"Male privilege" is actually just UTILITARIAN SEXISM (you know like women have benevolent sexism) - misnadry-archy theory and patriarchy theory.

EDIT: Yes it misandry-archy theory, it is specifically NOT supposed to be matriarchy theory that wouldnt work.

I have posted a few times about how patriarchy theory (as used by modern feminism since the creation of it in 1970 by Kate Millet - an absolute mad feminist according to her own sister and conspiracy theorist) is like flat earth theory (which includes the global cover up to hide the fact that the earth is flat by NASA etc). Flat earth theory and the theory that there is a global conspiracy to cover this up has amazing comebacks for why e.g. no one has found the edge of the earth etc. why private companies who have sent satellites have seen the earth being round. Feminism has similar reasons for why patirchcy is true despite things such as women live longer, or we have laws like men retire at 65 and women at 60 and so on. Its not like there aren't the odd useful things in patraichy theory or slivers of truth, its just its overall a conspiracy theory that is bullshit. You can't apply it to all situations, or really hardly any.

https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/kjs8e1/the_article_no_feminism_wants_you_to_read_and/

Anyway, what better way to show how stupid grand narratives are then to create one. I am self identifying as a gender studies professor. Respect my pronouns. Lets go:

So I proposed misadnry-archy to explain society, but someone said how come most USA presidents are male. FUCK. My theory ruined.... don't worry friends, misadnry-archy theory still covers this.

​

Misadnry-archy theory explains our entire society. In misadnry-archy theory society is shaped by the exploitation of men. Both men and women enforce this. This is due to a hatred of men (misandry) which views men only for their utility, whereas women are viewed as innately having value (this is demonstrated in experiments and of course real life and in policy where women are saved over men). Men are viewed only as utilitarian objects which must be exploited to maximise the benefit for society. This is done to privilege women (misdnry-archy allows to live easier comfortable lives, women higher life expectancy, they spend all the money [90% of consumer spending directly comes from or is controlled by women] better health, work less hours, only 6% of work deaths are female, women are far less likely to work outside, in extreme weather, at heights, at risk etc. men die in their hundreds of million in wars while women are exempt from service, forced male conscription is prevenaltn all over western developed nations but spares women). Although remember, misandry-archy actually harms women! Women are paid less, less represented as CEOs and presidents. This is misandry-archy back firing on women.

Men are oppressed under this system. Any benefits e.g. men in positions of power is actually just utilitarian sexism. I.e. men are given positions of power as under misandry-archy society exploits men for all their utility. They are just success objects. This actually harms men.

Evidence for utilitarian sexism includes the fact that men live 4 years (UK) to 12 (Russia) years less than women, 94% of work deaths, higher murder, suicide, rates, and so on.

Under misandry-archy all women are privileged, by exploiting mens labour. Of course individual women may be harmed e.g. women may not enter leadership roles and so on. This is misadnry-archy back firing on women. All men are oppressed under misandry-archy.... yes it is true individual men may appear have some benefits e.g. leadership roles, however this is utilitarian sexism viewing men as success objects, only useful for their benefit to society.

To help women we must end misadnry-archy. Fighting Misandry archy is for everyone

What utter bollocks, just like patriarchy and all feminist theory.

Next step in misandry-archy I create thousands of "gender studies" programmes and teach this in the curriculum to young impressionable men and women, who swallow up this raw shit (sound familiar? Im sure feminist have never done this right? Right Kate Millet? Sally Miller Gearhart, Dworkins?). I go on bra burning marches and post 1,000,000 articles covering this bullshit in guardian and other "respectable" sources to slowly drip feed society in buying this shit. Hmmm maybe I create a UN women department to teach this shit and spread it globally? Hmm maybe I infiltrate WEF, WHO etc with thousands of people from my gender studies course.

Hmm maybe by gender studies graduates can go into journalism, blogging, activism, law, politics, NGOs, charities and spread this bullshit patraichy erm sorry misadnry-archy theory all throughout the world. Hey maybe we can make this taught in English Literature, sociology, history, you know separate disciplines.... now infaltired by feminist patriarchy, or sorry I mean misandry-archy theory.