“The days are long past when the courts in this country required corroboration before accepting the unsupported testimony of a female complainant.”

pvtshoebox · 2020-07-27T16:48:29+00:00

I caught that line and was taken back a bit.

The argument is that reprinting anything a woman says cannot be libel, because #BelieveWomen.

mgtowolf · 2020-07-27T17:39:09+00:00

https://archive.is/7Kg1f You really should archive the trash instead of giving them any traffic

divers69 · 2020-07-28T09:24:27+00:00

One of the fascinating lines of argument is that he is an addict and thus his memory is untrustworthy. He might not even remember attacking her. Imagine the outrage if this was said of a woman.

mhandanna · 2020-07-27T22:36:28+00:00

Lol can someone explain this phrase?

Lipshitz1 · 2020-07-28T14:01:02+00:00

Although the point had been made that witnesses called by the defence did not see Depp actually hit Heard, she said: “Each and every pleaded incident is supported by the testimony of Miss Heard herself and if my lord finds her to be a truthful and plausible witness, doing her best to recount what must have been extremely traumatic events, then Miss Heard’s evidence alone is sufficient to establish the defence of truth.”

🤦‍♂️

Title	“The days are long past when the courts in this country required corroboration before accepting the unsupported testimony of a female complainant.”
Author	TheOtherNick
Upvotes	99
Comments	9
Date	July 27, 2020 4:15 PM UTC (5 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/hyv9qj/the_days_are_long_past_when_the_courts_in_this/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/the-days-are-long-past-when-the-courts-in-this.1196333 https://theredarchive.com/post/1196333

Comments