~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | UN says Gender bias hasn't improved.This study is not assessing bias. By definition of bias, a bias is when one's attitude toward a group is different from his attitude toward another group and, this attitude-difference is not reflective of reality. For example, if asked on safety of Chevrolet cars vs. Ford cars, then if "42% believe Chevrolet are safe to drive", this is not evidence of bias until we also inquire about Ford, because we might get "42% believe Ford are safe to drive", and, if we do inquire and get "10% believe Ford … | /r/AntiFeminists | 07/07/23 07:06 AM |
| 1 | Not only not all men are bad towards women, but only a low minority of men are a threat and they aren't regular men. Here's the evidence:Outstanding. Saving this one for discussions with feminists and whoever fell pray to their distortions. | /r/MensRights | 08/06/23 01:24 PM |
| 1 | This shows how unbelievably deep and wide the dehumanization of men and boys isThe rise in institutionalized anti-male hate that some boys grow up into since birth, and the exponential rise in the past 20 years in boys and teens requesting not to be considered male, is in your book a miracle, I understand. A fascinating coincidence, that when even mothers and teachers tell a boy that he is born evil and should accept being treated as such, as opposed to being treated as a human being like the girls around him, a society produces tens of thousands of boys begging not be con… | /r/MensRights | 08/06/23 01:13 PM |
| 2 | This shows how unbelievably deep and wide the dehumanization of men and boys isHow is that "hate speech". Did anyone here said anything about treating people who call themselves trans differently, avoiding them, not hiring them? There are tens of thousands of boys who were made to believe through hate and systematic dehumanization that the only way they can hope to be treated as humans is by being considered female - this is a persecution as severe as that of the Inquisition against the Jewish people - and you are calling protecting their humanity "hate speech"? You either… | /r/MensRights | 08/06/23 12:01 PM |
| 1 | This shows how unbelievably deep and wide the dehumanization of men and boys isBy organic I don't mean biological. There's nothing biological causing a guy to want to be a woman. By organic I only mean the prevalence within a society that employs zero actions to induce in boys or men the idea that they don't want to be considered male - either by negative or by positive reinforces - persecution or promising human treatment only for females. "The baseline state". | /r/MensRights | 08/06/23 11:44 AM |
| 3 | Equal Reward for Equal Merit. This is equality. Equal reward for unequal merit is the opposite of equality and the definition of privilege, i.e., of discrimination. It means that person A who excels half as well as B or less, is entitled to the same or more - a privilege, the principle of feudalism.And in addition there are rights for basic human needs, such as safety, prevention of hunger, a roof etc. There is often a confusion between equality as equal basic fundamental rights, and equality as equal lives and equal personal biography. There is no such human right for equal lives and equal biographies and even imagining such an idea is authoritative. The only equality which can be considered as basic and mandatory is equality in the most basic and simple human needs - safety, a roof, nutr… | /r/MensRights | 06/06/23 08:41 AM |
| 1 | The reason female violence against males isn't taken seriouslyOne last comment on this matter: Yes, some types of a woman's physical attitude toward a man were always perceived as funny and "not taken seriously" - the example that captures it best is the "get outtahere" shove Elaine gives Jerry on Seinfeld on a regular basis, that can sometimes push him across the room. But here we must make sure we still understand correctly the term Violence, after half a century of redrafting of its meaning by feminists by lowering the bar until virtually any human inte… | /r/MensRights | 04/06/23 08:01 AM |
| 3 | why is sexual assault against men not talked about in schoolsFemale violence against males isn't taken seriously because in the 1960s, women we call today feminists could not accept that there are two sexes and that innate sex causes differences between men and women, so to be able to deny sex-differences they developed a theory that says that men and women are not two sexes but two classes and that "if any differences appear between men and women it must be because the male sex constantly oppresses the female sex with permanent violence". This meant they… | /r/MensRights | 03/06/23 01:57 PM |
| 1 | There are no "alpha males" in humanity and the term is derogatory and treats humans as animals.A note from a biologist: In the first degree in biology, students are guided to conduct a simple behavioral experiments with insects (usually crickets): they put in a jar two males out of a batch of 6 labeled insects and watch which pushes the other to the corner. They mark in a table who wins for all possible matches. They are then asked to repeat the same tournament twice more and analyze their three charts. They all find out that within any group of insects, one will always come first in all … | /r/MensRights | 29/05/23 03:35 PM |
| 0 | Was I raped this morning?It is rape by feminist definitions. Feminist definitions are meant to inflate truth to spread panic and hate. Whether or not an adult person was raped is a question of what that person authentically felt - did they feel raped or not. It's not a matter of technical descriptions of movements but of inner authentic feeling (we are ignoring here for a moment the notion that people might later lie about what that feeling was, we are not discussing here "proving to others" the existence of a feeling a… | /r/MensRights | 27/05/23 10:11 PM |
| 2 | How to avoid a man hater! 😈💔👿Good video. In all the gaslightining around us, always nice to see another woman acknowledging what we all know. As always, it also stings to see again that men are not allowed under the feminist dictatorship to speak for themselves and have to have a woman talking in their name or they'll be called "misogynists". Good that you share it. Don't mind the low voting. Guys here are rarely youtube enthusiasts. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/23 07:41 PM |
| 2 | I've been so touched deprived, it's really starting to affect my mental healthYes, absolutely go to an escort. There's no problem with that. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/23 07:36 PM |
| 0 | Women cheat more than men in pre-wedding parties - 43.36% of female guests compared to about 40.06% of male guests. In the state with the widest gap, 59.4% of women compared to 21.9% of men. 5% of brides vs. 4.8% of grooms. And the feminist menbad while excusing women's cheating still lingers.2 of 5 people who were at a pre-wedding party. 1 in 20 brides who had the party. The data is not for "out of all people". Some people don't marry, some never went to such a party, some get married but don't organize this and celebrate in a pub with 2-3 best friends (I am married and didn't have a party and I was never invited to one, only to gatherings the groom has with 2-3 friends). The proportions between sexes are the significant finding. I think they didn't report "how many organize pre-wed… | /r/MensRights | 25/05/23 03:24 AM |
| 0 | Women cheat more than men in pre-wedding parties - 43.36% of female guests compared to about 40.06% of male guests. In the state with the widest gap, 59.4% of women compared to 21.9% of men. 5% of brides vs. 4.8% of grooms. And the feminist menbad while excusing women's cheating still lingers.I think that if we regard feminists as "women's leadership" then women were led for a very long time by the least intelligent individuals in that demographic. Feminists could never really understand, technically, intellectually, the consequences of their demands and actions, nor to even see those consequences in the world once caused by them, let alone understand the direct causality between their actions and the results around them. Volumes can be written about the examples. Not being able to s… | /r/MensRights | 24/05/23 05:51 PM |
| 0 | Women cheat more than men in pre-wedding parties - 43.36% of female guests compared to about 40.06% of male guests. In the state with the widest gap, 59.4% of women compared to 21.9% of men. 5% of brides vs. 4.8% of grooms. And the feminist menbad while excusing women's cheating still lingers.A great feminist achievement. Feminists declared in the 1960s that the ultimate and utopian goal of feminism is annihilating marriage, and actually meant any shared life between the sexes, when you look at what they were saying. Great achievement. They succeeded. Women should be happy. They wanted feminism to become a hegemony, the West entire, haven't they? | /r/MensRights | 24/05/23 09:50 AM |
| 1 | Women cheat more than men in pre-wedding parties - 43.36% of female guests compared to about 40.06% of male guests. In the state with the widest gap, 59.4% of women compared to 21.9% of men. 5% of brides vs. 4.8% of grooms. And the feminist menbad while excusing women's cheating still lingers.It refutes the sinister stereotypes feminism uses to turn half of humanity against the other half, "men are cheaters!" It also refutes the central disinformation in the feminist gaslighting of blaming men for the reality of 80% of divorces being initiated by women. The gaslighting is - "Women are the initiators of almost all the divorces because men are cheaters!" In reality the 80% is created by vigorous feminist encouragement to women to divorce for reasons such as "boredom" or for no reason. … | /r/MensRights | 24/05/23 08:58 AM |
| 1 | Women cheat more than men in pre-wedding parties - 43.36% of female guests compared to about 40.06% of male guests. In the state with the widest gap, 59.4% of women compared to 21.9% of men. 5% of brides vs. 4.8% of grooms. And the feminist menbad while excusing women's cheating still lingers.the article's author isn't hiding that brides to be cheat at bachelorette parties more than grooms It is literally the last line in the article, delayed as much as possible, that's what hiding means in journalism. They never presented the total of men vs. women, I had to calculate it myself. Not reporting the total is tantamount to not reporting the findings at all - the totals are the whole point. Do you think if the gap was in the other direction they would not say the percent of men in the co… | /r/MensRights | 24/05/23 05:28 AM |
| 1 | Women cheat more than men in pre-wedding parties - 43.36% of female guests compared to about 40.06% of male guests. In the state with the widest gap, 59.4% of women compared to 21.9% of men. 5% of brides vs. 4.8% of grooms. And the feminist menbad while excusing women's cheating still lingers.Please do. I have to answer emails. I'd appreciate any help. | /r/MensRights | 23/05/23 06:36 PM |
| 13 | Women cheat more than men in pre-wedding parties - 43.36% of female guests compared to about 40.06% of male guests. In the state with the widest gap, 59.4% of women compared to 21.9% of men. 5% of brides vs. 4.8% of grooms. And the feminist menbad while excusing women's cheating still lingers.Newspaper article: Wellington woman shares her how to have an affair cheating guide. Show me a newspaper article teaching men how to cheat properly? Another news item: Affairs boost married women's self-esteem and life satisfaction, new study reveals. "Research found that women who cheat are more likely to experience a boost in wellbeing, with greater self-esteem and life satisfaction." Show me where the media portrays to men and to women men's infidelity as if it was a gym subscription in the l… | /r/MensRights | 23/05/23 06:34 PM |
| 1 | Women cheat more than men in pre-wedding parties - 43.36% of female guests compared to about 40.06% of male guests. In the state with the widest gap, 59.4% of women compared to 21.9% of men. 5% of brides vs. 4.8% of grooms. And the feminist menbad while excusing women's cheating still lingers.When I hear about men cheating I wonder what they’ve got going on that gives them the opportunity. Publicity. It does something to women. The last thing I could care about in a woman is if she was on TV. If she's [imagine here offensive physical descriptions that I don't want to repeat] and had her name in the paper she's as sexy as a bucket to me, and if she's a cleaning lady in a motel in the middle of the Sahara desert who looks like a supermodel then I couldn't care less about the desert - s… | /r/MensRights | 23/05/23 06:07 PM |
| 0 | Women cheat more than men in pre-wedding parties - 43.36% of female guests compared to about 40.06% of male guests. In the state with the widest gap, 59.4% of women compared to 21.9% of men. 5% of brides vs. 4.8% of grooms. And the feminist menbad while excusing women's cheating still lingers.I'm not sure about that, but I am sure that the way I averaged the fraction is not entirely accurate (I didn't want to go into these nuances in the post but it deserves at least a comment). The correct way to average proportions of groups of different sizes is weighted averages. The fraction should be multiplied by a normalized factor that represents its sample's relative size compared to the overall pool (by normalized we just mean taking the highest sample size and calling it "1", then scaling… | /r/MensRights | 23/05/23 05:43 PM |
| 14 | Women cheat more than men in pre-wedding parties - 43.36% of female guests compared to about 40.06% of male guests. In the state with the widest gap, 59.4% of women compared to 21.9% of men. 5% of brides vs. 4.8% of grooms. And the feminist menbad while excusing women's cheating still lingers.Rephrasing that last sentence of the title: "And the feminist permanent accusation against men with "men-bad", still lingers, while at the same time excusing women's cheating." | /r/MensRights | 23/05/23 07:23 AM |
| 1 | It will never be creepy for a man to look at a half-naked woman. This is the human sexuality. Nudity is not neutral in homosapiens, it is a neurobiological activator of sexual arousal. Feminism is trying to normalize BDSM fetishes, feminization of men and "no looking!" of doms.Let's make the distinction between "men thinking that a woman dressed provocatively wants anyone and specifically them to approach her" (something that no man thinks for the past 40 years or so, because feminism made sure to carve that message in stone), and, "men see a woman dressed provocatively and LOOK". No one said in this entire discussion the former. Only the latter. Now notice how feminism moves the pole: it requests "don't interpret walking half-naked as addressed to you personally and … | /r/MensRights | 21/05/23 06:31 PM |
| 6 | It will never be creepy for a man to look at a half-naked woman. This is the human sexuality. Nudity is not neutral in homosapiens, it is a neurobiological activator of sexual arousal. Feminism is trying to normalize BDSM fetishes, feminization of men and "no looking!" of doms.Absolutely. It is a fascinating undercurrent, especially because when you pause to look, it seems as if these are not undercurrents, but a stream. A vortex even. You can definitely find here on reddit large conventional forums where what most people would think is a standard relationship would be considered male-domination kink. DM me if you want to get my take on it, I did some research, with interesting findings. | /r/MensRights | 21/05/23 06:18 PM |
| 2 | It will never be creepy for a man to look at a half-naked woman. This is the human sexuality. Nudity is not neutral in homosapiens, it is a neurobiological activator of sexual arousal. Feminism is trying to normalize BDSM fetishes, feminization of men and "no looking!" of doms.Everyone sees nude women as objects and not people. Lie. This is feminist womansplaining of men to women. Men feel profound, complex and completely humanizing deep emotions in response to a nude woman in addition to the thoughts they will have of her body. Their dreaming in response to a nude woman - or to any beautiful sexy woman who attracts them regardless of clothing - would include a sunny afternoon in the living room and talks into the night. Feminists lied to all women about what men thin… | /r/MensRights | 21/05/23 04:20 AM |
| 4 | It will never be creepy for a man to look at a half-naked woman. This is the human sexuality. Nudity is not neutral in homosapiens, it is a neurobiological activator of sexual arousal. Feminism is trying to normalize BDSM fetishes, feminization of men and "no looking!" of doms.I think it's bleeding into everyday life through systematic deprivation of any female human regard to boys growing up, including all women and girls and from even mothers and teachers. The guys that come out on the other end of this emotionally-abusive upbringing feel they would do anything to get a woman to acknowledge them with so much as a look (I see the dickpic self-humiliation phenomenon as a direct concrete result). And I had a chat once with a guy who apparently got into sub-BDSM without… | /r/MensRights | 21/05/23 03:51 AM |
| 0 | It will never be creepy for a man to look at a half-naked woman. This is the human sexuality. Nudity is not neutral in homosapiens, it is a neurobiological activator of sexual arousal. Feminism is trying to normalize BDSM fetishes, feminization of men and "no looking!" of doms.No. Men refuse to become haters like feminism caused women to become. Feminism could reach this with women because of the latent sexual misandry most women have as a result of their sexual selectivity, and because women have a weakness for fashions and are very susceptible to psychological suggestion (because such suggestion is the fundamental mechanism of mammalian mating, and women like all female mammals are the receptive side of that process that creates life). But feminism has always failed… | /r/MensRights | 20/05/23 04:12 PM |
| 15 | It will never be creepy for a man to look at a half-naked woman. This is the human sexuality. Nudity is not neutral in homosapiens, it is a neurobiological activator of sexual arousal. Feminism is trying to normalize BDSM fetishes, feminization of men and "no looking!" of doms.Not many women realize that they are seeing The Handmaid's Tale forming right before their eyes in the west, but not by the sex they imagined would do it and not to the sex they expect. | /r/MensRights | 20/05/23 11:00 AM |
| 49 | It will never be creepy for a man to look at a half-naked woman. This is the human sexuality. Nudity is not neutral in homosapiens, it is a neurobiological activator of sexual arousal. Feminism is trying to normalize BDSM fetishes, feminization of men and "no looking!" of doms.Yet, always remember that feminism is always attempting to delete public memory and to redraft it in a way that will enable it to justify continuous aggravation of the feminist oppression, and now after roughly three generations have lived under the continuous redrafting, this causes many to understand feminism-born trends as "women's" or "men's", that is as if the feminism-born phenomena are innate. The deprivation of empathy from men and boys is the most staggering example - 3000 years of writ… | /r/MensRights | 20/05/23 09:52 AM |
| 1 | Hard-working tired husband on r/Marriage: wife forces sex daily causing him to take a separate bedroom to get sleep, accuses him every time the children cry, chases after work with blaming. Comments: "you are not marriage material", "she wants a partner", "autism" "doesn't seem you want marriage".Yes, this would seem to be the case. | /r/MensRights | 20/05/23 05:38 AM |
| 22 | As an academic, I wish more people would be aware that the 60% majority of women in academia is entirely coming from adding to universities political departments and calling them "research departments" - gender studies, women's studies, sexuality studies.a blue color Blue collar, my apologies. Please look in my profile for the post where I mentioned wife biters. I am sorry to say that English is not my first language and I indeed make funny mistakes. It's a nice language nonetheless, especially the American version which is very figurative, although I still prefer French. | /r/MensRights | 15/05/23 01:48 PM |
| 48 | As an academic, I wish more people would be aware that the 60% majority of women in academia is entirely coming from adding to universities political departments and calling them "research departments" - gender studies, women's studies, sexuality studies.In the 19th century, when almost all academics were men, some of them were holding academic positions despite being mediocre. Each such man of those few who were not talented enough for their position, was holding the position of a talented woman who under equal cultivation and opportunity would have surpassed him in a meritocratic environment where only personal capabilities matter. When psychology was developed enough to assess IQ distributions, it was found that the male and female averages o… | /r/MensRights | 15/05/23 09:11 AM |
| 69 | As an academic, I wish more people would be aware that the 60% majority of women in academia is entirely coming from adding to universities political departments and calling them "research departments" - gender studies, women's studies, sexuality studies.And if you are a blue color (edit: collar) guy hearing women telling you that "as a PhD or MA I expect a man of my level" - they are 90% of the time at or probably below your intellectual level. Ask guys with a PhD in science, psychology or economics if they would consider these women who showcase a PhD in "women's studies" or sociology their parallel. | /r/MensRights | 15/05/23 06:45 AM |
| -2 | "No uterus no opinion" but feminist equality means "if no balls - no problem! Tell men what to do with theirs."well, once all comedians get this protection from feminists and society, that is, the quality granting protection is "comedian" and not "woman", which will be evident in men doing what she did without anyone suggesting cancelling them like she could do it without facing cancellation - I will be all for this argument. I'm not against being cute. I'm against only half of society having the right to play it cute and the other half living in terror for doing the same or 100th of it - chauvinistic fe… | /r/MensRights | 11/05/23 07:22 AM |
| 74 | "No uterus no opinion" but feminist equality means "if no balls - no problem! Tell men what to do with theirs."I imagine a man with 7.5 million twitter followers lying in bed naked from the waists down holding his genitals and caressing them to hide them from the camera and saying to all women "I demand that you tie your tubes, men are tired of the pain of pushing tight rubber over themselves", and not getting cancelled on the spot (she said this half naked in bed hiding her breasts with her palms and playing with them. I'll let you guess whether she lost one follower over lying naked and demanding of me… | /r/MensRights | 11/05/23 06:50 AM |
| 14 | "No uterus no opinion" but feminist equality means "if no balls - no problem! Tell men what to do with theirs."I am sure they are all real and actually follow every word she says And I'm sure whenever any other lunatic has 7.5 million followers your argument is immediately "I am sure they are all real and actually follow every word" to say "in fact a white supremacist with 7.5 million followers, is nothing to worry about - she doesn't really have 7.5 million followers, so ignore baby, she's one white supremacist, the 7.5 mil? Don't be ridiculous. They're not there". | /r/MensRights | 11/05/23 05:06 AM |
| 20 | "No uterus no opinion" but feminist equality means "if no balls - no problem! Tell men what to do with theirs."Right, a woman with 7.5 million twitter followers is not feminism. No - you are feminism. This "extremist" has 7.5 million extremists following her. As we all know, the myth that the famous bell curve has on the extremes minuscule minorities and most individuals are clustered around the median, was a patriarchal manipulation and in FACT the bell curve was all this long upside down, it's in the shape of a U curve - someone with millions of followers is just the extremist outlier, and a mainstream… | /r/MensRights | 11/05/23 02:41 AM |
| 2 | Evangeline Lilly slams contempt for traditional gender roles. 'Why are we applauding masculinity in women and villainizing it in men?'There is no such thing as "gender", there are only sexes and only two of them, these are not man-made "roles" like theater roles but innate qualities, and they are not "traditional" as if invented by a culture with some "tradition" - they are natural, formed by nature in the course of evolution and imprinted into every cell of men's and women's bodies. So the above statement only capitulates to the very same false assumptions she is trying to object to. Say: Evangeline Lilly slams contempt for n… | /r/MensRights | 07/05/23 08:32 AM |
| 0 | A psychologist who treats boys who request to be females, explains that shaming masculinity is in his professional experience a cause of their attempt to escape masculinity. #SaveTheBoysI agree. I have been realizing this about five years ago, when the very marginal subject of "trans kids" suddenly became part of the me too momentum when of all people, feminists in the media who had no relation to the subject started promoting in full force in the media the spreading and "acceptance" of basically castrating toddlers as young as three year old. Back then in 2018, feminists were still not aware that they are in the midst of taking over the west, and continued expressing themselve… | /r/MensRights | 06/05/23 08:32 PM |
| 1 | Regarding the defamation against forums like this one - what I learned about this forum after following it for two years (and as a former human rights worker who cherishes the values of equality and human rights that the slanderers allege such forums violate)Yes. I'm sorry that I can't share them, I am under an alias. Buy I published a book under the alias and I run a website where I attempt to replace some of the disinformation with information, you can find them here. | /r/MensRights | 05/05/23 08:52 PM |
| 1 | Regarding the defamation against forums like this one - what I learned about this forum after following it for two years (and as a former human rights worker who cherishes the values of equality and human rights that the slanderers allege such forums violate)That's a valid point. But some women do join the forum, and I respect that, that's the more moderate reading of the post. Personally I do want women to know what's happening, personally I think that most of men's problems are because: women don't know. Because we were completely silenced and feminism spent decades falsifying for women almost everything about us. If they knew, it would be over. I believe. By "over" I mean not a nirvana, but the usual roughing it of life, that all people had since… | /r/MensRights | 05/05/23 08:45 PM |
| 0 | Regarding the defamation against forums like this one - what I learned about this forum after following it for two years (and as a former human rights worker who cherishes the values of equality and human rights that the slanderers allege such forums violate)I'm a neuroscientist with a degree in psychology. I know a lot more about the human mind than 99% of the members of the APA. I'm a member of some scientific associations myself. I can write you volumes here about how the cult abducted scientific freedom via administrative-level forums such as associations like the APA, to dictate by spreading fear among clinicians and investigators what they are expected to nod to in silence despite knowing these are complete lies. You can read an article about … | /r/MensRights | 05/05/23 01:19 PM |
| 0 | Regarding the defamation against forums like this one - what I learned about this forum after following it for two years (and as a former human rights worker who cherishes the values of equality and human rights that the slanderers allege such forums violate)yes, I never accepted public capitulation to the demand to call men women and women men, there's another view for you ^ the next sentence after the one you cite. Because a man trying to live as a woman is a man. A man from the trans group. And a woman trying to live as man, is still a woman - a woman from the trans group, a trans, woman. During 2020 there was a short period of public confusion about what does "trans man" refer to - and the cult has won. But the cult is delusional, misleading and… | /r/MensRights | 05/05/23 11:54 AM |
| 1 | Question: I'm a women who is anti feminist is it ok for me to join this group? I don't want anyone to feel I'm invading their space.Ah, we are not feminists, who create bendable "criteria" for excuses to delete and erase anyone and anything not shouting with them in one voice the absolute feminist truth in a petrified salute. We invite everyone. Especially women. Most of us (really the 90% of us) don't want to just rant here but we come here to basically eventually be heard by women, because feminism deletes us from everywhere else, by these bendable "criteria", so that women won't be able to know what's going on and who and… | /r/MensRights | 05/05/23 08:23 AM |
| 3 | The trend of trying to explain today's unwillingness of men to marry with "porn addiction and video games", is pure, distilled feminist anti-male dehumanization.from most articles I’ve seen on the internet and ( coughs ) “experts” on YouTube blogs, the number of women that file for divorce is about 70 to 80 percent How much is 40 out of 50. (if you can't figure this out in your head it's a little troubling, but you can get over the deep mathematical conundrum using a calculator [if you don't know where you can find a calculator at this hour that's somewhat disturbing, as this would mean you are not necessarily aware that you are typing on one right now … | /r/MensRights | 04/05/23 07:01 PM |
| 6 | Canadian Children's Right's Council's stance on paternity fraud is a jokeMen, you are living under a female patriarchy - imagine this text as referring to an IVF pregnancy where the man was not only in an affair with another woman but also made his lover the egg donor for his wife behind his wife's back, then think of the text as citing a man in a position of power saying "The developing baby is considered part of the father and the results of the test therefore belong to him". "Since telling the mother [that her husband not only cheated on her but then tricked her i… | /r/MensRights | 01/05/23 07:23 AM |
| 2 | Are young men working to undo recent advances in women's rights? OP: The comments are the best partDefinitely a thought to contemplate, but I think the link is to a GPT-generated text? (which I take with a grain of salt). | /r/MensRights | 28/04/23 12:09 PM |
| 3 | Isn't everyone in this sub advocating for gender equality?Legal rights should be identical. As for softer social privileges, in this realm humans are first and foremost a biological species with innate tendencies, that since the dawn of humankind have created a balance between two sets of complementary privileges - men's privileges and women's privileges (alongside two sets of obligations, men's and women's). Around the 1990s, at a point when feminism was not needed for formal equality (thanks to humanism, of both sexes, that starting in the 19th centu… | /r/MensRights | 28/04/23 11:15 AM |
| 3 | Are young men working to undo recent advances in women's rights? OP: The comments are the best partwhen someone is used to special privileges, equality feels like oppression I don't think this feminist statement was ever true. When someone takes privileges forcefully (the force could be excreted socially, not only physically), she knows very well that she took something she doesn't deserve, or, she develops the idea that she is a supreme being and hence deserves the privilege, and then constant doubt and self-criticism follows throughout the attempt of a blood-and-flesh human being to continu… | /r/MensRights | 28/04/23 10:31 AM |
| 1 | "Girls run the world."Just wear a shirt saying "The best-suited for the job should run the world, I don't care if they have the frankfurter or the bun between their legs" | /r/MensRights | 28/04/23 09:22 AM |
| 2 | My husband works so hard and takes such good care of me. I'm wondering what are some extra little things I could do to show him how much I appreciate him?Sex. Frequent physical affection out of context (you are on the sofa watching a movie - put your head on his shoulder, your hand on his chest. You are with friends, put here and there your hand on his shoulder or arm). Feed him with something you made just because you know he likes it - women express love with feeding and men bloom when watered with a woman's love given with feeding. Let him tell you about it when something upsets him in life - never allow yourself to think in that moment "I nee… | /r/MensRights | 25/04/23 07:42 AM |
| 1 | Boys asking to be converted to girls are cultural refugees escaping persecution, of a demographic whose humanity was revoked, similarly to how Jews of 16th-century Spain were driven to request conversion to Christianity to escape persecution by the Inquisition and be regarded human beingsI've been thinking for the past few years, ever since the demand to "accept me as sex X" appeared, "what if someone would use she and her when referring to me". This was a simple yet telling simulation. It explained to me something crucial about the trans psychological complex and the progressive cult metaphysics. I would: 1. be surprised, 2. rather than my first response being anger at the person treating me as a woman, it would be: self-doubt, "what is it in me causing them to think I'm a woma… | /r/MensRights | 25/04/23 05:27 AM |
| 1 | Boys asking to be converted to girls are cultural refugees escaping persecution, of a demographic whose humanity was revoked, similarly to how Jews of 16th-century Spain were driven to request conversion to Christianity to escape persecution by the Inquisition and be regarded human beingsI hope you understand we are only having this conversation because I experience you as a woman. The entire vibe is the vibe I have with women, I sense it very distinctly and consciously. I never chat with other men. Only with women I have this channel of communication. I'm sorry, I thought I should let you know. (Edit: part of the reason I had to let you know, is that I'm missing that type of communication. Ever since me too started it was cut off, chats were no longer possible, everything becam… | /r/MensRights | 08/04/23 11:01 PM |
| 1 | Boys asking to be converted to girls are cultural refugees escaping persecution, of a demographic whose humanity was revoked, similarly to how Jews of 16th-century Spain were driven to request conversion to Christianity to escape persecution by the Inquisition and be regarded human beingsI don't set for you standards for what it means for you to accept me - I won't tell you to accept me as a famous writer, or as a fantastic lover, or as a person with IQ 142 with the preamble that otherwise you're not really accepting me since this is how I see myself. You experience me as the individual you find in me and this (with your own personal personality) creates whatever perception you have of me as an individual - it's an autonomous and very private and independent inner experience tha… | /r/MensRights | 08/04/23 10:33 PM |
| 1 | Boys asking to be converted to girls are cultural refugees escaping persecution, of a demographic whose humanity was revoked, similarly to how Jews of 16th-century Spain were driven to request conversion to Christianity to escape persecution by the Inquisition and be regarded human beingsHere are a few, summary taken from https://statsforgender.org/desistance/ Gender-related distress will alleviate for around 80% of pre-teen children once they become teenagers. Evidence from 10 available prospective follow-up studies [1]from childhood to adolescence indicates that childhood gender dysphoria will recede with puberty in ~80% of cases. A Dutch paper [2]notes that follow-up studies show the persistence rate of gender identity disorder to be about 15.8%, or 39 out of the 246 children… | /r/MensRights | 08/04/23 09:15 PM |
| 1 | Boys asking to be converted to girls are cultural refugees escaping persecution, of a demographic whose humanity was revoked, similarly to how Jews of 16th-century Spain were driven to request conversion to Christianity to escape persecution by the Inquisition and be regarded human beingsYou sound like a very nice person. I urge you to read the following: The Myth of the “Desistance Myth” You cited one study, however there is a wide range of such studies, almost all of which showing 65%-95% abandonment of the trans identity after a few years, and the article tries to put some order in the data. It refers to an article by Kenneth Zucker, who is the person who headed the committee that originally coined and defined the term "gender dysphoria" in the DSM. Please note that medical … | /r/MensRights | 08/04/23 06:41 PM |
| 1 | Boys asking to be converted to girls are cultural refugees escaping persecution, of a demographic whose humanity was revoked, similarly to how Jews of 16th-century Spain were driven to request conversion to Christianity to escape persecution by the Inquisition and be regarded human beingsBoys and girls are humans, and all humans have a universal inner innate supreme goal of realizing themselves sexually - the success with the other sex is in every human of both sexes the ultimate goal of all other human activities. Homosexuals of both sexes are hereby acknowledged as an exception and we are now continuing to the rest of humanity - the 99%: All humans as a result have a deep innate supreme and all-encompassing drive to be a favorable member of their sex to realize themselves as a… | /r/MensRights | 08/04/23 02:14 PM |
| 6 | Boys asking to be converted to girls are cultural refugees escaping persecution, of a demographic whose humanity was revoked, similarly to how Jews of 16th-century Spain were driven to request conversion to Christianity to escape persecution by the Inquisition and be regarded human beingsPermanent url: https://lovists.com/2023/01/28/madness-epidemic/ | /r/MensRights | 07/04/23 03:27 PM |
| 1 | I am so so very tired from the overtime I need to work because of women in the teams I work with who aren't functioning. I'm working until midnight day after day and into the weekend week after week. It's all a lie. Almost no woman I work with who has a demanding position actually works. I do it allI have no idea what their position on feminism is. Most would probably be unaware of current trends (I'm probably much more informed). I'm not a conservative. I'm a leftist. I believe in equality. Equality spells equal opportunity. "Equal numbers in each and every area" when it comes to two sexes spells chauvinism. Because in many compartmentalized abilities, the innate human bell curve of capacities does not overlap in the two sexes. In some capacities the male bell curve is above the female cu… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/23 09:55 PM |
| 1 | I am so so very tired from the overtime I need to work because of women in the teams I work with who aren't functioning. I'm working until midnight day after day and into the weekend week after week. It's all a lie. Almost no woman I work with who has a demanding position actually works. I do it allIf half of all men were convinced by a new men's movement to all start wearing dresses and occupy half the positions in my son's kindergarten and elementary school - that is, the people now working as construction workers, police, accountants, lawyers - all in dresses trying to make sure my kid is nurtured and learning, then I'll have a rather terrible opinion on men, as I'll be seeing about 9 out of 10 of those men in dresses either not doing the things necessary for nurturing soft young childr… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/23 08:15 PM |
| 0 | I am so so very tired from the overtime I need to work because of women in the teams I work with who aren't functioning. I'm working until midnight day after day and into the weekend week after week. It's all a lie. Almost no woman I work with who has a demanding position actually works. I do it allNope. You are not aware of the kind of responsibility and commitment many positions require for the world to go round. And feminists as a whole are not aware. Feminists see only titles, only status, because this is the female sexuality - it sees in men only status. So when women started to envy men, what they wanted was "titles", "status", and were completely blind to the actual content behind these titles - commitment, responsibility, willingness to do what is takes to make sure a goal is reach… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/23 07:47 PM |
| -2 | I am so so very tired from the overtime I need to work because of women in the teams I work with who aren't functioning. I'm working until midnight day after day and into the weekend week after week. It's all a lie. Almost no woman I work with who has a demanding position actually works. I do it allSorry but you are describing the "I don't care, I just punch my hours" attitude that causes people like me to work to make it happen. There's a personal inner commitment and inner responsibility to reach a destination. When everyone has that commitment, which in some fields means making sure you know what will be needed and learning any subject you need to cover, then no one needs to work more. Only when in this rank of responsibility and autonomy someone sees their job as just being in the offi… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/23 06:55 PM |
| 1 | I am so so very tired from the overtime I need to work because of women in the teams I work with who aren't functioning. I'm working until midnight day after day and into the weekend week after week. It's all a lie. Almost no woman I work with who has a demanding position actually works. I do it allRelated to cures for diseases. Unrelated to internet stuff. It's a very large array of companies, institutions, regulators, agencies, all over the world (my watch has 5 time-zones), millions of people in this array of fields. It's what creates medicines in the world. | /r/MensRights | 06/04/23 06:25 PM |
| -6 | I am so so very tired from the overtime I need to work because of women in the teams I work with who aren't functioning. I'm working until midnight day after day and into the weekend week after week. It's all a lie. Almost no woman I work with who has a demanding position actually works. I do it alldude what are you complaining about then? If everyone does their part you don't get to the point of everyone collapsing. Yes, people will go an extra mile - but they won't need to do that every day and every week if everyone are just doing their job professionally. When everything is running smoothly, working in irregular hours will be needed once every few weeks at most. Or months. I was describing the level of inner commitment people have, not a normal routine. I was answering the question "wh… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/23 03:18 PM |
| -26 | I am so so very tired from the overtime I need to work because of women in the teams I work with who aren't functioning. I'm working until midnight day after day and into the weekend week after week. It's all a lie. Almost no woman I work with who has a demanding position actually works. I do it allI can't let a project fail if I can save it. First, this is my professionalism, "I will do what it takes and if there is a way I will find it". Second, it's my inner drive to get the ship to harbor. Thirdly, if it fails, normally people will be devastated and will look for the cause and if a woman is responsible rarely will it come back to her (and if she will so much as sense such an option, be sure that before you even left the room she will complain in advance on you to anyone she can, it hap… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/23 11:34 AM |
| 15 | I am so so very tired from the overtime I need to work because of women in the teams I work with who aren't functioning. I'm working until midnight day after day and into the weekend week after week. It's all a lie. Almost no woman I work with who has a demanding position actually works. I do it allSo, so familiar. | /r/MensRights | 06/04/23 07:56 AM |
| 5 | I am so so very tired from the overtime I need to work because of women in the teams I work with who aren't functioning. I'm working until midnight day after day and into the weekend week after week. It's all a lie. Almost no woman I work with who has a demanding position actually works. I do it allThis kind of work is goal-driven. "Responsibility" positions. There are defined office hours in these fields, but if an important project failed because someone had to do something on a Sunday or at 3 am and didn't - it won't matter that the person had the 8-5 office hours. It's a responsibility for your part in a project. Everyone knows that most women in these places are less effective but they have to hire women. Mostly because the CEO / head instinct is always "remove any immaterial obstacle… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/23 07:53 AM |
| 18 | I am so so very tired from the overtime I need to work because of women in the teams I work with who aren't functioning. I'm working until midnight day after day and into the weekend week after week. It's all a lie. Almost no woman I work with who has a demanding position actually works. I do it allIf women put in 50% effort and some guy then has to work 150% to compensate - and I'm not talking here about hours worked, assume both work the same hours but one is doing his job and one is trying to make it look like she's doing her job - then if they were both paid the same the gap would be in the woman's favor. | /r/MensRights | 06/04/23 06:00 AM |
| 1 | Women who murder boys and men are not reported in most media nearly as extensively as when men hurt women, because feminist women in the media are preventing reporting due to their fanatical beliefs. The ban on reporting and discussion of female lethal or sexual violence is part of a new censorship.Dear troll who has nothing but ad hominem to offer, as you noted, murder rates are accessible. You can search for them. The M murder of F vs F murder of M rates range between 4 to 1 and 5 to 1 depending on year, not "1000x", and these proportions are generated when only convictions are considered, that is without taking into account the two known trends or biases, of less prosecutions against women compared to men for the same crime, and less convictions of women for the same crime. If these two… | /r/MensRights | 04/04/23 11:46 AM |
| 1 | Women who murder boys and men are not reported in most media nearly as extensively as when men hurt women, because feminist women in the media are preventing reporting due to their fanatical beliefs. The ban on reporting and discussion of female lethal or sexual violence is part of a new censorship.Notice that within the female sex, the minority of individuals who are violent toward the other sex are the feminists. Feminists are the equivalent within the female sex of the wife beater in the male sex. Feminists abuse and harm the other sex at will, to simply drain stress, making the other sex a punching bag, just as a wife beater does to a woman. In many cases of female rapists of boys or killers of children and husbands, the perpetrator is a devoted feminist (for example the murderer-autho… | /r/MensRights | 04/04/23 05:05 AM |
| 1 | Women who murder boys and men are not reported in most media nearly as extensively as when men hurt women, because feminist women in the media are preventing reporting due to their fanatical beliefs. The ban on reporting and discussion of female lethal or sexual violence is part of a new censorship.This is not what studies show - what you wrote is precisely the false belief that you acquired because of the feminist censorship on the media. Perhaps it would help you to figure out "how is this possible" if you consider that in the first place, feminist data on "how many men are violent toward women" is inflated. Since it's inflated it makes you ask "wait, how can there be THAT MANY women with same violence". There aren't, because there aren't that many men either who are violent toward the o… | /r/MensRights | 04/04/23 04:42 AM |
| 5 | War on women: The link between white supremacy, "men's rights" and anti-abortion politics | They’re not even hiding it anymore - major think tanks want to openly associate us with white supremacy through mental gymnastics.Tell them you have an ex-antifa socialist Jew here. Let them fascist feminists come against him with their feminist-supremacy tanks. Here's something you can send them from me, the anti-fascist anthem https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VwcKwGS7OSQ | /r/MensRights | 02/04/23 08:13 PM |
| 0 | I legally changed my sex to womanI see your point but you took trolling to real life. I doubt that you changed "legal sex" to get anything more than making a point, but it's nonetheless a good point. | /r/MensRights | 02/04/23 02:56 PM |
| 1 | I legally changed my sex to womanThe fact that there's even such a thing as "legal sex" is remarkably idiotic (will there be a "legal species"? Will I be able to register as "species: non-human alien" and "nationality: Martian"? If not - an offense against human rights? An offense against Martian rights? But if I call myself a Martian then there ARE Martians ergo there are Martian rights, bigot. Can human law decide on facts of nature? If we pass a law stating that the moon is made of cheese will the moon be made of cheese? And… | /r/MensRights | 02/04/23 02:41 PM |
| 2 | Modern feminism is an exercise in justifying female privilege through fictional oppressionThe easiest way to show female privilege is to imagine the discrimination done between two men. If Joe works 12 hours and Jim works 8, both having the same position, experience and education, and Joe earns 33% more than Jim, if Jim then demands compensation for the 33% difference without working one minute more above his usual 8 hours, any compensation given to Jim is called a privilege. Joe and Jim earned the same - Joe worked 33% more hours so he received 33% more pay. Being able to receive mo… | /r/MensRights | 02/04/23 02:07 PM |
| 6 | Remember my fellow men, YOU ARE VALUABLENever forget the scientists, novelists, thinkers and doctors. They have created and revealed the ideas that allowed humanity to have medicine, transportation, communication, buildings, roads, bridges, law, morality. No, the proportions of the two sexes among the very small group of extremely intelligent individuals is not the same. Within that tiny group, innately, 99% are male. For the vast majority of humanity - the 99% - one might make the argument that the proportions of men and women in eve… | /r/MensRights | 02/04/23 12:50 PM |
| 2 | The use of female pronouns when we do not want to specify gender.Your supervisor is a great man. Stick with him. | /r/MensRights | 02/04/23 12:32 PM |
| 1 | Women who murder boys and men are not reported in most media nearly as extensively as when men hurt women, because feminist women in the media are preventing reporting due to their fanatical beliefs. The ban on reporting and discussion of female lethal or sexual violence is part of a new censorship.That's just the world you live in. | /r/MensRights | 02/04/23 12:29 PM |
| 1 | Women who murder boys and men are not reported in most media nearly as extensively as when men hurt women, because feminist women in the media are preventing reporting due to their fanatical beliefs. The ban on reporting and discussion of female lethal or sexual violence is part of a new censorship.You are right - feminists are never willing to admit it when they arrive at an equal-numbers point as they demanded, because they always want to continue using the rhetoric of "this only balances" for what becomes past an equal-numbers point: privileges. That if two similar candidates, a man and a woman, are considered, the woman will be preferred automatically due to her sex (that is, privileges by sex and discrimination by sex, the dentition of chauvinism). So data on the sexes proportions in … | /r/MensRights | 02/04/23 10:59 AM |
| 1 | Women who murder boys and men are not reported in most media nearly as extensively as when men hurt women, because feminist women in the media are preventing reporting due to their fanatical beliefs. The ban on reporting and discussion of female lethal or sexual violence is part of a new censorship.It's called sex. No such thing as gender. For the last 10 or 15 years now most of the media is female. | /r/MensRights | 02/04/23 05:08 AM |
| 1 | Women who murder boys and men are not reported in most media nearly as extensively as when men hurt women, because feminist women in the media are preventing reporting due to their fanatical beliefs. The ban on reporting and discussion of female lethal or sexual violence is part of a new censorship.Yes. All men were placed after me2 under permanent universal feminist accusation regardless of who they are, and for the last 5 years they are trapped in the "not guilty" cycle. They are always afraid that if they refuse even one insane feminist demand, they will be tagged immediately as being the cause for every item on the list of the feminist indictment against the entire male sex including every rape and murder in history and as such will receive the treatment appropriate for rapists (the Ha… | /r/MensRights | 02/04/23 04:42 AM |
| 1 | Women who murder boys and men are not reported in most media nearly as extensively as when men hurt women, because feminist women in the media are preventing reporting due to their fanatical beliefs. The ban on reporting and discussion of female lethal or sexual violence is part of a new censorship.What is this thing? Does Australia has free press? The title of this document is "How to report". I saw the word "don't" in red. This seems like severe dictation to the press - as found in dictatorships. Is it obligatory? State-initiated? Are there penalties? | /r/MensRights | 02/04/23 04:25 AM |
| 2 | Women who murder boys and men are not reported in most media nearly as extensively as when men hurt women, because feminist women in the media are preventing reporting due to their fanatical beliefs. The ban on reporting and discussion of female lethal or sexual violence is part of a new censorship.But five and half years ago the left had nothing to do with feminism. I'm telling you this as a 40 something year-old guy who is active in the left since he was 16, but if you find it hard to believe that until yesterday virtually no leftist called herself or himself a feminist I'll add that in a poll from 2016 from the UK only 7% of the public identified as feminist that year (feminism is always revising history and the public memory. Not only of ancient history but of yesterday. Yesterday no o… | /r/MensRights | 01/04/23 07:38 PM |
| 2 | My uncle and his friend are both divorced...Find love, get a girlfriend, this has nothing to do with marriage. Live your life. Marriage is not an entirely lost cause because there are a lot of beautiful kind women in the world, the issue men have now is that the unkind type have now the power to really flip their life, and possibly there's some conversion of good women into nasty ones, shrinking the pool of good women. This only means that you require some experience before you consider marriage, to learn how to "train your gut feelings" … | /r/MensRights | 25/03/23 04:09 PM |
| 0 | Thought yall would be interested in this trend of the term "male only gym" since 2004. It is a small thing compared to other issues men face, but might be nice to get the ball rolling?The gym IS a male-only place. Watch Rocky (the first movie). A gym used to be until about the mid-end 1990s a masculine, run-down blue color place for body builders and some boxing. No women in her right mind would go near there. The invasion of womanhood into the gym is part of the feminist project of making out of women men and to make it clear to men that they can never be allowed an environment for themselves, only women have that right (because equality), and there must be females functioni… | /r/MensRights | 25/03/23 03:32 PM |
| 5 | According to the feminism that has taken over our entire culture, women who show “empathy” are “toxic”. They are deliberately encouraging women never to show empathy or sensitivity. This is something I would expect to see in a badly-written dystopian story, not real life.Feminism is a spectacular lying machine. Toxic femininity was coined to refer to radical feminists who invented the term "toxic masculinity" to treat humans as a poison (the Nazis treated Jews as insects - treating humans as a poisonous chemical exceeds even the Nazis' dehumanization, Nazis treated my family as sub-human creatures but as creatures, feminists treat men as inanimate molecules - a poison, toxin). "Toxic femininity" meant violent, sadistic cruelty to men. Within two years feminists … | /r/MensRights | 25/03/23 03:13 PM |
| 1 | Just had letter from my doctor warning me, saying female receptionist claimed I was abusive to her on phone-truth is she is lying, was abusive to me in call, & is now playing on fact Im male to avoid getting in trouble!This is why men ignore women as much as possible - any woman you run into might ruin your life because she happens to be in a bad mood. A lot of women are not aware of how chauvinistic women are, toward men, and how it is like for men to go through such female permanent chauvinism since me2 (and generally since the end of the 1990s). Any woman uncomfortable with all men ignoring her should start an anti-me2 movement - only women can end this, or, accept being ignored. Women introduced into cultu… | /r/MensRights | 25/03/23 09:12 AM |
| 1 | Guys, beware. Your profiles are being posted in large female exclusive Facebook groupsI recommend you not be at all on any dating app (initiate with girls the old way), and if you are on an app, not to put any picture. A witty text will get a guy much more traction than a shirtless picture (speaking from personal experience, without ever taking my shirt off). Men and women are different. | /r/MensRights | 24/03/23 11:25 AM |
| 2 | If you are a woman wanting to get married you see in front of you a world where you have 90% chance that the man won't decide to divorce you, but if you are a man you look at the same world and see 60% chance, almost fifty-fifty, that the woman will decide to divorce you.Feminism drove women to think of divorce as switching cars and added laws that enable women who want to, to practically end their ex's life as a person. Feminism caused women to create for men a world in which men can't risk entering a marriage - women would not want to enter marriage either if they had to face the prospects that feminism drove women to create for men. Assume a meninist movement of tens of millions of men creating for women the conditions feminism created for men - would anyone … | /r/MensRights | 24/03/23 06:22 AM |
| 1 | Freezing their eggs, highly paid highly educated women victims of men's bad behavior once again50% of all marriages end in a divorce and 80% of those 50% are ended by the woman, meaning 0.8*50%=40% of all marriages are ended by women compared to only 0.2*50%=10% of all marriages ended by men, that is 40% of married women compared to only 10% of married men will end their marriage, that is 90% of married men will not initiate divorce but only 60% of married women will not initiate a divorce, which means that if you are a women wanting to get married you see in front of you a world where yo… | /r/MensRights | 24/03/23 05:34 AM |
| 1 | What do you guys think of this statement? “The only reason you hear men 32+ saying they want a young “pure” women is because they want to get away with substandard treatment. “Financial stability - or the prospects thereof. I had gigantic debts when I married my wife (of 15 years now) and a car with only one functioning door (front passenger, luckily for her). But I had a scientific master degree cum laude and was studying for a hard-science PhD at the time, winning prizes and traveling to conferences in Europe (with her) - that was enough. | /r/MensRights | 19/03/23 08:24 PM |
| 19 | Victim of “are we dating the same guy” Facebook group. They posted my name and picture.This is no different than a guy publishing online nudes of a girl. This is severe and violent harassment. You should sue if you have the money for it. Society needs to know about these groups and to think of them as severe violence just as it sees sharing online nudes. Plus guys must start their own groups where every girl who ever added a like to misandry will be disqualified. That's the only way to stop the wave of abuse - girls need to know they will be held accountable and become undatable f… | /r/MensRights | 18/03/23 11:20 AM |
| 2 | Masculinity is being forcefully killed in young menDon't question yourself - listen to your guts. I am 45 and I felt the same way 30 years ago (with less force), the cultural attempt to erase manhood has been going on for decades and is escalating. I can tell you from the other end of the bridge - keep going! You are doing great, your rebellion is justified, what you are trying to save in yourself from extinction is your very core, you need it, women appreciate it in you as well (they were taught to lie to themselves and to you about that, but t… | /r/MensRights | 18/03/23 07:36 AM |
| 3 | Having pro rape rumors spread about ne at schoolIgnore it. Girls use gossip aggressively and feminism liberated in women distilled violence, that is, violent gossip. Men and boys can't defend themselves against the female-type violence (gossip) just as women and girls can't defend themselves against the male-type violence (physical force). The best each can do when facing the violence typical of the other sex is: avoidance. Completely ignore them. The motivation for lying in girls could be competition - you probably excelled in something (up … | /r/MensRights | 18/03/23 07:14 AM |
| 5 | 57% of women - including 70% of those 18 to 24 - identify as feminists in Canada, the highest number in decadesI took a quick look and couldn't find any question that reads "are you a feminist". Instead what I saw is for example "is fighting violence against women important" - 70% say yes, that's obvious and has nothing to do with feminism, they would get the same response for any question about being against violence against anyone. Feminists have a strong tendency for manipulation and they always try to generate illusions that in their mind would push people into "oh, everyone except me?? Then me too!"… | /r/MensRights | 18/03/23 07:02 AM |
| 6 | Study: Findings indicate people (especially women) are less willing to accept instrumental harm befalling women (vs. men).Thanks for sharing but this study is only part of The Big Concealment - the concealment of the fact that the west has been cultivating for half a century a racist-type movement. The West has a version of Nazism - complete dehumanization of half of society - and no one is allowed to say this in the mainstream and instead we see fearful reports of this type, impersonating as "probing mysterious human tendencies". Really? The "patterns in the findings" are simply what you get from racists when you … | /r/MensRights | 18/03/23 06:27 AM |
| 13 | Study: Findings indicate people (especially women) are less willing to accept instrumental harm befalling women (vs. men).Interesting. To recap, when women believe something benefits them they become blind to negative consequences for men. This is more or less all of feminism. The most sophisticated woman whom I heard responding to negative consequences for men of feminist actions was saying "we were not aware at the time of other consequences", and I was thinking, "wasn't aware at the time? People have been shouting at you the consequences before you even finished the sentence - you were simply incapable of calcul… | /r/MensRights | 18/03/23 06:17 AM |
| 1 | Hypocrisy is increasing every year within feminists.You did good. You presented them with the truth and let them deal with it. A guy your age is not supposed to have friends from the other sex whom he has no romantic or sexual directions with - that would require your mental castration. You have no business associating with her or her female friends unless you are inviting one for a date. Girls gossip aggressively, they do this all the time to each other, and because you positioned yourself as one of them they are now gossiping about you as well.… | /r/MensRights | 18/03/23 05:57 AM |
| 1 | Says walking her to the car is misogynistic but complains when I don't.It's not wrong "in your opinion", it's idiotic and manipulative. Grow some balls. And explain nothing. Walk away. Never talk with this girl again. She's bad for you. | /r/MensRights | 17/03/23 07:08 PM |
| 9 | What do you guys think of this statement? “The only reason you hear men 32+ saying they want a young “pure” women is because they want to get away with substandard treatment. “This is womansplaining. Feminists have no idea how it feels from the inside to be a man. We are just attracted to beautiful sexy girls. Completely biological. Experienced as an inner overwhelming power: SEXUAL ATTRACTION. Younger women are simply usually more beautiful and sexy, that's all there is to it. The entire female sex knew this very well up until the me-too brainwash they've taken from feminists. Men and women do not begin and end their attractiveness on equal grounds - while girls shin… | /r/MensRights | 17/03/23 07:47 AM |
| 2 | Why does society treat women like perfect angels who do no wrong?It's called selection-bias. Humans have a tendency to ignore (or explain-away) information that refutes their perceptions (especially self-perceptions), this then means that they are fed selectively only with data that reinforces their predetermined conceptions, which then strengthens those very perceptions, which causes them again to act as prisms that filter out refuting data and filter in only reinforcement, in a cyclic process that thus always strengthens itself. Feminism has captured most w… | /r/MensRights | 17/03/23 06:14 AM |
| 1 | Spanish husband is ordered to pay his ex-wife £180,000 for 25 years of unpaid houseworkWhy does that mean he owes her money "for unpaid work". You didn't answer the question - if what she did at home is "unpaid work", than the funds he gave her all those years are "pay". Why then he owes her more "pay". It's your game, you set the definitions - "unpaid work". Now stand by your own rules. If being a stay at home mom is "unpaid work" then why the money received by the woman from the husband isn't "pay". It is me who argues that there's no such thing as "unpaid work at home" because … | /r/MensRights | 09/03/23 07:00 AM |
| 1 | Where exactly should a man meet a woman?Nowhere. The relations between the sexes are ending and the reason is not "technology". https://lovists.com/2022/10/09/sexesrelations/ | /r/MensRights | 08/03/23 11:23 AM |
| 1 | Spanish husband is ordered to pay his ex-wife £180,000 for 25 years of unpaid houseworkWhat do they mean by "unpaid" - who paid for the food she ate, her dresses, car, roof, bills, shopping, cash, travel, hotels? She must have been the primary beneficiary of everything he earned in those years - probably using more of his earnings than he. If a man lives as a "home maker" with a wife who works full time and gives him half or more of everything she earns for whatever he wants to do with it while he takes care of the house and children, does he get 180k Euros when they divorce for h… | /r/MensRights | 08/03/23 10:43 AM |
| 3 | Do you think the system is bound to collapse?Two more inequality facts: at least since 2012, women own 60% of the wealth in the US, and this year it was reported by the NY Times that there are 12 million single women who own a home compared to 8 million single men who own a home. Another dynamic to note - as of this year,the majority of births in the UK are by single women, after the US marked this tipping point in 2016. | /r/MensRights | 05/03/23 05:38 AM |
| 2 | The cancellation of International Women’s Day and what it meansShouldn’t that disgusting sign in the middle not be allowed? It’s advocating illegal genocide. In a normal world, yes. The reason this sign is not only allowed but is very popular on tiktok and twitter and you can even buy shirts with this title, is that social media companies have defined something they called "protected groups". Originally it was meant as a prohibition on saying anything that someone from "a protected group" might call "offensive" (whether authentically, or just to taunt someo… | /r/MensRights | 02/03/23 07:07 PM |
| 1 | Why is @JustPearlyThings now at the forefront of the Manosphere on YouTube?I see what you mean and at first I also considered not liking it - but I always argued that feminism hurts women too and not only men, and that eventually it will be women who will take down feminism, and this is exactly what's happening now, and it will only continue and grow. Let's remember: we all had a life once, until bored women who don't need to work for a living started spending their entire day spreading hate and rumors on social media, while men were busy working and surviving without … | /r/MensRights | 02/03/23 01:05 PM |
| 1 | What can me and other women do to help?A tremendous help would be to share the following letter with other women, and telling them to share it further with more women if it struck a chord with them - https://lovists.com/2021/09/28/letter/ Thank you dearly... I appreciate your sympathy tremendously. | /r/MensRights | 02/03/23 11:37 AM |
| 1 | Feminists often deny that boys or men could be forced by women into sex, citing the feminist myth of "a man can't be forced to have an erection". Enclosed is a link to a detailed clinical paper on involuntary arousal under coercion in both sexes, that you could paste to feminists who protect rapistsNot men, but boys. Yes. The majority of males raped, are raped by women (80%), not by men, and this is typically in childhood. While the total number of boys raped by women is not necessarily higher than of girls raped by men, you would agree that because of feminism, those girls receive acknowledgement while those boys receive denial. This denial means legitimizing these actions, protecting the rapists, and these two are expected to increase the problem. Boys deserve the SAME protection as girl… | /r/MensRights | 27/02/23 07:14 PM |
| 1 | Most young men are single. Most young women are not.True. But at some point feminism will face "anti-feminist feminism" - women who would rebel against feminist lunacy and oppression. In a sense, women of the type known as "feminists" never really wanted to dispose of chauvinistic men - but to replace them. To be them and to control women from that position. And I truly believe that all that this is creating is a new women's liberation movement - liberation... from feminists. | /r/MensRights | 27/02/23 06:57 PM |
| 3 | Feminists often deny that boys or men could be forced by women into sex, citing the feminist myth of "a man can't be forced to have an erection". Enclosed is a link to a detailed clinical paper on involuntary arousal under coercion in both sexes, that you could paste to feminists who protect rapistsNo, it's a Jew arguing with a Nazi about Jews being human. | /r/MensRights | 26/02/23 10:00 AM |
| 7 | Feminists often deny that boys or men could be forced by women into sex, citing the feminist myth of "a man can't be forced to have an erection". Enclosed is a link to a detailed clinical paper on involuntary arousal under coercion in both sexes, that you could paste to feminists who protect rapistsThen she protects rapists and you should send her or the school the enclosed paper and explain that arguing what she argued is protecting rapists. | /r/MensRights | 26/02/23 09:59 AM |
| 4 | Feminists often deny that boys or men could be forced by women into sex, citing the feminist myth of "a man can't be forced to have an erection". Enclosed is a link to a detailed clinical paper on involuntary arousal under coercion in both sexes, that you could paste to feminists who protect rapistsI just explained to you why I have no examples - when something is all around us, we do not take screenshots. When hundreds of thousands of girls add a like to "kill all men" you do not save a proof because all the other millions of people around you see this with you, the last thing you think is "I need to save a proof for these millions who are watching it with me". What you don't consider is the degree of lying - that those millions will forget a year later and those who shouted "kill all men… | /r/MensRights | 26/02/23 06:49 AM |
| 7 | Feminists often deny that boys or men could be forced by women into sex, citing the feminist myth of "a man can't be forced to have an erection". Enclosed is a link to a detailed clinical paper on involuntary arousal under coercion in both sexes, that you could paste to feminists who protect rapistsThank you for informing me of another feminist lie - "we never said a man can't be forced to have an erection", I'll have to start saving screenshots as I began when I discovered that feminists now gaslight that "we never wrote kill all men". It's always hard to anticipate what degree of lying feminists can reach - hundreds of thousands of them endorse "kill all men" and the next day after they understand the wind has changed and it is now a reason for shaming - "feminists never said kill all me… | /r/MensRights | 26/02/23 06:02 AM |
| 3 | Feminists often deny that boys or men could be forced by women into sex, citing the feminist myth of "a man can't be forced to have an erection". Enclosed is a link to a detailed clinical paper on involuntary arousal under coercion in both sexes, that you could paste to feminists who protect rapistsCan you show me one example of a feminist who isn't a gaslighter? | /r/MensRights | 26/02/23 05:15 AM |
| 4 | Feminists often deny that boys or men could be forced by women into sex, citing the feminist myth of "a man can't be forced to have an erection". Enclosed is a link to a detailed clinical paper on involuntary arousal under coercion in both sexes, that you could paste to feminists who protect rapistsShe was gaslighting, it's a troll, but it's good that we have now such an informative response - thanks for that. | /r/MensRights | 26/02/23 05:13 AM |
| 2 | Boys as young as 13 forced by ISIS women to impregnate them at women's Syrian detention camps. Drugged by Viagra-like drug until poisoning. Kept in tunnels. Ten rescued, total number of unaccounted for victims unknown. Sources report women decided to rape boys to enlarge the Caliphate.I'm a neurobiologist and non of what you wrote is true. Both sexes may reach involuntary arousal which especially in teen boys and under stress can induce an involuntary ejaculation. http://www.pereestupinya.com/pdf/sexual\_arousal\_during\_forced\_sex.pdf | /r/MensRights | 25/02/23 05:34 PM |
| 2 | Boys as young as 13 forced by ISIS women to impregnate them at women's Syrian detention camps. Drugged by Viagra-like drug until poisoning. Kept in tunnels. Ten rescued, total number of unaccounted for victims unknown. Sources report women decided to rape boys to enlarge the Caliphate.These are women-only camps. There are no men there. Men and women were separated to different detainment camps (there are dozens of camps, each with tens of thousands of detainees. A camp is similar to a town, with markets and "neighborhoods", as shown in documentaries on the aftermath of the war there). The boys might be the children of some of the women there who were allowed to bring into the camp their toddlers with them and they grew up inside the camp and are now entering adolescence. No o… | /r/MensRights | 25/02/23 08:10 AM |
| 4 | Boys as young as 13 forced by ISIS women to impregnate them at women's Syrian detention camps. Drugged by Viagra-like drug until poisoning. Kept in tunnels. Ten rescued, total number of unaccounted for victims unknown. Sources report women decided to rape boys to enlarge the Caliphate.It's a women-only camp. The boys might be the children of some of the women detained there who were allowed to bring their toddlers with them when detained and they grew up there. | /r/MensRights | 25/02/23 07:10 AM |
| 4 | Boys as young as 13 forced by ISIS women to impregnate them at women's Syrian detention camps. Drugged by Viagra-like drug until poisoning. Kept in tunnels. Ten rescued, total number of unaccounted for victims unknown. Sources report women decided to rape boys to enlarge the Caliphate.Are you aware that female victims of rape sometimes orgasm involuntarily during the act and that this was used against them in trials by the defense of the perpetrator using your line of argument, and that 30 years ago feminists campaigned to raise awareness to this involuntary physiological response and as a result today this kind of argument is inadmissible in court? Are you also applying your argument to such women and girls or are you saving your inhumanity only for men and boys? Are women a… | /r/MensRights | 25/02/23 07:00 AM |
| 3 | Boys as young as 13 forced by ISIS women to impregnate them at women's Syrian detention camps. Drugged by Viagra-like drug until poisoning. Kept in tunnels. Ten rescued, total number of unaccounted for victims unknown. Sources report women decided to rape boys to enlarge the Caliphate.Are you aware that female victims of rape sometimes orgasm involuntarily during the act and that this was used against them in trials by the defense of the perpetrator using your line of argument, and that 30 years ago feminists campaigned to raise awareness to the idea that using an involuntary physiological response is victim-blaming and as a result today this kind of argument is inadmissible in court? Are you also applying your argument to such women or are you saving your inhumanity only for… | /r/MensRights | 25/02/23 06:57 AM |
| 3 | Boys as young as 13 forced by ISIS women to impregnate them at women's Syrian detention camps. Drugged by Viagra-like drug until poisoning. Kept in tunnels. Ten rescued, total number of unaccounted for victims unknown. Sources report women decided to rape boys to enlarge the Caliphate.Yahoo - https://news.yahoo.com/isis-women-accused-turning-teen-093206828.html Daily Star - https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/world-news/sex-slave-boys-young-13-29295291 Toronto Sun - https://torontosun.com/news/world/twisted-isis-womens-sick-plot-to-force-teen-boys-into-jihadi-sex-farm | /r/MensRights | 25/02/23 06:43 AM |
| 2 | Boys as young as 13 forced by ISIS women to impregnate them at women's Syrian detention camps. Drugged by Viagra-like drug until poisoning. Kept in tunnels. Ten rescued, total number of unaccounted for victims unknown. Sources report women decided to rape boys to enlarge the Caliphate.Don't say that. There are red lines that keep us human. The culprits should be sentenced and jailed. | /r/MensRights | 25/02/23 06:41 AM |
| 9 | Boys as young as 13 forced by ISIS women to impregnate them at women's Syrian detention camps. Drugged by Viagra-like drug until poisoning. Kept in tunnels. Ten rescued, total number of unaccounted for victims unknown. Sources report women decided to rape boys to enlarge the Caliphate.Feminist psychopath alert ^ | /r/MensRights | 24/02/23 07:54 PM |
| 7 | Boys as young as 13 forced by ISIS women to impregnate them at women's Syrian detention camps. Drugged by Viagra-like drug until poisoning. Kept in tunnels. Ten rescued, total number of unaccounted for victims unknown. Sources report women decided to rape boys to enlarge the Caliphate.^^^ r/ThisIsFeminism | /r/MensRights | 24/02/23 07:03 PM |
| 5 | Boys as young as 13 forced by ISIS women to impregnate them at women's Syrian detention camps. Drugged by Viagra-like drug until poisoning. Kept in tunnels. Ten rescued, total number of unaccounted for victims unknown. Sources report women decided to rape boys to enlarge the Caliphate.I'll do my best. I am a former human rights worker. I used to work with these UN agencies. I was the guy in the white jeep. I saw a lot. In the human rights community we call what we have secondary trauma. We are edgy types. Sorry for being rude and thank you for your understanding. I'll do my best to relax, it is a good advice. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/23 06:01 PM |
| 1 | Boys as young as 13 forced by ISIS women to impregnate them at women's Syrian detention camps. Drugged by Viagra-like drug until poisoning. Kept in tunnels. Ten rescued, total number of unaccounted for victims unknown. Sources report women decided to rape boys to enlarge the Caliphate.That's fine. We are not discussing here the prices of mushrooms after the rain. This is an ongoing situation, the testimony is that it is currently happening in more women's camps and the media is ignoring it which might mean that who knows how many more boys are left there in this condition as we speak. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/23 05:49 PM |
| 2 | Boys as young as 13 forced by ISIS women to impregnate them at women's Syrian detention camps. Drugged by Viagra-like drug until poisoning. Kept in tunnels. Ten rescued, total number of unaccounted for victims unknown. Sources report women decided to rape boys to enlarge the Caliphate.Assuming whenever you hear of violence between the sexes "men guilty" is sexism. Imagine the report being on men from ISIS holding girls in underground tunnels for drugging them with estrogen and raping them and someone asking "but are those men forced by bad women to do it? Maybe women are the ones guilty in all of this?" - what would you call such a person? A sexist women-hater? | /r/MensRights | 24/02/23 04:45 PM |
| 6 | Boys as young as 13 forced by ISIS women to impregnate them at women's Syrian detention camps. Drugged by Viagra-like drug until poisoning. Kept in tunnels. Ten rescued, total number of unaccounted for victims unknown. Sources report women decided to rape boys to enlarge the Caliphate.No, dear sexist men-hater. The women are the ones forcing, they are the rapists. This is done in women-only camps, by women, there are no men there. The boys are probably the children of women detained in the camp (these camps are similar to towns, women are detained with their children) - whether the mothers are complicit in the rape or are they forced by the other women to give their boys for raping is unknown at this point, and because of sexist bias such as yours all the media except for 4 o… | /r/MensRights | 24/02/23 04:26 PM |
| 21 | Boys as young as 13 forced by ISIS women to impregnate them at women's Syrian detention camps. Drugged by Viagra-like drug until poisoning. Kept in tunnels. Ten rescued, total number of unaccounted for victims unknown. Sources report women decided to rape boys to enlarge the Caliphate.The depiction in the west of religious fanaticism in the middle east is biased to "men oppressing women" while in reality it is more frequently, including Iran and Saudi Arabia, "fanatic men and women oppressing everyone else including both men and women". This is a women-only camp. The Kurds and the Syrians have separated between men and women and they are in dozens of different camps. In more than one women's camp, women began raping boys "to expand ISIS". My guess is that these are children o… | /r/MensRights | 24/02/23 03:46 PM |
| 6 | Boys as young as 13 forced by ISIS women to impregnate them at women's Syrian detention camps. Drugged by Viagra-like drug until poisoning. Kept in tunnels. Ten rescued, total number of unaccounted for victims unknown. Sources report women decided to rape boys to enlarge the Caliphate.You are right. I accept the correction. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/23 03:25 PM |
| 20 | Boys as young as 13 forced by ISIS women to impregnate them at women's Syrian detention camps. Drugged by Viagra-like drug until poisoning. Kept in tunnels. Ten rescued, total number of unaccounted for victims unknown. Sources report women decided to rape boys to enlarge the Caliphate.Yahoo - https://news.yahoo.com/isis-women-accused-turning-teen-093206828.html Daily Star - https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/world-news/sex-slave-boys-young-13-29295291 Toronto Sun - https://torontosun.com/news/world/twisted-isis-womens-sick-plot-to-force-teen-boys-into-jihadi-sex-farm | /r/MensRights | 24/02/23 02:16 PM |
| 43 | Boys as young as 13 forced by ISIS women to impregnate them at women's Syrian detention camps. Drugged by Viagra-like drug until poisoning. Kept in tunnels. Ten rescued, total number of unaccounted for victims unknown. Sources report women decided to rape boys to enlarge the Caliphate.How about a rape farm in facilities monitored by the UN. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/23 11:26 AM |
| 58 | Boys as young as 13 forced by ISIS women to impregnate them at women's Syrian detention camps. Drugged by Viagra-like drug until poisoning. Kept in tunnels. Ten rescued, total number of unaccounted for victims unknown. Sources report women decided to rape boys to enlarge the Caliphate.I asked under posts of UN Women on twitter who in the UN will report it - I checked OHCHR which is a UN agency for children's human rights and nothing was reported by them. UN women is reporting today in their twitter account about women in Ukraine, yesterday - the day the mass rape of boys by women was reported in the Daily Mail - UN Women tweeted a picture from Syria of a man and a woman with the headline that "during an earthquake women and girls are at more risk of sexual violence" (without … | /r/MensRights | 24/02/23 08:36 AM |
| 75 | Boys as young as 13 forced by ISIS women to impregnate them at women's Syrian detention camps. Drugged by Viagra-like drug until poisoning. Kept in tunnels. Ten rescued, total number of unaccounted for victims unknown. Sources report women decided to rape boys to enlarge the Caliphate.I can't disqualify the possibility that the editors asked themselves where such a sick idea can come from, which may have reminded them - "hey, there's western women in those camps". | /r/MensRights | 24/02/23 08:23 AM |
| 6 | Most young men are single. Most young women are not.The entire text blames men basically for "not being good enough" - ignoring quotas that prevent guys who are the better candidate from getting the position, ignoring the study on 39,000 children showing that for the same performances boys receive lower grades than girls, ignoring how feminism expels guys from universities with a violent anti-male culture that includes demanding of guys in classes to submit that they are either rapists or potential rapists and holding illegal tribunals for expell… | /r/MensRights | 23/02/23 07:06 AM |
| 4 | Minnesota mother Juilissa Thaler kills 6 y/o son shooting him 9x with a shotgun only 10 days after winning full custody of him despite her drug abuse and mental illness historyIf feminism would have never been allowed to dictate to legislators anti-men laws and norms that create a system that assumes "mothers are always the better parent, men are always bad" instead of "all people are human and men and women alike may be good or bad and each human case must be treated separately without prejudice" this boy would have been alive today. | /r/MensRights | 19/02/23 03:31 PM |
| 1 | Not only bricklayers: Humanity needs men for extraordinary intellectual abilities of a tiny minority of individuals who are 99% male.Dear person, until you understand how scientific work is performed, please refrain from commenting on such matters. "Her lab produced a photo" is the typical technical work performed by technical personnel. A Nobel (or any other scientific or meritocratic award) is not awarded "collectively" to "anyone somehow involved". It is awarded for a specific, cognitive, intellectual, mental, "made-of-what-thoughts-are-made-of", "made-of-what-an-idea-is-made-of", breakthrough. You are either unable to per… | /r/MensRights | 14/02/23 10:43 AM |
| 1 | Not only bricklayers: Humanity needs men for extraordinary intellectual abilities of a tiny minority of individuals who are 99% male.Nature is occupied and governed by Gender Studies. They publish daily in their newsletter radical gender studies materials. Ctrl+F in the link "Nature" or scroll down to the sentence "The second decade of the 2000s" - https://lovists.com/2021/03/01/science-plus-violence-equals-silence-the-gender-church-equation/ Have you read what you pasted? It says that none of those two discovered the double helix. If you copied it from a Nature op-ed that wanted to argue that "Franklin was the true discovere… | /r/MensRights | 13/02/23 06:29 AM |
| 2 | Transman culture shock?It is obvious to me why young men want to impersonate today as girls - they want to be treated as humans (human dignity, human rights), they are treated all their life as a subhuman by a society that tells them from birth that only females will have the status of a human - compassion, considerations, justice, acknowledgment of need and distress. When I'm trying to ask myself what then would cause a young woman to want to be a man, my first guess is not being able to realize the immense sexual an… | /r/MensRights | 13/02/23 06:15 AM |
| 5 | Transman culture shock?Listen, find therapy. You are a woman. There are no "boys born girls" or "girls born boys" or women "who are actually men" or men "who are actually a woman". A person who doesn't want to be in his or her sex suffers from a psychological problem that needs addressing. From all what we know today the harshest damage of the gender delusion is not the hormones or the operations but the neglect of the true psychological condition that causes unhappiness and distress. By mis-attributing them to "gende… | /r/MensRights | 13/02/23 05:47 AM |
| 1 | Not only bricklayers: Humanity needs men for extraordinary intellectual abilities of a tiny minority of individuals who are 99% male.Wikipedia became a social media debate and reflects the same trends as twitter or reddit. A research associate is a technician. They are not independent investigators. They are training undergrads and graduate students for the PI but these are not "their" students. What Watson had said is very interesting and sounds like a polite answer to someone pressing him for an answer. The feminist wiki-twitter is of course glad at the opportunity to argue "dead people are not awarded" but people like Fran… | /r/MensRights | 12/02/23 04:01 AM |
| 1 | Not only bricklayers: Humanity needs men for extraordinary intellectual abilities of a tiny minority of individuals who are 99% male.False. For decades feminists had trouble accepting the minor differences between distributions that create a large male majority in science, and one of their strategies to deny this reality was by trying to argue that the history of science is full of female geniuses whose achievements were "stolen" by men. The figure who became for feminists "the paradigmatic example" was a female technician who worked for the two men who discovered the double helix, Watson and Crick. In fact the esoteric belie… | /r/MensRights | 11/02/23 07:25 PM |
| 1 | Not only bricklayers: Humanity needs men for extraordinary intellectual abilities of a tiny minority of individuals who are 99% male.Thank you for the comment. I understand what bothered you, and anticipated the reservation because naturally GPS is not based on relativity similarly to how, for example, fMRI is based on magnetic fields, however GPS could not be used without subtracting deviations caused by relativity. But I see where you're coming from and agree - it might have been a somewhat far-fetched (albeit not inaccurate) example. Here's NASA's short summary about the red-shift effect and GPS - https://www.nasa.gov/miss… | /r/MensRights | 11/02/23 07:08 PM |
| 2 | Not only bricklayers: Humanity needs men for extraordinary intellectual abilities of a tiny minority of individuals who are 99% male.Analogical reasoning is not generative. It's not accepted, for example, as a valid scientific rationale in scientific journals that on its own justifies a scientific approach for a problem. It is used in human thinking as reliance on authority (in this case nature being the authority), and is: a form of copying. You are right in saying AI isn't well understood, and, there are algorithms created in its operation that no human wrote for the AI, but, these algorithms are merely extracted patterns t… | /r/MensRights | 11/02/23 01:13 PM |
| 6 | Not only bricklayers: Humanity needs men for extraordinary intellectual abilities of a tiny minority of individuals who are 99% male.No, I have nothing to prove, because I received enough prizes. Have you read my bio? | /r/MensRights | 11/02/23 01:01 PM |
| 1 | Not only bricklayers: Humanity needs men for extraordinary intellectual abilities of a tiny minority of individuals who are 99% male.A.I. is not generative. It's a sponge. A sponge with so many absorbing layers that it's hard to track the route a drop of information took in the sponge from beginning to end, but nonetheless a sponge. | /r/MensRights | 11/02/23 11:49 AM |
| 6 | Not only bricklayers: Humanity needs men for extraordinary intellectual abilities of a tiny minority of individuals who are 99% male.Here you will find a more elaborate explanation with links. https://lovists.com/2021/01/28/what-does-equality-look-like-in-the-feminist-society-we-live-in/ The context is important so I recommend reading from the top, but what you are looking for starts in the line "In very few areas, occupied in each society by no more than a few thousands of individuals". Here is a link on how a small feminist organization managed to censor a new study about the above after it was already accepted for publicat… | /r/MensRights | 11/02/23 11:44 AM |
| 1 | No feminists. Men don't hate women. They hate only you.Men also discovered relativity that enables GPS and satellite communication, the calculus that allows humans to build bridges and buildings and fly airplanes, the DNA structure and the molecular principles of cells which allows treatments for diabetes and cancer, founded cognitive psychology which in the past 30 years gave rise to CBT and helped millions, and on and on. Feminism's vision for humanity is equal numbers of men and women in the top 1% of roles, then all women, then all men as a kind… | /r/MensRights | 11/02/23 10:51 AM |
| 1 | No feminists. Men don't hate women. They hate only you.Will you look women in the eyes when visiting the metro in London? | /r/MensRights | 11/02/23 03:09 AM |
| 6 | No feminists. Men don't hate women. They hate only you."Posters warning against ‘intrusive staring’ are put up on the Tube" https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/tfl-intrusive-staring-tube-london-crime-women-underground-b987537.html "Man jailed for 'staring intently' at woman on Reading train" https://www.readingchronicle.co.uk/news/19988545.man-jailed-staring-intently-woman-reading-train/ "Arresting men for staring at women on the train won't make us any safer. Prosecuting rapists and sex abusers will, writes JULIE BURCHIL" https://www.dailymail.co.uk… | /r/MensRights | 10/02/23 07:50 PM |
| 4 | No feminists. Men don't hate women. They hate only you.I am Jewish. I have aunts that walked out of the gate of Auschwitz on their feet. I had their soup (good soup). If my attitude to those Germans who were in the SS is as that of those SS Nazis to all Jews, that makes me as bad as them? Yes? You are morally corrupted. Societies die if most individuals develop such moral blindness and cowardliness as yours. | /r/MensRights | 10/02/23 06:44 PM |
| 2 | No feminists. Men don't hate women. They hate only you.You were misinformed. Read this. https://lovists.com/2022/04/27/humanism/ | /r/MensRights | 10/02/23 06:38 PM |
| 1 | No feminists. Men don't hate women. They hate only you.Here is my answer. https://lovists.com/2021/09/28/letter/ And https://lovists.com/2021/05/10/why-i-am-not-a-feminist/ | /r/MensRights | 10/02/23 05:51 PM |
| 6 | No feminists. Men don't hate women. They hate only you.Suffragettes. Suffragists Fascinating. Never heard about the distinction. I stand corrected, yes, I was referring to suffragettes. | /r/MensRights | 10/02/23 05:46 PM |
| 1 | No feminists. Men don't hate women. They hate only you."Posters warning against ‘intrusive staring’ are put up on the Tube" https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/tfl-intrusive-staring-tube-london-crime-women-underground-b987537.html "Man jailed for 'staring intently' at woman on Reading train" https://www.readingchronicle.co.uk/news/19988545.man-jailed-staring-intently-woman-reading-train/ "Arresting men for staring at women on the train won't make us any safer. Prosecuting rapists and sex abusers will, writes JULIE BURCHIL" https://www.dailymail.co.uk… | /r/MensRights | 10/02/23 04:09 PM |
| 18 | No feminists. Men don't hate women. They hate only you.Suffragists in England were amazing - most men in that country didn't have voting rights, and they planted bombs as part of their campaign to give only to women universal voting - not to men, the majority of whom in their mind should still not have a vote and would still need to go to war to get the vote. Equality, right? Right. | /r/MensRights | 10/02/23 04:08 PM |
| 12 | No feminists. Men don't hate women. They hate only you."Posters warning against ‘intrusive staring’ are put up on the Tube" https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/tfl-intrusive-staring-tube-london-crime-women-underground-b987537.html "Man jailed for 'staring intently' at woman on Reading train" https://www.readingchronicle.co.uk/news/19988545.man-jailed-staring-intently-woman-reading-train/ "Arresting men for staring at women on the train won't make us any safer. Prosecuting rapists and sex abusers will, writes JULIE BURCHIL" https://www.dailymail.co.uk… | /r/MensRights | 10/02/23 03:29 PM |
| 5 | No feminists. Men don't hate women. They hate only you.I'll get you some water. Try not to spill it all over your KAM shirt. | /r/MensRights | 10/02/23 02:42 PM |
| 55 | No feminists. Men don't hate women. They hate only you."Stand in the rain in the dark in a freezing temperature to fix a cable when a storm breaks a tree so that thousands will have heating and light, climb into the open radioactive core of Chernobyl to save a continent from 10,000 years of pollution, hang from a rope inside the debris of a house after an earthquake to pull a child out of there under the secondary quakes that often bury rescuers." Nope... we want staaaaaatus without the costs, we have status-vision, it's all we see, the risks and sa… | /r/MensRights | 10/02/23 02:28 PM |
| 8 | No feminists. Men don't hate women. They hate only you.Never hate It's unpopular to say what you wrote but I agree with you. Hate is: 1) contagious, 2) self-destructive. I have hard feelings for feminism but I do try to separate between anger, which is normal and legitimate, and hate which I think is more personal and consumes us from the inside. I am telling myself that this is probably what it does to feminists, and try to respond to them analytically without catching what they have - let them deal with it. | /r/MensRights | 10/02/23 08:45 AM |
| 14 | No feminists. Men don't hate women. They hate only you.many men are feminist as well Because of systemic feminism-driven deprivation from infancy of human regard (sometimes even by their own mothers). They do this as an attempt to be treated as humans, not knowing that feminism has no terms of acceptance for men - that even self-castration would not grant a man in the feminist society a status of a human being. They don't understand that their dehumanization is principled, and try to break out by attempting to appease the hegemonic feminism by self-… | /r/MensRights | 10/02/23 08:25 AM |
| 14 | No feminists. Men don't hate women. They hate only you.some men do hate women No, no man hates all women. When a study was conducted to find out if any psychological research has ever been performed that examined men psychologically to determine whether such men exist, or reported on finding with psychological instruments (interviews, psychological tests) men who hate all women, the study found that no research of this kind was ever published. Here is that study, and here is the reason a person like you began believing that some men hate all women. | /r/MensRights | 10/02/23 07:41 AM |
| 6 | No feminists. Men don't hate women. They hate only you.All men who call themselves feminists are ultimately acting out of fear. There are no male feminists just like there are no Jewish Nazis. | /r/MensRights | 10/02/23 07:37 AM |
| 20 | No feminists. Men don't hate women. They hate only you.I'm trying not to hate like they do (I can feel angry about certain things, but hopefully not hateful). I try to feel sorry for them. They are probably jealous of manhood. I don't know why. We used to be first of all human, both of us, men and women. What a strange way for someone to look at the world - "all the men out there" and then to become for some reason jealous. We used to look at people, everyone, just people in general, and the last thought anyone had was "this person I'm seeing is par… | /r/MensRights | 10/02/23 06:45 AM |
| 1 | NY Times yesterday: A study finds that 10.76 millions U.S. homes were owned and occupied by single women, while 8.12 million owned by single men. Portrayed as an accomplishment. Feminism, does, not, want, equality. Feminism, is, chauvinism. Female, anti-male chauvinism.Read the comments. This was the most frequent observation. | /r/MensRights | 09/02/23 03:24 PM |
| 5 | Advice on dealing with "inhumanity exposure aches" (that deep burning pain in the lower right side of the chest as if somebody placed a red charcoal deep in your chest or a burning stone)No, this is a response that many men feel today and is a response to severe pan-cultural inhumanity as done by feminism in the past 5-6 years (since me-too). It is probably related to the stress response of the vagus nerve (I'm a neurobiologist who studied stress). If I have to throw a wild guess I would guess that Jews had it in Germany under the Nazi regime. The solution is not medication but as noted above and the alleviation is immediate. After alleviation the medicine is a humanist anti-fem… | /r/MensRights | 08/02/23 12:06 PM |
| 8 | Who are the other 81%?Don't be ridicules. Men are not human. The other 81% are human-like manikins -only the 19% part was human casualties and hence only they matter. The Nazis were the first to propose that part of humanity isn't in fact human but a humanoid low life form of creatures that developed the resemblance to humans (five fingers, a thumb and so on) but are in fact close to the vermin, according to feminism the only thing Nazis got wrong is the numbers - Nazis thought only Jews are non-human manikins but fe… | /r/PussyPass | 08/02/23 07:26 AM |
| 1 | The pay gap myth explained graphically (for sharing)"When all job differences are accounted for, the pay gap almost disappears" https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2017/08/01/are-women-paid-less-than-men-for-the-same-work | /r/MensRights | 06/02/23 10:39 PM |
| 1 | NY Times yesterday: A study finds that 10.76 millions U.S. homes were owned and occupied by single women, while 8.12 million owned by single men. Portrayed as an accomplishment. Feminism, does, not, want, equality. Feminism, is, chauvinism. Female, anti-male chauvinism.Women's rights were (and are) an integral part of universal humanism and this was (and is) very basic, you may call it noble but it's very basic - it has little to do with feminism. Feminism was invented in the 1970s long after humanists of both sexes have created almost complete equality (this continued regardless of the then-tiny marginal obscure feminism until by the 1990s equality was reached in all aspects including culture thanks to people from both sexes with a humanist perspective and re… | /r/MensRights | 06/02/23 04:33 PM |
| 1 | The pay gap myth explained graphically (for sharing)Please refer to the hand manual for the liberated woman to find out which choices have been listed as free choices by the feminist freedom commission. Remember: Your choice is only ours and nobody else's! Liberated at last. | /r/MensRights | 06/02/23 04:26 PM |
| 0 | NY Times yesterday: A study finds that 10.76 millions U.S. homes were owned and occupied by single women, while 8.12 million owned by single men. Portrayed as an accomplishment. Feminism, does, not, want, equality. Feminism, is, chauvinism. Female, anti-male chauvinism.I'm coming from the same civilization you are coming from. We live in a humanity that has two sexes, who by and because of being two biological sexes, are mostly similar but also somewhat different, the differences causing a situation where EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AND CULTIVATION WILL NOT RESULT IN IDENTICAL NUMBERS IN EACH AND EVERY DOMAIN SEPARATELY. Refusing to accept that, feminists have been treating for the past 40 years the different numbers in a few aspects as resulting "by definition" "form a… | /r/MensRights | 06/02/23 10:18 AM |
| 1 | The pay gap myth explained graphically (for sharing)Not just okay - it's perfect. And I sincerely believe this myth is hurting women as well. | /r/MensRights | 06/02/23 10:06 AM |
| 1 | The pay gap myth explained graphically (for sharing)Excellent. I think you can also click it in the post, right-click on it and "save image as" to get it in full resolution (I was able to do that in chrome on a lap top). | /r/MensRights | 06/02/23 09:46 AM |
| 2 | The pay gap myth explained graphically (for sharing)I agree. I also left out the part about many women on the left side being MARRIED to those men on the right side, which means that those earnings are theirs too. Feminists, decades ago, stopped thinking in terms of the bio-social atom of humanity called the family, and started looking at the world as if men and women are completely separated. Governments never calculate economical status per individual but only per household, because men's earning are women's too, it's not really "the men's" (in… | /r/MensRights | 06/02/23 06:52 AM |
| 1 | The pay gap myth explained graphically (for sharing)This is so funny Whenever feminists are presented with data showing that when the wages are stratified by occupation, hours, rank, years of experience and education the "gap" drops to zero or nearly that, they suddenly act as if they don't understand the word stratification. Feminists are provided with data disproving their "gap" myth all the time, data where wages are stratified (separated) by occupation, hours etc., for a head-to-head comparison that shows time and again that two people doing … | /r/MensRights | 06/02/23 05:39 AM |
| 1 | NY Times yesterday: A study finds that 10.76 millions U.S. homes were owned and occupied by single women, while 8.12 million owned by single men. Portrayed as an accomplishment. Feminism, does, not, want, equality. Feminism, is, chauvinism. Female, anti-male chauvinism.I do my best not to read into texts, but going over your comment - are you sure you are not doing exactly that? | /r/MensRights | 05/02/23 03:08 PM |
| 8 | The pay gap myth explained graphically (for sharing)How about a study published last year with 39000 children showing that boys receive lower grades for same performances as girls, the fact that some institutions have 300 scholarships only for women and zero equivalent funding for men, and the fact that in those colleges there are tribunals that are enacted to remove young men from colleges for normative behaviors that women can engage in freely (sending a text message to your ex) by treating this as "harassment" only if done by males, as the cau… | /r/MensRights | 05/02/23 12:59 PM |
| 15 | The pay gap myth explained graphically (for sharing)These are exactly the questions I'm asking myself, and that should have been in my opinion the content of the discussion rather than the lie "a man and a woman doing the same are paid differently". And to your questions I would add - why are men choosing rocks, and how is that related to female sexual expectations of men. Feminism treated for decades the sexes as identical and by that ignored differences in sexuality, specifically, that men are attracted to beauty and women to success. Thus men … | /r/MensRights | 05/02/23 10:59 AM |
| 9 | NY Times yesterday: A study finds that 10.76 millions U.S. homes were owned and occupied by single women, while 8.12 million owned by single men. Portrayed as an accomplishment. Feminism, does, not, want, equality. Feminism, is, chauvinism. Female, anti-male chauvinism.This reported gap means 25% difference. Do you really think 80 year old widows and some sugar-daddies wives make up 20% of single women who have a home. This is coming from the fact that in the age range of 20-30 women have a chauvinistic advantage in getting a good job - starting with primary school where research shows that boys get lower grades for same performances as girls, college where there is an anti-male culture with little to no scholarships for guys and illegal tribunals against men,… | /r/MensRights | 05/02/23 09:32 AM |
| 1 | NY Times yesterday: A study finds that 10.76 millions U.S. homes were owned and occupied by single women, while 8.12 million owned by single men. Portrayed as an accomplishment. Feminism, does, not, want, equality. Feminism, is, chauvinism. Female, anti-male chauvinism.Correct. The disparity men are at is because they can't synchronize, because feminists control most means of communication. In traditional media they have since me-too close to absolute power, and in social media, through the introduction of the role "administrator/moderator" and in combination with power over headquarters, they likewise dictate what information and discussion are permitted (even google search results are under this control. Type "jokes on feminists" and see what you get). By th… | /r/MensRights | 05/02/23 08:48 AM |
| 2 | NY Times yesterday: A study finds that 10.76 millions U.S. homes were owned and occupied by single women, while 8.12 million owned by single men. Portrayed as an accomplishment. Feminism, does, not, want, equality. Feminism, is, chauvinism. Female, anti-male chauvinism.This is a feminist troll. Anti-human. Please mods, there's no point in keeping here people who do not regard men and boys as human beings. | /r/MensRights | 05/02/23 05:55 AM |
| 3 | NY Times yesterday: A study finds that 10.76 millions U.S. homes were owned and occupied by single women, while 8.12 million owned by single men. Portrayed as an accomplishment. Feminism, does, not, want, equality. Feminism, is, chauvinism. Female, anti-male chauvinism.Because it is the fundamental definition of economical inequality. This is what started the revolutions that created modern democracy. Those who have a piece of the land and those who don't. A place on the face of the earth is almost the definition of being human. People who have no part of the land do not belong to that land. | /r/MensRights | 05/02/23 05:50 AM |
| 1 | A man who thinks he is a woman is a man, who thinks he is a woman.How many psychiatrists and psychologists do you know. | /r/MensRights | 27/01/23 06:32 PM |
| -1 | I knew a lot of intelligent women and a lot of feministsThese are not sides. What we mean is that the error of "underestimating the enemy" is one half of the full concept of not estimating an opponent correctly, which includes both underestimating and overestimating him, and both cases are as dangerous. You overestimate feminists. It's like assigning sanity to a madman in an argument. It won't help you win, only make you insane too. Know thy self, and know the other. That's the full theory. | /r/MensRights | 27/01/23 01:08 PM |
| 1 | I knew a lot of intelligent women and a lot of feministsAnd I should add that feminists respond best to being treated like a toddler or an imbecile. Just like nodding to everything a 4 yo says and patting him on the head makes him happy, just like talking slowly and patiently to a toddler in a tantrum relaxes him, just like derailing a discussion without notice to a playful amusing thought unrelated to the subject, captures immediately the toddler's attention, causing him to forget any conflict from the original discussion and making him agreeable, s… | /r/MensRights | 27/01/23 12:44 PM |
| -2 | I knew a lot of intelligent women and a lot of feministsIf you assign sanity to a madman when having an argument with him, the result is not winning an argument with a madman, but going mad. Your principle is correct, but in fact it is the first half of a broader idea, that Confucius (the Chinese philosopher) has articulated nicely: "if you feel that you haven't been appreciated correctly, ask yourself whether you have appreciated correctly them". By which he meant both sides of the equation - sometimes you would underestimate another person and be s… | /r/MensRights | 27/01/23 12:23 PM |
| 1 | I knew a lot of intelligent women and a lot of feministsNo, it's low IQ. There's an inability to relate two propositions and draw a conclusion from their combination. Which is why there's an inability, among other limitations, to see a contradiction. The low IQ is partly related to a very narrow working memory - only one proposition can be held in the person's mind at any given moment, meaning that adding another necessitates the evaporation of the previous one. Which is why all discussions with feminists are circular: there would be only, say, two p… | /r/MensRights | 27/01/23 12:00 PM |
| 14 | The feminist recent demand of women to thank feminism for their rights, is anti-male incitement and a distortion of history.False. In both sexes one finds a minority with a tendency to express sex-supremacism. Feminism consistently applies two moves: 1. delete the female part of any negative human phenomenon, 2. take the equal part of men in that negative phenomenon and stretch it over all men, to come up with the idea that 'women are pure victims, evil is purely male'. Sorry my friend. The actual historical reality is that by and large men did not treat women the way you cited and this was found in a minority of men… | /r/MensRights | 19/01/23 03:48 PM |
| 9 | The feminist recent demand of women to thank feminism for their rights, is anti-male incitement and a distortion of history.This is your personal artificial forcing of modern-day definitions on a historical phenomenon. This is suitable as a poetic perspective on history. But history also has facts. | /r/MensRights | 19/01/23 03:38 PM |
| 9 | The feminist recent demand of women to thank feminism for their rights, is anti-male incitement and a distortion of history.beggars can't be choosers The point of view you are taking is called anachronism - interpreting past events using meanings created in a later generation after the original meaning of terms and conditions has been lost. To understand why most of the differences that existed between the sexes around the 19th century, when the concept of rights as we know it today was just invented, were never discrimination, nor male chauvinism, and were created by both sexes without any intention by either of the… | /r/MensRights | 19/01/23 03:21 PM |
| 2 | The feminist recent demand of women to thank feminism for their rights, is anti-male incitement and a distortion of history.Thank you my friend. I am a cancelled novelist with several cancelled novels and poetry books (the prizes they didn't cancel, yet). I wrote a book after my cancellation and created a website to go with it to save the world, you can check it out - https://lovists.com/about-lovism/ | /r/MensRights | 19/01/23 02:58 PM |
| 2 | My problem with (online) feminism and misogynyThanks, happy cake day! : ) | /r/MensRights | 19/01/23 02:04 PM |
| 5 | My problem with (online) feminism and misogynyJust as a note of support in your exploration, I'm citing from the letter - "I know you are afraid of speaking out against what happens in feminism, not only because the powerful hatred could be directed against you, but because as part of spreading this hate, feminism has convinced women and girls that there’s a danger lurking to all women from all men, and that the only thing protecting them is the feminist aggression. I want to tell you that this is not true. Yes, a small number of men are da… | /r/MensRights | 19/01/23 01:13 PM |
| 4 | My problem with (online) feminism and misogynyYou might want to read this - An open letter to an incredible woman | /r/MensRights | 19/01/23 11:52 AM |
| 9 | The feminist recent demand of women to thank feminism for their rights, is anti-male incitement and a distortion of history.I am aware that men's rights activists became used to saying that feminist attitudes toward men start earlier with suffragists. But we should keep in mind that this connection exists only in the meta level. As some poetic or psychoanalytical analysis of texts to find similar motives between two historical fashions. Undoubtedly there is a shared psychological deviation in both groups, which should cause us to hypothesize that throughout history there has always been a tiny fraction of women with … | /r/MensRights | 19/01/23 08:57 AM |
| 2 | how common are really devastating divorces for men?I believe that it's the minority of divorces, but the issue is that society pays attention to injustice regardless of how many individuals are affected (if only one woman is raped in a year no one will say "it's a small minority - no need to pay attention"), while in men's case, when they are negatively affected specifically by women, they are ignored as a matter of principle. It's the ignoring and the double standard compared to any other injustice in society that's crucial, rather than whether… | /r/MensRights | 15/01/23 11:06 AM |
| 2 | This is why "body-positivity" does not apply to men and boys and never willTheir own looks, yes. Men's? False. In men they want to see "kept", "no dirt under nails no eggs on shirt no holes in shoes no weird smell", that's all. | /r/MensRights | 13/01/23 01:45 PM |
| 7 | Systemic Sexism: How UN manipulated the Gender Development Index to hide that men are the less developed genderTerrific analysis. Thank you! I should add that the way to correct this index is by adding two parameters: Gross National Expenditure per capita, and share of household expenses. In the west, while women WORK less for money, they SPEND more of any earned money - the husband's income is theirs, hence their DEVELOPMENT status should be HIGHER than men's in reality. In the west at least, women have more of anything that may be regarded as personal development: they buy pharmaceutical products more … | /r/MensRights | 22/11/22 06:32 AM |
| 3 | This is beautiful. We are discussing a lot the lack of role models and fatherly figures - I am over 40 (not from the U.S.) and I needed to hear what this man has to say. I recommend you to watch this. We probably all need that.I completely understand what you are saying. I wasn't careful with my wording. I didn't mean to imply that other men are there to replace the fathers. I don't have a father. Mine passed away when I was in my twenties. I advanced through life like... well, like how a blinded animal runs through the bush, breaking branches and collecting cuts and bruises on the way, sometimes chasing a noise, sometimes escaping a voice. There was no one there to guide me. I made every mistake possible and trusted … | /r/MensRights | 18/11/22 05:30 PM |
| 1 | If women are entitled in divorce to half the fortune that their ex-husband entrepreneur made over the years because they contributed equally to the business by being married to him, shouldn't then women be liable for half the dept of an ex's business when he didn't do so well?I'm not from the United States, and have read recently about a case in my country where the court ruled that the woman will not be required to share the ex's debt after the divorce, hence the post... But I hope in other countries the situation is different (although, it's always changing. The fact that the newspaper cared to report it might mean that it's a new approach. Not sure what to make of it). | /r/MensRights | 15/11/22 06:18 PM |
| 1 | Anti-feminist is not anti-women.There's a website for what you just described and want - a constructive alternative - https://lovists.com/about-lovism/ It also comes with a subreddit that you can contribute to - r/TwoSexes | /r/MensRights | 14/11/22 06:19 AM |
| 2 | Anti-feminist is not anti-women.Thank you, dear friend. | /r/MensRights | 13/11/22 11:35 AM |
| 3 | Anti-feminist is not anti-women.I concur! Here - https://lovists.com/ | /r/MensRights | 13/11/22 11:35 AM |
| 2 | Anti-feminist is not anti-women.will get scoffed at by people who are educated in the intricacies of history, anthropology, sociology Quite the opposite. When I'm done the people you mentioned will be teaching the writings you have missed to their students. You might want to read the following: https://lovists.com/2021/10/12/what-is-equality/ https://lovists.com/2022/04/27/humanism/ https://lovists.com/2022/02/19/orientation/ | /r/MensRights | 13/11/22 11:24 AM |
| 5 | When feminism declared it has no interest in truth.I think we are looking at half a century before it will be over. But I also think that within a year, a consolidated legitimized humanism that demands equality for all will be established enough for surviving the social winter (that is, people will see generic equality as the basic requirement - I phrased it too philosophically, most will just say "I support equality, feminism in it's current form doesn't seem to support equality"). In centers of power I see 50 years of feminist hegemony. In the… | /r/MensRights | 12/11/22 06:22 PM |
| 5 | When feminism declared it has no interest in truth.They were trying to manipulate both women and men for decades. But were unsuccessful until social media appeared and became connected enough. But they were becoming increasingly more and more successful during those decades in manipulating bureaucrats. In targeted manipulation. At the beginning of the 2000s they started to make their first successes in manipulating universities' administration - but not the faculty yet. The faculty remained autonomous up until me too, when they now had social me… | /r/MensRights | 12/11/22 04:13 PM |
| 5 | When feminism declared it has no interest in truth.You should really read the book Who Stole Feminism published in the early 1990s, where Christina Hoff Sommers is describing the feminism of the 1980s in a very eloquent and even amusing way - you will be blown away from seeing how early everything you see today around you had appeared and pushed in feminism, and at what early stage they started controlling officials, always with the usual manipulation, "this is only supporting women". They started erasing reading lists in schools and colleges al… | /r/MensRights | 12/11/22 03:53 PM |
| 41 | Anti-feminist is not anti-women.Men are great. After all the hate and mistreatment by feminists and seeing millions of women supporting this inhumanity, they love women. 99% of men after all this hatred are not generalizing from feminist haters to all women - almost all of them are even regarding the millions of women and girls who support this inhumanity as being only misinformed by feminists and love them. In fact most men remain silent under the institutionalized cruelty they live under, and most of those who do say somethi… | /r/MensRights | 12/11/22 10:57 AM |
| 36 | What happens when a woman is being treated the same way an average man and boy are treated daily, with institutionalized hate and a demonizing attitude.I want to add that we are still living as a society in a coordinated lie because of fear. Listen to her describing her ordeal. All those involved, as evident from her descriptions, are feminist women. But she and the interviewer never dare call them by their name. They are "people", they are "woke". And the self-muting both she and the interviewer always add over the word they are both well aware of, is the loudest shout heard in this interview - "feminists". Even a woman, even when taking them … | /r/MensRights | 08/11/22 04:49 PM |
| 2 | Speaking as a leftist, radical feminism and radical LGBT and gender ideology have nothing to do with the left.You might be conflating Marxism with communism. Communism is but one implementation of Marxist theory. Communism is indeed centered around classes, because it erupted within conflicts between classes - first in France, then in Russia. But Marxism is much more general than a distinction between classes. The basic distinction is between owners of means of production, and workers. They could be classes like in France and Russia, but they could be all of the same class like in Silicon Valley where o… | /r/MensRights | 07/11/22 10:43 AM |
| 1 | Speaking as a leftist, radical feminism and radical LGBT and gender ideology have nothing to do with the left.It's in my blog, but generally speaking, all decrees must be universal. Educating that "a person must not abuse a person" as opposed to "men must not abuse women". The former is humanism, the latter racist-fascism (just switch "man" to "black" and "woman" to "white" to see this). Here is an article about what equality is: https://lovists.com/2021/10/12/what-is-equality/ | /r/MensRights | 06/11/22 06:44 AM |
| 3 | Speaking as a leftist, radical feminism and radical LGBT and gender ideology have nothing to do with the left.What I was trying to convey is that Marxism is not one sentence that identifies two groups and assigns them to classes. Marxism, is not a sentence. It's a very complex analysis of economy. The fact that feminists took one sentence and replaced in it two words and thought that switching two words in a single sentence is called "Marxism" shows how idiotic some feminists can be. Everything those feminists did since switching two words in one single sentence and calling this "Marxism", was purely ca… | /r/MensRights | 06/11/22 05:45 AM |
| 0 | Speaking as a leftist, radical feminism and radical LGBT and gender ideology have nothing to do with the left.all my left wing friends are. They were intimidated into saying they are feminists. Five years ago almost no one on the left said that - man or woman. Feminists were an independent small group. They targeted the left but weren't a part of it. The line I'm drawing on the year 2017 is a global line. In the US, the feminist onslaught on the left seems to have started with the outcome of the 2016 elections between Clinton and Trump, so in the US some leftists might have began caving in to feminists … | /r/MensRights | 06/11/22 05:06 AM |
| 1 | Speaking as a leftist, radical feminism and radical LGBT and gender ideology have nothing to do with the left.I'll just mention that I'm a biologist with a degree in psychology as well. There are two sexes. They are innate. There are three types of differences between the sexes, or three layers: 1. differences that are expressed biologically and come from innate biological differences, 2. differences that are expressed culturally but come from innate biological differences, 3. differences that are expressed culturally and originate in culture. The third layer is the thinnest. It comprises very mild diff… | /r/MensRights | 05/11/22 07:17 PM |
| 2 | Speaking as a leftist, radical feminism and radical LGBT and gender ideology have nothing to do with the left.Critical theory is a feminist invention. It has nothing to do with the left and never did. Only after feminists took over the left in 2017 it became for the first time "leftist", because feminists forced their ideas on the left. Please, I'm not trying to manipulate you. This is the actual history. It seems that feminism's revisionism is so powerful that you actually believe them that they always had supporters and that the left had anything to do with their insane theories. CRT, gender ideology,… | /r/MensRights | 05/11/22 06:09 PM |
| 5 | Speaking as a leftist, radical feminism and radical LGBT and gender ideology have nothing to do with the left.You just quoted a text saying that the socialist movement created this day. I don't see what point you are trying to make. | /r/MensRights | 05/11/22 06:05 PM |
| 0 | Speaking as a leftist, radical feminism and radical LGBT and gender ideology have nothing to do with the left.The left adheres to universalism. It regards the economy as an instrument and not as an end and applies socialism to use the economy for the benefit of all. It sees humanity as the fundamental group and so it is inter-national and opposes national separatism and conflict. Feminism has nothing to do with Marxism. The origin of this baseless association is twofold - first, feminists abused the term and applied it without any relevancy to their distorted and simplistic ideas, and then, the right wh… | /r/MensRights | 05/11/22 03:57 PM |
| 1 | Women make choices, men are to blame.If you infer from this response that you are being liked, age might not be the issue here. | /r/MensRights | 03/11/22 12:09 PM |
| 5 | Women make choices, men are to blame.^ a 14 yo girl shares her wisdom. | /r/MensRights | 03/11/22 06:25 AM |
| 1 | Women make choices, men are to blame.Well, there's a difference between three levels of causality - being the cause of something, which is neutral, being responsible for something, which is affirmatively moral but not necessarily negative, and being guilty of something, which is both moral and negative. Blaming, is attributing the third level - guilt. But attributing causality or responsibility is not assigning guilt to someone, rather it could be the neutral indication of a cause or the indication of responsibility to a positive o… | /r/MensRights | 03/11/22 05:16 AM |
| 3 | Since when was Women having all the power feminism? I thought feminism was about equality.By the way, she married an unattractive passive man who described in an interview how he helped her in the home so she could reach the necessary track record for being nominated - from watching the interview it's clear that this is the kind of guy that today uploads on r/tinder his matching report that shows 30,000 swipes right, 2000 swipes left, 2 matches, zero chats. No woman or girl chooses the guy that she married and who took breaks from his own law career for her. Again: women make choices… | /r/MensRights | 02/11/22 05:37 AM |
| 9 | Since when was Women having all the power feminism? I thought feminism was about equality.Oh, so thousands of feminists including herself in this very sentence, shouting for decades about the number of men there and "patriarchy patriarchy" - this is considered "and nobody raised a question". I see. More feminist lies. The reality is the opposite: when 100% of best-selling authors are women, 75% of psychologists are women, 80% of editors in publishing houses are women, all creating discrimination, questioning is truly not allowed. She questioned the male majority and wasn't cancelled … | /r/MensRights | 02/11/22 05:25 AM |
| 1 | Misandry is becoming so casual and accepted amongst womenI think that it's the end of the world. There's no coming back from the spreading of feminist hate. No social institution will ever be able to withstand the manipulation of "we are only protecting women", and so any absurdity can be packed under this title and it will be accepted. The sentence "we are only protecting women" causes mental paralysis. The things shoved under this title are entirely dependent on what feminists decide to put there, and once they decided to put there full blown anti-m… | /r/MensRights | 01/11/22 08:33 PM |
| 1 | Woman claimed that women initiate most divorces because it's men who cheatIn the last decade the tables have turned and now women are the ones who cheat more, according to this article from the NY post form 2022. You can send that woman the link and tell her that since women cheat more they are not initiating divorces in higher rates than men because "men cheat more" since they aren't. https://nypost.com/2022/08/23/women-are-more-likely-to-cheat-than-men-heres-why/ | /r/MensRights | 01/11/22 08:26 PM |
| 9 | How do you deal with men who believe in “the patriarchy” or “toxic masculinity”?Very few men use this term. Some are LGBT (no offense gay guys, but you know the type), some studied in a faculty where without using the term you won't get a degree. Some are radical left activists (like me) - the radical left was the first social environment outside feminism to be taken in Me Too by radical feminism and to survive there as a male you have to internalize this language (which is why in 2018 I became an outcast in my "social home"). In some art circles - poetry in particular - th… | /r/MensRights | 01/11/22 07:56 PM |
| 2 | Stop with the "Boys and men don't cry because of society's expectations".It's specifically feminists who don't even want men, that say that "women in general" want crying men, whilst those feminists couldn't care less what other women want let alone who men are, they are only looking for something more to add to men's battering, the "manhood wrong" mantras (I bet my entire cancelled literature career that once those sadists raise enough boys to be crying machines, the same feminists will batter those men for burdening women with too much crying. That's the sadistic f… | /r/MensRights | 01/11/22 07:07 PM |
| 5 | Stop with the "Boys and men don't cry because of society's expectations".You're right. The blocks of text are a direct result of feminist oppression. I used to write normally, and I used to write for newspapers. Then the madness came in October 2017. My articles about the madness were rejected (only months later it became clear that this is censorship, that it wasn't the style or the subject, but the facts, that got the articles rejected). People who did manage to get a sanity-paper published, got lynched and lost everything, and in light of the danger, I and a few o… | /r/MensRights | 01/11/22 06:45 AM |
| 1 | Stop with the "Boys and men don't cry because of society's expectations".Who said our emotions are repressed. Feminists? Womansplainers? I express my emotions in talks with friends, with my wife, in writing here, in shouting some times (today I shouted at a driver who blocked my driveway), in poetry, in facial expressions. Feminists deleted all the manners men express feelings - particularly with words - and invented for us "repressed female crying" that we don't have. Whenever we express feelings in words, here for example, feminists tell everyone not to listen - th… | /r/MensRights | 31/10/22 09:25 PM |
| 46 | I'm sorry, but the idea that men's rights and feminism can "unite" is an absurdity. The solution lies elsewhere.What feminists mean by 'patriarchy' is in fact: human society. Feminist's supremacism sees men as the cause of everything bad, thus the very imperfection of life is 'the Patriarchy'. Blaming the other for everything is typical of abusers; feminism acts as an abuser with all men. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/v5fqf2/what_feminists_mean_by_patriarchy_is_in_fact/ | /r/MensRights | 30/10/22 08:23 AM |
| 7 | According to the Atlantic, we should unite with, not oppose feminists when trying to fight for men's rights.When feminists hear that men are facing discrimination by sex, their response is "so start your own movement", upon which they label whatever such movement men attempt to organize as "misogyny" and "dangerous", and demand of media, academy and authorities to ban it, and are granted their request with no questions asked. But the idea of "unification" is absurd and hypocritical to begin with, because the lion's share of men's problems are caused by feminist actions. Men who go through parental ali… | /r/MensRights | 30/10/22 07:10 AM |
| 1 | When you're down, and troubled, and you need some lovin' care, there's nothing more comforting than listening to a woman explaining why she stopped being a feminist and why men and fathers matter. Enjoy this couple having a normal conversation.The comments are depressing. The majority of women there do not know that feminism is not meant to create equality (this is what humanism does, not feminism), but to end the relations between the sexes, end all love in the world (the fact that most feminism-sympathizers don't understand this doesn't change the fact that this was indeed the goal and this is the physical result). | /r/MensRights | 30/10/22 05:57 AM |
| 1 | A man-hater is called a feminist. A misandrist is a feminist who shows what she is.So do all feminists! False. Feminists as a group and through their organizations forcefully and effectively oppose to equal treatment of male and female rapists and abusers and by that protect female rapists and abusers. One recent example is from the British parliament - British MP to parliament: "A third of domestic abuse victims are male, yet male victims are defined as victims of 'violence against women', semantic nonsense, mockery of equality, will gov publish a specific strategy?" Minister… | /r/MensRights | 29/10/22 05:16 PM |
| 1 | A man-hater is called a feminist. A misandrist is a feminist who shows what she is.Yet another example of feminist abuse is the feminist protection to female rapists of children (specifically when they are boys): https://lovists.com/2021/02/20/women-are-as-sexually-violent-as-men/ In a recent case from the US, a mother who was convicted of raping her 2-yo toddler (a boy) by forcing the insertion of a sex toy into him, was released with no jail time because the state supreme court redefined rape specifically so that she will be released, because of the protection feminism provi… | /r/MensRights | 29/10/22 03:33 PM |
| 1 | A man-hater is called a feminist. A misandrist is a feminist who shows what she is.Another example for feminist abuse is the feminist anti-male chauvinism in literature: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/yaigds/more_disinformation_an_analysis_of_one_example_of/ | /r/MensRights | 29/10/22 03:24 PM |
| 1 | A man-hater is called a feminist. A misandrist is a feminist who shows what she is.The article is not about having less sex. Here is a quote (with links to reports): Feminists have defined human rights and equal opportunity as “privileges” when given to men equally, so these could be denied. Consequently, the feminist vision was that women will reach equal numbers in all domains through handicapping the men. Since the 1990s, feminists have been deliberately educating boys to feel incompetent and faulty; dozens of studies have shown that female teachers in feminist societies wo… | /r/MensRights | 29/10/22 03:20 PM |
| 1 | Hard-working tired husband on r/Marriage: wife forces sex daily causing him to take a separate bedroom to get sleep, accuses him every time the children cry, chases after work with blaming. Comments: "you are not marriage material", "she wants a partner", "autism" "doesn't seem you want marriage".I completely agree that marriage includes sex and that it's an essential part of the relationship, and if one party wants to exclude sex from the relations then the other person should leave (it's a type of abusive control - "you won't have sex here but Instead of separating I'm keeping you here under binding loyalty and by that forbidding you to find sex anywhere else - you will never have sex again in your life because I decided"). That said, as far we can tell from the post, this guy didn't s… | /r/MensRights | 26/10/22 06:46 PM |
| 1 | A coincidence maybe, maybe not. How do I discuss abortion with my partner without getting the old "My body my choice, end discussion""I'll support you in whichever path you take, but just as your body is your choice my body is my choice and my choice is having a family - if yours isn't then that's fine and I'll help you with that, but then I'll take my body and my choice and leave to choose someone who wants the same thing I want, a family." (rephrase more gently). Just as her body is her choice, your body is your choice including whom you and your body live with. | /r/MensRights | 26/10/22 07:59 AM |
| 1 | Hard-working tired husband on r/Marriage: wife forces sex daily causing him to take a separate bedroom to get sleep, accuses him every time the children cry, chases after work with blaming. Comments: "you are not marriage material", "she wants a partner", "autism" "doesn't seem you want marriage".That they aren't anymore and that's the problem? A woman doesn't need to be a homemaker to be a mother, but regardless I'm not claiming in the comment here anything normative about what women had - I'm stating a fact - in the west, women's conversation about their family life was eradicated. I do make a normative assertion regarding what took their culture's place - anti-male radical feminism, this is something I do regard as extremely violent, toward everyone involved, men, women and children. … | /r/MensRights | 26/10/22 07:22 AM |
| 2 | Hard-working tired husband on r/Marriage: wife forces sex daily causing him to take a separate bedroom to get sleep, accuses him every time the children cry, chases after work with blaming. Comments: "you are not marriage material", "she wants a partner", "autism" "doesn't seem you want marriage".I have no idea what kind of rationale guides this comment. If a Jewish guy is lynched with racism in any forum, you show an overlap of that forum with the Nazi party, and? What is the point being made then. "Don't worry about it - thousands of Nazis haunted a guy because that forum is full of Nazis"? Any forum full of Nazis should be closed down and any spreading Nazism should be eradicated. What's your point. | /r/MensRights | 26/10/22 07:13 AM |
| 3 | Hard-working tired husband on r/Marriage: wife forces sex daily causing him to take a separate bedroom to get sleep, accuses him every time the children cry, chases after work with blaming. Comments: "you are not marriage material", "she wants a partner", "autism" "doesn't seem you want marriage".I can say abut myself that it's true - but, not for any woman. I will invite in a sports illustrated girl any time of day in whatever condition I'm in. But good old wifey, which I'm attracted to for 15 years now, and sleep with about 3 times a week give or take considering what the kid is doing and how exhausted we are - you share a bed when your wife smells of garlic after eating something at work and when you are sick and when you are sad or after you had a fight - so no, absolutely the "men a… | /r/MensRights | 25/10/22 01:27 PM |
| 40 | Hard-working tired husband on r/Marriage: wife forces sex daily causing him to take a separate bedroom to get sleep, accuses him every time the children cry, chases after work with blaming. Comments: "you are not marriage material", "she wants a partner", "autism" "doesn't seem you want marriage".A lot of "most likely" and a lot of projecting. Just say that you haven't clicked the link under the image to read the comments. It's okay to admit it. It's less okay to type a generic "I'm good and everything I believe in is very good" response. | /r/MensRights | 25/10/22 11:33 AM |
| 23 | Hard-working tired husband on r/Marriage: wife forces sex daily causing him to take a separate bedroom to get sleep, accuses him every time the children cry, chases after work with blaming. Comments: "you are not marriage material", "she wants a partner", "autism" "doesn't seem you want marriage".one anonymous redditor question you're using as anecdotal evidence to misrepresent the feminist movement? No, gas-lighter, the battering in comments that receives 600 endorsements is what I'm basing my accurate depiction of feminism on. These are hundreds of women who treat the situation precisely the way a male chauvinist would treat 100 years ago a woman describing rape and mental abuse by a spouse, without any of those hundreds of women seeing what they have become - a chauvinist pig. Because… | /r/MensRights | 25/10/22 10:34 AM |
| 24 | Hard-working tired husband on r/Marriage: wife forces sex daily causing him to take a separate bedroom to get sleep, accuses him every time the children cry, chases after work with blaming. Comments: "you are not marriage material", "she wants a partner", "autism" "doesn't seem you want marriage".that's some of the most toxic, victim blaming threads I've ever seen And what should make everyone worry (women as well) is that this is not a feminism forum - its title is Marriage. Five-ten years ago any forum with this title was of women who discuss issues with children, possibly the affair that the husband had, their relationship with their mother-in-law. There were women who live this life and have this mindset. Currently the entire society lives in a delusion that such women exist, in larg… | /r/MensRights | 25/10/22 09:57 AM |
| 75 | Hard-working tired husband on r/Marriage: wife forces sex daily causing him to take a separate bedroom to get sleep, accuses him every time the children cry, chases after work with blaming. Comments: "you are not marriage material", "she wants a partner", "autism" "doesn't seem you want marriage".She sounds like a 30-something teenager with a family. She is not working, the children most likely have daycare, the house is most probably full of appliances that make taking care of the house a matter of 1-2 hours of work a day, maybe they have a help (we have one, but we both work full time), so she has the life of a teenager and she expects him to share that life of freedom of a 20 yo with her, and when he can't because he needs to keep her entire illusion of teenagerhood running she is fur… | /r/MensRights | 25/10/22 06:57 AM |
| 1 | When someone is forced to address feminist madness too often, he should be careful not to catch femeningitis - a severe and highly contagious brain infection that causes a feminist to see discrimination everywhere.True. They do get discriminated against (happened to me more than once, at least three times it temporarily ruined my life, I'm still not really over the last time it hit me five years ago and I'm not sure if I'll ever be able to go back to who I once was), but - no, it doesn't happen all the time. It's rare. Most days, most places, you just live your life. | /r/MensRights | 23/10/22 10:46 PM |
| 0 | Harrasment in the workplace by female colleague and HR doing nothing to helpA private talk between you, her and your manager? Or is it that cold up there where you both work that a manager won't take the call. | /r/MensRights | 23/10/22 10:43 PM |
| -1 | Harrasment in the workplace by female colleague and HR doing nothing to helpListen, this happened to me more than once, a girl I didn't like fancied me, either when I was single or more recently after I got married, taking my hand, caressing my shoulder, embracing me with her hand around my shoulder and so on, and I don't think HR have anything to do with it - if you completely ignore her gesture one time - just pull away and freeze - it usually gives her the signal (she might get insulted for a second there and it's a shame but there's not much you can do to prevent he… | /r/MensRights | 23/10/22 09:53 PM |
| -4 | When someone is forced to address feminist madness too often, he should be careful not to catch femeningitis - a severe and highly contagious brain infection that causes a feminist to see discrimination everywhere.Fascinating, thank you! However I think femeningitis is catchier. I'm not sure if everyone are aware of the etymology - meningitis (pronounced "men, in, gitis", that last part uttered jah-y-tees), is a severe, highly contagious, infection, of the brain (specifically of the menings, which are three thin layers enveloping the brain). Hence: fe-meningitis, the meningitis of feminism, pronounced feminin, gitis. Plus, although TIV indeed captures fantastically the symptoms of femeningitis, it doesn't… | /r/MensRights | 23/10/22 08:11 PM |
| 1 | Has no one seen the recent family guy episode?When someone is forced to address feminist madness too often he should be careful not to catch femeningitis - a sever and highly contagious brain infection that makes a feminist see discrimination everywhere. If one isn't careful he can quickly become infected, by his efforts to constantly find examples for feminists to show them that what they regard as "discrimination" happens to men too - so if it's wrong we should talk about it as a general human issue, not as "something men do to women" (so… | /r/MensRights | 23/10/22 03:08 PM |
| 3 | More disinformation: an analysis of one example of the manufacturing-chain of lies that feminism uses to distribute disinformation to the publicThanks for sharing this! Is there a link I can find it in or is it only in print? I would love to add this to the references I'm using when discussing this. | /r/MensRights | 22/10/22 02:45 PM |
| 2 | "The patriarchy"Thank you. Click on my profile and take a look at my bio. I have been working on it and on many other ideas for some time now, there's a website full of information and analysis and a book - and your support of it would be really appreciated. Thanks! | /r/MensRights | 22/10/22 02:42 PM |
| 2 | More disinformation: an analysis of one example of the manufacturing-chain of lies that feminism uses to distribute disinformation to the publicThis post can be shared when you want to show how a world looks like, when women rule it alone - it shows that when women have nearly absolute power they create severe chauvinism against men, not any equality; and it can also be shared as a detailed answer to "feminism is for men too". When feminism is in power, the post shows, it creates powerful networks that purposely marginalize men, along with public announcements that the marginalization should aim at complete annihilation of any male pres… | /r/MensRights | 22/10/22 02:21 PM |
| 7 | More disinformation: an analysis of one example of the manufacturing-chain of lies that feminism uses to distribute disinformation to the publicAs a TLDR I'm pasting here the last paragraph, to give you the bottom line: "More severely, if a decade ago such a flawed attitude to research, of withholding crucial information and misrepresenting findings, was found only in gender studies departments, here we see a STEM researcher, a computer scientist who specializes in AI and not in gender studies, joining the crusade. As a result of this expansion, we see an aggregation of lies. This has grave consequences. When one lie is generated, the p… | /r/MensRights | 22/10/22 10:13 AM |
| 7 | More disinformation: an analysis of one example of the manufacturing-chain of lies that feminism uses to distribute disinformation to the publicMen, read good novels. The books need you. The authors need you. They are being erased. Your stories, the stories of men, are being erased. In a real sense, by this, you, are being erased. | /r/MensRights | 22/10/22 09:49 AM |
| 2 | Common concerning things women have told me about menNow imagine living it. | /r/MensRights | 21/10/22 05:10 PM |
| 1 | Feminist performance artSaving it as penis-envy examples to illustrate to women the extent of the problem in feminists. | /r/MensRights | 21/10/22 04:54 PM |
| 5 | "The patriarchy"What feminists mean by 'patriarchy' is in fact: human society. Feminist's supremacism sees men as the cause of everything bad, thus the very imperfection of life is 'the Patriarchy'. Blaming the other for everything is typical of abusers; feminism acts as an abuser with all men. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/v5fqf2/what_feminists_mean_by_patriarchy_is_in_fact/ | /r/MensRights | 21/10/22 04:29 PM |
| 1 | False Accusations!! Guess who is the victim??As for the comment on image 3 which is addressed to this father, "you managed to ruin two lives", that is, his son's and his stepdaughter's - no, the stepdaughter is the one who ruined lives, not two, but four, of her stepbrother, her two parents and herself. The daughter has brought this upon herself. Just as when a thief attempts to rob and gets injured, then the responsibility for any injury lies with the thief, that girl is the person who carries the most blame here. The parents are guilty a… | /r/MensRights | 21/10/22 03:30 PM |
| 7 | A man-hater is called a feminist. A misandrist is a feminist who shows what she is.Feminists are a tiny fraction of women and when someone objects to feminism he and she are not referring to women at large - only to feminists. The suffering of men and boys in the west is not caused by themselves, and arguing such a thing is the demonstration of the behavioral pattern of an abuser - abusers hurt the other and then blame that other for being hurt, "you did this to yourself!" and "look what you made me do!" Feminists are what's hurting men - here, read this to understand better: … | /r/MensRights | 20/10/22 01:10 PM |
| 2 | The average woman is not an innocent brainwashed victim of feminism!I disagree completely. Women are not aware. When they are informed, they gradually change their view of feminism, and of men. DO NOT BE A MISOGYNIST. Women and men are both captives of a culture that forbids to inform them on statistics and data, they are simply not aware, by and large neither have malicious indifference. Your testimony of that discussion supports that - you have added a layer of interpretation which seems to distort the sympathy that woman found in her for men. Please. Both sex… | /r/MensRights | 10/10/22 05:28 PM |
| 3 | How do you not let it hurt you to hold your tongue in with your feminist relatives or mother saying something you don’t agree with?Don't hold your tongue. Speak up. | /r/MensRights | 10/10/22 05:13 PM |
| 1 | We need to talk about this.r/ThisIsFeminism #ThisIsFeminism | /r/MensRights | 10/10/22 05:12 PM |
| 1 | The relations between the sexes are ending – the reason is not technologyThere's an article about this, called Is Feminism For Women Too, https://lovists.com/2021/02/19/is-feminism-for-women-too/ | /r/MensRights | 10/10/22 08:51 AM |
| 2 | Feminism seems more than anything as a sexual orientationYou are only offended by the fact that sexual orientation was defined here as neural processing inversion. You want homosexuality to be considered as a random variant just like hair color, something that is equivalent to all other variants. I'm so sorry, but homosexuality is equivalent to other sexuality types only in terms of social and cultural acceptability, not in terms of the actual biological causes and implications. So sorry to be the one who brings this to you, but heterosexuality is a f… | /r/MensRights | 01/10/22 08:31 AM |
| 1 | I’m honestly getting tired of defending myself as a manThere's a social pandemic of a hate movement. It's not growing anymore and in fact slowly losing supporters, but the reaction to that is increased social violence in the form of hate speech both in severity and in frequency. This hate movement might take decades to dissipate, many of us will live all our remaining life under it, all of the safeguards that modern societies have enacted to prevent fascistic racism from spreading have failed because this specific hate movement converted those very … | /r/MensRights | 07/09/22 04:34 PM |
| 1 | What Dating Issues are More Difficult Now Compared to 20 Years Ago?Thanks friend. After making the comment I also published it as a post here so more people will read it. Cheers :) | /r/MensRights | 07/09/22 04:23 PM |
| 1 | You are allowed to want sexy.Trolling is a symptom of isolation and loneliness. I urge you to go out. Just sit at a bar a have a drink and be nice to someone, and talk to a real human being. It's important. | /r/MensRights | 07/09/22 04:20 PM |
| 11 | A thought experiment for a feministFirst published here (this is a permanent url): https://lovists.com/2021/06/04/a-thought-experiment-for-a-feminist/ | /r/MensRights | 07/09/22 04:04 PM |
| 2 | You are allowed to want sexy.Oh, so I got it right. You're a great supporter of men so long as they castrate themselves and say that all they want is to marry and be the perfect spouse of a woman and the devoted father of her babies, to provide and share the house chores and childcare and prove that they have a right to exist (can you find the similarities between this description and society's expectations of women in 1950? Can you see how this is nothing but feminist chauvinism - making out of the man the woman of 1950?) … | /r/MensRights | 28/08/22 01:08 PM |
| 2 | You are allowed to want sexy.Tf is this post. People want theywant. Stop trying to say they want something else. Maybe I didn't get that comment right? What's "Tf" and who should "stop trying to say they want something else", feminists to men, feminists to women, or the post? | /r/MensRights | 28/08/22 01:06 PM |
| 3 | You are allowed to want sexy.So it's just men being free to want whatever they like just like women can that got to you? | /r/MensRights | 28/08/22 12:59 PM |
| 5 | You are allowed to want sexy.LOL, if feminists could only stop to see how hilarious their manipulations are they could make the first funny feminist standup at long last. Go girl, you can do it! | /r/MensRights | 28/08/22 12:55 PM |
| 1 | Guys are being dehumanized in the dating scene and these are the reasons.I'm not sure what you mean but when I was 20 I was a flirting machine. I shot in every direction, all the time, everywhere. Mostly with girls I liked, but when I was drunk with anyone. I'd start philosophical nonsensical funny conversations, gossip with girls about the world, offer a taste of my joint, lament with them about our tragic destiny as a species, whatever came to my mind. I loved talking to girls and there were only two types of responses: either they were flattered of the attention a… | /r/MensRights | 28/08/22 06:35 AM |
| 0 | Guys are being dehumanized in the dating scene and these are the reasons.You are allowed to want sexy. Men are different from women. Unlike the feminist womansplaining of men, men never had one uniform ideal for a woman (I personally always liked curvy girls, always, slim is to me not sexy. At all). Women are the ones who have a uniform ideal for men, because they are fashion victims and each generation of women has one archetype of an ideal man. These change by fashion, it's a matter of luck whether you are born in a generation where the female expectation happens t… | /r/MensRights | 27/08/22 05:33 PM |
| 24 | Guys are being dehumanized in the dating scene and these are the reasons.As the OP I approve this message ;) That's the TLDR | /r/MensRights | 27/08/22 05:17 PM |
| 8 | Guys are being dehumanized in the dating scene and these are the reasons.Your comment sounds like an ad ;) but I see what you mean. Still, I'm skeptic if this can replace flirting. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/22 01:02 PM |
| 1 | Guys are being dehumanized in the dating scene and these are the reasons.I'm married with a kid so I don't date, but, you are absolutely right in what you say about a reversal point - I'm okay but I was never considered an exceptionally attractive guy, up until I turned 40. Since then I've been getting more female attention (from all ages - 18 to 60) than what I received my entire life put together. When you wear a buttoned shirt and take your briefcase on the shoulder they sometimes literally eat you or strip you (I have no idea) with their eyes. It's true. I love m… | /r/MensRights | 27/08/22 11:57 AM |
| 8 | Guys are being dehumanized in the dating scene and these are the reasons.Don't accept that. This hurts everyone, guys and girls. Demand the return of flirting. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/22 11:40 AM |
| 6 | What Dating Issues are More Difficult Now Compared to 20 Years Ago?I'm 45 and I had the same experience you are describing. Online platforms for dating which were back then only websites like Okcupid, were more or less a taboo, both guys and girls regarded having a profile there similarly to how today "femcel" and "incel" are perceived, people who had a profile kept it a secret, and felt ashamed, and this goes for both sexes, as this was considered admitting you are not attractive enough to find love in the real world, as if you have some kind of disability. Ti… | /r/MensRights | 27/08/22 07:24 AM |
| 1 | I just had a recent thoughtI disagree and feminism is the reason you don't see the problem in your rational. Feminism wanted to erase the notion that there are two sexes in humanity with two specific and different types of sexuality - male, and female, each with it's unique set of drives that together form sexuality. Feminism always attempted to cause women to have male sexuality, and in practice blamed men for not having female sexuality. But this is all a lie, there are two innate sexes with two different and complement… | /r/MensRights | 26/08/22 07:39 PM |
| 1 | Spain passes ‘only yes means yes’ sexual consent lawRelax, the law doesn't state that if a couple kisses passionately and continues to having sex without anyone ever saying "I do" then it's rape. It's the guardian and they have their own agenda and want to cause Brits to believe that the law the Guardian wants was passed so that in the UK people would think "hey everyone's doing it, we should do it too". It's the classical feminist manipulation of "if Sarah says no, lie to David about what Sarah said so he would say oh if she said yes then I'm in… | /r/MensRights | 26/08/22 07:09 PM |
| 1 | MGTOW is only a response to WGTOW, woman going their own way, aka, feminism, the "who needs a man, live alone only for yourself" movement.All humans aspire for love (95% of them with the other sex), except for the WGTOW who say "who needs a man" and the MGTOW who responded to WGTOW with "so be it". You wrote "we don't need you", which makes you a WGTOW. | /r/MensRights | 25/08/22 03:15 PM |
| 1 | MGTOW is only a response to WGTOW, woman going their own way, aka, feminism, the "who needs a man, live alone only for yourself" movement.I'm not a MGTOW, I'm married with a kid, it's written at the end of the post. "Ours is supporting and loving each other"? "Kill all men" is supporting and loving, I see. I have no idea what MGTOW write in their posts, I never saw a MGTOW forum, but I know that feminist forums accuse all men in raping or allowing rape, they present men as a disease, so my impression is that WGTOW are rather similar to MGTOW if they are as bad as you say (here MGTOW is not allowed, which is why I added a link to a… | /r/MensRights | 25/08/22 12:30 AM |
| 1 | MGTOW is only a response to WGTOW, woman going their own way, aka, feminism, the "who needs a man, live alone only for yourself" movement.But not with women's aims. Feminism represents women like bicycle represent fish. Women need men. Because they are human and any human needs love (dating apps are not a replacement for love). So feminism taught women to lie, telling women that lying would give them privileges that to human has, like the lie "we don't need men". So on the face of it MGTOW seems as "continuing feminism's historical primary goal" - ending the relations between the sexes (equality was never a feminist goal. It's the… | /r/MensRights | 24/08/22 10:09 PM |
| 1 | MGTOW is only a response to WGTOW, woman going their own way, aka, feminism, the "who needs a man, live alone only for yourself" movement.Successful at what, attempts of what. What are you talking about? What did you think the post was about? The post says that feminism is the WGTOW movement. That men did not invent MGTOW, but only accommodated to WGTOW, "women going their own way", also known as, feminism. | /r/MensRights | 24/08/22 09:35 PM |
| 1 | MGTOW is only a response to WGTOW, woman going their own way, aka, feminism, the "who needs a man, live alone only for yourself" movement.Sorry, these are not facts. The reason 80% of divorces are initiated by women is that feminism encourages women to divorce for any petty reason (reasons for which feminism and women drive society to criticize men if they see in that grounds for initiating a divorce, e.g., "feeling bored"), while at the same time enacting laws that on the one hand make it in some cases a more lucrative option for a woman to divorce than to remain married and on the other create a risk for the man of being left on… | /r/MensRights | 24/08/22 07:53 PM |
| 1 | MGTOW is only a response to WGTOW, woman going their own way, aka, feminism, the "who needs a man, live alone only for yourself" movement.From the post: women are trapped in the anorexia psychology that they have, of receiving satisfaction instead of from satiating needs, from starving the needs to gain control over the environment and feeling satisfaction from this control instead (in anorexia it's caused because of a controlling mother when the girl tries to gain any kind of autonomy by this, but the mechanism exists in all women just as self-sacrifice exists in all men - both mechanisms having lethal consequences when activated… | /r/MensRights | 24/08/22 02:36 PM |
| 1 | MGTOW is only a response to WGTOW, woman going their own way, aka, feminism, the "who needs a man, live alone only for yourself" movement.Currently, this would be a wise move. But existentially, it's only temporary. As in the 1980s, the 2020s have a large feminist group in society but its only shrinking and the opponents of the feminist oppression of both sexes - especially women especially young - are only growing. Within a decade we will probably see a second 1990s, which was a reasonably good decade in the history of love. But the captives will probably remain a lost generation until the end, they are missing out on their best … | /r/MensRights | 22/08/22 11:17 PM |
| 1 | MGTOW is only a response to WGTOW, woman going their own way, aka, feminism, the "who needs a man, live alone only for yourself" movement.The women who do this do it as a pathological manipulation. What they don't understand, is that "the world" is not their therapist, and responds to actions, not to manipulative intentions, and because they don't understand why the manipulation of self-starvation isn't working they are frustrated and absurdly, angry at men for taking their words at face value. They imagine that the men will "rewrite themselves" in response to the self-starvation. They are unable to understand the hubris of them e… | /r/MensRights | 22/08/22 10:37 PM |
| 6 | MGTOW is only a response to WGTOW, woman going their own way, aka, feminism, the "who needs a man, live alone only for yourself" movement.The post is a little off topic for a men's rights forum, so it will probably be removed at some point, in anticipation I re-published in this subreddit as well - https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoSexes/comments/wuk22t/mgtow_is_only_a_response_to_wgtow_woman_going/ | /r/MensRights | 22/08/22 04:41 AM |
| 2 | Shows/Movies can't have an actress as lead roll without it being about men and how shitty they are.Well, I'm not suggesting at all that you should watch them (some are great, some okay), but examples would be: The Help https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1454029/ The BFG https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3691740/ Irina Palm https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0762110/?ref_=wl_li_tt Blue Jasmine https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2334873/?ref_=wl_li_tt Dogville (a must see) https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0276919/?ref_=wl_li_tt Amelie https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0211915/?ref_=wl_li_tt I, Tonya (a nice movie) https://www… | /r/MensRights | 21/08/22 06:39 PM |
| 2 | LOL! This is a hilarious reading!!Good observation. And I might add - it's a love-hate relationship that women have with themselves when they decide to have a relationship with themselves. They in fact periodically detest themselves and worship themselves, in an ever-speeding oscillation of a manic-depressive cycle. Which is inevitable when someone decides to receive love instead of from another human being, from oneself, because of the "self-tickling effect". An individual cannot tickle himself, because the mind traces back the… | /r/MensRights | 21/08/22 09:41 AM |
| 2 | LOL! This is a hilarious reading!!MGTOW is only a response to WGTOW, woman going their own way, aka, feminism, the "who needs a man, live alone only for yourself" movement. As you said, feminism created this, not men. Guys are only accommodating to the WGTOW movement - feminism - "a woman needs a man like a fish needs bicycle - go to the gym, have a career or a business to spend money only on yourself, take a picture of you at 40 alone with a glass of wine". WGTOW, feminism, invented this, not men. What did women expect? That if… | /r/MensRights | 21/08/22 09:01 AM |
| 2 | LOL! This is a hilarious reading!!Here are some facts (references are in the book Lovism: A humanist alternative to feminism): "The prevalence of loneliness has been growing exponentially6 and doubled itself over several decades - and more so in the generation that grew up into this era, in which for the first time younger people are lonelier than the elderly7. After 200 years of industrialization and urbanization, during which the number of people who live alone increased only slowly, in the feminist half-century, from the 1970… | /r/MensRights | 21/08/22 08:49 AM |
| 1 | LOL! This is a hilarious reading!!This "research" is a lie. They are the most depressed generation of women on record. See for example “It’s not easy being a young woman these days: Levels of anxiety higher among young women than seniors". The Sydney Morning Herald. https://www.smh.com.au/national/it-s-not-easy-being-a-young-woman-these-days-levels-of-anxiety-higher-among-young-women-than-seniors-20191022-p53387.html Published October 23, 2019. | /r/MensRights | 21/08/22 08:42 AM |
| 6 | Misandrist article insinuates men are solely to blame for their lonelinessLOL! That was a hilarious reading!! Feminists be like "a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle who needs a man you don't NEED a man you might WANT a man and actually you don't WANT a man men are monsters and women get from men ONLY pain yes EVERY woman yes from EVERY man look at me I'm so happy in this picture of me alone at 40 with a GLASS OF WINNNNNE with the entire IKEA catalog spread all over the room behind me I chose that I decided this I wanted it I made my life what they are me m… | /r/MensRights | 21/08/22 08:19 AM |
| 6 | Shows/Movies can't have an actress as lead roll without it being about men and how shitty they are.You need to be careful not to catch femeningitis, a severe and extremely viral infection of the brain that causes feminists to start seeing discrimination everywhere. I'm in your favor but you are wrong, there are tons of movies with a woman in the lead role without it being about how men are awful. In areas controlled by feminists, men are discriminated against and abused and their human rights and human dignity are violated, and do what you can to make people aware of that, but do that with a … | /r/MensRights | 21/08/22 08:08 AM |
| 1 | I’m a woman and the worst type of women to deal with are feminists.I see exactly what you mean. I understand why you don't feel like going into detail. It's maddening. | /r/MensRights | 21/08/22 08:00 AM |
| 1 | Why there are almost no debates between men and feminists?They are not open to having a discussion ("shut up and listen"), and they accuse any man who doesn't agree with them on anything as being a women-hater and men are terrified of this lablel because women at large believe this tagging immediately with no questions asked and any guy receiving it is perceived immediately as a potential rapist or murderer, is isolated from women and in life - work, friends - and his life are over. Feminists are radioactive to men. So men have to avoid them at all cos… | /r/MensRights | 21/08/22 04:53 AM |
| 1 | Women and girls are kept in complete darkness about the society they live in and become hate machines based on distorted depictions of their reality. Here is a list of lies and the corrections. The more women and girls as well as boys and men become aware of them, the better.What a wonderful reply! Yes, you are right, on the spot. The mismatch between the website and book on the one hand, and the blog on the other, in the tone, is something I am very much aware of, and of the harmful effect, as well as of the reasons for this. To make a short story long (not a typo this time), when I wrote the book lovism, around 2020, I was absolutely confident that the web must be full of groups and forums where men and women respond to the confusion and hostility that me too had,… | /r/MensRights | 19/08/22 11:30 PM |
| 1 | Women and girls are kept in complete darkness about the society they live in and become hate machines based on distorted depictions of their reality. Here is a list of lies and the corrections. The more women and girls as well as boys and men become aware of them, the better.I'll ignore the extensive ad hominem because you are treating the subject seriously, which I appreciate (I'll only say regarding the ad hominem that my tone in my blog doesn't matter, only the content). I am familiar with how feminists conflate in my texts "feminists" with "women", I usually interpret this as an intended deflection of criticism but I am also aware that some have become so accustomed to regarding those two terms as interchangeable that they truly read "all women" or "women" when … | /r/MensRights | 19/08/22 08:57 PM |
| 1 | Women and girls are kept in complete darkness about the society they live in and become hate machines based on distorted depictions of their reality. Here is a list of lies and the corrections. The more women and girls as well as boys and men become aware of them, the better.Please read here how the idea "all women" was arrived at. I'll wait patiently until you finish reading it. https://lovists.com/2021/04/26/some-feminist-readers-may-want-to-sit-before-continuing/ | /r/MensRights | 19/08/22 03:38 PM |
| 1 | Women and girls are kept in complete darkness about the society they live in and become hate machines based on distorted depictions of their reality. Here is a list of lies and the corrections. The more women and girls as well as boys and men become aware of them, the better.I re-published it here and sending you in a DM too. https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoSexes/comments/wsfy4f/women\_and\_girls\_are\_kept\_in\_complete\_darkness/ | /r/MensRights | 19/08/22 02:59 PM |
| 3 | Women and girls are kept in complete darkness about the society they live in and become hate machines based on distorted depictions of their reality. Here is a list of lies and the corrections. The more women and girls as well as boys and men become aware of them, the better.Post removed by mods (no idea why). Re-published here - https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoSexes/comments/wsfy4f/women_and_girls_are_kept_in_complete_darkness/ | /r/MensRights | 19/08/22 02:52 PM |
| 1 | Women and girls are kept in complete darkness about the society they live in and become hate machines based on distorted depictions of their reality. Here is a list of lies and the corrections. The more women and girls as well as boys and men become aware of them, the better.Women are not being constantly harassed but rather, with the goal of constructing an indictment against an entire sex, five years ago feminism aggravated its effort to redefine the sexual communication between the sexes as harassment (and even non-sexual communication). Everything added to the list since then are things women do to men just as often, and then you have to argue either "100% of men are harassed by women as well!" or, adopt anti-humanism with "a behavior done by a woman to a man is… | /r/MensRights | 19/08/22 02:34 PM |
| 1 | Women and girls are kept in complete darkness about the society they live in and become hate machines based on distorted depictions of their reality. Here is a list of lies and the corrections. The more women and girls as well as boys and men become aware of them, the better.The mods deleted it, I'm not sure why. I can only assume that the more effective a post is, the harsher the complaints to reddit are and the more fire the mods need to handle and the pressure to remove (they are always walking on thin ice here, constantly facing the threat of being closed). That's just a guess. I re-published in my personal profile so you can share from there. | /r/MensRights | 19/08/22 02:23 PM |
| 4 | Women and girls are kept in complete darkness about the society they live in and become hate machines based on distorted depictions of their reality. Here is a list of lies and the corrections. The more women and girls as well as boys and men become aware of them, the better.I have no idea. The mods of mensrights delete my posts for the past few days. They did it yesterday as well when I published a post saying that guys can't date girls who declare "kill all men", it was endorsed enthusiastically but nevertheless deleted. I can only assume that the more effective a post is, the harsher the complaints to reddit are and the more fire the mods need to handle and pressure to remove. That's just a guess. I re-published in my personal profile so you can share from there. | /r/MensRights | 19/08/22 01:49 PM |
| 12 | Women and girls are kept in complete darkness about the society they live in and become hate machines based on distorted depictions of their reality. Here is a list of lies and the corrections. The more women and girls as well as boys and men become aware of them, the better.Lie. What they surveyed included online violence and all studies show that the vast majority of online violence against women is perpetrated... by women. They never reported and possibly never asked, "from whom was that online violence directed - men, or women?" The finding that almost all women experience aggression from other women (hence the nearly 100% result) is a consequence of the simple fact that as in all two-sexes species most aggression in the two sexes is within the sex and not betwe… | /r/MensRights | 19/08/22 11:27 AM |
| 15 | Women and girls are kept in complete darkness about the society they live in and become hate machines based on distorted depictions of their reality. Here is a list of lies and the corrections. The more women and girls as well as boys and men become aware of them, the better.Stop lying. You know very well how. Feminists incited women to demand that feminists will be included in each and every level of any type of administration, under the pretext of equal representation, while the individuals who took those positions were almost never just women, but ideological feminists. For years those feminists pretended to be part of humanism and just representing women, but in October 2017 when me too started and was immediately hijacked by radical feminism, the call was sent … | /r/MensRights | 19/08/22 10:38 AM |
| 23 | Women and girls are kept in complete darkness about the society they live in and become hate machines based on distorted depictions of their reality. Here is a list of lies and the corrections. The more women and girls as well as boys and men become aware of them, the better.Yes they are. Women have elevated radical feminists into positions of power, and then forgot about it. But they are still there. The testimonies in this forum tell the story. For example, about a teen who stood in line in the cafeteria behind a girl, she then stumbled on him and shouted that he touched her, the (feminist woman) principle immediately accepted the narrative, that principle then sent letters to all of the colleges he was accepted to, the (feminist women) position holders there, nev… | /r/MensRights | 19/08/22 09:59 AM |
| 24 | Women and girls are kept in complete darkness about the society they live in and become hate machines based on distorted depictions of their reality. Here is a list of lies and the corrections. The more women and girls as well as boys and men become aware of them, the better.Absolutely friend. Much more data and materials for such debates, here: https://lovists.com/blog/ | /r/MensRights | 19/08/22 09:50 AM |
| 17 | Women and girls are kept in complete darkness about the society they live in and become hate machines based on distorted depictions of their reality. Here is a list of lies and the corrections. The more women and girls as well as boys and men become aware of them, the better.I changed it to "making millions of them across the world into hate machines". Now will you admit that there's a hate movement because of the spreading of lies? | /r/MensRights | 19/08/22 09:30 AM |
| 2 | GIRLS AND WOMEN NEED TO KNOW: "IF I LIKE OR SHARE OR PUBLISH ANTI-MALE HATE-SPEECH I WILL NEVER DATE AGAIN".Read my blog. It's full of arguments and data: www.lovists.com | /r/MensRights | 19/08/22 08:37 AM |
| 20 | Switcheroo on the dating tablesFor the last 18 months, since I joined Reddit (what a mistake) I've been telling feminists: it's the women who will take you down, not men, you are the oppressor, and not only of men but indirectly of women, and while you managed to silence us, you can't do that to women. | /r/MensRights | 19/08/22 08:35 AM |
| 3 | GIRLS AND WOMEN NEED TO KNOW: "IF I LIKE OR SHARE OR PUBLISH ANTI-MALE HATE-SPEECH I WILL NEVER DATE AGAIN".Liar. You have never seen a post by a girl saying "I'm tired of my boyfriend always telling me that he hates all women". You are welcome to come back to this post at any time in your life to paste a link to such a post if your ever come across one. Liar. See, girls and women? This is what you have been following. Lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies. "One in three!" Lie. 1.4% of women were raped. "All women!" Lie. 7% of women were sexually harassed. "93% of male rape … | /r/MensRights | 18/08/22 01:54 PM |
| -1 | I’m convinced my sister lied on this guy 7 years about him R*peing her. Her story started to change and now she’s going through a situation that seems like KarmaIt's your sister. Stand by her. The most vicious effect of feminism I have seen is how it turned family members against each other, mothers against sons, wives against husbands, and now this. Even if she had lied and hurt an innocent man, she is first of all your sister. At the very least remain quiet and don't discuss her online. I believe you. But still. | /r/MensRights | 18/08/22 01:24 PM |
| 2 | Feminism is losing.https://www.quora.com/Why-dont-guys-pursue-women-anymore | /r/MensRights | 18/08/22 12:58 PM |
| 2 | Feminism is losing.Thank you for that. I needed that. | /r/MensRights | 18/08/22 12:54 PM |
| 2 | GIRLS AND WOMEN NEED TO KNOW: "IF I LIKE OR SHARE OR PUBLISH ANTI-MALE HATE-SPEECH I WILL NEVER DATE AGAIN".Agreed. As for vulgarity, I see what you mean. But I don't like the word vagina, it always sounded clinical to me. The Red Rose would be better? | /r/MensRights | 18/08/22 11:58 AM |
| 7 | GIRLS AND WOMEN NEED TO KNOW: "IF I LIKE OR SHARE OR PUBLISH ANTI-MALE HATE-SPEECH I WILL NEVER DATE AGAIN".You are wrong. First, men including yourself love pussy so please stop calling it names. Secondly the great victory of fascist feminists is the recruitment of millions of ordinary straight girls. It's tragic to everyone - those girls included - but yes, you need to appreciate your opponent and its power in order to face that opponent. You are not dealing with "men-hating lesbians", this is not the 90s, you are facing millions of ordinary girls and women incited to join a hate movement, and they … | /r/MensRights | 18/08/22 09:45 AM |
| 8 | GIRLS AND WOMEN NEED TO KNOW: "IF I LIKE OR SHARE OR PUBLISH ANTI-MALE HATE-SPEECH I WILL NEVER DATE AGAIN".Feminism took over the means of communication. It controls large media platforms and any large online platform and forum. It uses this control intentionally to hide from both sexes the falsifications of the lies it spreads. So these men and boys are hard to reach. The girls who believe in complete lies about the society they live in and become hate machines based on distorted depictions of their reality, and those boys who receive long and distorted explanations telling them why what is in fact … | /r/MensRights | 18/08/22 08:58 AM |
| 14 | GIRLS AND WOMEN NEED TO KNOW: "IF I LIKE OR SHARE OR PUBLISH ANTI-MALE HATE-SPEECH I WILL NEVER DATE AGAIN".They were raised under intentional and hateful emotional deprivation (edit: of any female affection - even from their teachers and often from their own mothers and sisters) - which made them do anything to get a pat on the back - they are not an enemy but civilian war casualties. Casualties of the feminist sexes war. They need to be told "you are human". They need to hear, "Whatever you think would be unimaginable to do to women and girls - is as unimaginable to do to you, you are as human as an… | /r/MensRights | 18/08/22 06:23 AM |
| 9 | GIRLS AND WOMEN NEED TO KNOW: "IF I LIKE OR SHARE OR PUBLISH ANTI-MALE HATE-SPEECH I WILL NEVER DATE AGAIN".It works as we speak. The men and boys girls and women wish they could date, won't have it. Their self respect needs to be conveyed to the others. And more and more guys understand that they are hurting themselves when they accept such treatment, and start saying: no. Stop with this defeatism. It's working very well, come and help instead of waiting on your back for the armageddon. | /r/MensRights | 18/08/22 05:53 AM |
| 1 | I've been Shadow Banned from TwoX. I'm Saddened for a Different Reason than You Think.The movement you are looking for has a name. Here - https://lovists.com/ | /r/MensRights | 17/08/22 06:02 PM |
| 0 | Women act so different in real life.Listen, I don't want to start calling you names here because you are the victim here, you were taught to see yourself as sub-human, but I have no hate for women, I am married, I work with women, I collaborate in art with women in projects I initiate with them because I want their contribution, I receive from my female friends messages where they are telling me how exhausted they are of this madness, this social disease of feminist hate - you are not talking to a "women hater" but to a normative … | /r/MensRights | 17/08/22 04:36 PM |
| 4 | Women act so different in real life.No, your "let them spill vile" conclusion is completely wrong, men and boys pay with their mental well-being, work, education, sometime their lives, for this. Millions suffer because of the laws and norms this hate movement creates - women too. Guys must show girls that if they have on their social media record, any indication of them endorsing, supporting or promoting the anti-male hate movement, then when they'll want to date you the door will be shut. This is the only way to stop this. Can yo… | /r/MensRights | 17/08/22 01:12 PM |
| 13 | A study examines whether there are double standards toward men and women regarding sexual behavior, and finds no bias against women. However, it never examines whether such double standards exist against men, thus demonstrating the very bias it sought to evaluate.https://www.npr.org/2019/03/05/700288695/google-pay-study-finds-its-underpaying-men-for-some-jobs Google Pay Study Finds It Underpaid Men For Some Jobs | /r/MensRights | 16/08/22 02:43 PM |
| 7 | A study examines whether there are double standards toward men and women regarding sexual behavior, and finds no bias against women. However, it never examines whether such double standards exist against men, thus demonstrating the very bias it sought to evaluate.Yes, and I'm sure you are always saying that to feminists who complaint about double standards - "you are confusing double standards with different standards". Absolutely. No chance that the only time you suddenly come up with this exquisite insightful distinction between "double" and "different" is when you are the one doing it. No chance. I'm sure. | /r/MensRights | 16/08/22 09:22 AM |
| 6 | A study examines whether there are double standards toward men and women regarding sexual behavior, and finds no bias against women. However, it never examines whether such double standards exist against men, thus demonstrating the very bias it sought to evaluate.Thanks, yes. Here is the link: https://lovists.com/blog/ | /r/MensRights | 16/08/22 09:16 AM |
| 1 | A study examines whether there are double standards toward men and women regarding sexual behavior, and finds no bias against women. However, it never examines whether such double standards exist against men, thus demonstrating the very bias it sought to evaluate.Yes, and I'm sure you always said that to feminists who complaint about double standards - "you are confusing double standards with different standards", as you always said to blacks and Jews, I'm sure - "you are confusing double standards with different standards". Absolutely. No chance that the only time you suddenly come up with this exquisite insightful distinction between "double" and "different" is when you are the one doing it. No chance. You've been saying this to feminists and blacks fo… | /r/MensRights | 16/08/22 09:08 AM |
| 4 | A study examines whether there are double standards toward men and women regarding sexual behavior, and finds no bias against women. However, it never examines whether such double standards exist against men, thus demonstrating the very bias it sought to evaluate.Why. Are you a humanist? Do you believe that all humans regardless of color, sex, ethnicity or orientation are human, have a human psychology, feel pain and suffering the same way from the same things, or are you a racist or racist-type sexist who believes part of humanity is human and another is made of human-like mankens, puppets that may seem as human but in fact do not have a human mind and psychic and do not feel pain and suffering as the humans do, like the Nazis regarded Jews and the slav… | /r/MensRights | 16/08/22 09:02 AM |
| 3 | A study examines whether there are double standards toward men and women regarding sexual behavior, and finds no bias against women. However, it never examines whether such double standards exist against men, thus demonstrating the very bias it sought to evaluate.Okay, thanks. I'm not sure I understood your point. I probably wasn't clear - if you suspect that there's a difference between men and women in, say, the weight of their socks, then your scales must be able to detect both the case where women's socks weigh more than men's and the case where men's weigh more than women's, in order to be able to offer a conclusion in the form of "there's no difference between the sexes in this respect". If your scale to begin with cannot sense it when men's socks … | /r/MensRights | 16/08/22 08:05 AM |
| 6 | A study examines whether there are double standards toward men and women regarding sexual behavior, and finds no bias against women. However, it never examines whether such double standards exist against men, thus demonstrating the very bias it sought to evaluate.This is a published paper, peer review was performed and concluded. In research, when someone identifies a gap in a published work, the proper response is conducting another study and publishing the results that correct the problem or fill that gap. The community then regards this as contradicting conclusions, more research follows, and sometimes a consensus forms, leading to changes in text-books. The text-book reflects the current accepted conclusions of a field. The journal is very low-grade,… | /r/MensRights | 16/08/22 07:27 AM |
| 13 | A study examines whether there are double standards toward men and women regarding sexual behavior, and finds no bias against women. However, it never examines whether such double standards exist against men, thus demonstrating the very bias it sought to evaluate.I don't believe this is the case here. Which is why the study deserves special attention. I read the methodology section. The study uses advanced and very appropriate methods that are never found in articles coming out of gender studies departments (here they examine two statistical formulae called reliability and validity, without which a questionnaire has no value; gender studies only hand out a list of questions, they don't even know what reliability and validity are, let alone how to test an… | /r/MensRights | 16/08/22 06:54 AM |
| 19 | A study examines whether there are double standards toward men and women regarding sexual behavior, and finds no bias against women. However, it never examines whether such double standards exist against men, thus demonstrating the very bias it sought to evaluate.More analyses of studies and explanations about data can be found in my blog (in my profile). Thanks for reading. | /r/MensRights | 16/08/22 06:33 AM |
| 2 | Why women are not a substitute for fathersI agree. I was imagining the north-American society that attempts to force both sexes into making choices against their wishes, dreams and drives. To implant dreams. I was attempting to explain to members of such a society, that even in that kind of a society, there would still be areas where capabilities will limit sex balance. But if we imagine A FREE SOCIETY, something that in north America people can't even imagine anymore - a society where people are given equal cultivation and opportunity … | /r/MensRights | 16/08/22 05:59 AM |
| 2 | This is why feminists have to deny that there are women who perpetrate domestic and sexual violence against men.I actually think those memes reflect a correct insight. I think that feminism is a theory of the privileged. As well as the entire identity theory. I do believe that both, help the most privileged not only avoid criticism, but actually become "victims". It's a shield. I have a lot of thoughts about this. First, I think feminism started in the late 1960s when social upheaval began to publicly point fingers at the upper classes (they weren't drafted to the war in Vietnam, the poor were sent to die… | /r/MensRights | 31/07/22 09:55 PM |
| 4 | Feminists are under a distorted perception of reality which makes them regard actual equality, as discrimination, and hence to act in practice to replace what is in fact a balance, with what is actually discrimination in favor of women.It's actually much simpler than that. In the 1960s feminists came up with a theory, that says that men and women are not two sexes but two classes, and that the relations between them are not shaped mostly by the innate human sexuality and the innate properties of the sexes, but that those relations are identical to the relations between the aristocracy and the proletarians. Since according to some thinkers the relations between the aristocracy and the proletarians were based on continuous viole… | /r/MensRights | 31/07/22 05:31 PM |
| 4 | Feminists are under a distorted perception of reality which makes them regard actual equality, as discrimination, and hence to act in practice to replace what is in fact a balance, with what is actually discrimination in favor of women.The minority of women who never wanted children don't need to be compensated then, they don't have children, and those who do are realizing in doing so their deepest desires and have nothing to be compensated for, unless of course we are compensating men for having sex with women and children for having ice cream. I'm not sure you truly understand what children are for women. Here, read this. https://lovists.com/2021/09/08/why-fathers-cant-be-mothers-and-vice-versa/ | /r/MensRights | 31/07/22 07:39 AM |
| 6 | Feminists are under a distorted perception of reality which makes them regard actual equality, as discrimination, and hence to act in practice to replace what is in fact a balance, with what is actually discrimination in favor of women.Having a child is for women what having sex with woman is for a man. If you don't think men should be compensated for realizing their desires, nor should anyone else. Why don't you compensate children for having ice cream while you're at it. | /r/MensRights | 31/07/22 07:12 AM |
| 6 | Feminists are under a distorted perception of reality which makes them regard actual equality, as discrimination, and hence to act in practice to replace what is in fact a balance, with what is actually discrimination in favor of women.It is kind of the difference between just allowing women into the military vs making sure the military is actually designed in such a way where women get the same opportunity as men. Can you pull a paper and pen and write down that if in 30 years from now and after 30 years of the changes you want in the army, nothing changes, you will finally acknowledge that your experiment has failed? If you can sign it then I'll sign on your changes to the army. To what extent are you aware that what you are… | /r/MensRights | 31/07/22 06:16 AM |
| 6 | Feminists are under a distorted perception of reality which makes them regard actual equality, as discrimination, and hence to act in practice to replace what is in fact a balance, with what is actually discrimination in favor of women.Yes, here are a few lists. https://lovists.com/2021/01/28/what-does-equality-look-like-in-the-feminist-society-we-live-in/ https://lovists.com/2021/05/10/why-i-am-not-a-feminist/ | /r/MensRights | 31/07/22 05:25 AM |
| 1 | Sexual harassment of a guy by a women at work by singing to him stripping songs when he needs to take off a sweater and repeatedly asking to use his finger while giggling, should receive from the woman at HR the response "she didn't mean to make you feel uncomfortable"?Women siding with women is an established, measurable fact. Yes it is. But the reasons for it are the only thing that matters. If you have a headache, the question of whether you have it because you skipped two cups of coffee or because you have a brain tumor, will decide what can you do in response and the consequences of not identifying the reason correctly. The reason for the fact you cited, is oppression of both sexes by feminism (women as well are not inclined to become cheerleaders for the… | /r/MensRights | 30/07/22 09:53 AM |
| 1 | Sexual harassment of a guy by a women at work by singing to him stripping songs when he needs to take off a sweater and repeatedly asking to use his finger while giggling, should receive from the woman at HR the response "she didn't mean to make you feel uncomfortable"?I see where you're coming from now that I read your reply - see some edits in mine. I believe that among MRAs some are a bit fixated (possibly unknowingly) on evolutionary thinking and follow its conclusions even when they contradict what we know about humans. Men had strong alliances among them (armies are premised on that), women had sympathy for men and competition with other women. The feminist condition, if you will, where men sympathize only with women and women sympathize only with women,… | /r/MensRights | 30/07/22 07:11 AM |
| 2 | Sexual harassment of a guy by a women at work by singing to him stripping songs when he needs to take off a sweater and repeatedly asking to use his finger while giggling, should receive from the woman at HR the response "she didn't mean to make you feel uncomfortable"?that would be matriarchy I am aware of the term Matriarchy. I purposely used here the terminology of "female patriarchy", to tie back to feminism the associations built in feminism for decades for that word, to point out what most of us know: feminism has been for some time now precisely what it claimed to be fighting against. The word patriarchy is used in feminism completely out of its semantic meaning in the dictionary, and that feminist use is what was meant here by the word. To say to femin… | /r/MensRights | 30/07/22 05:51 AM |
| 1 | Sexual harassment of a guy by a women at work by singing to him stripping songs when he needs to take off a sweater and repeatedly asking to use his finger while giggling, should receive from the woman at HR the response "she didn't mean to make you feel uncomfortable"?What do you mean by "that women have and men lack". The entire depiction of men in feminism for decades, a depiction from which feminism derived its concept of "the patriarchy", is of a band of loyalties between men - you can fill entire shelves with feminist books written about this. What you are describing is not a "lack" of something in men due to some incompetence - but oppression - the absence of comradeship because of a prohibition on coming together, organizing, communicating among each o… | /r/MensRights | 29/07/22 05:23 PM |
| 25 | Sexual harassment of a guy by a women at work by singing to him stripping songs when he needs to take off a sweater and repeatedly asking to use his finger while giggling, should receive from the woman at HR the response "she didn't mean to make you feel uncomfortable"?Wrong. HR is made out of women and if you are a woman then HR is your friend. There's a female patriarchy. In universities, in fields dominated by women, the faculty is made out of women and if you are a woman then the faculty is your friend. There's a female patriarchy. In law practices, from layers to judges to state officials, law is made primarily out of women and if you are a woman then the law is your friend. There's a female patriarchy. In the media. In literature. In television productio… | /r/MensRights | 29/07/22 07:38 AM |
| 19 | Sexual harassment of a guy by a women at work by singing to him stripping songs when he needs to take off a sweater and repeatedly asking to use his finger while giggling, should receive from the woman at HR the response "she didn't mean to make you feel uncomfortable"?Feminism wanted to achieve an indictment against the entire male sex, and in adopting the logical fallacy of "if all women were harassed then all men harassed - hence all men are guilty", it aspired to show that "100% of women were sexually harassed". Me Too quickly turned into a project of proving that "all women" by constantly lowering the bar for what constitutes harassment until saying "hello" was tagged sexual harassment (this is not a hyperbole, this actually happened, there's a youtube vi… | /r/MensRights | 29/07/22 06:50 AM |
| 92 | Sexual harassment of a guy by a women at work by singing to him stripping songs when he needs to take off a sweater and repeatedly asking to use his finger while giggling, should receive from the woman at HR the response "she didn't mean to make you feel uncomfortable"?And please don't tell me that feminism doesn't hurt men - this guy didn't receive protection at work because feminism taught the woman at HR that "guys cannot be sexually harassed by women" and that men who discuss and reveal in forums like this one the sexual harassment that women do, are "misogynists and women haters that you should never listen to". Feminism is not "for everyone" - it benefits only women - including protecting female harassers. Someone who wants equal rights becomes a humanis… | /r/MensRights | 29/07/22 06:04 AM |
| 4 | I am tired of being a guy in today's societyFriend, as men, we are on our own. Some are pampered, some are feminized and then treated as humans, but most are on their own, and, although in the past the general treatment was more humane, it was mostly like that since the dawn of time. You were not told the things that a man needs to hear to deal with this: you are capable, you are great, you have what it takes, go out and get it, live it, make it what you want it to be, it's all nothing but a game, go out there and play the game - you are … | /r/MensRights | 28/07/22 10:41 AM |
| 1 | Most people who object to abortions are women. So feminists want to mutilate men's genitals for not having the right for abortionNo we're not. This forum is monitored by various people for various reasons. We should use that to disseminate views, data, analysis and personal stories. I estimate that thousands and possibly tens of thousands scroll through this forum on a regular basis without being members and without endorsing or commenting out of fear of society's wrath toward any man or boy who dares not accepting being hurt by a woman or by a feminist bias against him, and hundreds more participate in policing us to rep… | /r/MensRights | 28/07/22 05:05 AM |
| 2 | Most people who object to abortions are women. So feminists want to mutilate men's genitals for not having the right for abortionWhat you wrote above, "the old men with copious amounts of wealth that are in power suddenly for no reason banning abortion", this is a conspiracy theory. What "old men in power" are you talking about? Most of the men who hold political positions and object to abortions, adopt this view in exactly the same manner the male politicians on the left voice out feminist views. In the right, there's a kind of "right-wing feminism" - strong, independent women, who have organized a mass movement called t… | /r/MensRights | 27/07/22 05:35 PM |
| 2 | Most people who object to abortions are women. So feminists want to mutilate men's genitals for not having the right for abortionPlease take a moral stance. Saying on hurtful acts "sad" is deciding to stand aside in the face of a malicious act, and standing aside when facing violence is passive support in violence. If you have any doubt that this is violence and a hurtful act, simply imagine a large collective of men who were offended by a decision whose objectors are equally men and women yet its supporters are mostly men - for example sending them to an unnecessary war to die - and in response have published announcemen… | /r/MensRights | 27/07/22 04:55 PM |
| 4 | Most people who object to abortions are women. So feminists want to mutilate men's genitals for not having the right for abortionThe reason the ruling was aborted and that laws are changing is the pro-life movement and this is distinctly a women's movement. Call it right-wing feminism. The men at the front, are almost entirely men who try to satisfy their female constituency - the pro-life women's group who lobby for this. Those men are exactly like men on the left who express feminist views because of the pressure feminists put on them - it's the very same mechanism. Women are facing other women here, not men. And of cou… | /r/MensRights | 27/07/22 12:43 PM |
| 0 | This is the reason that feminists hate men and manhood so muchIf your criticism still stands then there is no reason to consider most medical advice and guidelines. The level of confidence in every step of the rationale is identical to that of most inferences made in public health guidelines and recommendations. But we don't even need to use the rationale for public health guidelines as a criterion. If you acknowledge that society accepts the feminist conclusion that, say, eating disorders are caused by "distorted body image originating in male sexual expe… | /r/MensRights | 26/07/22 09:59 AM |
| 2 | This is the reason that feminists hate men and manhood so muchThe premises to the article are from neuroscience, yes. The hypothesis of the article itself has not been investigated in neuroscience, no. The evidence provided for the validity of the hypothesis come from a social analysis of phenomena around us that remain unexplained until the hypothesis is accepted, upon which those phenomena are explained extremely well. This is precisely the manner by which research arrives at hypotheses that can be then tested directly - by observing that a hypothesis wo… | /r/MensRights | 25/07/22 12:15 PM |
| 5 | This is the reason that feminists hate men and manhood so muchBut it went rather well, I think. After reading once on this reddit a mathematical discussion about the actual probability of hitting precisely 50:50 split between sexes in any given area, I got the impression that the audience here is one of the sharpest on reddit. You are welcome to review the neuroscientific premises to the article, here: https://lovists.com/2022/02/19/orientation/ | /r/MensRights | 24/07/22 05:28 PM |
| 1 | This is the reason that feminists hate men and manhood so muchThe TLDR: feminism is a sexual orientation of a very small fraction of women, an orientation created by an inversion in a step in the neural processing in the sexual brain circuit (connecting four areas which are the same in both sexes), the inversion being from attraction toward the male-distinguishing qualities, to jealousy toward these qualities; since in women, jealousy is nearly identical emotionally to hate, feminists develop deep hate toward men. The minuscule fraction of women with the s… | /r/MensRights | 24/07/22 05:04 PM |
| 5 | This is the reason that feminists hate men and manhood so muchThis is based purely on neuroscience, not on evolutionary guessing. I posted only the second half of the article. You are welcome to read the first where the neuro-scientific research and data are presented: https://lovists.com/2022/02/19/orientation/ | /r/MensRights | 24/07/22 04:49 PM |
| 1 | Why is there so much hate for this sub?Because the members expose disinformation disseminated by feminists out of their hate toward men. The whole point in demonizing a group of humans with disinformation, is suppressing the data and personal testimonies, by inciting society against those who disclose them. This was done throughout history by all incitement groups and regimes who held power. The power of such groups depends on demonetization and disinformation, so they have to silence those who share the true data and stories, and th… | /r/MensRights | 24/07/22 11:23 AM |
| 1 | We are a 30 year old couple with a 2 year old boy who moved to the west from a 3rd world country. Need advice on how to raise him to be comfortable with his masculinity.I wouldn't worry about sexes appearance confusing the child. Children are innocent and they don't participate in the self-deceptions adults tell each other (such as "all differences between sexes are just stereotypes, men and women are identical"), children are the first ones to know immediately which is which. But there's a trend in kindergarten and schools to misguide children about dress codes and encourage boys to like pink, or to regard girls toys as theirs. Most boys don't care about this … | /r/MensRights | 22/07/22 08:37 AM |
| 1 | I don't want to stay here anymore. In life. There's nothing for me here. I'm trapped because I'm a father, I can't leave him, he loves me. I see the 30 years I have left as a constant torture that I can't escape. I wish daily for five years now that I would stop existing.When you'll write in my language the way I write in yours, I'll be happy to listen to your criticism. | /r/MensRights | 19/07/22 01:03 PM |
| 1 | I don't want to stay here anymore. In life. There's nothing for me here. I'm trapped because I'm a father, I can't leave him, he loves me. I see the 30 years I have left as a constant torture that I can't escape. I wish daily for five years now that I would stop existing.Very funny, sadist. This was a suicide letter and this is what you have to say. You need to go back to your anti-sociopathic pills. | /r/MensRights | 18/07/22 07:49 PM |
| 1 | I don't want to stay here anymore. In life. There's nothing for me here. I'm trapped because I'm a father, I can't leave him, he loves me. I see the 30 years I have left as a constant torture that I can't escape. I wish daily for five years now that I would stop existing.Fuck off idiot. Ignorant. Beast. | /r/MensRights | 18/07/22 03:05 AM |
| 1 | We are a 30 year old couple with a 2 year old boy who moved to the west from a 3rd world country. Need advice on how to raise him to be comfortable with his masculinity.I have a 6 yo boy. I simply negate and correct all the misinformation he is exposed to, on TV, in kindergarten, in books. I tell him "they got confused!" and lough a little to make it seem like something funny - like slapstick or cartoons. For example on TV he stumbled across a show where everything is pink, and some 3-4 kids are enjoying baking all day long (the cookies then have personalities...). This is clearly a girls show. But they added a boy there, because of all the agendas, with long s… | /r/MensRights | 17/07/22 11:07 PM |
| 2 | Fascinating study on the breakdown of societyWow, splendid! Fascinating! What a great find! | /r/MensRights | 17/07/22 10:19 PM |
| 2 | Is it normal to feel bad just for being a man? Like I'm an enemy to society of sorts?We are all feeling what you are describing, you are great, you are not guilty of anything. Read my blog, it would probably make you feel much better. www.lovists.com. | /r/MensRights | 17/07/22 10:16 PM |
| 10 | Please buy and read books - especially ones that liberate men and their humanity and sexuality. You are not aware, but feminists have successfully deleted the mental richness of boys and men through a radical chauvinist annihilation from literature.The Rape of the Male Mind Has only two reviews on Amazon, which means it will never be shown to readers in the suggestions they see. Please, men and boys, try to understand how this works because feminism has been using the system for years: when you buy and add a review, in any platform or manner, you cast a vote, which is picked by an algorithm (prior to Amazon, publishers and stores were the ones performing the calculations instead of computers but it was the same algorithm), and the book is … | /r/MensRights | 09/07/22 10:38 AM |
| 1 | Please buy and read books - especially ones that liberate men and their humanity and sexuality. You are not aware, but feminists have successfully deleted the mental richness of boys and men through a radical chauvinist annihilation from literature.Vouchers for books that is? | /r/MensRights | 09/07/22 08:56 AM |
| 10 | Please buy and read books - especially ones that liberate men and their humanity and sexuality. You are not aware, but feminists have successfully deleted the mental richness of boys and men through a radical chauvinist annihilation from literature.Yes! The old man and the sea, Ernest Hemingway; To have and have not, Ernest Hemingway; All quiet on the western front, Erich Remarque; A journey to the end of the night, Ferdinand Celine; Ham on Rye, Charles Bukowski; Women, Charles Bukowski; War and Peace (scroll quickly through the romantic parts, like women skip the war episodes); Growth of the soil, Knut Hamsun. And there are many more, that's off the top of my head. As for contemporary ones, it's harder to find good ones because since the … | /r/MensRights | 09/07/22 08:26 AM |
| 1 | So feminism "was originally about equality"? (the support of equality can only be of equality for all, and support of equality for all is called humanism, not group-ism, such as femin-ism, group-ism being the road to chauvinism: if rights of only one group are supported they are called privileges)Yes. We are in an Orwellian reality. "Equality is discrimination". It's news to me that it had reached such an explicit declarative nature. If one finds herself stating that equality is bias, she knows she is standing on the dark side of the earth. | /r/MensRights | 08/07/22 08:06 PM |
| 2 | So feminism "was originally about equality"? (the support of equality can only be of equality for all, and support of equality for all is called humanism, not group-ism, such as femin-ism, group-ism being the road to chauvinism: if rights of only one group are supported they are called privileges)I rest my case. | /r/MensRights | 08/07/22 10:16 AM |
| 2 | So feminism "was originally about equality"? (the support of equality can only be of equality for all, and support of equality for all is called humanism, not group-ism, such as femin-ism, group-ism being the road to chauvinism: if rights of only one group are supported they are called privileges)They did not fight for equality. That same Stanton wrote a letter to the president proposing to use "birth control" to annihilate the blacks in the united states. They refused to receive the same rights and duties as men - a vote for a draft. The consequence was that after world war I, in Germany there were 22 million voters who are exempt from fighting (the women) and 18 million voters whose draft is mandatory (the remaining men after world war I), the men who came back from the trenches voted … | /r/MensRights | 08/07/22 06:06 AM |
| 3 | So feminism "was originally about equality"? (the support of equality can only be of equality for all, and support of equality for all is called humanism, not group-ism, such as femin-ism, group-ism being the road to chauvinism: if rights of only one group are supported they are called privileges)Can you explain your belief in a "man-built" society? You live in a democracy. It was built by both sexes. Not only in the past 100 years after women in the US started voting. But much before that. Women were voting for local institutions, and they influenced their husbands and impacted society through those men. You are probably aware of the thousands of feminist articles that assign to the wife of a historical figure that figure's life achievements. Feminists have argued for example that Georg… | /r/MensRights | 08/07/22 05:47 AM |
| 2 | So feminism "was originally about equality"? (the support of equality can only be of equality for all, and support of equality for all is called humanism, not group-ism, such as femin-ism, group-ism being the road to chauvinism: if rights of only one group are supported they are called privileges)Can you explain to yourself what you just wrote? You tried to justify privileges for women and discrimination to men, by saying that "this only 'balances' because underneath the surface of reality women are disadvantaged". Where is that level of existence where women are disadvantaged - where does this "footing" that you are thinking of takes place? Once you answer me I will show you that in that level women are privileged, then you will regress to a deeper level, again I will show you the same … | /r/MensRights | 08/07/22 05:22 AM |
| 73 | Name single right men have that women don't?Good. Next time you can show them that the prevalence of SV done by women is similar to that done by men - here are the studies. https://lovists.com/2021/02/20/women-are-as-sexually-violent-as-men/ | /r/MensRights | 06/07/22 05:55 AM |
| -2 | To the feminists here that are constantly trying to shit on men having equal rights… why?Imagine a game where David and Sarah are standing on a flat floor in complete darkness, in a room where apples are hanging from the ceiling on strings. If they're hungry they need to find an apple and pull. There's a small wall between the two, so they can't really reach out to each other, they can only talk. Outside the room their conversations are broadcasted to millions of fans who watch this terrible show (a show where there's nothing to see; but these are the standards of the audience). The… | /r/MensRights | 23/06/22 12:08 PM |
| 3 | My mum doesn't believe men can get rapedAsk your mother whether she considers a girl who forces another girl to smother with her bare vagina the first girl's bare vagina, when the second girl is under the influence of alcohol beyond the ability to provide consent and repeatedly says "no", as not sexually assaulting the girl, "because it's not a penis penetrating a vagina". Ask your mother: if she had a daughter, and that girl would do the above to her daughter, would your mother repeat the words she just said to you and say that nothi… | /r/MensRights | 20/06/22 07:48 PM |
| 1 | Do you think vasectomies will become mandatory for boys at puberty in the future?You can't force any medical procedure on a human being. No democratic country can enable this. Take chemical castration of inmates for example. No one can force it - it's elective, they can choose this in return for more freedoms. Feminists might try to publish campaigns calling on men to do this voluntarily, but... well that would be rather idiotic, no one would do this and what exactly will the feminized men who would, say with the act? That "they can't tell if they might rape - so to be sure … | /r/MensRights | 19/06/22 12:15 AM |
| 1 | "I have prosecuted women for domestic violence throughout my career as a prosecutor. Researchers have corroborated the reality that I have witnessed first-hand: real cases are often very different from what is portrayed in the media." The myth of "one abusive sex, one abused" debunked.Well, the media often chooses what to highlight, but very rarely does it choose what to ignore. Turning a blind eye by the media requires special pressure, and spreading a fair amount of fear. Anyone has a guess who might be pressuring the media to enable domestic violence by turning a blind eye? Anyone? | /r/MensRights | 13/06/22 05:35 PM |
| 1 | Yes, feminism is misandry.Lovism is mutuality. It requires the understanding of women, that feminism has been hiding from them the fact that men are hurt too from women. This hiding prevents mutuality - women are not willing to do for men what they demand of men - to "listen, understand what it means to be me among your sex, be considerate". When men don't receive what they are demanded to give, they refuse to take part. Because there is indeed a balance and men do indeed experience from women almost everything that wome… | /r/MensRights | 13/06/22 10:30 AM |
| 1 | Men, how do you feel about the argument “men created society so men can’t complain about society”?Nature creates society. It's absolutely ludicrous to think that humans invented the human species. It's insane. Men did not design in a cave the human brain with the female sexuality, the male sexuality, the tendency as in other species to form groups, the tendency as in other mammals in groups to form hierarchies and leaderships, the tendency as in all mammals for hierarchies (regardless of what sex is in the hierarchy) to sometimes abuse power, the limbic system in the deep nuclei of the brain… | /r/MensRights | 13/06/22 06:35 AM |
| 1 | Yes, feminism is misandry.That's fine, you are doing great - please let me share an advice about changing views: never expect the change to happen within the conversation. Typically and assuming you had some meaningful discussion/s that left an emotional trace, it will take about 1 year before the person changes views, toward your understanding. For various psychological reasons they will almost never say "you were right" and will mostly not even notice they changed attitudes, that's irrelevant to you. So keep doing the … | /r/MensRights | 11/06/22 11:18 AM |
| 1 | Yes, feminism is misandry.I'm not from the US. Globally it erupted in October 2017 when me too was quickly hijacked by the most militant of radical feminists to spread their distorted perceptions to millions by spreading fear and sex-nationalism (nationalism around sex as the defining common denominator, in contrast to the typical one, set around a nation). Only with time I (and like me others around the world) realized that the US had been growing a new fascist-racist movement (racism against a sex, aka sexism), for sev… | /r/MensRights | 11/06/22 09:06 AM |
| 1 | Yes, feminism is misandry.Read this. | /r/MensRights | 11/06/22 08:20 AM |
| 5 | British MP to parliament: "A third of domestic abuse victims are male, yet male victims are defined as victims of 'violence against women', semantic nonsense, mockery of equality, will gov publish a specific strategy?" Minister: "If done, there will be complaints from women's organizations".I suggested here a year ago having The Men's March, in multiple countries, women included, for equality of both sexes. A march to capital cities. Do you have an idea about how to organize that? | /r/MensRights | 10/06/22 05:26 PM |
| 2 | Yes, feminism is misandry.Ok. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/22 05:23 PM |
| 7 | British MP to parliament: "A third of domestic abuse victims are male, yet male victims are defined as victims of 'violence against women', semantic nonsense, mockery of equality, will gov publish a specific strategy?" Minister: "If done, there will be complaints from women's organizations".Love you, I truly think most women agree with you and the only reason we are seeing these objections to common sense is that some aggressive women took over powerful positions without having the right intentions and are forcing their agenda on behalf of all women. I'm sure it will change with time, women love men and men love women and none want this war we are thrown into. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/22 05:21 PM |
| 3 | Who has women in their lives that understand the need for MRM?I talk with my wife about everything, from men's position in life under feminism to abusive feminism, sexist feminists, misandry, discrimination against men caused by feminists, violence by women that receives feminists' protection. I also have some friends on social media (women) who completely agree with me that what happened in feminism is madness and it depresses them too. I am not an MRA and don't talk about MRA agenda, just about the things I see around me or that happened to me from femin… | /r/MensRights | 10/06/22 04:48 PM |
| 2 | Yes, feminism is misandry.There is no men's day. Some men's rights activists mark that date independently with the hope that because of their mentioning of the day it will become a recognized day (all power to them), but no one recognizes this day and it is mentioned by no one - no newspaper, TV channel, school, university, google, company, state or country, because it is not recognized by the UN as an international day nor by any country as a national day, save for one small country where the date was first mentioned (i… | /r/MensRights | 10/06/22 09:32 AM |
| 3 | Yes, feminism is misandry.Yes, thanks for listing them. I know about Sommers and Young, and about Paglia, and the three are definitely the immediate counter-examples, although one could argue that it's not entirely clear if they are feminists, despite their insistence on using the term (actually I am aware only of Sommers and Paglia identifying as feminists, never read Young stating it, she might have, I have no idea). I don't understand why Sommers continues calling herself a feminist. She is a humanist. She has an imag… | /r/MensRights | 10/06/22 08:45 AM |
| 2 | Yes, feminism is misandry.The past five years have seen the rise of an Orwellian newspeak: "discrimination is equality", "hate speech is humanism". And after this thinking became normalized, those living surrounded in it lost the ability to tell right from wrong, and to comprehend what they are saying and doing - that it's hate speech, violence, and taking pride in applying and promoting systematic discrimination by sex. They can't see anymore that hate is hate, and violence is violence, and discrimination is discriminat… | /r/MensRights | 10/06/22 07:56 AM |
| 2 | Yes, feminism is misandry.Can you stop trying to sell us Please, this is uncalled for. She explained herself and this tone is disrespectful while her intentions as she said, are simply to know better what men are experiencing or bringing up. Please, let's change the tone. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/22 07:39 AM |
| 1 | Yes, feminism is misandry.Thank you. I understand. I apologize for being suspicious. And thank you for wanting to learn more about this. I think that between men and women, there needs to be love, not just because of an idealistic expectation but because men and women are completely exposed when facing abuse or violence or even unkindness from the other sex, much more than when they receive it from their own sex. As much as our society is reluctant to acknowledge it, women and men do have some differences and these inclu… | /r/MensRights | 10/06/22 07:25 AM |
| 2 | Yes, feminism is misandry.Well, thanks for being kind and appreciative - it's the first time in five years that a feminist expressed herself this way in a discussion about feminism with me. I see your decision to be civil as coming from an inner understanding on your part of the level of cruelty that feminism has reached. You understand that it became too big to try and deny it or hide it, or tag people who point to it as "women haters". Especially after both the detachment and power of feminists became apparent in the a… | /r/MensRights | 10/06/22 06:41 AM |
| 9 | Yes, feminism is misandry.That person whose name you mentioned is the classical manipulative feminist - the type that preceded the outspoken supremacist. Before social media allowed the most violent individuals in marginal ideological groups to spread their violent beliefs to millions, and feminists no longer felt a need to hide their violence and supremacist views, the manipulative feminist was common. There was little legitimacy for feminists to say outright the inhumane ideas they believe in, so they used tons of mani… | /r/MensRights | 10/06/22 05:28 AM |
| 10 | Yes, feminism is misandry.Are you implying that I'm an incel? I am a published author, a neuroscientist by my education, former human rights worker who worked closely with the UN, married with a kid (edit: a few years ago you would probably call me "SJW", although I never was, I am only following my conscious and currently the conscious thing to do is to object feminist racist-type hatred, it's the largest hate group in the West today). If a group of men would be saying in broad daylight about women the violent things fe… | /r/MensRights | 10/06/22 05:07 AM |
| 2 | Yes, feminism is misandry.The only ones who can stop the feminist hate are women, and for that reason men must: 1) explain to women what living under such hate means, 2) ask women to demand of feminists to stop this. Yes, women have this responsibility because no one else can stop it, no man has the legitimacy to object feminism even when feminism preaches "kill all men". And men have the responsibility to kindly tell women how wide-spread and hurting this hate has become, so women will know it's there and that they need… | /r/MensRights | 10/06/22 04:10 AM |
| 10 | Yes, feminism is misandry.Read this: "Many women may call themselves feminists or express support for feminism, while in fact there seems to be a very clear distinction between three types of such self-identification: women with a general humanist notion of equality who are not aware of the prevalent anti-humanism of feminism (and who would probably not agree with most of this preaching); feminist women who are aware of the anti-humanist sentiment, and endorse it, but are not the ones articulating the anti-humanist preac… | /r/MensRights | 10/06/22 04:01 AM |
| 5 | Yes, feminism is misandry.When does feminism promote discrimination against men? Here is a list. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/22 03:20 AM |
| 20 | Yes, feminism is misandry.Women were the most protected group throughout all of history. Those who told you that women went through something from men that justifies the level of hate and cruelty you have, have lied to you by systematically deleting half of every picture - oppression was done between classes and half of the oppressing classes was women and half the oppressed classes was men, and men suffered at least as much - mostly more - than women, and women benefited from the exploitation at least as much as men, pr… | /r/MensRights | 09/06/22 07:46 PM |
| 6 | Yes, feminism is misandry.I think the distinction you are looking for is between feminism-sympathizers, and feminists. Like here. | /r/MensRights | 09/06/22 05:15 PM |
| 29 | Yes, feminism is misandry.Oh, it's a terrific collection of wisdom. It took me 15 minutes to realize that the entire feed is cynical when agreeing with what they share, because they always cynically agree with the actual facts. Amazing. | /r/MensRights | 09/06/22 05:04 PM |
| 30 | Sign in a shared restroom in Cleveland.Misandrists, we usually remember but in case we forget please use your leg to put it back down like the rest of us, instead of trying to depict men as "disgusting" under the pretext of "sanitation", which is more disgusting than a toilet seat, especially considering that you are most probably the type that demands everyone to praise her menstruation and never as much as hint that it's repulsive - if your secretions should be respected as blossomy and beautiful and we are all in support of equali… | /r/MensRights | 09/06/22 01:40 PM |
| 6 | While women are exalted for taking care of children alongside work, the identical life of a man – dividing the day exactly like a working mother between work and babies in the same proportions (as demanded by feminism) – is typically done under contempt, cynicism and criticism. An article.No, not because of anything related to natural family settings (settings that were defamed by feminism with the misleading term "traditional", a term that has the underlying false premise that human relations among parents and offspring are coming from "culture" and have nothing to do with the fact that innate sexuality which includes reproduction and mating, is a complex set of innate neurobiological mechanisms. As if no other mammal has families with specific functions for male and female pare… | /r/MensRights | 09/06/22 12:08 PM |
| 1 | The third way - not feminism, and not contra-feminism.Not at all. But because of how wide-spread the feminist hate has become through social media and by social media in mainstream media, so that millions of women and girls expressed distilled hate toward all men ("kill all man" etc.), within men's response to the feminist misandry that was spread to so many women - and this is not related in any way to MRAs but rather appears in men sporadically and as such also in MRAs - is the response of imitating the feminist attitude of "who needs the other s… | /r/MensRights | 09/06/22 07:35 AM |
| 59 | saying all feminists are radical misandrists is the same as saying all mens rights activists are like incels.Show me one feminist who objected when the UN declined a request to declare a certain date international men's day and responded by announcing the requested date that some groups marked, "Toilet Day", and I'll be willing to consider inspecting tentatively your unsupported proposition that not all feminists are misandrists. Until then, yes, this is feminism. Watching silently as hateful acts are done in your name does not exempt you from responsibility for those acts, it only shows that you prefe… | /r/MensRights | 08/06/22 08:13 PM |
| 15 | EU demands 40% of glass ceiling is broken for women on corporate boards. Without demanding 40 % coverage on the same concrete floors.There is no "glass ceiling". Women have not only an equal opportunity to join boards but are favored, because this pressure on companies has been going on for at least a decade. The only reasons are lack of suitability and lack of interest. Very few women are interested in sitting in boards, and out of the very few who do think of it, not many have the relevant track record. A glass ceiling means that given two equally suitable candidates, systematically the man will be chosen - this is not in a… | /r/MensRights | 08/06/22 06:32 AM |
| -1 | The third way - not feminism, and not contra-feminism.Members of MensRights, who upvoted the commentator - this is a radical feminist woman who got offended from the accuracy of the post. She is attempting to justify the feminist promotion of hate between sexes using the ordinary rationalizations that feminists use to deny human psychology. Just so you understand what you upvoted (I too thought at first I'm talking to a MGTOW. This is a WGTOW - aka, feminist). She bothered to respond because she knows how powerful the post and its rationale will be… | /r/MensRights | 07/06/22 08:26 AM |
| -1 | The third way - not feminism, and not contra-feminism.I call what you wrote here: contra-feminism. Copying the feminist premise of separatism, to counteract it. But the feminist premise is a lie. A woman needs a man, emotionally - love is one of the most basic human needs. Love cannot exist without mutual dependency - this is a psychological fact of life. Feminism wanted to make women completely independent of men, but on the way it reached the point of denying a human psychological reality: regardless of material dependencies, all humans have emot… | /r/MensRights | 07/06/22 08:11 AM |
| 0 | The third way - not feminism, and not contra-feminism.Contra-feminism refers to copying feminism to counteract it. In particular copying its separatism, the "who needs the other sex". While objecting to feminist extremism or being feminism-critical is the much wider understanding that feminism has long reached a point of becoming harmful (to one or both sexes). Lovism is the idea that the way forward for both sexes is being feminism-critical without slipping into contra-feminism, into copying the premise that made feminism harmful - separatism, "wh… | /r/MensRights | 07/06/22 07:47 AM |
| -1 | The third way - not feminism, and not contra-feminism.True. Lovism is the acknowledgement of precisely that. It's a name for this acknowledgment. | /r/MensRights | 07/06/22 06:39 AM |
| 17 | Ladies: Men Are Not Here To Make You Happy in RelationshipsI completely disagree. Both sexes need each other, emotionally, for psychological survival. I know it's very hard for us men to continue to admit this fact about humans when millions of women are incited by a hate movement to show cruelty and hatred toward all men - there is an understandable (and probably necessary) drive to show to women that as long as they indulge in hate and dehumanization they will not receive love, and that if they want to be loved they must abandon a movement devoted to … | /r/MensRights | 07/06/22 05:35 AM |
| 3 | please don't downvote me, just genuinely curious! i just like to learn hahaHere is the full answer to your question (thanks for asking!) https://lovists.com/2021/01/28/what-does-equality-look-like-in-the-feminist-society-we-live-in/ | /r/MensRights | 07/06/22 05:10 AM |
| 3 | What feminists mean by 'patriarchy' is in fact: human society. Feminist's supremacism sees men as the cause of everything bad, thus the very imperfection of life is 'the Patriarchy'. Blaming the other for everything is typical of abusers; feminism acts as an abuser with all men."feminists will see patriarchy even in a room full of women"--do you have an example of this, or is this just a projection? Oh absolutely. My personal experience was with a large feminist facebook group that I visited occasionally (without being a member) to see how far the madness and cruelty have gone. They used to get into extremely vicious quarrels among them, on deletions and banning by mods and on attacks by members against other members. The lament of those who "refuse to take sides" was … | /r/MensRights | 06/06/22 05:28 AM |
| 1 | I found these, and I genuinely think it’s a good idea for a proper movement to move away from feminism and towards a more egalitarian movement. Thoughts?There is one. "Lovism: A Shared Philosophy of Equality for Both Sexes". See here. | /r/MensRights | 03/06/22 04:50 AM |
| 8 | The only permitted reporting on the Depp and Heard in mainstream media is the feminist one - siding with the woman abuser and ignoring (that is, legitimizing) the violence against the man, which shows again: Feminism is sex-nationalism. Feminism is female anti-male chauvinism.Too little too late and reaching 0.000001% of men affected by feminism. If you support equality for all you need to end feminism - humanism is the framework for equality for all. There is no "humanism 2.0". Once separatism forms - and feminism is separatism - anti-humanism is a matter of time. | /r/MensRights | 27/05/22 07:42 PM |
| 13 | A "FEMINIST" tries to explain why 'Public is wrong about Depp v Heard case'Why are you adding quotation marks. This is feminism. The guardian, the NY times, the Independent, Washington post - in all of them the only permitted reporting on the case is the feminist one - siding with the woman abuser and ignoring (that is, legitimizing) the violence against the man, victim blaming, victim silencing, continuing the smear campaign that the abuser started to silence her victim and helping it. "Supporting women" means in feminism "regardless of what a woman did". This is femi… | /r/MensRights | 27/05/22 05:35 PM |
| 2 | Largest reddit books forum, 20.9 million, reacts to news of woman convicted of murdering her husband after writing a book called "How to murder your husband". Post received 17.3k likes, comments endorse the act, with k likes. Switch sexes mentally, to see the mainstreamization of anti-men violenceAnd the most dramatic demonstration of how normative violent hate speech is - if I were to comment below that post in r/books saying some of what I've written here, I was the one banned - and without any of the members even knowing that something was hidden from their awareness by deleting it and by boycotting the person who dared say what it is going on there. | /r/MensRights | 27/05/22 03:43 PM |
| 3 | "You are the ones minimizing what SHE did". Two excellent easy-going bloggers from Canada calling out and pin-pointing the hypocritical treatment in the media of the Depp-Heard case, and the absurd criticism in the media of the moral response of tens of millions to lies and abuse by a woman.The worst part is that with the help of the media they are actually unaware of any of the testimonies and facts that came up in court, so there are a few millions out there completely protected from truth, and they don't even need to deny anything personally, they are truly certain that whatever evidence there is, it shows how Depp physically abused Heard. You'd think you would find such cognitive isolation from facts in sealed detached social media groups (like the people who started believing … | /r/MensRights | 22/05/22 03:21 AM |
| 2 | "You are the ones minimizing what SHE did". Two excellent easy-going bloggers from Canada calling out and pin-pointing the hypocritical treatment in the media of the Depp-Heard case, and the absurd criticism in the media of the moral response of tens of millions to lies and abuse by a woman.Mods, this user, u/Max_Schmidt350 has just encouraged violence - I reported it. And as for you - 1) do not ever hit a woman (no, it's not the same as you hitting a man), 2) if you are being hit by your wife or girlfriend your job is to get out of the scene, immediately. Walk out. Do not hit any woman, ever. If your life is at immediate risk - and only if the risk is immediate and concrete such as when facing a loaded gun - you can defend yourself to prevent harm, but this doesn't include any amo… | /r/MensRights | 21/05/22 08:49 PM |
| 6 | "You are the ones minimizing what SHE did". Two excellent easy-going bloggers from Canada calling out and pin-pointing the hypocritical treatment in the media of the Depp-Heard case, and the absurd criticism in the media of the moral response of tens of millions to lies and abuse by a woman.Troll alert. This is not a typical member of this forum (I'm also guessing there aren't many Max Schmidts in Iraq, by the way). Probably someone who can't find any indication here for any misogyny or any objection to women's rights so he or she are planting some to be able to incite against human rights (this is a human rights forum). | /r/MensRights | 21/05/22 07:13 PM |
| 8 | "If men don't have as many rights as women, then why don't they fight for them" <-- A question asked to me. Below is my response.Short answer: because feminism calls it "misogyny" | /r/MensRights | 21/05/22 07:03 PM |
| 13 | "You are the ones minimizing what SHE did". Two excellent easy-going bloggers from Canada calling out and pin-pointing the hypocritical treatment in the media of the Depp-Heard case, and the absurd criticism in the media of the moral response of tens of millions to lies and abuse by a woman.They are guys so obviously they respond to things that affect men as well, but it's not their main focus. They talk about what bothers women as well. They are just two friends who like talking about stuff and share it with us... | /r/MensRights | 21/05/22 01:40 PM |
| 31 | "You are the ones minimizing what SHE did". Two excellent easy-going bloggers from Canada calling out and pin-pointing the hypocritical treatment in the media of the Depp-Heard case, and the absurd criticism in the media of the moral response of tens of millions to lies and abuse by a woman.Just two guys thinking freely and being honest. I wouldn't call them "MRA". | /r/MensRights | 21/05/22 01:27 PM |
| 27 | "You are the ones minimizing what SHE did". Two excellent easy-going bloggers from Canada calling out and pin-pointing the hypocritical treatment in the media of the Depp-Heard case, and the absurd criticism in the media of the moral response of tens of millions to lies and abuse by a woman.Can you point to any evidence that he ever hit her in any way? Heard said he smashed a phone, there's a picture of that phone taken the day after - the phone is fine, not smashed in any way (to which Heard responded with "oh no there was another phone, on the same table, right next to this one"). Heard said that her sister was caught at the top of a staircase between the two while Depp is in front of the sister and Heard is "afraid he would push the sister down the stairs" and that when she appr… | /r/MensRights | 21/05/22 11:33 AM |
| 1 | "I won't let them castrate my son" - Jeff YoungerSupport this man and his son regardless of your political or religious beliefs. I am a radical leftist and I stand by him and by his son in all my heart, I am a completely secular person and Jewish and I stand with him. I am a neuroscientist and I can confirm that he is completely right, there are no locations in the body or the brain, where a male is female or vice versa. The brains of "trans" have been studied and they are completely typical to their innate sex. And, hormones injections, do no… | /r/MensRights | 20/05/22 07:05 AM |
| 3 | "I won't let them castrate my son" - Jeff YoungerWhat context do you need. Violent feminists in positions of power have a castration drive and castrate boys. They incite women against maleness and recruit mothers to help them castrate their sons when they are toddlers and little children. This is a crime against humanity according to the UN treaty on minors genital mutilation which defines minors genital mutilation as a crime against humanity INCLUDING IF DONE BY CREATING A CULTURE THAT WOULD CAUSE THE MINOR TO COOPERATE - these are the explic… | /r/MensRights | 20/05/22 06:34 AM |
| 1 | How do you cope?Got it. I'll send a personal message. Thanks. | /r/MensRights | 19/05/22 10:38 AM |
| 7 | How do you cope?Hi, and thank you. First for being such a kind person and second for visiting this forum and bringing up the question. I'll try to think this through together with you, as a married man who also was affected by the atmosphere in society. My wife is sometimes, I think, in a similar position to yours. Your question, I think, is something that men like your husband, myself and others in this forum, have not yet really articulated and found answers for - "what can I do as a woman, or wife (or a moth… | /r/MensRights | 19/05/22 06:34 AM |
| 2 | Judge strikes down California law requiring women on corporate boards as unconstitutionalIt's important to explain why the law was a form of discrimination: if there are 9 board members all men and all chosen in a manner blinded to sex, strictly by track record, and there's a 10th place to appoint someone to, and of the candidates the best qualified person happens to be a man, while the women considered for the role are less qualified, the law would force the company to tell the most qualified candidate "you are rejected because of your sex", and this is against the law. You cannot … | /r/MensRights | 18/05/22 06:07 AM |
| 3 | "Amber Heard is hurting REAL victims of Domestic Violence!"It becomes logical for them because on the one hand they have no way of believing she was abused, but since men are not as human as women in their eyes, they also have no way of believing she abused. So for them her only fault is claiming to be abused when she wasn't, and by that hurting "real victims" - the fact that such a real victim is sitting right before them in that same room is imperceptible, because seeing him requires seeing a human being sitting there. | /r/MensRights | 18/05/22 05:35 AM |
| 15 | AngerAs a published, award-winning novelist, yes, I can confirm that some feminists in literature and some women who are exposed to their preaching, do have this belief that women "write better" (and my personal impression is that many if not most feminists are under the impression that they know everything there is to know about men while men are "clueless" about women and cannot possibly write a female character). However, if this is any consolation, I can tell you that writing, has psychological e… | /r/MensRights | 15/05/22 11:42 AM |
| 1 | Feminists respond in the media to the abuse Johnny Depp underwent by depicting feminism as unrelated to the case, and the case as rare and not requiring rethinking. But Depp is not alone, and got to where he was because of a powerful group who protects abusers and discredits victims: feminists.There's a name for what you believe in! See here. | /r/MensRights | 11/05/22 08:14 AM |
| 2 | The MeToo movement has gone too far.Forget it. I'm right. Cute video, thanks for that. I also have an eye for people and I was right on the spot with this specific OP. See her comments. When someone shares devastating circumstances her response is "join my channel". She is exactly what I saw in her and needs to hear exactly what was written to her. | /r/MensRights | 10/05/22 10:24 AM |
| 0 | The MeToo movement has gone too far.You are unbelievably cynical. Are you aware that you are in a forum where most participants are people who struggle with daily suicidal thoughts, people who were hurt in various ways and often could never receive any acknowledgement, even from their closest friends? Your only priority is collecting subscribers for a channel, and when a person shares a typical predicament you jump with a pen to sign him for your product? What's the matter with you? Are you really incapable of seeing that the peop… | /r/MensRights | 10/05/22 09:56 AM |
| 2 | The MeToo movement has gone too far.This is a rude answer. Don't get defensive. Men say the truth. Women got used to how other women treat them - that is, telling them what they want to hear. This is the last thing women need. Men simply say what they think and women need to listen, because women need truth. Women got so used to silenced men and vocal women that they forgot how truth sounds like and react to simple relevant directness as if they were offended. No one offended you, just told you some truth. Now please think of the … | /r/MensRights | 10/05/22 09:28 AM |
| 3 | The feminist myth of "Thousands of years of oppression" completely debunked in a new book - article in the GuardianControl by whom. The overwhelming majority of those who object abortions are women, not men. Men who take interest in human rights are particularly supportive of reproductive rights - you can run a pole in this forum, I think you will find that almost every man visiting this sub-reddit is enthusiastically in favor of basic reproductive rights. If the objection to abortions is about "control" then it's primarily a control of women over women - the majority of those who object abortions are women.… | /r/MensRights | 08/05/22 12:09 PM |
| 6 | The feminist myth of "Thousands of years of oppression" completely debunked in a new book - article in the GuardianCan you try to ask what is the closest idea to truth instead of what is the broadest lie that would still sound believable? | /r/MensRights | 01/05/22 04:42 AM |
| 3 | The reddit forum "TwoXChromosomes" has become much more moderate, they discuss women's issues including those concerning men, but are mostly not expressing generalized hate and are rarely stereotyping all men. Maybe a sign for hope that the sexes wars are subsiding?The Women's March. I live on another continent and even from here it was scary to watch. Like Mordor organized all its trolls for the big crusade. I read the other day that a woman who is a convicted man-killer and rapist spoke on stage. The words right and wrong have been replaced on that day with the words female and male. A murderer and rapist becomes the right thing to support, if female. | /r/MensRights | 27/04/22 12:22 PM |
| -2 | The reddit forum "TwoXChromosomes" has become much more moderate, they discuss women's issues including those concerning men, but are mostly not expressing generalized hate and are rarely stereotyping all men. Maybe a sign for hope that the sexes wars are subsiding?"if you can't give a man an erection, he doesn't value your life" That alone requires a new Freud to analyze. | /r/MensRights | 27/04/22 11:59 AM |
| 1 | The reddit forum "TwoXChromosomes" has become much more moderate, they discuss women's issues including those concerning men, but are mostly not expressing generalized hate and are rarely stereotyping all men. Maybe a sign for hope that the sexes wars are subsiding?Your not going to stop feminist from believing they are superior to men I agree. I hope more women join men in equality rather than feminists in female-chauvinism. The reason I think the feminists themselves will continue disregarding men is this: https://lovists.com/2022/02/19/orientation/ | /r/MensRights | 27/04/22 11:57 AM |
| 2 | The reddit forum "TwoXChromosomes" has become much more moderate, they discuss women's issues including those concerning men, but are mostly not expressing generalized hate and are rarely stereotyping all men. Maybe a sign for hope that the sexes wars are subsiding?Still I take a look every few weeks, hoping to see a change, sharing if I notice anything... | /r/MensRights | 27/04/22 09:41 AM |
| -1 | The reddit forum "TwoXChromosomes" has become much more moderate, they discuss women's issues including those concerning men, but are mostly not expressing generalized hate and are rarely stereotyping all men. Maybe a sign for hope that the sexes wars are subsiding?But how many endorsements? When I saw the first one it was very low, 10-20 (in a forum of 13 million, that's very, very low). I didn't say misandry disappeared... it never will. We are always discussing only the mainstream, what is considered a common and acceptable view, and what is the accepted view. In that respect I felt that I see a difference - whether it is a change or just a coincidence (or a personal bias, me wishing to see it...) - I don't know. I know that I hope to see it some day, b… | /r/MensRights | 27/04/22 09:40 AM |
| 1 | The reddit forum "TwoXChromosomes" has become much more moderate, they discuss women's issues including those concerning men, but are mostly not expressing generalized hate and are rarely stereotyping all men. Maybe a sign for hope that the sexes wars are subsiding?Take a look at my profile... I have been on reddit for one year, I have 12500 karma, out of which 9500 are from... MensRights. My last three posts on MensRights were: - It is never "mansplaining" to correct or criticize feminist women when they discuss: men. - The illegal feminist tribunals in universities are a violation of human rights - The idea that all should be equal is called humanism. Not feminism. Humanism is concerned with the rights of all, feminism only with the rights of some. When … | /r/MensRights | 27/04/22 09:29 AM |
| 2 | Thoughts ?Everyone, not men in particular, are paying attention, because: 1) this is the Weinstein case all over again - for years powerful people in the media have been helping a person hide her violence, the sheer magnitude and thoroughness of the concealment and protection is hair-raising, we are all amazed at the discrepancy between the facts and how the powerful commentators in the media presented the case over years. We all thought, men and women alike, that perpetrators can no longer abuse their fa… | /r/MensRights | 27/04/22 07:44 AM |
| 2 | The idea that all should be equal is called humanism. Not feminism. Humanism is concerned with the rights of all, feminism only with the rights of some. When protection of rights of only half of humanity, is accepted as the full concept of equality, the rights of half of humanity exist nowhere.Wonderful!🙏 | /r/MensRights | 26/04/22 10:39 AM |
| 8 | Why isn’t it all right to point out that Amber Heard’s feminism made the lies, and abuse against Depp possible?Feminist violence and hiding perpetrators is regularly discussed it. I think that in the mainstream that does see Heard as a violent perpetrator, the role of feminism does disappear. Feminists have been publishing false descriptions of Depp in newspapers for years and describing his mental collapse as showing that he is at some fault and is guilty of something. This help in hiding her acts is no different than the people who helped Weinstein hide his crimes. Yet the role of feminism in the abuse… | /r/MensRights | 24/04/22 02:06 PM |
| 1 | The illegal feminist tribunals in universities are a violation of human rightsIn my country it started around 2005 and continuously expanded since then. I would guess that as with other such injustices that are usually formed in the US and then exported to other countries, it began a little earlier in the US, possibly the late 1990s. | /r/MensRights | 24/04/22 09:37 AM |
| 2 | The idea that all should be equal is called humanism. Not feminism. Humanism is concerned with the rights of all, feminism only with the rights of some. When protection of rights of only half of humanity, is accepted as the full concept of equality, the rights of half of humanity exist nowhere.I understand your point of view. I would just note that social media is a powerful tool in the hands of extremists, and extremist feminism used it phenomenally successfully to convert all of feminism into the most extremist tone, that up until 5 years ago was no more than a few hundreds to thousands people in any given country. For 3-4 years now, even feminists in governmental organizations are extremely radical. The questions I ask myself, and that I would suggest you ask yourself as well, is f… | /r/MensRights | 24/04/22 09:24 AM |
| 15 | The illegal feminist tribunals in universities are a violation of human rightseven the appearance of a violation of the ethical code can be grounds for dismissal, whether the accused performed the deed or not False. Faculty who were internally prosecuted on these grounds and responded by suing the institution in court for defamation were consistently ruled large compensations. The court, that is the law, does not accept the violation of rights that you tried to justify here. You are part of an anti-humanist circle of violent individuals who attempt to find rationalization… | /r/MensRights | 22/04/22 12:17 PM |
| 1 | The idea that all should be equal is called humanism. Not feminism. Humanism is concerned with the rights of all, feminism only with the rights of some. When protection of rights of only half of humanity, is accepted as the full concept of equality, the rights of half of humanity exist nowhere.Here is an article from the Washington post that responds to the phenomenon. These are internal committees that thousands of universities in the US and all over the world were driven by feminists to enact, where a form of tribunals are ruling in possibly thousands of cases a year globally of allegations of "sexual harassment" within the institution. In these tribunals, a text message to an ex-girlfriend by a student, or a romantic relationship between a male teaching assistant and a female stude… | /r/MensRights | 22/04/22 09:41 AM |
| 7 | The idea that all should be equal is called humanism. Not feminism. Humanism is concerned with the rights of all, feminism only with the rights of some. When protection of rights of only half of humanity, is accepted as the full concept of equality, the rights of half of humanity exist nowhere.I am not an MRA (nor a "masculinist"). You can find more about what I advocate for here. I am proposing my perspective to both MRAs and to feminists, but only MRAs are tolerant and open-minded and welcome the open discussion even if not always agreeing, while feminist forums ban me for merely proposing to have a discussion. | /r/MensRights | 21/04/22 07:11 PM |
| 5 | The idea that all should be equal is called humanism. Not feminism. Humanism is concerned with the rights of all, feminism only with the rights of some. When protection of rights of only half of humanity, is accepted as the full concept of equality, the rights of half of humanity exist nowhere.I agree. And I think it's because feminists have utterly convinced themselves in the existence of a powerful patriarchy and of male privileges, making them confident that "men don't need anyone or anything articulating and protecting their rights - each and every male on the face of the earth has so much invisible power that any attention to any rights of any male is nothing but giving more power to someone with a surplus of power". This is of course a completely false, cruel and anti-humanist p… | /r/MensRights | 21/04/22 02:21 PM |
| 1 | The idea that all should be equal is called humanism. Not feminism. Humanism is concerned with the rights of all, feminism only with the rights of some. When protection of rights of only half of humanity, is accepted as the full concept of equality, the rights of half of humanity exist nowhere.Cheers, click my profile and see my previous post here, it's about the male feminist. | /r/MensRights | 21/04/22 01:55 PM |
| 3 | The idea that all should be equal is called humanism. Not feminism. Humanism is concerned with the rights of all, feminism only with the rights of some. When protection of rights of only half of humanity, is accepted as the full concept of equality, the rights of half of humanity exist nowhere.Thanks, yes, I see that a lot - feminists arguing that a radical type of feminism is humanism. (edit: by that I mean they give the definition of humanism when wanting to say "what feminism really is", and there are explicit examples where someone argues that feminism is humanism - I had a link to the UN website that stated just that but they updated that page). I'll try to add some examples here in an edit. | /r/MensRights | 21/04/22 01:53 PM |
| 8 | The idea that all should be equal is called humanism. Not feminism. Humanism is concerned with the rights of all, feminism only with the rights of some. When protection of rights of only half of humanity, is accepted as the full concept of equality, the rights of half of humanity exist nowhere.I don't see a difference. Egalitarianism is french for "equality-ism". Perhaps used more in the context of internal affairs of countries, while humanism is mostly perceived as a more global perspective about all human beings. So advocating for basic human rights that any human of any nation has, because of being born human, will be usually called humanist, and discussion of equal civil rights of members of one given nation within the country is sometimes called egalitarian, but I think the word … | /r/MensRights | 21/04/22 01:29 PM |
| 1 | Why men don't resist their marginalization and dehumanization by feminism (the feminist man: explained)Because of the unique female sexuality and its expectations of men, to be resilient to stress and even pain from females (which would allow the woman to treat the man as an anchor while having emotional freedom - being able to "sway" emotionally around the "male branch" without fearing it might "break"), men are trapped in a conflict when feminism abuses them and drives society to treat them as sub-human: if they stay silent, they will continuously lose their humanity; if they resist, they will … | /r/MensRights | 21/04/22 01:02 PM |
| 1 | Why men don't resist their marginalization and dehumanization by feminism (the feminist man: explained)No, what you described above is called humanism. Not feminism. Feminism is separatism. The separatism is in its name. Feminism is not concerned, like humanism, with the rights of all humans. If a woman kills her husband out of cruelty, the husband's right for life does not concern feminists, protections that would have allowed him to realize his right for life and not be murdered, do not concern feminists, and in fact most of them would protect the wife who committed the murder (demand her relea… | /r/MensRights | 20/04/22 03:58 PM |
| 1 | Why men don't resist their marginalization and dehumanization by feminism (the feminist man: explained)Yes, I think that humanity is organized (innately, I believe) in a manner that forms a thin balance between the two sexes, a balance which is not founded on symmetry but on equivalences of asymmetries. Men are physically stronger than women, but women are more supported socially than men - both those trends are biological, as far as I can tell. The social power of women comes from a variety of human qualities, all can easily be attributed to biology (not merely to evolution; to actual observable… | /r/MensRights | 20/04/22 10:05 AM |
| 1 | Why men don't resist their marginalization and dehumanization by feminism (the feminist man: explained)Correct. And when we ask "why men can't admit that a society driven by feminism has created a power balance that made them weaker than women and lacking equality in opportunity, rights and human treatment", the answer is: female sexual idealization of men, increased by the feminist further effort to utilize the innate tendencies of both sexes to weaken men, with the phrase "fragile masculinity". The expectation in female sexuality of men for inexhaustible emotional resilience, which men and boys… | /r/MensRights | 20/04/22 05:41 AM |
| 1 | Why men don't resist their marginalization and dehumanization by feminism (the feminist man: explained)I'm sorry, what you wrote here is false. Edit: The last two paragraphs are a direct conversation in the second person with the feminist man, and an empathic conversation for that matter. Writing falsehoods is possible - the keyboard won't burn and the screen won't shut down and the text will appear - it's your own responsibility to maintain internal, I repeat, internal, intellectual integrity, and to always do your very best not to write falsehoods by continuously attempting to refute your specu… | /r/MensRights | 20/04/22 05:32 AM |
| 2 | Why men don't resist their marginalization and dehumanization by feminism (the feminist man: explained)Yes, I agree with your point about resilience (that men shouldn't feel forced to avoid anything solely because of female sexual expectations), I didn't intend to imply that a conclusion of this analysis is that men should wear a mask or resilience for women to be content. I only tried to explain what psychological tendencies (innate tendencies) in both sexes create both the feminist man, and the overall dynamics where men don't respond (as feminism always imagined them doing, for example in the … | /r/MensRights | 20/04/22 05:31 AM |
| 5 | Why men don't resist their marginalization and dehumanization by feminism (the feminist man: explained)The same applies to women - among women as well the majority will never encounter any harm from men or due to their sex and only a small minority will - and yet women in your position have no problem to openly identify with the plight of the small minority of women who do suffer due to their sex or from men. Men in your position on the other hand refrain from doing the same for the minority of men who suffer due to their sex or from women. Why is that (hint, the post explains why). Side note: an… | /r/MensRights | 19/04/22 12:12 PM |
| 3 | Why men don't resist their marginalization and dehumanization by feminism (the feminist man: explained)I see now that we didn't understand each other. Being assertive and being confident is exactly what the description in the post aims to describe, it only explains why this is attractive to women. However, and you can take it or leave it, being an MRA is not perceived by women as being assertive and confident - the opposite is true - accepting the atmosphere of false accusations, tribunals, discrimination against men, in silence, is what creates in women the feeling of "assertive and confident". … | /r/MensRights | 19/04/22 09:32 AM |
| 2 | Why men don't resist their marginalization and dehumanization by feminism (the feminist man: explained)To most women, in our present western cultures, unfortunately yes, they would be unattractive. This is not a necessity, only a human tendency. But in a society that never explains to any of the two sexes what was written here, the entire dynamics remain implicit and basic drives operate unchecked. It would usually require some special effort from regular women (as opposed to women who are humanists, they have a special interest in humans and rights) to take their tendency into account and avoid … | /r/MensRights | 19/04/22 09:18 AM |
| 1 | The only justification given in this article to allowing men to be equal to women in education and income is so that women will be able to achieve sexual gratification. If this article is not the most violent sexual objectification of human beings then I don't know what objectification is.I know what she meant, I understand the subtext, I'm actually not an MRA either. But the fact that she didn't dare approach her audience (feminists) with an argument whose premise is human rights but had to revert to self-serving interests, is telling and chilling. I disdain the copying by MRAs of the feminist tone, and have criticized this self-victimization here in the past. But in this case I suspect that you are having trouble facing the degree of dehumanization you as a man are at in the so… | /r/MensRights | 19/04/22 06:55 AM |
| 6 | Women may pay the price for finally closing the gender pay gapThis is amazing. The only justification given in this article to allowing men to be equal to women in education and income is so that women will be able to achieve sexual gratification. If this is not the most violent sexual objectification of human beings then I don't know what objectification is. This article finally admits the truth - that women in the US are not discriminated against but are favored, and bravely does what no feminist is willing to do - it asks feminists to declare that the g… | /r/MensRights | 18/04/22 10:40 AM |
| 3 | "How do I force my reproductive slave to stay?"Dear Quora, Before marriage, I agreed with my partner not wanting kids, thinking she will change her mind later. I replaced her pills with placebo I got on ebay and got her pregnant. My wife is demanding a divorce. At any cost, I won't allow her to abort nor let her go. How do I force her to stay? | /r/MensRights | 15/04/22 01:06 PM |
| 4 | False accusations also include false accusations of sexism.Here are some good statistics for demonstrating to skeptics how false is the re-defining of trivial behaviors as "rape", and what motivates it - https://lovists.com/2021/04/26/some-feminist-readers-may-want-to-sit-before-continuing/ I think now I understand your point - you are treating false accusation as rape, and then conclude that treating social incitement as false accusations is tantamount to treating a text message as rape. And then you feel that just as the feminist treatment of a text a… | /r/MensRights | 14/04/22 02:05 PM |
| 6 | False accusations also include false accusations of sexism.I couldn't agree more with the emphasis you're giving to false accusations of rape. But you must excuse me for not seeing how pointing to collective false accusations can be used against the advocacy for the the falsely accused in rape. It seems to me that if anything, the former strengthens the latter. It explains why society and institutions are so inclined to accept false accusations without examination - they hold a bias, formed by collective false accusations. If you explain to people where… | /r/MensRights | 14/04/22 01:41 PM |
| 6 | False accusations also include false accusations of sexism.I don't think this discussion about collective false accusations can interfere with the effort to reduce personal false accusations and to hold accountable women who make false accusations. Many men, possibly most, will encounter in their lives hate, resentment, hostility and discrimination because of the collective false accusations I and others mention here. They will lose careers, sometimes suffer isolation or deliberate exclusion, because of the social consequences, this is in fact the pheno… | /r/MensRights | 14/04/22 01:00 PM |
| 9 | False accusations also include false accusations of sexism.I would add another example - the proportion of men in STEM. It is accepted as fact in and around feminist circles that the male majority in mathematics, physics and computer science is a result of male sexism against women and this male majority is seen as evidence for the prevalence and effect of male sexism. In reality a female candidate is twice as likely to be accepted to a STEM position in academy than a male counterpart with the same qualifications and track record, meaning women are FAVO… | /r/MensRights | 14/04/22 11:23 AM |
| 2 | Why I Am Not a Feminist (or, how feminism causes much of boys and men problems, rather than a "patriarchy", the mentioning of which being an appeal to a conspiracy theory, and a pattern of an abusive relationship, between feminism and men - feminists abusing men, then blaming them for the suffering)I personally agree with everything you noted here. I see the very same dynamics, motivations and mental gymnastics. I must also note that the tactics you described of feminists redefining a term once refuted, is something we see done by them regarding other concepts as well, and it's important to see it for what it is: not being able to admit that you were wrong. The discussions thus follow a typical course: the feminist assigns a name for what she regards as a phenomenon in humans or society, d… | /r/MensRights | 12/04/22 02:48 PM |
| -23 | Please stop using the term "genders" instead of Sexes.Who do you believe defined the term gender. | /r/MensRights | 12/04/22 01:28 PM |
| 4 | Don't know if this is the right place to ask for help, but my ex is going around slandering my name by telling people at our college that I sexually assaulted her. The only "crime" I committed was breaking up with her over 2 years ago because she was clingy and manipulativeWomen use premeditated social violence, it is done by gossiping and spreading rumors methodically, a violent woman would systematically approach dozens of people in person and even hundreds to repeat the same story in order to hurt the targeted person. Men must be aware of this type of female violence (most women are not that violent, just as most men never attack physically anyone), and of the only way to protect against it: a man or a guy who faces this must do something that would seem very p… | /r/MensRights | 01/04/22 10:08 AM |
| 3 | Do any of you guys actually do something about the things you are complaining about?I wrote a book and published it on Amazon, founded a website that presents data and analysis, wrote articles with data and analysis, and am sharing them weekly wherever I can (I am a published, award-winning author, who published articles in top-notch newspapers, but this type of data is banned and censored, I tried my best but no editor will publish such articles, realistic data and analysis about men, women and their relations are repressed, so I do my best to disseminate it single-handedly). … | /r/MensRights | 01/04/22 09:10 AM |
| 2 | How feminism became chauvinism, and has created chauvinism (female anti-male chauvinism). Data and links to references are provided.Yes (thanks), I published it as an article on a blog, here: https://lovists.com/2021/01/28/what-does-equality-look-like-in-the-feminist-society-we-live-in/ | /r/MensRights | 28/03/22 07:20 AM |
| 1 | I reject the attempt to associate criticism of feminism and its harmful effect on society, on men, on women and on their relations, with the political right. I am a leftist, a radical one for that matter, and criticize most of feminism. Objecting feminist extremism is universal and humanist.There are probably several hundreds of thousands of men and women in the West right now with PTSD because of the Me Too mob attacks. Anyone who wouldn't agree with any of the violent actions or false assertions of the feminist mob was a target. These people lost jobs, careers, friends, and some were harassed for months or longer by the feminist bullies. They have been waking up in the middle of the night with nightmares since then, or trying to get rid of ruminations and fears, or dealing with s… | /r/MensRights | 24/03/22 04:24 AM |
| 1 | I reject the attempt to associate criticism of feminism and its harmful effect on society, on men, on women and on their relations, with the political right. I am a leftist, a radical one for that matter, and criticize most of feminism. Objecting feminist extremism is universal and humanist.I used to hang around down there but one of the mods started telling me what I can and can't write, we had a pleasant conversation (pleasant on my side, arrogant and ill-informed on his side, a semi-progressive confused child as a matter of fact) , where I learned that I will not be able to write anything of substance there and that in fact the mod of the only place on earth where the left can resist in an organized way, doesn't know that he is controlling the only place there is and what it mea… | /r/MensRights | 24/03/22 04:20 AM |
| 2 | I reject the attempt to associate criticism of feminism and its harmful effect on society, on men, on women and on their relations, with the political right. I am a leftist, a radical one for that matter, and criticize most of feminism. Objecting feminist extremism is universal and humanist.I completely agree. The left did not take well the technological advancements of the 20th century. It developed the expectation of a suffering-free world, a nirvana. The technological advancements caused the left to develop unrealistic expectations of life (I remember reading as a child about "when robots will work for us", no one thought that the robots will be owned by a few corporations and humans will not "read books in their free time" but just have time to hate or simply become poor withou… | /r/MensRights | 23/03/22 12:41 PM |
| 2 | I reject the attempt to associate criticism of feminism and its harmful effect on society, on men, on women and on their relations, with the political right. I am a leftist, a radical one for that matter, and criticize most of feminism. Objecting feminist extremism is universal and humanist.I disagree but I completely understand why people on the right keep saying that. The right in the US is currently on the defense after a democratic president was elected and needs to recruit voters, so in parallel to dealing with anti-humanism in the left it also wants to use the radicalization in the left to make voters leave the left. As a non-American who has no opinion about whether democrats or republicans should be in power in your country, I can understand why you wish to make the argumen… | /r/MensRights | 23/03/22 09:34 AM |
| 7 | I reject the attempt to associate criticism of feminism and its harmful effect on society, on men, on women and on their relations, with the political right. I am a leftist, a radical one for that matter, and criticize most of feminism. Objecting feminist extremism is universal and humanist.There are a lot of us. Many women as well. Most are too afraid to speak up. Our lives are surrounded by cult members and we will lose everything if we speak up, work, friends, any human regard - no support will come from the right because we are leftists and the right is mostly happy to see people like us get slammed, people in the left who object the progressives are left entirely alone in the world - the left banishes us and the right is holding our leftism against us. It's a very very lonely … | /r/MensRights | 23/03/22 08:41 AM |
| 2 | I reject the attempt to associate criticism of feminism and its harmful effect on society, on men, on women and on their relations, with the political right. I am a leftist, a radical one for that matter, and criticize most of feminism. Objecting feminist extremism is universal and humanist.I have no idea how your discussion is related to the post. Objecting feminism is not objecting the idea of two working, married parents who share the burden of child raising. This is not what feminism is about. The idea that all should work and all need to contribute their share is a basic premise of any political left. The left was always about work - everyone need to work according to their ability, and this always included women, this has nothing to do with feminism and this is not what's bei… | /r/MensRights | 23/03/22 07:00 AM |
| 8 | Coun. David Kirton suggested to council that for far too long, males have had a distinct advantage by having a urinal, so removing it will make things fair for everyone. So presumably men can wait in long lines at our new arena just like females will.Women also live longer, so equality by this reasoning would mean de-funding the 3.5 times higher allocations to research on female diseases compared to male diseases so women will live less? This is their idea of equality? If they're building it anew, couldn't they just build in women's rooms the same number of booths as the total number of booths plus urinals they planned for men's rooms? (which is by the way what the big library in my city has?) | /r/MensRights | 20/03/22 07:04 AM |
| -7 | Coun. David Kirton suggested to council that for far too long, males have had a distinct advantage by having a urinal, so removing it will make things fair for everyone. So presumably men can wait in long lines at our new arena just like females will.But women take longer because they fix themselves there. If they really wanted equality in lines they should have put alligators in the men's room, swimming in the toilets - only that would make men spend time there like women - misogynists! | /r/MensRights | 20/03/22 06:59 AM |
| 1 | Feminist insistence that only men can rape combined with feminist belief that there are no innate manhood and womanhood, only cultural molds, backfires at women; a woman raped by trans, hospital won't report saying she can't be raped (as per feminism, perpetrator is a 'woman mold', women can't rape)The core is diverse. Some get more satisfaction from castration than from hate, some get more satisfaction from hate than from castration. If you want to know what the members of the feminist core have in common take a look here: https://lovists.com/2022/02/19/orientation/ | /r/MensRights | 19/03/22 12:17 AM |
| 5 | Feminist insistence that only men can rape combined with feminist belief that there are no innate manhood and womanhood, only cultural molds, backfires at women; a woman raped by trans, hospital won't report saying she can't be raped (as per feminism, perpetrator is a 'woman mold', women can't rape)TERFs are a tiny minority in feminism, and the only reason you got the opposite impression is the rage they trigger in the feminist hegemony. The feminist response to them is disproportional to their numbers. Also keep in mind that the level of men-hating in TERFs is much deeper than in ordinary radical feminism. They are reluctant to join the attitude of the feminist mainstream toward male trans (born male) not because of common sense but since for them maleness is what another ethnicity is for… | /r/MensRights | 18/03/22 11:32 PM |
| 19 | Feminist insistence that only men can rape combined with feminist belief that there are no innate manhood and womanhood, only cultural molds, backfires at women; a woman raped by trans, hospital won't report saying she can't be raped (as per feminism, perpetrator is a 'woman mold', women can't rape)None of what you wrote is true. Read this: https://lovists.com/2021/02/20/women-are-as-sexually-violent-as-men/ | /r/MensRights | 18/03/22 11:17 PM |
| 2 | Currently the planet has not one chauvinism but two.Are you a feminist troll trying to prove to the world that men's forums are "full of misogynists"? I don't think you could find even one guy here that argues that the Taliban are not sexist chauvinists - I do think however that feminist trolls like you and millions like you can't see chauvinism when it's female and in their own country - click the links in my post to see that the only blindness here is yours and that you are what you're trying to "expose". Look in the mirror and you will find wh… | /r/MensRights | 18/03/22 03:21 PM |
| -1 | Currently the planet has not one chauvinism but two.The Taliban and Saudi Arabia are not a myth. Male chauvinism still exists outside the west. I don't recommend trying to make women see chauvinism when it's female and in the west, by demonstrating inability to see chauvinism when it's male and outside of the west. Tell women that we all should denounce chauvinism wherever it arises, there, or here, by men, or by women. | /r/MensRights | 18/03/22 08:08 AM |
| 3 | I lost three careers because of feminism. These are the questions I would like to ask a feminist (if only I had the equal human right to express myself where feminists and the rest of society would hear me; such questions are banned in the mainstream. Which I think spells oppression).Well, actually this is not the case. Whatever happens, I always keep going. Otherwise I would describe losing only one career, wouldn't I. I have a fourth one now, and I also have been doing some other things, some of them quite elaborate, to get back on track with what I always did and which was severed. But none of this resilience could stand as some excuse to what quite a few feminists are doing - sabotaging men's work and personal life by ignoring the fact that men have the same human rights… | /r/MensRights | 18/03/22 05:37 AM |
| 1 | Men declaring that they are leaving a field that became female-dominated, due to their encounters with female sexism, is something I saw also in psychology and in places in literature. This was shared in two reddit forums, sharing it here.Reading your comment was like reading a compact novel. I hope you keep writing about all this. | /r/MensRights | 14/03/22 05:57 PM |
| 33 | Mayor of London, everyoneFeminists will lynch him for this. Men who try to prove they are "good" by feminist standards don't understand that there are no terms for their acceptance as humans by feminists - even if they kill themselves by committing suicide to "make women feel safe" they will be accused of "doing it to hurt women by making them feel guilty - more toxic masculinity", and certainly if they castrate themselves to be accepted by feminists as humans they will be banned and bashed (a true feminist is like a ra… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/22 11:57 AM |
| 1 | Reading about men's rights has been really bad for my mental healthYou summarized it perfectly. I do think you are right about the positive trends you mention and about the anxiety being unfounded vs. these trends. Thanks for cheering me up with some reality check friend : ) | /r/MensRights | 13/03/22 02:12 PM |
| 2 | Enough with this lie about the right to vote.White women were the oppressors of blacks. There's no comparison. The fact the modern feminists actually put themselves on the same level as blacks in the US during slavery is mind blowing. Maybe the feminists also want to say that in Nazi Germany German women were oppressed with the Jews, on the same levels. I hope you are aware that the women of Germany are the ones who voted Hitler into power. He lost among the men, who after WWI had no interest in another war, and won so overwhelmingly among… | /r/MensRights | 13/03/22 12:14 PM |
| 12 | Australian report by feminist organisation claims support for men's rights is a "significant barrier to gender equality"Thank you so much for this summary and analysis. How crazy can it get? Feminists are actually willing to admit that men who discuss men's issues are not "dangerous wife-beaters from the racist alt-right" but human beings discussing human rights from a humanist universalist agenda, and then they call the "moderate" advocacy, "obstacle to women's equality"? Men having human rights is considered in feminism "an obstacle to equality"? How more absurd than that can it get? Save for simply shouting "w… | /r/MensRights | 13/03/22 10:37 AM |
| 1 | Reading about men's rights has been really bad for my mental healthI think my impression from a year of following this sub, is that in both sexes there is a tiny minority who is greatly harmed by the other sex, and in both sexes there is a tiny fraction that would cause this harm, and that the difference is in how society treats this. When I was growing up there was one restraining message for all people, regardless of sex (to be kind to any person, not to harm any person) and the support to the injured was similar for both minorities - none almost, an injury f… | /r/MensRights | 13/03/22 05:53 AM |
| 18 | Enough with this lie about the right to vote."Not allowed" is a distortion of the reality in which Swedes as well as other nations lived. The vote was considered in those countries a household vote. Women did participate, but the vote was through the husband. You may wish to argue with that, but the historical fact is that this is how the vote was perceived and "not allowed" is a completely distorted anachronism articulated a century later. Note that even feminism did not attempt to distort this history up until the advent of social media,… | /r/MensRights | 12/03/22 03:34 PM |
| 3 | Reading about men's rights has been really bad for my mental healthYes, yes, yes - I had the very same experience! I was hurt by feminist discrimination and anti-male hatred, badly, but I actually coped with it emotionally and psychologically much much better before I started reading the sub. I had energy - I had hope! I think that I was under the impression that what I encountered when feminists had hurt me, is something marginal and that out there there is a normal world, and like what you're describing, after reading this sub this feeling was replaced by the… | /r/MensRights | 12/03/22 03:16 PM |
| 9 | Enough with this lie about the right to vote.that doesn't disprove that other suffrage movements assisted in moving the concept forward Listen. It is extremely difficult to re-consider beliefs embedded from childhood. In many cases it would be as difficult as it would be for a person raised as a religious believer to abandon god. You don't need to form an opinion right now - only to ask yourself questions. You have nothing to lose. If your beliefs are grounded in facts, your questions will provide you with more answers for next time. Just … | /r/MensRights | 12/03/22 01:44 PM |
| 0 | Criticism from a man who sympathize with this forum, on something which is not your fault but still bothers: Just like feminism doesn't represent women, most of men's rights discussions don't represent men, we come here mainly because our thoughts are banned everywhere else and rarely find sanity.I see your point but why should the answer be doing the same as feminism instead of offering women a third way, a shared way. Something for both of us. When men try their own version of feminism, women usually don't tend to join. And we need them to join if we want to return to normality (it's a feminist delusion that "who needs a man", "all women can be amazons and never have a man in their life", it's all false, women and men, both, need each other and with exactly the same depth of need. Emot… | /r/MensRights | 12/03/22 01:00 PM |
| 1 | Criticism from a man who sympathize with this forum, on something which is not your fault but still bothers: Just like feminism doesn't represent women, most of men's rights discussions don't represent men, we come here mainly because our thoughts are banned everywhere else and rarely find sanity.I agree deeply. Even if not much can be done right now, it's great hearing some sanity. | /r/MensRights | 12/03/22 12:39 PM |
| 5 | The written goal of feminists, as declared in texts from the 1970s, is ending the relations between the sexes. Feminists have not been honest with women about what are the goals of statements feminists have been pushing to women, so women are following feminists thinking that it's about equalityEnough with this lie about the right to vote. First, WOMEN HAD THE RIGHT TO VOTE SINCE THE 18TH CENTURY. True - the right depended on wealth and there were much fewer women who met the criterion than men, BUT WOMEN WERE NOT CATEGORICALLY DENIED VOTING DUE TO THEIR SEX. Almost no one - man or woman - had the vote in the 18th and 19th centuries. Secondly, the ones who wanted everyone, men and women alike, to have a vote, were THE HUMANISTS, NOT THE FEMINISTS. When the vote was given to 8 million w… | /r/MensRights | 12/03/22 11:47 AM |
| 1 | The written goal of feminists, as declared in texts from the 1970s, is ending the relations between the sexes. Feminists have not been honest with women about what are the goals of statements feminists have been pushing to women, so women are following feminists thinking that it's about equalityBy the way, all these assertions are supported by studies. The links are in a book I published. I am simply tired of attaching links to things that everyone knows. The asking for "links" became a form of trollism - some self-evident fact is stated, some disturbed lunatic wants to object it, so instead of acknowledging that she is the disturbed one with a distorted image of reality and open Google and find what the reality is, she sends YOU to do the search FOR HER and usually don't even bother t… | /r/MensRights | 12/03/22 08:55 AM |
| 3 | The written goal of feminists, as declared in texts from the 1970s, is ending the relations between the sexes. Feminists have not been honest with women about what are the goals of statements feminists have been pushing to women, so women are following feminists thinking that it's about equalityYes they have. But - I believe that the full set of the sexual drives (this includes not only sex, but attraction to what makes each sex different from the other, love, parenting) is the strongest force in the living world, and that no one can destruct them as feminism attempts, and that all this suppression of both sexes will eventually burst its way out as a revolution of love. Interestingly, much of what we are going through now from feminists repeats a similar period in the end of the 19th c… | /r/MensRights | 12/03/22 08:11 AM |
| 2 | The written goal of feminists, as declared in texts from the 1970s, is ending the relations between the sexes. Feminists have not been honest with women about what are the goals of statements feminists have been pushing to women, so women are following feminists thinking that it's about equalityPerfect | /r/MensRights | 12/03/22 05:08 AM |
| 0 | Baby, you are not paid less.You are a troll and I'm sorry, I can't humor you anti-social disorder anymore. Farewell. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/22 06:59 PM |
| 1 | The written goal of feminists, as declared in texts from the 1970s, is ending the relations between the sexes. Feminists have not been honest with women about what are the goals of statements feminists have been pushing to women, so women are following feminists thinking that it's about equalityNice! Read this, it adds the explanation for where the predisposition of this minority of women is coming from. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/22 12:55 PM |
| 1 | Baby, you are not paid less.Your last argument about women being at fault for ending „couple-hood“ is not only completely delusional but also so weird and this exactly play into slut-shaming culture. I never had any such argument about women, only about feminists. The written goal of feminists, as declared in texts from the 1970s, is ending the relations between the sexes. Feminists have not been honest with women about what are the goals of statements feminists have been pushing to women, so women are following feminists … | /r/MensRights | 11/03/22 11:03 AM |
| -1 | Baby, you are not paid less.You are a woman who got disappointed that somebody treated her like a man. You want witty - get pretty. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/22 07:39 AM |
| 0 | Baby, you are not paid less.in, boundaries aren't your strong suit... If the atmosphere is right and the vibe is there, sure, grab and be grabbed. Men and women have a channel of communication between them. If you are not able to tune yourself into the women's channel do not attempt this, if you can, the "consent" is not verbal, it's on the sexual channel between two people. Most women know what I'm talking about. If you don't, it's not for you. By the way, I never grabbed anyone, because I always want women to show what t… | /r/MensRights | 10/03/22 10:44 PM |
| 1 | Baby, you are not paid less.Don't take it hard baby, show me a smile, come on... here you go. Let's dance - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-SD-ZpPeHg | /r/MensRights | 10/03/22 09:04 PM |
| -1 | Baby, you are not paid less.It's love. Here, listen - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-SD-ZpPeHg | /r/MensRights | 10/03/22 08:58 PM |
| 3 | Baby, you are not paid less.Love the example. That's what really happens. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/22 08:54 PM |
| 4 | Baby, you are not paid less.do in fact get promoted less No they are not. The question of promotion rates is not determined by proportions a "group" has in high levels relative to the "group" size in the general population, but only relative to the "group" size in the list of CANDIDATES. When there are 10 high-level positions and 100 candidates but within the candidates there are only 10 women applying, because other women SIMPLY CHOOSE NEVER TO APPLY, then equal opportunity to women means that on average out of the 10 who… | /r/MensRights | 10/03/22 12:52 PM |
| 9 | Baby, you are not paid less.Baby, you have been lied to. You were fed with the lie that there are no such things as "a man" and "a woman" but only "cultural molds". There are three layers to manhood and to womanhood: the outermost and thinnest is indeed an arbitrary allocation by culture of symbolic attributes, but the second, deeper and much more substantial layer, is a cultural manifestation of innate drives, and these differences are only expressed in cultural forms - they do not originate from culture but from biology … | /r/MensRights | 10/03/22 09:42 AM |
| 1 | The feminist anthemMs. Grumpledump's song | /r/MensRights | 03/03/22 05:46 AM |
| 21 | UK: A former Ms Great Britain claims it's impossible to find love? The answer gives a troubling insight into the mindset of many young men today. OP: More anti male crapOh, the explanation is very simple: for several years now, in beauty contests in the west, because of the feminist mysticism of "women's beauty standards are just a social construct - we can and must re-write men's preferences! (but never say anything about women's preferences)", they are selecting ordinary girls, very average-looking ones, sometimes even below-average, thinking that men are cows and that "if we tell men that this is beauty - then all ordinary girls will feel like queens because… | /r/MensRights | 01/03/22 03:43 PM |
| 6 | I refuse to date a woman in my workspace; all women turn against meSo pm_me-urcatpics wrote that a woman who doesn't want sex with a certain guy who is hitting on her at work is a lesbian. Very progressive of pm_me-urcatpics. | /r/MensRights | 01/03/22 03:31 PM |
| 3 | I'm having anxieties because of the coming women's day. In the past four years almost every day is men-battering day, and on the last women's day it became more of men-hating day, on social media and in newspapers. Have you been experiencing this anxiety these days?Last year it was on every news website, one had a giant picture of a girl in Paris with a big Kill All Men sign. And I don't know if you knew that, but it's actually a women's week and not a day, and at least in my country they make it the Women's month (March), I think it's the same in other countries, anyhow it means that in order to not hear or see things like calls for death you need to disconnect for about a month. Which I wish I could by I can't. It's not only on social media, it's in most… | /r/MensRights | 27/02/22 09:00 PM |
| 26 | I wish feminists would quit using me as an example to attack men.You are a wonderful human being. You don't how much your post is appreciated. Your words are hope, and solace. | /r/MensRights | 27/02/22 06:31 PM |
| 3 | All the gender earnings gap proves is women avoid higher paying but dirty, stressful and very dangerous jobs. If you want more money you can find it in these jobs.It's really a choices gap. Unless some society wishes to infringe human beings' freedom of making personal choices, there really isn't much that any society can do to close a choices gap. | /r/MensRights | 27/02/22 08:37 AM |
| 11 | All the gender earnings gap proves is women avoid higher paying but dirty, stressful and very dangerous jobs. If you want more money you can find it in these jobs.Managers employ women in high-paying, stressful or dangerous jobs where the risk of death is 10 times higher than other professions - women simply don't apply. In professions that require extremely demanding training over years, employers hire women out of the female candidates at least at the same proportions as men chosen out of the male applicants if not more - women, simply, don't, apply. Feminists have been trying to track women socially since childhood to choose to work in such professions… | /r/MensRights | 27/02/22 08:29 AM |
| 2 | This is the reason feminists have so much hate toward mentldr: Feminists’ attitude towards womanhood with shame and suppression; their articulation of an aspiration for equality not as equal human rights but as “physical equality” – sameness of two sexes; their attitude toward manhood through jealousy that transforms into hate with yet the conflicting drive of showing that “women are better than men in being men” – of having the male sex-distinguishing qualities personally; all become explained if one only regards feminism – that is, this core as oppo… | /r/MensRights | 27/02/22 05:57 AM |
| 1 | A new sexual orientation called FeminismIn fact in the 1970s there was a feminist movement of ideological lesbianism. There was even an article in the 1990s asking "can a woman be accepted as a feminist today without being a lesbian?" (in so many words, this isn't the actual title). This ideology has returned today - I have seen a TwoX post, suggesting that women should form households without sharing a bed, but as a couple-hood, which is very akin to the 70s political lesbianism. The post was moderately popular (hundreds of endorseme… | /r/MensRights | 26/02/22 10:05 AM |
| 1 | I strongly believe that much of the trans phenomenon in boys and young men in the past decade is in fact a persecution phenomenon equivalent to how Jews were persecuted so harshly in medieval Spain that many converted to Christianity just to be accepted as humans.No, the exact opposite. Lovism rejects the false narrative of "thousands of years of oppression" and provides the systematic debunking of this propaganda. Please read this as an example for refuting the "thousands of years of oppression" incitement: https://lovists.com/2021/10/12/what-is-equality/ | /r/MensRights | 15/02/22 09:46 AM |
| 2 | How to deal with a College Professor (female) who call all men rapists with male privilege etc. (Alberta, Canada)Show her these two articles. https://lovists.com/2021/04/26/some-feminist-readers-may-want-to-sit-before-continuing/ https://lovists.com/2021/02/20/women-are-as-sexually-violent-as-men/ | /r/MensRights | 05/02/22 04:31 PM |
| 6 | Women were given the message that immense privilege awaits them if they only cooperate with the feminist effort to depict men as an abuser-sex and women as a victim-sex.Yes, the links are provided in the text. | /r/MensRights | 04/02/22 09:13 PM |
| 7 | A member shared an r/Science post on a new study showing that feminist men suffer from impotency. r/Science took the trouble to provide a spastic explanation aimed at showing that it actually indicates something good, and anyhow is men's fault. Here is the probable explanation, from a neuroscientistWell, the studies you describe are fascinating, but I must say that your final suggestion is rather radical and odd. The solution is simply acknowledging publicly, that most of what women were taught to say about male sexuality, is first, not authentic but is them complying with what feminism taught them "a decent girl should say" ("men are disgusting", "men are frightening"), and they conform and try to sound "decent", and secondly, is not based on a reality of some universal abuse by the male … | /r/MensRights | 04/02/22 07:52 PM |
| 37 | "When a woman beats a man, it should be classified as men's violence against women," The Gender Equality Authority writes this in a handbook on "violence, gender and prevention". #FEMINISM_IS_CHAUVINISM, female, anti-male, chauvinism.Both violence in lesbian relationships and women beating men should thus be included in the concept of "men's violence against women", according to the authority. Oh, they internalized toxic manhood because they live in a patriarchy that tracked them into being violent. Men are guilty of causing lesbians to hit each other, and men are guilty of causing women to hit men. I'll make it simple for you because evidently testosterone poisoning has disabled your mental capacities: men are guilty of eve… | /r/MensRights | 18/01/22 09:06 PM |
| 1 | TwoX are citing a new study showing that outcomes of male surgeons are better for men while female surgeons reach same level outcomes with both sexes - an entire biased discussion ensues stemming from what seems as a bias of the researchers themselves. Before the media feasts on it, here's why.True. I must say, knowing how studies are reviewed by journals and what a review report looks like, that I'm amazed this paper was accepted by a JAMA journal. Reviewers notice much more subtle problems and request additional steps routinely before accepting a paper, and here obvious gaps that undermine the ability to regard the conclusions proposed by the investigators as necessarily following from the data and therefore as valid, were overlooked. JAMA is no nature but I respected it, now it was… | /r/MensRights | 15/12/21 06:14 AM |
| 4 | So i made a post on off my chest about how I wanna be strong and a women said i am a mysoginyst. The fuck?Ignore her. Sounds like she's the one with issues, misandry most probably. You are great and your effort to get over insecurities is terrific. A tip: read Hemingway. It will give you what you're looking for. | /r/MensRights | 15/12/21 06:00 AM |
| 5 | TwoX are citing a new study showing that outcomes of male surgeons are better for men while female surgeons reach same level outcomes with both sexes - an entire biased discussion ensues stemming from what seems as a bias of the researchers themselves. Before the media feasts on it, here's why.Exactly but you left out the crucial factor: 75% male surgeons, 25% female. This means that it's not that "among males there are some bad ones - men should stop being surgeons" but that (most likely) there are just as many male as female great surgeons (if not more) and they are (presumably) about 25% of all doctors in the sample like the females, and then you have the less great ones - the remaining 50% - but among those almost all are men. But (presumably and most probably) if you could reach … | /r/MensRights | 14/12/21 04:11 PM |
| 12 | TwoX are citing a new study showing that outcomes of male surgeons are better for men while female surgeons reach same level outcomes with both sexes - an entire biased discussion ensues stemming from what seems as a bias of the researchers themselves. Before the media feasts on it, here's why.It's different than the pay gap studies and this is why I expect a tremendous backlash and men-bashing wave in the mainstream media coming now after this study, and this is also why I bothered to explain here the issues (considering there's nowhere else to explain it) hoping the information will somehow be carried all the way to commentators who will be able to explain what's wrong with the study. In this study and unlike pay gap "research", the outcomes are real and the gap is concrete. Only th… | /r/MensRights | 14/12/21 01:05 PM |
| 9 | TwoX are citing a new study showing that outcomes of male surgeons are better for men while female surgeons reach same level outcomes with both sexes - an entire biased discussion ensues stemming from what seems as a bias of the researchers themselves. Before the media feasts on it, here's why.No, because their results showed that the average outcomes between all female doctors was same for both sexes, and at the level of the male-patients outcomes for male doctors. They absolutely showed that on the 4-cell matrix of doctor-sex X patient-sex, 1 of 4 cells shows 15% worse outcomes relative to all other 3 cells - male doctor-female patient. What they haven't taken into consideration is the first and most important control when you examine a sample with a sharp numerical imbalance betwee… | /r/MensRights | 14/12/21 12:35 PM |
| 3 | Feminism kills. The following is a post appearing on TrueOffMyChest. The feminist depiction of humanity as "one abusive sex, one abused sex" is the social hiding and legitimization of female violence and abuse under a guise of equality. When half of humanity is exempt of humane imperatives.I was attacked by my feminist friends on social media when I posted in me too the list of harassment I had from women. Some unfriended me, some commented nasty things, others called me on the phone and demanded that I remove the post immediately, yet others wrote me in private and attacked me viciously. One continued battering me for several weeks. I am not here to convince you - by denying what you know nothing about, you become part of this - please excuse me for trying now to believe you don'… | /r/MensRights | 13/12/21 11:38 PM |
| 3 | Feminism kills. The following is a post appearing on TrueOffMyChest. The feminist depiction of humanity as "one abusive sex, one abused sex" is the social hiding and legitimization of female violence and abuse under a guise of equality. When half of humanity is exempt of humane imperatives.Not exactly but I understand why someone would think that. Since antiquity and probably for as long as humans existed, women always had their "conversation by the well", the women's well-talk. Feminism tapped into that and made women feel that feminism is their new well (I think this occurred roughly around the 1980s, all the advice columns, lectures, advice books, discussion groups). While in fact feminism was a politicization of that well-talk, that most women have no interest in (at least unt… | /r/MensRights | 12/12/21 05:08 PM |
| 6 | Feminism kills. The following is a post appearing on TrueOffMyChest. The feminist depiction of humanity as "one abusive sex, one abused sex" is the social hiding and legitimization of female violence and abuse under a guise of equality. When half of humanity is exempt of humane imperatives.Please make the distinction between women and feminism. First of all, equality is called humanism which pertains to equality for all. As for feminism, this is an occult ideology that until not long ago belonged to a very small and extremist faction, that with social media became extremely influential. Women are not feminism and feminism is not women, objecting feminism is not being against women, and certainly not against men's and women's equality. Feminism is not synonymous with equality any m… | /r/MensRights | 12/12/21 04:05 PM |
| 12 | Feminism kills. The following is a post appearing on TrueOffMyChest. The feminist depiction of humanity as "one abusive sex, one abused sex" is the social hiding and legitimization of female violence and abuse under a guise of equality. When half of humanity is exempt of humane imperatives.Is this to say women don't care about men and you blame feminism for that? Is feminism so powerful that is has affected how all women think? Even the women that don't identify as feminists? Please read this. | /r/MensRights | 12/12/21 11:57 AM |
| 17 | Feminism kills. The following is a post appearing on TrueOffMyChest. The feminist depiction of humanity as "one abusive sex, one abused sex" is the social hiding and legitimization of female violence and abuse under a guise of equality. When half of humanity is exempt of humane imperatives.This is what that has to do with feminism. The full article is relevant but scroll down to Legitimizing Violence (Edit: by the way, I didn't downvote you. You are asking an important question that requires an answer, which I provide and hope you would read. Women are not always aware of how life look like in the last couple of years from the eyes of men, because they are not the target of feminist aggression so it's not always easy for them to notice such aggression and what it does. This is why… | /r/MensRights | 12/12/21 11:51 AM |
| 21 | Feminism kills. The following is a post appearing on TrueOffMyChest. The feminist depiction of humanity as "one abusive sex, one abused sex" is the social hiding and legitimization of female violence and abuse under a guise of equality. When half of humanity is exempt of humane imperatives.Here is how. The full article is relevant but scroll down to Legitimizing Violence. | /r/MensRights | 12/12/21 10:53 AM |
| 59 | Feminism kills. The following is a post appearing on TrueOffMyChest. The feminist depiction of humanity as "one abusive sex, one abused sex" is the social hiding and legitimization of female violence and abuse under a guise of equality. When half of humanity is exempt of humane imperatives.They are not only ignoring it. Feminists actively try to prevent men of reporting female abuse, by attacking them if they do, and by this, feminists are one of the primary reasons men can't talk. Why have we not seen in me too men posting about what women did? Read this. | /r/MensRights | 12/12/21 10:51 AM |
| 1 | A member asked here, "How do we know that the statistics on 97% and 1/3 of women have been sexually assaulted are false?" here is the full answer, with all the links to all the studies. Read and disseminate.Read this: What is Equality? P.S. I suspect you are a woman, but this only makes this discussion all the more important. You need to regard yourself as human before a woman. Read this link. | /r/MensRights | 12/12/21 10:43 AM |
| 1 | A member asked here, "How do we know that the statistics on 97% and 1/3 of women have been sexually assaulted are false?" here is the full answer, with all the links to all the studies. Read and disseminate.Are you talking about Western Europe, North America and westernized societies? What exactly is a "man's world" in those regions? What do men have there that women don't? What rights or privileges? Have you read the links I attached or have you come only to preach? Read them. Then explain to me what makes women in the West "needing equal rights as men". Here they are again: Article 1, article 2, article 3. And if you are referring to third world countries, first - please direct your politics at t… | /r/MensRights | 12/12/21 05:43 AM |
| 134 | Feminism kills. The following is a post appearing on TrueOffMyChest. The feminist depiction of humanity as "one abusive sex, one abused sex" is the social hiding and legitimization of female violence and abuse under a guise of equality. When half of humanity is exempt of humane imperatives.I think it's time that someone opens the Reddit ThisIsFeminism. Where all the things feminists would not admit about feminism and its consequences will be uploaded as screenshots and links. | /r/MensRights | 12/12/21 05:16 AM |
| 1 | A member asked here, "How do we know that the statistics on 97% and 1/3 of women have been sexually assaulted are false?" here is the full answer, with all the links to all the studies. Read and disseminate.Who are you to tell me that I was better off than a poor woman in the same situation. I was assisted by a scholarship meant for exceptional students from poor backgrounds, which had a yearly event, so I got to know the others, half were girls, no, I was not better off than them but worse because they also had dedicated scholarships to promote women which I didn't have, and no one discriminated them as that feminist professor discriminated me (this was not the only case I was treated with bias by… | /r/MensRights | 11/12/21 06:30 PM |
| 3 | Texas ‘Teacher of the Year’ engaged in sex acts with student in classroom, affidavit saysAll research shows that boys mature slower than girls. A 13-14 teen, regardless of sex, is not at a stage to have any sexual relations with a 36 yo. The fact that boys at that age start exploring with girls at the same age sexuality, does not mean either sex is on par with a 36 yo. In both sexes they start to have the body of an older person of their sex but their mind is in certain respects that of child, they are innocent. I remember when being 17, a 14 yo girl wanted to flirt with me, hard, a… | /r/MensRights | 11/12/21 05:47 PM |
| 56 | Audience during an interview laughs at a man getting abused and hurt, but interviewer explains how they wouldn’t be laughing if it was a woman.Actually this incident was in 2015 and this year this show by that host got cancelled... Still nice to remember that once upon a time while it was already something to lough at such laughter was still criticized. Maybe today no one would have noticed the laughter. Who knows. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3081266/Viewers-slam-Jeremy-Kyle-audience-laughed-male-domestic-abuse-victim-told-jumped-three-storey-high-balcony-escape-abusive-girlfriend.html | /r/MensRights | 11/12/21 01:45 PM |
| 26 | Texas ‘Teacher of the Year’ engaged in sex acts with student in classroom, affidavit saysOne report indicates that she was an eighth-grade teacher at the time of the arrest. This would make the pupil 13 or 14 yo. I would call this pedophilia. And this is not some 19 yo substitute teacher from your fantasies messing around with a 17 yo student. Have you looked at the pictures? The lizard neck? A 13 or 14 yo wouldn't be able to even smell her. She is a rapist pedophile. Plain and simple. Not all women are great, you know. Some are disgusting rapist pedophiles and society will have to … | /r/MensRights | 11/12/21 01:34 PM |
| 1 | A member asked here, "How do we know that the statistics on 97% and 1/3 of women have been sexually assaulted are false?" here is the full answer, with all the links to all the studies. Read and disseminate.Feminism is not equality but female chauvinism (female anti-male chauvinism). Equality for all is called humanism and not feminism. Since the concept of equality for all means only one thing - the very same rights to every human - there is only one humanism (one set of rights; to all), and hence any deviation from it can only be one thing - some kind of chauvinism. There is no patriarchy in the west today, and for at least 100 years. It existed in the 19th century and is long gone. When feminist… | /r/MensRights | 11/12/21 08:46 AM |
| 1 | A member asked here, "How do we know that the statistics on 97% and 1/3 of women have been sexually assaulted are false?" here is the full answer, with all the links to all the studies. Read and disseminate.No my friend. Humans are not a fabrication created by "culture". They are living beings with innate needs and psychology. Women as men, are in unbearable pain because of the feminist severing of the two sexes of each other by what I described above. Women are agonizing, without having access to analysis such as what I gave above, that would explain the source of this suffering. We are all humans and require sexuality, love, regard, including subliminal sexual regard from the opposite sex. Natura… | /r/MensRights | 10/12/21 01:26 PM |
| 1 | A member asked here, "How do we know that the statistics on 97% and 1/3 of women have been sexually assaulted are false?" here is the full answer, with all the links to all the studies. Read and disseminate.Lie. Almost none of us "harass" women. Women themselves are doing with and to men all the things feminism told you to regard as "harassment", and they do them because this is the language of sexuality - the human species is a two-sexes species with a sexuality between the two sexes that materializes through an entire dedicated language of gestures and signs meant specifically and only for sexuality, and both women and men alike, use this language. Feminism has taught women to experience the norm… | /r/MensRights | 10/12/21 10:35 AM |
| 1 | A member asked here, "How do we know that the statistics on 97% and 1/3 of women have been sexually assaulted are false?" here is the full answer, with all the links to all the studies. Read and disseminate.Thank you friend : ) | /r/MensRights | 10/12/21 09:40 AM |
| 28 | Finding an apartment to rent is really hard as a manYou are joking but notice that younger teens may encounter so much of this hostility and discrimination that they will be driven to do just that. Instead of stopping the anti-male violence that pushed them out of their sex, and caused them to try and convince the environment to regard them as female just to be acknowledged as humans, so that their humanity will be accepted and respected, a feminist psychological world (with a latent penis envy and a castration urge) encourages them, pretending t… | /r/MensRights | 08/12/21 01:11 PM |
| -11 | Finding an apartment to rent is really hard as a manYou live with your girlfriend in separate rooms? I never heard of that. Aren't you a couple? Is this some new feminist banning of the sexuality between the sexes? Was that her idea? (is she a feminist?) | /r/MensRights | 08/12/21 01:05 PM |
| 1 | A member asked here, "How do we know that the statistics on 97% and 1/3 of women have been sexually assaulted are false?" here is the full answer, with all the links to all the studies. Read and disseminate.Perfect. Thank you! | /r/MensRights | 07/12/21 01:19 PM |
| 2 | Men should start leaving western and westernized countries and migrate to hospitable countries. The media now portrays the overall earnings gap between sexes as a pay gap by treating raising children as unpaid work. This will lead to discrimination in pay by law. Men must leave.I guess you are addressing your comments to the BBC and the authors cited. If so, then I agree with what you write, and in my country as well, men can take a paternity leave (shorter than women's), which I took after my wife. The perspective that you present, which I share with you, is that there is such a thing called a family, and in this human arrangement called family the man and the woman are anything but two independent concerns that only happen to live under the same roof - but rather the… | /r/MensRights | 07/12/21 11:00 AM |
| 1 | Men should start leaving western and westernized countries and migrate to hospitable countries. The media now portrays the overall earnings gap between sexes as a pay gap by treating raising children as unpaid work. This will lead to discrimination in pay by law. Men must leave.Why not? You can make it a paradise. You can contribute to society and be appreciated for it instead of hated. You can build and develop. How do you imagine places like the US, Canada and Australia became developed? By such migration. And if men from developing countries can migrate to first world countries, why can't men from the west migrate to those places? Sure - some of those places are underdeveloped, but many are still full of opportunity and potential. I won't consider dictatorships and … | /r/MensRights | 07/12/21 07:30 AM |
| 2 | Men should start leaving western and westernized countries and migrate to hospitable countries. The media now portrays the overall earnings gap between sexes as a pay gap by treating raising children as unpaid work. This will lead to discrimination in pay by law. Men must leave.I don't think so. They already have quotas, so the quotas will force to hire and pay by any new laws. And most large companies have already factored into their business model the losses caused by employing personnel who are not well qualified for the position (women accepted only due to quotas) to avoid the public defamation that feminists will cause. Spending resources on employing women who would not return the payment is considered today just another "expense", like advertising. Advertising i… | /r/MensRights | 07/12/21 04:04 AM |
| 3 | Men should start leaving western and westernized countries and migrate to hospitable countries. The media now portrays the overall earnings gap between sexes as a pay gap by treating raising children as unpaid work. This will lead to discrimination in pay by law. Men must leave.Fine, start a revolution. I think that some countries are so aggressive toward men, that the only thing preventing a revolution is the censorship that prevents thinkers from explaining to large audiences the causes of their hardship. Currently censorship put in place through feminism to maintain the feminist advantage, becomes what keeps men from organizing. This is why women can unite while the men and women who oppose the feminist dictation cannot. This censorship is allowed to continue becaus… | /r/MensRights | 07/12/21 03:46 AM |
| 1 | Men should start leaving western and westernized countries and migrate to hospitable countries. The media now portrays the overall earnings gap between sexes as a pay gap by treating raising children as unpaid work. This will lead to discrimination in pay by law. Men must leave.Are the sky blue. | /r/MensRights | 07/12/21 03:26 AM |
| 2 | Men should start leaving western and westernized countries and migrate to hospitable countries. The media now portrays the overall earnings gap between sexes as a pay gap by treating raising children as unpaid work. This will lead to discrimination in pay by law. Men must leave.I believe that a significant migration would enhance countries in which western men will settle. They are motivated, hard working, and mostly much more educated than in other countries. They can cause economies to flourish, while countries left with less and less working men, because they discriminate and incite against men, could find themselves in crisis. The countries of East Europe and South America could have immense potential for motivated men. And there are countries in southern Europe su… | /r/MensRights | 06/12/21 08:09 PM |
| 3 | Men should start leaving western and westernized countries and migrate to hospitable countries. The media now portrays the overall earnings gap between sexes as a pay gap by treating raising children as unpaid work. This will lead to discrimination in pay by law. Men must leave.I disagree. Men in the west are well trained and could make countries progress. Currently thousands of western academics who could not find positions in their country due to the institutionalized discrimination of universities that cause these institutes to reject a better-qualified man if he is not twice as good as a female candidate, are finding positions in China. China is already benefiting from a massive academic immigration of highly competent and highly trained men, expelled from the univ… | /r/MensRights | 06/12/21 06:44 PM |
| 2 | "Men are MEANT to be expendable. Women are not." J Walters for Congress on TwitterMen are meant to protect. Not to be expendable. The expectation is that they will survive their efforts to protect because they will be supported for their sacrifices, and not that they will be disposed of. This is hate speech. Assume that you read here "blacks are expandable", "Jews are expendable", "immigrants are expendable". This is what is being said in "men are expendable" - this is what "men" includes. When these are treated by society as human waste, it is primarily and often exclusively… | /r/MensRights | 06/12/21 08:12 AM |
| 1 | A member asked here, "How do we know that the statistics on 97% and 1/3 of women have been sexually assaulted are false?" here is the full answer, with all the links to all the studies. Read and disseminate.Thanks. If the data on female perpetrators was interesting, you might want to take a look at part 2 of the article, here. Its entire discussion and research data is about this complementary part of that same picture. | /r/MensRights | 06/12/21 08:00 AM |
| 3 | A member asked here, "How do we know that the statistics on 97% and 1/3 of women have been sexually assaulted are false?" here is the full answer, with all the links to all the studies. Read and disseminate.It's available online here. This is also a chapter in a new book that you can get on amazon (link in that same url). The book discusses more data and references. | /r/MensRights | 06/12/21 07:57 AM |
| -6 | UK prisons are purely misandrists : Male prisoners cannot refuse easily to be searched by a woman, male visitors can be searched naked but to search a female prisoner who attempted to escape you need special authorization.I meant this as common sense. Men don't mind a woman searching them (as long as being respectful of course). Unless gay (sorry I'm not a PC guy) guys are disgusted by a man searching them. It is what it is. | /r/MensRights | 05/12/21 01:21 AM |
| -6 | Vox Article on the Cost of Single Living - No Mention of MenI disagree. I think you're not making the right comparisons. You are asking whether a man's standard of life changes when leaving together - naturally the answer is usually yes - and you then regard the increased cost of an increased standard of life as more expensive living. But equals must be compared with equals. It's irrelevant if you increased the standard of life - the relevant question is: for those items on your expenses tab that appeared both when living alone and in a couple, was there… | /r/MensRights | 05/12/21 01:01 AM |
| -2 | Vox Article on the Cost of Single Living - No Mention of MenBut isn't Vox a women's magazine? And a feminist one? Why should a feminist women's publication write about men? | /r/MensRights | 05/12/21 12:33 AM |
| -10 | UK prisons are purely misandrists : Male prisoners cannot refuse easily to be searched by a woman, male visitors can be searched naked but to search a female prisoner who attempted to escape you need special authorization.I don't want to be searched by a man. A woman is my first choice for this. This is where men's rights start copying feminism and applying it automatically on men. Most men see in men searching them what feminists see in men searching women. Invasion. Don't. | /r/MensRights | 05/12/21 12:30 AM |
| 5 | A member asked here, "How do we know that the statistics on 97% and 1/3 of women have been sexually assaulted are false?" here is the full answer, with all the links to all the studies. Read and disseminate.It's available online here. It should be straight-forward to save as PDF there (in chrome, menu > print > choose "destination" as pdf). This is also a chapter in a new book that you can get on amazon. The book holds more data and references on similarly-acute subjects. | /r/MensRights | 05/12/21 12:10 AM |
| 7 | A member asked here, "How do we know that the statistics on 97% and 1/3 of women have been sexually assaulted are false?" here is the full answer, with all the links to all the studies. Read and disseminate.Correct. As mentioned under the post, the text is available on a website (which holds much more similar data with references) in the url: https://lovists.com/2021/04/26/some-feminist-readers-may-want-to-sit-before-continuing/ | /r/MensRights | 05/12/21 12:02 AM |
| 13 | How do we know that the statistics on 97% and 1/3 of women have been sexually assualted are false?Here in the full answer with all the links to all the studies. Enjoy and disseminate. https://lovists.com/2021/04/26/some-feminist-readers-may-want-to-sit-before-continuing/ | /r/MensRights | 04/12/21 07:17 PM |
| 2 | Im not even going to bother explaining thisI find it hilarious. The image shows very well the self-deception behind "who needs a man". Women who want to be men, aka feminists, need a man, evidently. The comment in the circle is actually to the point. I imagine him thinking, "rejecting a feminist can cause her to file a sexual harassment complaint? What's my best move here..." | /r/MensRights | 30/11/21 09:59 PM |
| 1 | An apology: I'm sorry, members of men's rights. As a man, for years I have been ignoring you, I internalized the feminist depiction - "wife bitters", we all have, and what you were pointing to kept growing, until it reached almost all of us, now we understand. I'm so sorry.It's a post I wrote here. It's not from any source, just what I wanted to share. But I write and publish books. Mostly under my real name, through regular publishers, and then after the lynch I published one independently on amazon using an alias, where I attempted to offer men and women to have a conversation. But here I just posted what I wanted to share with the members. Some here, many, went through difficult times. I know how many times I considered suicide - I can only imagine where they w… | /r/MensRights | 30/11/21 09:39 PM |
| 1 | An apology: I'm sorry, members of men's rights. As a man, for years I have been ignoring you, I internalized the feminist depiction - "wife bitters", we all have, and what you were pointing to kept growing, until it reached almost all of us, now we understand. I'm so sorry.Thanks friend. I appreciate that : ) | /r/MensRights | 30/11/21 09:30 PM |
| 2 | An apology: I'm sorry, members of men's rights. As a man, for years I have been ignoring you, I internalized the feminist depiction - "wife bitters", we all have, and what you were pointing to kept growing, until it reached almost all of us, now we understand. I'm so sorry.Yes, I think you are right. Which is why I think men must start educating men and boys about expecting women and girls not to express such hateful attitudes if those women and girls want to be accepted romantically and sexually - this will pressure women and girls to be afraid of collaborating with the supremacy violent urge feminism is spreading. I in fact think men need a spreadsheet. Online. A website. Where each girl and woman taking part in this hate movement is named, with a screenshot of … | /r/MensRights | 30/11/21 09:01 AM |
| 2 | An apology: I'm sorry, members of men's rights. As a man, for years I have been ignoring you, I internalized the feminist depiction - "wife bitters", we all have, and what you were pointing to kept growing, until it reached almost all of us, now we understand. I'm so sorry.I will! Thanks! | /r/MensRights | 30/11/21 08:30 AM |
| 2 | An apology: I'm sorry, members of men's rights. As a man, for years I have been ignoring you, I internalized the feminist depiction - "wife bitters", we all have, and what you were pointing to kept growing, until it reached almost all of us, now we understand. I'm so sorry.I know. You won't like hearing this but - I understand you. You are right. I do have a son. I am teaching him things no one taught me. I am weary about his future, about all sons' future. What kind of society is waiting for them. The things I see and hear around me as a grown person, will be (already are) the starting point he will have. | /r/MensRights | 30/11/21 08:28 AM |
| 3 | An apology: I'm sorry, members of men's rights. As a man, for years I have been ignoring you, I internalized the feminist depiction - "wife bitters", we all have, and what you were pointing to kept growing, until it reached almost all of us, now we understand. I'm so sorry.After a little thinking, I think what made it hard for me to relate to men's rights agenda, was how it followed the footsteps of feminism and translated feminism to men's issues - so if feminism brings up breast cancer men's activists bring up prostate cancer, feminists raise awareness to mutilation in Africa - activists bring up circumcision, feminists make domestic violence seem like a pandemic, activists highlight how men are the ones who come out as most affected by DV in studies. It's not t… | /r/MensRights | 30/11/21 05:59 AM |
| 1 | An apology: I'm sorry, members of men's rights. As a man, for years I have been ignoring you, I internalized the feminist depiction - "wife bitters", we all have, and what you were pointing to kept growing, until it reached almost all of us, now we understand. I'm so sorry.I am following his posts, and yes, they are very instructive. | /r/MensRights | 29/11/21 08:31 PM |
| 4 | An apology: I'm sorry, members of men's rights. As a man, for years I have been ignoring you, I internalized the feminist depiction - "wife bitters", we all have, and what you were pointing to kept growing, until it reached almost all of us, now we understand. I'm so sorry.Love it. Yes, exactly (so your sample size is now two). | /r/MensRights | 29/11/21 08:29 PM |
| 7 | An apology: I'm sorry, members of men's rights. As a man, for years I have been ignoring you, I internalized the feminist depiction - "wife bitters", we all have, and what you were pointing to kept growing, until it reached almost all of us, now we understand. I'm so sorry.Thank you dearly. For all the reasons often discussed in this forum, I think it's extremely difficult to reach men. Our competitive nature against other men, our protective instinct toward women when told they are at risk - especially when told they are at risk from men's groups, the affection-deprivation men are in because of feminism's instruction to women to regard men as repulsive and dangerous, which makes men do anything for positive regard, and above all - the tapping of feminism into our… | /r/MensRights | 29/11/21 08:20 PM |
| 9 | An apology: I'm sorry, members of men's rights. As a man, for years I have been ignoring you, I internalized the feminist depiction - "wife bitters", we all have, and what you were pointing to kept growing, until it reached almost all of us, now we understand. I'm so sorry.I created a website and published a book to try and offer women to join men in a mutual reciprocal movement meant for the equality and human value and dignity of both. I felt that most women, are inherently not against men and are authentically (I think mostly because of how feminism depicts men) afraid for their future and safety (and unaware of how men go through life, and that men and women are both human and have much more in common in their human experience than feminism taught women to bel… | /r/MensRights | 29/11/21 07:29 PM |
| 41 | An apology: I'm sorry, members of men's rights. As a man, for years I have been ignoring you, I internalized the feminist depiction - "wife bitters", we all have, and what you were pointing to kept growing, until it reached almost all of us, now we understand. I'm so sorry.*in title, "beater". Sorry for the misspelling (no excuse, simple mistake). | /r/MensRights | 29/11/21 04:51 PM |
| 2 | I think the way women treat me is the way they actually feel about all men but just won't admit.Listen, I commented before reading all of it. Listen, you are great, please, please please read Charles Bukowski, he lived a life like yours, he wrote poetry and novels, he gives solace and friendship to men in this position (and to women to), and to all of us - we are all at times in your position, but we are not allowed as before to say it, to talk about our lives, we need to abide with women's expectation that we will always talk about ourselves as calm and strong and hurt by nothing and cert… | /r/MensRights | 29/11/21 01:14 PM |
| 2 | I think the way women treat me is the way they actually feel about all men but just won't admit.All true. Thanks for taking the time to express this in writing. | /r/MensRights | 29/11/21 12:59 PM |
| 1 | This OP is a neuroscientist and wishes you to be aware: Manhood and womanhood have cultural manifestations, but are in essence not cultural "roles". They originate from innate traits, the rewriting of which, due to how brains operate, can be achieved only through oppression of human drives.How dare you. I have spent 30 minutes writing a 3-pages response specifically for you - you asked for information and hence below the response, information was copied here. This is the meaning of providing information in response to a request for information - giving the information. Do you expect me to run studies just for you and paste for you the readouts here? I HAVE WRITTEN AN ENTIRE BOOK TO PROVIDE ANSWERS SPECIFICALLY ON THE QUESTION YOU ASKED, you are not even willing to read it so I, th… | /r/MensRights | 29/11/21 12:26 PM |
| 1 | This OP is a neuroscientist and wishes you to be aware: Manhood and womanhood have cultural manifestations, but are in essence not cultural "roles". They originate from innate traits, the rewriting of which, due to how brains operate, can be achieved only through oppression of human drives.The innate differences in sexuality create a highly intricate system of pressures within society, from each sex on the other, that explain vast areas in the human condition and of the psychology of men and women. This means that through the denials underlying the word Gender, an entire world of emotions, dreams, hopes, disappointments, and human experience, has been completely repressed. The very reference to it and the conversation about it are considered in feminism what "creates" the "gender … | /r/MensRights | 29/11/21 07:38 AM |
| 1 | This OP is a neuroscientist and wishes you to be aware: Manhood and womanhood have cultural manifestations, but are in essence not cultural "roles". They originate from innate traits, the rewriting of which, due to how brains operate, can be achieved only through oppression of human drives.The fact that all mammals studied have the same brain circuit with the same difference in activity between the sexes, is dramatic. Different types of animals have different characteristics - for example, a dog has a tail, and we do not. But different animals also have common features, such as the division of the palm into five fingers, which humans, dogs, and cats have. Traits common to many species are called "phylogenetically conserved traits" because they were conserved in different species t… | /r/MensRights | 29/11/21 07:37 AM |
| 1 | This OP is a neuroscientist and wishes you to be aware: Manhood and womanhood have cultural manifestations, but are in essence not cultural "roles". They originate from innate traits, the rewriting of which, due to how brains operate, can be achieved only through oppression of human drives.In animals, sophisticated methods can be used to investigate how the structure of a network causes it to be sensitive to a certain sight and indifferent to some other sights. For example - how an area would be sensitive to faces but not objects, or to objects and not faces23. In humans, the same methods can’t be applied, but fMRI brain imaging shows very consistently the same type of specialization of equivalent areas in men and women. This time, the specialization is for sexual inputs, as shown… | /r/MensRights | 29/11/21 07:37 AM |
| 1 | This OP is a neuroscientist and wishes you to be aware: Manhood and womanhood have cultural manifestations, but are in essence not cultural "roles". They originate from innate traits, the rewriting of which, due to how brains operate, can be achieved only through oppression of human drives.The War on Femininity and Masculinity to Achieve Sameness Until the middle of the 20th century the word Gender simply meant biological sex and was used to refer to sex from birth as opposed to sec in the sense of intercourse. This started to change after 1949 when the writer Simone de Beauvoir published a book called The Second Sex, where she wrote that “One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman”17. She explained that in her view there is a difference between sex at birth and what she referre… | /r/MensRights | 29/11/21 07:34 AM |
| 1 | This OP is a neuroscientist and wishes you to be aware: Manhood and womanhood have cultural manifestations, but are in essence not cultural "roles". They originate from innate traits, the rewriting of which, due to how brains operate, can be achieved only through oppression of human drives.With members of the gender church like yourself this always comes up. Yes, you are correct - we have not shown here the neural correlates of the specific differing sexual male drives and female drives, nor the origin of these neural correlates, that is, that they start after birth (meaning, that they are innate) and that they start after birth because of genes located on the sex chromosomes - meaning that innate sex determines innate and differing male and female sexuality. There is a detailed a… | /r/MensRights | 29/11/21 07:31 AM |
| 1 | mens rights activists, i need the facts! the data! the statistics! you can help!Here you'll find endless sources, contextualized with links: https://lovists.com/blog/ I recommend to begin here, where discrimination is discussed with data and references: https://lovists.com/2021/01/28/what-does-equality-look-like-in-the-feminist-society-we-live-in/ More links about studies on specific discrimination here: https://lovists.com/2021/05/10/why-i-am-not-a-feminist/ Here you will find organized data showing that the number of sexually-violent women is similiar to men's and that th… | /r/MensRights | 28/11/21 08:54 PM |
| 21 | My wife is leaving.Men and guys, please learn from his experience. Never date and never marry a woman with explicit feminist attitudes, even if mild. This would be like a black woman dating and marrying a kkk-sympathizer. They will hurt you, physically or emotionally, sooner or later, because they are truly incapable of regarding you as human. | /r/MensRights | 26/11/21 05:23 PM |
| 2 | Once and for all - criticizing feminism is not being against women or "hating women", being anti-feminism is in no way whatsoever being against equality. Whenever feminism becomes harmful, being supportive of equality to all and particularly to women becomes being anti-feminism as it should.Thank you. There is actually a name for supporting both, it's called a lovist (as here - lovists.com). | /r/MensRights | 26/11/21 09:02 AM |
| 1 | Once and for all - criticizing feminism is not being against women or "hating women", being anti-feminism is in no way whatsoever being against equality. Whenever feminism becomes harmful, being supportive of equality to all and particularly to women becomes being anti-feminism as it should.Disagree. Women and men don't need sameness to have equal human value - both have equal value to human existence. A world without either is not worth living in. What you wrote about emotions is true but - being able to understand logic in it's most abstract form when it's stripped from any emotional charges, is a capacity of very few. Most of those few are men, but some are women, and most men are far from that minority and like women require an emotional significance attached to logical lemmas … | /r/MensRights | 24/11/21 11:16 PM |
| 1 | Once and for all - criticizing feminism is not being against women or "hating women", being anti-feminism is in no way whatsoever being against equality. Whenever feminism becomes harmful, being supportive of equality to all and particularly to women becomes being anti-feminism as it should.The exact opposite. Will you take a few minutes to read the post again? | /r/MensRights | 24/11/21 11:15 PM |
| 2 | Once and for all - criticizing feminism is not being against women or "hating women", being anti-feminism is in no way whatsoever being against equality. Whenever feminism becomes harmful, being supportive of equality to all and particularly to women becomes being anti-feminism as it should.Sorry you're right lol, my kid needed me and when back I drifted... tdlr is here - lovists.com | /r/MensRights | 24/11/21 11:13 PM |
| 4 | Once and for all - criticizing feminism is not being against women or "hating women", being anti-feminism is in no way whatsoever being against equality. Whenever feminism becomes harmful, being supportive of equality to all and particularly to women becomes being anti-feminism as it should.Well, two points need to be made here. First, feminism created the idea of "opinion packages" (like triple packages offered by AT&T, "cell+internet+streaming") - "if you you have a specific opinion then you MUST endorse a whole set of opinions on a full list of human subjects". This is completely false, it is yet another effect of social media and five years ago no one thought this way - almost all people were INDIVIDUALS and each had his and her mix of opinions, there was no "obligatory uniform… | /r/MensRights | 24/11/21 07:29 PM |
| 10 | Once and for all - criticizing feminism is not being against women or "hating women", being anti-feminism is in no way whatsoever being against equality. Whenever feminism becomes harmful, being supportive of equality to all and particularly to women becomes being anti-feminism as it should.Yes, I got the same impression from living with my beloved wife for 15 years. It took me about 14 years out of those 15 to realize that. But today it's a little better. For example, a few years ago we were at restaurant and I said they should serve a jigsaw with the steaks (it's so hard). I thought she'd lough but she started crying. I was shocked. Turns out since she picked the place she interpreted my comment as being about her. Took me days to explain it was a joke, and about a random restaur… | /r/MensRights | 24/11/21 05:37 PM |
| 23 | Once and for all - criticizing feminism is not being against women or "hating women", being anti-feminism is in no way whatsoever being against equality. Whenever feminism becomes harmful, being supportive of equality to all and particularly to women becomes being anti-feminism as it should.Feminism is a dust cloud. We need to always keep in mind that feminism attracts the most violent of the female sex because it would provide social legitimacy for personal violent tendencies that would otherwise not be accepted, and, that unlike male violence, female violence mostly occurs as emotional manipulation and social incitement against the target. Always remember that feminism is not confusing at all - feminists are simply individuals who lie about their true beliefs and positions to man… | /r/MensRights | 24/11/21 04:40 PM |
| 12 | Once and for all - criticizing feminism is not being against women or "hating women", being anti-feminism is in no way whatsoever being against equality. Whenever feminism becomes harmful, being supportive of equality to all and particularly to women becomes being anti-feminism as it should.Anyway this was a good opportunity to explain that in contrast to feminist assertions, feminism is not "part of humanism" but the very opposite of humanism (and equality to all). So I'm glad it came up (thanks for making it clear). | /r/MensRights | 24/11/21 01:19 PM |
| 12 | Once and for all - criticizing feminism is not being against women or "hating women", being anti-feminism is in no way whatsoever being against equality. Whenever feminism becomes harmful, being supportive of equality to all and particularly to women becomes being anti-feminism as it should.I'm sorry but what you quoted is not a post I ever published, nor a comment I ever made. I am a humanist. I regard feminism as the wrong path to a correct goal. The goal of equality to all (which is my only goal - and please don't internalize again feminist propaganda in believing that equality can only mean sameness, equality is equal human value, not sameness) is achieved only through shared action, of all together, for all, and not through separatism. Up until 1970, men and women acted togeth… | /r/MensRights | 24/11/21 12:39 PM |
| 17 | Once and for all - criticizing feminism is not being against women or "hating women", being anti-feminism is in no way whatsoever being against equality. Whenever feminism becomes harmful, being supportive of equality to all and particularly to women becomes being anti-feminism as it should.I have a friend with leukemia. The treatment is radiations. Radiations would kill anyone - but when someone has cancer you try to kill the cancer cells before killing the patient so they get a chance to survive. Perhaps you who are healthy should undergo radiation because my friend has cancer? This is what you just wrote: that since some other country 5000 miles away from where you live oppresses women, men in your healthy country that does not oppress women in any way should undergo the treatme… | /r/MensRights | 24/11/21 12:06 PM |
| 8 | Once and for all - criticizing feminism is not being against women or "hating women", being anti-feminism is in no way whatsoever being against equality. Whenever feminism becomes harmful, being supportive of equality to all and particularly to women becomes being anti-feminism as it should.Where did you see a white knight here. I am trying to help you make women understand why criticizing feminism including being anti-feminist when feminism is chauvinism (female anti-male chauvinism) is not only not "hating women" but necessary. Perhaps you are not aware of the meaning of the word chauvinism? It's any group demanding privileges. Named after one of Napoleon's officers who after returning from conquests in Egypt formed a group that demanded extra-privileges for military personnel. F… | /r/MensRights | 24/11/21 11:42 AM |
| 21 | Once and for all - criticizing feminism is not being against women or "hating women", being anti-feminism is in no way whatsoever being against equality. Whenever feminism becomes harmful, being supportive of equality to all and particularly to women becomes being anti-feminism as it should.Wrong. Equality to all is called humanism. Not feminism. Feminism is separatism. It is not articulated for all humans but for women. No separatist agenda can ever "empower everyone". A separatist agenda articulates the human rights and humanity of only one group in humanity. If its goal is then achieved and the separatist agenda becomes the universal theory of equality, the rest of humanity is now not described as humans in that new universal theory of equality nor their human rights - these wer… | /r/MensRights | 24/11/21 11:27 AM |
| 1 | Schools are constantly beating down boys in order to ‘empower’ girls when it comes to the stem areaYes, please click my profile, my website address is there, and there there is a "contact" section (I'd rather not add an address here because that's the the best way to be added to every spam list on the western hemisphere). Thanks! | /r/MensRights | 24/11/21 12:18 AM |
| 3 | Schools are constantly beating down boys in order to ‘empower’ girls when it comes to the stem areaThank you OP - can you please elaborate on the restriction on gathering and limiting it strictly to boys to up to five? This would be a severe violation of human rights and should be reported as such. I am collecting information on anti-democtratic feminist actions against men as a group for a book and would be interested in more information. Were there any written documents involved such as an email notification or a printed announcement? Will you be able to add a screenshot of such texts? Or a… | /r/MensRights | 23/11/21 02:15 PM |
| 2 | UN Women has driven the UN to announce the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women. Every person who believes in equality should ignore this prejudiced date and mark on this date Elimination of Violence Between the Sexes day, because this violence is completely bidirectional.No. Because the entire discussion about violence between the sexes is anti-male incitement. In the 1970s feminists elaborated a lie in which men and women are two human classes, parallel to aristocracy and proletarians, where the male class oppresses the female class through intimidation by violence to keep it down. In this lie, all men are coordinated and every male violence toward a female is done on behalf of "the male class" to keep the female class subjugated. This description is mentally d… | /r/MensRights | 20/11/21 08:37 AM |
| 9 | UN Women has driven the UN to announce the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women. Every person who believes in equality should ignore this prejudiced date and mark on this date Elimination of Violence Between the Sexes day, because this violence is completely bidirectional.A powerful one. Men and women who believe in equality must aspire to rename UN Women to UN Human. UN agencies are powerless in inter-national politics, but extremely powerful in intra-national politics, affecting regulations and laws within countries through assembling coalitions of countries that threat a given country to revise internal laws. Much of the feminist chauvinism in laws was attained this way. Do not underestimate the power of the UN to shape civil life within countries. Men are not… | /r/MensRights | 19/11/21 02:53 PM |
| 10 | Which country is least influenced by feminist or me too movement?I think all English-speaking countries are in the worst condition, Western Europe is in better shape because of a humanist tradition (for example, when a book called I Hate Man was published in France it was banned for violating hate speech laws, when the female mayor of Paris appointed almost only women to senior positions the municipality was fined by the government for violating anti-discrimination regulations), and then what I call "westernized" countries are in the third place (countries in… | /r/MensRights | 18/11/21 06:38 PM |
| 4 | Read through the comments on this postThanks for sharing! The testimonies are horrifying. I see that the original post at the top was deleted. But the thousands of personal stories below it tell the story. No one collects these stories as statistics, no one publishes a yearly report on discrimination, harassment and abuse toward men and boys by women and on behalf of women through society's institutions. I am absolutely certain that if those concerns that do monitor these phenomenon concerning women, would have monitored this and wi… | /r/MensRights | 18/11/21 06:39 AM |
| 30 | Listen, feminists. When you wish that all men were dead or excluded and then say that you have some empathic advice on rewriting masculinity simply because it's harmful to those you wanted dead, whose best interest you have in mind - it's only for their own good - it doesn't come out well.Also, "and every subject on earth is first and foremost affecting uteruses and nothing affects penises including having a penis hence only women are allowed to talk about everything including the state of penises and men are not allowed to talk about any subject including the state of penises - all is mansplaining and mansplaining is the oppression of women - shut up about everything including yourself". Notice how only women are allowed to speak publicly or write publicly with legitimacy about … | /r/MensRights | 14/11/21 03:22 PM |
| 10 | Listen, feminists. When you wish that all men were dead or excluded and then say that you have some empathic advice on rewriting masculinity simply because it's harmful to those you wanted dead, whose best interest you have in mind - it's only for their own good - it doesn't come out well.The editor of huffpost. | /r/MensRights | 14/11/21 02:16 PM |
| 1 | The women who joined feminism in the me too wave are not using the term mansplaining correctly.Well, there was some truth in that term 60 years ago. I'm your age, but I read books written by men in the 50s or 60s explaining aspects that might be accessible only to a woman. Now - the whole trouble with the anger embedded in the word "mansplaining'" is that this writing wasn't malicious, plus, a man who works on a subject pertaining to women can attain insight on women and express important ideas about women despite not being one (for decades, female specialists have been writing about men … | /r/MensRights | 14/11/21 07:38 AM |
| -1 | The women who joined feminism in the me too wave are not using the term mansplaining correctly.And I should add that younger women probably don't know the meaning simply because they don't know the phenomenon. Their misuse is another evidence of the fact that feminism ended its role and should be terminated. The girls today never even saw men explaining publicly what it's like being a woman and hence what's good for women - it doesn't exist for 40 or 50 years. | /r/MensRights | 13/11/21 10:34 PM |
| 0 | Mansplaining 101The women who joined feminism in the me too wave don't use the term mansplaining correctly. Feminists did not mean by that men explaining "things" to woman "as if women can't understand" but men explaining on behalf of women what's good for women. Please advise new recruits of the feminist cult (in response they will tell you that you are mansplaning again, you will explain again they are using it wrong, and so on - keep at it until she gets tried). | /r/MensRights | 13/11/21 10:03 PM |
| 1 | This OP is a neuroscientist and wishes you to be aware: Manhood and womanhood have cultural manifestations, but are in essence not cultural "roles". They originate from innate traits, the rewriting of which, due to how brains operate, can be achieved only through oppression of human drives.And Stalinism. That would be the closest to the social engineering feminism is engaged in to overrun human needs and tendencies. Feminism has a tool that 1930s Stalinism didn't have - a conditioning technology applicable for mass human programming: social media (I am a leftist and this is not a criticism against the left in general. Stalinism was a violent distortion of the left agenda, and most leftists acknowledge this). | /r/MensRights | 13/11/21 01:54 AM |
| 2 | This OP is a neuroscientist and wishes you to be aware: Manhood and womanhood have cultural manifestations, but are in essence not cultural "roles". They originate from innate traits, the rewriting of which, due to how brains operate, can be achieved only through oppression of human drives.So please read the post before commenting. | /r/MensRights | 12/11/21 07:03 PM |
| 3 | This OP is a neuroscientist and wishes you to be aware: Manhood and womanhood have cultural manifestations, but are in essence not cultural "roles". They originate from innate traits, the rewriting of which, due to how brains operate, can be achieved only through oppression of human drives.I'll be exuberated to be proven wrong - please visit any feminist forum, write that beautification of women has nothing to do with men's actions but is an innate female sexual drive and that men's drive to initiate with women is not "learned performance caused by a patriarchy" but an innate male sexual drive and that none has that drive of the other because the two sexes have two matching and different sexualities that create heterosexuality and that culture did not create it - and paste here th… | /r/MensRights | 12/11/21 06:53 PM |
| 5 | This OP is a neuroscientist and wishes you to be aware: Manhood and womanhood have cultural manifestations, but are in essence not cultural "roles". They originate from innate traits, the rewriting of which, due to how brains operate, can be achieved only through oppression of human drives.If you have a personal opinion that is different from a common feminist perception, this does not falsify the fact that those perceptions are common in feminism. Let me reiterate: OP: "feminism regards human sexuality as a social construct" you: "wait but I'm a feminist and I don't regard sexuality as a social construct - hence feminism is like me and OP is wrong!" OP: "it's great that you are different but almost all feminists think that sexuality is a construct - the fact that one feminist (yo… | /r/MensRights | 12/11/21 06:15 PM |
| 6 | This OP is a neuroscientist and wishes you to be aware: Manhood and womanhood have cultural manifestations, but are in essence not cultural "roles". They originate from innate traits, the rewriting of which, due to how brains operate, can be achieved only through oppression of human drives.If you want to acknowledge that feminists think that beautifying is not a female drive but tracking by men, and to acknowledge that feminists try the hardest they can to push women to initiate because they don't think that the male initiation is a male drive and the female disiterest in being the initiator a lack of such a drive, because feminists reject the fact that there are indeed two innate sexualities determined by innate sex and comprising two complementing sets of innate drives - then we… | /r/MensRights | 12/11/21 05:50 PM |
| 11 | This OP is a neuroscientist and wishes you to be aware: Manhood and womanhood have cultural manifestations, but are in essence not cultural "roles". They originate from innate traits, the rewriting of which, due to how brains operate, can be achieved only through oppression of human drives.When left speechless throw the arbitrary misogyny slur (item 1.1, The Guide for The Speechless Feminist) | /r/MensRights | 12/11/21 05:23 PM |
| 10 | This OP is a neuroscientist and wishes you to be aware: Manhood and womanhood have cultural manifestations, but are in essence not cultural "roles". They originate from innate traits, the rewriting of which, due to how brains operate, can be achieved only through oppression of human drives.I absolutely love it when feminists say about an everyday feminist agenda, "this is not feminism at all". This is the feminist way of saying "okay you're right I'm wrong". | /r/MensRights | 12/11/21 05:01 PM |
| 6 | This OP is a neuroscientist and wishes you to be aware: Manhood and womanhood have cultural manifestations, but are in essence not cultural "roles". They originate from innate traits, the rewriting of which, due to how brains operate, can be achieved only through oppression of human drives.Thanks : ) | /r/MensRights | 12/11/21 04:47 PM |
| 6 | This OP is a neuroscientist and wishes you to be aware: Manhood and womanhood have cultural manifestations, but are in essence not cultural "roles". They originate from innate traits, the rewriting of which, due to how brains operate, can be achieved only through oppression of human drives.Thanks. And I agree with you. | /r/MensRights | 12/11/21 04:46 PM |
| 1 | Why I am not a feminist and neither should youThanks : ) | /r/MensRights | 12/11/21 03:04 PM |
| 2 | Why I am not a feminist and neither should youI think most here have great sex, thank you. None here are against women (and women are not against us). We are not like feminists, who generalize from a few to an entire sex. We are conversing here with a small fanatical group called feminists - not with all women as a "group". Sure - we all know that feminists wish to say that they represent all women and that objecting feminist fanaticism is objecting women or women's equality, this manipulation is familiar to everyone. But feminists know ver… | /r/MensRights | 12/11/21 10:43 AM |
| 2 | Why I am not a feminist and neither should youSorry, it's not a choice. Humans are born with drives. Female and male sexual drives are overlapping in certain ways and are innately different in other respects. These are not "roles" from culture but innate drives. Culture can't change that, only oppress male and female drives. This is a fact about brains. Here are the details. | /r/MensRights | 12/11/21 09:13 AM |
| 1 | Why I am not a feminist and neither should youThe reviews that challenge a paper on these subjects today are political and not scientific. Yes, there are differences at the level of the population. No, sorry, the brains are not identical (I'm a neuroscientist). Two things were used by people with political agendas (who entered science specifically to spread political agendas), to try and convince the public that on average the brains of men and women are identical: focusing only on morphology of areas and on crude tasks that do not distingu… | /r/MensRights | 12/11/21 08:12 AM |
| 1 | How to explain to a feminist that 'kill all men' is disgustingThis letter was written precisely for this purpose, you can send her the link: https://lovists.com/2021/09/28/letter/ | /r/MensRights | 12/11/21 07:43 AM |
| 3 | Why I am not a feminist and neither should youYou wrote somewhere that you are 20 or something. This starts kicking in in women at 24. I promise to publish another chapter from the book as an article, about the difference between a rule and an exception in mathematics and physics, and a rule and an exception in biology and psychology. For the time being - only in math and physics the exception to the rule refutes the rule. In biology and psychology, the rule and the exception are not mutually exclusive because they both exist on a distribut… | /r/MensRights | 12/11/21 07:14 AM |
| 4 | Why I am not a feminist and neither should youYou gave me a link to an article from 2019 by a woman. Since October 2017 there was a public endorsement for lying and manipulating facts by women in the printed media - it is considered since that month "women empowerment". A text by a woman about feminism from after October 2017 has the value of a used lottery card. The text you read is distorting history and is manipulative. It shows that there were a few men who objected the right to vote - what's new about that. The question at hand is not … | /r/MensRights | 12/11/21 06:34 AM |
| 1 | Why I am not a feminist and neither should youAs for "You are talking about Egaltarians/Suffragists whom women should thank equality." Egalitarians - yes. The suffragists were a rather racist and puritan group whose main agenda was around birth control but specifically for the purpose of exterminating blacks, and banning alcohol, based on the same arguments we hear from feminists today about men (being violent and dangerous). I have no argument with the assertion that British suffragists held in late 19th century protests regarding voting r… | /r/MensRights | 11/11/21 06:49 PM |
| 10 | Why I am not a feminist and neither should youYour entire profile is composed of trolling in MensRights. I would throw a wild guess and say that you are using two accounts and this is your "trolling mensrights" account. But all the comments are at a level of "nonsense". You should realize that you are causing more damage than good to your cause - when someone doesn't have an argument, it shows they know they are wrong. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/21 06:39 PM |
| 3 | Why I am not a feminist and neither should youThese are not "roles" but innate traits. Please read this. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/21 06:35 PM |
| 6 | Why I am not a feminist and neither should youHere is the synopsis of this history. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/21 06:30 PM |
| 5 | Why I am not a feminist and neither should youEgalitarian is "equaliterian" in French (more precisely, adapting the French word for equality into English). From the french revolution motto, Liberté, égalité, fraternité, which means "liberty, equality, fraternity" (France's national motto since the revolution, a motto like "In God We Trust" of the US). I think almost no one without a special interest in humanism have heard of the term egalitarian, or even knows how to pronounce it. Up until 2016 however, and for a long time, it was very cust… | /r/MensRights | 11/11/21 01:14 PM |
| 1 | I strongly believe that much of the trans phenomenon in boys and young men in the past decade is in fact a persecution phenomenon equivalent to how Jews were persecuted so harshly in medieval Spain that many converted to Christianity just to be accepted as humans.Tran is mostly a social phenomenon. Read this. Scroll down to 4th paragraph, about Dr. Lisa Littman. It also has the links to the scientific studies. Then scroll a little further to the section about prof. Kenneth Zucker (reading the full article is also advised). | /r/MensRights | 10/11/21 07:26 AM |
| 1 | I strongly believe that much of the trans phenomenon in boys and young men in the past decade is in fact a persecution phenomenon equivalent to how Jews were persecuted so harshly in medieval Spain that many converted to Christianity just to be accepted as humans.I'm Jewish and don't tell me what offends me. First what happened in 16th century Spain was not killing in mass numbers but persecution and mass conversion ending in mass deportation. Don't tell me what offends me as a Jewish man. I have been reading about racism all my four decades of living, I have two aunts that walked out of Auschwitz on their feet, the other 150 family members of both sides of my mother remained in the crematorium and what offends me and haunts me day and night for the past… | /r/MensRights | 10/11/21 07:01 AM |
| 2 | I strongly believe that much of the trans phenomenon in boys and young men in the past decade is in fact a persecution phenomenon equivalent to how Jews were persecuted so harshly in medieval Spain that many converted to Christianity just to be accepted as humans.Studies found no difference between trans and everyone else in their innate sex in brain sexuality areas. The only difference is at an area related to self-esteem. When sexual brain areas are examined, studies find that the areas in trans operate like those in everyone else in their innate sex. For example, a certain circuit responds in men 3.5 times stronger to nudity of women than how the same region in women responds to male nudity - men are 3.5 time more sensitive to nudity. This difference … | /r/MensRights | 10/11/21 06:10 AM |
| 11 | Can you tell me how men are segregated or discriminated against today?Here is how: Discrimination in literature, in psychology, in work: https://lovists.com/2021/01/28/what-does-equality-look-like-in-the-feminist-society-we-live-in/ Discrimination by sexual oppression: https://lovists.com/2021/06/29/the-unspoken-cause-of-the-low-testosterone-epidemic/ Discrimination by silencing of sexual harassment and rape by women: https://lovists.com/2021/02/20/women-are-as-sexually-violent-as-men/ Discrimination by defining equal opportunity and equal human rights as privileg… | /r/MensRights | 10/11/21 05:50 AM |
| 3 | LGBTQ community started to speak up about misandry in some subcommittees.Click my profile, I posted this comment as a post - and added the link there. | /r/MensRights | 09/11/21 12:46 PM |
| 3 | I strongly believe that much of the trans phenomenon in boys and young men in the past decade is in fact a persecution phenomenon equivalent to how Jews were persecuted so harshly in medieval Spain that many converted to Christianity just to be accepted as humans.And I would also add to what you wrote the following reading about testosterone and feminism. It's extremely disturbing how the begging question of whether a predicting factor of low testosterone (and possibly also perception of men and own maleness) is living with a single mother who self-identifies as a feminist (or scores exceptionally high on a feminist-attitudes test). This is such a begging question that as someone coming from research I can explain the lack of studies about it only as yet… | /r/MensRights | 09/11/21 12:39 PM |
| 2 | I strongly believe that much of the trans phenomenon in boys and young men in the past decade is in fact a persecution phenomenon equivalent to how Jews were persecuted so harshly in medieval Spain that many converted to Christianity just to be accepted as humans.In case you missed it, please read this, about testosterone decline and about testosterone and feminism. | /r/MensRights | 09/11/21 08:36 AM |
| 0 | I strongly believe that much of the trans phenomenon in boys and young men in the past decade is in fact a persecution phenomenon equivalent to how Jews were persecuted so harshly in medieval Spain that many converted to Christianity just to be accepted as humans.Yes, you will run into all sorts of unpleasant encounters throughout your life, no, there is no way to prevent this, no, you don't have a right to oppress the entire human race so that you won't encounter throughout your entire life something unpleasant to you, no, you will not be able to control every human expression that might bother you even after you announce a dictatorship - yes, that's life and you need to accept it. And the only reason people like you even think that they can set as a st… | /r/MensRights | 08/11/21 02:46 PM |
| 4 | I strongly believe that much of the trans phenomenon in boys and young men in the past decade is in fact a persecution phenomenon equivalent to how Jews were persecuted so harshly in medieval Spain that many converted to Christianity just to be accepted as humans.Please read this, about testosterone and feminism. | /r/MensRights | 08/11/21 02:34 PM |
| -1 | I strongly believe that much of the trans phenomenon in boys and young men in the past decade is in fact a persecution phenomenon equivalent to how Jews were persecuted so harshly in medieval Spain that many converted to Christianity just to be accepted as humans.You and your friends will have to lower your expectations. What you are describing will never change - unless you enact a dictatorship that forces people to act as if they are comfortable with all you described. You and your friends follow a theory, which is supported by no evidence, and is refuted by all evidence - that "everything is culture" and that "with culture you can change everything in human beings". You, are, wrong. The attitudes you are describing will never change and never go away,… | /r/MensRights | 08/11/21 11:02 AM |
| 2 | I strongly believe that much of the trans phenomenon in boys and young men in the past decade is in fact a persecution phenomenon equivalent to how Jews were persecuted so harshly in medieval Spain that many converted to Christianity just to be accepted as humans.We all know about your "societal acceptance" theory and it's false. This "theory" is feminist manipulation conceived in order not to expose the castration urge feminists have, which is what really motivates the "acceptance" in a feminist society - it's not "acceptance" but encouragement as shown before (here). If feminists "accept" a 3 yo boy as "wanting to transition" then feminists don't "accept" but create, encourage, cause. In case you don't know, toddlers at this age are still learning the … | /r/MensRights | 08/11/21 07:43 AM |
| 1 | I strongly believe that much of the trans phenomenon in boys and young men in the past decade is in fact a persecution phenomenon equivalent to how Jews were persecuted so harshly in medieval Spain that many converted to Christianity just to be accepted as humans.The current rating on amazon is actually 3.5. Not sure why the bot wrote 4.6. | /r/MensRights | 08/11/21 07:40 AM |
| 6 | LGBTQ community started to speak up about misandry in some subcommittees.Now that we see how difficult it is for a woman to say in a feminist world that she wants to be a man, think of all the young men who are born male, and need to live in a world where being a man is almost a crime - you are born guilty. I strongly believe that much of the trans phenomenon in boys and young men in the past decade is in fact a persecution phenomenon equivalent to how Jews were persecuted so harshly in medieval Spain that many converted to Christianity just to be accepted as humans … | /r/MensRights | 08/11/21 06:27 AM |
| 2 | I think people should start referring to feminists as what they are - WGTOW, and to "body-positivity" as female-incelsI agree with your observation regarding tradcons, they are sexist. But again - this is a typology that applies only in the US. In my country, almost all women are what you call "tradcons" (leftists as well), and none regard themselves as "trad" but only as being normal - and by that I mean, they all have a job, but the job is usually a little less lucrative than that of the husband, if only because they usually work 7 hrs a day if they have kids - most employers are very considerate in this resp… | /r/MensRights | 07/11/21 04:08 PM |
| 2 | I think people should start referring to feminists as what they are - WGTOW, and to "body-positivity" as female-incelsIn my country the average woman is not a feminist. She would naturally support equality but would not call herself a feminist and would not think that women around her don't have equality. The ones who would say that are a minority (a powerful one, but a small minority). In the US, where you live, yes, the mania had spread and affected all of society. I'm sorry to tell you but your country might be lost. A sinking boat. So in your world these concepts might be irrelevant at this point. But the o… | /r/MensRights | 07/11/21 11:30 AM |
| 4 | I think people should start referring to feminists as what they are - WGTOW, and to "body-positivity" as female-incelsWell, as for why, I think it's in the post. Regarding how it's related to rights and equality - I am pasting the lines from my comment above (sorry for this, it simply addresses what you asked) - we all support here equality, and we know that feminists insist that feminism is nothing but supporting equality, but it isn't - supporting equality is called humanism, not feminism, and when feminism is evaluated by actions it clearly doesn't support equality but chauvinism - female anti-male chauvinis… | /r/MensRights | 07/11/21 10:51 AM |
| 6 | I think people should start referring to feminists as what they are - WGTOW, and to "body-positivity" as female-incelsThank you | /r/MensRights | 07/11/21 08:17 AM |
| 6 | I think people should start referring to feminists as what they are - WGTOW, and to "body-positivity" as female-incelsIf you ask me, no one can really go their own way. The meaning of being human is in being part of humanity, and love and friendship are the elementary substance of human society. MGTOW was a rebellion (as we all knew up until recently, when the media started to become more hostile toward men and started to depict this legitimate rebellion as some terror organization). But I don't think that what caused the rebellion - WGTOW - was a rebellion as well. It was something else (and just as a note to … | /r/MensRights | 07/11/21 07:17 AM |
| -6 | Stupid Ukrainian laws make their men want to kill themselves just because they are … males. This needs to stopWho told you that to be a man you need to be just strong. You need to be human. A person. Above invertebrates, a thing with: a spine. If you are so oppressed that you need to hear the following, then here it is - you need to be what a girl and a woman are told to be. You need to have human dignity, self-respect, a feeling of competence, empowerment. Does it seem normal to you, that telling you to have everything you know girls and women are told to have, sounds wrong to you but when you hear tha… | /r/MensRights | 06/11/21 05:53 PM |
| -11 | Stupid Ukrainian laws make their men want to kill themselves just because they are … males. This needs to stopJust do your service and stop complaining. Every other man now becomes a feminist woman. "Oh it's so difficult, and dirty, everything is so against me and sexist because I'm a mannn". Stop that. Give yourself a slap on the face and be A MAN. Fuck that castrating shit about "gender roles shmender roles are against man oh my rolllles and streooooootyyyyypes are so abusive to me". Grow balls, shut up, we have enough of this shit from feminists already. | /r/MensRights | 06/11/21 03:12 PM |
| 2 | It's hard to believe that this needs explaining, but here goes:Thanks. It's actually a basic concept from chemistry. This is the first step of the explanation of dynamic equilibrium. The second is another machine doing the opposite in it's own rate. Thus if the two operate in equal speed the state in the pool will remain constant but not because the system is idle but because it's in dynamic equilibrium. Change the activity rate of one of the two machines for a while and then back to the regular rate - and you get an equilibrium shift. All the chemistry of … | /r/MensRights | 01/11/21 07:40 PM |
| 1 | After equality was reached in the West in the 1990s and feminism would not announce ending its actions there, its continuous search for women’s oppression in a Western world that had none, eventually brought it to the very limitations imposed on every human being by society to keep it humane.Because if you reach the balance point and is unable to admit it and to announce that your goal was achieved and that you terminate your activity, and instead continue past the balance point applying the same pressure and same activities, YOU CROSS THE BALANCE POINT and create DISCRIMINATION IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION, which then makes out of feminism, a new chauvinism and men the ones needing a feminism, a "men's rights movement". Here is an article on how feminism inability to admit that is rea… | /r/MensRights | 01/11/21 11:10 AM |
| 1 | After equality was reached in the West in the 1990s and feminism would not announce ending its actions there, its continuous search for women’s oppression in a Western world that had none, eventually brought it to the very limitations imposed on every human being by society to keep it humane.Nice. | /r/MensRights | 31/10/21 06:39 AM |
| 1 | After equality was reached in the West in the 1990s and feminism would not announce ending its actions there, its continuous search for women’s oppression in a Western world that had none, eventually brought it to the very limitations imposed on every human being by society to keep it humane.As someone familiar with traditional orthodox communities in both Islam and Judaism, I want to let you know that in both, the status of women today is a recent radicalization. Prior to the 19th century, these two orthodox populations were much more moderate regarding women, both radicalized since, orthodox Judaism since the 19th and then again during the 20th centuries, and Islamic peoples primarily during the 20th and in particular since the 70s. You need to know that the entire Islamic world w… | /r/MensRights | 31/10/21 06:05 AM |
| 5 | After equality was reached in the West in the 1990s and feminism would not announce ending its actions there, its continuous search for women’s oppression in a Western world that had none, eventually brought it to the very limitations imposed on every human being by society to keep it humane.Thanks people for the comments. Regarding what is equality, that I think is a difficult question. I analyzed it here (let me know what you think). What I offer in that link, is that the very concept and reality of the notion "equality", changed along the 19th century, from a nature-born equivalence, of different and matching privileges to two sexes that are balanced, to a human-born novel perception of equality as same rights to two sexes. So, prior to the 19th century, while there was a lot of … | /r/MensRights | 30/10/21 11:30 AM |
| 8 | Literally gutted for nothingYou are describing disgusting feminist chauvinism - imagine a male boss entering a room and asking a woman next to everyone "was that pad floating in the toilet yours? Because women do that and you are the only one who can do this since you are a woman, leaving your pad", in front of everyone. I encountered similar feminist chauvinism (described here), I left that place. | /r/MensRights | 28/10/21 12:06 PM |
| 1 | Interesting article, "Feminism’s Biggest Lie Is That Women Don’t Have Power", from a magazine that seems to pose a female alternative to feminism (they run a pole under the piece, "are you a feminist", 82% - no)Thanks for all the comments mates. I still think it's a good publication and article. I don't believe men or women should aspire for some eternal resolution of the tension between them. But rather, go back to having their game (as existed throughout history until feminism). What's important for the mental and physical survival of both sexes, is that they will always know it's only a game, and that at the end they both love each other, depend on each other, and crave for each other, and, that the… | /r/MensRights | 26/10/21 05:43 AM |
| 1 | Why the root of men's issues is PATRIARCHYThanks for your comments. Now that I have read you, please take the time to read this: https://lovists.com/blog/ | /r/MensRights | 24/10/21 03:06 PM |
| 5 | Sexual violence statistics based on sexual orientationGreat post - thanks for advising about the data! | /r/MensRights | 24/10/21 03:04 PM |
| 1 | “You don’t understand feminism”. What this actually means, and the problem of confusing intention with effectVery few people are ideologists. Most choose an agenda that others conceived, and sympathize with it. This applies to feminism as well. Most girls and women who call themselves feminists, know about feminism probably much less than anyone in this forum, they follow a trend. It's important that we make the distinction between "core" and "sympathizers". The core is a lost cause but it's very very small - no more than a few thousands per country (tens of thousands in a large country like the US). T… | /r/MensRights | 24/10/21 02:42 PM |
| 1 | How feminism is leading to discrimination in pay by sexWell, I took the number "16%" and it's labeling as "global" from UN Women. I don't regard this figure as reliable or representing in any way or shape. First, most countries are not developed enough to have the means to estimate this figure. Even in developed countries this figure is very hard to estimate, as the UK example reveals: after a harsh feminist push, they passed laws and enacted new agencies just to require all employers to report annually this figure, and still there are a lot of deba… | /r/MensRights | 23/10/21 04:30 AM |
| 3 | “You don’t understand feminism”. What this actually means, and the problem of confusing intention with effectThank you dear MrPaineUTI. I appreciate it. | /r/MensRights | 22/10/21 02:10 PM |
| 1 | How feminism is leading to discrimination in pay by sexThank you for adding this - it's the necessary continuation of the explanation. I would also add another factor that is never discussed and when it will, it might point to a gap in the opposite direction, and this is the issue of outliers. Every person with scientific training knows, that it is impossible to draw reliable conclusions from data without examining first disposing of outliers, because specifically in the case of the statistic called average, outliers with sufficient weight (sufficie… | /r/MensRights | 22/10/21 01:58 PM |
| 5 | “You don’t understand feminism”. What this actually means, and the problem of confusing intention with effectI think it's a perfect description of this problem. I also suspect that feminists, specifically, might have difficulties in analyzing complex systems in motion such as a human society, and tracking the influence of what they do - before, during and after applying actions. Including in extrapolating direct consequences beforehand. A very dramatic manifestation of this problem is how feminism formulates rules and practices based only on limited examples that bother feminists, without ever even sus… | /r/MensRights | 22/10/21 10:39 AM |
| 7 | “You don’t understand feminism”. What this actually means, and the problem of confusing intention with effectThis is why I wrote "mostly". I think you are perfectly right: the feminist core did and does intend to end the relations between the sexes and this is declared in writing in feminist texts. But: it never explicitly informed women that this is the goal of the advice it has been giving them, knowing that if it will inform women about the goal (ending all relations between the sexes), women will reject feminism. And as a result, most of the millions of women who sympathize with feminism (as oppose… | /r/MensRights | 22/10/21 09:02 AM |
| 1 | How feminism is leading to discrimination in pay by sexGreat, I'll be happy to read it. We might not agree on everything but I have some sources that would probably be useful to you too, for your own purposes. Here - https://lovists.com/blog/. It's full of references. | /r/MensRights | 22/10/21 07:30 AM |
| 1 | How feminism is leading to discrimination in pay by sexThank you for responding. I am not attacking a straw man. I am only explaining to a political group what their actions will necessarily lead to. Nowhere in the post have I mentioned that to the best of my knowledge, today employers pay women more because of their sex for the same job and work. If you acknowledge: 1) the fear in politicians of confronting feminist demands, shouts and accusations of sexism; 2) the consistent data that women's income collectively as a "group" is saturated - whoever… | /r/MensRights | 22/10/21 06:43 AM |
| 2 | Should a woman lying to a man about being on birth control be considered rape/entrapment?Yes. | /r/MensRights | 18/10/21 04:23 PM |
| 2 | Scientific article stating that on average men are stronger than women removed from Instagram and Twitter for violating Hate Speech rules. Dark Horse Podcast #100 (time = 21:30) (Via Rights.Men)Thanks for sharing. Men and women of the common-sense-resistance, please use as much as possible text to explain views and events and not only videos and podcasts - it is impossible to reference a sentence in a 1.5 hours audio. No one will ever be able to listen to or watch an hour long file to verify one fact in several sentences - the world is full of data and this is the purpose of the referencing method that the human species developed. Each statement is an article that can be linked to, and… | /r/MensRights | 17/10/21 01:09 PM |
| 2 | Woman at workWhat?? What woman was ever "kind" to someone who pinched her? | /r/MensRights | 15/10/21 07:48 PM |
| 11 | Woman at workDo not repeat what she did. We all know that you will lose everything and she will become a victim. You don't need the others. Make a list of all who told you that she did it to them, report her and report what the other told you, if the organization ignores, ME TOO HER AND THE ORG. Publish your ME TOO post here with a link to the FB post - we'll like your post by the thousands, we'll tag every feminist organization out there, and every newspaper. | /r/MensRights | 15/10/21 07:46 PM |
| 20 | Woman at workNo. Me Too her. Expose her. | /r/MensRights | 15/10/21 07:41 PM |
| 1 | Even though I want one, I don’t know if I’ll ever have a relationship because of feminism.Friend, don't give up on women, just avoid feminists.I dated a feminist once, before I even new what it means, it was terrible - abusive, sexist, hurtful. But then I learnt that such women exist and from then on I just asked myself whenever I met someone, if she's a feminist, and everything was fine (well, in this respect). I also think that today guys must ask, as a first question, "are you a feminist?" I can attest that there's no issue with the question and most just say "no", to those who sa… | /r/MensRights | 15/10/21 02:33 PM |
| 3 | Responding to "Research finds that 97% of women in the UK have been sexually harassed". The following is phrased in the second person, as a direct response to those responsible for this title.I am Jewish. My mother's aunts, who passed away recently, walked out of Auschwitz through the famous gate on their feet. My grandmother's and grandfather's entire families were annihilated. For someone like me, the holocaust is not a history book but my life, a daily thought since I can remember myself. Someone like me spends his entire life trying to understand hate, group-thinking, automation of moral thinking, reliance on figures of authority, stupidity, industrialization of lies, to understa… | /r/MensRights | 12/10/21 05:19 AM |
| 1 | Recent data and references on how Westernized societies are shaped in the image of feminist chauvinismI definitely see hope, but also peril. These are uncertain times. What we see are two opposite dynamics - while the rise in popularity of radical feminism seems to have reached a saturation point and at long last stopped growing by the millions, and in the general public, and even among few in the previous generation of feminists, awareness to it's nature is on the rise, this is not the case in the elite. The centers of power, in all ranks, are only radicalizing. And we need to remember that thi… | /r/MensRights | 11/10/21 05:34 PM |
| 3 | Responding to "Research finds that 97% of women in the UK have been sexually harassed". The following is phrased in the second person, as a direct response to those responsible for this title.Precisely. | /r/MensRights | 11/10/21 04:52 PM |
| 2 | Recent data and references on how Westernized societies are shaped in the image of feminist chauvinismMen are not falling behind. This is a PC, anti-men euphemism resulting from intimidation. Western and westernized societies, and westernized sections of societies, are chauvinistic societies - of feminist direct and determined anti-male chauvinism. Men are oppressed. Not "falling" behind, as if someone intended them to receive equal opportunity and have equal human value but "unintentionally neglected some peculiar needs of men". They are intentionally, in a policy-driven manner, discriminated a… | /r/MensRights | 11/10/21 12:32 PM |
| 2 | The Atlantic claims that the "end of men is near" and proudly states how equality is NOT enough.Correct. I have summarized recent and updated data about the situation today from multiple references, here: https://lovists.com/2021/01/28/what-does-equality-look-like-in-the-feminist-society-we-live-in/ | /r/MensRights | 10/10/21 07:42 PM |
| 2 | When I was 20 something in the 90s-00s we always split the check, no one cared, we'd just dig our pockets to reach the total, sometimes one had more cash at that moment, him, her, we'd just pay and go, NO ONE CARED. I want to tell you that feminism took all of you way backwards.Some of what you write is probably true, but I want you to be aware that when I was in my 20s (90s-00s), we had dating websites just like now, and something that I think is nearly extinct now called chat rooms, sites with a few dozens of titles and in each a live chat between all the people logged in (everybody's lines were "scrolling" from bottom to top all mixed together) with an option to click on someone's name and start a private chat. I think at least half the girls I met were from all the… | /r/MensRights | 06/10/21 05:25 AM |
| 4 | When I was 20 something in the 90s-00s we always split the check, no one cared, we'd just dig our pockets to reach the total, sometimes one had more cash at that moment, him, her, we'd just pay and go, NO ONE CARED. I want to tell you that feminism took all of you way backwards.Exactly! This is word for word what I feel about all of this. | /r/MensRights | 06/10/21 05:13 AM |
| 2 | Watch it. She speaks your voice, on mainstream TV. You are doing great, men and women of MensRights, yes your voice is starting to be heard, keep going and do not despair - keep doing what you're doing and never give up. Never.This is how news work. That's fine. Reporters report, they don't experience every subject they cover - and this one was reacting emotionally to the things she was reporting. Be happy for it : ) Things will get better, I promise you!! | /r/MensRights | 04/10/21 05:39 AM |
| -3 | "Women most affected."Well, if you are an ordinary reporter who doen't know that in Reddit there's a 100-million strong assilum where insanity is taken as being normal, then you are thinking, as a reporter, about the anti-vaccination cult, and you try to put your report in the context of "look what tragedies may happen to you", and in this report because of the substance matter being a girl you are trying to appeal to women in the cult. Tomorrow you will report about a father who left behind 3 kids and cite the data … | /r/MensRights | 23/09/21 10:57 AM |
| 3 | It’s becoming less and less attractive to date women (in my age group - in their 20s) because what is expected of men and what role is assigned to them in comparison.Married guy here. Do not listen to feminists and you'll be fine. Feminism leaves you with no approved ways of existing - whatever you do you will be slammed. So ignore feminism completely. Do not expect girls to appreciate the fact that you followed a feminist call for men. The girls are not even aware of your efforts, plus most of them don't really want guys to be what those feminist calls asked men to be, even when those girls are the very ones repeating the calls. The level of self-awareness … | /r/MensRights | 23/09/21 08:11 AM |
| -12 | "Women most affected."Don't be a feminist looking for prejudice where there is'n't any. This time you took it out of its context. Someone shared here the link. It's a local news item about a wedding. The report is not about covid as a disease but about a girl who died the day before the wedding (of covid). The entire piece is a local-type, personal story, the groom, the plans, the shock, and so on. That's the only reason this sentence is mentioned way down close to the end. Not the point, just associative data becaus… | /r/MensRights | 23/09/21 07:13 AM |
| 1 | It's not that women don't care about men.I didn't intend it this way. This a men's rights forum where most people are men, so here I'm addressing men. In what little chance I get before being banned simply for challenging feminism, to reach out to women in women's forums, I address them and propose to listen to men. Maybe take a look here to see where I'm getting at - lovists.com. It's a website I established to start a change. My approach is to try and start a conversation between men and women, so women would also listen to what men … | /r/MensRights | 21/09/21 01:31 PM |
| 4 | It's not that women don't care about men.I am also married and have a boy, and I did manage to make my wife see feminism in a new light. To the point that she is now the one sending me text messages with links showing feminist insanity. Maybe you should give her my book? (A link to Amazon on my blog, lovists.com). Don't get me wrong - my wife still has a warm place for the overall feminist project and for the core traditional targets from 50 years ago, like de-normalizing the idea that a man hitting his wife is a private matter (it use… | /r/MensRights | 21/09/21 12:12 PM |
| 3 | It's not that women don't care about men.The principle of changing someone's mind: point to what you are both seeing but only you notice and explain what you are seeing. Your explanation will come as a shock, they will deflect. But if you have pointed to and explained something common, they will carry (resentful) your explanation, and the next time they see what you pointed to, they will perceive it slightly differently. It will not register as it was registered before - they now have your narrative in the back of their mind, detested … | /r/MensRights | 21/09/21 09:01 AM |
| 1 | Feminist GF seems unsympathetic to mens issues, sees most men as assholes. Is this a red flag to break it off?Guys, you have to ask as first or second question - "feminist?" If yes, gently and politely get out (don't argue, they are vindictive, violent and have little regard for you as a human being. You can end up with a shaming campaign or even a complaint just because she was insulted by the rejection). As for you friend, I never want to get between a couple online, without knowing the complexities, but in this case I have to share - been there, done that, it leads to abuse, the sooner you get out th… | /r/MensRights | 21/09/21 06:34 AM |
| 5 | It's not that women don't care about men.So if a guy tells them "I was harassed by a woman, tried to report, was attacked by feminists, now punished myself", they will either say "I don't care" or "good you deserve all of it"? Even if they know you? | /r/MensRights | 20/09/21 05:01 PM |
| 2 | It's not that women don't care about men.I wrote and published a whole book about it. Link in the website from comment above. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/21 04:50 PM |
| 1 | It's not that women don't care about men.44 | /r/MensRights | 20/09/21 04:47 PM |
| 2 | It's not that women don't care about men.Some. But I think they are few. I think we must keep trying to reach out to women and tell them what's going on so they hear us and not only those women you are referring to. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/21 04:13 PM |
| 3 | It's not that women don't care about men.Feminism has been lip-reading men in women's ears for 50 years. It has been falsely interpreting for them everything we do, as carrying a malicious indifferent intent. By now, it became very difficult to become a girl or a woman who can see and hear men directly, without covering us with what this lip-reading said we are. So we have a transparent plastic coating sprayed on us, a chocking thick layer of misinterpretation, that we have to tear in order to be heard and seen by women. I agree. I als… | /r/MensRights | 20/09/21 02:32 PM |
| 5 | It's not that women don't care about men.I think you should share more of them. Thank you! I am doing it a much as I can - take a look: https://lovists.com/blog/ | /r/MensRights | 20/09/21 02:21 PM |
| 9 | The myth that rapists don't get convicted/don't get long sentences because courts are sexist against women debunked. Studies cited.In a normal world this article would have been allowed in the NY Times. But truth is banned, and becomes a post on a forum, while lies are in the headlines daily. The transparent dictatorship. No law needed to be enacted for establishing it - fear is stonger than any law. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/21 07:41 AM |
| 16 | Since June, Swiss feminists have been protesting for "equal rights" and against women's retirement age being increased to match men's retirement age. Typical feminist hypocrisy.The reason for the different retirement ages is the thinking that working is for women an anomaly, that their natural state is at home and if they work it should end as soon as possible. This idea had been outdated already half a century ago and now preserved mostly by feminism's objection to equal retirement age. If feminism had anything to do with equality and women's empowerment it would protest to make the age identical, not different. This really shows that feminism is a privileges movement… | /r/MensRights | 19/09/21 08:01 AM |
| 1 | Netflix sued for sexism in Queen's Gambit by female USSR chess champion in 60s-70s. In contrast to series' premise and statement that no woman "was allowed" to compete against men, won men in competitions. The distortion and incitement about women in intellectually-challenging fields - explained.Honey, you only know what ad hominem is because of me, who explained the term to your mob four years ago. Now I'm teaching you a new word. I have ended fascist racism before elsewhere, and I will end yours. | /r/MensRights | 18/09/21 08:24 PM |
| 1 | Netflix sued for sexism in Queen's Gambit by female USSR chess champion in 60s-70s. In contrast to series' premise and statement that no woman "was allowed" to compete against men, won men in competitions. The distortion and incitement about women in intellectually-challenging fields - explained.Yeah. So let's recap what you're saying: someone has an emotional complex with reality, blurbs unfounded excuses for all the actual data, has no other data to rely on, and calls anyone relying on the findings that do exist dogmatic. I see. Please look up the term argumentum ad consequentiam. You'll find it oddly familiar. | /r/MensRights | 18/09/21 07:16 PM |
| -1 | Anyone tired of attacks on male sexuality?Listen, you might be right in some respects but the depth of analysis you go into for one sentence by one guy… who is not even giving a good example of the issues, and he's a guy… (he is a brainwash victim, not the brainwash designer). You seem to have caught the feminist virus. They have what they call "the pink glasses", how they get used to looking for discrimination in every grain of dust and then can't stop, they start seeing discrimination in everything. Men are in danger of catching it, b… | /r/MensRights | 18/09/21 06:03 AM |
| 6 | What do You think about the statistic that's says there are only 2% or 1-3% of false rape accusations? And it's a common argument that is used.It's refuted here along with an identification of the source for the 2% myth. https://www.saveservices.org/2021/05/one-third-of-sexual-assault-allegations-are-unfounded/?fbclid=IwAR0_JikSZ3FHjF-0StXMLejwzrDVjwHVwu2issblq4ZyCfeCG1B11vPoMuk One-Third of Sexual Assault Allegations in Criminal Setting Are Unfounded The source for the 2% myth is party smalltalk, cited in a book, which was then itself cited as a "source" by feminists for decades. Which is why often I refuse to add links when answering… | /r/MensRights | 17/09/21 03:36 PM |
| 1 | I was sexually harassed by a woman at work. I reported her to her male superior and I was crucified.Men must march. March for eqaul human rights. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/21 07:16 AM |
| 2 | "Normally when I talk about men it is because I'm angry about them, but right now I'm angry for them." Someone here shared in a comment this 36-seconds video by a girl talking about her boyfriend, I transcribed it here because every person in the West needs to see this.Lol | /r/MensRights | 16/09/21 07:42 PM |
| 1 | "Normally when I talk about men it is because I'm angry about them, but right now I'm angry for them." Someone here shared in a comment this 36-seconds video by a girl talking about her boyfriend, I transcribed it here because every person in the West needs to see this.I agree with your premise. Men have nothing to negotiate with right now. Women can get everything by force, no need to compromise in negotiations. This is why I am not joking when saying that men, at least single guys, should start a sex and sperm strike. I am completely convinced that women are faking it - they need men sexually just as much even if not the same way or at the same frequency. They are in a great position to discard this because they know there will be no consequences - they can … | /r/MensRights | 16/09/21 03:09 PM |
| 1 | "Normally when I talk about men it is because I'm angry about them, but right now I'm angry for them." Someone here shared in a comment this 36-seconds video by a girl talking about her boyfriend, I transcribed it here because every person in the West needs to see this.I'll try to explain myself better. What I mean in lovism is more or less going back to the way relations were around the 90s, and, making sure that going forward, those women who have always, and will always be obsessed with scrutinizing the relations between the sexes, will have something a little less destructive to be obsessed with - lovism instead of feminism. It's a replacement for feminism, for those women you would regard as "mildly feminist". Most normal people would just live their live… | /r/MensRights | 16/09/21 02:24 PM |
| 1 | "Normally when I talk about men it is because I'm angry about them, but right now I'm angry for them." Someone here shared in a comment this 36-seconds video by a girl talking about her boyfriend, I transcribed it here because every person in the West needs to see this.It's a conflict. Feminism wrapped the tie around the necks, and it's suffocating everyone (women as well, they just don't see who's pulling the rope). Breaking lose sounds to both as looking for air, but the issue, and feminist madness, is that the rope is humans' oxygen tube. I would say that the problem is two-fold: first feminism, but secondly a deeper issue, of which feminism was only a severe symptom. It seems that to create sexuality, life created two sets of drives, that are not completel… | /r/MensRights | 16/09/21 05:59 AM |
| -8 | 1) UN: Record number of women and children killed or wounded" (Women were %14 and 10% of civilian casualties) 2) "Priorities will include promoting gender equality. UNICEF requires US$143.6 million to meet the humanitarian needs of women and children in Afghanistan in 2021." History never changes.I have no problem with that reporting. Women and children are regarded universally as the helpless-protected - protected by their men. Men are regarded as the protectors. Women are regarded as the caregivers of children who are always with them and thus counted with them. The UN demonstrates that it acknowledges that women and men are not the same, but along with similar qualities have also different qualities and different innately-determined functions as opposed to "only cultural roles". This … | /r/MensRights | 15/09/21 05:19 AM |
| 2 | My thoughts on the call for a sex strike in Texas to protest the new abortion law.Ah, I think men should go on a sex strike, everywhere outside Texas, for all the other stuff that's going on. As of yesterday. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/21 05:23 PM |
| 6 | "Normally when I talk about men it is because I'm angry about them, but right now I'm angry for them." Someone here shared in a comment this 36-seconds video by a girl talking about her boyfriend, I transcribed it here because every person in the West needs to see this.Man-up is very important psychologically for guys and men. Indispensable. Men have an inner (innate) need to feel self-relient. This feeling is imperative for their well-being and unique to them. Guys and men will not be able to achieve positive emotional state when feeling that their security (physical and mental) is out of their hand, leaning on the environment's acceptance and support of some fragility. In men such a state only generates anxiety. Man-up is correct and necessary. It has nothin… | /r/MensRights | 14/09/21 03:36 PM |
| 25 | "Normally when I talk about men it is because I'm angry about them, but right now I'm angry for them." Someone here shared in a comment this 36-seconds video by a girl talking about her boyfriend, I transcribed it here because every person in the West needs to see this.The problem is not with man-up but with man down. The normal existence is not: 1. society never telling women what it constantly says to men - "complement partner, show love", 2. men are deprived emotionally of affection and appreciation - the norm becoming "Man? Down!", 3. men accumulate sadness, 4. society tells them to cry. The normal existence is: 1. society stops discriminating in messages, tells women the same messages it gives men about showing affection (and gives same messages to both s… | /r/MensRights | 14/09/21 03:03 PM |
| 10 | "Normally when I talk about men it is because I'm angry about them, but right now I'm angry for them." Someone here shared in a comment this 36-seconds video by a girl talking about her boyfriend, I transcribed it here because every person in the West needs to see this.Thank you! For the first share and the proper link - I was wondering where I could find it... | /r/MensRights | 14/09/21 12:31 PM |
| 53 | You want to see this meme from r/memes. "Boys after receiving their yearly complement." Read comments. Truth is returning to mainstream : ) Keep going, members of /MensRights, you're doing great.Listen guys, I actually told my wife, three years ago - listen, never mind that I'm always telling you how delicious what you cooked was, how beautiful you look in that dress, how wonderful you were when you danced in the amateur dancing group show, how great you're doing at work and deserve that promotion, and you not telling me ever, "you built that 15 meters fence to keep our baby from falling from the balcony in only half a day and it's strong as concrete? Looks good!", "Nice job with drivin… | /r/MensRights | 14/09/21 07:03 AM |
| 3 | This subreddit is heartbreakingThank you. You have lightened my day with your kind words. We don't have to call ourselves feminists or meninsts, we can all call ourselves humanists, and support equality because we support everyone, not any human of a particular kind. I call myself a lovist. I support love. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/21 05:27 AM |
| 0 | Someone asked in AskMen what guys refrain of saying because of fear of backlash, one guy wrote that a woman smacked his behind in a bar, he yelled at her, someone heard a male shouting at a female and called the police, they came, took him aside for questioning, did nothing with her, expelled him.Listen friend, there's something off with your conversation. I'm not sure what, it's in how it seems like you don't care about what would be correct, true, sound, as if finding the truth is not the purpose of a discussion for you, but "what's important is that what I said will win, because it is I who said it". These priorities - "me before truth" and "the only purpose of discussions is me coming out as winnig", which is sensed in the strange out-of-context cheerfulness, as if what you say is im… | /r/MensRights | 12/09/21 09:13 PM |
| 2 | Boy gropes girl at school. What should the consequences be?No suspension. When I was 13 or 14 there was a girl who used to chase boys her age trying to grab them by the package. She would do it all the time. Some couldn't pass the hallway without being chased. She would do it only to her friends, some 3-4 boys from her class (I was at a different class). No one ever said anything. Certainly not the boys, who DID NOT LIKE ANYTHING ABOUT IT, but wouldn't even think of hurting her by reporting it. I'm sure teachers passing by saw it. Women mostly. They nev… | /r/MensRights | 12/09/21 08:29 PM |
| 8 | For the mods.He's got a point. So many times I grabbed my head here and thought, "why did I just spend ten minutes providing arguments and data, this is a troll". I don't mean feminists and people who even ridicule a subject, which is fine by me, I mean people who deliberately write something provocative they don't really believe in, just to agonize the environment. It's a kick for them. | /r/MensRights | 12/09/21 04:25 PM |
| 1 | Boy gropes girl at school. What should the consequences be?No punishment. Just a talk from the kid's teacher, "this is rude, don't do this again". This is insanity and a chauvinistic dictatorship of feminist chauvinism. A girl doing the same does not even get a talk from her teacher. | /r/MensRights | 12/09/21 03:55 PM |
| 1 | Someone asked in AskMen what guys refrain of saying because of fear of backlash, one guy wrote that a woman smacked his behind in a bar, he yelled at her, someone heard a male shouting at a female and called the police, they came, took him aside for questioning, did nothing with her, expelled him.Yes, absolutely. Have you gone mad? Do you think there's anything normal in the feminist expectation that all human sexual communication will be held verbally with explicit questions and formal consent? Are there any women who communicate this way sexually with men? There are endless implicit tacit cues in human sexual communication, without which there is no sexuality. This is madness, and the reason for the madness is the hyperbolic description of unwelcomed mild sexual acts like a grope as so… | /r/MensRights | 11/09/21 08:39 PM |
| -1 | Someone asked in AskMen what guys refrain of saying because of fear of backlash, one guy wrote that a woman smacked his behind in a bar, he yelled at her, someone heard a male shouting at a female and called the police, they came, took him aside for questioning, did nothing with her, expelled him.No, this is not what I said and I never groped anyone, although I was groped here and there. What I said is that there are situations when this is not harassment even between strangers - for example if you talk and flirt and there's a mutual feeling of sexual tension, groping when going or returning is not necessarily violence, depends on context. What I said, and you can read about it more in my book (click my profile), is that instead of first having a cultural conversation about meaning, cont… | /r/MensRights | 11/09/21 07:32 PM |
| 7 | Someone asked in AskMen what guys refrain of saying because of fear of backlash, one guy wrote that a woman smacked his behind in a bar, he yelled at her, someone heard a male shouting at a female and called the police, they came, took him aside for questioning, did nothing with her, expelled him.If feminists don't like what is done in their name they should face feminism, not those affected by feminism who report what was done to them. | /r/MensRights | 11/09/21 07:16 PM |
| 3 | Someone asked in AskMen what guys refrain of saying because of fear of backlash, one guy wrote that a woman smacked his behind in a bar, he yelled at her, someone heard a male shouting at a female and called the police, they came, took him aside for questioning, did nothing with her, expelled him.I hear you. So sorry that you need to take this from them with no right of protest. So sorry. | /r/MensRights | 11/09/21 07:13 PM |
| 2 | Someone asked in AskMen what guys refrain of saying because of fear of backlash, one guy wrote that a woman smacked his behind in a bar, he yelled at her, someone heard a male shouting at a female and called the police, they came, took him aside for questioning, did nothing with her, expelled him.No such right. Tjis belongs in a pan-human conversation about communication. About signals and their meaning. So that people like that woman will know: a. To ask oneself "is this wanted?" b. "How it will be understood?" Improving human communication, not banning it. Improving through cultural conversation, the banning of which by feminism, as that woman shows, is not helpful. This is not in the realm of rights but of communication. There is an abuse of the realm of rights by feminism copied to a… | /r/MensRights | 11/09/21 05:49 PM |
| 4 | Someone asked in AskMen what guys refrain of saying because of fear of backlash, one guy wrote that a woman smacked his behind in a bar, he yelled at her, someone heard a male shouting at a female and called the police, they came, took him aside for questioning, did nothing with her, expelled him.This was funny. Thanks. I needed something like that. Loved the progress talk, you can't make this shit up. I don't care about men's rights. There's no such thing as men's rights, just as there's no such thing as women's rights, THERE ARE ONLY HUMAN RIGHTS. If you support equality then these are THE SAME RIGHTS regardless of any label you want to give humans. No label should ever be attached to the word "rights". This is the path to prejudice, not to equality. I know you don't know that. You wer… | /r/MensRights | 11/09/21 05:34 PM |
| 6 | Someone asked in AskMen what guys refrain of saying because of fear of backlash, one guy wrote that a woman smacked his behind in a bar, he yelled at her, someone heard a male shouting at a female and called the police, they came, took him aside for questioning, did nothing with her, expelled him.Are you sitting? I want you to sit before continuing: touching someone's ass is not a crime. Yes all you brainwashed fellas and girls, it's not. For thousands of years this was happening in both directions - humans are sexual and this, yes this! is part of human sexual communication. It was feminism who first started to argue that this is "violence" done out of "hate" (hate? really? Have you ever wanted to pat someone you hate from behind? what??) to "keep women down" (really? So all the million… | /r/MensRights | 11/09/21 04:47 PM |
| 8 | Someone asked in AskMen what guys refrain of saying because of fear of backlash, one guy wrote that a woman smacked his behind in a bar, he yelled at her, someone heard a male shouting at a female and called the police, they came, took him aside for questioning, did nothing with her, expelled him.We think alike. Women are fashion victims. Change the fashion, and most of them will go along. | /r/MensRights | 11/09/21 04:28 PM |
| 9 | Someone asked in AskMen what guys refrain of saying because of fear of backlash, one guy wrote that a woman smacked his behind in a bar, he yelled at her, someone heard a male shouting at a female and called the police, they came, took him aside for questioning, did nothing with her, expelled him.So what are we to do? Accept the status feminism has created for us - a sub-human? If a man would have grabbed him, wouldn't he do the same? Is a woman a super-human? The conclusion is the exact opposite - never accept the sub-human status, always insist on your human dignity, with humane and dignified responses, until society will have to choose - arrest all men in the West, or free them of their oppressor. | /r/MensRights | 11/09/21 04:01 PM |
| 13 | Someone asked in AskMen what guys refrain of saying because of fear of backlash, one guy wrote that a woman smacked his behind in a bar, he yelled at her, someone heard a male shouting at a female and called the police, they came, took him aside for questioning, did nothing with her, expelled him.Kohlberg analyzed morality by inspecting the depth of arguments given by people to explain ethical acts or judgments they make. He quantitatively measured to what length a person goes for justification and whether this reaches principles or self-serving purposes. And he found a clear difference between sexes. It's not trivial because comparing morality is always done under the criticism of being premised on a set of values (and thus biased). But he managed to circumvent the problem and provide a… | /r/MensRights | 11/09/21 03:41 PM |
| 9 | Someone asked in AskMen what guys refrain of saying because of fear of backlash, one guy wrote that a woman smacked his behind in a bar, he yelled at her, someone heard a male shouting at a female and called the police, they came, took him aside for questioning, did nothing with her, expelled him.I agree with this seldomly told truth. I have the same impression. Have you heard of Kohlberg? A psychologist from the early 20th century studying morals. His conclusion was as yours. Feminists protested and he's been canceled decades ago, but the analysis is there and is very compelling. | /r/MensRights | 11/09/21 03:27 PM |
| 19 | Someone asked in AskMen what guys refrain of saying because of fear of backlash, one guy wrote that a woman smacked his behind in a bar, he yelled at her, someone heard a male shouting at a female and called the police, they came, took him aside for questioning, did nothing with her, expelled him.Right on. But also - remember not to confuse feminists with women. Most women are normal. Not perfect and not deaf, sensitive to themselves but can also feel compassion for someone who's different from them. Feminism attracts the worst women and brings out the worst in women. It gives excuses for being violent and inhumane, so the violent and inhumane come there for excuses. It provides legitimacy for dis-logic and insanity so arguing with women there is maddening - a sane person who tries argui… | /r/MensRights | 11/09/21 03:05 PM |
| 18 | Someone asked in AskMen what guys refrain of saying because of fear of backlash, one guy wrote that a woman smacked his behind in a bar, he yelled at her, someone heard a male shouting at a female and called the police, they came, took him aside for questioning, did nothing with her, expelled him.I can see the original post there (16.5k likes, 8k comments), but it is locked for comments. | /r/MensRights | 11/09/21 02:44 PM |
| 92 | Someone asked in AskMen what guys refrain of saying because of fear of backlash, one guy wrote that a woman smacked his behind in a bar, he yelled at her, someone heard a male shouting at a female and called the police, they came, took him aside for questioning, did nothing with her, expelled him.No, it's active. Sorry that feminism in it's enterprise of silencing you so that you won't be able to reveal what women (or feminists) did, banned you from even reading what other men write. May all humans recieve equality and all chauvinist dictatorships including the one feminism evolved into be demolished in our time. Free yourself, because no one else will. Read books, speak privately with other men, feel freely whatever you feel - feel like a looser, a winner, a nobody, a somebody, a player… | /r/MensRights | 11/09/21 01:46 PM |
| 1 | You can shame a man for having a small or average penis, but cannot shame a women for having a loose vaginaI never understood why "tight pussy" is supposed to be a good thing. It's turture. I love loose vagina (I don't think I have exceptional equipment on my end). But that's beside the point of course. OP is absolutely right. | /r/MensRights | 17/08/21 05:32 AM |
| 41 | A US veteran burns his uniform after being wrongly convicted of assault by a woman.He means middle aged privileged women. | /r/MensRights | 15/08/21 10:22 AM |
| 78 | A US veteran burns his uniform after being wrongly convicted of assault by a woman.He is a hero. Because this is what he did in order not to do that to himself. The uniform is a surrogate for his own self. It is his own self. And he is a hero for combating the drive of doing it to himself and instead do it to the uniform. What he is describing happens in other countries - men abandoned when returning from combat, and the suicides. Society must thank its men for all they do for society, or face the shame. | /r/MensRights | 15/08/21 10:22 AM |
| 2 | I am sharing a post from TwoXChromosomes about the mass shooter from the UK who killed five this week and was linked to Reddit male forums. I am sharing this because I believe fighting this is a fundamental premise and not a matter of debate - we all must fight this, on reddit and everywhere.These are not two conflicting needs. People in forums need to avoid hating - this is true for everyone including feminists - and society must be informed about the changes that occurred in it, its new oppression of men and its silencing of that oppression. Hate and crimes are the very last thing that would make it listen. I proposed here 6 months ago that men must drop any fear and shame and hold The Men's March, where such forums as here will become the platform for organizing hundreds of thous… | /r/MensRights | 14/08/21 07:10 PM |
| 1 | I am sharing a post from TwoXChromosomes about the mass shooter from the UK who killed five this week and was linked to Reddit male forums. I am sharing this because I believe fighting this is a fundamental premise and not a matter of debate - we all must fight this, on reddit and everywhere.I never saw here any violence. I was not talking about this forum. I am taking a stand becauae this is a human rights forum and nothing else, and I am writing this in case some here go to other forums and see a line crossed. I wanted to let them know they can do something (object, calm things down, critisize). I am critical of feminists who remain silent while other feminists write killallmen - and yes it does affect lives - if this doesn't represent them then they should say it to other feminis… | /r/MensRights | 14/08/21 04:39 PM |
| 1 | I am sharing a post from TwoXChromosomes about the mass shooter from the UK who killed five this week and was linked to Reddit male forums. I am sharing this because I believe fighting this is a fundamental premise and not a matter of debate - we all must fight this, on reddit and everywhere.You are right, I can't, I tried and was banned, there is a crowed of tens of millions that completely shut itself from every outside information, through censorship by adminns, moderators, editors and journalists - the isolation is so tight that the people inside the sealed universe are not only unaware of data, they don't even know there was a question. The fact that they have migrated into a parallel dimension, living right next to us and completely out of our reach, doesn't mean truth changes… | /r/MensRights | 14/08/21 04:20 PM |
| 4 | I am sharing a post from TwoXChromosomes about the mass shooter from the UK who killed five this week and was linked to Reddit male forums. I am sharing this because I believe fighting this is a fundamental premise and not a matter of debate - we all must fight this, on reddit and everywhere.You know this is not true. Men have zero legitimacy for calling women names (nor should they) while feminists get to call all men rapists, abusers and trash with cheers. Please try to update your version of reality - you want to treat the world as if this is 1970 and as if feminist actions never affect the world. But they have, and do, and feminism first changed the world from the 1970s until 1990s in creating a new balance - you may call it equality - and then, as you do here, was not able to u… | /r/MensRights | 14/08/21 02:23 PM |
| -3 | I am sharing a post from TwoXChromosomes about the mass shooter from the UK who killed five this week and was linked to Reddit male forums. I am sharing this because I believe fighting this is a fundamental premise and not a matter of debate - we all must fight this, on reddit and everywhere.Don't make this connection.A person who killed a three-year old is a sick monster, not "someone driven to madness by feminism". You are hurting your own cause - don't go there. Instead see what I wrote above: "Everything needs to change: feminism must stop legitimizing the generalizing-thinking-pattern with it's generalizations. It will be impossible to cause forums to stop making their own harmful generalizations, when newspaper headlines and fully-endorsed and protected forums have titles with… | /r/MensRights | 14/08/21 02:07 PM |
| 7 | I am sharing a post from TwoXChromosomes about the mass shooter from the UK who killed five this week and was linked to Reddit male forums. I am sharing this because I believe fighting this is a fundamental premise and not a matter of debate - we all must fight this, on reddit and everywhere.The term "men babies" is chauvinism and in some contexts hate speech. When you are using hate speech, you are legitimizing hate speech. You become a cause for hate speech. Stop doing that. Take responsibility. you are not a phantom or a shadow. Your actions have an effect in the world. Get your facts straight: the number of mothers who abandon children is the same as the number of men who do this. | /r/MensRights | 14/08/21 02:02 PM |
| 1 | I am sharing a post from TwoXChromosomes about the mass shooter from the UK who killed five this week and was linked to Reddit male forums. I am sharing this because I believe fighting this is a fundamental premise and not a matter of debate - we all must fight this, on reddit and everywhere.No, you are going the wrong way with that. In a world that treats as sub-human your victory is remaining human. | /r/MensRights | 14/08/21 01:58 PM |
| 2 | I am sharing a post from TwoXChromosomes about the mass shooter from the UK who killed five this week and was linked to Reddit male forums. I am sharing this because I believe fighting this is a fundamental premise and not a matter of debate - we all must fight this, on reddit and everywhere.Providing mental health and guys being careful with what they write online, are not mutually exclusive. They go together. Providing health care is necessary and insufficient. Mentally ill individuals will sometimes resist and reject care (free or not), and if they find a place that encourages them to resist help, that rationalizes for them how mental care is only part of the system, then no care in the world would help. Everything needs to change: feminism must stop legitimizing the generalizing… | /r/MensRights | 14/08/21 01:45 PM |
| 3 | I am sharing a post from TwoXChromosomes about the mass shooter from the UK who killed five this week and was linked to Reddit male forums. I am sharing this because I believe fighting this is a fundamental premise and not a matter of debate - we all must fight this, on reddit and everywhere.Men are not accountable alone, nor as a "group", nor including each and every one of them - what you wrote is racist-type incitement. If one Muslim commits a terror attack, are all Muslims accountable? All should face punishment if an attack occurs again? All should live under constant blaming and violations of their human dignity and rights for something they could not control or stop? Would you dare coming to a Muslims' forum and write after a terror attack committed by a radical Islamist, "Al… | /r/MensRights | 14/08/21 12:51 PM |
| 2 | I am sharing a post from TwoXChromosomes about the mass shooter from the UK who killed five this week and was linked to Reddit male forums. I am sharing this because I believe fighting this is a fundamental premise and not a matter of debate - we all must fight this, on reddit and everywhere.This is a very sensitive subject and time. No need to add the comment about clicks right now. The TwoXChromosomes reddit is where this was published and where it should be read. Our only defense against hate, is love. This is not me trying to be poetic. Between men and women, this is the empirical fact. This is indeed what makes having this discussion, with feminism, so painful and difficult. Still. Never forget: Women are who we love, more than anything. Anything else is a defense mechanism. We… | /r/MensRights | 14/08/21 10:55 AM |
| 2 | A few points from a book I'm writing - what really was the history of "the patriarchy", and correcting feminist misinterpretation of human historyI will! And the bottom line of the book is not showing the problem, but pointing to the solution, which I chose to publish first, as a book which is available - https://www.amazon.com/Lovism-Humanist-Alternative-Henry-Blair-ebook/dp/B08RXMS7M2 | /r/MensRights | 13/08/21 09:25 PM |
| 2 | A few points from a book I'm writing - what really was the history of "the patriarchy", and correcting feminist misinterpretation of human historyAs I write in the post, families were led by fathers and sporadic chauvinism (I'd say in both sexes against both) existed. Whether this generates anything resembling the patriarchy defined in feninism, which expliclty (bluntly) assumes sinister, premeditated and coordinated ongoing male crime of oppression and abuse against women which basically meant that all women were facing enslavement, rape and murder until feminism came along (and which will be repeated if feminism is gone or even criticiz… | /r/MensRights | 13/08/21 07:46 PM |
| 3 | A few points from a book I'm writing - what really was the history of "the patriarchy", and correcting feminist misinterpretation of human historyThank you. I will definitely be interested - I'll have to fine-tune and edit with references and get in touch with you. Cheers! | /r/MensRights | 13/08/21 02:36 PM |
| 1 | A few points from a book I'm writing - what really was the history of "the patriarchy", and correcting feminist misinterpretation of human historyYou are right in saying that I am insisting on making a clear distinction between what might be dubbed "formal patriarchy" and what may be described as "male dominance", and you are also right in guessing that I am not accepting at all the (feminist, I'd say) idea of seeing both as merely two manifstations of one and the same thing - call it male supremacism. Rather, I believe the following is true: Male dominance is not dominance when it exists outside of a feminist society that teaches forcefu… | /r/MensRights | 13/08/21 09:40 AM |
| 1 | A few points from a book I'm writing - what really was the history of "the patriarchy", and correcting feminist misinterpretation of human historyGo ahead. | /r/MensRights | 13/08/21 08:58 AM |
| 1 | A few points from a book I'm writing - what really was the history of "the patriarchy", and correcting feminist misinterpretation of human historyNo way of doing that, I think. Like asking when a fetus becomes a person : ) The sequence of events, as we know, has usually two axes: France is one, and England-US is the other. The details themselves are extremely gritty - anyone who ever tried to follow the steps of the French revolution had to take a week off after that, it's endless small changes and conflicts over the course of 100 years or more. Eventually there's a republic. The birth of a state is very much like the birth of a human. It… | /r/MensRights | 13/08/21 08:38 AM |
| 5 | A few points from a book I'm writing - what really was the history of "the patriarchy", and correcting feminist misinterpretation of human historyThanks! I am not that great in doing collaborations - my thing is "send and forget" (and if they publish it, great, if not, I don't care, I submit more). But I'll try for once to be a proper human being and work with someone on something. | /r/MensRights | 12/08/21 02:32 PM |
| 5 | A few points from a book I'm writing - what really was the history of "the patriarchy", and correcting feminist misinterpretation of human historyI should add that the book is more or less written, with references, but not in English. As for narrative, it already has a relevant structure. Here I was trying to outline an overall narrative - the arguments without the details that establish them. I just want to share here a framework, in this post. It's a trajectory. Part of the problem I'm facing is not having the time resources, nor the assistance, a feminist has. What I'm trying to do in that book, is what historians and sociologists shou… | /r/MensRights | 12/08/21 01:28 PM |
| 3 | A few points from a book I'm writing - what really was the history of "the patriarchy", and correcting feminist misinterpretation of human historyI have not, although I am aware of the history of voting you elegantly summarized. One interesting hidden fact - women in England and the US did have a vote, in the 19th century (and I believe in the 18th as well), the restriction being by wealth (interpreted as independence) and not by sex, and some did vote - much before most men received the right to vote. | /r/MensRights | 12/08/21 01:15 PM |
| 7 | A few points from a book I'm writing - what really was the history of "the patriarchy", and correcting feminist misinterpretation of human historyWhy aren't we creating a website with a clear narrative? Feminists are creating endless resources (e.g. every relevant wiki page), of a false skewed narrative. We must do something. A Human History project? | /r/MensRights | 12/08/21 01:05 PM |
| 1 | A few points from a book I'm writing - what really was the history of "the patriarchy", and correcting feminist misinterpretation of human historyFascinating! | /r/MensRights | 12/08/21 10:21 AM |
| 1 | A few points from a book I'm writing - what really was the history of "the patriarchy", and correcting feminist misinterpretation of human historyThank you. This is not a section from the book, only a summary of the general notions, written originally as a comment in a reddit discussion that I wanted to share further. Can I ask you to edit and paste here to improve it for the benefit of everyone? English is not my first language. I am trying to do my best and I need help. I am trying to do something that a feminist would easily receive funding for, with zero funding. Any assistance will be invaluable. If anyone can help with: 1. Translati… | /r/MensRights | 12/08/21 09:17 AM |
| 2 | A few points from a book I'm writing - what really was the history of "the patriarchy", and correcting feminist misinterpretation of human historyI'm a leftist and feminism is a mutation of the left - it's what you get when a left develops the psychology of fascism (fascism is a universal human tendency. It has nothing to do with the political right, as my leftists friends think. They are wrong. Currently they are the fascists. Not figuratively but in practice). Hence some overlaps between feminist propaganda and what I would write as a humanist. But this is not a true overlap, because feminism gives a distorted (and rather manipulative) … | /r/MensRights | 12/08/21 07:42 AM |
| 1 | This is outstanding. Social sciences started to acknowledge that sexism against men deserves being studied, but, only as a "belief in sexism shift" or "BSS", wherein they began measuring, not sexism against men, but, the level of belief in men that sexism against them exists. "killalltruth"?I'm not aware of changes in history that historians are making. Gender clergy from the gender church write their mythology in their scriptures and call it history, but I haven't noticed this coming from any historian. The patriarchy that feminists describe - men enslaving and murdering and raping women for millennia - never existed and humanity would have long been extinct if it had. But a patriarchy did exist in a much more benign way when nation states formed - households were represented lega… | /r/MensRights | 12/08/21 05:48 AM |
| 3 | This is outstanding. Social sciences started to acknowledge that sexism against men deserves being studied, but, only as a "belief in sexism shift" or "BSS", wherein they began measuring, not sexism against men, but, the level of belief in men that sexism against them exists. "killalltruth"?I hear ya, but humanities is history, philosophy, literature and art. They are not as affected yet (as much as the sciences are, save for literature, but that's because of extramural influence (publishers, editors, poetry journals, the literature gang)). I think you meant social sciences - sociology and anthropology mainly, and naturally, the gender church department that converted them. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/21 09:58 PM |
| 3 | This is outstanding. Social sciences started to acknowledge that sexism against men deserves being studied, but, only as a "belief in sexism shift" or "BSS", wherein they began measuring, not sexism against men, but, the level of belief in men that sexism against them exists. "killalltruth"?Agreed. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/21 08:44 PM |
| 13 | This is outstanding. Social sciences started to acknowledge that sexism against men deserves being studied, but, only as a "belief in sexism shift" or "BSS", wherein they began measuring, not sexism against men, but, the level of belief in men that sexism against them exists. "killalltruth"?Impossible. Don't you know that "abuser" and "abused" are not determined by what each did but innately by sex? (and there are no innate differences between sexes. That too). Women can't be sexist by definition of sexism, which is "what men do to women" in feminist texts. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/21 02:28 PM |
| 2 | I just want you to know, all women, that millions of men will never forgive you for never responding to "killallmen" with an "ILoveMen" hashtag.This forum is emotionally abusive. It is based on trolling. The people who post here are incapable of feeling empathy. I looked for a place where feminists are willing to have discussions, but what I found is that all feminists here (yap, all) are trapped in the mindset of a sociopath. They seem unable not be manipulative and harmful, unable to have any sincere discussion, every statement they make here is a re-write of authentic feelings to drive the other person into pain - the essence of the … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/08/21 02:16 PM |
| 25 | This is outstanding. Social sciences started to acknowledge that sexism against men deserves being studied, but, only as a "belief in sexism shift" or "BSS", wherein they began measuring, not sexism against men, but, the level of belief in men that sexism against them exists. "killalltruth"?Yes, they said that if millions of Germans write "kill all Jews" then the main concern is that a baseless Jewish belief that millions of Germans write "kill all Jews" is yet another Jewish discrimination against Germans. Sorry - I meant women and men, so sorry. Did I write Germans and Jews? Sorry equality police from r/AgainstHateSpeech watching over us, now you will write that they need to shut us down for comparing "kill all men" to "kill all jews" which is of course sexist - everybody knows t… | /r/MensRights | 11/08/21 01:07 PM |
| 4 | This is outstanding. Social sciences started to acknowledge that sexism against men deserves being studied, but, only as a "belief in sexism shift" or "BSS", wherein they began measuring, not sexism against men, but, the level of belief in men that sexism against them exists. "killalltruth"?Same. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/21 11:32 AM |
| 17 | This is outstanding. Social sciences started to acknowledge that sexism against men deserves being studied, but, only as a "belief in sexism shift" or "BSS", wherein they began measuring, not sexism against men, but, the level of belief in men that sexism against them exists. "killalltruth"?ME TOO | /r/MensRights | 11/08/21 11:27 AM |
| -4 | Here's a calculator for women to find how many men fit their criteria, and the results are not goodWhy not liking gay marriage is being a bigot? I am all for any marriage or couplehood, I have good friends who are a same-sex family, but if someone doesn't like it I don't see how that makes her a bigot. She may not like it, who is she bothering? I read a lot of feminists who are against any kind of couplehood between men and women, let alone marriage. Are they bigots? Wait - a woman who doesn't like the idea of a woman marrying a man is not a bigot, but a woman who doesn't like the idea of a m… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/08/21 04:42 PM |
| 1 | Here's a calculator for women to find how many men fit their criteria, and the results are not goodI think you are saying it's not any guy's fault that he became what feminism made of him. I agree. I have deep empathy for them and I'm not competing in any way with them, on the contrary, I'm trying to help them. Also because I feel sorry for the girls as well. And I had these strange situations where a girl suddenly gives my that look and I try to show her that her guy is great and show him "it's okay, you are allowed to be a man". I'm not taking advantage of what feminism did to men. I am dev… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/08/21 04:13 PM |
| 6 | Here's a calculator for women to find how many men fit their criteria, and the results are not goodWhy is this entire forum some depiction of men as some starved beings only wishing some woman would so much as look at them while women are princesses with their only burden being choosing between the constant rain of men begging for their attention? This is one big lie. Women are obsessed by how men see them (lie all you want), live in constant chase after the male standard, and have a periodic mental breakdown about not being beautiful and sexy enough. Men reject most women who would want them… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/08/21 03:21 PM |
| 1 | Change My View: the "Female Dating Strategy" reddit-verse posters often exhibit behavior as bad or worse than that of the men they criticize (and allow zero discussion, at all).Can you and I start something together? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/08/21 05:16 PM |
| 11 | Excellent educational documentary (debunking the wage gap myth) now age restricted by YoutubeThanks for the info. It's great that people share resources. We all need books, articles, films - it's what constructs a culture that replaces feminist culture. | /r/MensRights | 09/08/21 01:09 PM |
| -1 | Change My View: the "Female Dating Strategy" reddit-verse posters often exhibit behavior as bad or worse than that of the men they criticize (and allow zero discussion, at all).I agree. Men and women must start having shared discussions, and not for blaming and getting angry, but for explaining and understanding. Both should listen, both should talk. I am amazed at the fact that this does not exist, nowhere, at all. I joined this forum hoping it occurs here - this place was the closest thing I found on the whole internet for a shared discussion of both sexes, and here is light years away from the kind of conversation we all need to have. Without blaming and bashing, ju… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/08/21 08:38 AM |
| 3 | Men learning not to accept women's chauvinism, lesson 1: "If you can't deal with me at my worst, you don't deserve me at my best."So sorry for what you went through. I hear you. The feminist man is a lie, they are not feminist. Feminism manipulatively tapped into their manhood self-esteem, by saying "a REAL man takes abuse and shuts up, because he is a REAL man, he is STRONG enough to recieve one-sided inhumane treatment without complaining". Feminists have abused the very innate tendency men have to selflessly protect women, to make it "accepting dehumanization from me is protecting me". This created the feminized macho p… | /r/MensRights | 09/08/21 06:07 AM |
| 3 | Men learning not to accept women's chauvinism, lesson 1: "If you can't deal with me at my worst, you don't deserve me at my best."Because many women and girls are hurt too by the women who use the phrase or see the world this way. Another unspoken truth in the feminist era, is that the slogans on "men are hurt mostly by men" are not some proof of the toxicity of men - women are hurt primarily by women, too, it's the case in both sexes, since aggression is primarily an intra-sex means of competition within two sexes. But, while the feminist liberation of women from all humane limitations - the very limitations that keep soc… | /r/MensRights | 09/08/21 05:16 AM |
| 20 | Men learning not to accept women's chauvinism, lesson 1: "If you can't deal with me at my worst, you don't deserve me at my best."Sorry, every guy has to accept certain restrictions on his behavior so he won't hurt his girlfriend or wife, and if he won't abide he will be called toxic or abusive. Humanist protections are for everyone and humanist restrictions apply to everyone. Women do not get the freedom to never restrict their behavior as to not hurt their boyfriend or husband while the responsibility to carry the burden of their behavior is put on the man. You will have to take upon yourself the same restrictions you wi… | /r/MensRights | 08/08/21 03:44 PM |
| 8 | What’s Up w/Reddit’s Hate on Men?They will tell you that the re-education camp on the MensLib gulag and the like is always recruiting. Acceptance there is easy, you just go through reprogramming to "the only ones hurting men are men, no woman has ever hurt me, I am only hurting myself, please help me escape the patriarchy, can someone take the clockwork orange clips off my eyelids for a sec I need to sneeze thank you". | /r/MensRights | 08/08/21 02:36 PM |
| 1 | Why does the data show that calls for equality create severe discrimination?I write about the solution here - lovists.com And here - https://www.amazon.com/Lovism-Humanist-Alternative-Henry-Blair-ebook/dp/B08RXMS7M2 | /r/MensRights | 08/08/21 05:12 AM |
| 2 | Why does the data show that calls for equality create severe discrimination?Regarding the analogy (I missed the question, sorry) - my advice would be not to build a fiction book on social analysis. Because stories are led by emotion and tension between the people in them, and to seem real these need to be free to follow any trajectory. While when we add to fiction a social insight to make the story an analogy, our agenda dictates the trajectory and the realness is lost. Which is why all woke fiction from tv to movies to books feels so fake and artificial. Stories have a… | /r/MensRights | 07/08/21 09:48 PM |
| 1 | Why does the data show that calls for equality create severe discrimination?Great idea! I'll search for a reddit on that. I found a facebook group of mothers, from the UK, and they appreciate the input, but it's not very active. When I started this (a website, blog, book, to fuel a conversation) I was amazed at the absolute lack of shared forums for men and women who want to talk post-metoo and reach over the fear and hostility that feminism created in me too. I was sure I just need to find them and join in - not a single place. The closest was "purplepill" here on redd… | /r/MensRights | 07/08/21 09:28 PM |
| 3 | Why does the data show that calls for equality create severe discrimination?Absolutely. Here it is. https://www.amazon.com/Lovism-Humanist-Alternative-Henry-Blair-ebook/dp/B08RXMS7M2 | /r/MensRights | 07/08/21 09:12 PM |
| 2 | Why does the data show that calls for equality create severe discrimination?I'm not gender neutral. I know this is not reflected in the text, but you can take a look here - lovists.com. I agree with you. I want to offer arguments that can be cited to women and feminists as well, hence the point of view of the text. These arguments are only a first introduction, to capture any attention. They are meant to be followed by another step, and another, until a conversation between men and women can form, in which after listening is gained (for the first time), the asymmetry ca… | /r/MensRights | 07/08/21 07:12 PM |
| 2 | Why does the data show that calls for equality create severe discrimination?I agree, and equity by sex is discrimination. I fully support actively helping the disadvantaged, but a state of being disadvantaged must be determined on a personal basis. When it is determined by innate traits, as sex, it is privilege, not equality. | /r/MensRights | 07/08/21 07:06 PM |
| 2 | Why does the data show that calls for equality create severe discrimination?I agree with everything you wrote. In particular the first part about the nature of feminism. The goal in my analysis (and I agree this was not reflected above) is acknowledgement in sexuality through conversation. I see sexuality as a cliff, erected between the sexes, and requiring them to tell each other about "what it's like to go through life as my sex among yours". I call having insight about this, Androstanding and Gynostanding, and argue that in contrast to feminism's expectation, no sex … | /r/MensRights | 07/08/21 05:59 PM |
| 2 | Why does the data show that calls for equality create severe discrimination?I don't accept equity by sex. The only equality is equal opportunity and equal cultivation. Equity immediately turns into active discrimination (I do support active support for the disadvantaged, but "disadvantaged" must be decided only according to personal state and not by innate traits, otherwise it is unjust privilege, not equality). I also disagree that in the 70s women were in an inferior position in politics relative to today. On the contrary, I think feminism decreased their participatio… | /r/MensRights | 07/08/21 05:11 PM |
| 2 | Why does the data show that calls for equality create severe discrimination?Yes, it's great that you mention it - we must separate the feminism discussion from the right-left debate. This is why what you described failed, and not the fact that it was a new equality movement - this is hard to hear but we must start this discussion. As a leftist I understand the right putting the sex relations and feminism in the context of right-left. A lot of people including women, including vast parts of the left, and including many feminists (!) (those called "terfs") are harmed by w… | /r/MensRights | 07/08/21 03:14 PM |
| 3 | Why does the data show that calls for equality create severe discrimination?You are right with your point about women needing a framework for their rights. This is why men must offer them such a framework to replace one-sided feminism. A mutual and reciprocal replacement. I called it Lovism, you can choose any name. The whole point of lovism is exactly what you said - women will never let go of feminism just because of problems pointed out. But women have always asked, what will make men join (most men, not just a few LGBT and progressives), this was frustrating for the… | /r/MensRights | 07/08/21 01:40 PM |
| 5 | Why does the data show that calls for equality create severe discrimination?Men's rights are human rights. They need protection under the universal approach of humanism and not through copying the feminist error - of separatism. Separitism is what caused, and had to cause, feminism becoming chauvinism. Feminism was a mistake. Women's rights were addressed by universal humanism. Men should not copy that mistake in forming "male feminism". Especially since this would never achieve rights - men and women are different. Women will join the feminist error, very few men will … | /r/MensRights | 07/08/21 12:36 PM |
| 18 | Why does the data show that calls for equality create severe discrimination?Melinda Gates has already stated her side of the Gates fortune will be spent on women and girls. Why isn't Elon Musk or Bill Gates setting aside money to help men and boys? Because if they will, feminism - which has a lot of loyal believers in the media - will make sure to depict them as misogynists. No man with high public profile dares to support equal rights of men publicly, because feminism is a powerful force that maintains forcefully a paradigm: "supporting women's equal rights is supporti… | /r/MensRights | 07/08/21 11:57 AM |
| 1 | Why does the data show that calls for equality create severe discrimination?Well, I probably should have removed the link to the book before pasting... The point is not a book nor is a blog - the data and references are. | /r/MensRights | 07/08/21 09:57 AM |
| 2 | Why does the data show that calls for equality create severe discrimination?I have a blog where I try to help promote human equality by organizing lists of references as a narrative, so that it would be easier for all to disseminate facts and data, to make more people aware of what's going on around them (including women, and feminists). I come from research, all my life is around research, so I feel this is were I can contribute the most. This text is taken from that blog. Use any reference cited as you see fit. Thanks. | /r/MensRights | 07/08/21 09:39 AM |
| 3 | If you are white or male you arn’t protected under reddit’s hate speech rules. White men can’t be oppressed according to reddit and feminism ideology.Dear reddit administrator, here is how men are oppresed as a group. Mind you, the fact that one can find individuals in a "group" who seem unaffected by the oppression of their "group", does not mean the others are not oporessed, as you should be well aware of (if one finds a black man who is the President of the US it does not mean that other blacks are not discriminated against). https://lovists.com/2021/06/29/the-unspoken-cause-of-the-low-testosterone-epidemic/ | /r/MensRights | 07/08/21 05:20 AM |
| 38 | Not Only Conservatives, Feminists Too Want to Police and Control SexualityIt's amazing how in feminism everything is social construction until it comes to feminism. When feminism's actions are up for discussion, suddenly the barrage of commands and bans has no social influence. One stares at thin air with piercing suspicion, like a shrewd detective ready to unearth every rock to find the murder weapon when looking at a body with an ax laying next to it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/21 04:03 PM |
| 3 | Not Only Conservatives, Feminists Too Want to Police and Control SexualityPrecisely. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/21 03:37 PM |
| 1 | The differences between men and women in and around couplehood and sexuality are not artificial "roles". This terminology is a falsehood.Here you go https://www.amazon.com/Lovism-Humanist-Alternative-Henry-Blair-ebook/dp/B08RXMS7M2 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/08/21 04:58 AM |
| 2 | The differences between men and women in and around couplehood and sexuality are not artificial "roles". This terminology is a falsehood.Good questions, both are answered here - https://lovists.com/2021/03/01/science-plus-violence-equals-silence-the-gender-church-equation/ I am actually a big fan of Marx, and I believe feminism had radically extrapolated his arguments to the level of completely distorting them. That said, as a leftist I am (aggressively) critical of the recurring tendency in the left to deduce rigid conclusions from principles, while ignoring the human in people, to the point of reaching anti-humanist positions, … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/08/21 03:54 PM |
| 2 | The differences between men and women in and around couplehood and sexuality are not artificial "roles". This terminology is a falsehood.You are correct. The studies that will close the gap you are pointing to, require a scientific world that allows scientists to test any hypothesis. Alas, the current atmosphere (see link - censorship by removing already-published studies and by firing), forbids scientists of perusing the questions you are raising, which I agree that require answering. Will you fight the violence against and silencing of scientists with me, so that these questions could be explored freely with no limitations on h… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/08/21 02:15 PM |
| 1 | The differences between men and women in and around couplehood and sexuality are not artificial "roles". This terminology is a falsehood.I have responded to the original post that presented this paper on the sub-reddit Science. I'll paste the response here when I'll find it (edit: I found it, see next) - that post misrepresented the conclusions. Please be aware that today, scientists are operating under intimidation that includes threats of violence when this subject is discussed (see a summary here https://lovists.com/2021/03/01/science-plus-violence-equals-silence-the-gender-church-equation/), so we must look at the data itself… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/08/21 11:11 AM |
| 1 | Romantic and sexual interest are just differentCool. That's a valid perspective. I know about the new type of girl that has a male function, of just having sex and not expecting anything more than that. That didn't exist 20 years ago, girls wanted a romantic context, even if for two weeks. By the way, conservatives keep attributing the new girl (that exists for about a decade or less, no more), to "the sexual revolution of the 70s". That's nonsense. That revolution only meant sex without getting married. For 50 years girls kept wanting love.… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/08/21 09:58 AM |
| 2 | The differences between men and women in and around couplehood and sexuality are not artificial "roles". This terminology is a falsehood.The pattern difference is seen in babies a few months after birth. No life experience is relevant after birth. As I mentioned. You are welcome to read the book. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/08/21 05:14 AM |
| 1 | The differences between men and women in and around couplehood and sexuality are not artificial "roles". This terminology is a falsehood.Can you give here an example for a culture where what you regard here as "role from culture" is or was different than what you regard here as "traditional roles"? (this is a trick question. Human sexuality functions are pan-human, and what I'm trying to make you recall, is that when a human characteristic is pan-cultural - appears in all cultures - such as facial expressions, then we conclude that it's pan-human because it is biological, because we acknowledge that detached cultures that had no … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/08/21 09:31 PM |
| 2 | The differences between men and women in and around couplehood and sexuality are not artificial "roles". This terminology is a falsehood.I wonder if we are capable of further evolving as enlightenment comes into play Please read this. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/08/21 01:32 PM |
| 2 | Women are the "wild" gender nowThis is because of feminist violent oppression of men. This is not "a good thing". See here: https://lovists.com/2021/06/29/the-unspoken-cause-of-the-low-testosterone-epidemic/ A good thing would be equality. I'm not sure if you are aware, but one of the primary complaints of feminism 50 years ago was about the exact same asymmetrical pattern, only with the sexes reversed, and feminism called the asymmetry a result of oppression and chauvinism. I hope you understand that if you are so enthusiast… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/08/21 01:21 PM |
| 1 | The differences between men and women in and around couplehood and sexuality are not artificial "roles". This terminology is a falsehood.There's a link in my profile, and if you send me a message I'll send it to you directly. The main issue is that the link is behind a paywall - I can send you (and anyone) the url plus the full text directly. This way I can share while not promoting any specific website. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/08/21 12:34 PM |
| 5 | The differences between men and women in and around couplehood and sexuality are not artificial "roles". This terminology is a falsehood.Thanks for publishing the post. I just want to note that I think I chose the flair "Science" and not "CMV" ("change my view"). If I'm not mistaken, in a CMV post there's a time limit within which the PO needs to address comments, and living in a different timezone than most redditors I will probably not be able to respond fast enough - I'll do my best. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/08/21 11:20 AM |
| 4 | Detained by police for "Man with child"ME TOO. When my son was a baby and toddler (two years ago, now 5 yo) I got used to the constant hostility from women on the street, in parks or at the doctor's waiting room when it was just the two of us, which was a lot because I took a paternity leave (not to mention being treated as thin air by doctors and staff if my wife was there). | /r/MensRights | 03/08/21 07:12 AM |
| 5 | Detained by police for "Man with child"The fruit of feminist anti-men systematic and systemic demonization and legitimized hate speech, and the product of the feminist message that all men are potential criminals and that most are. We live in a new racism, disguising itself as "equality". National and international authorities have been pushed into adopting and spreading the new racism - education systems make boys stand up to apologize for things they have never done, universities operate tribunals clean of due process for male stud… | /r/MensRights | 03/08/21 06:19 AM |
| 1 | Is it just me or are websites like only fans just super depressing?Thanks, I have a blog where I write about these matters, lovists.com | /r/MensRights | 03/08/21 04:06 AM |
| 10 | Is it just me or are websites like only fans just super depressing?It's more depressing that everything got so distorted and ill in the feminist society. I'm a liberal, not a conservative, but what the left created in the US because of the feminist and progressive seizure of the left is completely demented. They deny human drives and oppress them and this is the result. They denied that when it comes to sexuality men and women are different and have different and matching drives, and forbade acknowledgment of their drives - guys have a drive to look and girls t… | /r/MensRights | 02/08/21 04:42 PM |
| 4 | Kelly Clarkson has to pay ex husband 200k a month in child support. Feminists loose their mindsSo don't watch. You have a finger, scroll on. | /r/MensRights | 01/08/21 04:30 PM |
| 3 | Blue Pillers, what is it you actually believe, and how does is contradict trp?I think I agree with most of what you say. I'm not red pill, but am not willing to endorse feminism either (I used to regard feminism as part of society, until me too came along and the most radical feminism took over all of feminism, and completely disqualified it for me as a humanist, feminists have been saying and doing things since me too that are anti-humanist). I'm not sure that the way "red pill" is used in this sub is the common use. It seems that when you say red pill, you are referring… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/08/21 01:57 PM |
| 1 | The online attack in South Korea against an archer who won three medals seems as a hoax. The context reveals a group that attempts to show to progressives their absurdity by making absurd claims aboutLast comment: In addition to the vicious targeting of a great athlete and woman, this group also damaged the image of men and women who aspire for equality, as those writing in this forum, portraying them as chauvinists and violent, which they are not. Millions were willing to accept this false depiction of feminism-criticizers. There's absolutely no gain in feeding this wrong perception about egalitarianism - we already live in world were feminism is perceived as infallible and all criticism on… | /r/MensRights | 01/08/21 11:09 AM |
| 0 | Traditional gender roles are not "the natural way of things", nor are they particularly "good"There are no gender "roles". This terminology is a lie. Both sexes have a neural sexuality brain circuit connecting four regions. The circuit is the same in both sexes, but its activity - the code imprinted in it - is different, the difference appearing immediately after birth. The difference is caused directly by genes on the sex chromosomes. The different innate code of the sexuality circuit creates two different and matching (complementary) sexualities with different and matching drives. Thes… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/07/21 04:22 PM |
| -1 | Even when you agree with them you are still the enemyThis is why a new perception on equality, a shared and mutual one, is neccesary. You are welcome to join. See here: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08RXMS7M2 | /r/MensRights | 31/07/21 07:43 AM |
| 3 | Even when you agree with them you are still the enemyPrecisely. Because ideological feminists are racists. Anti-male racists. Just as Jews and blacks saw that no matter what they will do, including attempting to escape their Judaism or blackness, they will never be acceptable to a racist, we see time and again that men will not be acceptable to ideological feminists no matter what they'll do. We see it clearly with men who attempt to escape the feminist dehumanization by transitioning to femininity (just as Jews living under the inquisition in 16t… | /r/MensRights | 31/07/21 06:55 AM |
| 13 | Trans woman describes her treatment pre and post transitionAnd the big question: what part did this dehumanization play in his escape from malehood. How much of the trans phenomenon, which increased 4 to 10 fold within a decade in boys, spreading along with the mainstreaming of radical feminism, is the response to a legitimized, institutionalized hate movement. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/21 10:33 AM |
| 4 | Why are single women happier than married women? If so, why do women even bother with men?You are knowingly lying. Lonely women are not happier than women in couples. The prevalence of depression doubled in women in the West with each generation since feminism started in the 1970s and now reached 60%, which is exactly the same proportion of uncoupled women - 60%. Girls and women who read the post - please make a mental note of how feminism's goal has nothing to do with equality but rather it's goal is ending the relations between the two sexes. Note how feminists would bluntly lie to… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/21 06:17 AM |
| 0 | Is female sexuality only 'passive' when she is not sufficiently attracted to the man?If you refer to courtship, not sex, then yes, women can be as blunt as it gets. Remember that all the sexual harassment education is one-sided. Women and girls are never taught what boys and men are indoctrinated with - to restrict oneself. So they have zero boundaries when they dive in. They will just tell you "I love you" out of nowhere, or show up at your house, or grab. It's not violent just as when men do it it's not violent (feminism is the greatest lie in human history. Women are not trau… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/21 04:33 AM |
| 2 | If you believe a liar, doesn't that mean there was no rape!?Yes. So the writer of this message would believe a liar who lies about the writer. Some woman would tell the writer the statement which they both know to be false, "you have raped me", and, knowing this is a lie, the writer will look at her own sign and say, "I would rather believe a liar than believe a rapist, I believe you", upon which she will be sent to jail for ten or twenty years of her life. Yes, I believe her that this is exactly what she would do when a liar would lie about her. I belie… | /r/MensRights | 28/07/21 03:04 PM |
| 3 | It would be a lot more productive if instead of just saying all men suck, women were more actively validating men who do try to improveMen don't need women's validation. They need sex and love, and everything that women need - appreciation for efforts, affection, consideration, trust. Reciprocity. As a tip for guys here: if there's one thing repulsive to women in a guy it's need for their validation. The two sexes have two different and matching sexualities and the equivalent in female sexuality to the sensitivity to beauty that men's sexuality has, is sensitivity to confidence. A guy who expects a girl to validate him, is for … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/07/21 12:58 PM |
| 1 | Surgeon is divorcing beauty queen wife after discovering 'history of sex work', court papers allegeI also want to add that from reading women's accounts, it seems that sex work is addictive, and this might be an issue in a marriage. For some, it's very high income for very little effort in a very short time - I am referring to those who can work like the rest of us but want a shortcut to the car and house. And some, once discovering the shortcut, find it hard later in life to resist the temptation. There's an addictive dimension to sex work that is never mentioned because of the feminist dict… | /r/MensRights | 27/07/21 07:34 AM |
| 2 | Surgeon is divorcing beauty queen wife after discovering 'history of sex work', court papers allegeOh. I would do the same then. | /r/MensRights | 27/07/21 07:18 AM |
| -11 | Surgeon is divorcing beauty queen wife after discovering 'history of sex work', court papers allegeUnpopular opinion: 1. The problem is dishonesty, not history. 2. The history, in and of itself, is not a good reason for divorce (a quarrel on dishonesty may lead to a divorce, but then, again, it's the dishonesty rather than the subject matter that leads to a divorce). 3. Prostitutes can be wonderful women who love men and feel the freedom to comfort them on loneliness. 4. The fact that a woman was for a short while a sex worker, and assuming this happened years ago and is not expected to retur… | /r/MensRights | 27/07/21 06:29 AM |
| 6 | Feminists have nothing to do with supporting women. Humanism - which is universal equality to all - is the agenda that supports women's equality along with the equality of all human beings.I'm on vacation with the 5 yo and wife, but will post when back (the only vacation on vacation with kids is when you're driving. I love driving). | /r/MensRights | 25/07/21 01:01 PM |
| – | Why is it that you always hear about women being very vocal about not wishing to date men of their opposite political spectrum (the vast majority of the time it's liberal women vs conservative men) but you don't see men doing the same thing nearly as often (mostly conservative men vs liberal women)?I love women. Can you say that you love men? Like I did - plainly. No "but". I don't think you are using that word correctly. Here's something to help you with that. https://lovists.com/2021/02/05/where-does-misogyny-come-from/ | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/07/21 07:45 PM |
| – | Why is it that you always hear about women being very vocal about not wishing to date men of their opposite political spectrum (the vast majority of the time it's liberal women vs conservative men) but you don't see men doing the same thing nearly as often (mostly conservative men vs liberal women)?Men do the same. When I was single and had a profile in a dating site, it said clearly "only leftists". In the two times I happened to date girls who said during the date racist things, I waited until it would be over, escorted her politely home, and when she would hint that I'm invited in, I gently said I'll be heading home. Maybe we are not shouting it, but in both sexes this is a criterion, and my guess is that it's in the same proportion of people (both sexes, both political sides). Men are … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/07/21 02:35 PM |
| 37 | Working Woman Wants Maintenance From Husband Suffering Cancer; Asks Him To Sell KidneyI'm not from India and nothing in what he wrote about a judge telling a man to rob projects negatively on Indians, only on feminism. If anything, what he wrote makes me respect India even more when I see what they need to go through. Please deal with the situations feminism is creating instead of attempting to raise a cloud of dust. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/21 03:01 PM |
| 0 | We are headed for a huge population cliff mainly because men and women have been conditioned to hate each other.Feminism has set a goal 50 years ago to stop the relations between the sexes. It's actions have been directed to achieve this and it has accomplished the goal. In 2016 feminists all over the world celebrated the first year in history where in the US the majority of new mothers who just gave birth were without a man. Women and girls, you need to decide what's important for you. If it's the relations with men, then you will have to reconsider most of the messages feminism has given to you. I know … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/07/21 12:42 PM |
| 3 | Women often say that they can't be nice or polite to men because it's interpreted as romantic interest by the latter. Do you think that is true?Yap. They are right. And I'm saying this as a man. This is why men and women need to start a conversation about the language of codes between them. As described in the book Lovism. https://www.amazon.com/Lovism-Humanist-Alternative-Henry-Blair/dp/B08RRMS8KT/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr= | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/21 05:21 PM |
| 1 | How many men in relationships view themselves as "beta?"Asking someone to google for you what you can google yourself is a form of trolling. 2011, ten years ago, by a women called Faye Flam: "It’s a stressful job being the alpha male baboon" https://www.inquirer.com/philly/blogs/evolution/Its-a-stressful-job-being-the-alpha-male-baboon.html 2008, thirteen years ago, by an unidentified women writing for a newspaper: "Be honest: we all love the sexist alpha male" https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/be-honest-we-all-love-the-sexist-alpha-male-6959c3xl0gb… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/07/21 10:20 AM |
| 2 | Differences of living as a woman vs man (in my experience)Yap, that's being a man. | /r/MensRights | 22/07/21 09:44 AM |
| 0 | How many men in relationships view themselves as "beta?"I have proof that you have access to a keyboard and can type yourself in google any keyword you like if something troubles you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/21 09:37 PM |
| 1 | How many men in relationships view themselves as "beta?"Unless you have an academic degree in biology, please do not consider your knowledge equivalent to mine just because we are both only icons with texts on a screen. If you do not have a degree in biology we do not have equal knowledge. The scale is not of "winner and loser". This is a populist interpretation that has nothing to do with the scale. The point of this scale is not social order but IMMUTABILITY. Only in animals, and primarily in insects, there is an order THAT DOES NOT CHANGE WITH CON… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/21 08:08 PM |
| 4 | Boys are treated worse than girls (with studies)Hi there, progressives and feminists reading this during their shift of policing us to ban and stop this activity. YOU ARE ANTI-HUMANIST. Have you read some of the links? Baby boys in your society are at higher risk of dying of abuse than baby girls. These are babies. A baby boy has three to four times less chance of being adopted in your society compared to baby girls. YOU ARE NOT LIVING IN A SOCIETY WHERE BEING A FEMALE IS MORE DIFFICULT. You are in a delusion. You are completely brainwashed a… | /r/MensRights | 21/07/21 07:02 PM |
| 1 | Boys are treated worse than girls (with studies)Thank you for performing the analysis and sharing it! | /r/MensRights | 21/07/21 06:43 PM |
| 2 | The European Union adopts radical feminism as the framework for analyzing sexes equality. The humanist criticism against feminist chauvinism, is regarded formally as "authoritarian". In the EU, female chauvinism is egalitarianism, and universal humanism is authoritarianism.I think they always talk only about equality of women, never about equality of women and men. The phrasing "equality of sexes" is mine, because I do expect of equality to be just that, equality, for all. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/21 02:38 PM |
| 3 | How many men in relationships view themselves as "beta?"No one sees himself this way. It's like asking "how many Jews see themselves as insects?" This is a derogatory labeling and rating system taken from zoology and applied to men (it has no applicability to humans, I'm a biologist, please ask me why this scale does not exist in humans). The assignment of a scale that only exists in animals, to humans, was done by feminists - yes, not by red pill, but by feminists, they were the ones who started the dissemination of this terminology, in op-eds where… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/21 02:07 PM |
| 0 | Men's unrealistic expectations of female sexuality is the problem, not women's "high standards" of physical attractiveness and the 80/20 rule.I tend to agree, but the new idea that girls are attracted to looks is not male, it's feminism. Feminists have this theory that men put women in a beauty race, so they attempted to make women put men in such a race. A lot of feminists in the 90s and the early 2000s made efforts to make women treat men based on looks. They created new "most sexy man" competitions, they gave interviews about male strippers as women empowerment, they invented a term for this - "the metro-sexual" and tried to push i… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/07/21 01:13 PM |
| 1 | "'Red pill' killed my best friend". Fraud alert. A feminist woman disguises as a young guy in r/AgainstHateSubreddits to incite man against men's forums by describing how allegedly the writer's "best friend died because of men's forums".So sorry. | /r/MensRights | 20/07/21 08:15 PM |
| 1 | "'Red pill' killed my best friend". Fraud alert. A feminist woman disguises as a young guy in r/AgainstHateSubreddits to incite man against men's forums by describing how allegedly the writer's "best friend died because of men's forums".Full post (thank you Edward_III for noticing that it's still online) 'Red Pill' killed my best friend This is a half sad post, half warning. So growing up I lived a pretty normal life in a small town, I sometimes had trouble making friends due to being the more introverted, nerdy type of kid. I then met this other kid who was very similar to me. We had all the same interests, hung out together constantly and we quickly became best friends, let's call him 'Jake'. So throughout school we never rea… | /r/MensRights | 20/07/21 07:19 PM |
| 4 | "'Red pill' killed my best friend". Fraud alert. A feminist woman disguises as a young guy in r/AgainstHateSubreddits to incite man against men's forums by describing how allegedly the writer's "best friend died because of men's forums".No luck. | /r/MensRights | 20/07/21 03:23 PM |
| 54 | "'Red pill' killed my best friend". Fraud alert. A feminist woman disguises as a young guy in r/AgainstHateSubreddits to incite man against men's forums by describing how allegedly the writer's "best friend died because of men's forums".Hmm. I should have saved a screenshot. This is the profile, anyway. She posted it on several reddits. https://www.reddit.com/user/Throwaway87603452/posts/ Edit: I'll attempt to give you a synopsis to compensate for being irresponsible and not taking a screenshot. The writer describes how she, a 22 yo guy, had a very good friend that she knew since childhood. She then elaborates on how both boys had trouble connecting with girls when they were growing up, and how devastating this failure was for … | /r/MensRights | 20/07/21 01:41 PM |
| 1 | Women still expect men to be masculine while refusing to be feminine themselvesYeah. I live around Europe and here the vast majority is completely normal, women are great, men are great, overall everything is really okay. Feminists occupy here every imaginable influential position so everywhere you look you get the impression that the entire society is made of angry, womanhood-hating, misandrist women and gay and trans. But this is just the progressive brainwash machine, they promote each other so they are the hegemony in the media, art, education, with all of them being p… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/21 02:47 PM |
| 2 | Women still expect men to be masculine while refusing to be feminine themselvesI agree, except for one small yet crucial reservation: what you wrote describes feminists. Feminists are a tiny fraction of women. All the other love being feminine, to dress sexy, to make something nice to eat and watch you eat, to ask you to fix something, to cuddle. Just don't date feminists and you'll be fine. Most men I know would try to understand from the first sentences if she's a feminist, and if yes - it's have a nice life and goodbye (most simply ask on dating apps as the first or sec… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/07/21 09:56 AM |
| 46 | To the MensLib lurkers who think Mens rights should work with feminismAh, another example of the humanist egalitariansim of feminism. I'm sure that all those feminists who would say "this is not feminism you don't know feminism" went inside and said that to the owner instead of telling it to the half of humanity who needs to live in this hate. If the same sign would be on gays (all of them are men as well), that place would be closed within hours forever. But hating the very same people as men, is universal humanism in the feminist mind. | /r/MensRights | 17/07/21 08:07 AM |
| 23 | The Fact That MRA is Used As An Insult On Reddit Is Beyond WeirdThe positions of radical feminism (rad fem) are endorsed as policies by the UN, thousands of universities around the world, the entire human rights community, most mainstream newspapers with international reach, governmental authorities in multiple countries, parts of law systems all over the world, education systems, psychological establishments. All this while men's demand to be treated equally in every respect including in the relations with women, is not endorsed by any public concern on the… | /r/MensRights | 14/07/21 08:28 AM |
| 8 | Discussing a situation that affects both sexes by presenting only the effects on one sex and arguing for gender discrimination, is deleting an entire sex and hence itself gender discrimination.Very well put. I would love to read an article of yours which is based on the response you give here. | /r/MensRights | 13/07/21 05:14 PM |
| 1 | Please stop using the term Gender.People are not randomally different. In a small specific proportion of traits - physical and mental - men and women are different. The nature of the difference follows the same pattern as any biological trait: there is a mean value, and around it variance, that creates a (usually bell-shaped) distribution. In those traits in which the sexes are different, when we arrange all the men and all the women side by side by the "level" of a trait, we do not get one bell curve, but two. The men are at on… | /r/MensRights | 03/07/21 04:16 PM |
| -1 | Please stop using the term Gender.Yes, but the meaning changed. In the past, sex meant both the act and the biological sex. In the first half of the 20th century, because of what you mentioned, sometimes, but mostly in more formal contexts such as a book, the term gender was used - but it did not mean in any way "a cultural mold" but the innate sex at birth. However, since the 1960s and 1970s when feminism started to grow and influence society, the meaning of the word gender changed. In the feminist language it stopped being inn… | /r/MensRights | 03/07/21 03:23 PM |
| – | Culturally-induced chemical castration – the unspoken cause of the low-testosterone epidemic? The figure mentioned in the notes is enclosed. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/07/21 01:13 PM |
| -1 | Culturally-induced chemical castration – the unspoken cause of the low-testosterone epidemic?Originally published in my blog. Sharing it here as well, hope you find it useful. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 01/07/21 07:09 AM |
| 4 | Woman sentenced to 64 to 102 years for raping multiple boys on multiple occasions. Notable for the severity of punishment.I noticed that many upvoted comments on that article are saying things like "boys that age are sexually aggressive and would have wanted this to happen". True. And, the outlets - the very same ones that screen and delete most comments criticizing feminism's aggression - have no problem with the very same comments with the sexes switched. Which can be regarded as both coming from, and as promoting, distorted perceptions in women about boys and men that originate in feminism. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 07:00 AM |
| 4 | Woman sentenced to 64 to 102 years for raping multiple boys on multiple occasions. Notable for the severity of punishment.Could that be a result of a whole culture persistently regarding males as the culprits and the ones to blame even when these are children? Whenever young male teens are involved in sex with adult women or female teens, our feminist society depicts them as abusers. I once saw a report in a newspaper website in my country about a teacher having sex with a 13 yo male student, the website asked at the end "who is responsible?" (would that be asked if the sexes were reversed?), with the three options… | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 05:49 AM |
| 1 | The ill-conceived belief that all violence in humanity originates from men is incitement of the racist type. Men and women contribute equally to human violence. Here is why.Another study, a more recent one, showing that in the domain the study focused on, girls are more violent than boys (2018). "When it comes to teen dating violence, boys are more likely to report being the victim of violence -- being hit, slapped, or pushed -- than girls. That's the surprising finding of new research from the University of British Columbia and Simon Fraser University." https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/08/180829133154.htm | /r/MensRights | 25/06/21 07:20 PM |
| 1 | The ill-conceived belief that all violence in humanity originates from men is incitement of the racist type. Men and women contribute equally to human violence. Here is why.There are in fact studies with conclusions along the same lines as what you are describing. Here is a summary of studies out of one (outdated) review, link to full text below. Girls and Violence: The Case for a Feminist Theory of Female Violence Kerry Carrington While males still dominate crime statistics as offenders and prisoners, a body of international and national trend data points to a consistent narrowing of the gender gap for officially reported crime and violence in countries like the U… | /r/MensRights | 25/06/21 07:11 PM |
| 3 | The ill-conceived belief that all violence in humanity originates from men is incitement of the racist type. Men and women contribute equally to human violence. Here is why.Violence against children is part of the overall amount of violence in humanity. You have just provided one of the components that make up the fact, that women are responsible for half the violence in humanity. | /r/MensRights | 25/06/21 02:30 PM |
| 2 | The ill-conceived belief that all violence in humanity originates from men is incitement of the racist type. Men and women contribute equally to human violence. Here is why.I can only advise reading the book. I discuss this there. | /r/MensRights | 25/06/21 02:27 PM |
| 2 | Just this late night experience I had with a lesbian talking about MRABeautiful. Great job : ) And thanks for sharing, we can learn from how you handled it (I know I can). | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 18/06/21 06:12 AM |
| – | New Data from the Telegraph indicate that levels of sexlessness among young men are still steadily increasing, just 34% of male University students report being sexually active while studying at University and 43% report never having had sex.Feminist oppression. Men are forbidden to be sexual in the feminist society. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/06/21 10:00 PM |
| 1 | I finally realized what spins the wheel of day-after regret and the ensuing allegations, a day after or six months later (making it retroactively rape without the guy having any way of preventing this aside from time travel or celibacy). It's all because of body count.Well, it was a good discussion with quite a lot of good arguments, and not without a thrill. I liked the fact they started flirting at some point. A good conversation always has a sexual subtext. The point is ever the point. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/06/21 03:41 AM |
| 2 | I finally realized what spins the wheel of day-after regret and the ensuing allegations, a day after or six months later (making it retroactively rape without the guy having any way of preventing this aside from time travel or celibacy). It's all because of body count.You just wrote that women don't need to live by the values of society. So they will be allowed to steal? Kill? Rape? Lie? All these are restricted solely because of the values of society. The rules of society are what prevent humans from becoming biped animals, because all of us have all the wild and violent drives - yes, this includes all women. What you wrote is an outstanding example of what feminism has become since the 1990s: since equality had been reached by then and there was nothing lef… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/05/21 09:38 PM |
| 4 | I finally realized what spins the wheel of day-after regret and the ensuing allegations, a day after or six months later (making it retroactively rape without the guy having any way of preventing this aside from time travel or celibacy). It's all because of body count.It won't matter. It's not social. It's like the male feeling the male sexuality has of conquering. It's the innate female sexuality. But just as culture restrains men's drives if they can be harmful it needs to restrain women's drives if they can be harmful. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/05/21 05:49 PM |
| 1 | Straight men will not spend a significant amount of time/are not close friends with a straight woman in whom they are not sexually or romantically interested.You do not understand men. Please become curious about men or say nothing. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/05/21 06:45 AM |
| 1 | Straight men will not spend a significant amount of time/are not close friends with a straight woman in whom they are not sexually or romantically interested.Goes without saying. And to women who disagree, try to understand that anything else is for a straight the equivalent of castration. Please don't try "to change that" - that would be oppression. Accept it out of acknowledging that men are human and have human dignity that you have to respect, yes, accepting our innate nature is respecting our human dignity. Here is a study. Science Says Men and Women Can't Be (Just) Friends The "When Harry Met Sally" effect is alive and well. Kelly Bourdet by Ke… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/21 04:32 PM |
| 3 | You can't extrapolate average male attractiveness from dating websiteThe picture quality doesn't matter. Women respond to a vibe, and a picture can't transmit a vibe. Dating apps allow only for men to get an impression, because men do respond to looks. It gives women no way of knowing what they would think of the guy if they met him in person. True, women discuss those profiles as if they can really know anything from them and as if looks is what interests them, but this is only because they were told by feminism that the sexes are identical and thus that women h… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/21 02:52 PM |
| 1 | Why should a woman have sex with you? What do you have to offer her?You should attempt to corroborate your beliefs about the world out of curiosity, and make a habit out of doubting social-media accepted wisdom. Likes do not establish facts. But in social media, it's extremely difficult for individuals to resist the tendency to regard thousands of likes on a claim as affirmation that the claim is factual, and be curious about it, and search for themselves for data. This is how social media creates both in the left and in the right detached perceptions of reality… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/05/21 06:00 AM |
| 1 | Why should a woman have sex with you? What do you have to offer her?Why, is there something wrong with your keyboard that you can't google it? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 24/05/21 04:57 PM |
| 8 | This was a Facebook post I had to share because the comments were horrible. Women were praising the girl for finally using the "oppressors" ways.The slogan "killallmen" is not a joke. It causes women's homicidal violence by legitimizing it. #stop | /r/MensRights | 23/05/21 07:41 AM |
| 1 | The concept of masculinity and femininity are the reason why men's and women's life are messed upI should add two things: it's not a matter of success. We shouldn't judge nature. It's just a matter of understanding that in nature, biological properties have DISTRIBUTIONS - some types are common, some are rare. Homosexuality is rare (yes, it's rare, sorry fluidists), heterosexuality being the overwhelmingly more common type, but both are natural - both are determined at least in most people before birth (it should be noted that no genetic basis for homosexuality was found and in fact such a … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/05/21 10:28 AM |
| 4 | The concept of masculinity and femininity are the reason why men's and women's life are messed upMasculinity and femininity are no more "concepts" than mountains and rivers are. They are concrete objective phenomena of the world. They are innate. Culture only defines styles for expressing them, not their very existence. If you were brought up in a feminist society that has misled you regarding both the mundane facts, and the research data, about the two sexes and the biological mechanisms that determine manhood and womanhood, you can find a thorough discussion of the scientific data in the … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/05/21 12:34 PM |
| 2 | New report: One-Third of Sexual Assault Allegations in Criminal Setting Are Unfounded (and tracing the origins of the 2% myth)But I'm glad for the references they added. I've been looking for those for some time and they are quite useful, I will definitely paste them the next time "2%" will be waved at readers as it does. Disinformation is a social disaster. | /r/MensRights | 18/05/21 08:35 AM |
| 2 | New Zealand economy would make a $1.5 billion jump, if men did more at homeFine, let the country force men to stop working in challenging areas that require devotion and do the dishes. Let's see where this would take them: 1. A drop in marriages, because women are not looking for clean dishes but for stable earners with a professional pride, 2. Lack of high-quality personnel in demanding areas that require those COMPETENCIES THAT ARE MALE-SPECIFIC AND ARE MORE PREVALENT IN MEN INNATELY (intellectual and physical). Go ahead. Put the delusion to practice. If you can't un… | /r/MensRights | 17/05/21 08:06 AM |
| 1 | CMV: Most debate on manosphere subs is just lonely dudes trying to "out-alpha" each other with their philosophiesNot at all. They are regular guys with a conscience. Often married with kids with academic professions. Some are single and younger, these are guys raised without any positive image of men in the culture around them, only demonization, belittling and guilt-brainwash, who seek advice from the older generation and confirmation that they are human and are entitled to expect human rights and human dignity. Some are divorced, but there are specific help groups for the divorced, it's not the typical p… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/05/21 05:42 PM |
| 2 | “Say something nice” and “food.” How sad that the bar has been set this low for so many men. One commenter said a woman called him handsome 4 years ago and he hasn’t forgotten it.Sex. | /r/MensRights | 14/05/21 06:06 PM |
| 2 | Are men upset that having money is considered an attractive feature?Yes. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/05/21 06:06 PM |
| 1 | Radical RP men are vehemently ill-mannered toward women over 25.I don't regard the responses you are quoting as personal and authentic. I think they are paraphrasing on feminists who ridicule older men who dare attempt to flirt with younger women or even just approach them. A couple of years ago there was a nasty attack of feminists against older guys (over 40): many young women are very attracted to older guys; feminists hate that and see it as a "weakness"; hence feminists attempted to "wean" women off their attraction, by trying to present, as women thems… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/05/21 06:57 AM |
| 5 | Why I Am Not a FeministNew blog post , answering the pressing question: why I am not a feminist. Highlights: - Given absolute equality, on average, men and women will not finish in each and every realm in equal numbers. While in most matters the sexes will be rather similar, women will have an advantage in some areas and men will have an advantage in others, not because of any bias, but simply because of innate traits. - After observing that exhausting female competence under equal terms did not yield equal numbers in… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 10/05/21 07:36 PM |
| 1 | Why should a woman have sex with you? What do you have to offer her?My d is average length but quite girthy This is what you said. And I asked if you've ever seen here a woman doing the same, that is, describing her vagina to get approval and some regard from men in the forum. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/05/21 11:08 PM |
| 1 | Why should a woman have sex with you? What do you have to offer her?What her vagina looks like, is the first thing a woman tells in a public forum for discussions about society and dynamics between men and women? You see a lot of women telling everyone in a public forum how their vagina looks like and that it meets men's expectations, so that you won't need to "have sex with someone regardless of what they look like"? This is something that a lot of women around you find important to say about themselves because of this rationale? Can you see that living in a fe… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/05/21 08:12 PM |
| 1 | Why should a woman have sex with you? What do you have to offer her?To the guy. Do you imagine a girl or a woman writing in this reddit what you wrote in response to the opposite question by a guy? Including her trying to describe her vagina as agreeable enough so that men will be willing to pay attention to her? Had you seen a girl writing it here, what would you say the position of women in society is? That's you, my friend. Have some human dignity. Even if feminist chauvinism denies it of you - regain it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/05/21 05:31 PM |
| 2 | Why should a woman have sex with you? What do you have to offer her?Sorry, I have different data. Your link is to a political manifest, not to a study. Because of the political agenda, its goal is to reach a pre-defined conclusion that the writer thinks would strengthen her rhetoric ("men are terrible, women constantly suffer and all of their sufferings are from men, those awful beings"), rather than finding the truth. The action of trying to reach a pre-defined conclusion at all costs (also known as dogmatism), is done by three moves: ignoring differences betwe… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/05/21 03:29 PM |
| 2 | Why should a woman have sex with you? What do you have to offer her?If you are asking if I am her dildo and sexual servant and must commit to giving her an orgasm regardless of how she treats me (for example, if she takes the orgasm and then uses society's legitimization for a woman to stop at any point, to do what you've just described - getting an orgasm and quitting), then I really don't care about her motivations and she can find a piece of plastic similar to her and settle for that. If she wants men to be committed to giving her an orgasm, then she has to t… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/05/21 10:31 AM |
| 3 | Why should a woman have sex with you? What do you have to offer her?Neither of us need to offer anything over and above sex. Sex for sex. It's really simple. Called equality. If she gives a lot, she gets a lot. If she just wants to receive without reciprocating and expects "to know" that she will have an orgasm without herself having the same commitment that the other person will get his share, she can try talking to a piece of plastic. If you can't be human, find something at your ontological level, like a plastic stick. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/05/21 07:09 PM |
| 5 | Why should a woman have sex with you? What do you have to offer her?She won't. Is she guaranteeing anything? My obligations are equal to hers. Equality goes both ways. Of course we could promise to each other in advance that both of us will care about the other's climax. That I won't get what I want and then quit, and that she won't get what she wants and then quit. Oh - but of course, she is living in a society that tells her that she has no obligations and can quit anytime - especially to have an orgasm and then say "that's it, bye", and anything that would be… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/05/21 03:17 PM |
| 6 | Why should a woman have sex with you? What do you have to offer her?An orgasm. That's more than enough. I don't see the question here. Girls have sex to have sex. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/05/21 06:06 AM |
| 1 | Why do girls brag about having simps?Why are they sending money if they are not getting anything from her? The girl calls them "pigs"? I thought that only fans is webcam porn. It's not? Sounds like a weird type of BDSM. Is this common? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 08/05/21 06:00 AM |
| 8 | As a woman trying to fight misandry, I'm feeling tired and alone.Remember that we all appreciate what you're doing and support you here. And also that the benefit in these discussions is usually not in convincing a fanatic but in demonstrating her fanaticism to all those watching, which I promise you that you most probably have done beautifully. On behalf of everyone reading this, I wish to send you love and appreciation! | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 07/05/21 11:14 AM |
| 1 | The term Feminism does not stand for equality, but for chauvinism, a female anti-male one. The demand of all people to be feminists as if it will only be stating a commitment to human equality and as if rejecting it is a rejection of equality, is ignorant or manipulative. Feminism, is chauvinism.Sure, no problem (if you want to tag, it's HenryBlair_HB on twitter, Henry Blair on FB). By the way, a tip in case you encounter resistence: when faced with the chauvinism of feminism, people who are concerned about equality in the relations between the sexes tend to feel anxious. They have difficulties accepting what feminism is, just because they are concerned that without it, women's condition would deteriorate (I think they are wrong in that assessment; I believe they feel this way only beca… | /r/MensRights | 07/05/21 05:58 AM |
| 2 | Q4all: Do men have a moral obligation to physically protect women in dangerous situations?No. It's an instinct. Like the one mothers have toward babies. Do mothers breastfeed their babies only because "it's moral not to let the baby starve"? It's an instinct. So is male protection of females - in fact, this is the male parallel of the female instinct toward babies. If biologically-imprinted actions could be regarded as moral then every pigeon and all cats would be moral beings. The reality is the complete opposite of the feminist propaganda - men are born with an instinct to protect … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/05/21 11:26 AM |
| 5 | Do you have any sympathy for women who wish men would approach them in real life *more*?More women like her need to step up and oppose publicly the feminist oppression of human sexuality. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/05/21 05:52 PM |
| 2 | Some Feminist Readers May Want to Sit Before ContinuingThank you. I share your feelings on the subject. | /r/MensRights | 27/04/21 10:36 AM |
| 3 | Some Feminist Readers May Want to Sit Before ContinuingThank you! | /r/MensRights | 27/04/21 08:38 AM |
| 0 | Why there's empathy for women and "Man Up" for men"Man up" is motivated by empathy. Men are not identical to women. While women can rely emotionally on social support, men have a deep internal need for a feeling of self-reliance. If this is replaced with "male feminism" men are not reaching well-being but the exact opposite. Women are likewise expecting men, innately, to be self-reliant and to demonstrate it and will generally reject dependant men (this includes feminists). This is not to say that: 1. Men shouldn't organize to fight against fem… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 10/04/21 02:13 PM |
| 4 | Why can’t men just accept that women are just attracted to whatever it is they are attracted to and there’s nothing we can do to change it?If anything, it is women who don't accept it in men. All the feminist talk about "changing the beauty ideal" when there is no "social ideal" but as you wrote - people are attracted to what they're attracted and that's it. All the women in feminism talking about "body shaming" and DEMANDING that men will be attracted to all women the same way. Who can't accept here what the other sex is attracted to? If anything, it would be women and feminism. If some men use such language now, they are a tiny f… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/04/21 06:48 AM |
| 3 | She accused a university prof of sexual assault. Now he’s suing for defamation. Some fear the ‘landmark’ case could have a chilling effectWomen are unaware of how male lives look like. Women need to know that because of liars and aggressors in the female sex, with full state support due to radical feminism, men can't trust women enough to have a relationship. Women need to understand they can't remain silent. That only social pressure from women will stop this social violence and allow men to trust women enough to have relationships with them again. If women don't rise up against radical feminism, they will not be able to find lov… | /r/MensRights | 10/04/21 06:31 AM |
| 11 | New running and bike race opens early and at a lower cost for everyone but white cis-men. Maybe i’m over reacting but I feel excluded and like this is wrong.Sounds illegal. | /r/MensRights | 09/04/21 08:13 PM |
| 3 | A woman’s personality has a LOT to do with her league.Goes without saying. What surprises me is that for Redditors this is "a hypothesis". Do people here ever leave Reddit and spend some time outside? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 09/04/21 05:20 PM |
| -9 | Man patiently waits whilst his wife cheats so she can be the breadwinner and he is the primary parent after finding out she’s cheating on him. She ends up paying him child support!Yes, fight it without losing your humanity. Without becoming subjected. Subjected to a woman who cheats on you, subjected to a woman who funds you while you are completely dependent on her. Read about resistance. Resistance is not based on glorious victories or revenge. It is based on understanding that as long as you remain human, you have won, and on persisting in remaining human until the system of oppression cannot dehumanize that many individuals who resolve to remain human and free of subj… | /r/MensRights | 05/04/21 08:42 AM |
| -5 | Man patiently waits whilst his wife cheats so she can be the breadwinner and he is the primary parent after finding out she’s cheating on him. She ends up paying him child support!Probably not in our life time, no. You will have to build a resistance that transcends generations, that is, a culture. | /r/MensRights | 05/04/21 08:28 AM |
| -43 | Man patiently waits whilst his wife cheats so she can be the breadwinner and he is the primary parent after finding out she’s cheating on him. She ends up paying him child support!People, don't follow this advice. Don't make your life a revenge. Don't live to get even. If you learn that she is cheating, pack up and leave. Do you really want to be a full-time parent supported by someone else? This is your idea of independence? Be a man. Be independent and self-reliant. This is the most important substance of your being and happiness. Yes, because you were born men. Women can be happy with this solution, but 99.9% of you men, can't. Without the feeling of self-reliance you … | /r/MensRights | 05/04/21 01:21 AM |
| 2 | To address the Gender Inequality on this Subreddit, all Misogyny is now BannedA couple of minutes. I don't generate text for comments. It's in my head. I'm a writer (click my profile). I used to write for newspapers before me too lynched me for objecting the gloating over the suicide of some guy. I still publish books in my country, but when I have something to say about feminism, I do it under an alias in English. Edit: someone commented on what type of men would comment here. I'm married, sometimes I make in one day a monthly salary, I have a pile of degrees, I am not a… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/04/21 04:59 AM |
| 5 | To address the Gender Inequality on this Subreddit, all Misogyny is now BannedThank you, it's really humiliating and tough. Yet, I'm strengthened in knowing it wouldn't be as funny without it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/04/21 05:33 PM |
| 13 | To address the Gender Inequality on this Subreddit, all Misogyny is now BannedOh. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/04/21 04:21 PM |
| 7 | To address the Gender Inequality on this Subreddit, all Misogyny is now BannedSaying negative things about women is not misogyny. Women are not perfect beings. They are human. The reason there are more men here than women is that men want more than women to have a dialogue because women don't feel they need a dialogue - they have the power to dictate. You have dozens of reddits with millions of followers where only radical feminism is allowed to be expressed and mods ban every person who dares to challenge these radical perceptions, much like in a religion. The reddit Psy… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/04/21 03:54 PM |
| 5 | Are prostitutes profiting from male loneliness?Yes, being a human is a drag. We humans, didn't create ourselves. Our wishes are free, but our existence is not. It is restricted by physical existence and by innate tendencies that we carry within us, imprinted without asking us, by mother evolution. This creates an unbearable gap between wishes and satisfaction which is fundamental and causes human suffering to be existential. We can try to alleviate the existential suffering a little (poetry and love are the best ways I know), but we cannot e… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 01/04/21 01:25 PM |
| 2 | Are prostitutes profiting from male loneliness?How is that exploitation if the men receive sexual attention? Those women are giving them what no other woman will at that moment. Are you really thinking that female sexuality, which is restrictive and puts men in this position, was deliberately conceived by women to drive men into paying them? Women are born with their restrictive sexuality, they didn't create it, let alone in order to take advantage of someone. You are digressing to feminist thinking patterns. It was feminism who first invent… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 01/04/21 12:39 PM |
| 6 | Are prostitutes profiting from male loneliness?Criminal human trafficking and cases of abuse aside, I think prostitution is weakness meeting weakness. There are no guilty sides to this. Humans have weaknesses. Some women prioritize income over everything else (this is their right to want it), some men want sex without needing to pass the rather restrictive female judgement over their quality as a man and a human (this is their right to want it). When two with reciprocal wishes meet they satisfy each other's wishes. I don't think that lonelin… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 01/04/21 11:55 AM |
| 5 | Today’s women’s lobby deploys a faulty logic: In cases where men are better off than women, that’s injustice. Where women are doing better—that’s life.This article by Christina Hoff Sommers is from 2014. Dr. Sommers is a great thinker who relentlessly objects to feminists who depart from egalitarianism and I strongly recommend reading her book from the 1990s Who Stole Feminism, which will leave you speechless when you'll realize that nothing in present-day feminism is new, and that what we see around us was already reached at in the 1980s and became a feminist consensus by the early 1990s (the only recent change being that social media transfo… | /r/MensRights | 01/04/21 10:22 AM |
| 3 | Do men want woman to just do what they say and be okay with whatever they want?Some men are the family guy, others prefer having only casual romantic relationships that they can walk out of any time. Some are of the second type but are tired of the dating game with all its heartbreak, disappointments, and loneliness periods, so they become a family guy that wants other women. Some women are excited that their husband is seeing other women (and they don't see other guys), It is called Cucquean but most women who are into it don't know the term, it's just something they dig.… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/04/21 05:55 AM |
| 1 | Are men inherently seen as disposable by society?It's male because only males develop it. It appears around the ages of 5 to 7. In this fantasy a girl that the boy has feelings for, for example from class, is in distress, or in need. The need can be trivial. The boy then helps her and gains her trust, which leads to an exciting acknowledgment by her of his value. This then develops throughout early adolescence and remains a template for all the romantic regard for girls. Later the template is slowly and often painfully reshaped, by social expe… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/03/21 06:05 PM |
| 14 | For the femlurkers: Do you ever plan on actually deplatforming misandrists of your communities or are you just gonna preach to men about the potential of feminism to help men?Well put. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/21 05:27 PM |
| 1 | Are men inherently seen as disposable by society?So let's try it again. You are trying to understand, and I'm saying, no, that's something else - would you like to ask me follow-up questions to gradually zoom in? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/03/21 05:00 PM |
| 0 | Are men inherently seen as disposable by society?You are womansplaining here. Please try to assume that just as you as a female have a certain level of inner experience which is inaccessible to men from direct first-person experience and men have to listen to women explaining about it and try to understand, men also have a level of inner experience which is inaccessible to women from direct first-person experience and women have to listen to men explain about it and try to understand. What you described about imagination games has nothing to d… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/03/21 11:10 AM |
| 2 | Birth of toxic masculinity/biopolitics: Excommunication, Conflict & Fragmentary IntersectionalityInteresting title. I'll watch! | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 31/03/21 09:04 AM |
| 1 | Man I'm tired of women blaming me for not crying enough and never calling out this shit. How am I supposed to deal with these it is honestly driving me to the point of self hatred. How do I deal with this? Please Help! I feel so weak and defeated.There was a comma missing which caused an ambiguity, as if the part about bdsm continues to gays. I added that comma after I guessed this was the reading that caused the report. It's a valid reading when the comma is missing, hence the comma was added as I intended. What the setence says about inferiority was regarding bdsm, not gay sex. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 31/03/21 08:46 AM |
| 0 | Are men inherently seen as disposable by society?All true. For me as a man, when I heard about three years ago the entire line of argumentation you just presented, it was trivial, and the only thing that struck me is that someone bothered to mention it because it's so basic. The surprise for me, was that it was described as a bad thing. This was the first time someone talked about it as if something is wrong with this trivial reality, and let me explain what I mean by that: I don't think that male disposability is social, but biological. Men h… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 31/03/21 05:53 AM |
| 1 | Man I'm tired of women blaming me for not crying enough and never calling out this shit. How am I supposed to deal with these it is honestly driving me to the point of self hatred. How do I deal with this? Please Help! I feel so weak and defeated.Okay, where's the misinformation then. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 30/03/21 01:13 PM |
| 8 | Post on askwomen- “what male issues do you NOT empathize with?” Pretty disgusting answersLet's put things in proportion, your post here (which is outstanding) has a 25% higher upvotes rate than hers. So the world is not that bad. Listen. Radical feminists are racists. They can empathize with men about as much as Nazis can with Jews. They also have the same delusional beliefs about the past and present as Nazis had - they don't know that in India, in the 70s, about 8 million men were forcefully operated on to be sterilized by a female prime minister, or that men were castrated throug… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 30/03/21 10:56 AM |
| 1 | [Instagram] Minnesota Supreme Court rules it’s not rape if victim voluntarily intoxicated | This is hugely problematic for both sexesFor a minute there I was amazed to see 180k likes for such a rational decision, I'm used to seeing common sense ignored at best, and I asked myself if I need to leave Reddit and join Instagram. Then I saw the framing at the bottom - "blaming the victim!" and everything returned back to normal, the world is not sane after all. | /r/MensRights | 29/03/21 02:37 PM |
| 1 | Man I'm tired of women blaming me for not crying enough and never calling out this shit. How am I supposed to deal with these it is honestly driving me to the point of self hatred. How do I deal with this? Please Help! I feel so weak and defeated.You and all men are currently living under incitement no less severe than in some of the most brutal historical racist societies. This will be resolved only with a relentless struggle that will result in a humanist revolution against feminism, and it's replacement by humane equality. Until then, you need to maintain your mental health. First, you need to transform as much as possible your exposure to the feminist incitement and legitimized hate speech, from passive exposure to active engagement.… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 29/03/21 09:53 AM |
| 1 | There are no "beta" males. This is a sexist feminist labeling meant to humiliate. There are only oppressed men and free men. Men, free yourselves.I still don't understand. It seems that this researcher discussed wolves, and I don't see where it says that he applied this to humans. By the way, the hard-wired hierarchy does exist, in insects. From the link, I see that there's one big confusion in the public about this trivial unimportant biological phenomenon (I'm a biologist). So the simple facts: an unchangeable order exists in nature. It is observed and studied in insects. When it is applied to more recent species, the regularity of the … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/03/21 08:32 AM |
| 2 | There are no "beta" males. This is a sexist feminist labeling meant to humiliate. There are only oppressed men and free men. Men, free yourselves.Yes, so what you described is called dehumanization and the logic you applied was the basis from which the racism of the late-19th century and early 20th century emerged, becoming Nazi Germany. As for wolves, here are a few notes FYI. The terms come from ethology, which is a biological field that studies animal behavior. Biologists have found that in many species, there is an immutable hierarchy. The emphasis is not on there being a hierarchy, as people wrongly assume, but on it being unchangeab… | /r/MensRights | 29/03/21 04:50 AM |
| 9 | What it's like to be trapped by a female abuserThanks for your oppenness and willingness to share. I'm not sure why this post is not receiving the attention it deserves. If I could I would have given you k upvotes. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 28/03/21 06:45 PM |
| -1 | Are "post-wall off the CC" women forcing men to date them or something? What's with the hate against them?Thanks. I don't speak Acronish. If you could be so kind as to write that in English I'll definitely look for that. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/03/21 12:49 PM |
| 1 | There are no "beta" males. This is a sexist feminist labeling meant to humiliate. There are only oppressed men and free men. Men, free yourselves.Who was that man? The terms come from ethology, which is a biological field that studies animal behavior. Biologists have found that in many species, there is an immutable hierarchy. The emphasis is not on there being a hierarchy, as people wrongly assume, but on it being unchangeable and constant regardless of context. While human societies also have hierarchies, they are not constant at all. The same person can have a leading position in one context and an inferior position in another. No cons… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/03/21 11:42 AM |
| 4 | There are no "beta" males. This is a sexist feminist labeling meant to humiliate. There are only oppressed men and free men. Men, free yourselves.Couldn't agree more. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/21 11:06 AM |
| 2 | Are "post-wall off the CC" women forcing men to date them or something? What's with the hate against them?Can you cite an example for hate? I never encountered it. I did see that men don't want a relationship with these girls, but this is because they don't understand how a girl who needed to have sex with so many different men would suddenly want only one. They see cheating running their way. Women are exactly the same. They literally tell men who had fun with hundreds of women, when they ask them to marry them, that they don't trust them. I have a good friend who was a little like that, and even 1… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/03/21 10:40 AM |
| 2 | There are no "beta" males. This is a sexist feminist labeling meant to humiliate. There are only oppressed men and free men. Men, free yourselves.All men are equal. All humans are equal. The fact that life isn't fair, and the ability of individuals or clans (feminism is a clan for that matter) to gain control over others does not make any person superior by essence. We are now celebrating the Jewish Passover. This day commemorates how slaves became free people, under the leadership of a man who could not speak clearly, a person who sounded to most as mentally disabled. This is taken as a myth, but this captures and describes something whi… | /r/MensRights | 28/03/21 06:34 AM |
| 5 | There are no "beta" males. This is a sexist feminist labeling meant to humiliate. There are only oppressed men and free men. Men, free yourselves.Thanks. I've just published a book called Lovism: A Humanist Alternative to Feminism, and I'm running a blog called lovists.com. We should collaborate. You can find my email on the said blog, I'd be happy to discuss this further. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/21 05:42 AM |
| 3 | I want to help & understand (former feminist, current egalitarian)Please look for the book Lovism: A Humanist Alternative to Feminism. It describes what you are looking for. | /r/MensRights | 27/03/21 10:18 PM |
| 2 | Restriction of male sexuality?You live under opperssion. Good morning. Read the book Lovism. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/03/21 05:46 PM |
| 1 | Women are just as upset being friend-zoned as men are. I can attest to that from personal experience. And both sexes are right. If one person is in love and attracted sexually, the other person can't ask him or her to rewrite their feelings just so he or she could have a longer list of friends.Yes, that's the common perception. It's becoming less and less accurate today. It's a system in motion. Three and a half years of Me Too, coming after about a decade of more or less the same, caused men and guys to ignore women and girls. I know they are saying that they are "constantly harassed", but one cannot ignore what they count now as harassment to keep thinking men are taking an interest in them as they used to - sitting across a room with legs not held tight together as if the guy was w… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/03/21 08:48 AM |
| 4 | Q4M: I don't understand the complaints about women "riding CC". Do you want women to engage in casual sex or not?It's becoming a thing. Follow Me Too and start asking yourself "if a woman would have been doing what he's now being slandered for? Wouldn't that be simply slut-shaming?" Try to look at the two sexes as equal and deserving equal treatment from society about the very same actions, and then look around you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/03/21 07:59 AM |
| 2 | Q4M: I don't understand the complaints about women "riding CC". Do you want women to engage in casual sex or not?This retaliation is universal and generalized by feminists and women to all men, and, it continues and escalates, long after slut-shaming became almost extinct at least in the public domain. Women and feminists retaliate against the entire male sex, constantly, for a variety of things, most of which have ceased to exist over half a century ago, some have never even existed at all ("the rock on the head and dragging into the cave", men are held accountable for something that only existed as image… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/03/21 05:57 AM |
| 3 | Q4M: I don't understand the complaints about women "riding CC". Do you want women to engage in casual sex or not?The very suggestion "he wanted sex" is considered disgraceful and something to be ashamed of and reprehensible, only when used by women about men. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/03/21 05:43 AM |
| 1 | Q4M: I don't understand the complaints about women "riding CC". Do you want women to engage in casual sex or not?Happens all the time. You don't see it because you regard it as obvious and understandable. Use bull shaming instead of slut and you'll see it all around you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/03/21 05:38 AM |
| 1 | Q4M: I don't understand the complaints about women "riding CC". Do you want women to engage in casual sex or not?Slut shaming and bull shaming go both ways. Feminists and women generally, slam guys who ride the pussy carousel like they were mass murderers. As if wanting to have sex is legitimate only for women and if it's a guy who wants it then he's "a sinner", who did something wrong, some kind of a "creep". I don't see why this question refers only to one sex. Are you also taking on feminists who bull-shame guys just for being popular with the ladies? I don't question your logic, I'm questioning your mo… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/03/21 05:24 AM |
| 1 | Women are just as upset being friend-zoned as men are. I can attest to that from personal experience. And both sexes are right. If one person is in love and attracted sexually, the other person can't ask him or her to rewrite their feelings just so he or she could have a longer list of friends.Ah, you're being dishonest right now, I don't want to continue. Bye. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/03/21 04:53 AM |
| 1 | Women are just as upset being friend-zoned as men are. I can attest to that from personal experience. And both sexes are right. If one person is in love and attracted sexually, the other person can't ask him or her to rewrite their feelings just so he or she could have a longer list of friends.Hitting on someone to have sex is not a crime. Girls do that all the time, you'll be surprised to learn the men have the same liberties women have. Friend zoning is based on emotional manipulation. It consists of conflicting messages meant to confuse and create an emotional conflict. It's a form of abuse. Sure, women will friend zone someone they don't even know who just wanted to hit on them for sex with both of them knowing that it's about sex. But the more traumatic and relevant case is the m… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/03/21 04:50 AM |
| 1 | Women are just as upset being friend-zoned as men are. I can attest to that from personal experience. And both sexes are right. If one person is in love and attracted sexually, the other person can't ask him or her to rewrite their feelings just so he or she could have a longer list of friends.You are normal. Finally. One of a few survivors. The future of the West depends on your kind. You're it's best chance. I wish you a lot of love and that you'll make a lot of friends, maybe they'll catch being human again from you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/21 10:24 PM |
| 2 | Women are just as upset being friend-zoned as men are. I can attest to that from personal experience. And both sexes are right. If one person is in love and attracted sexually, the other person can't ask him or her to rewrite their feelings just so he or she could have a longer list of friends.Lol Yeah you're right. Yet you can't but love humanity. It has great potential, I'd give her that. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/21 10:15 PM |
| 4 | Women are just as upset being friend-zoned as men are. I can attest to that from personal experience. And both sexes are right. If one person is in love and attracted sexually, the other person can't ask him or her to rewrite their feelings just so he or she could have a longer list of friends.I'll tell you where you should try - Europe, South America, the mediterranean. Russia. East Europe. I guess almost anywhere where they don't speak English yet got rid of Malaria. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/21 10:06 PM |
| 2 | Women are just as upset being friend-zoned as men are. I can attest to that from personal experience. And both sexes are right. If one person is in love and attracted sexually, the other person can't ask him or her to rewrite their feelings just so he or she could have a longer list of friends.Whichever are the more annoying ones. Not that you are annoying, just to delineate the cut-off point | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/21 10:01 PM |
| 2 | Women are just as upset being friend-zoned as men are. I can attest to that from personal experience. And both sexes are right. If one person is in love and attracted sexually, the other person can't ask him or her to rewrite their feelings just so he or she could have a longer list of friends.Woke? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/21 09:57 PM |
| 2 | Women are just as upset being friend-zoned as men are. I can attest to that from personal experience. And both sexes are right. If one person is in love and attracted sexually, the other person can't ask him or her to rewrite their feelings just so he or she could have a longer list of friends.Well, the 90s were a little different than that series. I would go as far as saying that there's nothing furthest from that decade than friends. You do know that your generation has the first people to like that show in the history of the world. In the 90s it was the most hated show on tv. Except for in Beirut in Lebanon. They were the only ones on earth who could relate to the intimidated inhibited treatment of sex and love in that thing. But then again they were fighting for their lives for 30… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/21 09:45 PM |
| 2 | Women are just as upset being friend-zoned as men are. I can attest to that from personal experience. And both sexes are right. If one person is in love and attracted sexually, the other person can't ask him or her to rewrite their feelings just so he or she could have a longer list of friends.Agreed. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/21 09:33 PM |
| 1 | Women are just as upset being friend-zoned as men are. I can attest to that from personal experience. And both sexes are right. If one person is in love and attracted sexually, the other person can't ask him or her to rewrite their feelings just so he or she could have a longer list of friends.Good example. That was the kind of thing this post talks about. I'm not sure why some here think women don't get FZed. Perhaps they're teens or something, I don't know. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/21 09:20 PM |
| 1 | Women are just as upset being friend-zoned as men are. I can attest to that from personal experience. And both sexes are right. If one person is in love and attracted sexually, the other person can't ask him or her to rewrite their feelings just so he or she could have a longer list of friends.Ah, no. If I happen to be the person that guy wants to be friend with, then yes, it's up to me. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/21 09:15 PM |
| 8 | Women are just as upset being friend-zoned as men are. I can attest to that from personal experience. And both sexes are right. If one person is in love and attracted sexually, the other person can't ask him or her to rewrite their feelings just so he or she could have a longer list of friends.You guys really need to live outside North America for one year. Being FZed by everyone? I never heard of that. The ordinary guy will run into someone like that every couple of years. Girls over there in your country seem to have received total social legitimacy for every mean thing a human can do in love and sex. Just leave, just for a while, meet females who live in societies that require them the same human consideration it requires of men, normal humane women who don't think cruelty is a bas… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/21 09:11 PM |
| 1 | Women are just as upset being friend-zoned as men are. I can attest to that from personal experience. And both sexes are right. If one person is in love and attracted sexually, the other person can't ask him or her to rewrite their feelings just so he or she could have a longer list of friends.Obviously. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/21 09:03 PM |
| 1 | [Q4All]Whats your thoughts on the common Advice of joining clubs/activities with people of the opposite sex?Well, most people do that. Both sexes are doing it to find love. It's about the most normal thing homo sapiens are doing. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/21 08:06 PM |
| 1 | I've seen a lot of feminist posts recently talking about not all menThanks. A good comment about a severe and spreading thinking. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 17/03/21 08:02 PM |
| 3 | Women are just as upset being friend-zoned as men are. I can attest to that from personal experience. And both sexes are right. If one person is in love and attracted sexually, the other person can't ask him or her to rewrite their feelings just so he or she could have a longer list of friends.Why what happened since the 90s? Girls started falling in love by request? Or have they suddenly decided to let go of guys they reject? What happened since the 90s? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/21 07:49 PM |
| 1 | Women are just as upset being friend-zoned as men are. I can attest to that from personal experience. And both sexes are right. If one person is in love and attracted sexually, the other person can't ask him or her to rewrite their feelings just so he or she could have a longer list of friends.Ah, yes. - avoidance period - running into him - creepy - "Listen, this is too weired, but don't take it the wrong way, you're a great guy. Sorry. Okay? B y e". | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/21 07:12 PM |
| 4 | Women are just as upset being friend-zoned as men are. I can attest to that from personal experience. And both sexes are right. If one person is in love and attracted sexually, the other person can't ask him or her to rewrite their feelings just so he or she could have a longer list of friends.They are hurt, but try to get the guy to cheat on the girlfriend (or wife) with them for comfort. I agree that they have more to work with than guys, but they are still hurting inside. Badly. You don't want to be the guy in these situations. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/21 07:01 PM |
| 1 | Women are just as upset being friend-zoned as men are. I can attest to that from personal experience. And both sexes are right. If one person is in love and attracted sexually, the other person can't ask him or her to rewrite their feelings just so he or she could have a longer list of friends.But you agree that this would be up to you to accept this, not up to him, and if you don't want this position then he needs to accept it. What if you prefer not to be in that position after telling him how you feel and being rejected, and he will try to demand of you to accept it, either directly or indirectly? What if guys start posting general posts saying that girls like you need to accept this position anyhow if the guy asks them, otherwise you and girls like you "are hurting guys". What if … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/21 06:42 PM |
| 2 | Women are just as upset being friend-zoned as men are. I can attest to that from personal experience. And both sexes are right. If one person is in love and attracted sexually, the other person can't ask him or her to rewrite their feelings just so he or she could have a longer list of friends.So you love a guy, you are in love with him, you dream of his touch and of all the things you will do together, how happy you will be! And after telling him how you feel he tells you "no but I want you to be my friend" and you don't mind watching him for years preferring another girl over you while you are the de-sexualized friend, as sexual and romantic as a tree is for him, and being in love with him and dreaming about him this tree-status is your constant position in life as long as you know … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/21 05:49 PM |
| -1 | Women are just as upset being friend-zoned as men are. I can attest to that from personal experience. And both sexes are right. If one person is in love and attracted sexually, the other person can't ask him or her to rewrite their feelings just so he or she could have a longer list of friends.Yes, you have to cut. See above. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/21 02:57 PM |
| 1 | Women are just as upset being friend-zoned as men are. I can attest to that from personal experience. And both sexes are right. If one person is in love and attracted sexually, the other person can't ask him or her to rewrite their feelings just so he or she could have a longer list of friends.Yes. "So sorry, bye". This is extremely difficult for girls and women to do, because they are possessive. Many are simply unable to resist their immense need for male sexual affirmation, an affirmation that they gain from knowing that this guy wants them - they gain the sense of affirmation even if they don't care about the guy. The thought of him saying, "that saddens me, but I'll get over it, sorry I bothered you" - the part "I'll get over it" - is unbearable for women and girls. Just from the… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/21 01:45 PM |
| 2 | Women are just as upset being friend-zoned as men are. I can attest to that from personal experience. And both sexes are right. If one person is in love and attracted sexually, the other person can't ask him or her to rewrite their feelings just so he or she could have a longer list of friends.All, yes, women get near the friend-zone and hate it. Whatever number of guys they have that show interest in them, they too fall in love with someone who is not interested in them. Yes, he'll sometimes have sex (not always. Depends on why he's not interested in her. If it's because she's really not attractive or she's crazy, sex is rarely an interesting thought). But if he is an honest person he will tell them the same thing that any woman tells a guy she's not in love with - that this will not… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/21 10:05 AM |
| -5 | YES ALL MENOnce you have a child in the world, unless you can't take care of him or her because of mental or severe medical reasons, it's your responsibility to father this child. Adoption is not a magic solution. Adopted children carry a scar. Separation, even without knowing the father, is an open wound that never heals. If you do not want to parent, these are the options you have: make sure you don't get a woman pregnant, when this fails, do everything in your power to get an abortion, if this fails - f… | /r/MensRights | 16/03/21 07:37 PM |
| 1 | The activating signal of women's arousal is different than men's. Generally, men are activated internally, by sight, women are activated externally, by a man's activeness and touch. Feminism teaches women to wait for an internal cue, and men not to entice women, preventing their stimulating signal.The only reason there is no evidentiary basis is feminist censorship on science which spreads fear among investigators of even hypothesizing effects that would contradict the feminist narrative. If you are looking for evidentiary basis you can read it here: https://lovists.com/2021/03/01/science-plus-violence-equals-silence-the-gender-church-equation/ This is a magnificent system. First terrorize scientists to prevent them from freely producing data that would refute a narrative, then write in c… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/03/21 05:09 PM |
| 2 | Indian member of parliament asks for celebration of men's day in the parliament , get's laughed at by other female MPs and gets massively trolled on twitterYou are not alone. We all feel that and think that. Don't give up and don't despair. There are a lot of people working to change this. The mass is accumulating and it will eventually break the silence. Hold on. Think of the good things, remember always that because of the silencing, most women have no idea about what we are going through, they love men and appreciate men, but are simply not aware of the severeness of the atmosphere. When the silencing will eventually, slowly, break, they will jo… | /r/MensRights | 09/03/21 06:09 PM |
| 1 | Russia: Is your boyfriend cheating on you? Tell us and we'll conscript him into the Russian Army: Colonel's extraordinary offer for International Women's Day OP: No conscription for females in Russia.It's Russian sense of humor. Don't get too excited. I assume Russians just had a good lough. If there's one place on earth today with normal sex relations for the benefit of both sexes it's Russia. And what's so great about female soldiers? Men protect, women nurture. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/21 05:57 PM |
| 3 | The Cancellation of International Women’s Day and What it MeansBlog post, that in a free society should have been accepted to a regular newspaper. Here's an excerpt. ...an international day the media is encouraged to put as a top story what it normally leaves for the bottom of the page in a hidden sub-section or doesn’t report it at all, and many outlets and newspapers would publish in-depth articles that reveal figures, statistics and personal stories, that replace stereotypes and ignorance with an appreciation of a pertinent, acute issue. The first proble… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 09/03/21 12:14 AM |
| 26 | After two years of massive criticism, Gillette disabled comments on YouTube video "The best a man can be", still can be disliked.Thanks for sharing. It's extremely important to keep the true historical events in memory. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/21 04:24 PM |
| 1 | Unpopular opinion: Many mothers give horrible dating advice to their sonsWhat I don't understand is when did mothers started to be the ones teaching boys about relationships and not fathers. It's obvious that mothers in a feminist society will only think of the girls and neglect the well being of their sons and drive them into being abused. What happened to the fathers? Fathers - guide your sons. And young guys - love shouldn't hurt, not right at the beginning - if you are suffering then something is WRONG - get out of there. It's an extremely important post. There i… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/21 11:37 AM |
| 1 | The activating signal of women's arousal is different than men's. Generally, men are activated internally, by sight, women are activated externally, by a man's activeness and touch. Feminism teaches women to wait for an internal cue, and men not to entice women, preventing their stimulating signal.I think some women are like you and some are different. As for your explanation about fearing rejection - this is precisely my analysis as well. You can read about it here (this is not a commercial. I'll send you a free copy if you want. This is about men and women who are very curious to hear each other, and want to converse, but don't really have a framework for that and setting up this framework). https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08RXMS7M2?ref_=k4w_oembed_Lmy71v0mv4fe8N&tag=kpembed-20&linkCode=kpd | /r/PurplePillDebate | 07/03/21 07:23 AM |
| 1 | The activating signal of women's arousal is different than men's. Generally, men are activated internally, by sight, women are activated externally, by a man's activeness and touch. Feminism teaches women to wait for an internal cue, and men not to entice women, preventing their stimulating signal.We have to find a way to talk again, men and women. Currently feminists are lip-reading men in the ears of all women, and what they are telling women about how to understand men is not true and creates deep suspicion. This process leads to the end of the unique and privileged relations between the sexes. It is a declared and outspoken goal of feminism to end the relations between the sexes, although this is not part of what ideological feminists are telling women - they keep women under the impr… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/03/21 10:05 PM |
| 2 | Do women have a minimum looks threshold you need to pass or do they have a basic personality threshold you need to pass ?Exactly! You and me against the world! That's how feel it! Sometimes I see these questions by younger women on Facebook or Reddit, about "dating" (how did it become a second profession? I usually called it finding love), and I have this urge to say something, that it's about intimacy, the "I found you" feeling, it's something you feel, not know. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/03/21 07:03 PM |
| 1 | Do women have a minimum looks threshold you need to pass or do they have a basic personality threshold you need to pass ?From my personal experience, most women I knew are like you. I always thought that it's a matter of vibe. There's a vibe. I never knew though what it is exactly, for women. Men have speculations about the vibe that women see, but none of us knows what it is exactly. I think women don't know we don't know. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/03/21 03:29 PM |
| 1 | The activating signal of women's arousal is different than men's. Generally, men are activated internally, by sight, women are activated externally, by a man's activeness and touch. Feminism teaches women to wait for an internal cue, and men not to entice women, preventing their stimulating signal.Right on. I wouldn't go as far as saying that women can never give consent. I think most of the time the two figure out their way. But human sexuality is built in a certain way that creates a potential for hard feelings in both directions, and nobody talks about it, because there's a dogma, enforced forcefully, that sexuality is identical, and there's also a motivation to incriminate maleness so there's an incentive to present the inherent problem as male violence or deafness. The feminist dogma… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/03/21 12:34 PM |
| 1 | The activating signal of women's arousal is different than men's. Generally, men are activated internally, by sight, women are activated externally, by a man's activeness and touch. Feminism teaches women to wait for an internal cue, and men not to entice women, preventing their stimulating signal.What we used to regard as foreplay is now defined as coercion into sex. For years. A lot of people, both sexes, are avoiding it completely, guys believing that this is rape and girls believing they should be as eager as the guy is from square one and wait until "it shows up" out of the blue. I'm sorry to say that feminism explicitly and intensely spreads this message. I know that many feminists would say "you missed the point" but these men and women haven't missed anything, feminists are confus… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/03/21 08:47 AM |
| 1 | The activating signal of women's arousal is different than men's. Generally, men are activated internally, by sight, women are activated externally, by a man's activeness and touch. Feminism teaches women to wait for an internal cue, and men not to entice women, preventing their stimulating signal.This is a good discussion. I'm not offended. Girls and women can grab and make blunt suggestions, that's not news to me. But if humanity had to depend on that it would become extinct long ago. Most women and men never did that (the fact that only men are forbidden now of doing it while women are even encouraged, it's "empowering", is sexism, hardcore, but that's for another post). Sexuality has its own language and that language was banned, by feminism. We usually hear about it from the male per… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/03/21 07:06 AM |
| 1 | The activating signal of women's arousal is different than men's. Generally, men are activated internally, by sight, women are activated externally, by a man's activeness and touch. Feminism teaches women to wait for an internal cue, and men not to entice women, preventing their stimulating signal.So, this is what the post was about. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/03/21 06:35 AM |
| 1 | The activating signal of women's arousal is different than men's. Generally, men are activated internally, by sight, women are activated externally, by a man's activeness and touch. Feminism teaches women to wait for an internal cue, and men not to entice women, preventing their stimulating signal.Not everyone is like you. The original post was by a girl describing women who wish they were aroused and can't reach that. She was referring to couples. I know from experience some are like you and others are expecting the guy to get them going. They want him to, but they are not there yet. They sometimes guide the guy to bring them there. In the 80s and 90s there was a constant preaching for men about foreplay. This was as big as the war on drugs. I was a kid but I remember this. Hundreds of t… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/03/21 11:38 PM |
| 1 | The activating signal of women's arousal is different than men's. Generally, men are activated internally, by sight, women are activated externally, by a man's activeness and touch. Feminism teaches women to wait for an internal cue, and men not to entice women, preventing their stimulating signal.I'm so sorry for what you went through. Regarding the figures you mentioned, please see here (in particular the second and sixth items): https://lovists.com/blog/ | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/03/21 07:18 PM |
| 1 | The activating signal of women's arousal is different than men's. Generally, men are activated internally, by sight, women are activated externally, by a man's activeness and touch. Feminism teaches women to wait for an internal cue, and men not to entice women, preventing their stimulating signal.The fact that a girl or a woman doesn't agree with feminism's actions and their consequences, doesn't make feminism what that girl or woman wanted feminism to be. It is what it is and it does what it does. Women and girls who dislike what feminism does can't demand the entire world to behave as if feminism is what they would have liked it to be. If they are uncomfortable with what feminism is and does in actual terms, they should debate it with the feminist crowd, and try to make them adopt thei… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/03/21 05:57 PM |
| 3 | The activating signal of women's arousal is different than men's. Generally, men are activated internally, by sight, women are activated externally, by a man's activeness and touch. Feminism teaches women to wait for an internal cue, and men not to entice women, preventing their stimulating signal.Beuatiful analogy. Coming from neuroscience myself I can only applaud her example, and add that these cars are tied together, one engine pull-starts the other. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/03/21 02:54 PM |
| 1 | The activating signal of women's arousal is different than men's. Generally, men are activated internally, by sight, women are activated externally, by a man's activeness and touch. Feminism teaches women to wait for an internal cue, and men not to entice women, preventing their stimulating signal.Thanks. She will definitely learn a lot from the new book. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/03/21 02:32 PM |
| 2 | What is the future relationship between men and women?I have written a book that I published two months ago, about this, with data and analysis. I am a neurobiologist and an author with a background in psychology and philosophy who published about adjacent themes in newspapers. Whether a feminist or not, please consider reading the book. Here is a link. https://www.amazon.com/Lovism-Humanist-Alternative-Henry-Blair-ebook/dp/B08RXMS7M2 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/03/21 06:47 AM |
| 1 | PurplePillDebate is by far the most sane place I know in all of Reddit, and in the socialsphere in general. A sanctuary.Even better. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/03/21 06:05 PM |
| 0 | PurplePillDebate is by far the most sane place I know in all of Reddit, and in the socialsphere in general. A sanctuary.Well, I did say on a good day. Today was okay. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/03/21 06:03 PM |
| 4 | PurplePillDebate is by far the most sane place I know in all of Reddit, and in the socialsphere in general. A sanctuary.I keep reading here about this, people mention this like it's the 3rd world war. What's that about? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/03/21 06:00 PM |
| 5 | PurplePillDebate is by far the most sane place I know in all of Reddit, and in the socialsphere in general. A sanctuary.I'm a leftist. What you might call radical (I call it ideological). Antifa type. I'm a socialist for one. But I'm the resistance, on the left. To PC madness, radical feminist fascism, SJW hypocrisy, all that is not humanism, it's the exact opposite. I'm a rare breed, I admit. All of my leftist friends became a fascist mob, save for the ones I kept close and informed about the fact that our own circles are the true far-right now - they are the ones banning books like in fascist regimes, using new… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/03/21 05:02 PM |
| 2 | A scientist explains what men don't understand about dead bedrooms. I think she's right.That's interesting but I regret to say that it's a rationalization. I know this because I never knew a woman who consistently says "no", just an occasional and rare "no", and I know for a fact that some of the time they went along with it even if they weren't really into it at first - just as I did for them some of the time. So from my experience, women don't have this inhibition that you're describing, not as an extreme inability to have sex "even if they wished they wanted" as you describe it.… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/03/21 02:07 PM |
| 1 | The phrase "safe spaces for women" is a paranoid enticement, coming from, and spreading, the feminist belief that all men want to rape and kill all women so women need places to hide. As if there's a continuous massacre going on.They make up 50%. Not 8%. Your line of argument internalized the feminist concept (now replaced by a newer concept, see below) that only physical violence should be counted as violence. Feminism acted to legitimize social violence committed by women. After about a decade passed, feminism felt confident enough in this hiding, that is, that "society forgot about the emotional and societal violence of women", and during the last year feminism started accepting again that this is violence - but by a… | /r/MensRights | 04/03/21 11:16 AM |
| 1 | The phrase "safe spaces for women" is a paranoid enticement, coming from, and spreading, the feminist belief that all men want to rape and kill all women so women need places to hide. As if there's a continuous massacre going on.Please don't use this argument. It started somewhere in social media by someone who isn't the sharpest nail in the box. It was immediately hijacked by feminism to argue that men are responsible for all the violence in the world, that humanity including men is a victim of maleness, and hence that manhood should be erased or re-written by feminism to save humanity from manhood and "men of themselves" (as part of this, in 2018, the demonetization term "toxic masculinity" became viral). This entire … | /r/MensRights | 04/03/21 10:13 AM |
| 4 | Leaving the r/Feminism SubredditYou are great. Thank you for joining : ) | /r/MensRights | 03/03/21 10:46 PM |
| 9 | Which opinions do you hold that would be considered unpopular or controversial even on PPD?I like this post. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/03/21 10:44 PM |
| 5 | The phrase "safe spaces for women" is a paranoid enticement, coming from, and spreading, the feminist belief that all men want to rape and kill all women so women need places to hide. As if there's a continuous massacre going on.In the title, that's incitement. Not "enticement" (auto-correct). | /r/MensRights | 03/03/21 03:38 PM |
| 1 | Does anyone here have an academic background who would like to take a shot at revising Mary Koss' wikipedia article?Thanks. In my opinion, the entry allows readers to critically consider the data presented. It doesn't state the 1/4 concept as a fact but very accurately as an idea that she started. I think it's good. Disseminating the actual data is up to human rights activists, and when this effort will start to change views, people who visit the page will understand that she is one of the sources for the myth. It will take a conceptual revolution to add to the page "the myth of 1/4". The revolution will not … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 25/02/21 07:41 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter