~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
banned_by_cucks
[–]fredanderssen4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link
Biologically speaking, a man marries a younger woman (reproductive viability), and a woman marries an older man (monetary viability). This makes sense. A woman has a greater chance to have healthy offspring in her youth, and a man has a greater chance to have accumulated wealth as he get older.
Now, if you reverse that, you have an older woman (more time to accumulate wealth) with limited reproductive viability, vying for a man with less resources than she. But the man’s raison d'être is wrapped up in his ability to provide and the woman’s youth. Now the older, richer woman has two strikes against her: lack of viability and not needing a man’s resources.
The third strike for this woman is “not settling.” Since a very successful woman has to either find a man with more resources than she has or a younger man who is a gold digger (rare), she’s has a conundrum. The more successful man is looking for a young, fertile woman and cares little for her earning ability, and the younger man will more than likely fill his biological urges “on the side” with a more youthful woman.
Of course, you could just marry a nice, beta man, who would be loyal and faithful to you, but you just couldn’t stand that, because that would be “settling.”
[–]AeternusDoleo1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
So logically, the biological reason fails here. I'm looking more towards the convenience/status aspect. Essentially paying for an alpha-ish individual, just like men would pay for someone they are attracted to.
Makes me wonder - how quickly laws will change once the ladies are on the receiving end of the divorce raping... They're leaving themselves open for it. And alpha men tend to not care about anyone but themselves, it's just a trait of those.
[–]fredanderssen2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Good points!
Someone summed it up best on SydneyMGTOW on Youtube:
Charlize Theron. Age 43. Net worth $130 million. Chances she will accept a man with a lesser OR equal net worth: Zero. Chances a man with significantly greater net worth will hook up with her: Zero. The wall plus hypergamy predict her fate. Chances she will remain alone and miserable: 100 percent.
[–]BLOOD_PALADIN0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Charlize Theron remaining alone? You are deluded.
[–]fredanderssen2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
There’s an article by Theron regarding just this. She hasn’t had a date since 2015.
[–]BLOOD_PALADIN0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Oh shit, she's fairly good looking tho. She must a total bitch to be so single, either that or having huge standards. This although proves how we are far less gold digging than women.
[–]Lawuhiku0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
>censoring your own name
lol
You are deluded guys, check at those rich Hollywood milfs (and also ugly hags even) with young men. Check at Jeremy Meeks who is an ex convict who married a billionaire's daughter solely because of his face. Don’t let money become a new coping mechanism.
[–]mdigibou0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
I was just about to X-post the link to this, but decided to check your post history first and saw this.
The reply two below you was fantastic " I know you’re in r/FIRE but I hope you brought ice with that burn. "
[–]banned_by_cucks[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
If I understand/remember correctly that was supporting a claim made against me, in which the person replying said "Like time for them" in regards to me originally staying that the average 'successful' woman doesn't have qualities/attributes that high-value men with options are looking for.
[–]mdigibou0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Oh that's not how I took it.
I saw it as someone else saying that women SHOULD be making time for a man in their life if they want them to stay around.
lol internet vagueness.
[–]banned_by_cucks[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
It appears you were right. I'm pretty surprised lol
[–]mdigibou0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
\0/ Hooray. The internet was nicer than we thought lol.
[–]banned_by_cucks[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Haha, the thing is though I'm pretty sure the majority of people who upvoted that comment interpreted it the same way I did initially.
© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]fredanderssen4 points5 points6 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]AeternusDoleo1 point2 points3 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]fredanderssen2 points3 points4 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]BLOOD_PALADIN0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]fredanderssen2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]BLOOD_PALADIN0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lawuhiku0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BLOOD_PALADIN0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mdigibou0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]banned_by_cucks[S] 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]mdigibou0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]banned_by_cucks[S] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]mdigibou0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]banned_by_cucks[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link