So women can go their own way in marriage. How about men GTOW and NOT getting married? Probably not allowed.

DangZagnut · 2018-04-06T17:32:34+00:00

I don't disagree with any of this, since she's describing a roommate she fucks now and then.

Not listed by her, "You don't have to exclusively have sex with your spouse. STDs are just a way to say you're empowered".

Personally, whatever makes you happy. You're all going to end up in separate beds anyway, so you might as well start with separate rooms in the first place, preferably in different zip codes.

Now just get rid of that "divorce" bullshit where suddenly you become hyper conservative and now aren't empowered at all, and need all the money and property.

syd-heich · 2018-04-07T00:10:28+00:00

Why do they make an obligation for us without the benefit towards us whatsoever?

2ravens · 2018-04-07T11:09:09+00:00

Take away the marriage (which is dumb as hell especially in these cases) and this might work for some mgtow's. Living Apart Together

Even in a pro-women go girl article like this though they can't help but highlight why we would never want to live with a woman. "If I'm lonely, I can't just slam dishes while I'm cooking and hope that someone notices.” Honestly, my kids were taught to stop that at about 10 but some never do.

UrbanEngineer · 2018-04-07T01:28:28+00:00

"You can sleep in separate beds We tried for a while to share a bed. It made me want to murder him. That’s the least successful method of divorce, btw."

Brokemgtow · 2018-04-07T12:35:24+00:00

sleep in separate beds.. LOL

Title	So women can go their own way in marriage. How about men GTOW and NOT getting married? Probably not allowed.
Author	MGTOWManofMystery
Upvotes	42
Comments	7
Date	April 6, 2018 5:12 PM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/8abafm/so_women_can_go_their_own_way_in_marriage_how/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/so-women-can-go-their-own-way-in-marriage-how.572684 https://theredarchive.com/post/572684

Comments