"I Am Not a Sex-Fueled Robot" a blogpost by a Christian man tearing down the male/female sexual stereotypes that often hurt marriages

2013-07-18T19:40:25+00:00

Woman who pressures man into sex: strong, independent woman that is in control of her sexuality.

Man who pressures woman into sex: rapist.

Mitthrawnuruodo1337 · 2013-07-18T21:41:03+00:00

"men give love to get sex, and women give sex to get love."

I remember that exact line from some folks in church back in the day, it was pretty offensive to me (especially in high school, when I was a hopeless romantic). For whatever reason it seems to be generally paired with the "kiss dating goodbye" crowd, though I don't think they invented it. Fortunately, I rarely see these attitudes in church anymore. Maybe it's still relevant in some areas, but it seems to be on the decline in my experience.

6inchpianist · 2013-07-18T21:15:50+00:00

Is a sex-fueled robot a thing? I'm off to the skymall website...

Morbas · 2013-07-19T07:28:19+00:00

Did anyone else read the comments section? most of them I agree with/like but HOLY SHIT

"While all of what you have said is true, Love, sex, and relationship is still away out of biblical context here. In the NT it is written do not deprive each other. The women wrote back to the writer, but if we do this we will have so many babies we will die and the writer said you would be fulfilling what Jesus called you to. Marriage is a relationship, but the Almighty made sex for procreation. Before My beautiful bride of 37 years and I allowed our girth to get in the way, we enjoyed sex. We have allowed it but still we are madly in love with each other. In my fathers generation none of my uncles or aunts are divorced. I now have two sons, one a preacher. In each case the wife became manipulative and controlling then left. Am I saying that the woman is totally at fault, no, but i can say that a majority of divorces come because the wife says " I do not have anything in common with my husband." As a pastor I have heard it over and over again. Sex is enjoyable and should be, but we must never divorce sex from family. Sex outside of Marriage is bad, sex inside marriage is just as bad if it is not used for producing children and creating a stable family environment for them to grow up in. I have talked to quite a few couples that say we do not want Children. There is no need for sex without children. I am not saying you should have a dozen children, that is between you and Jesus. I am saying the the secular humanist brainwash two children is wrong. This allows the evil Muslim people to take control because they have five or six. We are loosing this war, and it is a war, because we have become so selfish that we want more things rather then more souls to bring to Jesus. Oh yes there is always the argument what about those who can't? (mostly because of Monsanto produced genetically engineered seed) This is a non-sequitur. If we were producing the children we should be there would be ample children for them and if we were truly Christian we would produce Children to give to the childless Christian couples. There is a side to the Monsanto story. They used a lady who was sterile because of a genetically induced virus. Monsanto took this Virus and engineered it into corn, then give it to the Third World. It is now in our food to. This is why infertility rate has went from 3% to 20% and rising."

Where do these people come from?

saint2e · 2013-07-19T16:41:13+00:00

/u/micahjmurray is the author of the post, and has been commenting here and in other threads in the "Other discussions" tab.

Title	"I Am Not a Sex-Fueled Robot" a blogpost by a Christian man tearing down the male/female sexual stereotypes that often hurt marriages
Author	Coldbeam
Upvotes	47
Comments	9
Date	July 18, 2013 7:27 PM UTC (13 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1ikvch/i_am_not_a_sexfueled_robot_a_blogpost_by_a/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/i-am-not-a-sex-fueled-robot-a-blogpost-by-a.1168476 https://theredarchive.com/post/1168476

Comments