Summary :

TRP is basically explaining what to do and how to adapt (ie swallowing the pill) to a society plagued by the fallout of feminist ideology. If you are interested in understanding why the feminist agenda is pushed forward so much despite its obvious failings, then read on. In a word: feminism monetizes everything it touches, and thus creates economic wealth for those who profit from it (e.g., George Soros and the Femen). For the majority, on the other hand, too bad. You'll be divorce raped, and even if you don't marry, you'll somehow have to use the fruits of your labor to counteract the effects of Feminism.

I was spurred to write this upon seeing the recent submission on a video of Alain Soral where OP actually misunderstood the point being made, and turned a Marxist criticism of feminism into a criticism of Marxism. I have also often seen passing comments here about “the left” “Marxists” and “communism” laden with cringing inaccuracies because not many people here seem to understand those words properly and use them as boogeymen. This is understandable since that’s how they have been used in the US for decades, and most folks here are from the US, the vanguard country of feminism. So just as an aside, Marxism is not communism. Marxism is an analysis of the economy that states that by nature, capital goes to capital (ie the rich get richer) no matter what. It is I think a perfectly valid analytical framework for understanding modern societies that are based on market economy. If you’re into understanding it thoroughly, check out David Harvey. Communism is a political ideology, that may or may not be Marxist. Mainly it is, and Marx himself was a communist, having written with Engels the Communist Party manifesto. Basically it says that Capitalism will eventually fall due to its own contradictions, then we’ll all be living in the land of Teletubbies. Some flavors of communism offered some shortcuts, but no matter what variation, communism has been a big failure. As for the left, it doesn’t have to be either Marxist or communist. Most leftists nowadays are neither.

If you have looked into Feminist nonsense, one particular flavor is called French feminism (because in the US universities it gives it an aura of serious intellectual shit if it comes from Old Europe) which is just a collection of different ideas that have not much in common except having been written in French. Here I propose to you French anti-feminism which, on the contrary, is very consistent. This revolves around three people, only one of them being easily accessible in English: one university writer, Michel Clouscard, one novelist (without a doubt the best French writer of the last 2 decades), Michel Houellebecq, and one political writer, Alain Soral. They all basically have the same analysis regarding the roots and effects of feminism on society.

Clouscard was a university professor, and he was a Marxist. In the 70’s and 80’s, he produced the kind of books that only university folks would read (his main one was “The capitalism of seduction”). In short, his theory was that society was moving from an industrialist economy to a service economy, and in the service economy, there is no limit to what can become the object of the market. In an industrial society, you had to create goods to create wealth, but in a service economy you only need to create services that answer to needs to create wealth. And a way to create more needs is to create frustrations. The more frustrations there are, the more money can be made. Now you understand the Ad industry and also why you now have an app for agreeing to have sex, thanks to “yes means yes”. Who would have thought twenty years ago that money could be made from agreeing to have sex?

Michel Houellebecq is vastly available in English. Reading his novels is like drinking red pill juice. They are most often recounting the awakening of a blue pill man. Him being French novelist, the solutions he offers in his books are not to hit the gym and everything that is in the sidebar, but to smoke cigarettes, drink Cognac and watch the world burn. Basically his books are about how the liberal values of the west have just brought economics into human sexuality and relations, and thus making them devoid of real value. His first book “Extension of the realm of struggle” (translated as “Whatever”) is explaining clearly what the sexual MARKET is (hence the Marxist sounding title). “Atomised” is taking the feminist journey till its logical end (sexless reproduction). “Plateform” is about why should people give a shit about sex in the West while they can go and pay to have sex in Thailand. Just have a read, or check out the movies made from the books.

Finally, Alain Soral’s seminal book, “Vers la feminisation?” which has not been translated into English, shows who reaps the political benefits of feminism. There is a Wikipedia page on it so I’ll let you have a read there.

Ideologies and philosophy are like any other knowledge field: educate yourself a bit before dishing out definitive opinions.