Every marriage starts the same way – a woman marries someone she dislikes

Despite having Red Pill Theory flair, this post and video are about the blue pill life. As of because it gives a look on blue pill guys from the harsh truth of life perspective:

Every marriage starts the same way – a woman marries someone she dislikes. Every philosopher knows that in relations only one loves, other allows one to love - immutable rule. If it's she - who is in love – she fails to make him marry her. But, if it's he - who is in love – she succeeds in her efforts to make him marry her. Every marriage starts the same way. She marries someone she dislikes: He romances her, gives her gifts, tries to adapt to her, and tries to please her. Everyone is familiar with this. Everyone knows how this happens. However, in shitty films, films for a retarded audience it's shown that prior marriage she also romances him, loves him, or at least highlights him among the others. In real life, it is a rare occasion when she depicts him her love and interest. Rare bride makes that pre-wedding gift to her groom. Because woman thinks that it is him who owes her everything. Because a woman thinks that her groom is a stupid manageable freak, and in most cases she is right. She thinks that freak owes her for a privilege to be around her. That’s why she demands something over and over again. Demands money, demands attention and pleasing, and demands her boorishness be tolerated.

Most of the men stay in this state, state of a mule permanently until they die. But not all of the men. Some manage to swap roles. And he becomes the one who is the impudent harridan.

The position of an imprudent woman a so called man can obtain only under specific circumstances. For example, if he exposed his significant other in cheating, in adultery that she committed during their relationship. The fact of cheating being exposed is not enough - he must have moral right and power to convict her.Many men are aware of the suspicious activity of their wives but they prefer do not think about it.
If a man has cheated on her on his own – he has no moral right and power to convict her and he stays in the mule state. That means if a woman in some family or relationship acts very imprudent – it means that her husband does not know about her cheating, or he does know but he cheated and betrayed on his own too.

In order to maintain their government in the house safely, every wife attempts to lure her significant other into adultery, at least once. There are plenty of methods to do so. For example, she may repeatedly, with excited intonation, tell the story about her night dream where her husband fucks another woman. If it’s not enough, next she might tone down their sex life. If it’s still not enough she will restore their sex life quality and tell that she had that dream again and imply it turned her on

There is a lot of text, but why read if you can watch full theory video here.

And sorry for poor grammar, english is not my first, or even second language.