TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

A deeper look at the "slut" (xpost from /r/redpillwomen)

30303030303030

July 27, 2013
28 upvotes
/r/TheRedPill

http://www.np.reddit.com/r/RedPillWomen/comments/1j0n7t/the_slut_and_how_not_to_be_one/

Read there, comment and ask here.

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title A deeper look at the "slut" (xpost from /r/redpillwomen)
Author

30303030303030

Upvotes 28
Comments 22
Date July 27, 2013 11:58 AM UTC
(12 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1j5nca/a_deeper_look_at_the_slut_xpost_from_rredpillwomen/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/a-deeper-look-at-the-slut-xpost-from-rredpillwomen.5898
https://theredarchive.com/post/5898
Red Pill terms in post
the red pill
Top posts by 30303030303030

A take on honor between women from a soccer ref.

42 upvotes
June 1, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

so feminists talk truth now?

15 upvotes
June 13, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

Comments

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]fuk_offe 12 points13 points14 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Someone make a car sticker with that quote.

[–][deleted] 30 points31 points32 points 12 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

That was a truly great post. I like how it touched on how Nice Guys are the male analogue of sluts in that they give out emotional investment and a relationship (something women want) too cheaply.

[–]DavidTIntellectual 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

But unlike sluts, other men don't hate nice guys because they do not lower our SMV.

[–]Lakey9133 points 12 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

They do. By offering free emotional investment, they reduce the value of male commitment. The reason that flowers and chocolates worked (to a degree) for our forebears and works against us is because the value of male investment has been debased by these emotional sluts.

"What do you offer? "

"Love and commitment and a steady job"

"I can get that anywhere!"

A relationship is no longer necessary for sex, but sex is no longer necessary even within marriage. The market for both has crashed.

[–]lono12 9 points10 points11 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Very nice.

[–]Endorsed ContributorThe_PUA_Punanny 14 points15 points16 points 12 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

While betas don't lower the SMV of alphas, they raise the SMV of plain janes and ugly harridans and make life miserable for other betas. They also White Knight to protect fugs when alphas are putting them in their place, which is alphas doing a favor for betas. Alphas putting them down means betas would have been able to collect on that fug pussy.

Betas are essential to the functioning of society and reducing their prospects for ever being able to get some trim makes them depressed and unproductive.

Additionally, society reconfiguring to take a big dump on "men" falls almost entirely on the heads of betas. They unwittingly become instruments of their own oppression and feel even more worthless and unwanted.

Nice guys are feminists' best tools. And what thanks do feminists give them? They are exploited, vilified, and ridiculed; their self-expression of any desire whatsoever called "gross" and "creepy".

Women are "winning" the war for everything below the top 1% of society, because they've taken over all the betas' nervous systems like the venom of a parasitic wasp.

  1. "After parasitoid larvae exit from the host to pupate, the host [caterpillar] remains alive but displays stunning modifications in its behavior: it stops feeding and remains close to the parasitoid pupae to defend these against predators with violent head swings. The parasitized caterpillar dies soon after while unparasitized caterpillars do not show any of these behavioral changes."

  2. "Soon after the sting [by the wasp] the spider recovers to resume apparently normal activity. It builds normal orb webs to catch prey, while the wasp's egg hatches and the larva grows by feeding on the spider's hemolymph. The larva feeds for about two weeks and just before it is about to kill the spider, a dramatic behavioral change occurs in the spider. The prey, driven by an unknown cause, starts weaving a very unique web with a design apparently tailored to fit the needs of the larva for its next stage in development, the metamorphosis. The new web is very different from the normal orb-shaped web of P. argyra, and is designed to support the larva’s cocoon so that the cocoon is suspended in the air, rather then lying on the ground. In this safe net, the wasp larva consumes the spider, ultimately killing it, and then pupates in the suspended net."

Feminism = Parasitic WASP venom.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Parasite Rex is the most horrifying, fascinating book I have ever read.

[–]desire_engineer 36 points37 points38 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Paraphrasing a user's story I read here recently:

Two women are sitting at a table discussing slutty behaviour and one girl asks "how long should I wait before having sex with a guy?" before her friend can answer, our RP user interrupts the conversation and says "The question you should be asking is - why should he stay after he's had sex?"

[–]TRP VanguardYouDislikeMyOpinion 15 points16 points17 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Great post, but here is the definition of a slut:

Slut: A slovenly or promiscuous woman.

Here is the definition of promiscuous:

Promiscuous: (of a person) Having many sexual relationships, esp. transient ones.

Here is the definition of transient:

Transient: Lasting only for a short time; impermanent.

Here is the clarified definition of slut:

Slut: A woman who has many sexual relationships, especially those that are impermanent and last only for a short time.

Like it or not, that's the definition.

[–]DavidTIntellectual 9 points10 points11 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nono the definition is clearly A WYMYMN WHO IS HAVING MORE SEX THAN YOU DEEM APPROPRIATE YOU STUPID NECKBEARD VIRGIN SHITLORD Please let me act in a way that has always been viewed negatively with impunity... ahem.

[–]lono12 9 points10 points11 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I posit that a slut is a woman that shoots above her league. She can get sex with higher SMV men but not a relationship.

It's the same for men. They can get friendzoned and be orbiters to higher SMV women but they cannot get sex.

[–]16 TRP VanguardTRPsubmitter 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I tend to find it very interesting when people can break down human behaviors to economics.

A slut is a woman whose sexual market value consists mostly of sexual availability, and little else. --> A slut is a woman who does not have the ability to turn sexual encounters into relationships.

OP does a great job translating the sexual market "economics" part into a concrete and clear thought here.

Also thought the distinction between high partner count being a symptom of sluttiness and not the cause is right on. You can only find a solution to a problem once you identify the underlying cause. After all, we're all here to find more efficient sexual strategies...

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The onus of value shifts from the male to the female after sex. While the post is great a lot of it is just pointless padding, especially the introduction, the last section is all anyone really needed to say.

Regardless this idea should be sidebar material, if it isn't already and I've just missed it.

[–]Decabowl4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I can't find fault with what she says.

She is right about one thing, don't complain about sluts when you sleep with everyone woman you can see, thereby creating sluts.

[–]Endorsed Contributor30303030303030[S] 11 points12 points13 points 12 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

I can't find fault with what she says.

/u/Whisper is a he.

don't complain about sluts when you sleep with everyone woman you can see, thereby creating sluts.

That's what we are suppose to do though. Fuck until something of worth holds. Men getting many women = value. He says sluts not to be less pumpable, but less dumpable. Sluts have no further value than just their bodies.

Nobody is complaining about sluts until they start pretending they are wife material close to wall. Great majority of men appreciate sluts.

[–]Decabowl0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I agree with you in part. Yes, use a slut for what she's worth: a vagina with legs. But you cannot deny the ever growing slut population while noticing the ever dwindling "virgin" (to a degree) population. If every guy went out and got as many notches on his bed post as he can we won't have anything but sluts left. That's the point, the more women you pump the more sluts there are. I'm not naïve enough to think all men go for the same few sluts all the time.

[–]Endorsed Contributor30303030303030[S] 7 points8 points9 points 12 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

If every guy went out and got as many notches on his bed post as he can we won't have anything but sluts left.

The problem is, if a man doesn't "GET" women he won't have any. There are men who are like magnets, they get approached by women and women literally throw themselves at them but they are counted in single percentiles. Rest of us has to work for it. It's your job to approach, carry the conversation, spike her attraction to you and make her feel safe enough with you to go home and spread her legs. If you won't fuck her at this pont then some other man will.

That's the point, the more women you pump the more sluts there are.

It's your job to pump a woman. It's her job to offer you something else than just pump. If a woman wasn't easy and screened her fucks properly she wouldn't be a slut with dozens of cocks in her.

[–]TRP VanguardYouDislikeMyOpinion 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I won't complain about sluts, but I won't wife (figure of speech) them either. I will sleep with who ever I god damn please, and if I want someone that didn't have a lot of sexual partners, I will obtain what I want.

I don't care about society, or the sluts I created (hint, I didn't create them, that's who they were).

[–]DavidTIntellectual 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

you sleep with everyone woman you can see, thereby creating sluts.

But the average man sleeping with every woman he has the chance to will be sleeping with about 10%-30% the number of people an equivalent female sleeping with every man she has the chance with would.

[+][deleted] -7 points-6 points-5 points 12 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

It's a good post, but honestly nothing really new. It has been discussed before and I would think that most guys here already know this.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

True. One, it never hurts to reiterate the core points of TRP, and this is one of them INHO. Second, as ayrefeek, until this post is side-bar'd (it should be), newbies here (we will continue to grow) will keep asking the same old question "why is it ok for men to sleep around but women's value goes down if they do?".

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter