I've been thinking about this these days and as I know reddit is also a sanctuary for edgy randoms with outlandish ideas. Maybe someone could help me know if this idea makes any sense in someone's head, and then develop if it's true.

For a brief context, the human being has several needs to seek in life. All his activity boils down to the means of satisfying his needs, whether physical in nature or derived from his mentality. According to evolutionary psychology, everything that human beings do is in search of reproduction and when we talk about reproduction we are talking about their sexual satisfaction. Obviously, it should not be understood here only on the male side. Much is lost when one ignores the fact that a woman also has the goal of perpetuating her genes. Come to think of it, this explains the human tendency towards polygamy and women shouldn't be excluded from it. Whether you think of it in formal terms of perpetuating your genes or having sexual satisfaction, the utilitarian means of polygamy makes the most sense primarily. Even for women, but at a primitive stage, this would require that the man be deprived of the perpetuation of his genes by the creation of infants who were not his children. In other words, there is basic competition between men and women in the field of biology.

Getting to the heart of the matter, let's introduce "alpha cattle". I am not going to be too serious in choosing terms here, because it would undermine as little humor as might interest the reader and also because it is difficult to communicate what I mean by using another term. I keep in mind that the civilization process is dependent on the low rate of time preference of individuals, which, coupled with original appropriation, gives rise to a sedentary lifestyle and the family. A sedentary lifestyle can be understood in two ways, one anthropological and the other medical. In this case I mean a combination of the two. And by "family" I mean the primary particle of society according to the assumption that the individual always leans more towards the group with which he has most compatible interests. But I am also taking into account that the family, in order to exist, depends on the disposition of the factors that lead man and woman to monogamy and, thus, the perpetuation of genes in an inseparable set. And, of course, I'm dont want to imply that I think human beings are "mere" animals determined by their biology. I'm just zeroing on the specifics that make him a distinct animal and take factors derived from his rational faculty as a given. "Alpha cattle" is that individual or group of individuals who, after becoming sedentary to the point of not needing to exert physical strength and activity themselves, have become weak and degenerate from everything that is physically attractive to women in the process of sexual selection. He is therefore excluded and even if he does get a mate, he could very well fall victim to betrayal and end up raising the infant of an "alpha male" who is subordinate to him. Alpha cattle then very much want to have a wife, but without any requirements to ever be sexually selected and have her loyalty. His strategy, then, is not simply to nullify female sexual selection, but to limit the sexual satisfaction men in general can have. It would not be enough for alpha cattle to interfere in the sexual selection of women and let her have ownershi, right to receive inheritance and citizenship (influence on political decisions). No, the woman would have to be deprived of her rights and never allowed to mature and have adult autonomy, but to be relegated to the position of a child forever, with the satisfaction of her needs always dependent on the directives of a man. Usually the father. By granting the father the moral and legal prerogative over the daughter and giving him the power to determine when and with whom she would have her sexual satisfaction, the father, the patriarch, could use the daughters in commercial agreements, involving exchanges of status and the upbringing. of a primitive network of contacts. Therefore, fathers would always seek to adorn their daughters to attract men of higher status for personal benefit in the process. In the primitive civilizational stage, the most likely way to acquire status (social prestige) would be to join the army and become soldiers and gradually rise in rank as their virtues were proved (and they survived). In this way, alpha cattle ensured that they could perpetuate their genes, even if they weren't aware of it in those terms. Alpha males would have to play the status and influence game themselves in order to satisfy their needs. In the end, all men were looking for were ways to rise on the social podium and then get the best women.

I've been thinking of a type of man who would antagonize the Alpha Cattle and be a balance of the Alpha Male's physical virtues and the alpha cattle's playful, intellectual virtues. Perhaps the proper term would be the simple Integral Man, but I am afraid that this will be confused with integralist concepts. The Integral Man is simply an Alpha Male who has intellectualized himself, who has not used his free time gained after acquiring a modicum of prosperity in futile pleasures, but in the pleasure of seeking wisdom and mastery of his Being.