R. Baumeister hypothesizes that one significant difference between men and women is in relation to the types of relationships that they are the best at/inclined towards. In particular, he claims that men are more adept and more inclined to form shallower but broader relationships, which have formed the backbone of large social institutions, while women are more inclined to nurture very strong relationships among very small groups of people (think large company vs. family unit). I happen to agree with him, and as such, I think volunteering is one way to help satisfy that base male inclination. Additionally, I think it is a good way for the less socially inclined among us to get out and interact with people in the context of a common interest.

Just like the previous posts in this series, I don't think it matters much what your precise implementation is, with one exception; I believe that, at this point in time in the Western world, any kind of direct work with children (e.g., academic tutoring, Big Brother/Big Sister, being a sports coach) is an inherently risky proposition, from a legal point of view, and as such, should be avoided. Additionally, I am generally against the notion that I (or any other man) should look after/contribute to the well-being of any other man's children (maybe unless explicitly and directly asked by the parents). Other than that, almost anything would exhibit the characteristics described above. I choose to work at a local animal shelter, as well as with several other animal causes. I have friends and colleagues who work with various other organizations, including some who advocate for the poor, veteran's groups, and with cancer patients. Certainly, I claim no moral high-ground in this regard; assist whatever charity is in line with your moral code and life experiences. Just get out there . . .

Next week: Mechanical Prowess