Growing up, many of us were taught that women were hard wired for monogamy but that men were hardwired to want many partners and as such, entitled and prone to infidelity.
Turns out, this conventional assumption was based on a faulty scientific study which is debunked in this article:
When Are Women Most Likely to Be Promiscuous?
https://slate.com/technology/2013/12/female-promiscuity-in-primates-when-do-women-have-multiple-partners.html
Contrary to popular belief, it is unlikely that women are hardwired for Monogamy. In fact, in most primate species the females are opportunistic and will mate with many males to secure additional resources and purposefully confuse paternity.
Since the females are not naturally monogamous, the males must constantly physically mate guard the females to prohibit them from having sex with rival males. The females are as monogamous as the males can force them to be.
This is important to remember because:
All Males are Hardwired to Mate - Guard.
In a few primate species, such as Chimpanzees, the males have resorted to abusive tactics such as rape and assault to intimidate the females into remaining monogamous.
This is very similar to humans.
Pervasive Patriarchy & Misogyny lessens the burden of male mate competition. Why? Because it’s easier to bully a woman into submission and cripple her ability to be independent of men in society than it is to fight off competing males.
Enforcing Monogamy and dependence in females lessens infighting between males and increases infighting between females.
Instead of males competing for access to females, the females must compete to secure resources from a singular valuable male. In actuality, it would be more advantageous for women to secure many resources from the many available males. This role reversal allows Men to have the advantage and energy to pursue other females while still maintaining ownership of single female.
It is also why the concept of “gold diggers” and “hoes” is so demonized in society. It thwarts male control over the natural opportunistic female mating patterns.
Even so, hoes and goldiggers are often successful in securing their desired partners. This is because hoes and gold diggers are great at seizing opportunities and triggering the male mate guarding instinct.
How can women use this to their advantage in the dating?
You must, at all times, trigger the male mate-guarding instinct.
Keep your options open, always. Instead of women desperately pursuing a relationship with a single male, you maintain several which are beneficial to you in different ways. Although, at this stage, you shouldn’t allow sexual access.
Go on dates where you’re likely to encounter a lot of male mate competion. Sporting events are at the top of the list, but this can be any event or activity where men are likely to be “peacocking” for females and posturing for other men.
Sexual Access is reserved for the male or males who have demonstrated good character and significant investment. There is no need to abide by an artificial 90 day timeline. You withhold sexual access until you can safely assure the encounter will be to your tangible benefit.
Monogamy is for marriage. Unless a man expresses an explicit desire for marriage, with a timeline in mind, you should not be monogamous. Again, monogamy benefits men, not women.
You’ll know you’re successfully triggering the mate-guarding instinct if the man or men begin to demonstrate “sequestering” behavior.
They will physically try to block out other males from talking to you, continuously try to pull you off to the side, or be constantly communicating to maintain your interest.
[–]berite1day11 points12 points13 points (2 children) | Copy Link
Idk man, this article reads like a how-to manual for women looking for a husband/provider/sucker. It explicitly guides women on how to trigger a man's "mate-guarding instinct" in order to manipulate him into "choosing" her.
The only thing I would do is change "mate-guarding instinct" to "oneitis." What they call an instinct is really just a guy who has forgotten about all the other women he has available to him.
[–]peguy20009 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Women self sabotaging eachother. Nothing new 😂
[–]OverEasyFetus9 points10 points11 points (5 children) | Copy Link
God damn that sub is disgusting.
[–]DeplorableToast1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
Most of reddit is like that.
[–]OverEasyFetus2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
It's sad that sub will never get banned for spewing that drivel. Young girls are on reddit.
"Become a conniving slut like me so no man will ever want to marry you"
This world is a lost cause.
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]OverEasyFetus1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
I was banned from that sub in a second lol. I told the mods to have fun with their cats when they're 40, dumb sluts.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
2nd comment down. Some whore going on about dating 5 men. Smh. What a sub. That was a red pill enema. Fak.
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points (2 children) | Copy Link
Jokes on those men who think they have to learn all this. Women are naturally shrewd, manipulative and "political", they don't have to learn any of this, they are naturally born with it. Once you accept this fact, it becomes much easier to predict them. The more a woman is feminine the more she is like this, nothing unexpected as it's just the effect of female hormones.
[–]Diogeneplz11 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
How much do they learn from each other growing up? Boys grow up almost totally oblivious to what is happening in girl's circles.
[–]markhamONT0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
and boys and men’s groups are being eliminated to prevent us from talking about female nature. Lol
Didn’t work. We have the internet.
[–]le_flapjack4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
Reading the comments on that makes me want to vomit. Those bitches are vile creatures.
[–]Chakra_Devourer1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Only fools would commit to any of those bitches. They ain't loyal and fuck other guys just because...why the fuck would any man want to devote his time and resources to "them." With them cheating like that, how can the man be sure that he's the father? What's that? Paternity test? "you don't trust me! I'm offended." Also there are laws in certain western countries that will prevent a man from getting paternity test.
[–]wawakaka4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
all their strategies crumble when the men keeps his money in a vault and doesn't get married. he who has the money has the power.
[–]youarewastingtime2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
You know I’m not going to lie they almost had me... but this is pseudo science through and through they try to legitimize sleeping around as a strategy to secure resources but... how do they enforce that? In a tribe or no federal government setting they are not going to make every man pay for her lifestyle she’s just going to end up with a bunch of kids and no to take care of her. They even admit that men can enforce monogamy but how for they enforce resources stealing they can’t.. which is why the “patriarchy”( god I hate that term) or whatever was their best bet at survival and they couldn’t even do that right
[–]markhamONT0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Society will vote in a populist and socialist (feminist) government that will unequally distribute more free resources for the sake of “equality”.
This is going to happen within the next time years.
After that, it’ll be tragic.
[–]liberules1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
nonsense. monogamy benefits both. the male knows it's his kid and he has the monopoly on her sexual access. the female knows she has a monopoly on his resources. if he goes and fucks around, odds are he's going to be spreading resources outside the relationship. this directly harms her interests, which is why monogamy benefits both. this is so pervasive in society, that there are literally laws which force men to pay women overwhelmingly more than the other way around... it's called divorce laws. historically, if he fucked around, she could screw him to the wall and take his resources. the modern issue of no-fault divorce is that now he doesn't even need to fuck around.
nowhere do they explain male mate-guarding is beneficial to women. they jump straight from "men are hard-wired to mate guard" ... sure, nothing wrong with that, all the way to "mate guarding causes abuse/rape/oppression" and this thing that triggers rape/abuse/oppression leads to "You must, at all times, trigger the male mate-guarding instinct." yeah, fucking right. that's ridiculous.
this reads more like some women read TRP materials, thought they'd make a female version of it, and just started spewing any nonsense TRP buzzwords they could think of, mixed in with SJW cult-speak.