~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | With the risk of being downvoted, here's why I think the Men's Rights Movement will never gain enough traction...I love this. What I used to hear all the time was the same question sans the word "enough." It was not long ago at all that the idea of this movement gaining traction at all was alien to even most MRAs. But to answer your question, it is best to understand the nature of most past social movements. They were not propelled by universal or even majority popularity. They moved forward on the intense actions of a very small minority that had undeniable truths on their side. Granted, the nature of res… | /r/MensRights | 19/02/13 12:30 AM |
| 1 | Fuck you, Troy Aikman - Paul Elam tears into a man-hating manYes it is. We will be doing a number of upgrades and additions in the next month or so. Resolving the mobile viewing problem will be one of them. | /r/MensRights | 13/02/13 02:31 AM |
| 3 | A Voice For Men has less of a gender spread then reddit.com as a whole does.To put it directly, they don't with 100% certainty. But they do know a lot more about most users than they would think (or that I am comfortable with), including their sex. Assuming they get it wrong about the same percentage of time across the board, it would mean that the comparison probably has some validity. At least on the surface it would seem to bear out with cases like the Good Men Project. It is written to appeal to a female readership despite its name. Google pretty much confirms they … | /r/MensRights | 09/02/13 01:59 AM |
| 12 | A Voice For Men has less of a gender spread then reddit.com as a whole does.I am not surprised by this. What is even more interesting is that AVFM has more sexual balance than the Good Men Project, which is primarily read by women. | /r/MensRights | 08/02/13 11:16 PM |
| 4 | "The Rules": How to control and abuse men while maintaining plausible deniabilityThis is not woman hating, or anything close to it. White knighting is not one of the MRM goals, either. One of the things that is a men's issue (given that I recognize this as my opinion only) is that a formal critique of current norms and expectations of both sexes is essential for understanding where we are and where we need to go as a society. This article is neither woman hating nor irrelevant to the MRM, IMO. And I don't think that taking the attitude that men should just ignore possibly ab… | /r/MensRights | 28/01/13 11:07 PM |
| 3 | U of T Student Union trying to ban and shut down A Voice for Men.A note of thanks to the members of this subreddit for the support. And thanks as well to the would-be dictators at UTSU. AVFM, and the men's movement in general, has grown, largely thanks to histrionic and tyrannical attempts to shut us up. It is a bad strategy that keeps on giving. And it has given so much now that it is too late to backtrack. The MRM is here, in many different forms, with many different styles. I can only suggest that feminists do what they have so far refused to do, and that … | /r/MensRights | 24/01/13 11:09 PM |
| 13 | Erin Pizzey reflects on Toronto protest - "It is there that they can finally see what lies underneath the disingenuous façade of egalitarian feminist rhetoric — jackboot thugs and robotic, hate-filledRight, I am sure it grieves you so. | /r/MensRights | 20/01/13 11:43 PM |
| 1 | Erin Pizzey, an internationally-recognized activist on domestic violence and gender issues, is joining A Voice For MenThat is a good and important question. I think there is room for considering that, if there is a credible demonstration of a lesson learned from any of them. And I stress the the word credible. These acts were pretty deplorable. But they are young people, and if they actually learned something, and made a significant effort to make amends for their actions, I would be inclined to consider removing them. | /r/MensRights | 05/01/13 09:46 PM |
| 4 | Erin Pizzey, an internationally-recognized activist on domestic violence and gender issues, is joining A Voice For MenStalking? You have got to be fucking kidding. We reported on and identified people who were using violence and intimidation to stifle free speech and to harass young men who were seeking solutions to their problems at a university sponsored lecture. Bigots are what we are dealing with, but it troubles you to call them that. And the violent protesters are just kids. I normally like your posts, but this reeks of enabling bullshit and cheap dramatics. Good thing my white knight has been put to rest… | /r/MensRights | 03/01/13 11:14 AM |
| 3 | Erin Pizzey, refuting 40 years of lies about domestic violencehttp://www.avoiceformen.com/video/ending-the-fempire-in-canada/ | /r/MensRights | 19/12/12 11:31 PM |
| 3 | I'm both a feminist and a MRA.Very thoughtful post. And a worthy item for discussion. The only dissent I can honestly offer is that I am not aware of any subsets of the MRM that discriminate against women. | /r/MensRights | 12/12/12 02:33 AM |
| 5 | girlwriteswhat, Stand up comedian and UFC commentator Joe Rogan wants you on his podcastShe is more than capable and has done it many times before. | /r/MensRights | 11/12/12 05:21 AM |
| 0 | Hate monger identified by AVFM. And would you look at that, pictures that show her twitter account. It looks lonely, maybe we should say hi? ,:)It is not that I disagree. I just don't think in the scheme of things it matters that much toward getting the job done. Like I said, no one is perfect. | /r/MensRights | 11/12/12 01:09 AM |
| 0 | Hate monger identified by AVFM. And would you look at that, pictures that show her twitter account. It looks lonely, maybe we should say hi? ,:)Point taken. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/12 05:37 AM |
| 1 | Hate monger identified by AVFM. And would you look at that, pictures that show her twitter account. It looks lonely, maybe we should say hi? ,:)I think men form some of the best bonds out of conflict. There are very, very few men that I have gone toe to toe with that maintain any hard feelings about. We all feel strongly about this stuff. No hard feelings on my end with you at all. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/12 05:36 AM |
| 1 | Hate monger identified by AVFM. And would you look at that, pictures that show her twitter account. It looks lonely, maybe we should say hi? ,:)Like I said. Never said I was perfect. But pointing at one possible mistake on my part and trying to say it constitutes something chronic on my part is amiss. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/12 05:34 AM |
| 2 | Hate monger identified by AVFM. And would you look at that, pictures that show her twitter account. It looks lonely, maybe we should say hi? ,:)Fair enough. But you are stretching it to imply I directly called you a feminist. I didn't. I wrote to provoke, as I often do, so I am not complaining that it pissed you off. I will also offer that this is the only MRA environment where I see MRAs and feminists use practically the same verbiage to raise the same objections. In this place, it all kinda runs together for me here. What I wrote was not with you specifically in mind. And the big picture here remains them, not me and you. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/12 08:21 PM |
| 2 | Hate monger identified by AVFM. And would you look at that, pictures that show her twitter account. It looks lonely, maybe we should say hi? ,:)Well, I was just responding honestly to the criticism that if people didn't tow the line, etc.etc., I understand by style is hard to take for some. It is a trade off. On one hand, my style pisses off some people I'd rather not piss off. On the other, my style has created probably the most successful website of its kind. I am provocative and obviously opinionated, and sure not going to write every line that will make everyone happy, but the dissent from any of it is not something I avoid or mind … | /r/MensRights | 09/12/12 08:15 PM |
| 1 | Hate monger identified by AVFM. And would you look at that, pictures that show her twitter account. It looks lonely, maybe we should say hi? ,:)There should be a link at the bottom that says "turn mobile off" Unfortunately it is the only way to get to the comments. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/12 06:50 PM |
| 1 | Hate monger identified by AVFM. And would you look at that, pictures that show her twitter account. It looks lonely, maybe we should say hi? ,:)I don't see a SRS or 4chan style attack happening to her from MRAs. Just don't see it at all. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/12 06:49 PM |
| 0 | Hate monger identified by AVFM. And would you look at that, pictures that show her twitter account. It looks lonely, maybe we should say hi? ,:)I hope the mods approve this, as I am shadowbanned, but I just have to call bullshit on this. Bullshit. Even on the thread to that article now, there is a serious and vocal dissenter to how it was done, who has made repeated posts to that effect, engaging both Dean and myself. He has been treated with respect by both of us all the way through and he remains a welcome voice on that site. There are many, many other examples of that on the site as well. There are times, of course, that like most an… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/12 06:47 PM |
| 6 | Hate monger identified by AVFM. And would you look at that, pictures that show her twitter account. It looks lonely, maybe we should say hi? ,:)Isn't that my freedom of speech? | /r/MensRights | 09/12/12 06:37 PM |
| 1 | On the shadow-banning of Paul Elam and Dean EsmayThanks for the heads up. I never did understand the ban. I know I got cautioned a few months ago about posting from my own blog. I actually exchanged messages with one of the admins after apologizing for it and all seemed well. I never posted another item from AVfM. So who knows. I know that I have a lot of people trying get me to shut up (and can't say I blame all of them, lol) but things continue to go well overall. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/12 05:07 PM |
| 0 | On the shadow-banning of Paul Elam and Dean EsmayYou must be young. I read Myth of Male Power when it was first released. I have been at this ever since. I have a great deal of respect for Dr. Farrell, but as much as I admire his work, he has not taken on the role of reaching out to the men of the Western World as a leader that connects to them, to their pain and their deep desire for justice. That is fine. He has chosen a different path. But understand this, Warren has been off the mark where it concerns the movement. In Myth of Male Power he… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/12 03:26 PM |
| -4 | On the shadow-banning of Paul Elam and Dean EsmayI see. Well, It is interesting. I appreciate your POV, but the fact is that I have managed to collect a very large team of volunteers who pour a lot of work into activism for AVfM. I don't maintain that by raging at people, and trust me, these are MRAs with spines. They tell me things I don't like all the time. I never rage or treat any of them with the slightest disrespect. And to tell you the truth, there is not a conversation I have had here that has raised my blood pressure one point. What y… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/12 03:15 PM |
| 1 | On the shadow-banning of Paul Elam and Dean EsmayWow, was told I was shadow banned. Go figure. Oh well, lol. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/12 03:03 PM |
| -1 | On the shadow-banning of Paul Elam and Dean EsmayI think there needs to be a splintering! I think that people who believe things should be done differently than the way I do it should roll up their sleeves and make it work a lot more than they have. Actually, I live for the day that that will happen. If feminists and mainstream politicians have a choice between a carrot and a stick, and they know they have to choose one of them, I imagine they will choose the carrot. That's a good thing. When the numbers of people brought in to the movement fr… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/12 03:02 PM |
| -12 | On the shadow-banning of Paul Elam and Dean EsmayI am shadow banned, so no one but you will see this. Feel free to repost and attribute if you like, but YOU and people like you never were our audience. If you don't support outing the identities of ideologues promoting hate and violence against men and boys, whoever and wherever they are, then you are just a clown that happened on to a news feed and ended up calling himself an MRA. Nothing more. We don't need you for an audience or for anything else. So fuck off you enabling, rescuing piece of … | /r/MensRights | 08/12/12 11:15 PM |
| -1 | To the University of Toronto Student UnionNow you are accusing me of strong arming you, all while telling me what to do and how to do it? LOL, fuck you. Bye. | /r/MensRights | 07/12/12 11:50 AM |
| 0 | To the University of Toronto Student UnionBecause I don't view it as surrendering higher ground. Truth tell, I think your approach is the one that lacks a moral compass. I don't mean that as a personal insult, but it is my perspective on it. And either way, it is far from accurate that I am "lowering to their level." For me to to that I would have to try to stifle their free speech, advocate for the better treatment of one sex over the other, promote ideology based on lies and hatred, etc., etc., I appreciate the congenial tone and arti… | /r/MensRights | 06/12/12 09:17 PM |
| -2 | To the University of Toronto Student UnionThank you for your kind words. I do not regard those here without the demeanor to do this work as unmanly. Just lacking a certain moral compass. If I were going after people for abusing any other group the way these bigots abuse men and boys, most of them would be cheering me on. I appreciate this place, and I think it helps. But it does lack for enough men and women who will treat bigotry and hatred against men and boys for precisely what it is with no compromise. It is as though a lot of peopl… | /r/MensRights | 06/12/12 02:53 PM |
| -2 | To the University of Toronto Student UnionYeah! Besides, what would SRS say!! | /r/MensRights | 06/12/12 02:25 PM |
| 1 | To the University of Toronto Student Union"Google it" hah That feminist in the UofT video said the same thing. So what? I asked you to search for dissent and critique of rape shield laws from legal scholars, including vast constitutional and due process concerns, which you would find in abundance, and you are reacting as though I sent you to "Brainy Quotes"? Fuck you, that is just straight up disingenuous. I'm trying to understand. Are you saying that, as it stands, you wouldn't vote guilty during a rape trial if you were on the jury? E… | /r/MensRights | 06/12/12 02:21 PM |
| 1 | To the University of Toronto Student UnionWell, I am glad to finally be speaking with someone that is doing some work. Thank you for that. However, I remain unconvinced. At this point, given the nature of your work and my position with AVfM, I don't think a public dialog about this is a very good idea. You are welcome to converse with me in private, if you wish, and I would welcome that, but it will not change the outcome of my actions. Nor would I expect my opinion to move you to alter your current course. There will be times when ther… | /r/MensRights | 06/12/12 01:27 PM |
| 0 | To the University of Toronto Student UnionThank you. | /r/MensRights | 06/12/12 03:56 AM |
| 1 | To the University of Toronto Student UnionThen you disagree with the need for guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in order to convict, which you cannot ascertain with rape shield laws in place. This is not just my opinion but that of many legal scholars. Google it. The hypothetical man in front of me on trial for his freedom does not have the luxury of waiting for laws to change. His freedom and his life are on the line at that time. If I don't believe that he is getting a fair trial, I have a moral obligation to acquit. That is speaking fo… | /r/MensRights | 06/12/12 03:54 AM |
| -4 | To the University of Toronto Student UnionPardon me for being lazy and just using a partial copy and paste, but I have to ask you the same question that I just asked another commenter. What are you personally doing to either bring light to the issues of the boy crisis or the virulent ideologues that oppose solutions? I work every day on both, so I think that earns me the right to ask who I am talking to. Are you an activist, or are you someone who argues with feminists? If you are an activist, if you have some organization or group that… | /r/MensRights | 06/12/12 03:20 AM |
| 1 | To the University of Toronto Student UnionNot sure if it will be a petition, but we will follow this up with activism directed directly at the U of T administration. | /r/MensRights | 06/12/12 03:14 AM |
| -2 | To the University of Toronto Student UnionExcuse me, but who, precisely is WE? What are you personally doing to either bring light to the issues of the boy crisis or the virulent ideologues that oppose solutions? I work every day on both, so I think that earns me the right to ask what you mean by "we." | /r/MensRights | 06/12/12 03:13 AM |
| 1 | To the University of Toronto Student UnionI note your opinions and disagree. Nothing left here to say. | /r/MensRights | 06/12/12 03:11 AM |
| -1 | To the University of Toronto Student UnionREAD the article. You won't be able to make intelligent points or address anything substantive till you READ the article. | /r/MensRights | 06/12/12 03:09 AM |
| 1 | To the University of Toronto Student UnionI will definitely pass this along to our contacts in Canada. Thanks. | /r/MensRights | 06/12/12 02:14 AM |
| 2 | To the University of Toronto Student UnionInterviewing Warren Farrell is NOT covering the violence being fostered at U of T. | /r/MensRights | 06/12/12 02:13 AM |
| 1 | To the University of Toronto Student UnionAnd it could be a violent rape scene by two consenting adults, put on videotape. That happens, you know. And with rape shield laws, I have no way of knowing that the "victim" does not have a history of acting out rape fantasies, because her sexual history is not admissible. | /r/MensRights | 06/12/12 02:10 AM |
| 0 | To the University of Toronto Student UnionYou either did not read, or you did not fully comprehend the article. Can't help you with that. | /r/MensRights | 06/12/12 02:07 AM |
| -2 | To the University of Toronto Student UnionNo offense, but don't let the door hit you in the ass. Outing hate mongers and violent ideologues is our main purpose. | /r/MensRights | 06/12/12 02:05 AM |
| 1 | To the University of Toronto Student UnionThe explanation is found in our mission statement and our results in the past. But I doubt it will do much to inform anyone whose primary concern is what SRS will say. She is not the first, and she won't be the last. | /r/MensRights | 06/12/12 02:03 AM |
| 4 | To the University of Toronto Student UnionIt is already in the process of happening, I am glad to say. And SRS does not have a cause any different than hers. FUCK SRS. | /r/MensRights | 05/12/12 10:32 PM |
| 0 | To the University of Toronto Student UnionI said I would practice jury nullification, and I would. Here are the reasons, for which I have never heard an effective counter argument. http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/government-tyranny/on-jury-nullification-and-rape/ | /r/MensRights | 05/12/12 10:31 PM |
| 1 | To the University of Toronto Student UnionWell, there are risks and rewards with every approach. My take on it is that the legitimacy of our cause can't suffer until the cause itself is in the public view. It still isn't, even after nearly 100 years of trying. I think it will take ALL approaches to make that happen. I will be very happy when the day comes that AVFM can change its tactics, but until there is a national level and ongoing debate about men's issues, right in the public spotlight, I don't see it happening. And I think you ha… | /r/MensRights | 05/12/12 10:28 PM |
| 5 | To the University of Toronto Student UnionYour opinion is noted. Fortunately, we are free to proceed with this as we see fit. But as a point to consider, your words: She will cherry pick comments from message boards on avoiceformen.com (which has already happened). You see, it is the "already happened" part that I am talking about. What we do has little to no impact on the bad conduct of violent ideologues. What we know, and have confirmed through experience, is that outing them shuts many of them up. We have seen it over and over again… | /r/MensRights | 05/12/12 08:27 PM |
| 3 | Introducing A Voice For BoysOutstanding! If AVfM can help you promote, let me know. You might consider a short article for us to publish on the site. Also, contact me about a banner for us to run for you. | /r/MensRights | 19/11/12 12:38 AM |
| 4 | Australia to launch anonymous false-accusation smart-phone appOh wow, gee, that was life changing. | /r/MensRights | 14/11/12 04:43 AM |
| 3 | Australia to launch anonymous false-accusation smart-phone appLOL, if someone told you that you could tell anyone here what to talk about, they lied to you. And the information they gather is going to be useless. We already have many people ready to abuse this app with garbage information every day, as soon as it launches. | /r/MensRights | 14/11/12 04:00 AM |
| 7 | Australia to launch anonymous false-accusation smart-phone appSure they can, but this is edgy and trendy and third wave feministas will find it fab and the rape hysteria movement will need funding for it. | /r/MensRights | 14/11/12 12:51 AM |
| 3 | From woman, to man, to red pillFair enough, but I see it a little differently. I am aware that wolf-whistling and such do happen a fair amount. I just never bought the emotional significance of it. I have never been one to do it because I think it is stupid, but I have always thought women should just get over it when it happens. Still, what this article addresses is much more important than that to me. I am not going to lose that for a single line I may not agree with. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/12 08:24 PM |
| 4 | To the nice feministsTrust me, I will somehow survive without your sympathy. Typing equality in all caps does not prove that it is the actual goal of feminism. Feminism is useless, largely because women, at least in this culture, have more rights and privilege than men. Check this page at AVfM. http://www.avoiceformen.com/mission-and-values/about/ These are all well documented realities of the discrimination and hardship faced by men and boys not in the upper one percentile that feminists obsess on and claim to be i… | /r/MensRights | 07/11/12 11:14 PM |
| -1 | To the nice feministsYes, and there have long been feminist writers that describe testosterone as a toxin that induces violence. Much more explicit than that. See Radfem hub and 10 percenters; those that want to reduce the male population on earth to between 1 an 10 percent. Add in VAWA, rape shield laws, Title IX, Dear Colleague, mandatory arrest and primary aggressor statutes. Patriarchy theory hinges entirely on asserting women's lack of agency and autonomy, casting women into the role of perpetual victim and men… | /r/MensRights | 07/11/12 07:11 PM |
| 1 | To the nice feministsGo to the site and do a search on "radfem hub underbelly of a hate movement." I can't link you here due to forum TOS, but that will answer some of your questions. | /r/MensRights | 07/11/12 07:04 PM |
| 3 | To the nice feministsLynching was not near the only degradation of humanity committed by the KKK. Saying that feminists have to literally lynch men for being men before they can otherwise be compared to the Klan is illogical. The thrust of the Klans ideology is separatism, group superiority, justified discrimination and targeted hatred. Much of mainstream feminism fits that to the T. The comparison is completely fair. If feminists don't like that sort of comparison, they should be a lot more active in self-policing … | /r/MensRights | 07/11/12 07:01 PM |
| 2 | To the nice feministsYour flavor of humanist feminism is not the one informing a collection of lawyers, social workers, educators, child care specialists, psychologists and other professionals to collaborate on a blog and cheer for plans to eugenically exterminate the male half of the human race. Because of forum rules I cannot directly link you to the source, but check that paragraph for the link and see if you think the claim is so retarded. | /r/MensRights | 07/11/12 06:54 PM |
| 1 | The Men's Rights ChallengeChallenge accepted. :) | /r/MensRights | 19/10/12 04:32 AM |
| 1 | As a woman, how can I respond to other females who tell me that I "just don't get it" when I disagree with their radical feminist stances?She would have complained to the world of her discomfort if he had asked her to coffee in the middle of a pasture. | /r/MensRights | 19/10/12 04:20 AM |
| 3 | As a woman, how can I respond to other females who tell me that I "just don't get it" when I disagree with their radical feminist stances?All the more reason he is struggling with the need to identify as alpha. If I were in a relationship that required me to surrender personal agency to my partner, I would likely want to imagine I was king walrus, too. :) | /r/MensRights | 18/10/12 07:20 PM |
| 9 | As a woman, how can I respond to other females who tell me that I "just don't get it" when I disagree with their radical feminist stances?I would suggest that your husband was not "pro-Watson" so much as he is, like most men in this culture, pro infantilization of women on some level. The net result of his irrational protection of a woman's "comfort" is that he robs them of agency and autonomy. It makes him the king walrus on the rocky shore; the powerful alpha that has, on an unconscious level, sexual access to all those he "protects." I am sure he would deny this vehemently, and insist that he is just trying to be a decent guy, … | /r/MensRights | 18/10/12 04:07 PM |
| 21 | As a woman, how can I respond to other females who tell me that I "just don't get it" when I disagree with their radical feminist stances?I would first erase the expression "as a woman" from your vocabulary. The idea that you must agree with them because you are female is a vulnerability in their position. Lots of women don't agree with radical feminism. I would argue that openly radical feminists are in fact a minority. I would replace the term "As a woman" with the term, "You just don't get it is NOT an argument." I would tell them they are right, that you don't get it, and you don't get it because they are not making a rational… | /r/MensRights | 18/10/12 08:25 AM |
| 1 | Princess Miserable and the Great American Bitch Machine | A Voice for MenThank you. The fun has only just begun. :) | /r/MensRights | 11/10/12 04:23 AM |
| 12 | Woman wins 10k for lying about rapeSays who? The propensity for society at large to believe a rape claim, without substantiation, is very much a men's issue. | /r/MensRights | 08/10/12 07:26 PM |
| 1 | Second motion to gag AVfM filed | A Voice for MenFirst, thank you for posting this. Also, "publicly available" is a relative term here. The law in West Virginia seals all family court proceedings, and keeps documents from being accessed through the court by media and other outside parties. However, the principals involved in this case all receive copies of court documents. There is no law that prevents them from transmitting those documents to whomever they want, unless there is a specific gag order on them. In this case, the video portion of … | /r/MensRights | 05/10/12 09:33 PM |
| 1 | Proposed gag order in Harrison family law case put on hold | West Virginia Record -- Kirk case entering mainstream mediaHe is a crossover. He was a Marine, where he got his flight training, then transferred to the USAF some years later. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/12 04:40 AM |
| 3 | Kirk recusal motion in West Virginia Supreme CourtNo, but it certainly doesn't hurt. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/12 05:48 AM |
| 5 | Kirk recusal motion in West Virginia Supreme CourtThe mechanism should be impeachment. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/12 05:16 AM |
| 0 | Embarrassed by public scrutiny, family court Judge Lori B. Jackson attempts to gag AVfMOf course it does. | /r/MensRights | 03/10/12 10:18 AM |
| 2 | Egalitarian State Rep Candidate in NH on Men's Rights (And Women's!)Indeed. :) | /r/MensRights | 03/10/12 12:01 AM |
| 3 | Egalitarian State Rep Candidate in NH on Men's Rights (And Women's!)This post is the ballsiest (and perhaps craziest) political move I have seen in a long time. Being a Democrat makes it even ballsier/crazier. If you get anywhere near election they will try to crucify you as a misogynist, and most of the dumbed-down voters will buy it. Dangerous ground you are walking, but I assume you know that. At any rate, your post was a breath of fresh air. I wish you luck in your efforts. | /r/MensRights | 02/10/12 11:40 PM |
| 0 | Embarrassed by public scrutiny, family court Judge Lori B. Jackson attempts to gag AVfMApparently, knocking the MRM is more important to you than a child's safety. | /r/MensRights | 02/10/12 07:36 PM |
| 0 | Embarrassed by public scrutiny, family court Judge Lori B. Jackson attempts to gag AVfMCool Thanks! | /r/MensRights | 02/10/12 07:34 PM |
| 0 | Embarrassed by public scrutiny, family court Judge Lori B. Jackson attempts to gag AVfMYou can get an embed code from the version on change.org, but I could not get it to work properly in my custom wordpress them. You may gave better luck. | /r/MensRights | 02/10/12 06:52 PM |
| 4 | Embarrassed by public scrutiny, family court Judge Lori B. Jackson attempts to gag AVfMWe are doing things. Unfortunately I cannot go into any detail online about it. Thank you for asking. | /r/MensRights | 02/10/12 06:51 PM |
| 2 | Embarrassed by public scrutiny, family court Judge Lori B. Jackson attempts to gag AVfMSmall readership is better than no readership. We appreciate the help. | /r/MensRights | 02/10/12 05:07 PM |
| 3 | Embarrassed by public scrutiny, family court Judge Lori B. Jackson attempts to gag AVfMRight now AVfM has two attorneys working on this case. That will cost substantially, and add to the thousands we have already spent on legal fees for incorporation and other services. In addition we run dedicated servers, a blog talk radio show, pay heartily for image royalties for the site, and have other operational costs. Most of this is posted to the AVfM site in several places, and all of it has never left me anything but working 12-14 hour days and trying to keep my nostrils above the wate… | /r/MensRights | 02/10/12 05:04 PM |
| 3 | Embarrassed by public scrutiny, family court Judge Lori B. Jackson attempts to gag AVfMWith respect, did you even study the facts of the story? If you want to give the children "the chance to overcome the abuse" then removing them from where the abuse is currently happening should be the first matter of concern. | /r/MensRights | 02/10/12 04:50 PM |
| 2 | Embarrassed by public scrutiny, family court Judge Lori B. Jackson attempts to gag AVfMOne of the best things you can do is sign the petition at the bottom of the OP and pass it around to as many people as possible, facebook and other social network sites. Also, if you have a blog, repost the article and help distribute this video, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZG9VFomUkk&list=UU255AfKquZnQMO0amxdEGWw&index=2&feature=plcp This petition, were this case happening to a woman whose husband was the abuser, would have tens of thousands of signatures by now, maybe hundreds of thousands… | /r/MensRights | 02/10/12 04:47 PM |
| 43 | Embarrassed by public scrutiny, family court Judge Lori B. Jackson attempts to gag AVfMOur attorneys are already on this. | /r/MensRights | 02/10/12 03:19 AM |
| 1 | Princess Miserable and the Great American Bitch Machine | A Voice for MenYoung men and women of all ages. And that is what we are doing. :) | /r/MensRights | 01/10/12 07:26 AM |
| 1 | Princess Miserable and the Great American Bitch Machine | A Voice for Menhttp://www.avoiceformen.com/mission-and-values/ | /r/MensRights | 30/09/12 10:41 PM |
| 1 | Princess Miserable and the Great American Bitch Machine | A Voice for MenNot lazy. Trust me, I am anything but lazy. It is just a product of answering the same questions, from the same kinds of people, over and over. You don't get lazy, you just quit putting much effort into it so you can save the juice for more productive things. | /r/MensRights | 30/09/12 10:48 AM |
| 1 | Princess Miserable and the Great American Bitch Machine | A Voice for MenI wrote the piece. And what you are saying is nothing new. Going in the wrong direction, fodder for detractors. I am sorry to tell you this, but marketing and promoting is not your forte. AVfM is the most successful website of its kind, ever. We are in growth mode and it is because of this kind of writing. I have been at men's activism for 25 years. I might have learned a few things you are not aware of. Thanks for the feedback. | /r/MensRights | 30/09/12 09:42 AM |
| 1 | Princess Miserable and the Great American Bitch Machine | A Voice for MenActually, what I said, if you had any form of reading comprehension, is that is it silly for WRAs, and MRAs to keep blaming one another, Oh, wow, I just caught the post below. That was not what you said. It is what you edited in after I posted to your comment. I knew I remembered FRA being there when I responded. So you changed it then accused me of lacking reading comprehension. Trust me, you're a feminist, alright. MRA? Not like the ones I know. Sleazy. | /r/MensRights | 30/09/12 08:59 AM |
| 1 | Princess Miserable and the Great American Bitch Machine | A Voice for MenWell, obviously when I pen something my intent is for it to resonate for the reasons I am writing about. That being said, I can't account or be responsible for why some imbalanced person (a true misogynist, for example) might twist things around in his head to serve his hatred (which he is going to do regardless of what I write). Yes, sexual politics (I refuse to use misnomers like "gender focused") attracts people that are angry. All activism does. People are angry about racial prejudice, pollu… | /r/MensRights | 30/09/12 08:49 AM |
| 1 | Paul ElamI am not annoyed or insulted, but this is really another in what I assure you is an endless stream of people suggesting what I "ought to do." I take that in stride. It comes with the territory. But just so you know, I have a very open policy about contributions and ideas to the site. My one insistence is that if people feel strongly about AVfM doing something, and I think it would benefit AVfM, they are welcome to sign on and do the work making it happen. I have plenty going on in the areas most… | /r/MensRights | 30/09/12 08:30 AM |
| 1 | Princess Miserable and the Great American Bitch Machine | A Voice for MenWell, I do care. I care a lot about the growth of AVfM and that means caring about the perspective of the uninitiated. And since AVfM has grown radically in two years, then my material (that article got MASSIVE traffic) must be resonating with a lot of men who read it. The site itself is literally packed with solid statistics on many relevant matters. This was clearly an opinion piece, which means it does not need research (just FYI). It only matters whether the average guy reading it has it str… | /r/MensRights | 30/09/12 08:26 AM |
| 0 | Princess Miserable and the Great American Bitch Machine | A Voice for MenDo you know that the "A" stands for? You said: Well I consider myself a mra and a feminist Who needs reading comp when you have copy and paste, eh? :) Anyway, after wading through your circuitous semantic quicksand I get the point now. You are here expressing unqualified opinions on matters of sexual politics because when all is said and done, you don't have a real investment in the subject, don't read a lot and don't know much. But you can judge things like "not seeing things from the other gen… | /r/MensRights | 30/09/12 08:18 AM |
| 0 | Princess Miserable and the Great American Bitch Machine | A Voice for MenI hate to point to the elephant in the room, but I just did hear from you. This exchange started with your post about how silly MRAs are, followed by your saying that you actually are an MRA....and a feminist, and then saying you don't care enough about the issues to write about them. Maybe not hearing from people like you isn't such a bad thing? Writing cogent ideas does require at least some ability to start at point A and get to point B. Cheers. | /r/MensRights | 30/09/12 07:21 AM |
| 7 | Paul ElamThank you for your interest. AVfM is a Texas based LLC. It is not a journalistic endeavor, per se, though we do have an informal news department. We have a loosely associated group of editors that operate independently and also chip in as needed for site management. We do not have a board of directors. I run it as my own intellectual property. The ostensible objective is for AVfM to utilize the power of the internet to publicly expose and undermine agents of misandry and injustice toward men and… | /r/MensRights | 30/09/12 07:09 AM |
| 3 | Princess Miserable and the Great American Bitch Machine | A Voice for MenNice to meet you. I look forward to your like minded fellows writing articles on feminist websites. :) | /r/MensRights | 29/09/12 11:10 PM |
| 1 | Princess Miserable and the Great American Bitch Machine | A Voice for MenIt is worth considering, yes, but I don't think it is worth much of a factor weigh in this situation. I don't think it is self-fulfilling that I notice that immaturity is enabled in women and shunned in men. I think it is pretty objective. | /r/MensRights | 29/09/12 11:08 PM |
| 2 | Princess Miserable and the Great American Bitch Machine | A Voice for MenThanks for speaking up about that. You are the first one I have heard of. | /r/MensRights | 29/09/12 11:06 PM |
| 3 | Princess Miserable and the Great American Bitch Machine | A Voice for MenOh, and as to MRAs not seeing things from the other side of the fence, most of them I know, including myself, have identified at one time or another, as a feminist. I have never met a feminist that used to be an MRA. Just saying. | /r/MensRights | 29/09/12 07:01 PM |
| 2 | Princess Miserable and the Great American Bitch Machine | A Voice for MenI am not so sure. I agree that the personality traits, or at least the potential for them, may be of roughly equal proportion, but I actually see more of it in women than I do in men. It makes sense to me that I would see more behavior that was socially enabled than behavior that was socially condemned. Which is to say that the problem is not women, per say, but the social norms that enable their immaturity. | /r/MensRights | 29/09/12 01:35 PM |
| 3 | Princess Miserable and the Great American Bitch Machine | A Voice for MenYou missed his point (of course). His intent was obviously not to just say "a woman." He was inferring, "women," meaning collectively. And you can't handle it, just like the rest of the SRS trolls. In a culture where we can say shit like "men can stop rape," while pointing directly at the entire male sex, it stands to reason that women can be collectively held to account as well. It's called equality. Learn to live with it, or continue to infantilize women, a form of sexism against them as sure … | /r/MensRights | 29/09/12 12:58 PM |
| 3 | MRM blueprint for bridge buildingAhh, I see. I had not made the connection. Thanks. | /r/MensRights | 28/09/12 02:43 PM |
| 8 | MRM blueprint for bridge buildingMaybe the moderators got tired of your bullshit questions, too. Who knows? All I know is that I don't owe you an explanation for anything I do. I don't owe you an answer to loaded questions and I don't need to defend my personality or my ego to the likes of you. Now, asshole, that is the last thing I have to say to you. Go find a life, or something to do that makes you more meaningful than this. Failing that, go fuck yourself. | /r/MensRights | 28/09/12 01:53 AM |
| 2 | MRM blueprint for bridge buildingWhatever. | /r/MensRights | 28/09/12 01:25 AM |
| 2 | MRM blueprint for bridge buildingI am so put in my place. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/12 08:23 AM |
| 3 | MRM blueprint for bridge buildingI will speak what I want to as I please. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/12 05:58 AM |
| 0 | AVfM launches forum for activistsI just checked. The forum is still there. And I can provide a referral for the coprophilia thing if you are open to getting help. | /r/MensRights | 25/09/12 10:52 PM |
| 2 | MRM blueprint for bridge buildingI like your points, but it also strikes me as a lot of hair splitting. As to the following: Provide comfort, sanity and confirmation of experience to men facing a male-hostile world; Agitate for the political, social and personal rights of men. Precisely what we do. And the fact that the word equality finds its way into the rhetoric from time to time does not change that. No, I am not naive about the power of language, but I am not buying that the MRM is at any risk of being co-opted because a f… | /r/MensRights | 25/09/12 10:47 PM |
| 1 | AVfM launches forum for activistsHere's a Kleenex. You can wipe your tears away, and clean the spittle from your keyboard. Save some for when you are done masturbating. If anyone told you I took marching orders from Warren Farrell, they lied to you. FTSU!! | /r/MensRights | 25/09/12 10:20 PM |
| 3 | MRM blueprint for bridge buildingYou may well be right, but there is a lot more benefit to men in the mrm than is found in social or legal change. The main value of the MRM, in my opinion, is to free men from the traps of their own minds. That opens up a world of possibilities for any man with a mind to take it all in. | /r/MensRights | 25/09/12 10:15 PM |
| 3 | MRM blueprint for bridge buildingSo much for counting on the masses. What's a brother to do but carry on. I suppose your point, which I could not agree with more, explains why movement are actually accomplished by a small percentage of the population. The masses seldom have much to do with it. | /r/MensRights | 25/09/12 10:13 PM |
| 3 | MRM blueprint for bridge buildingIn principle, I like your solution better than my own. In terms of viability, I have to stay on the path I am on. | /r/MensRights | 25/09/12 08:52 PM |
| 2 | MRM blueprint for bridge buildingIndeed, society will never be perfect, which is of course why we have had activists for such a wide range of causes. So what is your alternative? What is your different direction? | /r/MensRights | 25/09/12 06:34 PM |
| 2 | MRM blueprint for bridge buildingThese are all valid points, but I think you are missing the main thrust of what I am actually trying to accomplish. I 100% agree that equality, real equality, is a fools goal. It will never exist between the sexes, because it can't. We are not equal. But as a vehicle for pursuing changes in thinking and in some of the more overt forms of discrimination, it is an essential value. Mainly because people are able to wrap their heads around a concept like "equality" and apply it functionally (and I a… | /r/MensRights | 25/09/12 06:17 PM |
| 1 | MRM blueprint for bridge buildingIt would have to gain considerable real estate, for men, before that would become an issue. Not that I am buying this model. Feminism has the goal of equality. It has been swallowed up by nothing and almost all the advantages that feminism acquires, benefits women. Whether it joins an imagined choir at that point is incidental. | /r/MensRights | 25/09/12 07:47 AM |
| 3 | I would like to start a local group for MensRightsActivismThis is not going to officially launch till tomorrow, but you are welcome to anonymously register now. We will be providing locked areas for MRAs to plan activism http://forums.avoiceformen.com/index.php | /r/MensRights | 25/09/12 07:32 AM |
| 1 | MRM blueprint for bridge buildingSo are you saying this is the inevitable end to any inclusive movement? If so, please provide support. | /r/MensRights | 25/09/12 01:03 AM |
| -1 | MRM blueprint for bridge buildingThanks for jumping the shark with no real prompting. | /r/MensRights | 24/09/12 10:16 PM |
| 2 | MRM blueprint for bridge buildingNo, that is not what you said at all. You said we had sacrificed action, not truth. I think if you look the two words up you will find they have vastly different meanings. Do I need to copy paste, or can you just read your own post? But let's say I give you a pass on changing what you said. You won't really deal with it so I might as well. So, tell me, what "truth" has AVfM sacrificed in order to attract more followers and get more money in donations? Try to measure your words this time. Think a… | /r/MensRights | 24/09/12 08:04 PM |
| 3 | MRM blueprint for bridge buildingThat may be the most glaring non sequitur I have seen in a long time. How exactly does one "sacrifice" action for diversity? Please give me the precise mechanics for the exchange, because it sounds like what you are saying is that with diversity, comes inaction. And, on the other end, that division produces results. Is this what you are saying? | /r/MensRights | 24/09/12 07:51 PM |
| 3 | New info on the Vancouver AVFM debate postponement: It wasn't feminists after all.And best wishes to you as well. | /r/MensRights | 23/09/12 10:49 PM |
| -1 | The New NiggerSorry, I misunderstood what you meant. I did not imagine anything so stupid. | /r/MensRights | 23/09/12 10:39 PM |
| 1 | The New NiggerIt is OK because it is her opinion. Last I checked, the willingness to speak was all she needed. | /r/MensRights | 23/09/12 09:20 PM |
| 1 | New info on the Vancouver AVFM debate postponement: It wasn't feminists after all.If you think that is a Clintonism, that is your prerogative. A tad hyperbolic, but par for the course. I am blaming feminists in that statement, 100%. They have been destroying property, making threats against people for trying to schedule a simple debate and used corrupt media hacks to distort our message. A good bit of that revolves around the post in question. I could have said something much stronger than I did and it would be justified. "I dunno Paul" is right. If you can't see the validity… | /r/MensRights | 23/09/12 09:18 AM |
| 1 | New info on the Vancouver AVFM debate postponement: It wasn't feminists after all.Please go back to that article and point out to me any assumptions I made. I think if you do a review you will find that between you and I, it was not me who made assumptions. | /r/MensRights | 23/09/12 07:53 AM |
| 5 | New info on the Vancouver AVFM debate postponement: It wasn't feminists after all.Hi Rod, I am about to go in and post an update with the new information. I would not call it a mistake or a correction. I reported what I knew at the time, and everything I reported still remains true. But the new information now provides a solid reason to believe that there were forces other than ideologues at the root of this situation, and that certainly does need to be presented on the pages of AVfM. | /r/MensRights | 23/09/12 07:31 AM |
| 1 | New info on the Vancouver AVFM debate postponement: It wasn't feminists after all.I respectfully disagree. I reported the information I was aware of as it happened. I did not draw any conclusions or point fingers. But I do not think it was out of the bounds of reason to wonder what influences were actually behind this considering what happened in the first debate, and the fact that the second attempt to schedule it had been advertised with the business name in several places. I still wonder what the whole story is, as I am not willing to think that the same people tearing dow… | /r/MensRights | 23/09/12 06:46 AM |
| 1 | Kanamara MatsuriThat is why I did not even bother with the comment. Anything that starts with "I glanced through.." isn't even worth a response. | /r/MensRights | 21/09/12 07:37 PM |
| 3 | Kanamara MatsuriShould not have to be NSFW, but..... | /r/MensRights | 20/09/12 11:32 PM |
| 3 | Former SPLC fundraiser raises questionsnot really. I know for a fact he read this letter, which was my first response to their hit pieces on AVfM and similar sites. i think you will find it is welcoming, sincere, and while I disagreed with their writings, it was not hostile. http://www.avoiceformen.com/a-voice-for-men/an-open-letter-to-richard-cohen-of-the-splc/ They responded with more lies as quickly as they could manufacture them. These are not honest people that will respond to truth or any sincere attempt at dialogue. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/12 04:05 AM |
| 1 | The dishonor of Judge Lori B. JacksonThank you! | /r/MensRights | 16/09/12 12:31 AM |
| 1 | The dishonor of Judge Lori B. JacksonThen don't. Dr. Palmatier wrote a lengthy and clinical piece if that suits your taste, but this one started with "Dear men and women in the men's movement" Does that sound like it is being disguised as straight journalism? | /r/MensRights | 16/09/12 12:30 AM |
| 5 | Derek Bedry confirms he did not tear down postersI also note that both men in the video were named Derek. Not sure what it means, just saying. | /r/MensRights | 15/09/12 07:42 PM |
| 9 | The dishonor of Judge Lori B. JacksonBingo. It's trolling. That's all. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/12 08:48 PM |
| 13 | The dishonor of Judge Lori B. JacksonA request for those who frequent here. Please consider joining in the activism by writing to the media contacts and making friendly but firm contact with the office of Judge Jackson. Also, if there are any activists from that area who would like to help us with some work on the ground (we have one other volunteer) please contact me through the site. Thank you. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/12 08:40 PM |
| 2 | Child abuse from the benchThank you for saying that. I hope we can make a difference, as well. It is a very rough road, even as compelling as the facts are in this case. Very soon I will be posting a call to action regarding this horrific case. I hope that all activists will join us in demanding justice on behalf of Lt. Colonel Kirk and his children. I hope, that despite whatever differences anyone here has had with me personally, they will join that effort for the sake of the real victims of this sad story. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/12 10:52 PM |
| 9 | Child abuse from the benchThank you! | /r/MensRights | 13/09/12 03:28 AM |
| 8 | Child abuse from the benchThey will be, along with much more. | /r/MensRights | 12/09/12 10:02 PM |
| -8 | Herald Sun interviews Paul ElamWhat makes you think you pissed me off, much less did anything at all because of an interaction with a non activist? | /r/MensRights | 29/08/12 04:53 PM |
| -15 | Herald Sun interviews Paul ElamAnd if you cared about this movement, you'd be an, ah, activist. You aren't part of any movement, so your opinion is jack shit. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/12 11:30 PM |
| 1 | Announcing r/mensrightsactivistsYeah, I put you guys up in the side bar when I started, as you seem to have passed 100 a good while back. :) | /r/MensRights | 27/08/12 08:05 PM |
| 2 | Announcing r/mensrightsactivistsI don't worry about that. It's easier to take problems as the actually happen. And whatever does happen, there is a solutiuon at the ready. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/12 08:04 PM |
| 1 | Announcing r/mensrightsactivistsThank you. Will do. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/12 07:59 PM |
| 1 | Announcing r/mensrightsactivistsThat is nice to know. Thank you. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/12 07:58 PM |
| 0 | Announcing r/mensrightsactivistsThe mods are free to do as they wish at any time. | /r/MensRights | 26/08/12 11:10 PM |
| -1 | Announcing r/mensrightsactivistsWell, that should not be an issue as posting is open to the public. I am hoping for a 20:1 ratio. | /r/MensRights | 26/08/12 10:05 PM |
| -4 | Herald Sun interviews Paul ElamWell, I am thinking that the headline will draw a lot more fire than the movie remark. | /r/MensRights | 24/08/12 04:06 PM |
| -55 | Domestic Violence: women are half the problemSo why is this large amount of egalitarian MRAs not organized into a prominant alternative to AVfM? If you want something different than what I do, why aren't you doing it and pulling like minded MRA's to your side? And more directly, who the fuck is the "our" part of "our PR?" I enjoy a lot of support at AVfM for what I do. I am leveling with you here. I have no idea who you are talking about when you speak of this other part of the movement that you think is being damged. Just point me at them… | /r/MensRights | 24/08/12 03:48 PM |
| -24 | Herald Sun interviews Paul ElamChoose your words carefully and don't act like a belligerent ass so normal people aren't scared off because they think you're saying horrible shit. That's all. That's it? That's your plan? No, asshole, I will tell you what your plan is. Your plan is keep your head down, protect your job and don't offend anyone while you mentally masturbate yourself into thinking you're an activist. You're not. You're just a coward that comments in a headline aggregate site under an assumed name because you don't… | /r/MensRights | 24/08/12 03:41 PM |
| -6 | Herald Sun interviews Paul ElamI am prioritizing page views above a lot because that is the correct strategy for this point in time with the resources we have. The website itself has a huge library of some very fine articles from a wide range of writers that can serve to educate any visitor willing to learn anything. But if you think that walking into a setup with a rag like the Herald Sun (it is regarded as a low end tabloid) will actually help educate people, then I don't know what to tell you except that I see it much diff… | /r/MensRights | 24/08/12 03:23 PM |
| -5 | Herald Sun interviews Paul ElamI know what your kind wants. You want silence, while innocent men waste away in prison, while they have their children and everything else taken from them, while children suffer at the hands of abusive mothers because we won't recognize their violence on them, and on the men in their lives. The idea of saying nothing, doing nothing in the face of all this outrageous injustice is just what you want because you are a loathesome piece of feminist shit. Fuck you and anyone like you who doesn't have … | /r/MensRights | 24/08/12 01:02 PM |
| -11 | Herald Sun interviews Paul ElamOh yes, you are quite the expert. Which explains your role on the sidelines fitting so well with your experience. The "kid" that posted those posters is in his forties was with Greenpeace for a number of years. He also knows a little about activism as well. And the assumption of asinine phrasing would make sense, except it does not fit the facts. Volumes of research point to sexual symmetry in IPV, which is the point. But perhaps we could have come up with a watered down lie or two that a real P… | /r/MensRights | 24/08/12 11:52 AM |
| -7 | Herald Sun interviews Paul ElamActually I discerned it the moment I saw the publication the request came from, so I am either super extra psychic, or I know the media much better than you. It does not take Jean Dixon to figure which one is which. And here is an example of an interview where it served my purpose to be a lot more accomodating. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tol4MGSpyz8&playnext=1&list=PL041A9669D1337875&feature=results_main The problem with armchair quarterbacks like you, other than being armchair quarterbacks,… | /r/MensRights | 24/08/12 10:54 AM |
| -4 | Herald Sun interviews Paul ElamWell, I don't understand why there are still MRAs that want to play ball with members of the media that have no intention of listening to anything, and are ONLY there for a hit job. So I suppose that we can each do our own interviews our own way. | /r/MensRights | 24/08/12 08:18 AM |
| -242 | Domestic Violence: women are half the problemWould you like a Kleenex to go with your feelings? | /r/MensRights | 24/08/12 12:36 AM |
| -91 | Domestic Violence: women are half the problemAnd I am disappointed that you question my motives, call what I do nonsense and refer to it as "obnoxious, pointless, farcical, time-wasting crap," but then turn around and claim it was a "relatively minor tactical disagreement." Oh well, it seems we both have our disappointments. | /r/MensRights | 24/08/12 12:35 AM |
| -112 | Domestic Violence: women are half the problemI don't know who you are or who asked you to write a piece for AVfM, but I will take you at your word that someone did. That being said, your comment exactly reflects why AVfM is in the news, and forcing the details of more balanced dialogue to actually come out, and people like you are not. We are not through with the posters. And yes, they are intentionally provocative. I would try to explain the necessity of that to you, but it would be a waste of time. I am just as happy as a pig in mud righ… | /r/MensRights | 24/08/12 12:15 AM |
| 1 | Lies, damned lies, and rape statisticsFair enough. Here are some easily accessible sources http://www.avoiceformen.com/video/wage-gap-debunked/ http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505125_162-28246928/the-gender-pay-gap-is-a-complete-myth/ | /r/MensRights | 23/08/12 09:25 PM |
| 1 | Lies, damned lies, and rape statisticsYou might consider posting your analysis to AVfM, where the author will see it. | /r/MensRights | 23/08/12 09:09 PM |
| -1 | Lies, damned lies, and rape statisticsWhat do you think he brushed off? Those are factors that affect income. | /r/MensRights | 23/08/12 09:08 PM |
| -1 | On studs and slutsFuck off. | /r/MensRights | 20/08/12 08:00 PM |
| -1 | On studs and slutsMan, if you can't stand the idea of someone expressing views on men and women collectively, then where on earth could you read anything to do with gender politics? Just askin. | /r/MensRights | 20/08/12 06:29 PM |
| -1 | On studs and slutsYou have claimed much and supported nothing here. I never said men were the "victims" here. I said that slut shaming, which is clearly directed at women, is a product of seeing men as dirty in the first place. Misandry is real in our culture. And your suggestion here appears to be that we can't talk about it without playing victim. I think that dies by its own failed logic. Also, I don't try to destroy the notion that women can be discriminated against. I actually look for how they actually are,… | /r/MensRights | 20/08/12 06:25 PM |
| -1 | On studs and slutsJust curious as to why you did not substantiate anything you claimed. :) | /r/MensRights | 20/08/12 06:17 PM |
| 3 | Censorship and stupidity from "free-thinking" feministsYou must have just forgot to point out where. :) | /r/MensRights | 19/08/12 01:42 AM |
| 0 | Steal this blog!It surely gives those groups a warm fuzzy feeling, and leads them to see the Men's Rights movements as their ideological property. LMAO here. That is just too funny for words. I'd love to stay here and follow you around in circles, but I am busy dealing with cultural Marxism. | /r/MensRights | 17/08/12 04:39 PM |
| 0 | Steal this blog!That is a pretty bad case of splitting hairs, but if you insist allow me to follow suit. Note from your source: From its beginning, the promoters of cultural Marxism have known they could be more effective if they concealed the Marxist nature of their work, hence the use of terms such as “multiculturalism. Bold emphasis mine. I could yield and say, well, then we are in semantic quicksand. But I don't care who you are, you can't identify an ideology and then say it only exists in the minds of sec… | /r/MensRights | 17/08/12 02:26 PM |
| 1 | Steal this blog!I respectfully disagree. While there may be many Jews in the entertainment and banking industries, the vast, vast majority of Jews are not bankers or entertainers. The same analogy does not apply to academicians, the vast, vast majority of which are philosophically dominated by political correctness and other aspects of cultural Marxism. And to support it further, the ideology cuts across racial, religious and sexual lines. It is indeed so ideologically dominant in academe that student and facul… | /r/MensRights | 17/08/12 01:44 PM |
| 0 | Steal this blog!I am getting from this post that you don't have a place to point me to directly for the insinuation you made. I know what cultural Marxism is. And while the cloak and dagger stuff you tried to pin on St. Estephe is stuff I shrug off as unreal, there is no denying the fact that political correctness is a powerful weapon of social control, steeped in Marxist ideology and it has filtered its way into the collective consciousness, much of that coming out of academe. I don't think that is so much a t… | /r/MensRights | 17/08/12 12:32 PM |
| 0 | Steal this blog!The idea that a bunch of ex-marxist postmodernists in the first part of the 20th century weren't really ex-marxists at all, but undercover agents with a nefarious plan to undermine the Western Spirit, is certifiably crazy. Can you point me to the part of his blog that says that? | /r/MensRights | 17/08/12 11:58 AM |
| 1 | Cowards and copyright claimsThis just in from GWW UPDATE: it appears that the pathetic cowards who perjured themselves filing these maliciously false copyright infringement claims have chickened out, and retracted their claims. My account is back in good standing, with zero copyright strikes, and the videos in question are back up for the illumination of the viewing public. | /r/MensRights | 15/08/12 10:17 PM |
| 0 | Responding to the Virgin Airlines misandryBlow it out your ass. And quit trying to co-opt this issue. If you want to have a campaign to normalize pedophilia, by all means, and lots of luck. But if you think you are going to get traction with men who are sick of being regarded as potential child abusers, you have more issues than wanting to diddle kiddies. | /r/MensRights | 15/08/12 08:38 PM |
| -8 | Leaving the sisterhood: A recovering feminist speaksGood point, and the fact is that I am not much interested in conversation with morons, adult or otherwise. | /r/MensRights | 15/08/12 02:30 AM |
| -6 | Leaving the sisterhood: A recovering feminist speaksOK moron, lets try it your way. Do you even understand that women sizing up men financially is objectifying, and that I was using that as an analogy; that is was not something I presented as a quote from you? Let's see if you are not too stupid to understand that out of the gate, because if you are, then it will be even more obvious that I was not derailing, but simply pointing to the obvious. That being that you are not bright enough to engage in a meaningful debate (which was actually clear wi… | /r/MensRights | 15/08/12 12:13 AM |
| -4 | Leaving the sisterhood: A recovering feminist speaksIt's ANALOGOUS for Christ's sake. Sorry, but I don't waste my time on stupid. | /r/MensRights | 14/08/12 11:27 PM |
| 9 | Leaving the sisterhood: A recovering feminist speaksWhat a pointless bit of condescension this is. Do you think when women "stare" at a man's car, wallet, job and social status that they are not objectifying? Does it make her creepy to follow those instincts? No. It's, ah, instinctive. Not only is what you are saying condescending, it also speaks to a desire for control in a way that just won't wash. Being looked at may be uncomfortable for some women, just as being economically sized up by women may be uncomfortable for some men, but to toss aro… | /r/MensRights | 14/08/12 08:39 AM |
| 8 | Leaving the sisterhood: A recovering feminist speaksAgreed. | /r/MensRights | 14/08/12 03:26 AM |
| 1 | It's hard to be a trailblazing womanAyup, generally at the top, leadership is shitty, and genderless. But as to going making the top, the biggest part of the problem is that women aren't going for it. If you don't choose to reach for the top, you don't get there. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/12 05:33 PM |
| -5 | Poor, invisible, oppressed womenOk, let me make this even simpler. It is a direct quotation which you were too ignorant to understand, and you proved it by calling the article misogynistic and trash. Where is your evidence of misogyny in here? And what does this have to do with pro-father writers elsewhere? Where indeed is any evidence you have to contradict the well sourced information in the article? Are you saying that there is not a correlation between single mothering and criminality, truancy, drug use, alcoholism, early … | /r/MensRights | 10/08/12 08:27 PM |
| -7 | Poor, invisible, oppressed womenMoron. That is not what he was saying. The only trash is in your hateful mind. | /r/MensRights | 10/08/12 01:18 AM |
| -4 | Activism coordinator neededNo, but I will make sure you have a really nice cellmate named Buck. | /r/MensRights | 10/08/12 12:56 AM |
| 1 | Activism coordinator neededGreat. Just send me your real name and address and we will get started. | /r/MensRights | 10/08/12 12:51 AM |
| -4 | Feminists on the attack in VancouverVery kind words and I am most appreciative. Also, I look forward to the day that the issues have gained enough attention that it won't take inflammatory titles and rhetoric to have people pay attention. Fortunately, I have had the feeling lately that the day is coming pretty soon. :) | /r/MensRights | 09/08/12 10:00 AM |
| 1 | Feminists on the attack in VancouverI am deeply moved. | /r/MensRights | 09/08/12 04:59 AM |
| 1 | Feminists on the attack in VancouverOK, you are not doing what you are doing. Got it. | /r/MensRights | 09/08/12 04:22 AM |
| 2 | Feminists on the attack in VancouverAbsolute fucking nonsense. Tell me, who is supposed to be the arbiter of how "we" are perceived, and by whom? You? Suicidebanana? Manboobz? Fact is, you have absolutely no answer to that because there isn't one that makes a lick of sense. I'm a blogger and an activist. I write opinion pieces and I interpret events through my own lens. And here you are suggesting that I should alter what I do because of how other people might perceive you? Fucking incredible. If what AVfM does bothers you, then b… | /r/MensRights | 09/08/12 03:46 AM |
| 0 | Feminists on the attack in VancouverJust who is "us"? | /r/MensRights | 09/08/12 02:29 AM |
| 16 | Feminists on the attack in VancouverHard-line traditionalist women would not be out there doing it. Their white knights would. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/12 11:14 PM |
| -2 | Feminists on the attack in VancouverAnd you are a thoughtless clone, whether you like it or not. Done here. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/12 11:08 PM |
| 7 | Feminists on the attack in VancouverOh for fuck sake, we didn't photograph their vaginas either. Do you want proof they were women? They were feminists. Deal with it. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/12 10:51 PM |
| 8 | Feminists on the attack in Vancouvernp, and if you want to see much better images, they can be downloaded here http://www.avoiceformen.com/activism-page/manuel-dexter/' | /r/MensRights | 08/08/12 10:49 PM |
| 5 | Feminists on the attack in VancouverOne of the things I love about the concept of zeta masculinity is that it allows me to condescend to anyone, especially idiotic strangers, who stupidly imagine they can tell me who I am. I post comments at several sites. That does not mean I am a New York Timer, a Boston Glober, a Cracked'er, or even A Voice for Mener. I have a suggestion. If you self identify based on participation in a headline aggregate website, then you might try to find something meaningful to do with your life. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/12 10:42 PM |
| 0 | Feminists on the attack in VancouverAnd in that I have no problem with your opinion. If suicidebanana is a part of your "we" then by all means... | /r/MensRights | 08/08/12 10:22 PM |
| 7 | Feminists on the attack in VancouverI'm a men's rights activist. Posting on reddit is something I do. It is not my identity. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/12 09:48 PM |
| 8 | Feminists on the attack in VancouverI don't care how I come off to you. All I care about is that the act of putting up these posters is spreading, and rapidly. I will leave it to morons to wonder if the people objecting are feminists or Mormons. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/12 09:47 PM |
| 10 | Feminists on the attack in VancouverI identify myself as "A" voice for men, not "The" voice for men. So it is nothing more than my opinion when I say you are not a "we" part of the MRM. And you are not. You're just a troll trying to stir up shit, not realizing you already have it all over your face. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/12 09:30 PM |
| 11 | Feminists on the attack in VancouverThey are in the video, and there are more here http://www.avoiceformen.com/misandry/mens-rights-are-not-human-rights-apparently/ | /r/MensRights | 08/08/12 09:10 PM |
| 4 | Feminists on the attack in VancouverWhy do you think the word "we" applies to anything you say? | /r/MensRights | 08/08/12 09:08 PM |
| -2 | Why women’s shelters are hotbeds of misandry - Dr. Gerhard AmendtYou didn't even understand the point. I would not go around calling people fucking idiots, given your intellect. Just saying. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/12 07:05 AM |
| -2 | Why women’s shelters are hotbeds of misandry - Dr. Gerhard AmendtIf some women choose to hate because someone is honest with them, I cannot imaging why anyone should care. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/12 07:04 AM |
| 7 | Why women’s shelters are hotbeds of misandry - Dr. Gerhard AmendtDon't worry, I don't think getting you to take the article seriously was anyone's aspiration. If he wanted to do that, he would have written a piece about the bad, bad men. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/12 01:44 AM |
| 0 | Men’s rights are [NOT] human rights, apparentlyYou think that was an attack? Just wow. And I did reply with facts, just not the ones that fit your political beliefs, which explains your lack of rebuttal. That is the thing with partisanship in the MRM. Some people are gung ho MRA's till it conflicts with their party or candidate of choice, and suddenly logic and facts go out the window. I have seen a lot of that, but thankfully a lot of the MRM is waking up to what a dead end it is. The agenda and actions of your party are misandric, just lik… | /r/MensRights | 07/08/12 10:43 PM |
| 0 | Men’s rights are [NOT] human rights, apparentlyWell, thanks for the education. I had no idea that Canada's political approach to rape, wage parity and domestic violence were addressed without respect to gender. /sarcasm Seriously, Dewar's actions were calculated political strategy mirroring the same anti-male policy advocacy we have here in the US, and based on the same lies, e.g. false wage gap, DV disinformation and rape hysteria. He didn't lose because of that advocacy. If anything he lost because he did not push it early enough and hard … | /r/MensRights | 07/08/12 08:52 PM |
| 1 | Men’s rights are [NOT] human rights, apparentlyOK, I can start with the following, which is policy advocacy for pretty much the typical feminist lies. It took me about 10 seconds to fine this, 5 of which were used taking a sip of coffee. OTTAWA — Days after he was lambasted for naming a man and fellow Ontarian — instead of a woman — as his deputy leader should he become head of the NDP, Paul Dewar unveiled his plan to boost women’s equality. The plan, co-authored by NDP MP Irene Mathyssen who is the chairwoman of the status of women committe… | /r/MensRights | 07/08/12 07:57 PM |
| 2 | Men’s rights are [NOT] human rights, apparentlyI can see well enough to not be blinded by your bullshit. You used one misstatement by some commenter somewhere as your rationale for it being justified to insinuate that the MRA in question had staged the posters being ripped down. G-O was right. The standard in the MRM is intellectual integrity, something feminists, generally speaking, cannot lay claim to with a straight face. In fact, much of the MRM is based on debunking feminist lies and obfuscations. I see my patience with you has come to … | /r/MensRights | 07/08/12 07:27 AM |
| 8 | Men’s rights are [NOT] human rights, apparentlyOh I get it. If one MRA is shown to make a mistatement, then everything all MRA's do is subject to heightened scrutiny. Damn, now if only I could catch a feminist making a false claim.... | /r/MensRights | 07/08/12 05:58 AM |
| -1 | Men’s rights are [NOT] human rights, apparentlyThe dissonance must be hell. | /r/MensRights | 07/08/12 05:55 AM |
| -1 | How /r/MR, Southern Poverty Law Center, SRS, and RadFemHub are Tied TogetherIt is our job to liberate the truth. Let the reckoning begin. | /r/MensRights | 05/08/12 05:58 AM |
| 1 | A short case for hateFair enough, and I agree with a lot of what you are saying. I do though, think, that if we focus on allowing the venting of anger, with reasonable limits, that it is time much better invested than in worrying about anyone being "misguided". If there were MRA's actually doing harmful things, I would feel differently, but other than the needed blowing off steam, all I see from the body of MRAs is good work. | /r/MensRights | 02/08/12 08:37 PM |
| 2 | A short case for hateI didn't catch any rationale for hating women in that (or I would not have allowed it to run) but the piece was a bit ambiguous about that. My interpretation was that he was talking about the things that bring harm to men as a matter of socially acceptable routine, e.g. feminists, family courts, white knights. I don't see what you see in the MRM, though. I do see a minority of men who are freshly wounded and obviously need help in moving past the betrayals and injustices they have suffered onto … | /r/MensRights | 02/08/12 07:08 PM |
| 2 | A short case for hateLOL, don't get me wrong, I am most happy that you don't visit. Please keep that up. But do you know how ridiculous you sound saying that a comment is a thoughtful analysis of something you haven't even read? Just rotflmao here. | /r/MensRights | 02/08/12 06:50 PM |
| 1 | I need the men's rights movement because..left, removed, it's all good. | /r/MensRights | 31/07/12 11:54 PM |
| 8 | I need the men's rights movement because..Nice job, Typhon. Seems your opponent has left the building. | /r/MensRights | 31/07/12 10:59 PM |
| 5 | I need the men's rights movement because..As soon as you make statements like this, you undermine the whole process of what's being done, and the validity that you think "your side" has. It depends entirely on who is reading it. For instance, I found almost everything you said to be myopic and entirely off base. | /r/MensRights | 31/07/12 08:35 PM |
| 1 | Man, Woman, Truth Radio: Big Brass BallsWhat can I say? I see it differently. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/12 07:21 PM |
| 1 | Man, Woman, Truth Radio: Big Brass BallsPerhaps you should listen to the show before you pull any more conjecture out of your ass. This letter was posted first to, ah, let's see, shrink4men.com. The guy is getting help. Lots of it. And he is prepared, JUST LIKE HE SAID. That isn't shaming you, it is just pointing out that you are leading with assumptions instead of making inquiries. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/12 06:59 PM |
| 1 | Man, Woman, Truth Radio: Big Brass BallsGee, thanks for telling me that. I never would have guessed that a borderline woman with an attorney in a corrupt family law system could be dangerous. How'd I ever miss it? | /r/MensRights | 29/07/12 06:16 PM |
| 1 | Man, Woman, Truth Radio: Big Brass BallsWell, he did say he was prepared. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/12 04:59 PM |
| 0 | How to conceal regressive hatredFor me the point is that the woman is a bigot. Lots of bigots are otherwise good people, and not near all of them have bad intentions. But this woman's message is clear. "Don't let men know you think they are creepy or they might not take out your trash." Hard for me not to be harsh with that, so I think he was spot on. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/12 05:17 AM |
| -1 | Three cheers for three male corpsesIf you are ever going to stop the manipulation and shaming of men to their deaths, whether it is to save a woman, or to "protect freedom" from people who have oil, you MUST take that away from them. | /r/MensRights | 27/07/12 02:17 AM |
| 0 | A voice for liars and cowards:) Arrggh, matey, thar be method to our madness! | /r/MensRights | 25/07/12 08:52 PM |
| 13 | A voice for liars and cowardsHere's a thought. How about eliminating rape shield laws and affording accused rapists the same due process and other constitutional rights extended to other alleged criminals? How willing are you to hold on to rape accusations needing less proof of truth than other alleged crimes? Save your outrage over nullification. It is wasted on anyone who values due process and fair trials. | /r/MensRights | 25/07/12 07:28 PM |
| 3 | A voice for liars and cowardsAlas, I love it when people actually get it. The funny thing is that we can actually tell people what we are doing and they don't get it. I suppose that works for us, though. Still, I don't think there is anyone more than me that welcomes the time when reasonable discussion will guide our understanding of sexual politics. I will undoubtedly box myself out of that discussion, because, as you say, my provocation is intentional and calculated to stir the pot. But that is really OK with me, if the j… | /r/MensRights | 25/07/12 07:23 PM |
| -1 | A voice for liars and cowardsThank you for sparing me a response to Mr. Fruitypants | /r/MensRights | 25/07/12 07:18 PM |
| 1 | Femitheist Divine suicideCheck the mirror, it is the only place you will find who screwed up your life. Quit whining and take responsibility. | /r/MensRights | 25/07/12 01:46 AM |
| 0 | Femitheist Divine suicideLOL, it appears the acorn has not fallen far from the tree. Thanks for the dramatics. | /r/MensRights | 25/07/12 12:48 AM |
| 0 | Femitheist Divine suicideWell, fuck you and your mother the borderline. People do need to be warned about BPD, and thank goodness they are being warned. But you are right about one thing, I am not a good person to treat borderlines (as though that actually exists). When I worked in treatment we had a routine expression. "You don't treat borderlines, you ignore them." And that was the general consensus across the board. It was a standard rule of thumb with borderline patients to leave the door open during sessions with t… | /r/MensRights | 25/07/12 12:21 AM |
| 1 | Femitheist Divine suicideFor the same reason we do the same thing with sociopaths. As a warning to people about them. Regarding your mother, you are not an objective source. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/12 11:05 PM |
| 2 | Femitheist Divine suicideAu contraire, mon frere, Grapeban will always take Grapeban very seriously. Others may follow at some point. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/12 07:47 PM |
| 3 | Maine raises the bar on corruption - Maine Courts allow false evidence and Holocaust analogy to convict Vladek FillerHe was exonerated of the rape, and convicted on a charge of assault. Kellett was moved aside, not ousted. She has been put on the back burner while Cavenaugh and Bassano have taken over actions against Filler. In short, yes, this is still going on. When he beat their concocted rape charge and succeeded in getting an investigation of Kellett, it pissed them off. They are going after payback right now. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/12 07:43 PM |
| 0 | Femitheist Divine suicideDiazepam, a benzodiazapine, is VALIUM. Valium is not used to treat BPD, and is likely to be abused, but may curb/mask some symptoms. There is currently NO medication with FDA approval for treatment of BPD. And sorry, but giving me a link that shows therapists recommend therapy says nothing about efficacy of treatment. I worked with and around people with personality disorders for 20 years. I never met a treatment professional that did not roll their eyes at the prospect of "treatment" for PD, ex… | /r/MensRights | 24/07/12 07:38 PM |
| -1 | Femitheist Divine suicideOh really now? What medication was your mother given for BPD? Please name it so I can inform the medical establishment. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/12 04:10 PM |
| 3 | Femitheist Divine suicideNo, I didn't. Not specifically or otherwise, and it would help your case if you quoted what you thought was the implication. Check these quotes: I am not blaming the death of this woman on feminism. I will leave that sort of disingenuousness to the likes of Tory Shepherd. and this One is that we always remember that Krista Jane Heflin is dead because of Krista Jane Heflin. She chose to die as surely as she chose to hate and call for the deaths of others. Feminists are gearing up now to crow othe… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/12 11:37 PM |
| 3 | Femitheist Divine suicideThere is very, very little help to be had for personality disordered people. There is no medication, cognitive therapy does not work, and individuals (non professionals) who engage them and try to help frequently end up victims of their abuse. As to your statement, "Ah, see, that argument just comes from your personality disorder." Well, it is a matter of circumstance. Just depending on a diagnosis to refute a point is indeed lame, but if someone gives me ten points in a row, all of which, after… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/12 11:32 PM |
| 4 | Femitheist Divine suicideI agree. Arguments should be assessed for merit, even if coming from Hitler. But it also helps to understand personality disorders, especially when the arguments you are vetting turn out to be manufactured ideations of victimhood. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/12 10:09 PM |
| 3 | Femitheist Divine suicideIf you think I pinned this on ideology, you should read the article a few more times. Nothing could be further from the truth. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/12 10:05 PM |
| 7 | The radfem conquest of SwedenProbably, but I would not turn a single attempt on her part to find out into a reason to have her jailed and her life destroyed. Only a scumbag would do that. And only a sick society would allow it to happen. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/12 02:19 PM |
| 6 | The radfem conquest of SwedenWoman with a feeling = man in prison. Just the way feminists want things to be. And they scratch their heads and wonder why we don't like their ideas. Incredible. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/12 05:51 AM |
| -5 | The radfem conquest of SwedenWell, bless your pointed little head. | /r/MensRights | 20/07/12 04:43 PM |
| -14 | The radfem conquest of SwedenI am supposed to take the advice of "use your brain" from someone who didn't even understand the exchange? LOL, just LOL. | /r/MensRights | 20/07/12 02:59 PM |
| -4 | The radfem conquest of SwedenOh for pity sake, read the exchange. | /r/MensRights | 20/07/12 02:47 PM |
| 2 | The radfem conquest of Swedenhttp://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/government-tyranny/swedens-empire-of-governance-feminism/ | /r/MensRights | 19/07/12 11:40 PM |
| -7 | The radfem conquest of SwedenNo, you can't, and if you do I will prosecute you. | /r/MensRights | 19/07/12 10:30 PM |
| 21 | The radfem conquest of SwedenSo, something is a criminal act based not on what happened, but on how I FEEL about it? You are the kind of person that turns human existence into a dystopian nightmare. Fuck you and your feelings. Good-bye. | /r/MensRights | 19/07/12 10:24 PM |
| 19 | The radfem conquest of SwedenI think you are a liar. I think you are looking for an excuse to use trigger warnings because it adds more drama. | /r/MensRights | 19/07/12 10:18 PM |
| 11 | The radfem conquest of SwedenI did not ask you if she should have asked. I asked you if it was a sexual assault. I am asking again. Was what she did a sexual assault? Yes or no will do just fine, and skip the trigger warning. I am assuming you are capable of answering a simple question. | /r/MensRights | 19/07/12 10:16 PM |
| 25 | The radfem conquest of SwedenI had a GF that liked to wake me up with a blow job. After the first time, she clearly knew I didn't object. But that first time, she did not ask. Was that a sexual assault? Top tip, some sexual actions are rape, and some sexual actions are things which you partner might say "I don't like that, don't do it again," which is where the incident should end. Top tip number two. Don't be completely stupid. | /r/MensRights | 19/07/12 08:57 PM |
| 6 | German court says NEIN to circumcisionYes, it is also huge for the actual human aspect of it. At least in Germany, infant boys won't be greeted into the world with a blade mutilating them. It's a victory for all German boys. | /r/MensRights | 28/06/12 03:37 AM |
| 5 | To the women that aren't like thatAlready done at r/ladyMRAs | /r/MensRights | 26/06/12 08:22 PM |
| 0 | The original feminazis? Fake rape cases - 1945Not to worry! You didn't! But impressed with your self-evaluation! Ciao! | /r/MensRights | 24/06/12 11:20 PM |
| -4 | Jay Smooth's lecture on manhood - video and short commentary.OMG bigots!!! Next thing you know there will be man eating cunts! | /r/MensRights | 24/06/12 10:25 PM |
| 0 | The original feminazis? Fake rape cases - 1945I gave it the attention it deserved. | /r/MensRights | 24/06/12 10:24 PM |
| 1 | 13 reasons it’s unlucky to be a manyes I am. https://www.facebook.com/paul.elam I appreciate the add. | /r/MensRights | 24/06/12 09:35 PM |
| 1 | 13 reasons it’s unlucky to be a manThose are unfortunate statements. And I disagree with them completely. But his material appearing there is not really surprising. I don't ideologically screen contributors to AVfM. Or at least I have never had to. I evaluated the video and article and found them very well presented, and consistent with AVfM's typical content. There was nothing else to find out. I would, though, like to hear details about this "pro-feminist" agenda. Thanks. | /r/MensRights | 24/06/12 02:17 AM |
| 2 | 13 reasons it’s unlucky to be a manI am aware that I don't care about what people tell me about other people really being feminists and all. I evaluated his material and found it suitable for AVfM. | /r/MensRights | 24/06/12 02:11 AM |
| -1 | The original feminazis? Fake rape cases - 1945Oh goody, I just love feelings! | /r/MensRights | 23/06/12 02:30 AM |
| -5 | Jay Smooth's lecture on manhood - video and short commentary.Comment mine much? | /r/MensRights | 23/06/12 02:28 AM |
| 4 | 13 reasons it’s unlucky to be a manGallstones | /r/MensRights | 22/06/12 11:58 PM |
| 0 | 13 reasons it’s unlucky to be a manIt was 70 years between Seneca Falls and the passing of the 19th Amendment. Then another 50 years before the rise of gender feminism. And you are shitting your pants over two years of a website identifying men's issues? lol, bless your pointed little head. | /r/MensRights | 22/06/12 11:56 PM |
| 2 | 13 reasons it’s unlucky to be a manIf we view men and women in terms of global humanity, it is not at all weak to point to the fact that men in some countries are poorer than women in others. And a hint, quality of life starts with being alive. Longevity is a real issue. | /r/MensRights | 22/06/12 11:53 PM |
| 2 | 13 reasons it’s unlucky to be a manFixed, thank you. | /r/MensRights | 22/06/12 05:21 PM |
| 1 | Naomi Wolf's combat rape epidemicI can't be doing the same thing because the circumstances are not the same. Feminists remain focused on male perpetrated DV and deny male victims despite the fact that the totality of services, funds, public opinion and political support already side with their agenda. They are simply running the game they own. On the other hand, none of the more overarching problems, like PTSD, suicide, and especially the fact that women remain exempt from the combat mandate, are addressed in any substantive wa… | /r/MensRights | 21/06/12 09:34 PM |
| 2 | Naomi Wolf's combat rape epidemicIt is difficult to find reliable information even on prison rape, something most people are familiar with. I was not surprised to find that I could not find anything on just the rape of male soldiers. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/12 10:59 PM |
| 0 | Naomi Wolf's combat rape epidemicOf course, most feminists have problems with what happens to women, and women only. Never mind the atrocities happening to men as a matter of routine. There are lots of things that happen in combat zones that probably warrant investigation. Rape is pretty far down the list compared to a lot of things. If we are not going to at least act like we should strive to ameliorate the wholesale abuses against men, then I hardly see the need to make an exception for women. Welcome to the world of real equ… | /r/MensRights | 20/06/12 10:56 PM |
| 1 | Naomi Wolf's combat rape epidemicCheck the link in the article to male combat rape. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/12 09:59 PM |
| 1 | Man, Woman, Truth Radio: The Golden UterusYou can order them from BTR but they are expensive. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/12 03:11 PM |
| 1 | MRA flyers/graphics that I created; feel free to use.Man Woman Myth is some of the most professionally presented and compelling video work we have to date on men's issues. It is an invaluable resource and a top notch introduction to the MRM. But you have an issue with him saying "women" at some points instead of "feminist" when you think he ought not to. Aside from the fact that women, as a group, are part of the problems that perpetuate the issues, it is an important subject to discuss. If you think that is being too "militant" I would suggest it… | /r/MensRights | 05/06/12 05:36 PM |
| -1 | MRA flyers/graphics that I created; feel free to use.Yeahhhhh! That's a plan! LOL | /r/MensRights | 05/06/12 06:32 AM |
| -1 | MRA flyers/graphics that I created; feel free to use.Very good work. Thanks for helping all of us spread the word. | /r/MensRights | 04/06/12 08:02 PM |
| 2 | Radfems ousted from Conway Hall!I would be honored. Thanks. | /r/MensRights | 03/06/12 10:21 AM |
| 1 | Radfems ousted from Conway Hall!Thanks for filling me in. | /r/MensRights | 03/06/12 10:20 AM |
| 6 | Radfems ousted from Conway Hall!Of course, we should just point and laugh. Isn't that how we handled racism for long time before we actually started doing anything about it? | /r/MensRights | 02/06/12 09:09 AM |
| 14 | Radfems ousted from Conway Hall!Not when it comes to taking money from bigots. | /r/MensRights | 02/06/12 03:43 AM |
| 1 | What is a real man?Nah, the article has plenty of comments. They all do. | /r/MensRights | 01/06/12 08:30 PM |
| 3 | What is a real man?Just think, if you had read it you could have commented about the article. | /r/MensRights | 30/05/12 04:08 AM |
| 6 | Sex, Lies and Rinsing Guys - VideoWhich is precisely why MGTOW, Zeta, Grass eaters, etc, are happening. The exchanges between these people are just exaggerations of the conventional flow of power between men and women. What you see in that video is not so different than what most traditionalists would call normal. It's work and sacrifice in exchange for sex or the possibility of it. In these times it is a particularly foolish path for a man to walk. A growing number of men, not all of them so stupid or egocentric, are catching o… | /r/MensRights | 30/05/12 02:06 AM |
| 1 | The failed manhood of white knightsIt's just sad to see a protective instinct that most people have turned into a mechanism of control. BINGO. That would be the precise point I was making in the article. Case in point, you don't know if your friend was sexually assaulted or that the man she accused did anything wrong at all. You only have what you have been told. You may have every reason to believe her, but that is not a justification for grabbing a baseball bat. The accused is entitled to be handled by law enforcement, and supp… | /r/MensRights | 24/05/12 05:54 AM |
| 0 | The failed manhood of white knightsTranslation. Too dishonest, lie too much. | /r/MensRights | 23/05/12 11:57 PM |
| 2 | The failed manhood of white knightsOh, and please provide your hard data that women evaluate men financially. Thanks in advance for the link. | /r/MensRights | 23/05/12 08:04 PM |
| 3 | The failed manhood of white knightsIsn't that exactly what the article is saying? | /r/MensRights | 23/05/12 07:56 PM |
| 3 | The failed manhood of white knightsIf you read that as witty, by all means enjoy. I guess that can pass for witty if what you are doing passes for an argument. Fact is, offering opinions in an opinion piece is pretty standard practice in the real world. You can find literally thousands of pieces of opinion work across the planet every day that don't cite research on their opinions. It leave it up to the reader to decide if it fits their experience. If it doesn't, they don't buy it. And since this doesn't fit your experience it ob… | /r/MensRights | 23/05/12 07:53 PM |
| 6 | The failed manhood of white knightsSo you are saying that the act of offering physical protection has nothing to do with how the sexes are socialized, that women are as prone as men to extract physical revenge on those who assault? That wives are as prone as men to get out of bed and see what goes bump in the night? Really? Of course, you were 30 seconds away from a baseball bat and playing Bufford Pusser. Hate to tell you, a lot more men don't let the clock stop on them. | /r/MensRights | 23/05/12 04:20 PM |
| 6 | The failed manhood of white knightsI say those things because they represent my experience with both men and women, and because they are consistent with matters I see documented in other ways. Of course I don't have statistics on this. I don't have statistics that prove women evaluate men based on income, or that men evaluate women based on physical appearance. Do I need a study to cite before I can make those assertions, too? You're not making any cogent objection, and not making any good points at all. And that is why I can't t… | /r/MensRights | 23/05/12 04:16 PM |
| 7 | The failed manhood of white knightsTo protect a victim? Who are these people protecting after an assault happens? At least be more honest. You are supporting vigilantism and revenge, not rule of law and justice. And that interest has nothing to do with protecting anyone. | /r/MensRights | 23/05/12 04:10 PM |
| 3 | House passes VAWA reforms!I am well aware of problems with people using the police for coercion. Immigration fraud related to VAWA is a huge problem. U Visa does nothing to prevent it, which is why there is an effort for change here. http://www.saveservices.org/2012/05/hr-4970-includes-measures-to-reduce-vawa-immigration-fraud/ I don't care how many people immigrate here, but when the system is so broken that people are finding loopholes by making false accusations, something needs to give, and it should not be the poor … | /r/MensRights | 18/05/12 04:44 AM |
| 2 | House passes VAWA reforms!I want to be able to vote for representatives who support men's rights and who are pro-choice, in favor of gay marriage, etc. Name one. | /r/MensRights | 17/05/12 10:48 PM |
| 1 | House passes VAWA reforms!The only immigrants facing deportation after reporting domestic assault would be those here illegally. That makes them aliens, not immigrants, and the current system provides them a loophole around immigration law at the expense of innocent US Citizens. The "incentives" you are speaking about are at the cost of due process for the accused. The GLBT community has legitimate concerns about VAWA. Let them take that up with the gender ideologues that insisted on channeling monies that only address t… | /r/MensRights | 17/05/12 10:44 PM |
| -1 | Gay Men as Feminist "Allies"I hear you. I didn't read your comment either. What a laugh. | /r/MensRights | 17/05/12 04:38 AM |
| -7 | Manboobz earns his nameWell, that makes you speak for a whole lot of people, doesn't it? Either way, it matters not. No doxed info will be posted here, so there is nothing for you to support, or not. | /r/MensRights | 13/05/12 05:51 AM |
| -14 | Manboobz earns his nameThe policies of this subreddit will be respected by anyone who wants to publish at AVfM. As to the "we" part of your concern post, I don't know who you might be referring to. | /r/MensRights | 13/05/12 05:27 AM |
| -3 | This Mothers Day: Daffodils for DumpstersBitter, old, lost it? My, my, my. How ageist and ableist of you. Your fembot allies will turn on you one day. Daffodil for you? | /r/MensRights | 12/05/12 08:41 PM |
| 1 | You want privilege? You got it!Let me put it this way. I am preaching to the choir and that is the strategy to spread the word. You have to understand how this stuff works. The entire culture we live in is misandric. There is no polite way into public discourse about men's issues. The sooner you disabuse yourself of that idea the better. The only way to provoke discussion is to provoke people. Profanity is one way of doing that. Your idea that I can't spread the word and use profanity is quite literally nonsense. Can I spread… | /r/MensRights | 07/05/12 07:23 AM |
| 7 | The daughter he foundAVfM is proud to announce that noted father's rights attorney Jeffery M. Leving has joined the ranks of contributors to this website. In his debut article, Leving addresses the sexism faced by one father. | /r/MensRights | 06/05/12 08:09 PM |
| -1 | My inner ChristinaAnd one I note that you cannot refute, thus the critique of "class" Meh. I really wish the feminists and feminized MRA's here had more skills. | /r/MensRights | 05/05/12 11:43 PM |
| -1 | My inner ChristinaNope. I have terminated the conversation. Talking "at" you, which I am doing now, is much different than conversing. | /r/MensRights | 05/05/12 11:42 PM |
| -3 | My inner ChristinaSure, whatever your creative imagination tells you. | /r/MensRights | 05/05/12 08:46 PM |
| 1 | My inner ChristinaThis is irrelevant because you haven't convinced anyone who wasn't already convinced. What I am doing draws in new people all the time and changes peoples thinking. I have plenty of proof of that. I can't appeal to all of them for sure, but I don't know a way to do that and neither do you. Your remark is so incredibly stupid that I have to terminate the conversation with you. | /r/MensRights | 05/05/12 08:37 PM |
| -1 | My inner ChristinaI am not surprised at anything. Including this crazy comment. So if I do a critique of a particular kind of woman's inner dialogue, a kind of woman that both men and women confirm actually exists in abundance, then that makes me a sexist? What I do is for better thinkers than that. Enjoy shopping at K-mart, this here store is out of your reach. | /r/MensRights | 05/05/12 08:34 PM |
| 2 | My inner ChristinaI do have the courage of my convictions, and I articulated those convictions clearly. Just not clearly enough for you to understand. That says more about you than me, by the way. The article is an indictment of the "you get everything" message that we currently encourage women to embrace in this culture, and an indictment of the women who embrace it. I made it a point to address the women who choose to reject the cultural norm in favor of personal integrity. So, the article does not constitute s… | /r/MensRights | 05/05/12 02:55 AM |
| 0 | My inner ChristinaIndeed you have. Don't read them any more. If you are not smart enough to see an attack on sexism and distinguish it from sexism itself, then by all means stay away from AVfM. | /r/MensRights | 04/05/12 11:25 PM |
| 1 | You want privilege? You got it!Sorry, it is really hard for me to buy. The article has lots of logic and reason in it. It is actually most of it. The presence of words and styles in addition to that doesn't make this an either/or. Again, to the rest, your ideas of how things should be clash directly with the history of all social movements. I think you are seeing an "ought to" world, there, friend. I don't advise putting stock in it. Ciao | /r/MensRights | 04/05/12 03:40 AM |
| 1 | You want privilege? You got it!I think that lacks empathy and pragmatism. Why should we "never praise basing emotionally-driven, no matter what has happened to us."? Please make sense of that for me, considering that social movements of disenfranchised people have never made progress without a lot of anger. Please explain how denying fucked over people an audience for their emotions, screw it, for their anger, helps us make progress. In a world that largely ignores any plea for men reflexively, no matter how rational and fair… | /r/MensRights | 04/05/12 02:52 AM |
| 4 | You want privilege? You got it!Need I say more? | /r/MensRights | 03/05/12 05:41 PM |
| 3 | You want privilege? You got it!What that says to me is that you have been spared a lot of things that could have happened to you. AVfM serves men who have been totally devastated by feminist and white knight policy, as it serves the women who are now part of their shattered lives. I laud you for your steadfast intellect and refusal to be guided by your base emotions. However, a man who hasn't seen his children in three years, or who has lost everything over an accusation, or whose academic career was destroyed for making the … | /r/MensRights | 03/05/12 05:38 PM |
| 2 | You want privilege? You got it!It is my job to provoke thought and discussion, and to push the material toward as many people as possible while delivering the message that my audience takes solace in. I have succeeded at that numerous times. AVfM is much more of a community than this place. This is a headline aggregate site. It is not activist in nature, and attracts a lot of feminist participation. I don't fault anyone for that. It is just the nature of things. But it puts this subreddit in a greatly different light than an … | /r/MensRights | 03/05/12 05:33 PM |
| 17 | You want privilege? You got it!I recognize and accept what is presented to me and verified. You offer no evidence that men have privilege over women, particularly in the culture in which this reddit inhabits. Don't tell me what I "should" do. Prove your point. But one look at your post and I know you can't do that, so I will cut to the chase and tell you to go fuck your hateful self. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/12 01:37 AM |
| 4 | You want privilege? You got it!Good for you. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/12 01:34 AM |
| 2 | You want privilege? You got it!Thank you. I think I recognized that it was emotion, not intellect that would get most people interested in the MRM. Thanks for the validation. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/12 12:33 AM |
| 6 | You want privilege? You got it!I will agree to disagree. I don't think we will get anywhere with this. And yes, I am Paul, and no one else uses my reddit account. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/12 12:32 AM |
| 3 | You want privilege? You got it!You are offering an opinion with no evidence of fact. I would agree, if I just used profanity to make a point, it would be useless. The same way that if a comedian like Chris Rock just walked on stage and said shit, piss and fuck 300 times, he would not have a career. I note someone above said he could do without fembot and caterwaul, two non profane words. He said nothing is perfect. I respectfully disagree with him. The fact is you just can't please everyone. I get help with my writing from pe… | /r/MensRights | 03/05/12 12:23 AM |
| 11 | You want privilege? You got it!OK, so now men have advantages, but only single ones? meh. And earning the money is an issue of privilege, but spending it isn't? You need to seriously work on that argument. Look in your average home and tell me who chose everything about it. If a man is single, he still has the social obligations of a man. He earns more for two primary reasons. One, he works harder and longer at more dangerous and demanding jobs than the average woman, and two, he earns more because in the systemic sense, he h… | /r/MensRights | 03/05/12 12:14 AM |
| 7 | You want privilege? You got it!I get criticism all the time, and I do take it on the chin. Some of the criticism is actually helpful, but I am afraid yours isn't. All you have done is point out that you prefer not to read "profane" words. There are more people like you, but the vast majority of the people who read (and financially support) my writing, like the style of my delivery. You're not offering critique in the true sense, you are just demonstrating you don't like profanity. Fine by me, but that must make the internet, … | /r/MensRights | 03/05/12 12:01 AM |
| 12 | You want privilege? You got it!Being statistically more likely to make a larger amount of money means nothing when you are not the one in control of it. Men earn most of the money, and women end up controlling most of it. So which one is the advantage, earning more money by doing dangerous work, or being the one who ends up pocketing the funds? You are not showing me any advantage to being male. The advantage in the facts you presented favor women, not men. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/12 11:58 PM |
| 4 | You want privilege? You got it!Being male gives you some advantages. It's seriously ridiculous to disagree with this. Prove it, else you prove that you are being ridiculous. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/12 11:32 PM |
| 8 | You want privilege? You got it!Depends entirely on who you are writing for, and why. I don't write to encourage others to respect me, but it happens quite a bit anyway. Check the comments from my audience, who, last I checked, were the people I was writing for. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/12 11:31 PM |
| 2 | From an old man to a young manNot buying any of this at all. The job of a good father is to raise a good, responsible human being that actually has something of value to give a relationship if they choose to have one. Acting as thug/enforcer/screening agent for an infantilized, quasi-adult doesn't buy much, IMO, except the outrageously unrealistic expectation of finding a surrogate daddy to take real daddy's place when princess is too old to live at home. And given the current zeitgeist, I would wager that if anyone needs pr… | /r/MensRights | 29/04/12 10:43 PM |
| 1 | Taming the abusive shrewMen don't count, period. | /r/MensRights | 28/04/12 05:11 PM |
| 5 | From an old man to a young manSure, as a father, you teach. HER, not any random male than finds her attractive. Show me a 15 year old daughter is seeking the company of a 35 year old man, and I will likely be able to show you a father who fell down on the job. Whether or not he is a "truckie" is irrelevant. | /r/MensRights | 28/04/12 05:10 PM |
| 2 | From an old man to a young manRather than fading out, violence by proxy has increased. In feminist governance, the state has the shotgun, and it is at her disposal as she sees fit. SSDD. | /r/MensRights | 28/04/12 05:07 PM |
| 5 | Taming the abusive shrewSigh. I think you are missing the point. In modern legal terms, consent happens based strictly on a woman's after the fact claims. It does not matter whether she actually consented. What matters is what she says about it later. If she actually consented, and later claims that she did not consent, then in the eyes of the law she did not consent. | /r/MensRights | 27/04/12 05:57 PM |
| 1 | Why feminism may be rightSo if they call themselves sluts it is a political statement, but if a mrm writer does it, it is gratuitous name calling? bah. | /r/MensRights | 25/04/12 03:30 PM |
| 1 | SPLC linked to anti men’s rights subredditShe calls in the SPLC to attack people for exposing the identities of ideologues who work in positions of trust with families and children and have expressed a desire to kill men and children, to taint the food supply, to practice eugenics with human beings as though they were ears of corn, and you think it is shitty she got flak for it on reddit? That is astounding. | /r/MensRights | 25/04/12 08:16 AM |
| 1 | AVFM News and Activism Show 2http://www.blogtalkradio.com/avoiceformen/2012/04/25/avfm-news-and-activism-show-2 Register as a show follower and we will provide you with an email link to each episode as it is scheduled. | /r/MensRights | 25/04/12 02:35 AM |
| 1 | Why feminism may be rightYour troll-o-meter needs calibration. I am a serious MRA. I don't troll. No, condescension and correctness are completely independent properties, so no, being correct does not prevent you from being condescending in any way. You should pick up a dictionary. And you should check your reading comprehension. Yes condescension and correctness are independent, but that does not mean they are coexistent every time. In this case, I was simply stating some facts. Your claim that calling women sluts is w… | /r/MensRights | 24/04/12 02:18 PM |
| 1 | Why feminism may be rightActually, there is a difference between condescending and correct. I was the latter, and I did very much address what you said. But since what I said, e.g. "you fail to grasp the fundamentals," happens to be true, then it also provides an explanation for why you don't think what you said was addressed. You just don't get it. And it showed the instant you wondered aloud if "this kind of language is destructive to the movement and completely unnecessary, not to mention reinforcing the gender stere… | /r/MensRights | 23/04/12 11:42 PM |
| 1 | Why feminism may be rightMy dystopian nightmare is generally bad? That's your point? OK, dude, whatever. | /r/MensRights | 23/04/12 11:31 PM |
| 1 | Why feminism may be rightYour serious? Well, I have to tell you that makes no sense to me at all. Women across the world are having SlutWalks, writing "proud slut" across their tits, reclaiming the slut sisterhood, and I can't run articles with counter-theory on the same subject without first passing a test based on THEIR sensibilities? Meh, I think not, and not just as a matter of principle. Men's issues are gaining recognition, slowly, but surely, by and large because men are beginning to speak out in provocative, def… | /r/MensRights | 23/04/12 11:25 PM |
| 4 | Why feminism may be rightWhat is unreasonable is to infer from my comment that I expect positive change overnight. I don't. I just choose not to indulge in the fantasy that we have already arrived. Big difference. | /r/MensRights | 23/04/12 03:59 PM |
| 2 | Why feminism may be rightOh yeah, I have noticed how we have replaced fossil fuel with hydrogen batteries and solar panels. | /r/MensRights | 23/04/12 03:43 PM |
| 0 | Why feminism may be rightNo, you are not alone. There are a good many people as wrong as you are. Many of them are prone to your simplistic interpretation of the article. You are failing, utterly, to even grasp the fundamentals here on sex and power, and how our society is legislating the sexual dominance of women. Many of the "MRA's" on this reddit are just the green ones who know little and do less. | /r/MensRights | 23/04/12 03:41 PM |
| 1 | Mounting the Throne of PeterHello? Anyone home? How is it misogynistic? Is that something you can support, or is it just a label you put on anything you don't like but can't argue against? | /r/MensRights | 22/04/12 11:27 PM |
| 1 | Mounting the Throne of PeterHow is it misogynistic? | /r/MensRights | 21/04/12 05:47 AM |
| -2 | Why men's rights?And a hush falls over the room. | /r/MensRights | 17/04/12 08:16 PM |
| -4 | Why men's rights?I don't like what it says about women either, especially so since it is true. | /r/MensRights | 17/04/12 05:31 PM |
| 1 | Man, Woman, Truth: Getting honest about boysMy guess is that it puts you in the great majority. | /r/MensRights | 16/04/12 06:43 PM |
| -1 | Gender privilege in Titanic EraYou brought up the same points at the site. My answer is the same: You are making a distinction without a difference. It is a sufficient enough standard historically that it is still practiced today. On the Concordia efforts were made to instruct men to wait back behind women and children while life boats were loaded. Thankfully most of the men ignored it, but those instructions were still given by rescuers. When US Airways Flight 1549 was forced to land in the Hudson River, the order was give b… | /r/MensRights | 15/04/12 03:06 AM |
| 0 | Gender privilege in Titanic EraResearch will also tell you that it was men who were much more likely to be on board the ship to begin with, especially in cases of war. Protecting women and children, with male blood in the balance, is a historical fact that can be documented 1000 times over. I will leave it to women's studies majors to figure out that none of it ever really happened. | /r/MensRights | 14/04/12 09:49 PM |
| 1 | Can I ask what you all think about this? I have been a long time lurker/supporter, but this seems kind of horrible.Agreed, it doesn't prove that on its own. But when you ask questions that have already been answered three ways to Sunday in the article, which you did, then it is a good bet that you either didn't understand it, or didn't read it. | /r/MensRights | 13/04/12 03:11 AM |
| 4 | From the sister of black visions who committed suicide - a thank you to men's rightsMy sympathies to the family for your loss. I wish you success with getting some kind of justice. | /r/MensRights | 12/04/12 04:45 AM |
| 3 | Can I ask what you all think about this? I have been a long time lurker/supporter, but this seems kind of horrible.You don't understand either article, and I am too busy to help you get here what you should have gotten from the 4,000 plus words already provided. | /r/MensRights | 12/04/12 01:49 AM |
| 1 | Can I ask what you all think about this? I have been a long time lurker/supporter, but this seems kind of horrible.It's not up for debate. Thank bloody Jesus. | /r/MensRights | 12/04/12 01:48 AM |
| 2 | Can I ask what you all think about this? I have been a long time lurker/supporter, but this seems kind of horrible.That is about as dumb an arrangement of ideas as I have seen around here, and THAT is really pathetic. I have seen guys like you play golf, all big wood and no finesse- and your game sucks. | /r/MensRights | 11/04/12 10:05 PM |
| 2 | Can I ask what you all think about this? I have been a long time lurker/supporter, but this seems kind of horrible.:) Like shooting fish in a barrel. | /r/MensRights | 11/04/12 05:19 PM |
| 3 | Can I ask what you all think about this? I have been a long time lurker/supporter, but this seems kind of horrible.Unfortunate on both counts. But if you really want to understand the argument for nullification, read this: http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/government-tyranny/on-jury-nullification-and-rape/ Despite any pain felt by rape victims, this is an argument that needs to be heard. | /r/MensRights | 11/04/12 04:09 PM |
| 2 | Can I ask what you all think about this? I have been a long time lurker/supporter, but this seems kind of horrible.He doesn't understand what jury nullification is. | /r/MensRights | 11/04/12 03:57 PM |
| -7 | Can I ask what you all think about this? I have been a long time lurker/supporter, but this seems kind of horrible.Try reading whats available at the prison library. | /r/MensRights | 11/04/12 03:55 PM |
| 4 | Can I ask what you all think about this? I have been a long time lurker/supporter, but this seems kind of horrible.Ahhh, there is intelligent life here. Of course you are correct about what I do. I am a pacifist that spent 20 years counseling people, many of which (both sexes) had childhoods you would not wish anyone. Stuff bad enough to have you sticking needles in your arm to forget about it. And quite honestly I would prefer not to have to manipulate people with intended affronts and radicalized language. Even more honestly, it often feels like toying with a very stupid general public. But here is the pro… | /r/MensRights | 11/04/12 03:51 PM |
| 1 | Can I ask what you all think about this? I have been a long time lurker/supporter, but this seems kind of horrible.Which of course ultimately helps us gain more ground and attention. :) | /r/MensRights | 11/04/12 03:26 PM |
| 3 | Can I ask what you all think about this? I have been a long time lurker/supporter, but this seems kind of horrible.Heee Dog! You guys are workin' it! Daaaaayum! I am particularly proud of this one. It drew HUGE traffic and pissed off feminists all across the net. The provocative, in your face delivery paved the way for me to provide the detailed rationale. It is a lot longer and carefully articulated than the barn burner, but because I got so much attention by being aggressive it got a lot more reads than it would have. And now you have provided me a really good opportunity to link to it here again. http://w… | /r/MensRights | 11/04/12 02:49 PM |
| 0 | This article is making me seriously reconsider whether MRAs/MGTOWs should associate with A Voice For Men.I quit reading four words in. I don't know what your problem is, and I don't care. Bye. | /r/MensRights | 11/04/12 08:56 AM |
| 0 | This article is making me seriously reconsider whether MRAs/MGTOWs should associate with A Voice For Men.You are wasting your time advocating obviously false solutions, I get emails from men, and women who love them, saying that finding AVfM pulled them out of the ground and even saved their lives. I get them regularly. I don't know what you want to do with your time, other than carrying a chip on your shoulder about being "superior" to women, but I am more than satisfied how I spend mine. Save your laughable attempt to shame for someone who isn't looking down their nose at you, right at your point… | /r/MensRights | 11/04/12 07:43 AM |
| 1 | This article is making me seriously reconsider whether MRAs/MGTOWs should associate with A Voice For Men.I never ranted about an NHL Game on the 360. Maybe it isn't me that's retarded. | /r/MensRights | 11/04/12 03:31 AM |
| 0 | This article is making me seriously reconsider whether MRAs/MGTOWs should associate with A Voice For Men.You're dancing. Link me to your blog that you have written on MRA issues under your own name for years. Remember, that is the proof you claimed that you are an MRA. So. Where. Is. It? | /r/MensRights | 11/04/12 03:28 AM |
| 1 | This article is making me seriously reconsider whether MRAs/MGTOWs should associate with A Voice For Men.AVfM is unwilling to recognize the inherent inferiority of (most) females. Aww, gee, poor AVFM. | /r/MensRights | 11/04/12 03:25 AM |
| 0 | This article is making me seriously reconsider whether MRAs/MGTOWs should associate with A Voice For Men.It's the same with your ignorance of the men's movement. | /r/MensRights | 11/04/12 03:23 AM |
| 0 | This article is making me seriously reconsider whether MRAs/MGTOWs should associate with A Voice For Men.It is a big site because of the provocative articles, and I have said a thousand times I represent no opinion other than my own. DISTANCE YOURSELF. Whatever the fuck that is supposed to mean. | /r/MensRights | 10/04/12 11:36 PM |
| 0 | This article is making me seriously reconsider whether MRAs/MGTOWs should associate with A Voice For Men.A bad reputation with whom? | /r/MensRights | 10/04/12 11:31 PM |
| 1 | This article is making me seriously reconsider whether MRAs/MGTOWs should associate with A Voice For Men.The real problem with Elam's article is its veiled implication that it's mostly heartless conniving women who are rape victims. He didn't outright say that, or even imply it technically, but he doesn't dispel it either. That is a criticism I can agree with, along with the rest of your observations. I could have addressed this and still maintained the provocative edge. Thanks for the notes. | /r/MensRights | 10/04/12 11:30 PM |
| -1 | This article is making me seriously reconsider whether MRAs/MGTOWs should associate with A Voice For Men.highlights a major divide in the MRM. You mean the one you two are hoping to create here. | /r/MensRights | 10/04/12 11:24 PM |
| 0 | This article is making me seriously reconsider whether MRAs/MGTOWs should associate with A Voice For Men.Please note the attempts to split. You are actually watching something that is orchestrated to, in this case, cause Pierce and GWW to reconsider their affiliations. Also, this poster should get their facts straight. Register-her makes strong, precisely worded delineations between the bigots and the felons on record there. It is articulate quite clearly in the description of terms. | /r/MensRights | 10/04/12 11:23 PM |
| 0 | This article is making me seriously reconsider whether MRAs/MGTOWs should associate with A Voice For Men.You said you have been blogging on men's right for years under your real name. I say your a liar. You have done no such thing. That is the problem here. Once you establish yourself as dishonest, nothing you say is going to make a difference here. Believe me, I know what is up here. You are trying to cause a split between MRA's. Shit, that has already happened many times that I can think of. It won't make any difference. You're a fool on a fools mission. It won't do you any good at all. Whatever … | /r/MensRights | 10/04/12 11:17 PM |
| 0 | This article is making me seriously reconsider whether MRAs/MGTOWs should associate with A Voice For Men.Yes it does. First to another post you made, allow me to clarify. My conclusion in the writings I did on this subject were that manner of dress did not impact the incidence of rape. You may be buying into the myth that I was literally saying women deserved to be raped, or that they even ask for it. When you examine the articles for actual, non-satirical assertions, what you find is that I actually advocate that women are responsible for the life circumstances they choose to walk in to, in the sa… | /r/MensRights | 10/04/12 10:54 PM |
| 0 | This article is making me seriously reconsider whether MRAs/MGTOWs should associate with A Voice For Men.That would be "tarnish the MRM" MRA is just an individual activist. It might help your critique if you at least knew the difference between the two. | /r/MensRights | 10/04/12 10:46 PM |
| 1 | This article is making me seriously reconsider whether MRAs/MGTOWs should associate with A Voice For Men.You have been blogging on MRA issues for years now, under your real name, but you can't prove it? Fuck all, what a liar. | /r/MensRights | 10/04/12 10:13 PM |
| -2 | This article is making me seriously reconsider whether MRAs/MGTOWs should associate with A Voice For Men.The really beautiful thing here is that regardless of what happens in this feminist forum, the MRM will keep growing, as will AVfM. It seems, unlike any other MRA website, more of the compelling online female voices in the MRM choose to post work at AVfM as well as their own blogs. They even co-host our radio shows twice a week. :) So you don't have to (or deserve) to hear my justification for the language I choose. All you have to do is see that a lot of people besides you, including some very … | /r/MensRights | 10/04/12 09:37 PM |
| 1 | Don't like catcalls? Cover your titsOf course I don't get to choose what women are bothered by. I don't want that choice, as it is none of my affair. But I can choose to not care what bothers them, and I do. The point you are missing is that this is not about what I like or don't like, or at least you seem to think that I want to tell women how to dress. I don't. I just take the position that women can take responsibility for their choices. If I had my way, men would not be designed get so completely stupid, gullible and selfless … | /r/MensRights | 09/04/12 05:06 AM |
| 1 | Don't like catcalls? Cover your titsLots of people know they are a joke. They were ridiculed in a lot of places that have nothing to do with men's rights. Listing a site as a hate site because a guy doesn't call a woman back after sex? Fucking incredibly stupid, and only tainted the SPLC to do it. They were once a worthy organization. It is a shame appealing to morons like you took them down. Oh well. | /r/MensRights | 08/04/12 09:25 PM |
| -1 | Don't like catcalls? Cover your titsOh, now personal insults is hate speech? I guess by those standards that includes most of you idiots in this forum. I am PROUD of AVfM being called a hate site by SPLC. It was just in time to stir up a lot of support for AVfM and offered more proof of what a joke they have become. They only managed to embarrass themselves and helped us at the same time. God, I LOVE being an MRA. | /r/MensRights | 08/04/12 06:14 PM |
| -6 | Don't like catcalls? Cover your titsThe problem is that you don't get to choose exactly how everyone in the world is going to react to your sexual provocation. If you don't want to be unnerved, or if you don't want things you can't abide by, then cover your tits in public. | /r/MensRights | 08/04/12 05:57 PM |
| -6 | Don't like catcalls? Cover your titsFuck off and die. I have no use for scumbags who will try to accuse you of being a rape supporter simply because you suggest that women take some responsibility with their sexual power. | /r/MensRights | 08/04/12 05:54 PM |
| -4 | Don't like catcalls? Cover your titsThe fact that anyone up voted this brain dead comment is a pretty sad statement of how stupid the feminists and white knights are that inhabit this "men's rights" subreddit. How incredibly obtuse do you have to be to compare a man exposing his penis at a urinal - an intentionally segregated and mostly private area - to urinate, as opposed to women who dress revealingly in heavily populated, public areas. with the direct intention of getting sexual attention. Just fucking dumb beyond belief. | /r/MensRights | 08/04/12 05:49 PM |
| -3 | Don't like catcalls? Cover your titsMan, did you ever BECOME the point of that article. Yes, women are going to do what they want. Yes, for pity sake, the world ought to get that much by now. But there is also going to be, not matter how haughty you get about what people "ought" to do, a primal reaction to women "doing what they want." Fine, let them get over the sad facts of life like the rest of us. A good looking enough woman can walk in a bar, turn almost every male head in the place and have a good percentage of them instinct… | /r/MensRights | 08/04/12 07:00 AM |
| -5 | Don't like catcalls? Cover your titsWith power comes responsibility. Unless you are a woman wielding sexual power. If that is the case, the world is expected to pretend that you are powerless. All must remain silent. Except for JTO. | /r/MensRights | 08/04/12 05:40 AM |
| 2 | An offer of help to feministsYou're off the mark on this one. They can ignore the MRM, sure, though it is very hard for them, like trying not to pop those bubbles in packing material. The problem is that the MRM message has spread far past the MRM. They can ignore ME, but they can't ignore a growing population of people that want the truth from them, and who know they are not telling it. They are actually fucked at this point. They just don't know it. | /r/MensRights | 05/04/12 10:17 PM |
| 1 | Violence by proxyI think Paglia said "grass huts" | /r/MensRights | 02/04/12 12:18 AM |
| 2 | A message from Dan Moore (Factory)I hope that you continue to find a reason every day to live. | /r/MensRights | 25/03/12 04:53 PM |
| 0 | How feminists define gender traitsNote the website there to the immediate right of the title. At that website, there are lots of cited articles that rely heavily on research. There is also another kind of article. It is known in the publishing world as an opinion piece. Really, people have been writing and reading them for ages. They're all the rage. Since your criticism is that the article is one kind, instead of another, you might want to consider never clicking through again, because the site has that annoying habit of allowi… | /r/MensRights | 24/03/12 05:09 AM |
| 2 | /r/mensrights has a feminist infestation, crush them like roaches.You're lucky. If I were a mod here I would boot you in a heartbeat. Your no MRA, in my less than fucking humble opinion. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/12 12:57 AM |
| 3 | /r/mensrights has a feminist infestation, crush them like roaches.Yep, troll for sure. Trying to a sell a retro-traditionalist, anti-gay worldview. The troll knows this is how anti-MRA's try to characterize the MRM. Down voted. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/12 12:55 AM |
| 1 | Is Futrelle Barca's boy-toy?Well, at least you have revealed why you are so in error. You're looking for misogyny and manage to find it under every rock. I think it comes with the feminist tin foil hat. The remark is just one of about a million things you don't know how to interpret, and reflective of your ignorance of the MRM. In 25 years of activism, I have come across very few MRA's who think there ever was a "good old days," when men ruled the roost and women minded them. I have encountered many traditionalists who see… | /r/MensRights | 21/03/12 07:50 AM |
| 1 | Is Futrelle Barca's boy-toy?LOL. I get the down votes, just no proof of misogyny. Probably has everything to do with the fact that the charge is bullshit. | /r/MensRights | 21/03/12 02:45 AM |
| 0 | Is Futrelle Barca's boy-toy?Funny, for all the allegations, yours included, still no one is able to point directly to any misogyny. And I don't concern myself with feminists lifting fingers to do anything. I figured out a long time ago that what defines the whole feminist gig is enjoying rights without lifting a finger to earn them. Without your white knights doing the heavy lifting, you're no different than you were fifty years ago fetching coffee. | /r/MensRights | 21/03/12 01:09 AM |
| 3 | Is Futrelle Barca's boy-toy?yes | /r/MensRights | 20/03/12 08:42 PM |
| 1 | Is Futrelle Barca's boy-toy?Yep, it's strange. They just come out that way sometimes. | /r/MensRights | 20/03/12 08:35 PM |
| 1 | The abuse excuseIf you have a source on the FBI definitions being shot down I would like to see it. | /r/MensRights | 20/03/12 08:31 PM |
| 0 | The abuse excuseWhat you are missing here is really important. The new FBI definitions of rape clarify that it must involve penetration. So, a man having drinks and getting hustled by a woman is not the same thing as when the roles are reversed. It is gender based, and against the man. | /r/MensRights | 20/03/12 07:45 PM |
| 2 | A slut, by any other name....It's stupid to accept drinks from strangers or get wasted on your own Put on a badge and say that and you, too, can inspire thousands of cheap tramps across the planet to strut around like dime store hookers and call it social awareness. educating people on the nature of rape would stop rapes Like I said...MORON. | /r/MensRights | 20/03/12 01:38 PM |
| 2 | A slut, by any other name....Avoiceformen has solved the rape problem, women just have to never go out. There's plenty of dishwashing to do at home after all, right? Histrionics, just like I said. Enjoy the emotion ridden, simpleton's approach to addressing a complicated problem. Be sure to hang on to the idea that women are powerless victims and that there is nothing they can do to prevent bad things from happening to them; that we just need to appeal to bad people to just stop doing bad things. Oh, yeah, that's the ticket… | /r/MensRights | 20/03/12 07:29 AM |
| 1 | A slut, by any other name....LOL, you say "nonsense" and then, in the very next sentence, give the rationale for what you think justifies an international movement to instruct people not to "blame victims," all over the remarks of one constable in a room with 10 people. This is histrionics and nothing more. We are much more likely to act with irrational haste against alleged rapists in the west than we ever were prone to blame victims for anything. This whole mess is just a bunch of neurotic women with nothing better to do,… | /r/MensRights | 20/03/12 04:20 AM |
| 1 | A slut, by any other name....they're an attempt for a general attitude shift. Yep. A shift from free expression to one of control by PC narrative. | /r/MensRights | 20/03/12 12:37 AM |
| 1 | A slut, by any other name....slut shaming is a worthwhile and honorable pursuit in our society Indeed, that is exactly what the article is about. And while I don't know if I agree that curtailing female sexual looseness is something that can ever happen again without first having a social collapse, it is worth pushing for nonetheless. The "man up" articles are nothing but an awkward attempt to fix the wrong end of the problem. We are essentially telling men to indenture themselves to corporate slavery so they can afford to … | /r/MensRights | 19/03/12 06:57 AM |
| 4 | Talking out of their vaginas - thoughts on Eve Ensler and talking through your vajayjaySerious answer. Misandry based disinformation is one of the biggest MRM issues there is. SERIOUS QUESTION. Why are you having to ask this? | /r/MensRights | 17/03/12 11:33 PM |
| 1 | Ben and Jerry’s is a radical hate groupNope. I already tried "discussing" something with you once before, after you made a totally unprovoked attack on me in the comments. You handled that dishonestly. Fool me once.... | /r/MensRights | 16/03/12 09:12 PM |
| 2 | Ben and Jerry’s is a radical hate groupYour conduct forces that as a legitimate question. I am by no means the only MRA who feels that way. That leaves you with choices. You can ignore the fact that more than just a handful of MRA's have real concerns about your intent, and just brush it off as you have here. Or you can prove us wrong with your actions. My mind, and I am sure those of others, are always open to examining the evidence in front of us. But we are not open to remaining quiet about what is in front of us either. | /r/MensRights | 16/03/12 08:11 PM |
| 3 | Ben and Jerry’s is a radical hate groupActually not so much. And really the best job of spin I have ever seen is this subreddit. I think the top mod here is a feminist, aiming to co-opt the message of the MRM wherever possible. That is the only reason trolls like you are even allowed to be here. | /r/MensRights | 16/03/12 05:40 PM |
| 1 | Ben and Jerry’s is a radical hate groupI totally agree. Feministing.com is just disgusting, isn't it? | /r/MensRights | 16/03/12 05:05 PM |
| 1 | And the song plays onRight symptoms, wrong etiology. | /r/MensRights | 15/03/12 07:52 AM |
| 1 | And the song plays onFeminism was "intended" to be a cure to a disease, but they misdiagnosed the problem and treated the wrong patient. | /r/MensRights | 15/03/12 06:47 AM |
| -4 | Important Update on the SPLC, the status of their listing and my having to step downSo, you assumed what I was saying based on what you think might be happening with others, because, why, they saw something that made them angry? Feminists are morons. | /r/MensRights | 12/03/12 09:17 PM |
| 1 | It's time to wake the A up in MRA-Let's sue the SPLC for libelThank you. | /r/MensRights | 12/03/12 09:16 PM |
| -4 | Important Update on the SPLC, the status of their listing and my having to step downNo, that is not what I told you at all. I told you there was an increase in support as a result of the SPLC debacle (which they are now backing off of). You just twisted what I said. Feminist much? | /r/MensRights | 12/03/12 08:27 PM |
| -2 | Important Update on the SPLC, the status of their listing and my having to step downWe have had a sharp increase in traffic, financial donations and volunteers since the SPLC ran their articles. We can now target more hateful feminists than ever, and we will Cheers. :) | /r/MensRights | 12/03/12 04:04 PM |
| 1 | SPLC: A poverty of integrityThat was not the point of this article, however, if you want to write such a piece we will be happy to run it. | /r/MensRights | 12/03/12 04:29 AM |
| -1 | Important Update on the SPLC, the status of their listing and my having to step downYes, that is what I come up with because that is what I see. I don't need your meaningless respect. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/12 07:59 PM |
| -2 | Important Update on the SPLC, the status of their listing and my having to step downWith all respect, and I have that in abundance for you personally, you are wasting your time here. Your top moderator will keep this place mired in anti-MRA conflict and pro-feminist bias. That was just made official for me. It forces us to make lemonade out of lemons, which we will do where it concerns this subreddit, but it does preclude this place from being a substantial resource for the MRM. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/12 06:04 PM |
| 5 | SPLC: A poverty of integrityCould have, probably should have.. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/12 05:58 AM |
| 6 | It's time to wake the A up in MRA-Let's sue the SPLC for libelIf he could sue you for stupidity he would have an airtight case. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/12 12:37 AM |
| 3 | It's time to wake the A up in MRA-Let's sue the SPLC for libelThey published my name, but it still isn't a good libel suit. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/12 12:34 AM |
| 15 | It's time to wake the A up in MRA-Let's sue the SPLC for libelThere are things you have to consider before taking this on. I have already spoken with counsel and the suit is a bad idea, for a good number of reasons. As has already been mentioned, the subject of damages is forbidding. Also, depending on where this is filed it brings up different problems. No one in their home state is going to go after them. Also, there is the matter of SLAPP statutes. If you go after someone for libel without a strong case, you can end up being forced to pay their attorney… | /r/MensRights | 09/03/12 11:30 PM |
| 1 | An open letter to Richard Cohen, President of the Southern Poverty Law CenterUnderstood. If it will only likely result in a dead end, it can't be worth any personal cost. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/12 10:40 PM |
| 5 | An open letter to Richard Cohen, President of the Southern Poverty Law Center"If the SPLC keeps calling us a hate movement, I'll have to quit fighting for male human rights." Allow me one respectful correction, John. These people who say they will have to quit fighting if someone calls them bad names were never fighting to begin with. They were on the internet expressing opinions in comments, perhaps even that agreed with MRM goals, but fighters? Fuck sake, they aren't fighters, they're posers. Saying you are fighting for rights is an acknowledgment that you are aware th… | /r/MensRights | 09/03/12 08:29 PM |
| 0 | An open letter to Richard Cohen, President of the Southern Poverty Law CenterSorry, I misread you. I don't think it would be fair to put him in a "guilt by association" framework with this father, but it is not unfair to seek his opinion. You never know what you are going to be told. I would be most interested if someone would ask him to study the letter to his father and offer a reaction. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/12 08:13 PM |
| 1 | An open letter to Richard Cohen, President of the Southern Poverty Law CenterWhich organization is that? | /r/MensRights | 09/03/12 05:36 PM |
| 1 | Bury the bullshit - and quit the powerless wailing about voting rightsThat is not a very tenable point. You are pointlessly mired in hair splitting semantics. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/12 05:36 PM |
| 4 | An open letter to Richard Cohen, President of the Southern Poverty Law CenterActually no, dipshit. I was mocking the futility of your little list. That's OK. Next time we will get you an interpreter. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/12 08:59 AM |
| 6 | An open letter to Richard Cohen, President of the Southern Poverty Law CenterYou forgot to add NOW, Good Men Project, AMSA, NOMAS, Division 51, Andrea Dworkin, Radfem Hub and Valerie Solanas. Oh yeah, don't forget Pee Wee Herman and Chyna. So you can make a really big list. Do you want a cookie? What else can you do? Oh yes, I forgot, you can tell others they are not qualified to respond to attacks made on them. Aren't you the talented one! | /r/MensRights | 09/03/12 08:44 AM |
| 8 | An open letter to Richard Cohen, President of the Southern Poverty Law CenterYou're an ignorant twit. And your feet stink, and you don't drink enough eggnog, and you don't have a fucking clue about what it takes to get the issues out there. That is why you are sitting there sniping at people doing work instead of getting any traction with your pathetic, untenable ways. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/12 08:18 AM |
| 13 | An open letter to Richard Cohen, President of the Southern Poverty Law CenterThen why did you read that one? I am laughing my ass off. They targeted my website. I was identified by name. Who was supposed to respond to it, Jessica Valenti? Read JTO's comment below and please consider joining them. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/12 07:46 AM |
| 0 | AVfM Radio: Does Feminism cause brain damage?:) | /r/MensRights | 09/03/12 12:51 AM |
| -2 | Bury the bullshit - and quit the powerless wailing about voting rightsI'm not drawn in to anything. I don't participate in any such debate and don't buy in to the systemic false dichotomy of elections. That is why I have been called a leftist sycophant by some and a right wing nut case by others. But I am not so stupid as to pretend that left and right don't exist. Your problem here, other than being the only real cunt in the conversation, is that you have over reacted emotionally. You need to learn to reign that in and actually think. We face two different kinds … | /r/MensRights | 08/03/12 09:47 PM |
| -1 | Bury the bullshit - and quit the powerless wailing about voting rightsOh, do please provide me a list of all the things we should not talk about. Of course, per your opinion. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/12 05:37 PM |
| 3 | A couple of change proposals - Need community input - MR Title and Violent CommentsI imagine my response to this will seem like a cop out, but I really don't think it is. I know that people can be difficult, even outrageous. I have had to deal with more than my share of that over the past few years. My concerns, though, are only about my exchange with Ignatius. I am sure you can empathize that I feel like I have paid my dues on dealing with difficult people in my own environment, and can't take responsibility for the actions of others in a domain not under my control. What you… | /r/MensRights | 07/03/12 02:18 PM |
| 2 | A couple of change proposals - Need community input - MR Title and Violent CommentsWould you please quit lying? God, I can't believe anyone trusted you to have the integrity to moderate here. For the record, as though it isn't up a few posts for anyone to see anyway, here is how I entered the thread, word for word: I support this on all counts. Including the fact that you have supported a lot of MRA work. I have seen it first hand. Also, since it came up, there is the world wide web and all the mainstream frigging everything for the expression of misandry. We need more places … | /r/MensRights | 07/03/12 01:46 AM |
| 1 | Feminist lie #3,468: ObamacareOh Gee, and here I was thinking all those provisions were just for women. | /r/MensRights | 06/03/12 11:07 PM |
| 0 | A couple of change proposals - Need community input - MR Title and Violent CommentsApparently you aren't strong willed enough to decide for yourself Oh yeah, I get that all the time. I have no self will. Whatever you are smoking, please pass it my way. Smells like one hit quit. I am absolutely dumbfounded that you take Jeremiah at his word when he makes shit up. Perhaps you would be less dumbfounded if you recognized that I didn't take him at his word for anything. I didn't have to. The only point that he and I both weighed in on (aside for my verification that he is an activi… | /r/MensRights | 06/03/12 10:49 PM |
| 3 | A couple of change proposals - Need community input - MR Title and Violent CommentsI have proved once again that I think you are full of shit Really now? You have provided proof that you think something? Aren't you the sterling-tongued devil! I see this place is in the skilled hands of an intellectual surgeon. God help the feminists, now. I am sure they are going to cower in the corners. You know, I once had some pretty severe conflict with Jeremiah. Eventually we worked through it like adults. I think that was facilitated by the fact that even though we disagree on some signi… | /r/MensRights | 06/03/12 07:42 PM |
| 1 | A couple of change proposals - Need community input - MR Title and Violent CommentsIt is coming to fruition pretty quickly, too. Bad move, Kloo. You might as well have tossed the whole subreddit in the toilet. | /r/MensRights | 06/03/12 06:00 AM |
| 2 | A couple of change proposals - Need community input - MR Title and Violent CommentsI could not agree more. One of the most overarching problems with the MRM is new MRA's. It takes years for most men to sort through their own denial, bullshit and indoctrination to start having the first clue as to what they are fighting and what is in the way of getting the job done. That is why it is so easy in a place like this for feminists to exploit the naivety that rules the day here. Advocating for men's rights, in case the mods here don't get it yet, means going up against 3,000,000 yea… | /r/MensRights | 06/03/12 05:57 AM |
| 4 | Feminist lie #3,468: ObamacareThat's funny, I don't care who here has problems with AVfM, either. :) | /r/MensRights | 05/03/12 10:33 PM |
| 3 | A couple of change proposals - Need community input - MR Title and Violent CommentsWhatever, dude. Enjoy all the piss stains on the floor, and then pat yourself on the back because you think it makes you inclusive. You're a circle jerk of one. | /r/MensRights | 05/03/12 05:43 PM |
| 3 | A couple of change proposals - Need community input - MR Title and Violent CommentsYou're talking in circles (jerks). I don't have time to chase you around, trying to get you to deal with a direct point. | /r/MensRights | 05/03/12 03:27 PM |
| 3 | A couple of change proposals - Need community input - MR Title and Violent CommentsThat is not what was being discussed here. So let's try to stay on topic. I said that we needed more places where misandry was not tolerated, you responded to me with an allegation of wanting to form a circle jerk. So I responded to that, appropriately. Now you have gone into left field. | /r/MensRights | 05/03/12 02:30 PM |
| 3 | A couple of change proposals - Need community input - MR Title and Violent CommentsAre you really unable to tell the difference between giving bigotry a platform and "silencing dissent"? Really? That is pathetically myopic. Dealing with racism sometimes means a reasoned discussion in dissent of concepts like affirmative action. Does that mean you have to allow The Klan to have a microphone? How 'bout the WN's? Do they have to have a place to talk about "booting fags" so that you feel cozy and inclusive? The thinking that instructs us that most depraved and ideologically infect… | /r/MensRights | 05/03/12 01:58 PM |
| 1 | A short lesson in realityIn that case, I suggest you go back, and this time learn something. | /r/MensRights | 04/03/12 08:00 PM |
| 1 | A short lesson in realityThe land of not letting some asshole stranger, or anyone else, define me as a man. I suggest a trip there for you. Very nice place. | /r/MensRights | 04/03/12 01:54 PM |
| 3 | A couple of change proposals - Need community input - MR Title and Violent CommentsI figured that is what you meant, but I don't think it will mean much to the average person wandering in here. | /r/MensRights | 04/03/12 02:13 AM |
| 7 | A couple of change proposals - Need community input - MR Title and Violent CommentsI support this on all counts. Including the fact that you have supported a lot of MRA work. I have seen it first hand. Also, since it came up, there is the world wide web and all the mainstream frigging everything for the expression of misandry. We need more places where it is not tolerated. Down vote Jeremiah all you want, he is still right. | /r/MensRights | 04/03/12 01:00 AM |
| 7 | A couple of change proposals - Need community input - MR Title and Violent CommentsI like the idea of changing from "earning scorn..." to something else, but what you have here is too watered down. Doesn't even mention the term "men's rights" or the key issue of FRA's. And what is "spending inequality" supposed to mean? Other than that you guys really do a good job for an environment like this. Just my 2 cents. | /r/MensRights | 04/03/12 12:57 AM |
| 3 | A short lesson in realityJust one question for you. Go visit the link again and tell me what paid advertising you see on it? Better yet, I will answer it for you. NONE. AVfM has no advertisers and never will. The banners on the home page are comps given to other important men's sites like FRS, AM and Angry Harry. People interested in men's rights might just be interested in all these other sites, as well as AVfM. | /r/MensRights | 04/03/12 12:49 AM |
| 6 | A short lesson in realityReal men don't tell anyone else what a real man is. | /r/MensRights | 03/03/12 09:55 PM |
| 1 | The ethics of hypocrisyYep, sorry. The good side of that is that we are switching to a dedicated server. Before long we will be back, with enhanced performance. | /r/MensRights | 27/02/12 11:27 PM |
| 2 | Sexual privilege checklist - for the next time they squawk about male privilegeIndeed, I don't respect you. At long last you got something right. | /r/MensRights | 25/02/12 07:49 AM |
| 1 | Sexual privilege checklist - for the next time they squawk about male privilegeOh, so the misandric feminists responsible for anti-male legislation, and hateful ideology in academe and the media aren't real, but you, KittysNeverLie (gotta love THAT) are real. And you are not smart enough to consider that the largely female demand for ornamental jewelry has anything to do with blood diamonds. I bet you think that it was male demand for baby seal fur that led to all that slaughter as well? Why tell you to fuck off? Why not? You can't deal with a valid argument when it is pre… | /r/MensRights | 24/02/12 06:22 PM |
| 3 | Double standards: the sine qua non of misandryThis one is a straight up ass kicker. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/12 03:09 AM |
| 2 | Sexual privilege checklist - for the next time they squawk about male privilegeWhy hate on another gender to gain more rights? I dunno. Ask feminists. They're the experts on that. I also note that you think the blood diamond argument is funny, which is telling. As long as boys are getting slaughtered, it either doesn't count or provides a laugh. Fuck you. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/12 03:06 AM |
| 1 | Sexual privilege checklist - for the next time they squawk about male privilegePerhaps when so many of my brothers are not rotting in prisons or living in poverty or can see their children or can live in their own homes or keep their own income - right down the street from me - I will take a look at the lives of women in a Congolese Jungle 8,000 miles away. But until then, no. Besides, I am pretty sure I will find that Congolese men have it worse. I wonder how many female children have been conscripted into armies to fight for blood diamonds so that white bitches in the we… | /r/MensRights | 23/02/12 10:17 PM |
| -1 | Sexual privilege checklist - for the next time they squawk about male privilegeYep, something happened. It's called feminism. Here is a more detailed account of my background. http://www.avoiceformen.com/activism-page/paul-elam/ I am saying that exactly. I don't care about the abuse of a girl but I am concerned about the abuse of boys. It is not because I think abuse of females is right or justifiable, and I do not condone it. So in that respect I suppose I care - in the abstract sense. The problem is that while we have countless agencies, programs, government funding and … | /r/MensRights | 22/02/12 11:09 PM |
| 1 | Sexual privilege checklist - for the next time they squawk about male privilegeYou really are clueless about what I see and don't. I spent a number of years advocating for women and women's causes. I have been involved in this arena for most of my adult life. I am not blinded by hate or anything else. There is a time when it is appropriate to focus on the issues of one group. Women have had the benefit of that focus for half a century, to the point that the feminist agenda has become elitist, exclusionary and bigoted. (I know, your next step is likely to tell me that not a… | /r/MensRights | 22/02/12 07:52 PM |
| -5 | Sexual privilege checklist - for the next time they squawk about male privilegeI don't give a damn about women's issues collectively. In fact, aside from some exceptions in the third world, they have nothing to complain about at all, as this list aptly illustrates. Women have enjoyed the advantages of chivalry and male disposibilty on their behalf for countless generations as well as the insanely female-centric agenda of feminism for the last 50 years. During none of that time has anyone been willing to listen to the issues of men. You yourself didn't know anything about t… | /r/MensRights | 22/02/12 04:34 PM |
| 0 | Sexual privilege checklist - for the next time they squawk about male privilegeNeither. It is about whether to wear a gag for the benefit of people that don't want you to talk in the first place. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/12 02:46 AM |
| 1 | Sexual privilege checklist - for the next time they squawk about male privilegeCorrection. That should be saying saying "squawk" is counter productive is counter productive. As long as we are riding the 'be congenial to bigots' wagon, we might as well staying stay on it good and proper. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/12 02:45 AM |
| -9 | Sexual privilege checklist - for the next time they squawk about male privilegeSaying "squawk" is counter productive is counter productive. | /r/MensRights | 21/02/12 11:03 PM |
| 1 | Trigger warning: FeminismActually, I like your logic better. Distort criticism of trigger warnings on blogs till you make it look like a dead baby joke. Much better than actually addressing the point for some, I suppose. | /r/MensRights | 19/02/12 08:42 PM |
| 1 | Trigger warning: FeminismFact is, I don't allow anything I come across to ruin my day. It is called mental health. And I don't have a problem with anyone choosing to put their heads in the sand to keep from dealing with unfinished business. It's a free world, even if your choice is to be unhealthy. But the point you people keep missing (and avoiding like it is a trigger or something) is that there is no way to protect yourself in this way. Way too many reminders in life come our way aside from feminist blogs. Trying to … | /r/MensRights | 19/02/12 08:38 PM |
| -3 | Trigger warning: FeminismIsn't a part of the healing from any trauma actually "getting over it"? I don't mean that in the "man up" sense, but just basic emotional health. The fact is that even if every feminist blog in the world puts a trigger warning out before they write about rape, people are still not going to evade the subject no matter what they do. They will go to movies that will reference rape without knowing it. It will come up on television, radio, in magazines, social conversations, school, etc. Is the entir… | /r/MensRights | 19/02/12 12:03 PM |
| -2 | Trigger warning: FeminismOh great. Armchair analysis from a redbot. Actually no, I don't require any advance warnings. I prefer to embrace life, and my emotions as they come. After all, they are only feelings. They don't hold any significant power over me, and the last thing I want is for my feelings to dictate to anyone else what they have to say before they say it. That is not recovery from trauma, it is being a slave to it, and I opted away from that a long time ago. But I tell you what, Peachy, I would prefer a warn… | /r/MensRights | 19/02/12 11:52 AM |
| -7 | Trigger warning: FeminismThe statement is well reasoned. Feminism is based on so much hypocrisy, lies, distortions and misinformation that it consists of easy slams and little else. Maybe you are too mature and sophisticated to appreciate the delivery, but you are unable to refute it. And that is where our difference lies. You ask me how this all affects me, why it seems to bother me. You claim that eating disorders are not a feminist issue. All this an more speaks to a lot of ignorance. I point to the fact that feminis… | /r/MensRights | 19/02/12 09:01 AM |
| -10 | Trigger warning: FeminismLooking for an easy slam at feminists is like looking for cow shit on a cattle ranch. As to me personally, you have no idea whatsoever what I have struggled with. I assure you I have not been spared trauma even though I don't expect the world to anticipate it and give me some sort of specialized warning. I hate to have to point this out to you, but this whole load of garbage isn't and never was about preventing post traumatic memories. These people obsess on issues they think are traumatic to wo… | /r/MensRights | 19/02/12 06:05 AM |
| 5 | On military preparedness - why women have no business in the militaryMost of them? I am just flattened by this. And who, pray tell, is supposed to pay the price when the "most of" standard doesn't pan out? I have the same reaction to the rest of your statement. You don't understand the military. Men are already suffering now in the M.E. because of policies that protect women and further a political agenda to have women there when they don't belong. (and I say that as someone who does not think the men should be there either). Combat zones are not day care camps o… | /r/MensRights | 15/02/12 06:33 PM |
| 6 | On military preparedness - why women have no business in the militaryYes there are. So by your logic we reserve jobs for non heavy lifters to go to those that don't measure up for the military's basic requirements for fitness. I'm a vet, and I can tell you that when I was in training focused on every individual being able to carry the weight of any job because you have no way of predicting what circumstances on the ground will dictate. It is not as simple as just a division of responsibilities. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/12 05:52 PM |
| 5 | Lessons from nature: primal masculinityFeminists, both male and female, despise the fact that at some primal level, the masculine ideal elicits their respect. They cannot stand it. Deep down inside they realize that the same kind of respect can never ever be earned by the provided-for sex. That is why feminists are trying to drive men down to their own level. | /r/MensRights | 14/02/12 10:23 PM |
| 1 | Red pill prescription: take 'em allAhhh, were this only a juke box, lol | /r/MensRights | 14/02/12 09:02 PM |
| 3 | Red pill prescription: take 'em allGood, kindly link them to the donation button and pass along that I am granting female empowerment for donations of $100.00 or more. | /r/MensRights | 14/02/12 01:21 AM |
| 1 | More on the anti-man mentalityDishonesty, like pussy, can be a drug. :) | /r/MensRights | 13/02/12 09:35 PM |
| 5 | Campus warrior against political correctnessMy site is known for a lot of things. As a source of refuge for men who don't think like you. And I figured as long as you were misinterpreting Mr. Harlan, that you might like some of it yourself. Hypocrite much? | /r/MensRights | 09/02/12 11:04 PM |
| 1 | Campus warrior against political correctnessWhy do you laugh at rape victims? That is disgusting. | /r/MensRights | 09/02/12 09:51 PM |
| 8 | Campus warrior against political correctnessI love watching a good comment get down voted for being truthful. :) | /r/MensRights | 09/02/12 09:49 PM |
| 1 | Why are atheists so religious? PZ Myers and the religion of feminismWell, that kind of boils down to feminist atheists getting the same criticism from Christians and other atheists. It is not the first time feminism has been regarded as a religion, either. In fact, the similarities are so striking that when Roy Hollander sued the Columbia women's studies department, he did so on the grounds that feminism was being treated as a religion. | /r/MensRights | 07/02/12 10:26 PM |
| 1 | Why are atheists so religious? PZ Myers and the religion of feminismI have to say the same for your comment. First, Myers assumes that men, generally speaking, do not listen to women, generally speaking. Generally bullshit, and certainly not provable on his part. It is PC flattery designed for a female audience at the expense of men. What should be even more obvious is a that Myers admonishes us to listen to women, not to reason, not to logic, not to empirical evidence, but to anything with a vagina. How fucking stupid is that? If he had bothered to say we shoul… | /r/MensRights | 07/02/12 05:13 PM |
| -1 | Why are atheists so religious? PZ Myers and the religion of feminismReply to the comment from the article: I am not creating a fallacy at all. Far from it. I noted exceptions (NAAALT) since you seem to insist on it. However, in the online presence of vocal atheists there is an overarching feminist narrative. That is all I said, and I stand by it. If it does not apply to you then I suggest you have better options than to be offended by it. | /r/MensRights | 07/02/12 12:39 PM |
| 2 | How to get picked for a juryNullify. | /r/MensRights | 06/02/12 10:31 PM |
| 7 | How feminists corrupt DV research - a bombshell of a paper by DV expert Dr. Murray StrausHe's pissed that other feminists are ignoring his life work on DV research. Totally unsupported. Conjecture on your part doesn't constitute facts any more than it does for feminists. As is most of everything else you said except for the last line. | /r/MensRights | 05/02/12 02:38 AM |
| 1 | Rape is a 1970's mood ringThe really sad thing here is that in all likelihood, this person did think before responding, with all the intellectual prowess at their disposal. | /r/MensRights | 04/02/12 01:36 AM |
| 1 | AVfM Radio Tonight: Nullify!I don't care if 10,000 guilty men go free, it is time to correct the problem. Feminist influence on our legal system has been so corrupting that the only route left to promote justice is to undermine the system. You won't be able to screen MRA's because we are going to teach them how to make themselves attractive to jury selection. This was bound to happen sooner or later. My vote is sooner. | /r/MensRights | 03/02/12 11:46 PM |
| 2 | Put on your thinking caps - What is your problem with advocating for men's rights?They are good points. You are just refusing to deal with them, or your too incompetent. You are focusing on bullshit minutia. There are always really angry people involved when justice is withheld based on prejudice. Otherwise there would be no need for a movement. It's a given. Crack a history book some time. You're just wailing pointlessly about some angry voices that were created by the injustice the MRM is fighting. It has nothing to do with how people look, especially to people like you. | /r/MensRights | 02/02/12 10:18 AM |
| 2 | Put on your thinking caps - What is your problem with advocating for men's rights?I second Snark's fuck off. And can I add fuck off and die, quickly. The problem is disingenuous shits screaming "Misogynist! Misogynist!" every time there is a challenge to feminism or a serious question about the values embraced by the average woman in this culture. The good news is that you people are not doing yourselves fuck all for good with that tactic. Reasonable people understand legitimate anger. Even unreasonable people do if you catch them at the right moment. The notion of men's righ… | /r/MensRights | 02/02/12 05:27 AM |
| 0 | Put on your thinking caps - What is your problem with advocating for men's rights?I know just how you feel. When I see how many forest fires we have it makes me suspicious of anyone who makes kitchen matches. Think maybe we should worry about the world not even knowing men's issues exist more than we worry about them becoming like feminists? | /r/MensRights | 02/02/12 05:15 AM |
| 1 | Please distribute this video on false rape claimsLOL., spreading information instead of an emotional response? Sure, right after society starts paying attention to information. Really, I can't speak for the maker of the video, but I assure you that many black men were lynched on rape allegations. These comments are nit picking bullshit. | /r/MensRights | 28/01/12 05:40 AM |
| 2 | Colleges push anti-male sex policies to the edge (Pierce Harlan and Paul Elam)http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/false-rape-culture/colleges-push-anti-male-sex-policies-to-the-edge/ | /r/MensRights | 28/01/12 12:12 AM |
| 3 | i have to give the good men project their due . they are printing more MRA orientated storiesThat is the whole point. As the tune changes in different places, and more of the MRA message gets exposed, gender ideologues have fewer and fewer places to operate in the open. They have to settle for places where they cannot be challenged, which reduces their credibility and social acceptability. Kinda like what happened to the klan. But GMP still has a long way to go before proving they can be trusted. | /r/MensRights | 27/01/12 08:46 PM |
| 1 | All this goodness is pissing me offVery good rewording | /r/MensRights | 24/01/12 03:38 AM |
| 1 | All this goodness is pissing me offSure, but what you are saying has nothing really to do with AVfM articles, except perhaps for being in general agreement with them. I hold doors open, too, it is just not based on sex in any way. I don't see anyone advocating an end to courtesy of that kind at AVfM, just the expectation of courtesies based on the genitals of the giver and the recipient. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/12 10:31 PM |
| 2 | All this goodness is pissing me offI understand what you are saying, but generally disagree. What AVfM pushes for is the sacrifices be conscious. We have quite a few people at AVfM that sacrifice quite a bit for the MRM, which we believe is ultimately for the greater good, but not because we are programmed to. Most men, even highly conscious red pill takers, will offer something to society. They just won't be shamed into doing it. Big difference. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/12 07:12 PM |
| 3 | State sponsored sexism in the US prison systemThank you. I will be looking into this some more. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/12 09:42 AM |
| 1 | State sponsored sexism in the US prison systemDo you have facts to back that up? We would love to get the story out there if it is true. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/12 06:26 AM |
| 4 | State sponsored sexism in the US prison systemYep, we are very proud to have him at AVfM. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/12 02:33 AM |
| 1 | Maligned - warning, almost 12,000 words, but well worth the readThen why is your comment still here? Or is that part of the mods conspiracy? | /r/MensRights | 22/01/12 05:50 AM |
| 2 | All this goodness is killing meThat pretty much sums it up. | /r/MensRights | 21/01/12 02:26 AM |
| 3 | All this goodness is killing mehttp://goodmenproject.com/good-is-good/my-response-to-an-open-letter-from-mras/ I have also linked this in to the article, thanks. | /r/MensRights | 20/01/12 11:18 PM |
| 4 | 21st century fatherhoodJust read that exchange. Most unfortunate. | /r/MensRights | 19/01/12 05:22 AM |
| 3 | Selling the MRMAgree with JeremiahMRA, Very well said. | /r/MensRights | 17/01/12 06:23 AM |
| 0 | Real men are disposable, so says MariaOf course. :-) | /r/MensRights | 17/01/12 06:21 AM |
| 0 | Real men are disposable, so says MariaTemper, temper! LOL! | /r/MensRights | 17/01/12 03:43 AM |
| 0 | Real men are disposable, so says MariaNope, I simply rejected your ideas, and explained why. I did not expect you to feel ashamed about it, quite unlike your intentions for men who don't die for your causes. | /r/MensRights | 16/01/12 05:20 AM |
| 1 | Real men are disposable, so says MariaWhat is wrong with you? You have to create imaginary scenarios in order to give us a pumped up rationale for using shame to control men? Perhaps I was harsh on you on the understanding part. Perhaps you did understand it and that is the problem. You are just like her, gloifying dead boys and tossing out crumbs of "honor" for their diposability. I have always said that there is so little difference between feminists and traditionalists that it is not worth distinquishing them from each other. Bot… | /r/MensRights | 15/01/12 07:52 PM |
| 0 | Real men are disposable, so says MariaSounds to me as if she's telling ALL adults not to be self-centered and take care of those you're responsible for Sounds to me as though you didn't read or didn't understand her article. But of course more of you is revealed when you talk about calling people a "fucking coward" for not being willing to die for the corporate interests of your country. Call me a coward if you will. The name being callled by a moron that does not know what courage means will not bother me in the least. | /r/MensRights | 15/01/12 06:46 AM |
| 2 | The vanishing civil rights of Australia's men - If this does not wake up the Australian people, then we might as well put a sheet over their lifeless bodies.I am really not being sensitive. A little impatient, perhaps. I thought, and still do, that making that kind of comment about the statement being extreme, give how extreme the events in Australia are, was like pointing out that a man on fire was ruining his shirt. I take criticism all the time an I am fine with it, but I do prefer it when people at least come close to saying something relevant. | /r/MensRights | 13/01/12 04:56 AM |
| 0 | The vanishing civil rights of Australia's men - If this does not wake up the Australian people, then we might as well put a sheet over their lifeless bodies.Oh, Please. If you think that is more worthy of your attention than the facts presented in the article then lets put a sheet over your lifeless brain. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/12 10:18 PM |
| 2 | Shepherd of liesI don't have a stone face. I just got finished laughing my ass off reading your concerns that assuming women wear panties is bigotry. Dude, get some help. Done here. | /r/MensRights | 10/01/12 07:50 AM |
| 3 | Shepherd of liesI get it. Rape jokes are perfectly acceptable but saying "get your panties in a twist" sets off the red flag of sexism for you. You're not PC resistant, you're common sense resistant. I am against the application of gender roles to men or women, totally and completely. I don't think that telling a woman not to get her panties in a twist is relegating her to a role. It's a figure of speech, and nothing more. If you think it is more, then you delude yourself about being PC resistant. It is OK to e… | /r/MensRights | 10/01/12 05:34 AM |
| 5 | Shepherd of liesIn order to present a counterargument I have to first be presented with an argument. People assuming that a large masculine man might identify with other masculine figures isn't sexism, it's common sense, even if you were the special exception. Calling something like that sexism isn't an argument, it's a catastrophic failure of reason and indicates a mental malleability to PC that qualifies as a disability. | /r/MensRights | 10/01/12 05:06 AM |
| 4 | Shepherd of liesWhat fucking planet are you on? | /r/MensRights | 10/01/12 04:20 AM |
| 3 | Eric Holder weaponizes a Grey Gooseyes, thank you. Anyone can send me an email to [email protected]. Please put "article correction" in the subject line and be very specific as to the location of the error. We will promptly correct any mistakes. | /r/MensRights | 09/01/12 08:18 PM |
| 1 | Go My Own WayWhy don't you post the music you have produced. | /r/MensRights | 09/01/12 10:17 AM |
| 1 | Eric Holder weaponizes a Grey GooseThank you for the offer, and please don't think I am looking a gift horse in the mouth, or trying to offend, but what do you mean by offering your services? We do need a line editor, for sure, but we also have a demanding schedule and the need for immediate attention to that work if it is going to be done. Frankly, most people can't or won't make that kind of commitment, and I don't blame them. When the day comes, and I think it will, that someone with line editing skills and a whole lot of time… | /r/MensRights | 09/01/12 02:11 AM |
| 1 | An open letter to Bill and Melinda GatesYou are speaking utter nonsense. Condoms are practically 100% effective against the spread of STD's. When you determine whether a surgical procedure is safe, you have to weight it against not only the possible complications and side effects, but you also have to weigh in the availability of other less invasive and less risky measures. Circumcision is a joke of an anti STD measure compared to condoms. | /r/MensRights | 07/01/12 08:59 PM |
| 1 | An open letter to Bill and Melinda GatesNope, your just setting up a contradiction where one does not exist. I don't consider either of these to be safe surgical procedures. | /r/MensRights | 07/01/12 05:43 PM |
| 10 | An open letter to Bill and Melinda GatesWhat I claim is that the science is incomplete and misleading. The CDC issued a report that concludes that circumcision results in reduced risk for HIV acquisition in males. The problem is that the centerpiece study that they used for their report was the "Orange Farm Study." That was the same study cited in the OP here, in which all the clinical trials were stopped prematurely, destroying the credibility of the outcome. The CDC made no mention of that fact, which destroyed their credibility as … | /r/MensRights | 06/01/12 04:29 PM |
| 1 | An open letter to Bill and Melinda GatesThx | /r/MensRights | 06/01/12 04:22 PM |
| 0 | Feminists: demented, stunned or cultistsComplete Bullshit. Any ideology that is concerned exclusively with the issues of one demographic cannot, by its very nature, be about equality. That is not to say that women never had specific issues in need of amelioration, but the result of feminism, as it is actually practiced (opposed to your naive definition) is that the ideologues have created false issues e.g. wage gap, distorted stats on DV and rape, in order to justify seeking more special privilege and funding. The equal rights ploy on… | /r/MensRights | 03/01/12 04:49 PM |
| -1 | Feminists: demented, stunned or cultistsPeople used to think slave ownership was a good thing in the Antebellum South. Slavery still needed to be attacked. I don't know about you, but feminism IS my enemy, and so is a lot of what you call society. That is why ALL social movements begin with negative attention. Try learning some history before you are so harsh on the people who are now making it. | /r/MensRights | 03/01/12 04:35 AM |
| 1 | Sheila Jeffreys a "real" concern Down Underah, thank you | /r/MensRights | 28/12/11 09:39 PM |
| 1 | Sheila Jeffreys a "real" concern Down UnderSo your logic here is that because the government disregards the men it uses to dispense and absorb violence, then that proves there is no plan to bring them more of the same? Really? | /r/MensRights | 28/12/11 03:14 PM |
| 1 | A resounding silenceYep, you are defining how the world pretty much works, but as I am invested pretty heavily in exposing what is "expected" of men, and what their "value" has come to mean, particularly when it is at the expense of their lives, health and freedom, then part of that means that what other people think I need to do to garner their approval of my worth is less than relevant. So yeah, I have no problems with your choices about me, at all. | /r/MensRights | 20/12/11 10:34 PM |
| 2 | A resounding silenceThere is a problem with you view, however, when it comes to a basic question. Utility to who or what? That load you want us all to share may not be one that I am willing to carry, and I may have damn good reasons for it. How do many men prove their "worth" these days? By fighting and dying in illicit wars because we tell them it is their duty? By paying to support a woman "in a manner to which she has been accustomed," after she has used the family courts to shear him of everything and kick him … | /r/MensRights | 20/12/11 09:24 PM |
| 3 | A resounding silenceROTFLMAO!! | /r/MensRights | 20/12/11 09:13 PM |
| -3 | Release to the WorldThank you. But I don't need luck. All I need is their ideas, and their words, on display. The rest takes care of itself. It's just gravy that it pisses people like you off. Very well made, home style gravy. Have a nice life. :) | /r/MensRights | 18/12/11 09:35 PM |
| -3 | Release to the WorldLOL, you have seriously overestimated your understanding of sexual politics. The reason, and the only reason, that feminists are in power, is because of chivalry and other extensions of reproductive genetic programming. Feminists are some of the most shrill, anti-charismatic people around. The did not finesse their way into power, they whined their way into it and charismatic, powerful men did the work for them. And in the current zeitgeist, with charisma and being persuasive rendered ineffectiv… | /r/MensRights | 17/12/11 08:24 PM |
| -10 | Release to the WorldIndeed it is. Now go fuck yourself. | /r/MensRights | 17/12/11 03:48 AM |
| -9 | Release to the WorldFact check: I never claimed to speak for you. I hope that helps | /r/MensRights | 17/12/11 02:47 AM |
| -3 | Release to the WorldI will make some coffee for them. | /r/MensRights | 17/12/11 02:46 AM |
| -12 | Release to the WorldIt is comforting to know what is about to happen. It has needed to happen for years. Agent Orange has done a great service for humanity, and as far as I can tell on this thread, "humanity" sure as fuck needs it. Am I really seeing people get upset that the identities of violent ideologues who have proclaimed they want to murder children are about to be outed? Shame on the fucking lot of you. What kind of moral depravity leads a person to treat the messenger like he is the problem? My site has al… | /r/MensRights | 16/12/11 11:03 PM |
| 4 | A call to mothers to stop killing their childrenWhat is more interesting is that forty years ago, the spousal homicide rate was roughly equal. What changed? The DV industry gave women shelters, places to go BEFORE killing abusive partners. No such "luck" with men. It may well be that the DV industry is responsible for the disparity in deaths between women and men. | /r/MensRights | 13/12/11 09:36 PM |
| 1 | New Moderation Policy for r/MRI believe you, but I also think you understand my objections. | /r/MensRights | 12/12/11 09:52 PM |
| 0 | New Moderation Policy for r/MRyes, and thankful. | /r/MensRights | 12/12/11 06:46 PM |
| 1 | New Moderation Policy for r/MRI do not have, nor have I ever had a problem with any rules here. What I have a problem with is seeing AVfM cited along with a word like justice in scare quotes, and when vetting concerns about vigilantism. The same things I said in my first post on this. It's your forum and your free speech, but using my website in this way is bullshit and you know it. | /r/MensRights | 12/12/11 04:05 AM |
| 0 | New Moderation Policy for r/MRPersonal Information: Personal information is defined as information about a person or a user that is not easily accessible via a Google search. This type of information is not allowed as per the global reddit policy, and we plan to enforce it on r/MR as well. If you are posting information from Facebook, all names should be blurred or obscured in some way. When it comes to sites such as A Voice For Men revealing personal information about people for "justice" purposes, we will address these on … | /r/MensRights | 12/12/11 02:42 AM |
| 1 | We are all being watched - Canadian MRA interrogated by police officialsPerhaps he is willing to explain it to you. I personally don't ask MRA's to explain anything like that. | /r/MensRights | 11/12/11 12:05 AM |
| 2 | We are all being watched - Canadian MRA interrogated by police officialsIf you are an MRA, you ought to know enough to have a good idea who he is and how to get a hold of him. But I will be damned if I will out him. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/11 05:19 AM |
| 10 | When feminists attack- former VAWA attorney assaults fathers rights activistI wish I could upvote that about a thousand times. | /r/MensRights | 08/12/11 11:06 PM |
| 1 | JtO apologizes for Register-her.comLOL | /r/MensRights | 06/12/11 06:07 PM |
| 1 | JtO apologizes for Register-her.comYou are still waltzing around the very core of this problem. Name me a male comedian that makes humor of cutting off parts of female sexual anatomy,or that could without serious repercussions. You need to answer that one or just STFU. | /r/MensRights | 06/12/11 08:00 AM |
| 5 | JtO apologizes for Register-her.comFirst, you used YOUR rape jokes as the example, not professional comedians. Then there is this: I imagine the same would happen as if some woman told a castration joke. Your "imagination" must be fueled by methamphetamine and crack. This is the problem with people like you. You are absolutely clueless -presumably by choice - about the way the world operates. I pray you are just being dishonest because dishonest people can learn to tell the truth, but if you can look at the world around you and c… | /r/MensRights | 06/12/11 07:03 AM |
| 10 | JtO apologizes for Register-her.comBut a joke about violence, of really any sort, is always acceptable, for the simple reason that it is a mere joke. Absolute bullshit. Go into your job and openly tell rape jokes, or jokes about sexually mutilating women and see what happens. | /r/MensRights | 06/12/11 06:53 AM |
| 1 | Borderline Personality Disorder: Sick, or just crazy asshole?ME If you have evidence to the contrary, present it. You No, your approach to this is destructive and has much research backing that up. Translation: You have no evidence to back up a single thing you are saying. Period. All hat and no cattle. It's not me that is desperate here, and every time you post you prove it. I will explain a couple of other things to you and then I am done here. I don't have time to debate someone that can't follow what they have been presented. However it is one tool am… | /r/MensRights | 04/12/11 03:34 PM |
| 0 | Borderline Personality Disorder: Sick, or just crazy asshole?If you have evidence to the contrary, present it. You're just clutching at straws here. If a depressed person has a psychotic break, then yes, they cannot make an informed decision. But that is not the same thing as impairment due to just the depression. Your approach to this is destructive. Accountability is a valuable tool for anyone to help deal with some very real problems. You are so wrapped in concerns about victim blaming that you are missing the golden nugget. If a person can't make rati… | /r/MensRights | 04/12/11 02:23 AM |
| 0 | Borderline Personality Disorder: Sick, or just crazy asshole?Let me explain why you are the moron here. First, read the article again until you comprehend what I am saying. I never said that depressed people had control over what they feel. They don't. For that matter, neither do borderlines. My point was clearly stated that people with depression do have control over their actions; the implication being that we can best serve depressed people by addressing whatever endogenous and/or exogenous factors are contributing to the problem and by giving them res… | /r/MensRights | 03/12/11 07:20 PM |
| 0 | Borderline Personality Disorder: Sick, or just crazy asshole?As a person who has repeatedly dealt with the devastation that personality disordered women have brought into the lives of men I have worked with allow me to say, you're welcome. I understand that makes you angry, and I get why. I don't make up the things that happen in life. If I had my way, there would be a treatment for BPD. Currently, there isn't. And the fact remains that BPD's do a tremendous amount of damage to peoples lives, and all people have a right to know what the dangers are. You s… | /r/MensRights | 03/12/11 02:45 AM |
| 2 | Moral Panic for Fun & Profit - How language was used to construct rape culture out of thin airAh, I see. I am not sure about that. I am sure he would address that with you if you questioned him at the site. I don't know if he follows these threads. | /r/MensRights | 02/12/11 09:15 PM |
| 1 | Apology to Men's Rights ActivistsShe is leeching off her husband. That is just one of the gender role disadvantages for men that the movement is about. | /r/MensRights | 02/12/11 09:14 PM |
| 2 | Moral Panic for Fun & Profit - How language was used to construct rape culture out of thin airThe article was saying that rape was encoded into the biology of some felines. | /r/MensRights | 02/12/11 01:28 AM |
| 1 | The feminist fantasy of "male privilege" - Truth is, feminist arguments hardly ever back up their claims of “male privilege” with anything more than superficial hyperbole or emotional tantrums.Translation: I was so stupid as to promote the idea that women's and men's experience in war is comparable, so now I will grab at some other straw to avoid stepping the same shit twice while trying to pretend I'm not a fuckwit. | /r/MensRights | 01/12/11 12:48 PM |
| 1 | The feminist fantasy of "male privilege" - Truth is, feminist arguments hardly ever back up their claims of “male privilege” with anything more than superficial hyperbole or emotional tantrums.lol since we're down to attacking each others' wording,..blah, blah, wah, wah, blabbity blab.... Translation: I was so stupid as to promote the idea that women's and men's experience in war is comparable, so now I will grab at some other straw to avoid stepping the same shit twice while trying to pretend I'm not a fuckwit. | /r/MensRights | 01/12/11 04:28 AM |
| 2 | The feminist fantasy of "male privilege" - Truth is, feminist arguments hardly ever back up their claims of “male privilege” with anything more than superficial hyperbole or emotional tantrums.OK, so you say your male. Fine by me. The last guy compared you to a stupid cunt and it seemed to fit well enough. You still have not answered the questions. Telling, all by itself. If you really think you have go on a limb to say men suffer more in women, then what can I say? You're a stupid cunt no matter what sex you are. If I am a pile of shit in the eyes of a person who thinks like you do, then I am doing great. Thanks. | /r/MensRights | 01/12/11 01:53 AM |
| 2 | The feminist fantasy of "male privilege" - Truth is, feminist arguments hardly ever back up their claims of “male privilege” with anything more than superficial hyperbole or emotional tantrums.Would you rather be raped, or dead? Would you rather be raped, or legless? Would you rather be raped or wake up every night for years hearing the screams of your dying comrades? Well? Comparing the experiences of women in war, which are admittedly sometimes horrible, to the experiences of men, which are almost always far beyond horrible, is a sterling example of ignorant misandry. Women like you will always fail to recognize that the experience of war related suffering of men and women is not co… | /r/MensRights | 30/11/11 11:33 PM |
| 2 | Bleeding Sweden: the fall into ideological depravityDo you really expect me to point to the conversation that is recorded in front of your eyes and explain it to you like you were retarded? Hint: The answer is do it yourself. Second hint: Try growing up first. Lates. | /r/MensRights | 30/11/11 07:29 AM |
| 2 | Bleeding Sweden: the fall into ideological depravityLet me know when you are ready to substantiate any of your claims. If you are going to work this hard (for you) you might as well have something to show for it. | /r/MensRights | 29/11/11 10:23 PM |
| 1 | Bleeding Sweden: the fall into ideological depravityLOL, the fiction here is the illusion you are trying to create that you actually have a point to make. You haven't substantiated a single thing. Nothing. You merely called the article "fiction" as though your utterance of that made it so. Like all feminists (or those who conduct themselves as such), you imagine that your POV is so unassailable that you don't figure the need to support it with evidence. It is what makes people like you such easy fodder, but ultimately boring and puerile. The arti… | /r/MensRights | 29/11/11 05:38 PM |
| 2 | Bleeding Sweden: the fall into ideological depravityNo, more like the fiction you are writing now. Not bad, if a little pointless and boring. | /r/MensRights | 29/11/11 03:47 PM |
| 1 | Bleeding Sweden: the fall into ideological depravitySure I do. What do you think attracted me to the study of feminism? | /r/MensRights | 28/11/11 10:35 PM |
| 2 | Bleeding Sweden: the fall into ideological depravityI'm a law and order kind of guy. | /r/MensRights | 28/11/11 09:30 PM |
| 3 | Bleeding Sweden: the fall into ideological depravityI understand a few Jews liked 1942 Poland as well. | /r/MensRights | 28/11/11 03:17 PM |
| 1 | Some questions from Sweden- A Swedish newspaper questions A Voice for Men about activism targeting the SCUM videoEveryone has their crosses to bear. | /r/MensRights | 27/11/11 10:36 PM |
| 3 | Some questions from Sweden- A Swedish newspaper questions A Voice for Men about activism targeting the SCUM videoSwedish courts have no power over me. Keep dreamin, matie. | /r/MensRights | 27/11/11 04:42 PM |
| 0 | Some questions from Sweden- A Swedish newspaper questions A Voice for Men about activism targeting the SCUM videoInternet-crime is crime. There has been no crime. Absolutely untrue. | /r/MensRights | 27/11/11 04:42 PM |
| 2 | Some questions from Sweden- A Swedish newspaper questions A Voice for Men about activism targeting the SCUM videoI don't see anyone messing with the politics of a foreign, just people expressing opinions about it. But if there were a place where people should mess with the politics of a foreign nation, Sweden would be a candidate. http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/feminist-governance-feminism/bleeding-sweden-the-fall-into-ideological-depravity/ | /r/MensRights | 27/11/11 06:38 AM |
| 0 | Some questions from Sweden- A Swedish newspaper questions A Voice for Men about activism targeting the SCUM videohttp://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/feminist-governance-feminism/bleeding-sweden-the-fall-into-ideological-depravity/ | /r/MensRights | 27/11/11 06:34 AM |
| 1 | Some questions from Sweden- A Swedish newspaper questions A Voice for Men about activism targeting the SCUM videoWell, I suppose we all become acclimated to our own level of discomfort. By the way, I never made a comparison between Scandinavia and the US, UK. That sort of thing is pointless, IMO. The mission of AVfM is to out ideologues who are spreading hatred. I understand that some will disagree with our tactics. As the saying goes, you can't please everyone (so you are better off not to try). But I would argue that any argument that AVfM is a detriment to the advancement of Scandinavian men's rights is… | /r/MensRights | 26/11/11 06:27 PM |
| 2 | Some questions from Sweden- A Swedish newspaper questions A Voice for Men about activism targeting the SCUM videoOh yes, they are not a part of SCUM, they are just SCUM actors, promoting a SCUM play to be presented to school children. Moron. Assage ought to know a little about Sweden, and I know (recently heard from) quite a few Swedish men and women who agree with him. | /r/MensRights | 26/11/11 04:09 AM |
| 0 | Some questions from Sweden- A Swedish newspaper questions A Voice for Men about activism targeting the SCUM videoDecided that even before reading it, eh? I have always known EXACTLY who I was dealing with. SCUM is right. | /r/MensRights | 26/11/11 12:46 AM |
| -1 | Some questions from Sweden- A Swedish newspaper questions A Voice for Men about activism targeting the SCUM videoAnd I am looking forward to the proof flying over your head. | /r/MensRights | 25/11/11 11:50 PM |
| 0 | Some questions from Sweden- A Swedish newspaper questions A Voice for Men about activism targeting the SCUM videoI will come back to this soon with a link for you. One of our writers is doing an analysis of Swedish laws. It will be chock full of facts that you will quickly ignore. That is the thing about facts. It takes honesty, and sometimes some balls, to deal with them in any meaningful way. So, it won't do you any good, but the facts will still be out there, not this drivel about "Oh, gee, we don't have alimony so there is no problem." | /r/MensRights | 25/11/11 07:44 PM |
| 0 | Some questions from Sweden- A Swedish newspaper questions A Voice for Men about activism targeting the SCUM videoSounds like you have it really good there. I guess that is why they are spreading violent propaganda to school children and Sweden is considered hostile to men by most Swedish MRA's. | /r/MensRights | 25/11/11 01:22 AM |
| -4 | Stalking Sady DoyleHappy to do it. Cheers. :) | /r/MensRights | 21/11/11 03:43 AM |
| -5 | Stalking Sady DoyleSo build a registry and put me on it. | /r/MensRights | 21/11/11 01:13 AM |
| 0 | Stalking Sady DoyleWell, it appears that despite what you think she should do, exposing bigots is more important to her. Good on her. What do you do besides whine? You suggested that I would back off with a punch in the nose. You prepared to deliver it? Didn't think so, and it wouldn't make me back off anyway. You're just another bitch that can't stand the fact that men are standing up to sick feminist bullshit. I've crapped better than you. Latah. | /r/MensRights | 20/11/11 09:08 AM |
| -2 | Stalking Sady DoyleOh, I see, you live in the land of "ought to be." Fact is that no one is getting stalked here. Try reading the actual article. The title is tongue-in-cheek. I am not doing anything that you claim I am doing, and this is precisely why what I actually do is so important. I shed light on bigots and liars. I attack their ideas. And I never endorse anything else. Learn to read, then come back and try to make a valid point. | /r/MensRights | 20/11/11 09:03 AM |
| -1 | Stalking Sady DoyleIzzey is a woman, you stupid fuck. | /r/MensRights | 19/11/11 09:51 PM |
| -3 | Stalking Sady DoyleI am often in the same situation. It's part of what I signed on for. And I am fine with it. If people expressing public political opinions can't take the heat of others that do the same, they should shut their mouths. Or if they want to, they can try to make me shut mine. Lots of luck with that one. | /r/MensRights | 19/11/11 09:50 PM |
| -3 | Stalking Sady DoyleI know some that aren't laughing about that any more, and more in the future. | /r/MensRights | 18/11/11 09:34 AM |
| 3 | In the bosom of justice - man slices dancing girlfriends breastsDoesn't look like it's me that needs to calm down. I'm not talking about shooting anyone. | /r/MensRights | 13/11/11 04:20 AM |
| 3 | In the bosom of justice - man slices dancing girlfriends breastsI am 54 years old. The only rape joke I ever recall hearing was told by Clayton Williams during his campaign for Governor of Texas. The joke, among other things, cost him the election. The idea that rape jokes are a common item among men is bullshit, and so is the idea that Osborne was being satirical. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/11 07:19 AM |
| -3 | In the bosom of justice - man slices dancing girlfriends breastsLOL, and it looks like he decided that bitch deserved a knife in the tits. So what's your whitey knighty point? Oh, wait, that's it! | /r/MensRights | 10/11/11 08:22 PM |
| 1 | In the bosom of justice - man slices dancing girlfriends breastsThank you. The nature of what AVfM does forces me to assume the intelligence of the reader. That will leave a few behind. Maybe a lot. But we like having a crowd that "gets it," even if it is a little smaller. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/11 07:12 PM |
| 1 | Tracy Odell of CafeMom placed on offenders registryA statement that is likely to lead to the reader into believing something that isn't true is misleading, even if it's correct. LOL!! | /r/MensRights | 10/11/11 07:09 PM |
| 1 | Tracy Odell of CafeMom placed on offenders registryI suppose I should answer that, since it is my registry. The registry is not just for civil and criminal offenses. It was designed that way from the beginning. Last I checked, I get to define my own intellectual property. The registry lists bigots. She is a bigot. She is on the registry. Nothing misleading about it. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/11 07:08 PM |
| 3 | Tracy Odell of CafeMom placed on offenders registryYour point is a fail in a number of ways, though I don't interpret the failure as your playing white knight. Ever heard of leaving? That is what people should do when a relationship becomes abusive. It is what many people do each and every day. They just leave. Supporting the idea that the sexual mutilation of an unconscious person is justified in the retributive sense, after a person CHOOSES to remain in an abusive relationship doesn't wash, IMO. Also note, and this is very important, that the … | /r/MensRights | 10/11/11 07:04 PM |
| 7 | In the bosom of justice - man slices dancing girlfriends breasts??? | /r/MensRights | 10/11/11 06:57 PM |
| 2 | Pamela O'Shaughnessy exposedWe aim to please. ;-) | /r/MensRights | 10/11/11 12:56 AM |
| 2 | Pamela O'Shaughnessy exposedOh, yeah, no doubt, and the truth is hurting that cunt pretty good right now, I'd say. Cheers. All smiles here. | /r/MensRights | 09/11/11 10:53 PM |
| 1 | Pamela O'Shaughnessy exposedSince you didn't get it, he just called your bullshit. You think it is "safe to say she was gang raped or something horrible like that"? Just what do you base that on? The fact that she is a bigot? Is that the source of bigotry? Then what explains your bigotry? If you need to find a man or men to blame every time a woman acts like a sociopath, that makes you a class A bigot in my book. Do us a favor and knock that stupid shit off. | /r/MensRights | 09/11/11 09:50 PM |
| 2 | Game Over - TDOM weighs in on GameAgreed. | /r/MensRights | 07/11/11 01:38 PM |
| 1 | Elam vs Frost: Round 5Sure, whatever. | /r/MensRights | 05/11/11 04:24 PM |
| 1 | Elam vs Frost: Round 5Yep, so do I. I use a simple formula to estimate reads (60% of total hits). Granted, this one may be a little less than that given there were more than 1,500 total comments on the exchange. Either way, your trying to make the point that no one was interested in this debate was a complete fail before you ever made that first comment. You're deluding yourself into thinking that because you are not interested in something that no one else is. Huge, and what should be embarrassing, fail. | /r/MensRights | 05/11/11 04:03 PM |
| 1 | Elam vs Frost: Round 5It's averaging 3,000 reads per post and hundreds of comments on most of them. Apparently fucks were given, just not by you. Funny how that makes the world go round. | /r/MensRights | 05/11/11 02:38 PM |
| 3 | Profiting from Pain - a cutting edge look at the money behind circumcisionWomen often tell me they prefer my circumcised penis to uncircumcised ones they have encountered previously. Well, shit son, why didn't you say so? Damn, if women prefer it, then it must be done, right? Right? | /r/MensRights | 05/11/11 01:49 AM |
| 1 | Elam vs Frost: Round 5Previous posts in chronological order http://www.avoiceformen.com/sexual-politics/game/chateau-bullshit/ http://www.avoiceformen.com/sexual-politics/game/paul-elam-does-not-have-the-answers-youre-looking-for/ http://www.avoiceformen.com/sexual-politics/game/elam-vs-frost-texas-death-match-round-1/ http://www.avoiceformen.com/sexual-politics/game/elam-vs-frost-round-2-frost-speaks/ http://www.avoiceformen.com/sexual-politics/game/elam-vs-frost-round-3/ http://www.avoiceformen.com/a-voice-for-men/… | /r/MensRights | 04/11/11 10:31 PM |
| 1 | Elam vs Frost: Round 4Good points, though I think a bit overstated on both sides. Still, this will provide the core of my last response in the debate. | /r/MensRights | 03/11/11 01:09 PM |
| 2 | Elam vs Frost: Round 4From the beginning http://www.avoiceformen.com/sexual-politics/game/chateau-bullshit/ http://www.avoiceformen.com/sexual-politics/game/paul-elam-does-not-have-the-answers-youre-looking-for/ http://www.avoiceformen.com/sexual-politics/game/elam-vs-frost-texas-death-match-round-1/ http://www.avoiceformen.com/sexual-politics/game/elam-vs-frost-round-2-frost-speaks/ http://www.avoiceformen.com/sexual-politics/game/elam-vs-frost-round-3/ | /r/MensRights | 03/11/11 10:49 AM |
| 1 | Apology to Men's Rights ActivistsI think you overrate your understanding of the law. Let's test that theory. What case can be made against me? Go ahead, lay it out. Let's examine what you think is the basis for a law suit. | /r/MensRights | 30/10/11 07:40 PM |
| 1 | Apology to Men's Rights ActivistsI am well prepared, good lawyer and all, for anyone that tries to sue. What I am doing has been thoroughly vetted and is perfectly legal. You must get your understanding of the law from watching movies or something. Besides, if someone told you I gave a damn about how you think RHC should be run, they lied to you. | /r/MensRights | 30/10/11 06:23 AM |
| 1 | To the editors of CafeMom, The StirOK | /r/MensRights | 28/10/11 08:45 AM |
| 2 | To the editors of CafeMom, The StirYou have not made your case that this is censorship, mainly because you can't. | /r/MensRights | 28/10/11 07:26 AM |
| 2 | To the editors of CafeMom, The StirYou have not demonstrated at all that this is intellectually dishonest, only that you disagree with it. Big difference. And you are also wrong to say I am taking their microphone. I don't have that power at all. All I can do is put on the internet that I think it is bigotry to support posting of that nature by allowing it, which is as intellectually honest as it gets. I boot and ban anyone on my site who advocates violence. Your point here is poorly, poorly thought out. | /r/MensRights | 28/10/11 06:58 AM |
| 4 | To the editors of CafeMom, The StirOne of the things I think is very important to remember here is that we are not playing by establishment rules (speaking for AVfM). Like John, I am squeamish about any censorship of speech, in most cases. But I have to ask myself how I actually feel about that as an ideal compared to the fact that men are being butchered and the Sharon Osborne's and even Cafe Moms of the world are facilitating an environment of social acceptability for it. It is, without any over statement, reminiscent of 1936 B… | /r/MensRights | 28/10/11 05:38 AM |
| 4 | Feminism and the plague of male homelessnessOh, and just so you know, Dickweed, one of our main contributors has been an advocate for homeless men in New York for a long, long time. | /r/MensRights | 27/10/11 10:10 PM |
| 5 | Feminism and the plague of male homelessnessThat's right, fuck homeless men because you don't think AVfM is doing what you want. Go fuck yourself, asshole. | /r/MensRights | 27/10/11 10:05 PM |
| 2 | Apology to Men's Rights ActivistsSo sue me. | /r/MensRights | 27/10/11 08:01 PM |
| 1 | Paul Elam does not have the answers you're looking for (debate, Game vs MRM)Exactly. Exactly. Exactly! | /r/MensRights | 27/10/11 07:30 PM |
| 2 | Apology to Men's Rights ActivistsWhere did you get your knowledge of law. watching daytime TV? There is no defamation in expressing opinions, or in pointing to what was written or said by anyone. It's called free speech. If one of these idiots is stupid enough to try to sue me, I will just turn it in to more branding for the site. | /r/MensRights | 27/10/11 07:27 PM |
| 2 | Nicole Fabian-Weber placed on offenders registryCan't comment there, but I did send her a friend request. :) | /r/MensRights | 27/10/11 08:31 AM |
| 1 | Nicole Fabian-Weber placed on offenders registry??? No page found.... | /r/MensRights | 27/10/11 03:54 AM |
| 2 | Nicole Fabian-Weber placed on offenders registryThanks again. We will get to it asap. and I will come back here to get the links. Cheers. | /r/MensRights | 27/10/11 01:29 AM |
| 1 | Apology to Men's Rights ActivistsWho the fuck are you to tell me what the site was originally meant to do? It's my site, and I know what it has been meant to do from the moment of conception. Fuck her. If her reputation won't stand scrutiny of her own words then she should just shut the fuck up and go back to leeching off her husband and settle for just ruining the one life that was dumb enough to be with her. Get this. I AM HAPPY TO DO ANYTHING LEGAL THAT I CAN TO BRING AS MUCH PAIN, SUFFERING AND HARDSHIP INTO THE LIVES OF TH… | /r/MensRights | 27/10/11 01:26 AM |
| 2 | Nicole Fabian-Weber placed on offenders registry"You can safely assume that I believe none of the shit he posts." It took me 10 minutes to stop laughing at that one, David. Wow! | /r/MensRights | 27/10/11 01:21 AM |
| 3 | Nicole Fabian-Weber placed on offenders registryThank you, we will be looking for it. | /r/MensRights | 26/10/11 07:27 PM |
| 4 | Nicole Fabian-Weber placed on offenders registryHave you attempted to register her? | /r/MensRights | 26/10/11 07:17 PM |
| 1 | Dear Colleague Letter to be included in VAWA renewal; kiss your rights good-bye college boysStop trying to feed a war machine, a corrupt family court system, a misandic university culture and a generation of entitled women? Ah, yes. | /r/MensRights | 26/10/11 04:57 PM |
| 1 | Dear Colleague Letter to be included in VAWA renewal; kiss your rights good-bye college boysThe solution is for men to drop out and stop producing anything. Enjoy the weed and video games and sparse living guys, the price of success is going up all the time, and even if you make it, the chances are fair that a woman will steal it from you legally. | /r/MensRights | 26/10/11 06:12 AM |
| 1 | Apology to Men's Rights ActivistsRead the information provided at RH for your answers. I am not going to type them out every time someone asks questions instead of investigating for themselves. I don't agree with hating women, but I do believe in holding them to account. | /r/MensRights | 26/10/11 12:53 AM |
| 3 | Paul, Take Jenna off Register-her.comThat is naive nonsense. Pathological liars, bigots and other miscreants do apologize if it serves their purposes, and they can easily appear to rethink things for the same reasons. | /r/MensRights | 25/10/11 09:25 AM |
| 1 | Paul, Take Jenna off Register-her.comNo, but it fosters crime and criminality. See: lynchings. Also see: False accusations going unpunished Also see: VAWA and the arrest of men who are victims of domestic abuse. Also see: British Airways policy to not allow males to sit next to unescorted children on planes because they see men as potential molesters, just like this woman. I appreciate your position. NO WAY is she coming off that registry. | /r/MensRights | 25/10/11 09:24 AM |
| 6 | Apology to Men's Rights ActivistsI think this event has sparked a lot of good dialogue, not with the bigot, but between MRA's. Just for the record here, and speaking as a co-founder of register-her.com, she was not placed on that registry to teach her a lesson or change her mind, and she will not be removed based her reaction to being put there. There was a short time when we considered removing her, and actually gave her a chance (at her request) to come out and diligently CORRECT the bad information she presented, to undo her… | /r/MensRights | 24/10/11 06:29 PM |
| 2 | An ambiguous apology, or just bullshit? Karvunidis offers a questionable mea culpa.I understand how you feel. I do feel differently though. A few things. One, the "apology" was almost smothered in victim play and rationalization. Two, she is an activist, not just a housewife. It is one thing to express an opinion, but another to take action toward a business, pushing them to comply with a demand to practice misandry. Three, the first two don't matter all that much. The point of this aspect of register-her is to have a resource that actually discourages the kind of bigotry she … | /r/MensRights | 24/10/11 08:39 AM |
| 1 | A memory of a barber: a poignant essay on haircuts and heartachesBeautiful. | /r/MensRights | 24/10/11 07:33 AM |
| 0 | Chateau BullshitLet 'em mock, just spell my name right. | /r/MensRights | 21/10/11 09:24 PM |
| 0 | Chateau BullshitSeriously, you try to shame me with a homophobic insult and then want to lecture me on hate? News for you, fuck-knuckle, there is nothing wrong with being gay. It is not an insult. But suggesting it would insult me also reveals just one of the short circuits in your mind. Go back to sniffing for pussy and leaving your spine in the closet. You are out of your league here. | /r/MensRights | 21/10/11 06:37 PM |
| -1 | Chateau BullshitThat's right, pussy is the answer to everything, right? FTFY | /r/MensRights | 21/10/11 03:49 PM |
| -9 | Chateau BullshitDo you fuck children? | /r/MensRights | 20/10/11 11:58 PM |
| -5 | Chateau BullshitEver my brother. :) | /r/MensRights | 20/10/11 07:13 AM |
| -13 | Chateau BullshitYou are asking the wrong questions, and not very honest ones. And you don't know very much about women for someone that offers training. The fact is that PUA is based on the idea of a man shaping himself into something so that he increases his chances of sex with women. Talk circles all you want, that IS what PUA and Game are about at the basic level. What you start with, you end up with, no exceptions. Men don't self actualize by learning how to pass shit tests, by engaging in fakery over a pie… | /r/MensRights | 20/10/11 12:01 AM |
| -11 | Chateau BullshitAnd allow me to translate that comment. "Hey guys, I can teach you to self actualize by begging for pussy! FREE TRAINING!! The only tool you need to screen women is self respect that you won't surrender for a piece of ass. Deal with it. | /r/MensRights | 19/10/11 11:32 PM |
| 2 | Eight people dead? Is that all?Nobody ignored anything, except you. Yes, he had a good custody arrangement, but that was what the dispute was about. She was trying to take his son, and he did something terrible in response. No one at AVfM is backing him, and you are a bald face liar to say that; a fact that leaves you in the scumbag department. If you don't want more people to die, then push for changes in family law. Everyone knows that killing is wrong, but cooler heads understand that fighting poverty or drug abuse does no… | /r/MensRights | 18/10/11 10:04 PM |
| 3 | Did they get what they deserved? The recent attack by two women of a man at McDonaldsI am not buying that he crossed a line, yet. I don't know if the attackers were trying to get back up. If I were in his shoes, after being attacked by two people, I would make sure they didn't get back up and resume the attack. | /r/MensRights | 17/10/11 07:31 PM |
| 2 | Did they get what they deserved? The recent attack by two women of a man at McDonaldsAs long as you stay away from women who go to school there, ENTIRELY. http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/false-rape-culture/the-american-university-of-vigilante-justice/ | /r/MensRights | 17/10/11 05:28 PM |
| 3 | Did they get what they deserved? The recent attack by two women of a man at McDonaldsIt depends. If you are a male in college, your next place of residence could be the state penitentiary. | /r/MensRights | 17/10/11 05:09 PM |
| 1 | When "good" feminists do nothingseconded. | /r/MensRights | 15/10/11 05:05 AM |
| 3 | When "good" feminists do nothingSure, they took a wiki page about men's rights and over wrote it with feminist dogma. I guess if you are a feminist, that is factual. What a fuckbucket. | /r/MensRights | 15/10/11 05:04 AM |
| -2 | World Net Daily covers MRM: actually speaks to mra's, thousands shockedI guess most people see what they want to in the world. And for some, the simpler the better. | /r/MensRights | 14/10/11 02:06 AM |
| -1 | World Net Daily covers MRM: actually speaks to mra's, thousands shockedI see your at it again. Thanks for the repeated fails. | /r/MensRights | 14/10/11 01:24 AM |
| -1 | World Net Daily covers MRM: actually speaks to mra's, thousands shockedDid you go to school with lulfas? This is an open aggregate of linked articles, news stories and opinions. There is no "it" to differentiate between the maligned and the misogynist. It is just a shifting mass of people with different opinions and ideas. R/mensrights does not even create its own content, and in that light represents nothing except a collection of material that originates elsewhere. I suggest before you start proclaiming what should at should not "represent" the MRM that you might… | /r/MensRights | 14/10/11 01:22 AM |
| -2 | World Net Daily covers MRM: actually speaks to mra's, thousands shockedI am sure the movement will somehow get along without you, but you might want to consider the buffoonery it takes to actually think of WND as an individuated, thinking entity, who either disagrees, or agrees with anything. The article was the product of one person who found enough validity in the MRM to investigate and do a balanced piece on it. His name is Phil Elmore, not WND. Sheesh. Come to think of it, PLEASE rethink your involvement with the MRM. I think you are absolutely right to have co… | /r/MensRights | 14/10/11 01:17 AM |
| 5 | World Net Daily covers MRM: actually speaks to mra's, thousands shockedI still think you are engaging in wishful thinking. Check the writing roster on the site, as well as the Alexa traffic rankings. Just because you don't agree with something doesn't mean it's not mainstream. In fact, it may be an indication that you can think. | /r/MensRights | 13/10/11 02:53 AM |
| 5 | World Net Daily covers MRM: actually speaks to mra's, thousands shockedThat sounds mainstream to me, that is if you are speaking about Christians and those that choose to have children. I know you'd prefer them to be marginalized, but so far, you are still outnumbered, and out-gunned. Cheers. | /r/MensRights | 13/10/11 01:45 AM |
| 2 | Where have all the men gone?Cunt, please. You didn't get the point. He was taking a (well deserved) shot at so called "work" that women elect to do, and it was in no way referencing, even tacitly, your supposed innate need in men to have an inferior partner. And I don't think anyone is blaming the other gender. We, ALL OF US MEN AND WOMEN, have bred the women in this culture to be nothing more than a bunch of personality disordered, entitlement brats with a sense of expectation that would make Narcissus blush. It has been … | /r/MensRights | 12/10/11 06:31 AM |
| 5 | Where have all the men gone?Not partnering at all is what they are doing. So what do you care if they drop out of the idea of taking care of anyone but themselves? After all, women are the true experts at that one. They call it empowerment. Also, your line here: "if she can earn a living, then she's not sufficiently dependent on me, and she'll destroy me, so I am going to stay home and play XBox" Not in the article, explicitly or even tacitly implied. You just made it up some bullshit to have something to attack because th… | /r/MensRights | 12/10/11 12:04 AM |
| 2 | Dear Students of Saint Louis University:Not sure what to say, to me it isn't satire. The SLU policy effectively makes any sex a sexual assault because there is no sex that ever occurs that fit their guidelines as appropriate. I have never had sex where I obtained ongoing, repeated "permissions" and I don't know anyone who has. | /r/MensRights | 11/10/11 12:52 AM |
| 1 | Dear Students of Saint Louis University:"...I still do not accept is as satire..." PRECISELY. It is not satire. He, the author, stated as much. And since he is the sole arbiter on whether he was writing satire, I suppose that puts and end to this pointless debate. | /r/MensRights | 10/10/11 11:41 PM |
| 1 | Dear Students of Saint Louis University:Thanks for posting Chappelle's show link. Good stuff, and relevant. | /r/MensRights | 10/10/11 09:44 PM |
| 2 | Dear Students of Saint Louis University:Check the last line. He said it isn't satire, and I believe him. I think every line he wrote is literally true. | /r/MensRights | 10/10/11 09:43 PM |
| 1 | Dear Students of Saint Louis University:What satire? | /r/MensRights | 10/10/11 07:55 PM |
| 3 | A Google search for Jessica Valenti turns up Register-Her.com on the front pageNo scenario's have identical factors. So by your logic comparing anything is off the table. Fail. Fail. Fail. | /r/MensRights | 10/10/11 02:59 AM |
| 2 | A Google search for Jessica Valenti turns up Register-Her.com on the front pageThanks for trying. | /r/MensRights | 10/10/11 02:58 AM |
| 3 | A Google search for Jessica Valenti turns up Register-Her.com on the front pageThe truth isn't slander. Big enough fail on that one. And I didn't post this to reddit. So another fail. But the site does target some female feminists. Hey, that is one out of three. Not bad for a fembot. | /r/MensRights | 10/10/11 02:57 AM |
| 2 | A Google search for Jessica Valenti turns up Register-Her.com on the front pageDo you have a link for that? That is a big one to include in her profile. | /r/MensRights | 09/10/11 08:30 PM |
| 2 | A Google search for Jessica Valenti turns up Register-Her.com on the front pageBINGO | /r/MensRights | 09/10/11 08:29 PM |
| 3 | A Google search for Jessica Valenti turns up Register-Her.com on the front pageMen who are falsely accused of rape are sometimes murdered. Also, they go to prison where they can be subject to being raped for years on end. Your objection is a fail. This is not a comparison of the experience of whites to that of blacks, but a comparison of a social climate that facilitates injustice based on sex. The comparison is more than fair. | /r/MensRights | 09/10/11 08:28 PM |
| 2 | A Google search for Jessica Valenti turns up Register-Her.com on the front pageNo, actually, I will tell you it is a really bad idea to worry about fear in a culture that is wired to discredit you no matter what you do, if you oppose feminist governance. I will also tell you that most of the people that rail about this "discrediting" the site are people that don't want the site there in the first place. Also, look at it this way. The site will invariably get some harsh criticism. I have already been interviewed by three network affiliate television stations about the websi… | /r/MensRights | 09/10/11 08:24 PM |
| 1 | A Google search for Jessica Valenti turns up Register-Her.com on the front pageWe indeed have that day in sight. Count on it. | /r/MensRights | 09/10/11 08:12 PM |
| 2 | A Google search for Jessica Valenti turns up Register-Her.com on the front pageSo am I, so in the ghost world, it was a discussion. Boo hoo. | /r/MensRights | 09/10/11 06:44 PM |
| 3 | A Google search for Jessica Valenti turns up Register-Her.com on the front pageYour request has been forwarded. Thank you. | /r/MensRights | 09/10/11 05:06 PM |
| 0 | A Google search for Jessica Valenti turns up Register-Her.com on the front pageOK, so you are not a fan of the site. Who cares? It is doing its intended job, as evidenced by this being posted to reddit. You are even a part if the plan by being here discussing it. So thank you for your assistance with our promotion of register-her.com. Cheers | /r/MensRights | 09/10/11 08:02 AM |
| 1 | A Google search for Jessica Valenti turns up Register-Her.com on the front pageAnd if that happens we will use the censorship ploy to generate three more articles on her, and she will be back in the same place. | /r/MensRights | 09/10/11 08:00 AM |
| 3 | Spotting violence and hate"All sex, even consensual sex between a married couple, is an act of violence perpetrated against a woman." Catherine MacKinnon "The traditional flowers of courtship are the traditional flowers of the grave, delivered to the victim before the kill. The cadaver is dressed up and made up and laid down and ritually violated and consecrated to an eternity of being used." Andrea Dworkin "You grow up with your father holding you down and covering your mouth so another man can make a horrible searing p… | /r/MensRights | 08/10/11 08:06 AM |
| 0 | Defining and Implementing Zeta MasculinityThat's your goal, and I have no issue with it. And quite honestly I agree in part. I refuse to accept the label of "maculist." But my point to you was twofold, one, the men's movement as a whole involves more than your personal definition of it, and two, part of that movement, as I witness each and every day, is about men taking stock of how they view masculine identity for themselves and making adjustments to compensate for life under feminist governance. Those are specific goals, but it takes … | /r/MensRights | 06/10/11 03:24 AM |
| -2 | Defining and Implementing Zeta MasculinityThank you for informing the entire world what the men's movement is all about. I had no idea that any one person had a lock on the definition for the rest of us. But let me say, as a zeta male, BULLSHIT. Now as to the argument that the three V's are not exclusively masculine traits, I agree. In fact I can't think of a single valuable human characteristic that is not equally attractive and admirable in either sex. That being said, I don't think that the author of this piece was excluding women, b… | /r/MensRights | 05/10/11 09:20 PM |
| 25 | Fire- an eyewitness account of one female firefighter in actionYes, it is. Why? Because it is too difficult and risky to fire her. I had similar experiences working for the state of Texas in a maximum security youth facility. They would plan riots when the most females were on staff because they knew the women would fade into the woodwork when things got rough. It put all the men at greater risk, and if you complained about it, you could get into trouble. BIG TIME men's issue. | /r/MensRights | 03/10/11 02:24 AM |
| 2 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsYour debate is pointless. You haven't even asked a single question that is not detailed on the site, and I still answered them anyway. If you want to debate, then give me a reason this site should not exist and quit asking questions that you can answer by bothering to read the site info. | /r/MensRights | 02/10/11 10:07 AM |
| 2 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returns"I'm just confused. Discussions about patriarchy and a system that leaves women in a lower bracket than men (or a system that privileges white people over people of color, certain cultures over another, etc. etc., as is often included as INTEGRAL pieces of feminist work) does not necessarily equal men-hating." No, but feminist man hating equals man hating. And you are getting more full of shit than you are worth. If you can, with a straight face, call Valenti, who openly advocates the end of due… | /r/MensRights | 01/10/11 11:50 AM |
| 1 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsHave you quit molesting children yet? | /r/MensRights | 01/10/11 11:45 AM |
| 2 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsWomen that get raped should go to trial. The questions you are asking here are straw clutching nonsense, asked only to paint me as someone who does not want real victims to get justice. Full of shit. | /r/MensRights | 01/10/11 11:43 AM |
| 2 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsTHAT is a false allegation. But not the kind we put on the registry. We have lots of other types of criminal conduct there, not just false rape accusations. We also have two other categories. One for corrupt public officials, and one for bigots. We qualify quite plainly in our descriptions that "bigot" is a matter of editorial opinion only, and not an inference of illegal activity of any kind. We have, in the belief of our editorial staff, a false rape culture that has emerged in the west, destr… | /r/MensRights | 01/10/11 06:29 AM |
| 2 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returns1) As far as I can see there is no grounds to consider an acquittal proof of a false accusation. It doesn't near pass our litmus test which is that we have to have conclusive proof of a false accusation, as in a conviction in a court of law, or a verifiable admission that the accusation was fabricated. We are not in the false allegation business. 2) If I take the word "recant" literally, then yes, she belongs on the registry. Now, if she refuses, for whatever reason, to not cooperate with the pr… | /r/MensRights | 01/10/11 06:18 AM |
| 3 | A lecture from Larry the MRA guy, on angerI understand. I get "MRA" and "cable" confused all the time. The only male feminist I have seen be accused of being fat and pudgy and soft is David Futrelle. That is probably because he is fat and pudgy and soft, but who knows for sure. Is your stupidity cyclical? I have seen some posts of yours that were near intelligent, but there seems to be these cycles you go through where you are just fucking dumb. Certainly today you are deep in one of those swings. | /r/MensRights | 23/09/11 08:38 AM |
| 3 | One Million Moms to Castrate Ben & Jerry"Are you really this stupid?" Ahem, :) | /r/MensRights | 23/09/11 02:48 AM |
| 0 | Register-her.com registers!That's it, of course. I am dismantling the site forthwith. :) | /r/MensRights | 21/09/11 06:54 PM |
| -2 | Register-her.com registers!Oh, your words, they burn me. LOL. Tell you what, cupcake, messages like this make my day. Really they do. MRA's have been telling people for years that feminists are lying ideologues with a questionable relationship with reality. And here you are to prove it. Always remember, sweetie, register-her.com is EVERY DAY adding false accusers to the registry. It is only a matter of time before one of these women's lies costs her employment, a potentially good relationship or some other consequence for… | /r/MensRights | 21/09/11 06:53 PM |
| -1 | Register-her.com registers!Thank you for yet another display of obtuse feminist perspective, which of course presents me with the opportunity to point to said obtuseness and speak some more about the registry. And I also note some improvement on your part with the somewhat bizarre overuse of caps in your posts. Good for you, sweetie, you're getting better. Register-her.com is a directory of women who have made false allegations of rape and other crimes, and for which very few of them were punished to the extent actually p… | /r/MensRights | 21/09/11 04:28 PM |
| 6 | Register-her.com registers!If you can, read the inclusion qualification for that category. You will see it clearly stated that this is a matter of editorial opinion that applies to that category only. But be forewarned, you may have difficulty reading it as there are no psychotic looking strange comBINatiONS of caps and lower case letters. Do you really think it takes courage to offer a response to you? Now, I am done, and you are dismissed. But do me a favor, keep up the psychotic rants about the site, you are making us … | /r/MensRights | 20/09/11 09:45 PM |
| 8 | Register-her.com registers!No she doesn't. The registry does not list women whose accused rapists were acquitted or otherwise not convicted. It lists women who were proven, though conviction, confession or other impeccable court documentation, to have made false allegations. Like any other feminist I have seen, she is just speaking out of total ignorance, or lying, to make her point. Yawn. Nothing new. And I find her vitriol most reassuring. The site is absolutely having its intended impact. The more rabid feminists becom… | /r/MensRights | 20/09/11 08:04 PM |
| 2 | What's the difference? (between feminism and the MRM)Yes, it is a generally conservative blog, but that is not what you said in your original comment. You said: "LaSalle shut it down when it started getting overrun by MRAs." You make it sound like Mike shut it down because of MRA's. That is not correct at all. And neither is this, really: "it's still a conservative/traditionalist blog trying to convert MRAs." I was there for right at one year, from August 2008 to August 2009. During my time there I wrote and ran a good many articles that the right… | /r/MensRights | 19/09/11 03:19 PM |
| 1 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returns"and all you need to do is keep feeling like victims" You oughtta know. | /r/MensRights | 18/09/11 05:46 PM |
| 2 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returns"this may be completely alien to you, but feminists deal with false rape accusations too, BY TEACHING WOMEN SELF ESTEEM AND POSITIVE BODY IMAGE SHIT that means ladies don't need to yell rape to feel validated and heard." Is that the state of modern women? That they need to be TAUGHT not to yell rape to get validation? Don't tell me, it's the patriarchy's fault right? Women, who are now more educated and now more commonly employed than men, are still downtrodden. No one listens to them so they ar… | /r/MensRights | 18/09/11 09:49 AM |
| 4 | What's the difference? (between feminism and the MRM)That is incorrect. I was the last Editor-in-Chief for MND and, as an open MRA, I was invited by LaSalle to come on board, complete with my MRM agenda. Prior to me the managing editor was Bernard Chapin, another staunch MRA. After nine years online supporting men's issues Mike simply moved in a different direction for far different reasons than you stated here. Edit: and please note that MND is not shut down, but has greatly slowed operations. It maintains listing in Google news index, and still … | /r/MensRights | 17/09/11 06:11 AM |
| 1 | Murderess Jasmine Richardson attends Mount Royal UniversityI find your whole line of thinking offensive and in bad taste, but since that is just my opinion it is not going to change the world. I am not subject to Canadian law. So Canada can shove it's law into a pipe and smoke it. She killed three people, including an 8 year old boy. Her victims deserve to have her tainted with this for the rest of her life. Anyone doesn't like it can send the RCMP, for all the good it will do them. | /r/MensRights | 15/09/11 01:08 AM |
| 2 | Double Standard: 38yo Female Teacher has sex with teen boy, admits it but does NOT GET PRISON - and will get her record cleared if she stays out of trouble for two yearsGood. At least if the criminal justice system issues a pussy pass, there are some people that will at least try to revoke it. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/11 10:17 PM |
| 3 | Register-her.com goes worldwideThere is a search function. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/11 06:00 AM |
| 4 | Register-her.com goes worldwideUnderstand that this website, like almost every other advocacy effort for men and boys runs on a shoes string budget, depending on people to donate money and expertise to get things done. We struggle to meet every objective. I think the point you made is fair, and there are several other features we will add to the site as resources and money become available. And we do get a fair amount of help. When that help exceeds the complaints from people who "refuse" to use the site because it isn't "thi… | /r/MensRights | 13/09/11 10:19 PM |
| -2 | Register-her.com goes worldwideFreedom of choice. Dontcha just love it? :) | /r/MensRights | 13/09/11 09:27 PM |
| 1 | Dr. T launches new radio programhttp://www.blogtalkradio.com/avoiceformen Tuesday nights. Dr. T's show will also be available in the archives 24/7. AVfM Radio is Tuesday nights. Many dads have visitation with their children on Wednesday nights, so Dr. T chose Monday. I guess if potential callers would like to speak to her they might have to miss a few minutes of a football game. | /r/MensRights | 12/09/11 04:45 PM |
| 2 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsRight, we should protect the identity of false rape accusers because someone might rape them. Ho-lee-fuck. | /r/MensRights | 12/09/11 06:40 AM |
| 4 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsThat the writing sucks is your opinion. That you are an arrogant asshole that does not know effective writing from swill is mine. The writing stays, you get put on ignore with the rest of the peanut gallery, and the website continues to climb in popularity every day. | /r/MensRights | 09/09/11 05:05 PM |
| 0 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsAnd just because you "think" your argument is logically sound, doesn't mean it is, either. | /r/MensRights | 09/09/11 05:02 PM |
| 2 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsNo, It is basically, "I am doing this. I think it to be right, and I don't give a fuck if you think otherwise." Who the fuck are you to appoint yourself as arbiter of what is right for me? Feminism is an ideology of hate, practiced by elitist swine with the ignorant support of uninformed masses. Spare me your "good and bad Nazi" bullshit rationalizations. Feminism is a cancer and needs to be cut, savagely, out of the heart of our culture. I will gladly be one of the offensive, ill-mannered, imma… | /r/MensRights | 09/09/11 05:00 PM |
| 6 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsYou are a liar. There are no women on that site that have not been proven by authorities to be have made false allegations. Shame on you. | /r/MensRights | 09/09/11 04:52 PM |
| 2 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsWhose to say you can't go read through the site and find your answers? | /r/MensRights | 09/09/11 04:47 PM |
| 1 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsYou really are this stupid, aren't you? You really think that what you are saying actually relates to this! LOL! Hint, heterosexuality, except to a lot of feminists, is not a psychopathology and does not describe the tendency to desire something illegal, like rape or sex with children. Wouldn't you call a heterosexual man who rapes someone, duh, let's see, a rapist? I have seen stupid remarks from you in the past, but nothing like this. Fucking WOW! Go to r/downssyndrome and post there. It will … | /r/MensRights | 09/09/11 08:18 AM |
| 1 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsThanks for your opinion, but the way you wrote it was muddled and convoluted; a tad beclouding. Just kidding. But I disagree. There are so many people on the sidelines ready to armchair quarterback, and few willing to put in the sweat and time to help. If you are serious about helping, rewrite the piece and send it in. Hell, rewrite all of them if you want to. If you do a better job than is already there, there is no pride issue in any of us that would stop us from using it. But if you just want… | /r/MensRights | 09/09/11 08:13 AM |
| 3 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsThanks, yes we got that today and are working on the proposed changes. | /r/MensRights | 09/09/11 08:05 AM |
| 5 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsWorks for me. :) | /r/MensRights | 09/09/11 08:04 AM |
| 4 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsFine then, you stay here on reddit and wax philosophical about how things all ought to be for the world, and I will continue dealing with the actual problems, in my own way. | /r/MensRights | 09/09/11 06:21 AM |
| -2 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsIt doesn't matter. The point of the site is in the google returns. When people click through on that they are taken directly to the persons profile and treated to the story of that false accuser (remember the false accusers?) complete with news links and in some cases pictures. They don't even see the front page. Whether they later go to the front page and follow suit with someone like you who thinks I am a kook is certainly possible, but I bet they don't rule out the news stories because of tha… | /r/MensRights | 09/09/11 06:19 AM |
| 9 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsYes there is, PLEASE review the site. You are making assumptions out of thin air. We are not posting profiles on women just because their allegation was not proven. ALL of the false accusers are there because news stories confirm they have been found by legal authorities to have lied. | /r/MensRights | 09/09/11 04:31 AM |
| -3 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsYou are more than welcome. | /r/MensRights | 09/09/11 04:28 AM |
| 2 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsThank you for your entry! There are literally thousands more that need to make it to the directory. Will will eventually get to them, but it will take time. | /r/MensRights | 09/09/11 04:26 AM |
| 2 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsMy, OUR, goal was to create a registry where female false accusers are listed and exposed to the public in a way potentially damaging to them in light of the fact that they otherwise operate with impunity in most cases. We have done so. End of debate. Oh, and I wish I had a dime for every know it all that told me what I "should" and "shouldn't" be or do. Maybe I'd hire the best professionals on the internet and pay them gobs of money to accomplish what me and a handful of good men have done on a… | /r/MensRights | 09/09/11 04:24 AM |
| -8 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsWell, until my online efforts start failing instead of racking up one success after another, I will maintain a different view on which one of us fails to understand logic. Thanks for your opinion. | /r/MensRights | 09/09/11 04:17 AM |
| 1 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsFair enough. | /r/MensRights | 09/09/11 03:04 AM |
| 1 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsNO. THE POINT IS EGALITARIAN AND HUMANISTIC EQUALITY Actually, the point on my website, which is my intellectual property, is whatever I say the point is. Period. That being said, you still aren't convincing at all. I am a huge fan of male-centric services, and intend to launch as many as possible with whatever time I have in life. I think they are badly needed and will be until the cultural norm shifts to eschew female-centric services, at which point, male-centric services will also be antiqua… | /r/MensRights | 09/09/11 03:02 AM |
| -1 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsFor what little there is left of it in western culture, I am happy for the fact that we don't all have to see things the same way. | /r/MensRights | 09/09/11 02:58 AM |
| 3 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsThe site focuses on FRA's but is not exclusive to them, as is pasted all over the definitions and submission guidelines. We also specifically identify the classification of bigot as editorial opinion. Nannie Doss killed a lot of people, including children, and got away with it for a long time because of hesitance too see women as capable of such acts. This is all part of the equation. Jessica Valenti, if you read her profile, is part and parcel to the system of false rape culture. She is an acti… | /r/MensRights | 09/09/11 02:56 AM |
| 3 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsYou should check the site definitions. We know pedophilia, at least the state of being a pedophile, is not a crime. It is, however, an accurate description of adults who have sex with children, so the listing is legit. In terms of legal definitions, if we went on the type of conviction we would only open up a logistical nightmare for site navigation. Most cases involve some sort of plea arrangement. Those pleas leave us with literally dozens of different felonies and misdemeanors for which those… | /r/MensRights | 09/09/11 02:44 AM |
| 5 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsThat is a very good question. I did not personally write that entry, but I agree with your assessment. It has been corrected. | /r/MensRights | 09/09/11 02:18 AM |
| 2 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsTHERE IS NO BIAS. The site, as presented IS the balance aimed at the bias, which is all against men. Any service to women will only add to the imbalance against men. There is a need, and a desperate one, for male specific services. The world is full of them for women, after all. That does not mean that efforts to help women affected by false allegations (whoever they are) cannot be furthered. This registry is here for men. Period. | /r/MensRights | 09/09/11 02:08 AM |
| 3 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsUltimately as content develops we will look at expanding access to different recordsets as you suggest. In the meantime, a name search will do. | /r/MensRights | 09/09/11 02:02 AM |
| -3 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsIf you think there is politically biased content, please point to it. I will be waiting to see that, especially since I know it is not there. | /r/MensRights | 09/09/11 02:00 AM |
| -2 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsAttempts to shut us down will fail and we will use them as publicity for the site. We are fully prepared to handle any contingencies. RH.com is here for good. As to the addition of Valenti (feministing) We stand by it in full. There are certain ideologues who actively further policies that aggravate the problem of false allegations. It is not just for anyone who badmouths men, but for individuals who make the problem worse. We put Maine prosecutor Mary Kellett on there in the category of "Corrup… | /r/MensRights | 09/09/11 01:58 AM |
| 7 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsThank you for that. I hope that all bloggers interested in addressing this problem will provide a link to register-her.com. And for the mods here, I would be interested in a banner or link exchange if you are interested. | /r/MensRights | 08/09/11 09:47 PM |
| 4 | Register-her.com hitting the mark - listing false rape accusers at top of Google returnsThe safeguards are an essential part of what we do. The only entries that will be allowed are ones that provide verifiable sources for the information. Everything on the site so far is confirmed by news sources and is already public information. We will consider, though, information that did not make the news if the user entering the info provides meticulously credible documentation from courts or other sources that we can verify. We are not in the false accusation business. Just the opposite. | /r/MensRights | 08/09/11 09:44 PM |
| 1 | I was rapedFact is, if the roles were reversed there are a lot of places that this could be considered a sexual assault. The guy who wrote this is 17. He knows it, maybe you should, too. | /r/MensRights | 08/09/11 06:37 PM |
| 2 | Fugitive from the feminist chain-gangPlease, please, please, it is AVFM. | /r/MensRights | 08/09/11 06:07 AM |
| 3 | This is what a feminist looks likeHe is only one of the whole lot of corrupt bastards. http://www.avoiceformen.com/misandry/sycophants/mens-studies-the-complete-freak-show/ | /r/MensRights | 05/09/11 12:43 AM |
| 2 | Celeste Adamski: sexual preditor, litigious husbandLOL, yeah, I missed that. | /r/MensRights | 02/09/11 01:54 AM |
| 2 | Adventures of a child abusing bitch at PsychCentral.comYou should go to her blog and read the entire post, including her responses to the people that challenged her. She is clearly an abusive women who is using her bipolar diagnosis as an excuse and a rationalization. It strikes me as insufficient to just dwell on a single moment of rebelliousness of a teenager and use it to define a situation like this. Robotic compliance to parental authority may be the desire of a lot of parents, usually the worst of them, but it is a poor measure of mental healt… | /r/MensRights | 28/08/11 06:03 AM |
| 3 | Adventures of a child abusing bitch at PsychCentral.comThere are some mothers out there that could stand to be told to shut up. Casey Anthony ring a bell? Being a mother isn't a sacred cow. And just based on what she revealed in the article I am pretty clear that she has a large screw loose. | /r/MensRights | 28/08/11 05:09 AM |
| 1 | Academicians reject presumption of guilt for menOutstanding. I would happily post this to AVfM if you like. | /r/MensRights | 25/08/11 08:11 PM |
| 1 | Academicians reject presumption of guilt for men??? | /r/MensRights | 25/08/11 07:32 AM |
| 1 | Academicians reject presumption of guilt for menYou're a better person than me. :) | /r/MensRights | 24/08/11 03:20 PM |
| 1 | On Slutwalks and Survival: The Truth About Men and WomenSure. Right after you provide a citation on your theory comparing childbirth to gazelle hunting. | /r/MensRights | 24/08/11 07:50 AM |
| -1 | Excuse me, do you have a gun I could borrow?This subreddit is not a men's rights website. It is an aggregate forum largely dependent on other websites, including AVfM, to have content. No one here built this place in the sense that other sites are built. And they don't even own the url. Were it not for the huge volume of traffic that the main reddit pulls in, this place would not exist. So spare me your very spare understanding of he internet. R/mensrights is a valuable resource, but I bet you can't provide me with an alexa ranking on thi… | /r/MensRights | 24/08/11 03:31 AM |
| -1 | Excuse me, do you have a gun I could borrow?I love the fact that I have gotten under your skin so. Let 'er rip, but you really should consider that you're not coming up with anything but leakage from your ass. I run the most heavily traveled men's rights website on the internet. And we are the only one that is truly activist in nature. We put the Vladek Filler case on the map. We take it to the enemies you like to imaging you are fighting, and in the process we earned the ire of the New York Times, CBS News and other media outlets. And ju… | /r/MensRights | 23/08/11 10:50 PM |
| -1 | Excuse me, do you have a gun I could borrow?I love the fact that I have gotten under your skin so. Let 'er rip, but you really should consider that you're not coming up with anything but leakage from your ass. I run the most heavily traveled men's rights website on the internet. And we are the only one that is truly activist in nature. We put the Vladek Filler case on the map. We take it to the enemies you like to imaging you are fighting, and in the process we earned the ire of the New York Times, CBS News and other media outlets. And ju… | /r/MensRights | 23/08/11 10:50 PM |
| -1 | Excuse me, do you have a gun I could borrow?You don't donate to anyone I presume to speak for, because I have never presumed to speak for anyone but myself, you dumb as rocks motherfucker. And no, that was not me being mad. Just calling it like I see it. And by the way, where the fuck have you been that you think only one group has a full time lobbyist? I know of three, two of them working totally off radar. You are not in the know, and you have no idea who backs what I do, and recognizes the need for it. Being popular here, or anywhere e… | /r/MensRights | 23/08/11 08:21 PM |
| -1 | Excuse me, do you have a gun I could borrow?We can skip the watermelon, it is too easy to do the Gallagher routine on your pointless comments. Trust me, if you were important enough, the only embarrassment I would feel would be for you. Try again when you have some substance. IOW, have a nice life. | /r/MensRights | 23/08/11 04:19 AM |
| -1 | Excuse me, do you have a gun I could borrow?Gee, I was waiting for you to submit an article to give us what we really need, but all you have done is bitch, like a feminist. I am proud of Keith's work, and proud to present it on the site. I don't even have to agree with all of it to allow it to add to the discussion. Much more impressed here with those that suit up and ready themselves for flak vs those who just armchair quarterback because they don't have jack shit to put in the game. Bugger off. | /r/MensRights | 22/08/11 11:30 PM |
| -2 | Excuse me, do you have a gun I could borrow?Gee, I was waiting for you to submit an article to give us what we really need, but all you have done is bitch, like a feminist. I am proud of Keith's work, and proud to present it on the site. I don't even have to agree with all of it to allow it to add to the discussion. Much more impressed here with those that suit up and ready themselves for flak vs those who just armchair quarterback because they don't have jack shit to put in the game. Bugger off. | /r/MensRights | 22/08/11 11:29 PM |
| 1 | Scaling the bridge: is illegal activism justified?They didn't lose their individuality, they gained more control of the masses. That was the point of feminism all along. | /r/MensRights | 22/08/11 03:52 PM |
| 2 | Mr Nice Guy Doesn't Live Here AnymoreI am quick to be offensive toward you because I am committed to being so. This, in case you haven't noticed, is a men's rights forum, and confronting misandry is part of the gig. I did offer you an argument. I asked you to consider using your own example of saying women didn't understand the offside rule and apply to using it unsolicited with a woman you didn't know. You failed to address it because you know that such unsolicited remarks from a strange man would generally be regarded as rude and… | /r/MensRights | 20/08/11 09:46 AM |
| 2 | Mr Nice Guy Doesn't Live Here AnymoreSure thing, asshole, anyone who takes offense to sexist remarks from women is living in a paranoid fantasy. Let me point something out. I will do it real slow so you don't get lost in the attempt to get it. There...is...a...difference...between...friends...and...strangers. Capiche, Einstein? Try going to a football game and telling the nearest woman to you (that you don't know) that she will never understand the offside rule because she is a woman. Then report back. It is really hard for people … | /r/MensRights | 19/08/11 07:07 PM |
| 2 | Mr Nice Guy Doesn't Live Here AnymoreHoly fuck, these bitches make that kind of insulting remark and you think it is flirting? Three points here. One, if it was flirting, fuck them. Two, if it was not flirting, but a flaunting of their stupidity (which it was) fuck them. And three, what the fuck do you think he is supposed to do if it were flirting anyway? What? The chance that it might result in a date or a piece of ass is a reason for him to just take it--- wait--- appreciate it? Your problem is that you can't see the sexism that… | /r/MensRights | 19/08/11 04:18 AM |
| 2 | How to slap your way to slaveryThe series is meant to address male on female violence only. I may make mention of some female on male violence, to the extent that Mary may use violence as part of her control of Harry. But as I said in the intro, AVfM covers a good deal of ground on female violence already. | /r/MensRights | 13/08/11 03:38 PM |
| -6 | How to slap your way to slaveryI think the entire article flew over your head. There is not a bit of "she made me" in the piece. You conjured it up in your own mind because you struggled with the depiction of the behavioral patterns that are shared in most abusive relationships. And by focusing only on the hitting in a continuum of actions by both parties you reduce everything to a simplistic and myopic definition. | /r/MensRights | 12/08/11 10:43 PM |
| 3 | How to slap your way to slaveryStay tuned for part 2 | /r/MensRights | 12/08/11 07:33 PM |
| 1 | Dancing With My LadyI understand. I am disappoint two. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/11 04:17 AM |
| 6 | AVfM Radio: How to make a male bomb - London styleYou can always listen to it in the archives, and then you will get a chance to see the difference between brief show descriptions and the actual content of the show. Yeah, it does run deeper. Who'da thunk, eh? | /r/MensRights | 09/08/11 09:36 PM |
| 4 | AVfM Radio: How to make a male bomb - London styleSay Hi to Karl Rove for me. | /r/MensRights | 09/08/11 09:34 PM |
| 2 | Letter to a Friend at WarIt is weak because you refuse acknowledge or address the preponderance of experience that men collectively share in family courts, and the overwhelming statistical risk men face in marriage and divorce and the hands of the legal system and the female behavior described in the article. And you do so, not in a way that fairly addresses the problem, but simply, for whatever reason, to practice NAWALT. I assume it is to make yourself feel balanced, and if so, that feeling is not warranted. Any fool … | /r/MensRights | 09/08/11 09:29 PM |
| 1 | Letter to a Friend at WarOh yes, lets all be careful and warm and fuzzy and whatever you do, don't say anything that might offend any woman anywhere for any reason. That's not a hair on your red pill. It's just stuck in your throat because you can't muster the guts to swallow it. | /r/MensRights | 09/08/11 04:20 PM |
| 1 | Letter to a Friend at WarDamned skippy. I'm from Texas, too. | /r/MensRights | 09/08/11 04:16 PM |
| 2 | Letter to a Friend at WarLearn to read. | /r/MensRights | 09/08/11 07:33 AM |
| 2 | Tweaking the Nose of Radical FeminismThat's your bitch? You don't like the pic? Considering the fact that you don't seem to be able to comprehend anything that is not tidy and literal; written in concrete with crayons, please consider a bit of literal info I know you will understand. I am not your fucking brother. | /r/MensRights | 05/08/11 06:25 PM |
| 2 | Oh, oh, oh, Jamie's lyin'Sorry, the site is still propagating after changing servers. You should have access very soon. | /r/MensRights | 05/08/11 03:49 AM |
| 0 | Jezebel.com: taking stupid to a whole new levelIt is difficult to justify addressing your points when you have done little but avoid mine, but yes, African Americans do have legitimate grievances, many of them, though I have not seen any advertising in a long time that would justify a complaint by that group, in my mind. But this really isn't making a point for your argument. Men have legitimate grievances about advertising and a plethora of other media related issues (think Sharon Osborne). It is the qualification that matters. Complaining … | /r/MensRights | 23/07/11 05:05 PM |
| -3 | Jezebel.com: taking stupid to a whole new levelWhere are men entitled, in ANY instance? | /r/MensRights | 22/07/11 07:45 PM |
| -6 | Jezebel.com: taking stupid to a whole new levelI stopped reading after that line. Most feminist stop listening when presented with a fact. Nothing new there. | /r/MensRights | 22/07/11 07:44 PM |
| -1 | Jezebel.com: taking stupid to a whole new levelNo, that is not my logic. It is how you are interpreting it because you fail to grasp the obvious as much as the more subtle. Since you did not overcome my point by identifying ANY legitimate grievances faced collectively by western women, then this little debate is over. Better luck next time. | /r/MensRights | 22/07/11 07:42 PM |
| -6 | Jezebel.com: taking stupid to a whole new levelI was speaking about the OP, which you linked me to. And your argument is still a straw man. The only determinant of whether my logic is "dangerous" is whether the women in question actually face any legitimate kinds of discrimination. They don't. This article is just one in an entire zeitgeist of manufactured and imagined discriminations from a phony wage gap to the false rape culture to DV as a female only problem. Women are entitled above all others in this culture. They have no legitimate co… | /r/MensRights | 22/07/11 05:42 AM |
| -6 | Jezebel.com: taking stupid to a whole new levelYour "logic" here is a complete fail. The milk ad was supposedly offensive to women, not men. Try again. And try with an example of what MRA's are actually complaining about. Otherwise, complete straw man. | /r/MensRights | 22/07/11 04:37 AM |
| 1 | It's Okay, Kia Abdullah Was Just KiddingYeah, going nuts here. But getting it under control. Thanks for your patience Dr. Snark. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/11 06:03 PM |
| 2 | It's Okay, Kia Abdullah Was Just KiddingChanging web hosts, and the transition is glitchy. Will be back | /r/MensRights | 06/07/11 01:42 PM |
| 1 | A Voice for Men raises $5000 in only 3 days (we're coming for you, feminists)OK, whatever. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/11 01:40 PM |
| 5 | Jessica Valenti doesn’t understand the Streisand EffectDisagree. IF, and it is an impossible IF in this case, standing up for your opinion and arguing fairly would result in the same in return, then that would be one thing. Have you ever witnessed Valenti in a fair debate with and MRA, or have you just witnessed her taking the worst comments and making a generalized "Fuck You" video that paints all MRA's as sexually frustrated losers that dwell in their mothers basement? When it comes to Valenti, there is no difference between scholarly dissent and … | /r/MensRights | 04/07/11 03:38 PM |
| 1 | A Voice for Men raises $5000 in only 3 days (we're coming for you, feminists)You simply have a fundamental misunderstanding of my work and the philosophy of AVfM. Indeed, you may be incapable of understanding it because you can't think very well outside the box. AVfM stands ALONE. We do not seek affiliation with any other organization. That is a great thing to do for most entities, but not AVfM. It is a dedicated voice for men who have been chewed up and spit out by the system. A growing number of these men, betrayed by mainstream politicians and mainstream culture, DON'… | /r/MensRights | 04/07/11 05:42 AM |
| 0 | A Voice for Men raises $5000 in only 3 days (we're coming for you, feminists)Good for you for donating to F & F, but you can still fuck off. And just for the record, dumb ass. the civil rights movement go exactly fucking nowhere till some blood ran in the streets. The world is full of Chamberlain's. They always pussy their way into capitulation. Fuck that and fuck you. Your opinion of whether I am bad or good at this is irrelevant. I am hugely successful at what I sat out to do. No one else can measure that but me. Just the same, I invite you to come into my forum and in… | /r/MensRights | 02/07/11 02:36 AM |
| 0 | A Voice for Men raises $5000 in only 3 days (we're coming for you, feminists)First a word of thanks to those who donated. You are appreciated more than you know. And now a general word to phlake14222 and anyone who does not like AVfM. Fuck off. I assure you I mean that in the best possible way. It's just my good-natured way to deal with the otherwise useless armchair quarterbacks in the peanut gallery. And r/mensrights is chock full of them. You are right about only one thing. 5 grand is really small potatoes compared to the budget of fembots. Of course, if we could rais… | /r/MensRights | 01/07/11 01:41 PM |
| 5 | Jessica Valenti placed on offender's registryThat is coming. | /r/MensRights | 29/06/11 05:29 AM |
| 8 | Jessica Valenti placed on offender's registryActually, instead of ludicrous and pathetic it is just another exercise of first amendment rights. Funny how those rights get fuzzy for some people when they don't like the form of speech. | /r/MensRights | 29/06/11 05:28 AM |
| 0 | Mainstream acceptance is for losersPlease tell me he is a master of irony. I'd much rather think talent is on display here than what it actually looks like. | /r/MensRights | 26/06/11 05:29 AM |
| 1 | (Don't) Fuck the PoliceAnd being stupid isn't helping yours. The cop told him he was under arrest, before he, um FUCKING ARRESTED HIM. Jesus, where do you ignorant assholes come from? | /r/MensRights | 26/06/11 05:26 AM |
| 1 | (Don't) Fuck the PoliceFirst this: Either way, I feel it was very much justified that he was cuffed for this. Then this: There was honestly little reason for the kid to be arrested. That's not being argued. You lack consistency and intelligence, perhaps integrity as well. Good-bye. | /r/MensRights | 24/06/11 05:10 PM |
| 0 | (Don't) Fuck the PoliceI look forward to the day that cops pay the ultimate price for this. The kid asked a question. He was waiting to speak to the police officer without interrupting. The cop was not in an investigation, it was a personal conversation outside the police station. How was the cop being disturbed again? I missed it. Oh,. wait, that is because you just pulled the conclusion out of thin air. It was the cop who asked the young man what he wanted and placed him in custody when he answered, and not that it … | /r/MensRights | 24/06/11 01:49 PM |
| 1 | (Don't) Fuck the PoliceI look forward to the day that cops pay a very severe price for this. The kid asked a question. He was waiting to speak to the police officer without interrupting. The cop was not in an investigation, it was a personal conversation outside the police station. How was the cop being disturbed again? I missed it. Oh, wait, that is because you just pulled the conclusion out of thin air. It was the cop who asked the young man what he wanted and placed him in custody when he answered, and not that it … | /r/MensRights | 24/06/11 01:43 PM |
| 2 | Conscious Men Guilty Of MisogynyOMG, I have screwed the pooch now. So sorry Dr. Snark. I swear I didn't know it was here. Please forgive me. And don't let the bad people hurt me. I posted as a matter of habit. <sighs and walks away in disgrace> | /r/MensRights | 22/06/11 10:46 PM |
| 1 | Study Reveals Female Rape Victims Enjoyed the ExperienceBingo. This was the intent all along. When feminists use "evidence by citation" this is precisely the tactic they use. The AAUW study on the "gender wage gap" is a prime example. In the executive summary they assert women get paid 20% less for the same work as men do. In page 2 of the body we find out that when factor weighed for variables like experience and education, there is no wage gap, but by then the media has picked up the garbage and spread it everywhere, just like they intended. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/11 03:40 AM |
| 1 | Gay Hendricks and Arjuna Ardagh are Not FaggotsI didn't write it so I am not doing any explaining, nor has the author been asked to on the site. Our gay readers who commented had no problem with it, so I don't either. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/11 04:57 AM |
| 1 | Gay Hendricks and Arjuna Ardagh are Not FaggotsThere are many ways to communicate a lot of ideas, but you really need a more compelling reason to assert that anyone should NOT use any one of them in particular. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/11 07:09 PM |
| 2 | A stunning historical first: The truth down under (VIDEO)Amen. I think I have watched this seven times now. Also, please stay tuned for more. MP Christiansen has agreed to give me an interview over the telephone. I will record it and play it back on AVfM Radio Tuesday night. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/11 06:34 AM |
| 1 | Time to blame the victims: only women can stop rapeDo you honestly think that the women you were talked to who confided in you that they were raped are a representative sample of the population? Yes. how do you expect to understand the true effects of rape on your average person? Because I actually have experience dealing with rape victims. If you are so convinced that rape related suicide is a significant problem, please offer a source for that conclusion. In any case, even if you didn't "invent" the evil of placing guilt on the victim for not … | /r/MensRights | 27/05/11 05:37 AM |
| 1 | Time to blame the victims: only women can stop rapeFrom 20 years of counseling drug addicts and alcoholics, quite a few of whom were rape victims, very few of whom displayed or complained of symptoms of PTSD. There was a small handful that were genuinely suffering long term trauma, but most of them dealt with what happened and moved one from it as an unpleasant experience in their lives. Just like I did from being mugged. I didn't say it was a common perception that all men are responsible for rape, but it is a growing meme in feminist ideology,… | /r/MensRights | 26/05/11 08:29 PM |
| 2 | Time to blame the victims: only women can stop rapeI don't need an excuse to make a proposition. And you don't understand rape victims very well. You are over blowing its impact on the average female victim. It is not that traumatic for most women. It is not a false dichotomy either, it is a lesser of evils and one that society has thrust on us with rape hysteria and the fashionable trend to tell men they are all responsible for rape. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/11 06:45 AM |
| 2 | Time to blame the victims: only women can stop rapeI disagree with your contention that rape is one of the "cruelest things imaginable." It is a serious crime, no doubt traumatic to some of the victims, but there are many worse things that can happen to you. Ask POW's if they can imagine things more cruel than rape. The crime that happened to me was worse than most rapes. Even that aside, though, I agree that it is every persons choice of whether they report a crime or not, but whether they feel guilty or not, unreported rapes, real ones anyway,… | /r/MensRights | 26/05/11 04:36 AM |
| 1 | Time to blame the victims: only women can stop rapeThat is just infantilzing women. Almost all victims of serious, violent crimes are traumatized by them to one degree or another. That does not excuse the shirking of civic duty. And the mindset that rationalizes away that responsibility is part of the problem. I was brutalized in a crime. I was a terrible experience that I would have loved to have just forgotten. I reported it to the police. It was my responsibility. | /r/MensRights | 24/05/11 10:15 PM |
| 1 | Must See Video: A "kid" confronts a cop, gets arrested, but won't be silencedFrom the people that matter, I certainly am. | /r/MensRights | 20/05/11 02:05 AM |
| 3 | Must See Video: A "kid" confronts a cop, gets arrested, but won't be silencedAccording to that blog owner, reddit folks are lispy losers. Some of you are. | /r/MensRights | 18/05/11 03:57 AM |
| 1 | Must See Video: A "kid" confronts a cop, gets arrested, but won't be silencedActually the anger is supposed to be there. I really enjoy the arms length, "let's do activism over latte and scones" that some of people think is actually getting somewhere. It is entertaining, if weak and ineffective. Check out my comments. Lots of people disagree with me and it isn't a problem. Maybe that is because most of them make their case without calling me a spammer, not even knowing that I have no advertising on the site. What I really think is that some of you guys are just misguided… | /r/MensRights | 18/05/11 03:57 AM |
| 3 | Must See Video: A "kid" confronts a cop, gets arrested, but won't be silencedNot really. But someone makes a false accusation against me like that, reserve the right to return the incivility. No one has to like it. | /r/MensRights | 18/05/11 03:50 AM |
| -5 | Must See Video: A "kid" confronts a cop, gets arrested, but won't be silencedI don't have advertising, asshole. And if my content were spam, I don't think the mods would allow it. So go fuck yourself. | /r/MensRights | 17/05/11 09:34 PM |
| -2 | Must See Video: A "kid" confronts a cop, gets arrested, but won't be silencedI disagree. IF the mods want to remove this I will take no offense. But if you don't think that out of control state functionaries are a major issue in the men's movement, then you may have some things to learn about the MRM. I also submitted to the reddit you suggested. Thanks for that. | /r/MensRights | 17/05/11 06:28 PM |
| 1 | Princess Miserable and the Great American Bitch MachineDone | /r/MensRights | 17/05/11 12:30 PM |
| 1 | Princess Miserable and the Great American Bitch MachineDone | /r/MensRights | 17/05/11 12:30 PM |
| -1 | Princess Miserable and the Great American Bitch MachineToo busy spreading the word, successfully, to mess with that. You, on the other hand, seem to have abundant time. Try not to hurt yourself. | /r/MensRights | 17/05/11 04:34 AM |
| -1 | Princess Miserable and the Great American Bitch MachineNot the same type of question, which is probably why he said you were not really a bastion of intelligent commentary. | /r/MensRights | 17/05/11 03:52 AM |
| -1 | Princess Miserable and the Great American Bitch MachineAre you angry because he said it, or because it may be true? | /r/MensRights | 17/05/11 03:17 AM |
| 3 | Princess Miserable and the Great American Bitch MachineSeems this was cross posted and continued on here. This is what I said in response. I hear you, but stand in disagreement. Let me explain. I don’t think aetheralloy gets it. I don’t think he is stupid. Every comment though, that I have ever seen from him is like it comes from a blue pill MRA. He wants a mainstream tailored message. I say there is tons of that already there and it is getting nowhere. Aetheralloy is not seeing that. He doesn’t understand what is actually happening out here, and he… | /r/MensRights | 16/05/11 10:39 PM |
| 1 | Just In: Kellett Attempts, Fails, to Obtain Court Order to Gag MRA'sInstilling fear is the greatest things since sliced bread in a thousand different ways! Harsh legal consequences instill enough fear in a lot of people to keep them honest. Fear of social rejection and condemnation creates enough fear in people that people who embraced recognized forms of bigotry will often keep their mouths shut, which is a good thing. And when misandry becomes recognized for the hate ideology it is, then the same fear will apply to misandrists. That is also a good thing. I lov… | /r/MensRights | 15/05/11 05:27 PM |
| 2 | Just In: Kellett Attempts, Fails, to Obtain Court Order to Gag MRA'sThe dynamics are different. Men embrace feminism for generally different reasons than women do. I don't buy for a minute that it is out of egalitarian values for either. The One Good Man | /r/MensRights | 15/05/11 04:18 AM |
| 0 | Just In: Kellett Attempts, Fails, to Obtain Court Order to Gag MRA'sSee headline above. It is called a contribution. And your assessment of what I do is as lame as saying this is not a contribution. Some of you, whether you personally happen to be a feminist, mangina, white knight or a self imagined MRA that thinks you are going to further men's issues by wearing a PC gag and playing nice with truly hateful ideologues, really need to wake up. This is a war. And all the hate that has been fomented toward men must be confronted for what it is, no less. That isn't … | /r/MensRights | 15/05/11 04:06 AM |
| 3 | Just In: Kellett Attempts, Fails, to Obtain Court Order to Gag MRA'sHmmm. 17 down votes and nary a peep out of any of them. I suppose some gag orders are self imposed, lol. | /r/MensRights | 14/05/11 05:15 PM |
| 9 | Just In: Kellett Attempts, Fails, to Obtain Court Order to Gag MRA'sThis reminds me of that Skynnard song, "Can't you smell that smell?" | /r/MensRights | 13/05/11 11:52 PM |
| 3 | Dear Sluts (Part Deux)You mean that poll that judges people by their actions? Hmmmm. | /r/MensRights | 12/05/11 02:38 PM |
| 2 | Dear Sluts (Part Deux)Thanks for visiting my site. I have heard your personal insults. You think I am a disgusting woman hater and that the intelligentsia you seem to think resides in the rest of reddit thinks this subreddit is a joke. But, are you capable of answering a direct question? Why are you in a men's rights forum? Eh? I assure you that the only one in this exchange full of hate is you. And you are here proving it right now. | /r/MensRights | 12/05/11 01:50 PM |
| 4 | Dear Sluts (Part Deux)So fucking what? The whole world reacts to men's issues like they are a fucking joke. So, tell me, why are you here? Really, no fucking joke, why are you here? | /r/MensRights | 12/05/11 06:54 AM |
| 1 | On Slutwalks and Survival: The Truth About Men and WomenThere is a big caveat to that one. Until the 19th century, men did the diving and were forced out of it because they were taxed and women were not. We should also note that since then, that population has been in steady and rapid decline, moving toward disappearing. The women did do well for a time, maintaining, for a short time, a pretty robust economy (which is easier with no taxes and no male competition because of it). But now their daughters are refusing to dive, opting to work in the touri… | /r/MensRights | 12/05/11 02:08 AM |
| 1 | On Slutwalks and Survival: The Truth About Men and WomenAnd every place on earth today it is more dangerous to be a man than it is to be a woman. | /r/MensRights | 10/05/11 06:26 AM |
| 2 | An Introduction and a ChallengeThen be an activist. | /r/MensRights | 09/05/11 07:51 AM |
| 1 | The Myth Of EqualityJust what I thought. A coward. C-ya. | /r/MensRights | 09/05/11 05:18 AM |
| 3 | The Myth Of EqualityI don't need to defend them. If you don't like them, go to the site and say so. :))))) | /r/MensRights | 09/05/11 12:45 AM |
| 2 | The Myth Of EqualityYou mean like you are doing here? LOL! Go back to feministing.com and get some more marching orders whydontcha. | /r/MensRights | 08/05/11 08:13 PM |
| 2 | SlutWalks: Stupidity in a Tube TopPeople actually read my blog rants. :) | /r/MensRights | 08/05/11 08:10 AM |
| 2 | SlutWalks: Stupidity in a Tube TopI love these long posts. Maybe some day I will read one. | /r/MensRights | 08/05/11 06:17 AM |
| 2 | SlutWalks: Stupidity in a Tube TopThat is the way the law is written. But of course the government is breaking its own laws in the way services are extended and in the way monies are distributed. Go here: http://www.saveservices.org/reports/ And you can read the reports from SAVE on the widespread discrimination that is happening, and the non existent response from the federal government to correct it. While you are there feel free to sign the petition targeting the US House, demanding that services be provided according to the … | /r/MensRights | 07/05/11 11:41 PM |
| 0 | SlutWalks: Stupidity in a Tube TopI'd try putting caps at the start of sentences. If you want to critique writing, you might start by knowing the basics, and you might get me to actually read whatever it was you said here. You made your point, I made mine. You are now dismissed. | /r/MensRights | 07/05/11 11:21 PM |
| 1 | SlutWalks: Stupidity in a Tube TopDear narcissistic pig, If someone told you that I chose writing projects based on what you found useful (especially as someone that clearly knows literally jack shit about the MRM), then they lied to you. If you were unaware of the remedial bit of education I gave you about VAWA, then there is a Grand Canyon of information about men's issues that you also live in ignorance of. I am laughing my ass off here. You didn't even know about VAWA? Fuck sake, what a moron. But if you need an education, c… | /r/MensRights | 07/05/11 10:14 PM |
| 0 | SlutWalks: Stupidity in a Tube TopI don't write for mainstream sensibilities, especially since mainstream sensibilities is a huge part of the problem. And I don't pay any mind to wanna be librarian dictators trying to tell me what and how to write about anything. By boasting of themselves as sluts, these women have objectified themselves. No reason for me not to follow suit. Your problem with the MRM is that men are starting to take off the PC gag and say what they mean without concern for who likes it. Get used to it is all I c… | /r/MensRights | 07/05/11 10:07 PM |
| 3 | SlutWalks: Stupidity in a Tube TopOh, do please list those areas and the mainstream feminist efforts to get behind them. If it is anything other than bullshit I will beat a path to post them on my site. That would be BIG news to thousands of my readers who are more current on gender politics than the average reader of reddit. | /r/MensRights | 07/05/11 05:31 PM |
| 1 | SlutWalks: Stupidity in a Tube TopWomen's liberation? First, let's move up to 2011. It is FEMINISM. That being said, I will give you one example, and we will see if you can handle more after that. VAWA is feminist authored and politically backed legislation that assumes, often through bogus feminist research, that only men are perpetrators of domestic violence and only women are victims. Subsequently men, <i>and their children</i> are denied DV services based on gender. VAWA funds go to train police departments in methods of add… | /r/MensRights | 07/05/11 05:29 PM |
| 1 | SlutWalks: Stupidity in a Tube TopYou are very naive if you think you are going to pursue men's rights without going directly though the feminist establishment to do it. With all respect, your lack of experience is glaring. I appreciate your "ideals" but it is clear you have no idea what you are up against. I suggest, though, that you fully consider that much of the truly egregious discrimination men face is rooted in gender feminism. If you can't see that now, you eventually will, after learn a lot more than you know now. | /r/MensRights | 07/05/11 09:40 AM |
| 6 | SlutWalks: Stupidity in a Tube TopI don't understand how this blog post is relevant to men's rights. A lot of people, especially those just dipping their toes into the men's rights arena, or those who are just spectators, might be asking the same question. And let me politely suggest that in a growing and diverse movement, you are not qualified to say what is and isn't relevant. I know I'm not qualified and I have been at this for 25 years. One thing you can do to help you understand is to start by understanding the environment … | /r/MensRights | 07/05/11 06:55 AM |
| 2 | SlutWalks: Stupidity in a Tube TopWow, You missed the point. I was pointing to the irony (and perhaps idiocy) of claiming proud ownership of a name like slut, especially without redefining it in a more positive way. By doing that the author of the slutwalks mission statement essentially endorsed everything in the article, even if she would object to the way it was said. So like the mentality I addressed in the piece, you are rescuing her (and apparently ALL women, lol!) And last I checked, misogyny applies to women across the bo… | /r/MensRights | 07/05/11 05:48 AM |
| 1 | Why Men are More Intelligent Than WomenSo bring it to my site where plenty of people will read it and comment and we will see | /r/MensRights | 05/05/11 08:18 PM |
| 1 | Why Men are More Intelligent Than WomenYou should have read my earlier posts. Gardner has been debunked a hundred times over and rejected by the scientific community. And besides, I asked you for the standardized test for emotional intelligence, not some debunked piece of junk science. If you think I don't know that finding that non existent test is the real reason you are not "wasting" your time, you are dumber than I thought. What a FAIL of a diversion. | /r/MensRights | 05/05/11 06:05 PM |
| 1 | On Slutwalks and Survival: The Truth About Men and WomenThen it must be a feminist moron who can't argue so takes shots at penises. Quack, quack, cupcake. | /r/MensRights | 05/05/11 05:39 AM |
| 1 | Why Men are More Intelligent Than WomenPlease refer me to the standardized test for emotional intelligence. Do that and I will concede your point. Fail to do that and I will conclude what I already know. Emotional intelligence is nothing but an unproven theory. No scientific validity. No nothing. And for good reason. It's junk. | /r/MensRights | 05/05/11 04:55 AM |
| 1 | bin Ladin Dead and All it Cost was a Thousands of Young Men and The TruthI talk to vets all the time. At the V.A. where I get my medical care. And if women take the same risks as the men, why do they only represent less than 2% of combat fatalities? If you can't do that math on that, don't talk to anyone about being obtuse or a dumbass. | /r/MensRights | 05/05/11 04:50 AM |
| 4 | Fisking Feminism: How Womyn Invent Womyn InventorsMaybe you were dumb when you read it. I never said Edison invented the light bulb, I said he "built" one, and he did. Attention to detail, Sherlock. If you ever want to invent anything, you might want to try it. And if you applied that same studious concept to the rest of the piece, perhaps you would have understood it. Enjoy your shots. Perhaps they will make you forget how obtuse you are being. | /r/MensRights | 05/05/11 04:46 AM |
| 0 | On Slutwalks and Survival: The Truth About Men and WomenOh, Geez, are any of you fuck-knuckles the least bit original? | /r/MensRights | 04/05/11 09:12 PM |
| 0 | bin Ladin Dead and All it Cost was a Thousands of Young Men and The TruthYou need to talk to some more vets. I have talked to many from the Gulf wars, and they tell much different stories than you do. And you might think outside your little box too. Ever have you ass in the grass in a jungle? You think female soldiers would carry their weight there, too? Answer yes and I will tell you you are brainwashed again. | /r/MensRights | 04/05/11 09:10 PM |
| 0 | bin Ladin Dead and All it Cost was a Thousands of Young Men and The TruthYou need to talk to some more vets. I have talked to many from the Gulf wars, and they tell much different stories than you do. And you might think outside your little box too. Ever have you ass in the grass in a jungle? You think female soldiers would carry their weight there, too? Answer yes and I will tell you you are brainwashed again. | /r/MensRights | 04/05/11 09:10 PM |
| 1 | bin Ladin Dead and All it Cost was a Thousands of Young Men and The TruthI hope you are right and I support your idea, but be careful what you wish for. Ever heard of fragging? It's what happens to incompetent or overly ambitious officers and even NCO's who get people killed in the field. An "accidental" stray bullet from a friendly finds its way to their head during a firefight. It also happens to other personnel that don't carry their weight or who make their fellow soldiers vulnerable because they are incompetent at their jobs. It is a brutal, but honestly quite e… | /r/MensRights | 03/05/11 06:03 PM |
| 1 | bin Ladin Dead and All it Cost was a Thousands of Young Men and The TruthI think you are brainwashed. IF you are really a vet of the two Gulf Wars, then you have to be aware of different ways men and women are handled over there, including, even according to your own observation, that it was mainly men dying. If you see mainly men dying, but don't see gender, then you are simply choosing when and where to be blind. Wake up, soldier, you are part of the problem. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/11 05:46 PM |
| 1 | bin Ladin Dead and All it Cost was a Thousands of Young Men and The TruthIt is a nice distraction, but you really aren't getting the point here at all. Not really a surprise here. I am not diminishing the sacrifices of any soldier who has done their job along side others, taking the same risks, doing the same work and carrying the same weight. I am not even dismissing the sacrifices of those that are given pussy passes from taking the same risks, doing the same work and carrying the same weight. I appreciate their service. But I tell you and anyone else that I will n… | /r/MensRights | 03/05/11 03:08 PM |
| -1 | On Slutwalks and Survival: The Truth About Men and WomenOh yes, they did, at factory jobs which were often hard work, sometimes even a little risky, but there is a problem here, and I do mean other than the fact that I know a lot more about this period in history than you do. Mass production jobs are not the physically grueling, dangerous jobs you are incorrectly painting them to be, nor did women, by and large, fill in for men on the jobs that actually were grueling and dangerous. Those factory jobs were actually the safest, easiest of all the tradi… | /r/MensRights | 03/05/11 02:54 PM |
| 1 | On Slutwalks and Survival: The Truth About Men and WomenYes, and? | /r/MensRights | 03/05/11 05:46 AM |
| 0 | Why Men are More Intelligent Than WomenYou seem to be the authority, I will take your word for it that they are just peachy. Regards to your "little boys." | /r/MensRights | 02/05/11 10:14 PM |
| 2 | bin Ladin Dead and All it Cost was a Thousands of Young Men and The TruthIf I thought it would stop a war, ergo making sure there were no pictures like that to take, I would be shoving them in the faces of strangers all day. If the mods here want to tag that pic, they can. I'm not. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/11 08:26 PM |
| 3 | bin Ladin Dead and All it Cost was a Thousands of Young Men and The TruthMost war is avoidable, we just don't hold our politicians to enough account to prevent it. But that is beside the point. I am a men's advocate. It would be pretty shitty of me to take the position that men should die because "somebody has to do it" Sorry, that is just defeatist bullshit. I hope parents wise up and start raising their sons to dismiss that kind of thinking. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/11 08:21 PM |
| 1 | bin Ladin Dead and All it Cost was a Thousands of Young Men and The TruthMost war is avoidable, we just don't hold our politicians to enough account to prevent it. But that is beside the point. I am a men's advocate. It would be pretty shitty of me to take the position that men should die because "somebody has to do it" Sorry, that is just defeatist bullshit. I hope parents wise up and start raising their sons to dismiss that kind of thinking. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/11 08:20 PM |
| -1 | Why Men are More Intelligent Than WomenI am glad someone here know it well enough to give directions. Good for you!! | /r/MensRights | 02/05/11 08:17 PM |
| 3 | bin Ladin Dead and All it Cost was a Thousands of Young Men and The TruthMy point is that it is a fucking picture. If you need a protective helmet and knee pads to surf the net, stay off your computer. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/11 05:52 PM |
| 3 | bin Ladin Dead and All it Cost was a Thousands of Young Men and The TruthThen you should be including civilian deaths, where the female count is much higher. ROTFLMMFAO!!! You mean I should include civilians as military combat deaths so that it stacks the numbers to the point I need to use language that infers female soldiers make the same sacrifices and take the same risks as male solders? Are you SERIOUS? Sorry, but what a feminist move! LOL! And my point is that you are not getting the point. I am not just looking at statistics, but in how these women were killed … | /r/MensRights | 02/05/11 05:47 PM |
| -2 | bin Ladin Dead and All it Cost was a Thousands of Young Men and The TruthNot it's not in the least. I am telling women soldiers that I don't put them in the same category as men because, even in a military combat arena, they are afforded special protections and consideration not given their male peers. THAT is what is hypocritical. I regard the unfortunate deaths of those women as collateral damage, which is what they are. Playing some make believe bullshit game that discounts the experience of men so women can feel better about what they are NOT expected to do is pu… | /r/MensRights | 02/05/11 05:37 PM |
| 4 | bin Ladin Dead and All it Cost was a Thousands of Young Men and The TruthI think most of the patriots would state their case, but you could be right. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/11 05:33 PM |
| -2 | bin Ladin Dead and All it Cost was a Thousands of Young Men and The TruthPeople should be warned before we go to war. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/11 05:10 PM |
| 1 | bin Ladin Dead and All it Cost was a Thousands of Young Men and The TruthLOL! Well, you know what they say, if you can't defeat them with debate, try to derail them with down votes. :) | /r/MensRights | 02/05/11 05:10 PM |
| 0 | bin Ladin Dead and All it Cost was a Thousands of Young Men and The TruthThere is no hole in my logic at all. For several reasons. One, as I already said, women killed in combat are exceedingly rare and their deaths are not part of the DESIGN of the battlefield- just like civilians and other collateral losses. Their presence there sometimes puts them in harms way, but the intent is for the men to do the dying. Society does not count most rapes into the equation because most of the victims are male to begin with. When you factor the number of men raped in prison and o… | /r/MensRights | 02/05/11 04:05 PM |
| 2 | bin Ladin Dead and All it Cost was a Thousands of Young Men and The TruthThe men's movement is not limited to legislation, though selective service law is a matter related to this story. Another part of this movement is the social expectations on men. Yes, young men CHOOSE to do this, after intense socialization that promises them rewards them for identifying as cannon fodder, and after government, well aware of that socialization, offers them some incentives for pursing false glory on the battlefield. That would be the same government that FUCKS THEM OVER when they … | /r/MensRights | 02/05/11 03:57 PM |
| 2 | bin Ladin Dead and All it Cost was a Thousands of Young Men and The TruthFixed, thanks. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/11 03:19 PM |
| -6 | bin Ladin Dead and All it Cost was a Thousands of Young Men and The TruthWhen young women are carrying the weight of young men and it is costing them in terms anywhere near approaching parity on the battlefield, then I will change the language I use. Till then I will regard those dead women for what they really are, collateral, unintended damage in wars that men are shouldered with fighting. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/11 02:35 PM |
| 15 | bin Ladin Dead and All it Cost was a Thousands of Young Men and The TruthThen you are in luck, within weeks your government will give you another bastard to go die for. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/11 12:37 PM |
| -3 | Why Men are More Intelligent Than WomenHere is why I won't bother with your questions. Follow the logic here: You claim something like "emotional intelligence" as though it is a commonly accepted reality. I refuted that by pointing to the fact that it has no accepted scientific legitimacy and that the main theorist behind the idea, Gardner, has been debunked and rejected repeatedly. Your reply? Eh you cant deny some people have the ability to control their emotions better than others, some would consider that an aspect of intelligenc… | /r/MensRights | 02/05/11 07:46 AM |
| -5 | Why Men are More Intelligent Than WomenYou're right, it is. You should leave immediately and put yourself in more refined company. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/11 07:37 AM |
| -3 | Why Men are More Intelligent Than WomenEmotional intelligence is junk science - no validity whatsoever, like all non psychometric models. Gardener has been debunked a hundred times over. And with all respect, if you were as logical and level headed as you assert here, you would not be asking questions that are inapplicable to the article. Nowhere did it say that gender was the sole indicator of intelligence or anything close to it. Try again. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/11 05:57 AM |
| -4 | Why Men are More Intelligent Than WomenWho is it you imagine that we are seeking credibility from? | /r/MensRights | 02/05/11 05:48 AM |
| 1 | On Slutwalks and Survival: The Truth About Men and WomenI understand fully you may not believe this, but the core point is not to simply insult or devalue women. The point is that none of the other goals I mentioned are possible unless people are free to speak in unpopular ways, expressing unpopular ideas. I also intentionally push the envelop because my experience unfortunately instructs me that this is what generates the most debate. And on a side note, I have, as a 54 year old man, been insulted my entire adult life by the lies and distortions of … | /r/MensRights | 02/05/11 05:46 AM |
| -4 | Why Men are More Intelligent Than WomenYou would have to address that to the author. But my personal response would be that it is an opinion piece. What specific point did he make that you think should be sourced, that women choose taller men, or men with more money? That's what you need proof of? | /r/MensRights | 02/05/11 03:38 AM |
| -6 | Why Men are More Intelligent Than WomenOtay. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/11 03:20 AM |
| -1 | On Slutwalks and Survival: The Truth About Men and WomenI don't have any kind of Utopian agenda, nor to I believe one is possible. I only have one mission and that is to offer some men, because most will fail to see it, the opportunity to see though the matrix of feminism and traditionalism, to see where they are reduced to fodder on the supposed behalf of women in general and on behalf of a microscopic percentage of very powerful men. The idea is ostensibly to create a better interrelationship with both women and other men in the long run, but for n… | /r/MensRights | 01/05/11 11:17 PM |
| -3 | On Slutwalks and Survival: The Truth About Men and WomenWhen you are through defending the glorious contributions of women to society and civilization, like getting pregnant and doing what their bodies will do with or without their conscious choice, please let me know. If I want to hear over glorified accounts of childbirth, I can go to any women's forum and they will babble on endlessly, as though having a child is an "accomplishment." Sure women are flooding those fields. In many of them standards were lowered, and even where the standards were low… | /r/MensRights | 01/05/11 09:18 PM |
| -1 | On Slutwalks and Survival: The Truth About Men and WomenI love it when neophytes come charging in like White Knights, all full of piss and vinegar, and too totally stupid to even recognize that "true gender equality" is just another feminist myth. You can assume what you want about my intelligence, but I assure you that your "message" will go nowhere. Feminists will see you for the useful idiot that you are, and MRA's will see your awkward and failed attempts to come to grip with reality for what it is...the cognitive dissonance that every MRA must w… | /r/MensRights | 01/05/11 09:12 PM |
| -6 | On Slutwalks and Survival: The Truth About Men and WomenThey asked and they were denied, by their historical owners. Like blacks they had to fight to vote, to go to school, to own property, and join the workforce. And you claim you are not a feminist? LOL!! Claiming women were owned by men is one of the most egregious feminist myths ever perpetuated. I don't care what you have said elsewhere, you are still brainwashed and dangerous if you claim to be an MRA. Well, not really dangerous as there is no MRA forum I know of, (other than this one which is … | /r/MensRights | 01/05/11 08:42 PM |
| -4 | On Slutwalks and Survival: The Truth About Men and WomenYour problem is misandry. You are attempting to place non threatening, protected work on the level of work that demands a great deal more risk taking and danger than gathering berries. The berries are important, but it is child's play, something that can even be done by the injured or handicapped. I recognize it, and respect it, but nor on the same level as tasks that require the actors to face death each time they do it. For that matter, your blindness to the difference would leave you no way t… | /r/MensRights | 01/05/11 08:33 PM |
| -2 | On Slutwalks and Survival: The Truth About Men and Women"EXCITING"??? Is that what you call that kind of risk taking? | /r/MensRights | 01/05/11 06:20 PM |
| -4 | On Slutwalks and Survival: The Truth About Men and WomenIf you are not calling me a Nazi then shut the fuck up with the German-Jew analogies. Saying shit like that and then saying you are not calling me a Nazi is just lying bullshit. Yes, I am calling you a liar because you are one, and I won't make up some stupid shit when you come back not liking it. I will tell you what I told another feminist poster. Your logic is non existent. For instance, saying that men have superior upper body strength compared to women is not male supremacy, it is the truth… | /r/MensRights | 01/05/11 06:16 PM |
| -3 | On Slutwalks and Survival: The Truth About Men and WomenTalking honestly about female capabilities and having it called denigrating is the PC bullshit that feminists have made their bread and butter for 50 years. If women were capable of stepping into those roles they would be doing it. They are not and never have been. Show me a single culture in all of human history where women shouldered a burden of risk and sacrifice on par with men and I will concede you MIGHT be correct. But of course, as I have been saying all along, you can't. I don't fault w… | /r/MensRights | 01/05/11 06:06 PM |
| 1 | Men Are A Disease: A Critique of George CarlinUnderstood and appreciated. | /r/MensRights | 01/05/11 05:59 PM |
| -7 | On Slutwalks and Survival: The Truth About Men and WomenYou are welcome to your opinion, such as it is. And on a more personal level, you can take the shopworn Nazi analogies and shove them up your ass. It's cheap theatrics put on by people who cannot make a substantive argument, precisely what the MRM does not need. The facts here are simple. Women, by and large, in this culture are afforded rights and privilege that men, by and large, still pay for with their blood, sweat and their lives. To do anything but prove yourself to be a fool, you have to … | /r/MensRights | 01/05/11 04:29 PM |
| 1 | Men Are A Disease: A Critique of George CarlinI understand, but with all respect I am the only person that can make that call, and the only one that should. It is my site, that I have poured over two year of sweat into, that I am safeguarding. | /r/MensRights | 01/05/11 04:22 PM |
| 0 | On Slutwalks and Survival: The Truth About Men and WomenTyping is a catch word for office work, white collar stuff. I ask you what I asked a commenter on my website. What do you imagine would happen if we took all men out of the dangerous and physically grueling, demanding jobs needed to keep our society afloat, and tried to fill those positions with the very best women we could find? Be honest now. | /r/MensRights | 01/05/11 04:20 PM |
| -1 | On Slutwalks and Survival: The Truth About Men and WomenIt may be insulting to you, and of course you are free to interpret it as supremacy if you want to, but you give no evidence at all for the allegation. And you can't because there is no supremacy in my thinking at all. I know lots of women that have worked their asses off to become all those things you mentioned, too. The fact is, however, that most women's lives still depend on the work and risk taking of men. 93% of all workplace deaths are male because it is still men taking all the real life… | /r/MensRights | 01/05/11 03:42 AM |
| 1 | Men Are A Disease: A Critique of George CarlinI appreciate what you are saying, but with all respect I would not pull the article because it offends someone. We offend people all the time. Part of our mission statement at AVfM reads as follows: To promote a culture that values equal treatment under the law for all individuals. To that end, AVfM welcomes all advocates for men and boys without regard to sex, sexual orientation, race, nationality, religion or lack thereof, or any other factor commonly used to divide human beings. If I allowed … | /r/MensRights | 01/05/11 03:27 AM |
| 1 | Men Are A Disease: A Critique of George CarlinI can't speak for the author here, but if I had interpreted his use of the word "useless" to be literal, I would not have allowed the piece to run on the site. In the biological sense, homosexuals are "useless." I think this explains so much hostility toward gays historically. They have been resented by the majority of men because they don't have to assume the same mandate to care for women. That has resulted in much persecution. But I will seek clarification. If the authors intent was to litera… | /r/MensRights | 30/04/11 09:02 PM |
| 3 | A Letter to Women From The Conscious Men (NSFW)We are taking pre-orders. If you are male, the price is $700.00. | /r/MensRights | 29/04/11 04:31 AM |
| 2 | A Letter to Traditional Women RevisitedIf someone told you it was your job to instruct me in anything, they lied to you. Did Mommy inflate your ego for you? Hey, I have a really good idea. Since you are so invested in quality writing for the MRM, then try doing some yourself. Where is your contribution? And here is another hint. Until you can actually produce something yourself, shut your stupid mouth and quit acting like a little sneevie bitch. And in the absence of that, go fuck yourself. I am going to use your messages here for an… | /r/MensRights | 16/04/11 05:12 PM |
| 1 | A Letter to Traditional WomenHey, just because some women are idiots, and choose to work in a place where men tell them to go fuck themselves, doesn't mean all of us are that way. In fact, most of us aren't. And? A little hint for you here, cupcake. MRA's, including the women, know they are minority, even among their respective sexes. So spare me the groupthink, lockstep sentiments. Your point there is meaningless. Oh, but hey, you're a fembot. Meaningless is what you do best. That must be the reason why the article was so … | /r/MensRights | 16/04/11 07:12 AM |
| 2 | A Letter to Traditional Women RevisitedAnd you sound like the Good Men Project, as well as someone that doesn't understand the first thing about activist writing. I will try to educate you, though it is probably wasted. I observe from your comments and messages that you are pretty clueless as to what is going on in the MRM. avoiceformen.com is not an entertainment website. It's an activist website. That means nothing posted there is for any other purpose than to sort through ideas about men's issues, draw attention to them, and provo… | /r/MensRights | 16/04/11 06:53 AM |
| 2 | A Letter to Traditional WomenWhat kind of bullshit is that? You wonder what I want but you want to ask others to answer the question? Fuck sake. | /r/MensRights | 15/04/11 08:23 PM |
| 1 | A Letter to Traditional WomenSure. Division of the house chores would be fine, and would relieve men of some of their burden since they do more in the home, and at work, than women do. | /r/MensRights | 15/04/11 08:21 PM |
| 1 | A Letter to Traditional WomenSure. Division of the house chores would be fine, and would relieve men of some of their burden since they do more in the home, and at work, than women do. | /r/MensRights | 15/04/11 08:21 PM |
| 1 | A Letter to Traditional WomenLink away! I love useful idiots! AVfM has a substantial and growing number of female writers, not in spite of articles like this, but because of them. They don't like women like you any more than men do. | /r/MensRights | 15/04/11 08:18 PM |
| 2 | A Letter to Traditional WomenYou are really foolish, in my opinion, if you think that all that contained in the letter was raging and swearing. You should actually check out the comments on the site to see that many people got a lot more from it than that. For instance, and I quote from one reader: this article was a total eye-opener. I am just floored by the sheer novelty of the idea presented. I always thought feminists were the problem, and that “the traditional woman” was something of an ally who possessed perhaps just … | /r/MensRights | 15/04/11 01:57 PM |
| 1 | A Letter to Traditional WomenLOL! I just had to drop in and say that a "tone" is not something most people would agree or disagree with. Most usually reserve that for just the statements. If anger turns you off so much, perhaps being in the middle of a forum gender based social activism is a bad idea. Being angry doesn't make anyone wrong, or didn't you know that? | /r/MensRights | 15/04/11 01:39 AM |
| 1 | Elam Appearing Tonight on Dads on the AirThanks, man. | /r/MensRights | 12/04/11 03:48 AM |
| 2 | Petition to disbar Misandrist Prosecutor Mary Kellett (from A Voice for Men.com) Your signature needed!:) | /r/MensRights | 08/04/11 03:38 AM |
| 1 | Abuse Hysteria in Maine: The Ghost of Michael NifongWhatever it takes. | /r/MensRights | 30/03/11 04:11 AM |
| 0 | Murder as a Possible Outcome of Escalating False Rape ProsecutionsThat is the whole point. The emergence of a trend toward killing accusers would only be an expression of the fact that the punishment for false accusation is not a deterrent. The solution of course would be to punish false accusers in a manner consistent with the severity of their actions. | /r/MensRights | 18/03/11 02:40 PM |
| 3 | Murder as a Possible Outcome of Escalating False Rape ProsecutionsCalling murder "cold pragmatism" is an endorsement. Completely untrue. That kind of conclusion doesn't even approach lucidity. There are a lot of things people would call cold pragmatism. It is an observation of the nature of a decision, not a measure of it's validity. Fact: Killing an accuser quite clearly provides a better potential outcome than being convicted for rape, whether the allegation is true or not. Fact: That does not mean I endorse murder, rape or any other crime. It is just a reas… | /r/MensRights | 18/03/11 02:37 PM |
| 0 | Gentlemen, My Ass Thanks YouOK, you seem to be an authority on activism, at least enough to instruct me on what should and should not be happening. Admittedly, all I do is reach about 50-60,000 people a month with the thoughts and insights of about 15-20 MRA's. But for where the movement is at, I kinda look at that like a good thing. So what precisely is it that you do? I mean, aside form tell me how things should be done? | /r/MensRights | 17/03/11 11:19 PM |
| 1 | Gentlemen, My Ass Thanks YouSo, you are an MRA, but you won't present your ideas in an MRA forum. Not only chickenshit, but a lying chickenshit. AVfM is not my clubhouse. People dissent (yes, from me) and debate as a matter of routine. And besides, the point, as you so disingenuously ask about, is simple. You are hiding where you feel the waters are safe for you. What does the "A" in MRA mean to you? Avoider? You just don't want to hear or deal with the scrutiny your POV will bring across a spectrum of activists. What a co… | /r/MensRights | 16/03/11 07:24 PM |
| -2 | Rape is not Special and Neither are YouCompared to most other violent felonies, it isn't. | /r/MensRights | 16/03/11 07:17 PM |
| -1 | Nice Guys Are Emotional Toilet PaperNot much on nuance, are you? | /r/MensRights | 16/03/11 12:22 AM |
| 0 | Gentlemen, My Ass Thanks YouAll still boils down to chickenshit intellectual dishonesty. I would go in to any venue and defend my ideas. All you have said here is that you won't debate where people disagree with you. Like I said...chickenshit. | /r/MensRights | 16/03/11 12:21 AM |
| -1 | Nice Guys Are Emotional Toilet PaperAnd your post always raises the same question. MRA or feminist. My bet is on the latter. No one in the post said he approached anyone. You are making a point without a point. | /r/MensRights | 15/03/11 10:38 PM |
| 0 | Gentlemen, My Ass Thanks YouChickenshit. | /r/MensRights | 15/03/11 10:36 PM |
| 0 | Gentlemen, My Ass Thanks YouIs there some reason anyone should care whar YOU see or don't see? Seriously, the men's movement is growing rapidly and articles like this are getting resounding support from the men who have been involved in it for quite some time. You said "us" when referring to the MRM. Come over to the site and voice your concerns about this. I will stay out of it and ask the author to do the same. Just allow the men and women there tell you why they think it is very important to have this kind of expression… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/11 03:39 AM |
| 2 | Good Men Project Magazine: Ripping off Readers and AdvertisersOh, I was so very wounded by Aerik's disapproval. Gloom for me all day. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/11 09:30 PM |
| 0 | Gentlemen, My Ass Thanks YouMisandry and the marginalization of men, both historically and in contemporary life, has everything to do with the men's rights movement. What do you have to do with it? And besides, it is still men constructing and maintaining this civilization. What have women given us? | /r/MensRights | 13/03/11 09:23 PM |
| 1 | A Message for White KnightsMy regards to your therapist. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/11 08:06 PM |
| 1 | Use of the Word “Creep” Demonstrates Female PrivilegeI always find it a good idea to check the by lines of articles. That way I don't make the mistake of attributing anything anyone said to the wrong person. It helps, especially if I am trying to insult someone, from coming off like a complete fucking idiot. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/11 08:00 AM |
| 1 | A Message for White KnightsI'd check that temper if I were you. Touchy touchy. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/11 07:58 AM |
| -1 | Use of the Word “Creep” Demonstrates Female PrivilegeLOL! What article would that be? | /r/MensRights | 07/03/11 04:53 AM |
| 1 | A Message for White KnightsYep, I asked you, and you answered, completely oblivious to the fact that those anecdotes are completely under representative of the norm, and therefore irrelevant. If I made a mistake, it was in hoping you might notice that in the process. And sorry, if you are not able to see the interrelationship between feminism and the abject neglect, indeed harm of men and boys, that doesn't mean there isn't a connection. Perhaps you have some form of mild, undiagnosed autism. I say that because you appear… | /r/MensRights | 07/03/11 04:52 AM |
| 1 | A Message for White KnightsI'm stupid? LOL! I'm not the mangina in a men's rights forum offering up personal anecdotes to support women in a totally failed attempt to refute overarching social conditions that affect men as a whole. Man, if I only had a nickel.... :) | /r/MensRights | 07/03/11 03:43 AM |
| -3 | Use of the Word “Creep” Demonstrates Female PrivilegeOf course it's not, and women only make 70 cents to the dollar compared to men for the same work, right? | /r/MensRights | 06/03/11 05:23 PM |
| 1 | A Message for White KnightsThank you for proving my point so precisely and effectively. With the scores of men falsely imprisoned for rape, a false rape allegation rape of at least 40%, and men being killed, maimed, raped and socially destroyed as a result of those allegations, a society that by and large ignores the problem and gives women a pass, you come up with TWO men who you ALLEGE knew about a rape before it happened and concluded that this represents a problem in light of the massive protections afforded women in … | /r/MensRights | 06/03/11 04:50 PM |
| 1 | A Message for White KnightsActually, I only tell people to fuck themselves when they prove an inability to practice intellectual honesty. That isn't histrionics. It's common sense, and you are coming close to that status. For instance, how many men have you known that allowed a woman to get raped? Come on out with it. It is the tipping point for you in this conversation. For if the number of men you have known who have "allowed" women to get raped is that significant, I will call you a liar and tell you to fuck off right … | /r/MensRights | 05/03/11 06:18 PM |
| 1 | A Message for White Knightswhy can't you see that you're looking back through that same lens? I CAN. Look at it this way. What is the best way to wake people in general up to the fact that society is misandric? I mean, look at the misandry in you! I don't mean that to be insulting, but you live in a culture where it is men who are the most disposable, exploited and unfairly treated monolithic group. It goes on unnoticed and unacknowledged almost everywhere around you. Sure, I can "gather evidence" that the world is caring… | /r/MensRights | 05/03/11 03:08 PM |
| 1 | A Message for White KnightsYou might want to talk to women about how they are treating men, then. Whether you agree with me or not there is a growing number of men who are quickly embracing a philosophy of leaving women to completely fend for themselves regardless of the outcome. And just a slight hint here, I don't think calling those men bitter or other shaming tactics is going to do anything but strengthen and further justify their resolve. Either way, it means nothing to me. Since I am the one in the drivers seat for … | /r/MensRights | 05/03/11 06:34 AM |
| 0 | A Message for White KnightsWhen this culture gives a rats ass about male victims I will agree with you. | /r/MensRights | 04/03/11 09:01 PM |
| 1 | A Message for White KnightsOh shut the fuck up. At least if that is your best shot. Most MRA's are long past being shamed out of their beliefs by being called bitter. And as I read this guy it seems pretty clear that he is one of them. Good. I would not lift a finger to help a woman in trouble unless she were personally known to me. Not one finger. It's not bitterness, but resolve. So go ahead and try to call me bitter. I won't care, and it won't address the fact that more and more men are feeling the way I do all the tim… | /r/MensRights | 04/03/11 07:53 AM |
| -1 | A Message for White KnightsIt was Mark Twain that said “It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.” And that is the case with people like you. So sure of yourself. So fucking wrong. Men ARE raped more than women. First consider this: 2.1% of men reported forced vaginal sex compared to 1.6% of women in a relationship in the previous year. From: Predictors of Sexual Coersion. http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/ID45-PR45.pdf *94% of sexually abused youth in correctiona… | /r/MensRights | 04/03/11 07:44 AM |
| -3 | A Message for White KnightsWhat's really startling is that in a society where men are raped far more often and repeatedly than women, your concerns lie with the less frequent victims. | /r/MensRights | 03/03/11 08:45 PM |
| -2 | A Message for White KnightsAll you have to do is read the comments here to know that is not true. | /r/MensRights | 03/03/11 08:43 PM |
| -1 | A Message for White KnightsB-I-N-G-O. | /r/MensRights | 03/03/11 08:42 PM |
| -3 | A Message for White KnightsBack at the subtle misandry and shaming language again, huh Bolshey? Has she/he ever had any other language? Seriously, I wonder if bullshitpuppet would take care of my family if I got killed following his code of being "reasonable." What a crock. | /r/MensRights | 03/03/11 08:41 PM |
| -5 | I'd Give You an "A"Portrayed? Are you serious? He recounted his EXPERIENCE. This is his story, told as he claims it happened, he asserts it is true. I have no problem believing him. Portrayed. How lame. | /r/MensRights | 01/03/11 09:36 PM |
| -7 | I'd Give You an "A"The Puppet is a lost cause. Myopic, tunnel visioned misandry and nothing else, sinking in semantic quicksand, and either not knowing it or not caring. It is people like this that drive me every day to do what I do. | /r/MensRights | 01/03/11 09:33 PM |
| 2 | The Violence Behind Feminism's Humanist MasqueradeMen and women ARE working together for human rights. It is called the MRM. And no one said anything about half the population being the enemy, except as can easily be cited in 50 years of feminist and women's studies literature. Or are you one of the ones claiming to be unaware of the hatred that has been fostered by feminist icons for half a century? If you want to work on a humanist agenda, you have to first realize that it is only feminism in your way. | /r/MensRights | 28/02/11 04:11 PM |
| 1 | The Violence Behind Feminism's Humanist MasqueradeNice dodge of the point. But I can't ask you a thoughtful question with your providing a thoughtful comment to base it on. So far, you're batting squat. | /r/MensRights | 28/02/11 02:52 AM |
| 1 | The Violence Behind Feminism's Humanist MasqueradeHey, I have an idea, if you think this is bait and switch why don't you support that claim before asking another pointless question. | /r/MensRights | 27/02/11 09:00 PM |
| -2 | How not to be "a voice for men" (advice for Paul Elam)More, more, more! I might even read the next one. LOL!! | /r/MensRights | 25/02/11 04:00 AM |
| -4 | How not to be "a voice for men" (advice for Paul Elam)Good little hamster. A few more rounds and you get an alfalfa pill to chew on. | /r/MensRights | 25/02/11 02:06 AM |
| 2 | How not to be "a voice for men" (advice for Paul Elam)No, I'm not, and never said I was, but I am occupying a lot of space in your otherwise empty head. I love making your little hamster work overtime. :) | /r/MensRights | 24/02/11 11:14 PM |
| 6 | How not to be "a voice for men" (advice for Paul Elam)Another great thing about all this dialog is that it gives the opportunity for the intellectually unemployed (aka feminists) to come on and make comments like this. Keep it up, flake. Every time you post, you make a great case for the MRM. Sterling!! | /r/MensRights | 24/02/11 09:23 PM |
| 7 | How not to be "a voice for men" (advice for Paul Elam)I up voted this. Great post that proves my strategy all the more effective. Obviously, or should be by now, the support of feminists and manginas is less than necessary. In fact, they are superlative fodder. The point is force people to talk. I am really, really good at that. And when you force people to talk, you also force them to think. I love providing you people with nifty little tidbits like "Fuck the pain of women." because each time you try to use it against me, you also lead people to r… | /r/MensRights | 24/02/11 08:24 PM |
| 2 | The Scourge of Rape. Yeah, whatever.LOL! You're about as neutral as Sean Hannity. Thanks for the suggestions, but just the same I will pass on doing things already done in the MRM for some time now. As they say, if it ain't new, it's through. I think I will stick with the path I am on. As long as feminists and others support a culture that dismisses the pain and trauma inflicted on men, while insisting that I honor women who luxuriate in the status of victim whenever they get a hang nail or find they can't do a job well enough to … | /r/MensRights | 24/02/11 03:19 PM |
| -3 | The Scourge of Rape. Yeah, whatever.Actually your first stab was a lot better. The diatribe is too distracting. Is there any way your could just reduce it to like a dozen words or so? You know how it is with advertising, brevity is money. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/11 07:03 AM |
| -1 | The Scourge of Rape. Yeah, whatever.Funny, I was just asked for a really nasty quote about me for a poster promoting my new radio show. Thanks for providing a good one. God, I love what I do. :) | /r/MensRights | 24/02/11 06:19 AM |
| 0 | The Scourge of Rape. Yeah, whatever.Stupid is as stupid does. A watched pot never boils. Excuse me, I think there is a stick up your ass. (But I don't think that makes you gay) | /r/MensRights | 23/02/11 11:09 PM |
| 0 | The Scourge of Rape. Yeah, whatever.You must really be out of touch. Tell me though, how many people follow your work? What have you personally accomplished, if anything, for the MRM in terms of spreading the message? Anything? Anything at all? Is anyone listening to what you have to say, at least more than you can count on one hand? If you have a better way, set about proving it or STFU. Done here. | /r/MensRights | 23/02/11 07:06 PM |
| 2 | The Scourge of Rape. Yeah, whatever.You're just not quite as successful at succeeding the same way, because it's not illegal to be an asshole. There now, I just quoted you. Hey, with the skill level you possess it was bound to happen somewhere. Who knows, maybe next year the Podunk Times will be using your stuff. | /r/MensRights | 23/02/11 01:51 PM |
| 0 | The Scourge of Rape. Yeah, whatever.Down voting here doesn't count. This place is followed by as many or more feminists as it is MRA's, and MRA's are supportive of this to the hilt. So I don'e need to argue, I have already won. I won the moment you pwned yourself by saying no reasonable person would give me a second of their time, but have already spent much more than that tying to argue me down. I know you hate it, and that makes me laugh, but even having any discourse with you is just a little down time from what I normally do, … | /r/MensRights | 23/02/11 01:47 PM |
| 3 | The Scourge of Rape. Yeah, whatever.WOW!!! Another great article, Mr. Elam. As a woman, I could feel my blood pressure rise as I read the first paragraphs only to find redemption in what would follow. You made me think outside the box…….again! Well done! TOTALLY EPIC. Epic or Lame: 27 5 That is the first comment on the site, with the voting. And BTW, the down votes were just a recent addition. All of them cast without written dissent. It is similar to what you are doing here. You are all name calling and puffery, but totally lacki… | /r/MensRights | 23/02/11 01:40 PM |
| 1 | The Scourge of Rape. Yeah, whatever.I will be sure to pass that along to the gay men who write for A Voice for Men. Those would be gay men who are actually doing something about misandry. You don't have to be gay to be limp wristed. | /r/MensRights | 23/02/11 01:35 PM |
| 4 | The Scourge of Rape. Yeah, whatever.Well, they down voted you, but appeared to take your advice to STFU. I like it. And we are going to see a lot more fembots and manginas who are going to STFU in the future. Their entire existence will be here, skulking around a forum and down voting, because in the end, other than saying, "eewwww, thaths so naaasthy!" they don't have the depth or the intellectual ammunition to do anything but STFU. It's actually quite comical. | /r/MensRights | 23/02/11 05:43 AM |
| 3 | The Scourge of Rape. Yeah, whatever.And I stand behind every word. Until I can serve on a jury where I know the defendant has received a fair trial, I will vote to acquit. Disgusting is anyone who would roll the dice with a man's life when they have no way of knowing whether they have seen all the evidence. I think that would be you. | /r/MensRights | 23/02/11 05:33 AM |
| -4 | The Scourge of Rape. Yeah, whatever.Since you couldn't handle the reality of the article, you won't do any better with this, but you are totally full of shit. First, is there anything here that makes it appear to you that I am trying to make friends? What I am doing, whether you can deal with it or not, is gaining supporters. But I have made some friends in the process. If you are not one of them, trust me, I will get over it. My website has done nothing but grow since the day it was launched. I get serious financial contributions… | /r/MensRights | 23/02/11 05:28 AM |
| -4 | The Scourge of Rape. Yeah, whatever.Psychopathy? Fucking psychopathy? Are you fucking kidding me? That word has been out of vogue for thirty years, lol! It was replaced by anti-social personalty disorder. At any rate, if antiquated armchair diagnosis and name calling are all you have, then go fuck yourself, forced or otherwise. It is you that lacks empathy, and you, obviously that doesn't even understand the article. The point isn't to cut anyone down but to remove the sacred status of one type of victim over another. I hope some … | /r/MensRights | 23/02/11 12:37 AM |
| -2 | A Typical American Whore (Video)Myopic response. Women who expect financial subsidies from the men they are involved with are a mainstay in western culture. Lot of exceptions, but men are still expected to pay, and for the most part, they do. Just because those women conceal their avarice a little better doesn't make them that much different. If you don't know that, you have been under a rock. | /r/MensRights | 23/02/11 12:27 AM |
| 0 | A Typical American Whore (Video)It's only her way of saying, "Times have changed, a ho's gotta work a little harder than she used to." | /r/MensRights | 22/02/11 04:15 PM |
| 0 | A Typical American Whore (Video)It is typical enough that there has been a flourishing market for this kind of dressed up hooking for a long, long time. In fact, the only thing unusual about this particular clip is that in this case the whore was more or less called what she was from the beginning. So. it's not bullshit at all, except to the extent that it is truly bullshit that in the western female realm this kind of thinking can be monetized and marketed with great success. If you have issues with this, take them up with th… | /r/MensRights | 22/02/11 04:10 PM |
| 1 | My CEO asked on his blog for us to come up with ways to influence the education system to encourage and reward creative ways to teach science, technology, engineering and math. Here's my response.Very well said. Up voted. | /r/MensRights | 19/02/11 02:17 AM |
| 2 | No Language Barrier HereI often get criticized for communicating in the way you just did. My response? Fuck them, too. The people that oppose this kind of important and socially healthy message are FUCKED UP as human beings. Any courtesy given them might as well be extended to active pedophiles. | /r/MensRights | 18/02/11 03:27 AM |
| 0 | A Word From Zales Jewelers on Valentines Day (NSFW)I don't mean to be a smart ass, but if you are concerned with how you look, then being and MRA is not for you. After all, look like to whom, the men and women who will sell themselves out for sex and diamonds. The parody is a fair critique, IMO. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/11 04:21 AM |
| 1 | Super Bowl Winner: Psychotic Feminist HypocrisyOh, yeah, I am going nuclear. Scuse me, CSI is on. | /r/MensRights | 14/02/11 08:03 PM |
| 1 | Super Bowl Winner: Psychotic Feminist HypocrisyIt wasn't written so horribly that you should have missed the fact that it wasn't an article. It was a PM from YouTube, Einstein. Even then, it was better job of scribing than your reddit username. | /r/MensRights | 14/02/11 07:32 PM |
| 2 | A Valentine for VagiconsImprove their lives with men? By playing them for money? This you interpret as self improvement? I would offer more insight than you were able to pull out of Labadie's remark about Sweden, but if you think shallow opportunism is self help, then I wouldn't waste my time. Worst comment I have read this week. | /r/MensRights | 14/02/11 05:45 AM |
| 2 | A Valentine for VagiconsThat would be a good fit with *equal but special". | /r/MensRights | 14/02/11 01:15 AM |
| 1 | Super Bowl Winner: Psychotic Feminist HypocrisyDo you expect a feminist to be concerned with facts? :) | /r/MensRights | 13/02/11 06:37 PM |
| 1 | Arguing for Male Rights in Bizzarro WorldFeminist governance. | /r/MensRights | 08/02/11 03:58 PM |
| 8 | On March 1, 2011 Men Will Speak...Like You Have Never Heard Them BeforeI want every fembot skulking around this forum to down vote the living shit out of this post. I get to laugh out loud at the futility of your actions. The MRM is gaining steam and there is nothing you can do about it. | /r/MensRights | 07/02/11 04:10 AM |
| 1 | Understanding the Dumb Choices Women MakeTemper, temper, son. And try using your head. Grabbing peoples attention with headlines that are provocative is a staple of publishing, on line and off. Reddit even suggests that you make your title "interesting." Well, it seems that the author of this piece (not me) already seemed to have a grasp of that. It is driving a lot of reads out of reddit at this very moment. And that would be the purpose of spreading information, would it not? Oh, sorry, I forgot, your Peter Pan mentality tells you th… | /r/MensRights | 06/02/11 09:32 PM |
| 1 | Understanding the Dumb Choices Women MakeIf someone told you what you think was important to me, they lied to you. And to boot, your comment is obtuse. Women and men both make dumb choices, each kind more prevalent to their sex. That may sound sexist to you, but it is real. And exploring why just might provide some insight into why that happens, and point the way to some solutions - in case you are interested more in that than you are how an article is titled. By the way, I have seen many articles in women's magazines with similar titl… | /r/MensRights | 06/02/11 07:43 PM |
| 1 | And All Women are Potential Child Abusers, TooSure thing, cupcake. Just keep telling yourself that. | /r/MensRights | 04/02/11 08:56 PM |
| 1 | And All Women are Potential Child Abusers, TooDon't need to. There are plenty of man hating feminist douche bags to do all the convincing we need. That is why we have an MRM. | /r/MensRights | 04/02/11 03:02 AM |
| 2 | What is Wrong With These Women?I would seriously question whether or not your assessment, that it "isn't particularly well written," holds any water at all. Good writing is effective writing, plain and simple. There isn't any other way to judge it, except in the mechanical, grammatic sense that has as much to do with good writing as good penmanship. This article evokes emotions and interest. It is the best kind of writing there is. | /r/MensRights | 02/02/11 04:48 PM |
| 2 | The Colonization of Male SpaceAgreed. Insightful analogy. | /r/MensRights | 01/02/11 04:14 AM |
| 2 | Conservative MisandryA war won? Which one? | /r/MensRights | 27/01/11 10:40 PM |
| 1 | And All Women are Potential Child Abusers, TooOh come on. Where on earth in the western world did you get an education in psychology that was not in a feminist dominated university department? And your use of platitudes like "factual healthier nicer side of people" leaves me seriously wondering where you got an education in psychology at all. Sorry, just calling it like I see it. | /r/MensRights | 26/01/11 10:10 PM |
| 11 | "It is awful" to prosecute a 15-year-old girl who told a rape lie that got a boy arrested, says women's rights advocateDisagree to an extent. Getting raped is a tragedy, but it doesn't necessarily mean a destroyed life. Once the rape is over there are services and help for women. It doesn't mean it is less traumatic, but there are many rape victims who recover from what happened and go on to relatively normal lives, and they can always count on the compassion of a society that abhors rape. Being falsely accused or convicted is another matter. Texas just released two men from prison -both from the same city - tha… | /r/MensRights | 26/01/11 07:40 AM |
| 2 | And All Women are Potential Child Abusers, TooEqualitarianism isn't bullshit. Feminism, on the other hand, is a big fat steaming pile..... | /r/MensRights | 26/01/11 03:41 AM |
| 3 | And All Women are Potential Child Abusers, TooPlease specify any areas of gender discrimination extant in western culture that does not work against men and for women. I'll pass on the rest of your point, although I don't think they are any more supportable than the one I asked about. | /r/MensRights | 26/01/11 03:40 AM |
| 3 | And All Women are Potential Child Abusers, TooYou are amazed by this? That is interesting. Since you are a credentialed psychiatric professional you must be aware that the mental health field, both in the professional community and the university milieu, is one of the main disseminating forces in the false paradigm that just men are perpetrators. It has been that way for at least 30 years. | /r/MensRights | 26/01/11 03:39 AM |
| 1 | What the F-ck is Wrong with Jack Donovan?Please feel free to contact me via email. I would really like to lean why you feel like Jack has men's interests in mind. And I actually hope you can convince me. Thanks. | /r/MensRights | 21/01/11 02:05 PM |
| 1 | What the F-ck is Wrong with Jack Donovan?Man (draws a deep breath) please bear with me while I try to address this with the respect you deserve. I am honestly flattered by what you said, but I also find it dangerous. I have never wanted to rep the MRM, and have, on many occasions flatly rejected the notion that I am any kind of leader. All that title does is make me a target. I am just a writer on men's issues with a lot of opinions, and while I do engage in activism it is always a one man show. I don't think I have done anything colle… | /r/MensRights | 21/01/11 07:34 AM |
| 2 | What the F-ck is Wrong with Jack Donovan?I certainly welcome you to your opinion, but could not disagree more. The Foundation for Male Studies has threatened feminist hegemony in academe in the only way it has ever been threatened. Jack screwed the pooch by attacking them, especially on such flimsy reasoning. He was against the initiative the first moment he heard about it. And I don't think what I wrote was unjustified. I often explore possible reasons for the actions and behaviors of feminists often going into personal territory, and… | /r/MensRights | 20/01/11 10:12 PM |
| 1 | What the F-ck is Wrong with Jack Donovan?My concerns are that ANY conception of being a man is forced on anyone. Period. I don't care what the definition is. In fact, and I say solely for myself, I think part of the reason the world is so screwed up is because of men being forced into utilitarian molds and being punished if they don't comply. Sexuality is just one thing, there is a whole lot more. I think a lot of times, and I am not saying this applies to you, that the reaction is not just from me but also from the other end. Being an… | /r/MensRights | 20/01/11 10:08 PM |
| 1 | What the F-ck is Wrong with Jack Donovan?If you like much of what I post, then you know I don't treat feminists with any more kindness than this. Male studies is a very important initiative, and it has been attacked, in true mud slinging fashion by someone no more interested in the struggles of men and boys than Gloria Steinem. I see no reason to treat him different than anyone else. I can't please everyone with what I write, and I am not inclined to try, but I appreciate your concerns. | /r/MensRights | 20/01/11 06:04 AM |
| 2 | What the F-ck is Wrong with Jack Donovan?I do believe I linked readers to Donovan's article, as well as his archives at The Spearhead, so that the unfamiliar could acquaint themselves with his work. Perhaps if you investigated that you would feel differently, perhaps not. Either way, I don't see character assassination as an issue when character itself IS the issue. | /r/MensRights | 20/01/11 06:01 AM |
| 1 | An Open Letter to Congressman Ted Poe of TexasFixed. Thanks. | /r/MensRights | 19/01/11 05:55 PM |
| 1 | A New Super Bowl Hoax that Eclipses the Last One in its Sheer DepravityThis is a staggering comment. And it goes to the core of your credibility. Well, either your credibility or your ability to reason. Go back are read the very first sentence of that message again. And please read it over and over till what they are saying sinks in. If you help run a campus organization that advocates for equal treatment of men in regards to sexual consent, then it is almost certain that you are aware that your biggest problem in that advocacy is overcoming disinformation and the … | /r/MensRights | 18/01/11 04:05 PM |
| 1 | A New Super Bowl Hoax that Eclipses the Last One in its Sheer DepravityLOL! I hear you, just the same I never could resist trying to flush every turd out of the toilet. | /r/MensRights | 18/01/11 02:04 PM |
| 2 | A New Super Bowl Hoax that Eclipses the Last One in its Sheer DepravityMy website and and youtube channel get tens of thousands of visits per month. My comment sections in both places, not to mention my email, are full of thanks you's directly from people whose awareness I have raised. (Not to mention that I have the support of several academicians that do leading work on cultural misandry) My readers and viewers have recently donated thousands of dollars to create an internet MRM radio station correctly and more is coming in every day. And you think I have a probl… | /r/MensRights | 18/01/11 03:59 AM |
| 0 | A New Super Bowl Hoax that Eclipses the Last One in its Sheer DepravityI suppose the choice of battles will be, as it should be, left to those actually fighting them. There are some good MRA's here. It is also infested with idiots. | /r/MensRights | 18/01/11 03:16 AM |
| 1 | Remember: BOYCOTT Valentines DayJust keep telling yourself that. | /r/MensRights | 18/01/11 01:20 AM |
| 0 | Is TED Now Compensating for Hanna Rosin's Misandry? (VIDEO)What an absolutely bullshit, racist article. | /r/MensRights | 17/01/11 07:59 PM |
| 2 | Is TED Now Compensating for Hanna Rosin's Misandry? (VIDEO)Anyone who has followed this ongoing story should get the headline, but I agree, for those that are seeing the story the first time, the headline could have been clearer. | /r/MensRights | 17/01/11 07:49 PM |
| 2 | Peace Needs a Woman Like a Fish Needs a BicycleI could not agree more. And this idea applies to a lot of other areas. I have said for a long time that death penalty opponents should campaign for gender equity on death row. If we ever started executing women whenever they legally have it coming, the death chambers would shut down overnight. | /r/MensRights | 17/01/11 09:02 AM |
| 5 | Peace Needs a Woman Like a Fish Needs a BicycleThis comment from an AVfm reader: War will end when men are no longer treated as expendable. The more feminists and society denigrate and dismiss men from the category human and equally valuable the more they promote the conditions necessary for war. | /r/MensRights | 16/01/11 11:56 PM |
| 0 | Answering a Schoolgirl's Questions"I know absolutely nobody like this, nor have I ever read anybody who thinks that the destruction of the family is a good thing," You were done before you ever got started. You just didn't know it. | /r/MensRights | 16/01/11 07:01 PM |
| 2 | Answering a Schoolgirl's QuestionsNo, cupcake. It does't work that way. I have some really good (and surprising to you) answers to that, but it's tit for tat with fembots for me. You have failed to address the very first points made to you with intellectual honesty. And before I answer any questions from you, you have to fix that by answering mine. Hiow do you explain, given your initial assertion that feminism doesn't, and never has, had anything to do with being anti marriage, the repeated and chronic assertion by feminist ico… | /r/MensRights | 16/01/11 06:24 PM |
| 1 | Remember: BOYCOTT Valentines DayOh please. Would just one of you jerk offs please point to the actual or legitimate men's rights group that you support? Where is it, feministing.com? | /r/MensRights | 16/01/11 11:43 AM |
| 1 | Remember: BOYCOTT Valentines DayWhy should I date when I can get a blowjob by snapping my fingers? | /r/MensRights | 16/01/11 11:41 AM |
| 1 | Remember: BOYCOTT Valentines DayOK, so now you have shifted from buying shit to spending time with someone. Transparent much? | /r/MensRights | 16/01/11 11:40 AM |
| 0 | Answering a Schoolgirl's QuestionsOk, so you have chosen the rationalization route by first saying "I know absolutely nobody like this, nor have I ever read anybody who thinks that the destruction of the family is a good thing," and then confronted with the hard evidence, you are now side stepping to the NAFALT (Not all feminists are like that) position. Typical feminist avoidance. It should be obvious, even to you as a feminist, that what the article was addressing was the feminism that has damaged the family (and everything el… | /r/MensRights | 16/01/11 11:19 AM |
| -1 | Answering a Schoolgirl's QuestionsIt is bullshit that he takes as his entire premise that feminists are out to destroy the family - as a feminist, and as someone who associates pretty much entirely with feminists of one stripe or another, I know absolutely nobody like this, nor have I ever read anybody who thinks that the destruction of the family is a good thing. "How will the family unit be destroyed? ...[T]he demand alone will throw the whole ideology of the family into question, so that women can begin establishing a communi… | /r/MensRights | 16/01/11 07:57 AM |
| 0 | Answering a Schoolgirl's QuestionsI don't have to subject myself to bullshit. Oh, my, a victim are you? I know this may sound strange, given your apparent mentality, but some people might think it more credible, reasonable even, to point out what you think is bullshit and why. Then you could give others the opportunity to support or criticize your conclusions. All you are doing here is sticking your fingers in your ears and yelling "Nah nah nah nah nah I am not listening nah nah nah!" Doing this likely makes you look erudite to … | /r/MensRights | 16/01/11 05:45 AM |
| -1 | Answering a Schoolgirl's QuestionsMaybe it felt comfortable with you? | /r/MensRights | 16/01/11 02:38 AM |
| 1 | Answering a Schoolgirl's QuestionsIt is too late for them to ignore anything. The very presence of all this misandric dissent, all of which lacks any cogent critique of the article, is proof they are fighting us. Too late, fembots. And while you clones are hiding all these men's rights articles, maybe you should question why you are even in a men's rights forum. Just saying. | /r/MensRights | 16/01/11 01:37 AM |
| 1 | Answering a Schoolgirl's Questions"I tried to read the article and I had to stop after a few minutes." Funny, that sentence marked the exact spot where I quit reading your post. If you won't read something, you should not comment on it. | /r/MensRights | 16/01/11 01:35 AM |
| -1 | Answering a Schoolgirl's QuestionsWrong. While there were injustices that needed to be addressed, they have been. But feminism did not stop there. It has result in much more net harm than good. Ask any young man who gets treated like a potential rapist the first day of college, or any number of children capriciously ripped away from good fathers since no fault divorce. | /r/MensRights | 16/01/11 01:34 AM |
| 3 | Remember: BOYCOTT Valentines DayNo, I think not. If men want to compete for women via traditional means, they have to lead with their wallet - their ability to protect and provide. If you don't know that, you have a very odd idea of what idea means. | /r/MensRights | 14/01/11 05:26 AM |
| -1 | Remember: BOYCOTT Valentines DayI like bringing my girlfriend home flowers and all that shit. See you in court. :) | /r/MensRights | 13/01/11 10:41 PM |
| 3 | Remember: BOYCOTT Valentines DayActually, I wasn't addressing sexual preference at all...* Fair enough. In our previous encounter you brought up valid points about actual activism in the MRA community. And I spent a a lot of time thinking about it. However, in my area, there are not MRA groups and I don't have the resources to start one. Appreciated, but I was dealing with the impression you gave. And I do appreciate your good words, but (and no, I don't assume this matters to you) I will be much more inclined to believe that … | /r/MensRights | 13/01/11 10:19 PM |
| -1 | Remember: BOYCOTT Valentines DayMan what an idiot!! LOL! Did you really think I was addressing what attracted you sexually? Are you actually presenting here that because a gay man likes masculine men sexually that it means he was unaffected by a society that disenfranchised him for not being "manly?" Dude, you're lying. And I mean BADLY. Just like you were about having nothing to say. You argued yourself into a corner, just like you did here, and ran off because you lack the ability to sort through your own dissonance. | /r/MensRights | 13/01/11 10:06 PM |
| -2 | Remember: BOYCOTT Valentines DayI think you came to the wrong place. Though I am not sure there is a r/mangina here. And yes, Virgil, I am mocking you. You make is so easy. And just for the record, the shaming tactics mean nothing to me, especially coming from a step and fetch. Have a nice V-Day, and I hope it gets you laid. | /r/MensRights | 13/01/11 10:03 PM |
| 0 | Remember: BOYCOTT Valentines DayWhen you say "it" you are only talking about your own relationship. Please don't tell me that you are not aware that Valentines Day is for the most part a day when men are expected to shower women with romance and buy them things. | /r/MensRights | 13/01/11 09:59 PM |
| 3 | Remember: BOYCOTT Valentines DayActually, it is extreme. But so is a social standard that requires men to perform financially for women in any way at all, much less to have it institutionalized once a year. If you are all about boycotting jewelry and stuff, and don't mind alternatives like a "Steak and a BJ Day," then why insist on conflating the two by insisting it be celebrated on Feb 14th? You would get a lot more traction by picking a different day. | /r/MensRights | 13/01/11 09:53 PM |
| -3 | Remember: BOYCOTT Valentines DayYou became a traitor to your gender when you ran from answering direct questions about your advocacy for men and boys. Yes, I still have the thread. You try to harm men you see as traditionally masculine because you are resentful, all because you have colluded with others to not feel like a man because you are gay. It is pathetic actually. | /r/MensRights | 13/01/11 09:50 PM |
| 1 | It Happened in New YorkThanks. It was about 12%, overall, evening out after an initial spike. It seems to have snagged quite a few regular readers. | /r/MensRights | 13/01/11 09:47 PM |
| -2 | Remember: BOYCOTT Valentines DayLet's see, you are on a men's rights forum promoting a commercial holiday that enriches women at the expense of men. I won't bother asking you for a list of corporations you have to patronize for your little "celebration." "They" are not calling you Mr. Tibbs right now. They are calling you Virgil the mangina. | /r/MensRights | 13/01/11 09:35 PM |
| 1 | Paul Elam is putting together a book and seeking media spots, needs donationsI was not inclined to post this article here, so I didn't, because it is really an internal matter to my site. Just the same, I appreciate ReluctantNihilist for doing so. I think these goals will do some actual good. And thanks K2Y, for the donation. I'll do my best to put it to good use. | /r/MensRights | 11/01/11 03:12 AM |
| 1 | A Voice for Men get's New York Times MentionI think that is it. | /r/MensRights | 11/01/11 12:09 AM |
| 2 | Female Supremacist Organizations, Feminist Front Groups (FEMDOM)I am dumbfounded that you -or anyone - could see the clear connection between their sexual lifestyle and the political agenda they want to finance, and assert I am conflating anything. Astounding! As to your question, it's a no brainer. I oppose policies that dominate anyone. But if some dom males were organizing to present themselves as masculists seeking the end of the 19th amendment I would go to war against them. FUCK! THESE QUESTIONS!! | /r/MensRights | 09/01/11 03:22 AM |
| 2 | A Voice for Men get's New York Times MentionAgreed. I was almost tempted to be kind to McGrath, because I really think he was trying aim traffic toward AVfM in the only way he could at the NYT. I don't want to make concessions though, so I responded to his words as written, but I think there may be an ally there. | /r/MensRights | 08/01/11 09:14 PM |
| 2 | Female Supremacist Organizations, Feminist Front Groups (FEMDOM)Image replaced with the larger one now. Thanks. | /r/MensRights | 07/01/11 04:24 PM |
| 1 | Female Supremacist Organizations, Feminist Front Groups (FEMDOM)I have only to conclude that you are constitutionally incapable of grasping intellectual honesty. You have been challenged to answer, multiple times, about the evidence presented that shows these people are taking a sexual proclivity and are driven by it to assert a political agenda that is elitist and oppressive. Make all the snide remarks you want, anyone reading this thread with an open mind knows you are taking a disingenuous cop out from answering a simple question. | /r/MensRights | 07/01/11 03:46 AM |
| 1 | Female Supremacist Organizations, Feminist Front Groups (FEMDOM)Let's see, you won't answer mine or Snark's points, but you come over here. Avoiding something? The point of the article was not to bash people involved in BDSM. There is a great comment on the site from a female dom who gets it. You should read it. And you should try facing the information from their archives and making a more sound analysis of the article based on that. | /r/MensRights | 07/01/11 01:06 AM |
| 3 | Female Supremacist Organizations, Feminist Front Groups (FEMDOM)Great point. I'll use that when I write my own article on this. | /r/MensRights | 07/01/11 01:03 AM |
| 2 | Female Supremacist Organizations, Feminist Front Groups (FEMDOM)Did you click on it in the article? It will take you to a larger version. Thanks for the heads up. I will add a caption. | /r/MensRights | 06/01/11 07:52 PM |
| 1 | Female Supremacist Organizations, Feminist Front Groups (FEMDOM)Big time. | /r/MensRights | 06/01/11 07:51 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter