Let's begin with the main premise of this popular titkok and Reddit post. "There can be no misandry". The proper expansion of which should be "There can be no gendered violent intent". So if there can be no misandry, there can be no misogyny either. Except if she implies the genders are fundamentally different which negates the whole homogeneous to a leveling degree equality concept that feminism pushes. Which in turn implied all men on earth and many women, are collaborators in a global suppression scheme.

Then moves on to say she cannot rape a man. (Weird ideations and scenarios to play within one's mind don't you think?). Which she repeated in 3-4 different ways as if she was adding new points each time. Let's say she cannot do it physically face to face with most men. She absolutely can when the age gap is enormous though, as female teachers and nannies were repeatedly busted doing. Or when the man is drugged or drunk or under the threat of a lethal weapon, or overwhelmed by group force.

She also claims to not strip the rights of our male bodies. Well probably forgot to mention the dozens of millions aborted male babies per year. The abandoned kids. The murdered husbands. The circumsized boys. The millions of men who are victims of unwanted female touching and can say/do nothing back. Because when women do it it's "playful". The men being hit and not being able to strike back etc. The every day increasing prohibitions and restrictions about what flirting language is allowed by men, in what spaces they can navigate etc. Those must not possibly reduce male bodily autonomy in any way.

She doesn't torture men. Again. Does 99.99% of men torture women either? Why is she even having those kind of ideations. What kind of chronic suppressed antimale emotions are those? Freudian slip again maybe? Also why do many women join isis, communist/nazi parties and psychopathic cults. Isn't torture and extortion gonna be an integral part of those regimes?

"Misandry isn't real." Apparently that's what every abuser says according to your logic. Sounds like 101 textbook gaslighting to have the victim feel guilt for its own emotions. If male hatred isnt real why did you call them all opressive genociders, and fantasised of potentially murdering and raping them in the same post?

"I don't laugh at their pain". Well i wish i could say that you don't. But your thinking history indicates someone who could definitely laugh at male murder, rape or other misfortunes. Or brutalities to be more precise. Who even accused you of lack of empathy? Maybe projecting again?

"Women won't be able to give back the pain and suffering men cause us". Are you referring to your ex Chads' (whom you chose) baggage, and generalising it as the experience of the entire female population? Also what's with the whole "pain talk". A BDSM fantasy slipup this time? And which men cause that? Can you name enough of those men? To the degree that would make it constitute a legitimate general threat? Because the average man today even apologises to the local dustbin if he throws the recycling trash in the wrong can. I don't think he makes his daily motivation and goal to make your entire existence one of suffering and pain as you claim.

Of course the emotional exhilaration in the comments was warningly hilarious. And there were naturally comments even talking about queer men being also supressed in "Patriarchy" etc. the same queer men that if they gained all male attention, would leave women out of business? Yes, certainly those are only threatening "to the patriarchy". (Wouldn't be surprised if top OF creator was a trans man). Not that women are the gatekeepers and main shamers of masculinity and lackthereof. And if its so harmful even for men themselves, why "keep doing it"? Maybe so that milady here who wouldn't even be a shepherd in her village mumbling to her 7 sheep, can have internet access and be an Idol and voice for millions? So hateful and opressive men are, who took women out of the caves and into the technological palaces of western democracy. But i guess once an opressive pig... You get the gist.

post image