TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Change the Sexual Offences Act so women can be charged with rape against men

Razorbladekandyfan

March 18, 2021
2369 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/556250?fbclid=IwAR2FnHOZqcYJB2nrlG-VGiEa2e8cKe5Nc-gfYoWghd-tJG9NvwqGXorDiN8
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Change the Sexual Offences Act so women can be charged with rape against men
Author

Razorbladekandyfan

Upvotes 2369
Comments 50
Date March 18, 2021 5:20 PM UTC
(5 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/m7vuv4/change_the_sexual_offences_act_so_women_can_be/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/change-the-sexual-offences-act-so-women-can-be.1190806
https://theredarchive.com/post/1190806
Top posts by Razorbladekandyfan

No pussy pass for women on their periods!

6513 upvotes
October 28, 2019
/r/PussyPassDenied

If men's rights have to be put on pause during war, then men don't really have rights.

1605 upvotes
March 21, 2022
/r/MensRights

Pussy pass denied In Anime! Life shoud imitate Art more often.

1115 upvotes
January 18, 2020
/r/PussyPassDenied

Senate Democrats propose requiring women to register for military draft

1066 upvotes
July 20, 2021
/r/MensRights

Ohio men not registered for military draft pay hundreds of thousands extra for college

843 upvotes
October 11, 2022
/r/MensRights

Zelenski signed new laws that would make younger men eligible for the draft.

655 upvotes
April 6, 2024
/r/MensRights

I'm team Ukraine and all, but the ban on all men from leaving the country is abslutely barbaric and disgusting.

502 upvotes
March 21, 2022
/r/MensRights

Latvia is bringing back male ONLY conscription from 2023!

485 upvotes
July 6, 2022
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]Razorbladekandyfan[S] 209 points210 points211 points 5 years ago (27 children) | Copy Link

People found guilty of rape normally get longer sentences compared to people found guilty of sexual assault

With no aggravating factors, the suggested sentence for rape is longer than the suggested sentence for sexual assault

Rape is also often viewed as worse than sexual assault

It also means that rape is seen as a gendered crime on rape statistics in which only men are the perpetrators and women are the victims, which is false

[–][deleted] 38 points39 points40 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Do you mind sending the evidence through, I'd love to use them in debates.

[–]BonjourReturn 10 points11 points12 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

any NISVS reports should do the work :)

https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/datasources/nisvs/index.html

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh I meant the prison sentences. That rape sentences are usually longer than sexual assault.

[–]tothecatmobile 13 points14 points15 points 5 years ago* (16 children) | Copy Link

Rape and Causing sexual activity without consent, however have the same sentencing. As does sexual assault by penetration.

Not saying that it shouldn't be rewritten with more gender neutral terms. However we can't ignore that the sexual offences act includes other offences that match rape in punishment.

[–]Solid-Perspective98 11 points12 points13 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

The maximum imposable sentence is often a poor indication though. Although the two types of offences shared the similar max sentences, the sentencing banding may differ.

Aside from legal technicalities, gender-differentiated terms also have academic and social implications.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Judges will read this constitution and will instantly let off a female rapist, you think judges are magical wizards who will guess the u.k parliament's gaslighting BS answer.

What do you think "ooooh i am a judge with my magical super powers i found out the u.k parliament says rape is not illegal when done by woman because muh sexual assault act"

For fuck sake, wake up.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Women are not forced to use prison uniforms, the u.k government this year is giving more extra funding to preferential treatment prison programs for women and designed years ago "female offender strategy" and started ranting in the beginning of this year because all the female criminals they realesed from prisons reoffended instead of becoming angels of the noble society LOL.

That's all you need to know.

[–]Solid-Perspective98 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

TBH, being forced to wear prison uniforms is nothing compared to what we have in my country. This is not to say that it doesn't constitute as discrimination.

In Singapore, only male offenders can be punished with caning (NSFW). Moreover, shaving of hair and beard is mandated for male inmates. Female inmates are free to keep their hair.

Not to mention, rape is also gender-specific in Singapore. We have a framework that is rather similar to UK.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Singapore is another garbage country, with a garbage criminal government.

[–]Solid-Perspective98 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Judicial system was inherited from the Brits fyi.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

"Not saying that it shouldn't be rewritten with more gender neutral terms. However we can't ignore that the sexual offences act includes other offences that match rape in punishment."

Congratulations, you've been succesully gaslighted by the u.k parliament.

[–]tothecatmobile 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

If we ignore that they exist. Then they just point to them as a solution to us pointing out that women can't be charged with rape.

The issue isn't that equivalent crimes don't exist for both men and women. The issue is with the idea of "separate but equal" never actually being equal. But the UK government can continue to just wave away our legitimate concern because people keep making petitions about a law they don't seem to actually know.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Women cannot be charged with rape, they are lying to you, don't you understand that that ?.

Just because some sentences under the sexual assault act carry the same maximum, doesn't mean women who rape are given the same punishment of their male counterparts or even being punishment at all, it's so outrageous who easily people are gaslighted by this garbage government.

[–]tothecatmobile 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

No, women cannot be charged with rape. This was one of the criticisms of the law over 20 years ago. And the "solution" was to create a new offence that women can be charged with.

All people are doing now is bringing up the original argument that women cannot be charged with rape. Which, according to the government. They have already fixed. And they can just wave away any criticism by pointing out the fix they made.

Until people actually start pointing out that the "fix" isn't good enough, and actually pointing out why it isn't good enough. The government will never take notice. Because they can just act like those complaining don't actually know the law they're complaining about.

This petition, just like every one just like it, will just get the same exact response from the government and will achieve nothing.

Congratulations.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

The sexual assault act was created to criminalize forced oral, sex, all forms of pedophilia and to increase the punishment for sex trafficking/sexual exploitation, liar.

[–]tothecatmobile -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

There's no such thing as the sexual assault act.

Its the sexual offences act.

And yes, it made a lot of new things illegal and updated sentencing. What's your point?

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

My point is this "No, women cannot be charged with rape. This was one of the criticisms of the law over 20 years ago. And the "solution" was to create a new offence that women can be charged with"

You are lying.

[–]tothecatmobile 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That was one of the reasons why the offence causing sexual activity without consent was created in the sexual offences act 2003.

It specifically addresses women forcing a man to have sex with them.

That was the government's "solution" to women being unable to be charged with rape.

It's not a lie. It's literally the law. Written in black and white.

[+]GreekusRomanus -23 points-22 points-21 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

No one is discrediting male victims, but by a huge majority males are the preparators in rape cases. Male victims do need to be taken seriously, but we have to realize men are the perpetrators most of the time.

[–]Jakeybaby125 18 points19 points20 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You're using the exact same logic feminists use to justify their hatred of men . Plus, the only reason why we believe that is because female perpetrators of rape are effectively erased off the system because people believe women can't rape

[–]Ariliescbk 11 points12 points13 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

*by a huge majority males are the perpetrators in rape cases that are reported.

ftfy

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Here we have some statstic issues:

First the amount of victimized men is constantly increasing the more recent the study is (due to improved research methods and removal of taboo). Probably they are higher than the numbers I cite here below.

Second from wikipedia: "One study (Hannon et al.) found 23.4% of women and 10.5% of men reported they were raped while 6.6% of women and 10.5% of men reported they were victims of attempted rape." This means that women consist out of approx. 2/3ths of the rapevictims, whereas males 1/3th. Rape of both men and women mainly takes place along heterosexual lines. This means that approx. 1/3th of the rapes is commited by a female.

Compare this with this number: Males constituted 98.9% of those arrested for forcible rape in the USA in 2011. You have almost no chance of being arrested as a female rapist.

Third, even if there would only be 1 female rapist compared to 10.000 male rapists (which are the numbers a lot of feminists have in their heads), that one women deserves to be punished for the crime she did.

[–]Razorbladekandyfan[S] 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Because rape by envelopment isn't counted as rape. When it is, the numbers are roughly the same. This is why the whole petition was started, to get rape by envelopment recognised as rape.

[–]GreekusRomanus -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Sources? I’m not trying to undermine male victims, but it’s a big difference. I mean there’s nothing wrong with a gender doing the majority of rapes, you don’t have to victimize your selves always.

[–]Razorbladekandyfan[S] 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

The sourse is the CDC - men made to penetrate and women raped are roughly the same in numbers for a year (1 200 000) , only we don't define made to penetrate on a man as rape. Thats what needs to change.

Link- https://poisonedwell.wordpress.com/2013/10/19/40-of-rapists-are-women/

Table - https://poisonedwell.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/ps9ww.jpg

[–]Rockbottom503 66 points67 points68 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I hope you don't mind, I wrote a fairly lengthy response to a post similar to this so I'm just going to copy and paste it here for awareness.

You'll have to forgive me for the length of this post but the same petition goes up quite regularly and regularly garners enough signatures to warrant a response. The government response is always the same. We need to move on from this to get the issue resolved and start highlighting the problems with that response rather than just repeatedly asking the same questions that garner the same response.

You can see the full response to one of the previous petitions here https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/300270?reveal_response=yes but the essence of it is that they won't change the act because the male equivelant is supposedly already dealt with under section 4(4) of the same act, with the same mandatory sentencing as would be applied for a rape charge. Even if this claim were true (which I'm about to show you, it isn't) the concept of gender specific laws for either men or women is problematic and overly beauracratic at best; I've copy and pasted the entirety of section 4 below from the act for clarity but the response directs us to subsection 4 specifically.

Causing a person to engage in sexual activity without consent (1)A person (A) commits an offence if— (a)he intentionally causes another person (B) to engage in an activity, (b)the activity is sexual, (c)B does not consent to engaging in the activity, and (d)A does not reasonably believe that B consents.

(2)Whether a belief is reasonable is to be determined having regard to all the circumstances, including any steps A has taken to ascertain whether B consents.

(3)Sections 75 and 76 apply to an offence under this section.

(4)A person guilty of an offence under this section, if the activity caused involved— (a)penetration of B’s anus or vagina, (b)penetration of B’s mouth with a person’s penis, (c)penetration of a person’s anus or vagina with a part of B’s body or by B with anything else, or (d)penetration of a person’s mouth with B’s penis,is liable, on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for life.

(5)Unless subsection (4) applies, a person guilty of an offence under this section is liable— (a)on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6 months or to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum or both; (b)on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years.

Now, remember we're directed to look at (4). Can anyone point out where in that subsection it deals with a female forcing a male to penetrate her as the government response claims? It doesn't. Best of it is, the particular subsection is clearly designed to apply mainly to men, with the only caveat within that subsection being that a woman can also be guilty of something if she uses an object to penetrate someone against their will. In addition the only part of that entire section which carries a mandated life sentence (the same as rape) is penetration of a mouth with a penis....... Which is actually dealt with under section 3 anyway. It just seems that it has been included to ensure men who do that to other men are dealt with aswell. Sentencing guidelines are contained in subsection 5 which clearly says summary (less serious) offences carry a maximum term of 6 months and indictable (the most serious offences) carry a maximum term of 10 years. This is not equal treatment in any way; it is ignoring the question in the knowledge that people can't reply to your statements and the hope that nobody will bother to check and it will all just go away.

Anyway, sorry for taking up space on your thread - I hope the petition succeeds but I wouldn't expect a different response.

[–]tothecatmobile 12 points13 points14 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Now, remember we're directed to look at (4). Can anyone point out where in that subsection it deals with a female forcing a male to penetrate her as the government response claims? It doesn't.

...yes it does.

(4)A person guilty of an offence under this section, if the activity caused involved— (a)penetration of B’s anus or vagina, (b)penetration of B’s mouth with a person’s penis, >(c)penetration of a person’s anus or vagina with a part of B’s body or by B with anything else, or (d)penetration of a person’s mouth with B’s penis

(c) and (d) deal with when a person, A. Forces another person, B. To penetrate another. This can be A or a third party.

[–]merc_M_9856 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Was going to point out the same. C is oddly worded but is the rapist using a part of the victim to penetrate themselves. D adds the mouth to that.

[–]tothecatmobile 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Its oddly worded because it also covers forcing someone to penetrate another using something that isn't part of their body. A sex toy or any other foreign object.

[–]MyLittleDashie7 26 points27 points28 points 5 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think it's worth noting that the current wording doesn't just exclude women from raping men, but also women from raping other women. Granted the later is probably less frequent (I haven't checked, but I'd assume so), but the point is the law needs to cover all bases. It's just as important that female victims of female rapists are represented in the law as male victims of female rapists. If the purpose of the petition is to represent all possible victims properly, it should probably be reworded so it actually says that.

[–]Mister0Cat 13 points14 points15 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Would have but i'm no bitish, i'm belgian, but i support all of you guus because i eard how shitty feminist are there.

[–]vaevictus75 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's past due

[–]bak2redit 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

UK law is strange.

[–]opistrue 14 points15 points16 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

too bad this is only for BRI'ISH citizens

[–]AtemAndrew 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Given the US just brought back the 'Violence Against Women Act' and a bunch of Dems are trying to manhunt the Republicans who voted against it as misogynistic - in some cases racist...

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I feel that false accusations against men for rape should also be considered sex crimes and punishable by both jail time and registration on a sex offender site.

[–]saucenazi 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Can't sign the petition. Have an upvote.

[–]DeadlyDesai 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I signed with temp mail - as I'm not an UK resident.

[–]tygamer9999 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Damn wish I lived in the uk for a day to vote for this.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

signed

[–]S4njay 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It says only bri ish residents and citizens so... but yeah gd luck anyways

[–]crossoverfan96 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

i would sign but i'm a gun loving in-breeder (american) and not a brit so i can't sign it

[–]Rockbottom503 -4 points-3 points-2 points 5 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

These subsections can only apply when the offender penetrates a victim, so yes a woman taking a dildo and shoving it up someone's butt would apply but if a woman was holding a gun to your head, drugged you etc etc and forces the man to penetrate her it wouldn't...... That's what is meant by 'made to penetrate'. Parts c and d are actually used, in practice, to ensure people who participate in a rape (i.e by holding someone down while they do it) are convicted.

[–]leachlurker 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I signed it good luck on this petition I am shocked that we had to sign it it should just be reality

[–]LoomisKnows 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Signed and shared!

[–]RegisterCompetitive1 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not British

[–]HaelenHaagen 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

does anyone know when this petition was created? It said somewhere on the page that petitions last 6 months but the deadline was May. Does that mean that it was created almost 3, months ago?

thanks

[–]juhanuppone03 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Im not bri'ish so i can't

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So the u.k government has openly admitted they give preferential treatment to women who get in trouble with the law too many times.

Rape laws and assault by penetration laws made it very clear, the perpetrator must have a penis and uses male pronouns.

The rape discourse is entirely controlled by feminists, so are all those rape centers including those brand new useless "centers for men", we have in the uk, a bunch of prison reform programs basically advocating to legalize all crimes when perpetrated by women.

And we are supposed to believe in the u.k parliament that they give female and male rapists the exact same punishment, that female perpetrated rape isn't legal and that male victims are taken as serious as female victims because muh SExUAl Ass@uLt @ccTt.

this is nothing pure gaslighting bullshit, anybody who believes in the u.k parliament's answer is an idiot, THEY ARE LYING.

FUCK OFF..........................................

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter