TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

A medical student saddled with debt recently filed a lawsuit against Dartmouth after being expelled for nonconsensual sexual contact. Like so many Title IX cases, this case involves a night of heavy drinking. Unlike many, it involves two male students.

Title_IX_For_All

February 8, 2022
85 upvotes
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
https://titleixforall.com/new-lawsuit-mutual-accusations-in-homosexual-relationship-at-dartmouth-college/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title A medical student saddled with debt recently filed a lawsuit against Dartmouth after being expelled for nonconsensual sexual contact. Like so many Title IX cases, this case involves a night of heavy drinking. Unlike many, it involves two male students.
Author

Title_IX_For_All

Upvotes 85
Comments 5
Date February 8, 2022 6:29 PM UTC
(4 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/snr66d/a_medical_student_saddled_with_debt_recently/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/a-medical-student-saddled-with-debt-recently-filed.1100345
https://theredarchive.com/post/1100345
Top posts by Title_IX_For_All

A nightclub security video showing his rape accuser leading him to have sex caused a judge to toss the criminal case against him, declaring it did not meet the minimal pretrial evidential burden. USC expelled him anyway! He filed a civil suit & was just reinstated.

2136 upvotes
December 31, 2018
/r/MensRights

Judge rules boys discriminated against in Title IX sports case

1547 upvotes
November 14, 2018
/r/MensRights

A woman with an STD infects a man she has consensual sex with, then falsely accuses him of rape because she was afraid he was going to report her to the authorities for infecting him. She said she was "scared and didn’t know what to do."

1302 upvotes
March 8, 2022
/r/MensRights

Campaign: complimenting a woman, asking for her number, or giving her any attention is regarded as predatory in the off-chance it is unwanted. At some point, even a cynic should wonder if the purpose is simply to demonize men.

1154 upvotes
September 29, 2023
/r/MensRights

Another accused student commits suicide. Parents sue.

640 upvotes
February 17, 2023
/r/MensRights

Jezebel, the notoriously misandrist and gynomyopic online magazine launched by Gawker Media, is finally being shut down.

580 upvotes
November 9, 2023
/r/MensRights

A false sex-assault accuser has been sentenced: 12 years probation and "court costs and fees totaling $290 in $100 monthly installments beginning 30 days after she was sentenced." Basically, probation + the cost of a Nintendo Switch, on an installment plan.

546 upvotes
February 27, 2024
/r/MensRights

Lawsuit: a university counselor initiated an unauthorized investigation against a falsely accused student who confided in her about the pain of being wrongly accused. This resulted in him being dismissed from the program.

497 upvotes
September 12, 2024
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]Title_IX_For_All[S] 32 points33 points34 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I thought this might be an interesting post to share because we don't hear too much about Title IX-related accusations in same-sex relationships. Dartmouth has been sued by accused students at least seven times. 98% of accused students who file lawsuits alleging their rights have been violated in Title IX proceedings are male.

[–]molbionerd 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

They need to completely re-do the way these investigations and judgments are made. The 51% standard is complete garbage. There should be discovery for the defendant. The accused’s name should be protected as well. The whole thing is a joke. There is too much room for false allegations and biases against a defendant. It ends in a shorty investigation that any one can poke holes in and then the whole thing resurfaces in the media further traumatizing the victims.

[–]Title_IX_For_All[S] 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

If they are going to do these kinds of investigations/adjudications, they really need to use a "clear and convincing" (~70% probability of guilt) standard. Using a preponderance standard ("50% plus a feather," as some have described it) affords universities too much wiggle room, too much plausible deniability for their biased proceedings.

Regarding discovery, the 2020 regulations mandated a pseudo-discovery phase where both parties could review and respond to the evidence before the completion of the investigation. In this Dartmouth case here, both parties were afforded the right to read the preliminary report, for example. However, there is nothing like real powers as the courts provide, such as subpoena powers, hearsay protections, full discovery (such as compelling the production of phone records), or punishments for lying while under oath.

Ultimately, they are trying to enact a school solution to a criminal justice problem. Schools are really better suited for providing accommodations. They are very poor pretenders for adjudicating felony rape accusations and pretending they can do it expertly by simply labelling it misconduct.

[–]1ayaway 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Can you espouse a little further on the 51% standard and what it means? I’m uninformed.

[–]molbionerd 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The idea is there are different levels of evidence needed for various levels of government intrusion/disruption of a private citizens life. The one you are likely more familiar with is what’s used in jury trial, “guilty beyond a reasonable doubt”. This is the highest level and I have heard it described as >99% certain the defendant is guilty (though I’m not a lawyer). Then there is clear and convincing evidence, meaning it’s highly probably the accused did what they did, I’ve heard it described as >75% certain of the accused guilt. I believe this comes into play when executing unwarranted searches (like being pulled over). And then the standard used in the title 9 kangaroo courts is a preponderance of evidence or >50% (not 51% like I misstated) likely that the accused is guilty. It’s an extremely low standard especially if the defendant is afforded no rights to see the evidence or face their accuser, and when the system has little to no transparency or oversight.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter