696,537 posts

APA’s War on Masculinity

Reddit View
January 30, 2019
39 upvotes

Post Information
Title APA’s War on Masculinity
Author redpillschool
Upvotes 39
Comments 12
Date 30 January 2019 04:32 PM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit TheRedPill
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/218327
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/alefcp/apas_war_on_masculinity/
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
the red pill
Comments

[–]Modredpillschool[S,M] [score hidden] stickied comment (2 children) | Copy

Yes, it's a video, and yes, I think videos are low-bandwidth. If anybody had something important to say they could write it. But nevertheless it's good material.

I know we've talked about this before but its worth continuing discussion. Our mission statement has never been more true than it is today:

The Red Pill: Discussion of sexual strategy in a culture increasingly lacking a positive identity for men.

From the APA:

The main thrust of the subsequent research is that traditional masculinity-- marked by stoicism, competitiveness, dominance and aggression-- is, on the whole, harmful.


Dr. Smith discusses the ridiculousness of this statement, and analyzes the actual guidelines.

"These are just qualities. Qualities can have upsides and downsides."

"To say that they're harmful on the whole is just absurd. It's no different than saying that feminine qualities are harmful on the whole."

"I want to focus on how these guidelines were built, because they weren't built on anything resembling science."

From the guidelines: "Feminist scholars have argued that some men use violence and control in relationships as a way of maintaining sexist beliefs and dominance over women."

Dr. Smith: "Yes this is true lots of people have argued lots of things. I didn't know that I was supposed to build my clinical interventions around argumentation and opinion. I thought it was supposed to use reliable data and research but apparently not when it conflicts with the APA's approved ideology."

"Nothing in here about treatment, it's about advancing ideology and that becomes readily apparent in guideline number three where the APA charges psychologists with understanding the impact of power privilege and sexism on the development of boys and men and on their relationships with others. Again nothing here about treatment this is about me making sure that my clients know how powerful and privileged they are whether or not that squares with their experience and the money quote comes way down in the middle of page 10 and it reads like this:

"indeed awareness of privilege and the harmful impacts of beliefs and behaviors that maintain patriarchal power have been shown to reduce sexist attitudes and men and have been linked to participation in social justice activities"

"I take that to mean that the APA is creating a policy which compels psychologists to compel their clients to participate in a political agenda."

Especially scary how political the test questions are at the end.


The fact is, the words feminist or patriarchy should not even appear once in the text. This is all the evidence I need to know the APA is strictly anti-male. I will never allow myself or any of my children anywhere near this man-hating establishment.

Granted, I already knew they were anti-male before this, this is just more proof.

Despite my hatred of videos as an essay medium, it's worth watching.

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil21 points22 points  (7 children) | Copy

Psycholgy especially the Positive Model this man is following has always been Anti Traditional. Capitalism alienates people from their traditional structures: family, Homeland religion and race. This causes depression and discontent. Then it's the job of the psychologist to reintegrate the person into the system without questioning the system itself

The Blue Pill consensus is maintained and manufactured by a professional class of teachers, doctors, lawyers and psycholgists (all of who voted for Hillary). Their job is to make sure the masses don't do anything too populist.

So here's a guy who spent decades working within his field somehow ignorant of what his true purpose really is. Experts like this buttholeface don't question the question. They answer the question within the frame of the dominant idiology.

Calling all masculintity toxic is buisness as usual for the APA. It's just the next step in the logical progression, a progression this "expert" is purposely ignorant of.

Do these people look like deep intellectuals with the courage to question the system?

Or are they fat cows who mindlessly impose the blue pill onto children sans reflection. That's the real purpose bof psychology.

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]largepaycheckaddict10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy

This is also why lots of women have BPD, depression, lead careless promiscuous lives etc.. the poz’d out media tells them that being a stay at home mom/house wife (e.g.. most women’s natural biological role) is for “brain dead women” when in reality nurturing and supporting a family is the virtue and honor of the feminine.

Instead media tells them to go enter army ranger school, so when they see how much they suck at being a man they get penis envy. Society tells them to slut it through their 20s (get it girl!), and they become degenerate train wrecks incapable of pair bonding and truly loving a man. Our Women used to make clothes for our children, now we purchase ready made cotton shirts made in some factory shipped to our country from the other side of the world (polluting the planet in the process)

This is a planned deconstruction of western civilization or simply its dying out after its spring. Most women are brainwashed. Most of our men are fat body losers who do drink drug and game themselves into a gluttonous stupor. The metaphysical cancer (or lack of metaphysical spirit) swooping through the western world turning everyone into these pleasure addicted nihilists is something else.

The modern world is disgusting. It disgusts me and it should disgust anyone who is red pill aware.

[–]largepaycheckaddict2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

God that picture... Slave morality in a nutshell.

[–]shaggyctes881 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

If Nieztsche came back to life, he would burst on an Explosive NEIN! At this mess of a world we made

[–]NextBad1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

>Capitalism alienates people from their traditional structures: family, Homeland religion and race. This causes depression and discontent.

Allowing people to follow their best interests, is what stave of depression and disconnection, you can choose your group, you can choose your path. Socialism is forced feminism, the less capitalistic a country the more feminized it becomes

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy

This is Ben Shapiro Jordon Peterson tier reversal. Russia and China operated under full communism for most of the last century and are less feminist than America.

Egalitarian Liberalism is the cause of feminism. Communist contries are more patriarchal then Capitalist ones.

And now a quote from Karl Marx himself:

The bourgeoisie, wherever it has got the upper hand, has put an end to all feudal, patriarchal, idyllic relations. It has pitilessly torn asunder the motley feudal ties that bound man to his “natural superiors”, and has left remaining no other nexus between man and man than naked self-interest, than callous “cash payment”.


If Marx had a problem with Patriarchal relations he wouldn't be lamenting it's destruction by Capitalism.

[–]NextBad3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

I was speaking socialistic , such as Sweden, and Denmark

> Russia and China operated under full communism for most of the last century and are less feminist than America.

Because they give superiority to the state, rather than the individual, feminist isn't the end all of our troubles, we have other enemies, such as totalitarian government. Given the three choices, America seems the most free in terms of speech and pursuit

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev10 points11 points  (1 child) | Copy

Within a decade or sooner, "Traditional Masculinity" will wind up in the DSM.

[–]NextBad4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Socially it seems men are powerless to stop this , not that they are fighting much. Men are more concern with science, and building than social aspects. Men are arrogant they act as if they can make enough money and sleep with enough women and there life is complete. This trend will continue, We don't got much time left. School are already making feminism mandatory. You can not opt your child out of feminist training.

But why would any women want too, most children are raised by single mothers, any father opposing his wife is a abuser. The next step is not for men but for women.

Imagine a world where a father in the home didn't mean anything, most SWJ believe that the mere presence of a penis in a child life is what makes a father a father. If men are trained in feminist ego from birth, than having a father presence will no longer mean family but rather a secure brain washing station for children which are checked at school.

Say hello to mental slavery 2.0 , you won't want anything else



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2020. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter