Feminist Math teacher goes after algorithms because they are sexist. Lol

Mora616 · 2018-11-21T12:36:56+00:00

So her entire career is based in sexism them?

DangZagnut · 2018-11-21T12:59:17+00:00

She's got shitty green hair, bad skin, and of course is ugly.

Femcel feminist detected. Opinion automatically retarded.

throwaway_dba · 2018-11-21T12:38:40+00:00

No hablas espanol amigo

[deleted] · 2018-11-21T12:56:40+00:00

2+2= not defined, there is actually a spectrum of possible results to this equation due to diversity

One single result to this equation is a result of hundreds of years of patriarchy.

Ludakrit · 2018-11-21T13:06:43+00:00

It would be very difficult to program a computer to determine if a teacher does his job well

This is where prove they are a moron. The best teacher's students will have better outcomes measurable by their student's performance. The teacher's RESULTS are able to be documented, and thus their performance is as well. (You would also need to control for various other factors impacting the students outcomes of course, but that isn't hard to do since we do it already.)

rooster-one4 · 2018-11-21T15:24:00+00:00

I honestly think a lot of this has to do with some mental illness - relating gender to inanimate objects and then being victimized by their imagination. My ex, I found out after years, would 'rescue' misshapen candies...she had a fucking box she kept the candy in because they were not made right, and she didn't want them to feel bad. It was a reaction a 2 year old would have to something, trying to relate to the world.

Every time I see a story like this, some string of characters being sexist, some round thing attached to a car being sexist, trees being sexist, all I see is severely underdeveloped emotional responses caused by a parent's neglect.

veasel79 · 2018-11-21T13:34:47+00:00

She likely damaged by the flash backs of papa smurfs balls sack brushing against her face when he wiped his ass with her head.

Now it's dicks and oppression everywhere!

jamocadyn · 2018-11-21T17:46:19+00:00

I'm on "old reddit" and because of the little pic...I thought she was wearing UN blue beret. LOL

battle_of_homme · 2018-11-21T18:03:29+00:00

She's not wrong.
She doesn't mention any examples of sexist algorithms or models so it's hard to determine if she is concerned that women will be disadvantaged.

In government and academia there's a sexist bias against men, whereby algorithms are designed with an anti-male bias, such as domestic violence offender prediction / Spousal Assault Risk Assessment (SARA).
So, if the Duluth model is implemented in software, it is inherently sexist.

With machine learning it is still difficult to assess the validity of the derived model and/or how representative the input data is.
Some AIs have been shut down because they are politically incorrect.
I would suspect that feminists can't handle that.

hardtostarboard2016 · 2018-11-21T19:35:43+00:00

Green hair es avertencia

wsuofd · 2018-11-21T21:50:59+00:00

shutup

LabTech41 · 2018-11-22T06:21:29+00:00

Just tell her that we use ARABIC numerals in math and that the word 'algorithm' is a romanized version of the word 'Al-Khwārizmī', who was an ARAB scholar. A huge chunk of this kind of mathematical framework originated amongst the Arabs of the Muslim world at the time (sadly they never really recovered from their decline afterwards).

The moment this Feminist cunt realizes she's badmouthing Muslims, she'll shut right the fuck up, because first world Feminists have a blind spot the size of Aldebaran (another Arabic accomplishment was astronomy) when it comes to critiquing that demographic.

Title	Feminist Math teacher goes after algorithms because they are sexist. Lol
Author	CaptainMGTOW
Upvotes	36
Comments	18
Date	November 21, 2018 12:33 PM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/9z2tze/feminist_math_teacher_goes_after_algorithms/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/feminist-math-teacher-goes-after-algorithms.455688 https://theredarchive.com/post/455688

Comments