<<<<<HIGH IQ POSTS ONLY. NO BULLSHITTERS ALLOWED.>>>>

(referring to my title....)

Either that or tell people to get a brain and stop stereotyping feminine or masculine traits depending on a person's ethnic origins instead of their actual physical traits that varies depending on multiple factors (sub-groups, familial phenotype selection, diet and nutrition, styling, ect).

  1. But you can't change biology!

Except it's not biological. The cultural perception of East and Southeast Asians being feminine, Black Africans being masculine, South Asians (like Indians) being weak, and Caucasian Europeans being just in the middle can be directly traced by a white supremacist in academia who astroturfed his ideas in the beginning of the 21st century which explains how these ideas became more prevalent during this century.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race,_Evolution,_and_Behavior

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Philippe_Rushton

​

  1. So if that's not biological reasons as to why certain groups are less desired than others, what is?

Folly of your logic. Societal influence and impact is massively downplayed by the presentism existentialists who want to believe that the current time and location they're living in is the absolute truest form of humanity. So, they cannot have great meta deconstruction to their current era because they've been fed the progressive, humanism lie that humanity 100 years from now was less advanced and further to the ultimate enlightenment than current humanity. Technology has progressed, but human attitudes, susceptibility to propaganda or cultural influence, and struggles hasn't.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presentism_(literary_and_historical_analysis))

To get to my point, proof that cultural perception of targeted groups changes easily depending on which agenda(s) the elites want to push that benefit them:

Asian men used to be stereotyped as sexual threats to White women and AMWF marriages were banned because of this fear of WF leaving WM for AM en-masse. This perception existed as recently as the 1950's. This was obviously done to create anxiety among the high number of Chinese male immigrants migrating to Western countries like the Netherlands, Australia, France, and America. Another factor that influenced this strong conviction was the obsession with white women's sexual purity in terms of not mixing with other races and the non-forgotten history of Mongols wrecking havoc on Europe.

This concern over ‘racial mixture’ between Chinese men and white women was not uncommon in Europe either (Guiqi, Citation2011; Guttinger, Citation2004; Stovall, Citation1998). The ‘evil’ of sexual intercourse between Chinese men and British white women and their offspring was a main topic in early twentieth century Britain, contributing to the development of migration laws such as the 1925 Special Restriction (colored Alien Seamen) Order (Parker, Citation2016). In Britain as well as France, deportation served to limit the number of interracial relationships. Other forms of regulation included censoring the news on French-Chinese romances and issuing official warnings against French women marrying Chinese (Guiqi, Citation2011, p. 149) or brochures warning against Chinese migrants’ interest in white German women (Guttinger, Citation2004, p. 1

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1081602X.2019.1633678

And the AM are feminine stereotype is directly used because AM are socioeconomic competitors of WM and AM sex symbols achieved popularity in the past so this was forced in public perception to deride them.

In the mid-1800s, early Chinese immigrant workers were derided as emasculated men due to cultural practices of Qing Dynasty. The Chinese workers sported long braids (the "queue hairstyle") which was compulsory in China) and sometimes wore long silk gowns.[92] Because Chinese men were seen as an economic threat to the white workforce, laws were passed that barred the Chinese from many "male" labor-intensive industries, and the only jobs available to the Chinese at the time were jobs that whites deemed "women's work" (i.e., laundry, cooking, and childcare).[92]

This stereotype had received wider usage as a backlash due to Sessue Hayakawa's status as a sex symbol back in old Hollywood in the 1920s.[93][94]

And take a look at this, an Austrian philosopher in the 1800's was so afraid of Asian men's sexual prowess and natural ability to polygamy that he believed that Asian men would destroy European civilization. JFL.

Ehrenfels believed that Asians were especially dangerous enemies of the Europeans because in East Asia, polygamy was accepted as a natural part of the social order. Ehrenfels warned that this process of "socially victorious" Chinese men taking as many wives as possible was ultimately a grave threat to the West.[11] As a result of polygamy, genetically superior Asian men were fathering as many children as possible with as many women as possible while genetically superior European men were fathering children by only one woman.[15] As a result of European monogamy and Asian polygamy, the Europeans were losing out to the Asians, and it was only a matter of time before this genetic edge allowed the Asians to destroy European civilization.[15] As a Social Darwinist and a philosopher thereof, Ehrenfels saw all history as an endless racial struggle with the fittest "races" surviving.[15] Ehrenfels took it for granted that the whites and Asians were natural enemies, and always would be. In Ehrenfels's viewpoint, the fact that Chinese were capable of working hard while eating less than Europeans were an important sign that the Asian "race" was thanks to polygamy was starting become the stronger "tougher race"

source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_von_Ehrenfels

And in places with less Anglo cultural influence, like Russia or South Korea, AMWF is more common than WMAF.

As for blacks, their stereotype was that they were uncivilized and ignorant because they were so childish, passive, and incapable of governing themselves which is how they came to be enslaved by white Europeans. Depictions of blacks as hyper-masculine beastly people were first used to justify lynchings and abuse of the African-American community in post-Civil War era and then re-appropriated in progressive contexts throughout the media by white guilt liberals. However, it goes to point that because blacks were shown as uncivilized and backwards it wasn't essentially tied to masculinity until the mid-late 20th century.

And the most common race-mixing between blacks and another race was largely XMBF in both the Americas and Africa because of how accessible black women were to other men. Even BM encouraged the miscegenation between BFs and non-BMs.

​

Africa has had a long history of mixing with non-Africans since prehistoric times. The Eurasian Backflow which happened in prehistoric times saw a huge migration from the Levant entering the region and these migrants mixing with the native Africans. Signs of this migration can be found among the people inhabiting the Horn of Africa and Sudan.[27] Africa in antiquity, also has had long history of interracial mixing with male Arab and European explorers, traders and soldiers having sexual relations with black African women as well as taking them as wives.[28]

Sir Richard Francis Burton writes, during his expedition to Africa, about relationships between black women and white men: "The women are well disposed toward strangers of fair complexion, apparently with the permission of their husbands." There are several mixed race populations throughout Africa mostly the results of interracial relationships between Arab and European men and black women. In South Africa, there are big mixed race communities like the Coloureds and Griqua formed by White colonists taking native African wives. In Namibia there is a community called the Rehoboth Basters formed by the interracial marriage of Dutch/German men and black African women.

In the former Portuguese Africa) (now known as Angola, Mozambique and Cape Verde) racial mixing between white Portuguese and black Africans was fairly common, especially in Cape Verde where the majority of the population is of mixed descent.

There have been some recorded cases of Chinese merchants and labourers taking African wives throughout Africa as many Chinese workers were employed to build railways and other infrastructural projects in Africa. These labour groups were made up completely of men with very few Chinese women coming to Africa.

source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miscegenation

So depending on the cultural zeitgeist of the time and the elites' agenda to promote whatever image of groups in their favor, perceptions can and do radically change which aren't necessarily rooted in biology.

​

  1. But you can't just say that it's a lie! Asians are the most neotenous race with lower testosterone and Blacks are the least neotenous with higher testosterone!

Mostly false. While Asians are the most neotenous race as defined by anthropologists Black Africans come in second-place which blows the argument of Blacks and Asians being at polar opposites of femininity and masculinity out of the water (since the logic of this argument goes, that neoteny is feminization)

source: https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/108/10/djw223/2412589?

However, in regards to testosterone, testosterone levels do not differ between ethnicities of men and in fact African-American people were found to have the highest rates of estrogen while East/Southeast Asian people have the lowest rates of estrogen.

source:

https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/108/10/djw223/2412589?login=false

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17456570/

  1. So are you implying that Asians are actually the least feminine race?

No, I'm saying that human ethnic groups are made out of blended factors and it isn't so cut and dry as the wildly perpetuated cletus take that "hurr if you have high neoteny it means you're hyper-feminine". It's observable that even if Asians / East Eurasians have the highest neoteny, their women are also less noticeably curvier than other women and they have big heads with square shaped faces more than other ethnic groups. Blacks / Subsaharan Africans have the second highest neoteny, but they are more sexually dimorphic than other groups and have darker skin and coarser hair that is usually seen as undesirable. Whites / West Eurasians have one of the lowest neoteny, but they have the biggest eyes out of any group and have the lightest skin/hair color on average which is seen as a desirable feature. And this is not getting into how ethnic traits vary depending on the geographical location, family phenotype, and other factors I described in my opening post.

  1. What is your proposed solution to combat gendered racism then?

A good way to combat gendered racism is to directly challenge those who blindly parrot these ideas but also educate people about the mere fact femininity and masculinity cannot be gridlocked to a certain race and that people of the same race can have enough variation where each individual has their own levels of femininity and masculinity. Teach people that they are a product of their generation and to stop sheepishly thinking that anything that gets forced down their throat must be the universal truth because it can be justified by a semi-legitimate sounding scientific basis. Teach people that they hypocritically rejected religion and church for being too dogmatic while treating science or any thing remotely like science (in the case of pseudo science about masculinity and femininity of different races) as the Gospel truth.

A second solution, is to promote interracial relationships involving people that are negatively stereotyped through gendered racism that makes them be seen as essentially "transgender" in comparison to white people. IR couples that have received massive coverage and promotion that encourage the perception of gendered racism like WMAF or BMWF should be given a backseat in the media and even in pornography. So, interracial couples involving Latino, Indian, (not paired with asian females because that encourages gendered racism stereotypes of unflattering perceptions of asian males) East or Southeast Asian men should be promoted. Interracial couples involving Indian, Arab, (not paired with black males because that encourages gendered racism stereotypes of unflattering perceptions of black females) and Black women should also be promoted. But that is only IF people are too hard-headed to stop having shitty racist cultural beliefs that are relatively new in history but blindly parroted everywhere as the "biological truth" by lazy and duplicitous people.

​