It's no surprise that abortion is being brought to the forefront now that we have a new seat opening up on the Supreme Court of the United States.

The understanding I had was that roe v Wade set such a huge precedent and it's been in place for so long that's it's unlikely for it to be completely overturned.

That is the risk people run when they attempt to bypass the legislative branch. The Supreme Court was not attended to be utilized as some sort of co-legislator. They were supposed to be the government branch with the least amount of power. Their only job was to read the constitution as it was written, and not turn it into some piece of living poetry.

Radicalized liberals are being used by Leftist ideologues as useful idiots to pave the way for authoritarianism, under the guise of compassion. Abortionists are literally paving the way for malicious actors to circumvent the Checks and Balances the US was built upon in the name of "equality" and "democracy," but I digress.

Most likely, Utah's heartbeat bill will undo the Roe vs Wade ruling, granting fetuses personhood. It will be a good day to be an unborn child seeking life, and a bad day to be an irresponsible "free spirit," especially for women.

Abortion has allowed men and women to convert sex into the new cocaine. Time to put the breaks on.

This should illustrate why it's so important to go through proper channels in government to get your desired outcome. Easy come (Roe vs Wade), easy go.

It incentives irresponsible people to convert their womb into a tiny business, and encourages women who would normally be responsible with their sexual access to have sex without (immediate) perceived consequence.

Modern liberals cry about the separation of children at the border when they separate children from their parent's womb as a matter of course, daily. What they don't realize is that their message is being utilized by Leftists to encourage their opposition to engage in dysgenics.

Body autonomy ends when another person's life begins.

Sex was designed with producing children in mind. Abortion, and to a lesser extent birth control, allows humans to have their dessert without eating their vegetables. It will have consequences. Women who utilize abortion will generally self select themselves out of the gene pool. Abortion was originally developed to destroy the African American race in the US. Today, a black child has a 50/50 shot of being born.

Abortion was developed as a eugenics program. Those who utilize it in some misguided sense of respecting a woman's "body autonomy" do so at the grave risk of genetic death. It's no different than Nazi Germany death camps, except those in the womb cannot protest and don't have to be thrown in gas chambers. The woman's womb becomes their tombs.

Long story short, Leftists have convinced western civilization that genetic suicide is no big deal, and currently women are being rewarded for their dysgenics by the dopamine rushes that are released by having consequences free sex with high quality males in rapid succession. Abortion has allowed people to convert sex into the sexual equivalent of cocaine.

Abortion should be like the death penalty: executed only under extreme circumstances. Not done flippantly, and without reservation, out of convenience.

What does this have to do with the purple pill? I'm seeing alot of debate around abortion in other threads justifying murder and claiming that it is more humane rather than granting men the ability to financially abort his responsibility. One of these options leaves absolutely no chance of survival for the child.

I ask you this, which is more humane?

If women have the option to abort the literal life of a fetus in the name of body autonomy, men should have the right to abort their financial responsibility towards the child in the name of autonomy.