http://www.donotlink.com/b2kw

Woman starts with the "provocative" lead in about the benefits of daily sex with your husband. The hostess is incredulous, stating "that's not feasible."

The blogger being interview agrees and admits to hyperbole that , stating she meant intimacy, then she goes on to acknowledge the "challenge" of putting in a whopping 15 minutes (or more) of time into her relationship into something that makes him "totally happy."

"Do I think this will happen for our whole marriage? Probably not."

I'm sure that husband feels so respected after that.

She understands this is good for her marriage. She understands her husband loves it. She understands that this is a simple 15 or 20 minutes of time invested. The value is packaged with solipsism.

The conversation moves towards her feelings—why she’s happy or unhappy. They don't get into the particulars of why he is happy. Its just assumed that increasing duty sex to the husband is going to make him happier. His feelings are irrelevant unless its to get the husband more attached to her and for the husband to give her more positive feedback.

His character depth in this discussion is reduced to a neglected erection, and these women are talking about the benefits to them if they manage to give it a few more duty strokes.

The video closes with "What you should think is - I'm going to take 20 minutes at the end of every day to strengthen my relationship, and maybe that means sex, I think you'd have a lot more women doing it, and husbands that were fist-pumping."

Who here is ready to sign up for that with half of their assets?