing really controversial about a subreddit adding it to the list makes it look worse than it is. It becomes fairly clear that the people who like feminism made the list and added MRAs to smear them - no?
/r/MensRights13/02/18 08:31 PM
1

So are feminist subs. I'm not sure how you can claim that because being critical of feminism is how we landed on the lists. Also, there's a glaring absence of feminism on those lists.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 08:15 PM
15

There’s a risk involved but no reward. The mere complaint alone can get you fired.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 06:36 PM
2

It’s a two person lift for any average adult (male or female). It can be done with one person but there’s a risk of catastrophe that’s also risked when there’s too much help.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 06:29 PM
1

Strange... we are a controversial subreddit according to wiki and the SPLC...
/r/MensRights13/02/18 04:08 PM
1

For Reference: That fridge is shorter than all of those women so I’d guess it’s five feet tall and two feet x two feet wide which means 12 cubic foot fridge. A 12 cubic foot fridge is about 120 lbs.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 03:39 PM
-3

It wasn’t a joke - it was an awkward penguin win. His intention was to relate to them but he managed to mock them instead. meets crazy feminists try’s to relate to them on their terms pimp slaps them instead
/r/MensRights13/02/18 03:05 PM
2

Patriarchy is the official feminist complaint against the downside women face due to human sexual selection. They see it as female victimhood and conclude that men are the oppressors. It works for women because female victimhood itself is a part of sex selection and men are infact the ones who determine the sexual value of women.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 05:08 PM
6

He should sue them for sexual harassment for implying he's a pervert when they sexualized his normal human behaviour, followed by sex discrimination if he can prove they said it because he's male, followed by creating a hostile work environment for placing him in a position where his only logical move was to quit his job since they they were watching him with the notion that he's a bad person.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 04:38 PM
3

I have seen somewhat similar things happen to women There's a long list of this type of shit for every demographic of people under the sun and it's called prejudice. It's unjust to conclude people are up to no good based on negative stereotypes about their demographic.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 04:31 PM
0

Women will insist on also having their name on the ownership of the house - it's the non-wealthy woman's version of a prenuptial agreement.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 02:50 PM
3

From what I recall it was a jocular complaint of professional women where an unqualified man would explain an aspect of their own field to them. Like all ideas it has be co-opted by the brutes and weaponized. Mirco-aggression, institutionalized ____ism, etc. weaponized to the point that the academic who put it forward doesn't even recognize it.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 02:42 PM
1

It looks a lot like the like the complaints certain people make against disengaged men in various parts of third world nations.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 12:00 AM
3

The women of two X are like no woman I’ve ever met. It’s like they’ve all conspired not not talk about or support anything remotely related to the colour pink even though the colour pink is a big part of their lives.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 10:16 PM
4

Not fraud - the X signifies that you are unwilling to disclose your gender so the insurance company will create a new value for X, lump you with the men, or lump you with the women. They take human rights risks when lumping X in with men and they probably don't want to open that can of worms if they can help it - so you'll most likely get the women's rate.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 06:55 PM
2

If all controls over men are completely diminished - do men really need money or power or status? Men don't aquire those things because they enjoy material comfort or physical security themselves. You can't even fathom a world where men live without their necks in some sort of harness.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 04:55 PM
1

Imagine if those employees at GE could never be fired or lose pay - why would they care about what management wants? Suppose they don't want to make light bulbs but instead they want to put on a play? Suppose they aren't honored in their roles?
/r/MensRights10/02/18 03:31 PM
7

They were sold a bag of magic beans that said the warm embrace of an office chair beats that of their child’s, eight hours in a cubical means liberation, that men are objects of mistrust or fear, that a making a sandwich for someone you love is degradation, and despite all of this - they’ll still be able to attract a mate who will risk losing half of everything he’s acquired in the 30+ years he’s been alive over a woman past her prime mating years.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 02:34 PM
1

She welcomes it in her own YouTube channel... Is that your counterpoint to my point? Give me enough medals and I’ll win you any war. ― Napoléon Bonaparte
/r/MensRights10/02/18 01:30 PM
4

I think she’ll have to pay to have her toilet fixed whereas now she has options open to her and I believe that was her point.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 01:14 PM
2

Women have to want to give up being a damsel which has been used by women for centuries as a path to power and a path to sex.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 03:03 AM
8

Most men don't appreciate being categorized with children. Women don't value a man who can be categorized with children. Can women man-up? because most men can't man-down even if society could afford it - we are just not inclined to and wont be valued by the thing we want most. This elephant in the room needs to be compensated for if women are to have equal value in society. Are women really coming up so short in being gender equal that we need to compensate by slandering men? Does a bumbling si…
/r/MensRights09/02/18 02:30 PM
38

It’s ‘stranger danger’ followed by ‘I need an adult!’
/r/MensRights08/02/18 05:42 PM
1

The gap is due to women's choices not men's hard work - it's a car - so there's no 'hard work' involved. Women need to use a machine to lift the things that I lift at work and I get a return on time because of it. I'm above the standard while they are below the standard but I get recognized with bonus pay - that's a pay gap due to harder work. Sexist? Not really because there's men at work who also need a machine to lift the heavy things.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 04:03 PM
1

It was accidental. He was trying to relate to their bullshit not mock them over it. It's just happens to be a socially awkward penguin win.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 02:51 PM
8

Apparently, she wasn't even aware that he liked her so it's unlikely that he actually harrassed her except when he pushed for her being fired. The most likely situation is that he kept her around because he liked her but when he found out that he had no chance he pushed to have her fired. I say this is most likely because she assumed her firing was due to herself not doing a good job which he was able to demonstrate to the other faculty members who also agreed that she should be fired. If she wa…
/r/MensRights08/02/18 02:39 PM
16

With regards to politicians - yes. The scientists themselves work in probabilities - it's highly probable that human behaviour has a negative impact on climate change and from my observation they are quick to not blame every little weather phenomenon on climate change even with the media's leading questions.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 02:04 PM
44

If it's not open to criticism it's not philosophy or a theory - it's a sacrosanct doctrine demanding a leap of faith - also called religion. Even 2+2=4 is open to criticism.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 01:32 PM
2

My number is based on survivability without the mother which is currently proven to be at 21 weeks and six days.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 02:56 AM
2

If that's true it must of been a mistake - there's no way that he was that clever.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 02:42 AM
2

I pronounce it hue-min so it's okay.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 02:35 AM
8

That’s much more inclusive - peoplekind implies division because there’s different types of “people’s”.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 10:31 PM
2

Women can as well in the Canadian provinces of Ontario and BC. It’s so rare an event that the police often forget that it’s a women’s right and once in a blue moon they need to be reminded. I’ve never seen it myself in the two decades that it’s been law but my wife tells me that the day after the law was changed she saw topless girls holding advertising signs outside of a strip bar.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 10:09 PM
1

Was it the equivalent or was it a blame and shame?
/r/MensRights07/02/18 09:53 PM
5

Once again we see the difference between the way men and girls are treated. That standards authority clearly views women as overgrown children. Adult girls? Woman babies? Grown up big girls. Whatever you want to call them - those post-pubescent children with vaginas are clearly not as adult as men according to that regulator’s practices. Where are the feminists to complain that men should be treated with the same mentality? I guess they got their pablum early and were put to bed?
/r/MensRights07/02/18 09:46 PM
2

Almost every prochoice person has a number when the baby has the right to life and due to medical science that number keeps getting shorter. My wife's number is within the first trimester (12 weeks) and mine is 20 weeks.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 12:14 PM
2

She also falsely accused Rob Ford when he was mayor of Toronto. Meanwhile, Coun. Carmine Perrelli, a politican in Richmond Hill, told Newstalk 1010 Thomson planned to “set up” the mayor. “I would ask her to rethink what she’s alleging,” Perrelli said. Mark Towhey, the mayor’s chief of staff, also fired back Friday with a different version of events and warned they are consulting legal counsel. “I didn’t hear the conversation. I can tell you I was there throughout, the mayor had me there plus thr…
/r/MensRights07/02/18 11:38 AM
5

For most of human history democracy didn't exist, infact: For the USA there's a 129 year gap between men only permitted to vote and women voting. For Canada there's a 33 year gap between men only permitted to vote and women voting. For the UK there's a 104 year gap between men only permitted to vote and women voting. During those time gaps there were further restrictions from each country placed on men enabling them the vote - stuff like land ownership for example. Universal voting without restr…
/r/MensRights07/02/18 02:51 AM
15

This is her title? Director of Policy for Canada, Foundation for Defense of Democracies A defender of democracy who believes that presenting misinformation and making factual omissions to push an agenda is a good thing?
/r/MensRights06/02/18 11:08 PM
17

All forms of FGM are banned.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 11:03 PM
1

A drunk person can consent it’s a person in a drunken stupor who can’t consent.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 05:47 PM
8

It’s not the man - it’s the country. Canada’s war plan has always been to have the upper brass in place commanding over a cheap skeleton army during peace. In the event of war they’ll boost the lower rank and file with quickly trained conscripted soldiers. Sound familiar? It should - this is why Canadian losses are so terrible in wars. We send our soldiers armed only with their own courage but not with the best equipment or experience. We mark Remembrance Day but remember nothing about the destr…
/r/MensRights06/02/18 05:27 PM
9

He’s an outlier not the standard. ;)
/r/MensRights06/02/18 03:17 PM
8

It doesn’t fit the narrative that men are oppressors of women. Why don’t they popularize the vote results on the laws that permitted the women’s vote? Try to find who voted to allow women the right to vote and what that division was like. Was it a narrow vote? Was it a landslide victory? Who knows? Everything about the women’s vote can be found online except the voting count for the bill itself!
/r/MensRights06/02/18 02:46 PM
2

If this was true wouldn’t there be a significant increase of males filing for divorce? Even if he doesn’t want alimony it still means his freedom from a bad marriage so he’d be more inclined to pull the trigger but the increase is only 31 more men in 2016 than in 2006.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 02:34 PM
27

Her defense: You’re ganging up on me, a menopausal woman Her attack: Bunch of testosterone ...
/r/MensRights06/02/18 02:14 PM
55

At the end she still didn’t fathom why her negative stereotype about a demographic of people is wrong but she clearly understands the concept because one of her complaints is about antisemitism... Same brain: Antisemitism is bad! Men are garbage is good! Somebody told her one is bad and the other is not and she’s never developed her own philosophy on discrimination or prejudice.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 01:46 PM
1

'What asians?'
/r/MensRights05/02/18 08:54 PM
1

The various things women can do thanks to the fact that they can now plan their pregnancies. Take the pressure off blaming men for women's oppression.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 08:46 PM
3

Women and children first has a downside for the people who aren't women or children?
/r/MensRights05/02/18 08:38 PM
2

Indian = South east Asian. Kinda makes that 6% look even worse doesn't it? They get to share their demographic with other people who look nothing like them. Don't bother to complain - taxonomy doesn't support the concept of race so speaking scientifically - whites, blacks, chinese, Latinos and indians (of both types) are the same group. It would be like complaining to science peers to update phrenology because you found a new bump at this point.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 12:24 PM
1

Two points: Their retirement savings increased in value after Trump was elected. The stock market was depressed when it was thought that Clinton was going to win. It's fairly clear where the middle class and upper class American's voted even with the media blaming poor white men.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 12:11 PM
2

I looked a bit into it, and from what I read, shopping is a way women use to indulge in their own sense of independence. Fashion is presented to women as a way for them to show their freedom and wearing the same dress twice means a woman’s husband has some control over her spending and so she’s not really liberated. This also explains why some women have a problem complying with company dress codes - the organization is preventing her from exhibiting her independence so it’s an attack on her lib…
/r/MensRights04/02/18 11:07 PM
13

They can’t have their cake and eat it as well. Too many whites is used to signify racism in the system despite the fact that there’s a significantly disproportionate number of people from a non-white ethnic group within the company. It’s absurd. They make the asians invisible to support their racism theory instead of following more logical reasoning.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 07:19 PM
66

71% of Americans are white. 61% of google employees are white. There are less white people working for google than there should be. Anybody want to address the real elephant in the room? 5.1% of America is Asian. 30% of google is asian. The CEO of google is asian.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 04:16 PM
15

Choosing not to be submissive is a privilege? Makes me wonder how women were ever liberated because their daughters and grand daughters are having such difficulty rebelling against the fashion industry by wearing an outfit twice.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 04:05 PM
7

I'm sorry, but when it comes to heterosexual relationships - women are the only people who get to determine men's value since they have what men want.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 08:38 PM
0

Their vitriol might be publicly directed at straight white men So, you are aware of it. Let's sum up: We've established there was a moral panic against gay men and it was wrong. we've established there is currently a moral panic against straight men and although I see it as wrong your stance on it is unclear. it would seem by your last paragraph that you would like to initiate some sort of gay moral panic against women which I also see as wrong.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 03:23 PM
2

Before he met her he was a painter and bus boy but after marrying her he was suddenly an ambitious drug dealer with a two million dollar plan and she was merely a puppet not the instigator?
/r/MensRights03/02/18 02:48 PM
1

Race is an unscientific concept except when it describes a social culture and Mulsim is a social culture.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 05:52 AM
3

Since you lived through it - you must be aware of how a once biased media fostered homophobia but you can't currently see how media bias is currently fostering another moral panic concerning straight men and sex assault of women? You don't see any parallel behavior?
/r/MensRights03/02/18 05:22 AM
1

It's actually quite romantic. The sports typically use the beautiful women to fulfill the "courtly lady" trope with the notion that the champions are truely the champions by having the beautiful woman "courtly lady' award the heroes with the trophy and there's sometimes a kiss (a PG rated kiss of course). It inspires the chivalry and courtly romance that is the root of most men's problems so I'm not sure men lose that much by sports dumping that pretense - from what I see the damsels will lose m…
/r/MensRights03/02/18 04:42 AM
18

That article was quite common when I was a kid - back in a day when we had a 'race/stupid people problem.' Back then they'd list the colour of the offenders when crimes were committed and your every day stupid white feminist felt a lot safer around the men in her life... Smart people felt that listing race was propagating racism so they stopped and here we are today - stupid white feminists feel unsafe around all men not just the darker men. If only these types of jerks would just stop using dem…
/r/MensRights02/02/18 04:52 PM
26

No call for women to learn not to assault men? No call for gay men to be saddled with illegal restrictions? Surely the article used emotionally charged words like - epidemic! Or gave us a terrifying stock photo of a shadowy figure hovering over a terrified male. A 200% increase in reported sex assaults and it reads like they're giving us a weather forecast. If only they reported women's sex assault stats in the same boring manor and gave men the day off from being an object of fear.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 03:31 PM
1

Debate the MRAs you disagree with and change their mind if you can.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 01:00 PM
4

Woah! she has academic knowledge of sexual assault so you just keep your practical knowledge of being an actual victim of it to yourself. Also, as a woman, she's a victim of violent sexual assault merely by a few degrees of separation. /s
/r/MensRights02/02/18 12:55 PM
2

Respect has more than one meaning. a feeling of deep admiration for someone or something elicited by their abilities, qualities, or achievements. due regard for the feelings, wishes, rights, or traditions of others.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 12:26 AM
1

There are some very popular female MRAs so I don't know how anybody here would think what you seem to believe we think... Also, what are the remaining women's issues that aren't largely due to a women's own personal life decisions?
/r/MensRights02/02/18 12:15 AM
3

When you say 'they' you are also talking about me and I'm being critical of this post. There's some quirks about this place that look odd at first but they are needed to combat sexism against men and gynocentrism. How do you argue against the notion that men are exclusive sex predators? How do you fight against the notion that women are more wonderful than men? When some person says men are violent or sex predators and you have no understanding that women can be just as bad... you have to accept…
/r/MensRights01/02/18 08:56 PM
18

They will complain that there's something defective in the men. 'What's wrong with men today!' Or 'He's probably gay'
/r/MensRights01/02/18 03:53 PM
6

I thought the general consensus around here is that it's bad when people go out of their way to pester other people in this fashion when they are simply increasing their comfort? Interesting behaviour from people who claim to use logic and reason as their guide and not silly emotions.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 03:22 PM
2

From what i recall, when you observe America's population, the only group that is disproportionate to the general public in tech are Asians. Asian men are being hired at a significantly disproportionate rate not white men. Asians make up only 4% of the US population but are in some cases over 40% of the company.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 02:20 PM
27

I wonder which one makes it impossible for a women to do... Women can't collect wood? Women can't collect honey? What impossible skill do men have in that area that women are lacking? The ability to take life threatening risks to provide for their family? What thing could stop ladies from following their husband's career? Were their husbands some sort of superman with a terrible weakness was tigers?
/r/MensRights31/01/18 07:15 PM
10

What’s his take on shared parenting? Or alimony reform? Or child support? Or any men’s issue where men’s interests and women’s interests conflict? Peterson is a classic liberal fighting modern liberals and that’s it. He’s not an MRA.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 06:19 PM
4

Much better titles: Women infighting is resolved when feminists appeal to authority figures. Or I'm telling dad!
/r/MensRights30/01/18 10:33 PM
6

Two incidents over a ten year span? Two incidents from a group with over 168,000 subscribers? Two incidents and the last of which occurred 5 years ago? Aww is probably more controversial than us.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 05:09 PM
6

Tell him the truth - they aren't the same women. Perhaps she should stop pretending that all women share the same brain?
/r/MensRights30/01/18 02:43 PM
5

The only one who didn't beat him was the same one who was accusing him? That's a bit fishy - hmmmm... I wonder... It turns out that video surveillance shows no contact between the two. Why did I have to read a bunch of different articles to find that information?
/r/MensRights30/01/18 01:15 PM
5

Men were not taught to fear women by mom and dad like their sisters were taught to fear men. Women need to unlearn their parent’s sexism like my generation had to unlearn racism.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 12:13 AM
2

She shoved a metal rod up the victim’s rectum and you’re saying his homosexuality is less relevant than another factor which devalues his being the victim of a terrible crime.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 11:53 PM
3

All of it was done on the behalf of and betterment of a white/woman and her white/children. Ladies, your white/mothers were a willing accomplice to all of it.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 11:32 PM
55

Web search: 'NOW opposes shared parenting' 'Warren Farrell U of T protest' 'Janice Flamengo U of T protest' 'Red pill movie protest' Read all of the material that comes up. Feminism places itself in the path of men's rights and needs to be moved out of the way before we can progress in true gender equality. They need to be dethroned as the gatekeepers to equality. Consider this - the prime minister of Canada is a feminist - they are the establishment so when this woman talks shit about women bei…
/r/MensRights29/01/18 03:38 PM
5

That’s your counterpoint? You seemed like a person who needs to be spoon fed points bit by bit or else you’d be lost and I didn’t want to lose your attention before I was finished. I’m sorry if this revelation about yourself embarrasses you.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 12:51 AM
21

I support women's rights but I'm not a feminist. In order for you to understand this you need to accept that feminism is not the only path to women's equality. An attack on feminist theory isn't an attack on women or even women's rights but you think so or else you wouldn't equate this post with trying to hurt women... How many women were injured by this post? How does this post dehumanize women? How does this post disrespect women? It's your thinking that is binary - feminism = women. It's a li…
/r/MensRights28/01/18 10:05 PM
-1

It does but not in the way that it's being presented. This is a men's issue because both of those issues - child marriage and those camps also hurt boys but the message is solely about poor girls so the outcome will only help girls which adds more suffering to the boys.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 08:48 PM
8

some of these people Find the article that showed me how boys are treated in that culture. I want you to look for it. I want you to understand just how hard it was to find how boys are treated in that culture and see the article after article that is dedicated to girls. After you find it - you come back here and tell me again about 'some of these people' as if they are not the entirety of people. To the internet! An I hope you take this time to honestly learn about how not only they treat boy's …
/r/MensRights28/01/18 08:14 PM
5

No. You can't solve cultural problems by only focusing on the problems facing one demographic within that culture. They need to take the pressure off the male's roles as they relieve women of their roles or else the men will even suffer more than they currently do. It's not a gender issue because the culture affects both boys and girls in different ways so it shouldn't be presented as a women's issue and exclusively solved for women - doing this will double the harm for boys in that culture.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 07:57 PM
12

A few months ago a radio station near me interviewed a woman similar to this. An african woman fighting for women's rights. In almost every example she gave of where a girl lacked rights the girl's own brother would also lack those same rights. Take child marriage - in her nation it was two children being paired off by thier own parents - an arranged marriage. The boy had no choices either but it was presented as a woman's issue. She was the victim of genital mutilation, but then so was every ma…
/r/MensRights28/01/18 05:07 PM
1

How is he with her? Would you say that he considers himself her tertiary caregiver?
/r/MensRights27/01/18 03:31 PM
2

Does your son have in interest in being a father?
/r/MensRights27/01/18 02:33 PM
-1

As long as we don't web search for "phallic symbol" and look at the images that come up - you are correct.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 01:30 PM
1

Hormones are more of an accomplice than the prime suspect. Hormones + something creates an outcome; it's never hormones alone. That 'something' makes the difference and secondary to that comes hormones.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 09:54 PM
4

Damn those guys they only facilitated the end of racism when they placed high value on the way other people did stuff. No other adherence to another people's culture but the wasps could of lead to this article being written. They found art and beauty in other people's cultures long before their own. Their creative writers worked in french not english. Their scholars worked in latin not english. They honoured other people's cultures before their own and they continue to do it to this day. Progres…
/r/MensRights25/01/18 10:57 PM
-1

I'm sure their husbands will be impressed by their credentials and if not their husbands at least their children will be happy to have their asses changed by a person with a wasted degree from such a prestigious school! The point I'm making is that those women are more likely to choose to bow out of the rat race to care for their baby - so that dimploma is worthless unless they also choose a mate to complement their work ambition - which involves working for wages while your husband gets the bet…
/r/MensRights25/01/18 04:27 PM
49

You are being used as cheap labour. The staff are tossing out the intended role of the program and just using you to do their dirty work at not cost to them but the students lose out. Watch DOGS is a national organization - not just that school. I'm sure they'd be better able to explain if men being used for free grunt work is the program's intended purpose - it doesn't sound like it to me. They have contact numbers on their site. The custodial staff at the school might be unionized - the union …
/r/MensRights25/01/18 12:58 PM
2

Are you a toddler? Toddlers are taught not to hit because, at their age, they don't employ much empathy towards other people - it's all about them. By the time boys are old enough to find an interest in sex they've understood empathy for a number of years. Do you need to be reminded not to steal? Do you need to be reminded not to hit? Do you need to be reminded not to murder people? Do you need to be reminded to respect people? Does your mom or dad really call you every morning before you leave …
/r/MensRights23/01/18 08:18 PM
9

She's employing a negative stereotype of a demographic of people with her 'hope'. You're insinuating that there's a more than usual possibility that you fear you'll break your leg tomorrow or else you wouldn't bother to saying it and the people surrounding you will begin to question your sanity if you made such future statements without a risk of it being probable... Lacking a rational reason to exhibit such a fear is called a phobia.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 03:25 PM
13

Let's purge the sexism in favour of racism and see how it looks: After all of my hard work I hope my adopted black boy doesn't grow up to steal cars. Oh...
/r/MensRights23/01/18 02:49 PM
6

I lived without a wife or a sex doll for more than 10 years... Around here they tell legendary tales about the man who washed his own clothes without spontaneously exploding! Ate food prepared by his own hands! And cleaned up after himself! Six and a half feet tall he was - with spikes of grey hair crowning his regal head! A God? A demigod? Gay? No - a straight man; but no ordinary man to be sure! He's what was once called a bachelor! A tribe of men gone today and hardly remembered... but there …
/r/MensRights23/01/18 02:31 PM
22

Her men sexually assaulting a person is so statistically remote it's not worth mentioning unless she employs sexist stereotypes. Men are an object of fear for her. She's so afraid of men that she goes on a limb to turn her own children into objects of fear on behalf of other women and has the nerve to mention using kindness instead of suspicion... She's planting the seeds of suspicion and what does she expect to grow? You reap what you sow.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 02:02 PM
4

The factors that caused her violence: The Journal of the American Medical Association recently unveiled in a report that 92% of domestic abusers were abusing alcohol not just in their lives but at the time of the incident. According to NCTSN 'in addition to these physical, behavioral, psychological, and cognitive effects, children who have been exposed to domestic violence often learn destructive lessons about the use of violence and power in relationships. Children may learn that it is acceptab…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 01:40 AM
1

I think the problem here is that you and I are married with children so when someone says 'babysitting' we chalk it up to hyperbole and it's water off a duck's back. When a single father hears that - it's probably different. He had to fight rigged system to earn his role as a father. He had to prove his fatherhood. He had to fight to be called a father. Now, call that man a babysitter... A man gripped by fear of losing his kids has to be ever vigilant against his fatherhood and can spare no quar…
/r/MensRights22/01/18 09:56 PM
3

They fear and mistrust you because you are male and they utilize that fear and mistrust as the glue that bonds them together or else they'd be at each other's throats. You are a fear object to them. You are thier boogeyman. You would have to accept your role on their stage and spend your time trying to appease them with hair shirts and gender-flagellation.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 11:43 AM
5

He's one of the good ones ladies you should mate with him and have wholesome and morally upstanding children! Someone archived the article if you don't enjoy puppet shows as much as I do. http://archive.is/0Ofn3
/r/MensRights22/01/18 07:38 AM
1

A man holding a sign that places a grown woman at the same level as a child in the middle of a 'woman's march'. Telling a person that, in a crisis they are no better than children, is utterly insulting to any adult and much worse when you say it to an entire gender during a march that's supposed to be empowering them. He should of been railroaded out of town after his tar and feathering but instead he looks quite at peace.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 08:26 PM
2

It's not peer-pressure when it comes from your very first authority and is confirmed by virtually all of a heterosexual male's potencial mates. It's a mandate.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 07:30 PM
9

A sacred matriachy of women manipulatied by a promoted childlike fear and mistrust of men. She needs to watch disney's Tangled.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 05:17 PM
1

Unless Britain has a different system - that's bullshit. He's still serving his time and his debt has not been repayed because his sentence is not complete - apparently, he still has 10 years to go on his sentence. That's 20 years total and he's only served half. Probation or parole is a part of the sentencing time not additional time added on. If an offender spends their entire sentence in jail they are released without the authorities supervising them.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 04:40 PM
3

a lot of modern outspoken Nazis are men Men shielding women from being exposed isn't an MRA thing - in fact, around here it's the opposite - a lot of modern outspoken MRAs are women shielding men from being exposed.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 04:14 PM
7

Unless it's to prevent being viewed as defective men - it's never for their own sake that men control their emotions.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 02:02 PM
9

Under their definition I am too and I place feminist theory on the same level as race theory or the illuminati...
/r/MensRights20/01/18 03:36 PM
7

A plane full of adults who are rendered powerless by a sleeping man's erection? I hope no one was inconvenienced when they made an emergency landing at the nearest airport!
/r/MensRights20/01/18 02:40 PM
1

female conditioned brain There's no conditioning involved. The conditioning occurs when she's told to persue her own power and wealth at an expense to her fertility. She did exactly what the most basic part of her brain wanted her to do - find a mate with material wealth so that they both have the best odds at raising healthy children together. And after reviewing his life she realized that he wasn't what she thought and she left.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 01:59 PM
2

From what i understand the modern men's rights movement was started in the 1970s when men like Warren Farrel were tasked to create a men's liberation movement as a complimentary group with the women's liberation movement. They came back with shared parenting as the primary male concern and that was the end of men's liberation as far as f minism was concerned. The ladies were asked to give up a privlege in the name of equality and they refused gender equality.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 01:52 PM
10

You are placing men's word of honour above women's with nothing but their gender to guide you. You should trust people on their word of honour but use facts and evidence to confirm their story.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 03:20 PM
3

Alice B. Lloyd is a woman.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 01:17 PM
1

Did you ever? I was in one yesterday with my son and we were the only two males in the store and we were only there to use the post office.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 01:03 PM
1

I'm what police used to be and I've startled cops in the mall while shopping with my kids. Can you imagine the same effect while the cop is looking for a dangerous suspect and I'm just putting out the garbage?
/r/MensRights17/01/18 12:42 PM
5

They are all standing in the splash zone. They're trying to pay their way out of the splash zone in case some splash-back hits them.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 03:21 PM
3

But on March 12th, the International Transport Federation published a letter... The ITF is a union that represents taxi drivers which the real reason for the cancellation.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 03:01 PM
11

Uploaded to The Pirate Bay yesterday by an anonymous user If the person is anonymous how does the writer know about their activism? This edited movie is evidence that the person supports men's rights?
/r/MensRights16/01/18 11:15 AM
0

It's only useful as a counterpoint to the pay gap.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 10:51 AM
1

There's always outliers but we shouldn't pretend they are typical. Is he still a stay at home husband? If so - I salute you for being one of, from what I remember is, only 4% of women, if not... at least tell me he doesn't make as much as you with his part time job?
/r/MensRights15/01/18 08:06 PM
50

She wanted a relationship and he wanted sex. She was delusional about the relationship between them and her delusions prevented her from seeing that she was on a one night stand but as the night wore on... she understood that she had no chance of a relationship and left. He's to blame for her delusion? He's to blame for her inability to convert him into her boyfriend instead of a one night lover? Her own ambition is not to blame?
/r/MensRights15/01/18 04:28 PM
1

The very people who should celebrate women's advances are the same people who damsel women to gain political power. Women must remain victims so that women's victimhood can continue to be a political tool. It also doesn't help that those women in leadership typically despise women's victimhood status.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 03:48 PM
1

The first wrong is...
/r/MensRights15/01/18 03:25 PM
1

Women value his ability to provide material wealth and men value healthy women (sex object) so when you say - If she's not a sex object, you're not a success object. How do you intend for men and women to prove their ability in the areas that their potential mate finds valuable? Also, just because it's not a mental disorder doesn't mean it's normal.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 01:12 PM
-2

Two wrongs don't make anything right. Huh?
/r/MensRights15/01/18 11:50 AM
3

There are powerful groups in North America pushing this agenda, but they are not usually considered feminists. Who?
/r/MensRights14/01/18 03:47 PM
5

She disagrees over her presumption of innocence vs. their presumption of guilt. Innocent until proven guilty vs. guilty until proven innocent. Insufficient evidence to support an accusation protects the innocent and sometimes even the guilty. An accusation alone protects no one.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 03:28 PM
17

Wow, she's really up on her shit when it comes to the men's rights movements that don't concern themselves with men's rights - she found a group of nihilist PUAs with 250 readers and used to to smear the men's rights movement.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 01:51 PM
9

It's an exclusionary tactic. The conversation itself should be against a company's D & R policy since they were sexualizing employees.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 01:09 PM
73

Men: it's her money and she can do whatever she wants with it. No outrage. Women: It's his money ... And what follows creates the outrage!
/r/MensRights14/01/18 12:34 PM
2

Feminists exploit traditionalism. Without it feminism is finished. They use chivalry to borrow power from apex males by promoting that women are weak damsels. As women gain their own power there's a significant challenge to continue to promote that women are damsels which is making modern women look more and more like children than adults.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 12:04 PM
1

You don't have the expectation that they should help? You don't consider 'help' to be a preferred outcome that you deem a value to society?
/r/MensRights13/01/18 05:17 PM
1

When the accuser is caught editing facebook messages to make the accused look worse than they are - doesn't the accuser lose all credibility when it comes to recounting events?
/r/MensRights13/01/18 02:04 PM
1

How about we just allow people to follow their natural inclinations?
/r/MensRights13/01/18 12:04 PM
1

Why couldn't she talk to management, security, or the police?
/r/MensRights12/01/18 02:17 PM
1

Shaming men into putting themselves at risk is one the themes of this ad! Shaming women into standing up for themselves isn't. A man intervening on behalf of a woman will take the harrassment off the woman and place it on the man which escalates the situation into something far worse than the harrassment. A white knight stepping in to protect m'lady makes him a rival of that rascal brigand of a black knight. They are trading women's emotional discomfort for men's physical safety.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 02:10 PM
3

You see someone getting beat up on the street. Do you realize that 'someone' was the woman being harassed when you say this..? Does she get criticized for not championing her knight as his face is beaten to shit?
/r/MensRights11/01/18 08:38 PM
3

It's not - it just sounds offensive to them and their jump to conclusions. And I currently have -25 votes for the same reason. Fucking hypocrites. lol
/r/MensRights11/01/18 07:01 PM
8

He exercised his control over his own sexuality and, as I pointed out, he has no obligation to explain why. The fault is in their unfair assumptions about him.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 06:05 PM
-5

Where's the unreality in my original post and the following post?
/r/MensRights11/01/18 05:30 PM
3

What's the message? Women are no match for men? Only a man can defeat another man? Women should fear men? It's unsafe to be a woman so be sure to take a man with you? Good men should never assume a grown woman can protect herself?
/r/MensRights11/01/18 05:20 PM
-14

Don't shoot the messenger. Are you authorised by Ginuwine to offer that on his behalf?
/r/MensRights11/01/18 01:23 PM
11

We get it... you're sexually attractive because you get hit on by strangers. You are so much more worthy of your selected mates attention than those other women around you. He or she should find you as sexually irresistible as that gas station attendant. Was the gas attendant's name Haven Monahan?
/r/MensRights11/01/18 01:14 PM
-32

The offense isn't the kiss it's the fact that he said he wouldn't date a trans woman. His reasoning on not dating a trans women determines whether it's transphobic or not. He has not given any reasoning so there's a rush to judgement which is unfair. He also doesn't owe any one his reasoning.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 12:53 PM
3

This reminds me of a story but I can't remember where I heard it... Warriors in battle would both desire and fear the attention of their God because they worshipped a fickle God who would bestow favours in battle as often as the god would challenge the warrior with woe. So depending on the Gods mood there was living glory waiting for the warrior or a glorious death. At the golden globes there was no glory - living or dead, but only senseless death for any warrior who drew the attention of their …
/r/MensRights10/01/18 08:04 PM
2

That's not what they are saying at all. Just because they don't define the behavior as a mental illness doesn't mean it's normal behaviour. Killing a person is typically not a mental illness either. The vast majourity of men are sexually attracted to a woman with curves and that comes, at the very least, in the last stages of puberty. These women with breasts, hips, and butts are the ideal sexual mate, as seen in a popular study often cited around here. Men don't like 'boobs on a waif' which is …
/r/MensRights10/01/18 07:41 PM
1

I'm sure it was a badly worded notion that you can remove all the muslims from england and you will not remove crime. I prefer the way the clash said it with 'something about england.'
/r/MensRights09/01/18 03:24 PM
1

When you are confronted with a superior force sent by an enemy that wants you removed from your land by any means - it's incredibly stupid to help them in their efforts by using violence to expedite their mission. Are you really so fucking stupid that you can't see that Palestinian violence supports and justifies the Israeli agenda? If I saw some dipshit at the zoo jumping into the lion cage to poke the lion I'm not a shill for the lion when I say 'hey stupid, that's not going to end well for yo…
/r/MensRights09/01/18 03:09 PM
8

I need a career, She's confusing her wants and her needs at her own expense.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 02:45 PM
7

Due process is a measure we take to ensure that innocent people are not sent to prison. Innocent people in prison are victims.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 01:09 AM
0

I don't think any of these folks understand how crime works. Crime is perpetrated by specific people and in the absence of those people the crime will not happen - this is why we put people in prison. The actions of specific people is what identifies them as criminals and nothing else. You can't determine a criminal until they commit a criminal act and to suggest you can by singling out an aspect of their identity and tying it to crime is an injustice. 'Muslim' groomers...
/r/MensRights08/01/18 10:26 PM
0

a key element of the Indian strategy was being willing to die in direct opposition to military occupation. The Palestinians aren't willing to die in direct opposition to military occupation but they are willing to kill - how much more civil they are than those awful Israelites who are also killing... Palestinians doing the same thing would be butchered. Ah yes, they'd prefer the slower genocide by attrition precipitated by their own use of violence. It's an old joke: Patient: Doctor, it hurts wh…
/r/MensRights08/01/18 07:47 PM
2

ThIs is my best response to men need feminism: A women's advocacy group in a binary society comprised of only men and women is in a direct conflict of interest when it comes to men's issues.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 04:23 PM
1

That's not true. The violence is reciprocal. Her behaviour supports the evil system at work. The freedom riders broke an evil system. The Dandi Marchers broke an evil system. She and her side are conspiring with an evil system.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 03:27 PM
1

She used violence. The west prefers civil disobedience. With her slap she affirmed her support for an evil system.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 01:41 PM
8

She got hers - the settlement was reduced to the best they could bend settlement case law without breaking it.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 11:21 AM
5

It takes 8 years of primary school, 4 years of high school, and 4 years of college to master... let's face it - English is a dog's breakfast.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 11:13 AM
3

The two of you need to pick your specific jobs. This is my job and this is yours and don't touch the job again ever.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 11:47 PM
2

It's a trap. Very few women will look at their husband doing one of their jobs and think 'awe, he's helping me because I'm swamped he loves me sooo much'. Instead they will think 'that jerk thinks I'm useless at my jobs...' It's a trap. 'Honey, I can't help but notice you struggling to keep up with the roles you've taken on'. Doesn't that sound like shots fired to you? It's a trap. You will find yourself in the middle of an insane domestic 'arms race' as your wife runs around doing her weekly ch…
/r/MensRights07/01/18 10:13 PM
2

It's fear. That person is afraid of men. Feminism leads women by fear and then borrows power from males by exploiting women's fear (damsels) since males are raised to protect the weak and fearful (chivalry). The OP is not afraid of men and even calls her a little girl because OPs picking up on it.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 07:56 PM
25

Answered each question honestly and I got 41 out of 100 and I'm a middle class middle aged white man living in a first world nation. Edit: My wife got 55.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 03:50 PM
34

Another paper gave the full list of questions: I am white. I have never been discriminated against because of my skin color. I have never been the only person of my race in a room. I have never been mocked for my accent. I have never been told I am attractive “for my race.” I have never been a victim of violence because of my race. I have never been called a racial slur. I have never been told I “sound white.” A stranger has never asked to touch my hair, or asked if it is real. I am heterosexual…
/r/MensRights07/01/18 03:37 PM
27

That'll teach him! The discrimination he's facing and the fact that he's six has probably made him resent his sister and her gender.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 02:11 PM
4

...was not rude during the majority of her engagement with you. Kinda like somebody not being a murderer during the majority of the time with their victim? Just the stab in the back! The rest of the time they weren't killing a person.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 01:26 AM
1

You are technically correct and this position is the reason for overreaching governments pushing their way into our bedrooms with affirmative consent. I prefer having an adult conversation before hand of boundaries and dislikes so there's no surprises although these days I've been married a few years and we rely on a rapport system that we've developed. If people don't want to follow affirmative consent or have a conversation or haven't been together long enough to develop a rapport - there's bo…
/r/MensRights06/01/18 10:02 PM
0

In his role of providing security he should be able to recognize unsafe acts as well as unsafe conditions. He should of followed procedures and taken measures to ensure the safety of his children. His children should always be free from danger or threat.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 09:00 PM
3

No. You failed to make men an object of either fear or mistrust so that modern women have to make absurd leaps of faith in their everyday interactions with men. Google "What would you do if all men had a 9pm curfew?" to see this scheme at play.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 03:10 PM
7

It reads like her objection isn't that her tits were grabbed it's that he was aggressive enough to cause her physical pain. Me shaking hands with you isn't assault but if I squeeze hard enough to break your bones... They charged him with shaking hands instead of breaking bones - so they fucked up the charge.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 02:31 PM
6

Their mistake was in the charge indecent assault. They should of just went for assault.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 02:15 PM
4

If you obey traditionalist rules: He failed in his duty to provide security. She failed in her duty as a caretaker. Her failure is due to a mental disorder. His failure is due to ...?
/r/MensRights06/01/18 01:54 PM
6

That judge is elected into that position by the people. Being tough on scoundrels gets you re-elected.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 01:46 PM
1

Men and women concern themselves with these triats for the benefit of their future children together and that's not a shallow reason... Equality is working but there are problems that need to be resolved. Men and women are co-conspirators when it comes to the problems - your placing the blame on women is just as one-sided as feminism placing the blame at the feet of men. Stupid is finding one slightly bruised apple and throwing out the entire basket.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 10:43 PM
15

It's not about sex in exchange for power so much as specific males having experienced this exchange so often that they apply it universally. "And when you're a star they let you do it. You can do anything ... Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything." The above mentality didn't develop without women who "give it away more".
/r/MensRights05/01/18 01:15 PM
2

That's as unfair to women as calling men shallow is when men desire a young and sexually attractive (AKA healthy) mate. Women desire certain traits in a mate which will create their best odds at raising healthy children. Men desire different traits in a mate which will create their own best odds. These traits aren't too far from men and women's natural inclinations. Today's women are burdened with a secondary best odds of affording themselves the ability to create their own wealth which, for man…
/r/MensRights05/01/18 05:05 AM
3

women are oppressed This is not the message - the message is women are weak. Only the weak are oppressed. In their weakness women have a significant influence over the people who were raised from cradle to grave to protect them.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 03:21 PM
1

The main fault of feminists in all of their waves is their demand to be treated as the equals of men from their pedestals.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 11:13 PM
1

The automobile did that more than corporations and fathers are a product of casual sex. There's two types of dads those that wanted kids and those that wanted sex.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 10:47 PM
2

Spokesman Ronald Riege said both tents were available to anyone -- not just women -- but that there would be a small sign saying "Women's Safety Area" at their entrance.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 01:47 PM
8

I spent my high school years trying to get an education while sitting next to neo-nazi skin heads and this type of bullshit is too familiar to me. From what I observed the skin heads were typically dysfunctional kids who created a social life out of using a prejudice of minorities as a catalyst to making friendships. You can see it at work in her thoughts - she relates her prejudice of men with friendship.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 11:52 AM
1

Their sentiment denies black American's their greatest contribution to advancing the USA closer to perfection. Civil rights are for everybody
/r/MensRights30/12/17 01:25 PM
7

They define the privileges in terms of action power not control power. Standing in the middle of your living room with a baseball bat looking for the source of that noise in the night makes you seem more powerful than your wife even though she's the one who sent you. The puppet commands our attention more than the puppeteer.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 06:10 PM
1

A garbage degree is a fairly easy way to show that a school's educational quality has been compromised and that is tracked by the schools themselves. but rather we educate them as to the nature of the situation. I'm trying to reduce worthless learning and the wasted money related to it not increase it so your solution is counterproductive.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 03:50 AM
1

My position is that a school that receives tax dollars should not use those dollars to promote the maximizing of profit at the expense of quality. Higher education should never of become such a ridiculous a commercial enterprise.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 04:50 PM
6

It's disappointing to see women behave towards men today in a way that they imagine women were treated by men yesterday.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 04:38 PM
0

The kid shouldn't have the option. These are mostly government funded schools knowingly selling a crap diploma to people. We are throwing tax dollars at what amounts to confidence men and medicine shows.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 10:57 PM
0

Yeah, but typically your diploma will leave you with a career as a cashier and a debt which is worse than just being a cashier.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 10:48 PM
3

We only started taking the people when those photos of the drowned boy was being shown in newspapers around the world. The father survived but lost his entire family which meant that the only survivor of that tragedy that opened our border was still not eligible to enter Canada. This should be fucking disgusting to any decent people.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 03:16 PM
3

It's not surprising - men follow the money and the money isn't in higher education anymore. My generation was told that we would live in horrible poverty if we didn't seek higher education so most of us did. The career i was pursuing in higher education paid less than my current job, had more stress, and had no med benefits. I dodged a bullet. It's foolish to chase after a costly diploma when the same lifestyle can be met by holding a stop sign at a construction site.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 02:51 PM
2

They are hypocrites when they don't protect men when men have a need of chivalry. They are hypocrites when they diminish the authority of a female knight by championing her cause rather than celebrating her.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 03:13 PM
4

Think what the passion for propaganda will bring some girls to! I, of course, threw it all on my destiny, posed as hungering and thirsting for light, and finally resorted to the most powerful weapon in the subjection of the female heart, a weapon which never fails one. It’s the well-known resource—flattery. Nothing in the world is harder than speaking the truth and nothing easier than flattery. If there’s the hundredth part of a false note in speaking the truth, it leads to a discord, and that l…
/r/MensRights26/12/17 03:01 PM
13

I would be more than happy to stay at home and raise our children, as would my wife be more than willing to bring in the money for the household... So what happened? Why aren't you a stay at home dad? As I remember, only 6% of men are stay at home dads. The only men I can think of who are stay at home dads are also disabled (10% of America's population). As you said - you'd be more than happy to be a stay at home dad, but you aren't and neither are most men no matter how eager they are. I'm gues…
/r/MensRights26/12/17 02:35 PM
2

a special type of natural selection in which the sexes acquire distinct forms either because the members of one sex choose mates with particular features or because in the competition for mates among the members of one sex only those with certain traits succeed. Biology's definition of 'sex selection' which is the human method of selecting mates.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 02:05 PM
2

Aside from the cases that this article mentioned? I suspect I know why you haven't 'found' anything.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 12:18 PM
1

Prosecutors were warned nearly two years ago that lawyers were under increasing pressure to boost rape convictions By who? Are they a qualified critic of the justice system? Is their agenda political or is it just?
/r/MensRights24/12/17 01:57 PM
50

In a nation where a woman can stab a man and not get jail time don't talk about how many women are in prision. Declared not guilty more often than men, sentenced to serve no time in prison more often than men, serving less time in prison for the same crime as men - these factor in to the rate of women in prison. If we treated men as we do women there would be a lot less men in prison too.
/r/MensRights24/12/17 12:54 PM
6

Force men to pay for the sex they enjoyed or force us all to pay for the sex he enjoyed? The choice is obvious if you view women as less than adults unable to stand by the consequences of their unilateral decisions. Edit: For clarity - her being viewed as less than adult is also seen in the default assumption that the woman will be a welfare drain in the absence of her John.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 03:06 AM
1

It sounds good in theory, like communism, but in reality they are just viewed as defective men and it's not just crying it's any emotion. Ever see that hidden camera video of the grandfather jump for joy after everyone leaves the room? Yeah... Everyone thought it was adorable but consider that man's life when he feels that he can't express unbridled joy with his daughter and wife and in the room.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 02:53 AM
1

Hair rinsing gone wrong is my guess.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 02:26 AM
6

What more could they possibly want at this point? To be freed from their own unlimited choices and being able to blame others is the mortal method to achieve this. What is patriarchy except feminism sparing women from their own bad decisions. There's an article by a complaining second wave feminist about her grand daughter's future life that really highlights this - I'll try to find it. Found it: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4733400/Will-granddaughter-pay-price-fight-equality.html T…
/r/MensRights22/12/17 07:42 PM
1

It's the same difference under equality. No?
/r/MensRights19/12/17 10:15 PM
0

There's a significant reluctance of many women to be victimized to the point that the specific offence itself is less significant - for them, the crime is victimization. They hold #me too up as a continuing justification of their all consuming fear of being victimized. What hope is there to reach them when their own perceived prejudices of men victimizes them?
/r/MensRights19/12/17 04:41 PM
1

And it's a spectacular example of what I described above on how this subreddit functions.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 01:52 PM
2

To be fair, we also want men to be treated like women.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 01:42 PM
1

An angry and confused male is a fear object but I've said nothing angry or contradictory... What then do you fear?
/r/MensRights19/12/17 01:37 PM
3

Where and when was that quote made and was it interesting enough for the people here to vote it up? From what I understand very little around here is officially policed - the mods typically leave it for us to vocally disagree with comments by using counterpoints rather than police the comments directly unless they are obviously offensive. Your offending comment doesn't show up in a search of this subreddit except for this thread. Your offending comment doesn't show up in an external search excep…
/r/MensRights18/12/17 06:52 PM
3

It's all part of the erosion of words having a specific meaning to suit a political agenda. Being in a drunken stupor removes your ability to consent. Being black out drunk is the same as being in a drunken stupor. Being drunk is the same as black out drunk. Drinking is the same as being drunk. Therefore drinking is the same as being in a drunken stupor, so drunk people can't consent.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 04:28 PM
2

Men had to be supermen: stoic, responsible meal tickets. That's me and it's 2017.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 01:59 PM
5

From what I understand men's lib was an offshoot of feminism during feminism's infancy. Men's lib went off to their corner to come up with the most pressing issues facing men and came back with shared parenting, the feminists objected and turned their backs on liberating men from their gender roles.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 11:13 PM
1

They took plea deals so there no comparison.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 10:43 PM
16

There's no way a woman born in the USA in the 1970s ever believed in her life that ass grabbing was normal behaviour.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 10:27 PM
15

From a very young age, I encouraged him to “take a moment” — to find a quiet spot and experience his emotions within his own comfort zone and timeframe Hide your tears young man because they offend the women folk including your own mother.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 10:35 PM
3

Or strangers who smile at the kid. 'My kid made you smile - 10 dollars please.'
/r/MensRights15/12/17 08:46 PM
1

Women already select men by their physique with their desire for physical security. Short men are not wanted. Lean, tall, and physically strong men are highly desired. Male ideals of female beauty matches female healthiness. Men aren't as shallow as we are being told - men aren't chasing beautiful women so much as they are chasing the healthiest women. Female success is becoming important out of necessity more than a male desire - that's not a good thing for women.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 02:24 PM
26

She was a 24 year old staffer for the biggest tv show in it's time slot so she has to be a very aggressive person and her resume must be full of experience who was about to leave the conpany to work somewhere else. What power can anybody have over you after you submit a resignation letter to your employer?
/r/MensRights15/12/17 01:32 PM
1

They are a minority so they can never be the typical. Show them dignity and respect by protecting their rights and give them justice when there's an offense and ask for the same in return. By justice I don't mean 'hang em' high!' I mean what's fair.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 03:58 PM
1

He writer accounted for them in the article by pointing out that not every woman thinks as she does. Make allowances for these folks but let's not pretend they are typical is what I took away.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 03:38 PM
12

Being rewarded for the sexual exploitation of other people makes you a pimp.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 01:39 PM
166

WTF am I manning up for? For women.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 01:18 PM
2

It was meant more as an addendum than a counterpoint...
/r/MensRights14/12/17 12:48 PM
3

He said CPS has expressed reservations about moving the boy out of foster care because Christopher doesn’t know his father very well. Never mind, Crawford points out, that Christopher doesn’t know his foster family well either.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 12:30 PM
7

The power to point a finger utter some words and destroy a person isn't a privilege males have access to. Women yesterday had that power. Women today still have that power. The men are not acting to protect themselves they are acting to protect other people. That demand for protection has to come first.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 07:07 PM
2

He was the american women's husband more than their father. As a man, morning TV 'news' doesn't appeal to me and seems more geared towards female viewership. They cultivated a husband image for him and women responded favourably. This is why his bad behavior stands out with women above the rest.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 06:18 PM
1

It doesn't matter when the end result is the same. Use all the legal and rational arguements you want but you will still be viewed the same as the other people. It's your message not how you are saying it that they have a problem with.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 01:33 PM
3

The right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness being infringed upon by inequalities men face in legal and social systems.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 01:04 PM
2

As a Christian, I do not share your belief in the ideology of transgenderism. His own words. Read them and then observe his behaviour towards the kid. He looks like a bully. If he said it was a simple mistake - I'd be inclined to cut him some slack, hell - I'm prone to making that same mistake, but when he says, in his defense, I don't believe in this thing, he starts to look like an adult bullying a little kid because of Jesus' views on transgenderism... Wait... Jesus never talked about transge…
/r/MensRights12/12/17 09:55 PM
2

I love how religious people always pretend that their God is some intransigent asshole when it comes to something they want. Gotta make a little kids life hell to appease God or else I might not go to heaven!
/r/MensRights12/12/17 02:57 PM
4

Telling a person that their memory of an event is false and that they shouldn't trust it is also abusive behaviour...
/r/MensRights12/12/17 02:26 PM
1

Men with power and their wives > women > all other men. Here's the flow of power. Look at who is in office right now. I daresay he's in the first group. Which statistics? Suicide statistics? Homeless statistics? Workplace death statistics? Homicide statistics? Violence statistics? Combat deaths? College grads? It doesn't look good for men unless they are in the first group and not so great as women if they are in the bottom group.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 12:43 PM
1

Do you have anything from this century? Anything more recent than 100 years? Academics today tell a different story than the aged academics you are digging out of mouldy journals who allowed their biases to influence their work. You are observing debunked studies only found on certain biased websites... C'mon dude, a study from 111 years ago conducted by a white man who thought that blacks were a lower form of life than whites? You honestly trust that study even tough it's not supported today by…
/r/MensRights11/12/17 11:20 PM
3

Males are granted that power by women. A noise in the night doesn't get men out of bed - their wives do. The ones with power don't die on battle fields. The ones with power don't die early. The ones with power don't go down on bended knee with an expensive bauble and beg another person to live with them. Minority of ruling class men and their wives > all women > all other men. Here's the flow of power in your patriarchal societies.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 10:09 PM
2

That best results for raising your kids is spending time with them and the best method for that is to live with them with an equal partner who shares your specific interest in raising the same children together and you get that with monogamy. It also has the advantage of both elderly people being visited at the same time because they live in the same home together. The child has constant updates on both parents even when they only see or speak to one of them.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 10:01 PM
32

Two in five British women, and a fifth of men... 'a fifth of men' well that sounds insignificant. wait a minute! That's 1 in 5 men.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 01:28 PM
2

It has been attributed by racially prejudiced people to the high basal testoste... blah blah blah Fixed that for you. The study you are citing indicated that environmental factors played a role in raising testosterone levels and when they controlled for those factors there wasn't. Soldiers also exhibit higher testosterone. New fathers exhibit less testosterone. Older men exhibit less. Children exhibit less. This is the same person different testosterone levels at different stages or environments…
/r/MensRights11/12/17 01:16 PM
3

It can't be patriarchy if it's a mandate placed on men's shoulders by women. It can't be patriarchy if it's demanded by feminists who invented patriarchy and declared it bad.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 11:27 AM
8

My daughter is as equally violent as my son was at her age. Nobody has ever asked my daughter if she's going to protect her brother multiple women have charged my son with her protection. Her height will help her be a model not a defender of the weak.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 08:28 PM
16

Take a child and demand that they protect the weak - you've immediately made violence an option for that child to resolve a problem. Take another child and tell them that it's the other kid's duty to protect them - you've immediately taught them to rely on another person's violence not their own. Men are not inherently violent they are taught to be violent on behalf of the ones who aren't taught to be violent.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 05:17 PM
2

From my understanding, and I've looked into it, modern medical science has not found any connection between skin colour and a propensity to do anything at all from building towering structures to shooting up a crowd of innocent people... If your research indicates otherwise - I'm willing to look at it in a private message.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 05:03 PM
10

Blacks are known to be more impulsive and violent. Q: Who knows that? A: Racially prejudiced people of course!
/r/MensRights10/12/17 03:02 PM
0

Having kids ensures that you wont be alone and uncared for in old age. Monogamy is the supreme method to ensuring your old age security. Even today your own kids are better than social security and care programs.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 01:58 PM
12

Hold on. She handed the role of caregiver off to him because she's the ambitious one and he's just not - and that didn't bother her. He's at fault? He's consistent. She's choking on her ambition.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 04:30 AM
2

Custody laws favour women to prevent those women from drawing on social services. Remove the kids and those women lose a source of income.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 02:36 PM
1

This is an attack on the spreading influence of Islam in sub saharan Africa. Edit: what I mean is that promoting women above men doesn't conflict with christianity which, as I recall, was 60% of the population. Muslims are 30% of the population but growing and they will need to tailor their culture to suit the aid or they won"t get aid. The government of Canada is creating conditions that are fertile for christianity but not for the current culture of Islam. Christians will flourish and Muslims …
/r/MensRights09/12/17 02:04 PM
1

Never had a condom break. Read and follow these instructions: Heat, sun, oils, and chemicals all can weaken condoms, making them more susceptible to breakage. Keep condoms away from heat and light, which can dry them out. And, don't use oils or lotions with a condom, only water-based lubricants. Carrying a condom in your wallet, where it may be folded or sat on, can also wear down the material and cause the condom to break. Also, don't open a condom with anything sharp, like scissors or teeth. C…
/r/MensRights09/12/17 01:05 PM
10

Everyday feminism is at it again - infantilizing women. Here's the themes of the cartoon: some women don't understand dress codes, some women will be hostile when they don't get their way, and some women will try to test boundaries - these are the traits of children not adults. My two year old wanted to wear sandals yesterday - it was cold enough to freeeze water outside - I policed her choice of footwear and she exhibited all of those traits but she's only two.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 01:40 PM
5

a “large grown man” shouldn’t have been so physical with the woman. Ah yes, she's merely a grown woman who only took something without consent and struck a person without consent - she's not to be considered a grown up and shouldn't face adult consequences for her action, after all, she's just an adult girl.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 02:43 PM
2

Yes, women should be saying that because it would normalize interactions between men and women. It's so rare for men to experience this that when a rare woman does treat men to this behaviour it must mean she's flirting. A feminist challenge would be for women to break out of their gender role and make it a point to approach men in this fashion to normalize the event but that would mean courage which is a toxic masculine trait.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 02:30 PM
4

it's men, not women, who need to be chaperoned Interesting that no chaperone for anyone is not an option - which brings us to the point - women demand protection. It's her sexist fear of men that makes it impossible for her to even consider that no chaperone at all is an option. She demands to be protected! Men don't make that demand...
/r/MensRights07/12/17 01:45 PM
2

War on sex? Every example he gave was about a man touching a knee or a back or for making crass advances to an adult of the opposite sex. War on sex, eh? All of these facts are in his head since he's the one who wrote the article but something just can't allow him to write it. War on men. How hard is that to say for a man whose been taught his entire life to favour women over men as his best strategy to access offspring?
/r/MensRights06/12/17 07:33 PM
8

It's not about her power as an individual - it's about the total sum of her demographic's experience. She gets to access her demographic's suffering although she has not really suffered herself. She also gets to access her demographics historic suffering even though she wasn't alive at the time. She also gets to access her demographics suffering in different parts of the world. If they allowed us to have allow our personal lived experience I don't know about you but I'd be classified as an oppre…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 03:25 PM
1

They've deleted the tweet.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 01:46 PM
1

Work/life balance is the only correct box and typically that's only in instances where she's married and with children. Everything else in all of the other boxes stems from that.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 12:52 PM
23

From the article: While the offence of sexual assault involves intentionally sexually touching another without consent and without reasonably believing the other consents, rape must involve penetration with a penis.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 12:40 PM
107

The truly bizarre part is that those trolls are directing their insults to a specific person and it's being viewed as an attack on a demographic of people. Calling one specific woman names is considered sexism. The bans are happening because the 'victims' are attacking a demographic of people not the specific people they have a problem with. Calling all men names isn't considered sexism. She is garbage vs. Women are garbage. One has a specific target and the other targets an entire group of peop…
/r/MensRights04/12/17 02:54 PM
1

All of society is hardwired to come rushing to the defense of women Men not society. Society is comprised of men and women - women demand safety and security and men provide it. Although it appears that men are the ones with the power they are acting as agents on behalf women issuing a mandate - keep us safe! Safe from what? Other men? All men? Their unlimited choices? Air conditioning? A stagnate career? The effect of childbirth on their wages? Reciprocal violence? Prison sentences? Prostitutio…
/r/MensRights03/12/17 04:22 PM
4

All that will do is increase the number of women with problems. Women can be bad too.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 02:40 PM
5

A link that describes the stability pyramid (or triangle) using a fork lift as an example, which also has three point stability just like your two feet and your ass. https://www.thebalance.com/forklift-stability-triangle-2877832 Here's an example of women's naturally lower center of gravity - the reason why they can typically sit on moving transit without spreading their legs too much: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oXxrfqY0kA0
/r/MensRights03/12/17 12:26 AM
8

She hasn't learned anything. She never accepted him for who he is and has always wanted him to be someone else. Even at this stage she still wants him to be someone else.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 11:39 PM
55

There's also a difference between male and female center of gravity - men's center of gravity is higher and in order to compensate they need to spread their legs to increase their stability pyramid. The more masculine the person's physique to more they need to spread their legs to prevent themselves from tipping over.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 06:46 PM
14

All kids are different and as much as we'd like to think we have control over shaping them into something we really don't. The problem here is that the writer doesn't like their kid and never has. He's just not somebody the writer enjoys spending time with.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 03:43 PM
8

She's assuming the voters are as sexist as her group is.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 03:16 PM
8

She's right. The preferred BMI for men is on the upper end of healthy side of the BMI index. Women think that men desire a twig with boobs but that's not correct. Men in real life don’t go around sexually rejecting women solely on the grounds that their armpits could have been a bit more toned So, this disconnect between heterosexual men and women isn't coming from heterosexual men. Most heterosexual men don't watch 'red carpet' events. Men's magazines don't cover 'red carpet' events. Men don't …
/r/MensRights01/12/17 03:09 PM
1

The legal system observes most of these concerns of yours during the sentencing process. Ideally, we should have rigid laws with flexible punishment. A guilty judgement doesn't have to mean jail time.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 02:40 PM
5

Mostly from India and China - two cultures that hold sons responsible for caring for their parents. Sending their males to a good school is America's version of retirement savings. While you insist that girls should be educated you also need to place traditional male roles on their shoulders or else you are cutting the throats of boys and their parents.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 02:12 PM
6

There hasn't been a first son in the whitehouse since 1993. It's been two decades of presidents not asking - what about my son? Suddenly that question is asked and the department of education is told to scale back the bullshit.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 08:13 PM
48

Nothing beats: Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 07:09 PM
1

The facts speak for themselves so his excuse is irrelevant - he trespassed and she didn't like it. I wouldn't like it if some dude was going thru my stuff without permission and neither would you xmas gift be damned.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 07:00 PM
6

From that description he was the first person to choose a treadmill...
/r/MensRights30/11/17 06:18 PM
3

Alhough there's no confirmation that it came from a feminist it seems unlikely that Syokudai made it up in May of this year (the oldest date I cared to find with a search), spread it around the web for a few days, and then sat on it until now. It does remind me of a feminist writer's work where she claimed she was raising her son 'different than previous women' by getting him to isolate himself when he was upset and laid down her approach to how he should treat women, which was the same as the t…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 03:40 AM
13

The scare is that we show them the same compassion we show other non-masculine people or we treat those other non-masculine people in the same manner we treat these 'defective men' - man the fuck up! Women lose a lot of control over men if these men are shown compassion. Nice guys exhibit non-masculine traits so if you want to see the future of how women will be treated in a non-gender society - look at how we treat nice guys. They are also low hanging fruit for men wanting to illustrate their m…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 02:29 AM
10

A locked door is only as secure as the people who open it.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 01:47 AM
1

spent 54 minutes a day caring for children in 1965 but 104 minutes in 2012. That's just lunch around my house.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 01:43 PM
1

Your identity comes with merit badges.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 01:36 PM
1

In a sardonic voice: It's our daily vaccination against the women are wonderful effect. I don't think it should be daily but others do and others still think it should be hourly.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 01:24 PM
1

And unfortunately it has backfired on us. There's nothing worse than being a beautiful woman in today's society. We just don't care for our beautiful women like we should. The homeless shelters are spilling over with beautiful women and it's such a disgrace. There just isn't enough millionaire playboys to take in these incredibly good looking women! Donate today and rescue a beautiful woman from living on some rich man's yacht for the summer. For just 1000 dollars a day you can save a gorgeous a…
/r/MensRights28/11/17 09:03 PM
3

Let us know how it works out for you and here's to hoping they don't let us men down.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 06:15 PM
11

Ask them to sacrifice a female privilege in the name of gender equality and see where they actually stand on gender equality. Fair weather feminists support gender equality at no cost to women. The message above costs women nothing.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 01:16 PM
1

And that screams us to seek out a mate and reproduce It screams at you to seek out a mate and to rear your offspring into healthy adults.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 12:28 PM
7

It's not traditional gender roles so much as human sex selection. The fault of feminism is that they lay the blame of human sex selection at the feet of men without addressing women's culpability.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 05:29 AM
4

Would you ask a friend to take you back to the house so you can steal more stuff? Would you tell your mom that you executed him? Would you make up a story that is inconsistent with how the police found the body and maintain that story even after you've seen the photographs?
/r/MensRights28/11/17 03:51 AM
1

The law protects impressionable people from predatory people. The law is more just when we make allowances for similar age groups. I'd prefer a sliding scale of justice than no scale of justice in this instance.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 03:32 PM
1

No, she's going under the bus. People are watching this case. A white woman accused black men of rape - there's a racist history in this act that can't be ignored which had to be explained to them during the initial process when she was going to get a slap on the wrist.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 03:13 PM
50

She took money from his wallet and took two guns before driving his truck to a nearby Walmart parking lot after shooting him in the back of the head. Once you take the time to steal shit after killing someone you stop looking like a victim.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 02:41 PM
7

Shaking vulnerable people down for money is called an extortion racket and it's supposed to be against the law.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 03:16 PM
2

Higher education needs to stop wasting people's money on this garbage. Sure, it brings in money and there's very little costs to running the classroom, such as, no expensive equipment, but at some point you have to discover that you're just running a medicine show.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 03:08 PM
2

White men aren't falling for race baiting anymore what are we going to do to keep them divided?
/r/MensRights26/11/17 02:10 PM
-1

He's priming his daughters to place a high value on their beauty and appearance because that's what future men will desire in a partner. They don't dress like sluts... The more desireable she is the larger her selection of males will be and the more able she will be to choose a partner and also be able to recognize and weed out bad father (to her kids) behavior. The purpose of dating is to prove your value in the areas that are desirable to the other sex while they prove their value to you with …
/r/MensRights25/11/17 02:06 PM
2

Yeah, then we lesbians get all the women! Now let's all get in shower it's been a long day of slut walks without any men around and free the nipple without any men around. What? I'm not a pervert! Only men are perverts, silly, now let me rub this lotion on you after the shower... chick·en hawk a hawk of a type that is reputed to prey on domestic fowl.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 01:27 PM
-2

Yeah, black dads suck! fuck those guys! Damn fithly bastards! I just didn't get caught Here's the real reason why he's a star instead of a criminal. Not an absent daddy. Denzel parents divorced when he was 14 (he had a father not just a father figure) and he was sent to Oakland Military Academy which saved his ass and here is why: Police can't bust you if they don't see you. there's a higher police presence in poorer communities. Police will not look the other way. riding your bike on the side w…
/r/MensRights25/11/17 01:19 PM
1

Where there's a significant life experience gap it tends to look like exploitation to me. 16 is an impressionable age when people can be easily coaxed or pressured into doing things they don't want to do and as such they should be protected from people who would seek out an exploit them.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 12:32 PM
5

If you can sit on the job and still do your job you should be able to sit.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 02:39 PM
13

It's fine for a 16 year old to have sex with another person of a similar age and it's commonly seen as sexual experimentation but with an older person it starts to look more like sexual exploitation and if the older person is an authority figure it's a stronger lean towards exploitation.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 08:40 PM
6

The important part: For the year ending March 2017 CSEW, an estimated 1.9 million adults aged 16 to 59 years experienced domestic abuse in the last year, equating to a prevalence rate of approximately 6 in 100 adults (Figure 2). Women were more likely to have experienced domestic abuse than men (7.5% compared with 4.3%). This equates to an estimated 1.2 million female victims and 713,000 male victims (see Appendix Table 1 for more information). 4% is out of the total population of men not a tota…
/r/MensRights23/11/17 08:15 PM
13

Their house and, in some cases, their personal lives were surrounded and besieged by a mob of angry and violent people - that kind of thing creates PTSD and since they are young men it will probably go unrecognized.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 03:59 PM
1

Sacrifice your mental health so that you can procreate isn't a choice that should be presented to men. That famous abuse wheel so often presented by the domestic violence industry actually has 'isolation' of a form of abuse. Men are systemically pressured into what amounts to an abusive relationship with their spouse and no body wants to address this problem. Men are to blame not the pressure for them to surrender all of their time to making sure they are always domestically available or they ar…
/r/MensRights23/11/17 03:46 PM
5

It's more likely that a women suggests something and a man enthusiastically champions it. Women tend to employ agents to work for them while men are more direct. Women lead from behind.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 02:08 PM
9

He's apologizing for being the victim of a crime.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 01:13 PM
4

Men are joining committed relationships at the same time they are abandoning their friendships... Men are joining committed relationships at the same time they are stopping sports... Men are joining committed relationships and when that relationship breaks up they are suddenly completely isolated during the worst crisis of their lives. We need to create some sort of solution that allows men to be in a committed relationship and still have time for their friends, sports, and social activities. Wh…
/r/MensRights22/11/17 11:16 PM
6

From what I recall 40% of victims go forward to become perpetrators. This type of violence, much like, domestic violence is often cyclic so breaking that cycle should be paramount. If they want to end violence against women they need to address that same sort of violence that hurts men.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 07:45 PM
1

They are rewarded for it by all sorts of women even those who demand women's equality. Sexism against women is learned piece meal from chivalry.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 07:16 PM
20

Nobody should be forced to hug anybody they don't want to. My daughter needs to warm up to people before she hugs them and if you try to hurry it along you are doing more damage than good in your relationship with her. Gramma is an adult with a lifetime of experience so she has a lot more experience than a toddler dealing with hurt feelings so the adult is the one who gets their feelings hurt not the one who can barely speak.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 09:54 PM
5

A man comes across a crying female co-worker at work. He expresses concern and rubs her shoulder to comfort her. A day later he's hit with a sexual harrassment claim. Me? I look at it and think 'that's how I've comforted my brother and I'm a heterosexual man so the behavior can't possibly be sexual, but the company can't afford to tell that women she's a fucking fool so they send him to reeducation and he learns to walk on by from that point on.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 09:28 PM
12

Mr. Segal said he had explained to the men that the context mattered and that pretending there was a gray zone between collegial friendliness and sexual assault was absurd. It's not up to Mr. Segal or anyone else to determine the grey zone - it's up to the victims 'feelings' to determine that zone. When an accusation is enough to ruin a career we need it to be more black and white.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 02:24 PM
5

It needs to reflect the population of the student body. There are absolutely some people that need to be accommodated with the gender-neutral washrooms and that’s totally cool. But that is a minority Population of Alberta = 4,146,000 million Albertans that have changed the gender marker on their birth certificates since the rules changed = 294
/r/MensRights21/11/17 02:07 PM
1

https://www.usnews.com/news/education-news/articles/2017-05-09/black-girls-are-twice-as-likely-to-be-suspended-in-every-state https://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/rulesforengagement/2017/10/teachers_lower_expectations_for_black_students_may_become_self-fulfilling_prophecies_researchers_say.html http://www.kentucky.com/news/local/education/article181582496.html http://wwno.org/post/report-louisiana-schools-suspend-black-low-income-students-higher-rates-peers http://www.dailycomet.com/news/20171120/stu…
/r/MensRights21/11/17 01:44 PM
1

Feminist policy? It's human sexual strategy. It 's found in the codes of knightly chivalry. It's celebrated from the sinking of the birkenhead to the sinking of the Concordia. It's the main motivator for men volunteering to fight in war. Feminists exploit it and because of their dependance on it we can't rely on them to bring about gender equality.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 05:11 PM
1

There's no double standard Murray is important because of his utility - he provides for her.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 04:16 PM
-1

Male victims are defective men and women don't desire defective men so declaring other men as defective means that you aren't defective - you are good mating material.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 03:50 PM
11

Damseling women by demonizing men gives them their subscribers. In order for women as a group to be damsels by default you need the other group to be anything but damsels. You need to create a blindspot to powerful women and weak men.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 03:07 PM
8

He's playing a hero to people who cultivate gender chivalry from men but those people don't reward heros - they shame heros and make them apologize for it. He'll learn.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 02:25 PM
3

There is no myriad of other factors that outweigh the effect of active parents in children's lives. You can't replace dad with a boys or girls club and lucky for us we don't have to because, as it turns out, black dads are doing their good as much as nonblack dads are - so why are their efforts not being recognized, hmmmmm? It wouldn't be the same problem driving the disenfranchising of their kids would it?
/r/MensRights20/11/17 07:00 AM
0

I set up a trap and congrats you stepped on it. Read the OP - then my initial response - then the arguement the dude is making... By his arguement black people should be doing worse now than in 1995 but across the board they are doing better. Graduation is up. Crime is down. More black men are in college than in prison. Black fathers are active in their children's lives. It's all a bunch of mythological horseshit that we are told to swallow to support the notion that black men are failing their …
/r/MensRights20/11/17 02:11 AM
2

Table 6 is about eating a meal. Yeah, a meal. Everything else like playing with and reading to kids was average or above average, but eating is the clincher that makes the difference? There's a lot of myths and stereotypes about blacks that leads to lowered expectations which is probably the most harmful problem facing young black men followed by harsher punishments for undesirable behaviour.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 10:58 PM
3

According to FBI stats violent crimes are down since 1995 by all races by a significant amount. Less wedlock seems to be the cure for criminality since less people are engaging in wedlock and crime.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 06:44 PM
4

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2999910/
/r/MensRights19/11/17 06:02 PM
2

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr071.pdf
/r/MensRights19/11/17 05:59 PM
3

5 out of the 8 implies that women can't advocate on thier own behalf and demand that men to do it for them. The other 3 has men apologizing for women's inability to champion themselves. Feminism has men expected to take the superior position by weak women and men are still made to apologize for it. No guts no glory is gender neutral
/r/MensRights19/11/17 05:24 PM
6

Black people in America are leading the charge away from institutionalized marriages and towards common law relationships. In 1970 500,000 couples were common law. In 2000 5,000,000 couples were common law. This is 20 years later and I couldn't find recent stats but it's not unreasonable to assume that the trend has continued to gain ground. From what I remember from a recent government survey black men spend as much time with their children as any other ethnic group when all factors are taken i…
/r/MensRights19/11/17 04:56 PM
3

I worked a tough manly job moving heavy things for a living. I'm currently on STD so I stay at home. At work I pushed in one direction. As a stay at home parent you are pulled in multiple directions. The job is as 'hard' but the rewards are greater so I'd prefer to stay at home.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 05:48 PM
4

Were they not vulnerable men? Were their rights not violated? Were they helped when they asked for it? Weren't they targeted because of their gender?
/r/MensRights18/11/17 05:35 PM
1

As a man I know that if I berate another man in public violence is on the table. When you champion your cause and berate a man in public and don't expect the possibility of violence you are less of a champion and more of a bully.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 05:26 PM
6

The constant braking and accelerating causes instability which forces people with a higher center of gravity (men) to spread their legs as counterbalance. The larger the man's upper body the more he will spread his legs to compensate - the more manly he is the more need he has to spread to prevent toppling onto the little people around him. As a rite of passage into adulthood american white men typically get a car. As police have powers to stop and frisk people taken away they invent new methods…
/r/MensRights18/11/17 05:00 PM
4

A champion initiated a conflict with a stranger and suffered a violent consequence for it. Upon being struck violently the champion transformed into an immediate damsel. She's not being honoured as the champion because she seemingly accepted the damsel role after the violence when she allowed another person to further champion her on her behalf. He is credited with the champion role and she is merely a damsel in distress.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 04:37 PM
3

It's the perceived threat from men that unifies them. Perhaps we need some outside universal threat to make us recognize this common bond. I occasionally think how quickly our differences worldwide would vanish if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world.” President Ronald Reagan - United Nations speech in 1987. They need to constantly reaffirm that all men are a threat to all women everywhere.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 06:34 PM
14

Neither member was subservient in a traditional family. Both complimented each other in their roles as caregiver and provider ensuring an optimal performance by both. The problem wasn't the roles themselves it was because those roles were gender based leaving no room for a minority of people who didn't want their assigned gender role. Claiming women as champions of the traditional male role isn't helpful since typically women are not inclined to want to be the primary provider and when given a c…
/r/MensRights17/11/17 03:11 PM
2

Pretending that women's shit doesn't stink is harmful to men and women.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 10:28 AM
1

From what I understand it's either drug induced, a mental trauma, or involves some kind of physical abnormality which is largely genetic.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 05:02 PM
1

They were rhetorical questions.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 07:30 PM
2

How do you rid yourself of that guilt? Go to church? Consume food, drugs, alcohol? Apologize? Come clean to the public? Convince yourself that you were the victim?
/r/MensRights14/11/17 02:02 PM
1

That was the reasoning of the people who lynched black men.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 09:19 PM
2

It's a tool with very limited functionality.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 08:32 PM
6

https://japantoday.com/category/national/man-revives-woman-with-aed-but-branded-pervert-for-removing-her-clothes-to-apply-electrode-pads
/r/MensRights13/11/17 08:23 PM
7

There were some fish, still alive, who were being cooked in a frying pan in boiling oil. One of the fish said, "Brothers, let us flee from this place, so that we will not perish." Then they all at the same time jumped out of the frying pan and fell into the burning coals. Stricken thus by even greater pain than before, they cursed the plan they had adopted, and said, "By how much more terrible a death are we now going to die." This fable warns us that when we are avoiding present dangers, we sho…
/r/MensRights13/11/17 08:07 PM
7

Your child also has the right to a relationship with you and will most likely benefit from it.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 07:50 PM
3

We stand charged of being guilty of another person's gender prejudice and sex stereotypes. Defend yourselves from our prejudices and sexism! The only winning move is not to play.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 04:35 PM
15

As a baby you endured physical trauma to the point that you most likely also suffered from the mental trauma of PTSD as discussed in a recent post here. You will bring physical and mental suffering to a person you're supposed to love when they are utterly helpless and all in the name of your own aesthetic ideals? You will risk penile amputation in the name of your own aesthetic ideals? You will risk his death in the name of your own aesthetic ideals? Is this what you offer the helpless? Physical…
/r/MensRights13/11/17 03:44 PM
3

You don't need a prince to be a princess but you need footmen. When you grant women all of the choices men don't get one. Either side of the coin- men lose.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 12:01 PM
1

No - don't do that. If you have ADHD and the current pills aren't working for you; try a different kind or a different dose - you don't quit all together. There's multiple types of drugs that help with ADHD and sometimes people respond better to one over another. ADHD is not a problem with the right drug and dosage that works for you. Quit taking those pills but keep trying meds until you find your right combination. It's worth it.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 09:03 PM
0

If your medication isn't working - why are you taking it? Ask for something else to take.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 03:32 PM
5

Odd - I can read this and post to it after the ban? Oh, he was talking about some other group with an entirely different agenda and purpose but conflated them with us to influence well meaning people and keep them completely ignorant about the problems men face.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 02:18 PM
2

Women tend to have an emotional support network that men don't have which prevents them from becoming isolated. Women can maintain friendships over the phone. Men maintain friendships over an activity. If you can't find the time you lose your friend and if he can't find the time you lose your friend.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 10:11 AM
7

What's the good reason that makes women afraid everyday? Propaganda? Prejudice? Misinformation? Factual Omissions? Bigotry? Negative Stereotypes?
/r/MensRights09/11/17 12:07 PM
215

There's clearly some good in everyone who has ever stood infront of that judge.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 10:32 AM
5

She needs to stop objectifying men as things to fear.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 10:22 AM
1

Women have been conned by feminism to fear men. Feminism rules over women with that fear.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 06:56 PM
2

You aren't listening. Saying that he's not a victim dosn't mean that he doesn't acknowlege that men aren't victims. I'm also not a victim but I support those that are and not along gender lines which is what makes me an MRA and is one more thing that prevents me from following the feminist version of gender equality.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 05:50 PM
2

Men were 'also' victims?
/r/MensRights08/11/17 05:39 PM
4

I don't want a woman telling me how to be a man This has been human mating strategy for thousands of years and is based off of a human male's own typical inclinations. Men champion those who are not men. This is typical of men and desired by women as seen by the article. What happens to the non-typical men who are not champions? They are not 'men' and are needed to be championed, right? No. They are defective men and need to man up. Here is the danger for women's equality. How will those poor wo…
/r/MensRights08/11/17 03:22 PM
1

Bigots using a prejudice to confirm their world view. Good thing black folk, jews, and muslims are a protected class these days because if white women feared them... well, we already know what happens - don't we?
/r/MensRights07/11/17 02:07 PM
2

The same can be said for female predators. The predator will always want to be in close proximity to their victims and will always look for an opportunity. Ovaries are not a determiner of harming children and neither is a penis. The prejudices cast on the penis gives the female predator a significant advantage to harm children - she is beyond suspect and given the benefit of doubt when she shouldn't have it.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 01:43 PM
6

It all stems from a woman's mandate to her suitors.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 08:51 PM
-10

Same can be said for women, so it's not a gender issue.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 08:31 PM
1

I'm guessing you weren't alive in the late 1980s? There was a push to stop listing the colour of offenders because people were using it in the same way feminists use gender today.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 02:09 PM
1

that there are a large number of women who work full time jobs, not acting as primary caregiver for the home Who is the primary caregiver then? The children care for themselves? The preschool teacher is their go-to parent? 'At this school we like to think of ourselves as co-parents so no you can't take that vacation while school is in sesson.'
/r/MensRights02/11/17 01:58 PM
1

According to your own citation you know 4 to 6 men out of 100 who stay at home. According to government census 10 out of 100 men are disabled (19% of americans). It's absurd to assume that there's not a strong overlap between the 10 men who are disabled and the 6 men who are stay at home dads. According to a forbes article 71% of employees hate their job, so I'm not speaking for myself, I'm speaking on behalf of the vast majority. Women want to be the stay at home caregiver or they would offer t…
/r/MensRights01/11/17 12:55 PM
2

There's a significant difference between wants and needs. You are looking at needs and declaring them to be wants. Men don't want to work. Men put money aside so that they can afford to stop working one day. Men buy lottery tickets with dreams of a future of wealthy unemployment. Women are different creatures than men in this regard? Hahaha! Bullshit. Very few people want to work - they work out of necessity. Men don't want to work. Women don't want to work. When an option is presented to allow …
/r/MensRights31/10/17 09:45 PM
1

That study had more female participants than male participants and one country had zero male participants.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 09:28 PM
4

This was the idea pushed by academics like her a few short decades ago and she's supporting the same reasoning that they followed. You could probably argue that her attack on all men is the result of law enforcement's reluctance to list the racial identities of perpetrators and for good reason - because of dipshits who think like her. Without ethnicity to blame these reactionary morons are forced to blame gender.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 02:32 PM
2

According to your own citation under table 4 for children under 6 only 4.5% had the mother employed but not the father and it doesn't get much better as the kids get older at the most being 6.1%. That means women prefer the role of caregiver over the role of provider which was my point. Someone ought to tell women that it's not the 1950s and that it's okay for fathers to be the stay at home caregiver.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 08:07 AM
6

Feminism upholds an ideology that spares women the obligations of women's own unlimited choices by transferring all responsibility for ever to men.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 04:10 PM
20

Great! Dream up some dubious reason to satisfy your perversion and you're no longer a pervert you're noble just like St. Weinstein and his protest against circumcision and the loss of sensation that comes with it...
/r/MensRights30/10/17 03:18 PM
19

Great! Women can go to work and men can stay at home and raise the children. Funny thing, the only men I know who are full time caregivers are on disability from work - they aren't allowed to work because their work won't have them. It doesn't look like women are eager to surrender their role as caregiver, which is nessessary for men to stay at home. Women's sexual selection is partially based on his ability to earn money - that needs to change if men are to stay at home. Women need to be way mo…
/r/MensRights30/10/17 01:19 PM
-1

She doesn't have to but she will have to pay for the wrongful death. A percentage of her wages over the following 18 years...
/r/MensRights30/10/17 12:49 PM
1

"Different things appeal to different people."
/r/MensRights29/10/17 12:49 PM
5

Man allegedly molested by yoga teacher...
/r/MensRights29/10/17 12:25 PM
13

It also doesn't tolerate a lot of women's experiences if they step outside of that group's accepted narrative. Many women don't support abortion and most women believe that abortion should be restricted to the 1st trimester. Women enjoy being a housewife. Girls bully girls over fashion.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 12:07 PM
1

If the father wants to keep it, and the mother doesn't, does she still have to carry the baby to term or can the father sue everyone involved for wrongful death?
/r/MensRights29/10/17 11:46 AM
3

Speaking of Asians... I doubt sumsung is worried about their non-asian demographic in Korea or sony worried about their lack of diversity in Japan. They probably accept that, in Japan, they are more likely to have Japanese applicants. I think people forget how many whites there are in America sometimes and how that works against 'visible diversity' probably more than any other factor.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 03:23 PM
32

So why is it so common for men to struggle with or lash out at a rejection? It's not common. There's 323,000,000 americans and almost half of them are men and boys - if it was common - there'd be significantly less americans and significantly more arrests for violent crimes. It's not even uncommon - it's highly rare.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 02:59 PM
3

Few women will qualify for combat so they will take all of the non-combat roles, and with them taking up those roles...
/r/MensRights28/10/17 02:46 PM
1

You're confused... Reddit isn't life. Life is what you do when you are not on reddit. If it takes me days to respond what does that tell you? No, wait... You aren't good at logic and reason, so imagine a person who uses logic and reason and reply with that response.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 01:59 PM
1

The government taught my grandfather to stab Germans to prevent them from invading a nation that was not his own. Here's where you say 'that's different!' And I say 'probably not' when you consider the nature of most of those homicides and violence are the result of territory disputes related to organized crime.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 01:43 PM
1

This is men's rights and you don't get 'it'.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 01:27 PM
3

No, but they are leading. This slide is leading us to the conclusion that all of that violence is domestic in nature. They didn't list any other specific motivations for the violence except domestic violence which is a dirty mind trick. If you look at a lot of the responses in this post you'll see the trick at work - a lot of them focus around domestic violence instead of accepting the fact that a lot of that violence wasn't domestic in nature. A psychology class no less.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 01:19 PM
3

Men typically don't have an addition and are not willing to piss their careers away or risk jail to get sex. Some men have a problem but let's not turn it into all men have a problem. Under her definition of men - men can't be forced to penetrate.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 12:52 PM
12

Exploiting homeless men for upvotes on the internet vs. Telling someone that they shouldn't do that... Hmmm... Who's more of an asshole?
/r/MensRights24/10/17 12:20 PM
1

A non-disclosure agreement doesn't apply to crimes that have been committed. You don't have to report the crime in some places but you also can't argue that your name on a piece of paper bound you to silence.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 11:59 AM
2

It probably has more to do with the appearance of cleanliness and the relationship between symmetry and beauty. The same standards apply to men as seen with the term 'clean shaven'.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 08:14 PM
3

But, but, but, that would make this second wave feminism and I've been assured that it's modern feminism that's the problem...
/r/MensRights22/10/17 07:58 PM
1

Shop the largest assortment of fabric, sewing, quilting, scrapbooking, knitting, crochet, jewelry and other crafts under one roof. And all the bathrooms were probably vacant...
/r/MensRights20/10/17 08:50 PM
2

She added men as victims a few times which was great but failed to add women as offenders.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 08:03 PM
13

Her actions simply create new victims of racial prejudice and resolve nothing. Her behavior towards people of colour implies that they are only valuable under her and not on their own merit - she's the citizen kane of race relations. It's better to give black people handout respect than have them command respect - that way you are still the boss in your relationship with them.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 06:32 PM
3

Women's chess doesn't pay as well and has less prestige than non-segregated chess?
/r/MensRights20/10/17 03:24 PM
1

Fear of black people makes you a bigot and it victimizes black people. Grrrrrr! Fear of muslims makes you an islamaphobe and it victimizes muslims. Tsk Tsk! Fear of men? Men are to blame for it! Women are the victims dammit!
/r/MensRights20/10/17 01:41 PM
1

I think men on average would be attracted to both women.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 11:43 AM
8

There's nothing more that I like to do than wait in the dark in the middle of nowhere for a random woman to show up with her little girl so that I can stop girls from learning about astronomy at the hands of a very stupid person - that's my fridays. If my wife left the house after 9 - I'd drink water from a coffee cup. i don't do that now. Of course there's nothing stopping me when she's home and I doubt she would even notice but, my irrational fears make it look like I'm a victim of her don't t…
/r/MensRights20/10/17 11:28 AM
1

You joined the party didn't you? I'm a supporter of women's rights but I'm not a feminist. I'm a supporter of civil rights but I'm not a black panther nor am I a member of the Nation of Islam. Feminism, like the black panthers and NoI, supports a very specific doctrine. You? You're a feminist so if I'm wrong about you - you are wrong about feminism.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 09:48 PM
1

Then it's not satire.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 09:21 PM
3

It's not beauty so much as healthy. Men desire healthy women and beauty is a signifier of health.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 09:03 PM
5

From what I read almost half of the perpetrators of these types of crimes are often found to be the victims of these types of crimes, so the solution can't be found without addressing both genders as both victims and both as the offenders. Focusing on one group as the victim and the other group as the offender will just continue the cycle. This is not a women's issue - it's a human issue. It needs to be covered as a human issue. Women as exclusive victims and men as exclusive offenders is counte…
/r/MensRights19/10/17 08:37 PM
6

Why are you here? Nothing you learn here will be useful to you as a feminist. Anything you learn here will cause you to lose all of your "friends" if you dared speak up about any of them. You joined the ranks of a youth group of alienated people whose membership demands you obey it's dogma in order to remain a member of the group. You're a modern day neo-nazi member minus the racial hate - it's not black men anymore. it's not jewish men anymore. It's all men! I was there in the 90s and what I sa…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 01:14 PM
2

Other than total abstinence, no method of birth control is 100 percent effective.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 01:05 PM
1

I'd self identify as a feminist I self identify as the King of Canada, but since nobody supports my monarchy... (I'm not really the King of Canada and you probably aren't a feminist for the same reason.)
/r/MensRights12/10/17 12:32 PM
2

The Red Pill: Discussion of sexual strategy in a culture increasingly lacking a positive identity for men. This is their own description of their subreddit. How is teaching men to get laid going to help human rights issues like alimony reform or child custody?
/r/MensRights12/10/17 12:15 PM
46

Money means something different to your husband than it does to you - it's not just something exchanged for goods and services - it represents his opportunity to prove his value to mate and then provide for his mate. Women are driving men's want of money. An equivalent article would be to exploit women's desire to look young and healthy as a means to smear them when compared to men.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 08:44 PM
330

In a series of behavioural experiments that often involved making decisions about whether or not to share money Money is important to men because men who have the ability to provide material comfort is desired by women.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 05:53 PM
1

Sex is part of a man's emotional connection. Men and women cheat for the same reason.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 12:12 PM
8

Feminist careerism at it's finest.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 07:47 PM
1

Yeah, let's discuss what obama thinks about lesbians because that's about as relevant to men's rights as one woman's fight with title ix over her comment about women brought forward by complaining women - that's a lot of women and no men but it's still important for men's rights, dammit! We care about traditionalist women and their battle against title IX!
/r/MensRights03/10/17 07:41 PM
1

The article where she addressed the those issues was already discussed here and not only did I not object to it but I believe I commented on it because it was relevant to men's rights. Edit: In what way does title IX prevent men from getting access to their children? How does title ix force unfair alimony on men? How does title ix get men arrested when they call the police for domestic violence help? Title ix is the primary tool... The world view that Kipnis supports is what creates these proble…
/r/MensRights02/10/17 02:11 PM
1

When you give the spotlight to a person who is self-promoting you are, infact, promoting that person.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 01:55 PM
1

Censorship? Isn't that when you tell somebody not to make a comment...? Haha! I'm fairly sure the purpose of this sub is advancing men's rights so the topics it covers should probably have something to do with men's rights and although title ix often has to do with men's rights not ALL title ix issues are men's rights related - this one sure as hell wasn't - two young women complained about another women's discussion about women and it's somehow relevant to men and men's rights...! Huh? In the p…
/r/MensRights29/09/17 08:28 PM
-1

The article promotes her past writing and promotes her thoughts and as I've pointed out - none of it has anything to do with mensrights, so we are going out of our way to discuss this person on something that has nothing to do with us except in an enemy of my enemy sort of way even though she doesn't believe that men's rights is a real thing. She's the female equivalent of that self promoting PUA guy we don't post about around here. It's baffling.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 04:00 PM
-2

The title ix grievance had to do with her views on women not on men. It was a feminist infight which had NOTHING to with men or men's rights. Her views on men and their value in society are strictly traditionalist and were not the subject of the title ix complaint. She only gave a shit about title ix when she was subjected to it not when it was the male students and faculty. When her ideas being a female were objected to suddenly title ix had gone to far. She's the type of person we complain abo…
/r/MensRights29/09/17 03:22 PM
-12

This has nothing to do with men's rights, and aside from acknowledging that women have agency, Kipnis is no friend of men's rights.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 01:30 PM
3

First, there's many ways of coercion that can't be resolved with violence. Second, most men aren't prone to violence - the army spends a ton of money mentally conditioning people to be violent only to pay another ton dealing with the mental problems that arise from that violence. Third, pretending that men's lives play out like kung fu movies is ridiculously naive to the point that I'm sure this person has never spent any time with a man.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 01:05 PM
1

Fun fact: if you give ADHD medication to a person who doesn't have ADHD they'll get the symtoms of a person with ADHD. If you give ADHD medication to a person with ADHD they will not have ADHD symtoms. So when you say these 'typical' kids are given a stimulant that reduces their behaviour issues... It kinda doesn't make sense - a typical kid would ramp up and be worse on stimulants not better. The problem isn't that kids are over diagnosed, it's quite the opposite, we are under diagnosed.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 01:15 PM
1

You need to remember that it's saudi arabia. As much as average women experience difficulties the average men there also face difficulties because of it. So giving women the right to drive is great news but I wonder how it affects the average man.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 12:41 PM
4

Let's not overlook "female instructor" which makes it sound like she teaches kungfu or driver's ed but is not a school teacher. This article won't show up in a search for keywords like rapist or teacher. Why is fox shielding her?
/r/MensRights28/09/17 12:01 PM
1

Mensrights is not a pushback against gender equality it's a push for a more balanced approach to gender equality.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 11:20 AM
1

The schools had a system in place to help him but in order to pay for teacher's consistently increased wages year over year - it was probably cut. Before benefits a teacher makes more than the average family income in Ontario. All included they make just shy of 100,000 dollars that puts them in the upper class. That money comes from somewhere and here it comes from ignoring the cracks in our education system. In order to pay for teachers increased wages special classes were cut. In order to pay …
/r/MensRights20/09/17 08:10 PM
1

Are you a white woman? Have you experienced the shame of being spurned by a black man the morning after? Title IX is here to help you. Apply today and you'll never have to see his face again! Are you a white woman? Has the white male right of passage of car ownership left you rubbing knees with non-white men? We have a name for that that will make you seem like less of a racist - manspreading! Your pristine white knees will be legally protected in the absence of white males. Curse those racist M…
/r/MensRights20/09/17 02:21 PM
1

White women, who don't drive, have imput on the family car. This type of out-to-lunch bullshit is the precise reason why she lost - she ran a burn your bra campaign in a time when women can be topless.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 12:43 PM
1

He owes nothing to them as a couple - the onus is on her to respect her vows not some other person. She betrayed her vows. She cheated on her husband.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 03:21 PM
6

For that to occur all men everywhere would need to be collectively connected into some sort of hive mind - one of us experiences something and we all have the novelty wear off.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 10:44 PM
4

There's too many egalitarians in the MRA for a white supremacist to be at home.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 06:07 PM
1

Sounds like she needs to sue her lawyers.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 03:08 PM
0

Not really. A bunch of very loud dipshits might associate that behavior with rape culture in order to comfirm their prejudice or push an agenda, but the rest will shrug and understand that's human nature to find sexy looking people sexy. These articles are only useful as a counterpoint to those specific dipshits so I'd prefer these types of posts to illustrate that ogling sexy people is not a gender issue.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 02:59 PM
15

That's an alarmist title for the natural process of people going from liberal in their youth to conservative in their old age.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 02:20 PM
60

Shhhh! A gay man is lecturing us on women and when he's done childless aunts are going to lecture fathers on children.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 01:52 PM
2

uh.. toxic blackness is all well and fine for black people but for us white people it's clearly institutionalized racism...
/r/MensRights13/09/17 07:54 AM
6

Do you know how women got the right to vote in Canada? The first women to officially vote were granted the power if their male relatives were fighting in ww1. The ruling party wanted to introduce conscription and the ladies vote got them re-elected. Women voted to send men to fight a war the men didn't volunteer to fight.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 07:35 AM
3

No no no! She rescued India from the british east india company - those rogues!
/r/MensRights13/09/17 07:23 AM
4

Yes, it was an incredible privilege to be invited to be a part of Queen Victoria's empire. It's uncanny how she always seemed to send the worst people to represent her empire and then miraculously replace those awful people and gain more regional power in doing so...
/r/MensRights13/09/17 07:19 AM
5

I should keep my children in the sun without sunscreen? I guess second degree burns on my kids is a small price to pay to save a woman's ego?
/r/MensRights13/09/17 06:42 AM
5

Let me simplify the hate you should have for these complex people by comparing them to another universally recognized hated group.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 03:19 PM
114

And while they are at it complain that the men's room needs a baby change station too (that's what the koala stcker means).
/r/MensRights12/09/17 03:02 PM
21

It's probably a building code violation. The building is typically built to code and then dipshits start doing their own thing without even being aware that there is such a thing as a building code. The only buildings that don't need to follow the code are older buildings where only one gender was present at the time. My old work place was 'grandfathered' because women 45 years ago didn't do that type of work. The new building has an equal number of men's and women's washrooms even though there'…
/r/MensRights12/09/17 02:49 PM
1

Toxic macho bullshit? Like mental illness? Alcoholism? Drug abuse? Poverty? Access to higher learning? Those are more likely to cause a problem than having a penis as is demostrated every time a woman commits an such a toxic offence.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 10:20 PM
10

showing how women can exercise power indirectly Women's desire to retain access to that power is what prevents them to this day from being perceived as truly equal with men.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 01:51 PM
2

It depends on your age, the place the pic was taken, and the nature of the group. Sounds like a gay man took a pic of an adult in public and posted it so other people can ogle at the image. Adult, public, generally benign. Meh.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 01:06 PM
57

forcing him to have sex with her That's a strange way to spell rape.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 11:54 AM
2

No person should have the right to decide that type of mutilation on anyone's behalf - it is a human rights violation. It is not recommended by the major medical associations. It is done to resolve uncommon potential problems that are mostly remedied with a bar of soap or at worst cheap medication. It puts the male at risk of death and dismemberment. It is illegal to clip the tail of dogs, but not the foreskin of baby boys. Would you remove all of your child's teeth on the off change that they m…
/r/MensRights10/09/17 04:08 AM
2

Women's equality can't be found on the roads that start from gender chivalry.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 07:55 PM
11

So, it' still far safer to be a woman than a man in 'the most dangerous places on earth to be a woman.'
/r/MensRights09/09/17 07:26 PM
6

They are already doing that as seen in this article so stear the conversation back to the actual causes of domestic violence.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 03:47 PM
25

Mr Tweedy, 45, had secretly endured 12 years of violent abuse from his wife, a teacher, who has a long-term drinking problem And here we see what happens when there's no penis or skin colour to blame - people are forced to address the actual problems that cause domestic violence.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 10:46 AM
60

He's not obliged to honour their vows - she is. She's entirely to blame for the entire situation.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 12:44 PM
26

It's illegal because he broke into another man's house and filmed it. The other man did nothing wrong - his wife is obliged to honour her marriage not the other man. This dipshit keeps harrassing the other man and that is probably what lead to the charges. He needs to place the blame entirely on his wife, she's the one who made the vows - not this Lopez fellow and his failure to do that is why he's getting screwed a second time and now crying about it. He's a victim to a point but he's also maki…
/r/MensRights07/09/17 12:38 PM
7

People were onto the idea that women might be a bit shady 500 years ago when Justice got her blindfold. 500 years later and it's still an issue? What a great PR team they have.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 05:31 PM
8

I'm on short term disability looking at maybe long term and I'm encouraging my stay at home wife to go back to work. Get going! Her college education allows her to do what she loves and carries an average wage of 80,000 a year while sitting in an air conditioned office with great benefits. Get going! We'd be pulling in six figures with one parent at home at all times to handle the household chores! Get going! She's good at what she does. Get going! Nope, instead we are double stay at home parent…
/r/MensRights05/09/17 03:48 PM
23

Wives are only good for sex? Examine the political ramifications of a woman making a sandwich for her husband and you'll see part of the problem. Examine the fact that women desire men who make as much or more money than they do and you'll see part of the problem. Examine that women delay marriage (their prime fertile years) in favour of education and a career and you'll see part of the problem. Examine that when a woman is finally desperate for children the eligible (to her) men are already mar…
/r/MensRights04/09/17 02:21 PM
2

Reliable birth control was non-existent, abortion was illegal, and daycare was largely unheard of but these weren't the factors that kept women out of the workforce it was societal pressure and their patriotic duty to abandon their jobs for the men! Good thing feminism saved today's women from having to take lower income jobs in order to meet their children's needs. Patriotism? Evil men? Naw, it's women's own children's needs and the choices they make in a mate that keeps them from their rivitin…
/r/MensRights04/09/17 12:14 AM
3

Yeah, because a boat sinking with 50 people on it somewhere is somehow the end of mankind. Also, that's fine for women, but why children then?
/r/MensRights02/09/17 02:44 AM
1

He confessed his guilt of the hypothetical rape of his theoretical girlfriend in the article.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 02:19 AM
1

Chivalry is the main culprit for both men's and women's problems and privileges.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 02:12 AM
1

This is a perfect example of why the mods here don't edit people's thoughts for them. The highest voted comment is a criticism of the ideas the OP was trying to push. The system worked without your censorship.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 05:09 PM
2

This means that my theoretical girlfriend’s retroactive consent determines if I go to jail or not. Uh... That's how it works with most crime - there's a common saying 'it's only cheating if you get caught' Also, a sleeping person can't consent until they are awake - that should be self evident. I'm a radical feminist now?
/r/MensRights01/09/17 12:32 PM
0

Yes, what we need is everybody marching to the same tune and nobody being allowed any different opinion on anything, that way, our ideas will become sacrosanct and can never be challenged.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 11:45 AM
45

It's the law! No, there are building codes that prevent this. It's company policy..? No, the company paid for the real sign. It's a piece of paper stuck to a door - take it down or ignore it..?
/r/MensRights31/08/17 07:02 PM
1

Well meaning people working with wrong or misleading information to push sales or a political agenda.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 06:54 PM
1

incubus.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 10:21 AM
9

Of course you'd say that, you're an MRA, and you believe that women and men are equals! But what about other groups who don't believe that men and women are equal? How are they supposed to feel about this?
/r/MensRights31/08/17 10:14 AM
3

When I was a kid people felt the same way about the 'other' people in their community. They had all sorts of statistics and facts and rationalizations and lived experiences to justify their beliefs too. After 40 years it's the same bullshit just in a different pile.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 09:59 AM
1

Spent an entire week in the wrong forum and it didn't even occur to you that you're in the wrong place? You've got the right skill set to become a journalist!
/r/MensRights30/08/17 01:56 PM
3

The female prison population has increased by more than 150 per cent since 2002 when there were 275 female prisoners in New Zealand. I'm guessing it has more to do with a budget cost cutting than anything else.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 07:33 PM
2

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/canada-child-benefit-by-default-goes-to-woman-1.3812520
/r/MensRights29/08/17 06:04 PM
44

She topples when the bus turns? Sounds like she needs to lower her center of gravity by increasing her stability triangle which is done by spreading her legs apart... I wish I was joking. Edit: here's a link that describes the stability pyramid: https://www.thebalance.com/forklift-stability-triangle-2877832 Here's an example of women's naturally lower center of gravity - the reason why they can typically sit on moving transit without spreading their legs too much: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v…
/r/MensRights29/08/17 05:42 PM
5

We don't need a stance on that since it doesn't conflict with the goals of men's rights. You will get every opinion under the sun.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 05:34 PM
1

Feminism does not = women so an attack on feminism is not an attack on women. Patriarchy theory and rape culture that comprises the majority of feminist theory are ideologies rooted in anti-male prejudice. Feminism is a part (of) popular cultural with many cultural icons and even some western leaders professing membership. If you want equality treatment for woman AND MEN eventually you will have to address the elephant in the room, especially if the elephant is trumpeting that it's the ONLY PATH…
/r/MensRights28/08/17 01:13 PM
2

Whelp, I'm off to buy a toy to replace my stinky dog who shits and pees on the floor... No, wait! I'm not going to do that... I wonder why I'm not going to replace my dog with a nice clean imitation toy dog.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 12:01 PM
10

Where I live there's an annual list of government employees who make over 100k a year and it's not uncommon to see police officers on that list. Throwing the word 'base' in there sent up a massive red flag.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 11:21 AM
11

average base salary of $56,260 a year So, what's the real average?
/r/MensRights28/08/17 10:51 AM
1

Children need to be spared of their mother's decision to birth them at the expense of men. Think of the children? Check Women aren't held responsible? Check Men have to carry the load? Check Business as usual.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 12:17 PM
2

Can you see how damaging the idea that women fart rainbows that smell like bresh baked cookies is for men AND for women?
/r/MensRights25/08/17 04:38 PM
3

Then you won't mind me explaining why boy's and girls both have a problem with ADHD but male behavior is problematic while girls behaviour is excused, misdiagnosed, or overlooked. This is the crap that sexual prejudice is founded on and we should set the record straight when we can. The daughters of that social circle probably have the same problems - infact, it's more than likely those women also have ADHD since there's an strong indication that it's inherited, but the focus is on those boys wh…
/r/MensRights25/08/17 04:10 PM
8

Or maybe they should open their doors to boys who are inclined to enjoy what they have to offer?
/r/MensRights25/08/17 01:53 PM
8

Those problems you list manifest differently in girls. Popular sterotypes of girls mask those issues. A girl with ADHD will be labeled with depression and anxiety long before ADHD is suggested. She's overly talkative? That's girls for you! She overly spends on shopping? Girls! She sucks at STEM? ....! She's overly aggressive? You go girl! Each problem has a gender based crutch for girls by a society that makes up gender excuses for girls poor behaviour. They don't get the right kind of help. Bei…
/r/MensRights25/08/17 01:46 PM
3

How long did it take the men to complete 200 reps vs. Women? Is this a turtle and the hare story?
/r/MensRights25/08/17 12:52 PM
6

They post these here as a counterpoint to the popular notion that women fart rainbows that smell like fresh baked cookies. Here's an example of the same: here
/r/MensRights25/08/17 11:53 AM
19

Did you read the article? The boys scouts are targeting girls to pad their low membership. If you are the girl scouts and the boy scouts are draining your numbers - you might want to rethink your idea of what girls want.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 11:38 AM
3

We are here to protect you and keep you safe now stay in your designated safe area at the back of the bus.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 06:29 PM
11

That's terrible! Men eating and master-baiting instead of learning how to smash another man's head in with a shovel? It's a disgrace! Kids these days!
/r/MensRights24/08/17 05:55 PM
411

There's a victim compensation reward given for injuries related to being the victim of a crime. If this is the case I remember, she was given 15,000, although I might be mistaken. She was using rape as a fund raising scheme.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 01:53 PM
5

Or that time he visited her in the Whitehouse when she was first lady... Or that time he donated to her run for political office... Or that time he donated to that clinton charity... Or any of the other times these two families sat beside each other at exclusive new york events... Her husband and him were golfing buddies... Their daughters were good friends...
/r/MensRights24/08/17 01:32 PM
3

Up next - neo-nazis pushing for segregated cars to protect non-whites from hate crimes. Edit: Jim Crow 2.0
/r/MensRights24/08/17 12:27 PM
10

Kids are boring these days. Crime is down. Violence is down. Kids these days... I was going into my driveway and a teenaged boy moved a garbage bin that was kind of in the way. The latest generation have the maturity of 40 year old men.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 11:08 AM
1

The judge has made the same conclusion and I doubt he's red pill. To the judge and much of society women are somewhere in between children and men. Being not quite man enough to go to jail has benefited this woman, but it harms her in other areas where the percieved situation calls for the type of person who can handle being a man - a man. Women and children first has it's downsides.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 10:45 AM
4

No but there's a neglect of men in favour of people who are perceived as weaker than men, women and children, which is rooted in gender chivalry which is sometimes tied to physical attraction for women. Keeping the perception that women need more help is the key that motivates men and women to not help men. Women feign weakness for some benefits but to some detriment and men feign strength for some benefits but to some detriment.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 11:33 PM
1

It's not reality if there's a bias in the photos being fed to the program. Garbage in, garbage out.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 01:06 PM
4

Where I am, they read families with small children and they are also a courtesy parking spot so anyone can park there and not get a ticket. The only suspicious person I've ever seen use it was a 50 year old lady with her older teenage son - she might of been pregnant but I doubt it.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 07:13 PM
7

She's a salesperson using sex prejudice to sell her product to a receptive group and it's sad that she's not being called out for it. When you have a negative prejudice against a people their good deeds are overlooked and you only see the negative things that confirm your negative view of them. When you have a positive prejudice towards a people their good deeds are highlighted and you often overlook their negative qualities.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 05:54 PM
8

Guardians are given limited powers to consent - the boundaries are often found at physical or mental injury. Education is within that power and we are asking that the physical harm of circumcision be removed from their power. The physical harm caused by circumcision should be deemed as child abuse and made illegal just as it is for girls.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 05:21 PM
11

It's not their religion it's the parent's religion. The babies and children can't consent. When the boy is old enough to consent, an adult, they can have it done all they want.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 12:30 PM
1

It's still a crime in some states. It's still a sin in the church. Those powerful men often lose their influence when they are caught. The article itself was written with the purpose of removing his influence on the grounds that he was not faithful to her. Historically, common people didn't have the right to vote so trust and honesty were not commodities in the relationship with historical leaders like it it today.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 01:10 AM
3

Fuck that shit! I spent more on the ring on my wife's finger than she's ever spent on the pink tax, nevermind the dates I paid for or the roof over her head. You're looking at at least half a million spent on my relationship with my wife. The transfer of wealth from men to women more than makes up for the paultry sum women pay in pink tax. Very few women have grounds to complain about their spending infront of men.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 07:15 PM
2

In many ways I was the HEIGHT of normal, in this culture. We’re taught to be providers and companions and at the same time, to conquer and acquire... Men conquer and acquire for the benefit of their wife and children and adultry is a betrayal of that. Men are taught to be monogamous by the church. Adulty is still a crime in some states. Infidelity brings disease into the family home. A man and a woman together carries the best odds for raising healthy children. Adultery also makes men lose their…
/r/MensRights21/08/17 12:44 PM
2

By downplaying female violence the title of the article answers itself. Violence is a human condition not a gendered one.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 03:07 PM
2

Most MRAs are egalitarian and argue from an egalitarian point of view. Much of the rational that applies to male equality also apply to racial equality. The awareness that many of us have for gender bias enables us able to identify racial bias. It's no surprise that people like cantwell find a place somewhere else, but for every cantwell how many hear the egalitarian views and change for the better?
/r/MensRights19/08/17 02:31 PM
10

He's trapped in what reads like emotionally abusive relationship and he can't exit himself without enduring a state-sponsored economic abuse that will just further allow her to abuse him. Here are his options: Stay with his abuser and endure further emotional abuse or leave his abuser and face future economic abuse. Economic abuse and emotional abuse are both used as power of control over an abused person. Either way he loses and continues to be her victim. Do you see it different?
/r/MensRights19/08/17 02:03 PM
7

Instead of blaming him maybe you can recognize him as a victim? Imagine that! A man can be a victim! Imagine how much better men's lives would be if men were permitted just an inch of sympathy!
/r/MensRights19/08/17 01:05 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter