The "Nice guy" and how it evolved from the will Smith incident

Vegetable_Camera5042 · 2024-01-27T20:39:34+00:00

Great post. Very good analysis here.

If you want to find out what the average misandrist would do in relation to masculinity.. look at what Andrew Tate would do, it works everytime — it's a variation of this idea that progressivism when it comes to men's issues turn conservatives as fast as flash a pretol-soused person runs away from fire.

I find this hilarious. Because during that fake situation where a woman was hit with a brick. Both red pillers like Andrew Tate and anti red pill progressive people would call the men in situation cowards and say they didn't do anything to help the woman.

Doesn't matter how progressive society is. They still expect men to have traditional gender roles. While women keep stepping out their genders every other generation, and perpetuate their gender roles when it is convenient for them

There's this messaging you'd see from progressives, unironically, about what "good men", "positive masculinity" "feminist allies" should imbibe, if we look at this from a progressive theory standpoint, here's what happened —

Will Smith defended a woman against an instantiated Patriarchal prejudice of valuing women based on their looks— Objectification .. and the fact it's a joke makes it worse — jokes are subtle ways used to normalize negative systemic beliefs( like misogynistic "women are dumb" jokes).

Will Smith did it in the way that would make them look bad if they defended him lol. So they have to switch the goal post. And say this is toxic masculinity all of a sudden. When this is something they would usually call positive masculinity. This is just convenient for them though. They are still going to say it's positive masculinity for a man to defend his girlfriend or wife whenever it's convenient.

It exposes the delusions embedded is the Patriarchal "knight in shining armor" archetype used to "protect" women.. but weird enough.. that's precisely what progressives imbibe.

Most men are stock into 3 groups. Male feminists, traditional men, and red pill men. Traditional men are the original template for what masculinity was. While Male feminists are just traditional masculinity under a new code of paint or the progressive version of male chivalry. And guessed you can say the red pill is the example of toxic masculinity or masculinity done wrong.

Of course there are overlaps between all 3 types of men. Again there is a obvious overlap between traditional men and male feminists lol. And there is also an overlap between traditional men and red pill men.

But these 3 groups of men are still important to society. That's because they still play the game. Hate to sound like a cringe red pill man here. All 3 types of men are still stuck in the matrix. That game or matrix is the Patriarchal "knight in shining armor" archetype used to "protect" women, you mention.

Think about it despite their differences all 3 types of men main goal is to always provide for and protect women, sure they have different reasons. Traditional men might feel the need to protect and provide for women because they were told that's the way it should be. Red pill men might feel this need because they have a huge ego or male power fantasy. And male feminists might feel this need to because they are naive or they like kissing up to women to get validation from women.

But at the end of the day it's all comes down how these men are expected to provide for women and protect women. Their whole masculinity identity is center around women. Whether it's traditional men majoring their worth as man on what they can provide for women. Or male feminsits doing anything to make women happy via positive masculinity. And the red pill using toxic masculinity as a way to get women, so they can have status that make their masculine identify look good in the eyes of society.

Men like me and assuming you might be too scary for society. There is a good chance that society might even hate us more than the red pill men lol. Because we don't play the game or uphold the status quo. The status being what we can do for women, children, and the betterment of society as a whole.

Every time I mention the GA word people get scared (Cough cough the GA word is gender abolishment). Even most progressive people or people on the left are afraid the of the GA word. Because the GA word change the status quo. And especially when it comes to men and traditional gender roles.

ImmaDrainOnSociety · 2024-01-30T08:55:44+00:00

Will Smith isn't a nice guy, nor is he a beta. He's a broken guy being held hostage.

Poor bastard is stuck with a woman that never really loved him and is trying her damnedest to embarrass him into being the one that initiates the divorce so she can take him to the cleaners. He also blames himself for his previous divorce.

Title	The "Nice guy" and how it evolved from the will Smith incident
Author	ValuableBreakfast527
Upvotes	23
Comments	3
Date	January 26, 2024 5:55 PM UTC (2 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/1abog68/the_nice_guy_and_how_it_evolved_from_the_will/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/the-nice-guy-and-how-it-evolved-from-the-will.1243879 https://theredarchive.com/post/1243879

Comments