~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
Rawaqy
[–]tableender 26 points27 points28 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
So when women have fat arses and are 4stone over weight and men turn them down it is misogyny, even though there is nothing to stop them eating healthier and losing the weight. Whereas when women turn down even average height men let alone those a couple of inches shorter it's not misandry, even though there is nothing they can do about their height.
[–]McFeely_Smackup 12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
two decimal places seems oddly specific.
[–]TetraThiaFulvalene 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'm 185 so I don't mind xD too bad that of the 3 sentences she used to the describe herself Two of them not only incredibly shallow, but also disproved the third.
[–][deleted] 7 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]disayle32 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I think he would say that it's not even a thing anymore, or that it plays a distant secondary role at best. Sexual selection is now the dominant selective force in our species--women have near-absolute power in the dating game, and many are not selecting for traits that benefit our species. We need only look at the example of the giant deer Megaloceros to see what happens when sexual selection runs amok. Natural selection would never have favored such enormous antlers, but sexual selection did, to the detriment of the species. We would do well to learn from that warning.
[–][deleted] 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]disayle32 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I wouldn't count us out just yet. We have something those poor deer didn't: technology. Through technology, we will eventually have artificial wombs that will allow us to completely decouple the reproductive and sexual processes from each other. No more will the whims of women and their sexual selection dictate the evolution of our species. Technology will also give us sexbots that will start out primitive and crude, but will improve until they are "close enough" for the majority of men to ditch real women. Feminists will try to fight these advances, but even if they manage to stop them here in the West, their influence is much more limited in the East. It will be a brave new world, assuming our species makes it that far of course.
[–]Stevegracy 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
She's probably pretty frustrated, what with there being such a small percentage of men who actually fit that criteria.
[–]Rawaqy[S] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
This is in the north of the Netherlands, 184 is average.. she's not Dutch tho
[–]Lion_amongst_gods 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
So, she's casting a wide net? If she's around the same height, then meh...
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If her only preference is height, I’d say she’s less judgemental than most people. Bet she wants more than just height though...
[–]Criket 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Ladies, if you're don't paid your own bills, have kids, doesn't own a car or weight over 140 lb, swipe left...
"Not looking for anyone shorter than my massive forehead"
[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
She looks like a twelve year old oompa loompa
[–]Zombarts 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Why someone that tall? Need someone bigger then you're 4head?
[–]soitaintsocuhh 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Hold up lemme pull out my conversion chart and see if I fit the criteria
[–]PleasantHuman -2 points-1 points0 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
People are allowed to have preferences.
[–]Rawaqy[S] 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Absolutely, it's just the last needless degrading sentence.
[–]xNOM 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Which makes her come off as a cunt. I'm sure a lot of people would agree. Not as many as I'd like. But there you are.
[–]disayle32 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Our society celebrates and promotes female preferences while shaming and denigrating male preferences.
[–]PleasantHuman 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Our world is fucked, Doesnt change the fact that people are allowed to have their preferences. If rancid dysfunctional females want to cry about Males having preferences just tell them to fuck off. Dont become a rancid dysfunctional human by copying them.
[–]Rawaqy[S] 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Again there's nothing wrong with having preference, it's just that it's accepted and laughable when women try to insult men based on their preferences
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]tableender 26 points27 points28 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]McFeely_Smackup 12 points13 points14 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TetraThiaFulvalene 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]disayle32 7 points8 points9 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]disayle32 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Stevegracy 4 points5 points6 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Rawaqy[S] 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Lion_amongst_gods 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Criket 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Zombarts 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]soitaintsocuhh 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PleasantHuman -2 points-1 points0 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Rawaqy[S] 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]xNOM 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]disayle32 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]PleasantHuman 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Rawaqy[S] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link