Hi everybody, here a guy in (almost only day)game since almost one year. I'm writing this because I've just seen a video from ToddV about texting and chat. In this video (it is almost 1 h long, given by union of some videos from "Text and Dating Machine" course) he explains which are the 4 types of text you'll face in every possible chat with a girl and how to deal with those.

Despite the video (that you can find on YouTube) is theoretically really enlightening, then he starts showing off some examples. And here it's when I started having a lot of doubts. In this video he shows how persistent he can be with texts, even the girl does not reply to him twice in a row. Basically what he does is simple : if she's interested he goes for the date, if she's simply chit chat talking he tries to make it emotional, and if she is not replying he continues offering value sending fun texts or memes that do not require any answer.

Now, I remained a little bit astonished about how much he keeps going for texts trought big windows of time, because my approach to texting, that I actually learned from Tom Torero and Paul Janka, is actually more minimalistic and less persistent : text should be used mainly to fix dates, and if she doesn't reply twice in a row move on.

Now, my doubts are about this way to see texting. ToddV does not apply this "ok move on" approach as Tom T and Janka said, and maybe this makes him having more from the girls he has the number of. I feel the approach "move on" is incredibly useful for beginners that still have no habit to approach everyday, and that could stop approaching once they got few numbers on which "focus on".

Supposed now I've the habit to keep approaching, despite I'm dating or not someone, should I be more persistent and actually not give to much fucks about "she's replying or not" or should I remain on this "numbers' game" mentality ? Do you think this last one is today (where basically text is the social conduit for almost everything) still applicable ?

I would like to know if out there there are guys that approach consistently like me and, at the same time, struggle with "text game", or, if not, how they solved it.