Double standards: the sine qua non of misandry

ForMensRights · 2012-02-23T23:27:23+00:00

Strangely enough, approximately 1 minute ago I just received a call from Lansing about pledging money for breast cancer.

JeremiahMRA · 2012-02-23T23:53:47+00:00

Pierce, you finally udpated and re-posted the battle of the sexes, you sexy son of a bitch! I still have the damn thing saved on my hard drive from July 10, 2009 from FRS before you deleted the article. :)

ForMensRights · 2012-02-23T22:42:25+00:00

Heh, a male Asari.

2012-02-24T05:43:13+00:00

Pierce and Paul, you both have my eternal admiration and gratitude.

GamblingDementor · 2012-02-24T19:48:36+00:00

"We shame young men who would never harm a woman by insisting they must be “part of the solution” to end rape. If we tell young women they must be “part of the solution” to end rape just by being careful, that’s victim blaming;"

This one is total nonsense. The man is raping the girl, he is 100% responsible for this. Saying the girl has to be careful is saying the man is dangerous, which is sexist. A woman does not have to be careful not to be raped, it's not an action which depends on her.

Title	Double standards: the sine qua non of misandry
Author	avoiceformen
Upvotes	13
Comments	6
Date	February 23, 2012 10:13 PM UTC (14 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/q34ol/double_standards_the_sine_qua_non_of_misandry/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/double-standards-the-sine-qua-non-of-misandry.1027162 https://theredarchive.com/post/1027162

Comments