thinkprogress.org specifically condemns House VAWA sarcastically condemning it because it will "provide protections for the “true victims” of domestic violence — heterosexual men", an admission that heterosexual male DV victims are given no protection under the Senate version of the bill.

loose-dendrite · 2012-07-20T23:29:52+00:00

Check out the link about Rihanna. They source some website that does not itself source anything.

Plus they frame it as Rihanna fighting against Chris's abuse instead of Rihanna attacking Chris then him retaliating. I don't know who hit first and Chris clearly went overboard but they're doing the Duluth thing and ignoring the possibility that a woman could decide to be violent. So yeah, denying women's agency.

irishsnowday · 2012-07-21T05:25:20+00:00

I hate how when a group fights for men to be protected against domestic violence, they're called misogynist.

Honestly, radical feminists are some of the most self-centered people on the planet.

2012-07-21T01:07:24+00:00

That quote is their characterization of NCFM's argument against the bill, not their commentary on the bill itself.

A_Nihilist · 2012-07-21T07:34:39+00:00

Liberals have to pander to feminists for votes. Remember that leftism isn't your friend, men.

chavelah · 2012-07-22T05:09:17+00:00

How about this - all versions of the bill suck, the name of the bill sucks, we'd be better off if the bill never passed in any form?

Comments