The media hates it when the shoe is on the other foot! Treat them the same way they would treat us.

ConstantChinner · 2018-07-30T01:03:47+00:00

Take her for everything you can. Women do it every fucking DAY. They leave men homeless, jobless and prison bound.

Global_MGTOW · 2018-07-30T01:25:18+00:00

A taste of their own medicine. Who wants to bet that as more and more women are out earning men and more women are paying alimony, said alimony will be abolished because it hurts women?

thotless_rat_bastard · 2018-07-30T01:21:26+00:00

Government has no business in marriage. But there is no way government will get out of the business of marriage since that is one of its more lucrative businesses.

Tre_Walker · 2018-07-30T05:00:20+00:00

She makes 34 million a year, is worth 220 million doesn't take care/have custody of her own sons. She isn't even paying 1% of her current income to K-Fed for taking care of her boys.

ChiCityD · 2018-07-30T06:17:52+00:00

Make it like Kobe, Tiger, Robin Williams — give him fucking half of it all. Then see how she likes it.

krenovinspired · 2018-07-30T12:01:50+00:00

A little language game ...

The extra cash injection could potentially raise his monthly take in the ballpark of $30,000.

How many stories of some famous THOT going after more of her ex's resources can you think of where they mentioned "her monthly take"? Yeah. I know. I can't either.

Brit has made it very clear that she pays more than enough for her baby daddy to cover the bills and provide a proper lifestyle for the couple's two children.

So? There are thousands of THOTS nationwide who are being paid "more than enough" to provide for and cover the bills of their kids. Yet, when it is a THOT who wants more, she is always the VICTIM. She can't work because "blah, blah", and whatever. There are millions of MEN nationwide who don't have $220M banked who are getting soaked. Where's your sympathy for them, MSM?

Sources familiar with the negotiations tell us the extra $10,000 is a good deal ...

Really? If the genders were reversed, would you think it was a good deal, too?

... the former dancer has already racked up over $80,000 in legal fees.

Obviously, she needs to pay those as well. Think of the children! It must pain them to see their daddy stressing over $80k in legal fees! Do it for the children!

... Britney is officially not budging on the $20,000 per month ...

Doesn't work for men to "not budge", they get their paychecks garnished, their reputations ruined, and sometimes thrown in jail for "not budging". And the vast majority of them are just average Working Joes who aren't worth $220M. Equal rights, anyone? Pay up, Brit. You can thank Gloria Steinem and Betty Friedan later.

If Federline shoots down the offer, he could be facing a huge burden as he continues to try and squeeze Britney.

No, the squeezing took place a while back; that's how the two kids came to be. She squeezed out his DNA. Beyond that, why isn't it some THOT described as "trying to squeeze" her baby daddy when the situation is reversed? K-Fed is only asking for what millions of wymyns nationwide whine for in scaled down similar situations nationwide. Why are they the victims, and K-Fed the bad guy here? Wasn't it all about equality? Yeah, I know, your definition of equality, and the real definition of equality are two different things.

However, the legal fees are about as financially straining for her as a run to Starbucks would be for the rest of us.

She's very rich.

Yes, thanks to Autotune, and genetics which granted her a nice package of TnA. Besides that, what exactly has she done to ADD to society? These two sentences strike me as humble bragging. Again, why is it that men who are being squeezed by their exes, when they are in some cases working 2 or 3 jobs, or sacrificing in other ways in order to pay their child support not championed the way this whole article seems to champion Brit's cause? Again, if the genders were reversed in this story, it would be written something like this: "He's very rich. He's making his kids suffer when paying the little extra would be the same for him as a run to Starbucks would be for the rest of us."

The writing in these kinds of articles just piss me off. The propaganda is subtle, but it is definitely there. Multiply it times 1000, and you begin to figure out why only thousands of men are leaving the plantation, instead of the millions it should be. Personally, given past behavior, I don't see Britney Spears that much different than say, Mel Gibson. The main difference is Spears has a vagina, so she is praised for her marvelous "comeback". And Gibson is to be reviled for eternity. Shit makes me sick.

BeeStingsAndHoney · 2018-07-30T12:25:08+00:00

[deleted]

mongolian_usa · 2018-07-30T01:27:29+00:00

Hi I'm The Mongolian, and I endorse this message!

TheDevilsAdvokaat · 2018-07-30T10:26:19+00:00

I don't think men should profit off women, any more than women should profit off men.

Ken should get enough to do a reasonable job of raising the kids; and that amount should have nothing to do with how rich or not she is.

gods_bones · 2018-07-30T13:09:59+00:00

It's ok. In the end it doesn't matter to her. She had a very cordial working relationship with Kevin in the past, and has never been stingy with her money. Britney will be okay with paying because the conservatorship will do it for her, she won't even notice the coin change is gone.

Her new Vegas residency will be paying her $500,000 per show. She could pay off the whole amount Kevin's asking for in just 5 shows. This is all just unnecessary drama the media is shitstorming, as usual.

nonchalantfool · 2018-07-30T01:58:51+00:00

Ata boy

rockorbe2002 · 2018-07-30T02:04:57+00:00

Federline may be a douchebag leech in my opinion, but that was a father's job, to make sure these kinds of men didn't get involved with their daughters. But thanks to Muh Women's lib, that's all gone.

Title	The media hates it when the shoe is on the other foot! Treat them the same way they would treat us.
Author	MGTOWrath
Upvotes	156
Comments	48
Date	July 30, 2018 1:00 AM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/92zojg/the_media_hates_it_when_the_shoe_is_on_the_other/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/the-media-hates-it-when-the-shoe-is-on-the-other.517163 https://theredarchive.com/post/517163

Comments