TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Feminists freak out about a Canadian barber shop that caters to men only.

Adanac23

September 5, 2014
50 upvotes
/r/TheRedPill
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Feminists freak out about a Canadian barber shop that caters to men only.
Author

Adanac23

Upvotes 50
Comments 34
Date September 5, 2014 4:32 PM UTC
(11 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/2fk8ky/feminists_freak_out_about_a_canadian_barber_shop/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/feminists-freak-out-about-a-canadian-barber-shop.228323
https://theredarchive.com/post/228323
Red Pill terms in post
feministthe red pill
Top posts by Adanac23

Wife bragging about being hit on... didn't know how to react.

81 upvotes
September 16, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

FckH8 promoting hate against males to sell T-shirts.

75 upvotes
October 23, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

BP contradictions in a large majority or TRP post..

0 upvotes
October 28, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

Comments

[–]Catmandoes68 points69 points70 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Can't even get a haircut today without some bitch complaining.

[–]BorMato30 points31 points32 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I think this comes down to the necessity for guys to have "male only spaces." There are dozens of women only places/businesses in North America and I don't see why men can't have the same.

[–]sumdumguy-throwaway 9 points9 points9 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

We definitely need this.

Anyone know if it is illegal in the US to have a business that only serves males?

wouldn't surprise me

[–]Shadowbannedaccount3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago [recovered] (0 children) | Copy Link

Our local gym has a mens fitness room, a womens fitness room and then a mixed area. I think it's become separate but equal kind of deal. For instance some states, there must be a "mens night" if you have a ladies night.

[–]Eenjoy6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Every space is a male space though. A woman cant even walk down the street safely because it is menz space.

/S

[–][deleted] 20 points21 points22 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

The local country club has an offsite barber. Not a hair stylist, not a salon, but a barber where old dudes go to get old dude haircuts and read old dude magazines and smoke old dude cigars. Women aren't allowed on the premises unless they're accompanied by their spouse. A friend of my girlfriend went on a Facebook rampage because she found out if she ever hypothetically wanted to go to the old dude barber that she wouldn't be allowed, despite being a member of the country club.

[–]Shadowbannedaccount5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

My club has a similar setup, but without the smoking... Thanks New York... The women have a spa though, so I can't imagine any of them throwing shitfits.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The girl in question is a entitled spoiled narcissistic millennial rapidly approaching the wall. Watching her and interacting with her is like having a RP training dummy. I could go on and on about it. She's just a professional umbrage taker. I heard her boss refer to her as the "billing princess" for her job, a perfectly innocuous compliment. 5 minutes later shes going on and on about how disrespectful it was for him to talk about her like that and how shes uncomfortable around him and how creepy he is. Mind you this is at an informal after work BBQ.

[–]Shadowbannedaccount8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sounds like a little shit. My female co-worker (a Sr. tax accountant, 55+ in age) used to call me boy-wonder because I was good at what I did, but young and inexperienced so usually a step behind the senior staff. They plastered my face on an old robin (with the tights!) picture and posted it on my cubical. I thought it was funny. HR did not, and that it was harassment. So I told them I printed it out and the nickname was fitting. I wanted to tell them to fuck off, but probably not the best thing to say to someone who does your employee evaluation. Kept the nick-name, YTD, still the best and most honest nick-name I've ever been given. Billing Princess can go jump off a ledge.

[–]SomebodyCool10 points11 points12 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

“[Ms. Ruddy] has been wronged,” said Claire Carter, assistant professor of women’s and gender studies at the University of Regina.

Watch out here guys, we have some high-profile academics on the case.

Ms. Ruddy told the Leader-Post this week that she would not do more interviews after receiving threats, forcing her to shut down her Twitter account.

Oh noes her precious Twitter account, how is she ever going to go on with her life? those must have been some serious threats if the worst that happened to her was having to shut down her Twitter account.

David Arnot, chief commissioner of the Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission, said safety concerns could factor in to those types of gender-specific policies.

Yes David, wrap your lips a bit tighter around that big feminist strap-on and suck forcefully. Fucking safety considerations...because zumba gyms are notorious for the high crime rate right?

[–][deleted] 14 points14 points14 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]HalfPastTuna0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The "attracted to masculine men" part really rings true. A lot of feminists are into really kinky degrading shit in bed. Its almost like closet gay dude who compensates by acting overly macho and masculine because he hates himself inside.

[–]Kepaso4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Ok i'm canadian and consider myself in the center of the politic spectrum ( taking ideas from left to right) but always voted for left parties. But god i hate those SJW angry extreme leftists liberal feminists. I cannot take anymore this perpetual offended state of mine. It seems there is always a pointless battle to fight, always on the scanning mode to find any little thing that will blow out of proportion. The craving for attention these people have, the need to be offended so they can alert the medias and doing their online jihad, the thought police...The worst is the eternal state of victimization. Always searching a way to be a victim.

There was a time when being in a left party was having big ideas about building your nation for a better future for all the society, you know, when they were talking about class struggle, poverty, equality , building things and creating health care and stuff, thinking about the wealth of the country so everybody could thrive. Now we go online to bitch about a barbershop. Or the new spider women cover. Or the curvy ladies not represented in movies.

[–]Newdist20 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And that time was about 80 years before you were born.

[–]MeanOfPhidias7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

"I own a business" "I choose which customers I serve" "If I cut out part of my customer base I lose money"

If the owner is fine with missing out on the huge profits involved with giving women male haircuts that's their prerogative.

They don't owe you their supply just because you have demand and can pay. Business owners aren't machines they are people. They are free to exhibit their bias just like anyone else.

[–]MasterTrollKing-5 points-4 points-3 points 11 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

I don't know how it works in the states, but In Canada it is illegal for a bisness to withhold a service based on a gender, race, etc..

It is seen as a human rights violation and if a complaint is made with the human rights tribunal shit goes down.

"I own a business" "I choose which customers I serve" "If I cut out part of my customer base I lose money"

On paper this idea sounds great when it is put like this. Now what if they decide to cut out their customer base of a certain ethnicity for whatever reason? Same idea. But it would result in a WAY bigger reaction. Next thing you know its whites vs blacks everywhere you go. Fuck that.

This isn't the 1920s. Everyone should be treated professionally regardless of age, race, orientation and yes, gender. The moment you cross the line on one, you cross the line on another.

Yes there are woman only gyms. Thats a social concept. If you showed up with a dick they cant refuse you service. Thats illegal.

[–]MeanOfPhidias6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Thank you for the information but I don't care about what the law says. Those are nothing more than the opinions of privileged individuals on how I should live my life. No different from a religion that I never subscribed to.

I can't reconcile it as a human rights violation if I am selling something and don't want to sell to you for any reason. What about the human rights of the person selling?

On paper this idea sounds great when it is put like this. Now what if they decide to cut out their customer base of a certain ethnicity for whatever reason? Same idea. But it would result in a WAY bigger reaction. Next thing you know its whites vs blacks everywhere you go. Fuck that.

Not at all. Any business that refuses to serve a sector of the market is just hurting themselves. If McDonald's refused to serve latinos Burger King, Wendy's and every other competitor would destroy them in advertising. The brand damage it would do alone would be enough.

How about looking at it this way:

Would you force a Jewish butcher to serve a Nazi in full regalia if one walked in to his Butcher shop?

Would you force a Nazi butcher to serve a Jew?

You make those decisions based on your own bias. The only "right" that is involved is the individuals right to choose for themselves who they serve/shop with.

This isn't the 1920s. Everyone should be treated professionally regardless of age, race, orientation and yes, gender. The moment you cross the line on one, you cross the line on another.

Fuck that. I treat children like children. I treat assholes like assholes. I don't like giving bigots my money.

A system that exposes bigotry instead of making it illegal is a system that gives bigots who are too stupid to know any better a reason to shut up about their bigotry. I would much rather see a sign "No blacks allowed" in the window and know that in a couple weeks a new business will be taking it's place. This is part of what is called creative destruction in economics.

Yes there are woman only gyms. Thats a social concept. If you showed up with a dick they cant refuse you service. Thats illegal.

That's stupid. If someone wants to open a woman only gym they have to provide enough services and have a high enough profit margin to outcompete the gyms that serve men and women. That means higher prices and they need to offer something that makes it unique.

If being a woman only gym is enough than that's what the market has decided. Oh, before your panties get bunched up "Letting the Market decide" means "Let people decide where to spend their money themselves."

There is nothing more free than that. I cannot take you seriously other than to say that you've presented an emotional platitude of no value to anyone living in reality.

[–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Women's only gyms exist and outcompete mixed gyms readily.. There's even a national chain called Curves.

[–]MasterTrollKing3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Women only gyms are stupid. But thats affirmative action for ya.

[–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women are just as stupid as men... they'll pay like $1000 a year in membership fees to go for a week or two after new years then not show up ever again.

[–]Fzed6002 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So fat women that use a treadmill twice a week for 30min? A place for women to talk about pointless banter. Now, if you threw in a couple in shape guys (paid to work out), I bet the shop would explode with women..

[–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Pretty much... Though throwing a couple of guys in there would tend to have the opposite effect. Women would not be doing their workouts because they'd be all self conscious and they know this which is why they go for women-only gyms.

If they wanted to enjoy some male eye-candy they'd go to a strip club for women.

[–]MasterTrollKing-1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link

Im glad you expressed your views and organized them reasonably so I'm not reading a clusterfuck of words, I appreciate that.

Thank you for the information but I don't care about what the law says.

The law is as necessary as it is evolved. Over thousands of years it has become the foundation of our success and exsistance. Nothing we could have achieved today could have been accomplished without the laws enacted before.

Those are nothing more than the opinions of privileged individuals on how I should live my life.

Opinions of people that were voted in to represent OUR best intrests. Let me guess, you don't vote do you? Easy to complain when you don't even take up the opportunity to contribute to the system.

No different from a religion that I never subscribed to.

Don't compare law to religion. Law is reason free from passion. Religion is reason derived from passion. One is based off of evolved morality whereas the other is based off of a supernatural belief.

I can't reconcile it as a human rights violation if I am selling something and don't want to sell to you for any reason. What about the human rights of the person selling?

The human rights of the person selling exist. Don't be stupid. He is allowed to refuse service on an almost infinite number of reasons, but that reason becomes a human rights violation when it violates the buyers human rights.

Not at all. Any business that refuses to serve a sector of the market is just hurting themselves. If McDonald's refused to serve latinos Burger King, Wendy's and every other competitor would destroy them in advertising. The brand damage it would do alone would be enough.

Obviously. But that doesn't mean said ethnicities will react like it is no big deal. Like I said. This is a slippery slope. Whats to stop a private doctor from treating a sick patient because he is Latino. A life is lost because someone has unjistified prejudice beliefs.

How about looking at it this way:

Would you force a Jewish butcher to serve a Nazi in full regalia if one walked in to his Butcher shop?

This would never happen for a number of reasons.

But i'll entertain the thought. Because you weren't specific lets say its 1938 and the Jews were not yet being sent to extermination camps. And before Jews legally weren't allowed to own bisnesses, if a Nazi walked in obviously the jewish owner would have to serve the Nazi for number of reasons.

(1) the Jew would be fearing for his life and any disrespect would probably result in his sudden disappearance or public punishment.

(2) there was no human rights clause protecting the Jews intrests because the human rights tribunal was not yet established. Funnily enough ot was founded BECAUSE of the autrocoties that happened in the second world war. This just goes to show why its important and why it needs to exsist.

Would you force a Nazi butcher to serve a Jew?

Same thing. No human rights tribunal had been established, which goes to show why it is imperative to todays society.

You make those decisions based on your own bias. The only "right" that is involved is the individuals right to choose for themselves who they serve/shop with.

Again. This is were it begins. An individual may be able to choose today, but in the future where discrimination was completely acceptable there will be the inevitable circumstance where a choice isn't avalible and someone is refused life saving treatment because they were born something they did not get a choice in.

What the hell is wrong with you? Jesus Christ. Its assholes like you who give TRP a bad name.

Fuck that. I treat children like children. I treat assholes like assholes. I don't like giving bigots my money.

Children are children and shouldnt be treated any different. Assholes are assholes and shouldnt be treated any different. Latinos are people and shouldnt be treated any different.

A system that exposes bigotry instead of making it illegal is a system that gives bigots who are too stupid to know any better a reason to shut up about their bigotry. I would much rather see a sign "No blacks allowed" in the window and know that in a couple weeks a new business will be taking it's place. This is part of what is called creative destruction in economics.

That's stupid. If someone wants to open a woman only gym they have to provide enough services and have a high enough profit margin to outcompete the gyms that serve men and women. That means higher prices and they need to offer something that makes it unique.

If being a woman only gym is enough than that's what the market has decided. Oh, before your panties get bunched up "Letting the Market decide" means "Let people decide where to spend their money themselves."

There is nothing more free than that. I cannot take you seriously other than to say that you've presented an emotional platitude of no value to anyone living in reality.

I can assure you it has the utmost value. And the vast majority of citizens in every developed country can agree with me there, because if they didnt the laws wouldn't exsist. :)

Sorry for the shit grammar, I'm on mobile.

[–]RedPillington1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

you don't answer his questions, then you drop this shit-bomb:

Because you weren't specific lets say its 1938 and the Jews were not yet being sent to extermination camps. And before Jews legally weren't allowed to own bisnesses, if a Nazi walked in obviously the jewish owner would have to serve the Nazi for number of reasons.

you're clearly psychotic and not worth talking to because this is clearly not what he meant based on context.

[–]MasterTrollKing-3 points-2 points-1 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I believe I answered every question. And I apologize if I didn't, like I said I was on my phone. OP didnt specify how a Jew and a Nazi would be thrust into that situation, but I entertained the thought nonetheless. Sorry if it was shit, but the initial example was pretty ridiculous.

Im physcotic because I believe everyone of all race, gender, age and orientation should be treated equally and have acess to basic human rights?

Im just fucking crazy, arent I?

Go fuck yourself.

[–]RedPillington1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Im physcotic because I believe everyone

you're psychotic because you argue almost solely with straw men.

[–]MasterTrollKing-2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You've stop making sense. Congradulations.

You are probably still caught up in the first phase and expressing your livid anger in anyway you can.

Don't worry it will eventually pass. :)

[–]RedPillington1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

if you're going to condescend, use proper grammar.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Looks like you haven't swallowed the whole pill. Hop on over to /r/DarkEnlightenment and have your little precious ideopia crushed to ashes.

[–]MasterTrollKing-2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That sub has almost nothing to do with TRP.

Sorry to break it to you.

[–]1aguy013 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Their mistake was not realizing what a cunt the woman with the male haircut would be.

[–]Frozen_Tundra2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In a city like Regina there must be tons of hair places. The woman who started this is just attention whoring.

[–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Same thing happened in Toronto not long ago too. Except THAT barbershop was protected by Islam/Muslim belief system protecting them guys under freedom of religion statutes.

[–]Shadowbannedaccount1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Forgive the blue pill, but here I think I must play devils advocate. There are some "ragged ass" biker broads that can shoot the shit, slam whisky and kick your ass in a fight. This chick may or may not be one of them, but considering shes acting like a baby, shes probably just there to throw a mini-bitch-fit. But just for a moment lets pretend shes ragged ass. She wants a mans cut and to shoot the shit, why not take her money? Yes, yes, established "mens barbershop." But as an owner, I'd seriously consider it. My barbershop gives me shaves and whisky, never see a chick there. To my knowledge, there has never been one through the door. Unwritten rules or just an unattractive place for women. But if one entered and acted like one of the guys, I wouldn't give a shit. Isn't that what sets men above women? The fact we just don't give a fuck?

Just my 2cents.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter