Equal Reward for Equal Merit. This is equality. Equal reward for unequal merit is the opposite of equality and the definition of privilege, i.e., of discrimination. It means that person A who excels half as well as B or less, is entitled to the same or more - a privilege, the principle of feudalism.

Henry_Blair · 2023-06-06T08:41:50+00:00

And in addition there are rights for basic human needs, such as safety, prevention of hunger, a roof etc. There is often a confusion between equality as equal basic fundamental rights, and equality as equal lives and equal personal biography. There is no such human right for equal lives and equal biographies and even imagining such an idea is authoritative. The only equality which can be considered as basic and mandatory is equality in the most basic and simple human needs - safety, a roof, nutrition, health, elementary and secondary schooling - such that beyond those needs, the rule of equal reward for equal merit applies. Equality necessitates separating between basic universal needs and personal individual rewards. As soon as one crosses the line separating between them she is immediately transformed from an equality-supporter to a discrimination-supporter. The line is always under social discussion - what kind of healthcare should be universal, what kind of education should be universal, what kind of minimal housing conditions should be universal, and what items are at all in or out of the list of basic universal needs (societies differ in their conclusions often based on their overall wealth), but the fact that the list is and will always be under social discussion must never be abused for behaving as if the line between what's basic and what's personal reward should not exist - this is the crossing of that line which is the transformation from being an equality-supporter to a discrimination-supporter. You always have to propose your line, what you are offering to include in "basic" and what you are offering to leave out and keep as personal reward. Refusing to do that makes one a chauvinist, a supporter of privilege and discrimination.

Feminism has always refused doing that - explaining what is it's definition of that line. It demanded that even Nobel prizes will be granted equally, not by Equal Reward for Equal Merit, that is that nothing will be left as subjected to the rule of equal reward for equal merit. This always meant a person A receiving a reward for half the excelling of person B - a privilege of A, a system of discrimination. This is how feminism became chauvinism.

Harsh-Pain-No-Gain · 2023-06-06T15:47:12+00:00

In short, you Gain what you Work Hard for.

Feminism Infected Walking Pains of Regret don't get it with their pathetic, victim, entitled mentalities.

Wonderful_Working315 · 2023-06-08T11:49:08+00:00

FYI- There are no rights for "basic human needs" (United States). I'm for Men's Rights, you sound like a feminist. I'm not paying for your fu***** house.

Comments