"If you are a loser and a P.O.S...thanks for the endless nights of sex but you need to step up your game."

TheRiseAndFall · 2017-05-30T04:03:37+00:00

This one gives me that "I have a kid but I won't tell you til after the second date when you are already hooked" vibe.

kevin32 · 2017-05-29T17:22:51+00:00

This is a good example of a woman who is rejecting the jerks for not committing to her. But she's also in her Chasing Chad phase.

The "losers" and "P.O.S." were jerks who pumped and dumped her, and rejected her wish for commitment. To say that she doesn't want to "go backwards" suggests she was once there, dating them primarily for sex. Now that she's approaching the Wall she wants "better" men, with a combination of Looks, Money and Status.

So when I say a woman is "Chasing Chad", it's not exclusive to jerks and bad boys. Many "strong independent woman" types tend to chase high-SMV men such as handsome doctors, attorneys, business owners, and men who have good careers in the STEM fields.

So it's possible to be considered a "Chad" and still be a Good Man if you have Looks, Money, and Status. Just know that women like this are primarily interested in those outer qualities rather than inner qualities (respect, courtesy, good morals, etc.). She's materialistic.

Ultramegasaurus · 2017-05-30T12:35:29+00:00

I work to (sic) hard and take care of myself to go backwards"

Ah, there it is. Her Chad past.

Devilsgun · 2017-05-29T23:29:00+00:00

Wanna have that cake (Stable McNiceguy when party time is over) and eat it (Chad Thundercocks x1000) too.

Title	"If you are a loser and a P.O.S...thanks for the endless nights of sex but you need to step up your game."
Author	kevin32
Upvotes	32
Comments	8
Date	May 29, 2017 4:55 PM UTC (9 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen/comments/6e1e3e/if_you_are_a_loser_and_a_posthanks_for_the/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen/if-you-are-a-loser-and-a-posthanks-for-the-endless.351118 https://theredarchive.com/post/351118

Comments