I had this thought in my mind for quite some time now. It's a big read, so buckle up.

I remember listening to this story... a famous PUA with his low-SMV male friend goes to a bar... the friend approaches a girl, calls her names, she bursts out... the PUA master approaches the same girl, calls her the same names, she starts giggling and kissing his ass.

What's the difference? In her eyes, the PUA master guy was a high-value male... she wants to lock him for herself. On the other hand, she hates the low-value guy... she's furious that how dare he try to cost her life?

Females judge a male based on a handful of categories.

  • Physical (for good genetics)
  • Economic (for resource providing)
  • Social (the higher social status, the safer)
  • Psychological (humorous, creative, confident -> signs of being higher in the hierarchy, better intelligence)

Now, try to formulate an equation based on the aforementioned variables. The values of the variable will determine how she'll behave with that male.

Input -> high-quality male; output -> she behaves like NAWALT (unicorn)
Input -> low-quality male; output -> she behaves like a BITCCH

She'll also behave like NAWALT to lure in a thirsty loser (chameleons).

Basically, AWALT, always have been. A female will only behave like NAWALT as long as she's having benefit. Some other factors include culture (cultural enforcement of certain behaviors), childhood (how she was parented) etc.

As for Johny Depp, Will Smith etc. situation, it may be explained with the idea that she lost interest as soon as she understood that he's domesticated... the Beast is tamed, so she no longer need to be the Beauty.