Briffault's Law

Docbear64 · 2018-05-09T23:37:06+00:00

" I never really loved you" that's the embodiment of it right there. Years , kids, life phases , friends, family, all the shared life experience you two might have had together culminates into a rationalization to her that she through all of this never TRULY had feelings for you.

Men tend to be visionaries ( looking to the future) and romantics( reminiscing or considering the past) women are much better at focusing on the right now.. today ... this second .

So when she tells you that she never really loved you it's because right now that's how she feels, it has no bearing on what she said when you two were at the altar , it has nothing to do with how she felt as you two held your kid as they were born , it's you as a person right now and the benefit, stimulation, and value you provide.

That's the raw essence of Briffaults law, nothing you ever did for her matters.

I imagine we've all heard the story of the dedicated husband taking wifey away for a few days so that she could relax , that bone gets him in her good graces for a few weeks before she's criticizing and berating for never taking her anywhere not too much later .

CastandRefused · 2018-05-10T03:16:32+00:00

You can give all you want in a relationship, it doesn't matter. At the end of the day, the female holds the "power." You can be as loyal and decisive as you want. Nothing matters, the female can and will change her mind at the drop of a dime. No more!

DigitalScetis · 2018-05-10T06:30:16+00:00

Things that work on a macro level aren't always applicable on the micro level. You can look at economics, physics, or even TRP knowledge.

Briffault's Law is a macro level theory of mate selection. It has great applicability to predicting species level choices across populations, like who is getting laid at a high school dance.

If you depend on Briffault's Law to explain everything about sexual selection, you find that it breaks down when explaining the micro level of the individual seduction.

One of the things that serves as incel fuel, and is ultimately destructive to a man's journey to liberation from gynocentrism, is an uncritical look at biology. For all of the power we give women, biologically and evolutionarily, there are enough reasons to think that, in most things, women are actually quite powerless to maximize hypergamy, derive benefits from males, and all of that.

A thot's connections gets her backstage to see her dire crush, Nick Jonas, at the afterparty on Saturday night. Now Briffault's Law can tell you where she'll be on Saturday night, and it's not with Larry the simp loser who calls her up saying sweet things.

But what Briffault's Law can't tell you is how compltely powerless this thot is to get what she wants on Saturday.

She wants Nick Jonas to blow his load straight up into her on Saturday; that's obvious. But there's dozens of thots there on Saturday, and Nick Jonas only has one, decent load to blow before he wants to get some sleep. So why is he going to pick this thot among all the other thots that are there? Why her, and not some rising Instagram model that texted "<3" complete with n00dz to him half a week earlier?

All she can do is just gussy herself up as best as she can, try to catch his eye, and hope she's what he's looking for.

Briffault never said much about that in his law, did he?

What we need to know about women is that they can be compared to flowers, and not in a proverbial sense. As flowers, they can't really actively pursue the chads they want so desperately; they can only attract the chads as best as they can, and if their best isn't good enough, they attract flies. On the micro level, it is the male that determines the conditions of mating, meaning that women have, as the flowers they are similar to, a condition like pollination syndrome they must contend with to get what they want.

You could, quite literally, reverse the whole scheme of Briffault's Law by simply inserting "the Chad" in where it says "female," and "thot" where it says male, and the whole law works to explain the reality of the thot at Nick Jonas's afterparty.

It is the Chad, not the thot, that determines all the conditions of the association.

Where the Chad can derive no benefit from association with the thot, no such association takes place (his entourage kicks her the fuck out of the afterparty).

Past benefit provided by the thot does not provide for continued association (his manager threatens to sue for defamation, or calls the cops on her for trespassing, the moment she thinks the pump and dump backstage meant something).

Any agreement where the thot provides the Chad a current benefit in return for a promise of future association is null and void as soon as the thot has provided the benefit (she'll only suck his dick if it's a "forever thing," and now he's like "suck my dick," and then afterword, when he sees her, he's "dafuq are you?")

A promise of future benefit has limited influence on current/future association, with the influence inversely proportionate to the length of time until the benefit will be given and directly proportionate to the degree to which the Chad trusts the thot (now you know why these sports and music stars have managers, security, and legal teams to keep chicks they don't know very well away from them).

It just goes to show, what works on the macro level breaks down at the micro level.

GrandYam_HomeRun · 2018-05-09T23:49:57+00:00

Thanks for posting this. Although it's sidebar material, many of the newer visitors need to read and understand this before posting.

DWShimoda · 2018-05-10T04:49:05+00:00

The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family.

Here's the question: Are you an animal?

Note that the question is NOT: "Are you a member of a 'mammalian species'?" ... rather it is: "Are you (only, just, merely) another 'animal'?"

Do you live strictly and solely by "instinct" -- no higher brain functioning going on -- you operate on your senses, do not make any plans, but rather merely act & react to the "forces of nature" that surround you, live by tooth & claw, live only to eat, eat only to live and procreate, then procreate when you go into a seasonal/cyclical "rut"...

If so, if you are only, just, and merelyanother "animal"... then yes Briffault's law applies to you.

Please abandon any pretense then that you are a "civilized human being"; quit making ANY demands upon "society" and head off into the woods/jungle/swamp where you (as an "animal") belong.

TotesMessenger · 2018-09-08T18:15:02+00:00

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

[/r/theredpillstories] Briffault's Law • r/MGTOW

^{If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads.} ^(Info ^/ ^Contact)

Title	Briffault's Law
Author	hundothepure
Upvotes	85
Comments	25
Date	May 9, 2018 10:07 PM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/8i9x46/briffaults_law/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/briffaults-law.559482 https://theredarchive.com/post/559482

Comments

Here's the question: Are you an animal?