After being inspired by coming across THIS post on the Relationships subreddit of how the sub responded angrily when male OP chose his best bro over a random girl and how aggressive the sub's reaction was, I decided I had to make my own post using a throwaway on the Relationships to really test RP theory.

I made this thread to test out how strong female solipsism really is.

The story in this thread is fake, but the reactions are not. The OP post was removed so here is the OP facts I made on a paste-bin:

https://pastebin.com/pVgcBkU0

Here are the responses (in case they're also deleted too):

http://archive.is/VbCZH

Essentially here is the OP summary:

  • OP (older brother) from strict Indian family. OP's younger sister drinks alcohol and rides the cock carousel. OP even hides this fact from the parents for more than a year

  • Things change however, once OP's parents decide to give the sister significant financial aid towards University, including rent/other helps under the belief that OP's sister has abstained from sex and alcohol and has been good

  • This is in SPITE of the fact that OP's parents are struggling financially

  • So now, the OP tells his parents the truth, because his guilty conscience can't handle the fact that his sister would be using the parents hard earned money based on a LIE. It's only once the money is involved, does the RP come into practice (will expand on this)

So, how does the Relationships subreddit respond?

  • OP is an asshole for not continuing to lie on behalf his sister. The fact that his parents have outdated and misogynistic beliefs means that their money is useless. Also, very little consideration is given that the parents are financially struggling and work for 12 hours. In short, their money doesn't matter if they hold certain beliefs

  • OP ''shouldn't get involved'', EVEN THOUGH THE SOLE REASON for the parents financial aid was based on his sister's personal life, and how they had been under the false belief that she had abstained from the cock carousel

So you may be wondering, how does this tie into Red-Pill theory? Well, it perfectly demonstrates the female imperative: Female Solipisism

  • The RP issue here is that NO consideration was given towards the parent's hard earned money. The fact that they work 12 hours a day and are struggling financially was not considered ONCE, as the commentators continuously brought attention to only the parents moral beliefs. The money was a MEANS TO AN END for the sister, and the comments even prove this. 100% of the focus was on how the sister is right.

  • Even if the parents views are outdated, it should have become MORE than just a discussion of their views once their money was brought into the equation... Hell, even one of the comments flat out says their money is expendable (example below):

''It is expendable though, they were willing to spend it and it was the right thing to do. Again doing the right thing for the wrong reasons is better than doing the wrong thing 10 times out of 10.''

^ (link to the comment chain): http://archive.is/eKEwR

The Female Solipisism prioritizes the female imperative. In this case, all the focus was on how the sister was morally right. NO consideration is given to the parents money because it gets in the way of the female imperative, the female imperative in this case even encouraged the sister to lie to the parents and ''do what she has to do''. The commentators here, fueled by BP thinking, were INCAPABLE of empathizing with the parents, even considering the parents were struggling financially, that was made irrelevant in contrast to to the sister's situation. They wanted her OP's sister to have her cake and eat it too: she not only deserves the cock carousel, but ALSO deserves her parents money even if the only reason she's getting that money is dependent on a lie.

Also, further proof to how vile and viscous BP Feminists can become - A user sending a message to my throwaway calling me a 'misogynist scumbag' and telling me to 'DIE in a fire':

https://imgur.com/a/INeKGWE